Planetary Radio: Space Exploration, Astronomy and Science - 2Fast 2Curious: Finding the source of the fast solar wind
Episode Date: June 28, 2023Some solar mysteries, like the origin of the fast solar wind, can only be solved by getting up close and personal with the Sun. James Drake from the University of Maryland joins Planetary Radio this w...eek to talk about the latest results from NASA's Parker Solar Probe as it soars closer to our star than any spacecraft in history. We share what to look forward to in the night sky and a Parker Solar Probe-themed question in our space trivia contest. Discover more at: https://www.planetary.org/planetary-radio/2023-fast-solar-windSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
What can you learn when you fly too close to the Sun?
We'll find out, this week on Planetary Radio.
I'm Sarah Al-Ahmed of the Planetary Society,
with more of the human adventure across our solar system and beyond.
Some space mysteries just can't be solved without getting
up close and personal with the sun.
James Drake from the University of Maryland joins us this week to talk about his team's research into the cause of the fast solar wind.
We'll sun dive into the Parker Solar Probe's newest data as it soars closer to our star than any spacecraft in history.
Then Bruce Betts will join us for What's Up in the Night Sky and a Parker Solar
Probe-themed question for our space trivia contest. Before we start today's journey into
the exciting new results about the solar wind, we have an important announcement to share with all
of our listeners, especially those of you who are joining us through our wonderful radio affiliate
stations. Starting August 2nd, we will be discontinuing the radio distribution
of Planetary Radio. To be clear, the podcast version will continue as always. This is just
for the radio side of the show. It was a difficult decision that we've spent many months deeply
researching, being the scientifically inclined people that we are. Ultimately, our hypothesis was correct.
The many hours it takes to maintain the radio side of the broadcast isn't worth the sacrifices
we keep having to make to the popular and more commonly consumed podcast version that the
majority of you are listening to right now. So despite how difficult this is, we're excited
about this update. These changes will allow us to do things we've never done before, like share videos of our
interviews with guests and build upon the success of our podcast.
The good news is, this may not even be a big change for some of you, but an improvement.
All radio stations airing Planetary Radio are welcome to air the podcast version, which
features extended interviews with
our guests. It and our entire 20-year back catalog will continue to be available for free to stations
everywhere. So if you're listening to this on the radio, you might want to write your station to ask
them to start airing the podcast version. And you can always download Planetary Radio from our
website at planetary.org slash radio,
or find it on any of your favorite podcasting apps.
I want to send a huge thank you to our radio affiliates and listeners for helping us share
the human adventure across our solar system and beyond.
I know that I and the show's creator and previous host, Matt Kaplan, are so grateful
for all of your years of support.
Whew. All right, now for this week's space news. The oceans of Enceladus may contain the building
blocks of life. Analysis of data from NASA's Cassini spacecraft, which studied the Saturn
system from 2004 to 2017, has found signs of organic compounds. It found them in the icy particles that were
ejected from the moon Enceladus into the planet's E-ring. The compounds detected include phosphorus,
one of the ingredients for amino acids that's never been found in an extraterrestrial ocean
until now. Our CEO Bill Nye spoke to CNN about this discovery and what it means for the search
for life. I'll link to that video on the website for this episode of Planetary Radio
at planetary.org slash radio. China's lunar exploration program is moving along with an
international partnership. Russia, Pakistan, the United Arab Emirates, and the Asia-Pacific Space
Cooperation Organization have all signed
agreements to participate in an international lunar research station. It's a project that
aims to build a permanent lunar base in the 2030s with a series of stepping stone missions before
the end of the decade. And NASA has selected five experiments for the 2024 total solar eclipse.
The eclipse is going to be visible from sites across North America on April 8, 2024,
and it's going to be a great opportunity for millions of people to marvel at this celestial phenomenon.
It's also a great opportunity for scientists to study the sun.
NASA has announced funding for five projects led by researchers at different academic institutions.
They're going to study the sun and its influence on Earth with a variety of instruments, including ham radios, cameras, high-altitude research planes, all kinds of cool stuff, and all with the help of volunteers.
You can learn more about these and other stories in the June 23rd edition of our weekly newsletter,
The Downlink. Read it or subscribe to have it sent to your inbox for free every Friday at planetary.org slash downlink. I also want to wish everyone a happy Asteroid Day.
Asteroid Day is held each year on June 30th. It's the anniversary of the 1908 Tunguska event.
It was one of the most recent and dangerous close encounters our
planets had with an asteroid. Bruce Betts and I will talk a bit about that later in the show.
The Planetary Society is one of the sponsors of Asteroid Day, and it's always one of our
favorite days of the year. You can learn more about Asteroid Day events or watch their live
stream on their website at asteroidday.org. And now for our main topic today, the fast solar wind.
Despite living so close to the sun, there's a lot that we don't understand about it.
Studying the complex nature of the atmosphere, magnetic field, and other quirks of an object
that intense is not an easy feat, but that's not going to stop us.
