Huberman Lab - Dr. Craig Koniver: Peptide & Hormone Therapies for Health, Performance & Longevity

Episode Date: October 7, 2024

In this episode, Dr. Craig Koniver, M.D., a board-certified physician trained at Brown University and Thomas Jefferson University, discusses the therapeutic application of peptides and hormones for enhancing physical and mental health and performance. We explore GLP-1 analogs for weight loss, BPC-157 for wound healing and reducing inflammation, as well as peptides that increase growth hormone, improve REM sleep, and enhance cognitive function. We also cover testosterone therapy, NAD, NMN, and NR supplementation, methylene blue for mitochondrial health, stem cell therapies, and supplements such as CoEnzyme Q10 and methylated B vitamins. Additionally, we discuss effective dosages, sourcing, safety considerations, and the importance of working with knowledgeable physicians. Whether you're currently using peptides or exogenous hormones, or simply curious about their potential benefits and risks, this episode provides the scientific rationale behind how peptides function, their potential to enhance mental and physical health, and how they can optimize performance. Access the full show notes for this episode at hubermanlab.com. Thank you to our sponsors AG1: https://drinkag1.com/huberman Joovv: https://joovv.com/huberman BetterHelp: https://betterhelp.com/huberman Function: https://functionhealth.com/huberman Eight Sleep: https://eightsleep.com/huberman Timestamps 00:00:00 Dr. Craig Koniver 00:04:52 Sponsors: Joovv & BetterHelp 00:07:40 What is a Peptide? 00:09:37 GLP-1 Agonists, Semaglutide Weight Loss, Brain Health 00:15:49 GLP-1 Microdoses, Muscle Loss; Inflammation 00:18:43 BPC-157, Inflammation 00:23:27 BPC-157, Injection & Oral Forms; Injury Repair 00:28:43 Sourcing, Anabolic Steroids, Testosterone 00:34:48 Black & Gray Market, Compounding Pharmacies, Purity 00:38:20 Sponsor: AG1 00:39:51 Partnering with a Physician, LPS 00:43:00 BPC-157, Pentadeca Arginate (PDA); Side Effects & Doses 00:46:35 Ipamorelin, GHRP-6, Sleep, Appetite; Tool: Sleep & Growth Hormone 00:54:17 Tesamorelin, Sermorelin, CJC-1295; Stacking Peptides 00:58:45 Sponsor: Function & Eight Sleep 01:01:54 Coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10), Mitochondrial Health 01:05:16 Prescriptions, Physicians & Trust 01:14:09 Agency in Your Health 01:17:13 MK-677, Appetite 01:19:32 Hexarelin; Growth Hormone Secretagogues Dosing 01:21:10 Methylated B Vitamins, Homocysteine 01:24:47 Peptides for Sleep, Pinealon, Epitalon 01:31:03 Glycine, Liver Detoxification; Dosage 01:37:19 GLP-1, Compounding Pharmacies 01:39:03 Stem Cell Therapy, PRP 01:41:18 Thymosin Alpha-1, Cerebrolysin & Brain Health 01:44:17 Peptides for Cognitive Function, Methylene Blue, Doses 01:50:20 Covid, NAD Infusion, NMN & NR Supplements 01:57:13 Nutritional Deficiencies; NAD Dose & Regimen, NMN & NR 02:07:53 PT-141, Vyleesi, Libido; Nausea 02:10:57 FDA Approval & Removal, Pharmaceutical Companies 02:20:17 Positivity, Mindset & Health 02:26:23 Zero-Cost Support, YouTube, Spotify & Apple Follow & Reviews, Sponsors, YouTube Feedback, Protocols Book, Social Media, Neural Network Newsletter Disclaimer & Disclosures

Welcome to the Huberman Lab Podcast, where we discuss science and science-based tools for everyday life. I'm Andrew Huberman, and I'm a professor of neurobiology and ophthalmology at Stanford School of Medicine. My guest today is Dr. Craig Conover. Dr. Craig Conover is a medical doctor

who did his training at Brown University and Thomas Jefferson University. He is a world expert in what he refers to as performance medicine, which involves the use of peptides and other therapies for improving mental health, physical health, and performance. Now, many of you have perhaps heard of peptide therapies.

Perhaps some of you have not. A peptide is simply a small protein. So insulin is a peptide. We have many different thousands of peptides in our brain and body, and they perform a variety of different roles. Dr. Conover's expertise is in the use of exogenous, that is peptides that one takes,

exogenous peptides for activating multiple pathways in the brain and body to augment health. Now, of course, peptides such as insulin have been used for many years now to treat things like diabetes. But today we talk about, peptides such as insulin have been used for many years now to treat things like diabetes. But today we talk about novel peptides, including GLP-1. So these are glucagon-like peptide analogs, things like ozempic and monjaro,

which I realize are a bit controversial. However, today we talk about the microdosing of those peptides. We talk about those peptides combined with other peptides, as well as behavioral practices to offset the muscle loss associated with them. And then we dive into some lesser known peptides, but ones that are growing in use. For instance, BPC157 or body protection compound 157, which is used to treat inflammation, to accelerate wound healing, and a variety of other things. Then we discuss the

use of peptides specifically to increase growth hormone secretion during sleep, as well as some peptides that can actually increase rapid eye movements sleep dramatically. Today, we also discuss testosterone therapies, not just for men, but for women. These are growing increasingly popular, as well as things like NAD,

as well as specific supplements. Dr. Conover, as he will soon tell you, is not a huge proponent of supplements, but he does mention several that he feels are of particular use, including things like coenzyme Q10 and some of the methylated B vitamins. And he explains why he takes that stance. So today's discussion is really for anybody interested

in mental health, physical health, and performance. And the reason I say that is that even if you aren't considering taking peptides or already taking peptides, peptides and some of these other compounds I've mentioned sit somewhere between doing nothing except diet and exercise, supplements, which I sort of see as the next step up the ladder in terms of augmenting your health approaches.

And then of course, there are a number of prescription drugs including hormone therapies such as growth hormone therapies, testosterone therapies, and a number of other things that, yes, can modify those hormone pathways. They are in fact hormones, but they actually can shut down one's natural production of those hormone pathways. Peptide therapy sits somewhere between doing nothing

and supplementation and those more advanced hormone therapies. And that's why peptide therapies, I believe, are growing in popularity. They can augment specific hormone pathways. They can augment specific, in fact, multiple processes within the brain and body to augment health, but they don't tend to operate

in that negative feedback cycle by shutting down one's own endogenous production. Now, that doesn't mean that they aren't without some safety concerns. And today we of course discuss the potential side effects and safety concerns of peptides, as well as the critical issue of sourcing clean peptides and working with a board certified physician

if one is going to pursue peptide use. So by the end of today's discussion, you will be right there on the cutting edge of what's happening and where things are going with peptides. And in keeping with that, you'll notice that during today's discussion, we talk a fair amount about what the FDA currently allows in terms of prescription peptides,

what the FDA has recently removed from the market in terms of peptides. And as a very recent update, just prior to the release of this episode, I learned that three peptides, CJC1295, ipamarylin, both of which are in the growth hormone secretagogue family, meaning they promote the release of growth hormone, as well as thymus and beta alpha,

which is in the sort of anti-inflammatory and tissue repair pathway. Those three are now re-allowed for prescription in the United States. So at the time of recording this episode, we discussed some of those as being recently banned by the FDA. They are now approved again for use in humans by the FDA.

So there's a brief and very recent update. So just to summarize this admittedly long introduction, today you're going to learn about this incredible area of science called peptide biology and how it can augment mental health, physical health, and performance. And you're going to do so from one of the world's leading clinical experts. Before you begin, I'd like to emphasize that this podcast is separate from my teaching and research roles at Stanford.

It is, however, part of my desire and effort to bring zero cost to consumer information about science and science related tools to the general public. In keeping with that theme, I'd like to thank the sponsors of today's podcast. Our first sponsor is JOOVE. JOOVE makes medical grade red light therapy devices. Now, if there's one thing that I have consistently emphasized on this podcast, it is the incredible impact that light can have on our biology. Now, in addition to sunlight, red light and near infrared light sources have been shown to have positive effects on improving numerous aspects of cellar and organ health,

including faster muscle recovery, improved skin health and wound healing, improvements in acne, reduced pain and inflammation, even mitochondrial function and improving vision itself. What sets JuveLights apart and why they're my preferred red light therapy device is that they use clinically proven wavelengths, meaning specific wavelengths of red light

and near infrared light in combination to trigger the optimal seller adaptations. Personally, I use the Juve whole body panel about three to four times a week. And I use the Juve handheld light both at home and when I travel. If you'd like to try Juve, you can go to Juve spelled J-O-O-V-V.com slash Huberman.

Juve is offering an exclusive discount to all Huberman Lab listeners with up to $400 off Juve products. Again, that's Juve spelled J-O-O-V-V.com slash Huberman to get up to $400 off. Today's episode is also brought to us by BetterHelp. BetterHelp offers professional therapy with a licensed therapist carried out entirely online. Therapy is an extremely important component to overall health. In fact, I consider doing regular therapy just as important as getting regular exercise,

including cardiovascular exercise and resistance training exercise. Now there are essentially three things that Great Therapy provides. First, it provides a good rapport with somebody that you can really trust and talk to about any and all issues that concern you. Second of all, Great Therapy provides support

in the form of emotional support, but also directed guidance, the do's and the not to do's. And third, expert therapy can help you arrive at useful insights that you would not have arrived at otherwise. Insights that allow you to do better, not just in your emotional life, in your relationship life, but also the relationship to yourself

and your professional life and all sorts of career goals. With BetterHelp, they make it very easy to find an expert therapist with whom you can really resonate with and provide you with these three benefits that I described. Also, because BetterHelp is carried out entirely online, it's very time efficient and easy to fit into a busy schedule with no commuting

to a therapist's office or sitting in a waiting room or looking for a parking spot. So if you'd like to try BetterHelp, go to betterhelp.com slash Huberman to get 10% off your first month. Again, that's betterhelp.com slash Huberman. And now for my discussion with Dr. Craig Conover. Dr. Craig Conover, welcome. Thank you, Andrew.

I appreciate the invitation to be here. I'm thrilled that you're here. We are gonna launch ourselves into the space that is called peptides. Yeah. And it's an interesting space. For sure. Because I think most people probably don't know

what a peptide is. They should feel no guilt or shame about that. Right. I'm sure you'll tell us. But this area of medicine that people broadly refer to as peptides is picking up a lot of momentum, even though it's been around for a long time. And I find it particularly interesting

because there are many people using peptides for very specific purposes, but most people haven't really heard of the various peptides that very specific purposes. But most people haven't really heard of the various peptides that are out there. And if anything, we can be sure that in the years to come, peptides are going to be increasingly popular. And there's of course the incredibly popular peptide of GLP-1 agonists.

