Transcript
Discussion (0)
Welcome to focused a productivity podcast about more than just cranking widgets.
I'm David Sparks and I'm joined by my cohost, Mr.
Mike Schmitz.
Hello, Mike.
Hey David, how's it going?
Good.
Good.
You are about to take a trip, right?
I am.
I'm going to Kansas city to hang out with our buddy, Sean Blank.
He's doing his focus course live session in Kansas City
and it is gonna be a fun time.
If you are a focus listener and you're there, come say hi.
Yeah, excellent.
Yeah, I'm gonna stay home like a shut-in,
but I have several trips planned
and we're gonna get around to that.
In fact, I'm deep focused today.
We're gonna talk about some of our favorite travel hacks
as two focused people.
I think we've got a couple
good ideas. But today is a little bit of a different episode. Cal Newport came out with
a new book. He's been a guest on the show before. Both of us are fans of his work. And
I thought it'd be fun to just kind of break down his new book, Slow Productivity.
Yeah. If there was ever a book written for the focused audience,
I think it is probably Slow Productivity.
Yeah.
Maybe the ideas here aren't brand new,
but they're definitely applicable
and Cal has a great way of breaking things down
and defining things.
So I thought it would be cool to kind of talk
about the different parts of Slow Productivity
and how they relate to some of the common themes that we talk a lot about on the Focus podcast.
Yeah, I really think there's like a trend right now that's kind of, I'll say, maybe a reaction
to the idea of highly paced productivity. So for several years, you know, as technology has emerged,
the productivity discussion got, you know, kind of wrapped up in how to do more faster.
And I think we lost the thread somewhere.
I mean, it's the reason, honestly, why we made this show because of the idea that, you know, you need to stop and focus on what's important.
And this isn't something we invented.
People have been talking about this for a very long time.
Chris Bailey wrote the Calm Book, I think,
which has a lot of the same themes in it.
But this is Cal's take on it.
And there really is kind of a Cal Newport literary universe,
I would say, because he doesn't write the same book over and
over again. You know, some of the productivity guys do that, right? They
have one idea and they just bang on it for three or four books. Cal kind of
takes on a different thing or approach or angle with each book and I really
like that he got around to this idea of slow productivity. I guess I've been
rambling, but it's a good book. I mean, overall say start with the point of, I think anybody that's interested
in this stuff should read this book.
I a hundred percent agree.
In fact, for my mind map book notes for this book, I have like the different
sections and the cover in the middle.
And the very first section obviously is the introduction and on page four, he has has a phrase which is very close to our tagline.
And in my notes, I have life is more than cranking widgets as a reference to that.
So right from the beginning, I'm like, oh, this is perfect focus material. Just to double click on
something you mentioned, we're not the first people to talk about this. Cal's not the first
person to talk about this. Chris Bailey's not the first person to talk about this. Cal's not the first person to talk about this. Chris Bailey's not the first person to talk about this.
And also in the introduction,
Cal mentioned several other books that came out during the pandemic,
which were kind of loosely based on this topic.
And I thought that was kind of cool.
Sort of a hat tip to everybody else who is talking about this.
And that's kind of interesting, I think, with the whole focus,
deep work,
slow productivity. I'm going to call it a space. I don't know. Like people who really believe in
this idea, they are not competing with other people to say, no, you got to read this one
because this one contains all the answers. It kind of seems like people who are advocating this
message, they find other people who are saying the same
thing in a different way and they get excited and they help promote those other messages,
which I think is kind of cool.
It's a camaraderie in the focus space, shall we say.
Well, and I will say that for me personally, this is the message of productivity that I'm
most interested in for myself, but also just
having talked to a lot of people since releasing the Productivity Field Guide, I've heard from
a lot of people out there and I think a lot of people are struggling with that sense of
overwhelm that feels uniquely modern.
I think that a lot of people are looking for ways out of that or around that and I think that a lot of people are looking for ways out of that or around that.
And I think this whole idea of more considered productivity, focusing on what's important.
I think that is a message that a lot of people are looking for and ways to implement.
And this book delivers the goods.
Less but better essentially is the theme here, but there is a specific definition that Cal uses for slow
productivity, which sort of has in it a framework. So maybe we should talk about that and then break
it down into individual parts as we go through the episode here. But the slow productivity
definition that he uses is a philosophy for organizing knowledge, work efforts, and work efforts in a sustainable and meaningful manner based on three principles,
which is do fewer things, work at a natural pace and obsess over quality. Now there's
probably whole episodes on each one of those different pillars there, but I want to just
basically talk about how those connect to the whole idea of focus. Before that though,
I think the problem to be solved here
is what Cal calls pseudo productivity.
And this is something we've been harping on for a long time,
but it's the use of visible activity
as the primary means of approximating
actual productive effort.
And where you see this a lot is agencies and organizations
where people are kind of monitoring,
are you working by the green bubble next to your slack name
or how quickly you respond to email?
And as we've been championing for a long time,
that is a terrible way to really measure
how effective somebody is at their job.
And so I think this is the big problem to be solved.
I don't think there's a simple solution or we would have
stumbled upon it more than 200 episodes in. But it's a constant effort. It's a constant battle
because it seems like as soon as you find a way to carve out some space and some bandwidth and
you have the conditions set up for you to actually focus on something. There is a new set of challenges or obstacles that are presented
into your life and work that you have to figure out new ways to overcome.
I mean, looking back at all my years in the law practice, I feel like the legal profession
really fell for this because it's a billable hour profession.
And, you know, there's a tremendous amount of pressure on lawyers, particularly young ones,
to bill hours. And like this idea of pseudo productivity fits right into that. It's like,
oh yeah, I can just keep writing emails to this guy and I can charge for that. And like, you don't actually move the case forward.
And I saw it all the time and I was really against it.
You know, I did not handle myself in that way.
I did not do busy work as a lawyer,
but a lot of people do.
And I think that there's a real feeling
that this is somehow productivity and it's not.
I mean, that's why he calls it pseudo productivity, but, but I would hope that
people listening are thinking about that problem because it's, it's an easy trap
to fall into again with the modern tools.
Yeah.
And it's harder for quote unquote knowledge workers because the work that you actually do isn't tied to the
getting paid by the hour method or system that you were describing as a lawyer for example.
And there's a great book, I'm not sure if he mentioned it here or not, but I read a couple of years ago,
this book by Mason Curry about the creative habits of all these famous people. And they're
just a whole bunch of tiny little character sketches on, you know, this is what Benjamin
Franklin's day was like. And I use him as the example because there's kind of that famous image of how he time blocked his day. You can find it on the internet.
But there's, I mean, everybody and anybody who has created like great work from musicians to artists,
painters, writers, and everyone's got their own method.
But what's kind of unique about it is that people always,
at least all the examples that Mason Curry shared,
they found their own rhythm and they almost never worked 40 hours a week. But you wouldn't say that
they weren't productive because they were able to write hundreds of thousands of words and have
all of these published works. So there's some sort of disconnect there
and it's not easily mapped.
And I think with the technology-based tools,
there is a tendency to have all the data
that you can possibly collect.
Well, it's hard to get data on what's actually going on
in your brain.