The mystery we're puzzling over this week
is the source of the so-called fast solar wind. For those new to the term, the solar wind is a
stream of charged particles, primarily electrons and protons, that are hurled into space from the
upper atmosphere of the sun. Most of the time, the wind is a gentle, steady breeze, but sometimes it's more like a storm, a fast solar
wind gushing out at high speeds. This fast solar wind is vital to understanding solar storms,
space weather, and how they affect our planet. But the source of the fast solar wind has been
a mystery for as long as we've been scientifically studying the star over our heads. Now that's where the Parker Solar
Probe comes in. Launched by NASA in 2018, the Parker Solar Probe is humanity's first ever mission
to touch our star. It's ventured closer and closer to the sun's surface, braving intense heat and
radiation in order to send back unprecedented high-resolution data about the sun and its
mysterious corona. And one of the key findings?
The potential discovery of the origin of the fast solar wind.
Our guest this week is Dr. James Drake, or as many know him, Jim. Jim is a distinguished
university professor at the University of Maryland's Department of Physics and Institute
of Physical Science and Technology. He's been
instrumental in analyzing the data sent back by the Parker Solar Probe. Let's learn more.
Hi, Jim.
Hi there. How are you?
Oh, I'm doing great. And thanks for joining me on this. I love talking about planetary stuff,
but anytime we can get into the sun and the details there, I'm so excited because, I mean, let's
be honest, it's the biggest thing in our solar system. It's kind of important.
Yeah, and it controls a lot of stuff that's going on in our solar system. So that's
also a good reason for talking about it.
Yeah. And the Parker Solar Probe is such an interesting instrument because there are so
many mysteries about the sun that we literally can't solve until we're right there. But
creating an instrument that can get that close to the sun at all is just't solve until we're right there. But creating an
instrument that can get that close to the sun at all is just a feat all on its own. So I'm
continuously in like awe of this spacecraft. It is awesome. And it's producing some amazing stuff.
So hopefully we'll get into that. So your team's exciting discovery has to do with the origin of
the fast solar wind. But before we get into what your team actually
found, what is the fast solar wind? And how is that different from the regular solar wind that
people are familiar with? There are sort of two types of wind coming out from the sun.
One is known as the fast solar wind, and it has a speed of around 800 kilometers per second.
And it comes from what are called coronal holes, which are regions on the
surface of the sun where the magnetic field is pointing in a particular direction. And then the
slow solar wind is more like 400 kilometers per second. And that comes from mostly active regions
on the sun, where there's a lot of magnetic fields releasing energy. The fast solar
wind anyhow comes from coronal holes. These are the dark regions you see on the surface of the sun
if you look at it. The other solar wind, if people were, say, looking through a telescope at the sun,
would these be things that come from areas with prominences or coronal mass ejections,
that come from areas with prominences or coronal mass ejections, those kinds of structures? Well, the slow solar wind, at least during the quiet period of the Sun, the non-active period
of the Sun is mostly from low latitudes around the low latitude region. And then during quiet
times of the Sun, the two poles of the Sun are totally dominated by coronal holes and the fast
wind then occupies most of space coming out from the Sun. During active periods
of the Sun everything gets mixed up, it's really complicated, and their fast and
slow winds are sort of mixed up as they come out. The Sun goes through this kind
of solar cycle over time. When is it more
active? When is it less active? How long does that process take? And what's actually causing that?
The sun has a magnetic field, and this is produced by what's called the solar dynamo.
The outer third of the sun is this region where all the ionized gas and non-ionized gas, neutral gas, are mixing around
and they're being stirred around and they're very turbulent. And this outer one-third of the sun
then twists the magnetic field around and amplifies it. And the consequence, of course,
is all the magnetic field that rises up and then comes out and helps form the corona and the whole magnetic
structure of the sun. This has a cycle. Every 11 years, the overall direction of the magnetic
field of the sun flips sign. So this is the classic solar dynamo.
The sun isn't like a solid ball like here on Earth. It's all gas and plasma. So does the sun rotate
at the same speed at all latitudes? Or is there some kind of like differential rotation going on
there? No, there's definitely a differential rotation. And the Parker Solar Probe mission
was named after Eugene Parker. And he's the one who really set up the physical picture for how the magnetic field
is generated. And so the differential rotation of the sun plays a key role. It's rotating faster
around the equator than it is at higher latitudes. And yeah, so that differential rotation is a
critical part of the magnetic field generation process. I love too that this is a probe that
was named for someone who was still
alive when it launched. That's such a special thing for someone who has contributed so much
to science, get to see a spacecraft named after them. I love that so much. I know Eugene Parker
pretty well. In fact, he wrote my recommendation letter for tenure at Maryland. You see these people and you watch their career and how they
interact. And, you know, in many ways, he's my model. He just kept working and producing
interesting stuff, you know, up until practically the day he passed away. One of the big disappointments
for me is that this paper we just wrote and came out didn't come before he passed away.
Because, you know, he was the person who had the idea about the solar wind being generated.
For him to see this result, I think, would have been just outstanding. But unfortunately,
didn't quite happen. But it was closed, and the mission was already getting really good data by
the time he passed away.
So, you know, it was still great.
Why is it so hard for us to study the origin of the fast solar wind from the distance where we are here at Earth?
Why did we need a spacecraft to go there to answer this question?
Let's go back to the main mission goals of Parker Solar Probe.