For sure, taking over. So to drop into this and make sure everyone's on the same page, what is a peptide? Yeah, I mean just from a very elementary level, peptides are just chains of amino acids. So amino acids, all naturally occurring molecules, we call it a peptide if it's 40 amino acids or less. Call it a protein if it's 41 amino acids or more.

The body makes, I think, the last I read, 300,000 peptides. So it's a massive number. We probably therapeutically are using closer to 150 over the years, which is obviously tiny compared to that. So to your point, this is blossoming. We've been using peptides for about eight years, a long time, but still very early in our understanding of how best to use peptides and how clinically we're gonna get the most out of them.

So it's exciting. Maybe just to orient ourselves, we should talk about GLP-1 first, not because it's necessarily the category of peptides that I think people would want to consider for themselves, but because most people have probably heard of semaglutide and monjaro and things like that. Sure. So how long ago was it that humans started injecting glp1 agonist in order to lose weight?

I think the weight loss aspect has only been a couple years. I mean, it's been tremendous How it's accelerated to like literally becoming the number one prescribed in America You know semi-glutidozempic was approved longer than that for four type 2 diabetics Helping with you know glucoseabetics helping with glucose control and helping with glucose utilization. And what they found as a side effect was that these people were losing weight. And then that word caught on.

And what's interesting, and I don't think most people understand, is most of the medicines prescribed, particularly in America, are prescribed off label. Meaning they've never ever been approved for what they're used. So, yeah, the vast majority, yeah, are never approved. So as a physician, I'm allowed to prescribe any drug

for any reason I want, as long as it's been approved for something. Right, as long as we're safe. Right, we don't wanna be cavalier about this and renegade and do all these things that are out of bounds. But that is the truth. So semiglutide is a great example being used for helping people with diabetics, type 2

diabetics, lower their blood sugar. And then it got to, well, now let's help diabetics lose weight, right? Because diabetics struggle with weight, the insulin resistance. And then it became, well, even if you're not a diabetic, could you benefit from losing weight? Well, heck yeah, right? I mean, look at the amount of obesity and people who are overweight and having trouble maintaining healthy weight.

It's exorbitant in this country and certainly worldwide. So then it spread. It did eventually get FDA approval specifically for weight loss, but at first, no, it's been just for type two diabetics to help with glucose utilization. And we've been using primarily trisepidotide, which is like semi-glutide version 2.0,

mostly for the past two years. Have learned a tremendous amount, and my opinion's actually changed from working with people. Yeah, what is your opinion? My understanding is that, well, there's sort of two camps on this it seems, at least two camps. One camp seems really bullish on this. They seem very excited about this drug.

The other camp seems to point to the fact that one may be creating a drug dependency, that it's very expensive, and they point to the also potency of lifestyle factors, like exercise and caloric restriction, eating mostly non-processed foods, et cetera, as a quote unquote better alternative. I'm not necessarily saying that. I think that both have their place.

To me it seems very contextual, but as a clinician I'm curious what you think. Yeah, I agree, Both have their place. My philosophy is I want everyone to have access to things that are number one, safe, that propel them to look, feel, and perform their best. And if that means, right, if it was just about, if I can exercise my way out of this,

eat my way out of this, meaning lose weight, change my body composition, why do we have an epidemic of so many people who struggle with that? Because it's really hard, right? We don't totally understand it. I'm not saying that, yeah, the processed food thing's a massive problem. I mean, I know that's come to light recently

with people pushing for us to take a look at food companies and the quality of our food, which is amazing. But if people aren't interested in doing better for themselves, and this may not make sense, but I think it does, the analogy I use is, I like to help people win the race first, which then helps them motivate to train for the next race. And this kind of goes against the grain

of conventional medicine, which is, if you want to train for the race, you have to run a certain number of miles, you have to sleep a certain way, you have to eat a certain way, you have to do all the things, struggle to get there, right? And losing weight is a struggle. And the way I look at it, if I can help people lose weight first, literally by using something like teresepatide, semiglutide, and I've seen this, they're now excited.

I mean, I met with a client yesterday here in Los Angeles and she literally looked at me and said, you've changed my life. She goes, I am a super successful woman in my company with my family, with my kids. Everything's great, but now I love my life. My workouts are better. I look better, my clothes fit better. I am super excited about waking up every morning.

Like she is there and that is what it's about, right? And so for people, if you can help them achieve their goal first, then they're gonna be motivated. The light bulb turns on, they're gonna be like, wow, I want more of this. And that's the aha moment that I love helping people with. So at first I was like, oh, we gotta be really cautious with this same thinking.

Like I don't want people to lose too much weight. Like this is a problem, are they gonna be dependent? I'm like the notion that you have to take something the rest of your life. And I'm not saying it has to be the rest of your life, but when something works, and as far as I can tell, it's very safe, I think it's worth discussing. And I like people having those options at least. Yeah, it sounds like from the story you just told us that it's not just about an aesthetic change that motivates people to lean

into other aspects of their health and life when they lose some weight, that it's also just the sheer literal weight, and also that adipose tissue, fat tissue, produces a lot of hormones that we know impact the brain and brain function, which is not to say that there aren't people out there with a lot of adipose tissues who aren't extremely bright and motivated, et cetera, but many people who are carrying excess body fat don't feel good.

They report brain fog, et cetera. I think now, thanks to Chris Palmer and actually at Stanford, there's also a program in metabolic psychiatry. We're starting to see or understand and appreciate the link between adipose tissue and brain health or lack of brain health in most cases. Sure. So in the case of GLP-1, people have criticized it saying that a fair percentage of the weight that's lost is lean body mass, muscle loss.

But it seems to me that can be remedied pretty easily if people just do some resistance training. I think part of that, yeah, resistance training. The other thing I would say is from what we've seen is when people are using the conventional dosages, they're losing weight too quickly. And so what we do is we get both semi-glutide, mostly trisapidide compounded, and that allows us to use basically micro dosages and start very low in terms of dosage and go slowly with people. And what we found is as long as people are losing less, two pounds or less a week, they're not losing the muscle mass.

We certainly encourage adequate protein intake, resistance training, but that micro dosing has been a game changer, like literally a changer, because then people don't feel like, and I've seen it where when we started, people were losing, you know, 15 pounds in three weeks. Goodness. Right? And then they're like excited, but then they're not, because then they come off of it and they just gain it right back. Or they lose a lot of weight and they lose that fat in their face,

and they look like skeletons. We've seen those caudizempic faces. We don't like the way that looks. And that fat takes a while to come back. So if we just go slowly with this and we can really dial it in and nuance it, that has had a tremendous impact. And now, beyond the weight loss, we're seeing cognitive benefits.

We're seeing inflammation. But it's a lot of people with autoimmune disease who their inflammation markers are coming down. And that's the only thing we can think is working. Is that a direct effect of Ozempic on the immune system and pathways related to inflammation or is it indirect through the loss of adipose tissue, body fat, which then lowers inflammation?

Great question. Or I could say, is it the positive thoughts that come from looking at yourself in the mirror and feeling good, right? Which transcends to feeling better about yourself and that feeds forward to the momentum that you put forth in the world. All of those things.

I think it's all of the above. You know, I think that's gonna be hard to dissect, but it's real. I mean, I have a patient, she's 50, she has Hashimoto's thyroiditis, meaning she attacks her thyroid, she doesn't make enough thyroid hormones, so she takes thyroid hormone. Well, one of the challenges with that is they make a lot of thyroid antibodies, this antibody

called thyroid peroxidase antibody. When you have an elevated thyroid peroxidase antibody, you don't feel good. You feel inflamed, your joints hurt, you get rashes, life is just not easy. It's a challenge to get that number down. It's certainly a challenge for me. You know, we traditionally use probiotics, a lot of things to help bolster the immune system. Well, now we're starting to use the GLP-1s

and we're seeing that those antibody levels come down. And I don't have a great way of explaining it, but there's something going on that's very positive. Very interesting. Well, I suppose moving from most widely known, peptides are still fairly unknown to most people, even the concept, but that's why you're here. You're changing that right now.

But moving from things like JLP-1 to what I would probably call the second most popular peptide, the one that we're hearing more and more about all the time, and that's BPC 157, body protection compound 157, which to my understanding, there are a lot of animal data, very few, if any, clinical studies on humans, but a lot of people now taking BPC in various forms.

What are some known uses for BPC? Let's just say within your clinic. Sure. And then we'll get around to the fact that BPC has, let's hope temporarily, been taken off market and what some of the alternatives are. But what is BPC? What instances or people have you found it useful for?

So many. So I think BPC for me, kind of the most utilized peptide that we've used. So we'd like to use BPC almost with every patient. It is very anti-inflammatory, right? And so just from a very general perspective, you know, most people walking around who are adults, you know, they're stiff, they're sore as they get older, they work out, we work with athletes of all levels. There's that element of inflammation.

Maybe they have some chronic disease, diabetes, heart disease, autoimmune disease. Inflammation is paramount, we understand that. And BPC, I, you know, observe with so many patients, we're talking thousands upon thousands of patients, where their inflammation comes down, so they feel better, they're not as stiff, they're not as sore, their knee doesn't hurt as much, their shoulder's improved.

So we've learned, you know, that we start with a dose, you know, based upon these, like you said, animal studies, which is conservative, make sure it's safe, and then we've seen over time that we can get to higher and higher dosages and have even more of an impact. And I think, so for people understanding using BPC, we started with a dose of like 500 micrograms a day.

We got up to 5,000 micrograms a day. We'd like a protocol five days on, two days off. And that's been very helpful for a variety of things from post-viral, with the pandemic. I had a lot of success with BPC to, again, you name it. Honestly, almost everyone I could think of, particularly as people are engaging more fitness-related lives, they're working out more, I would argue that anyone who's working out on a regular basis, BPC is going to benefit.

It's going to help, you know, improve the inflammatory status, but also help with recovery. And it doesn't seem to be one of these agents that's going to be detrimental. Like we were talking earlier, Rob and I, for the starter, like they found that people are working out hard taking antioxidants. There seems to be a negative consequence to that because you don't allow the body to kind of repair itself. I don't think that's happening with BPC.

That's interesting because my understanding is also that part of the specific and general adaptation of exercise is triggered by inflammation. This is why indeed it is true that doing ice bath, a really cold water immersion, cold shower seems fine, but cold water immersion in the four to eight hours after resistance training can limit some of the hypertrophy and strength gains from resistance training, because what you're inducing when you actually go into the gym is the,

that leads to the hypertrophy and strength training is an inflammation response that triggers the compensation or the hypercompensation. So it's interesting, you're saying that BPC, by the way, I must say this because then forgive the editorial, but that is not to say that cold plunges and cold immersion is bad. It's just in the hours following resistance training specifically for hypertrophy and

strength training. If those are your goals, probably best to do it outside of that window. Other times it has some tremendous benefits. Be safe, but there. Okay. Back to the topic again. Forgive me, but this can set off a complicated storm of sorts if I'm not ultra clear about the details.

