Crime Junkie - MURDERED: Laci Peterson - Part Two
Episode Date: December 25, 2017The story everyone thinks they know... but do you really? In part two, we discuss the continued focus on Scott as a suspect in the disappearance and murder of his wife, Laci. For current Fan Club mem...bership options and policies, please visit https://crimejunkieapp.com/library/.  Sources for this episode cannot be listed here due to character limitations. For a full list of sources, please visit https://crimejunkiepodcast.com/murdered-laci-peterson-part-2/  Â
Transcript
Discussion (0)
This episode of Crime Junkie is brought to you by Crime Stoppers of Central Indiana.
Excuse me, can I ask you a question real quick?
Yeah, go for it.
Do you know what Crime Stoppers is?
Um, is it the dog, the scruff of a gruff?
Nope, can't sing the song, can't afford the song.
But do you know what they do?
Uh, isn't it the dog just kind of goes around and helps solve the murders for the state
government?
No, no, not quite.
While everyone loves the idea of a badass crime fighting dog, that's not what Crime
Stoppers is.
Crime Stoppers is a non-profit that allows a place for people to give anonymous tips
about crimes if they are in fear for their life or for whatever reason don't want the
police to know who they are when they give the tip, but they have valuable information.
You can do this through phone numbers, online tips, they even have an app called P3 that
you can download and submit your tip along with photos and videos.
Crime Stoppers is a non-profit and receives no government funding.
So look into yours, see how you can get involved, see how you can help, and if you want more
information on Crime Stoppers of Central Indiana, go to CrimeTips.org.
Merry Christmas, junkies!
You know, most of the podcasts that I subscribe to and listen to all go on hiatus during the
holidays and it's something that drives me insane because there isn't a time in my life
when I need podcasts more than A, when I'm traveling and B, when I have to spend a ton
of time with extended family and then I just need like a couple of minutes to myself to
turn off my brain and listen to a story about murder.
So with that, I figure I would give you your Christmas fix by giving you the second part
of the Scott Peterson episode.
If you didn't listen to the first part, make sure you go back and download episode 2, Scott
Peterson part 1, and where we left off is it is March of 2003 and the case had gone
pretty cold.
Investigators really believe Scott did it, they're not looking into any other suspects,
but nothing is happening to further the case and they're kind of just stuck.
On April 13th and 14th, that's when the bodies of Connor and Lacey were found and Connor
was found first on the 13th and then Lacey was found on the 14th and they were found
just about a mile apart and the first body was alerted to police because someone was
walking their dogs and prior to this, you know, they had actually searched the Berkeley
Marina where Scott said he was.
I mean, they had done multiple searches, searched the water, didn't come up with anything.
They found an anchor, a lone anchor, but they actually washed up in the San Francisco Bay
and the police say that when they initially washed up, they thought there's no way that
this is our body, like the San Francisco Bay is too huge, bodies washed up all the time,
we're just not that lucky, but sure enough, they find out that it is Lacey, it is Connor
and the bodies are obviously a mess.
They have been in the water for some time, we don't know exactly how long, but Lacey
was just a torso, her arms, her legs and her head were missing and just her torso washed
up and then for Connor, it looks like he had been almost disemboweled and he had some electrical
tape on his ear and this fishing wire or some kind of wire that looked like a noose around
his neck.
So when we talk about the trial, there'll be a lot of speculation about what happened
to the body and whether it was the tide or not, but they were found in extremely unusual
conditions.
After the bodies found, obviously it takes a couple of days to identify them and I think
another, one of the big infamous points in the trial is on April 18th, it's Good Friday
and this is when Scott is air quotes running for the border and trying to escape.
What happens is police arrest Scott in San Diego and in his car, they find so many things.
They find camping gear for cell phones, his brother's ID between $14,000 and $15,000 in
cash, hiking boots, a shovel, a dozen Viagra and a picture of him and Lacey and his hair
is dyed blonde and all that we hear again in the media is he's fleeing, he's on the
run and he was trying to, now that their bodies are found and identified, he's trying to get
away.
Now, we go back again, there's always the family side of the story and what they say
happened is wildly different.
So they say that that day on Good Friday, Scott was going to play golf with his family.
They say that it had been just a crazy couple of months, they were just starving for some
normalcy and so he wanted to get away.
He had been actually living in San Diego for a while because he had family that lived
down there so it's not like he drove from Modesto to San Diego that day, he had been
living in San Diego and he was on his way to the golf course.