Actually, there was two.
One is what heats the corona. So we need to probably take a step back on this. The corona
is about 100 times hotter than the actual surface of the sun. The corona is this dilute gas of
ionized plasma, which surrounds the sun. It's about 100 times hotter than the surface.
surrounds the sun is about 100 times hotter than the surface. Now, why should the outer surfaces of something be hotter than what's interior? That's really unusual because the source of energy
that heats the sun is deep down inside near the core. And so here we have this corona, which is
hot. And that, of course, what heats that corona has been one of the major
mysteries of the sun for many, many years. One of the goals of Parker Solar Probe is to try to
figure out what heats the corona, and of course, at the same time, it's trying to figure out what
actually drives the solar wind. And of course, from 1 AU, that's the distance from the sun to the earth,
we look at what's going on. We have spacecraft in the solar wind that's measuring things. But
what we now know, now that we've gone very close to the sun with Parker, and by close to the sun,
I mean, it's now around 10 solar radii from the surface. The Earth is about 200 plus solar radii.
Now that we've gone from 200 plus solar radii down to around 10, we're seeing all this structure in
the solar wind that was all blurred out by the time we got to 1 AU. And because it all got blurred
out, we couldn't tell what was going on. That's just the fact of the matter. And, we got to 1 AU. And because it all got blurred out, we couldn't tell what was going on.
That's just the fact of the matter.
And as we got inside around 20 solar radii, we started seeing a very different solar wind.
It was much more bursty.
So that's the reason we haven't been able to figure all this stuff out before.
And we didn't know what we were going to see.
We didn't know that when we got close to the sun, it was going to be this bursty thing with all
sorts of weird behavior, like the magnetic field, for example. When you get close to the sun, it
has all these kinks in it. Instead of just pointing out or pointing in, it twists around and turns and
goes back in again and then back out. I mean, this is really weird. We had
seen a little bit of this at 1AU, but when we got close to the sun, we started seeing all this very
unusual behavior. Parker Solar Probe is an exploratory mission in the sense that we didn't
really know what we were going to see. And that's, of course, the exciting aspect of this whole
mission. Yeah, anytime there's a mystery that you can't really interpret from afar, you have to actually go there and figure it out.
It's always way more exciting, but also so much more difficult.
And the fact that we had to create a spacecraft capable of getting within that distance of the sun is absolutely startling. And even within the sun's atmosphere, even within like
the corona, say, it's not necessarily easy to see these fine structures. And it's also very
dependent too on the solar activity. Right now we're hitting almost solar maximum. The sun is
very active. Is that impacting how this probe is doing its work? Or is that in any way obscuring
the data? In the press release on this,
Stuart Bale, who's the principal investigator of the so-called field instruments that measure the
magnetic field, for example, and the electric field in the solar wind, he pointed out that in
many ways, when we started getting data on this, it was good that we weren't at solar maximum because that would have been
really complicated. And so I think the fact that when we started seeing this stuff, it was still
just starting to transition from minimum to max. I think that helped us because things weren't
quite as complicated as they're likely to get. Now, having said that, one of my main interests as we start
really hitting solar maximum and we start seeing some very intense debris from solar flares, I want
to see the energetic particle measurements and come from those solar flares because I'm trying
to model that. And so I'm really excited about Solar Max because I want to see all these very energetic
events coming out. We should have some very nice measurements of the energetic particle spectra
that are produced during the energy release process. So that's going to be really exciting.
How long do we think the Parker Solar Probe is going to last? I mean, we only have so many years
for Solar Maximum. Are we going to get enough data to do all that science? Yeah, I think we're going to get enough
data to do that. Now, how long is it going to last? That, I think, depends on a lot of things
which could be random. So keep in mind that Parker Solar Probe has a heat shield, and that heat shield
is always pointed towards the sun, and it protects the spacecraft and all the instruments.
is always pointed towards the sun and it protects the spacecraft and all the instruments.
We have to maintain the direction of the spacecraft so that it doesn't just burn up.
And so that means the operators have to be really careful about what's going on.
And this is not my area of expertise, but in any case, we certainly are going to make it through this solar maximum, but how long it's
going to last, I don't think we can be sure about that. And I don't want to give it away because we
do a space trivia contest at the end of each episode. This week, the question has to do with
that shield. So I'm not going to go into too many of the details, but I really encourage people to
look up YouTube videos about this shield because it is absolutely startling how this thing works.
And it is very surprising how effective it is, given what it looks like.
Yeah, it actually works.
Your team now has a good idea of what might be causing this fast solar wind.
Prior to us actually getting this Parker Solar Probe in place to do this science,
what were the
hypotheses that people thought were causing this fast solar wind?
There were two main ideas, lines of research on this topic.
I'd say the main major one was that the sun produces these waves called alphane waves,
which are basically kinks in the magnetic field.
And the idea was that these are produced down at the surface of the sun. These waves propagate along, just like,
say, for a sound wave in our atmosphere when we speak, that's a wave. It's a compressional wave
and allows us to communicate like we're doing now. But anyhow, the idea was that there's all these waves produced down near the surface of the sun, and that those waves propagate up into the solar corona.
