Crime Junkie - SERIAL KILLER: The Alphabet Murders Part 1
Episode Date: February 19, 2024Dozens of commuters see a young girl fleeing a car on the side of the expressway in Rochester, NY, but no one pulls over to help. The community is devastated when her body is discovered just days late...r, but it’s assumed to be a tragic but isolated incident. But when more young girls go missing…only to have their bodies discovered within days in a similar manner…the community must ask: is a serial killer stalking the streets of Rochester? And is he choosing his victims based on a seemingly random characteristic? This is Part 1 of 2. Check out Alphabet Killer: The True Story of the Double Initial Murders by Cheri Farnsworth.Check out Nightmare in Rochester: The Double Initial Murders by Michael Benson. Did you know you can listen to this episode ad-free? Join the Fan Club! Visit https://crimejunkie.app/library/ to view the current membership options and policies.Source materials for this episode cannot be listed here due to character limitations. For a full list of sources, please visit: https://crimejunkiepodcast.com/serial-killer-alphabet-murders-part-1/ Don’t miss out on all things Crime Junkie!Instagram: @crimejunkiepodcast | @audiochuckTwitter: @CrimeJunkiePod | @audiochuckTikTok: @crimejunkiepodcastFacebook: /CrimeJunkiePodcast | /audiochuckllcCrime Junkie is hosted by Ashley Flowers and Brit Prawat. Instagram: @ashleyflowers | @britprawatTwitter: @Ash_Flowers | @britprawatTikTok: @ashleyflowerscrimejunkieFacebook: /AshleyFlowers.AF Text Ashley at +1 (317) 733-7485 to talk all things true crime, get behind the scenes updates, random photos of Chuck, and more!Â
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Hi, crime junkies. I'm your host, Ashley Flowers.
And I'm Britt.
And the story I have for you today is about innocence
and how easily it can be stolen and the vulnerability it brings.
This is the story of Carmen Cologne, Wanda Walcoitz, and Michelle Maenza. Thank you. It's around 5.30 on a cold November evening in 1971 in Rochester, New York.
And one by one, commuters on the Western Expressway are jolted out of their routine drives home
by what they see on the shoulder
of the highway. Driver after driver slows and cranes their neck as they pass this almost
unbelievable sight in front of them. It's a young girl, naked from the waist down, with
her pants clutched in her hand and she is screaming and waving her arms as she runs in the direction of oncoming
traffic. And what she's running from is clear. There is a car on the shoulder driving in reverse
to chase her. According to a book called Nightmare in Rochester, one driver who will call Dave,
turns to his passenger, I'm sure in a total state of disbelief, and asks if he should turn back.
Hi, Dave, this is Britt.
Happy to answer that question for you.
Yes, yes, you should absolutely turn back.
Yeah, but easier said than done, maybe?
I mean, it's rush hour,
because turning back isn't really an option per se.
They'd have to get off at an exit,
get back on the expressway coming in the other direction.
Okay, so get off at an exit,
then get back on the expressway coming in the other direction.
I don't see why this is even a question.
And also why is Dave the only one asking?
Honestly, I'm sure they're all asking it,
but maybe the bystander effect kicks in for everyone
the same way it does
for Dave, because he lets that irrationally rational part of his brain take over, the
part that just wants to explain this whole thing away.
I mean, all these other drivers are seeing the same thing and they're not stopping,
so obviously it's not that big of a deal, right?
Nightmare in Rochester says Dave thinks it's probably just a parent who pulled over to
let their kid go to the bathroom and now the kids misbehaving.
And so no one stops, not a single car.
But the site sticks with Dave.
It bothers him enough that he tells his wife about it when he gets home.
But he still doesn't report what he saw to anyone official, and neither do any
of the dozens of other drivers who saw the exact same thing.
So when the Rochester Police Department gets a report of a missing child just hours later
around 7.50 that evening, the scene on the expressway isn't anywhere on their radar.
And this report that they do get is from the family of a little girl, a 10-year-old named
Carmen Cologne. She lives with her grandparents, but both her parents are in her life, especially
her mom, Guillermina. And without getting sidetracked, I want to acknowledge really fast that Carmen's
family situation is troubling, to say the least. Guillermina was only a teenager when Carmen was born, and the father is this guy named Justiano,
or maybe Justiniano, depending on the source,
but I'm gonna refer to him as Justiano.
