Planetary Radio: Space Exploration, Astronomy and Science - Voyager Mission Project Scientist Linda Spilker
Episode Date: November 16, 2022She has been heard on Planetary Radio more than any other guest. Linda Spilker returns in her new role as the Voyager project scientist, following the legendary Ed Stone’s half-century in that job. ...Linda provides an update on the interstellar journey. The Planetary Society’s LightSail 2 may be only hours from the end of its very successful mission. LightSail Program Manager Bruce Betts makes a special up-front appearance to prepare us for this milestone. And incoming Planetary Radio host Sarah Al-Ahmed introduces The Planetary Academy, a terrific new opportunity for young explorers. Discover more at https://www.planetary.org/planetary-radio/2022-linda-spilker-voyagerSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
The new Voyager mission project scientist is an old friend, and you'll hear from her this week on Planetary Radio.
Welcome. I'm Matt Kaplan of the Planetary Society with more of the human adventure across our solar system and beyond.
Linda Spilker of NASA's Jet Propulsion Lab has been named only the second project scientist in the more than half-century history of Voyager. Our most frequent guest arrives to tell us about how honored she is to succeed the great Ed Stone,
and what those distant twin spacecraft are up to in interstellar space. Before we check in with Linda, you'll want to hear our own Bruce Betts
prepare us for the end of the Planetary Society's
fabulously successful LightSail 2 mission.
It could happen any moment now as the little CubeSat with the big wings
re-enters Earth's atmosphere.
We'll also hear from Sarah Alamed about the Society's brand new
and pretty darn cool program for kids called
the Planetary Academy. The latest edition of our free weekly newsletter, The Downlink, is waiting
for you at planetary.org slash downlink. But the real elephant in the solar system this week is the
Artemis 1 mission. I'm hitting this week's planetary radio deadline just a few hours before NASA attempts again
to launch that giant Space Launch System rocket
toward the Moon.
In addition to the uncrewed Orion capsule,
it carries a herd of CubeSats,
including the Near-Earth Asteroid
or NEA Scout solar sail
that will be released shortly after liftoff.
I'm sorry I'm not at the Cape this time for what should be a spectacular night launch if it happens.
My colleague Jason Davis has updated his comprehensive Artemis I launch guide.
You'll find it at planetary.org.
Godspeed, Artemis.
What a long road it was to light sail, too.
I was around for the Planetary Society's attempt
to become the first to fly a solar sail. That was our Cosmos 1 back in 2005. That big spacecraft
plunged into the sea when its Russian booster failed. We came back 10 years later with a
radically different approach, a CubeSat called LightSail that has famously been
described as being the size of a loaf of bread. The brief test mission of LightSail 1 was difficult,
but ultimately successful in showing that we were on the right path. Finally, in 2019, LightSail 2
rocketed into mid-Earth orbit atop a SpaceX Falcon Heavy. It spread its sails a few weeks later, becoming the first solar sail
to maintain and raise its orbit propelled by nothing but the light of the sun.
Now, nearly three and a half years later, long after anyone thought it would still be sailing,
our little spacecraft paid for by 50,000 individual donors, is nearing the end.
My What's Up colleague Bruce Betts leads the LightSail program.
Hey, Chief Scientist and LightSail program manager.
You look kind of tired. Is there a reason for that?
I feel kind of tired. That would be the reason.
Because our spacecraft, it's burning up in the atmosphere really in the next few days.
And it's been kind of crazy monitoring that and reporting out on it.
And the weeping keeps me awake as well.
I'm glad you haven't lost your sense of humor.
This is a big deal.
Three and a half years, 18,000 orbits, 8 million kilometers, 5 million miles.
That's right out of the first sentence of your new article.
At planetary.org, LightSail 2 is about to burn up.
And so I refer people there if you want more detail.
But give it to us in a nutshell, which actually is one of your subheadings.
Well, that was actually revealing the whole mission in a nutshell.
Here, I will give you the whole mission in a nutshell. Here, I will give you the burn-up in a nutshell.
Basically, we always knew that this was going to be the end of the mission.
We weren't launched high enough with efficient enough or large enough sail to escape the Earth and keep going higher or even stay where we were.
There's enough atmosphere.
We think of space as being you
know a vacuum but it's not even 700 kilometers up there are enough atoms ions that you run into at
30 000 kilometers per hour that it slows you down and so we gradually we fought it with solar sailing
for a while but then we dropped lower and then solar activity kicked up and that inflated the
atmosphere and there was more atmosphere. So we dropped lower and it's quite the snowball effect
right at the, I mean, we're seeing huge drops now of 20 kilometers a day, whereas usually we were
in the tens of meters per day a while ago. But we're seeing these huge drops because as you get lower in the atmosphere, of course, it drags more and then that drags you down faster and you're in
denser atmosphere and et cetera, et cetera. So we are talking on the 15th. People aren't
going to hear this until at the earliest, the morning of Wednesday, the 16th. Is this so
imminent that, I mean, it could have already happened by the time this show
was published?
It could, but I don't think so.
But then I'm not an expert in deorbiting, although I've been learning a lot lately.
But it could within like the same day that this comes out. The different predictions that are out there from others
and from our own predictions kind of say the 16th or the 17th are kind of most probable,
which is really impressive considering we're still at over 350 kilometers up and like space
stations at 400 kilometers. But we have a giant area and a little tiny mass and they've got a giant area, but a really big mass.
So they don't get as affected by drag, but even they have to boost every few weeks to
stay in orbit.
Please share how you know all this stuff.
Where are these numbers coming from?