As they propagate up in the corona, they dissipate their energy and they dump their energy into the
corona. And the idea was that that's what's heating the corona. And that's why the corona
is 100 times hotter than the surface. The idea was it's from
these waves. One consequence of these waves is that the temperature of the corona goes up as
we just talked about. That produces a pressure. If you have higher temperature you have higher
pressure. And the idea was that that pressure then is what drives all of this ionized gas out from the sun to produce the wind.
Okay, so that was one of the main ideas of research. And in fact, I would say that that
in many ways was the dominant idea. The second idea was that there's a process called magnetic
reconnection. We haven't talked about that yet. Probably people pretty much know that there are
magnetic fields, you know, bar magnets and everything. And of course, the sun has a magnetic
field, as we talked about, because of the dynamo. A magnetic field has a direction. If you take
two magnetic field lines, and we sort of draw these magnetic fields as lines, you know, it's
sort of like a line wandering around with a direction.
Imagine that you have these two lines and they're pointing in opposite direction.
When they're pointing in opposite direction, they can annihilate each other. And then when
they annihilate each other, they release the energy that's in that magnetic field. And the
process by which this happens is called magnetic reconnection. And it turns out
that these bursts occur all over the surface of the sun. And then more and more evidence is
emerging that these bursts cover the entire surface. And so this second idea was that
it's these bursty releases of magnetic energy that are driving the wind. That's the second idea. And so,
in other words, it's not the waves themselves, which are heating the corona to drive the wind.
It's the bursty release of magnetic energy down at the surface, which is actually driving the wind
outwards. Now we get to the real good part, which is what your team actually discovered, which is
that you think you know which of these two mechanisms is
actually creating this fast solar wind. So what did you find? Okay, so this gets back to our
earlier discussion, which is as Parker got closer to the sun, we started seeing all this bursty
behavior. Number one, the wind gets all these bursts. It's not just a steady wind of 400
kilometers per second or 500 kilometers per second. It's got all these spikes in it. The
velocity goes up to 600 kilometers per second and then down to 200 kilometers per second and then
it goes back up again. And then they started seeing not only was it bursty, but the bursts
started occurring in patches.
So you'd see a sudden patch of these strong bursts, and then it would sort of die down a little bit, and then another patch of very strong bursts. So this started appearing, I would say,
around 20 solar radii, when Parker was within 20 solar radii. What the team did was to look at the magnetic field at Parker
and try to map that magnetic field down to the surface of the Sun and say, well,
where did those patches come from? And lo and behold, it turns out that these patches
match the periodicity of the magnetic field on the surface of the Sun. So then we started realizing that the structure
of the magnetic field on the surface seemed to be producing this patch, these patchy bursts of solar
wind. And not only that, but when they mapped the magnetic field from Parker down to the Sun,
they realized that it was mapping into a region which had this magnetic field that
was pointing outwards and inwards and outwards and inwards. And we then realized that, well,
that's a natural place where magnetic reconnection could occur. Seeing these patches was really the
key discovery that I think pointed towards magnetic reconnection as being the driver.
The other thing that was, I think, pointed in this direction is that we pretty much know
from both observations and our efforts to model magnetic reconnection that it's a bursty process.
And so all these bursts that Parker was seeing are one of the natural consequences that you would expect to be
happening if magnetic reconnection were the driver for all these things. So what we were able to do
was look at the data and we were able to figure out, you know, what's the strength of the magnetic
field down on the surface? How fast is magnetic energy being released down there.
And when we calculated how fast it was released, we discovered that the energy release rate
was sufficient to actually drive the wind.
Because you know, based on previous studies over history, scientists sort of knew how
much energy do we have to release to drive the wind.
So we have a pretty good idea of what that number is.
And lo and behold, when we looked at what was going on, we were able to demonstrate that the energy release rate down on the surface from reconnection seemed to have enough energy to actually drive the wind.
That's so cool that we can finally answer this question.
I mean, I know there's more science that still needs to be done,
but I feel like we've actually stumbled upon the answer here, and that's amazing.
Yeah, so keep in mind that this is still a scientific discussion.
You know, I think not everybody agrees with all of this stuff.
You know, last week we were at the SolarWinds 16 conference.
And from my perspective, the first day was very remarkable in the sense that there's a whole series of talks that were focused on studying these bursts as they come out from the surface of the sun, driven by reconnection.
And this included data from, for example, the Solar Orbiter,
which is a European spacecraft. Just beautiful data showing that the entire surface of the sun
has these bursty outflows. And then, you know, we presented the data from Parker and all of
these observations are pointing in the direction of reconnection driving this stuff.
But nevertheless, not everybody agrees.
So there's still a lot of support for the wave mechanism for driving the wind.
More science definitely needs to be done.
But I'm assuming your team is going to keep looking into this.
And if not your team, everybody else with the Parker Solar Probe data is going to continue to try to figure this out.
So we'll get to the bottom of it.
I trust it.
Yeah, there's a lot more.
And especially one of the reasons that this idea of the waves driving the wind has had such a lot of support over the years is because the wind itself, we can measure these waves in the wind.
We can measure waves in the wind.
