Follow Him: A Come, Follow Me Podcast - Doctrine & Covenants 67-70 Part 1 : Dr. C. Robert Line
Episode Date: June 19, 2021What is the Book of Commandments, and how does it compare to our current Doctrine and Covenants? Who was William McLellin, and what were his struggles with Church leadership? Join Dr. Robert Line as h...e expounds on these questions while reminding us of the eternally forgiving nature of God. The early Saints made mistakes, and so do we, but the power of repentance can wipe away all the pain of sin.Shownotes: https://followhim.co/Â Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/followhimpodcastInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/followhimpodcastYouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/FollowHimOfficialChannel
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Welcome to Follow Him, a weekly podcast dedicated to helping individuals and families with their
Come Follow Me study.
I'm Hank Smith and I'm John by the way.
We love to learn, we love to laugh.
We want to learn and laugh with you.
As together, we follow him.
Hello my friends, welcome to another episode of Follow Him.
My name is Hank Smith and I am here with my selfless co-host,
John, by the way.
Hi, John.
Wow, I hadn't heard that adjective before.
Thank you, you're moving through the dictionary right there.
If people knew you well, they would know how selfless you are.
Oh, that's very nice.
Thanks.
We are excited to be here.
We are on social media media just so everybody knows.
You can find us on Instagram and Facebook.
You can get show notes at followhim.co, followhim.co.
And please rate and review our podcast.
That helps us a lot.
Well, John, every week we have an opportunity to hear from one of the church's great minds.
And we give that chance
again this week. Who's with us? Oh, I'm so excited today. We have a brother C. Robert
Line. C. Has worked full time with religious education for the past 29 years. In addition to
teaching with the BYU religious education, he's been a presenter at BYU Education Week Women's Conference,
especially for youth, and has worked for CES programs as an instructor and director for institutes
of religion. Brother Lion has both a bachelor's and master's degree from BYU, and also a doctoral
degree from Purdue University and Sociology of Religion. He has authored various books and articles
to serve as the Editor-in-chief of Century magazine.
He played on the BYU men's basketball team from 1984 to 85 and he and his wife Tamara Wright line have five grandchildren and
I'm sorry five children and six grandchildren almost seven and they live in Cedar Hills. Brother Lane, welcome to our podcast today.
Hey, thanks so much. Appreciate it. It's really, really good to be with you guys.
Yeah. Brother Lane, we're so excited to have you and a former star athlete for the BYU Cougars.
This is, this is big 1984. I was just honored to be a
part of the program.
So you got to watch them play
close up.
Yeah.
I talked to them everything they
know about.
I was just honored to be a
part of the program.
So you got to watch them play
close up.
Yeah.
I talked to them everything they
know about.
I was just honored to be a
part of the program.
So you got to watch them play
close up.
Yeah.
Yeah.
I talked to them everything they know about. I talked to them. I talked to program. You got to watch them play close up. Yes, yes.
I talked them everything they know about
sitting on the bench.
So.
Well, let's jump into this week's lesson, Dr. Line.
We're studying sections 67 through 70.
These are all received in November of 1831.
Now, the church is just as a reminder
of to our listeners, is a year and a half old. It's still brand new. I've looked ahead a little
bit, Brother Line, and I've seen that a lot of these sections have to do with the printing of these
revelations. Right. So let's back up a bit. Let's let you take over and say, okay, what do we need to understand in order to get the
most out of these sections?
Yeah, yeah.
And again, thanks for having me on.
Yeah, these are some interesting sections and, you know, a little bit of background.
One of the things you'll notice, first of all, reading sections 67 through 70 is, and
you'll see these two threads all the way through the doctrine
and covenants, but one of them is the whole concept of Zion, which you mentioned Hank, right?
The building of the city of the New Jerusalem. I'm sure you've talked about that another
you know recordings that you guys have done, but you know Zion, Elder Christopherson said,
is both a place and a people, right?
The other thing that these sections touch upon
is this book called the Book of Commandments.
I think many of your listeners probably know
that this was the original forerunner
to the Doctrine and Covenants.
And you have two church centers at the time,
one in Kirtland and one in Independence, Missouri.
The press is eventually gonna get destroyed
by anti-Moroman mobs there in Missouri.
Never does come about, and it's not till 1835,
that you get the printing of what was then renamed
the Doctrine and Covenants, 102 sections,
unlike what we have now with 138 sections.
But yeah, so Zion Law of Consecration,
Book of Commandments, you know, one thing your listeners
might be interested in, I find a lot of my students
that I teach don't know this, but the Book of Commandments,
there were only partial, you know, productions.
In fact, today, I think there's only like about 30 to 40,
maybe 50 extent copies of the book of Commandments.
And, you know, if any of you ever find one,
bring it to me and John.
We'll let you know.
Yeah.
I know, I'll gladly hold on to that for you.
So let's go right into section 67 and talk about
who's this given to and what are some of the content
that we can talk about here?
Yeah, so I mean, you know, your readers,
you know, if they go into the section heading,
they'll see there that, you know,
this conference that had approved the publication
of the Book of Commandments, you know,
they originally had approved, you know, 10,000 copies,
which back then is quite a lot.