Because it's a great answer. Data on the orbit is coming from the 18th Space Defense
Squadron of the U.S. Space Force. They track all the stuff they can in orbit, and they put out the
information on a lot of the stuff publicly. And then they've done predictions and aerospace corporation has our team has that are models but it's tricky because it's hard any time to
predict this but it's very hard because we have this unusual shape so no one
else has done from that altitude something that's really big and really
light it's hard to get it right, but at least it's close.
And the more it drops, the more obviously the predictions will improve. So it's imminent.
So I would dare say we and others are still learning from LightSail too, because this is
such a unique re-entry. Yeah we certainly, at the very least, are contributing a fairly unique data point to how something with a sail will deorbit.
That's actually useful because a lot of, well, a lot, a few groups out there, including some of the members of our team working separately from the Planetary Society are looking at not solar
sails, but drag sails.
So they never tried a solar sail, but at the end of a normal, so to speak, satellite's
lifetime, they deploy one of these sails and then it increases the drag and it de-orbits
much faster.
So it's trying to address orbital debris and get stuff out of orbit faster.
So we at least will contribute something to that.
We're also trying to still get information down on the orientation of the spacecraft
and how it's responding to going lower and lower.
I'm still hoping that we get at least some thumbnails of additional pictures down.
We're running out of time and it's getting trickier to track because the orbit's changing
so fast that it's even harder to communicate than usual, which is usually fairly hard.
Yeah, but you have gotten some really beautiful shots just in the last few days.
Lights Hill has been able to send down and I hope people will take a look at those.
Yeah, and we've got a new one up in the article
and also on the pictures page of LightSail.
Do we need to worry?
It's just going to burn up, I hope.
I wasted so much of our team's time trying to figure out
if we could target you, Matt.
But they were like, Bruce, you're're an idiot which they say fairly frequently
actually I don't say it I just think they think it and so no we're one we
live out of the latitude band that light sail is going in we're constrained
we're in a 24 degree inclination orbit which means when it comes through the
atmosphere it will be somewhere between 24 degrees north and 24 degrees south.
But also, it's small enough that it will completely burn up, vaporize long before anything hits the ground.
So, helmets, not required, you mentioned this in your article, that there might not be a gap in having a solar sail mission underway?
Yeah, it's quite the intriguing coincidence that we've been there three and a half years.
And NEA Scout, NASA's asteroid exploring solar sail mission that will take the next steps out with solar sailing.
We're coming down and they're going up. And so as we've discussed various times,
they're trying to launch on SLS as part of Artemis I. And when they deploy, they will have
a little bit of overlap. We'll see. They're trying to launch tonight, again, the night of the 15th
to the 16th. And we're not trying, but are succeeding in coming down in the next few days.
So we'll pass the torch, so to speak, as we're burning up in a fireball.
Hang in there, guy. Les Johnson, by the way, the leader of the NEA Scout mission,
will be back on the show very soon.
Yeah, that's great.
We will continue to track this. Again, your article is at planetary.org. Easy to find. And that's where you can also track almost in real time, right? The actual numbers and see the graphs as a light sail proceeds toward its impending doom.
Honorable doom.
Honorable doom.
Oh, it is.
It's lasted much longer than we had hoped.
Hey, Matt.
Hasta la vista, baby.
I'll be back.
He will be back because he's not only the program manager for the light sail project.
He is our light sail program. He is the chief scientist for the light sail project he is our light sale program he is the
chief scientist of the planetary society and that means he's he's going to join us in a few minutes
after we hear from linda spelker and sarah who's coming up in just a moment uh but bruce will be
back for what's up sarah i don't think you were fortunate enough to be uh one of our colleagues
at the society when LightSail was
launched, but you certainly have been around for the majority of this three and a half year mission.
What has it meant to you?
LightSail just mechanically as an example of new technologies is really impressive.
But I remember the day that LightSail launched. I wasn't with all of you in person, but I was at
home watching the broadcast online because I was going to be producing a segment about it for for it to take us to new star systems.
I just remember being completely mind blown by it and thinking, how could we ever make that happen?
I might be a little old lady by the time that becomes a reality. So when I learned that LightSail was going to be a real thing,
and not just that it was a real mission that was getting produced,
but that it was backed by 50,000 people around the world as a passion project,
it just makes it feel so much more important and like a pivotal moment in history.
So you were there.
Kind of, in spirit.
Yeah, you were there for the beginning, at least.
And it's so fun to hear.
I didn't know, Griffith, that you were producing a special segment about LightSail for that.
Well, it looks like you're going to be around for the big finish, which who knows, as I
said to Bruce, might even happen by the time people hear this program.
People I know can't see me on the broadcast right now, but I'm actually wearing my LightSail
necklace.
It was given to me as a gift by my partner for my last birthday because light sail has been a big part of my life for the last few years.
I get excited every time a new image comes down and it's sad that it's going to burn up.
But it's just the beginning of a whole new generation of solar sailing spacecraft.
So I'm happy that I get to keep this necklace with me so I can just remember light sail forever. What a great guy.
What a great gift. There is something else that we're excited about at the Planetary Society.
It's not an ending. It's a beginning. Tell us about the Planetary Academy.
This is so exciting because I know that outreach to children
and fostering their love of space has been something that
our founders wanted for our organization since the very
beginning. It's wonderful to finally be able to launch the
Planetary Academy. And for those who haven't been following this
this effort, the Planetary Academy is our membership
program for kids aged nine years or younger. For a lot of people,
including me, our love of space science and exploration started when we were just children.
So this is an opportunity to get the kids in your life a membership to the Planetary Academy
and begin their journey toward understanding more about our place in space. Children who are going
to be enrolled in this program are going to receive quarterly adventure packs.