And the real question is, what's producing those waves? I mean, we know there are waves in the wind. We can measure waves in the wind. And the real question
is what's producing those waves? I mean, we know there are waves in the wind. In fact,
if there weren't waves in the wind, as the wind came out from the sun, it would cool
down and become very cold. And we don't see that. So we're pretty sure that the waves
in the wind are actually heating the wind as the wind propagates out from the sun.
So we know there are waves, but I think the question that's coming up now is whether those
waves are actually produced at the surface of the sun and then go out and drive the wind and
heat the plasma and everything, or is this bursty outflow from the sun produced by magnetic reconnection. It comes out as all these
bursts. And those bursts themselves carry energy. And so my view, and I think the interesting thing
we're going to be exploring over the next few years is, does all these bursty outflows actually
drive the turbulence that we actually measure in the solar wind.
And that's what I think.
One thing we know from the measurements around the Earth space environment is that magnetic
reconnection is bursty.
I'm of the opinion now that it's all these bursts coming out from the sun.
As they come out, they're actually twisting the magnetic field up and that
these bursts from reconnection are actually what's driving the turbulence in the solar wind.
You know, the data from Parker is going to be coming through for, you know, quite a few more
years. So I think we're going to sort this out. We'll be right back with the rest of my interview
with James Drake after this short break. Greetings planetary
defenders, Bill Nye here. At the Planetary Society, we work to prevent the Earth from getting hit with
an asteroid or comet. Such an impact would have devastating effects, but we can keep it from
happening. The Planetary Society supports near-Earth object research through our Shoemaker-Neo grants.
These grants provide funding for astronomers around the world to upgrade their observational facilities.
Right now, there are astronomers out there finding, tracking, and characterizing potentially
dangerous asteroids.
Our grant winners really make a difference by providing lots of observations of the asteroid
so we can figure out if it's going to hit Earth.
Asteroids big enough to destroy entire cities
still go completely undetected,
which is why the work that these astronomers are doing is so critical.
Your support could directly prevent us from getting hit with an asteroid.
Right now, your gift in support of our grant program
will be matched dollar for dollar up to $25,000.
With your support, working together, we can save the world.
Thank you.
These places where there are so many magnetic field lines close together creating this magnetic reconnection,
are those the coronal holes you mentioned earlier?
this magnetic reconnection. Are those the coronal holes you mentioned earlier?
The simplest picture of a coronal hole is it's a region on the surface in which the magnetic field is predominantly in one direction. However, that's too simplistic because actually if you go
down and you look at the surface of the sun, you can actually measure the magnetic field, and it's not all pointing in one direction. Down deep in those
coronal holes, the magnetic field is not pointing just in one direction. It points up and down.
And it's true, if you add it all up, it's dominantly in one direction. But if you look
at the details, it's not. It's up and down and up and down. It's the reversal of that magnetic field.
It's the up and down that's actually releasing magnetic energy and driving the wind.
So coronal holes are more complicated than you might have guessed based on historical ideas.
Yeah, I've read descriptions of these coronal holes up close as I've been researching for this.
Basically like showerheads of these strange
magnetic field lines poking in and out at pretty consistent distances from each other.
What is the kind of structure that we're seeing of the magnetic field there?
That structure comes about because of the dynamo underneath in the outer reaches of the sun. The
dynamo twists everything up. That twisting up produces these characteristic scales that produce
these localized regions. And so the twisting up of the magnetic field produces, for example,
these local downflow regions and upflow regions that carry the magnetic field up to the surface.
It's the structure of those flows that control the structure of the magnetic field deep within
the coronal holes. Parker Solar Probe figured this out by getting close to the sun and passing through these jets
of solar material. What instruments on Parker Solar Probe are allowing us not just to like trace
these jets back to these coronal holes, but actually analyze the structure of the magnetic
field there? So, okay, number one, of course, is the magnetic field.
They're measuring the magnetic field.
That's part of the so-called field instrument group.
And Stuart Vail from Berkeley is the principal investigator on that.
So the magnetic field, that's clearly key.
And then there's the particle measurements.
You know, we actually measure the velocity of all these particles that make up the wind,
these ionized particles.
So the wind is a plasma, which is an ionized gas.
And so it's made up of all these particles.
And Parker Solar Probe then measures the velocity of these particles.
You add them all up and then you find out how fast the wind is as a wind.
But it's all made up from individual measurements of particles.
And this is the so-called SPAN instrument on Parker Solar Probe
that measures the particle velocities.
And then there's another set of instruments called ESIS. And the ESIS
instrument measures the more energetic particles. We haven't talked about this, but another reason
we're actually convinced that reconnection, magnetic reconnection is driving this is because
the wind that Parker is measuring, it's not just a wind blowing at 400 kilometers per second.
It's actually an energetic wind.
And what I mean by that is that there's a spectrum of particles that carry a lot more energy than this 400 kilometers per second energy we're talking about.
There's a whole spectrum of particles that goes up to,
say, 80 kiloelectron volts, KEVs. The wind blowing at around 300 to 400 kilometers a second,
it corresponds to an energy of about one kilovolt. However, Parker measures this energetic component,
this energetic component, which is up to like 70, 80 kilovolts.
Wow.
And we never saw this at 1AU because it all just blurred out.