And so the easy metric is, are you at your keyboard working
and how long were you there?
And that is not a real clean measure of productivity.
So we still, all these years later,
are still trying to figure out what is the best way
to do the work that we're trying to do.
Yeah, and that's been a thing that I believe
Cal's written about in several books, but just the idea that we don't really have a way
to measure information workers.
It's not like how many cars did you spit out of the factory,
how many widgets did you crank, right?
It's a very different, what is the end product?
Is it the process of writing words,
or is it the process of finishing a book kind of question?
And I feel like this book starts out with a real attack
on kind of applying factory productivity standards
to knowledge work.
And the idea of why this random 40-hour week,
which kind of is under attack now anyway, uh, just in general, uh, uh,
become somehow the standard of which we measure ourself.
And, uh, and I really enjoyed that frankly, because I'm guilty of that, you
know, growing up in the 40 hour work week or, you know, Monday through Friday
work phase, it is easy to think, well, that's just what I need to do.
And really it isn't.
It's not.
And what's interesting is even in traditional settings, like factory work, for
example, I'm noticing I live in Wisconsin in an area where kind of the whole
industry was built on these paper mills that are on this river that runs right
through the state and, uh, I see billboards all the time of these paper mills that are on this river that runs right through the state. And I see billboards all
the time of these paper mills advertising, you know, a four day work week. So even people
who view these jobs as sort of a commoditized job, like you have to just have somebody at
this spot who's doing this thing and make sure that the machines don't break. They're recognizing that there is value in not doing that the 40 hour weeks.
Maybe it's they attract better talent. You know, they get more skilled people to fill those
positions. I don't know. That's not the world that I play in, but it is exciting to me to see kind of
the trickle down effects of this beyond just what we would define as knowledge work,
people working at their computers.
I mean, there was a proposal in the California state legislature to switch
California to just a four day work week.
And that's not four 10th, that's four eight hour days.
And it didn't get anywhere, but I feel like that idea is now generally
on the radar for people.
And there are studies that will show
that it can be more productive if done right.
I mean, so I don't know.
I feel like there's a movement afoot
and I'm really happy for it.
And I hope this gets more kind of penetration
into the general public because this concept
of slow productivity, calm, whatever we wanna call it now
is now I think more important than ever
because we've kind of got to a breaking point.
At least I feel like we have.
I agree.
We've gotten to a breaking point
and also like the story he shares right at
the beginning of the book I feel like is a great one because he talks about this guy,
John McPhee, who is trying to get this breakthrough and he doesn't get it by cranking more widgets
and by putting in more hours and he's just at the task long enough until something breaks.
The breakthrough comes when he's laying on his back on the picnic table in his backyard.
And you could, you could look at that as like, well, and it kind of case cow's
making is you got to disconnect and you got to not think about those things anymore
for a little bit.
That's kind of when the great ideas come.
But I like to think of this as sort of optimizing for those revelatory moments.
Like we've talked about the environment being important and we talked to Annie Murphy-Paul
with The Extended Mind. That's a big part of that book. So I feel like there's more that can be
gleaned from this story about what are the conditions that John McPhee finds himself in
when this breakthrough happens? And then kind of how can we set up our environment so that happens more often?
Yeah, agreed.
I mean, I think that's, I guess you started the show saying this isn't all revolutionary,
but it is told from Cal's point of view, which I think is very good.
But this is a lot of stuff we've been talking around throughout the run of the show.
This episode of the Focus Podcast
is brought to you by ZocDoc.
Go to zocdoc.com slash focus
to find the right doctor right now,
and you can sign up for free.
We all know there are things in life
you have to compromise on,
but when it comes to your health, there is no compromise.
So don't go back to that doctor
you don't feel really listens,
just because they're available right now
or they take your insurance.
This is where ZocDoc comes in.
ZocDoc is the place where you can find and book doctors
who will make you feel comfortable,
listen to you and prioritize your health.
And you can search by location, availability, and insurance.
So literally no compromises here
because with ZocDoc, you've got more options than you know.
ZocDoc is a free app and website
where you can search and compare
highly rated in-network doctors near you
and instantly book appointments with them online.
Once you find a doc you want, you can book them immediately,
no more waiting awkwardly on hold with a receptionist.
And these docs all have verified reviews
from actual real patients.
We're talking about booking appointments
with tens of thousands of top rated, patient reviewed,
credible doctors and specialists.
You can filter specifically for ones
who take
your insurance, are located near you, and treat basically any condition you're searching
for. The typical wait time to see a doctor booked on ZocDoc is just between 24 and 72
hours. That's it. You can even score same-day appointments.
You know those days of trying to find a doctor like the dread that came with it? I mean, you're already sick and now you need a doctor
and you've gotta go through the booklet
from the insurance company and you've gotta wait on hold
and you have to find if they still cover your insurance
and if they're available for you.
And you still don't know if they're even a good doctor or not.
Well, all of that is gone now because of ZocDoc.
ZocDoc takes all the friction out to get you a great doctor. If you need a doctor, you need ZockDoc. ZockDoc takes all the friction out to get you a great doctor.
If you need a doctor, you need ZockDoc. So go to zockdoc.com slash focused and download the
ZockDoc app for free. Then find and book a top rated doctor today. That's z-o-c-d-o-c dot com
slash focused. And our thanks to ZockDoc for supporting the Focus Podcast and all of Relay FM.
So why don't we get into the pieces of slow productivity and Cal's take on it.
One of the points he made toward the end of the book is that his three points are not
linear so much as they are interlocking.
Do fewer things work at a natural pace,
and obsess over quality.
All that has to happen at the same time
in order for this to work.
And I thought, I wish he had said that
at the beginning of the book,
because it really did click for me when he said that.
And I thought, yeah, this is something I should have had
in mind throughout the whole reading of the book.
So, three points, do fewer things, work at a natural pace,, obsess over quality, but you've got to do all of them in
conjunction in order to pull it off according to Cal.
Yeah.
And you also have to recognize that the term slow productivity that he's using
and really the whole idea that we're talking about when we're advocating for
not putting in so many hours and just doing better work is that it's
not about extinguishing ambition is the term that he used. I like that a lot. But essentially by
working less, you can actually end up doing more. You can produce more and you can produce it at a
higher quality. So you have to recognize that that is really the driver behind this. And I feel like that's important if this is going to gain any sort of traction in
a business corporate style environment is you have to make the case that
actually this is ultimately going to produce more in and better output.
But even if it's just you and you're trying to make the most of your,
your day as a independent
knowledge worker, this is important to understand that when you take your foot
off the gas, that actually helps you get further.
It feels very contradictory, but it's absolutely true when you take a, a
longer view of things.
Well, there's a, there's a guy in the max Barkey labs, uh, cause we do these
quarterly planning calls and, um and when he first started coming,
he was talking about how he was working on like 30 projects,
and we talked about, well, maybe you need to do less.
That's too much.
And he was really struggling to get much done with 30.
He eventually, I think, got it down to 14,
and then in their last meetup,
and for the beginning of quarter two, he said,
oh yeah, in quarter one I just took four projects
and I finished them all.