And these are going to teach them all about our solar system, our planet and its relationship with the moon,
and then ultimately about the inner and outer solar system.
So they have a good picture of what's going on in our place in space and beyond.
These adventure packs, at least for the first one, will include a welcome letter from our CEO, Bill Nye.
So that would be really exciting for kids, I hope. Also an official membership card for them. And then all kinds of
fun little activities. So stickers, activity books, trading cards, games, and things like that to
really get them involved in the adventure through space. I've been waiting for something like this
for young people. Get them while they're young, like Bill says. You've got to get them interested in science
by the time they're 10.
And that's what this is all about.
It realizes a dream of the society
and of Bill's that we have had for a long time.
I am so impressed.
I've seen the materials.
I can't wait to sign up my grandson.
And now's the time to do it, I guess,
because it's a little bit cheaper right now, right?
Yeah, we have a special launch introductory price.
So anybody who's joining into this program before November 28th will be able to purchase the program at $89 a year.
Now, you could still join after that, but if you do, it's going to go up to $99 a year.
Still a great price for what we're offering to kids.
This program will only be
available to children that live in the United States, Canada, and Mexico. We're really hoping
that if this program goes well, we can expand it to other countries in the future. But for now,
it's limited to those countries. Yeah, we're sorry about that. We would love to expand this
across the world. And if it's as successful as I expect it will be, I hope that that will not take too long for us to achieve.
Sarah, all they have to do is go to planetary.org.
It's right there.
It pops right up right now.
Thank you very much for the introduction.
And I look forward to talking again next week.
Thanks, Matt.
You can get to the Planetary Academy page
directly at planetary.org slash academy.
Sarah Alamed is the Planetary Society's digital community manager.
She'll become the host of this show on January 4, 2023.
Our toll-free line is still open to anyone in North America who would like to leave Sarah or me a message, 844-PLANRAD.
And you've got till November 30 to vote for the best space events and more of 2022.
Your ballot awaits at planetary.org slash best of 2022.
I'll be back for a wonderful conversation with Linda Spilker
after this message from Q himself, actor, director, writer, and producer John Delancey.
Star Trek has always represented the hope for a better future. I don't think you can have that
without pushing boundaries. And in the case of space, that is all that we're doing is pushing
those boundaries and finding out more, always finding out more.
And I think it's really important as a human being, as a society, to be able to do something
like that. And this is where we do it. 200, 300 years ago, we did it on sailing ships across the
ocean. Space is important to me because it's kind of a metaphor for risk-taking, tremendous rewards, possible rewards, being
more expansive in one's thinking, and opening oneself up to the infinite possibilities.
Probably the biggest thing that differentiates Star Trek from almost everything else is the
community in which you enter.
Well, the Planetary
Society is that type of a community. If you share, like me, the need to expand into infinite
possibilities, as my character does in Star Trek, and as I have said to Picard on more than one
occasion, then certainly joining the Planetary Society is a good way to go.
Join the Planetary Society.
Linda Spilker, welcome back to Planetary Radio, our most frequent guest here for one more
visit, at least while I'm the host.
And who knows?
I hope we'll have more chances to talk in the future.
Mostly, it's good to see you again.
Welcome back.
It's a pleasure to be here, Matt.
Thank you.
Someone needs to update your JPL bio page.
It leaves off with Cassini Project Scientist 2010 to the present, which is fine.
You got a new job.
What does it feel like to be the Voyager Project Scientist?
It's a tremendous opportunity.
I'm really grateful and happy to have it.
Ed Stone retired, and I was asked to step in for him. It's a tremendous opportunity. I'm really grateful and happy to have it.
Ed Stone retired, and I was asked to step in for him.
Of course, you know, Ed Stone is truly the heart and soul of Voyager and will continue to be so.
He's following the Voyager science.
And so I feel as though I'm just following in his footsteps,
following that dream for Voyager, going into interstellar space,
and we're just going to go as far as we can go.
As long as those two spacecraft stay healthy and keep working,
we're going to keep exploring.
What is it?
Second star on the right and straight on toward morning?
Sounds good.
You know, we had that event that we covered here on Planetary Radio,
that wonderful anniversary event.
And it was so delightful.
I mean, you had a great turnout, first of all.
So many great people who have served the mission over the years. At that point, you had already
come back as deputy project scientist, of course. And Ed was there as well. And it was just
delightful that after all these years, he was still project scientist and able to participate
in that celebration. It was very gratifying. Yes, it was wonderful just to see all of the people, many of whom I hadn't seen probably for a decade or more, come back for
Voyager's 45th anniversary. And already we're thinking ahead to what the 50th anniversary
might be like. That's great. There is another connection that I read about, which I hope you
can say something about. It's the person that you are training to take on the job of Deputy Project Scientist,
the one that you just moved up from.
And she has a connection to Ed.
That's right.
That's right.
Her name is Jamie Rankin.
She's currently at Princeton University.
And she was Ed Stone's last graduate student.
In fact, she started with him in 2012,
just after Voyager 1 had crossed into
interstellar space. And then she graduated in 2018, and she worked with the Cosmic Ray team
analyzing their data, and that was part of her thesis. So I'm very excited. I'd gotten to know
her earlier on in the mission, and I'm very excited to be able to train her and have her
carry Voyager forward because, you know, everything goes'm very excited to be able to train her and have her carry Voyager
forward because, you know, everything goes well. It could be the 2030s until we keep sending back
those last data. Okay, so that's my next question. As I asked Ed every time he was on, what's the
health of the spacecraft? How much more juice are we going to get out of those RTGs? Well, right now, Matt, both spacecraft continue to operate successfully,
and they're sending back data just about every day on interstellar space.