BPC157 strongly anti-inflammatory. My understanding is it also may upregulate growth hormone receptors. It does, right. And so it works well if you're, you know, we'll get into taking a growth hormone releasing peptide. It pairs very well with that because then you're working both sides of the equation, meaning if you're taking a growth hormone releasing peptide. It pairs very well with that because then you're working both sides of the equation,

meaning if you're using a growth hormone releasing peptide like Cymerelin or Ipamerelin, GHRP6, whatever, you're helping your pituitary put out more growth hormone. Well, if you combine it with BPC, which upregulates the growth hormone receptor, you make the process of growth hormone binding more efficient. So you get more out of it. Then you can use less of the growth hormone releasing peptide with the same result. Got it. BPC157 comes in many different forms,

or it used to when it was FDA not disallowed. So I could imagine how the oral forms would allow for a just general anti-inflammatory response. It's a gut peptide. So we don't have to worry about it being destroyed by the gut. Most peptides that go into the gut are broken down. But this peptide, when it's naturally occurring,

occurs in the gut. So it survives in the gut. So if somebody is taking BPC-157 orally through a capsule or tablet form, my guess is that has a general anti-inflammation response. I think it can. What we've observed is it's more limited to the gut. So people with any sort of gastrointestinal issue,

whether that's inflammatory bowel disease like Crohn's or ulcerative colitis, irritable bowel, you name it, leaky gut, I think oral BPC is more effective there. Has it been shown to be effective for those conditions or have you observed that clinically? I've certainly observed that clinically, but interestingly, I've observed a better clinical response when people inject it,

even for gastrointestinal related things. So I think injecting, and then, so people injecting sub-Q, which is right under the skin, we use the tiniest of needles, like an insulin needle, 30 or 31 gauge, We're talking super small. And so I know a lot of people are like, I'm never injecting one of these. Now this is less painful than a Texas mosquito bite.

There you go, super easy. Once you do it once or twice, it's really easy and we walk people how to do that. But interestingly, we started thinking, okay, if you've got something going on your gut, you should take oral BPC because it's gonna target it right then. And I found, you know, if we're injecting,

it actually works better than the oral. And then it came up, well, what if I've got an elbow injury? Should I inject it in my elbow? And we found, actually don't, it's going to work systemically. You can inject it in your abdomen or your rear end. You're still going to get benefit in your elbow, but now you're going to get benefit in all your joints, all over your body, systemically.

How do you think that's working? And my understanding is BPC-157 can initiate fibroblast migration, some of the cells that make up the various connective tissues that when injured or sore, other things can make us injured or sore, of course, but when injured or sore, those need repair. So it always was perplexing to me

why one could put BPC-157 in such a small volume under the skin, just a few centimeters off the belly button, and it would somehow seek out the injury site in an elbow or an Achilles. There are all these wild anecdotal tales of lore of, let's just say there was this Olympic athlete, not this last Olympics, but the previous summer Olympics that had a torn Achilles who came back a few weeks later and everyone was and meddled. People were talking about, you know, took podium that is,

and people were talking about BPC 157. There was kind of this, you know, and who knows? That's just chatter and fog, as they say, but kind of wild, the idea that you could just inject something systemically, put it into the systemic circulation, into the bloodstream, and it would ferret out the location in which the injury took place and initiate a recovery response. It is interesting.

But we've seen it with, not to get off topic, but we've seen it with stem cells. So they've taken stem cells, they've tagged them radiographically so you can see them. In the study I read, which I can find for you, someone had a wrist, broken wrist, and they gave them intravenous stem cells. And 24 hours later, when they visualized radiographically, those stem cells had aggregated at the site of the fracture. So there's a lot, you know, about our bodies. Obviously we don't know. There's a kind of innate human design and intelligence, which I believe in.

I see it because we've done a lot of IV therapy over the years. And it's interesting when you give something intravenously, you're getting in the bloodstream, and you can feel some of these different compounds, we're just talking about vitamins, working within seconds, and it shows you how quickly things circulate.

People don't understand how quickly we move our circulation. It's massively fast. If one has ever gone into the hospital for a surgery and got a cold saline infusion, you realize how quickly it hits your toes, either putting it in at your elbow. It's almost instantaneous. Yeah, within a few seconds.

It also makes one appreciate how we're all generally a little bit dehydrated. When you start getting a real proper saline infusion, all of a sudden you feel yourself come to life in a way that, oh, this is what it feels like to have just the right amount of salt in my bloodstream. Exactly. So going back to BPC, where I think it shines

is in these ligaments and tendons, right? I think this is where most of these injuries happen, is where muscle is connecting to the bone. You know, and there's, you know, people, you know, grow their muscle, but we don't stretch the tendons and ligaments well, and that's where we get pull, sometimes strain, sprain, and tearing, and I think that's where BPC shines.

That's certainly where it's been studied in animal studies, and I know that because we can inject it directly into tendons, which is unlike steroids, we would never inject steroids into a tendon, you damage the tendon. BPC, we mix with things like PRP, PRF, which is platelet-rich fiber, and a little bit different than PRP,

and you'll get healing within days. Like it's awesome. Wow. Super safe. And it's amazing for people. BPC is definitely shorthand for BPC-157, that is, is certainly in widespread use. I have been concerned, just personally, about gray market sources that contain contaminants

and the fact that many people are obtaining BPC-157, not from a physician, not from a compounded pharmacy, but just on quote unquote on the internet. Sure. You're a physician. I'm guessing that until the recent ban by the FDA, you were able to prescribe clean BPC as it were. Yeah.

What's the story with BPC now? And maybe we could talk about gray market versus- Sure. I think it's a great question. Versus prescribed and made it a compounding pharmacy versus pharmaceutical company pharmaceuticals. Then of course there's black market, but let's just leave that out. There are people that are going to tell you, hey, this is BPC and sell it to you.

That's obviously bad and dangerous. Well, we see that with the anabolic steroids. Anabolic steroids are in the black market. You can't really... I mean, there's one anabolic steroid, which is nandrolone, which is DECA, which can be officially prescribed. We use it. You can combine it with testosterone, all in the up and up, totally above table. The rest, things like Trenbolone, others, you can't get them from a physician.

In fact, it's very hard to get them from a reputable website in the United States. So as long as we're here, my understanding is deca-derabalin and testosterone-sipionate can be prescribed or testosterone and nam-thate, things like that, by physicians. That's because it's been FDA approved for the treatment of various things, hypokinetal syndrome, testosterone replacement therapy in both men and women, et cetera. So those categories of testosterone-like compounds, right, sepia and anthate, et cetera, and decadorabalin, which is basically like, is it similar to DHT?

Is it? A little bit, yeah. I mean, it's, the generic name's nandrolone. Yeah, I mean, it has the flavor of helping with joints. I think it works synergistically with things like testosterone, different, you know, whether it's testosterone, supranate, and antinate. And I like it for people who, particularly people

who've been on testosterone, men who've been on testosterone replacement for a long time, which is many men, they tend to get less out of testosterone, becomes less potent, like anything, right? If you use something for a long time, you're gonna get less out of testosterone, becomes less potent, like anything, right? If you use something for a long time, you're gonna get less out of it over time. Anything you expose yourself to continually doesn't work as well.

And so, you know, like to make this really real, I had a patient who was in the Marines and served at Secret Service for several White Houses, and he had a lot of osteoporosis, osteopenia, bone loss. And this is where I learned about using something like Nandrolone, because we combine Nandrolone with testosterone, it changed his life.

This guy in his 80s, who had to use a cane, who came back to life, who started becoming super mobile and working out again. And synergistically, I think it works really well, not to get too far off topic, but. No, it's interesting. And I think another sort of brief editorial for me, if I may, you mentioned this patient was in their 80s.

I think nowadays, unfortunately, a lot of younger males in particular, guys in their, gosh, even teens, but 20s and 30s, even early 40s, think that they need to look to synthetic testosterone in need to look to synthetic testosterone in order to look a certain way, perform a certain way in the gym, libido, et cetera. And I'll go on record again and again and again saying that it's absolutely not necessary

for most people of those ages, provided that they are taking good care to sleep well, eat well, take care. Now, but I realize that there are a growing number of use cases where people, for whatever reason, aren't able to recover from exercise, they're struggling. This is a little bit like the ozempic conversation, right? Where there are things that can help move the needle in the right direction, pun intended. But here with testosterone, synthetic testosterone and DECA, there's a real concern about loss of fertility.

Totally. Right. I think it brings up a larger point, which is, and obviously I'm biased, but I think it's super helpful for people to have a physician help them in this course, particularly with testosterone. It is just known that people get it from their trainers, their bros from the gym, right, who were saying, oh, you gotta use this. I mean, I have so many patients

who have started using testosterone in their late teens, early twenties. Goodness. Yeah. I mean, not goodness, meaning badness. That does not seem like a good idea. And it's still very common. Like, it's still very common. Goodness gracious.

And, you know, one in particular, this is probably 10 years ago, came to see me. He's 25, he got married, and to your point, he said, I'm ready to have kids. I have zero sperm left, right? And that's a real thing. And so he had been using, and I would say abusing, both testosterone and growth hormone for years. Now what he told me was, and I get it, he was Superman.

He could wake up, do a hard workout, crush it, wake up the next morning, was not sore, crush it again, and just kept going, kept going. He was super fit, super happy in that regard and how he looked, how he felt, how he performed. But then he got to a point where he was a little bit wiser, mature, and he was like, oh my goodness, now there's a repercussion for this.

And I've seen that time and time again, and the repercussion is big, you're not making any sperm, or the sperm quality is super poor, now what do you do? Well, now you got to come off the testosterone, you got to rebuild your system, which we can do. We can use things like Clomapheme, N-Clomaphene, HCG, lots of different agents to help in that regard, even certain peptides. But I think it brings up the large point, even getting into peptides, which is having

a physician who's knowledgeable to me is super helpful. The challenge for people is they don't know where to get the right information, right? And they're getting it from websites, and they're getting it from people saying, oh, just try this peptide. And I've had lots of people talking about the, you know, websites or whatever, not to name any names, who have had anaphylactic reactions to research-type peptides, which are not for human consumption. And I'm not saying that there's bad companies or whatever.

You just got to be careful. You got to be selective at least. Right. Well, what brought us on to the conversation about testosterone was this black market issue. There's also what I would call this dark, dark gray market issue, which is that there are a number of companies that will sell all sorts of things, but peptides in particular. And listed on their website, it'll say not for human or animal consumption for research purposes only.

Right. And one of the major issues is that the potency and cleanliness, so to speak, of purity of those compounds is not established. And many of them have LPS, lippie polysaccharide in them, which is inflammatory. And earlier before we started recording, you mentioned that you have heard of or interacted with not your patients, but people who have come to you saying that they had like really serious life-threatening- For sure.