And I mean, even the book of Mark,
how many was the Book of Mormon?
I think it was 5,000 original copies,
which was unheard of back then
to do a book run that big on an original book
that nobody knows about.
So 10,000 is pretty big.
It kind of shows, speaks to how much the,
not only the church has grown to this point in a year and a
half, but the faith that the leaders have of doing missionary work and going out, that's a pretty
cool thing that would probably be lost on a lot of people. I think out of all of the sections,
this one has not that the other ones don't have any meat, but this one is pretty meaty, it's got
some good stuff in it. And it involves a guy that I think some people have heard of.
He's a lesser known individual in church history name,
William E. McClellan, okay.
And William E. McClellan, he's actually gonna show up
in the section prior to this section 66,
and then in 75 as well.
And in fact, if it's okay, could we do a little bit
of context on William E. McClellan, you know, if it's okay, could we do a little bit of context on William
Imma Clawin first? Let's do it. And because he's going to be kind of the centerpiece behind this
controversy that is going to come up in section 67. And so, you know, just a little bit about William
Imma Clawin, he's kind of a contemporary of Joseph Smith. Joseph is born in 1805, December of 1805, if you remember,
just a few weeks later, 18th of January, 1806, William E. McClana is born, isn't baptized till the
summer of 1831 is going to become an apostle in 1835. You just don't see things like that today,
right? Four years later. People were 25, 30 years old, new converts becoming apostles, but that was kind of, you
know, that was kind of part and parcel back then.
The unfortunate thing about him is he's going to apostatize in 1838, but he's going to
die outside of the faith in 1883.
Never does come back.
He was a school teacher by profession.
And one of the reasons that's important to note, school teachers today often get a bad rap
or they get no rap at all.
But back in that day,
being a school teacher was a lofty profession.
You were considered to be an intellectual.
If you were a trained school you know, schooled teacher.
And so will you me McClellan?
He had a lot of standing in the church.
Okay, so yeah, let's just dive into section 67,
verse one, behold, and Hark and O'Yelder's
of my church, go have assembled yourself together,
whose prayers I
have heard whose hearts I know and whose desires have come up before me. Skipping down to verse 4,
I the Lord give unto you testimony of the truth of these commandments which are lined before you.
What's the context there? Well, it's not the 10 commandments, right? That's a good application,
but when it says of these commandments, that's a specific reference to the book of commandments, right?
Okay, and now why would he say this?
I the Lord and get, usually we give testimony to people, right,
about the scriptures, but this is a real cool instance
where the Lord is giving testimony of the truth
of the scriptures that are before you.
Now, why would he do this?
Well, there is an interesting thing that occurs. And is there
beginning to get ready the book of commandments for publication? And this conference approves,
you know, the printing of this book. There comes this question about the wording of some of the
revelations. And there were some members that were part of a group who felt quite frankly
that this really wasn't the Lord, you know, that it was kind of canned and maybe even hammed up
language. And that this was just Joseph speaking, right? Okay, verse 5, your eyes have been upon my
servant Joseph Smith, Jr. And his language you have known and his imperfections you have known.
And you have sought in your heart's knowledge
that you might express beyond his language.
This you also know.
Yeah, and we'll stay with the history and the context
for a moment, but I wanna come back to that
because I think that's an interesting concept,
especially in the church today
with all the faith crisis stuff,
faith transitioning stuff that's going on
with this idea of not just imperfections
that members have, imperfections that,
that's kind of interesting that the Lord would say,
and his imperfections you have known.
Let's come back and talk about this, Hank, verse six.
Yeah, now see key out of the book of commandments,
even the least that is among them,
and appoint him that is the most wise among you.
Or if there be any among you that shall make one like unto it,
then you are justified in saying that you do not know that they are true.
So give it a try.
You're right.
Yeah. And then verse 8, but if you cannot make one like unto it,
you're under condemnation if you do not bear record that they are true.
Well, this group, they actually decided to take, I mean, you could say it's Joseph's challenge, but really it's the Lord's challenge,
right? You know, see if you can write a revelation and make it sound like it's from the Lord.
You're saying Joseph is writing revelations on his own and trying to make it sound like it's from
the Lord. Well, see if you can do this. And so a point among you, the one that is most wise,
verse six, guess who they chose to do that. Yeah, it's none other than William E. McClellan was chosen.
And you know, we won't go too much into the history of it, but and there's not a lot of history.
Other than he tried and basically failed miserably to do this. And it was a pretty strong witness to this group
that, hey, yeah, this is, you know, this challenge
that the Lord has issued, it really panned out.
So that's kind of interesting.
I'd love to hear your thoughts.
Either Hank or John about verse five
and this idea of his language you have known,
his imperfections, you have known,
you've sought to, in your heart, that you might express beyond his language.
If I, could I read a quote real quick to maybe kind of frame where I'd like to go with
that? And I'm sure both of you are very familiar with this, but back in, back in conference,
October conference 2013, President Oukdorf at the time,
President Oukdorf now he's elder Oukdorf.
