Lex Fridman Podcast - #347 – Michael Malice: Christmas Special

Starting point is 00:00:00 The following is a conversation with Michael Malice. This is a special holiday episode, and it is made extra special because it's announcing the release of Michael's new book called The White Pill, A Tale of Good and Evil. Michael and I disagree on a lot of ideas and politics and philosophy, and we have a lot of fun disagreeing. But there's no question that he has a deep love for humanity and puts his heart and soul into his work, especially into this heart-wrenching deeply personal book. So I ask that you support him by buying it at whitepillbook.com that should hopefully forward to the Amazon page. As always, we each dressed up in a

Starting point is 00:00:41 ridiculous outfit without coordinating for the chaos that makes life so damn interesting. This episode is full of humor, darkness, and love, which is the best way to celebrate the holidays. And now a quick few second mention of each sponsor. Check them out in the description as the best way to support this podcast. We got house of Magadamia's for delicious Magadamia-based snacks Inside tracker for biological monitoring, net-sweets for business management and simply save for home security

Starting point is 00:01:16 Choose wisely my friends and now onto the full ad reads as always no ads in the middle I try to make them interesting, but if you must skip, please still check out the sponsors in the description. I enjoy their stuff. Maybe you will too. This show is brought to you by a new sponsor, a delicious sponsor, House of McAdamias, a company that ships delicious high quality and healthy McAdamia nuts directly to your door. I've gotten a shipment. What is it two weeks ago? Two weeks ago. And it brought happiness to my heart. I won't mention which episode, perhaps you might know. But it was a very stressful episode. I was getting attacked a lot online and I was just very stressed and I was feeling lonely. I was

Starting point is 00:02:02 feeling, you know, out of it sometimes, sometimes your heart, sometimes your mind could take you to some blowplaces. So I was sitting there on the couch and I got this shipment, the doorbell ring and I came outside and it was a mysterious box and I bought it in, like it was the holidays, but it wasn't the holidays yet and I opened it up and there was like a variety of delicious snacks. They were extremely healthy and extremely delicious And I part took in the snackage and it was glorious. I Immediately felt better. It's just for many reasons obviously delicious But also brought joy to my heart that there's people out there that really care about

Starting point is 00:02:42 crafting like a Culinary art essentially crafting out a snack from really good ingredients really care about crafting, like a culinary art. Essentially crafting out a snack from really good ingredients. That you could just tell a lot of love went into it. Nutritionally, there's a lot of nice things. I could say it's 30% less carbs than almonds. Let us not debate how I pronounce almonds or almonds. I think I'm horrible with this. I forget which is the right way.

Starting point is 00:03:05 It's the only nut rich in Omega 7's. This is basically the healthiest nut. I feel like there's a good joke in there. Anyway, go to houseomecadamias.com slashlex to get 20% your first order. You will not regret it, my friends. This show is also brought to you by Inside Tracker, a service I use, the track biological data. What I want to know is the data that was coming from my heart and mind during the partaking of the McAdamius Nackage, the great, the glorious happiness. I wonder how the body communicates happiness. Short term, like moment by moment, minute by minute, hour by hour, day by day, weeks, years,

Starting point is 00:03:52 the progression of human life, the ups and downs, there must be signals in there. And I think that's a really promising direction to take health advice, to take medical advice, to collect the full raw set of signals your body provides to help you determine the different turns to take in life, whether that's lifestyle or diet changes, all that kind of stuff. I think that's obviously the future. That's why I'm excited about Inside Tracker. They're taking those early big leaps into that future.

Starting point is 00:04:23 You can get special savings for a limited time and you go to insidetracker.com slash flex. This show is also brought to you by NetSuite and all in one, cloud business management system, they manage everything. Your financials, human resources, inventory, e-commerce, you're that kind of business and many business related details,

Starting point is 00:04:43 they automate the messy, the difficult, the challenging processes that are required to run a business. For me, the idea of running a business is really exciting, not for all the things I just mentioned, but for the idea generation, for the design, for the engineering, for the mass production, achieving scale, for all the challenges of bringing down the cost

Starting point is 00:05:06 while bringing up the quality, all of those trade-offs, and all the different people involved getting to work with and getting to be inspired by them, rethinking how things have done in the past, doing things that are totally new way, taking huge risks, and all that is super exciting. And ultimately, you do that to help some aspect of the world. In my case, the dream is to add a little bit of love to the world with things that create. And I mean, that's super exciting to me. Now there's a bunch of messy things that are required to make all of that happen. And financials and human resources and inventory, all that is extremely important.

Starting point is 00:05:45 So you should use the best tools for the job of running a business. Go to net suite.com slash Lex to access their one of a kind financing program. This shows also brought to you by SimplySafe, a home security company designed to be simple and effective. 30 minutes set up and you can customize the system for your needs. I think it took me even less than that.

Starting point is 00:06:09 It's incredible. It's the first layer of physical protection that I have. Of course, I have other layers. I take my safety and security extremely seriously. But for most of us, the basic low-hanging fruit solution should be a good, easy to set up, easy to use security system. Simply safe is the best of the best for that. Like I said, I have it set up on my place and I love it. Go to simplysafe.com slash Lex to get a free indoor security camera plus 20% off your order with interactive monitoring. Part of me

Starting point is 00:06:42 wants to have a nearly infinite number of cameras in my house so I can do full 3D reconstruction and at some point uh transfer myself into a virtual world and not know it like somebody else sets it up so I'll be living a virtual world with the exact same experience as I have in the physical world and I would know it and it'd be some fascinating experiment and in that place too there would need to be security and it would be a perfect reconstruction of the simplest safe system but in a virtual world. That would be incredible.

Starting point is 00:07:13 Anyway, it's simplysafe.com slashlex. This is Alex Friedman podcast, the supported, please check out our sponsors in the description and now to your friends here's Michael Malas. Since this is a Christmas special, a holiday special, have you been a good or a bad boy Michael this year? Well, that's interesting. One of the people in the book, Grandville Hicks, his autobiography starts with, I was a good boy and he wasn't a very good boy.

Starting point is 00:07:59 Um, I don't know, scale 1 to 10. I'm trying to think of what bad things I've done. Oh, okay, there's that. Okay, wait, that's not, that was, no, that was not, that's all right. I would say nine. I have a nine. Yeah, I try to do the right thing.

Starting point is 00:08:15 Okay, what are you? Is it gonna be a one or zero? Yeah, no, I'm extremely self-critical. I pushed the zero. Okay. I reached for the zero. Well, mission accomplished. So this episode is announcing the release of the White Pill, a book you wrote, which is I've gotten the honor,

Starting point is 00:08:34 the privilege, the pleasure of being one of the first people to read it. You're the first. So I'm really, I don't know if nervous is the word, but you are the first person who has read it that I am speaking to about it My first my last my everything. Yes, you say that to all the girls, but all the all the fanbots Oh the fanbots, but yeah, it was a truly incredible book. It's basically a story of evil in the 20th century and throughout it You reveal a thread that gives us hope. And that's the idea of the white pill.

Starting point is 00:09:07 So there's the blue pill and the red pill. There's the black pill, which is a kind of deeply cynical, maybe apathetic, just giving up on the world, given that you see behind the curtain and given that you don't like what you see, given that there's so much suffering in the world, you give up, that's the black pill. And the white pill, I suppose, is even though you acknowledge that there's

Starting point is 00:09:28 evil in the world, you don't give up. Yes. So if you're listening to this and you're a fan of this podcast, you go to whitepillbook.com, it'll go to it. whitepillbook.com. And if you don't know how to spell, we'll probably have a link that you can click on. So for people who also don't know, Michael Malice is not just a troll, not just a hilarious, comedic genius who hosts his own podcast, but he is an incredible brilliant author, dear reader, the unauthorized autobiography Kim Jong Il. So that's a story of North Korea.

Starting point is 00:10:00 The new right to journey to the French of American politics. That's the story of the extremes of the United States political movements. And then the anarchist handbook that's talking about the ideologies, the different flavors of ideologies of anarchism. But on top of that, you're now going into the darkest aspects of the 20th century, with the Soviet Union and the communism with the White Pill. So let me ask you, let's start at the beginning. At the end of the 19th century, as you write, the term socialist communist and anarchist were used somewhat loosely and interchangeably because the prophecy Marxist society was one in which the state had famously

Starting point is 00:10:45 weathered away. There was a great disagreement about what a socialist system would look like in practice, but two things were clear. First, that socialism was both inevitable and scientific, the way of the future, and second, that the capitalist ruling class were not going down without a fight. So what are the key points of this agreement between the socialist and anarchist, the communist, along that at that time, at the the end of the 19th century, at the beginning of the 20th century, the possibility of the century laid before us that eventually led to the first and the second world war.

Starting point is 00:11:19 The idea when the Industrial Revolution came and Marx was very much a product of Industrial Revolution or a thinking was, okay, now that we have technology, now that we have science, we can scientifically manage society. We saw this very much with Woodrow Wilson and this kind of idea of progressivism that we could use technology and kind of not capitalism in their view on federal capitalism was wasteful. You're making too much stuff. You have surplus as you have shortages if we produce just exactly what we need and you have these people engineers their engineering society Then you know everyone will be happy and you don't have to have any suffering or waste

Starting point is 00:11:56 So socialism at that time was used as a broad umbrella. It's not used in the term that it means today of necessarily state socialism. It just meant the idea of having societies scientifically run. So you had a huge argument, there are different wings, you even had it from the beginning, with Marx versus Bacunin, because Marx was for obviously state socialism, the absolute state running everything. Although even with Marx and Eng angles, it was a means to an end. After man is remade in his very nature, then the state withers away and everyone's equal and you have this kind of heaven on earth situation. But Kunin was the opposite. He regarded the state as inherently immoral and wanted to

Starting point is 00:12:39 have kind of like workers' collectives and things like that and ultra localized control. So, the end was always stateless. It's just that some people viewed the state as a convenient effective intermediate state. Well, I think at least Mark Simbaxu and there were plenty of others who just regarded it, you know, have the work have state owner have the workers, you know, control the production via the state. By the way, how does my hat look? It looks great festive. It's good. Yeah, yeah. Is this side better than the other side? I think you want it on this side so people can see you. Oh, no, no, I want to. You know, like when you have like hair, or hair, it's called

Starting point is 00:13:14 Veronica Lake, I think it was her name. And then I just glance flirtatious, Stay sure Oh No glove no love The bad the bad aspect of white gloves is The blood stains them. See if they get new ones every time And now I glance flirtatiously after that. I'm sorry, okay, but who knew the marks? Go ahead. So there were other socialists who did not regard this kind of end times where the state went through the way at all.

Starting point is 00:13:54 And there were various strains in between where you'd have some capitalism and some socialism. The concept of a safety net came out of socialist thinking, the labor party came out of the Fabian Socialists in Great Britain. Their logo was a wulf and sheep's clothing. And then when that was too on the nose, they changed it to a tortoise, meaning we're going to get to socialism slowly in the sense of either gradualism or boiling a frog. And also the big part of this thinking at the time, this is again the late 19th century, is the idea that there's gonna be a worldwide

Starting point is 00:14:30 workers revolution. It wasn't going to be that in one country, it was gonna happen and then all the other country would be capitalist. The idea was, all right, like the workers in Germany have more in common with the workers in America than the workers in Germany have

Starting point is 00:14:44 with the capitalist in Germany. So the idea is, all right, like the working class all over the world at one point, they're gonna be like, we're being exploited, it's getting worse and worse for us. We can't feed our families. We're getting injured and so on and so forth and there's no compensation for this. We're just gonna overthrow our chains and we're gonna run everything ourselves. We're the ones running it already anyway. And you know, this was a doing all the work and we're doing to run everything ourselves. We're the ones running it already anyway. And, you know, this was a doing all the work. And we're doing all the work. So why should we be getting all the benefit?

Starting point is 00:15:11 What's the role of violence in all of this? So this was a big source of contention. So the Fabians, for example, in Britain, who are all socialist, they were very heavily of the idea that we can do this through the ballot box. We can advocate and agitate and get the people to be voting for their own self interest and furthering the state at the expense of the capitalist class. Then there were the people who were the hardcore anarchists who were like voting changed anything that wouldn't let us do it. And the only way to have a revolution is to have a revolution, to kill, to overthrow, to seize these factories.

Starting point is 00:15:56 And this was a big argument. And it also fed into the idea of where does free speech end? Is it legal to be giving speeches advocating for violence and revolution? Is it legal? You know, Han Most, you know, who I discuss in the book and in the anarchist handbook he published the book in the 1800s about how to build dynamite and how to build bombs and this is a big free speech concern at the time because now anyone in their own house can make a bomb and kill lots of people and this is something that was happening with enormous frequency at the time and people tend to think you know because we have these kind of prejudices or we only remember what's happening now but this was a I mean world war two excuse me world war one got started with the assassination of our two Ferdinand. There were lots of people, McKinley's another one who I discussed in the book, his assassination. There was lots of violence happening very regularly.

Starting point is 00:16:52 And with the creation of dynamite, it kind of exponentially became more dangerous and threatening. Even now, on Wall Street, there was a bomb that went off, I think, in the 1920s. And the shards of Schrapnall are still in the JP Morgan building, I believe. Do you ever think if you were alive during that time, what you would be doing? You think of yourself as an anarchist? Right. Would you be, where would you be?

Starting point is 00:17:15 Would you be a socialist, a communist? Which parties would you attend figuratively? And literally. Well, the thing that was so interesting back then is there was a woman named Mabel Dodge-Luhan and she ended her days in Towson, New Mexico. She found an artist colony and she had an apartment on 9th Street in Fifth Avenue in Manhattan, Sheddle Salon, and everyone got together and talked and you'd have Emma Gulman who's an anarchist, Margaret Sanger, who invented Planned Parenthood and advocated for birth control

Starting point is 00:17:43 and you'd have the people from the wobbly, the hardcore labor unions. And everyone kind of, Ed Shell Mankin didn't attend, but he was friends with them at all. So there was this very weird, with the birth of modernism in art and in kind of modernist thinking, there was this idea, like, all right, like this was the first time where you could be intellectual as a class where there really was this space for people who are thinkers, and they just sat around being like, all right, like what are we gonna do with ourselves? You know, and you had it in modern art,

Starting point is 00:18:12 you had it in literature, you had it in politics. So it was a very exciting time where people were like, all right, like everything is now on the table, what are we gonna do with this? And they very much were aware that this was a break with the pre-industrial revolution kind of farmer labor error. Do you think for you violence would be compelling?

Starting point is 00:18:35 No, first of all, I'm too small. But second, I just... Dynamite doesn't care about your size. Yeah, but I mean, retribution does. And I think I don't know, but to me, violence is the kind of thing where you think you're running it, but it's running you. Once you cross that line, violence sings its own song. So whenever I hear even contemporary times where people are advocating for violent actions,

Starting point is 00:19:03 it's like, when you start a fire, you're not like, I'm just gonna burn down this house. And there's many cases over and over of people who are building bombs or trying to assassinate someone or things like that and it ended up literally, literally, literally blowing up in their own face. So, and violence doesn't really work necessarily because if you have an assassination, you're not assassinating the presidency. If you take out a president, there's

Starting point is 00:19:33 another president instantly there. So what have you accomplished? Someone's husband, dad is gone. You replaced him with someone who now is in a position to crack down a retaliate with even more violence. So it's, it's, the calculus for me isn't there. Would I be advocating for them? Who knows? But I mean, I don't know if I'd be able to have the space to be, I certainly wouldn't have the space to be a podcaster or like a media personality. That wasn't really a thing. To some extent, it was in the 1920s with the Algonquin roundtable and all the people from the New Yorker magazine. But they were all

Starting point is 00:20:09 drunk, you know, it was very much a weird kind of situation to be a thinker. What would you think you'd do? What could a carnival? You look good in lipstick. Well, thank you. I look good in anything., what I, I don't know. I mean, you're not building robots. I mean, you could have been a Tesla, right? Okay. I didn't mean a car. I'm at the person. Like, I understand. Oh, thank you for explaining the way the comments to me. I didn't, I didn't, I didn't, at all, because you wouldn't get Einstein, because you're never, he was an immigrant. So I wouldn't work with an immigrant. What does that even mean? No, you would have been a Tesla-like figure. There's already a Tesla. So you wouldn't literally be Tesla.

Starting point is 00:20:44 That's why I said, a Tesla. Oh, a Tesla. Okay. So, all right. I take you would have been a test to like figure. There's already a test lesson. You wouldn't literally be testless. That's why I said a Tesla. Oh, a Tesla. Okay. So, all right, I take you for the explanation. See, Michael doesn't only make funny things. He also explains them for you. It wasn't fun. Man splays them. It wasn't funny at all. That I agree with. Okay. Okay. So yes, when when you achieve, see, this is like I need it like you. it's this. All right, I'm don't grading it from a nine down to an eight. And if you keep talking like this, a five is a real possibility. All right, so the kind of vacuum is created with violence is usually filled with like a

Starting point is 00:21:24 harsh, with a harsher figure. So you don't think violent revolution ultimately leads to positive progress in the short-term. Well, sometimes it does. The American Revolution, I think, was a positive example. And overthrowing the czar, which was then peacefully, was a positive example. But again, when violence happens, people get scared and they want the violence stopped immediately and that's a call for authoritarianism. And you see it time and time again. And they also want retribution. They were like, bring this back to normal

Starting point is 00:21:55 and they don't really worry about things like civil liberties or things like that. It's a very, and then it also creates this space for invasion from foreign sources or demagogues. You know, like, oh, look, they're killing us in the streets. Now you got to support me. It's a very deadly game, obviously. I remember somebody told me that I forget where it was, but they told me that from the very beginning was obvious the communism is an evil system or a system that leads to evil.

Starting point is 00:22:28 And to me at least that's not, if I had to put myself in the beginning of the 20th century at the end of the 19th century, that's totally not obvious. They are trying to elevate humanity, the basic worth of a human being, of a hard working human being, of the working class, of the people that are doing the work and striving and just really trying to build up society with their own hands. It seems like a beautiful ideal. So I guess the question is, can you see yourself believing in that in the ideas of socialism and communism?

Starting point is 00:23:00 Yeah, let's say if you were living in Russia. Oh, yeah, easily. So first of all, I don't think anything is obvious in politics. It's not obvious that humans have rights. It's not obvious that liberty is better or the market's either. Either whether you're for a welfare state or you're for more free markets, not those is obvious. Both of them involve an enormous amount of thought and background information.

Starting point is 00:23:23 So when someone says something is obvious in politics, they really mean something is apparent. Well, it's not apparent on its face that if we all get together and promote a society based on equality, and we all chip in that it's going to really be good for everyone. I mean, that, to me, is the promise of communism. And it was also very appealing to many people because

Starting point is 00:23:48 it was new. So the idea was, all right, we've tried it these other ways. There's all these negative consequences. You have all these slums. You have people getting, you know, fired and then they have no recourse. You have women with 10 kids and they can't feed their kids in fut mortality. You have don't have sanitation. You don't have food, you know, recourse, you have women with 10 kids and they can't feed their kids in futontality. You have don't have sanitation, you don't have food, you know, everyone's illiterate and uneducated and then here's saying, look, if we all chip in together everyone will have clothes, everyone will have food,

Starting point is 00:24:15 everyone will be educated, everyone will do their part. It's gonna be rough in the short period. That's a very compelling case to be made for communism. It's really easy in many ways when something hasn't been tried to make it sound compelling, because you just talk about how great it's going to be. And then no one, you know, people are always arguing about like Venezuela and Sweden, like, oh, you want democratic socialists and to be like Sweden, you don't want to be like Venezuela. The Venezuelans didn't vote for Venezuela.

Starting point is 00:24:46 They voted for Sweden. They ended up with Venezuela. So it's, I think, and the thing with communism, especially at that era, it was very much a correlated with people who are too smart for their own good. Because they had the idea that if we're just put in charge instead of these business for people or these heirs to great estates,

Starting point is 00:25:10 if the people who are smart and get it like us, I don't mean you and me, the people at the time who are advocating for it, once we're in charge, since we're good people and we want what's best for everyone, we're gonna make sure everyone's taken care of and they always talked about how much they cared about the little guy,

Starting point is 00:25:27 and some sure some of them meant it a lot, and they're like, look, if the guy in charge is very much concerned with the little guy, he's not gonna sit between the cracks, and it's just gonna be absolutely great, and we don't have to worry about, you know, the capitalist class, just basically exploiting people, and having these huge estates while these people can't even feed their own families.

Starting point is 00:25:48 Since we have a little bit of momentum, can you steal me on the case for socialism? At that time, and even today, I don't know if it's, I don't know if there's a rhyme and similarity to those two socialism as implemented at that time and what could possibly be implemented today, but maybe it can dance between the two. The steelman argument for socialism is if you have everything up to private industry, you do not have a guarantee that someone won't fall between the cracks. And the other concern is in any other context, if someone is let's suppose mentally ill, right, through no fault of their own, and they are, or someone's handicapped, you know, they can't feed themselves or mentally disabled or something like that. If you have everything up to charity, some, if this, you see this with a endangered species, right, the species that are cute, it sees it raised money for them to protect them. Some weird kind of frog somewhere that no one cares about,

Starting point is 00:26:49 you can't raise money for it. There's people's interests are to what they find interesting. So if someone is someone who's like not socially appealing in some way, whatever capacity, they're going to fall between the cracks and they're screwed under socialism if you have a government taken care of everything No one is left behind you are guaranteed that the lowest of the low and the worst of the worst are still going to make sure that They're not starving the street or just left behind. So that is a big moral case to be made for having the state Running everything in terms of economics. It's a lot harder a big moral case to be made for having the state running everything. In terms of economics, it's a lot harder, but the argument there would be it's why it's not fair, a term which in my view does not actually have a good meaning, but it's not

Starting point is 00:27:36 fair that because you were born a Rockefeller and I was born in Poland that you never have to worry about food for rest of your life, whereas I have to worry about, you know, paying for a doctor for my kid. Like you just, you won this lottery when you're born, and now I have to be screwed, and I have to respect all your property. Why? So, that is another strong argument to be made for socialism. And the other argument is, if you have a media apparatus that is operated under profit seeking principles,

Starting point is 00:28:11 it is going to feed into people's worst qualities, most basic animal-like qualities, insinstational qualities, and will be used as a mechanism for capitalist control, whereas if the government, which represents all of us, all of us, is running things, then everyone will have a right to have their voice heard and won't be manipulated. That's the argument. What about the reaching towards the stateless version?

