Behind the Bastards - Part Two: What's New with Alex Jones?

Episode Date: June 9, 2022

We continue our update of Alex Jones by discussing his many, hilarious, legal battles.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information....

Transcript
Discussion (0)
Starting point is 00:00:00 Alphabet Boys is a new podcast series that goes inside undercover investigations. In the first season, we're diving into an FBI investigation of the 2020 protests. It involves a cigar-smoking mystery man who drives a silver hearse. And inside his hearse look like a lot of guns. But are federal agents catching bad guys or creating them? He was just waiting for me to set the date, the time, and then for sure he was trying to get it to happen. Listen to Alphabet Boys on the iHeart Radio app, Apple Podcast, or wherever you get your podcasts. What if I told you that much of the forensic science you see on shows like CSI isn't based on actual science?
Starting point is 00:01:21 And the wrongly convicted pay a horrific price. Two death sentences in a life without parole. My youngest? I was incarcerated two days after her first birthday. Listen to CSI on trial on the iHeart Radio app, Apple Podcast, or wherever you get your podcasts. Well, that's how you start a podcast. That's how professionals start their professional podcasts. That's their real big boy jobs. That's right. Hey everybody, welcome back to Knowledge Fight the Bastards. I'm Jordan.
Starting point is 00:02:03 I am allegedly Robert Evans, but I'm very tired right now and making myself some coffee to get perked up. What are we? What are we? What are we? What a stardust, man. The big questions are what we're going to deal with today. That's how you fucking cast a pod. Welcome to Behind the Bastards Smoke Circle. Listen, man, at the quantum level, we don't even know where our fucking electrons are, man. What are you? See, that's the title of a whole podcast right there.
Starting point is 00:02:46 Can I recommend to you Reset Wars? It's going to blow your fucking mind. It's the most important work someone's ever done. Speaking of blown minds, I think Alex's mind has been blown lately by the idea that there are consequences occasionally for saying things. That is true. It can happen. It appears to be in the process of happening. He seems to be in the finding out portion of the fucking around. I guess that's what we're talking about today. Is it not, Mr. Dan? Yeah, definitely. And I would say in terms of that, he got more than his share of fucking around. He certainly did. The ratio of finding out to fucking around is quite low.
Starting point is 00:03:31 It's astonishing, really. Yeah. I mean, we're yet to see what the damages are in the cases that he's lost, but I mean, it could be a huge blow of finding out. Sure. But still, like there's a lot of fucking around that didn't end up getting figured out. It's hard not to argue that he really could believe for a long stretch of time that he could fuck around without ever having to find out. Yeah, and he could probably convince himself that he was a charmed lucky person who like is untouchable. Yeah, yeah, basically nothing ever. And he and he was that's a reasonable conclusion to come to until it really wasn't.
Starting point is 00:04:09 Well, I mean, it's really safe to be like Hillary Clinton is a demon and Soros and stuff because they're public figures and they're never going to take the time to respond. And you say and who among us is not insisted that Hillary Clinton is a demon in some form or another. I think two of the three of us. Yeah, yeah, yeah. You said that sin. So, Robert, we're going to talk a little bit about the lawsuits today. Yay. This is exciting to me. This is very exciting because this is so rarely, I guess, I mean, there's the you can view this in two ways.
Starting point is 00:04:49 One of them is that this is a rare case of a bastard actually getting their comeuppance and it continues to be beautiful to watch unfold. The less optimistic is to actually think about the raw amount of human effort that was necessary for Alex to kind of start to pay the price for the things he's been doing. Like because we're pretty early in the finding out period, although we are we are starting to hit the fun part of that. It's yeah. And I think the other thing that's kind of like sour grapes about it is that like, you know, he's going to find out, but it's not like he's going to learn his lesson. No, it's not possible. And everybody who listened to him and believed that he was saying something meaningful isn't going to find out along with him. Yeah, no kind of the disappointing down to earth aspect of it and at the same time though.
Starting point is 00:05:38 I mean there's it's inarguable. I mean you just had Gareth and Davon from the doll. Yeah, and I'm fairly certain that he said on your show that there's something very satisfying about seeing a career grifter finally get his comeuppance. Yes, it's impossible to argue that. Yeah, you know it is it is nice when it happens this exactly the one time that it's happened. Yeah, right. There's that catch me if you can kind of like that spirit that we love of of like who he's going to get away with it. But then also at a certain point you go too far.
Starting point is 00:06:14 We got him. Yeah. Yeah. So here we go. Alex is getting sued in multiple cases stemming from his coverage of Sandy Hook in both Texas and Connecticut. He recently settled a case where he was being sued over statements he made about Brennan Gilmore and the Unite the Right rally. He's also facing a still facing a case where he's being sued for misidentifying a person named Marcel Fontaine as the Parkland shooter. He's lost all the Sandy Hook cases by default judgment and at this point it's just a matter of the jury deciding how much he owes and damages.
Starting point is 00:06:45 It's just a money thing. The Texas cases go to trial on April 25th and if I recall correctly the Connecticut ones are set for I think it's just one case in Connecticut set for this summer. Yeah. I'm not sure when Fontaine goes to trial but Alex is absolutely going to lose that case. Oh for sure. 100%. He definitely did the thing and his he is not taking any of it seriously which is like a default judgment. That's like I mean it's slightly more common than football games being called on account of unicorns.
Starting point is 00:07:17 Right. Like it doesn't happen. Barely. Yeah. Yeah. It's it's super rare except for in cases where people like bills lost all those Super Bowls is too many unicorns on the field. Yeah. One year.
Starting point is 00:07:31 Yeah. Yeah. I think there were three in a row. One was unicorns. One was trolls. Yeah. That Tom Brady got elevated to the quarterback of the Patriots because Doug Flutey was gored by a unicorn. It was brutal.
Starting point is 00:07:44 Dangerous. Yeah. Got on the business. It worked for unicorns. We wouldn't have to deal with that asshole. So yeah. Kit Daniels the guy who wrote the initial story that identified Fontaine as the shooter sat for deposition and at many points he testified things that will read very similarly to a confession in a courtroom setting. So that one is fun.
Starting point is 00:08:05 That one screwed for Alex. There's no hope. There's not much more you can say other than if somebody murdered a guy and you said in your deposition. Yeah. He probably murdered that guy and Alex told me to exactly. It's not going to go well after that. Yeah. This is what most lawyers would call in advised.
Starting point is 00:08:24 Yes. Yeah. I think one of the main misconceptions about the cases against Alex is that they're just about him asking questions about the Sandy Hook shooting and that is just not the case. There's a lot of things that need to be unpacked and the first is that the only reason that this case is able to be taken to court is because Owen Schreuer made videos. You know, one of them was claiming that it was not possible for Neil Hesslin to have held his son after the shooting and Alex covered Owens video on his own show and they did this in twenty seventeen. This was in response to Mr. Hesslin appearing in an interview with Megan Kelly discussing the conspiracy theories about his son's death, which obviously angered info wars in concert. In concert with this, Erica Lafferty, whose mother was the principal of the school and died in the shooting. She made a public comment that Trump needed to publicly distance himself from Alex, someone who had traumatized her and many other families.
Starting point is 00:09:17 Yeah. In response to both these things, Owen made videos attacking Hesslin and Lafferty, which Alex reared other things that Alex had said in like twenty fifteen. For example, those would be outside the statute of limitations, but this rearing of the claims made them fair game. It was a huge strategic error on Alex and Owens part, but they've just gotten away with everything up to this point like we talked about. Fuck around all the time. Yeah, why wouldn't it work? The idea of a strategy is almost anathema to them. So making a strategic error is something they feel is impossible to do.
Starting point is 00:09:51 The second thing that's important to make clear is that Alex and in fours were not just asking questions. They were promoting Wolfgang Halbig, who is actively harassing the family members of the victims of the shooting. They were helping Halbig raise money to fund his activities. They were painting victims family members like Lenny Posner as enemies of the First Amendment and publicly airing the address where he received his mail. They sent Dan Badandi, a reporter whose only talent is yelling and causing a scene to Newtown along with Wolfgang Halbig, where they harassed people affected by the shooting. Okay, when you put it all together like that, it sounds like they were, you know, ghoulishly harassing the parents of murdered children. But what you're not taking into account, Dan, is the content. Uh-huh.