He spoke and he gave a talk that I don't know if rattled
the church as the way to frame it,
but there he said some things about leaders
and their imperfections that really caused
a stir in the church.
It's not scripture, it's not doctrine, but we have a culture sometimes of infallibility, right?
And isn't it interesting Joseph even talks about his weaknesses, right?
Mormon says, hey, if there's imperfections or mistakes in this record, they're the mistakes of men.
Here's what President Oukdorf said,
and again, I'd love to get your guys' thoughts on this.
He says, some struggle with unanswered questions
about things we have done or said in the past.
We openly acknowledge that in nearly 200 years of
church history, along with an uninterrupted line of
inspired, honorable and divine events,
there have been something said and done that could cause people to question.
And to be perfectly frank, there have been times
when members or leaders in the church
have simply made mistakes.
There may have been things said or done
that were not in harmony with our values principles
or doctrine.
And I love that.
I think that's very healthy and refreshing
to know that this is not
the Church of Manus, the Church of Jesus Christ, right? Here's one more quote, and then I'd love to
get your guys' thoughts on this before we go back into section 67. In a document called
Approaching Mormon Doctrine in LDS Newsroom, this was written back in 2007 approved by the first presidency. It says this,
not every statement made by a church leader, past or present necessarily constitutes doctrine,
a single statement made by a single leader on a single occasion often represents a personal,
though well considered opinion, but is not meant to be officially binding on the whole church. With divine inspiration,
the first presidency and quorum of the 12 council together to establish doctrine that is consistently
proclaimed in the official church publications. So I love this idea and I love that idea of the
Lord saying, hey, you know Joseph Simperfections, right? There's times when prophets make a mistake.
Joseph one time said a prophet was only a prophet
when he was speaking as such, right?
And so I'd love to hear Hank, John.
What are your thoughts about that about this idea
of as members of the church not being critical
of the brother and but realizing, hey,
sometimes mistakes are made, it doesn't happen often.
But boy, how could that help us
be better disciples?
Yeah, I think it's one of the reasons the Lord gives us 15
leaders and their spouses, right?
Right.
Right.
Because there's a lot of variety there to encompass members
of the church, from all the whole spectrum of beliefs.
This is one of my favorite thoughts from Lorenzo Snow.
John, I don't know if I've shared this before, but he said this in 1900.
He said 70 years ago, this church was organized with six members.
We commenced, so to speak, as an infant.
We had our prejudices to combat.
Our ignorance troubled us into regard to what the Lord
intended to do and what he wanted us to do. We advanced to boyhood and still we undoubtedly made
some mistakes, which generally arise from a lack of experience. We understand very well when we
reflect back upon our own lives that we did many foolish things when we were boys. Yeah, any of you do foolish things ever?
I don't know, Father.
Yet as we advanced, the experience of the past
materially assisted us to avoid such mistakes
as we had in our boyhood.
It is so with the church, our errors have generally arisen
from a lack of comprehending what the Lord required us to do.
But we are now pretty well along to manhood.
And he says, we ought to congratulate ourselves in this direction.
We certainly ought to feel, but we certainly ought not to feel that we have yet arrived
at perfection.
I love that idea that the Church is a growing living thing, and it's going to make mistakes
and learn from those mistakes just like all of us grow and learn from our mistakes.
I know, I don't know about you guys, but I have learned by really sad, painful experiences
what not to do.
I don't know.
John definitely has not had as many experiences as I have with that.
In all of our conversations, it's usually him saying,
oh, wow, you did that.
Yeah.
So.
But I, the church is the same thing for me.
When I was reading this to get ready for today in verse five,
your eyes have been upon Joseph Smith.
And it's like, where should your eyes be?
I'm thinking of Peter walking on water. And as soon as he took his eyes off Christ,
that's why he started to seek, right? And so I drew a line from verse 5 to verse 9,
so the Lord says, okay, look at the revelations. There is no unrighteousness in them. And I don't know,
I kind of connected those two. You're looking at Joseph, but look at these revelations.
And they are beyond Joseph. They are beyond a farm boy. They're coming down from above from the Father of Light. I thought that was cool. That's a really cool phrase, isn't it, Father of Light?
Yeah.
The assumption that we make that the Lord's Church is never going to make an error.
That's not something that the Lord has ever said.
He's never said that.
We get this assumption somewhere.
Do we want to hold other prophets to the same standard?
Right, out of the scriptures.
It didn't Moses, what does it say?
Moses killed an Egyptian and what Jacob told a fib about his wife,
that's my sister. I mean, and if the reformers, do we want to hold them to the same standard? I
mean, I don't know. We're holding Joseph to a pretty high standard here.
In Luke chapter nine, James and John want to burn down.
Yeah, let's burn down. They want to blow it up. Listen to this story.
I'll read this from J. Rubin Clark. He said, he remembered a simple story. My father told me as a
boy, I do not know on what authority, but it illustrates the point. His story was that during the
during the excitement incident to the coming of Johnston's army, brother Brigham preached to the people in the morning meeting of sermon vibrant with defiance to the approaching
army and declaring an intention to oppose and drive them back.