Consequences for using these black market certainly, but dark gray market- Yes. Peptides. Yeah, and so to tell the story further is back in October of 2023, the FDA put many peptides, BPC, and we can name them out on what's called a category two list, meaning they are no longer allowed to be compounded, right? That excludes then research companies who are not under the purview of the FDA. But these compounding pharmacies, it's been a huge blow because they've been told they cannot use these agents.

And the compounding pharmacies are distinct from these other black and dark gray sources in that they actually can establish purity. They are designed to be injected into humans. And they have a totally different standard, right? So they, and I think it's confusing for people when they hear compounding pharmacy, they thought, fringe, they're not fringe, they're FDA regulated, they're board of pharmacy regulated in every state.

They are monitored, they are inspected all the time. I've worked with compounding pharmacies my whole career, which is going on close to 25 years now. Just like anything, there's some amazing compounding pharmacies and there's some not so amazing compounding pharmacies which cut corners. The not-so-amazing compounding pharmacies, which cut corners. The ones we work with don't cut any corners,

and I know that because they're inspected all the time, right? And it's a big deal to them. And they want to do it right with purity, with processing, and making sure that anything they make, especially a sterile compound, which is going to be anything injected, eye drops, things you inject in yourself, whether it's IV, subcure, intramuscular, they are considered sterile.

They have to then be tested by an outside lab to make sure purity, make sure that there's no endotoxins, things like that. It's highly regulated and it's a big deal for them. And it's a big deal for the physicians who prescribe with them, which I appreciate because the advantage of a compounding pharmacy is we can tweak the dosage. We don't have to use a standard set dosage.

We can combine things synergistically to get, one plus one doesn't equal two now, it equals four. And that to me is a huge advantage, just like we were talking about with the GLP-1, semiglutide and terzepotides. We get those compounded so that we have a, the compounding pharmacy we're using now, we're making a unique combination of terzepatide and semerelin, right? Which will address some of this muscle loss that people are getting so we can combine

Rellon to stimulate growth hormone release offset some of the muscle loss from exactly to represent Yeah, yeah, and and so you can do things like that with a compounding pharmacy But again just to make sure people understand compounding pharmacies are highly regulated, highly regulated. Again, there's always gonna be bad apples, but physicians who know how to work with compounding pharmacies, I think provide access to things

that these conventional both pharmaceuticals and conventional pharmacies can't. I'd like to take a quick break and acknowledge our sponsor AG1. AG1 is a vitamin mineral probiotic drink that also includes prebiotics and adaptogens. AG1 is designed to cover all of your foundational nutritional needs and it tastes great. Now I've been drinking AG1 since 2012 and I started doing that at a time when my budget for supplements was really limited.

In fact, I only had enough money back then to purchase one supplement, and I'm so glad that I made that supplement, AG-1. The reason for that is even though I strive to eat most of my foods from whole foods and minimally processed foods, it's very difficult for me to get enough fruits, vegetables, vitamins and minerals, micronutrients and adaptogens from food alone. And I need to do that in order to ensure

that I have enough energy throughout the day, I sleep well at night and keep my immune system strong. But when I take AG1 daily, I find that all aspects of my health, my physical health, my mental health, and my performance, both cognitive and physical, are better. I know that because I've had lapses when I didn't take AG1 and I certainly felt the difference. I also notice, and this makes perfect sense given the relationship between the gut microbiome and the brain, that when I regularly take AG1, which for me means a serving in the morning or mid-morning, and again later in the afternoon or evening, that I have more mental clarity and more mental energy.

If you'd like to try AG1, you can go to drinkag1.com slash Huberman to claim a special offer. Right now, they're giving away five free travel packs and a year supply of vitamin D3 K2. Again, that's drinkag1.com slash Huberman to claim that special offer. So is it fair to say that if one is interested in exploring the use of peptides for what you refer to as performance medicine, mental, physical health and performance falls underneath that, to essentially only put peptides into their body, maybe even on their body surface that they're obtaining from a physician who's obtained the peptides from a compounding pharmacy. Yeah, and who's developing a relationship.

So we, for any peptide that we use, we meet with the patient. We make sure they're a good fit. We make sure that there's no contraindications. We also can recommend and specifically dial it up or down, whatever it is, come up with, this is what we think you should use based upon your life experience, the medicines you're taking or not taking,

the conditions you're treating or not treating. I think that's really important. Again, I'm biased being a physician. My whole goal is to get to know patients. That's why I'm here is to kind of walk that walk and help people in that regard. And if someone's out there on the internet doing it themselves, they're walking in kind of on their own.

And so not to make it like everything bad is going to happen, but when you have the help of someone who has experience, that goes a long way, I think particularly with something like this. Yeah, I agree. And it worries me very much that people are buying PPC from gray mark, dark gray market or black market sources. Anything that says on it, not for animal or human use for research purposes only, you can pretty much guarantee the endotoxin, the lipopolysaccharide at least has not been removed. And that can be really problematic, especially since my understanding is that it can be cumulative over time.

It's not that one injection causes somebody to go into anaphylactic shock. It's that some of this LPS can build up an inflammatory response over time, and then you don't know where the tipping point is. And then somebody can have a really terrible reaction. Well, and then taking it a step further, getting away from just peptides, but I remember this was, I don't know, 15 years ago, someone was taking advice from a very famous doctor on TV

about taking an oral compound to lose weight, and they called me up and they said, I'm having terrible headaches, terrible headaches for days. It came in, their blood pressure was through the roof. You know, like, I don't remember the specific numbers, but let's just say 220 over 140. Normally it's 120 over 80. Well, did you take anything different? Yeah, this doctor recommended I take this weight loss compound, right?

So the problem is people have access to all this information. But if they're not under the guidance of a doctor to help clean up the mess, and we clean up the mess, and not that there's always mess, but this is what we enjoy doing. As a physician, we've seen the darkest of dark. We're able to help people when things don't go perfectly planned. And I think that's a big deal, particularly when there's lots of these tools, and they're exciting tools, and they're great tools. And fortunately for me, I've been in this space

longer than most, that I've just built up a large repertoire of experience, of observing people and working with people and seeing we gotta tweak this, we gotta nuance this, or sometimes we don't ever wanna use this again. This is not for most people. So given that BPC 157 has been effectively removed from the legitimate market, what are

people's alternatives? Again, working with the caveat that people should work with a physician, where can physicians get something similar enough to BPC157? So there's a new compound, newer, peptide called the short for PDA, pentadeca arginate. It's basically the same molecular structure as BPC, except they've swapped out an acetate for arginate. One amino acid substitution. Correct.

One amino acid substitution. And so, we're using that and having really good results. Certainly, it's early in the game of using PDA, but it seems very close to BPC in the clinical responses we're getting from our patients who are reporting back decrease in inflammation, all these wonderful things that we used to see with BPC. So, and I think I surmise that this is how it's gonna be

with all of these peptides, right? Because again, peptides are just chains of amino acids. Certainly a lot of people smarter than me trying to figure out how do we then create other types of amino acid combinations, i.e. peptides that do similar actions to BPC, to thymus and alpha, to ipamirone, to TB500, on and on and on.

So I'm hopeful in that regard. And I also, some of my patients work at the very highest level of the US government. They are well aware of this and who have assured me they're going to look at this, that this is serious because they've been using peptides. And they're concerned that, oh my goodness, the FDA came in and changed the game.

It's been a huge setback for all of us. I definitely want to circle back as to what the motivation was by the FDA for doing that. At some point, I think in the meantime, however, I think there's a lot of interest in BPC-157, a lot of use of BPC-157. The sources of BPC-157 are now drying up. And that's why I'm personally concerned that people are gonna start going to the dark gray market and black market. I'm excited about the pentadeca arginate.

So let's put that on people's ear map, brain map. Pentadeca arginate may be a good physician prescribed substitution for people that can benefit from BPC-157. And a good starting dose to make it really clear for people helpful, 250 micrograms to 500 micrograms. We're using 500 micrograms injected daily. Again, we like Monday through Friday, take the weekends off. That's a good dosing schedule. We'll see how that goes. We probably can use larger dosages. That's conservative, but that's a good starting point for people. And thus far you haven't mentioned any side effects of BPC-157 or Penta-deca-Arginate.

That's kind of remarkable. It's been tremendous. Yeah, and we were using BPC intravenously as well. You know, patients would come in and, you know, oh, tweak my knee, tore my ACL, tore my, you know, meniscus, whatever. You can give them BPC essentially as a bolus intravenously.

My goodness, that made a difference. Now that, using something intravenously from the pharmacokinetic standpoint, it's not gonna last in the system very much. More of a spark. Whereas if you use an agent subcutaneously, you're gonna get more of a long-lasting, again, not terribly long-lasting with peptides,

but longer than using something intravenously, kind of the sweet spot was certainly using both. You could use something as a spark to initiate that inflammatory cascade, then follow up with the subcutaneous dose. Yeah. And even though earlier we were talking a little bit about some hormone replacement therapies,

before that off microphone, you mentioned that you prefer peptides to direct hormone manipulations in most cases. So I think while peptides can be hormones, there are things like oxytocin is sometimes called a peptide hormone. In general, when people think about hormone therapies, they're thinking testosterone, estrogen, pregnalone, you know, thyroid, et cetera. It sounds to me like much of your practice is built up around the notion that there are

things that one can use, peptides, to kind of push and pull on these various systems without getting into them directly. My understanding is the advantage of that is you don't get the negative feedback. You don't get the shutting down of natural production. Yeah. of that is you don't get the negative feedback. You don't get the shutting down of natural production. Yeah, you know, testosterone is a great example because, like we were saying, I don't ever want to manipulate hormones. Growth hormone is another example. I don't ever want to manipulate that, meaning providing it to people more than they would

get in nature. This is why I actually don't, a little bit off topic, like when people use testosterone pellets or any sort of pellet therapy, because you're exposing people to a concentration of hormones we would never ever see in nature. I would prefer people inject it where you're going to get some variation in dose on a day-to-day basis, which we're humans, so we do get some day-to-day variation, or topically, or under the tongue or something. Peptide, same thing.

I don't want to manipulate the hormones. I want to just stick within the highways or the lanes, swim lanes for how they should operate and then take advantage of that. And that's been a safe way to do it as opposed to, and I've seen it, you know, talking about another peptide, which is ipamarylin, a growth hormone releasing peptide. Ipamarylin, you inject under the skin, travels up to the pituitary, the posterior pituitary in the brain, which is responsible for putting out growth hormone. That growth hormone then leaves the pituitary, enters the bloodstream, travels to the liver, where we make insulin-like growth factor one, which then enters the circulation.

It's very anabolic, meaning growth, healing, mending. As we get older, we make less growth hormone. As we get older, we wear down. Obviously, we get older, we make less growth hormone. As we get older, we wear down, obviously. We get degenerative conditions. Part of that, I don't know what part, if everyone's a little bit different, is because of our hormonal decline.