Starting point is 00:10:39 I'm taking into account the content. No, I think we've been so taking into account the content. Well, maybe we can talk about this on the next episode of my new show. Robert Evans tracks down people who have lost loved ones and recent tragedies and heckles them from the street corner. That's an interesting show. That's an interesting show. I am surprised the company's paying for it. Let me tell you.
Starting point is 00:11:07 I think in the room, the pitch didn't sound good. I'm going to be honest. There's a small chance you would be able to pull this off as satire. That was the original pitch for H. John Benjamin's Dog Bites Man. I'm pretty sure. It would be funny to like, well, I don't know, funny, maybe the wrong word. But like as a bit to make your thing be like, create an Alex Jones conspiracy theory, but about like tuberculosis. You didn't lose your mom to TB.
Starting point is 00:11:38 There's no such thing. Jokes on you. I saw a doctor in the woods. There's absolutely no way you're going to get out of this without. Yeah, multiple times. Jordan has come up with like fake dumb conspiracy ideas and then low and behold. It is impossible. Yeah.
Starting point is 00:11:59 Okay, I think that there's just like this key distinction that needs to be made between what actually is going on and what they did and the whole idea that we were just asking questions because I think that that suckers a lot of people in who would be critical of Alex and in for his actions if they understood the fuller picture of what they were engaged in. So basically we have a number of episodes. It's a series we called formulaic objections because in the first one Alex's lawyer keeps saying objection form. Yeah. So we came up with the name that way, but we have a bunch of those and those are long form deconstructions of the depositions themselves, but I've brought some clips from these depositions that I thought would be particularly interesting or relevant to enjoy to be to be up front. This is a very condensed version because we have roughly I think six formulaic objections. So yeah and a total of at least twenty to twenty four hours between those episodes. Yeah, probably if you're like oh they weren't they weren't as granular as they could have been your goddamn right we weren't the depositions themselves are like six hours.
Starting point is 00:13:17 Seven hours long. So yeah, I'm going to jump in. Are you are you prepared? I am. I am. Well, that may be putting it a little strong, but yes. So one of the things that happens throughout the depositions that Alex is in is he has claims that he's made repeated to him and the question obviously is where did this come from? Can you back this claim up? And for someone like Alex, he everything he says is right. He's totally always right. He studies. He researches things. So this shouldn't be a real problem for him in a setting where it's like you finally have your opportunity to prove things under oath. Yeah, this is your moment, bro. Yeah, exactly and consistently he has no idea and nothing like he just has nothing. Never heard of Sandy Hook. So in this first clip I have here it has to do with a claim that Alex made that Bloomberg had sent out an email just before the Sandy Hook shooting. I think even the night before he says to all of his people to get ready because something big is going to happen and they need to get their gun control agenda squared away. So here is a question about his source like on that email. Let's talk about that Bloomberg email that comes up this idea that there was an email sent the day before Sandy Hook saying get ready next 24 hours is going to be a big event. That email you've been asked for that email and you say you don't have it right. We were we were covering reports of the email that was sent out to the activist groups that have been in the news. Where were you covering it? What do you mean were you covering it?
Starting point is 00:14:56 We were covering the reports of them activating their anti gun rights organization. Okay, well, so here's the thing, Mr. Jones. At first, I thought there must be some email coincidentally sent on the day before Sandy Hook that Bloomberg or his people sent that you must be willfully misinterpreting or something like that. But the problem is, nobody who's looked at this has been able to find any evidence that such an email has ever existed. And I want to know if you can explain it. Well, I'm just not taking your sources. That's the case. Well, I'm asked that's why I've asked you questions in discovery. And you haven't been able to produce that email to me. Have you? Well, you guys are asking if we have an email in our emails. I was reporting on other news reports about an alert to put out to their group. All right, could you find those reports if you identify your source? Well, I mean, hey, you can hold back a source if you want to. But I remember being online, I can try to go find that again.
Starting point is 00:15:56 What do you mean you can hold back a source if you want to? What does that mean? I mean, if I have a confidential source on something, I'm allowed to hold back the confidential source for their protection. But that's not what's happened. In this case, I remember the news articles about it that we reported on. So you could find those, right? I should be able to. So this was in his 2019 deposition. Let's remember how this is three years ago. He has had plenty of time to find this email. Yes. And so here is him in the December 2021 deposition being asked about this again. Do you remember we talked in that last deposition about the Bloomberg email where Bloomberg sent an email out to his people, said, get ready in the next 24 hours, there's going to be a big event. You remember that?
Starting point is 00:16:45 That was a new story. Yeah. And then we talked about it for a while because you had brought that up to me. You were like, look, I don't have the email itself. That was something I was reporting on. I had, there was a story about it and I was reporting on it. You remember that? I do. And then you remember he told me you could find it for me, right? Yeah, I believe I said that. And then you never gave it to me. I'd be honest with you banks and you don't really inhabit much of my mind.
Starting point is 00:17:09 You don't have much respect for any of this process, do you? None of it. I don't think you have respect for America or anything. Okay. That's an interesting. That's an interesting move. Cotton. Let's see how that plays for you. You know, you gotta, you gotta lash out a little bit when you have been over years unable to produce the nonsense source that you have for, for this claim. And I think that that's characteristic of a lot of the ways that they, you know, obviously the, the questioning is like, where did this stuff come from? Where, where, what were you working off of? And it's just there's an inability to even like pretend that his reporting is based on anything. Right.
Starting point is 00:17:51 Robert, do you have a favorite show or like a favorite episode of a favorite show that you can rewatch over and over and over again? Oh, yeah. I mean, for sure. A bunch of them. Yeah. Yeah. So for me, it's cowboy bebop. And there's this episode speak like a child that's almost like dialogue lists, you know, and it's just this great soundtrack. And I can watch it over and over and over again. And I feel that way for the first time about a deposition. Like I can watch Alex get dismantled by Mark Bankston over and over and over again without ever getting bored. It's you just don't get moments like these.
Starting point is 00:18:29 You don't terrible people where it's just like all it's almost like he's it's almost like cosmic judgment. It's like it's like seeing somebody before an omnipotent judge that's just like, no, this is wrong. And this is wrong. And this is what you did, right? And he just has to like he's in front of fucking anubis with yeah. Yeah. Yeah. It's it's something else. It's pretty good. It's pretty good. Check out this fucking feather. It wakes a million pounds and it's still not heavy enough. You piece of shit. So what you you notice there how Alex when you sort of backed into a corner lashes out and he's like you don't care about that.
Starting point is 00:19:15 America. He does that a bit in these deposition settings and when confronted about some of these ideas about Sandy Hook, one of the things he does in these deposition. I think it's probably terribly advised really bad decision is to sort of imply that he still thinks Sandy Hook was fake. Again, bold. Second of all, you, Mr. Jones, you understand this jury is going to watch the videos of you saying unequivocally, not I see how people could think this, but unequivocally saying Sandy Hook is completely. Oh, no, Mr. Jones, you don't get to interrupt me. You understand that, sir? You're here to ask questions for this jury. And I want you to listen to the questions. You know this jury is going to watch videos of you saying multiple times over and over again.
Starting point is 00:20:04 Sandy Hook is completely fake, completely synthetic. It is not real, right? And you're going to sit here in this chair and say, oh, actually what I said, actually what I said is I could see how some other people could think it was fake. You know the jury is going to see those videos and you know they're going to hear your words. Do you think that they should take you seriously whatsoever when they can see you saying the things you said you didn't say? I know. Objection form. Go ahead and answer the question. I know that the jury is going to say, I always heard that people are innocent until proven guilty, not guilty until proven how guilty they choose, and that the system is actually scared for me to put on evidence.
Starting point is 00:20:41 The truth is deep down, I still have real questions about Sandy Hook and a lot of the anomalies and what's going on. I love it. And the CIA visiting Atomlands before it happened and the FBI, that was in mainstream news, and just all the bizarreness that went on, the public still has real questions. Just like to do about Jesse Smollett or the Roe v. Wade baby that never actually died or WMDs in Iraq, or just the Gulf of Tonkin or Operation Northwoods or Bubba Wallace or, you know, so many of these things that have happened, most of these hate crimes and type things end up being false flags. So I still, when I look at events, question it and say, could this be staged?