He saw some unmarked cars behind him and he thought it was the media so he just kind
of starts driving around, he actually calls his family, he doesn't want to bring the media
to the golf course because getting pictures of him golfing that would just be a nightmare
so what he doesn't know at the time which I think ends up being good for him is police
have his phone tapped and he actually calls his family to tell him that he's not going
to make it.
He ends up driving and driving and driving and they're still following him, they're
being pretty aggressive, he finally does end up going to the golf course, he doesn't know
where else to go and he pulls over and that's when they put on their lights and he realizes
that it's been the cops the whole time and not media and they end up arresting him and
find all of the stuff in his car but what the family will point out as well is okay
yes he was blonde however he had been blonde for a while, he had met with cops while he
was blonde and had the goatee so it's not like he was disguising himself from the cops,
he was just trying to get through like day to day life going to the gas station and going
to the grocery store without people bombarding him so really he didn't change his appearance
for that which again I never knew, no me neither, no idea he met with the cops like that and
then they go to try and explain away all this stuff in the car and they say that you know
the $15,000 in cash was actually his mother had borrowed some money out of his account
and the day before they have all the transactions to prove this but the day before she pulled
money out to pay him back and he hadn't gotten a chance to put it in the bank yet you know
again I don't know what to believe anymore it's like I wouldn't be driving around with
$15,000 of cash but on the other hand it's good Friday and banks may not be open all
day, that's a good point I didn't think of that, they said he had his brother's ID because
he was going to the golf course and he could get a discount with his brother's ID rather
than using his ID and then the hiking boots and stuff like that he had bought like a long
time ago and left in his car and they also point out that he's driving like a red Mercedes
and they say like who trades in their like pretty inconspicuous truck for a red Mercedes
to if you're going to go on the run right so again like what I keep coming back to with
this case is oh my god he either like did it and he's a genius who can like kill somebody
and leave zero evidence or like he is an idiot with just like the worst luck possible because
like I mean I can't even imagine like I imagine getting pulled over with all that stuff and
just being like every single one of it has like this like benign explanation but all
together looks really really shady yeah like I got pulled over for speeding ones and there
was a bottle of maple syrup in my front seat and I was like I'm sorry officer this isn't
liquor it's maple syrup you know the entire time so now that there's an arrest there's
actually a pending trial so the defense gets all 30,000 pages of documents and they can
actually because prior to this like the family and the defense have no right to any of the
information in the investigation they have no idea what the police do and do not have
so this is the first time they really get their hands on like okay what do they have
against scott that they think they have such a firm case and as they're going through all
these documents there isn't a single piece of physical evidence that suggests scott had
anything to do with the disappearance or that he had anything to do with a body dump or
body removal and they went so far back in his history to like middle school there wasn't
a single incidence of violence they decided to move the trial instead of having it in
medesto they said you know it's everyone in medesto is too tainted we have to move this
so they move it to redwood california which is about 50 miles away everyone in medesto
is tainted by the trial everyone in the country was exposed to this case and had very strong
opinions about it because me and you and indiana had opinions right like in my mind moving
it 50 miles i mean we were 2000 miles away it does nothing right i i don't know what
the point was and actually they moving it to redwood they actually moved it closer to
san francisco which was the media hub in the area so i mean in my mind i feel like they're
only making it worse yeah so initially when they're doing jury selection 50 percent of
the jury pool gets automatically dismissed because they say nope yeah he's he's for sure
guilty like the end they dismissed those people and also they dismiss anyone who says that
they're against the death penalty and this is a death penalty case however what the judge
was supposed to do is he's supposed to ask people okay i know you're against the death
penalty but you know that's the law here and if we find that he's guilty do you think that
you could apply the law to this case but he didn't do that at all he just said okay you're
against the death penalty you're out which really left a very specific type of juror
left in this pool yeah like an angry vindictive one right and then we even had people like
from the jury so in this documentary i watched people who were on the jury admitted that like
as soon as they found out what trial they were on even if they weren't familiar with
it they went home and just googled and of course again all we're getting is the media
their version of what happened and that's what these prospective jurors who are now on the
jury are getting all of this information before even day one of walking into the courtroom
and once they're in the courtroom the judge makes the decision not to sequester the jury so
which is insane insane a trial this big like the oj trial was about the same size and scope
and the whole the jury was sequestered there for eight to ten months and here they were
allowed to go home they were allowed to talk to their families and again it's it's against
the law for jurors to research the case on their own or to like even listen to the news
about it but this case was everywhere i don't know how they were able to get away from it