And it's like, you could see the light went off, right?
It's like, yeah, do less and nail it down.
And he's gonna get, not only is he gonna get more done,
he's gonna get the important ones done.
Like when you have 30, there's a lot on there
that doesn't matter as much, right?
So you pick the four that matter and you do those,
and then suddenly you're cooking.
And it was really fun to see him kind of go through that
and like figure it out for himself, really.
And one of the points that Cal made in the book about that
was like when you have a lot of projects,
there's a certain amount of overhead that comes
with each project and that overhead accumulates
the more projects you have.
I thought that was an excellent point.
Yeah, just hearing about 30 active projects
makes me cringe a little bit
because there's so much administrative energy
that is being spent just figuring out
which one of these do I engage with now.
But that's something people are dealing with.
I mean, it might be that your boss thinks that makes sense
to have you on 30 projects,
or you might have the software stack in place
that makes it look like you can track 30 projects.
And there's a lot of reasons today
that didn't exist years ago to make us think,
oh yeah, I can do 30 projects when in fact you can't.
And that's something you need to get through.
And the idea of doing fewer things.
I mean, to me, I think I've even said on the show before,
I feel like that is like the underlying premise
of all productivity literature.
Like if you just read every book,
there's like one underlying theme,
it's like do less, just do less.
If you do less, you'll be more productive.
And it's like, it takes a minute to get there,
but almost every person who writes about this stuff
inevitably says that.
I even put in the Productivity Field Guide,
I think I put a video called something like,
you have to do less, you know,
because it's just, it's just like, it's the truth. I mean,
it doesn't matter how good your tools are and how fancy your systems are.
If you're doing too much, it's not going to work.
A hundred percent agree.
And this is kind of the whole idea behind the 12 week year too.
Yeah.
The person who is doing 30 projects and will
whittle it down to four. Well, 30 was still too much, but the whole idea behind the 12
week year is you engage with those four projects and you actually ship them like you mentioned.
And then the next quarter you pick four more and the next quarter you pick four more. So
if you take a year view, you're getting 16 projects done. But if you were actually doing all 30 of those, you're going to be working on
those for who knows how long, but there's all the switching costs that.
And the admin costs that go with it.
So my guess is that by the time you're actually finishing all of those,
it's probably more like five years.
Yeah.
So there actually is a, an increased efficiency by choosing to do these fewer
things and then just focusing on those things for a short period of time. But then you have to have the reflective process, I think there to, okay, now we take a step back and we figure out what are the next most important projects. There's got to be some sort of, I don't know if it's a system, but there's got to be like a filter that you use a prioritization method where you don't just say, okay,
this is important and it gets added to a list.
But like what you were saying, you're saying these three things,
these four things,
there are boundaries around the number of things that I'm going to put in this
bucket.
And that's what's going to allow me to do these things with excellence and in a
timely manner.
Yeah. And for me,
that's why these quarterly reviews and planning are so important.
Like, for me, I don't take on four projects a quarter because I have so much existing
bandwidth being tied up with existing ongoing obligations.
Making this podcast, keeping up with the Max Barkie Labs and, you know, the Field Guide
production work.
So I actually only take on one,
I try to take on one additional Max Barkey project
per quarter and I feel like that's enough
because I'm keeping up with the other stuff
and I know that I don't have the bandwidth
to take on a bunch more.
And I have a list, like in the first quarter for me,
it was getting assistance on administrative stuff.
Second quarter for me, it's the newsletter.
I wanna work really hard on getting
the Max Berkey newsletter in better shape.
I'll put a link by the way.
I guess I should do that more often.
I'll put a link to sign up if you want
for the newsletter in the notes here.
But it's just like, I'm picking what I already know,
kind of what I want for the third quarter, but that's going to assume that I nail down the newsletter in the second quarter.
And I can tell you personally, I keep this list very short of extra things that I work on.
You have to.
Yeah.
Also like the fact that you're not picking a project with a set end state.
So just to clarify, like we've kind of been told you need to set goals and they
have to be these smart goals. They got to be specific. They got to be measurable,
all that kind of stuff.
And I have found when I do my personal retreats that I get the most traction
when I say this is the area of emphasis for me.
And I've actually had a couple of the same areas of emphasis now for the last couple
of personal retreats.
Yeah.
And that's because there is a specific metric that is indicative of the health of my independent
creator business, which is the number of email subscribers.
And for a long time, I neglected my email list.
I didn't send anything.
People kind of stumbled onto it, but, uh, they,
it wasn't clear like what am I actually going to send you all that kind of stuff.
So I've kind of been zeroing in on that for a while. And then tied to that,
which has been working for me is the whole YouTube stuff.
And we talked about this before, so I won't get into the details there,
but those have kind of been my two priorities for the last couple of personal
retreats is grow the YouTube channel, grow the email list. And the question that I ask during the quarters that I'm working on these
things is like, okay, so what can I do right now that is going to help me achieve these two outcomes
or what's in service of moving the needle in these particular areas? And sometimes it's, you know, just crank out a killer newsletter
for this Monday, but sometimes it's figure out a new automation sequence and
without having to define those things at the quarterly level. Because if I did
have to pick those things, I feel like they would change multiple times. So just
setting the direction, essentially what I'm doing is I am setting the compass,
but I don't have the blueprint and that is completely okay because I know that the things
that I'm going to engage with on a weekly level when I do that planning and even the
daily level when I time block are in service of those larger goals.
No, and I think you're right on there. Part of these quarterly obligations that come up
with a commitment like this to me is a
research project.
The first thing I do is I research the problem.
When I needed to get assistance, I researched offshore help, computer-aided support, hiring
local virtual listeners.
I looked at all the different options before I started actually picking what I was going
to do. I like going into it with kind of like a beginner's mind mindset.
And right now I'm doing the same thing.
I'm studying about the newsletters and mine and what works and what doesn't.
I'm just trying, I'm in data collection mode really right now on this problem.
But as we record this, we're in early April and I've got some time, but I've
got a plan.
Yeah, and that's really all you need is
what is the next step that I'm gonna be working on.
So this whole idea of, you know, do fewer things,
it is just selecting fewer things in the short term
or really right now.
It's doing less things concurrently. It's
less multitasking. It's not get less things done. But the reason that we default, I think,
to the multitasking stuff is that it's hard to know what's the thing I should be focusing on if
you don't have the clarity. The only way you get the clarity is by stepping back from the work and thinking about why are we doing these things in the first place. So you kind of have this
built-in system for FOMO where as soon as something appears it's like oh this might be important,
I better not let this slip through the cracks. So we optimize our systems to handle everything
that's thrown at us without any question as to is this something
I should really be doing?
Yeah.
And this is where to me, maybe the most impactful piece of this book was this concept of pull
based productivity.
And it's like I've read about this before and and Kourosh Dini calls it visit-based productivity, which I think might be a kinder
way to approach it.
But the idea of just taking on a few things at a time and leaving everything else on the
future list.
Like I said, I've read about it before, but for whatever reason, the way Cal frames it
in this book, this is where I'm like, yes, I really need to like,
spend more time with this.