But this guy was not only married to Guillermina's sister,
but he was also twice Guillermina's age.
So essentially we're talking statutory rape
by her brother-in-law.
That is the least sugar-coated version, yes.
And at this point in the story, Guillermina is living with Justiano's brother Miguel
Colon.
I think they're like dating.
So what the family tells police is that earlier that afternoon, Carmen went up the street to
Jack's drugstore to fill a prescription for her baby sister who had an earache.
And Carmen runs little errands like this for her family all the time, though every other
time her grandpa is usually trailing close behind her or keeping an eye on her from the
yard.
But today, grandpa didn't get the message, so when Carmen took off down the street, there
was no one keeping watch.
And then Carmen just didn't come back.
The family tells police that they spread out around the neighborhood looking for her, but I'm sure they were expecting to find
her safe and just distracted by something along the way.
Right, in true 10-year-old fashion.
Right, but they couldn't find her anywhere, and by the time she's reported missing,
around 750 panic has set in. Investigators respond and conduct a search as well as a
neighborhood canvas
that starts either that evening or the next morning.
One of their obvious first stops is Jack's drugstore
where they speak to the owner who says,
yeah, he did see Carmen right around 4.30
when she brought in a prescription to be filled.
But he told her it was gonna take a few minutes
that she should come back in like maybe a half hour.
So she left, but then she never came back
to actually get the medication.
What investigators quickly come to realize
is that was the last time anyone saw Carmen.
What about the commuters?
Do any of them come forward about what they saw
now that there's this little girl
that's been reported missing?
Not right away.
I don't know how much media attention Carmen's disappearance
gets right off the bat because investigators aren't necessarily assuming foul play right away. I don't know how much media attention Carmen's disappearance gets right off the bat because investigators aren't
Necessarily assuming foul play right away. They're concerned. I mean they're trying to find her for sure
She's only ten but according to Michael Benson's book Nightmare in Rochester
They're especially focused kind of on places Carmen could be hiding rather than like have been taken to right so they're looking like
Vacant houses places like that.
So it seems like there's not a lot of people
outside of this small group, like law enforcement,
her family, neighbors, who even realize she's missing.
But it won't stay that way for long
because on November 18th, two days after Carmen disappeared,
two teens are out riding around on the rural roads of town
just to the south of the expressway in this town called Raiga. And that's when one of them sees
something in the ditch alongside the road. They turn back to figure out what it is, and as they
approach, they're kind of thinking like, oh, this is a life-size doll or something. Or at least,
they're hoping that's what it is,
but as they get closer, they realize that it's not a doll.
And as crime junkies know, all too well, it almost never is.
There in front of them, up against a boulder,
is the partially clothed body of a little girl.
And it is a brutal scene, you guys.
I wish I could avoid describing it,
but unfortunately, what I have to say is relevant to the investigation.
The little girl is wearing a purple sweater and white sneakers, but she is naked from
the waist down.
Her body seems to be covered in scratches and there are bruises around her throat.
So the boys, seeing this book at home, they tell an adult what they found.
That adult immediately contacts law enforcement.
And once investigators arrive at the scene,
it seems like it doesn't take long to ID this little girl as Carmen.
And from what they can tell, it looks like she's been killed elsewhere and then just left here.
When her autopsy is performed the next day,
the awful circumstances of her death are fully
revealed.
She had been sexually assaulted and there are fractures in both her skull and her neck.
Her cause of death is determined to be manual strangulation and she had been killed at least
24 hours before she was found.
As word gets out about this, the community is horrified. And then they're outraged.
Cause that's when witnesses from the expressway
start coming out of the woodwork with what they'd seen,
but done nothing about, just a few days prior.
And to make matters worse,
the usefulness of their information
is kinda limited by now
because their recollections aren't exactly consistent.