Both are now flying in the local interstellar medium.
Voyager 1 headed north of the ecliptic.
Voyager 2 headed south,
based on the little nudges they got with their last flybys of the planets.
Voyager 1 is currently at 158 AU, if you can imagine.
You know, that's the distance between the Earth and the Sun,
so far surpassing its original intention, you know, to fly by Neptune,
but much further than that.
And Voyager 2 is at 132 AU, and each one is going a little over.
Voyager 2 is going about 3.1 AU per year,
Voyager 1 about 3.6. And so they're just gradually getting further and further away from the sun.
In fact, it takes about 22 hours one way to communicate with Voyager for the data to come
back from Voyager to these deep space network stations to the Earth. And if you think about
that, that's almost a light day, 22 hours for the data to come back. And so then it's another 22 hours for a signal to travel
from Earth back to Voyager. So you have to be patient to communicate with Voyager these days.
It just takes a little bit of time. Well, recently Voyager 1 had some trouble with its attitude
control system. And what happened is the attitude control system information suddenly became garbled. The engineering information that tells us the
status of that data, we just couldn't make sense of it. But the spacecraft continued to operate
normally and send back science data as though nothing were wrong. We just couldn't communicate
with it or understand what it was telling us. And through some very careful detective work, we figured out that what had happened is,
for a reason we don't know why it happened, it switched over to the backup flight data
system computer, which we knew was not working correctly.
And so when we commanded it back to the system that was working, all of a sudden, all of
the attitude control data suddenly
cleared up and the problem was solved. But we're still trying to figure out why it happened.
Clearly, we don't want that to happen again or something else to happen. But right now,
both spacecraft are operating and successfully returning data.
There are so many, I don't want to call them miracles because this is the work of humanity, but it is near miraculous to think of what is happening here.
It also strikes me that this ought to be in the Guinness Book of World Records as the most distant repair job ever accomplished.
That's absolutely true, Matt.
The most distant spacecraft and the most distant, very careful understanding of what's
wrong and be able to fix it with the distances we're at. And if you think about it, those Voyager
computers are tiny by comparison to the computers that now fly on the spacecraft or even have in
your iPhone. Yeah, I'm sure my iPhone is vastly smarter than either of the Voyager spacecraft,
but much less adventurous. I go
back to those RTGs, the radioisotope thermoelectric generators, gradually ticking down as they work
their way through multiple half-lives. You talked about into the 2030s. I know you're having to turn
stuff off as we lose power. How much longer? What are the estimates? How much longer can we keep things
going? Well, it turns out, Matt, that each Voyager is losing about four watts of power per year.
And so we've been slowly turning off the redundant systems. And even in the last couple of years,
turned off the heaters to the particle instruments. They're on the boom that
holds the scan platform about halfway out. And so one by
one, we've turned off the heaters on those instruments and they dropped some 60 or 70
degrees in temperature. And yet all of them continue to work. Yeah, I'm laughing because
I remember you saying this, I think when we last talked at that celebration and how amazed everybody
was. After all these years, they're working at
temperatures far below what they were designed for. Absolutely. And it's, in fact, in some ways,
the sealant noise has gotten better. Some of these detectors like being colder. And so it's been some
recalibration effort. But every single one of them, even one of them, the low energy charged
particle instrument has a little stepper motor that steps it through eight different quadrants to look in different directions.
And that little stepper motor is happily still stepping and still sending back data on all of its channels.
So it really is an amazing story.
I want to make sure people understand what we're talking about here.
Moving parts, a tiny electric motor working in space had to last out to Neptune for Voyager 2.
And so if they had a chance to put in a slightly better part or whatever, they would do that.
And so just very carefully built up the best spacecraft they could.
The other at least semi-miracle that I want to bring up here is the one we've probably talked about in every conversation that has mentioned Voyager on this program for 20 years.
And that is what you said, the Deep Space Network, still talking to these spacecraft
on a regular basis, trying to pick out that tiny stream of photons coming from so far away
with those dishes here on Earth. I mean, hats off to the DSN. Absolutely, Matt. Absolutely.
At 160 bits per second, the data are not coming back very quickly. Although on Voyager 1, we are
still using the tape recorder. The tape is still moving across the heads. We record data from the
plasma wave spectrometer, you know, just a frame or two a week, and then play back those
data. And that's at a much higher rate. We can't really control. We are at the lowest rate we can
get with that tape recorder. And so we have to start arraying four and sometimes five stations,
the 70 meter with multiple 34 meters to catch that very faint signal from space. And we're hoping to
out to about 2026 or so to keep
getting those data back because that was one of the more interesting, more recent discoveries
from Voyager 1, that there's a very faint signal in their data that actually it was a graduate
student, Stella Oker, figured out how to process the data, pick up that faint signal and provide
the plasma density essentially continuously
by looking at those recorded frames and very carefully processing them in a new way.
And so we're hoping to continue to be able to play back those data, you know, for another
several years.
But slowly we're having to turn things off and get more and more creative about what
we turn off next and how we manage the data.
creative about what we turn off next and how we manage the data.
And so it's just a very interesting time, actually, to think about how to carefully manage these spacecraft well beyond the warranty, much further than we were initially expected
to go, and to manage that.
It's possible Voyager 1 might make it out to 200 AU, and that would be the 2030s.
And it would only probably have two instruments still working,
probably the magnetometer and the plasma wave spectrometer, because we will,
over the next several years, have to slowly start turning off the science instruments for their
power. We hope maybe another three years or so we can wait, but at some point, that's the next step.