you couldn't go grocery shopping without hearing about it honestly mm-hmm so now that they
have a jury the prosecution finally lays out its case and nobody knew what they were gonna
say because again i mean there's really nothing so everyone's really interested to see what
their story was and the prosecution says that lacy was killed on the 23rd he cleans up moves
her body in the morning to his truck and that he takes it to the marina and dumps it and
their whole motive is that basically he did not want to be a father he did not want to
be married anymore it was all too much he wanted to live the life of a young single guy and
he just thought it would be easier to murder her than to get divorced the defense gets
up in their opening arguments and basically says you know what we all know they say you
aren't gonna like my client like he's done some stupid shit and he's not necessarily
a nice guy or a nice husband or a faithful husband but we're gonna prove to you that
he is an innocent husband of murder and they have this great like gotcha moment right in
their opening trial so the prosecution when they were laying out there their scene of
the crime or their way went down they are going through all of his lies and like he
lied about this and one of the lies that they point out is you know he has this whole fabricated
story about how he was spending the morning with lacy really he didn't spend the morning
with her he says they were watching martha stewart and that they were she was baking
lemon meringue cookies and but she wasn't so he's obviously lying about that blah blah
blah and in the defenses opening statement they actually bust out the episode of martha
stewart she was on good morning america i think that day and they play the clip of her
on good morning america and sure enough she's talking about lemon meringue cookies so even
the amazing it is it's like a kind of a perry mason moment like whoever the prosecution
was didn't even bother to watch the clip they're just i mean kind of like the media they're
just saying things that they want to be true and they actually got caught red handed another
huge moment for the defense in this trial is when they call when the prosecution calls
their computer witness so every time the prosecutions bring somebody up it's kind of like a one
two punch like yeah they say some good stuff for the prosecution but then the defense gets
up and kind of gets them to either refute what they say contradict themselves but the
jury said that every time a prosecution witness came up basically when they got off the stand
they they either felt like the defense was ahead or the prosecution didn't get ahead
so the defense was doing super well prosecution calls up the computer witness to talk about
the computer activity on scott's work computer where he was in his warehouse that morning
when i said he was emailing his boss and putting together this like tool thing and they don't
ask any further questions well when the defense gets up they say you know was there any computer
activity in the home that morning and sure enough it wasn't in the sky's report it wasn't
anywhere else but he's on the stand and has to testify truthfully he says that that morning
around 840 in the morning lacy or someone was looking at like a red scarf from gap or something
like that and then a sunflower umbrella and this basically blows the prosecution's theory
out of the water because at this point lacy's supposed to be dead right and now someone
is on the computer at her home looking up stuff and everyone said you know lacy was
obsessed with sunflowers and whatever so now she's all of a sudden alive and you know there's
some back and forth later so at this point prosecution doesn't know where or how all
they have is when but by the time this guy gets off the stand they don't have how she
was murdered they don't have where she was murdered when she was murdered and they basically
have a loose why but they basically have no case at this point but they keep going and
then they try and say well you know Scott was just trying to cover his tracks and so
he got on and looked at stuff on the computer that lacy would look up well if that's the
case why wouldn't Scott be using that in his defense this didn't come out until the middle
of trial the police have been saying she was dead on the 23rd for like a year at this point
why wouldn't Scott if he did that intentionally be like hey look at the computer I saw her
on the computer she was on the computer it just doesn't make sense and if that was the
case and even if lacy was so basically the prosecution changes their whole theory and
they say okay we kind of concede to it lacy's on the computer then you have about an hour
to kill her clean up and then load up her body and leave so mid-trial which is they
completely change their whole theory of the case which I think is damn near unheard of
yeah that's not a good move right and the prosecution also says that he they found
some empty like concrete powder bags in his workshop and he admits that he made one anchor
for his boat and they say well you know there should be like four more anchors and that's
the perfect amount because lacy's limbs were missing and you know whatever you had next
run for a head who knows and scott's like no I kind of I dumped out the rest of that
concrete in my driveway and again this was something that the media took off with especially
Nancy Grace she was all over this concrete and there's this kind of great outside of
the trial gotcha moment where on video they take Nancy Grace to the house to show her
where scott says he poured out the concrete because she's just going on and on and on
and the news about how that's crazy and why would anyone ever do that and they show her
where it is in the ground and you can see it and she just goes huh and then never talks
about it ever again man I know so at this point in the trial the defense is crushing
it and all the jurors even say like they had nothing the prosecution had nothing and we
were all wondering kind of why we were there but then the trial totally changes with the
introduction of the tapes when the defense gets ahold of these they first get the transcripts
of the tapes between scott and amber and they realize like as are we in the transcripts
