99% Invisible - 99% Invisible-68- Built for Speed
Episode Date: December 12, 2012I want you to conjure an image in your mind of the white stripes that divide the lanes of traffic going the same direction on a major highway. How long are the stripes and the spaces between them? You... can … Continue reading →
Transcript
Discussion (0)
This is 99% Invisible. I'm Roman Mars.
I want you to conjure an image in your mind of the white stripes.
Not those white stripes, but the white stripes that divide the lanes of traffic going in the same
direction on a major highway. How long are those stripes? You can spread your arms out to estimate if you want to.
Over the course of many years, a psychology researcher named Dennis Schaeffer at Ohio State asked
students from many different parts of the country this question.
And the most common response was two feet.
So if you're like most people, you estimated that those white stripes are two feet long,
maybe a little more.
But if you did, you'd be very, very wrong. This is Tom Vanderbilt. My name is Tom
Vanderbilt. I'm a writer in New York and author of Traffic Why We Drive the Way We Do and
What It Says About Us. Every three pages of Tom's terrific book traffic, I can probably
turn into a 99% of his episode, but back to the highway. Well, early on in my research,
I was talking to a highway engineer
and he said, if your car is ever broken down
on the side of the road,
we've ever been forced to get out of your vehicle
on a highway.
Just take a moment to notice
what a strange landscape it is.
If you're happy to be standing near a road sign,
these road signs are huge.
I mean, they're not meant to be experienced as humans
on foot, they're meant to be experienced at 75 miles an hour.
With the clear view typeface.
Perfectly visible, retro reflective.
And then there are the white stripes.
If you actually kind of got out of your car and were able to walk
on a closed highway and walk from one end of those stripes
to the other, you'd find that, I mean, years ago in the United States,
the highway standard was fifteen
feet long
which is longer than
car itself
current federal highway administration guidelines suggest a length of ten
feet with thirty feet between the dashes
that's something that that is shocking to people
and remember most people in the shape of study said that those stripes
were two feet long
that's such a vast
culture between it's not you know it's not sort of like said that those stripes were two feet long. That's such a vast gulf there between.
It's not sort of like, they're actually five feet
without they were two margin of error kind of thing.
And it goes back to this fundamental point
that when you're in a car at high speeds,
you're experiencing only a sense of the landscape
rather than the actual landscape.
This kind of sense of landscape has been presented to you to essentially make you feel comfortable.
And to make a highway work at what are really
evolutionarily ridiculous speeds for a human to travel.
You have this big, flat, wide open, kind of stretch of road
that even if you have a 65-mph sign,
the message of the road is telling you something entirely different.
I think that's really where a lot of our behavior comes from.
Sometimes you have sort of willful speeding,
willful kind of law breaking,
but a lot of it is just people are paying attention
to the visual messaging of the road,
not to their speedometer.
Long dividing lines and clear vistas,
give the illusion that you're going at a reasonable speed,
as soon as something encroaches into view, you get a sense of how fast you're going.
That's one reason why those temporary concrete walls that crews put up right next to the road
during construction are so unnerving. The error in perception of white striped length
is attributed to the fact that when we drive on the highway, we tend to look so far ahead that we usually only experience the dashes and gaps
when they are very far away in an angle where they look shorter.
But there's no consensus as to why people all over the country
were so consistently wrong with the two-feet estimate.
It's, yeah, become my favorite, one of my favorite cocktail party, you know, facts.
Mine too.
Stump the driver with this white stripes information.
I don't want to leave you with the impression that the white dividing lines are uniform though.
You won't find, you know, 10 foot highway lines on a, say, a boulevard in New York City.
And you probably won't find 10 or 15 foot stripes on bridges or highway on ramps.
Or let's hope you don't because that's an entirely inappropriate design language for that space.
Limited access highways are designed for a very precise purpose.
There's the highways meant for uninterrupted fast flowing traffic.
Get people from point A to point B, it's
quickly as possible with no interruptions. I mean that sort of environment does
not work in cities or suburbs. The problem is when that approach is grafted into
places where it doesn't belong. I think we're actually kind of paying the price
for this right now in some suburban environments where you find these kind of
arterial highways that were built almost an engine highway engineering
standard with again these long sightlines, wide roads encouraging people to go
fast and then we went and built all kinds of development along those arterial
highways which was never really supposed to be there but with so many people
driving on these roads they became absolutely irresistible to commerce.