Starting point is 00:21:19 We look for telltale signs. So yeah, his mind always retreats back to like hate crimes or fake. Yeah. That is kind of a safe harbor for him. Yeah. Yeah. It is interesting to see him kind of go back to what he considers base, you know, like a kid playing a tag or something, but with, you know, yeah, like racism.
Starting point is 00:21:42 You know what else is like the game tag, but with racism? No, that's not a good way to lead it. Well, it's time for ads anyway. So here's some fucking ads. During the summer of 2020, some Americans suspected that the FBI had secretly infiltrated the racial justice demonstrations. And you know what? They were right. I'm Trevor Aronson and I'm hosting a new podcast series, Alphabet Boys.
Starting point is 00:22:11 As the FBI sometimes, you got to grab the little guy to go after the big guy. Each season will take you inside an undercover investigation. In the first season of Alphabet Boys, we're revealing how the FBI spied on protesters in Denver. At the center of this story is a raspy voiced, cigar-smoking man who drives a silver hearse. And inside his hearse was like a lot of guns. He's a shark. And not in the good and bad ass way. He's a nasty shark.
Starting point is 00:22:42 He was just waiting for me to set the date, the time, and then for sure he was trying to get it to heaven. Listen to Alphabet Boys on the iHeart Radio App, Apple Podcast, or wherever you get your podcasts. I'm Lance Bass and you may know me from a little band called NSYNC. What you may not know is that when I was 23, I traveled to Moscow to train to become the youngest person to go to space. And when I was there, as you can imagine, I heard some pretty wild stories. But there was this one that really stuck with me about a Soviet astronaut who found himself stuck in space with no country to bring him down. It's 1991 and that man, Sergei Krekalev, is floating in orbit when he gets a message that down on Earth, his beloved country, the Soviet Union, is falling apart. And now he's left defending the Union's last outpost.
Starting point is 00:23:41 This is the crazy story of the 313 days he spent in space. 313 days that changed the world. Listen to The Last Soviet on the iHeart Radio App, Apple Podcast, or wherever you get your podcasts. What if I told you that much of the forensic science you see on shows like CSI isn't based on actual science? The problem with forensic science in the criminal legal system today is that it's an awful lot of forensic and not an awful lot of science. And the wrongly convicted pay a horrific price. Two death sentences and a life without parole. My youngest, I was incarcerated two days after her first birthday.
Starting point is 00:24:27 I'm Molly Herman. Join me as we put forensic science on trial to discover what happens when a match isn't a match and when there's no science in CSI. How many people have to be wrongly convicted before they realize that this stuff's all bogus. It's all made up. Listen to CSI on trial on the iHeart Radio App, Apple Podcast, or wherever you get your podcasts. We're back! Indeed. You're some fucking ass! Hey listen dickwads, buy some shit or die! Yeah hey motherfuckers, get a bed, buy a fucking mattress.
Starting point is 00:25:15 You already got a mattress, I don't give a shit, put it somewhere. Put it on the fucking floor and use it as a chair, god damn it. You fucking cowards. If you have a mattress, I bet it didn't come in as small of a box as this one. Just get really abusive, like what is it, Dick's Last Resort, where the windstaff gets to curse at you or whatever? Yeah. Isn't it Ed DeBevix? Ed DeBevix is a Chicago one.
Starting point is 00:25:38 Oh sorry, sorry. I think every town has their version of that. We had a couple friends. In some places it's just Waffle House. Kid Rock. Yeah. It's a boxing ring. So here is another club of Alex retreating to basically just saying like Sandy Hook is probably actually fake.
Starting point is 00:25:58 Can you know, just admit that for the jury that you said them, they're going to see the videos. Well sure, they should investigate Sandy Hook themselves. Objection form. They should look into it themselves and see why people ask questions. You hope they don't. No I really hope they don't. That's not going to play well in a courtroom. I don't think I don't think that's going to fly.
Starting point is 00:26:29 Dan, I just don't think that's going to do great for him. All right, your honor, I recognize that you have already found me guilty in a oddly specific circumstance that happens once a hundred years. However, have you considered that maybe all of you are wrong and I've been right the whole time? Yeah, I was in the room when he said that and I almost gasped. It's very hard to like hold in my like. Oh, that's a bad idea. That's why I was not invited. So this next clip is actually a little bit longer because like some of these deposition clips obviously are like questions and answers.
Starting point is 00:27:12 They can be a bit longer, but I think that this is something that's kind of relevant. And it's worth it. And this is Mark, the attorney, asking Alex about an email that Wolfgang Halbig sent to a family member of one of the victims at Sandy Hook and Alex's response to it. And then I'm going to go ahead and read this email to you. It says, Nick and Laura Phelps did a great job acting in Newtown, Newtown, Connecticut on December 14th, 2012. I visited their home today at 1924 Westover Reserve Boulevard, Windmere, Florida, 34786. And thanks to Lieutenant Van Gaely telling me during my wellness check of Nick and Laura Phelps that they no longer live in Newtown, Connecticut and that they are now Richard and Jennifer Sexton. Guess what? He is totally right.
Starting point is 00:28:07 And can you believe it that my Newtown Police Department guided me in the right direction? They have a beautiful home with a three car garage. They were not home today, but the good news was that the three adult female moms with their children standing outside their homes observed me and wanted to know what I was doing. It was spring break. It is spring break for Orange County, Florida school. I showed them this picture and I told them that I did not want to go to the wrong house to surprise Nick and Laura from Newtown, Connecticut, a.k.a. Richard and Jennifer Sexton today. It took a few minutes for them to look at the pictures. And then when they asked why I wanted to speak to them, I told them that I had been in Newtown and wanted to surprise them since they now live in Florida.
Starting point is 00:28:49 They asked for my name, which I gave them as Wolfgang Halbig. They told me how I would know them, knew them, and I told them that they have been on the national news, so I wanted to meet them again. Our conversation was all about Newtown, Connecticut, so she said, do you mind if I text her? I said, absolutely not. I waited about 10 minutes only to learn that they did not know me, which surprised me. They verified the pictures and why would she text them about Newtown, Connecticut and that someone from there wanted to visit if they were not Nick and Laura Phelps now. Richard and Jennifer Sexton. At first, I did not want to enter since it is a gated community, but several people told me, just go on in there, there is no security guard at the gates.
Starting point is 00:29:32 If there is CCTV, they will see me being told to go in, and that is the only reason why I would not have entered. Now, who says law enforcement does not know what they are doing? Thank you, Newtown, Connecticut Police Department. Can you turn the document over? First of all, read that email correctly? Yes. And then on the back, you see there is a picture here, right? Yes.
Starting point is 00:29:55 And at the top it says Sandy Hook Hoax Actors, correct? Yes. And it has arrows pointing to the Phelps, right? Yes. And then at the bottom it says playing the part of grief-stricken parents, correct? Yes. This is a horrible email, isn't it? I have never seen this email and it is...
Starting point is 00:30:10 Objection form. Yes, I don't like this email, and again, this is someone else, Wolfgang Halbig, after I already clearly knew that he cracked up, and so that's not my work. The next question that's asked is about how Alex did a video after this, repeating Wolfgang Halbig's claims. Yeah. So yeah, that's some of the reality of what the people who were being promoted by Alex and Alex was helping them raise money for their activities. These were the things that Wolfgang Halbig was doing. Yeah. And it's tough to listen to, not least, which because it's so long, but at the same time, like, it is part of the...
Starting point is 00:30:51 It is part of the length of it that is the torture, as well, of like, no, there's no way you can continue going on, and everything he does is just another fucking shovel full of dirt in the grave of misery, and it's just a fucking awful. Yeah, I mean, it's literally like, when you actually peel back and think about what's going on here, a crank is stalking people whose children were killed. Hey, but at least he's getting paid for it. Yeah, Alex is paying him because all he cares about is that it fills airtime, you know, and maybe it'll get him talked about on the news, which brings in traffic. Well, at very least, if Alex isn't paying him, he's promoting the organization that takes donations. The Wolfgang is running, so, you know, indirect payment. Right, right, right. Yeah, it's just disgusting.
Starting point is 00:31:43 So, but Alex at least has the kind of base intelligence of being able to be like, that sucked. Yeah. Are you okay? Now, even I went listening to that. Like, you almost want him to say, even I, you know, like, at least an admittance of like, listen, I don't believe shit, but this is bad. You would expect me to be thrilled by that. Exactly. You would expect me to say this is great.