And so when you can give something like ipamarylin, and we can talk about others, you're actually helping not only push out a little bit of growth hormone for people, we are directing when you push it out. We think that's why it's important for people to be asleep by 10 p.m., between 10 p.m. and 2 a push it out. We think, that's why it's important for people to be asleep by 10 p.m., between 10 p.m. and 2 a.m.,

because we think that's the largest pulse of growth hormone during the 24-hour period. Is that right? So I've long wondered whether or not the tale I was told when I was growing up, which is that every hour before midnight is worth two hours of sleep post-midnight. That feels true to me. Then again, feels true is oftennight. That feels true to me.

Then again, feels true is often misleading, but feels true to me. But it makes perfect sense if the largest pulse and growth hormone is occurring in a couple of hours before midnight. Yeah, I mean, that's how I learned it. I agree with you, it feels true to me as well. But taking advantage then of injecting something

like Ipameralin at bedtime, then you're gonna, within a few minutes, and with ipamirallin, it's interesting because people will get a little flushing, tingling at times. And what I've seen, the point I'm making is, there are some physicians and some pharmacies which the dosage of ipamirallin, and most of these growth hormone-releasing peptides,

should be 100 micrograms. That's the max dose to bind the receptor. And what I've seen is, with ipamirilin, rare, but some people do get anaphylaxis. And it's happened. And I think that happens when people are pushing it and giving more than they should. And I've heard of that, and they're giving 200, 300, 400 micrograms at a time, which is a big dose. Now what they're getting is the client,

the patient is like, oh my gosh, I feel this amazing flushing, it must be working. But then you could spiral into, oh my goodness, I don't feel so good in your circulation system collapsing. So. Yeah, using side effects as a indicator of whether or not something's working just seems like a terrible idea.

But. But it's very common. Yeah. I tend to be very conservative about these things. And by the way, I've tried various peptides for short periods of time because I like to experiment very safely. And some things like sermorelin, we'll talk about other growth hormones, secretagogues, for me, for whatever reason, gave me great sleep, but only in the first part of the night.

It nuked my rapid eye movement, sleeping the second half of the night. It spiked my prostate specific antigen. It was a very consistent effect. I came off it and it went back down. I went back on it, went back up. And so I just found I couldn't take it. And it didn't take me very long to figure that out,

but I know that there are some people who love Cermerelin and don't see any of the same issues, so it seems like it can be very individual. I agree with that, I agree with that, and that's why I think it's, again, helpful to work with a physician who has experience who can kind of, you know, I think of these peptides as having flavors, particularly the growth hormone

releasing peptides. Hippomerelin, very clean, you know, as long as you stay within 100 micrograms or less, people are going to lean out a little bit, sleep a little bit better. There's no real side effects. They take it pre-sleep. Pre-sleep at bedtime.

Without carbohydrates ingested in the previous two hours, correct? Yeah, or 45 minutes, technically. Yeah, but that's right. And then there's something like growth hormone release in peptide 6, GHRP6, which is also going to bind. So I think of it from around being the most specific for the growth hormone receptor, but the weakest. So when you inject it, you will get growth hormone to come out and only growth hormone, but it's not going to be a big burst of growth hormone. You inject

GHRP six. Now you may bind some prolactin. Now you may bind some ACTH, which is going to have your adrenals put out quarters off. Now you're going to get a hunger response, right? And maybe even have trouble sleeping if you're getting. May have trouble sleeping. But where that's beneficial for is if you're looking to put on mass or get strong, GHRP6 is your go-to, right? Because you will increase your appetite. And if you're smart, you'll eat a lot more protein. And the building of muscle is not necessarily complicated,

right, it's resistance training, sufficient protein, which is where I think most people fall off, and then having some anabolic kind of hormone in the background, like growth hormone or testosterone, or both helps that process. That's where GHRP6 can shine. I mean, within weeks, people will get big and strong, increase their bench press, whatever.

Stuff flat out works. But you got to know how to use it and understand the flavors. So the point I'm making is these different peptides have different flavors. And to your point, there's individual responses. That can be a good thing. I think for most of our audience, the interesting growth hormone, secretagogues,

probably relates to the better sleep and the overall feelings of vitality. And probably most people are seeking to not spike their appetite or put on muscle, really. These days we're hearing more and more from people, both men and women who want to be strong without being big and they prefer to be lean as opposed to not lean, which I think is a great goal.

Frankly, that's my goal at this stage of life. I just turned 49 yesterday and I really, oh, thank you, thank you. Yeah, thanks for coming out to the birthday mini bash the other day, it was a lot of fun. Yeah, I wanna be strong and capable. I also wanna be able to run and have cardiovascular fitness, but I don't wanna be large.

I don't wanna take up a lot of space. I'm not interested in taking up a lot of space. And I think most people fall into that category. I agree. So if GHRP-6 can spike appetite, which for a subset of people might be useful, but probably most people will want to avoid it, ipamorelin, I've always been calling it ipamorelin, but ipamorelin at 100 micrograms dosage or less per night sounds like it's

an interesting tool. What are some of the other growth hormones, so cretogogs, and I should just brief, I'll take the liberty of defining these are peptides that stimulate the release of your own endogenous growth hormone. This is not taking growth hormone. Right, yeah. Two other main ones that we use, one would be Tessemorelin, which is similar to semerelin

and that it also is going to work on the growth hormone releasing hormone aspect a little bit higher up in the chain of how these hormones are released. So both semarone and testarone, you don't necessarily need to add anything else to it. Classically with iparmorone, hexarone, GHRP6, we would add this other compound, CJC1295, which is going to work on the GHRH, which allows the peptide and then the growth hormone to stay in your system a little bit longer. The growth hormone releasing hormone.

Correct. Yeah, but we can almost set aside CJC now because CJC 1295. That's on the same list as BPC. The FDA just came in and let's just say one acronym took out another. There you go. The FDA took out CJC, okay. And BPC. Yeah, and BPC.

People are probably getting a little dizzy with these acronyms, but I think we're doing a good job of guiding people along. So sermorelin and tessamerelin are similar enough. Similar in that regard. Tessamerelin, again, talking about flavors, tessamerelin works on visceral fat reduction, so fat around the organs. And it's been FDA approved for that purpose. Yeah, with HIV patients having this lipodystrophy, which is abnormal accumulation of fat,

in particular, visceral fat around organs. So testum rilin works well for that. My observation from using it for lots and lots of people seems to work better in females than males. Or does it lead to this feeling of enhanced sleep as well? Yeah, so I think any of the growth hormone releasing peptides, anytime you're gonna make growth hormone more active in your world,

that's how I think about it, better sleep, better skin tone texture, right, you're more resilient. I think growth hormone is a resiliency hormone, durability, you know, people find that, oh I do a hard workout but it takes me days to recover, I sprained my ankle, it takes me a week to recover, I cut my skin, it takes me forever to heal. They've got a durability issue.

And that's how I think about where growth hormone can shine. Not that you gotta go all the way to growth hormone, but these peptides can be a really nice push. And this is taken before sleep, no food within 45 minutes of the injection. And then the magic in what we do is, when we first started about eight years ago, we'd use one peptide at a time.

And then what we learned is, let's combine these peptides, let's stack peptides, and that's how we do is, you know, when we first started about eight years ago, we'd use one peptide at a time. And then what we learned is, let's combine these peptides, let's stack peptides, and that's how we do it. At lower dosages? Sometimes lower dosages. But, for example, we had a great combination, BPC, ipamarylin, and testamarylin all together, taken at bedtime. And you're going to get subcutaneous fat reduction from the imprimarylin, visceral fat reduction from the testimarylin, upregulation of the

growth hormone receptor from the BPC. It was a wonderful peptide. We kind of labeled it as a fat loss peptide but people put on lean muscle mass, they sleep better, their skin would be better, they'd be more durable, their thought process would be better. Awesome stuff and that's where I think that that's where we enjoy it is stacking these peptides together. So it's not again, just one peptide at a time, but able to do it. And that's why again, working with a compounding pharmacy,

we can put these together. So you're only doing one shot a day. You may be doing three to seven peptides, but it's still one shot. Got it. And if one is combining a Tespamarylin or Cirmarylin, ipamarylin and well, not BPC anymore, but pentadeca- Yep.

Arginate instead because he can't get BPC-157 compounded. Is that done every night, five days a week, three days a week? What's the rationale of this five days on, two days off? Yes, five days on, two days off, I came up with because of how we would dose growth hormone. So the traditional growth hormone dosing cycle would be five days on, two days off, taking it bedtime. Mm-hmm. Yeah.

And that's where it came up. And then I personally, with patients and myself, I like to take breaks. So even with supplements, I won't take them on the weekends, right? Because I think you, you know, again, anything you expose yourself to on a regular basis is going to decrease the potency. We see that with exercise. We see that with food. If you're eating the same food every day, it seems to become less valuable for you, right? Like change it up. Like we, we have to, you know, throw on the crazy switch every now and then, but change it up. And so then you're going to make it more potent

for you. I do the same thing with supplements. So, so that, you know, just resonates with me with people to take a break from stuff. I'd like to take a quick break and thank one of our sponsors, Function. I recently became a Function member after searching for the most comprehensive approach to lab testing. While I've long been a fan of blood testing,

I really wanted to find a more in-depth program for analyzing blood, urine, and saliva to get a full picture of my heart health, my hormone status, my immune system regulation, my metabolic function, my vitamin and mineral status, and other critical areas of my overall health and vitality. Function not only provides testing of over a hundred biomarkers key to physical and mental health,

but it also analyzes these results and provides insights from top doctors on your results. For example, in one of my first tests with Function, I learned that I had two high levels of mercury in my blood. This was totally surprising to me. I had no idea prior to taking the test. Function not only helped me detect this, but offered medical doctor informed insights

on how to best reduce those mercury levels, which included limiting my tuna consumption, because I had been eating a lot of tuna, while also making an effort to eat more leafy greens and supplementing with NAC, N-Acetylcysteine, both of which can support glutathione production and detoxification and worked to reduce my mercury levels. Comprehensive lab testing like this

is so important for health. And while I've been doing it for years, I've always found it to be overly complicated and expensive. I've been so impressed by function, both at the level of ease of use, that is getting the tests done, as well as how comprehensive and how actionable the tests are, that I recently joined their advisory board

and I'm thrilled that they're sponsoring the podcast. If you'd like to try Function, go to functionhealth.com slash Huberman. Function currently has a wait list of over 250,000 people, but they're offering early access to Huberman Lab listeners. Again, that's functionhealth.com slash Huberman to get early access to Function. Today's episode is also brought to us by 8 Sleep.

8 Sleep makes smart mattress covers with cooling, heating and sleep tracking capacity. Now I've spoken many times before on this podcast about the critical need for us to get adequate amounts of quality sleep each night. That's truly the foundation of all mental health, physical health and performance. And one of the best ways to ensure

that you get a great night's sleep is to control the temperature of your sleeping environment. And that's because in order to fall and stay deeply asleep, your body temperature actually has to drop by about one to three degrees. And in order to wake up feeling refreshed and energized, your body temperature actually has to increase about one to three degrees.