And you know, the idea is,
you've got a queue of things you wanna work on,
but you don't put all of those into your system.
You just pick one or two, you take it on your desk.
You know, I use the term bench, I like, as a woodworker.
I put it on my bench.
You only have one thing on your bench at a time.
And you work on that.
And then when it's done, you go and you pull another item out.
And the example he used in the book was in a company
working with multiple people.
But I feel like individually as a knowledge worker,
I think that this applies equally.
And I've been doing a lot of research
and experimentation around that. Since I read the book've been doing a lot of research and experimentation around that.
Since I read the book, this is a piece of this
that I think I need to understand even fuller
and figure out ways to implement on a smaller scale for me
that I think can make a difference.
I agree.
The way that I'm doing this is not kind of how Cal
defines it in the book, but I agree with you that it is
definitely applicable to individuals as well. Anytime I have an idea for a newsletter that
I want to send out or a YouTube video that I want to make, I will add those ideas to a list.
And that is essentially a someday maybe list. But then periodically I'll go through a list and that is essentially, you know, a someday maybe list.
But then periodically I'll go through that list and the ones that I'm really
excited about, I will add those to, I've got kind of like a Kanban view and
obsidian, I won't get into the nerdy details about this, but essentially it's
a backlog and those are basically things that I want to work on at some point in
the near future, there are no deadlines associated with them and there's no commitment to actually do something
with them. If I decide, you know, this isn't exciting to me anymore. That's the reason it's
in the backlog. I can just remove it from the backlog, put it back in the idea bucket.
And when I need to send out a newsletter or when I need to make a YouTube video,
I'll go to that backlog. I'll look at the list. There's usually like five or six different things in there.
I'm like, OK, that one seems like I could write about that or create
something about that pretty easily.
I'm excited about that.
I'm curious about it.
Whatever that goes to in progress.
And that's the thing that I work on until it gets shipped.
I'm not thinking about any other things in the backlog.
And then once that thing works all the way through the channels, so it's actually published, it's actually delivered.
Then you go back and you pick one new thing from the backlog and you,
you work on that.
But every time I try to do more than one of those at a time,
I find that I just stopped working on them all together.
And then it gets to be Sunday night.
Cause my newsletter goes out on Monday morning and it's like, Oh man,
what am I going to write about now?
Yeah, I feel like the the way I do it is I like to to keep them in separate platforms.
And I've done this for a long time. So like I've got in OmniFocus, a project called
Content Ideas, you know, and it like you, I've got automation built
anytime something occurs, I'm like, I should use that.
And I've actually got it broken down
into different platforms for me,
like the labs versus the podcasts, et cetera.
But I've just got a list of ideas
for all the stuff I make sitting there.
But to me, they become real when I add them
to a Notion database, you know,
because I've got Notion databases for the shows
and for the labs, and so I only have a few items
in Notion that I'm actually actively pursuing,
but I've got this big list of ideas I can pull from.
But I was thinking about this idea of pull-based productivity
and I've been doing that workflow for a long time,
but expanding it even further to like,
what are the active projects?
You need to really narrow them down.
Like my labs member who only does four quarter,
I think that he's onto something.
And I think that is what Cal's referring to here.
And I think we all need to be able to step back
and get a little more perspective.
So before we move on from the pull-based productivity idea, I know for deep
focus, so a while back you had shared, you were implementing this with JF.
How is that going?
Is it still working with Max Sparky enterprises?
Yeah.
I mean, we're, we're early days with it, right?
I mean, but it's really not, um, it really doesn't impact him that much
because the way our workflow is, I create the stuff
and then he does the cleanup on it.
Kind of the terminology we use is I wash the dishes
and he dries them.
And so what I'm trying to do is wash fewer dishes
and then the ones he gets to dry are the ones
that are definitely going out.
I don't have, well I guess I just explained it.
I'm just picking on one or two at a time
and they get through the process
before the next batch comes in.
And so it doesn't really impact him that much,
but to a certain extent our model matches
what was talked about in the book,
but I am definitely the bottleneck
because I do the work of figuring out what to make
and then how I'm going to make it,
and then he picks up the production of the back end.
This episode of Focus is brought to you by Indeed.
We're driven by the search for better,
but when it comes to hiring,
the best way to search for a candidate
isn't to search at all.
Don't search match with Indeed.
If you need to hire, you need Indeed.
Indeed is your matching and hiring platform
with over 350 million global monthly visitors
according to Indeed data and a matching engine
that helps you find quality candidates fast.
So ditch the busy work,
use Indeed for scheduling, screening, and messaging
so you can connect with those quality candidates faster.
And Indeed doesn't just help you hire faster.
93% of employers agree Indeed delivers the highest quality matches compared to other
job sites according to a recent Indeed survey.
And that's great news because the hire is just the first part of the process.
And if you mess that up, it can be really expensive for your organization.
Think about all the time and money that you spend
trying to find the right candidates.
You get the candidate into the job,
you train them up to do the job that you hired them to do,
and it doesn't work out, so they leave
and you have to start the process all over again.
Hiring the wrong person can be a very expensive mistake.
And while there's no guarantees,
Indeed does the best job of any platform I have ever seen
of giving you the best chance of finding the right person.
I've used Indeed to hire somebody several times
in the last couple of years.
At the day job, I revamped our whole hiring process
and I centered it around Indeed as our hiring tool.
And as a consultant, I've worked with several people
and used Indeed every single time
to help them hire for their role. Every single time they've been
blown away by the quality of the candidates that they've received from
Indeed and they have been more than thrilled with the results that they've
gotten. I really can't recommend Indeed enough if you have a position that you
need to fill. Leveraging over 140 million qualifications and preferences every day,
Indeed's matching engine really is second to none,
and it's constantly learning from your preferences.
So the more that you use Indeed, the better it gets.
So join more than 3.5 million businesses worldwide
that use Indeed to hire a great talent fast.
And listeners of this show will get a $75 sponsored job credit
to get your job more visibility
if you go to indeed.com slash focused, F-O-C-U-S-E-D. Just go to i-n-d-e-e-d dot com slash
focused right now to show your support for the Focus podcast by saying that you heard about it
here on this show. Again, that's indeed.com slash focused. Terms and conditions apply. Need to hire?
You need Indeed. Our thanks to Indeed for their support of the Focus podcast and all of Relay FM.
indeed for their support of the Focus podcast and all of Relay FM.
Okay. The next part here is to work at a natural pace.
And I'm curious, David, what in the world does that mean?
Well, I mean, I think that, uh, in comparison to the modern pace that we're,
we're encouraged to work at,
doing things in a slower pace, just taking it. I think it comes in part with doing fewer things, but being focused on getting through them without the rush. In this section, he goes through a lot
of kind of old-timey science, like Isaac Newton and folks back then, Marie Curie.
And they would like come up with a theory
over a course of years and they'd take vacations
and they would kind of work around an idea
before they came up with their conclusions,
which is something that is just unheard of today.