Starting point is 00:32:10 So one of the reasons that Alex ended up getting the default judgment was because he kept sending incompetent and unprepared people to be the corporate representative for the company. He sent Rob do twice and he couldn't answer any of the questions. And then he sent Daria Carpova, who's one of his off-air talents at Info Wars, and she was actually asked about this exact same email that we just heard. And in contrast to Alex's response, here's what she thought of it. An email doesn't creep you out. You personally? Objection form. It creeps me out the way you're reading it.
Starting point is 00:32:50 Yes. It doesn't creep you out to have Wolfgang Havig showing up at these people's houses and describing their three-car garage and all that stuff. Accusing them of being people that are not actually are. That doesn't have any, you know, any strong feelings one way or another on there. Objection form. Correct. Are you asking my personal opinion? Yeah, your personal opinion.
Starting point is 00:33:23 Strikes me as a passionate man who's doing an investigation, something he believes in his own heart and wants to get to the bottom of. Thank you, Ms. Carpova. She's terrifying. She scares me so much. I've listened to that clip. How many times have you played that for? Like four? I don't know. Yeah. Once in the episode. Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Starting point is 00:33:44 She's terrifying. Yeah. It's bizarre to be able to hear those words almost like, isn't that email Wolfgang is almost like relishing the telling of like, I was in their space. Yeah. It's, it's sick. Yeah. And to hear like the response from Alex is the socially appropriate response. And then from Daria, it's the.
Starting point is 00:34:06 Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. I mean, trying to rationalize super creep them. If you've ever seen a horror movie, one of those found footage horror movies where somebody has like that personal camera and they just continue looking at somebody while they're asleep. And you're aware that nobody else knows about this. And this is a first person look that is terrifying. And you can see Daria being like, well, I mean, it's just a good idea to keep an eye on them while they're asleep, right?
Starting point is 00:34:36 You know, you don't want them to have, what if they have a sleep apnea? They might be in trouble. And that's why you need to constantly videotape strangers kids while they sleep. Cause what if they get hurt? There's nothing to be said. I mean, look, you're joking about that, but I do support not, you know what? That's not even a good, that's not a good bit to start. We don't, we don't, we don't need that bit. That doesn't even work.
Starting point is 00:34:58 It deserves us. It deserves us. Yeah. We don't need that bit. Um, let's watch as you while you're asleep. Well, yes, actually some of our sponsors, but that is why people pay for them. Listen, let's get good. So, um, one of the things that is a hallmark of Alex's discussion about his lawsuits is that like he did everything right.
Starting point is 00:35:22 And he's just getting jammed up and it's, it's a complete setup and a fraud. Um, and so this, this clip, uh, from his deposition, uh, is a really interesting glimpse into how he seems to not even be aware of how he didn't do anything he was asked to do. You've repeatedly said that this, this court process, this lawsuit, what just happened is all a sham because you turned everything over and that court still defaulted you anyway, right? Um, yes, uh, Owen Schreuer, you never sent him one deposition, one document request, one thing, and he was defaulted along with me. And if that isn't fraud, then nothing is. Okay, hold on. I may have to pull this order for you because. Do you understand that in Mr. Neal Hesson's case, there was a court order requiring Owen Schreuer to appear for deposition.
Starting point is 00:36:13 Do you know that? I know he appeared for deposition. Yesterday? After. You asked for it after the default. Hold on. Mr. Jones, do you understand that there was an order in August 31st, 2018, asking Mr. that required Owen Schreuer to appear for deposition.
Starting point is 00:36:30 Did you know that? I don't know what you're talking about. Yeah, you didn't know that on your show without even knowing what the discovery was. Yeah. So Alex, it's, it's, uh, when confronted with reality doesn't even know the things he has failed to do. Yeah. Uh, uh. It is, it is a constant source of enjoyment for, for him to be like, all right, Alex, you know that this happened.
Starting point is 00:36:57 And he's like, ah, this happened like a few months ago. I don't remember a goddamn bit of it. It's just, it's just amazing that a person can exist like this. It's fun too to think that some, some day we will learn how much money he's spent on these lawyers. I do believe that information will get out one of these days probably because they are, they're just not doing a thing for him. Like not that, not that they could, not that he would listen, but he, he doesn't. He's not getting his money's worth. I'll say that much.
Starting point is 00:37:27 Well, conversely, I'd like to propose that possibly they're doing everything for him. Yeah. In terms of creating a pretense of like, I had incompetent lawyers. I could have won these cases. Yeah. Like he has the, that to fall back on. Although that works better when you don't repeatedly have the lawyers as guests on your show. Well, right.
Starting point is 00:37:49 Barnes did have his own show for a little and give one of them their own show. Yes. Well, one thing that we, I don't know if it's in a later clip. Well, insurance. No, no, no, no. Fuck Norm Pattis forever. No, one thing later on is Bill will eventually say directly to was it Owen Troyer? He was like, Hey, are you going to sue your lawyers after this because it?
Starting point is 00:38:15 Look, I'm deposing you and it's my advice that you sue your lawyers after this. I don't think they have adequately prepared you for what you need to be doing. What's even funnier about that is that the reason he's saying it is to remind them that should they win a lot of money from their lawyers, that money will be going to the state. That would be considered an asset. Yeah. You should take that as well. Yeah. And just so you know.
Starting point is 00:38:41 Yeah. Yeah. I don't think I don't think it's impossible that they could do a malpractice. Oh, no. Yeah. No, they've got it. They've got a chance. Yeah.
Starting point is 00:38:51 So one of the things that has been a hallmark of these cases that in for wars has been subject to is that they don't seem to know what they're giving the lawyers in discovery. There was the child pornography that was the stuff. The emails that they turned over to the Connecticut people. And then in this case, there was something that is unexplainable that they had that they turned over. It's fair to say that Leonard Pozner and free speech systems have had an unfriendly relationship over the years.
Starting point is 00:39:29 No, I'm not. I mean, I don't really follow what he does. He shows about him. So you do follow him. Correct? I mean, I don't have you never refresh my memory. So I will refresh your memory about what you know about Mr. Pozner. I'm going to show you what Mark says to the five you ever seen out before.
Starting point is 00:39:59 No, not that I remember. What is it? That's the sole document you produced to me just a couple, I guess, months or two ago in regard to discovery requests for any documents you had regarding Mr. Pozner. That's the sole document that was in that folder labeled Pozner. That's it. And that you will agree with me appears to be a very large, looks to be about 187 page comprehensive background report on Mr. Pozner.
Starting point is 00:40:28 Correct? Oh, I never ran a background report on Pozner. I've never even seen this. I understand that you probably never even saw that. Someone email us this and then we opened it. I don't know, Mr. Jones, you gave it to me. What am I supposed to tell you about it? I don't know.
Starting point is 00:40:47 You tell me. I mean, we just go through the email. Most of it even unopened and just send you guys everything. This isn't an email, is it? I would imagine I'd never run a background thing on Pozner. Well, one thing we can agree on, because you look at the bottom of that document, it says sstx.085544, correct? Yeah.
Starting point is 00:41:09 That's the basic numbers you all use when you give me documents, right? So this document right here came from Infowars Corporate Files. I thought you said we haven't given you any documents. I've said we didn't. You said we didn't get, we were defaulted. We gave you nothing. We didn't even respond. You gave me documents in the Lewis case in response to documents.
Starting point is 00:41:26 Okay. Well, I mean, listen, I mean, I'm just telling you, I've never looked at this. That's not what I'm asking you, Mr. Jones. I remember just the news about me in Florida doing a background thing on him. And so I figure somebody might have sent us this. I'm just guessing. I shouldn't guess. I don't know.
Starting point is 00:41:42 Yeah. Do you think you should be guessing? No, I just said, you're right. I don't know what this is. So let's not do that anymore. That is upsetting. That's my favorite, my favorite part of the deposition really asked to just be like, you sent this to me.