The Democrat and Chronicle reports
on November 22, for instance, that investigators received quote, six different vague descriptions
of the car they saw backing along the shoulder of the expressway to recapture the girl. Now,
I don't know all of the descriptions or what they're doing to track down this driver, but I know
that they aren't close to finding him. And he that they aren't close to finding him, and he knows they
aren't close to finding him either, so he decides to taunt them with a chilling message
scrawled on the door of the men's restroom at a local department store.
The message reads, and I quote,
The message reads, and I quote, I killed a 10 year old girl.
Who will be next?
Pictures of the message are taken
and the police dust the whole area for prints.
But I mean, this is a public bathroom.
Like who knows if you're gonna be able
to get anything useful?
And it's 1971, so no security cameras.
And they seemingly aren't able to find any witnesses
who might have seen the message being written.
And to be fair, I mean, sure,
maybe this message is even just someone's idea
of a sick joke, but what if it's not?
So a tip line is set up by a local newspaper company
and calls do start coming in.
But even as each tip is passed along to investigators,
none of them really lead anywhere.
This is probably kind of a silly question,
but are investigators sure that it was Carmen
that the witnesses saw running?
Oh yeah, to be honest,
I'm not sure there's ever much of a question,
but if there was any doubt,
all of that is laid to rest by the end of November,
because that's when Carmen's frozen green pants,
the ones that she had been waving in her hand
as she was running on the expressway,
that's when they're found within a few hundred feet of where she was seen on the expressway.
But the finding of her pants, that's about all that really happens.
Before long, an investigation that initially spanned two separate agencies, the Monroe
County Sheriff's Office and the Rochester Police Department, is down to just three detectives
with the MCSO.
And from the outside, it kind of looks like the case might be going cold.
But in the first few months of 1972, it heats right back up when investigators interview
an anonymous witness who has a stunning claim.
What this witness tells them is that Miguel Cologne, so Carmen's mom's boyfriend, remember.
But also technically Carmen's uncle too, right?
Right.
Well, Miguel had said something super sketchy
after Carmen's death.
According to this tipster,
he said that he needed to skip town quickly
because he'd quote,
done something wrong in Rochester.
According to at least one report
in the Democrat and Chronicle,
he even mentioned Carmen by name.
And the thing is, he did skip town.
He skipped the entire continental US in fact.
Dude and his substantial criminal history
left for Puerto Rico where his family is from
just days after Carmen's murder.
So investigators decide that it's time for a little tropical getaway.
On March 15, Monroe County DA, Jack B Lazarus and a small team of investigators land in
San Juan planning to confront Miguel about his possible involvement in Carmen's murder.
But their plan goes sideways.
Because you see, someone had tipped off the Rochester press about this whole operation.
They in turn had tipped off the San Juan press.
Which tipped off Miguel?
Potentially, because it seems like the same day investigators arrived, he abruptly leaves
the San Juan suburb that he'd been living and working in, even leaving a paycheck behind.
But where to they don't know?
According to Michael Benson's book, all they say they know is that he is quote,
armed and on the run. By the time their trip comes to an end, Miguel still hasn't been located.
So they head back to Rochester, feeling kind of defeated, but not giving up.
And they have this plan in their back pockets. One, that the details are kind of fuzzy on, and I just have this gut suspicion
that it's probably because it wasn't all on the up and up.
Like technically it was, but like maybe we don't do it.
Yeah. Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Either way, what Sherry Farnsworth says
in her book, Alphabet Killer,
is that authorities detain Miguel's mother
and say that they're basically gonna keep her locked up
until he comes out of hiding.
And that's what seems to do it, because within just days, the Puerto Rican authorities notify
them that Miguel has turned himself in.
And he agrees to go back to Rochester for formal questioning chaperoned by an MCSO detective
who is on, like, the first flight back to San Juan to get this guy.
Oh my god, I'm just imagining all the frequent flyer miles right now.
Back and forth, back and forth, yeah.
Now when investigators finally sit down
with Magellan Rodchester,
he is adamant that he had nothing to do with Carmen's death.
He says he was in Syracuse the day that Carmen disappeared,
not even in Rodchester.
Okay, but you just decide to relocate to Puerto Rico the moment your niece disappears
when maybe your girlfriend and family need your support the most?