In the afternoon meeting, he arose and said that Brigham Young had been talking in the
morning, but the Lord was going to talk now.
He then delivered, he then delivered an address, the temple of which was opposite that of the morning talk.
So I, I, I love, I think it's very refreshing,
like you said, Rob.
Just one, can I, one other thought on this before we go on?
You know, I, I don't know how many of your listeners are familiar.
I think all of us are familiar with official declaration two,
right, the revelation in 1978, priesthood going to all worthy males. What a breath of fresh air that was. Elder Maconkey gave a
talk to church educators if you remember in August of 1978, about two months after the revelation
came out. I want to just read part of what he said. Speaking of the verse in second Nephi,
I think it's 26 where it says all are alike unto God. He denyeth them none. He says, these words
have taken on new meaning. We have caught a new vision of their true significance. Isn't that
interesting? An apostle saying that, you know, we, this is taking on new meaning for us. We've got a new vision.
He says this also applies to a great number of passages. Since the Lord gave this revelation
on the priesthood, our understanding of many passages has expanded. Many of us never imagine or
suppose that they had the extensive broad meaning that they do have. I want to read more of the
statement, but isn't that cool on a apostle saying, hey, we're learning,
we're growing, the Lord's continuing to reveal things.
And then he goes on and he says,
there's statements in our literature
that people hold onto and they say,
hey, Brigham Young and George Buchanan in you guys
said, you know, certain people would never have the priesthood.
And now we do, how is it that you said that?
And he says this, I love this.
He says, forget everything that I have said,
or what, bring him young or George Buchanan,
or whomever a set in days pass,
that is contrary to present revelation.
And then he says this, we spoke with limited understanding
and without the light and knowledge
that has now come into the world.
The reason I mentioned this,
I think you could even make the case
that there are some things that we taught
back in the 70s and 80s,
President Kimball and President Benson type
of theological paradigms that maybe we have moved away
from or that we don't emphasize.
And I think, what's that gonna be like
in 20 or 30 years from now?
And I guess
the bigger question, you know, if I feel disgruntled about book of Mormon translation issues, book of
Abraham translation issues, differences in the first vision accounts, LGBTQ issues, women and
the priesthood issues, where is it that the Lord is eventually leading this church?
Because as President Nelson said
with the dedication of the Rome temple,
he says, this church isn't done being restored yet.
This is an ongoing restoration and to understand that.
I just, I think that could help people so much
with a lot of these faith crisis questions.
Absolutely, absolutely. I remember Brigham Young, a quote I these faith crisis questions. Absolutely, absolutely.
I remember Brigham Young, a quote I read from Brigham Young,
off to find it and put it in our show notes,
but he said, I saw Joseph's imperfections and mistakes.
He said, but he was the Lord's prophet, not mine.
And if the Lord wanted to correct him,
it was between him and the Lord, right?
And so I like that idea that let, you know, If the Lord wanted to correct him, it was between him and the Lord.
And so I like that idea that let the Lord do this work.
Hinkley said this, he said, I have worked with seven presidents of the church.
I recognize that all have been human, but I have never been concerned over this.
They may have had some weaknesses, but this has never troubled me.
I know that the God of heaven has used mortal men throughout history to accomplish his divine purposes.
And I think it was Lorenzo Snow, who said he loved that the prophet Joseph Smith had weaknesses
because he said, quote, I felt like there was hope for me.
Yeah. Could we go back one section now to section six? Yeah, let's go to 66.
I know this isn't part of the block, but boy, there's such a great tie in here.
Let's just read a few verses if we could.
So, you know, if you look at the section heading, this is important, the place and the
date. So they're not in Kirtland, Ohio, they're in Hiram, Ohio.
This is at the John Johnson farm.
Remember, they go there for a time. This is eventually where section 76 is going to be received,
right? That great revelation on the three degrees of glory. So they're in Hiram, Ohio,
and it's October 29, 1831. And it says, William E. McClellan had petitioned the Lord to make known through the prophet Joseph the answer
to five questions, blah, blah, blah, blah.
Okay, of section 66.
Of 66, yeah.
Behold, thus say, the Lord, under my servant,
William E. McClellan, blessed are you,
and as much as you have turned away from your iniquities
and have received my truths, say, the Lord your Redeemer,
the Savior of the world, even
of as many as believe on my name.
Yeah, just a little bit of background here, if I could real quick, John.
So William Imaquan, he was baptized in the summer of 1831.
So he's only been a member for just a few months, right?
And so, hey, blessed are you, you've turned away from your inequities, you've received
my truths.
Okay, verse three.
Verily, I say unto you, my servant, William, that you are clean, but not all. Repent therefore of those things which are not pleasing in my sight, say,
the Lord, for the Lord will show them unto you.