Starting point is 00:41:57 I didn't come to you with a hundred and eighty seven page background check on Letty Posner. Where did this come from? You tell me, man. You tell me. Yeah. It's one of the creepier things that I think you find in this deposition, these depositions is that Info Wars turned over this extensive background check
Starting point is 00:42:17 on one of the parents of one of the kids that died at Sandy Hook and no one seems to know where it came from or why it's in their files because it wasn't in an email. No, it was in their files. No, it was in their files that they sent. Yeah. I can't. I can't stress enough how wild that is that you can be a essentially being
Starting point is 00:42:42 sued out of oblivion. And then at the same time be like, we'll just send him everything and I'm not going to check. Nobody was like, hey, this hundred and eighty seven page background check on Lenny Posner. It's got like associates addresses and family members. It's not going to play. It's not going to play well.
Starting point is 00:43:01 Yeah. Yeah. That is really creepy. Yeah. You ever done a background report on anybody, Robert? You have any enemies that you need to do background checks on? I mean, I haven't done a background. I have done background checks on my enemies, but not that kind of podcast is
Starting point is 00:43:22 essentially me doing that. No, no. That sounds tiring. Yeah. Your biggest background check so far has been Kissinger, obviously. Yes. We finally nailed him to the wall. We got him.
Starting point is 00:43:36 Yeah. It's the end of his career. We did it. Canceled. It only took 90 years. Yeah. Well, I feel like the jury was out until the podcast. Yeah.
Starting point is 00:43:47 Thank God. It finally tipped the balance for me. It's like, I don't know if this guy's good news. You know what? I'm starting to think this guy might have some bad qualities. Yeah. So I just, I mean, it's something that I don't think is going to be solved by this case.
Starting point is 00:44:03 No matter what happens, I don't know if anyone will ever publicly know why they had that background check. Yeah. It's infuriating. Yeah. Yeah. Because who did it? That is, yeah.
Starting point is 00:44:16 There's a lot of unanswered questions there. You know, you would have to think that it was some sort of private investigator, right? Probably or some firm. I mean, it's 187 pages. It's not like he went to the FBI. Yeah. But they've only bought one thing, right?
Starting point is 00:44:31 Yeah. He didn't just file like for a criminal record. Like somebody stalked a motherfucker. Right. But Alex, one of Alex's like bodyguards is ex blackwater. Yeah. That's true. You may have some like shady connections.
Starting point is 00:44:44 Yeah. No, totally. But that does mean that there's somebody out there who put this background report together and could 100% just be like, hey man, I'm the weirdo that did this shit. You know, you'd hope there'd be some kind of forensic fingerprint somewhere. But or I mean, I don't know.
Starting point is 00:45:00 Do we know if it's accurate? Cause like, is it possible somebody just grifted Alex? Somebody wrote 180 pages of bullshit fucking Douglas Adams novel about Lenny Posner. That would be something. Yeah. I'll be doing it. I think Alex would fall for it.
Starting point is 00:45:18 But that seems like a lot of effort. Lenny Posner has never left his towel at home though. So there is that. Mm hmm. So I've got a little bit of Owen Shroyer's deposition to jump to. He is involved in the case because he did a video where he was hosting the fourth hour or not the fourth hour. It was, it was hosting in Alex's place on a Sunday show and
Starting point is 00:45:44 someone gave him an article and some videos where he just decided hey, we're going to report this as Neil Hesslin couldn't have held his, his child. And one of the things that Owen is very clear about is like someone gave me this news to cover. I didn't, I didn't check it or anything. And this is a clip where Bill Ogden, the other attorney in the case, has to help Owen realize that he is a puppet.
Starting point is 00:46:14 I don't know who edited that video. Right. It could have been someone in our house. It could have been someone else on the internet that they found. Right. You know what? You know what we can't agree on? Nobody fact checked it.
Starting point is 00:46:26 We need to send, oh man, that's crazy. When did he say this? Google up the interview and watch it. It's 20 minutes. I didn't plan on covering the story that day so I had no preconceived notion that I would even have to do that. I know, Mr. Schreuer, you're here because you were a puppet. You would agree with me, right?
Starting point is 00:46:44 No. You, you, you don't agree with me that you, you know what a puppet is, correct? Yes. An object that is used to convey a message, but somebody else is actually controlling the message. You understand that? Yes.
Starting point is 00:47:00 Right. You were conveying a message, right? True? Yes. Somebody else was controlling that message. True? No. No.
Starting point is 00:47:10 Who, who was controlling the message that you were putting out? Were you in control? What was the message you're referring to? The coroner said he never released the children ever. Because that's the story you ran with. Who was in control of that information if you weren't? Because you already said you weren't in control of it. Who was?
Starting point is 00:47:28 Somebody has to be. Whoever originally posted the video. Right. So someone else had control and you were conveying the message. We just established that you were the puppet that day. There's nothing wrong with that. I'm not trying to be derogatory. It's analogous to where we are now.
Starting point is 00:47:44 You would agree. I think if anybody is being used as a puppet, it would be the people who are reporting the stories, and I'm just showing that information. You were reporting the story. Mr. Schreuer. You weren't showing the information. You were reporting. So if I just pick up anybody's news source and cover it, does that make me a puppet?
Starting point is 00:48:05 If you don't fact check it, absolutely. Okay. Then I guess I'm a puppet of zero hedge in this case. No. That's actually not true. You're a puppet of I coin bank. Okay. So Owen's a puppet.
Starting point is 00:48:22 It's tough to have to look in the mirror like that to to to see that. Yeah, it is fun that we have Bill on the case just because you could definitely see a lot of lawyers being like, well, I'm just going to drop the puppet coming. I mean, it's not like the puppet conversation adds a ton to the case, but Bill is like, I am going to get you to say that you're a fucking puppet. If it kills me and I'm going to win God, that's satisfying. That's just numb, numb, numb, numb, numb. That just feels feels good.
Starting point is 00:48:55 It feels good to have in the world. Well, someone who brands themselves as like the destroyer of cucks. Such it's it's it is. There's such they're all such Owen, especially this is less the case with really Alex, but like Owen is very much cut in that right wing, like debate guy personality. But none of them actually like debate. All they know how to do is have, you know, they have media training. They understand how things like look on film and they understand how to get sound bites
Starting point is 00:49:22 and they just kind of go out to surprise people and get sound bites and Owen can't edit this. He can't cut it apart. He can't end the interaction and he just gets revealed as the the hollow man that he truly is. And it's it's mwah. Yeah, and I think I think that's what's so compelling, especially for me about these like these glimpses, these depositions that, you know, you get this side of the these folks that they they aren't in control of. Yeah, and it it's a disaster. Yeah, now listening to it gives you such a like Thanksgiving dinner feel where you don't even want to say anything.
Starting point is 00:49:59 You just want to like loosen your belt and lean back and be like I'm full. That was a delicious meal. I just got to eat there. It's trip to fail. Yeah. Now you mentioned that Owen Shroyer's nickname is the cuckslayer. You know what else lays cucks? What's that? The products and services that support this podcast. What? It's fine. It's like a kink thing. During the summer of 2020, some Americans suspected that the FBI
Starting point is 00:50:30 had secretly infiltrated the racial justice demonstrations. And you know what? They were right. I'm Trevor Aronson and I'm hosting a new podcast series, Alphabet Boys. As the FBI, sometimes you got to grab the little guy to go after the big guy. Each season will take you inside and under. Cover investigation. In the first season of Alphabet Boys, we're revealing how the FBI spied on protesters in Denver. At the center of this story is a raspy voiced cigar smoking man
Starting point is 00:51:05 who drives a silver hearse. And inside his hearse was like a lot of guns. He's a shark and on the gun badass way and nasty sharks. He was just waiting for me to set the date, the time and then for sure he was trying to get it to happen. Listen to Alphabet Boys on the iHeart Radio App, Apple Podcast, or wherever you get your podcasts. I'm Lance Bass and you may know me from a little band called NSYNC.