Starting point is 00:28:40 Because USPOW say ideas of anarchism, it kind of has the same conclusion, which is reaching towards the removal of the state to where we, I guess, have some distributed reallocation of resources that are, quote unquote, fair. But the thing is, the Marxist vision of the state withering away and becoming anarchism, it's really kind of like the underpants nomes because it's like,

Starting point is 00:29:04 Tell me more. Well, step one. You have marks on me slowly. I'm sorry. You have full communism. The states running everything, including education. Step two, question marks, step three, anarchism. So their idea was that after enough time, the nature of man himself was going to change, changed. And then the government would be superfluous because we would all be equal and we would all naturally or socially whatever term they would use want to act the part that we would need to do. And in fact, Reagan had a great joke about this where there were two where there were two commasars I think in Moscow and one of them they're walking around they're going is this it? Is this have we done it? Have we reached full communism? The other goes oh no, it's gonna get a

Starting point is 00:29:54 hell of a lot worse. So you know that's kind of the counterargument to that. Do you think culture society can change the nature of man? No. No matter. You don't think this idea that, for example, America has been founded on, that all men are created equal, that that idea can't permeate the culture and thereby change how we see each other, how we think of the basic worth of a human being. And thereby change our nature. That's a change that's epigenetic. I don't, I don't think that that changes the nature of man.

Starting point is 00:30:30 I think, for example, if I say someone, at which I agree with that someone is innocent to prove guilty, they're not literally innocent. They're regarded in a legal context as innocent, but that person is or is not a murderer or thief or so on and so forth. So we can legally and ethically regard everyone as equal, but as Thomas Saul pointed out, a human being isn't even equal to himself over the course of a day, twins who are genetic clones are not equal to one another. So it is an important thing legally and it's a good yardstick, but it's not literally true. But don't you think that law becomes ethics? So we, that idea of justice starts to,

Starting point is 00:31:11 like, we start to internalize it, that we just, the way we behave, the way we think about the world. No, I think it's a complete red herring, because no one is... No, you're a red herring. Okay. See what I did there. red herring because no one is no you're a red herring okay Because

Starting point is 00:31:31 Someone is people are still going to always prefer their family to strangers or they're in group to our group So in terms if you're gonna have equality that means it's gonna not matter to you whether someone is your mom or someone is You know someone down the street. And I don't see how that will ever become the case. Do you think it would be possible if you weren't intellectual, like you are at the beginning of the 20th century, would you be able to predict the rest of the 20th century? No. I don't think at all.

Starting point is 00:32:01 I think there was so many out of nowhere turns that no one would have seen their them coming. And as an example, Lenin seizing power and making the Bolshevik revolution a reality was regarded as utopian and insane. The fact that he pulled it off is close to miraculous and it was quite literally unprecedented. The fact that so that's a very big one. Which aspect of it, sorry, to interrupt, which aspect was hard to predict, that a singular figure, which is some ideas would be able to take so much power, and maintain that power and remake that society so drastically, so quickly, despite such opposition. Also, not just a set of temporary protests by Hula Gens that lead to turmoil in the short term, but then stabilizes,

Starting point is 00:32:50 but literally changes the entirety of the society. Yeah, Lutendorf, who is the German general, he's like, all right, we got to get the Russians out of World War One. He's the one who's like, all right, let's get this lunatic Lenin, who already tried and failed to have a revolution in Russia. Let's send them back there and he's just going to cause problems to everybody and it's going to be great because it's going to weaken Russia and then our Eastern Front isn't going to have to be a problem.

Starting point is 00:33:14 And then to his surprise and everyone else is including anarchists and communist world wide, they pulled off this October revolution. And then for a while it's like, all right. I mean, I mean, I think my understanding is even people at the time in St. Petersburg and in Moscow were like, what does this even mean, right? Like, no one took it seriously. And then very quickly, you had the Checha and the Secret Police

Starting point is 00:33:38 and all these other kind of implementations of the, you know, the communist state and people are like, oh, they're not messing around, but they're like, all right, this is not going to last for long. And the USA, the US and A, we didn't even recognize the Soviet Union's legitimacy for very long time. There were no diplomatic relations. And after certain points, like, if you don't recognize Lenin and Stalin's government,

Starting point is 00:34:02 who is the government of Russia or the Soviet Union, is that the Tsar, like you have to recognize it, it's just they're not going anywhere. So that was something that was not, I think, very predictable. The Great Depression, in retrospect, there were certain things that were predictable, but it was not at all the case that it needed to last as long as it did in the states as FDR made it do. So there's all sorts of things. I mean, if they fought Germany's remilitarization, you know, World War II could have been prevented if you didn't have the Treaty of Versailles. Would you have the hyperinflation? Would you

Starting point is 00:34:36 have Hitler? These are all, I think, choose your own adventure moments where things could have gone in other directions. I don't believe this kind of idea, this is very Marxist idea that like history is inevitable and once you start with certain premises, the contradictions kind of unfold, I think that's ridiculous. I feel there's power in the Santa Claus outfit. Yeah. I mean, it's a fundamentally communist idea, right? Santa Claus. Arbitrary redistribution of wealth? It's not redistribution. Well, at least I decide who is good and bad. Only I only I know this. And I mean, I am somehow getting funding from somewhere, right? No. Okay, listen, I have so much to teach you. You have a little Michael workshop. Yeah. And how many people do you think are employed

Starting point is 00:35:27 in this workshop? They're slaves. Yes. I don't know. How many elves are in the workshop? I think the rest of you are going to have to look into it. Now anyway, and the red colors and everything, is that the biggest holiday of all time, Christmas?

Starting point is 00:35:38 Like just in terms of the intensity of the festivities? No, I think Christmas is a very recent phenomenon. I think historically it was not a big deal. No, I know, in historical case, not been, but in terms of how much it captivates, how intense it is, I guess from a capitalist perspective, like how much is going on, how visual it is, how intense it is, how grabs a whole population.

Starting point is 00:36:00 I think it's because the idea of Christmas is probably one of the most powerful holiday ideas. Easter is probably up there. Obviously, obviously up there because you have Christ's resurrection, Christ dying, his resurrection. So that's kind of a big one. But Christmas is the symbol of brotherhood and kindness and magnanimity. You know, one of the things I despise about our culture is this glory and something I'm fighting very heavily with this book, or at least attempting to, is this glorification of cynicism, this kind of like, oh, you like this song, that's cute, stupid. Whereas Christmas is the one time of year where you could be happy, enjoy us,

Starting point is 00:36:40 and kind, and people don't get to roll their eyes at you. They get to stop being too cool for school and they get to be like, you know, I enjoy your friendship, your my sister, my brother, my dad, my mom, whatever. And it's the, you know, I was Iron Man's favorite holiday. I adore it, especially Christmas in New York. And it's just this idea of like, even though we're cold, and it's dark outside, you know, it's just this idea of like even though we're cold and it's dark outside, you know, it's still this kind of like it's still cozy and you and the next let's hope the next year is

Starting point is 00:37:12 because with with with with Russians, did Maros Santa comes on New Year's. So it's kind of like let's make this next year an even better one. So it's very much the holiday of hope and joy. And like love for family for friendship and kindness and benevolence. Yeah. And like almost the whole that whole rat race of chasing material possessions and all that gets put on hold for a beef moment. It just all goes quiet. But it's also about giving people material possessions like here. Like I value you. This is something that brings you joy. Yeah. Yeah. You write in the book which by the way, people should go get by right now. If you support this podcast, or if you support their Dickels office, the Michael's where, where's the more books you buy, the more outfits he is going to

Starting point is 00:37:55 wear. I've got two my next two appearances in the show, assuming I don't burn this bridge. I've got some good ones. This bridge has been burning for a long time would be we've been going across the road I can't canoe at this point next time we're gonna be swimming How the hell are you gonna swim? You're right out of lead. Yes, true sink to the bottom get dragged across by rope Okay, you write in the book synics like to lie and call themselves realists, hoping for positive outcomes can let's be dismissed as being naive or utopian. Can you elaborate on this point just like you said right now? I mean, it seems like a, I don't know if it's

Starting point is 00:38:38 a fundamental characteristic of our society today or just societies throughout history, but there is a cynicism. You write in a Soviet Union, it was really, there's a deep cynicism. That was good at the end, yeah. And, but there is a cynicism today as well, at least in like public discourse. Yes. Why does it happen and how can we fight it? I think it is easy to be like, eh, everything sucks. Uh, you know, I had my friend Lux, she was a, uh, a vlogger, and she was an author.

Starting point is 00:39:14 She had this great line because, you know, we worked in media and she's like, if you're in a party and someone starts talking about a new app or website and you don't know what I think about it, just say, oh, I was on that for a while, it sucked. And that's all you need to say. I like, looks, that's a great line. But I think it is, and especially, I'm sure you had to, you experience this as well with your family, I certainly did with mine. There is this idea, especially in Russian culture, but in American culture, to some extent extent as well, where if you have aspirations, I remember there was this show called Russian Dolls. It was, oh, I just got it, like the Matrushka. Okay, I just got it. That's the name. Okay. The show was called Russian Dolls. It was about Brighton Beach,

Starting point is 00:39:56 which is the Russian Jewish neighborhood in Brooklyn. It was supposed to be their version of Jersey Shore. It was a lifetime and it had no ratings. And I remember the last four episodes, they had to burn them. So they just ran it through like 8 a.m. to 10 a.m. one day. And there was this one scene where the one the girls, every other name, probably Natalia. And she'd been in college. And she had been wondering what she went to major in, right? And this story was so perfect. I'm sure I've told it before. And she took an aptitude test. And she went with her mom to get like many pennies or something and she goes mom You know, I've had like 80 majors. I didn't know what I wanted to do and she goes

Starting point is 00:40:32 I took this apt to test it really made sense to me. I Am gonna go to law school. I want to be a lawyer and there's something I enjoy and the first thing out of her mom's mouth Is how you gonna pay for it and the girl and I related, because if you didn't have this rush and upbringing, you watched it, you would think her reaction was completely insane. She just lost it, just screaming. She's like, people pay for law school all the time. I'll figure out a way, why is your first reaction

Starting point is 00:40:55 to look for a problem? Why is your first response to be like, oh, are you sure you've thought this through? I have been struggling with one problem for years, what I wanted to do for a living. And now, like, as soon as I solve this one big problem by denity, your first reaction is like, let's find a new problem. Why is that you're instead of, let's figure out how we're going to pay for it. And that kind of approach is so deadly, and it naws

Starting point is 00:41:22 at you. And I always, I don't like giving people advice because I'm who the hell am I and also if I don't know the context of the problem I'm not informed enough to give advice But this is piece of advice that I do for country giving if you are someone who has around you People who as soon as you have any accomplishment or any hope that their first reaction is to be like well, what about this? You have to get rid of them or sit them down, maybe give them a chance, because that is something that is so demoralizing and it drains you. And it's like, you know, the example I've used all the time,

Starting point is 00:41:57 all the time, all the time. I say, if you want to be an author, right? You can go to any bookstore and look at all the shitty shitty books like the white pill. And you could say to yourself, I can be the shitty author. You don't have to be having right? So people should buy your book just to know that it doesn't take much. It really does not take much. Shitty writing is all about and boring. Yeah. You can just pick a random random period in history and just write a bunch of crap about it. Yeah. You could just pick a random period in history and just write a bunch of crap about it.

Starting point is 00:42:27 Yes. And put a pretty stamp on the cover and just go. It was pretty. Yeah. But I mean, like for you, right? Like not, you don't, I don't mean you let's. I'm sorry, it's by the wolves. The wolf bots.

Starting point is 00:42:39 There's lots of standard comedians who aren't Jerry Seinfeld. Yeah. Right? If you want to be a podcaster, you don't have to be Joe Rogan. You could be someone who's got a medium audience and are enjoying it. So, like, the idea that, like, something has to be, you have to be a massive superstar or your failure is also ridiculous, but that's cynicism. I mean, you can even be a failed comedian like Dave Smith. Yeah, I don't...

Starting point is 00:43:03 This is a generic name I came up with this an example. I think he has like a podcast of some kind. He said, yeah, not very funny. I don't know why you would call himself a comedian, but you he's being ironic. Don't you think? Yeah, so even then you could do something special. I remember what you did with me in the movie theater. What's that? I don't is oh oh you continue. Can you explain the jokes because I can't I'm not explaining jokes. I'm wearing lipstick It's not enough now. I remember you did to me in a movie theater And you wore lipstick that night too not what I was done People for sure will think this this feels like a gay porn

Starting point is 00:43:42 Like a very long intro thing. This feels like a gay porn. Like a very long intro. Yes, we're not wearing pants. Yes, there's many reasons why this feels like this. And the outfits and just everything about this. How would you know? I have my friend. I have stories. I thought I don't have friends. They're all suspiciously named either Lex or Lux or stuff like you lack complete creativity

Starting point is 00:44:08 Just like in the right of your or locks. Yeah It's like you didn't even use like a the source for your book the same words over and over and over Uh The sad thing about the synicism is like I don't think it's just a Russian thing. I think the people, let me trust you because I didn't finish what you were saying earlier. In America, it's not just a Russian thing. In American culture, if you have like a sitcom or a musical, it's regarded as less legitimate than a drama, right?

Starting point is 00:44:41 Like if something's got to be about someone struggling or someone suffering, whereas this is like a joyous, happy story, like maybe something like Pixar, right? Like if something's gotta be about someone struggling or someone suffering, whereas this is like a joyous, happy story, like maybe something like Pixar, right? Like sure they have conflict and they're going for something, but it's overall the background the universe is taking in is very joyous and happy. That is regarded artistically as less legitimate than something which is dark and the background is despair. And that very subtly sends a very to me pernicious message that what's real is despair and happiness is the aberration. And I think if you have that as your mindset, you're setting yourself up for maybe not failure but certainly not happiness.

Starting point is 00:45:20 Yeah, but that's in the figures figures the ideas that the culture elevates, but it's the local personal life of parents and teachers. That still happens a lot in Russia and here just my whole life, especially because I'm a weirdo. I've been kind of told to basically be less weird, be Basically, be less weird. There's a kind of sense in where there's a certain path you're supposed to take in life. And every time you have a little bit of success on those very specifically defined paths, you're pushed to do more and more and more in those paths. As opposed to celebrating the full complexity of the weirdo that each one of us is, and I certainly am, and I just teachers, even friends and certainly family have constantly been very cynical about my aspirations, my dreams and so on.

Starting point is 00:46:21 I think that actually created a deeply self-critical engine in my brain That I think it ultimately was productive because it was also balanced by just an internal maybe through genetics Thing I have of optimism about the world of just seeing the beauty in the world But it is weird looking back How much the how much the, how much people that love me were trying to bring me down.

Starting point is 00:46:48 Yeah. It's so strange. It's also very hurtful for me because when I graduated college, it was important for me to be self-made and not take money from my family. And I remember my grandma, this was a huge argument, an ongoing argument. And one time she, as we were leaving,

Starting point is 00:47:04 as she was leaving my house, she slipped money in under the door and I threw it out and it made me so angry. Um, we're like one year for my birthday, she gave me, I think like $500, which was a lot of money, you know, when you're like 22 or 23 and I was so pissed because that told me that they didn't believe that I'd be able to feed myself or make it on my own. And I understand their mindset, but it's like I wasn't, you know, I never was never hungry. Like maybe I couldn't, I remember I'd have to wait on the subway because I couldn't afford a cab. So, but that was a sacrifice I had to make, you know, I had to wait that half hour.

Starting point is 00:47:41 So it was a huge source and remains a source of enormous tension and contention. And I think also, I'm sure speaking to your upbringing, in their minds, unless you're going into an office, you can't pay the rent. It doesn't make sense. So. But there's just like you said, forget the office, forget all that. No matter what, there's always, whatever you accomplish in life,

Starting point is 00:48:07 you always do, you're always negative about your current position. You always come up with another problem, just like you said. I was always, it's like a self-generating problem box. Yeah, I remember I didn't speak to my dad for a few years that I'm like, let me give this guy another chance and in that time period Harvey Peacar the author of subject of American splendor the movie and author of the series comic books He and I became friends and he was writing a graphic novel about me and

Starting point is 00:48:37 When I met with my dad, I'm like, oh Someone's writing a book about me. He goes, I know So and it was one of those moments where I'm like, wow, you're an asshole. And not the kind of asshole I am. You're just like not a good person. And I don't know or really at this point care what the motivation or if there was no motivation with the visceral emotional reasoning for that. But that kind of thing is something I, you know, much later now in life have absolutely no tolerance for. Well, in my own private life, I try to forgive and love those people, but it is

Starting point is 00:49:16 there've been a few in my life like this and I think they are they are incredible people if you allow yourself to see it, but they're flawed. And so I tried to forgive them. That said, it is true that the people that are close to you, especially family, have a disproportionate psychological effect on you. Yes. You have to be very careful having them in your life too much. Like one thing is to love them and the others to actually, you know, allow yourself to flourish, surround yourself with people that help you flourish.

Starting point is 00:49:47 And like you said, the advice there is really powerful, especially early on to have people that believe in you in whatever crazy big dreams you have, that pat you on the back and say, you got this kid. And so, here's the other thing. If you try and you don't make it to that Rogan level, it's okay. Like I have several books that I've written that are on my hard drive that have nothing published. And there were a lot of work. And it was really disappointing when they went out and no publishers were

Starting point is 00:50:20 interested in it. Maybe I'll publish them. Maybe I won't point being, it's fine. I tried. Is it a romance novel? One is, one is a Maybe I won't point being, it's fine. I tried. Is it a romance novel? One is a, one is a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, All hours of the night I need more gay porn. I need some ones. I only have zeros Yeah, never enough. This one almost got a book deal. This was it would have been it was 16 years ago It was a it was a ladle it novel What kind of novel? Glad lit. It's like the corn bee. What? Nick Hornby about a boy. So there was a little mini genre of these books about young men trying to struggle the right through It was a whole little through is a whole little

Starting point is 00:51:05 there's this whole little series of them. Fight Club is adjacent to that. It's not literally that ladle it. I feel like you would write a great Fight Club type novel. No. You know Fight Club is much at Chuck Paul and it's my understanding admitted this. Fight Club is one of the few things where the movie is better than the book. Oh, interesting. But the movie is so iconic. Yeah, for sure. But, but still, isn't there a deeply like philosophical, it's kind of like David Fossil Wallace novels, isn't doesn't, doesn't the fight club capture some moment in time?

Starting point is 00:51:38 That's very kind of. I was hanging out with Kurt Metzger a couple weeks ago, comedian, very failed. Name drop. Yeah. Hey, Kurt. Watch out. And. Hey, Kurt. Watch out. And he was, he had this great story.

Starting point is 00:51:48 He was hanging out with Patreous and Neil the late comedian named drop with the great comics of all time. And Patreous goes, Kurt was talking about how much you liked the book or the movie fight club. And Patreous, like, that is the widest book on earth. He goes, your problem in life is you don't have enough violence. Your proper life, you need someone to beat you up. That's not a problem for me.

Starting point is 00:52:11 Yeah, well, that money, but still it is a very white book, but it's still captures a kind of anger in it angst and a certain subculture in society. Yes, yes. That's really powerful. They probably led to, in some part, to the thing you wrote about and then you write for yes, that's really powerful. They probably led to in some part to the thing you wrote about and then you write. Oh, for sure. I mean, it was this kind of like there's that line in the movie where Edward Norton says I'm a 30 year old boy. This kind of question of what is it? Sorry to be Matt Walsh, but what does it mean to be a man? Right? What does masculine and mean? Why are so many men?

Starting point is 00:52:43 So at such a young age, feeling so lost, this idea that like if I feel my house with nice furniture, that's still not gonna be fulfilling to anyone. Matt Walsh is... He's from the daily wire, he's the documentary called, What is a Woman? Can you explain, I don't know who he is.

Starting point is 00:52:58 So Matt Walsh is someone who works with a daily wire. Yes. And he just recently did a documentary called, What Is a Woman, I think it was called. And he just recently did a documentary called What is a Woman? I think it was called. And he went out to lots of people working in gender theory. And well, that's thing. And he asked them to define, he went to the Messiah in Africa, the tribe, and to talk to people

Starting point is 00:53:16 about transgenderism, non-binary, which is a word I know you hate. And the documentary was surprisingly well done. Is that like a passive-aggressive compliment? surprisingly well done. Is that like a passive aggressive compliment? Surprisingly well done. Well, because Matt is very aggressive on Twitter, we follow each other, and there was a lot of opportunities in this film for him to really be like, and instead to his credit, he let the people speak. And it's possible it's

Starting point is 00:53:47 edited a certain way, of course, it was obviously edited. But when he just asked them, can you just define woman for me and playing dumb? We're not playing dumb. Just saying, what's your opinion? A lot of the people he was speaking to were getting extremely agitated. So it worked in that kind of context as well. It was not his usual style. Speaking of which, do you ever regret your behavior on Twitter? There were a couple of times, but very rarely. Can you describe the big strategy before we dive back into the October revolution? My strategy? Do you have a strategy or is it does it come from the heart or does it come from the brain?

Starting point is 00:54:27 It comes from I want to have fun. So that's literally what it comes down to. It's like this is rolls just want to have fun. Are you drunk? What is it? What are your dread is in there? I'm very cheeky. I have the holiday spirit, even though it's not the holidays.

Starting point is 00:54:44 Oh, it's egg not hilarious. I did not sleep much last night. I've been, which is, I think the second time we talk or the third time, the second time, I stayed up almost all night. Oh, I know. I keep track of when you come and go. Yeah. So my door camera points at your garage, so I know when you're leaving or coming home. My camera points at your bedroom from the inside. So you can see what's inside, but I shouldn't have told you that. No, I love you ask you this because this is something that's been bothering me. Yes. There was a chair that you threw out.

Starting point is 00:55:13 Yep. And I was looking at my camera and I'm like, let me see when he threw this out. And then one time you went to the garbage and you adjusted it to make it stick out of the garbage even more, what were you doing there? Was I, oh, to make sure that people know there's a chair in there. Was that really what you do? Well, like the garbage person, so they'd know it's the chair, so they don't get, like, I always think I don't want them to get like hurt or whatever. Oh, okay. Like they open the thing. It's like,

Starting point is 00:55:40 uh, chair, I don't know, I don't know what I was thinking. Okay, it was really odd. I didn't know how to get rid of a chair. It was broken. It was like cracked and it chair, I don't know what I was thinking. Okay. It was really odd. I didn't know how to get rid of a chair. It was broken. It was like cracked and it was, uh, it was a problem. So Twitter for me, I, my point is to have fun. It's also fun to kind of smack down people who I regard as bad actors. And also kind of to promote news that I find interesting that maybe isn't as prominently

Starting point is 00:56:02 part of the culture as it might otherwise be. Do you think sometimes you draw too broadly the category of people that are bad actors and they're some thereby sort of adding to the mockery and the cynicism in the world. I don't think mockery and cynicism are at all synonymous. I think cynicism means everyone sucks. I don't think everyone sucks. I think it is undeniable that a lot of people suck. What if I told you most people don't suck? Could you steal me on the case that most people suck? I can do it in a cynical way, honestly.

