Crime Junkie - MURDERED: Phylicia Simone Barnes Part 2
Episode Date: December 21, 2022When 16-year-old Phylicia Simone Barnes is found dead in a river 40 miles from where she was staying, her family suspects one man is responsible. But bringing him to justice is far more difficult than... anyone could have expected. You can visit bellyscrub.com to stay up to date with everything pertaining to the release of John Butler’s upcoming podcast series, A Confidence in the Round. Did you know you can listen to this episode ad-free? Join the Fan Club! Visit https://crimejunkieapp.com/library/ to view the current membership options and policies.Source materials for this episode cannot be listed here due to character limitations. For a full list of sources, please visit: https://crimejunkiepodcast.com/murdered-phylicia-simone-barnes-part-2/
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Hi, Grime Junkies. I'm your host, Ashley Flowers.
And I'm Brett.
And this is part two of the story of Felicia Barnes.
If you haven't listened to part one,
first of all, you're probably surprised that you're Brett.
Hello.
But go back and listen to part one,
because otherwise you're going to be truly lost.
Honestly, I might still be lost having been in part one.
Yeah, you might need a refresher.
So for those of you who have already listened
and just need that quick recap,
16-year-old Felicia went missing in December of 2010,
only to be found deceased and floating in the river
a few months later in April.
And this is all going down in Baltimore.
Now, at the time, all eyes are on her half-sister's ex-boyfriend,
this guy named Michael Johnson.
But despite some sketchy coincidences, some weird behavior,
they can't pin anything on him.
But in June of 2011, the public learned
that the FBI had been investigating
child sexual abuse material
and sexual exploitation of a minor,
which they say was in connection to Felicia's death.
And although this completely comes out of the blue,
it seems to get the ball rolling towards
finally bringing Felicia's alleged killer to trial.
So when the news of the investigation into the abuse
and the exploitation hits the public,
a lot of people have a lot of questions, understandably so.
Like, who do they think was abusing her?
And how did they find the abuse materials?
Did anyone know about it?
I have all the same questions.
Right.
Now, they don't come right out
and say much of anything at first.
But what people do know is that the feds want access
to Facebook and email accounts belonging to Felicia
and a handful of other people, including her sister Dina,
including Michael, who again is Dina's ex,
two of Michael's brothers, and one of Michael's cousins.
And according to Fox 45 News,
that's because a cell phone video exists,
which shows Felicia, quote,
with other relatives in Baltimore, partially clothed
and appearing intoxicated, end quote.
Relatives?
Who's relative, so like Michael's, Dina's?
They don't say.
And the affidavits that explain all of this are sealed.
But whatever it is, it's still not enough for an arrest.
How is it not enough for an arrest?
I mean, she's 16.
Even if the age of consent is 16, she is still a minor.
No, you're right.
So the age of consent is actually 16 in Maryland.
But as long as she's a minor,
any explicit photos or videos taken of her
are still considered child sexual abuse material.
Even if she gave consent for those to be taken.
So you're right.
This seems like grounds for an arrest,
not necessarily for her murder, her kidnapping, whatever.
Just for these materials, right?
Apparently not.
And so that fall, investigators try a new tactic.
The Hartford County State's attorney
brings the case to a grand jury,
and one by one, they call in Michael's relative to testify.
While at the same time, police get a wiretap on Michael's phone.
Basically, the hope is, by doing this grand jury,
they're hoping they're going to scare him
and scare him into talking while they're recording him.
And it actually works to some extent.
It gets him talking.
And as detectives listen in,
Michael raises questions about the strength of the case
to one of his brothers.
And even though he sounds almost philosophical at times,
he is worried when investigators come to his house
to get a DNA sample.
And actually, here is a clip from one of the actual wiretaps.
Well, my thing is, what are they testing against?
They taking my DNA, what are you testing against?
DNA is found on hardware.
And the part about it is, I can't sit there
and tell you that it wouldn't be there.
Be where?
Underneath the fingernails and all that shit.
Because of the situation I was going on,
because me, her and Dana was play-fighting this shit.
And I don't know who it was,
but somebody scratched the fuck out of me.
And we was all sitting there playing.
They pretty much whipped my ass.
But it wasn't on the real shit and letting it like that.
But somebody scratched me.
Now, you play-fighting shit like that.
When was it?
It was not too long before all this shit happened.
Everybody was like, well, wouldn't that be washed away?
Seeing as though she probably took a shower,
I'm like, well, that's the case.
It wouldn't be washed away if you sat in the water.
So evidently, they must have got a DNA sample off of her.