Starting point is 00:51:34 What you may not know is that when I was 23, I traveled to Moscow to train to become the youngest person to go to space. And when I was there, as you can imagine, I heard some pretty wild stories. But there was this one that really stuck with me about a Soviet astronaut who found himself stuck in space with no country to bring him down. It's 1991 and that man, Sergei Krekalev,
Starting point is 00:52:03 is floating in orbit when he gets a message that down on Earth, his beloved country, the Soviet Union, is falling apart. And now he's left defending the Union's last outpost. This is the crazy story of the 313 days he spent in space, 313 days that changed the world. Listen to The Last Soviet on the iHeart Radio App, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. What if I told you that much of the forensic science
Starting point is 00:52:37 you see on shows like CSI isn't based on actual science? The problem with forensic science in the criminal legal system today is that it's an awful lot of forensic and not an awful lot of science. And the wrongly convicted pay a horrific price. Two death sentences and a life without parole. My youngest, I was incarcerated two days after her first birthday. I'm Molly Herman. Join me as we put forensic science on trial to discover what happens when a match isn't a match
Starting point is 00:53:12 and when there's no science in CSI. How many people have to be wrongly convicted before they realize that this stuff's all bogus, it's all made up? Listen to CSI on trial on the iHeart Radio App, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. We're back and we're talking about cucks. We have been, yes. But not the fun kind that everybody enjoys from occasion to occasion.
Starting point is 00:53:47 What type is that? Sometimes that kind of sense of debasement can be a sexual pleasure that many people have in a controlled environment to feel as though one is inferior can be a turn on for many people. That's why Elon Musk stays on Twitter. So we were talking about Owen Schreuer. Yes, completely different kind of cock destroyer. For sure.
Starting point is 00:54:16 So one of the things that's a lot of fun throughout these depositions is you get to witness people learning stuff about the company they work for and the people around them. I think that sometimes this is fairly genuine. As is the case in this clip where Owen gets to learn about some people who might like mass shooters. Michael Zimmerman, do you know who he is? Yes.
Starting point is 00:54:43 Are you friends with him? I would say we're friends, but we don't hang out or talk that often. Sure. But you have a somewhat professional and personal... If I saw him in public, I'd go say hello. Sure, okay. So you seem like a good guy. Yeah.
Starting point is 00:54:58 And I opposed him. He came off very respectful. He was shockingly nice. For a white nationalist. Has he ever shared any of his opinions or views on mass shootings with you? Not that I can recall. Were you aware that... Do you remember the Christ Church shooting?
Starting point is 00:55:22 New Zealand? Yes. Christ Church? New Zealand shooting? Yes. It was live streamed? Yes. Brandon Tarrant was the shooter.
Starting point is 00:55:34 He executed a bunch of Muslims at a mosque. So... Yeah, you were freshering the details of the event for me right now. Do you know whether or not anyone at Info Wars claimed it was a false flag? No, I'm unaware. Okay. Did you know that some individuals at Info Wars liked that shooting? No.
Starting point is 00:56:00 Did you know... You understand that Michael Zimmerman handles the IT stuff for Info Wars? Traction form. I know that he was doing IT. I'm not sure if that is still his role. Did you know that on March 14, 2019, Mr. Zimmerman registered the domain TarrantManifesto.com? No, boy. No.
Starting point is 00:56:29 Did you know that he registered the website ShooterChan.org? Oh, boy. Did you know... You know who Timothy Thrift is? Yes. Do you have a personal relationship with him? Work acquaintance. Okay.
Starting point is 00:56:44 Did you know that he registered the website SaintTarrant.com? No, boy. After the shooter Brandon Tarrant. How do you feel about the people that you work with, who you have somewhat of a personal relationship, registering these type of websites immediately after a mass shooting that was livestreamed to the world? Pretty surprised. I think that's a surprising thing.
Starting point is 00:57:09 I would be surprising. Yeah. You really don't ever want to be asked in court. Are you aware that your coworker made the website ShooterChan? That is just not a question you want to get asked. Really ever, but especially... Yeah. Yeah.
Starting point is 00:57:27 Not a question you want to be asked. It makes the argument tougher when there's multiple people who are like making websites that are presumably about celebrating a mass shooter to argue that you're not engaged in some form of stochastic terrorism. Hey, a bunch of your friends worked at Auschwitz. How do you feel about that? Did you know that they were? Because maybe that would kind of suggest that you're also...
Starting point is 00:57:53 It's a bad thing to be surprised by. Yeah. Actually, maybe it's better to be surprised by it. Yeah, if he was like, oh, yeah, of course I knew that. I go there all the time. He's my buddy. I have an account on there. Yeah, I guess that'd be worse.
Starting point is 00:58:11 I think what's fun about that, though, is that exemplifies one of the things that is consistent throughout all of the Info Wars depositions is like a weird caginess about 100% the wrong thing. Yeah. Like whether or not we're friends. Yeah. Yeah, you know, I don't know. Is the sky blue today? Like you don't even know the answer that. Well, yeah, I killed those guys, but like is the sky and you're like, no, no, no, you're wrong, man.
Starting point is 00:58:41 Yep. Yep. So the like, like I mentioned earlier there, the one of the reasons, the primary reason, one of the primary reasons that Alex ended up losing these cases by default was sending these people who couldn't handle being corporate representatives when they are sent as corporate representatives. They're supposed to testify as the company. Yeah.
Starting point is 00:59:07 So there is a responsibility that they have to prepare, get all their business in order and basic understanding of the case. Yeah. Yeah. And they're supposed to, I mean, they're given a list of topics that they're supposed to testify on on behalf of the company, things like, you know, personnel, who worked on this video, what are the sources for this video, those kinds of things. Yeah.
Starting point is 00:59:32 And they have whiffed it every single time. It has been a disaster. Rob do when he was in, it was funny because he was wearing a candle hat and he just seemed scared and confused. I, I really, while you're asking me these questions, what I would like you to start is treat me more like a fourth grader who doesn't know what business means. Could you begin at the like, what is money? Hmm.
Starting point is 00:59:59 So he, he was, he's a lot of fun, but unfortunately there's not a lot of like things you can really pull from it that really exemplify his stupidity. Yeah. Um, it's a real, oh, it's more of a totality. Right. Right. That kind of exemplifies what he's doing. Yeah.
Starting point is 01:00:17 However, Daria, when she was testifying as the corporate representative, I think there's a bit more stuff that, that sticks out as like, this is someone testifying on behalf of the company. And this is a mess. Yeah. So she had brought in a folder full of exhibits that she wanted to discuss in the course of the deposition. And here is Mark, uh, bringing up the first one.
Starting point is 01:00:44 I've marked this as 1A. You recognize that, correct? Yes. That's a document that you reviewed prior to this deposition, right? Correct. That is the Wikipedia entry for false flag. Correct? Yes.
Starting point is 01:00:57 Okay. Can you tell me why you looked at this document? Oh boy. I thought it would be a good idea to bring it as a reference to some of the points for the deposition. So you've brought a bunch of Wikipedia printouts. No, that's good. That shows like a willingness to engage with the, no, no, no, of course.
Starting point is 01:01:30 That's the beauty of it. Just like with the background report, except for way funnier, it's just like, it's very funny because it's like, it's, it's both like incredibly, like deeply irresponsible and also like something, uh, your grandma might do totally like, I heard you had a big case today, honey. I was looking to some things up online and I decided, listen, I wanted to support you in your, uh, your skits. I really wanted to, but it's like you would, uh, it would fail a high school paper.
Starting point is 01:02:04 Oh, if you were sure would yes, so it's, uh, it's a bad look. And, uh, it was befuddling, uh, the, you have the printout of Wikipedia for a false flag. Why did you bring this to me is such a, is such a consistent question that all of the depositions have of like, we, you know, we asked you for specific things. Yeah, you could have brought those and we could have dealt with that instead. You brought me a Wikipedia page. So let's figure out why this makes you even more guilty than you were yesterday.
Starting point is 01:02:37 Now, so, so Daria, as the company was supposed to testify about these videos that are in the plaintiff's petition, and it was pretty clear at the beginning of the deposition that she had not actually watched them, um, but then later in the deposition, she appeared to have watched some of them. And so this exchange, uh, happens, you see there, it's talking about an April 22nd, 2017 video called Sandy, the vampires exposed. Yes. I understand that that is the video that Mr. Posner and Mrs. Delarosa based their defamation
Starting point is 01:03:09 claim on. Did you know that? Okay. Did you know that? When preparing for this depot, did you know that? Yes. Okay. Did you watch that video?
Starting point is 01:03:26 I mean, unless you've watched it in the last couple of hours, you haven't watched it, right? For this deposition? I'm familiar with the video. Did you watch it in preparing for this deposition, though? Yes, I believe so. Okay. When did you watch it? Earlier today.