All right. Well, I look forward to celebrating the 55th
anniversary, I suppose, of the mission. I hope to be around for that just as much as I hope
the Voyager spacecraft are. Linda, you stay one step ahead of me. I wanted to go next to
what are we continuing to learn from the Voyagers that are telling us about this region of
interstellar space that we've never visited before.
Well, when we get out now past the heliopause, we can suddenly start to test some of the ideas and theories we had about interstellar space.
That's the boundary where the sun's influence stops.
It's basically a balance between the sun, the solar wind pushing outward in interstellar space.
And at that boundary, once we crossed it, we're making measurements. And I think one of the biggest surprises is that the sun's influence continues
out past that boundary. If there's a big event, a coronal mass ejection, something on the sun,
we actually are seeing shocks and pressure ramps that are propagating out quite some distance into
interstellar space. We're measuring the energetic particles that are
of solar origin, but also of the origin from other stars in interstellar space. The electron
densities, they were expected to plateau once we got out into across the heliopause, but they
haven't. In some cases, they've continued to pile up and increase, maybe piling up ahead of the heliopause.
Cosmic rays have both the density and the composition.
What's interesting is the cosmic rays themselves display unexpected periodicities, and we're not sure what's out there modulating the cosmic rays.
The magnetic field for interstellar space, we were expecting it,
once we crossed out of the sun's influence, it would rotate into the interstellar direction. And that just hasn't happened yet. For
both Voyagers, it's still predominantly dominated by that solar direction. And we're not sure when
we'll see that rotation happen and why it's persisting and influenced so much by the sun.
And of course, there's a lot of questions about the shape of the heliosphere. Is it like a giant bubble? Does it look more like a comet with a long tail?
Is it maybe, as some people think, twisted like a croissant with two lobes to it? There are lots
of ideas. And as the Voyager mission continues, we hope to be able to provide more information
to the modelers to help better understand the actual shape of the heliosphere.
If you think about it, the sun has a heliosphere,
but other stars have the equivalent, we call them astrospheres.
Studying our own heliosphere,
we're now going to be learning more about those other stars.
Voyager has gone from planetary to heliophysics and now into astrophysics,
so covering many different types of science along the way.
It occurs to me that if you want to figure out the shape of this gigantic body that surrounds our solar system,
it's pretty useful to have two different spacecraft going in two different directions.
That's exactly right.
That's exactly right.
Going above and below the ecliptic, above and below essentially the nose of the heliopause, making measurements
and we can then compare those.
And we also use information from other spacecraft inside the heliosphere.
New Horizons is one of them.
It basically can provide us information about what's coming and what Voyager should expect
to see.
And so we have sort of a synergy with the spacecraft that observe the sun and can let us know
what we'll be seeing. What's interesting, there's a lag, as you would expect, that Voyager 1 right
now is seeing information from the solar minimum. And so in a few more years, it will start to see
a change as we head back to the solar maximum as seen from Voyager 1. Wow. I thought of this question earlier when you said that we're seeing Voyagers able to detect
these coronal mass ejections that we see as we observe the sun.
But of course, we're only one AU away by definition.
How long does it take when something happens on the sun for the effect of that to get out
that far? We're not quite talking about the effect of that to get out that far.
I mean, we're not quite talking about the speed of light, obviously.
Right, right.
It's quite a few years to propagate out to the distance of Voyager.
And what it does is that those shocks interact with the heliopause.
And then from the heliopause, there's a shock that's generated from that
that propagates into interstellar space.
And so in the plasma wave spectrometer data, in the magnetic field data, we see the effects of
these shocks. And since we're now have been looking more at solar minimum, the number,
you know, there used to be a one per year or so, has sort of tapered off. And we'll see if they
increase again as we start to see information from the sun that starts back up towards solar maximum.
So theorists and those modelers you mentioned,
they must be following this data pretty carefully,
and I imagine it's affecting our models of the solar system and other solar systems.
That's right, Matt.
We're getting information to better understand the interactions
between the heliosphere and interstellar space. And what's really nice is there's a group, we call them guest investigators. Many of these are early career young scientists that are eagerly coming in and working with the Voyager teams and coming up with the models to try and better understand exactly what's happening in interstellar
space. And even to tease out, there's still some questions about what exactly happened in the
heliosheet, you know, that region right before the heliopause, and how to put all of the pieces
together into a more global model. So it's really wonderful to have these, you know, young scientists
who are enthusiastic and excited and transferring that knowledge about the Voyager
data to the next generation. And for future missions, if we ever have other missions that
go out as far as Voyager is going, or perhaps even further, for interstellar probe mission,
it would be really good to have as much information to inform that mission as we can.
How big is the Voyager team now? It can't be more than a fraction
of what it was 40 years ago. Oh, Matt, that's absolutely true. On the engineering side,
there's maybe between 15 and 20 people. They're not full-time, and they're the ones that are
sort of working and flying the spacecraft. Each of the Voyager teams is quite small. We have five
instruments across, four on one spacecraft, five on the other. And those the Voyager teams is quite small. We have five instruments across,
four on one spacecraft, five on the other. And those teams are pretty small, but they're really
augmented by these guest investigators. The program that NASA is funding to provide additional
resources and scientists to help us understand those data. But it's, oh, so much smaller than
those days of flying by the planets where you just had a big team of scientists and a team of engineers,
because there was so much going on with both Voyagers.
I'm going to turn away from Voyager, give you a chance to say anything, if you would like, about the Cassini mission,
the one that first got us talking to each other years and years ago.
first got us talking to each other years and years ago. Of course, it has sadly been over now for years, but really, we've also talked about the fact that it's really not over. Is there anything
that you want to call out that is still ongoing because of what Cassini and Huygens were able to
tell us? Yeah, there's a couple of new papers, Matt, that have come out recently from Cassini.