You were there with us, a scare tag.
They're like that fucking tool.
I still don't know what the fuck they're trying to pull.
I ain't trippin', yo.
It is what it is, nigga.
What you mean it is what it is?
That's a lie.
However, you look at it, it's a long call.
Yeah, well, I ain't complainin'.
It's life.
Some niggas get dealt to my fucking speed.
Some niggas get dealt to club niggas.
Yeah.
I can't say I had a fuck up when I had a pretty good one.
I did a lot of shit that I wanted to do.
There's only one more thing that I want to do.
What?
Brazil, nigga.
But the one thing I would tell you, nigga, to do,
take the first.
It ain't over yet, nigga.
And not yet.
Shit, I still wouldn't be over.
It's gonna be my fucking fight.
I ain't going down without fighting, nigga.
That's right, you should.
We got that recording from John Butler,
who used to be with the Baltimore State's attorney's office.
First, he was a law clerk, then a prosecutor.
And John is actually going to be dropping a deep dive podcast
on this case called A Confidence in the Round.
We actually have a link to John's website,
so you can stay up to date on anything pertaining to the release of that series,
right in the show notes.
Now, other parts of that call are hard to understand,
because at times, Michael and his brother jump into topics
that they've obviously discussed before,
and they talk in shorthand that sounds like honestly code.
Like, at one point, they discuss a storage bin,
which they call a tote,
because I think at some point, the state had one in the grand jury room.
But let me ask you something about that.
The way he was carrying it,
you can always tell if something is in there or if it's heavy.
One hand.
One hand is dragging that **** along?
No, not dragging. One hand, lift holding it.
Basically, so it was sitting in a vertical position
like it wasn't really nothing in it.
I actually was on a, I'll say, a 90-degree angle facing down
like it wasn't nothing in it.
But I mean, if anything was in a tote, that matters.
So it seemed like some bullshit.
Probably so.
What does that mean in relation to Felicia?
I don't know what it means,
but that bin is definitely on his mind, right?
Like, he's talking about it for some reason.
And in another call, Michael tells his current girlfriend at the time
that he's considering fleeing the country maybe to Brazil
because the U.S. won't be able to extradite him,
although I don't think he's actually right about that
because the U.S. and Brazil do have an extradition treaty.
Okay.
And he goes on, he's like, I don't want to leave,
because like at that point he had that newborn baby with this girl,
but he's like saying he doesn't have any options left.
Okay, hear me out.
It's great that we're getting all this information
or interactions from him,
but I feel like it's not clearing anything up for me.
Like, what does all of that even mean?
Why does he need to flee?
I have so many questions.
And I don't have any answers.
To your point, like, it sounds damning,
but as damning as it sounds.
That's all it is.
He doesn't admit to anything.
Right.
And because of that, I mean, it's as flimsy to the grand jury
as it is to us, and they decide not to indict,
which could just be because they don't think Felicia was killed
in Harford County, so it could be a technicality.
It could be because they don't think there's enough evidence
against Michael.
It could be a myriad of things.
We don't know.
Those things don't get released.
But after this, police get a strange new lead to investigate
thanks to some commentary on the People's Champion blog.
It turns out that back in January of 2011,
a woman who is friends with one of Michael's brothers tweeted,
quote, it's trapped at the dam.
Don't pull the lever.
End quote.
Excuse me.
What's trapped at the dam?
Yeah, that's what they want to find out.
When police confront the woman, she tells them that she's not
sure what the tweet means.
She doesn't remember, but she's adamant that it's not about
Felicia, who I'll remind everyone from episode one was
found in a dam.
And she even says she's willing to testify if need be that she
doesn't remember or doesn't know it's about whatever.
Now, after this, things go kind of silent until the one year
anniversary of Felicia's disappearance.
That's when Michael's lawyer shed some light on the child's
sexual abuse material warrants.
Well, sort of.
The lawyer says there are photos of Michael and Felicia streaking
with other people running around naked inside and outside of
Dina's apartment.
But the photos weren't taken during Felicia's winter 2010
trip.
It was taken when she had visited a few months before that.
And it's still not clear how they relate to the murder
investigation at all.
But the lawyer also tells reporter Justin Fenton that
police have nothing on Michael, that they've been wasting
their time going after him.
But clearly investigators and prosecutors feel a whole
other way because on Wednesday, April 25th of 2012, Michael
Johnson is indicted on first degree murder in the death of
Felicia Simone Barnes.
I mean, that seemed to come out of nowhere, though.
It did.
But Felicia's family doesn't care.