Starting point is 00:56:36 It's a quasi-synical way. I think most people are neither here nor there. Most people just kind of go with the flow. They're amiable. Human beings are social creatures. They want to get along. They don't want to cause problems. They don't have the capacity to be the target of a problem.

Starting point is 00:56:52 So most people, I mean, if most people sucked, then going anywhere would be excruciating ordeal, right? Like literally, like, they are ports annoying, but if most people sucked, it would really be annoying. Going the supermarket, we're really annoying. So I don't think most people suck, but I do think that in public discourse, there are lots of people who are dishonest about their agenda. For example, if I'm, you know, I could be a someone who has promoting a certain ideology, but I'm in the payroll of a candidate or, you know, I could be a someone who has promoting a certain ideology, but I'm in the payroll of a candidate or, you know, my think tank needs this to happen or

Starting point is 00:57:30 I'm being paid for someone or something like that. So that sort of thing, I think happens all the time. There's the line I have in the book, Updinson Claire. I forgot how he, he word exactly, but it's very hard to convince someone of something if his payroll depends on him not being convinced of it, right? So I think things like that are, the thing I'm really excited about with what Elon's doing with Twitter, and I'm just ecstatic about this, is to have the context now.

Starting point is 00:57:55 So you'll have a politician making a claim and they're gonna ward it in certain ways. Like my favorite example is when people like, if you look at the years 2002 to 2020 terrorism in America, it's like, did anything happen in 2001? Is there a reason you just coincidentally started in 2002? Like things like that. So when people are manipulating things to force an outcome that they want and to promote an idea that they want disingenuously to have that underneath that in Twitter now where the audience provides context, I think,

Starting point is 00:58:25 is something extremely useful, and it's a great way to nip propaganda in the bud. And propaganda pervades the entire political spectrum, of course. And the interesting thing about Twitter is also the discussion about free speech and so on. I think it's interesting to discuss free speech and the freedom of the press from the context of the Soviet Union. Sure. Let's return to the October Revolution and Lenin. What was the October Revolution? Who was Lenin? What are some interesting aspects of this human being and also this moment in

Starting point is 00:59:00 history that stand out to you that are important to understand. I think the interesting thing about Lenin is he was a zealot and he was a visionary and he really kind of meant it. And I'm skipping ahead a little bit, but Lenin also was someone who was strategic. So at a certain point when they were trying to advance communism throughout the Soviet Union and the costs were outweighing to benefits, he did a strategic retreat. He did the new economic policy. You had a rise of kind of these small capitalists coming back. You could hire people again. And for the hardcore people in the Soviet Union, hardcore communist, this was a huge betrayal. It's a step back. He didn't do it because he was some kind of crypto capitalist.

Starting point is 00:59:48 He did it because he's like, all right, we know where we got to get to, but we have to go at a certain pace and we have to adjust as we go along. So to have someone who is that much of an ideal log and that much of a visionary, but still to have any element of pragmatism to him is I think a very rare combination. And that pragmatism to him is, I think, a very rare combination.

Starting point is 01:00:07 And that pragmatism, do you think that's ultimately where things go wrong? Sort of, that's where you sacrifice the ideas. Pragmatism, in this case, was good because by taking a step back, you know, he kind of gave himself some breathing room to allow the revolution to continue, to win the Civil War. There was a big moment where Germany, it's just, there's lots of like, funny anecdotes that I learned while researching this book. So, you know, they were Germany in Russia, they were negotiating a ceasefire because they wanted Germany, wanted Russia out of the war. And basically Germany was like, all right, you will let you leave,

Starting point is 01:00:46 but you have to sign this treaty and basically hand over all this land that we're currently occupying. It was just parts of Ukraine, parts of Poland, and Lenin tells Trotsky to stall. He's just just run the clock because he was of the belief that now that they've taken power in Russia, you're going to have a worldwide workers' revolution. So he's like, just stall them. And stall, he's stalled and a certain point

Starting point is 01:01:07 Germany's like, all right, you're signing this tomorrow or we're invading. And Trotsky basically said, yeah, so we're leaving the war, but we're not signing anything. And the Germans are like, what? And it's like, yeah, well, that's what we're doing. So hey, and basically, eventually he had to sign the treaty and seed huge parts to land and a lot of money. And this was a very precarious moment for him to maintain control of Russia. And people were telling him like, you've lost huge amounts of territory. You know, you've blown it. You should be in jail.

Starting point is 01:01:41 And he's like, what's your mouth? Because if you look forward the future, it'll be clear which one of us is more likely to be the one ending up in jail and he was absolutely right This was Trotsky or Lenin saying this is Lenin saying this the Karl Radek So who are these figures here who's Trotsky who's Lenin who Stalin what are some interesting Aspects of all of this what it sort of just just linger on it? The personalities, the ideas that were important. Well, Trotsky came late to Bolshevism. He was really the brains in many ways of the October Revolution. He was an amazing strategist. He never forgot that he was an amazing strategist, had a very high pain of himself. And by the way, the October Revolution that he you 17, that's like a key moment. Of

Starting point is 01:02:27 course, the Russian Revolution lasted a long time, but this was a key moment of what the face shift towards success of the Bolsheviks. Well, that was the moment. That was like, all right, we are the government now. And now we have to make it's, you know, like Thomas Jefferson said, I think it was Thomas Jefferson, no, it's been Franklin, a republic, if you can keep it, it's like, all right, we've made our own kind of government if we can keep it, because that was the big question. You had international blockade, you had the White armies,

Starting point is 01:02:55 the Tsar's forces who want to restore Tsarism or at least the parliament from right before Lenin took over. So this was a big kind of, no one's, was, you know, in some, it was like the 2016 election. It's like, all right, we voted Trump. Well, what's this going to look like? Like no one, no one had any idea what a Trump president he was going to look like. All we knew was this guy's on Twitter running his mouth. He's insulting people and he's had all these views somewhere over here, somewhere over there. And the funny thing is the Russians hacked both the election. some over there. And the funny thing is the Russians hacked both the elections.

Starting point is 01:03:32 See, true. It was put in the Gremlin. So Trotsky was, you know, Lenin's right hand man. And he was, you know, enormous. And to this day, he remains this kind of figure who is supposedly a less authoritarian anti-stalinist version of communism that people can endorse. And Stalin, of course, was Lenin successor. At first, there was a triumvirate running Russia as Lenin was recuperating from strokes, then very quickly, not very quickly, but gradually, and then suddenly Stalin became an absolute dictator, and he had a series of purges and so and so forth, which solidified his control over the country. And of course, for Stalin, Trotsky later, but throughout, as you write, seemed to almost

Starting point is 01:04:19 take on a supernatural character, wherein everything that went wrong and the USSR was do not just to his views, but to his direct orders from abroad. And of course, George or well brilliantly, in probably my favorite book of his, which is Animal Farm and also 1984 portray Trotsky as a snowball in Animal Farm and Emmanuel Goldstein in 1984, is this embodiment of this evil that will always have to be fighting. And you need that in order to hold onto power. You always have to have that enemy. Right.

Starting point is 01:04:57 So that's something I talk about in the White Pill as well. When things start going wrong, they always have to have scapegoats, right? And there's this Russian and Dots. You know, what the Russians like to do is you can't say things out loud But if you make jokes you can say unspeakable truths and there's this one Then you got where there's a Russian leader and things are going bad and he looks in his drawer And there were two letters from his predecessor and he opens the first letter in a panic and the letter says You know for advice and the letter says blame everything on me. So he goes out there and he's like, oh, my predecessor sucked. He was terrible. Well, it's his fault. And everyone's like, okay.

Starting point is 01:05:32 And then there's a calamity again. And he's like a crap. So he goes back at his desk and he reads the second one. And it says, sit down and write two letters. So when things start going wrong as they constantly did throughout the history of the Soviet Union. Or any, you know, totalitarian, authoritarian country, it's someone has to be the blame. Since we know that our ideology is true and scientifically true, if it's not working in reality given the perfection of the ideology, someone must be intentionally undermining it and causing the disconnect between thought and reality. And in the Soviet Union, there was the Kulaks at one point, then it was the records, the doctors,

Starting point is 01:06:13 it was just different in the cap. There was always someone, and Trotsky was called a fascist, then was accused of plotting with Hitler and all this other stuff. And you also write the problem with communism is that eventually you run out of possible skate boats. Skate boats. Skate boats. You run out of boats. You do run out of boats.

Starting point is 01:06:33 Who's going to carry them? Eventually you run out of possible skate. It's my second language. This English thing. I'm a failed pod guest or I'm a failure. Eventually you run out of possibles, gave goats for failure, at which point acknowledging or even noticing that something was wrong

Starting point is 01:06:56 itself becomes a form of treason. Yeah. So I saw that in North Korea, right? Wherever you went in North Korea, something was wrong. So if you have four buttons for the elevator, one where you mismatched, every wall had a crack saw that in North Korea, right? Wherever you went in North Korea, something was wrong. So if you have four buttons for the elevator, one where you mismatched, every wall had a crack, every floor had a stain, the bathroom would be rusted through when you wanted to flush the urinal. But if you are someone who points this out, you're a troublemaker and you're

Starting point is 01:07:19 created, oh, you're saying something's wrong, you're criticizing the operation, you're creating your first all you're threatening the person who's in charge, because now they're incompetent, and now that's a big red flag for them. But second, if you're just going around saying, this is wrong, this is wrong, this is wrong, even if it's objectively true,

Starting point is 01:07:35 you're a trelllemaker in your counter-revolutionary. So at a certain point, everyone just has to put on blinders and pretend that everything is fine. One example I used in the book, an extreme example was there as a photography professor and he pointed out his class and he was an older man that before the revolution, the quality of photographic paper was better and he was I think executed for this heresy.

Starting point is 01:07:56 So yeah, you have to pretend, there was, I'm reading a book right now about the Chinese cultural revolution and there was an academic, I forget his name, Hushi, I think. Any points out that in these countries, not only do you not have freedom of speech, you don't have freedom of silence. You can't just sit there quietly.

Starting point is 01:08:14 You have to say how great things are and how much you're enjoying and how wonderful they are instead of just keeping quiet, because if you keep quiet, that's suspicious. Yeah, those, they're always singing those songs about how happy they are and how great everything is. And if everyone else is singing, who are you to not sing? Yeah, those pictures, especially when, you know, when it's Stalin giving speeches and everyone is applauding,

Starting point is 01:08:41 any dictator, any, you don't want to be the first person that stops applauding. Stalin has to have a button, his mind is standing at a certain point to tell people stop applauding because like you said, if you're the first one to stop clapping, people are going to notice. And why do you stop clapping? You don't like Stalin? But just imagine being one of those people clapping.

Starting point is 01:09:00 Well, that's the thing. They always had a sword over their head, but they all had a lot of blood on their hands, too. It's a very, very precarious life. But there's also, I mean, 1984 does a good job of this. What is that, like, two minutes of hate or something like this? You like lose yourself in the hysteria of it, in the hysteria. So there's some level of which at first,

Starting point is 01:09:25 it's you're sacrificing your basic individualistic ability to think, but then you get lost in this kind of wave of emotion and you give into it. You allow yourself, it's like a mix of fear and then anger and you direct that anger towards like snowball or trotsky or whoever the, and like, what is that? And you're also losing yourself in the crowd. Yeah, you lose. Because you're like, it's not just I'm angry. Everyone I know, we're all angry together.

Starting point is 01:09:52 So you really are becoming a part of something bigger than yourself and having this kind of communal, very primal, emotional experience. It's like the opposite of Christmas, right? Christmas, we're all together. Everyone's sharing their joy, everyone's sharing their love. This is the opposite, literally the opposite. Like everyone's together sharing their hate and anger and rage, but you're all kind of having a mind meld.

Starting point is 01:10:14 But I wonder what it's like to be an independent thinker in those in those moments, like allow yourself to think. No, we know because there were a lot of them and they were all punished enormously. So they can be noticed. You can notice them. Oh, yeah. You even noticed it in America, America's a free country,

Starting point is 01:10:31 but when people start asking too many questions, it's like, where are you going with this? You know, like if you're in an office, even in a corporate setting, you're a troublemaker. You're just, you know, you're making problems for everyone. Why can't you be normal?

Starting point is 01:10:44 Why can't you be just like everybody else? So people do not like having to be made to think, and they certainly despise having to be made to justify themselves, because that's a threat to their status and to their power. And this applies in totalitarianism or applies to, you know, Dunder Mifflin. I still can't believe you're wearing lipstick. I'm not. Goes to show you can pull lipstick on a pig. It's like a snowball. I think you've just been on a bender, that's it. It's been rough.

Starting point is 01:11:26 It's been rough. It's been rough. I feel kind of, I feel like I can be myself in this outfit. I honestly feel like I could just go around in this outfit and just be weird, because everyone will accept you if you're wearing a Santa outfit. You, you can say anything in a Santa outfit, right? Have you seen bad Santa? Yeah, bad. Exactly. You can't say anything. You're like, fuck stick. How does Stalin come to power? If we return back to those early days, post the October revolution

Starting point is 01:12:02 will let an entrosky and Stalin, how did he come to power? So, what Stalin did very cleverly, Stalin was, you know, he worked the system, he was, you know, but he was very much in the background. And what he did better than Trotsky is he was much more politician. He was a glad-hander, he made friends within the party, he made people feel respect and appreciated, and Lenin trusted him. After Lenin's stroke, Stalin was basically the one who was keeping track of him. Lenin asked Stalin at one point to kill him

Starting point is 01:12:33 because after the strokes, he was in capacity to Stalin talk to him out of it. But at the same time, Lenin was like, if I need someone killed, like this is who I need to talk to. You know, Stalin, if you look up photos of him when he was young, he was a stud. He was a gangster, he was a bank robber. And, you know, he basically worked the system and you had the Trotskyites on one hand who were more to the left. Stalin's big, I would guess, I would call it a heresy, was he put forth the idea

Starting point is 01:13:02 of socialism in one country, whereas we're just gonna make it work here in what became the Soviet Union, the Trotsky idea, and this is really kind of the Marxist idea, is that the workers' revolution has to be worldwide. This is just a worldwide kind of new era of humanity, where Stalin's like, no, no, no, no, we're just gonna make it here and then later, behind what became the Iron Curtain, but this was, sure, this was an ideological division

Starting point is 01:13:26 between the two, but what happens in totalitarian countries, you happens in any kind of, like, when you have intermingling of like religion and government, things that are like ideological disputes, like the Aryan Heresy, the Aryan Heresy Christianity is that Christ is subordinate to God the Father, right? Whereas the contemporary orthodox version

Starting point is 01:13:45 It's three gods one god and three person excuse me. So they're all co-equal aspects of God in heaven But that was an excuse to be like you guys are evil. You're on the side of the devil We're gonna kill you so these little Disputes about ideas are often a convenient cover for people to have a power struggle In the guys of being like, it's not that I'm about wanting to be more powerful. I'm just on the side of the truth, and you're speaking lies, and that's dangerous to the revolution or to the true faith. So he squeezed trot, but the thing is Trotsky had the seeds of his own defeat because per Trotsky, the party is always right.

Starting point is 01:14:20 You cannot be right against the party, right? So if you have this kind of party structure and the party is saying you're wrong, as an individual, you are wrong because the collective is what makes decisions. The collective, the workers are who have the knowledge and the information. And it is important for you to kind of subordinate your selfishness, your individualism to this greater good. So he kind of set himself up in many ways. Is it clear to you why Trotsky lost that power struggle? So you just explain that he set himself up, but you can see how different ideologies can be used to achieve different ends. Is there another alternative possible

Starting point is 01:15:06 trajectory where Trotsky could have been the head of the Soviet Union? It would be very hard because he was Jewish. So when they were seizing power, Trotsky explicitly said, I can't be in charge of Jewish. So the Soviet Union remained extremely anti-Semitic. One, the reason so many Jews became communists in the Soviet Union because the promise was once the communists took over, we're not going to have programs anymore. Programmas was you had these Jewish ghettos and under the permission or encouragement of the Tsar, just gangs of people go through killing, raping, robbing, stealing, riding for days and just just a clean massacre. And the idea is like under communism, everyone's going to be equal.

Starting point is 01:15:46 We're not going to have this anymore. They still had it, but to a lesser extent. But since Trotsky was Jewish, his real name is Lev Braunstein, it was almost impossible to have a scenario where he was going to be in charge. And Stalin fed into that to some extent. Also this kind of idea of Jewish internationalism, it's like, okay, he doesn't really have loyalty to Russia. And many of the people who were Jewish who were high up in Stalin's government administration, they very much had to prove their loyalty to communism as opposed to Judaism. Throughout the 20th century, what was the relationship between communism and Jews in the Soviet

Starting point is 01:16:29 Union? What in terms of anti-Semitism, the ups and downs of anti-Semitism, it seems like it lessened, it was lesser and greater in different parts of the 20th century. Well, it's the kind of thing where if something was bad, there's this Russian rhyme, it's like, yes, in the Void of Kranik, to the Ovipula Shadee, like if there's no water in the sink

Starting point is 01:16:56 who drank at all the Jews. So if something goes wrong, there's just a convenient historical scapegoat, it's the Jews fault. So this is something that's towards the end of his life very much. And this was after World War II, Stalin was getting ready for another kind of series of programs.

Starting point is 01:17:13 All these juice were getting kicked out of their jobs. Jewish doctors were getting sent to the Far East, instead of being in cities. The newspapers started talking about rootless cosmopolitan, which was a term that Nazis also used to kind of regard Jews as others or as aliens, and this was going to be, and they were very clever about it. In Proveder, they would, and I talk about this,

Starting point is 01:17:36 and the White Pill, in Proveder, there were articles and letters to the editor, they were like, you know, things are getting so anti-Semitic, we really should round up all the Jews and send them elsewhere for their own safety. letters to the editor, they were like, you know, things are getting so anti-Semitic. We really should round up all the Jews and send them elsewhere for their own safety. So they were kind of setting the ground rules or the basis to have this sort of program come back, but spoiler alert, Stalin dies and immediately all of this gets reversed and then you administration rehabilitates the doctors who are accused of trying to hurt him and all this other sort of thing.

Starting point is 01:18:13 What is it about the scapegoat in society? Are we always going to be looking for scapegoats? What do you learn from human nature that this seems to keep happening? I think there's a book called The Nurture Assumption. And I discuss this in the new right. And what the author learned is that humans define themselves by opposition. So if you have a group of people and its kids and adults, the kids will see themselves as kids

Starting point is 01:18:40 because we're as opposed to adults. If the adults leave, the kids see themselves as boys and girls. Because I'm not a girl, I'm a boy, I'm not a boy, I'm a girl. So they divide. So this idea, which is a very lefty idea that human beings naturally all get along is not accurate. And the best example of this is,

Starting point is 01:18:59 look after 9-11, look where there's a war. Nothing unites a popular, it's not like when times are thriving that everyone's all working together. When things are bad and there's an enemy, you know, it's the Japanese are Pearl Harbor. It's al-Qaeda. That's when everyone really comes together because now we have someone to be against. So there will always be someone has to be the outgroup and we have to be the in-group as opposed to them. Someone has to be the outgroup and we have to be the in group as opposed to them But there's a viciousness to the actions you take to the towards the out group that

Starting point is 01:19:40 Very thought yes some like the degree of viciousness can cross the line towards it like atrocities towards genocide Right, and that's that's the question of in Why does this sometimes do that? Why does it sometimes cross into genocide? I understand it's a useful thing to have the other to blame in this world, especially when times are rough, but why does that sometimes lead to sort of action that says I'm going to murder, I'm going to torture the other. I think the question really is why sometimes it doesn't. Right. And one of the things I learned when I was doing the new right is a lot of the Nazis, you know, in terms of loosely speaking, you're Nazis, they make the point that like, oh,

Starting point is 01:20:14 when the Holocaust happened, it really wasn't that big of a deal and that only became a big deal in the decades later. And this just shows the power of Jewish influence. And I'm like, this to me is this just shows the power of Jewish influence. And I'm like, this to me is a great thing. It's a great thing that we sat down pretty recently, historically, and we're like, wait a minute, guys, when we have a war or we have conquest, you don't have to just start killing everyone. Like this is something that's bad and wrong.

Starting point is 01:20:41 And certainly in the last 60 years, 70 years, this is something that people have come to take for granted. But that wasn't the case before. It would always be, or not always, but often, if you conquer, you just go wild and just start slaughtering massive people. It's, who's the guy from Harvard? And Stephen Pinker, I'm sorry, I forgot his name.

Starting point is 01:21:04 So he just talks about like, you know, we know this is one of the reasons also why there was so much skepticism when the Holocaust started because this was regarded as something that was barbaric. This is from the middle ages, from the biblical times. We don't do this anywhere. We're civilized now. So genocide is historically the norm. I think it's also harder to pull it off emotionally when you have the visuals and when you have the audio and

Starting point is 01:21:33 when you have the voices of the people being slaughtered. We don't know, you know, if this was 2,000 years ago and people, you know, in the Bible, they go kill this group, go kill that group. We don't have their names, we don't have the visuals, we don't have anything. But when you see someone being like, there's a book about, I think the Rwandan genocide and the title is, we regret to inform you that tomorrow we will be executed with all of our families like a telegram. And like when you get a telegram like this, it's very different than reading some history book about the Assyrians kill the Phoenicians.

Starting point is 01:22:05 It's like, I don't know who this is, I don't know who that is, right? So I think this is something that has changed very recently. There was this kind of interesting moment just that speaks to the way technology has liberated people from violence. Crystal Noct, which was a moment in the lead up to the Holocaust, were basically, you know, with Hitler's blessing, you had a nationwide burning of Jewish businesses, synagogues burnt down, and Kaiser Wilhelm, you know, the Kaiser, he said for the first time my life, embarrassed to be a German. But that was a moment where worldwide, even plenty of people

Starting point is 01:22:42 who did not think very highly of Jewish people were like, this is the rap. This is a complete nightmare. But 200 years ago, 100 years ago, maybe not literally a crystal knocked, but there's an outgroup and we hate them and we're going to kill them and it's fine. Anything is even more difficult now with the internet. Yes. That kind of thing. Now, more difficult, this means it doesn't happen kind of thing? Yeah, I'm not, now more difficult, doesn't mean it doesn't happen, where it can't happen.