Starting point is 01:03:45 Earlier today. Oh, good. Yes. Oh, so during the break, when it became apparent that you hadn't watched these videos, you went and tried to watch this video. Yes. You didn't watch the whole thing, though, did you? No.
Starting point is 01:03:57 It's a lengthy video. Yeah. So you didn't watch this video? Yes, I did. You didn't watch pieces of this video? Correct? Correct. How many pieces did you watch?
Starting point is 01:04:08 How many minutes total did you watch this video? Did not count. So this is the level of respect that the people who are the corporate representatives for intros are showing the proceedings. It's bad stuff. Yeah. That's... I feel like I could have done a better job representing Info Wars and I want the worst
Starting point is 01:04:29 for them. Yes. 100%. Your testimony would have been more effective at keeping them from receiving a default judgment in their own. Just because of like my basic sense of politeness. Total. Yeah.
Starting point is 01:04:45 In total fairness, just for the sake of clarity, this, the Darya deposition was after the default judgment. So... Okay. Okay. This didn't contribute to that. Sure. Sure.
Starting point is 01:04:56 Although it did bring sanctions. Yes. It is certainly evidence of why the default judgment happened. Yes. Yes. Yeah. And listening to it is a little bit... If you've ever had that friend who just lies about everything for no reason, not necessarily
Starting point is 01:05:08 a friend, but like the person you knew... I've met a guy like that. Yeah. Yeah. Totally. And then just to see somebody have to, like, no longer can disassemble, no longer can lie, just eventually has to come down and say, fine, I watched the video ten minutes ago.
Starting point is 01:05:27 Yeah. And I watched about five minutes of it. Yeah. And you said that at the first start, but you forced me during a bathroom break. Yeah. I watched a little bit and I had urine blasting out of me whilst I watched this fucking video. Pretty grim. Pretty grim.
Starting point is 01:05:47 So the last couple of clips that I have here from these depositions are is the most upsetting thing I think I heard other than Wolfgang, how big emails those are deeply, deeply disturbing thing. But Daria, when she was giving her deposition, she's asked about Wolfgang, how big had sent to Infowars a picture of the Sandy Hook choir that sang at the Super Bowl that year. And the argument was that the kids who were quote unquote killed at Sandy Hook were in the choir and it was like rubbing it in America's faces because it was a false flag. Yeah.
Starting point is 01:06:29 And so this got sent to Infowars and then someone at Infowars, I believe it might have been a Don Salazar wrote back. Thank you. Yeah. He thanked Wolfgang for this email. And so this this image becomes a little bit of a bizarre jumping off point for again Daria testifying on behalf of the company. You would, if somebody sent you this while you were doing reporting, you would thank
Starting point is 01:07:01 them for it? I don't know. It depends on circumstances. Okay. Well, the circumstances. I wasn't there when Nico was having this exchange, what information he had at that time. Well, I'm asking you, what if you had this information, a picture that says at the top 10 Sandy Hook children found alive and well, and then the Super Bowl choir from millions
Starting point is 01:07:24 of people. Yeah. And then you go, man, I'm glad I then sent me that personally. I would rather think that those kids were alive than than having because the tragedy of kids being murdered for no reason. The innocence of those children who didn't deserve what that that kind of fate. I would hold out hope to the the last bit of my soul hoping and praying that that picture was that that was something that be possible for those kids to be alive.
Starting point is 01:08:11 So is that how you would you would see that Robert? No, no, that's that's a weird. That's a weird call for her to make. I mean, she must have just that has to have been in the moment, right? That that's not calculated that like you would not calculate and arrive at that as like your your decision. Oh, no, totally. I mean, I remember this clip and the thing that I liken it to is like that John Ronson
Starting point is 01:08:47 psychopath test story, you know, it's like a psychopath goes to a funeral and meets somebody that they're romantically interested in. And so in order to meet them again, they kill somebody else because they meet that person at funerals, you know, like, yeah, it's a very logical thought process. So long as you have absolutely no empathy or or concept of other human beings being valuable. Right. Yeah. How can something this fucked up actually be a good thing?
Starting point is 01:09:18 Yeah, absolutely. And you're like, there's no way that a human being could react like that. Yeah. And and hearing that you you'd think that like, well, she's just saying that and it's just going to be a she kind of sticks on that that on that tip and stands by this, it seems. So if you think about it from your point of view, if you think about it, if the parents of my clients saw this picture, they should give them a lot of hope, right? They should they should react really positively to this with a lot of hope inside, right?
Starting point is 01:09:51 And for that, what you're saying, I'm not those parents, I'm looking at it as an outsider. And I would much rather and I don't know a person with a heart would rather think, would rather believe that the kids are dead versus that the kids might be alive. I would say it's reasonable for a person with a heart to have that sort of optimism. Because it's as I'm I'm sure Alex wanted to believe that those kids, if there was any possibility, oh boy, kids were not dead, then he was going to grab onto it because that's a much better proposition to have in your heart and mind than to to realize that they were.
Starting point is 01:10:37 So Alex Jones, according to how the company views things in terms of your Sandy Hook coverage, Alex Jones said the kids didn't really die and they were really alive in part because he has such a big heart and a lot of hope and optimism, right? He's a dreamer, objection for him, he's not the only one. Some have said Alex Jones is a dreamer. Yeah, I found that to be the most disturbing thing in the at least as an idea in the deposition that saying that the kids weren't dead and that they were being paraded out to sing at the Super Bowl is an expression of love and optimism.
Starting point is 01:11:27 Yeah, yeah, yeah, that's pretty pretty bleak. I mean, wouldn't you really hope that Nagasaki was a false flag, right? Like don't you want to believe that no one would really drop a nuclear bomb on a city? And so I think that's why it's a good idea to just deny that everybody died. Yeah, why would you want to believe cancer is real? Totally. Yeah, if it's anyone with a heart with a heart would assume that medical science is lying about cancer in order to keep us in fear.
Starting point is 01:12:01 It is a pretty fascinating the thoughts that had to have occurred in her head to wind up saying those things, it would be amazing to be inside that little brain just just watching those connections pop together. I mean, could you not could you not see yourself being like held underwater by Daria and her being like, listen, I can't believe how good it is that I'm strangling you and drowning you to death right now because of how nice I am as a person leaving Jordan's fantasies aside. Sure.
Starting point is 01:12:38 Well, I did make a cuck reference earlier. You did. You did. There is an element to it to that's added that is that, you know, someone had these thoughts decided this was going to be the angle we're taking, double down on it. And that also happens to be someone who's a higher up at info wars. Yeah. And they chose to be their corporate representative testifying for the company.
Starting point is 01:13:07 It's not like this is the first time she's had some kind of a messed up weird insurer is not don't thought like it's it's it's wild the the glimpse that you get through these depositions is just such a harrowing picture of people who are so disrespectful to the very idea that they did something wrong or the organization did something wrong. And I think that they're really valuable glimpse into that. And what we're going to see in the near future is very likely some some interesting developments over the course of the the cases as they come to fruition. I think we'll we'll see so even and some more information come out.
Starting point is 01:13:49 I would assume. Wow. Well, boys, Robin, I really feel like we've all transitioned from boys to men. Coffee. Didn't work. It's lovely to have you in the position where you're not usually in. You know, when you finish your script, usually your guest is like, Jesus fucking Christ. Did you know that we're on a show called Behind the Bastards and this guy's a real bad dude?
Starting point is 01:14:19 Yeah. I one of my favorite things to do to relax is to watch videos of people attempting to cut down trees and generally fucking up in a major way. And usually these videos are like, that's why sometimes a great notion is my favorite novel. I don't understand that joke. Oh, Ken, Ken Keesey. Nevermind.
Starting point is 01:14:43 Oh, OK. I've only read a oh, wait, no, that's not Ken Keesey. He's just in it. Nevermind. I was thinking of Tom Wolf. But I like watching these because you'll see like somebody making this chain of decisions were OK. I have this very tall tree.
Starting point is 01:14:57 It's like 200 feet tall and it's right in front of my house. I don't want to pay for someone. I'm going to remove it on my own. I'm going to winch myself up on top of it. I'm going to have my kids hold onto ropes to try to pull it to the right side and I'm going to cut the area above me that my like line is attached to and then everything goes wrong and they wind up like impaling themselves on a chainsaw. And I'm going to deep fry a frozen turkey at the same time.