You know, any thoughts about that? I've often thought that as an interesting phrase,
you know, hey, you've turned away from your inequities, you receive my truth, repent of those things that are not pleasing. And I'm going
to show them to you. But if you go down to verse 10, the Lord not only shows him, he shows the whole
world. So did you like that published? Yeah. Oh, man, out, right? You know, seek not to be
comfort for say, call on, commit, not adultery, temptation, which with which, right? You know, seek not to be cumbered for say, call on commit not adultery
attemptation with which, with which
thou has been troubled.
And I mentioned that, I mentioned that
because it's going to be part of the context
of what I'm going to do here in just a second.
But I've often thought, it's interesting.
The Lord doesn't say, quick committing
the adultery you are currently committing.
It doesn't say that, right?
He just says, this is a temptation.
You know, a lot of us, you know,
there's sometimes you and I have sins or misdeeds, but
maybe we don't, but we're troubled with them. Does that make sense? But any thoughts from either
of you before we do verse four and five, you're clean, but not all. Repent of those things,
which you're not pleasing. I've thought that's interesting.
of those things which are not pleasing. I thought that's interesting.
Well, it reminds me, the scariest question for me is the man in the New Testament who says to
the Lord, what lack I yet.
Right. That is exactly what I was thinking.
I was, did you really just ask that question?
I'm totally stumped. I can't think of a thing.
Yeah, the Lord has one, the Lord has like one thing to say. I think if I were to say Lord,
what lack I yet, he'd say, how much time do you have? Like, you want alphabetical or chronological?
Like, how do we, we've got volumes up here. So, I think it's a scary question to say, Lord,
show me my, show me my weaknesses, show me my sins, because he will.
John, isn't it interesting that the Lord does not say in that scripture and either,
if men come unto me, I will immediately make life hunky-dory for them and pour out so many
blessings, it'll make your head spin. It doesn't say that, does it? The way I read that is,
Heavenly Father says, Christ has come unto me and then we're like, yeah, okay, I want to.
And it's almost, if I can just, you know, add lib,
it's like, okay, if you really want to come unto me,
things might get a little worse before they get better.
Yeah, I love to tell pre-missionaries
that my sister-in-law told me before I left, my sister-in-law Linda
served a mission in England and she told me a mission will show you your weaknesses.
And I, boy, did I find that to be true.
I thought, oh, you probably feel really great in spiritual when you're on a mission.
And then you go out and you discover, you start seeing your own weakness and I really appreciated that advice and I like to share
that with others going on missions because it's not to be surprised that you'll learn
how I've got some work to do, don't I?
Oh, if I could, I'll tell you guys a little story.
I know you both have published books and not to talk
about name recognition, but you guys have been very successful.
I've had five books that I've published, let kind of lesser books.
They've been pretty well received.
But I remember the very first time, I've
been in church education for 29 years.
And there's this thing they have in church education
called CES peer review.
And if you do a book, you can actually have people in church correlation review it.
When I did one of my first books, I was so scared and offended about that.
And I asked him, I said, do I have to have them review that?
And this guy, I think he could see my concern.
And he goes, oh no, it's just
an optional thing. And then he said, why would you not want them to? And I was like, because
I, and I didn't say this, but inside I'm like, because it's my stuff and, and I don't
want to have them tell me what is a very prideful, came from a very prideful place. Well, now
15 years later, having done five books that have been pretty successful.
And again, it's not about my books or writings.
Whenever I write a book, I can't wait to send it
to CES peer review, to have professionals and people
who know the doctrine, to have another set of eyes,
to be able to say, let me show you some weaknesses in this.
Let me show you some things.
I love that and I don't take offense to it anymore
because what it's doing,
it's improving the quality of this work that I'm doing.
And why in the world would I not want someone
to show me my weakness?
But as humans, I guess there's this tendency, there's
a fear to say someone's attacking me. You know, you think you look at this culture we
live in now, this shame. I hear this all the time from kids, oh, people are shaming me.
Well, you know, are people shaming you? Is the church shaming you? Or are people trying
to help you? Are they, is Heavenly Father trying to help you
become a better person?
I've noticed two things.
One, parenting, John, like a mission has shown me,
has given me front row seats to my own immaturity.
It's given my wife, orchestra seats, to my immaturity.
And two, I've noticed the more I become aware of my own weaknesses and mistakes, the more
gentle I am with other people's weaknesses and mistakes.
I just have a tendency to, what did Joseph Smith say?
The nearer we get to our Heavenly Father, the more we are inclined to look upon perishing
souls with
compassion.
We want to take their sins, throw them behind us, and carry these people on our shoulders.
I think that as you get closer and closer to the Spirit, you become more gentle.
You can see the Lord being gentle here, direct, but also gentle.
You are clean, not all, repent therefore. Like I can, I'll
help you along.
The doctrine of reciprocity, if you extend mercy, you receive mercy. And I love that idea
that Hank is the more you confront your own weakness, the more you're, you know, we're
all just doing the best we can. You kind of take that attitude
and I look back at these folks in early church history.
And one of the things that's been so helpful to me
about this whole experience of doing this podcast
is just to keep reminding us,
look, these guys have been only members
of the church for a year and a half.
You know, they're still figuring this out as they go
and let's cut them some slack for
crying out loud. They don't have what we have and that helps me to do what Joseph Smith said.