Starting point is 01:23:08 I'm not saying that at all, but I'm saying that we know a lot about what's going on in North Korea, probably the most secretive country on earth. There's a lot of atrocities in Eritrea, which is kind of known. So I think it's also, like if you think about it,

Starting point is 01:23:24 if you're, how many years ago, 300 years ago, you only know the people in your village and they're all probably gonna look like you, so on and so forth. Whereas now, if I'm on social media and there's someone from any country and maybe their picture looks a little different and they use the same anime picture as somebody else,

Starting point is 01:23:39 but they're putting forth their ideas, you do see the humanity in them and you do see a sense of familiarity and a familial bond with them. And when you hear about these things, you know, when I, again, like I did when I did dear reader, no one, any, I was in al-Qaeda and I was in ox Jones. No one pushed back about like, oh, the North Koreans, they were all like, this is horrible. If I had a magic wand, I'd give them food.

Starting point is 01:24:04 I wouldn't have them live in fear. And this is something that I don't think was the case a couple of hundred years ago. That said, I'd love to get your thoughts about what's going on in Iran, the protests. It seems like the regime there is able to crack down with violence. My thoughts about Iran, let me just, there's something else about Iran, which thinks it's interesting. This whole idea of care for what you wish for because people have this site and something I kind of when the reasons I have the white pill is Americans really have very naive about the nature of evil, right? They really think that a dictator has a weird mustache and he's banging the table and he's you know like a crazy person and

Starting point is 01:24:42 It's often not the case, but they also think if something is bad, therefore the alternative is gonna be better. So you had the Shaviran, and he was kind of authoritarian, and no, he's not a good guy. So in 1979, there were a lot of people like this guy's a horrible, he's oppressed in the Iranian people.

Starting point is 01:25:03 Let's get him the F out of there. He's so bad that whatever comes after it has to be an improvement. And it's like, no, that's, if you think, I mean, this drives me crazy when conservatives are like, you know, Joe Biden's the worst president we ever had. Like this is destroying America. I'm like, you have no idea how bad things can get. The fact that you are in a position to complain means we got a ways to go. Yeah, every time you say the Donald Trump or Joe Biden is the worst president ever, that

Starting point is 01:25:37 warms my heart because you're allowed to say that. Yes, yeah. It's like, I just let it, it's like music. Because you're allowed to be pretty, in response to a president's tweet, you can write that. Yeah. And it still lives there and it's, and nobody arrests you. Yeah. Which is a rare thing in human history. Yes.

Starting point is 01:26:02 And it's still a rare thing in the world. I mean, what, it does seem that Iran, the current regime, is able to crack down on There's a rare thing in human history. Yes. And still rare thing in the world. I mean, it does seem that Iran, the current regime, is able to crack down on communication channels. It's still...it's surprising to me how much power a government can have. Like they could use violence to control the population. Right. And nobody's going to do anything about it. Well, I just... The rest of the population. Right. And nobody's going to do anything about it.

Starting point is 01:26:30 Well, I just the rest of the world just watches. But here's the thing, right? Because if the rest of the world starts doing too much, then they have a justification to crack down even more. This regi, this protest or legitimate, these are, this happen constantly. So, but you know, these are foreign provocateurs. This is in, you know, meddling in our country. So these are foreign provocateurs. This is in meddling in our country. Curfew, lockdown, mandatory searches, everyone's a spy. So that narrative is a very convenient one for people who are authoritarian. I know a lot of people who are Persian, as I'm sure you do as well. Very hardworking, very bright, great people.

Starting point is 01:27:04 And all you could do is hope for a peaceful liberalization of it. But here's the people don't realize how liberal Iran used to be. Andy Warhol, Andy Warhol used to be friends with the Shah. And if you read his diaries, he talks about how he knew things weren't going well for the Shah, because they had less caviar than table. But like this is he was really kind of there's there's I think a four understanding in America. And I'm not sure why of what these liberal Muslim countries are like. I gave a talk in Bodrum and Turkey, which is a resort town in Turkey. And I had thought previous to that, or I had suspected, if push comes to shove

Starting point is 01:27:50 and they have to choose people in Turkey between the West and like Al-Qaeda, not Al-Qaeda, but like, you know, hardcore Islam, they're gonna choose hardcore Islam. You go there and you're like, oh, this is like Los Angeles. Like these people are so liberal, so, and they are the first to be killed.

Starting point is 01:28:06 They're the first targets. So that people like that in Iran are who my thoughts are. And with the, I gotta tell you, like nothing makes me more of a feminist than seeing the women in countries like this fight for the rights of education, the right to dress as they please. Maybe we don't need them driving, but you know, that's okay. There he is with that characteristic brilliant humor that you're so loved for.

Starting point is 01:28:36 I should probably be banned for on Twitter. I'm doing my best every time you tweet, I just report, report, report, report. Please stop this man. You don't have like a script. Exactly. Well, it's funny enough I do. But I don't, I don't abuse my power. I wear the ring like Frodo and I respect the power. But you look like Gollum.

Starting point is 01:29:02 It's not what your mom said last night. She said you're hung like Golem. I'm not going down that road with you. I'm not holding hands one another time. I learned my fume once. Okay. My close childhood friend is from Iran. Oh, wow.

Starting point is 01:29:23 Okay. And I talked to him a lot. I wanted to go to Iran. But it's so far away. I can see it from my house, my friend. I would love to take that trip, even now. It's just culturally, so all the different little pockets of local cultures

Starting point is 01:29:44 that make up Iran. I just heard so many amazing things. Yeah, my friend Paul went there, he had an amazing time. And he just absolutely loved it. He loved it. People were awesome. It was so interesting, very developed.

Starting point is 01:29:56 Just like, Tehran is, I mean, this is the history and Tehran is insane. Yeah. I would really love to visit. Now we return back. I don't know how we ended up in Iran. But let us let us throw back to uh to Stalin taking power. What role did the suppression of speech? The censorship, the suppression of the the freedom of the press have in um Stalin taking hold taking power in Lenin and Trotsky in Stalin taking hold, taking power.

Starting point is 01:30:25 In Lenin, in Trotsky, in Stalin having power. Well, it was a very useful mechanism to direct public opinion and inform public perspectives and everything. So first of all, there was a lot of news about how great things were, you have a bumper crop here, grains never better. There's another anecdote where President Colleenian

Starting point is 01:30:49 is talking about how on Karl Marx Street in Karkiv, there's all sorts of new skyscrapers being built and it's just absolutely amazing. And some of the audience gets up and goes, come, Brad, I work on Karl Marx Street. I walk there every day. There's none of these skyscrapers. It goes, see, that's your work on Karl Marx street. I walk there every day. There's none of these skyscrapers. It goes, see, that's your problem. You're trusting your eyes instead of

Starting point is 01:31:08 reading something and learning what's in the papers. So there was this kind of disconnect between, you know, I forgot, you probably know the joke, like, propped in your propped, these vies, these vies, they're like, propped, it means truth, but there's no truth to be had in propped is like, kind of the Russian line. The point is it very much and the other thing, this is, you know, my mom wasn't particularly politically motivated, but she talked about how you didn't have to be smart to realize how dishonest it was because one day someone is the great hero of the Soviet people. And the next week, he's been a trader and a class enemy and the worst. And then sometimes they reverted. And it's like, okay,

Starting point is 01:31:51 like they couldn't even keep their their story straight. And in fact, at a certain point when they, you know, Gorbachev liberalized, they had to cancel tests because the history books had to be rewritten so quickly. So, and the thing that also with these newspapers is there was a lot of, it was very monotonous, because you know, you had the same message over and over. A lot of these papers were about kind of speaking to the lowest common denominator. Stalin's great. Everything's great. Overseas bad.

Starting point is 01:32:21 So it, it, it, very much was about not informing but creating a certain perspective in the public at large. And also you were educated as a citizen on what you're supposed to think and say. So you have a lot of this was this kind of private truth public lies situation. So you could read the paper and at your factory, you could be like, oh my god, this guy Carl Raddick's great. He's like, oh my god, yeah, he's amazing. You know what to talk about? And you knew how to look at it as well. And then when you get home, you could just kind of be more honest with family. But the question is, to which degree does this propaganda and this ideology infiltrate your actual thinking?

Starting point is 01:33:07 You give examples of the scientists in infiltrated science? Oh, yeah. So basically, you know, Lysenko is the textbook example of Lysenkoism in biology. So because Marxism is materialist, they didn't like the idea that genes pass on, you know, from one generation to the next. So, Lysenkoism kind of was a rejection of Mendel and that kind of genetics. And if you reject genes, you're really going in a bad direction in terms of biology, the Soviet Union's biological program became an international laughing stock. At one point, Lysenko claimed he crossed the tomato and a potato. You had things where they said they had nuclear, which, wait, we have fish in, but they said they invented fusion or hard or heavy water or hard water. It was point being in cultures like this,

Starting point is 01:33:59 your way to achieve status wasn't necessarily about your accomplishments, but about your loyalty to orthodoxy. So if you were saying things that got to a result that was congruent with the broader ideologies as a whole, that was much better as a means of furthering yourself in the arts or in the sciences than if you had something that was innovative, because if you're innovative, it's like, well, how do I fit the sin with the broader ruling ideology? The problem with totalitarianism, one of the many problems, is everything, literally everything has to be perceived through the lens of ideology.

Starting point is 01:34:39 And that is, you know, there were scientists who were arrested or at least fired because of their theories about sunspot developments because it was regarded as unmarxist. There was an epidemic and all these horses got sick and because the vaccine didn't work on the horses, the bacteriologists were arrested because they were regarded as records. It's like, we gave you a job, you didn't do it. You're undermining the socialist state. So it's kind of a backward series of incentives and it's designed to maintain at all costs the ruling ideological superstructure.

Starting point is 01:35:15 But you draw a small distinction between the ideology and the ideological superstructure and the propaganda aren't those kind of intermixed together? Well, the ideological is like in the sciences and what's true in genetics or what's true in astronomy, that doesn't really percolate out to the masses, right? So the provd is not, is maybe covering this scientist is great or these discoveries are great,

Starting point is 01:35:34 but it's not necessarily the same as day to day or glorifying political leaders. But the provd is a manifestation of the idea that truth can be conjured up. Yes, you can be constructed and it can be altered quickly. And then I just, I wonder, so 1984 caricatures that I wanted to a degree it really could control the way you think, that, like how many people it affected. I can give you an example, a very easy one.

Starting point is 01:36:03 So again, with, with regarding North Korea, Kim, the great leader Kim Il Sung, who was the founder of North Korea, had a tumor on the back of his neck. And it was too close to the skull of the sky, the spinal column, so they couldn't operate on it. And throughout his life, it got bigger and bigger. And I got mixed messages in my research about whether North Koreans knew about it because they always photographed them from this angle. And I met a refugee. And I asked her, like, did you know that he had this tumor? She goes, yeah, yeah. When people played him in the movies, they would, you know, make up there. And she goes, it was an old war injury. And I go, why would a war injury get bigger throughout your life? And she just stood there.

Starting point is 01:36:45 And she was like, holy, but she never questioned it. But it was the kind of thing where they put the idea in her head. And since there's no reason to question it, she just kind of went with it her entire life until I talked to her. Audrey, here's a name. Hi, Audrey. Hi, Audrey. I wonder what percent of the population is like that.

Starting point is 01:37:02 Here's the thing. If there's a cost to me questioning, Lysenko is a great scientist, and there's no benefit, why wouldn't I just go with what's going to keep me my family safe? But I also mean just the psychological, there might be a very local psychological cost. I'm not a cost you go to jail,

Starting point is 01:37:23 but a cost like you're gonna kind of ruin the conversation by bringing it up, kind of like. Yeah. I don't, I'm just trying to. It's like Debbie Downer, right? Wamp Wamp. Yeah. But there's also the whole metaphor of like

Starting point is 01:37:36 there's two fish in the river. And one says, man, the water is really great today. And the other one goes, what's water? Like a friend of mine, Adriana, her mom came to the West and they went to supermarket and the mom just in front of all the phanta. The sense, so it's just crying. Actually, what's going on? She goes, they told us we had more food than you. And when something is, you can, it's, you can underthink this story. This guy is an enemy of the people. He was the hero. he just offended someone,

Starting point is 01:38:05 this is bullshit. It's almost impossible psychologically to think I'm living in the Truman show, and that everything in the media is not just wrong, but a carefully constructed narrative and a lie. Like what they're never gonna tell the truth, and how you know, like what? Like, and even if you do understand that and how you know like what like you and even if that

Starting point is 01:38:25 Even if you do understand that how would you even read between the lines to deduce what the truth is? Yeah, it's a must have been a strange experience. There's stories of soldiers the red army soldiers Throughout World War II as they go to different countries even Romania, but in Europe To just to understand that people live much better in Europe, to understand that people live much better than the soldiers did back in the Soviet Union. That's why a lot of times when they went back, Stalin had them killed because they saw too much or sent to the camps. Just a link around this idea of free speech.

Starting point is 01:38:58 There's constant discussion about free speech and this modern debate about social media and all that kind of stuff. What's your take on it? Grounding it not in some kind of shallow discussion of free speech we have today, but more in the context of prada and the suppression of speech in Stalinist Russia. I hate the term free speech because it's used in many different contexts.

Starting point is 01:39:27 Some I agree with entirely some of my disgruth at all. I don't think everyone has something to say or some of the other conversation. And I have my local community and it used to be, I think the boilerplate language is come support free speech and free discourse and I change that because I don't like that term. Because people will tell you, with some reason

Starting point is 01:39:54 that if you block me on Twitter, you're voiding my free speech. It's like, okay. So I don't like that term as a whole. But one of the points of the white pill and something I see enormous parallels with today, if you have one news outlet or three news outlets with identical ideology, you're not going to be able to get to any kind of truth or any kind of useful information.

Starting point is 01:40:21 It's all going to be pre-filted for you It's like a baby bird, and you're eating the mother birds vomit, right? But if you have what we have increasing now with technology, if you have a world where everyone has a camera on their phone, if you have a world where anyone can put their ideas out there, maybe they're banned from certain outlets, but they're not literally vanished like they were in the USSR, certain outlets, but they're not literally vanished like they were in the USSR. That is very healthy. That is something I'm in a room to see supportive of because back in the day, if you only have the TV crews with cameras, you can only see what they're capturing and they could edit it.

Starting point is 01:40:58 Whereas now we saw this recently during COVID, right? You had these reporters with masks on, and they're talking, but the cameraman wasn't wearing a mask. So you'd have the people in the street being like, look, they don't believe it. Or as soon as they would start filming, the guy took the mask off, and they'd film them.

Starting point is 01:41:17 They go, you are lying. You don't believe this, you're putting this on for some purpose, whether you're leaving the thickest of masks or not, that person clearly does not is only putting on for show purpose, whether you're leaving the thick of sea of mass or not, that person clearly does not is only putting on for show. So that's, or crimes. It's people, you know, are anti-police. They say, okay, the cops said this,

Starting point is 01:41:34 did he draw the gun in this guy, necessarily so and and so forth. It is so much better when everyone has access to as much of the information as possible and can make that informed decision themselves. Now, there certainly is space for informed people to be like, no, no, no, no, no, this isn't what it looks like. If you look here, if you look there,

Starting point is 01:41:54 it's cropped here, so on and so forth. But that's still much more useful than just having that 22nd clip that someone has decided to edit for you. So like truth has a way of, because everything is so interconnected, truth no matter what has a way of finding its way to the populace.

Starting point is 01:42:12 And also there's a big asymmetry in terms of trust. So if I tell you 100 truths and one lie, that lie is equal, I'm screwed. Cause once you catch me and like, you don't have to kill someone every day to be a murderer, right? and one lie, that lie is equal, I'm screwed. Cause once you catch me in a, like, you don't have to kill someone every day to be a murderer, right? You only have to do it once.

Starting point is 01:42:30 So if you catch me in a brazen lie, you're gonna look at everything I say after that with an enormous grain of salt. So that is another big asymmetry in favor of truth. If someone trusts you, you have to be honest all the time and you're gonna make mistakes, you can own those mistakes.. We're like, Hey, this is why I made the mistake. This why I said such and such. Okay, but the flip side of that, which has been disheartening to me, is that people on the conspiracy side, conspiracy theory side of things, I've noticed

Starting point is 01:43:00 how easy it is to just call something a lie. Yes. And then that becomes viral. For some reason, there's a desire for people, yeah, for anyone who points out that the emperor is not wearing a clothes, even when the emperor is fully clothed. So I don't know what that is, but that really seems to mess with this truth mechanism. So when it becomes viral to call people a liar, whether they're a liar or not, it's like,

Starting point is 01:43:25 I'm feel, you feel like an unstable ground because to me, that idea of revealing a lie that somebody told is a really powerful mechanism to keep people honest. But when you're like misusing a crying wolf too much, it seems to break the system. Makes me nervous because there's also like a... Well, just if someone is a liar, that doesn't mean literally everything they say is a lie. No, but what is a lie and what isn't? I just noticed that there's money to be made

Starting point is 01:43:53 in calling out something as a lie. It's just the conspiracy theories. Straight up, the first thing, some traumatic event happened, given explanation, that's not the mainstream explanation. No matter what, whether it's true or lie, there's a lot of virality and money to be made in that. And that makes me nervous, because it doesn't matter if it's true or not, it becomes anti-establishment

Starting point is 01:44:20 ideas are viral, whether they're true or not. Sure, but I think establishment ideas are powerful whether they are true or not. So I think, on the whole, I think you're right. And the whole, it's good to test the power centers, but it just makes me nervous in our attention economy that the sexy thing seems to be the anti-establishment message. And then it feels like that becomes a drug where you, everything, anything the establishment says, anything institution say,

Starting point is 01:44:54 anything the mainstream says must be wrong because it comes from the mainstream. I have that line that you're supposed to take one red pill, not the whole bottle. I am certainly one of those people who is of the idea that they are dishonest, far more open than they're honest. That said, there are people who are of the belief,

Starting point is 01:45:13 using extreme example, that Trump is still the shadow president. And there's going to be these QAnon mass arrests. I thought this was something that the daily beast made up to make fun of MAGA, but I was just in the phone with my buddy last night and he was like, no, no, if you go to TROAT Central, they're like all over there. And if you disagree with them, they call you controlled opposition or a grifter or so on and so forth.

Starting point is 01:45:36 Is that unfortunate or where? TROAT Central, Trump's social media outlet. Oh, truth sent. No, truth. We have a heat. He forgot the name of it himself. So he's like, oh, I have to create the joke. You got to explain the jokes. I've got to explain the jokes. You do like the way Twitter puts that context.

Starting point is 01:45:52 You got to do the joke and then pause and explain it. And like turn to the camera and explain it. And have a laugh track. Yes, the people know where the joke is. Sorry, that's how that's real humor. Yeah. So we, and then we just clap and everyone and then everybody clap um I think for the last two years Especially visa be covid

Starting point is 01:46:10 the overwhelming message was The experts know what they're talking about and if you are questioning this you're a vax denier and you basically should be read out of polite society and one obvious counter example to this was social distancing. If social distancing was efficacious, why were there no attempts ever to bring it back, right, when you had different waves? And if it wasn't efficacious, why was it so insistent that we do it all do it at the very beginning? In fact, in many places, you'll still see the signs on the floor where it's six feet apart. So there's an incongruity there. And I think we are forgetting, as a people, the intensity, and understandably to some extent,

Starting point is 01:46:52 if you have this worldwide deadly plague, like it's going to be, go where the leaky-est hole is. So you really got to kind of get everyone on board. But to the, the vehement with which we're told, we know what we're doing. This is the way to solve it. If you don't do it, you're causing mass death. That I think fed in very heavily to people's enormous sense of skepticism toward establishment sources. Speaking of the plague, you opened the book with the quote from Camus. It's a strong, strong quote.

Starting point is 01:47:23 Camus brings me to tears and it funny, because I reread the myth of Cicifis, which I had been recommending to people, and like this book isn't that good, but he's got his ethos is my favorite of all the philosophers. It sounds like the myth of Cicifis was a myth. He says, After I, cute. All I maintain is that on this earth,

Starting point is 01:47:43 there are plagues and there are victims, and it's up to us so far as possible not to join forces with the plagues. And why I have that as the introductory quote to the book is I think morality and ethics are very, very complicated subjects. There's lots of gray areas where you don't know which way to choose. But at a base level, he has another quote that's described to him he never actually said. But something about, you know, is the duty of thinking people not to be on the side of the executioners. If you are, we should do whatever we can, not to have blood on our hands, not to be murderers, not to want death. And that in and of itself is a big pill for a lot of people to swallow. We're all brought up, taught that war is a last resort.

Starting point is 01:48:35 And yet when it comes to international affairs, it's always often a first priority. And people are championing it the bit to start going in and killing people. And what war means isn't good guy soldiers versus bad guy soldiers. My concern is always with the civilians, with the kids who become orphans, with the wives who become widows and things like that. And then communities which are ruined forever. So I love that quote of his. I think he's, I mean, the book started. It was going to be a recontextualization of Kamu's thought.

Starting point is 01:49:08 I was going to rip off my old buddy Ryan Holiday, what he did with the Stoics and do about Kamu. And then when I started rereading Kamu, I'm like, oh, I've read more into him than is really there. And then it went into whole other direction. So you wanted to do almost like an existentialist manifesto. So like, you might want to, you must imagine Suspice happy. Well, more like Camus for today and what his philosophy can teach us, like Ryan did with his many books.

Starting point is 01:49:36 About the Stoics. Yeah. And it was going to be called the Point of Tears. Live to the Point of Tears. Yes, but the title was giving the point of tears. No, I know, but that's from that line. Man, that's a good line, right? He has so many good lines.

Starting point is 01:49:50 Yeah. Maybe it's not about a shitty and bad though, right? Well, no, he was a big, he was a big lethario. He was pretty good. What's the good thing? He got around. What, what percent of the audience of humans on earth do you think know the the word

Starting point is 01:50:05 lethario? What percent of them have a computer look it up? Lethario it's not some weird term. Lethario LOTH ARIO lethario lethario a man who behaves selfishly in a response to being his sexual relationships with women they're seduced by a handsome in quotes they're seduced by a handsome lethario who gains control of their financial affairs. Oh, I didn't think I always thought of his more as just someone who's like a stud, like a player, but no, yeah, player. Yeah, there's a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, um, although I and Rand would be proud selfishly.