8Sleep makes it incredibly easy to control the temperature of your sleeping environment by allowing you to control the temperature of your mattress cover at the beginning, middle, and end of the night. I've been sleeping on an 8Sleep mattress cover for nearly four years now, and it has completely transformed and improved the quality of my sleep. 8Sleep has now launched their newest generation of the pod cover, the pod 4 ultra. The pod 4 ultra has improved cooling and heating capacity, higher fidelity sleep tracking technology,

and even has snoring detection that will automatically lift your head a few degrees to improve your airflow and stop your snoring. If you'd like to try an 8Sleep mattress cover, go to 8Sleep.com slash Huberman to save up to $350 off their Pod 4 Ultra. 8sleep currently ships in the USA, Canada, UK, select countries in the EU and Australia. Again, that's 8sleep.com slash Huberman. Before we start recording,

you mentioned that you're actually not a huge fan of taking massive amounts of supplements, that you are a big fan of taking CoQ10, Coenzyme Q10, 200 milligrams per day in the morning big fan of taking CoQ10, Coenzyme Q10, 200 milligrams per day in the morning. I also take CoQ10. I think I started taking it for quote unquote general mitochondrial health. I don't know that I thought very carefully about exactly what I was trying to accomplish

with it. But what is the rationale of taking CoQ10? So if I can break it down and try to keep it simple. If people are familiar with the mitochondria, it's the battery of the cell, these little organelles inside each cell, and they're responsible for doing many things, but primarily making ATP, chemical energy.

And so how do we make energy? Well, there's three main ways the body uses it, right? Or makes it. First is glycolysis. We take glucose, which is a six carbon molecule. We break it in half to make two pyruvates, right? When we do that, we make a little bit of ATP. That pyruvate then is converted

to something called acetyl-CoA. We run that through the Krebs cycle, where we're also making ATP, but then we're making these intermediate products. One of those intermediate products, and the main one is something called NADH. That NADH is then shuttled to the mitochondrial membrane for, you know, this is the magic

where we make the most ATP, and there's five different hubs, or we call cytochromes, right? And this is how I think about it, because I just like to simplify. Cytochrome one is where we use NAD. And what the different hubs are doing is we're exchanging electrons for protons.

And that's a kind of electrical process. We're exchanging electrons for protons, going down the assembly line to eventually turn this wheel, the ATPase wheel, to make ATP. The way I understand it is the five different hubs, different nutrients hit them. So cytochrome one is NAD, cytochrome two is riboflavin, vitamin B2 and succinic acid,

cytochrome three is CoQ10, vitamin K2, cytochrome four is methylene blue, which we can talk about, and then cytochrome five are things like magnesium, vitamin A, and copper. So if you're thinking about mitochondrial health, if you include any or better all of those, you're gonna maximize how your mitochondria can work and make energy.

It's the strongest way to do it. And it's, again, not necessarily complicated. So when I think of CoQ10, and again, we use a lot of NAD, which we can talk about, where I think most people, the traffic congestion happens on cytochrome one, right? And so when we give people, upregulate their NAD production,

it's essentially we're allowing for more electron flow at cytochrome one, which? And so when we give people upregulate their NAD production, it's essentially we're allowing for more electron flow at cytochrome one, which has a downstream effect on the other cytochromes, so the traffic jam opens up. And now you can move electrons to exchange for protons and make way more ATP. But that's not true for everyone. And so some people, it could be at cytochrome three with CoQ10, it could be at cytochrome two. A lot of people at cytochrome four, which is, again, cytochrome, we call it cytochrome 3 with CoQ10, it could be at cytochrome 2. A lot of people at cytochrome 4, which is again cytochrome, we call it cytochrome C oxidase, which is where methylene blue binds. But that's just a simplistic view.

People we run into traffic jams, right? These electron flow gets stuck. We're just trying to open up the traffic jam. So 200 milligrams a day of coenzyme Q10 can facilitate some of that flow through. Right, cytochrome 3 for sure. And CoQ10 has been studied, very safe, up to 2,400 milligrams a day. No harmful, yep, no harmful effects.

Sometimes I'll take more, like I was telling you earlier, it's been dramatic for me with migraine headaches and basically reducing them to zero. You know, as people are hearing this, they're probably thinking, okay, well, these are just, you know, this is what I call anic data or whatever. I don't have to remind people that you're a board certified

physician. I think that what's still ringing in the back of my mind this entire conversation, even though I'm paying very careful attention, is that most of the drugs that are prescribed in this country are off label. I think that just like I don't think I've ever heard that stated out loud. It's wild. Yeah, yeah. Right?

So the idea that people would take something that wasn't shown in a clinical trial to be effective for purpose A, that they would, but it gets approved for purpose A, but then can be prescribed by doctors for purpose B, C, D, or E. Right. I mean, you're not telling me this is commonplace, you're telling me this is the majority

of prescription drugs. But it makes sense if you think about it, right? So if you took an antibiotic, right, like we can just, and antibiotics can be very specific what it gets approved for in terms of like working against a specific bacteria. But then through clinical use and just experience, you know, we learned that, oh, I can use doxycycline or a Z-Pak, azithromycin or whatever it is

for a variety of bacterial infections that extend well beyond just what it's approved for, well, that makes sense. And does that ever cycle back to the clinical trials? Or no, this just becomes physician understanding and lore. Like, hey, yeah, I've got patients that, they get on azithromycin and their acne clears up. By the way, I'm not saying that folks,

I'm not a physician, but for instance. Exactly what happened with semiglutide and azempec, right? Approved for helping glucose utilization or lowering blood glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes, and they found through use only, people were losing weight. And now it's become blockbuster. And we see it with things like repurposing drugs for cancer, right?

There's a lot of that going on, a lot of the repurposing. So doxycycline is a very common one that's used in cancer therapies, I think by sophisticated oncologists. I don't treat cancer, but by sophisticated oncologists to use things like doxycycline metformin, but Benzol, which is an anti-parasitic drug, to help with cancer. So that's amazing.

So interesting, it is amazing. I think also, you know, I'm reminded that, you know, medicine, as beautiful a field as it is, I have tremendous respect for it, of course, is a field of fairly siloed training. And I love the idea that now thanks to public education efforts like this one that you're providing us that physicians learn from each other in a much broader way and can potentially hear about what drugs can be useful for this or that.

The other thing, and this is not editorial, this is a real observation. Pharmaceutical companies are very interested in the other uses of already approved drugs. Sure. The research and development process for a drug, the safety evaluation is incredibly expensive. So they want nothing more than to take a drug that's already been approved for one purpose

and to take that already safety approved drug and find other uses. How are they not circling back to the off-label use and understanding of these compounds and then essentially marketing them for these other purposes? Or I guess with Ozempic, that's exactly what happened. That's what happened with Ozempic. I mean, it's, again, I write prescriptions.

I think there's a time and place. I think it's challenging for me, though, right? And I think for a lot of physicians, it's become challenging operating in a paradigm where we talk about chronic disease, which is essentially failing. I mean, and we all know this statistically. We're not making huge dents in heart disease, cancer,

autoimmune disease, neurodegenerative. We're not at all, but we're spending exorbitant amounts of money, right? And this is something that I had to learn over time. And I don't know how I got into it, but when I started my practice back in 2006, I started, it was a traditional family medicine practice, but I started using these nutritional IVs. And this is before hangover IVs, this is before it was popular, this is 20 years ago. And what I learned was that these nutritional IVs help people feel better quickly. And I developed this model for my patients, which I think is a better model, which is I want to help people feel better first, like we were talking about earlier in this podcast. Because if I can get people to feel better,

what we learned through COVID, and honestly what I want to say to you, Andrew, which is really true, your podcast and what you do has been so successful at a time during the pandemic when people lost so much trust in people like me. People lost that trust of, what do I do? This is a scary time. I don't know what's going on. And you guys come along, you in particular, providing this very stable, vetted information

that people can trust and have a starting point and be like, this is what I wanna do. Because health, one of the gifts of COVID was it put our health on the forefront of most people's mind and life. And so what you're doing is tremendous work. And I can tell you personally, no, literally, like as a physician,

I am just, it's such an honor to be here and to talk to you because every day, every day my patients come to me and said, I heard this on the Huberman Lab podcast. What do you think of it? And I am not joking, and I love that. I think it is awesome because people, one, taking their health seriously,

but two, they have a stable resource that they can trust. The problem with physicians, and I'll tie this back in, is physicians are hard to trust, right? And it's this paternalistic model, which is, and that's how I was trained, which is, you're gonna do this because I'm gonna tell you to do it. And I remember being in medical school, which was in the 90s, and I can't remember

the exact specifics of the study, but they would go, they did a study where they collected the trash outside of physicians' offices, found that greater than 30% of prescriptions written that day were thrown away. Greater than 30%. Wow. And I remember learning that,

and I was like, what is going on? By the patients. Correct. Like you came to the doctor because you wanted a prescription, right? No. You came to the doctor because you weren't feeling good. You came to the doctor because you wanted to be listened to.

You came to the doctor because you wanted to be validated. And came to the doctor because you wanted to be listened to. You came to the doctor because you wanted to be validated. And most of the time, and this still happens to today, the vast majority of doctors will just write you a prescription or they'll write you two prescriptions. And that's not what most people want. Sometimes it is, and I do it, and sometimes it is, but there are so many other tools that we can use. And so when I help people feel better first,

why I've been successful, and I work with the peak people on this planet, whether the athletes, the best athletes, celebrities, the royal family, you name it, I'm so privileged. It's because they trust me. And that trust is really important. I take that really seriously. You know what I mean? And so, you know, tying it back in is,

we've lost a lot of that with the pandemic. It's actually come to the forefront. And so that's why I want to help people feel better first. You know, the traditional model of medicine is just get a diagnosis, write a prescription. If that prescription doesn't work, write another prescription. And so, yes, there's a time and place for that,

but there's also time and place for just helping people. It only works when people value themselves enough. Like we're talking, I can tie this back to weight loss, right? Why do people have such trouble losing weight? I would argue that most people don't value themselves enough to actually care enough to make the hard disciplinary choices in their life, to get away from emotionally eating, you know what I mean?