That doesn't make sense.
Right!
Not only is it your girlfriend's art, it's your niece, and we never get an explanation
for those like incriminating comments he was said to have made.
Oh yeah.
Now, he does say that it was just a coincidence that he left San Juan when he did.
He said he wasn't on the run.
He just had to go visit a sick aunt, which is like, again, to me, like your aunt is sick,
so you have to go, but like your niece slash girlfriend's daughter is missing and like,
yeah, you're willing to move then.
Okay, whatever.
Continue.
Either way, he then does something kind of unexpected.
He actually demands to take a lie detector test, which he does, and then he passes.
I didn't see that one coming.
I don't think they were seeing that coming either.
But suffice to say, not everyone is totally convinced.
When they search his car, which by the way somewhat matches at least one of the however
many witness descriptions of the car on the expressway.
They find a doll of Carmen's, which seems like a red flag to some, but like not to everyone.
Right. I mean, Carmen was his girlfriend's daughter and or niece.
Like he was in her life. She was in his life. She was probably in his car.
Yeah. So there's not much they can really make of that.
Now, they don't have enough to charge him,
so they kind of have to just keep an eye on him
and explore other possibilities.
One lead passes briefly on their radar in November of 72.
There's this guy who worked near Rochester recently
who'd been arrested trying to sexually assault
an eight-year-old girl,
but he seems to be ruled out just as quickly as he pops up
because he's just never mentioned again.
Investigators get their hopes up again in March of 73
when they're contacted by law enforcement
in California of all places.
They say that they just arrested a man
on a similar case out there.
And David Medina reports for the Democrat and Chronicle
that they found a curious thing in his wallet
when he was taken into custody.
It was this newspaper clipping about Carmen's case.
Okay, and this is happening clear across the country in California.
Uh-huh.
Don't love that.
And like I said, on its face it's a similar case, a sexual assault and murder of a young
girl.
But as bizarre
as this may be, this guy is ruled out as well because it turns out that he was serving overseas
in Vietnam when Carmen was killed.
The clipping from Carmen's case, that means he's just what?
Like, collecting stuff?
Yeah, collecting mementos about a 16-month-old child murder across the country, using it
as inspiration.
I don't know, I don't know.
So this guy's rolled out.
Meanwhile, life in Rochester has kind of gone back
to normal by now,
though only for the people whose lives
weren't ripped apart by this,
but other parents are starting to let their guards down a bit.
And that's when it happens.
On April 2nd of 1973,
an 11-year-old named Wanda Walkowitz
vanishes, just like Carmen,
while running a late afternoon errand for her mom Joyce.
According to Joyce's call to police
reporting Wanda missing, which was at like 8.15 that evening,
Wanda had asked if she could go to the hillside deli
a few blocks away to grab some things
that Joyce needed for dinner.
And Joyce agreed, but that was hours earlier, around five, maybe a little after.
And so when she didn't come home right away, Joyce sent Wanda's ten-year-old sister and
a twelve-year-old neighbor to the deli to find her, but they couldn't.
She wasn't there.
Same when Joyce went to the deli herself around eight o'clock, by now in like a total panic. Did Wanda ever even make it to the deli herself around eight o'clock by now in like a total panic
Did Wanda ever even make it to the deli?
She had the guy behind the counter had to write everything down to put the items on her mom's tab
And she had gotten everything on the list
Sherry actually lists it in her book as quote two quarts of milk a package of disposable diapers bread
Cupcakes soup tuna fish food, and cat food.
So law enforcement quickly launched a coordinated search
and they find two people who saw Wanda,
I mean literally within I swear like seconds
of her disappearing.
You see it was kind of raining that day
and some kids that she knew were walking down the street
in front of her and they look back
and they saw her kind of struggling
with her big grocery bag,
like kind of leaned up against a fence,
probably like pushing it up on her hip, you know,
trying to wrap her little arms around it.
And they say that they saw a big brown car on the road too.
But just seconds later, when they turned around again,
Wanda and the car were gone.
Now they didn't think anything of it at the time,
probably because there wasn't any screaming,
or commotion, or tires squealing away.
Just there one second and gone the next.