Yeah, there's a couple of new papers, Matt, that have come out recently from Cassini.
One involved the ultraviolet spectrometer.
They had a series of occultations of the rings, you know, using a star, but they also had about 40 occultations using the sun.
And so they've now been able to carefully analyze and look at those and get some information about the particle size distribution of Saturn's rings.
When you look in the ultraviolet,
you're seeing really some of the very smallest particles.
And so trying to understand Saturn's rings and their age and where they might come from,
all of that's very important.
And especially as we look at other missions,
there's going to be a Uranus orbiter
with probe flagship class mission.
What we can learn about Saturn's rings,
we can then apply
at Uranus and the other planets as well. So that paper just recently came out, a more complete
analysis of all of the 41 solar occultations in the ultraviolet. And another one has to do with
the ion and neutral mass spectrometer. They made a series of very interesting measurements in those grand finale orbits as we dove in between the planet and the rings.
And they found a very complex, surprisingly complex spectrum during those final orbits.
And it indicates there's a strong compositional interaction between the rings and the atmosphere of Saturn itself.
And they think that maybe a large amount of the signal that they saw was perhaps coming from vaporized ices and organics from the rings that are now flowing
into Saturn's atmosphere. And so a paper came out recently going into more detail and trying to
understand from those series of flybys that they took data to try and understand what exactly is happening between
Saturn and its rings. And there's such a treasure trove of data on Cassini that there will be
people looking at it, I think, for decades trying to understand and put the pieces together
that come up with a more complete picture of what we know about the Saturn system.
And a final paper that's very interesting has to do with the detection of a new kind of radiation.
They call it the anomalous meriometric radiation.
They've nicknamed it SAM,
so it's the Saturn Anomalous Meriometric Radiation.
And this came from the Radio and Plasma Wave Spectrometer
onboard Cassini.
And they saw a series of these events.
It's not like the Saturn kilometric radiation.
It's something slightly different.
And in very carefully looking at this large suite of data,
they found over 190 of these events.
They seem to be stronger and more frequent in close to Saturn.
And so this paper is just identifying them, pointing them out.
close to Saturn. And so this paper is just identifying them, pointing them out. And so a lot of work still remains to be done to try and understand exactly the connection to the
magnetosphere and what the source of this new SAM radiation is. So those are some of the more
recent papers from Cassini. To clarify, when you say a new type of radiation, it's not like, you know,
something that they invent for an episode of Star Trek. It's something coming from the planet,
and we just don't know what the source is yet? That's right. I should just say it's a newly
detected type of radiation that they've seen called the Serranomalous Meriometric Radiation.
They have, trying to characterize its distribution, frequency,
duration, bandwidth. Some of these, I guess, last as much as 11 hours. And just carefully looking
through the data, they're able to identify and find these. And it just shows you, you know, here,
five years after, more than five years after the Cassini mission ended, still we're finding new
things in the data. And I think that's very
exciting. It is. I appreciate the clarification. First of all, that'll keep my nightmare of some
tabloid or awful website saying Saturn scientist says new form of radiation threatens Earth,
which, you know, it happens. But also, what I like to say, you know, planetary science missions, the gifts that keep on giving.
You're still batting 1,000 because I wanted to ask you about that potential Uranus orbiter as well,
which, as we know, we reported on the show, was the top recommendation in the decadal study from the National Academies for a new mission at least last spring uh that we need
a mission to the outer planets which is what I've been hearing from you and other people including
your husband Tom spielker and so many other people for so many years it sounds like one Cassini has played a role in encouraging the academies to make that a top recommendation.
And two, that we can achieve it.
We did it at Saturn.
We can move one more planet out.
That's right, Matt.
And what's so exciting for me about the Uranus orbiter with probe is that there's only been one spacecraft that's flown by Uranus and Neptune.
Your spacecraft.
That's right.
That was Voyager 2.
And that was back, you know, for Uranus back in 1986.
So it's been a while since we've been out there to take a look at what's going on at this planet.
And so it would be an orbiter, you know, similar to Cassini,
probably full of all different science instruments,
carry an atmospheric probe to actually go in and probe the atmosphere of an ice giant.
These planets, Uranus and Neptune, are different from Jupiter and Saturn.
And so a chance to really study the system in detail.
There are some incredible moons in the Uranus system,
tiny Miranda that looks like it's been torn apart and thrown back together.
Uranus system, you know, tiny Miranda that looks like it's been torn apart and thrown back together. And some of the surfaces that look young, they're not heavily cratered, look young,
like some of the moons in the Saturn and in the Jupiter system. And of course, a very
intriguing and interesting ring system. So really be exciting to go back and study
Uranus in more detail. And so there's a lot of effort underway to start to identify
what are the key science goals that you would have
for a mission to go back to Uranus.
And from there, then you start to talk about what instruments do you want to take
and then what kind of a spacecraft do you need to build
to carry those instruments out to Uranus.
So we have a ways to go, but it's very exciting to think about
the fact that there now will be another mission to an outer planet, one that we've only visited a single time.
And I have been told that there are teams already devoted to putting together these
mission plans, laying out how it might work at JPL and at some of the other centers like
the Applied Physics Lab, APL, out on the East Coast and elsewhere around the country.
So as you say, we have a long ways to go, but it's nice to know that at least it's on the drawing
boards. I think it'd be great if we had the funds. I mean, that's always the problem. How much money
do we have to actually send a pair of spacecraft, similar to what we did with Voyager, and send one
to Uranus and one to Neptune? Oh, gosh, that would be fantastic. Only we had enough money.
That would be a great pair of missions.
They're very different places.
There was something I was going to mention when we were talking about Cassini, and I'll
bring it up now.
