Employee Survival Guide® - Civil Disobedience and the Workplace: The Economic Consequences of Political Conscience
Episode Date: January 15, 2021Podcast explores freedom of speech by political activists on January 6, 2021 when they stormed the Capital Building and their employer's reaction - immediate termination of an at-will employee.Li...sten to the Employee Survival Guide podcast latest episode here https://capclaw.com/employee-survival-guide-podcast/If you enjoyed this episode of the Employee Survival Guide please like us on Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn. We would really appreciate if you could leave a review of this podcast on your favorite podcast player such as Apple Podcasts.For more information, please contact Carey & Associates, P.C. at 203-255-4150, www.capclaw.com.The content of this website is provided for information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice nor create an attorney-client relationship. Carey & Associates, P.C. makes no warranty, express or implied, regarding the accuracy of the information contained on this website or to any website to which it is linked to.If you enjoyed this episode of the Employee Survival Guide please like us on Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn. We would really appreciate if you could leave a review of this podcast on your favorite podcast player such as Apple Podcasts. Leaving a review will inform other listeners you found the content on this podcast is important in the area of employment law in the United States. For more information, please contact our employment attorneys at Carey & Associates, P.C. at 203-255-4150, www.capclaw.com.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Welcome to another edition of the Employee Survival Guide, where you can learn everything
your employer does not want you to know about and more. Now, here's attorney Mark Carey.
Hey, it's Mark here, and welcome to the next edition of the Employee Survival Guide.
This week, we're going to talk about civil disobedience and the workplace,
the economic consequences of political conscience. In 1849, Henry David Thoreau was imprisoned for an act of civil disobedience.
Thoreau had broken local laws by refusing to pay a poll tax, which he found to be unconscionable.
The story goes that when Thoreau's friend, Ralph Waldo Emerson, visited Thoreau in jail, he asked,
Henry, what are you doing in there? To which Thoreau replied,
Waldo, the question is, what are you doing in there? To which Thoreau replied, Waldo, the question is, what are you doing out there?
Even in a free country,
there are often profound consequences
attached to the exercise of political conscience.
On January 6, 2021,
hundreds of pro-Trump protesters
stormed the Capitol building in Washington, D.C.
in an attempt to stop the congressional certification
of the Electoral College vote,
which elected Joe Biden as our next president.
While the protesters themselves probably believed that their actions were justified or motivated by conscience,
those who occupied the Capitol and participated in the riot that terrorized the nation
and caused at least five deaths and many more injuries
have been properly branded as criminals and insurrectionists. But what do their employers think of their actions? And can their employers
punish them for their activity? Major news outlets reported on January 8, 2021, that a number of
those individuals who participated in the siege of the Capitol have been identified by their
employers and terminated from their jobs for their participation in the violent assembly. One employee of a Maryland-based marketing company was
prominently photographed wearing his employee name badge inside the Capitol during the riot.
This employee was promptly terminated from his job for cause. While the man wearing his company's
name badge was photographed inside the Capitol building during the siege, several other employees
were forced or at least asked to resign from their positions for their participation in the assembly,
although they claimed that they only engage in a peaceful protest outside the building. It is not
clear whether those employees would have been fired if they had not resigned. Do employers have
the right to terminate someone who is engaged in peaceful protest? What about the not-so-peaceful protest?
Why does an employer get to punish an employee for his or her political activity at all?
Does the employer's right to terminate kick in only when there is a criminal activity associated with the protest?
While many may not agree with the ideology that motivated the insurrection on January 6th,
ideology that motivated the insurrection on January 6th, it is important to remember that Gandhi, Martin Luther King Jr., Thoreau also broke laws in the course of their political activism.
Regardless of one's political persuasion, why does an employer get to judge its employees'
political activism and net out punishment for it? Recently, the Wall Street Journal reported that
employers have wide latitude to limit employees' speech, both political and otherwise, that might offend other workers or impact the business.
The general rule is that the First Amendment only prohibits government from restricting speech, not private employers.
While government employees have some limited free speech rights outside the workplace, for example, the speech is a matter of public
concern and not related to their employment. Most employers have a great deal of discretion
in terminating employees for public activism, both in and outside of work. Vaguely worded
employee codes of conduct and other arbitrary company decrees are used to terminate employees
who violate management sensibilities. While some states, such as Connecticut, have passed laws to seek to protect First Amendment rights,
if the employer believes that the speech or activity interferes with job performance or the workplace relationships,
the speech is not protected.
Where an employee's political activism involves actual civil disobedience,
the law protects an employer's right to terminate an employee for criminal conduct.
While 36 states have enacted so-called ban-the-box laws, which prohibit employers from asking about
applicants' past criminal convictions on a job application. By the way, some 30% of adult
Americans have a criminal background of some kind. There is no law prohibiting an employer
from conducting a background check after the interview or hiring process and refusing to Bottom line, if an employer does not like what you did, they do not have to employ you.
While many may believe that the right to protest publicly and in defiance of laws one thinks are unjust is a right enshrined in the Constitution and the laws
of our country. It is important to remember that that right does not include the right to be
employed by a company or boss that disagrees with your views. While Americans may still enjoy the
right to protest, we do not enjoy a right to be employed while doing so. As long as the law allows for the so-called employment at will rule to govern the employment relationship,
all employees should be cautioned that public political protest often has a steep economic cost.
Before you head out to stick it to the man, just remember the man can stick it to you in the end.
stick it to the man, just remember the man can stick it to you in the end. If you'd like more information about this topic, please contact our office, Caring Associates PC, on the web
at capclaw.com. Thank you and have a good week.