They probably thought she had just gone another way,
or ducked away to hide under a tree until the rain passed.
You can imagine the collective trauma
that the community feels when her body
is found the very next day.
Tossed down an embankment on the side of the road
in the nearby town of Webster.
Right away, investigators see some similarities
between Wanda's death and Carmen's
nearly 17 months prior.
Yeah, I mean, they're ages for one,
and they both disappeared while running errands
for their moms, like, kind of late in the afternoon.
Mm-hmm. And Wanda's autopsy reveals others.
She also died of strangulation after being sexually assaulted.
But even though there are similarities,
there are differences as well.
For one, Wanda was found fully clothed.
So her killer redressed her?
Apparently so.
And it's also clear that Wanda had been strangled from behind
with some kind of ligature, maybe
a belt, while Carmen was actually strangled manually with hands, like from the front.
And maybe the most notable finding is that judging by Wanda's stomach contents,
she was fed custard, or something like custard, before her death, apparently by her killer.
Or at least that's what everyone has to assume, because what they find out is she didn't eat that at home,
and the deli clerks are certain she didn't get it there either.
And I know she didn't have cash with her,
because remember, she's charging her mom's tab for groceries,
so she couldn't have gone somewhere else to buy it herself.
Okay, so you're saying that the killer fed her ice cream before he killed her?
That's what it's looking like, which is like twisted.
Yeah.
And there's another part that's even more disturbing.
So Wanda disappeared late on a Monday afternoon, right?
Actually, I don't know if I said that, but it is Monday afternoon she did.
Well, two nights before that, something happened that might have been a sign of what was to come.
that might have been a sign of what was to come.
That previous Saturday, some creepy man had like followed Wanda and her friends
as they were walking around outside after dark.
They didn't get a great view of this guy,
but that's because Dude was hiding behind a bush
when they noticed him.
And when they started to run, he chased them.
Luckily, they got away.
Oh, what the fuck is going on in Rochester?
I know.
And just for the record,
this isn't some like neighborhood folklore
that got added on top of the story
of Wanda's disappearance after the fact.
The girl had actually told her mom
about the night that it happened.
And according to Nightmare in Rochester,
there was even a police report.
But without more detail on that, and FYI, we have no more now than they had back in
1973, no one knows what to make of that incident.
Just like they don't know whether Wanda and Carmen's cases are linked or not.
It seems almost impossible that these two cases aren't connected, though.
Well for the time being, investigators aren't so sure.
I mean, they're open to a connection.
An investigator who'd been working on Carmen's homicide
is even assigned to Wanda's just in case,
but it's kind of just one possibility among many.
But once again, a tip line is set up,
and once again, the tips start coming in
only to be knocked down one by one.
Though there is one standout.
Investigators are particularly interested
in one anonymous caller who claims to have seen a man
forcing a red-haired girl into a light-colored dodge dart
at knife point the evening that Wanda disappeared.
Wanda is a redhead, by the way.
So when another tip comes in about a similar car
being sighted near where her body was found,
they think that they might really be onto something.
Does a Dodge Dart match any of the many cars
described by witnesses in Carmen's case?
I know that the car in her case was described
to investigators as like a Lincoln or a Cadillac
or a Ford LTD.
But I mean, when you think about it,
like this car is chasing Carmen in reverse.
And as Michael Benson pointed out in his book,
what most people got a view of was just the car's tail lights.
Like I wouldn't be able to idea a car speeding
toward me in reverse.
And when I look at the cars named by the witnesses,
I could get them confused with the Dodge Dart.
But I don't know if that's just because like
all the cars
from the early seventies look the same to me or what.
So they put out a Bolo on the car
and make multiple appeals for the callers to come forward.
But whoever those callers were, nobody does.
And Paula Musto reports for the Democrat and Chronicle
that in the end, the tips are largely dismissed.
Investigators hopes are again raised
when a possible suspect is brought in and questioned
extensively the weekend after Wanda's disappearance.
But according to that same article, they're forced to move on when he provides a solid
alibi and passes a lie detector test.
As the spring turns into summer and then into fall, it seems as though Wanda's case is
destined to follow the same path as Carmen's, slowly
growing cold and fading from public consciousness.