Yeah, the thing that kind of stood out to me as I was reading this section was the
conversation that we had about Richard Feynman's 12 favorite problems and how those are basically
things that you're not rushing to get a solution for. And that feels weird in today's society. Maybe because a lot of the problems that we encounter, we feel our knowledge
problems and if we just had the right information, then we wouldn't have this
problem, but I think that actually can work against us because we find the first
plausible answer and then we assume that is the right thing. And it kind of
reminds me of liminal thinking by Dave Gray that our friend Ernie recommended to us a while back
and how we have this limited experience. And on that experience, we build all of our judgments,
all of our beliefs. We surround ourselves with people who look, think, talk, and act just like we do. And this is truth, but it's one small section of what is actually
knowable. So we have to constantly be curious. We have to constantly be seeking out other
perspectives. And it's hard to do that when you're not curious about the problems that are
in front of you. And so I really liked that idea of those 12 favorite problems,
the just the,
the TLDR with this is that there are these problems that you haven't solved,
but you just enjoy kind of thinking about them whenever you have some thinking
time. And so you've got this list and you consult it,
not every day, not every week, but every once in a while. And oh yeah,
this was something that was curious to me and kind of in the background, sort of like your brain's
background process. Occasionally you'll stumble upon something like, oh, that actually applies
to this. You've sort of primed the pump for those moments of inspiration. So how does that tie to
work at a natural pace? Well, I feel like a lot of our work
is I just got to put out these fires. I just got to solve these problems. And I think at the heart
of work at a natural pace for me is recognize, and this is easier said than done. I still struggle
with this mightily recognize that not every problem needs to be solved by you first of all and second
of all doesn't need to be solved by you right now that's really hard to say you know i'm just
going to put this one over here and that's going to remain a problem for the the time being because
this is the problem that i am trying to solve right right now but the truth is that we're never in this
trying to solve right now. But the truth is that we're never in this,
this state of utopia where all the problems have been solved.
We just aren't aware of the ones that aren't immediately
in front of us.
So when one appears, you know, fight the urge to,
okay, this is now being loaded into the active working
memory and we're going to solve this
alongside the other thing.
I also think a piece that stood out for me in this
is just the idea of how much harder working
at a natural pace is today than it was back
in the time of Isaac Newton.
Isaac Newton didn't have the demands on him
that we have these days.
He didn't have an email inbox.
He didn't have a shared calendar, right?
You know, your time was more your own back then.
And I think that, you know, this section just reminds me that, yeah,
we need to do this, but it's harder now than it used to be.
It is, uh, the strategies that we use to solve this, I feel like,
Kel Newport talked about these many years ago in deep work,
where it's kind of setting the expectations
and the boundaries.
And there's one story from that book that stands out to me
still to this day about the woman who was at a job
and she wanted more time to focus on deep work,
but she had to respond immediately to these demands from her
boss.
And the way that she got the time to do the deep work she wanted was by
scheduling a meeting with her boss and saying, okay,
these are all the things that you have asked me to do in the last couple of
days.
This is the thing that I am actually getting paid to do and I want to do with
excellence and do it well. So what would you rather have me do?
And the boss says, well, obviously the thing in the job description,
that's the most important. So, okay. Well, if that's the most important,
is it okay if I ignore these other things for the time being? Yes. Okay.
Now take it a step further.
Is it okay if I protect this time in the morning for two to three hours so I can actually do
that thing? That is a really uncomfortable conversation to have, but it needs to be had.
And I feel like the reason that it's so uncomfortable is we create this scenario in our heads of there is no way that I will possibly get, get the response that I want with this.
But you don't really know until you try it, you know, kind of the way I got into coaching soccer and I've coached soccer now for I don't know, three or four years at this point. I'm actually the head coach of the, the middle school soccer team now.
But originally I was asked because someone found out I played soccer in high
school and Mike seems to know something. Maybe, maybe he can help out.
And I, I was adamant.
I didn't want to do it because I had in my mind, well, these are the requirements.
So the very first conversation I had with the person is, okay, I'll help,
but I can't do Fridays. I can't do Thursdays and I can't do Wednesday nights.
And they were like, okay, sounds fine. Like it caught me off guard. I had built up this whole
big conversation I was going to have and all the arguments that I was going to have to make
going back and forth. And in the end, like all of it was, was mute. And I feel like there's the
opportunity for that, that we don't entertain with
these uncomfortable work conversations, but really the worst case scenario, if
you do have one of these conversations is that now you at least know what you're
dealing with instead of projecting it and creating this, this picture in your mind.
Yeah, I had a, um, one of the things I've been working on is doing less email.
And, uh, somebody wrote me about the problem of email how he was getting stuck
Going to email too often and couldn't figure out why and what was my advice and rather than write him a response
I wrote a post I'm actually gonna do it as a short series and the first one I did
I'll put a link in the notes was about
That I think one of the reasons we jump
into email and find ourselves going to it constantly
is because it's not the hard thing.
Quite often, the hard thing you do takes more energy
than email, so it's easier to just go to email
and engage in what Cal would call pseudo productivity.
And I do think that there's a real thing to that.
Like if you find yourself checking email too often,
it might be because you don't, at some level,
you don't want to do the hard thing.
And maybe you need to become more intentional
about doing the hard thing.
Yeah, you need to just do the hard thing.
But also I think kind of coupled with this,
at least for me, is this feeling
that you don't want to disappoint people.
You don't want to let people down. I guess I'm a recovering people pleaser, but I feel like
anybody who wants to avoid drama in a work situation, which is just about everybody,
is going to naturally want to help people out because they know that they're going to need help
at some point and they want people to reciprocate.
So it does require some conversations about what's most important.
If you're able to, you want to establish some boundaries within the work culture.
That's basically what I did at the last day job.
I was an integrator, so kind of like an operations person,
but really just kind of went through
how are we actually working and created documents
on like communication expectations.
Like we use Slack, we use email there,
but once we defined that, you know,
if you send somebody a message on Slack,
it doesn't mean because they have a green bubble
that they're gonna reply to you in 10 minutes.
In fact, in the company documentation now,
you're supposed to assume that that person
is actually in the middle of a project.
They're at their computer, but they're working,
and they will see your message during one
of their scheduled breaks in the morning.
So expect a response within three to four hours.
Okay, so just having that shared understanding
eliminates a lot of the, Hey, can you help me out with this quick? Because you know that you're not
going to get a response within 10 to 15 minutes. At least you're not supposed to. I mean, if you
don't have a management on board with that and the someone above you sends a request, you know, that can kind of be counter, counterproductive
at that point. But having the shared understanding, you know, these are the rules that we're playing
by can help eliminate some of that stuff. And kind of a related idea to this is the
idea of the small scale seasonality, because you know, there's an obvious application of
this with like the seventh week sabbaticals that we've talked about with Sean McCabe previously. But one of the things that Cal advocated for with this is
like no meeting Mondays, just a day a week that you're not going to have meetings. And I feel like
if you were to introduce something like that at a company or an agency, everybody thinks they have
too many meetings. So just the idea of, okay, we're not going to cut any of these meetings,
but we're going to organize them in a way where on this day,
we're not going to have to worry about it.
I mean, you're going to absolutely be able to champion some,
some support for that sort of idea,
but it requires you to think about how could things actually be better,
which is hard to do when you're just responding to the things that keep showing up in your inboxes and you already feel overwhelmed.