And now this wind, we're realizing this wind is an energetic wind.
It's got all these energetic particles in it.
You know, that's just a total new discovery.
And we never knew that this was going to be the case.
At Maryland, we've carried out these simulations, which actually reproduce the energetic particle spectrum that was measured by Parker Solar Probe. So if you look at the Nature paper, we show side by side,
the spectrum measured by the STEP-I instrument and the ESIS instruments. They put together a
spectrum of the flux of particles versus their energy.
And then we did the same thing with the computer simulation and the two just beautifully match.
So reconnection itself produces an energetic particle spectrum, which produces an energetic
wind. So we now know the solar wind is not just this wind moving at 400 kilometers per second.
It's an energetic wind. And that's so cool.
That really is. And wild that we weren't even like expecting to discover that. I mean,
it just speaks to the power of like actually doing this kind of exploration. Anytime we get
close enough to an object, whether or not it's the sun, or some moon or planet, we're always
discovering things that completely threw us for a loop that we did not expect. And I hope it's always that way. I hope
we never stop finding things we didn't expect as we're going out there. I tell all my students this
when I teach physics, or my graduate students too, and that is, you need data. You know,
if you don't have data, I'm a theorist, okay? So I can sit down and do all the theory I want, and I can go off and be in the totally wrong direction and not know that I'm just off base.
We need data because we never would have figured this out without data.
It was just hopeless.
So Parker Solar Probe is giving this just beautiful data.
Of course, we combine that with our theoretical understanding and our modeling
expertise. But you have to have data to figure out what's going on in the universe. Otherwise,
it's just hopeless. So these missions are extraordinarily important.
You heard it from him, folks, we need to keep advocating for these missions. So we can
learn even more things that we totally didn't expect. But I'm sure some people are wondering,
you know, like, this is all awesome to understand. But how is understanding this fast solar wind
important for us here on Earth? We all generally kind of understand that the solar wind causes
beautiful aurorae at our planet's poles. And sometimes solar storms can impact our communications
or electrical systems and stuff like that.
But why do we need to know more about these fast solar winds particularly?
The solar wind produces a bubble in the galaxy.
And this bubble is the plasma and the magnetic field that the sun sends out.
And it creates a bubble that extends out to maybe 130 astronomical units.
An astronomical unit is the distance from the sun to the earth. And the heliosphere,
which is the domain of the sun produced by the solar wind, the wind goes out at, you know,
solar wind. The wind goes out at, you know, 400 kilometers per second, approximately, all the way out to about 90 AU. And then there's a so-called termination shock. And then the wind slows down
dramatically. And then you go out a little further, and then there's the heliopause. And now the
Voyager spacecraft have mapped all this out beautifully. But anyhow, the sun then produces this heliospheric bubble in the galaxy.
We're a bubble.
And all stars produce these bubbles because they all have winds, just like the sun has a wind.
Okay, well, why is this of any significance?
Well, the galaxy has a lot of energetic cosmic rays.
These things are dangerous.
You know, cosmic rays can injure people.
They're energetic particles and they can pass through your body.
It's not good.
The heliosphere bubble shields the planets in our solar system from the galactic cosmic rays.
It's not a complete shield.
You know, some cosmic rays get through,
but it does form a shield that
screens out a lot of the energetic cosmic rays. So from that perspective, these bubbles and
understanding them are quite important because this bath of cosmic rays in the galaxy can impact
potentially whether a planet can have life on it or not. So, you know, I think
one thing, one reason for understanding all this is, you know, we want to be able to look at a star
and ask, okay, what kind of bubble is it producing? Are the planets that are circulating around
within the heliospheric bubble, How good is the bubble from this star
in terms of shielding the planets from galactic cosmic rays? Okay, so that's one reason.
And the second reason, of course, you already alluded to, and that is in exploring the driver
for the solar wind and magnetic reconnection, for example, we're learning a lot about how the sun releases magnetic energy.
And it's the release of magnetic energy which drives solar flares. It produces these coronal
mass ejections which hit the magnetic field of the earth and annihilate it. So these storms
around the earth are also produced by magnetic reconnection. We haven't
discussed this, but these coronal mass ejections, what happens is they're a big blob of magnetic
field, and they smash against the Earth's magnetic field and annihilate it. And that's what produces
the aurora. The aurora comes from energetic particles produced by magnetic reconnection between
the Sun's magnetic fields, the magnetic field in the solar wind, smashing against the Earth's
magnetic field, annihilating, producing the energetic particles that produce the aurora.
You know, understanding magnetic reconnection is a key to understanding all of the stuff that can
happen in the Earth space environment and can negatively impact our communication systems.
So, you know, all of this stuff builds up our knowledge base. So we can say, okay,
what's going on? Are our satellite communication satellites at risk? Are our astronauts at risk? Because if they're
out in space and there's a huge solar storm that produces a lot of energetic particles,
that's a big risk, especially if you really think we want to get to Mars.
Astronauts are going to be in space for a long time. And there's a risk that a big storm comes along
producing a lot of energetic particles, and that puts our astronauts at risk. So we want to
understand all this stuff. And we've learned a lot, I think now about the reconnection process
from the Parker data. And we're going to learn more during Solar Max, that's for sure.