like yeah this is like bad but it's it's not super bad like I think we can we can work
around this he's a bad husband but this isn't like send a man to death row worthy but they
say that when they hear the tapes it's just a totally different story it shows that scott
has zero problem lying and I mean in the midst there's not even like sadness in his voice
in the midst of everything that's going on he's putting on this whole charade about being
in europe and being in love with her and you you would have no idea that something what's
going wrong in his life much less that his wife and his child had been abducted and then
murdered so once these tapes are introduced in court even the jurors say it's just kind
of over the defense really tries to get them to consider anything else they actually set
up this test where they take a hundred and fifty pound like body shaped weight in the
same size boat that scott had and tried to show that it would be impossible to put something
that heavy over the side of a boat without capsizing or flipping the boat and they tested
it four times and every single time they couldn't do it without flipping the boat and the guy
that actually did the test almost drowned twice but the court wouldn't allow any of
that information and they said it was just too inflammatory which is I think a little
bit crazy yeah inflammatory is definitely a little bit of a stretch right the other
thing the prosecution had that really resonated with the jury is they said that they got dogs
that tracked lacy sent to the marina the dogs had come out months after lacy went missing
and what they find the defense finds is that the dogs had actually failed their certification
test for for being tracking dogs and twice before they had gone out and hadn't hit on
lacy sent but that was never entered into evidence they basically just said that they
went out and and saw her or smelled her immediately there was also cross contamination so some
of the stuff that they gave the dogs of lacy's also could have had scott sent on it and of
course scott was at the marina so I don't know again what order this came in if the
first two times if they were working off the same sent piece or maybe the third time the
one they were working off of had both rather than just lacy's either way I think it was
something that shouldn't have been entered in because it's it's you can't have a dog
that fails their certification then doesn't hit twice I mean if you're not gonna allow
the boat thing in I don't know how this got in right another thing that was really contested
during trial was the time of death for Connor because lacy was pregnant at the time they
wanted to show again their prosecution's whole theory is either she's killed on the
23rd or the 24th either way Connor would have to be dead in the womb at that point so the
prosecution has an expert come up that says Connor's dead on the 24th the defense has
a witness come up that Connor that says Connor's dead on the 29th so this shows that he could
have actually lived in the womb five days longer and five days later scott's with the
media scott's with family he's not doing anything there's no way he's even got lacy like tucked
away somewhere right so they kind of go back and forth the defense witness kind of breaks
down on trial like he's clearly never been cross-examined or at least not cross-examined
properly and basically there's a little bit of a meltdown and just ask people to like
give him a break and at that point everyone on the jury just kind of stops listening
to him also in court never used and this was a choice of the defense attorney he never
brought anyone up who said they saw lacy walking that day again they saw her walking the same
time that scott's on his computer so this would be huge I mean we have proof that scott
is not at home and then sightings of lacy at the same time walking around the neighborhood
but the lawyer said it was just a judgment call he said too many people stories I mean
he had I think like 21 24 witnesses so he said there were too many that were like contradictory
I mean when you have eyewitness testimonies the time isn't always right you know it's
one of the most like unreliable I mean but I think when you have 21 to 24 you've got
something there yeah definitely he just felt like it wouldn't hold up in court so he decided
to not use it at all jurors later said they would have loved to like at least here a couple
of people say like hey yeah I think I saw her and the way they basically wrap up the
trial is the defense kind of goes flat and they just say you know we showed a lot of
evidence he didn't do it they don't have any physical evidence and the prosecution came
out with a one-two punch and they relied on what their whole case was based on on this
affair and they have this kind of dramatic moment at the end where side by side they
put up a picture of Lacey who's eight months pregnant alone at a Christmas party that was
taken the same time as Scott is cuddling with Amber at this other Christmas party and really
hammer in because they don't have anything else they just hammer in motive and sure enough
the jury comes back with a guilty verdict and sentences him to death so in 2012 Scott
has a new team of attorneys and they've actually filed an appeal and really there's three things
that they're basing the appeal on one is they said that the jury selection was defective
that the judge should not have allowed people who just fully wholeheartedly believed in
the death penalty and there was also a lot of jury turnover during the trial of people
who got kicked off people who felt threatened and asked to get kicked off and people who
were talking about the case outside of the trial which they shouldn't have been but then
didn't get kicked off so it was very tumultuous yeah lots of lots of jury misconduct possibly
so they're saying that that was one one reason they said that the evidence was faulty that
the real only real evidence the prosecution has was that those hits on the dogs made but
that that should never have been allowed in because it wasn't really 100% accurate 100%
of the time and they were saying that they should have been able to present the case