It more disposed to look with compassion on them. They were trying to figure this out too
and look at the sacrifices they were making. They were doing great as far as I can see.
Yeah, they were doing great as far as I can see. Isn't it stunning to think that four of the original members
of the Corm of the 12 were age 24?
Yeah.
24, I mean, the oldest member,
if I remember correctly was David W. Patton,
well, Thomas B. Marsh was 35,
but Brigham and David W. Pat and we're there only 33.
And those were the senior members of the quorum.
That's, that's amazing.
Yeah.
I mean, I'm already past the age that Joseph Smith lived and I haven't, I haven't grasped
the lessons of, of, of life yet. Wow. And I liked the lesson.
You were a friend, Rob McLean, he
word, he taught us a couple of weeks
ago.
He said, you can be like Edward
Partridge and getting a big fight
with Joseph Smith and then
reconcile and do your best and
repent and come back.
Or you can be like Ezra Booth.
Right.
Stay offended. You, stay offended.
You can stay offended forever.
Simon's writer, right?
Yeah, just stay offended as,
and let that take over your heart.
That to me was an important lesson.
I wanna be more, try to be more like Edward Partridge
and reconcile and kind of say,
well, I'm gonna start over my, I'm going to start over
and do my best. Try again. I'm going to try again.
Well, let's, let's go on Hank verse four and five. Let's, yeah, we're still, we're still
back in 66, right? Still in 66, yeah. Now, very, I, the Lord, will show unto you what I will
concerning you or what is my will concerning you. Behold, verily, I say unto you that it is my will that you should proclaim my gospel from land to land,
from city to city, yay, in those regions roundabout where it has not been proclaimed.
Verse 6 says, Terry not many days in this place, meaning Ohio, specifically Hyrum, right? Go not up to the land of Zion as yet, that's reference
to Independence, Missouri, right? But in as much as you can sense that otherwise think not of your
property. And then here comes William E. McClellan's first mission call, go ye under the eastern lands.
And when it says eastern lands, we're not talking about East Asia or the Middle East, right?
We haven't extended that far yet, right? We still aren't in some of those lands today.
This would be the east coast of the United States, okay? Bear testimony in every place.
in every place. Let, verse eight, let my servant Samuel H. Smith,
this is the Prophet's brother, go with you.
Now, that's where we stop.
And remember, verse 10, if we look at that,
seek not to be comforted for say,
call commit not adultery,
temptation with which that has been troubled.
Now, real fast, what I'd like to do is this.
There's a really cool principle that I just love.
And this is all going to tie back to 67 and William E. McClellan in that episode.
If you look at section 66, this is October 29, 1831.
Okay. So this is when he gets his mission call to go with Samuel H. Smith to the Eastern
Lands, Eastern United States, and to preach the gospel. Now, we're going to skip all the way over to section 75.
Okay.
You know, sometimes I can't remember, I think it was Elder Richard G. Scott said,
sometimes you find a principle that's just in a verse of Scripture.
Sometimes you find a principle that's an entire chapter.
Sometimes you have to span across chapters
and sections to find principles.
Does that make sense?
Sure.
So let's look at the section 75, the date first,
revelation given to Joseph Smith at Amherst, Ohio,
January, 25th, 1832.
So this is about two, three months later, right?
Now, in the interim, Samuel H. Smith and Wayme McClomb,
they went on a mission and we actually know
they not only started, but they actually had to turn back
and go back to Kirtlin.
All that Samuel H. Smith says in his journal is that he says
our way was hedged up because of some things relating to William E. McClellan. And we had to go back
to Kirtland. Now we don't know what it was. And that probably wasn't Samuel H Smith's place to say that, right?
Bless his heart. So John, if you'd reverse it, therefore, very likely I say unto my servant William E. McClellan, I revoke the commission which I gave unto him to go unto the Eastern countries.
All right, so 75, seven. Yeah, seven, two. I know I'm going to take this thing. Yeah, Hank's going to do. Don't steal my verse, John.
I give unto him a new commission and a new commandment in the which I the Lord chasing him for the
murmurings of his heart. Verse 8, and he sinned, nevertheless, I forgive him and send him again, go ye into the South countries.
I don't know about YouTube, but I just, the first time I saw 66 and 75, I thought there
is so many cool things going on here.
First of all, like Samuel H. Smith, the Lord doesn't mention what the sin is, right?
He does mention kind of prefacing the sin that he murmured in his heart, but they did have
to go back.
But watch what it says there.
He sinned.
Nevertheless, I forgive him and say to him again, go into the South country's John Hank.
I mean, any principles putting that all together,
and I know we need to be careful about how we talk about
the liberty of grace, but let's talk about grace and the Lord
and his character.
I think there's, what are some things we can assume
from all of this that's going on here?
When we looked at, I remember just noting this,
when I was marking 60, 61, and 62,
that all three of them had a phrase somewhere,
I, the Lord, forgive sins.
And it was so nice to just see that.
If he's our Savior, that means he forgives, and he saves us from our sins.