Yeah. And I just feel like this whole section, work at a natural pace goes at the heart of
many of the modern worker problems, you know, getting space to do your work. You're
right. I feel like there's a lot of parallel between this section and the deep workbook. But I think this
is something that is a particular difficulty for a lot
of us now. I mean, I work for myself, and yet I still get
interrupted all the time. So it's just, it's just something
we have to really be conscious of. I mean, I think it's one of
the big goals of us making this show about focus is
finding ways to stop and work on the important stuff. And working at a natural pace comes right
in hand with that if you can back off the exterior interruptions and distractions.
You mentioned at the beginning that these three things kind of tie together. So what makes work
at a natural pace actually work is that you have done the first step in doing fewer things. You
selected fewer projects to work on. And by doing so, kind of implied here is that you know the
things that you are working on are important and
they're important enough that you're not just trying to crank these out in a day,
a week. These may be things that are going to transform your life or the
organization, but they're going to require a significant investment of
effort. And so you recognize that you're not
going to ship this. You're not going to get it done in a short period of time, but you can show
up every day and you can make progress. And as humans, we are terrible at estimating how long
something is going to take. We tend to overestimate what we can do in the short term and underestimate
what we can do in the long term. So if you can show up and write a thousand words a day,
I mean how long does that take? If you are clear on what you're going to be writing and understand
what fits into the big picture, maybe an hour or two at the most. But if you did that every day,
it's a couple of months before you have 60,000 words and you have a book. But
just thinking about writing this book, this feels like such a huge heavy lift. I'm not even going to
start thinking about that. If you chose fewer things and then you recognize that today I did
my thousand words, I checked that box. I'm just trying to show up every day. I'm trying to move the needle, but you have to trust that those small actions are tied to the
bigger outcomes. And over time, if you just show up every day, if you win the day, then the results
are going to take care of themselves. But you have to have that big picture in mind. And this
sounds kind of contradictory, I realized when I was railing on goals previously. But goals, I guess what I'm saying is, like, let's say you
have the goal of writing a book. I think that's a great goal. I just wouldn't say this is going to
be published by this specific time. For those people who have the book deal, like, fine,
you're working differently than most of us who are just trying to get something out into the world.
But the way to actually make that thing is I'm just going to do this small piece and I'm going to do it every single day.
But even like the people that we know that get book deals do it the same way.
Like I know for that Chris Bailey does that he thinks about it on a daily basis.
He doesn't think about it as a big project deadline.
He says, how many words do I need to write today?
And the other point I wanted to make is,
one of the downsides of this, as we've been talking about,
you get all these external interruptions,
I think you need to be serious about communicating with people if you decide
to take this on.
You're gonna do fewer things, you're gonna work
at a natural pace, you need to tell your coworkers,
like hey, you know that big project you want me to work on?
That is third in line right now.
These are the other two things I'm working on.
And I used to do this with my legal clients
when I was in trial.
All of my other clients would want clients when I was in trial. Like all my other clients would want help
when I was in trial.
And what I would say is, right now I'm in trial.
That means I'm giving 100% of myself to my client
who is in court, you know, every day looking at a judge.
And that means I can't help you right now,
but what I will tell you is when your turn
comes and you are in trial, I will give you the same priority.
And that was always very, I could, you could tell that was very
settling to clients to hear that.
Like, okay, I get it.
So, um, you can't help me right now cause you're doing this other thing, but when
it's my turn, I'm going to get the same focus where you can do that with respect
to this type of priority.
Like you say, I'm working on this one thing right now
for Mike and Joe, once I finish the thing for Mike,
you're gonna get the same priority.
Yeah, and then Cal says in the book
that the trick to making that work
is you actually have to follow through and do things
when you say you're gonna do that.
So kind of a result of implementing the slow productivity system.
And I say system, but really it's just those three ideas of doing fewer, but more important
things, working at a natural pace. And then the next one we'll get to obsess over quality.
The natural fruit of that is that you have more control. Maybe control isn't the right word, but you have more trust in your system,
you more trust in your ability to handle whatever is thrown at you. You've got the scaffolding
to support these things. And instead of constantly feeling like you're drowning the stage of overwhelm and it
feels like there's constantly more being poured in than you have capacity to do, that is the This episode of the Focus Podcast is brought to you by Vitaly, a new era for customer success productivity.
Get a free pair of AirPods Pro when you book a qualified meeting.
Just head to vitaly.io slash focused.
Customer success teams today are facing a problem.
How do they connect customer data back to their work?
Vitaly changes that. It's a new kind of customer success platform,
an all-in-one collaborative workspace
that combines your customer data
with all the capabilities you expect
from today's project management and work platforms.
Because it's designed for today's customer success team,
that's why Vitaly operates with unparalleled efficiency,
improves net revenue retention,
and delivers best-in-class
customer experiences. It's the solution to helping your customer success team
keep a better pulse on your customers, which maximizes productivity, visibility,
and collaboration. You can boost your bottom line by driving more revenue per
customer with Vitaly. And if you take a qualified demo of Vitaly, get a free pair of AirPods Pro.
So if you're a customer success decision maker,
actively seeking CS solutions,
working at a B2B software as a service company
with 50 to a thousand employees,
and you're willing to explore
changing customer success platforms
if you already have one in place,
schedule your call by visiting vitally.io slash focused
to get that free pair of AirPods Pro.
That's vitally, V-I-T-A-L-L-Y dot I-O slash focused
for a free pair of AirPods Pro
when you schedule a qualified meeting.
And our thanks to Vitally for their support
of the Focus Podcast and all of Relay FM.
thanks to Vitaly for their support of the Focus Podcast and all of RelayFM.
Okay, the third point, the third principle I guess we would say is obsess over quality.
Why is this important?
Well, actually this one I like a lot. So the obvious idea here is you want to do things with excellence. But I actually think the title of this one can be a little bit misleading because just grabbing the
headline of this, I feel like lends itself to perfectionism. And that's not what he's talking about. What he's talking about is doing work that
matters, that makes a difference in people's lives. And that is going to take some time. However,
as I said, this kind of lends itself, I think, without getting into the details towards
perfectionism. Again, that's not really what he's talking about.
The way to create quality things is to do it enough,
to get enough reps in.
So there's a balance here with the quantity and the quality.
And I would argue anyways,
where if you're creating something specifically,
you start off and you make something, you ship it,
it's not very good. But the fact that you shipped it, now that it's out there, you can actually see how it could be better.
And so the next time it gets a little bit better, the next time it gets a little bit better.
If I were to go back and listen to some of the first podcast episodes that I recorded,
I would probably curl up in a ball and be completely ashamed of how they sounded.
I remember editing the first one that I ever did and I spent so much time cutting out every on every um
And what I learned from that is like I got to clean up my filler words
I got to go to Toastmasters and get comfortable just kind of speaking
Stemper anus Lee about these different things and over time, you know, I did that and I published enough episodes
Oh, this could be a little bit better. That could be a little bit better. And I learned the quality.
So I think the way that I would kind of define this is you need to have an eye for quality.