It's my curiosity, wondering whether, if it had not been for Cassini, if we would now
be seeing the Dragonfly mission coming together, because
we would just not know that much about Titan. Probably, I'm guessing not enough to be able to
confidently send an octocopter there to fly around.
Matt, I agree. For the Dragonfly mission, what Cassini found, especially with the Huygens probe
parachuting to the surface, the combination of the orbiter plus the Huygens probe really provided enough detailed information to put together a mission like Dragonfly.
And also some of the science questions that need to be answered.
We really pretty much just had the Voyager information.
And we hadn't been able to pierce through the haze of Titan to even see what the surface looked like, much less understand the weather and the atmosphere in detail.
So certainly in this case, starting with the Voyager information,
we built the instruments for Cassini, including the radar and iononeutral mass spectrometer,
just basically to help study Titan.
And now we've got Dragonfly to go back, land in multiple places, and really get down there and study the surface
in detail. What an exciting, exciting mission. Absolutely. And I'm kicking myself now with
apologies to our friends at the European Space Agency for not mentioning Huygens once again,
because after all, it took us down to the surface of Titan. Linda, I hope that
you have many, many more years ahead of you doing this exciting work. But of course, you've been at
it for many years as well. And there is a question as we near the end here that I don't think I've
ever thought to ask. I'm pretty sure I never asked Ed Stone, or anybody else with the Voyager
mission, so I'll ask you now. Star Trek, the motion picture, came out in 1979. I think you
were fairly new on the Voyager mission team in 1979. I gotta think that a bunch of you went to see the Star Trek movie.
And there at the core, the center of the premise of that movie was something called V'ger.
Do you remember what was the reaction to that?
Oh, I absolutely remember that, Matt.
It was so exciting.
I had started on Voyager in 1977.
I was fortunate enough to be actually at the pad, watched the launch.
And so, yes, we went to see the movie.
And, in fact, what had happened is several of the friends I went with had seen the movie already.
And so they knew what was coming.
But I didn't.
I didn't figure out that V'ger meant Voyager.
And so we get to the end of the movie.
And here they are, you know, walking down.
And I'm all, it's Voyager.
It's Voyager.
And everybody was looking at me and not watching the movie and here they are, you know, walking down and I'm all, it's Voyager, it's Voyager. Everybody's looking at me and not looking at the movie, not watching the movie. And it was just so wonderful to think that they're on Star Trek. You know, one of my favorite shows growing
up would watch it all the time. There was Voyager 6 completing its mission in a very amazing way,
you know, collecting all of this data and all of this information. So
that was really a fun, really, really a fun time. Another one with Mimas with the big crater on its
surface, looking so much like the Death Star on Star Wars and making that comparison and just
really that, really the fun times on Voyager for all of those planetary flybys. So happy to be part
of that. Yeah. I had a very similar experience in the theaterys. So happy to be part of that, yeah.
I had a very similar experience in the theater.
I was there with a bunch of friends, college friends,
and a V'ger, V'ger, and then you see it in the distance,
and I thought, oh, it's Voyager!
And they, shh, shh, shh, quiet.
I know.
I did the same thing.
I just shouted out, it's Voyager.
Well, we've now ruined the big reveal at the end of the movie.
For all its flaws, I'm still a fan of that first Star Trek movie.
So I do recommend that people see it.
Linda, it has always been and I hope will continue to be one of my favorite experiences doing this show to be able to talk to you.
As we have watched these missions develop over a couple of decades, let's keep it up.
Oh, absolutely, Matt.
Let's stay in touch. And just want to congratulate you on your retirement and a chance to do what you love the most and continue on and keeping and learning and keeping in touch with the missions and the
projects as well. So congratulations on your retirement. Thank you so much, Linda. And I will
say to you, it means more for somebody working on Voyager than it does for most people. Add Astra
to the stars. Yes, absolutely. Agree. As promised at the opening of today's show, we are back with
the chief scientist of the Planetary Society.
It's Bruce Betts.
It hasn't come down in the last 20 minutes, has it?
Since we recorded that first segment.
Oh, shoot.
I didn't check.
Yeah, don't look.
Don't look.
I don't want you to get more depressed.
What's up other than light sail too, Bruce?
Nothing.
Nothing is up.
Nothing of significance.
Everything's down. Everything's down.
Everything's down.
All right.
Just kidding.
There's still all sorts of good stuff to see.
Plus, you can't really see lights out too very well unless you...
Oh, never mind.
Won't be there to see anyway.
So anyway, we've got Jupiter and Saturn in the evening sky up after sunset, hanging out in the east or south, hanging out high overhead if you're in the southern hemisphere.
Jupiter looking super bright, brighter than the brightest star.
And Saturn looking kind of yellowish.
But we've got reddish Mars.
It's just spectacular.
It's really approaching the brightness of Jupiter. It'll
keep growing in brightness until it's
closest approach to Earth in their orbits
in early December.
And right now, if you look
at it, it's hanging out between
the horns, the tips of
the horns of Taurus.
Be careful, Mars.
It's right
in the middle right now, roughly,
between the much dimmer than Mars stars El Nath and Tian Guan.
Mars is looking much brighter now than Aldebaran,
the reddish star of Taurus,
that it used to be similar in brightness a few months ago.
Now it's much brighter.
Also kind of near Mars, but a little ways away,
is the bright star Capella.
So a whole Mars party.
And I failed to mention that's in the evening within a couple hours after sunset over in the east or later in the evening higher up.
And one more thing.
We've got a meteor shower.
The Leonids, famous for huge meteor storms about every 33 years.
And this is not one of those years.
The last one was 2001.