To do the right things that they actually, it's gonna be a struggle to get the right food for themselves, get away from processed foods, to be disciplined, to go to the gym on a regular basis. They don't have the right people that they trust. This is where you've been such a gift, tremendous gift. Well, thank you for the kind words. I mean, the birth of the podcast did take place

during the pandemic and in large part because I saw everybody getting very anxious, their circadian rhythms disrupted. And those were focuses of my laboratory. And frankly, when I was a postdoc and graduate student, but especially as I got a little older in my years, I couldn't believe that, you know that I was reading these papers about how important morning sunlight is and all these things, but then my colleagues were all getting sick and dying around me or getting

what we call the tenured look, where they show up, start their job, and five years later, they look like they've aged 25 years. I realized that I wanted to avoid that, so I've always just enjoyed learning and sharing science and health tools. Thank you for the kind words. that I wanted to avoid that. So I've always just enjoyed learning and sharing science and health tools. And so thank you for the kind words. I've certainly been kind of both astonished and positively amazed in the ways that the pandemic

and the post-pandemic years, I like to think we're in the post-pandemic years. I think we can safely say that. Now, how they've drawn people's attention to this idea that they need to take agency into their own healthcare, that no one, no pill, potion, injection, et cetera, can replace good behaviors. Pills, potions, and injections can potentially augment those good behaviors and get people going down the right path, which is what we're talking about today, but that it's really a personal responsibility.

No one can give us a calmer mind. No one can give us a healthier body. No one can do that. It's interesting that some of the wealthiest people in the world, the new thing isn't for people to boast about their yachts or their properties. It's about their health. It's about their yachts or their properties. It's about their health. It's about their vitality, their longevity, because that's the thing that I suppose in some sense money can start to buy, but it doesn't require a ton of funds to take great

care of one's body and mind. It doesn't. What I've learned and I've had to learn this over time and I think the wisdom is, and this is why it's even more challenging, because I think people go on social media and they listen to podcasts and they listen to influencers and a lot of the messages is additive, right? If you're not doing a high intensity workout every day and then doing sauna for X amount of time and then cold plunge and all this kind of dieting, you're not doing it well.

I know that stress of that is cumulative to people. So what I've learned, and I have a really good friend, probably the most affluent, successful, but also the most generous and smartest person I know who lives on the Big Island, and he says to me, which is worth repeating here, I look for every opportunity to surrender. And it is that surrender to people who you can trust,

to guide you, right? So you don't have to be the quarterback of everything, right? And that takes off the pressure. And I think finding it's not always about adding, it's actually creating space for us to just be in that flow, right? Like it's to be in like, and I know you've

talked about this a lot, that kind of active rest place, where it's not about being super focused, it's not about just going to sleep. But almost the best parts of our day is when we're in that flow state where things just click. And to me, helping people with those types of times and figuring that out is the most valuable. And I don't think people talk about that enough.

So I appreciate that you do a lot. Yeah, well, and I appreciate that you're bringing up this notion that just stacking more and more behaviors, well, and I appreciate that you're bringing up this notion that, you know, just stacking more and more behaviors, like you gotta crush a workout and do sauna, and that is not the message. You know, sometimes we get teased and there's some good comedy takes on me that make me chuckle now and again about that.

But that's not the approach. These are tools that people can, it's a buffet. And I think most everyone agrees that sleep is key. Most everyone agrees that exercise is key, nutrition is key, great social connection is key. When it comes to, because I want to make sure that we circle back to this, when it comes to the peptides, it seems that one of your approaches, if I may, is to raise the tide so that the boat can get out to sea. We were talking about these growth hormones, the creatagogues.

We covered GHRP6, which is the one that stimulates appetite. It's probably going to be a niche case condition that people would want to use that. Ipamoralin, tessamoralin, seramoralin. I get a lot of questions about is it MK677? What in the world is MK677? It sounds like a weapon. It does. Yeah, I think of it just like GHRP6.

However, it's absorbed well orally. So it's basically the same. I see it working this very similarly. To GHRP6, so it stimulates appetite. It does. It can stimulate cortisol, so stimulates appetite. It does. It can stimulate cortisol, prolactin. It sounds like a not good situation for most people. Not for most people, although, you know, let me give you an example where I have a client,

very successful guy, and he's been on testosterone. He's doing all the things, right? He's in his early 60s. He's working out well. He eats well, super well, all these things. he can't put on muscle mass well, right? And actually as people get older, that does become an issue for a lot of people is maintaining healthy muscle mass.

MK677, before it was taken off the compound list by the FDA, it's another one that was included. Oh, another acronym take it out by the FDA acronym, okay. But you can take it orally, which again removes the stigma or burden of having to do a shot, and you will increase your appetite. And that actually is a very useful agent, you know, metabolically for people as they get older. And I know this, you know, my kind of approach with this and both personally and professionally,

I try everything I can. And I remember MK677 I took at bedtime. And it was an hour later, I was in a dead sleep, and I woke up and I had to go eat. It sounds like puberty. It was, I was like, what is going on? Because I didn't totally understand. I was like, what?

Oh, I took that calv- Oh my gosh, I should never have taken it right before bed. And I had to go up and eat and destroyed my sleep that night. But I learned, and I always learn, and I'm grateful for it, but don't take that one at bedtime. should never have taken it right before bed. And I had to go up and eat and destroyed my sleep that night. But I learned and I'll always learn and I'm grateful for it, but don't take that one at bedtime. But it absolutely will stimulate your appetite. Which are the growth hormones, the creatagogs

that your more typical patients who don't want to stimulate appetite, both male and female patients prefer? What are you compounding for them? I test some Rellon, I don't see any appetite simulation from that, Hexerallin, we haven't talked about that. I don't really see it. He talks about Hexerallin.

Yeah, Hexerallin. Hexerallin, excuse me. Yeah, sure, Hexerallin I think of is more, again, we talk about the flavor of these peptides, how I kind of look at it in my head, is more of the energy endurance growth hormone releasing peptides. I like it for people to use it in the morning.

They get a nice burst of energy. They feel it's a clean energy. It's not a caffeinated energy or jittery or anything like that. And it's good for more endurance type, you know, athletics or working out. So people in that, you know, field of competition or whatever, I think hexareline is a great choice.

Does not spike appetite. I have not seen that. So this is taken first thing in the morning, you get an additional growth hormone release. Yes, you do. Yeah, you do in the early mornings when you're waking up. And you used to compound it with CJC 1295 to get the other pathways involved that can help,

but now CJC has been taken out by the FDA. Right, but hexareline still exists. That can be compounded. What's the dosage on hexareline that you typically prescribe? 100 micrograms. It's the same as these other, like ipamirone, GHRP6, 100 micrograms. The two that are different would be testimirone.

Ideal dose is two milligrams per dose, which is 2,000 micrograms, so quite different. And then semirone has actually a very broad dosing range, anywhere from 200 micrograms, I've used it up to 3000 micrograms, depending on your goals. We were talking about Coenzyme Q10 and the Krebs cycle. And I forgot to close the hatch on supplements more broadly.

Again, doesn't sound like you're a big fan of taking lots of pills and capsules. I think some people will take that as a relief. I think a lot of people get tired of taking a lot of pills. Some people don't like to do that. What are some of the other things that you do take besides Coenzyme Q10? Earlier we were talking about methylated vitamins.

Methylated B vitamins. Yeah, this is becoming increasingly popular. We're starting to hear more about methylation and methylated compounds. Could you educate us on methylated B vitamins? Yeah, and I think people are familiar with it. You know, some people are talking on podcasts about the MTHFR SNP.

We've not talked about that in this podcast, so it'd be nice to hear. Sure, so a SNP is a single nucleotide polymorphism, meaning that genetically things don't flow as easily. Again, that's an oversimplification. And you could be homozygous for that, meaning you have both genes influencing you more. You could be heterozygous, meaning it's just one gene.

One copy from one parent, or homozygous copy from each parent. You say it way better than that. And so what that means is where we see that reflected, homocysteine is a marker we use, a lab marker we use. It's an emerging marker for looking at one's cardiovascular risk profile. And so if one's got an elevated homocysteine, an elevated by some labs it's going to be greater than seven,

by most labs greater than nine, means you're at an increased risk. What that is I don't remember, but you're at an increased risk of having a cardiovascular event, which would mean a heart attack or stroke. And so we wanna lower that number, and the best way to lower that number

is taking ample methylated B vitamins. Methylated means you're adding a methyl group. So methyl B12, methylfolate, trimethylglycine, methionine, these are all methylation donors, which just metabolically and through your detoxification pathways in your liver is going to help you lower that homocysteine. I'm sure it's more complicated than that,

but that's, most people, if you're gonna take a B vitamin, take a methylated B vitamin, because then you overcome, again, we've done a lot of MTHFR testing. I don't think it's as profound as some people make it out to be like it's gonna change their life. I've never seen that. Can it help you? Sure, but you're gonna overcome it

by taking sufficient methylated B vitamins anyway. And again, those methylated B vitamins are methylated B12. B12, folate, there's a methylated B6, there's, and then trimethylglycine, TMG is a good compound, methionine is a good methyl donor, it's an amino acid. Are these taken in the morning or in the afternoon? I like taking them in the morning, although I think,

for people to play around with, because I've certainly seen it, people get that 3 p.m. kind of slumber as opposed to reaching for the coffee or the donut, take some more methylated B vitamins and see what happens. Or just the coffee. No, sorry, you're not supposed to drink caffeine too late in the day.

Lately, what I find, I don't know, this is wrong to bring up on this podcast, but I can't help myself. I love your Ramate in the morning and afternoon. Okay. Coffee in the morning now makes me feel nauseous. I don't know if I'm pregnant or something, but it makes me feel nauseous.

But I love the taste of coffee in the afternoon. This is like a midlife thing. I don't know what it is. So now in the afternoon, like around one or 2 p.m., even just the smallest amount of coffee, it's like the most delicious thing I've ever tasted. Yeah, I love coffee. It can mess with your sleep too late in the day, but that's a perfect segue to talk about sleep.

Sure. Because one thing that I know you've done a lot of work on and with are these peptides that can improve sleep, not just by virtue of enhancing growth hormone release, but I'll just be very direct. I, for the last, gosh, like four to six months, I've had the opportunity to try pinealin and injectable pinealin combined with glycine.

Goodness gracious, in the positive sense of the goodness gracious, you're from the South. So I don't know where people have it. Never before have I found something that can improve the amount of rapid eye movement sleep that I get. Besides rapid eye movement sleep deprivation. Sleep deprivation, the next night you'll get a compensatory effect.

That's not the way to increase your REM sleep folks. There are a lot of things like high intensity exercise that improve my slow wave deep sleep. Cold plunge early in the day improved slow wave deep sleep. There have been a few other things. But with pinealin, and by the way, I'm not doing this every night. I do this occasionally.

I ran a little experiment and I track my sleep using the sleep tracker that's in eight sleep. And it's doubling the amount of rapid eye movement sleep that I'm getting. Doubling. Which is, so like from an hour to two hours, or from an hour and 30, it's like nearly three hours, you know? Even, I posted a picture of a sleep score with some rapid eye movement sleep.

It's not something I typically do. But even the most competitive of biohackers, Brian Johnson was like, oh, nice sleep score, you know? Even the most competitive of biohackers, Brian Johnson was like, oh, nice sleep score. Now he touts a sleep score that's perfect every night for every night, and I'm kind of poking at Brian because we like to poke back and forth. We're friendly with one another. So the point being that pinealin is a remarkable way

to increase rapid eye movement sleep. I have very little knowledge about it, except that my understanding is that it might stimulate some regeneration or stimulation of the pinealocytes of the pineal. That's exactly it. You've nailed it. Yeah, I remember when you messaged me after starting it and you were like, this is amazing. It's amazing. Yeah, you were saying it's amazing.