Starting point is 01:15:19 At the same time. It's like that. It's just like this string of, wow, none of you, you didn't think through what the next step of this was going to be because you just kind of figured it would go away because none of this, none of this feels in any way calculated. It's too incompetent for that and it's going too badly for them for that. It's just like they weren't aware. It's like watching someone learn about gravity as they fall off a mountain.
Starting point is 01:15:51 Well, the incompetence is the manifestation of it, but there is a strategy. And that strategy is coming to an end now. The strategy is the kicking the can down the road, appealing delay delay. Yeah. And so there was like a legal strategy that clearly was being employed. I even saw it with Alex and the Connecticut deposition recently where he pretended he was sick and couldn't go. It's just an attempt to delay the inevitable.
Starting point is 01:16:19 And I really don't, I mean that, that gravity analogy is good except for there's this other part where it's like, sure, this is their first time learning about gravity because they've been jumping off a thousand foot buildings for years and having no consequences for it. You know, well, they're landing on their listeners totally, totally. So they've got this such a comfortable landing every time they fall so hard that they're like, why am I bouncing and bleeding on the sidewalk right now? I've been bouncing, I've been flying the whole time, you know.
Starting point is 01:16:54 Yep. Yep. Woo. Podcast over. Everyone go home. You guys want to plug your plugables while we all sit and think about, well, I actually first, Dan, what do you think's going to happen next? Are they going to, are they going to lose all their money?
Starting point is 01:17:14 Um, yeah, I'm fairly confident it's going to, he's going to lose a lot. I think it's going to be a pretty. It seems like it couldn't be like a lot of times you get these things where it's like, ah, yeah, the bad guy lost a case and then it's like, oh, and they get a slap on the wrist. Fine. Like the Sacklers where it's like, well, that's not going to hurt them in any way, but this doesn't feel like that.
Starting point is 01:17:33 I think that Alex isn't in a great financial straits to begin with. Like I think he's, uh, Infowars is fairly precariously balanced on a ledge. Um, and then, uh, yeah, I think, I think he's going to get hit with a pretty, I mean, you have cases in Texas, Connecticut, the Fontaine case still being active, uh, there's, there is a number of blows he's going to take and he's already, you know, squeezed his audience pretty hard in terms of what he's able to, to make, uh, that way. I think, I think I wouldn't be too surprised if he's, um, asking to do a podcast, uh, on a network soon.
Starting point is 01:18:12 Well, and we'll be happy to have him. I think there's no doubt that the goal is to bankrupt him so he can never do the show again. Whether or not they succeed in that goal is, uh, you know, up in the air, but that is, that does seem to be like, here's what we're going to shoot for. And if we negotiate down from there, it's going to be fucking close. You know, if I think of the sentence that would be just for him, he'd be hooked up to a little buzzer that could deliver like a shock that didn't hurt, but like stopped
Starting point is 01:18:51 him from whatever he was doing. And then he would be forced to host a daily podcast on the show 90 day fiance, where if he ever attempted to say anything that wasn't directly about the show, he'd get a little buzz. So he had to just actually watch, it doesn't matter what reality show, but every day he has to watch and comment on that show without talking about anything else, without getting into politics, without having his personal theories. Is he allowed to be racist about contestants and people on the show because then he could
Starting point is 01:19:19 do it? No, we're going to say no racism for you. I've got a counter for you. All right, two words, wicker man, three additional words, not the bees, not the bees, not the bees. I always, I always kind of fantasized about like a fitting punishment. But I would, I would agree to this if the price was right, but Alex continues doing his show, but he has to do it with me sitting at the desk, Alex, Alex, no, no, no, no, no,
Starting point is 01:19:58 no, no, no, no, and that would make info wars the first show to last more than 24 hours a day. Yeah, probably we would have to go into leap time so you could properly do your job. Well, now you guys want to plug your plugables before we oh, that's right, we were going to do that website. We do it's knowledge right comm also on Twitter. We are on Twitter. It's at knowledge underscore fight and I go to bed Jordan as is my want for the second
Starting point is 01:20:27 episode of a behind the bastards cake song. I will admit that I did write a book, it's at the quiet part loud comm you can find it it's free. Yeah. And you can find me nowhere because I exist only in the ethereal plane where thoughts and feelings and audio clips of Alex Jones being deposed, right? There's amitabha Buddha and then there's you just serenely hovering over the knowledge steer.
Starting point is 01:21:00 All right. Damn. Hey, America, and to a lesser extent Canada. This is Robert and Dan from knowledge fight. We have excised Jordan for his sins. So we just had we recorded this. I think we say the date and episode one a while ago, right? That's just the way bastards works.
Starting point is 01:21:24 It's, you know, there's a backlog that Dan graciously helped me extend. But some shit has happened in the ensuing weeks. It felt like this was something that was evergreen and you could just have it sit on a shelf. Most of it is. Yeah. But just talking about Alex Jones and his his dumb troubles, but turns out curveballs. Yeah.
Starting point is 01:21:44 So let's let's get into those curveballs because I mean, obviously everything you've said about him is still accurate. It's just that some new shit has happened vis-a-vis particularly the court cases that changed the landscape a little since this this episode has to particularly do with the legal stuff. It is a little embarrassing just to look back. I remember that I think I think we said that Jordan and I were about to fly out to Austin for the trial right before we recorded the episode and tragic, which means you have
Starting point is 01:22:15 not had good barbecue in a very long time. That is true. Chicago has good food, but then some good barbecue, maybe allegedly. Yeah. Yeah. We, I think it was like the day after or two days after we recorded it, Alex had his whole bankruptcy thing that ended up postponing the trial. And so we never ended up going.
Starting point is 01:22:39 And since then, everything has just been a complete chaotic mess with the case. So we could honestly, we could do a whole nother episode about what's happened in the case since we recorded this episode. I'm sure we will at some point, but we'll let it all shake out. So yeah, as of mid-April, this is, this is fairly accurate. Yeah. Yeah. Well, cool.
Starting point is 01:23:05 Anything else? Nope. I just wanted to put that caveat on because otherwise I just would feel so self-conscious. Yeah. Yeah. It's okay. I feel self-conscious all the time about things that I say and then other things happened. But it's, it's, you know, how could, you can't be expected to predict the legal proceedings
Starting point is 01:23:27 of Alexander and Rick Jones because they're, they, they, they do not proceed the way any reasonable person would want them to, right? Yeah. If you're, if you're just try, if you're assuming Alex is a rational actor taking steps in his own self-interest, you'll be constantly surprised by how he handles his court cases. Yeah. Alex is a warped sense of his own self-interests that just game theory refuses to calculate. Yeah.
Starting point is 01:23:53 All right. Well, we're going to return you to your previously scheduled episode already in progress. And we are also going to unlock the shadow dimension where we've thrown George while we record this. For him, a thousand years has passed of unbelievable torment. Anyway. Behind the Bastards is a production of Cool Zone Media. For more from Cool Zone Media, visit our website, coolzonemedia.com, or check us out on the
Starting point is 01:24:23 iHeart Radio app, Apple podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Alphabet Boys is a new podcast series that goes inside undercover investigations. In the first season, we're diving into an FBI investigation of the 2020 protests. It involves a cigar-smoking mystery man who drives a silver hearse. And inside his hearse look like a lot of guns. But are federal agents catching bad guys or creating them? He was just waiting for me to set the date, the time, and then for sure he was trying to get it to happen.
Starting point is 01:24:52 Listen to Alphabet Boys on the iHeart Radio app, Apple podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Did you know Lance Bass is a Russian trained astronaut? That he went through training in a secret facility outside Moscow, hoping to become the youngest person to go to space? Well, I ought to know. Because I'm Lance Bass. And I'm hosting a new podcast that tells my crazy story and an even crazier story about
Starting point is 01:25:18 a Russian astronaut who found himself stuck in space, with no country to bring him down. With the Soviet Union collapsing around him, he orbited the Earth for 313 days that changed the world. Listen to the last Soviet on the iHeart Radio app, Apple podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. What if I told you that much of the forensic science you see on shows like CSI isn't based on actual science? And the wrongly convicted pay a horrific price?
Starting point is 01:25:53 Two death sentences and a life without parole. My youngest, I was incarcerated two days after her first birthday. Listen to CSI on trial on the iHeart Radio app, Apple podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.