Starting point is 01:50:45 Well, no, she wouldn't like that kind of selfishness. That's the case. A man who behaves selfishly and irresponsibly in his sexual relationships with women, huh? Yeah, okay. So he was, he was just a player. No, no, maybe I, maybe I stood. I don't think he was promiscuous particularly.

Starting point is 01:51:03 Nietzsche didn't get, he got, he didn't never got laid, right? He was a prostitute. He died of syphilis. Like the pro, it was from prostitute. Was it? Okay. Possibly. No, you're asking me like, I knew the guy.

Starting point is 01:51:12 I heard it's from, he never had a deep, loving, fulfilling relationship. He had a very skewed understanding on the way he wrote about women. Although somebody wrote to me and said that's a mischaracterization that he was actually very respectful with. Yeah, but he had that line if you're going before women, bring a whip. Wasn't that him or that show up on that? If I were to quote you from your Twitter, I think I could make a very convincing argument that you're a sexist, racist, and probably a Nazi.

Starting point is 01:51:41 Well, I do own like some of Hitler's stuff, exactly. I got the, I rest my case. I feel like I'm a Nuremberg. I'm gonna be hung by his own tie. This isn't a tie, it's a noose. You should have thought about that. We were saying all those things. Okay.

Starting point is 01:52:04 What do you think of the leak of the Twitter files? I was so happy that Elon gave the information to Matt Taibi and Barry Weiss who are both by any metric lefties, who are both professional journalists of long standing with great resumes. And overnight now they're doing PR for the world, which is all the way to the party line was. The fact that you had all these corporate journalists now have any play catch up and not having control

Starting point is 01:52:41 of the microphone to me was just absolutely amazing. I think transparency is what brought down in many aspects of Soviet Union and what will bring down what negative aspects of the regime we have here. When you see the machinations behind the scenes and then when you see the rationalizations after the fact, you realize, oh, these people are not acting in good faith. The fact that, for example, the New York Post article about the Hunter Biden laptop and how the New York Times covered it as well, they didn't mention any kind of dick pics, Twitter made it so I couldn't even DM you the link to the New York Post article, which was a tool they had previously

Starting point is 01:53:25 used only to prevent child pornography. So that shows to what extent they were willing to put their thumb on the scale. But it also shows that for any layman, when they're looking at this to realize what you are perceiving as news or information is very much sculpted edited and guided by powerful people who have a vested interest in maintaining their Power I think to me the important lesson is this not a left the right thing. Oh, not at all And you can be powerless. Yes, And but and also the important lesson there

Starting point is 01:54:06 I think at least in the case of Twitter in our society. It's a it's a slippery slope. You don't get there overnight You start you start using those tools a little bit a little bit to slow down this information to just a little bit that you start sending emails to each other a little bit and it becomes more and more, you start forming justifications, you're still getting a little more and more comfortable kind of talking about the stuff. I think there are several ways to fight that. One is having hardcore integrity up front. So don't even open the door.

Starting point is 01:54:43 But I think realistically human nature is what it is. And so I think the only way is to transparency is this is why the nice, I hate the fact that I got politicized. I really hate that the right has have run with it like look, the left is planning the rig elections and so on. To me, it shouldn't be left the right shouldn't be about politics, it's that transparency is good. Other companies should do the same. Facebook should do the same. In fact, that transparency will protect Facebook. It will protect Google. Look, this is our situation. Tell us what to do, and we'll do our best. I remember when I was writing the new right, Twitter's line was, we're not going to tell you guys what the metrics are by which

Starting point is 01:55:26 we ban or censor people because then bad actors are going to navigate around them. And it's like, what are you doing? Like just tell people in any establishment, what are the rules for which behavior is permissible? If I go to a store, if I return the sweater, is it cashback? No refunds or if I get store credit, you know what I mean? So that they were having this place which is presented as a huge international space for public discourse and they're not telling you ahead of time, this is what we will tolerate. This is what we'll warn you about. This is what will kick you out overnight. That to me was crazy and outrageous. And I'm really pleased

Starting point is 01:56:07 with, to what extent Elon is, like, is being open with their policies. And what I really want to commend him about is, uh, uh, now I'm triggered because one of the things that he took over, he's like, our first priority is getting with a child pornography and child exploitation. Yeah, yeah. That was, he's like, racial slurs, homophobic slurs, anti-Semitic slurs, yeah, yeah, that's cool. Kids getting harmed is number one.

Starting point is 01:56:37 And he fired the old task force because they weren't doing their job. Eliza Blue, who you know, she had been on this for a long time, but people who are victims of child pornography, child exploitation, were emailing Twitter, being like, these are my images, get them off. They're like, too bad, porn is allowed on Twitter. He starts trying to crack down on it. This is a very hard problem because these bad actors have mechanisms to evade, you know, being banned. They want to get there for lack of a better term product out there.

Starting point is 01:57:06 Forbes magazine, who is an agent of the devil, had a tweet, and they tweeted this nine times, you know, now that Elon's here, Twitter's child porn nightmare has gotten much worse. They tweet this nine times. I looked up, anyone listening, this can look up, look at Forbes and do a search. They never mentioned this problem before. So now that, you could, anyone listening, this can look up, look at Forbes and do a search. They never mentioned this problem before. So now that Elon is doing something about it,

Starting point is 01:57:29 now it's a problem for you. No, it's a problem. Elon's the problem. It's not the child porn that you guys had a problem with. And that to me is like, yeah, I understand that you think that Elon is a bad guy because he's upset your apple cart. This isn't a political issue. This isn't a gotcha moment. This is all right. Here are some tips. We talked to 10 experts, digital experts, and here are some techniques, Mr. Musk, that you might want to take from us free of charge that will help you solve this. That would be a great article. And I just want to use this opportunity to say quite clearly and strongly that even though Twitter and other parts of the internet are interpreting some of my statements to me

Starting point is 01:58:11 and I'm right in this case, meaning leaning right, right wing. And in other cases, leaning left, left wing, I'm not. I'm a political or at least I tried to be in my thinking, take one issue at a time. I do take an opinion on each issue at a time, but I hate camps. I try to avoid political camps in general. It's just, it sucks that promoting transparency, in this case, or celebrating transparency,

Starting point is 01:58:38 is somehow connected to being right-wing. No, it's being made into, so I've supposed euphemism for being right wing. No, it's being made into a supposed euphemism for being right wing. It sucks. It sucks, even though I'm wearing a red suit. And this is a very red themed conversation. Well, I mean, the revolution was the color of blood. I'm just going to let it sit on that for a second. Okay. You mentioned New York Times bestseller list. You chose to self publish. Yes.

Starting point is 01:59:14 So we just linger on that decision. What are the pros and cons of self publishing? The cons are, it is acceptable in our current business climate or cultural climate for corporate media outlets to pretend the book doesn't exist. So basically, and there's reason for it. I can make the case of them pretty easily. If someone's doing it themselves, who is this guy? Is this some crackpot writing crazy stuff from his basement, right? It's a little different, I think, for me, because I'm an established author. C-SPAN gave me an hour on book TV. Still crack, but yeah, I've established for dear reader. I think I was the first one to get an hour on book TV for a book that I did myself. So there is space for that. It didn't go through

Starting point is 01:59:58 a vetting process the way a book going through a corporate publisher did. So those are the minuses. The pros are, I can drop it and publish it immediately. If you go through a corporate publisher, you have to wait a year. You can do what you could have the book you want instead of getting past the editor. And some editors are very, very good. And there's a whole spectrum. Some of them not so good. Some are good. Some of them not so. I know the best. The real killers.

Starting point is 02:00:29 All right, let's be that is good people on both sides. Yeah, there's funny good people both sides. And I don't mean the white nationalist who I condemn totally. So but the thing is in terms of money, you get six times as much profit when you self published and when you go publish, then you go through corporate publisher. The buck stops here. It's in one of my books that I co-authored, I won't even mention the name.

Starting point is 02:00:52 There is a typo, and they don't care. They didn't fix it for the paperback edition. Here, since I'm going through Amazon, if there's a typo, I can fix it live and it updates. Oh, yeah. You can just update it. Yeah. So that's very useful. You feel like a fight club thing where you can insert like a dick pick in one of the pages.

Starting point is 02:01:10 Okay, why are you so, why do you keep texting me to send you dick picks? I didn't know. Talk about North Paul. You're right, all right. All right, get it. I'm not the editor. I get it.

Starting point is 02:01:19 North Paul, I get it. Yeah. Yeah. The other advantage just socially is I think people are like I found this with the Kickstarter I did for dear reader. People are much more excited to buy it and promote it and talk about it when they know you're doing it yourself. Instead of you're getting a big check from, you know, St. Martin's hyper Collins penguin or whatever. Are you also trying to use some kind of service to get a distributed to bookstores or you just

Starting point is 02:01:46 go to do Amazon? No, just Amazon. Yeah. And that's probably where most sales happen. The vast majority, yeah. So it's not going to be in bookstores. So how difficult is the process of getting it on Amazon? So I'll tell you a funny story about how Amazon works. And because this was a, I always planned for because everyone People's here's another piece of advice. I will give people your life will be a lot easier if you realize that the majority of people in every industry About other jobs like once you have that realization everything else makes sense and you your life will be a lot easier Right, so when I did the anarchist handbook, which was a collection of essays from various anarchists throughout history So when I did the anarchist handbook, which was a collection of essays from various anarchists throughout history, when I submitted it to Amazon, there was a lot of copyright issues.

Starting point is 02:02:30 Because they're like, do you have the rights to this essay? Do you have the rights to this essay? It has to go back and forth them a lot to make sure I had copyright or everything was public domain. And the thing is, you forward, you know, you update it, you get the information three days. There's another problem, So that three days. So it's weeks. The other thing with their create space program is the paperback and the ebook, the Kindle

Starting point is 02:02:54 are approved independently. So just because it's approved for once, not approved the other after I published Amherst Kishan book and it was a big success, they unleashed, enrolled, excuse me, a hardcover edition program. So I'm like, oh, great, I'll put in hardcover. They're like, sorry, this is too similar to Murray Rothbard's Anatomy Estate, which is a pamphlet or short book that Murray Rothbard wrote. I go, well, wait, I have the entirety of an anime estate in here.

Starting point is 02:03:24 I have permission from the Mises Institute in writing, which I'm giving to you to reprint it. And you guys already have been published for a year as a paperback and ebook. And they're like too bad, blocked. So it's not available as a hardcover on Amazon, even though it's available. Maybe now it's going to be pulled as paperback and ebook. So with this book, I was anticipating, all right, there's going to be some whatever. The thing with how it works is you have to upload it and hit publish, and then you got to wait

Starting point is 02:03:53 for the approval. I'm like, okay, this is going to be who knows. I just wanted to get as fast as possible. 4 a.m. Less than 24 hours, I get a notification. Congratulations, your book's available for sale. And after rundown stairs and pull it from publication because otherwise it was out and I didn't finish editing it. So that's the situation there. Oh, that's fascinating. But that's like powerful. That's like your it's all in your hands. It's all on you. Yes. And I think the program is great. It charts just like any other book. The quality of the books is great. I am very happy with. I have no, I have no contact with them. My buddy Tucker Maxx, he had a company that did this and they basically help people sell, push their own book. They did the dog and book. I think you've talked to him, haven't you?

Starting point is 02:04:41 Yeah. Or yeah, maybe the email near some. Yeah. Yeah. I think you've talked to him, haven't you? Or, yeah, maybe the email near something. Yeah, yeah. And he said, I have done dozens, maybe hundreds of books with them. I have never been able to get someone on the phone. So I don't know what's going on over there, but guys,

Starting point is 02:04:54 if you want to reach out to me, please call me. It's Michael at lexfreedman.com. And Freedman is spelled wrong. Yeah. If you ever have any complaints, please just add me a Twitter about Michael. No. Why do you think so few established authors self-publish? I mean, why it seems like it makes perfect sense

Starting point is 02:05:24 in this modern society to be able to when you finish the book to publish it within a few days, a few weeks. I think I talked to Jordan Peterson about this at length. And Michaela, his daughter, who I'm also a good friends with, she's actually named after Gorbachev, who's the big hero of this book. Also, friend. Michaela, you know, I was in talks to interview Gorbachev and then COVID hit. And that's one of the big regrets of my life that I didn't get. I think if I met him, I would be on my knees, literally kissing his feet, crying, because of you know, I mean, one of the big points of the White Pill is there were so many moments when they

Starting point is 02:06:03 were calling him up, sending the tanks, we want another TNM square and he's like, fuck you. So when you have anyone who has the capacity to murder, thousands of people and chooses to withhold that power, like all I could do is applaud. He resisted the cynicism. Yes. So the so the authors, why don't publish the book? I think they're still in the... You know how like there's this whole idea of how if you're a movie actor, you don't go on TV because that kind of ruins your brand. So, and that's kind of going away.

Starting point is 02:06:36 There's a lot of shows where the lead is now like a former movie actor and this is kind of like they're a big thing. Like Matthew McConaughey, you know, he had a TV show on HBO, I believe. So I think there's this kind of like, wait a minute. What's that? I need to reset. I said, all right. You see, all right. All right, all right, all right. Matthew McConaughey, all right, all right. I don't know what that is. Sorry. Just explaining what look at the context below. Okay. So I think for them, it might be a loss of credibility to some extent, but they're agent whose job is to sell them

Starting point is 02:07:16 and get a big advance wouldn't be encouraged at the self-published because I don't think it's percolated to powerful people yet how feasible this is and how profitable it is and how they'll still be able to reach their audience. And I feel if, you know, I don't, if Annark is handbook wasn't such a gigantic success, I would be more nervous about the white pill, but the fact that it was and that I saw it from start to finish and I know the ins and outs. Now, like, what do you guys bring to the table so that it's taking a year of my time and introducing edits that I would not otherwise agree with? I think for some people, a book is a, is this sort of beacon of reputation. So, like, so it's really important to not, to somehow not as much reputation associated with a self-published book unless it's successful. Yes.

Starting point is 02:08:06 And then like the, it's success. I'll challenge the actual however it was published. I think David Goggins self-published his book. Because it used to be you self-published when you can't get a book deal. So it's like an admission of failure. Yeah. So you would recommend it as something for authors. No, I would recommend it as something for authors of a certain stature for lack of

Starting point is 02:08:30 better term, because it is still in terms of your resume and your experience, it's better to get a crappy advance and have a book with St. Martin's that goes nowhere than a self-published book that goes nowhere, then a self-published book that goes nowhere. So the other thing is you have to make sure you have enough an audience that you can move some copies. What about only fans? Would you recommend authors? How much money do you think you and I can make if we did like bathtub scenes in only fans? Not just chilling, just reading, like reading like animal farm, just like while sitting in the back. Estality.

Starting point is 02:09:05 I don't know. Okay, snowflake. Snowball, sorry, snowball, okay, snowball. All right. What was his name? Snowball. No, the horse. Boxer.

Starting point is 02:09:19 I'm hung like a boxer. I will work harder. And that guy, I think about that guy a lot. Boxer? I will work harder. I think about that guy a lot. Boxer? Yeah, his model was I will work harder. Anything that happens, like the pigs would take advantage and his response to everything.

Starting point is 02:09:38 He was inspiring to me because he never gave in to the cynicism. Right, and they killed him. Yeah, spoiler, sorry. But that's a good way to die, never gave in to the synesus. Right. And they killed him. Yeah. Spoiler. Sorry. But that's a good way to die. Never giving in. Well, yeah, there's a lot of that in this book about the people who were like, I'm not, you're not going to break me. Like I am bigger than this. Did you ever believe in Santa? I remember the day I woke up on New Year's and there was a precedent under my pillow and it was like holy shit

Starting point is 02:10:10 Because did Maro is left it that's the whole thing he leaves your present under your pillow right? So you believed but what I thought the story was gonna be when you first realized he's not real I don't remember when I realized he wasn't real, but that story was I did think it was real. I was like, oh my god And okay, there's this Because I did too and I remember I don't think I can put myself in the mindset of the kind of person that believed he was real Because what did I think? What was my worldview that allowed? Like a giant person in a red suit to be real

Starting point is 02:10:44 like a giant person in a red suit to be real. Although I do remember, I think the first time a Santa Claus showed up to our, like, lived in this very small apartment, and when you first showed up to our apartment, I just remember it, because he was really drunk and smelled. It was like a party, it was like a New Year's party, or whatever. So one of the people dressed up with Santa Claus, I just remember this, wow, this got like real fast. I remember like thinking, of course, of course it would be,

Starting point is 02:11:15 like what was I thinking? What was I thinking? It was gonna be some perfect, like being, perfect being, like better than, like the best of humanity. He was just a regular dude. Kind of fat, but like not sexy fat. It was not really that jolly and kind of exhausted.

Starting point is 02:11:34 I really have not showered in a while, but also funny. I remember I love telling this story how old I was and I must have been five or six and it was just that age where you Distinguished between what's real and what's not so like Vikings and Knights and ninjas are real and dragons and Mermaids and Alms or fake and I was on the corner of Shore Parkway right before the park in Benzenhurst in Brooklyn and around the corner wearing a denim vest Was a little person a dwarf and I saw him and I was like all right back to the drawing board Like I don't know what's real or not anymore because I just saw a dwarf. So I don't know what's going on and since then Given your relationship with Alex Jones you've continued the journey of not knowing what's real or not.

Starting point is 02:12:26 That's correct. All right, let's talk about the next steps. After Stalin took power, he started to actually implementing some of the economic, some of the policies in this idea of collectivization. Yeah. What's the story of that in the 20s leading into the 30s? What was this idea? What was the relationship between the regime, the ideology and the farmers? Well, there has always been,

Starting point is 02:12:50 and obviously very much this day, an enormous amount of enmity for lack of better term hatred between Ukraine and Russia. I mean, this is centuries in the making, if not more. And the Ukraine or Ukraine now, this is centuries in the making, if not more. And the Ukraine or Ukraine now, but at the time the up seeking the region

Starting point is 02:13:10 is and still is the bread basket of Europe. It was very fertile lands. This is where the food comes from. And this was an issue also for Lenin, as I discussed in the book, because when you had famines there, you have famines throughout what later became the Soviet Union. And the problem is this happened in North Korea as well in the 90s when they don't have

Starting point is 02:13:32 food. If you let in foreigners and feed your people, all of a sudden you as the government are either superfluous or downright, you know, deleterious to their well-being and that's a threat to your power. So Lenin led in an American organization the early 20s, which was actually headed by Herbert Hoover of all people. And after a while, who were left, because he found that the Bolsheviks were just taking the grain that the Americans were given to feed the people and selling it for

Starting point is 02:13:58 export while the people suffered. And one of the people who grew up in these starvation times was a young Michel Gorbachev, where he had, you know, I think it was like a quarter or a third of his village starved to death during one of these periodic famines. Stalin's idea, this was a good mechanism for him to break the idea of Ukraine being an independent nation within its own identity. idea of Ukraine being an independent nation within its own identity. And he had this kind of liquidation of the Kulaks, very famously, which thankfully is much more discussed now than it was maybe when you and I were kids. And a Kulak, the real meaning, or the literal meaning, is this kind of wealthy landowner, right? But very quickly, it's kind of like, it becomes outgroup. So, you know, there was a big incentive to call someone you didn't like a

Starting point is 02:14:52 kulak and then good luck to you because now the eyes of the state are on you and you have to prove that you know you didn't hire people, you didn't have four cows or how many acres or so and so forth. They took a huge percentage of the population, the Kulaks, and they just deported them. These are lands that they had for generations and they just spread them throughout, brought a Russia. Many of them never made it.

Starting point is 02:15:16 And many of them were killed. This was by design. And the dark thing about the Kulaks, like you said, when it becomes abused, when it becomes the, when it becomes the the out group is Kuak is supposed to be wealthier than sort of the general farmer peasant. And so basically it gives you a mechanism of resentment. And nobody that's better off

Starting point is 02:15:39 must be better off because they're Kuak. Let's get rid of them. And it has a just from an economics perspective, even leaving ethics aside, it basically completely de-insensivizes productivity. It wants you to fail, because if you succeed, you're a cool out, you're going to be tortured, you're going to be deported, you're going to be derided all that.

Starting point is 02:16:02 And also your pork as he's rich. Like that's a big part of it So while this was going on and food was becoming a problem because you had you know for weather conditions There was a campaign about oh the reason you're hungry is because the cool ox are hoarded all the grain Yeah, and if you're somewhere else in in the Soviet Union How are you supposed to know any better? Because you're being told every year, the crops are bumper crop, bumper crop, bumper crop.

Starting point is 02:16:29 And now there's no food, there's no bread. And so, you see, we produced all this bread. It's not getting to you, because the kulaks are hoarding the grain. So they came like, and what became known as the Haldemore, and Applebaum, who's a great historian, who unfortunately, I disagree with a, who's a great historian, who, unfortunately, I disagree with a lot in contemporary politics, but who's done so much great work

Starting point is 02:16:50 about the Soviet Union that I pretty much give her a blank check and whatever. She wants to say nowadays, you know, she wrote a great book about this called Red Famine. And these activists descended on these villages like locusts. And their job was to requisition as much food as possible. And they would come back, you know, at all hours of the night to make sure you were hiding food. And this is what was so pernicious about it, your own body would betray you.

Starting point is 02:17:18 They could look at you and see that you're not losing weight, you've got those chubby cheeks. That means you have food. And that's the government's food. That is the food of the people. And if you are keeping food for yourself, you are stealing from the people. You're an enemy of the people, and you deserve whatever comes to you. And it got to a point where they're eating, they didn't have grain to plant for the next harvest. And what was even sicker is, you know, one of the big criticisms of communist of the czar was his internal passport system that I can't go where I want within Russia, the Russian Empire without permission, Stalin introduced this. So if your village was

Starting point is 02:18:00 targeted, you can't leave. Now, some people got away, they tried to get to the cities, it's so and so forth, but you get to the city, and you're starving, you have no clothes. You're a cooluck. I'm hungry because of you, and now you're too lazy to work, get the F out of there. And there were stories, you know, you know, I have them in the white pill

Starting point is 02:18:20 of this like starving teenage girl, and she's begging for food, and the guy knocks the shop keeps knocks the food at her hand and she dies on the spot and everyone in that line knew not to you know give her any food or any sympathy because she's a cool act sympathizer and very quickly if you're a cool act sympathizer all has to happen is someone has to call I think it was the NKVD at the time you know the different name so that the checker the secret police and that to be like oh you, you see, whatever her name was,

Starting point is 02:18:47 Zhenya, she was a Kulak sympathizer. We saw Kulak who was trying to shake us down for food because it was too lazy to work and she felt so bad for them. So you might want to check in on Zhenya. So yeah. But in 32 and 33, all the more. It wasn't just small injustice here and there. It was mass starvation and suffering. Yes, millions starved to death in the Ukraine alone and by design. So you mentioned Ann Applebaum's book, Red Famine, Stan's One Ukraine, but another excellent book on the topic. And by the way, thank you for recommending that to me. So it was her work's amazing.