Two cases, similar and awful, but ultimately more coincidence than pattern.
But there's a thing that I've heard a lot of criminal investigators say, a philosophy
they subscribe to, I guess.
And it's that they don't believe in coincidences, at least not in their line of work.
And that's a lesson that the city of Rochester is about to learn in the worst possible way.
On November 26th of 1973, a little over seven months since Wanda was killed and just over
two years since Carmen's murder, the Rochester Police Department receives a panicked call from a local woman named Caroline
Mayenza, and it is like deja vu all over again. It's 5.40pm and Caroline's 11-year-old daughter
Michelle hasn't come home from school. Usually, Caroline walks both of her daughter's home,
and she had planned to that day as well, But when she had gotten to the school that afternoon, Michelle wasn't allowed to leave.
She was being held late, apparently because of an issue she was having with another kid
in her class, and that kid was in trouble too.
And I guess the situation was that Michelle was being bullied, like relentlessly, and that
day had been no different.
So I don't know if she reacted.
Or maybe had one of those teachers
that just punishes everyone involved.
I feel like that happens a lot.
Right, right.
So I don't know why she was held.
But either way, she was gonna have to walk home alone afterward.
But even with her being held back like that,
like she should have been home hours ago
and Carolyn is frantic.
Police start another massive search right away,
although they're trying not to make any assumptions.
I feel like maybe it's time to start making assumptions.
I mean, you have two other young girls
who have been murdered in the past two years.
I mean, let's stop checking hiding spots first.
Let's go full force right away.
Yeah, you're not wrong. And to be fair, they're not like burying their heads in the sand either.
Everyone understands the context, but you got to hold on to some hope, right? Detective Captain
Andrew Sparicino is quoted in The Democrat and Chronicle as saying, the longer she remains missing,
the more concerned we are. But all we know now is that
she's missing. By the morning of the 28th, that worst case scenario everyone was hoping against
becomes the reality. Because that's when the chief of the Walworth Volunteer Fire Department
discovers Michelle's body in the nearby town of Macedon in a ditch on the side of the road.
Like Wanda, she's fully clothed, although her coat is missing.
Like both girls, the bruising around her neck suggests that she'd been strangled.
And that suspicion is confirmed at her autopsy, which finds evidence of both manual and ligature
strangulation.
Like Wanda, she'd been strangled from behind, and like both girls before her, she'd been sexually assaulted.
And you mentioned that she was fully clothed,
so she was redressed like Wanda was.
Yes, and she was also fed like Wanda was.
Remnants of an undigested cheeseburger are found in her stomach,
one that only could have been given to her by her abductor.
I don't know what it is about this, but that part really bothers me.
Like it just eaks me out for some reason.
Like what's your end game here?
Like to feel better about what you're doing, feeding them, like these fun things, feeding them at all.
You're still a monster.
Like what's the point?
Well, that's the thing is I don't know if it was like to make him feel better.
I think the end game was to get them.
Like I have this gut feeling that that was part of his ruse.
It's not to make himself feel okay
about what he's about to do.
But to get them to trust him.
Yes, exactly.
Like do you want some ice cream?
I'll buy you a cheeseburger, sit, talk with me,
feel comfortable getting in my car for a ride home.
So do you think that tells us anything about Carmen's case
if she hadn't been fed by her doctor?
And she hadn't.
Like I know from her stomach contents that whatever was there
was what she had eaten at home.
But I think it could mean a few things.
Like at a minimum, I think for sure it tells us that he didn't
spend much time with her.
But I think more than anything, like again,
she was the first one.
It didn't go as planned.
So maybe he was going to take her to get food and like she just fought back too
hard. She got out of the car and everything had to like go faster.
Or maybe this is the first time he was trying whatever he was trying.
And he realized the second time, like, OK, I've got to make them more
comfortable so they don't do that.
There's also a world where he didn't need a ruse
because maybe he could have known Carmen
and there's a world where they're not connected.
You know what I mean?
But there are these other similarities
that to me support a connection
when they're looking at the cases side by side,
like physical evidence specifically.