They're just understandably thrilled that something's
actually happening.
I mean, they're waiting, what is it, two years at this point
for an arrest?
But just like the investigation to get here, nothing about
this trial is going to be straightforward.
Starting from the moment Michael is arrested, in his jail
booking photo, his face is all banged up.
Like he's got a black eye, a swollen eye.
His lawyer says that police roughed him up while they
took him into custody.
Police, on the other hand, say Michael tried to run, so a
deputy U.S.
Marshall tackled him and his face hit the ground.
He said, he said, I don't know.
Right.
Also, Peter Herman reports that it's unusual for someone
in Maryland to be charged by a grand jury indictment first.
Typically, I guess that comes after the initial arrest.
So they're saying like things were done kind of backwards.
And a one-charge indictment is also pretty odd because,
I mean, we've seen this.
Prosecutors usually try and like tack on other charges.
Like stack them up.
Yeah, manslaughter, conspiracy.
It's a safety net, right?
I mean, could they just be so confident in whatever evidence
that they have that they feel like they don't need those
like extra charges though?
I don't know what's going on in their heads, but Michael's
lawyer kind of has this theory on why they're doing this.
Basically, he thinks they're rushing to charge him because
as if this case wasn't complicated enough, the lead detective,
Daniel Nicholson, who you'll remember as Daniel Nicholson,
the fourth, he had just got suspended at this time.
And that's the day before Michael was arrested.
Okay.
In the ultimate twist of irony, Daniel's own teenage
daughter had gone missing a few days ago.
And there were allegations that he went rogue to find her,
that he was like using his badge while off duty to get into
someone's home, that he then assaulted them.
And they're trying to get ahead of that investigation.
Exactly.
Again, at the time that they're going to charge Michael,
Daniel hadn't been formally.
Wait, this is just the day before, right?
Right.
Yeah.
So he hadn't been formally charged yet.
So Michael's lawyer thinks that basically they wanted a
conviction in Felicia's case before then going and prosecuting
Daniel.
Otherwise, you've got like your lead detective could
potentially be a convicted.
Is now like questionable judgment, character, et cetera,
et cetera.
All that to say, was his daughter ever found?
Yeah.
So no, thankfully she was found safe and sound.
And the police union defends Daniel's actions,
saying that he didn't do anything wrong.
He was just a dogged investigator, a dogged dad who
loves his family.
I mean, I can't imagine what it's like being in that
situation.
And I know I do anything for my kids, but assault is still
assault.
Did this person even have Daniel's daughter?
Well, WBAL TV's Jane Miller reported that it was an
apartment where he believed his daughter's boyfriend was
staying.
I don't know.
It doesn't sound like they found her there.
I don't know what the ins and outs of that were.
To your point, if someone took Joe, like gloves are off.
There's no rules anymore.
Right.
There's no.
So part of me gets it.
Anyway, Michael ends up pleading not guilty.
And since his previous comments about fleeing the country
make him a flight risk, he has denied bail while everyone
starts to get ready for trial.
And as the trial looms closer, John Butler, who remember,
he's the guy who gave us the recordings.
He's a law clerk assigned to the case at the time.
He notices something strange.
He notices that Michael used a different phone number on
his easy pass application than the one that police were
previously aware of.
It turns out that he had gotten a new number around
June of 2010.
So the state subpoenas those older records and surprise,
there are even more texts with Felicia.
More than 1300 between the two numbers.
Okay.
The hundreds of texts before was side-eye.
This certainly doesn't look any better.
I also don't know why they didn't see this on Felicia's
records, but could just be just a random older number.
I don't know.
I know, but you'd think they want like 1300 messages like
who's this?
I don't know.
Either way, they find it now.
Regardless, do they have any physical evidence?
Well, no, that's the thing.
This entire case that they're making against Michael is
circumstantial.
There is no physical evidence.
They don't have the storage bin that they believe was used
to move her, which by the way, they don't even know.
That's just their theory.
Right.
And they can't even say conclusively how she died.
Asphyxiation could be suffocation, strangulation,
even drowning.
Now, even though they collected Michael's DNA and he was
clearly fearful it would have been found maybe on her
fingernails based on that recorded call, they don't
actually have that.
They don't have DNA on her to compare it to.
Not to mention Michael's cell tower records don't put him
anywhere near the area where she was found.
And the state admits that they don't know how he would
have gotten her body there.
Although they have a theory.
They think that he stashed her in the well house where that
cadaver dog alerted or potentially stashed her in
Patapsco State Park until he was then able to dump her in
the river.