Starting point is 02:19:30 Yeah, it's a really, really powerful book about not just about Hanumur, but like the context of Ukraine, basically the history of Ukraine that's relevant for today, yeah, to understand, understand the relationship between Russia and Ukraine.

Starting point is 02:19:49 But another great book is Bloodlands Europe between Hitler and Stalin by Timothy Snyder. I don't know. I think you also recommend that to me at some point. Or maybe not. I haven't, but I'm familiar with that, right? So he does quite a bit of his brief, but extremely well researched writing about cannibalism

Starting point is 02:20:06 there. And that it was not uncommon during the Stalin imposed famine in the Soviet Ukraine for parents to cook and eat their children. He writes, quote, survival was a moral as well as a physical struggle. A woman doctor wrote to a friend in June 1933 that she had not yet become a cannibal, but was not sure that it shall not be won by the time my letter reaches you." The good people died first.

Starting point is 02:20:31 Those who refused to steal or to prostitute themselves died. Those who gave food to others died. Those who refused to eat corpses died. Those who refused to kill their fellow man died. Parents who resisted cannibalism died before their children did, and their stories in there about, um, yeah, cooking, cooking your children. Uh, the, the other thing about cannibalism, about famine in general that stood out to me that unlike a lot of atrocities is,ities is the people that are starving are exhausted.

Starting point is 02:21:07 They're basically unable to think. So they don't even have the energy to protest. It's a strange kind of way to kill thinking in the populace. That it kind of, I suppose it was obvious, but there's something fundamental about starvation where it slowly removes your humanity. Yeah, there was a scene in the book where a lot of times people literally go crazy and there's a scene where a mom in some train station was nursing her kid you know, going mad from hunger and she starts being the crap out of her baby and kicking it and then she just reverts to normal like nothing had happened.

Starting point is 02:21:51 Yeah, madness. Like, yeah, you lose, yeah, you lose your mind. Yeah, and I mean, I don't know what the physiological cause of this. It's not, I think it's, you know, if someone is dealt with a glycogen depletion, it affects their mood, things like that. So taking to an extreme who knows what happens when parts of the brain start functioning and start imploding. But yeah, it's, um, what I want, what just happened, this is something

Starting point is 02:22:17 that's really cool regarding the holiday more. So there was one Western journalist, Garith Jones, who was like, all right, something's not adding up here. So he was supposed to take a train through Ukraine, and he got out early and decided to start walking through the countryside to go from village to village. And I'll get to his story in a minute. Right before we started recording, I got

Starting point is 02:22:47 this book in the mail. I ordered on November 28th from Great Britain. It was the only copy available on the whole internet. It's called Experiences in Russian 1931. It is anonymous. And it's, uh, Gareth Jones wrote the introduction. It was published by the Alton Press in Pittsburgh. It was self-published. And, see, just says forward, it just says by the author. So, it was the author who went alongside Gareth Jones was summoned by the name of Henry John Heins who was heir to the Heins fortune. And you only know that if you start looking the internet, because his name's not anywhere in this book, well, I opened this book up right when I got it

Starting point is 02:23:35 right before we're taping and it's signed by him. And it took me a second. I'm like, wait a minute, who is this signed by? And it's H.J. Heins, because his name was Jack Heins, but it was Henry John Heins. From, so this second. I'm like, wait a minute, who's the sign by? And it's H. J. Heinz, because his name was Jack Heinz, but it was Henry John Heinz from, so this is, I'm very excited that I had this little miracle in the mail. Um, Christmas miracle. It's a Christmas miracle. Um, they traveled, they traveled together. They traveled together. So this book's a diary of their travels. What do you think so few journalists? They was able to do what he did. So there were

Starting point is 02:24:03 several reasons. First of all, if you were a Western journalist in the Soviet Union, you were under very strict circumstances. First of all, you could be deported at any time. You had no, there was no pretense that you have a right to be a journalist in, as especially as a representative of a capitalist by which they met Western paper. Second, it was a complete nightmare getting your articles filed because you had a sensor that you had to go through

Starting point is 02:24:31 and the sensor's job, whose life depended on it, was to make sure that your story was advantageous to the Soviet Union or at least neutral and they had all sorts of techniques. You know, they could spot, they spot on you all the time, they filed you around because you know, you're a foreigner. But also that sensor has answered somebody.

Starting point is 02:24:48 So all the sensor has to do is be like, look, I, having trouble with my supervisor and the reporter could be like, look, can I talk to supervisor? It's like, well, I'm sorry, that's not possible. And he's on deadline, but it's too bad bureaucracy doesn't recognize the needs of deadlines. No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no through what are you supposed to do? I think human beings are naturally, and also a lot of these journalists were prosovian. They thought this is the society of the future, at least everyone's trying to make it a better country for everyone, not like back home, with a poor slip between the cracks. We got to do what we can to make this work. And, you know, there was a lot of,

Starting point is 02:25:51 I don't wanna say conspiracy, but within the industry, there was a consensus that the Stalin was the good guy, and we were, if not the bad guys, certainly not as good in certain regards. So, when this news of the famine started percolating all the other Western journalists besides Garrett Jones and Mocka Muggridge were saying this isn't true. It's nothing that they haven't seen before. The paper that took the

Starting point is 02:26:17 lead in this was New York Times with their guy Walter Duranty who would previously want a Pulitzer and had interviewed Stalin, which is an enormously rare honor for a westerner. And he, because he had so much experience covering Russia and the Soviet Union, he basically took the lead, and other people followed his lead. He was kind of the dean of the press corps in Russia. And he made a point, and the thing, there's so many quotes I have from him, where he's not only denying that this mass starvation is happening, he's also going after journalists who are questioning the narrative, and he says things like, look, this is nothing that

Starting point is 02:26:56 the Russians haven't experienced before, they're simply tightening their belts. And it's like, you only have to tighten your belt when you don't have enough food, it's not like they started a new exercise regimen and now their body fat's dropping. That's why would someone tighten their belt. So that was one. And there were the New York Times at a 13 page article, big headline, Russians hungry, not starving. And he went after Jones, he went after Mugrage, I believe.

Starting point is 02:27:25 No, he did go after Mugrage, but the point being that this is just propaganda from people who want the Soviet Union to fail. They don't understand what they're building here. He had so many excuses like, oh, the reason all these Russians are supposedly leaving their villages to go to the cities isn't because there's no food. It's because they're nomadic, it's tradition, they go from town to town looking for new experiences. And it's just, at a certain point,

Starting point is 02:27:51 and I think it was 1941, where he was eventually like, or 51, rather. I don't remember, he was like, oh, well, I guess I was kind of wrong. And it's like, he's like, any journalist worth his salt can admit when he's wrong. And it's like, well, were you worth your salt? Because you sure, he explicitly said,

Starting point is 02:28:10 there's no point in sending out journalists look for themselves. I've been through the countryside and everyone's fine. And it's just that the loudest people are making noise, whereas everyone else is doing the work and, you know, trying, and, and this isn't about famine, but it's about Western skeptical about collectivization, which is just simply a new way of farming. And yeah, it wasn't a new way of farming, and there's results were by design, and also

Starting point is 02:28:34 accidentally absolutely catastrophic. How hard was it to see the truth at that time, do you think? Do you think that was a mistake that's understandable to make as a journalist? If my job as a journalist, I have two bosses, if I'm in Moscow, I've got my reporter in New York or London or whatever, but I've got my sensor here, and he is making sure I have a house, the department, he makes sure I have food, he makes sure I have access to, the department. Yeah. He makes sure I have food.

Starting point is 02:29:06 He makes sure I have access to dignitaries. He's my lifeline. If I piss him off, I'm on the next plane out of town. So that is that enough to slowly suffocate the integrity of a journalist? I don't think it was slow at all and it was clearly enough. And because what are they going to do? That's a good with that. I just, I think the failure of integrity has to come from the New York on the New York, on the American side,

Starting point is 02:29:35 that it's just the flock of fish or whatever that all move in the same narrative. Right. I think journalists Would like to be the kind of people that have integrity So if they are conscious of sacrificing their own integrity They wouldn't do it if they're conscious of an act that's doing it. They wouldn't do it So it has to happen like a lobster slowly boiling No, I think it happens when everyone else is it's a it's a Greek chorus, right? It's a chorus, but that's exactly the, that's right. So it's not about the act, but they will, I mean,

Starting point is 02:30:09 I've talked to you know, journalists where I get the sense that they will sell their soul for access. Cause that's their job. Is it though? Cause what they do, what journalists do, I've seen American journalists, they take a huge amount of pride for having gotten

Starting point is 02:30:29 the interview, whatever that is, the Putin interview. And first of all, they're glowing with pride. It seems like they're always showing off to the other journalists in America. So they're showing off, like, look, I got the access you didn't. And second thing they're doing when they show up to that interview is they ask all the questions that signal to the other journalists

Starting point is 02:30:53 that we're on the same side. They ask the most generic aggressive questions to which they know the answers. They just, they want to, they want to basically get the access and ask the quote unquote, hard hitting questions, that they know will not be answered.

Starting point is 02:31:12 And this is the entire machinery of it. It's not, it's, that's modern journalism. And I suppose at that time, it was worse. It was worse. They weren't even doing the hard hitting, the, the display of heart hitting questions, right? Because PR pieces think about what? High status that is if I'm an American journalist in Moscow. I'm allowed in this secretive country

Starting point is 02:31:35 I'm in a I'm the I'm the guy who is very privileged to have access to Live in Moscow and tell AmericansAmericans, which were all fascinating about this new society, the future, what it's like. And as soon as I kind of start questioning the narrative, I'm going to get kicked out and humiliated very publicly. I thought you were in Moscow. What am I supposed to say? So, you know, Eugene Lyons was, you know, he's one of the heroes in the book. He was a young communist and I think it was United Press. He was working for the Senate there.

Starting point is 02:32:10 And when he went there, he's like, oh, this is not what I thought it was going to be like. This is horrible. And he turned very heavily against it. But he talks about how they would write one thing and say another thing and then think another thing. And each of those steps was just more and more like kind of lying in terms of maintaining your sanity and maintaining your narrative. So you reference an apobom and say that quote, starvation was not simply a consequence.

Starting point is 02:32:39 It was the goal. It was the law, Stalin intended to break the Ukrainians once and for all. It thus became common for villagers to spy and inform on one another, turning in a neighbor for having a sack of grain might be the easiest and safest way to procure food for one's family. To what degree was this the intention? To what what degree distal and anticipate this kind of suffering as a consequence of the collectivization policy. I don't know that he intended the suffering to be a consequence of the collectivization, but he it was quite apparent and I think there's a pretty heavy consensus nowadays that his goal was very much because Ukraine again, you know,

Starting point is 02:33:27 resented the czar and had this kind of very contentious relationship with Russia, which obviously very clearly remains today. I mean, the hatred of Ukrainians for Russians preceded Putin's war. I mean, this is even when I was a kid, you know, I obviously don't remember it, but my parents just told me like the hatred that they had. Understandably, I mean, they're basically under foreign occupation, what they regards for an occupation for. So your parents talked about hatred by Ukrainian stories Russian?

Starting point is 02:33:54 Yoll yes. Oh yes. I mean, I, you know, I certainly haven't visited there this year because of the most recent invasion in February, that hatred is nationwide and very intense. But I don't know, I think the feeling the emotions were much more complex before. But at the same time, at least they were under occupation before, right? And they couldn't speak Ukrainian, they had to speak Russian. So this was a thing. But because of the forced intermixing, it's a more complex story. Okay. But I mean, they weren't certainly fans. Yeah, but there's people that came from Russia that are living there, they're marrying, they're falling in love, they're working with each

Starting point is 02:34:41 other. So like, there is a, the bigger atrocity of the genocide of it, but there's also the reality of intermixing of the peoples, right? Well, well, sure, I mean, let's say, there's a atrocity of slavery in the United States, but then there's also a reality that there's now an intermixing of a, of a peoples, and now they fall in love and they live after slavery is abolished.

Starting point is 02:35:01 It's, that's just the real the real like after the genocide, right, precedes a kind of generational integration that still remembers like the suffering reverberates, but there's still it's a different culture that's created. And now I think I mean, I have complex history. Most of my families from Ukraine, so I have complex stuff, most of my family is from Ukraine, so my understanding is grounded in Soviet Ukraine. But there is something in the last 30 years that's different. Where now, after the collapse of the Soviet Union, there's a true, maybe renewed fight for independence. That's a different thing. But there's also a difference.

Starting point is 02:35:49 Like, if I go to North Korea as an American, they're very friendly now. They don't perceive me as part of the Yank Devils. They're like, okay, you're an American, but you come from America. So yeah, there's going to be an intermarriage, but that's a big difference between the perception of Russia as an entity, as opposed to some individual Russians. I just, that wasn't the experience I've had talking to a lot of friends and family in Ukraine until the war started.

Starting point is 02:36:22 Really? So they really didn't have this kind of low-key animosity toward Russians? No. There was a lot of a factional conflict inside Ukraine. Okay. Now, the whole country is united. I think there's a clarity now. The war gave a clarity that wasn't there before.

Starting point is 02:36:41 Though this is how I was saying earlier, how humans define themselves by opposition. So now that there's a war, it's like, okay, this, all this little stuff doesn't matter. We are all united because we have a common enemy. But there's also, as you know, there's regions and there's, there's just groups of different people that people, and then one of the big divides, of course, is the city versus rural. And then in the case of Ukraine, it's it's Eastern Ukraine and Western Ukraine, it's very difficult to know what the truth is. Because my personal experience is sampled.

Starting point is 02:37:11 Right. You know, I don't know how many Ukrainians I know, maybe like 30 or 40, before I this trip, like 30 or 40. And then I'm close with just a handful. But then it's hard to know because you get a lot of Western press perspective and you get a the Russian perspective and you get other perspectives and it's very hard to know how much hate there is. Outside of this conflict, so my primary question is, and this is what I ask a lot of people when I visit Ukraine, is will you ever be able to forgive the Russians? And a lot of people said, never, never. So this isn't just about assuming, assuming we win,

Starting point is 02:37:51 they would say, assuming we win was still not ever forgive, never, never forgive. And they said it in a way where like, not only us, but our children will never forgive. And it wasn't just, you know what, it wasn't just about Russia or the Russian leadership is about the Russian people. But a lot of people also said that this is our feeling

Starting point is 02:38:17 currently we understand. Like you're lost in the rage of war. Yeah. Because you lose some way. I mean, if you asked the Americans, would you ever be friends with Germany or Japan? They'd be like, are you kidding? After Pearl Harbor?

Starting point is 02:38:30 Yeah. But of course most Americas didn't feel Pearl Harbor is different. It's a good point when it's your own land, but when imagine it wasn't just Pearl Harbor, but it was New York and Chicago and Dallas and all these cities being bombed. Yeah. Yeah.

Starting point is 02:38:56 It's just a linger on this worn Ukraine currently. Does it break your heart to see what's going on there now that it's on the same land as the same cities, the same stories and I'll like brought back to the surface like the the generational pain as it was in the in the time that you're writing about. Do you think it's a fundamentally different country, different war, different situation, or does it do you do hear echoes is the fundamentally different country different war different situation or does it do you do you hear echoes of the same I don't think it's the same because I think there is no one or I mean there is no one who is like I'm glad this is happening to the Ukrainian people right so even the people who are for Putin and for the invasion and whatever justification they might have for his war, no one is like, yeah, let's get those, you know, darn Ukrainians. I think there was that sense in America after 9-11 when we invade Afghanistan and Iraq and there was like, F-dos, Iraqis, Eftos, Afghan people. Whereas

Starting point is 02:40:06 now I think it's completely opposite. I also think a lot of Russians, I'm sure if I ask them, they're not thinking like let's wipe the Ukrainian people off the map. I think whatever reasons they have, it's not kind of going after this. Even if you have to kind of rile up people against the citizenry, it's not to that level of the hatred of the Kuulaks hatred of those villages. There's still a belief though amongst the soldiers, outside of the big cities, they're belief that the Ukrainian people who the Russian soldiers believe are their brothers and sisters are occupied by a naval regime.

Starting point is 02:40:43 Okay. But then you need to save them from the evil regime. That's also very different from the holiday more. And also, there is dispute in the press about the causes, the consequences, the victims, the villains of Putin's war. But when it came to this, no one is denying that the war is happening. The New York Times isn't saying everything is fine, and the only reason people are saying it's a problem is because they hate Putin or they hate Zelensky.

Starting point is 02:41:16 That's not a thing. And the fact that we have so much footage of what's happening in Ukraine, and you have, you have, takes two seconds to go on Google, and you have a map of And you know, you have, it takes two seconds to go in Google and you have a map of, you know, Russian advancement, what are the, what are, what parts of the occupying, what parts are not of the control. You know, I did a little live stream. I raised money for you, Canadian refugees to feed them

Starting point is 02:41:38 because that's my concern, just keeping people fed. There was none of that, you know, and the two people who kind of spoke the truth, the Gary Jones was shot, I think, the day before his 30th birthday while he was undercover news, I think it was in Mongolia. Malcolm Muggridge had problem finding work when he exposed this. And I think the, like we was talking earlier,

Starting point is 02:42:03 the ubiquity of things like cell phones and camera phones would make something like this. I don't know, I wouldn't say an impossibility if they could still do it, but it would be really hard to cover it up. Well, sort of to push back on that, if you just look at Iran, I would draw a difference. I agree with you mostly, but I would also draw a different distinction when the atrocities happening to your own people

Starting point is 02:42:31 versus there's a war. Ukraine is a sovereign independent nation. There's not a war between two nations. It feels like it's easier for journalists to somehow reveal the truth in that. When the atrocity is happening within the Soviet Union for some reason, that's easier to hide. That's easier for journalists to deceive themselves and easier for the authoritarian leader to hide the

Starting point is 02:42:51 position. I agree with you. And so that's the dark. I mean, that's why people maybe, maybe you can educate me on this, but this is why I think people don't talk about, um, That's why I think people don't talk about hall of more and other atrocities, the greatly forward, because it's inside the country versus the Holocaust, that's part of a war. Why is that that we, there were two almost like afraid to polite to what is it that we don't want to cover the atrocities Because side the country like it's their business, so we don't want to touch it That what what is it? I think it's that what we refer to as the news is in the business of selling narratives Right and the narrative of the Holocaust is a very powerful one which is if you let hatred of a subgroup in a population get out of control, this is the ultimate consequence, and this is something that we all have to be scared of

Starting point is 02:43:56 and do everything in our power to avoid in the future for any outgroup. Whereas what's the narrative of the holiday more? Sometimes governments kill their own citizens. There's nothing you could do about it. There's nothing we, I mean, they wouldn't have let us send food. They wouldn't acknowledge, like the newspapers, even Russia, we're acknowledging it. Like what's the, like this is some issues I had with regard to trying to advocate for the North Korean people. The report is to be like, well, what can I do as an American?

Starting point is 02:44:22 It's a very natural question. And I'm like, I don't know. I like, all I know is how to speak to what is happening, but in terms of next steps, I don't have a good answer for you. So that is where the news kind of does break down. If there isn't a story or a call to action, the kind of, you're kind of almost like having a movie with a cliffhanger and there's no sequel.

Starting point is 02:44:44 It's like, what am I supposed to do do here like this is not scratching that itch Which for me what as a consumer of news, you know, layman is like okay? Here's the story. There was a bad guy and the cops shot him or they took him to jail and now the bad guys caught Beginning middle end here. It's just like Mao did this a lot of people were Executed and starved isn't that awful? Well and Mao still in power. And now Richard Nixon is raising a toast to him. Like that story is just like how am I supposed to feel about this?

Starting point is 02:45:11 Yeah, it feels like when there's tanks and there's war and this military conflict, then it's more actionable. You can cover it. Yeah. And it did seem like Nazi Germany. I don't know if Holocaust was this thing that made it most coverable. I think it was that this is a threat to the entire civilization war with them. Yeah, this is that's what makes it coverable. And if the Holocaust was happening just inside a country, inside of Germany, or even if it didn't expand beyond Poland, yeah, it would be like a footnote. It wasn't many ways of footnote. Like many of the early steps toward it was like they didn't cover It's just like all right. They're they're being oppressive toward their own people. Okay, especially given some of the

Starting point is 02:45:52 Maybe if you negotiate certain peace treaties with the Soviet Union and which are like you're to the basic the pacifist imperative Oh boy Sorry Santa. So we say every time you masturbate, no, after you're done, you know, sorry. I hate it when you don't yes and because it leaves me in a hole I dug for myself and I sit there in a hole in my sadness. How long have you been writing this book? Two years. Mentally, it was like two years since you spent with it, time with it. What?

Starting point is 02:46:36 Now almost three, two and a half, yeah. And I suppose it stayed for you much longer, like you said, your family. So in many ways, this is a book you've been writing your whole life. I think that's fair that all my work's been leading to this Yeah, it's certainly the most in my opinion the most important thing I've done What stands out to you About hall of mor what moments what what asks for the human nature stand out to you? What asks books of human nature is then out to you? I don't know, I think that story is, I don't wanna say story, but I mean like that incident

Starting point is 02:47:11 is, I mean, I was familiar with it before, you know what I mean? So I kinda knew about it, you know, in part thanks to kind of the North Korean work and coming from Ukraine. The thing that was also kind of insane about it is that they were taking all this grain and not using it even to feed the Russian people. They were selling it for export for hard currency.

Starting point is 02:47:35 I think what they'll take away there, and I think, again, this is something Westerners and especially Americans don't appreciate. They think that evil often has like a logic to it, right? And that's like, why would, like because it makes no sense to them, like why would they kill their own people? Uh, therefore it probably didn't happen, right? There's that thing.