of the boat they allowed the jury to see the boat on land and they actually let them get
in it and the jurors were like going back and forth and like you could see that they
were kind of catching on and seeing if they could push something out of the boat but they're
on land so it doesn't really do anything right and the prosecution or the judge wouldn't
let them go out on water because he said it was too dangerous which kind of like I feel
like if you thought they're gonna flip the boat maybe proves the defense yeah that good
that action kind of speaks louder than words for me right so as they're going through this
appeal they get to do a full reinvestigation of the case and one thing that they're really
bringing up that was never brought up the first time is Modesto isn't this tiny small
quaint town the media portrayed it to be this you know idyllic American California town
but that's just because it really played well into their story the motto for Modesto is
water wealth contentment health but I guess everyone who lives in Modesto they always
say murder meth and auto theft like that's their slogan so there's I mean a ton of like
seedy underbelly I mean they have a meth problem there's constant robberies and you can't even
say that like oh that was outside of where Scott and Lacey lived in Modesto because again
there was a robbery across the street right across the street yeah they're not they're
not too far removed for that and then they also find this other huge I think story that
totally gets like my wheels turning and this is the thing that makes me question everything
the most between 1999 and 2002 seven pregnant women in the Modesto area go missing whoa
that's a lot that's a lot there's three in Modesto and then four within an 80 mile radius
of Modesto and in three years like I don't know the rate of pregnant women going missing
in Indianapolis but I'm pretty sure it's not this yeah that seems unusually high yeah
there was a one woman named Evelyn Hernandez who was eight months pregnant and disappeared
within six months of Lacey but of course like the whole Lacey thing was going on so it didn't
really get attention and they there was this story of a woman in a documentary that I watched
who actually could have been Lacey so she was eight months pregnant on Christmas Eve
of 2002 and she said she was actually working at this little shop that she owned and there
were these men who were like stalking her outside of her shop and she really felt threatened
by them they were following her and so she ended up like calling her family and just staying
inside and calling the police and when she called the police they went away and that
was earlier in the day like shortly before Lacey goes missing and this lady end up having
her baby the same day that Connor was due and she said she really feels like those men were
after her to kidnap her and she it's her belief and you know when you're in the situation
always feels probably scarier but it's her belief that if those men would have taken
her she would have been Lacey and Lacey would have been okay wow that's crazy that's an
insane story it is finally the defense is really pushing that Connor was handled outside
of the womb he had been almost disemboweled and they said that his injuries weren't consistent
with like the tide action that's what the prosecution tried to say is oh that's just
what happens when you're in water that long but they the defense doesn't think so and
they're still working on getting experts and he had that electrical tape on his ear and
that noose around his neck and they said none of that like you wouldn't get tape on your
ear from being in the water like right not even possible so they don't I mean the problem
is I think what people really want is they want a 100% story okay like well what are
happening to these other pregnant women we don't know like do they want their babies
do they like has any of them gotten caught no so there's no there's this kind of alternate
narrative but I don't feel like there are enough answers or enough solid answers to
revoke this like provocative story that the media and the prosecution have told about
Scott Peterson so I don't know what to believe if I'm if I'm being honest so when I came
into the story I was kind of like everyone else like I've heard this he did it the first
time I went through all of this it was so much new information that I thought oh my god
like there's there's no way there's no way he did it the second time I go through it
I think okay all of this is is super new it's super interesting but again my god he's got
to be the most unlucky man in America to have all of this happen to him and he's got to
be the dumbest man in America and like what are the odds of this guy is just such a crappy
husband and is so stupid and this happens to his wife so now I don't know what to think
I think like where I land is based on the evidence 100% he should not have been convicted
he should not have been sentenced to death I have no idea what happened to Lacey yeah
I mean at the beginning of of these episodes I said that I was 100% sure that Scott did
it and you definitely gave me a lot of things to think about and a lot of things to reconsider
I'm with you if he didn't do it he is the unluckiest guy on the planet yeah but yeah
I'm not sure where I fall either everyone I talked to seems super divided on this I
mean they're either really passionately believe he's guilty or they really passionately don't
people don't usually fall in the middle I don't know if we're going to be seeing more
of that but I would really love to hear what the listeners think after hearing all this
information so I if you guys could engage with us on social media I'm super super interested
to hear your thoughts and if you want to tweet at us it's at crime junkie pod if you want
to follow us on Instagram it's at crime junkie podcast and if you have any questions or
feedback on the case feel free to send us an email our email address is crime junkie
podcast at gmail.com
crime junkie is written and hosted by me all of our sound production and editing comes from
briff pray what and all of our music including our theme comes from justin daniel crime junkie
is an audio chuck production so what do you think chuck do you approve