So did the autopsy ever conclude how long she was in the
river though?
So not that I can tell.
And remember this was all in the middle of winter in the
Northeast.
So I would imagine that the temperature of the water would
actually impact their ability to make any kind of like
especially when you talk about she's been gone for months
and months.
You're not narrowing down a couple hour window.
It's like weeks or hopefully days but likely more like
weeks.
With frigid water too.
Like just guess and you'd probably be close.
But the prosecutors do have something that although it
doesn't link Michael to Felicia's murder, it does make
Michael look real bad.
In December 2012, they file a notice that they intend to
play that whole cell phone video in court.
The one that I mentioned earlier.
But this time they release a bit more information about it.
It's 16 minutes long and apparently it shows Dina and
Michael along with Felicia and Michael's younger brother
quote intoxicated and engaging in sexual relations.
End quote.
This news comes out on the second anniversary of Felicia's
disappearance and it makes her family just sick.
At this point, Janice wants Dina to go to prison more than
anyone.
I mean she thinks she deserves a longer sentence than
even Michael for putting Felicia in those situations in
the first place.
And she is just furious with everyone involved.
Understandably so.
It's really hard for me to understand how this all went
down.
Now Michael's trial begins in late January of 2013.
Prosecutors lay out their case.
They say that Dina made terrible mistakes while in
charge of her teenage sister allowing her to drink and
party with adults including Michael.
And the night that that video was recorded that would
have been June 13, 2010.
They say they alleged that that was a turning point in
Michael and Felicia's relationship which ultimately
led to her death.
Now the video involves kissing and quote unquote naked
touching Dina with Michael Felicia with his younger
brother.
But the state says that even though Michael was touching
Dina, he's actually looking at Felicia.
And from there they believe he became obsessed with
her and he began an inappropriate relationship
with her.
They even bring Dina up and she has to answer questions
about the video while it plays on TV monitors facing
away from court spectators.
Now when she's explaining that she says that the four
of them along with another of Michael's brothers were
just drinking and left a party at the apartment to go
streaking on a dare from Michael.
And she tells the jury that she doesn't know why she
let her teenage sister participate in the whole
thing.
She just wasn't thinking.
Yeah, no shit.
But just wasn't thinking isn't an excuse for that
kind of behavior.
That's something your 14 year old son would say.
I was going to say I barely let that slide for him on
like forgetting to switch his laundry from the washer
to the dryer.
It's not a good excuse for anything let alone this.
I mean she was an adult in this situation.
And it gets worse.
She testifies that in the video Felicia is seen
grabbing Michael's penis that they were playing
this so-called game that Dina and Michael made up which
they call.
Joinking.
Where they grab each other's privates.
I'm sorry.
They thought it was just OK to play this game with
minors.
I mean I don't know why they thought this was OK but
they obviously did because according to Joy Lapola's
reporting for Fox 45 at one point in the video Michael
is actually seen touching Felicia's breasts.
Dina says that after they were back in their
apartment that night she saw Michael reach for Felicia
like he was going to touch her vagina.
And Felicia laughed and kind of like pushed his hand away
and then Dina went and confronted him.
He denied the accusation and she considered calling
her father but then didn't like she was basically
afraid she said that she wouldn't get to see Felicia
anymore which like bing bing bing.
Yeah.
Right call.
I certainly wouldn't send my daughter back to her.
But she tells the jury basically like at that point
her and Michael's relationship was already rocky like
when they're making this video.
In fact she said it probably had been over for
like a year by then but she said that that night
was like the nail in the coffin for their relationship.
Other siblings of Felicia take the stand as well like
Kelly and Brian.
They tell the jury about the first night after Felicia
went missing how they kind of gathered at Dina's
place watching the door hoping she was just going to
show up.
They say Michael joined them eventually and they
make note that his eyes were quote unquote bloodshot
and they say that when he showed up he like sat on
the couch not saying much to anyone and he was
nervous about the implications of being the last
person to see Felicia and he also didn't help out
later with search efforts which to be fair like I
don't know if you remember from episode one but
like I remember Felicia's dad saying was like you
are all on the list and looking out for you and
police will want to talk to you.
And especially Michael he's like you're a suspect
you're a suspect but like you're the last person to
see her so like it's not his own head like people
are instilling the spirit in him as well.
Now the other person who takes the stand is the
medical examiner who says that Felicia's body was
only moderately decomposed which could fit the
theory that she was in a container when she was
dumped into the water because it might have
helped preserve her and again we're talking
middle of winter in Baltimore the cold weather
would have slow decomposition as well but just
note that they never actually found a container
with her it was just her body.