Starting point is 02:48:02 They, they really think like, okay, they can understand, you know, country A, Congress, country B, and the slaughter is a bunch of people country B as a means of conquest. Like that kind of makes sense. Them, they know that thing. But like, why are you starving all these people? Like, what are you gaining out of it? That doesn't make sense to them. And because it doesn't make sense, there's kind of like, well, it's probably more the story that I'm hearing. And a lot of times there's not. It's just like evil for the sake of power. And we don't really have that certainly anywhere near that scale and never have certainly, you know, since it's America has been a thing. I mean, it's, it's, and the fact that this is like the thirties, you know what I mean? This isn't that long ago.

Starting point is 02:48:51 But I think also the narrative in some ways is how, you know, technology is also something that kind of people have mixed feelings about. Like I said this before, and this is something I really believe very strongly, the ability of information to be captured and spread easily is such an effective tool in exposing humanity at its worst. Because it's one thing if I sit here and tell you what I saw in these villages, it's another thing I sat you down and showed you a YouTube. And you know, you and I don't know what it's like to look in the eyes of someone who's thinking about killing eating their own kids. I mean, you see that face and you know, it's, you know, not something some CGI, it will haunt you forever. Just looking at the different mechanisms that made all of this happen.

Starting point is 02:49:46 So this is not just one guy Stalin having a policy. There's a whole system. I mean, one of it is just a system of fear. But how do you implement that system of fear? Well, there's a giant bureaucracy of fear. Yeah. So what he implemented with the great terror of fear. Yeah. So what he implemented with the great terror is that's in the 30s, in the late 30s. It's throughout the 30s, but yeah, like it starts in the mid to late 30s. Basically, communism was based on the common good and the public good. And anything private, which was bourgeois, was a problem. When they were started, you know, when the revolution came, the October revolution, they wanted to recreate society entirely, and that included like, okay, let's make it so

Starting point is 02:50:33 everyone eats in like cafeterias. So they're eating by themselves. Let's design buildings to everyone has to share bathrooms. Like their whole plan was to have and eliminate any kind of concept of privacy at all. They also had this bizarre kind of radical idea of attacking shame. So many of these before the 1917 people were also very, very, very free love because the idea of having this private bond between husband and wife was also bourgeois and old fashioned

Starting point is 02:50:59 and we're the society of the future. That changed relatively quickly, but they were talking about things like raising kids communally and so on and so forth. So for Stalin, if you and I are friends, we have a bond that's a threat to him, the family is a threat, the any kind of organization is a threat because it's a power center that is not between a relationship between you and him. Now you have a relationship with somebody else. So, he, systemically, went through that whole society.

Starting point is 02:51:31 And, you know, it became, there were certain things that became a crime. Then it became a crime to be a spouse of the enemy of the people. Now, right away, I as a child become an orphan because my dad wasn't any of the people. My mom is married to an enemy of the people. Now, I as a child become an orphan because my dad was the name of the people. My mom is married to none of the people.

Starting point is 02:51:47 Now I don't have parents. They get arrested or executed or whatever. But now, I know where to go, but I can't go to my friend's house because their family doesn't want to take in a child at the enemy of the people. You had this culture where everyone was very much encouraged to turn people in. And if you turns, if you're arrested, you know, and tortured, you're like, okay, who are your accomplices? And now you just got to name names, people you knew. And then it becomes this whole chain. And it's like, how am I going to protest my innocence? If Lex just said, you know, I worked with Michael and we were working with trotskets and we were plotting

Starting point is 02:52:26 to overthrow Stalin. Lex testified to this. He signed a confession. What am I supposed to do now, right? So it worked its way in a most viral fashion through the whole society. There was this amazing moment where these poor people peasants, because obviously the powerless are often going to be caught in the web. They are going to jail for being trotskiet and they have to ask themselves what's a tractorist.

Starting point is 02:52:49 Like they didn't even know who Trotsky was. And the thing other thing is ethnicity was a problem, right? If you were an ethnicity, you have more power with other members of that ethnicity than you have with this kind of broader Soviet culture. So he would just deport entire populations from their ancestral lands to other parts, a, to spread the population around, but also to break that link between the peoples and their lands. There was this 1937 NKVD order against Polish people, where it's just like, if you had come from Poland or had been just this whole list and basically people were being arrested because they had Polish last names and I think it was a million people were killed like some astronomical number

Starting point is 02:53:34 So there was this anything that was a bond Was a threat to him and it went Systemically so after he had all these kind of executions of people who were like Lenin's people, the old Bolsheviks, then he went after he started resting the secret police. You know, he rested all the cops, he rested all the judges, and all these prisoners got to see the judges who yelled at them for being counter-revolutionaries and spies. Now they were in the jails. If you were a foreigner, if there was a huge push from the Soviet Union toward African-Americans, right?

Starting point is 02:54:07 Because they're like, look, you were living in a racist country. Here we have no racial inequality come live here. A bunch of them went and they were all vanished. Anyone who knew information about the outside world if you were a foreigner, Andre Babel, I forget his first name, he had a French writer he was friends with, he was a restaurant shocker, he's a spy, because you're friends with Melro and if you know

Starting point is 02:54:31 a foreigner you're a spy. Speaking of Sparanto, became a crime, having a penpal, literally anything that was some kind of chain between yourself and someone else was a threat and was grounds for arrest. It was, the Russians would joke about how relieved they would be if someone knocked on your door on the middle of the night to tell your house was on fire, because it wasn't the NKVD coming to arrest you. And of course, most of the accusations probably were completely false. So not only because you not do all of those things, you were also a victim of just being late to work became a felony. And also not doing your job became a felony because now you're taking food or product away

Starting point is 02:55:14 from the people and you're supposed to be there working for the people. There's this one story which you know I was doing the audiobook and this is like I still try to get through with that crying. This was 1920. They were a bunch of kids in Moscow who are pick pockets aged between ages 11 and 15. They rounded them up and they're like, all right, point out your accomplices and they would take them in their trams and you have to point out people. Then they would take them back to the seller, beat the crap out of these children and then they'd take them out again. If they didn't point out to anybody, they'd beat them. They're like, all right, so they just start pointing at random. And the thing that was really

Starting point is 02:55:46 sick about this story, if that wasn't sick enough, is that the screams that the other criminals, the adult hardened criminals had to hear from these children as they realized they were being taken back to the to the seller. It was just horrifying. And they so they tortured people they tortured confessions out of people. Yes. That's scale. Oh, yes. I mean it and the dark aspect of this is it's all. It's like this weird. It's it's a bureaucracy of torture. Yes. So like it's not like there's What is it the torture is afraid of? Like does it so they he doesn't become the prisoner right because then it's like oh you couldn't get a confession out of him Are you in any way that people know as well? And the thing that was even crazier is that a lot of these interrogators were frustrated because they're like look We both know you're innocent.

Starting point is 02:56:45 Just sign this confession and make my life easier. They knew it was crap. Stalin joked about Stalin, joked about this. This is one of his little jokes. There was a kid who was arrested and he was said, oh, he was forced to say you wrote Eugene O'negen, which is a play. It was that play was by Pushkin. And they tortured him, and they tortured him, and then his parents were walking on the street,

Starting point is 02:57:09 and they run into a secret police, and they go, congratulations, and they go for what? They go, you're son wrote Eugene O'Negan. Like, he admitted to it last night. Like, it's just like they could get you to say anything, and what else was really, really sick, which they understood is they lowered the death penalty for kids, I think, either 14 or 12, I don't remember what's up in my head.

Starting point is 02:57:29 And what Stalin's head of the secret police did is when you were interrogating someone, you either had to have some of your family members, of that family members possessions on the desk or a copy of the decree that saying that they can go after your family, and the amount of people who would confess to anything when they saw their family was in danger, and they knew this wasn't a bluff, was astronomical, and then it becomes a chain. Because if you confess, and I have your confession, how hard is it to get your neighbor? What do you make of the four times, for most of the time that NKVD was about the head of NKVD?

Starting point is 02:58:09 I'll have an anti-pavlovich barrier. No barrier, yeah. I have a death warrant signed by him hanging in my kitchen that I acquired. He was one of the most evil people who ever lived. The thing that Americans don't appreciate is how clever some of this sadism is. So there was one actress, I think, he took her back to his house and he asked her to try to get her to sleep with him and he promised her that if she did her father and either her husband or her grandfather, which one it was, it's going to be released from jail. Well, they were already dead at that point.

Starting point is 02:58:45 He had them executed. They're still finding the bodies of the women he murdered in the grounds of his dachshites in Embassy now. And the thing is, Stalin knew, because at one point Stalin, there's a picture of Stalin's daughter in his lap, you know, and she was at his house one day and Stalin calls up,

Starting point is 02:59:00 he goes get out of there immediately. So he, like a good bureaucrat, he had a, he kept the list of all of his sexual partners. It's still sealed. But both him and his bodyguard had this list. So it's just to clarify. Yeah. He headed the operation that did this whole giant mechanism of force confessions. Yes.

Starting point is 02:59:21 He was part of expanding the Gug. So he was in the head of the Gug, but he was part of this giant. And his famous quote was, show me the man and I'll show you the crime. Yeah. But on top of that, what you're describing is he was also related or not, was also just a mass rapist. Yes. And there's some dispute about whether he went after kids with his rapes, but there's plenty of adults, women that were targets for this. So it's also another little joke about him about how Stalin is looking for his pipe, and he can't find it, and he calls Beria, and he's like, okay, I can't find this pipe. And then the afternoon, he calls Beria again. He's like, oh, I found the pipe, he goes, but we've got four people to confess

Starting point is 02:59:58 to Steelfe already. So you have to laugh, but then you think about the nature of how it operates. to laugh, but then you think about the nature of how it operates. Well, it also the fact that this kind of person was allowed to run. I mean, I suppose it's all different kinds of evil. And rape was just a part of the story. His own personal willingness to oversee torture and commit torture himself. And rape. But it's also what happens when you're in a country

Starting point is 03:00:27 where it has no rights of any kind. And by the way, I should mention that people should get your book and when is your audiobook coming out? It's in a couple weeks, so I'll be out shortly. You gave me the great honor of voicing this man. That's for the promo. Yeah, for the promo. Yeah, the big one. That's for the promo. Yeah, for the promo. Yeah, excellent.

Starting point is 03:00:45 I appreciate that. For a moment, I actually, it was really difficult. Really? Yeah. It was just a sentence. I understand. I understand. Because it takes you to that place.

Starting point is 03:01:03 Oh, yeah. Because he told her scream if you want. Doesn't matter. Yeah. And he was right. Like, that's the thing. He wasn't bluffing. She could scream or she had these women could scream their head off.

Starting point is 03:01:11 No one's going to come help him. He would drive around Moscow at night in his limo, looking for victims. But somehow me saying those words was tough. I'm sure is, uh, is tough. But because this is where we came from. Do you know what I mean? This isn't just like some kind of Tolkien villain.

Starting point is 03:01:29 But it also was tough because I could see myself being somewhere in that machine somewhere. Like somehow that put me right there. Like, I see this. Any, like there. Any cog in that machine is committing evil. Yes. That's the dark thing.

Starting point is 03:01:51 I think the higher the higher you are to the top, the closer you are to the top, the more ability you have to stop it. But the less, the more freedom you have to stop it, I suppose, to a point, yeah. But like the little things. So Berria had the freedom to commit rape or not to. And so he chooses to sort of increase the amount of evil he's putting out into the world. Well, then you have to counterbalance that as dark as this calculus is, after Stalin dies,

Starting point is 03:02:31 like that week, they start making the gulag shrink. They start pulling back on the labor camps. So that is a big plus in his side. Like you start liberating, having this mass amnesty and freeing people from work camps. That's not minor thing. So it's crazy. Like, it's like, I'm not, I'm not saying Peter, right? I don't know.

Starting point is 03:02:58 I'm not saying he's a good person, but it's kind of insane that someone can do things that everyone listening to this would regard as pure evil. And at the same time, this guy also, when the time came, saved tens of thousands of lives. So in some sense, Stalin is the kind of cancer that permeates all the Soviet minds. And once it's gone, you almost like wake up, wait a minute. What the fuck was that part of? And Krusev was a 56 when he gave his secret speech behind closed doors. And he's just like, all this criticism of Stalin was true. This is completely not more Marxistism. He tried to solve the system. This is not what Marxistism about. We can't have a personality called Stalin killed all these top generals.

Starting point is 03:03:48 And when Hitler turned to be trade the pact and invaded Stalin didn't believe his buddy Hitler was going to do this. And as a result of this, we lost a lot of territory and lives. This is not a military genius. This was Stalin being an idiot or a moron, whatever, whatever term it want to be. So, you know, yeah, but the thing is, Khrushchev also was a butcher. You know, he had a lot of blood in his hands.

Starting point is 03:04:10 You don't become, you know, the Tik Salon seat without having overlooked a lot of murder in chaos. So, it's such, that's why it's called, subtitled books, The Tale of Good and Evil. There's so much malevolence to go around. What do you think was going to Stalin's mind in the 20s and the 30s? Like, did he directly like allow himself to acknowledge the reality of the suffering he was causing. Like what does it take to be that human?

Starting point is 03:04:49 I'm almost interested to extract lessons from that for leaders of today. Like how hard is it? Is it that Stalin is evil or can you just delude yourself gradually into where you don't have a sense of the effect of your policies and the populace. Well, you're not diluting yourself because you have around you an entire government of people telling you 24, 7, how great you are, how thankful they are for you, how awesome you are, you're the best.

Starting point is 03:05:20 So that's certainly going to play into it. I've asked myself that question as well. Do these people believe they're on bullshit? And at us, and I think the receipts are, uh, when Elena Chachescu, who's one of the four women on the cover, when she's being taken away to be executed in 1989, she's yelling at the soldiers, how could you? I raised you like a mother. So she at least believed her own bullshit. With Stalin, he was obviously extremely intelligent. I think it's kind of easy for us to kind of psychologize and say he's associate path, he's a narcissist, he's this, he's that. But at a certain point, like if you're

Starting point is 03:06:00 surrounded by a culture dedicated to glorifying you and everyone you meet is so happy to see you and oh my god all your pronouncements are so good and you know what if you make a decision that's wrong the people around you it's their job to tell you why it's not your fault it's the fault of the records or it's the fault of you know Hitler or whoever it is the the Kulaks, at a certain point, the human mind wants to believe how great it is, especially someone in that wanted position. But he had his love, there was this one funny, I'm using the word loosely quote,

Starting point is 03:06:38 when Hitler invades Russia and he couldn't believe it and he's just missing an action for days because how could Hitler betray me? We had a deal, birds of a feather. And he had this quote about like we've taken Lennon's legacy and shit it out of asses. I think he was very aware that that's no question that he was aware that in terms of being a philosopher or a thinker, he wasn't on Lennon's level, right? So that was, I'm sure, played a lot into his level. Right. So that was I'm sure played a lot into his psychology. He never quite lived up to the like everything he tried. I mean, there's some sense that the collectivization that this idea was a failure. The way he responds to the economic policy being a failure is to lean in and basically torture anyone who says it's a failure and

Starting point is 03:07:27 double down on the policy. Like, that says something about it. But it wasn't a failure. It broke the Ukrainians. You don't think he believed early on, that's what it turned into, but you don't think in the very early days, there was a thought that collectivization is the right mechanism by which to enact communism in the nation. But I think his goal was to break their spirit

Starting point is 03:07:55 and getting them fed was secondary, right? And given the fact that they stopped complaining because they're dead, He got what he wanted He got a compliant population I mean that's really interesting. I didn't I want to how much disagreement there is about Because if that was the goal from the beginning does a different level of evil I think that was clearly the so his

Starting point is 03:08:21 What like I said earlier right he broke with lightning because he wanted socialism in one country right that was his vision right and he was also very aware that what became the Soviet Union was extremely diverse versus gigantic countries the big country in earth. It's not always gigantic you had all these peoples these nationalities within it that have had historical and and they're not they're not going to have loyalty to Moscow. He's a Georgian himself. This was always a big problem. So that was what he wanted to do as well, is to homogenize and have them be standardized. And I don't see how you do that without either massive reeducation, which is only going to go so far, or really just crushing people's spirits.

Starting point is 03:09:06 So like a forced homogeneity. Yeah. And the other big thing, a big element of Soviet culture and the Soviet mythology, I mean, he called his name was, he anged his name to Stalin. I came and pronounced his George name, George's really or something like that.

Starting point is 03:09:25 It means man of steel. So a large part of the, and this still remains in Russian culture to this day. I see in my family too, and like all the Russians I know, there is this pride in ruthlessness and this kind of like, I'm so tough, like nothing's gonna affect me.

Starting point is 03:09:39 Like yeah, we're gonna suffer, but it's for a greater good or for the long term and not to be kind of sentimental or squeamish about things. Like that was a big part of it. Don't take that away from me too, Michael. What do you mean? Just taking everything. Am I wrong?

Starting point is 03:09:53 I admire not stoicism, but that kind of hardness. I look forward to myself. There's nothing to do with Stalin. But not to the extent that like, for example, like if you see someone suffering, and that's being used as a mechanism to get you to change your opinion, you're like, they're not gonna get to me.

Starting point is 03:10:15 Like that is very much part of that Russian psychology. Right. At least at that time. Yes, I think still largely, no. I'm not gonna be manipulated by someone else's suffering or weakness that kind of thing I think that's really part of it to this day. I Don't know. I don't know how much of his character how much of his reality sure sure I remember I knew I knew a someone who was him and his fiance were Russian and

Starting point is 03:10:44 I remember I knew I knew a someone who was him and his fiance were Russian. And they had this big fight. She took off the ring, right? And she's like, you know, he's like, that's it. And it's just like the way he retored, he told the story to me. She's like, what do you want me to say? Oh, don't leave me, baby. I can't live without you like that nasty cruelty. Which I don't know me.

Starting point is 03:11:03 I know, I know you're I don't know if there's a Russian thing. That's just that's just the people thing. I don't think it's an American thing. I think there's all kinds of flavors and they're different by region of the way that people are cruel to each other. Sure. Not in America. In America, New Jersey is different than Texas is different than California. You don't think Americans are higher trust More kind society than Russia even today Higher trust Listen, I'm not going to so first of all I have a very complex Feelings about Russia today. I'm talking about to say that's talk about January before the war.

Starting point is 03:11:45 I've talked about nowadays. I think it's a complex psychological dynamic of what trusting means. I think Russians are generally less friendly, but have more intimate friendships. Yes, I think that's true. So it's just a different. It's not different. It's just one is more trusting. Which is more trusted.

Starting point is 03:12:07 Americans. But then we define trusting different. Okay. I'll give you an example. If someone's having a party in America and people come over. Yeah. Okay. That's fine.

Starting point is 03:12:19 Everyone's welcome. If it's in Russia, it's like, who's that? Who'd you bring? And there's much more of a, like, let me be sure that's okay. This person's here. I know. I may be. You don't have parties. I had I have never been in a party and you don't come to mind. And that was very sad. Well, I love that. I love that. Well, you should have showed it by showing up.

Starting point is 03:12:37 This man, I'm a high-hide from the world and I'm afraid of social interaction. And I just lay on the ground instead and feel sorry for myself. It's not bad Santa, it's sad Santa. While I conserve, I conserve my emotional energy towards this one day of the year. Okay. Intensely spread my joy. All right.

Starting point is 03:13:00 Speaking of which, you tell a Christmas story in the book. Are you spoiling that chapter? It's called die hard. All right, well, I'm not gonna spoil it. It's really good. I was very proud of that chapter. Why? I think it's just,

Starting point is 03:13:12 because the ending that's a Christmas story is just like, I know everyone reading is gonna go Google it, be like, he can't be real, but it was real. Yeah, it was a Christmas, yes, yeah. I mean, this has to do with the bigger picture. We don't have to do the big reveal, but the bigger picture of there was an iron curtain and it was coming down in complex ways.

Starting point is 03:13:32 How would you define the iron curtain? There's a set of ideologies, a set of countries united by an ideology and a set of countries united by a different ideology. And there's a curtain that divided them and then eventually it came down. So how would you describe how it came down? It came, I hate that I can never remember, ever, ever remember if this was Hemingway. No, it was Hemingway. It was Mark Twain.

Starting point is 03:13:59 No, it came down two ways, gradually, then suddenly. The thing with the iron curtain and the war sub-hacked, these were a bunch of nations with, you know, under communism, but they were all, almost all, under the sway of Moscow. So if they were going to make big changes, Moscow had to prove it. It was in the 50s when Hungary decided to rebel,

Starting point is 03:14:29 or not rebel liberalize, and they even were thinking of leaving the Warsaw Pact and the Russians sent in the tanks, and you have the development of what was called the Brezhnev Doctrine, which was the idea that it is the duty of all the Warsaw Pact nations if another country tries to, and this was also in 68 in the Prague Spring in Czechoslovakia, if a nation wants to leave socialism, it is incumbent on those socialist nations to do whatever is necessary to make sure there is an account of revolution. counter-revolution. So they were very much under Moscow's thumb. And one of the big ways it changed was one man, and that was Mikhail Gorbachev. And he was the first Russian leader to be born after the October revolution. He grew up, and his grandfather was arrested for being a Trotsky

Starting point is 03:15:25 ite and the other one, you know, was arrested for this or that. He saw his village starve as a result of Stalin. So even though he was a very committed communist, he also was very and increasingly skeptical of authoritarianism. And, you know, in Poland, for example, you had the solidarity movement, and the labor union movement, and the government didn't know what to do. They were getting a lot of support from the people. They had strikes that the Gadant's Shepyard was one of them started. And basically, Moscow's hold them. Either you crack down or we're cracking down on you. And they're like, all right, and they declared martial law and they, you know, rested leaders put them away. But then when Gorbachev, you know, was in charge, there wasn't a gun to their back. And it was the

Starting point is 03:16:14 communist leaders themselves who were like, you know what, there was this really funny moment where, um, like Valesce is meeting with Margaret Thatcher. And she's, he's telling her what solidarity the movement wants. And she had been meeting with Margaret Thatcher. And he's telling her what solidarity the movement wants, and she had been meeting with the Polish government as well. And she's like, look, like, tell them, like, what, because they had, you tried, they wanted, the government wanted her to tell them that we wanted to negotiate

Starting point is 03:16:37 and work with the other side. She goes, all right, tell the government what is that you're asking for. And he just points to the ceiling. She goes, he's like, oh, yeah, our meetings are bugged anyway. But they then had the ceiling, and she goes, he's like, oh yeah, our meetings are bugged anyway. But they then had the freedom because they knew that Gorbachev was enforcing them to drive solid area underground. So they had the idea of like, let's work together with these people. And as a result of this, you know, Poland liberalized and freed itself

Starting point is 03:17:03 fairly easily. And with a minimum of bloodshed in 89. And there was this whole argument for the Vietnam War with something called domino theory, which is if you lose Vietnam, then you're going to lose Louse, then you lose Cambodia. One by one, the country is going to turn communist to the dominoes, but people didn't realize the reverse was true. Because after Poland liberalized, then you have a Hungary, then you have Czechoslovakia, then you had East Germany and the fall of the Berlin Wall. So it's a great thing because as this is happening, the people are looking around and they're like, wait, that's it. This has got to be a trick. And it wasn't a trick. So one of my favorite books, which was a big inspiration for this one, was by my favorite

Starting point is 03:17:47 historian. I apologize to Victor Petrusha, a David Petrusha in North of Herman, my second and third there tied. But Victor Sebastian wrote a book called Revolution 1989. And he just talked about that year and how all these countries, one after another, liberalized. And it's just such a beauty. And none of them thought this was possible. My, one of my favorite, favorite moments in this book is Helmock Hall, who was the head of West Germany,

Starting point is 03:18:14 is in Warsaw with like, Volesa, discussing the Berlin Wall. And like, Volesa's like, I don't think it's going around for like another, you know, few years. And Helmock Hall laughs in his face. And he goes, another, you know, few years and at home, the call laughs in his face. And he goes, look, you're young. This isn't how things work. Like this is going to take some doing.