You have to have a certain level of taste that is developed of this is where I want
to get to. But also you have to let go and say,
this is the best that I can do right now
and be okay with that result.
Yeah, I think consideration toward quality
is really more what he's talking about
than obsessing over it,
but this is the shortest section in the book.
And you do, I think looking at the interlocked nature of these principles,
if you are gonna do less, and if you're gonna work
at a natural pace, it needs to be good.
I think that's really what he's saying.
And you need to care about the results.
And I would argue that that should always be the case,
except I think when you're overwhelmed
with too many projects, it's just not possible. This is the gift, right?
The ability to,
to take more care over the quality that you get the pay.
It's almost like the payoff for the first two principles.
Yeah, it is. Uh, there's a, a phrase that he uses here,
which I like hardwood grows slowly. And I feel like this is the chapter,
but I can't recall specifically where he talks about
the musical artist, Jewel.
Kind of as a side note, I guess,
Cal Newport has some incredible stories in here.
But the one about Jewel I liked a lot
because basically she was this unknown musician
and she started showing up at this coffee shop and there were only a couple of surfers there for the first show and then the next show there were a couple
more and she just basically kept doing that enough and the the audience grew because every time that
she showed up and she sang and played, she gave it everything that she had.
And that was evident for even the few people that were there.
So they went and they, they told other people and eventually the attention came.
Um, but that's the, that's an application of this, this concept, I guess, that I
was kind of clumsily talking about earlier. I feel like is you need to just do the very best that you can
Right now and then if you have that eye towards excellence
I feel like it's not explicitly stated in this chapter
but I really do believe that if you're
Consistently trying to do the very best that you can do and you're asking yourself, how can I honestly be better?
You're open to receiving constructive criticism,
whether it's coming from yourself or others,
and you're able to overcome the fear of putting something out there.
I feel like the quality is a natural by-product.
Uh, if you just do it enough, if you just have enough quantity, then the quality will be there.
But it won't be there the first time. It won't be there the fifth time.
It's going to take some time in order for it to get there.
No matter how skilled or talented you are at the beginning, the first time that you do it, you're not going to be very good at it.
I would add to that that you have to care.
I mean, just doing it over and over again
isn't gonna make you naturally better
unless you're paying attention.
And the story about Jewel that stood out to me was,
so once she got kind of big at this coffee shop,
then the record company started showing up
and they offered her a million dollar deal.
She grew up relatively poor and somebody said, I'm going to give you a million dollars for
this record deal.
And rather than just say yes, she went to the library and read a book about the music
business and realized that if they give her a million dollars, they're going to expect
her to make a lot of money off her first record or they're going to expect her to make a lot of money off her first record
or they're gonna dump her.
And she knew that she wasn't quite there yet.
She didn't have the abilities that she wanted to
and she didn't want to put herself under that pressure.
The same thing happens with companies.
As a former attorney, I'll tell you,
the worst thing that can happen to a company
is a high valuation at the beginning
because suddenly they've got all these people
wanting money out of the company
because they've got this high valuation,
you want to start low.
And so she turned down the million dollars,
which took an incredible amount.
I mean, she was like in her early 20s
and she turned down a million dollars.
And she found a different record company.
She said, look, don't give me a bunch of money,
but I want a higher cut, you know,
and I want, and that way,
if my first record doesn't make a ton of money,
you're not in it, you know,
you haven't lost your million dollars
and you'll give me some time to get better.
And that's what happened.
Her first couple records did okay,
but she really blew up much later.
And she had the foresight to kind of put herself
in that position. I thought that was a really remarkable story. And she had the foresight to kind of put herself
in that position.
I thought that was a really remarkable story.
It's even more remarkable when you realize
that she was living out of her car at the time.
Yeah.
Like that million dollars would have been very, very helpful.
But that takes a lot of guts and a lot of belief,
I feel like in yourself and your ability to learn and get better.
And she did the same thing at the other end,
because when she was a massive success,
people wanted her to be in movies and everything,
and she stood back from that and said,
no, I have enough money, I'm happy.
I think she got a farm in Texas
and she still makes great music with her studio at her house
and she's doing what she wants.
I feel like a very impressive person.
I didn't know about her really.
I was aware of Jewel, but I didn't really know about her
after I read this.
I went back and listened to some of her music
because I'm like, this is a smart person.
Yeah.
Yeah, you kind of touched on another theme there,
which isn't super explicit in the book,
but she did end up trying a bunch of different things and then realized that I don't like
doing these other things.
I like doing this thing.
This is the thing that I'm really good at.
So kind of all the way back to the beginning now with do fewer things, you know, so this
is not a linear progression and then you get to the end and then there, we're done.
This is a cycle.
And so once you've done fewer things,
you work at a natural pace, you obsess over the quality,
that just sets you up for a little bit more clarity
to start the cycle all over again.
Another thing he does throughout the book
is he comes up with principles and ideas
and he's talking at this high level,
like we are in the show.
But in each section, he includes several little
practical things you can do to pursue some of these goals.
Like one of the ones he has in Obsess Over Quality,
he says, buy yourself a $50 notebook.
And he talks about how when he was a PhD student,
he bought a fancy lab notebook, like an archival notebook,
and owning that high piece of equipment
for what he was doing kind of raised his level of quality.
Like he wanted to work to a level of that notebook.
And I think that is something that really works
for a lot of people.
And it's something that we've talked about in the past
in the show in different kind of lights.
But I do like just overall throughout the book,
the way Cal includes some little exercises you can do.
He's not gonna really show you the path.
Everybody has a different path,
but he's gonna give you a few options
that kind of help yourself get started
on some of these principles.
Agreed, and that's gonna be something that certain people will love. options that kind of help yourself get to the end of the book and you're like, I thought you were going to tell me how to do this. And
you have more questions than answers still. But I would argue that that doesn't diminish
the value of the book at all. I think this is a great book and there's a lot of things
to that challenge you to think about, you know, how could I actually work better?
Excellent book. I would argue, well I'm not gonna argue,
I'm just gonna state it, I love the cover of this book.
I know it's a little weird to say that,
but productivity book covers are usually so boring
and this one has a beautiful painting of a cabin
out in the woods and I feel like it conveys the idea
of the book and I just love it as a cover.
I'm just gonna say that part. Agreed, I like it conveys the idea of the book and I just love it as a cover. I'm just gonna say that part.
Agreed.
I like it a lot too.
Reminds me a lot of the personal retreat stuff.
And I remember hearing Cal talk on his podcast
about how he kind of fought for that cover
because it is not your standard productivity book cover.
But I think it is very effective
and very in line with the message of the book.
Yeah, it's a good one.
If you're interested in this stuff,
if you're struggling with overwhelm,
this is a book you should read.
And I do think it's one of the best books
on this kind of emerging topic of more deliberate,
slower but better, less but more important
kind of productivity thing we're going through through and I'm on board for it.
Me too.
Speaking of books, what are you reading right now, David?
I'm catching up with you, Mike.
We talked about Feel Good Productivity by Ali Abdal
about a month ago.
I read the book last week and I liked it.
It was good.
You know what I liked about it the most
was the kind of the first premise that you know,
you should feel good about your productivity, right?