Now there's one more thing that I mean sends
shock waves through the whole courtroom and that's
when prosecutors tell the jury about a surprise
witness a 36 year old man named James McCray
who claims that he saw Felicia's body after she
was killed.
James claims that Michael showed him Felicia's
body and asked for his advice on what to do with
it.
Wait you're gonna have to back up I have a
million questions how long have they known about
this guy where'd he come from maybe let's start
with who is he this seems so random this also is
like feeling like cereal all over again like is
it not totally I can't again I got to get out of
Baltimore so the reason we haven't heard about
him before was I guess this guy only came forward
after the arrest like in June of 2012 James is
what the state calls a petty thief and he says
that he spoke up because he was overcome by
guilt while reading his Bible in jail okay he
says he's a drifter from New York who's currently
locked up for theft in a nearby county and he's
testified in a couple of high-profile trials
before that feels like a big red flag to me I mean
he could be making this story up for personal
gain well James actually has a response for that
he says that he was a reluctant witness every
single time okay and that in this case he has
nothing to gain because he's getting out of jail
soon anyway according to Justin Fenton's
reporting James testifies that he and Michael
were never like good friends but they didn't
know each other and he had even met Felicia as
well he claims that Michael called him one day
just out of the blue tells him that he needs
help with something serious so he gave James
directions to the apartment and when he arrived
Michael showed him Felicia's body wrapped up in
a sheet in the bedroom he says that Michael
told him Felicia had been like giving him mixed
signals and that he had raped her and then
choked her when she wouldn't stop crying
afterwards now James says that he wouldn't
help Michael move her body but he did offer
some advice he told him to turn off his phone
turn off Felicia's phone too because the GPS
would track their locations and then he
suggested throwing her in the water instead
of burying her so any evidence on her body
would be destroyed and do they have any
evidence placing James at the apartment
like phone records I haven't seen anything
about James's phone records but prosecutors
do have Michael's phone records remember
and the thing is is even though this is
their witness they have to admit that they
can't find any calls to any number that
could be associated with James that being
said they say that James knows things that
weren't public knowledge like that
Michael's nickname for Felicia was little
sis plus even though Michael did not turn
his phone off while he was driving around
that day on the very next day someone
used a computer which was later seized
from Michael's brother's house to search
whether a phone's location can be traced
when the phone is off okay but we know
his phone was off that day because he said
it died could he have stashed it with
Felicia's body then and then made it back
to wherever he was when it turned back on
I don't think so because remember he bought
that tote that they think she was buried
in at Walmart we know his phone was on
then right when he was like running errands
or whatever afternoon unless he hit her
somewhere else while his phone was off
bought the tote then turn off his phone
later put her in the top I don't know
how that timeline would make sense and
to be fair I don't know how any of these
timelines make sense they don't that's a
problem I told you I could do an episode
on these timeline discrepancies this is
such a difficult case to put together
again even that like shady search like
can they you know trap me if my phone's
off like you can't actually connect that
to Michael so again all fishy all
circumstantial and of course the defense
pokes all the holes in James's story
they basically dismissed him as a jail
house snitch who quote can't tell Michael
Johnson from Michael Jordan his
attorneys tell the jury that if this dude
is the state star witness their case has
to be in trouble for one thing James
began his testimony by telling the jury
that his name is actually James Lee
James McCray great way to start off
guy yeah although he seems to kind of
use both or go back and forth he also
testified that Dean's apartment was on
the second floor as he's telling his
story we know that hers is like the
basement apartment he claimed this all
happened before Christmas but it didn't
we know Felicia went missing three days
after Christmas got it got it then
there's the storage container or the
tote as everyone calls it prosecutors
have one of those in the courtroom they
say that it's identical to the one that
Michael used and they want to witness
to actually climb into it to demonstrate
that a person Felicia size could fit in
there but the judge won't allow it
because it's actually not the container
that was the container well the one
that was allegedly used is just similar
blue plastic 35 gallon container from
Dean's place and as the defense
points out there is no hard evidence
that a plastic bin is involved in the
crime at all let alone a 35 gallon bin
specifically like it that is weird to me
they have this theory and they're gonna
it's like not just a bin it is
yeah a very similar bin to this exact
size color yeah everything well again
to me there's no proof at all any bin was
used right then you're saying okay there's
this specific bin not only was a bin
used it's this is this one this kind of
bin but there is a lot of talk of bins
by other people but they're all
conflicting descriptions of it like take
Dean a statement hours after Felicia's
disappearance Dean it tells police that a
large blue storage bin was missing from
her closet okay but according to Kate
Amara of WBAL TV
Dina then changed her mind later that same
night after she saw a bin in Michael's
car filled with clothes which was
supposedly hers so I think she's saying
the one missing is in his car okay then
a few days later she tells police the
container in Michael's car was actually
smaller than the one that disappeared from
her apartment so that one's now still
missing meanwhile police have surveillance
video of Michael buying a storage bin
during his trip to Walmart that day at