Starting point is 03:18:32 It fell the next day. And Helmet Cole literally says, I'm at the wrong party. And he got in a plane and got out of Warsaw. So there are why this book has a broader message than the actual stories of these incidents is that As these wonderful things are happening the universal consensus at the time is it's never gonna happen Or if it does happen it's gonna happen only through an enormous amount of carnage and blood and when it doesn't then everyone's like Oh, it was inevitable Mm-hmm. You didn't say it was inevitable at the time.

Starting point is 03:19:05 You only said it was inevitable after the fact. And the other thing that was really brought me a lot of joy is there are so many moments of men with guns saying we're not shooting anyone. Because they wanted several 10 men squares. They wanted it in, you know, East Berlin. They wanted it in, you know, East Berlin. They wanted it in Romania. They wanted it in Moscow. And these strong tough trained men with guns were like, no, we're

Starting point is 03:19:33 not shooting the civilians. And then everything else was history. Yeah, just as surprising as the mass violence committed by like police and the army on its own citizenry, equally surprising is when they choose not to. Yeah. Somehow. Yeah. And what is that? What, how do you explain 1989?

Starting point is 03:19:58 How do you explain this progress that happens so suddenly. How do you explain that in the, at the beginning of the 20th century, so much revolution happened that created communism. And how do you explain then the collapse of that across so many nations at the same time? I think a large part of it had to do with the closer interconnections between people like Gorbachev and Thatcher and Gorbachev and Reagan. Because both of them visited Red Square and years before, these are enemies. They want to invade, they want to kill us. The Americans thought this about the Russians, the Russians thought this about the Americans,

Starting point is 03:20:41 obviously not so much the British. And they got on really well when Gorbachev came to checkers, which is the Prime Minister's country side of state, Thatcher sat him down and she's lecturing him about human rights and she's lecturing about economics and she's lecturing about this and that. And then she's lecturing him about why he's in eating while he's yelling at her. And he goes, Mrs. Thatcher, like, I know you have a lot of strong opinions. I do too. I haven't been sent here to recruit you to the Communist Party. And she just started laughing. But right away, there was such a sense in the air of we can do better. We're spending all this money on missiles. We're

Starting point is 03:21:22 spending all this money on the military. It's expensive. And for what? We don't have to be looking at each other as enemies, we can try to work together to kind of at the very least lower the volume and the heat. How much credit do you give to Gorbachev the man? So meaning how much power does a single individual have? I could not give him more credit. I had a tweet last year where I said, who do you think is the greatest person alive right now? And my answer by far would be Gorbachev. Then he died.

Starting point is 03:21:51 I don't know who it is right now. But it's just funny because Gorbachev also had a tweet. But it was. And he said, oh, sure. That would be a good. Now I wish I interviewed Gorbachev and asked him the the famous question of what would you like best about Michael Mouse? I took the transition after the Soviet Union fell to Russia and Yeltsin was not a smooth one by any means. You know, as I say at the end of the book, it's not like they live happily ever after. But my point, broader point is you take the winds when you can get them. People now had access to passports. They don't have to have, they can leave the country, they have food, they have access

Starting point is 03:22:35 to information. It's somewhat censored, but it's certainly nothing like it was under the Soviet Union. And they didn't have to live in this kind of constant fear. And they had opportunities, and it's such a step forward. And there was this one great moment. And I'm good. There's a super boris yeltsin became president of Russia. He's also mayor of Moscow at one point, or the equivalent of mayor. And he came here to visit NASA in the capacity of one of the other. And while he was there, he went to visit a supermarket. It was a Randall's then, I think it's a food town now. It still exists. I'm going to go there. I'm going to start bawling. And as he's looking around, like he had never seen so much food. And this is food that, like, even wealthy

Starting point is 03:23:19 people in Russia don't have access to. And there's pictures of him just like this, like what? And the scene that really was poignant to me is on his flight back, he's sitting there on the plane like this. And he's like, they had to lie to the people because if they knew, they wouldn't have been able to get away with it. And that's the moment where it's just like, oh, this wasn't like skewed propaganda. You know, this was like they knew and it was a lie from A to Z. And he was just like holy crap. Just like, and you can just imagine him on that plane, his brain reprogramming, because if you're taught since you're a kid and he was no, he was an older man. He was

Starting point is 03:23:59 no dummy. You think, okay, the Americans are starving and poor and they're lynching people every day. And then you go to a supermarket, the most banal place on earth. And you see, like, I think when the article said, like, they couldn't believe how big the onions were or something like that. And you're seeing this. And you're seeing these like,

Starting point is 03:24:15 janitors, school teachers, these aren't dignitaries. And they're regular people just picking whatever they want. And you're just like, like, like, you, you, it's like the equivalent having a stroke. I do think that that's one of the most powerful things is the grocery, the grocery store. As like in terms of drawing a distinction between the two systems. Yeah. Cause you know, you could have like technology, you can show off technology and so on, but you can kind of sign up right off technology is like, okay, that's the mechanism

Starting point is 03:24:44 of the devil. But when right off technologies like, okay, that's the mechanism of the devil. But when you look at just fruit and veggies and like very big fruit and veggies and like, yeah, and fruit in particular, like certain kinds of fruit there are just not available in Russia. I mean, it's, yeah, that really shows, wait a minute. Yeah. I mean, yeah, that really shows, wait a minute. Yeah. It's interesting, like when you're older and you have to face the reality that you believe to be true,

Starting point is 03:25:15 that your whole life has been based on a set of lies. And you're tough. Not mistakes, not like a little bit, like blatant lies from top to bottom start to finish. I don't know what that's like How much you've you start the book. I think you start the book with Iran. Yes. Yes As one does so before the revolution she was born in Russia. She witnessed the revolution And moved to the United States in the 2026 She was born in Russia and she witnessed the revolution and Moved to the United States in the 2026 2026

Starting point is 03:25:51 1926 I remember like it was yesterday Anyway, she you write that she spent a lot of her life trying to convince Americans in the world that The negative effects of totalitarian government just you know, maybe, maybe using hers as an example, but also this question, can we draw a distinction between authoritarian regimes and communism? Is it possible to still man the case that not all implementations of socialism and communism would lead to the atrocities we've seen, the Soviet Union

Starting point is 03:26:21 and in China and under Mao? Like when you, in studying all of this, how much blame do you put on the ideologies, on Marxist ideologies versus the particular leaders and dictators? Well, you have to blame the leaders a lot because they had different leaders in different countries were different from each other. Duček, who took over Czechoslovakia and he tried to introduce socialism with the human face in the Prague Spring of 1968. He was like, all right, we got to do away with this authoritarianism. We got to have more free speech.

Starting point is 03:26:53 He was thinking of introducing elements of democracy. Now then the Russians sent in the tanks, but the point is he certainly was someone who was like, all right, this has got to stop. This is just absolutely crazy. Khrushchev and Stalin were not the same animal at all. So I think the problem with communism in the Marxist sense is that you're going to have an introduction element of authoritarianism simply because you can't have economic planning. If I don't have a price mechanism, I don't know how, prices, what is, be knowing as a consumer or a producer,

Starting point is 03:27:31 what should be produced or what, had there's a shortage of. As prices increase, that's a signal that we have a shortage here. As prices decrease, that means that there's a surplus here. But if I'm setting the price, I don't really have no, how much weed I need to produce if I'm compared to corn as compared to shoes as compared to Santa costumes. So that is a big problem. The other issue is if you have one agency, the government having a monopoly on, let's suppose the news, like you were talking about earlier with Twitter, it's going to be really

Starting point is 03:28:01 hard to have any kind of objective discourse because everyone is going to be working for the same organization. That is going to cause a problem in terms of having a feedback mechanism, even in a best scenario, in terms of this is a problem, this isn't a problem. When you have a monopoly, which is what a government is, I think people are very familiar with what the problems happen with monopoly, this lack of accountability. Bureaucracy is our faceless and then no one's to blame, but, you know, and yet everyone kind of suffers as a consequence.

Starting point is 03:28:32 So it doesn't necessarily have to be as authoritarian as Stalinism, but you can't have it, a government which is authority by its nature, be this pervasive without a strong amount of oppression. And same thing with even if you just have like, let's suppose socialize health care, you're going to have to make it illegal for doctors to practice privately, you're going to have to have rationing so and so forth. Now that might be a price that people are willing to pay because you can't have infinite spending on health care, right? So something's going to have to give somewhere. So there is an element of authoritarianism there and people are comfortable with that and I can art my head around it.

Starting point is 03:29:11 But if you're going to have one organization running literally everything in society, I don't see how you do that and have any measure of liberalism. Why do you think I and Rand had so much trouble telling people the danger of Soviet Stalinism? Well, I think a more pertinent question is why did Emma Goldman and Alexander Berkman have so much problems? So they were hardcore these are anarchists. Yeah, they're Emma Goldman's on the cover. They were deported from the US. J. Edgar Hoover saw them off at Ellis Island.

Starting point is 03:29:52 They were sent to Russia. They were bloodthirsty revolutionaries. They had no shortage advocating violence when necessary. And when they went there, they were just like, this is a complete nightmare. They both individually had meetings with Lenin complaining about political prisoners, complaining about lack of free speech. She told them, you know, this is a revolutionary time.

Starting point is 03:30:11 You could do that later. And when they both left, they she wrote a, her memoir was split into two books, My Disillusionment in Russia and My Ford Disillusion in Russia. He wrote The Bolshevik Myth and she was in England and she gave a speech and she's just like if you guys think this is for the workers This is the biggest live ever heard like they're pressing the workers like no capillaries ever imagined and You know as she described it like people just shifting their sheets. They're interrupting her and she when she opened her talk She had a standing ovation and when she was done you could hear a pin drop So they didn't want to hear it because this was this kind of,

Starting point is 03:30:47 and Eugene Line talks about it later, this was like the guinea pig theory of the Russian people. Like, we're gonna experiment on them over there. If it works great, we're right. If it's wrong, it's their problem. And sure these animals squeal, but they're beneath us. And of course they're gonna make some noise,

Starting point is 03:31:01 but you know, this is a noble experiment, but they're experimenting on a country, several countries. So I think an ideology like this, which appeals to intellectuals because, you know, if it works or if it's implemented, they're the ones who are gods in effect in a society, like their status cannot be higher, they really want this to work. Like they want a society where they are the new aristocracy that the most important people. And their criticisms of America, if they had a binary worldview, if America is bad and this is the opposite of America, they're my definition.

Starting point is 03:31:35 It's good. And the other binary that they bought into is the Nazis and the fascists hate the communists and the communists true up to a point hated the fascists and the Nazis. Okay, well, Hitler is evil. So this guy is against Hitler. We're with him. So that's an argument that's still made in, you know, schools growing up when you talk about World War II with their like, we see no Stalin and they don't really talk about Stalin being a bad guy. But it's like, you know, we worked with him to fight Hitler. Because Hitler was a unique evil. Now that is certainly true. The Hitler's a unique evil, but that doesn't mean or even imply that Stalin is somehow

Starting point is 03:32:12 an angel or a saint. Do you think some of the lessons of history are forgotten here in our modern political discourse that are important to remember? I was so triggered because I was in the supermarket and there was like a company that's selling Russian ice cream because it meets these high-level Soviet standards. And I'm just like, you think this is some kind of joke? You think this is some kind of kitschy punchline that you had decades of people who were taught in school to turn their parents into the police if they were hoarding grain, even if it

Starting point is 03:32:43 cost them their own lives, where it was a crime to be married to someone who was in enemy of the state, where you had torture being the norm, where people institutionalized, because they were politically disadvantageous, and they were called insane. Like this isn't just like, oh, this hammer encircles this cool wacky symbol. Like the amount of blood under this symbol was just enormous and and so yeah I think the lesson is very much been forgotten. How did the ice cream taste? It was fine. I'm a basque robins guy to be honest but Van Luehns does some great work. The basque robins doesn't have any solace flavors. No.

Starting point is 03:33:39 those dark jokes, dark jokes. I'm going to self publish a book of jokes. Coming out in a grocery store near you. Okay. What was the hardest part about writing this book? It's been two years writing it. So when I write books for celebrities and I was co-authoring them, I did it kind of like method acting. I tried to get into their head as much as possible to kind of speak in their voice. And when you're dealing with children being tortured, harmed, starved, and you're trying to empathize with the characters, it's hard to take. The other big part I had, like I was saying earlier, is just, I was just very, very concerned that I told this story and that it did adjust this, because I think this is something that is, I still don't understand,

Starting point is 03:34:28 and I'm kind of angry about it, that it's fallen on me to tell this story. This isn't some minor incident that happened in some random town in Pick a State. This is half the world for, you know, 70, 80 years. And the fact that it's, this is the 80s. This isn't, I mean, you and I are old enough to remember the 80s. There's a show, I remember the 80s.

Starting point is 03:34:52 The fact that all these things have just kind of, we have this collective amnesia. And even amnesia, I think a lot of this stuff, even I was not known even at the time or was kind of obscured. This is, I remember I was at the Blaze, which is a network run by Glenn Beck, and they're conservatives, and I have a lot of fun there. And I'm just sitting there, and sometimes they veer off. They're like, oh, Biden's the communist.

Starting point is 03:35:18 I'm like, okay, Biden's the communist. But I'm like, we talk so much about slavery and the Civil War, the atrocities. We talk about World War II and the Holocaust. I'm like, how is no one talking about this? And this was can very easily be portrayed as like conservatism's big victory because Reagan and Thatcher were so instrumental in guiding this to a safe landing. And I'm like, how is no one telling the story? And then one day my brain is like, you know, you write books for living. This is kind of your job. And I'm like, how is no one telling a story? And then one day my brain is like, you know, you write books for living.

Starting point is 03:35:45 This is kind of your job. And I'm like, all right, but I still don't, I still, I gotta tell you, I'm kind of confused that I'm the one who has to do this because this should be, they should be, you know, they should be a dirty book like this. And it's a model to follow. Yeah, and it's also, that is such recent history.

Starting point is 03:36:07 Yeah. But it also kind of makes you realize that there might be other fights for progress going on right now. Oh, yes. The world that we don't know about. So you wrote about North Korea. I don't know to a degree there could possibly be fights there for progress, but there

Starting point is 03:36:29 could be, they could be boiling up in China, there could be boiling up battles for progress in other parts of the world. Russia, there could be. And in America. And in America. And these are all different kind of battles for progress. And now sometimes I sometimes I you know we sometimes tend to criticize these battles for progress like if it's on the left we'll call it like wokeokism or whatever. And we'll pick extreme elements of it and show how silly and ridiculous it is, not realizing it,

Starting point is 03:37:10 not acknowledging that there's a more civil battle going on underneath for actual, for respecting human dignity from all people for all walks of life. And the same, we tend to call anybody who questions mainstream narratives conspiracy theorists with dismissing them immediately. And they're ultimately fighting for progress. So people who criticize, file, chain everybody else. I don't know if they're, I think they want institutions that serve the public. They're fighting for progress too, and we tend to dismiss them. Each side tends to caricature the other. But the battle for progress is happening. And I

Starting point is 03:37:52 guess that's what you're, that's the hopeful message with the white pill, right, is that there's progress being made. Somehow, we're all making progress here. I think more of the hopeful message is that it's not possible that we have to lose. Like if someone tells you the straight face, you can't win. The enemy is too impressive and strong. I'm like, what are you talking about? I mean, look, this was the Soviet Union. And it happened relatively quickly and relatively peacefully. I mean, again, and it wasn't because

Starting point is 03:38:29 Hanukkah and East Germany was like, oh, I'm just gonna vacate my seat. He was like sending the tanks and the military guy said, no, so they wanted blood. There were plenty of people who wanted blood and would have been happy to have it. So to you, maybe if not the fall of the Soviet Union, then the fall of the Iron Curtain is a great leap

Starting point is 03:38:53 of progress in the 20th century. I don't see how anyone can argue against that point with a straight face. So that gives you hope that we humanity were able to do that. Yes. And at the same time, we were told at the time, give it up, be realistic. It's utopian to think this is going anywhere, maybe in a hundred years. Look, there's a reason checkoff was on Star Trek because the idea is, even the for future, you're going to have America and you're

Starting point is 03:39:22 going to have the Soviet Union. Like this is the reality. It was called real politic. We're going to have date-tongued because it's, you know, it's this permanent stalemate. We had the Vietnam War. We got our asses kicked. Russia's not going anywhere. America's not going anywhere. We got to learn to live with each other blah, blah, blah.

Starting point is 03:39:38 And Reagan said, you know what I hear? Maya strategy for the Cold War. Some people might say it's simple or even simplistic. Here it is. We win, they lose. And the people who won were the Russian people and the Ukrainian people and the Lithuanian people and the Polish people and the Romanian people especially and the Hungarian people. And it's just, there's so many moments of great joy that, you know, just tears coming down my face because you're like in Prague when Dubček, who, again, who tried to liberalize in 1968, and then when they sent the tanks, they deport him to Slovakia somewhere to do

Starting point is 03:40:18 some forestry job, like he appears in their big squares, just waving from the balcony, like this ghost from 20 years prior, being like, look, you know, the spirit of 68 is still alive here in Czechoslovakia. And it was like a matter of weeks, the entire government resigned and then they liberalized. It's just so many things about just overnight, just change for the profound better.

Starting point is 03:40:45 just overnight, just change for the profound better. And people are so committed to making sure you don't have hope and if things get better, it doesn't really matter because the broader picture never gets better. And there's lots of data to the contrary where that's happened before. And this isn't some magical farway place. This is the opposite of magical faraway

Starting point is 03:41:05 place, it's Eastern Europe. And to me, I think one such narrative that people assume will always be true, or just to degree will always be true, like in American politics, is the extreme levels of division. And it seems to me like that too we can overcome. So the division in American politics that seems to be counterproductive I think that can be overcome. And I think the division in geopolitics currently with Russia, China and the United States, particularly China and the United States, can be overcome. And I think that requires great leadership that galvanizes the populace to the better

Starting point is 03:41:55 angels of their nature. Like I have hope for that. People have become really cynical on social media and elsewhere in the way they talk. The liberals are destroying this country, the conservatives are destroying this country, this kind of language is becoming more and more popular. I think that's, I hope that that's temporary. At least that's my way, Pill.

Starting point is 03:42:22 I don't know if you have that kind of hope for like what does hope look like for you in American politics, forget American politics American the nation the country the people My hope Which I don't think is an unrealistic one, is that the next generation has a better life than you and I have had in this country. And I think anyone who thinks that America is over or is one president away from being destroyed cannot in good conscience call themselves a patriot because if you think America is so weak that it takes a Biden or a Trump to irrevocable to a revocally destroy it, then it's already a rap.

Starting point is 03:43:24 And I think that's just absolutely ridiculous. If you look what this country has survived, great depression, World War II, the Civil War, I mean, my God. So we've been through worse before. It wasn't always easy, certainly not. But I am, it's so hard for me as someone who's a helpful person, not by my nature, I'm not, you know, Michael Kahnis, who does work for Random House, or at least he did that last time I talked to him. I look at, even like, the thing is,

Starting point is 03:43:55 when you speak positively, it sounds corny. That's how screwed up our cynical culture. I'll be sure to see my Twitter. Like, you're, you're verified now. So that's good. But even like something like Etsy, like you can go and Etsy. I paid $8 for that verification. I earned it. It's an opportunity for independent artists to create something special and cool. And I bought a lot of stuff from them. That in and of itself is something that's pretty awesome. There's so much, I'm into shaving soaps, right? Of course you are.

Starting point is 03:44:28 The point is, there's like dozens of artisans every day when you have a shave, it brings you some joy. So there's just so many things that are wonderful. And I know there's people listening to this, rolling their eyes. How can you talk about shaving soaps when my daughter or when my wife or when blah blah blah and I'm not disparaging or dismissing what you're regarding as a problem? My point is hope means the belief that it's not at all a certainty that this problem will be insurmountable. That's all it means. What do you look forward to in 2023? So this is a holiday special. Honestly, like if I look forward to a lot of young people realizing that they still have lots of opportunity in this country and taking control of their own selves and realizing they can be a better person tomorrow than they are today that the entirety of their identity is not a function of a culture which may they may not identify with or like or think is is deplorable and realize you know what I have it in me to improve and find joy and happiness.

Starting point is 03:45:46 And also, the fact that that is so compelling and contagious. That is what I would want in 2023. And also for New York to get nuked. So those two things could be accomplished. Can I go back and switch the order? Because I think New York one. Oh, the jokes, the jokes. And one day, friends, if you work hard enough in believing yourself, you too can New York. No, you too can spend your days dressing up. days dressing up grown men dressing up in a Santa outfit and putting on lipstick and having hours upon hours of conversation with each other and loving every second. Thank you for writing this really, really important book. Please buy the white pill. I love you brother. I love you too. Thanks for listening to this conversation with Michael Malas to support this podcast Please check out our sponsors in the description and now let me leave you some words from shell, silverstein

Starting point is 03:46:55 Listen to the mussels child. Listen to the don'ts Listen to the shudders the impossible to the wounds Listen to the never-haves, then listen close to me. Anything can happen, child. Anything can be. Thank you for listening. I hope to see you next time. you

Lex Fridman Podcast - #347 – Michael Malice: Christmas Special

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.