So semen samples were gathered from all three girls
and they indicated that
the killer quote, had a blood characteristic found in only 20% of people. Now everything
only specifically says that they find stuff out about like a blood group. Like it doesn't
say exactly what, but everyone kind of speculates what they're talking about is secretor versus
non-secretor, which we've talked about before.
And in this case, or in all three cases,
they find that the perpetrator of all three
was a non-secretor. Now again, that doesn't mean
it's the same perp in all three,
because they can't compare that at this point
in the 70s.
It just puts them in one category versus another.
Yeah, it's just that all three of them
were killed by someone, or someone or someone who are in this
like 20% of the population.
Now there's also something similar that's found on each of them.
All three girls had the hairs of a white cat or a light colored cat on their clothing when
they were found.
So it's reported that in Carmen's case, there were light colored cat hairs and then in Wanda and Michelle's cases, it's reported that there are white cat hairs.
So they obviously aren't thinking that this is a coincidence anymore, right?
Well, no, no ish.
Everyone's on the same page about Wanda and Michelle definitely being connected.
Whoever killed one of them killed both of them.
The similarities are just too glaring there.
But there were actually some investigators
who still see Carmen's case as the outlier
because of her not being fed.
She wasn't fully redressed.
She was strangled differently than the other two.
And she had other injuries that were more severe.
So, I mean, the questions are asked,
he's like, what does it all mean?
Is there, is the different MO indicative
of a more personal crime? Or like you you said the guy lost control of the situation with Carmen lost
his temper you know learned from his mistakes with Carmen and changed his MO a little bit for
the next two I don't know I know and the thing that I keep thinking about is he literally couldn't
fully redress her because remember her pants are found on the side
of the road.
But she's not found nude, she's found partially clothed.
So either those were left on her or at least those were put on her, but it would have been
too risky to go back to the place where so many people saw her running to try and search
for her pants that she was holding.
But she must have lost those along the way.
So even if he wanted to redress her, it was not an option.
Now, in a move that is seen as innovative at the time,
the shell's body is checked for prints during her autopsy
using a state of the art technology,
which involved like silver and iodine,
and they actually find one print that could prove useful.
And it was on her neck.
Best they can tell, it's from the killer's wrist and palm.
So it's not an actual like fingerprint.
But that's not something they can put into a database.
I mean, there aren't even databases if they could.
It is just something that they can hope to compare
to a specific suspect once there is one.
And do they compare it to the people
that popped up in the other cases?
To be honest, I don't know, although I don't think so,
because that's never been reported.
Like, it's something that I would think you would say.
But I think that like, because of either alibis
or lie detector tests, if someone had been eliminated
by this point, they just considered them cleared.
So those prints aren't discussed much
in terms of comparison for a while,
like not till the early 80s, but I get the impression that since it's kind of
a weird print, it's not super easy to compare against.
So they might be saving that for suspects
that they can't rule out in other ways, I don't know.
So anyways, a massive task force is formed
and yet again, tips start flooding in.
According to Nightmare in Rochester,
no fewer than a thousand tips are called in on the
first day, Brett.
Oh my god.
Which is such like a blessing and a curse, you know?
Totally, because I mean every single one of those tips has to be run down, right?
And there are a lot of bogus ones.
People use the tip line to like settle scores with neighbors and business rivals.
There's an influx of calls from women, some I'm sure more credible than others reporting
suspicious husbands or ex-husbands or boyfriends. But it's actually a little girl's story
that might turn out to be the most promising. Because this little girl, whose story makes
it to police, actually knew Michelle.
And the afternoon Michelle disappeared, she'd seen something so scary that she raced home afterward,
hid in her mom's closet, and told her about this.
And this thing that she told her mom about, as she's telling her mom,
this is happening before Michelle's disappearance was known to the public.
I'm going to tell you all about that in part two.
You can either listen right now in the fan club or I'll be back in your feeds
with part two next week.
To see all the photos and source material for this week's episode, visit our website crimejunkiepodcast.com.
And you can follow us on Instagram at CrimeJunkie Podcast.
We'll be back next week with a brand new episode. Music Crime junkie is an audio chuck production.
So, what do you think Chuck?
Do you approve?