around 4 p.m. but the bin that he got at
Walmart was 22 gallons okay I know it's
a lot let me make sure I have this
containers bin situation sorted out the
bin from Dina's apartment which she says
is a 35 gallon bin is still missing and
the one she saw in Michael's car which
she thought was her bin but it's not her
bin was actually the new smaller 22
gallon bin that he bought at Walmart that
day I think question mark again this is
so confusing even the reporters in the
courtroom are like what the hell is going
on which is probably never a good thing
for a prosecutor right if you can't even
follow it that's that's bad news but
there's even more conflicting stuff
because remember our friend Elvis that
neighbor well he tells the jury that he
saw Michael struggling to move the bin
in the morning but again according to
prosecutors theory they believe that
he was killed in the early afternoon in
that small window of time when his phone
was off after she stopped using her
devices right like around one now here's
a thing so John Butler who was the law
clerk at the time told us that a blue
storage container lid was found in the
same debris filled area near the dam
where Felicia's body was found in the
problem is that area is super big it's
not super clear how far away it was from
her for some reason it was never
collected which seems wild to me since
they had this whole theory about it
since we're all talking about bins
nonstop yeah and it's not like they didn't
know like they've been building this theory
for like months they're looking for
surveillance footage but they didn't
collect it okay so the state isn't
allowed to introduce photos of it into
evidence so apparently they did take a
photo of it but because they didn't
collect it as evidence you can't bring
it into trial which I totally understand
but then why take a photo of it okay
now to top it all off the Emmy testifies
that nothing in Felicia's autopsy
suggests her body was ever folded
into a plastic storage
container in fact
she says the only firm conclusion she
can come to is that Felicia died from
lack of oxygen she found
no signs of drowning or choking on
food but also no signs of strangulation
there were no injuries
at all as far as she could tell
and the death was essentially ruled a
homicide by default just because of the
suspicious circumstances surrounding
you know her going missing the way her body
was found right but to be clear
you're telling me that they have
no physical evidence to determine
if Felicia was even murdered
pretty much I mean look
we can't completely discount all the
circumstantial evidence because there's a
lot of it and Michael's behavior is
sketchy as hell but even some of that
sketchy behavior is debunked by the
defense they argue that even though
Michael and Felicia texted a lot
none of the messages said anything
inappropriate
plus it's not that he didn't want to help
look for Felicia he had been told
to stay away by either police or her family
or both so after the state
rests its case Michael's
lawyers ask a judge for an acquittal
which is actually a totally common legal
strategy what's uncommon
is the judge's response
he tells prosecutors that he's
greatly concerned about the flaws
in their case everyone
in the courtroom is on the edge of their
seats wondering if the judge
is going to grant the defense's request
and just let Michael go
but he doesn't he says
that it should be up to a jury to decide
and Michael's lawyers only
call one witness when it's their turn
a co-worker of his who says that he
didn't find it odd that Michael called
in sick that day according to
Kate Amara's reporting apparently he skipped
work like three or four times a month I don't
even know how this dude like held a job
the defense was also supposed
to call a surprise witness of their own
this man who supposedly saw Felicia
like days after she was reported missing
in another county but they end up
not calling him I don't know why
but anyways both sides wrap up
their case and it's in the jury's hands
at the last minute
the jury is given the option
to convict him of first degree
murder or second degree murder
going in it was only first
so the tension is palpable
as Felicia's and Michael's families
wait for the verdict and after
two days of deliberating
the jury acquits him
of first degree murder but finds
him guilty of second degree murder
now Felicia's family is
relieved like it did
look dicey for a while and no it's not
as good as first degree I think this is probably
why they threw second degree on the table is
like just in case we need it
when they knew something probably going kind of
bad for them so again even though
it's not perfect even though it's not life in prison
he would still be in prison for up to 30 years
so they can rest easy knowing
that the man convicted for her murder
will be behind bars
that is until Michael's lawyers
file a motion for a new trial
and on Wednesday March 20th
instead of sending him to prison
the judge grants it
he says that Michael didn't get a fair trial
and that's because prosecutors withheld
key information about
their star witness James McRae
or James Lee or whatever you want to call him
they raise a few different issues
basically saying that there are too many
questions and concerns about this guy's
credibility but what's interesting
is a juror tells 11 news that
it wasn't even James's testimony
that swayed them towards the guilty
verdict it was actually the wire tapped
phone calls because they say
in them not once did Michael claim he was innocent
he just talked about the consequences
of getting convicted okay
then even without James's testimony
it sounds like the state could still have a really good case
definitely and Felicia's family
is still hopeful
so they all pack back into the courtroom
and a second trial
starts on December 2nd, 2014
this time there's a different judge
and different defense attorneys but overall
the state's case is pretty much the same
with the notable exclusion of James
McRae slash Lee on the witness list
they do introduce some new evidence though
but it's just internet history stuff
like Michael checking web sleuth message
boards so not exactly a
smoking gun nothing in this case is
and it doesn't help this time
around that neighbor Elvis's
testimony is inconsistent because
now he says that he saw Michael
moving the storage bin anywhere from 10 a.m.