And I just, I don't know, kind of the sigh of, he's forgiving.
He is forgiving.
And I'm so thankful for that.
Let me just maybe share some thoughts.
We really can repent of sin.
That's real, right?
We really can repent.
We can't.
Heavenly Father, Heavenly Father really does forgive.
And here's the other cool things.
What is the principle when he says, I give unto you a new commission
to go into the South countries.
Heavenly Father not only forgives,
but he does what?
Let's try again.
He gives second chances, that's right.
But John, is he going into the Eastern countries?
No, that was interesting.
Okay, that didn't go so well. Go south this time. Now this is
where I think people, I think all of us have been stung by this before. So, so try, I, I,
sorry to play this guess. What's on my mind game? I do this with my institute and BYU students.
But so we can repent. Heavenly Father really does forgive. He gives second chances, but what? You can miss opportunities
because of because of mistakes. I think there is a powerful lesson here. We can repent. God does
forgive. He gives second chances, right? But opportunities can be lost forever. Let me just
mention a few examples in John and Hank maybe you know of some.
This was Elder Ballard in October conference 2002. Remember the raise the bar in missionary work talk?
He said this. He said, please understand this. The bar that is the standard for missionary service
is being raised. The day of the repent and go missionary is over. You know what
I'm talking about? You don't you eat my young brothers. And in parenthetically, if you remember,
Elder Valor took some heat for this from certain places, certain individuals in the church.
He said, some young men have the mistaken idea that they can be involved in simple behavior
and then go when they're 18 and a half and then repent when they're 18 and a half so they can be involved in simple behavior and then go when they're 18 and a half and
then repent when they're 18 and a half so they can go on their mission at 19. He says,
and then here's the principle, while it is true that you can repent of sin, you may or
may not qualify to serve. Now, some might think that contradicts this principle that
we're setting up, but I don't think it does.
Can that young man repent?
Absolutely.
Well, God forgive, absolutely.
Does he give second chances?
Sure.
He could still go on a mission maybe later in life with his wife, become exalted in the
temple.
Someone who struggles with the word of wisdom, smoked six packs a day for 40 years.
Can they repent?
Absolutely. Does God forgive and love them? Sure.
Can they be exalted one day? Absolutely.
But what? They might need to deal with a lung ailment for a lot of their lives.
I think there is, I don't want to be Debbie Downer,
but I think there's a powerful principle here of realizing that repentance is real,
forgiveness is real,
God gives second chances, but there can be times when opportunities are lost.
I've sat in disciplinary councils before as a bishop, and I've had to explain this principle
that God does forgiven you can go on, but there might be some things you miss out on.
I've had to tell some young men who were prevented from going on and serving a mission,
that maybe you'll get to serve someday.
And God loves you and there is no need you need to beat yourself up.
I want to tell you a story real quick. I was serving as an institute director at an institute
out in the Midwest about 15 years going ahead a young man. He had to come home early from a mission.
John and Hank, you know and I know there is a stigma and a culture sometimes associated with missionaries that come home early.
And it is not right.
And it's very judgmental and very harsh.
But that culture exists, right?
He took several of my institute classes and he looked like Johnny Raincloud walking around
the institute for a whole year.
And I can't tell you how many times he was in my office telling me,
brother, line, these people, they judge me and girls won't date me and all this stuff.
It was really, really hard.
Something happened after about a year.
He kept taking my classes, really faithful young man,
had just done something which wasn't right.
You know, God himself under predicament had to come home, repented fully.
One day I noticed that there was the smile that had returned to his face.
And he started walking around the institute and he was just so happy and filled with joy.
And finally one day I grabbed him and I called him my name and
I said, hey, get in here, come into my office.
And he said, what's up?
And I said, sit down.
And I go, what's going on with you?
And he goes, what do you mean what's going on with me?
And I said, you look so happy.
And he started to cry.
And he said, brother, line, I finally decided to own it.
I finally decided to own it. I had to admit to myself,
I did those things, I did those things,
but not anymore, not anymore.
Within about a month he was dating this beautiful girl,
part of our institute, got married in the temple
and went on with this life.
And I just, again, sorry to get emotional, but there's such a powerful principle if I could
end with this quote. And then John and Hank, I'd love to hear your response to this principle.
Elder Richard G. Scott said, if you have repented from serious transgression and mistakenly believe
that you will always be a second-class citizen in the kingdom of God, learn that that is not true.
Find encouragement in the lives of Alma, the younger, and the sons of Mosiah.
They were tragically wicked, yet their full repentance and service qualified them to be considered as noble as righteous
Captain Moroni. Isn't that amazing? You know, one of the things I love about this
gospel is the grace, the love, the mercy of the Lord. Yeah, there's justice, but
there's also mercy. And I know some would some say, well, mercy can't rob justice,
but in Alma 34, it says, mercy does overpower justice and thank goodness.
We have the Lord Jesus Christ.
I saw an a greeting card in Alaska somewhere.
I think this little saying that said, well, none of us can go back and create a brand new
beginning.
All of us can start where we are and create a brand new ending.