Is this understanding going to help us interpret what's going on in the Sun
just from our readings of the solar wind at Earth,
or is it still just too complex what we're reading here from Earth?
We have to see what's going on close to the Sun to understand.
There's many ways of looking at the Sun.
For example, there's the radio telescopes that are pointed towards the
sun. They're also telling us something about how energetic particles are produced during
magnetic reconnection, during flares. You know, Parker Solar Probe is one of several different
ways in which we gather data. Each of these ways of looking at the data or gathering data tells us
different things. I'm a big advocate for saying that we explore, for example, magnetic reconnection
in the Earth space environment, and we explore it in the sun, and we learn information about each
of these different ways of looking at things, and then we try to put it together into a scientific picture about what's going on.
So having different measurements is what is really allowing us to make progress.
For example, if I hadn't done a lot of work on magnetic reconnection
in a nervous space environment, along with many of my colleagues,
I don't think we would have been able to figure out what's going on
with this Parker Solar Probe data. Because, you know, these things are connected.
I think the only other time that we've actually spoken about magnetic reconnection on the show
in prior months was when we were talking about the Juno mission with Scott Bolton.
They were seeing the same magnetic reconnection events, but instead of the Sun and the Earth,
they were seeing it between Ganymede and Jupiter. So understanding these things and how magnetic reconnection works helps us in all
contexts whenever we're seeing magnetic fields. And even in that situation, it's creating beautiful
aurorae behind Ganymede. That's so wild. Yep, yep. Magnetic reconnection is universal.
It happens throughout the universe. If you go now to astrophysical meetings, there's a lot of work going on about magnetic reconnection and the consequences.
It really is a universal process.
Well, thanks for joining me, Jim, and for explaining all this.
I know that there's just so many things that you have to take the time to explain to put this picture together.
But I think you've laid it all out very well. And I hope other people are as excited about these results as we
both are, because this is some foundational stuff that we didn't even know. Like, we didn't even
have the tools to know or understand until just very recently. And good luck to you and your team
as you continue to explore this topic, because who knows what new thing we're going to learn that we did not anticipate.
Thank you very much for having me on the show.
I'm continuously amazed by the Parker Solar Probe, but also by humanity in general.
For all of our faults, we've got to appreciate the fact that we're the kind of curious and determined creatures that literally created a probe capable of flying into the atmosphere of the sun.
Talk about daring mighty things.
Now let's check in with Bruce Betts, the chief scientist of the Planetary Society for What's Up.
Hey, Bruce, and happy early asteroid day.
Happy asteroid day to you as well.
That is an odd choice of words right like on asteroid day i usually celebrate it by going outside and just shaking my fists at the sky like
keep going asteroids you know back off wow we should list that as one of the deflection methods
that we work on that one's truly terrifying so anyway uh, yes, and Asteroid Day is, of course, the commemoration of Tunguska impact in 1908, which is on my list.
Well, you know, now I've blown it.
That's a preview for this week in space history.
But yeah, level 2,000 square kilometers of forest in an airburst of a comet slash asteroid.
It's so terrifying that they really didn't know what was going on there for such a long time.
I can't even imagine if that happened today, how terrifying that would be.
Oh, yeah.
I mean, fortunately, it hit in the middle of Siberia, but that's one and a half times
the area of the city of LA, which is not a small city.
Oh, man.
So if it hits the wrong place.
Now, fortunately, they only hit on average once or twice a millennium
of that size, we think.
But the problem is statistics don't really pay attention from day to day to average,
only over long periods of time.
Anyway, we're working to prevent it, save the Earth from disaster for asteroids.
That's one of the things we do at the Planetary Society.
You know what another thing we do is in our spare time?
We look at the night sky.
Yes, that was a beautiful segue, I know.
And in the evening, for the next month or so, you're going to watch Venus and Mars go away and leave the evening sky.
But for now, they're still up there, super bright Venus.
Mars has just gotten dimmer and dimmer as it gets farther from
Earth. Kind of an interesting, fun thing on July 10th, and a little bit the night before that and
the night after that in the evening, you will see Mars is right near Leo's brightest star,
which is Regulus. And Regulus is actually a little brighter than Mars right now, but they'll be hanging out about one lunar diameter apart over in the western sky, and they're above super bright Venus.
And if you're really lucky, you might catch Mercury way down low, but that one's a tough one this time around.
middle of the night, we've got Saturn coming up around, well, literally middle of the night now,
coming up in the east, looking yellowish, and then rising high up in the sky by the pre-dawn,
and Jupiter coming up an hour or two before sunrise as well, looking super bright over in the east. So there are planets, and they will do the thing that those planets do and keep moving earlier towards the evening.
Let's move on to this week in space history.
1971, three Soviet cosmonauts were lost, died in space.
And so we remember them.
And that was on the Soyuz 11 mission.
Moving on to much, much happier things. 1997, Mars Pathfinder landed on Mars mars got us back into the mars surface game
which we haven't left since then in 2005 we had the monster truck rally of planetary encounters
when at least the one before dart which was uh slamming into a comet instead of an asteroid
this time with the deep impact mission and And so I just like to say, take that comment,
change this orbit.