This is kind of the new American Main Street, right, where you have your Costco's and your
your fast food and all sorts of in and out parking lots, driveways, drive-throughs.
Yet people also going very fast and kind of Eric Dumbaw does a lot of research
suggesting that these are really some of the most dangerous places to currently
drive in America, not crowded urban cities, which is what a lot of people would think.
The whole approach is called the forgiving road.
The idea was that, you know, to first try to minimize the potential that a crash could
happen through, again, through lack of obstacles, you know, generous sightlines, all these
sorts of things.
But then if crash did happen to kind of mitigate the effects of what would happen to not
punish the driver for the
mistake that he will inevitably make. This was I'm quoting some of the language from the time.
So you see that nowadays in things like in California, you'll have your guardrails that are sort of
wire guardrails that if car strikes that guardrail tends to catch on the guardrail rather than
being bounced back out into traffic, which causes another series of collisions.
So this forgiving road is a positive thing in terms of good safety engineering.
But they were so sort of seduced by it that the call was made to bring it into
even the surface street network.
So things like street trees began to be deemed hazards by engineers,
just outright hazards.
I mean, that makes sense on a high-speed country road,
but if you're talking about residential street,
we're not supposed to be going more than 25 anyway,
is the presence of a street tree
in the side of the road where it's providing shade
and comfort to pedestrians,
is that the same sort of hazard?
Is it even a hazard at all?
The conclusion many planners came to was, yes,
trees are a hazard.
You find pre-war suburbs, you have the street,
a set of trees, and then the sidewalk.
Coast war, this sort of shift began to happen
where the trees removed on the other side of the sidewalk.
Suddenly pedestrians were put into the position
of being the buffer between drivers
and those menacing trees.
There was sort of a pernicious thing that happened here is that, you know, as you move those trees
away, the visual sensation of the road became wider. And if there's one kind of iron law of traffic
engineering, it gets into this visual perception thing as well. The wider a road is or is perceived
to be the faster driver speed tends to increase. And of course, you know, the final,
if you look at sort of 1990s era, you know,
the suburbia that they just kind of eliminated the sidewalk
and the trees altogether.
So that was sort of the final solution,
just to eliminate any kind of hazard.
And Tom Vanderbilt says you can almost date
a subdivisions development based on that shift.
a subdivisions development based on that shift.
This points to one of the problems about road engineering is that humans tend to consume the extra
engineering measures that have been built in for their safety.
Much in the same way I like to draw the analogy with some of the research that's been done on food packaging by Brian Wandsick at Cornell University. You're doing experiments where, you know,
if you give people, just random group people,
large buckets of popcorn filled to the top
with popcorn and give them a smaller amount of popcorn
in a smaller package, they'll just eat more
of the larger package, whether they're,
it has nothing to do with their level of hunger.
It's just the size of the package influences their behavior.
And I think a lot of our road environments are sort of like that. They're over engineered for this safety. And then we
tend to consume a lot of the extras, getting us back to this kind of homeostatic edge that we're
always kind of playing with, I think.
99% Invisible is Sam Greenspan and me Roman Mars. It's a project of 91.7 local public radio, KALW in San Francisco, and the American Institute
of Architects in San Francisco. You can find the show and like the show on Facebook. happens as go.
You can find this show and like the show on Facebook.
In fact, that's where a lot of the discussion and interaction happens.
So join us over on Facebook.
We're getting pretty close to 10,000 likes, which I would really enjoy.
I tweet at Roman Mars, and we have links to all the stuff that we've been talking about
in this episode at 99%invisible.org.
Oh, one more thing.
I and every other creative audio lover
owes a huge debt to the Third Coast International
Audio Festival.
And every year I send them a little something
to make sure that they keep going
or I buy a T-shirt and they have hands down my favorite
T-shirt design in the whole world across the front is the word listen written in braille. I have like six of them in every color.
It's a must-have for any radio lover. You can find out the various ways that you can support
the Third Coast International Audio Festival at 3rd Coast Festival dot org.
at 3rd Coast Festival.