Because I think so much of it has got these negative
kind of consequences or negative emotions attached to them
like oh I have to do more, I have to, you know,
bringing a sense of joy or happiness to it I think. Like, oh, I have to do more. I have to, you know, bring in a sense of joy
or happiness to it, I think could really, really help.
I also think this book pairs nicely with slow productivity.
I do too, which was surprising to me at first.
I guess just understanding that Cal is so anti-social media
anything and Ali Abdaal is a
youtuber who built his business on borrowed attention using social media
just seemed like those two two perspectives were a little bit at odds
and kind of the thing that opened my eyes to this was an interview that was
on Cal Newport's podcast where he had Ali Abdallah.
And I'll find a link and I'll put that in the show notes that people are interested
in that episode.
This was a really good interview.
And then after hearing that, it kind of made me realize that actually, yeah, these are
complimentary ideas.
I feel like if you are picking fewer things and you know that they're important, then
you feel better about working on those things and allows you to do a lot of
the other things that Cal talks about in his book.
And we've talked about here today.
So what are you reading these days, Mike?
All right. Well,
I've got a book that I am reading by someone who used to work with Brian
holiday, Brent Underwood. And this is not
a productivity book at all though. It is called Ghost Town Living. I'm not sure if
you came across this story a few years ago, but definitely some of the people
that I followed were talking about this. But there was a group of people who
make stuff online. I think Nathan Barry was one of the people who was part of this group that
bought this old ghost town called Cerro Gordo.
Do you remember hearing anything about this? Uh, yes, barely though.
Okay. So at the time I was like, what, why did these guys buy a ghost town?
Well, Brent Underwood,
to my understanding here is the person who actually has been living there.
So I just think the whole concept of Ghost Towns is fascinating. It was built on this mine, obviously, that produced a lot of silver and I believe gold hundreds of years ago, but it hasn't, it's been completely empty
since like 1850 or something like that. So I like the picture of that. And I just am fascinated by
old buildings and things like that. Like if these walls could talk, what sort of stories would they
they tell? And I'm not sure I would actually want to go live there, but I think it's a pretty fascinating premise.
So I am bringing this one on the plane and reading it while I'm traveling this week.
I can tell you growing up in the West, we would go out to ghost towns when I was a kid.
That was a thing back in the 70s.
I don't know if they're as accessible as they used to be.
And it was just weird that there was this town there that had a whole history behind it. And it's now
it's just a bunch of rubble or, or falling down buildings. But
yeah, I remember like, kind of going out there and we like we
would camp out there and stuff. And it was, it was weird. But
uh, yeah, that was the thing where I grew up.
Nice. Got any shiny new objects?
Yeah, I do.
I, you know, sometimes you just want to spend money
on yourself.
Have you ever had that feeling like,
oh, I'm going to buy myself something.
And I always, I make tea every morning
and I never finish it because it always gets cold.
And I finally decided to try one of these Ember mugs.
I've heard from a bunch of my friends that love them.
I bought one.
It's ridiculous to pay over $100 for a tea mug.
But what it is, it's a little mug.
It's got a heating element in it and a battery.
And then it comes with a, it's a plate.
It's not a hot plate, it's a charging plate.
And you make your tea, you put it in there in the morning,
and you've got hot tea for the whole morning.
And you can pull it off the charger,
and it holds, keeps the tea hot for like a couple hours
when you pull it off.
But I usually keep it on the charging plate
throughout the morning.
And my tea, I usually finish drinking it by about 11.
But I, man, it's a nice quality of life improvement for me
that I have hot tea all morning.
We're recording very early today,
I haven't made mine yet,
I'm looking at it right now,
thinking you need some tea inside of you.
Nice, yeah, these are cool.
I got one for my wife because she,
I typically make coffee in the morning,
and then she is the one who homeschools our kids,
so she gets busy,
and I go down to my office,
I drink my coffee and I write and I work,
but she'll get distracted by something
that someone needs help with and her coffee gets cold.
So I got her one of these a couple years ago
and she loves it.
Is it still working?
I mean, I'm wondering what the lifespan of this thing is.
No, it still works.
It's great.
There is an app that comes with it,
which is kind of useless once you set the temperature that you want your
beverage to stay at. Um, I guess that's kind of the, the killer feature of it.
Um, and I'm sure there are cheaper alternatives to this,
but it is a really nice mug first of all. Um, and, uh,
it's, uh, it's easy to use. Um, I, I'm a, I'm a big fan.
I just have not pulled the trigger on getting one for myself cause I drank my
coffee too quickly.
Oh, you don't need it then.
No, guess not. Uh,
my shiny new object is basically what I've been calling a life
theme in a box. Uh, Michael Hyatt has this product called Life Focus.
I put the link in the outline
and I'll put the link in the show notes
so people are interested in this.
But essentially, so I've got this process
for developing your personal mission statement.
I call it a life theme and I'm not original in this.
Everyone's got their version of it.
Well, this is Michael Hyatt's version of it.
And kind of all of them, you have to figure out,
you know, what's really important to you.
And then you talk about doing fewer things.
You choose projects that are in alignment
with your vision and your values.
So he's got obviously books and courses
to help you figure this stuff out.
And it's kind of all based off of this wheel of life concept.
So these are the different areas of your life and what are kind of the things that are important
to you in these different areas. So this is actually a box that has a whole bunch of these
cards. And I think it's a really useful tool for people who have never done this sort of
thing before. For example, there's a whole bunch of cards that have sample values. So if you just tell somebody, hey, sit down or write
down your values. Like that's hard to do if you've never thought about it before.
But by having all these cards, you have a bunch of examples and you can basically
like put them in three different piles. This really resonates, this kind of
resonates, this isn't me. Those aren't the exact terms that he uses, but that's the
idea. And then after you go through those, you go through like the stack with the ones that
are the most resonant and you pick three to five of those.
And then from there you have like the different areas of your life and there's different examples
of projects and things that you can do that would move the needle in those particular
areas.
So it's basically a box with a whole bunch of cards in it, but I feel like the cards,
the physical objects are kind of useful when you're kind of going through this
stuff and trying to figure out, you know, why, why am I here?
And what really matters to me?
I know I've got my system, you've got your system.
So if you've done this sort of thing before, chances are you may not actually
find this all that useful because I don't think there's anything revolutionary
here other than the physical nature of the cards.
But if you were looking for a place to start start I think this is a really cool product. Yeah I think Michael Hyatt
does such a good job of getting through to people who are not reading all the
books on this stuff like and you know he's he's one of the the best at this
yep. All right well that will do it for this episode. So if you haven't already,
go check out Slow Productivity by Cal Newport. Can't tell we're big fans of the book and
congratulations Cal on another phenomenal book. Thank you all for listening. Thank you to our
sponsors, which is our friends at ZocDoc, Indeed and Vitaly. In Deep Focus, David and I both have
travel coming up. So we'll be talking about some of our favorite travel hacks.
Deep Focus is the ad-free extended version of the podcast.
If you wanna sign up for Deep Focus,
you can do so at relay.fm slash focused.
Otherwise, we'll catch you next time.