to like 2 p.m. that day
which is a much bigger gap than he was
giving before luckily for
prosecutors they still have those wire tapped
phone calls on their side although
they have been ordered to redact
parts before playing them for the jury
here's where things get
caught up though whoever did
the redacting missed a couple
of different references and on Friday
December 19th as prosecutors
are wrapping up the jury hears
Michael discussing things that
should have been cut two times
how does that even
happen like this is
the Murphy's law of trials for the
prosecutors but not for the defense
Michael's attorneys move for a mistrial
and then just ask for an
acquittal again because they're saying
they think the state did this intentionally
because their case was like going
down the drain they were going to like cause
this pick up like oh now
it's not fair we have to get it over
over now the judge
doesn't agree about that he's like I don't think this was on purpose
but I do
understand that the jury can't unhear this
so he grants the mistrial
and has upsetting
as is his defilicious family
it is somewhat of a relief because
the case was going down the drain
five of the jurors just in front of interviews
says that they would have voted to acquit Michael
at that point maybe third
times a charm
no it is the exact opposite
the third trial
is derailed before it can even begin
because in January 2015
the judge decides
to reverse the mistrial
and instead
just outright acquit Michael
of second degree murder
you have got to be kidding me
why? what?
I've literally never seen this happen
so they were able to do this because
when the second trial ended
remember there was still that defense motion on the table
for an acquittal
so the judge should have made some decision on it
but they just never did
and so now because he doesn't think there's enough evidence
to convict Michael he decides it makes more
sense to acquit him
to have another trial
so the Baltimore state's attorney's office
re-indites Michael on another
second degree murder charge
wait isn't that double jeopardy though
you can't be tried for the same thing
twice the defense tries to argue
that this is double jeopardy but prosecutors say
that after the judge declared a mistrial
he no longer had the authority
to acquit Michael at all
right like that like ends that
this is like part
unreal so then the defense files a motion
to dismiss the indictment
and to the prosecutor's dismay
the judge who just acquitted Michael
is assigned to the case again
so not a big mystery what he thinks of it
and sure enough he sides with the defense
and dismisses the new charge
the state appeals
and Maryland's highest court agrees with their argument
so it's time for round three
like they are going to trial
I cannot imagine how horrible
this is for Felicia's family
I mean it's a trial that never ends
I know and I laugh because this seems
like something out of a movie
you'll laugh to not cry
we'll talk about this later
but what's wild about this is
the system is working like it's supposed to
but does that mean it's working
right that's such a good way to say it
now this third trial doesn't start
until March of 2018
so they have been dealing with this situation
for years
remember his first trial was in 2012
she went missing in 2010
for years that this is just like never ending
for them
now for Michael's third trial
he opts like he's done with the jury
he sees that judges
understand his case, understand that
there's not a whole lot of physical evidence
so he opts for just the judge to decide
he thinks he's going to have better luck
and the state knows that this is probably the last chance
that they're going to get
to get justice for Felicia
so new prosecutors are assigned
they even consider bringing James McRae back
apparently they don't
and when the judge asks if they can point to
anything to help prove their theory
about Michael becoming obsessed with Felicia
I mean he's like literally giving me anything
give me a text message, give me something
the prosecution can't
provide anything
because in their mind
they think Michael was grooming her
so he was being super careful with his words
I also heard that there might have been
some deleted texts that they were never
able to recover but again
who knows what those said
so Michael's lawyers argue that
the state's theory makes no sense
they say it is more logical
that she left the apartment on her own
for innocent reasons
and then met with trouble somewhere else
and it doesn't help
again this whole thing is happening
years after Felicia's death
witnesses don't remember things very well
the ones who do remember
it's not actually stuff that's helping the prosecution
like one of the detectives who
took a few days to secure Dean's apartment
and conduct any sort of foot search
he says that he never followed up
on several tips that Felicia was seeing
in a particular area
and according to K-Tamara's reporting