Not by much.
Cause it was really big.
And that wasn't the point of the mission.
One of the mission was to uncover stuff below the surface of the comment.
And then we learned things,
but let's go on.
Shall we too? But let's go on, shall we, to... Nice.
Have you heard of this thing called the Parker Solar Probe?
Nah, never heard of it.
Nah, I love the Parker Solar Probe.
I feel like people are going to know a lot about it.
And they might know this, since I don't know what's been discussed, but it's still really impressive. Parker Solar Probe gets so close to the sun.
How close does it get? That the sun's intensity is more than 400 times what it is at Earth.
No, thank you.
That's why they need that spiffy, nifty heat shield, which we might, I don't know,
it might discuss a little bit later
in just a few moments i could be could be now all those videos of people like testing the material
that they use to make that shield just on youtube i cannot recommend enough because it is so weird
to see someone just using a blowtorch on one side and then another person's hand just pressed right up against it without burning them.
The technology is amazing.
Yeah.
No, it's very cool.
Trivia.
Trivia.
I asked you, who was the fourth woman to fly in space?
How did we do?
Everyone got this one right.
Mostly.
Good. The answer is Judy Resnick, who became the fourth woman to go into space on the maiden voyage of the
space shuttle Discovery in 1984. And of course, a bunch of people wrote in to also add that she
wasn't just the fourth woman to go to space or the second American to go to space, but she was also
the first Jewish woman to go to space. So that's awesome. Unfortunately, I guess we're talking
about tragedies this show, but unfortunately, she lost her life along with the other heroes in the
Challenger disaster in 1986. She was a pioneer. She was and worth remembering.
Our winner this week is Stephanie Delgado from Tucson, Arizona, USA. And Stephanie,
you're going to be winning a copy of The Sky is Not the Limit by Jeremy DeCaff, which is a beautiful illustrated kids book about the Voyager 2 mission, which I love and I'm kind of sad to give away, but you deserve it.
It sounds very cool.
Congratulations.
That's a happy note.
It is.
I feel like this trivia question really got people because they just kept chiming in cool things about Judy Resnick, you know.
Yeah, she's impressive.
Really impressive.
I loved this comment, too.
Cody Roxwood from Seminole, Florida, USA, said, fun fact, Resnick, which is similar to the Polish Resnick, means one who cuts or a butcher.
So she was literally cutting the way for the future female
astronauts. And of course, I've got to mention Dave Fairchild, our poet laureate, wrote in this
poem, which I thought was very beautiful. Judith Resnick took a ride, discovery showcased, and so
became the fourth in line of women into space. Her name is on an asteroid, a crater on the moon.
Like all our fallen astronauts, we lost her much too soon.
Hmm.
That's very nice.
But all right.
Hopefully we don't have a tragedy-stricken Parker Solar Probe trivia question this week.
What is our next question, Bruce?
No, this is back to our protective heat shield that protects the parker solar probe
approximately how thick is the parker solar probe's protective shield go to planetary.org
slash radio contest nice and you have until wednesday july 5th at 8 a.m pacific time to
get us your answer and since we're coming up on Asteroid Day on June 30th,
I've decided to give away some cool asteroid posters.
I've got some posters from the Psyche mission.
So this time I'm going to be giving away two Psyche posters.
Because I've got a bunch of them and they're really, really cool.
So whoever wins this will get some awesome Psyche posters.
But this also brings me around to another topic, which is that earlier in the show,
we let our listeners know that we're going to be making some changes to Planetary Radio
to hopefully reach new audiences and do all the awesome things that we want to do for
the show.
And this strategy is going to go hand in hand with our new Planetary Society member community.
So one of the things that we're going to be moving from Planetary Radio into the member community is our space trivia contest. And I know this is a big
change for our longtime listeners who have been with us for over 20 years, but we want to give as
many Planetary Society members as possible an easy way to participate in this contest so even more
people can get in on it. I know that this means a lot to people, but we're not going to be killing
it forever. We're going to give people a new way to do this so more people have an opportunity.
So our last space trivia contest question on this show is going to be on July 12th,
and I'm trying to find some really awesome prizes to give away. My one sadness is that I can't give
away a bunch of those rubber asteroids because I haven't been talking about this. We're totally
out of those asteroids. There's a reason why I haven't been giving them away.
We are out of them.
So unless you have been hoarding asteroids in your house,
Bruce,
I may or may not have.
Well,
if you find any,
let me know.
Cause we can chuck a bunch of squishy asteroids at people.
No,
no,
don't hurt them.
All right,
everybody go out there,
look up the night sky and think about helium-filled balloons.
Thank you and good night.
We've reached the end of this week's episode of Planetary Radio, but we'll be back next week with more space science and exploration.
Planetary Radio is produced by the Planetary Society in Pasadena, California,
and is made possible by our solar-powered members. You can join us as we continue to support the
daring missions that teach us more about our place in space at planetary.org. Mark Hilverda
and Ray Paoletta are our associate producers. Andrew Lucas is our audio editor. Josh Doyle composed our theme,
which was arranged and performed by Peter Schlosser. And until next week, Ad Astra.