And I liked that idea that if the Lord is telling us to forgive seven times 70,
then I think we can suspect he is that forgiving of us as well.
I was Rob, as you were telling the story, I was thinking about the lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe, if you remember Edmund.
Oh, yeah.
Edmund of the Four Siblings, Edmund is the one who makes the serious mistakes, right?
And hurts his siblings pretty badly.
But eventually comes around and comes back to his sibling side, if you remember.
And then, if you've read the book, they did this in the movie, I think pretty well.
But he and Aslan go alone, Aslan being the Christ figure.
They go alone up onto a mountain side
and have a long serious talk about what Edmund is doing.
And you can see in the movie,
you've got Edmund there with his head down.
And then in the book, I don't know if they did this in the movie, you've got Edmund there with his head down. And then in the book, I don't know if they did this
in the movie, but they come walking back into the group.
And Aslan says, basically, to the rest of the group,
your brother is back and there is no need
to speak of this again.
Basically saying, he and I have worked it out
and be grateful he is home and there is no need to
work for you and him to hash this all out again, and I loved that moment like this is between me and him and
You know any Edmund personally apologizes to his siblings,
and then becomes, like you said, this great,
I think C.S. Lewis had that same idea of,
the Lord will be merciful and grant repentance
and forgiveness.
And we can do the same.
That's, I think that this is something
that we can learn from the Lord. That's, I think that this is something that we can learn
from the Lord how to forgive, right?
Isn't that in the parable of the,
and we maybe talked about this in earlier episode, John,
the parable of the unforgiving servant, right?
Where the Lord forgives him of this big debt.
And then the bells and talent debt.
Yeah, he won't forgive someone else.
And the Lord says,
didn't I forgive you just because you asked me to? Right. Anyway, that was that was my thought. It was one of my it's one I thought one of the most beautiful parts of the of the lion,
the witch, and the wardrobe is the forgiveness of Edmund and the Lord telling the other group.
There is no need to speak of this again.
Well, and Hank, you know, I think of the quote that you paraphrased.
Actually, I can't remember that you or John,
but from Joseph Smith,
of casting people's sins behind our backs.
And I've often thought based on that quote,
that one of the great, I think,
litmus tests
of where we are as disciples of Christ is not how righteous we think we are, but how
we respond to others who are not necessarily righteous. In other words, how do we treat
people who are, are, am I repulsed by people who are
in sin?
Well, Joseph Smith, what did he say?
He says, no, the more converted you are, the more you want to take, to help in shushing.
Yeah.
And so if I'm repulsed by people who are in sin, that probably is much more telling of
where I am as a
disciple than what that person is if that makes sense. And no, if the closer I am
to God, the more, and who's the greatest example of hanging out with
sinners, and showing compassion to sinners, there's no, you cannot read the
New Testament and miss that message. If you do, you've been asleep.
I don't know about both of you,
but I have learned by sad experience
that a very quick way to lose the spirit
is to attack a sinner, right?
Attack someone you believe to be in sin.
Right.
Go after them.
It's a quick way for the Lord to go,
ooh, that's, that is not of me.
I'm just thinking about the idea of owning it
because I feel like Alma 36 is Alma owning it.
And then saying, I could remember my pains no more.
And I always, I put this on a multiple choice test.
Did he say he could remember his sins no more?
No, he don't, he remembered.
I mean, he's telling us about him.
Right. But he said, us about him. Right.
But he said, but it didn't hurt anymore.
I was, I was herred up by the memory of my sins no more.
And I love that idea that he owned it.
But then when he came to Christ, all of the sudden,
his joy was as exquisite as was his pain.
I love it because at first he says,
the thought of coming to the presence of God did rack my soul with an expressible horror.
And then on the other side of the page, me thought I saw as our father,
Lehigh saw God sitting upon his throne, and my soul did long to be there. It went from such
opposites when and he remembered his sins, but it didn't hurt anymore.
I and I started John, I was going to say the whole turning point of that verse. Do you remember the whole chapter?
There's a turning point where he says, my father taught me my father taught me about
Jesus Christ to son of God who could forgive sins.
And I cried with my heart.
Yeah, it's a it was the time.
Our back there when dad didn't think I was listening.
I was actually listening.
And I remembered enough to say have mercy on me in it.
Yeah, it's what a great chapter.
And that brings us back to what you said earlier, John, when you said his imperfections,
you have known, right?
You have seen, where are your eyes?
Are your eyes on other people and their imperfections? Are your eyes on Christ?
Right. She's the turning point. Look at the father of lights instead.
It isn't it interesting that in section 66 God tells William E. McClellan, hey, you're
you're clean, but not all.
You've got I'll show you your imperfections. And the very next section, what's William and McClellan trying to do with the group of people pointing out Joseph's imperfection?
Yeah.
Yeah.
It's almost comical.
It kind of goes back to the unmerciful servant.
Parables like William, do you not recognize the mercy
I'm trying to extend?
And the second chance is I'm trying to give you
and yet you're going to be critical of of another member anyhow kind of interesting.
Please join us for part two of this podcast.
you