he didn't even get out of his car
during the initial canvas of the apartment complex
just imagine
what might have happened if they'd just taken
her disappearance seriously from the start
I mean I don't know maybe
did their actual jobs
it's heartbreaking it's appalling
it's almost not even words for how terrible it is
no and what comes out like
to make all of this worse
I guess under Maryland law
state police are supposed to be notified
if a child is missing for more than 24 hours
and that didn't even happen
which is meant to be kind of this other failsafe
like if local police but just didn't happen
so because of all of this
on March 30th
Michael is acquitted
for real this time
the judge says there are way too many
questions to find him guilty
beyond a reasonable doubt
which is the bar
and to say this is a crushing blow to Felicia's family
is an understatement
yeah I mean was anyone at least charged
with anything related to that cell phone video
it's not much in comparison to murder
but it's something
like someone should at least be held accountable for that
on video right like again
you want to talk about physical evidence
no no one is ever charged
I assume there's a legal reason
to be to not charge somebody
for something that's illegal
against a minor
when you say it like that it's very like da
right but I just know no one has
and I don't know why
but what I will say there was one good thing
that came out of
this whole horrible mess of a tragedy
and that's Felicia's law
which promotes better coordination
between law enforcement and community groups
during those crucial first hours
after children go missing
according to the Hartford current
it's the first state law of this kind
named after a non-white child
Russell believes police delays
in Felicia's case helped a killer cover his tracks
and ultimately go free
but I want to close this out
with someone else's perspective
actually two people
Chantel and Felicia's little sister on her mom's side Ayanna
as painful as it was
for them to share their sister's story
with us it was important to them
because Felicia's narrative has largely
been shaped by her dad's side
of the family and to some degree
even Janice
Chantel and Ayanna have never really
had a voice in it they don't share
a last name with their sister but they shared
a home with her for years
and not including them is almost like
erasing part of Felicia's history
they know that the only suspect
police have ever had can no longer
be held legally responsible
for Felicia's murder and they said
it's a hopeless feeling and they told us
it's a hard time finding good in the world
but if other people
were involved they could still face charges
plus no matter what
happens in the criminal justice system
Chantel and Ayanna just
want to know what really happened to their sister
and that made me think again
about how do we measure justice
like we said this earlier
like on one hand you could say
that justice was done in this case
someone was charged they went to trial three times
in fact there wasn't
enough evidence to convict so he went free
that is how the legal system
is supposed to work in this country
but on the other hand you have a young woman
who had barely begun to
live her life who never got to accept
the diploma that she worked so hard for
or go off to college like she wanted to
or have a career or marriage or children
or anything it's
likely no one will ever be held accountable
for taking all of that away from her
or for taking her away from the people
who love her and how do you call
that justice
I'm interested to know if you guys
would have done anything differently
we do this thing in the fan club called
the crime junkie jury we'll be posting
one of those so if you're in the fan club
go take a look and if you have thoughts
on this case find us on social
or send us an email crimejunkie
at audio chuck dot com
as always you guys can find all of our source
material on the website crimejunkiepodcast.com
and be sure to follow us on instagram
at crimejunkiepodcast
we are actually off
next week for the holiday
if you guys can't take the break
again the fan club has quite literally
hundreds of episodes and you get all
the regular episodes ad free
but before we go we have one
last list of fan shout outs
to celebrate our five year anniversary
but I cannot believe we
made it
all right so
Liz from Hawaii I love you
Ashlyn from Singapore
Megan K from Nashville
Tennessee Kelly K from
Phoenix Arizona ghost sun devils
and Grace from Kansas thank you
guys so much for tuning in
over and over again supporting us I love you
and I want to say
I love you to Tessa and Tanya
from Springfield Oregon
Natalie from Denver Colorado
Jez in Sydney Australia
so far
Hannah M from Hamilton Georgia
Jen and James from Austin Texas
and Hyman all the way from
South Korea oh my god
happy holidays you guys we'll see
you in the new year
crimejunkie is an audio
Chuck production so
what do you think Chuck do you approve
oh