And so we expect average kind of shower, 10 to 15 meteors.
That's peaking on the night of the 17th and the 18th of November.
But also we'll have extra meteors before and after that date.
Moons coming up.
We'll interfere with visibility, but as long as you look elsewhere, you'll do okay.
But we got the Geminids, much higher average rate coming up in December,
so I look forward to that.
On to this week in space history.
It was this week in 1969 that Apollo 12 successfully landed humans on the moon for the second time.
And think about that.
Quite a delay from Apollo 11.
And yeah, it went beautifully.
Couldn't say that about Apollo 13, of course, but Apollo 12, just a perfect mission.
Well, they did have excitement at the launch when they got hit by lightning twice.
Yeah, there's that.
But they built that rocket well.
Yeah.
It worked.
They did good stuff.
It was a fun time.
Speaking of fun times,
on to random space facts.
All right.
We'll take that for this week.
We'll give you a bye.
Okay. Thank you. So LightSail 2 will have been in space for almost three and a half years.
LightSail 1, the test mission, which never attempted to do solar sail and was designed
to test all of our components and deployment, was a launch to a much lower orbit.
It was in space for about 25 days.
And once they deployed the sail, they only were in space for another roughly seven days.
Because, again, the high drag of having that sail out and the fact that they were in a much, much lower,
they were in a similar orbit to where we have been the last few days. Now, that's an interesting random space fact. Right there, similar orbit
at the moment. Yeah, I mean, I exaggerate. They're in a similar perigee altitude. They're in a highly
elliptical orbit, and we're in a much closer to circular orbit. And it certainly did prepare us for the success of LightSail 2.
It did.
We learned a lot of things, which is a nice way of saying a lot of things didn't work.
And we came up with ways to try to make sure those things would work
or that it was capable of fixing itself if there was an issue on LightSail 2.
And LightSail 1 was successful at its basic
mission, which was to get all the way through deployment of a sail, and it did.
We go on to the trivia question. I ask what former JPL director or directors have won the U.S.
National Medal of Science? How do we do, Matt? This is interesting.
There were a lot of people who only came up with one person.
I don't know if anybody came up with two,
but apparently there were three.
Dun, dun, dun.
As we learn in this poem from Gene Lewin in Washington,
the first director so selected, Von Karman, was his name.
His leadership in aeronautics would garner him acclaim.
In the discipline engineering recognized by Gerald Ford, presented to William Pickering, the second director
to win this award, and third for physical sciences, Edward Stone, selected here, directing the Voyager
mission out beyond the heliosphere. That's very nice. Well done. We got this from Timothy Myers, listener in California. Dr.
von Karman was the first recipient, apparently, of the National Medal of Science. That's according
to Timothy. Here's our winner. He has been listening for a very long time, and I think,
I don't know if my records are correct about this, they're not perfect. But if I'm right, Ed Lupin in California, this is his first win.
Congratulations, Edward.
We're going to send you, Edward, a Planetary Society Kick Asteroid Rubber Asteroid.
Congratulations once again.
Congratulations.
We'll close with this from Dave Fairchild in Kansas.
He only salutes one of these recipients.
This National Medal of Science.
The president clearly can say we like what you're doing in cool engineering.
So thank you for showing the way.
When William H. Pickering won it, it recognized what he had done to put an explorer in orbit.
His JPL stellar home run, Explorer 1.
Explorer 1.
First successful U.S. satellite in orbit.
Low Earth orbit, just like LightSail 2,
getting lower all the time.
Sorry, sorry, couldn't resist.
Hey, congratulations to Ed Stone
on his retirement from 50 years as Voyager Project Scientist, and of course,
to your fabulous guest as the new Project Scientist.
Thank you. I'll pass that along to Linda.
Thank you. So the question for you, in two weeks, when we go over this answer,
it will be our 20th anniversary Planetary radio show. Do you know that, Matt?
Is it something special?
Well, I don't know. I'm trying to make it special. So apparently,
apparently, if for marriages, there's, you know, how they've got all the silly paper, leather,
whatever gifts you're supposed to give different anniversaries. Well,
20th anniversary traditional is China.
No offense, but I would not give you China. The question for you out there is what would
be an appropriate gift for 20th anniversary of Planetary Radio? Go to planetary.org slash radio
contest. We will judge it on however we judge it. Good luck, good hunting, and have fun.
You have until Wednesday, November 23, at 8 a.m. in the morning to get us this answer.
And tell us what you think the 20th anniversary of Planetary Radio should be celebrated with.
Were you to give me a gift?
I don't know. Maybe the gift should go to
the society. I mean, I'm not going to give you a gift anyway,
so it's really all hypothetical.
I'm sure you're not giving me a gift.
I might have a gift for you on the 23rd.
I actually have something in mind.
Ah, jeez. Now you'll have to
stay in suspense.
I have to figure out something. I've got...
Here's an
old can. Do you want that?
Yeah, no, no, no. Give it some more thought.
I think we're done.
Alright, everybody.
Look up in the night sky
and think about fireballs!
Preferably in Dungeons and Dragons.
Thank you and good night.
Or Fireball XL5, which was
my fave. He's Bruce Betts, the chief
scientist of the Planetary Society.
He joins us every week for What's Up.
How could I forget to announce the new contest prize?
It's a stunning Voyager t-shirt from our friends at chopshopstore.com.
You'll love it.
Planetary Radio is produced by the Planetary Society in Pasadena, California,
and is made possible by its members like me.
Join our voyage by visiting planetary.org slash join.
Mark Hilverda and Ray Paletta are our associate producers.
Josh Doyle composed our theme, which is arranged and performed by Peter Schlosser.
Ad Astra.