I hope the FDA doesn't nuke it as a consequence of this conversation. It's's amazing. Yeah, you were saying it's amazing. I hope the FDA doesn't nuke it as a consequence of this conversation. It's still available. Yeah, yeah, yeah. I hope so too. No, but I mean, your response is what we see with our other patients who are loving, and I think that combination with glycine,

I'm a big fan of glycine, and injecting it seems to work really well. But back to your question about Penelon, yeah, I mean, it's one of the smallest peptides, but I think it's one of the most profound. We used to combine it with epitalin, the smallest peptides, but I think it's one of the most profound. We used to combine it with epitalin, the Russian peptide that was used for circadian rhythm. And for my understanding, epitalin also is involved in DNA repair

and has been explored in animal studies for trying to offset vision loss and some retinal degenerative conditions. Yeah. Again, put on the do not compound list with all the others. That's a shame. That's gone. But pineal unstays and remains. And yeah, your response to it and experience with it

has been very commonplace from working with patients and seeing that. I think there's a sort of circadian rhythm aspect with it as well, you know, and helping with melatonin production, obviously that comes from the pineal gland. I, this is just, I'm postulating, I think there's more to the pineal gland than we understand.

Oh yeah, yeah, it makes things other than melatonin, that's for sure. Yeah, and I think it's kind of elusive, but I think there's something to it, and I say that, having used a lot of pineal line with people over the years and having very similar responses, which is awesome. Like everyone knows, like you said,

when you sleep better, your entire day is better. When you sleep better, your life is better, like exponentially better. I think of the millions of people that suffer from lack of rapid eye movement sleep, the lack of neuroplasticity that can be the consequence of that, the lack of healthy removal of emotional labels

on previous day memories that is the consequence of REM deprivation, the enormous impact on depression rates, the enormous impact on pretty much every mental health issue is made worse by lack of REM sleep. So I say, or I raise this conversation about pinealin with a little bit of trepidation because I do worry that on the one hand, people will see it as a miracle drug.

That's not what we're talking about. It has this effect. But at the same time, I, okay, I'll just say that there's another drug that was released recently. This is a FDA approved drug in the category of sleep drugs called the Doras. So it works a little differently. It doesn't push on the sleepiness system,

so to speak. It suppresses the wakefulness system. And the idea is that it's supposed to increase REM sleep. It was by name Quivivic and things like that. I tried it. It was a total disaster for me. I fell asleep, woke up three hours later, couldn't fall back asleep.

I tried it, it was lower dosage. It's extremely expensive as well. So I'm gonna piss off whoever makes Quivivic, I forget who makes it. It was a complete disaster for me. Pinealin has been incredible. And here's what's really interesting about it to me is that it seems to improve my sleep on the nights

when I don't take it, which makes total sense if it indeed is providing some regeneration of the pineal sites that make melatonin and other stuff. That makes sense to me. Yeah, so here we're talking about something that one could potentially pulse with now and again and get improvement in sleep every night. Yes.

Yeah, wild. Yeah, wild. Yeah, and it's, I mean, I think it's worth noting that you also take care of your health on many other aspects, and that's probably why you were sensitive to it, but it worked really well for you, right? And some other people it's gonna take longer,

you know, if they're having to work on their diet and having to work on their exercise and having to work on their thought patterns, right? We don't talk about that enough, having positive thoughts. But yeah, it's so safe. We've never ever seen, I mean, I never ever have seen a side effect or negative side effect from Penelon.

It's, and your response has been uniform. You know, people don't always get there as quickly, but people get there with their sleep. Well, and so you compound it with glycine. Yeah. What's the rationale there? I really like glycine as an inhibitory neurotransmitter. It's calming to the nervous system over the years.

I tend to start with that when people are having trouble settling down at night. Not that it's gonna sedate people, but just transitioning from being active, 8 p.m., 9 p.m., wanting to settle down, glycine in pretty large dosages, at least most people think they are, starting with 3,000 or 5,000 milligrams orally,

kind of tones down the nervous system. People relax a little bit, and then they tend to sleep better from it. And then you can dial it up. I mean, I've used very large dosages where the other advantage of glycine is it works on phase two liver detoxification, which is amino acid conjugation.

So you're helping your liver work better. And in a world where we're being exposed with all these toxic things from glyphosate to heavy metals, we all need to do some sort of liver mitigation strategies. Glycine's one of the best. Wow, interesting. We haven't done an episode of this podcast yet on heavy metals, but we're, I'm very interested in this

because many people write to me asking about metal toxicity and about mold toxicity. Molds become super big. Yeah, big. Yeah, I mean, it's very prevalent and it seems the more we talk about it, I mean, we've seen it for years and years and years. It makes sense, right?

Like if you think about the amount of airplanes flying above us every day, pouring down heavy metals. I mean, it's massive. It's in the air, it's in the water, it's in the soil. You talk about glyphosate or Roundup, same exact thing. So many chemicals and it's challenging for us as humans. The way I break it down, not to get too far on topic, is we're water soluble organisms living in a fat soluble world. It's the job of our liver, essentially, to take

the fat soluble stuff, make it water soluble so we can excrete it. That takes place in the liver in two phases. Phase one, we're using the P450 enzymes, like taking the trash, putting it in the trash can, putting it out on the side of the road. You have phase two, amino acid conjugation, the trash truck comes and picks up the trash. Very few things in nature induce phase two independent of phase one, meaning most of us have trash piled up on the side of our road. Those things are the polyphenols, right?

And so things like the blues, the reds, the pigments, that's why it's important to eat a wide variety of colors in your diet. Matcha tea has a very strong inducing effect on phase two liver activity. Is that right? Yep. I need to develop a taste for matcha.

Yeah. I feel like it's kind of grainy. It is and it's bitter. Yeah. But bitter things tend to be, again, helping that phase two. Glutathione helps phase two. We do a lot of that intravenously. And then glycine is a wonderful agent

for inducing phase two independent of phase one. And the trouble is I don't think people realize, people are told, well, most pharmaceuticals induce a P450 enzyme. And a misconception is, well, if I'm just inducing one, I'm good. If you induce one, you induce them all. So if you take any pharmaceutical,

you're inducing your entire P450 system. You're speeding it up, meaning you're putting more trash out on the side of the road. And if you look at the amount of things we're being exposed to outside of pharmaceuticals, it's mounting. It's crazy. We say on the side of the road, you mean in the liver. Yeah, that's what I'm saying. I'm just using that as a metaphor.

Yeah, yeah, yeah. You're not talking about it, screening it in the, you're talking about building up of debris, cellular debris with it, or excuse me, metabolic debris within your body. Right, the trash, again, or excuse me, metabolic debris within your body. Right, the trash, again, very oversimplification. You need to speed up phase two to get the trash trucks

come to pick up the trash so that you can then take that compound and excrete it in your stool, in your urine, your sweat, your breath. Right, I mean, that's the only way it works. It's not complicated per se, but I think there's a lot of misconceptions about it. So when people take a peptide that's injectable, pineal and glycine, they're getting glycine obviously, but for, let's say somebody doesn't have access to you or to, for whatever reason,

there's a barrier to getting ahold of those peptides. Can people take glycine orally? They can. Yeah, glycine's absorbed well orally. It has a really sweet taste. It's actually the smallest amino acid. Huge fan of it, we've been using it a long time. You can take big dosages of it.

So trans. Very, so, again, my starting dose is usually three to five grams at bedtime. Wow. And then I tell, what my, what the way I do this, recommend is try that for a few nights in a row. Not noticing a thing, double the dose. Go to 10 grams, literally.

Most people at 10 grams of glycine will notice it. And again, it's not gonna necessarily make you drowsy. You're not gonna be sedated, but your nervous system's gonna be toned down a little bit. It's gonna help you fall asleep a little bit better. And then while you sleep, where a lot of this detoxification process starts working, you're gonna be more efficient in how your liver works.

Everything ties together. Right, so I'm still a big fan of things like magnesium 3 and 8, apigenin, which is a chamomile derivative, and I'll try glycine. I think a few years back I was using a little bit of glycine, but it was more like a thousand milligrams. But now that it's in the injectable peptide, the pinealin, I don't take it.

Is there an oral form of pinealin that works? There's these bioregulator peptides, which were developed by this Russian scientist, last name Corvinson, I think. Done a lot of research, actually. There's published research about it. I think pinealin's one of the ones that they say will survive the stomach acid

and get through the gut and be absorbed. So I think that's true. We've always used it as injectable. And I tend to like injectable things for the bioavailability. So yeah, but to your point, I think people can, those are gonna be harder and harder to find actually. It's probably easier to find an injectable pinon

than an oral one. Yeah, and as we're talking about this, I'm realizing what, unfortunately, just the way the internet works, that people are gonna start selling, likely as a consequence of this conversation, will start selling pinealin, but you need to know that you're actually getting pinealin.

I mean, it's very easy for somebody to just pop something up on Amazon and sell it. And maybe they just throw some melatonin in there and call it pinealin. Like there's a lot of like BS stuff out there. So this is why the compounding pharmacy component and working with a physician is so key. And researching, right?

Making sure that what you're taking is legit. A lot of illegitimacy out there. Do you think that pharmaceutical companies are gonna move into these other peptides? I mean, that you certainly, Epimorlin for the reduction in visceral body fat, that's an FDA approved drug. So is somerelin, FDA approved drug. The GLP-1 agonists, FDA approved drugs. So those are, the FDA is unlikely to pull those, but they're blockbuster, especially GLP-1. I mean, they're making not even a small fortune, but a large fortune. Big money.

The concerning part about the GLP-1s is, to me, is what we're starting to see. They've been able to be compounded because there was a shortage. And the way it works with compounding pharmacies, because those are brand-name drugs, and they're not patented for the peptide, right? They're patented for the delivery system, which is the pen, which most people don't realize. And they've been able to be compounded and then way more affordable because they're compounded. And there is rumors that the pharmaceutical companies now have supply back.

They'll come back and they will, you know, remove the ability to allow these peptides to be compounded, which means we'll have to stick to traditional dosages and people will lose access because they're gonna be way more expensive. I mean, they are. If your insurance doesn't cover it, 1,500 a month for most people. Very expensive.

That's a lot more. Yeah. For a lot of people, that's rent and more. So I'm hopeful that doesn't happen, but that's in the works. That's in lot more. For a lot of people, that's rent and more. So I'm hopeful that doesn't happen, but that's in the works. That's in the works. And that would be a huge shame. And again, I'm not a pessimist by any means.

I'm a perpetual optimist. So we'll just make sure that stays this way. But again, if it does happen, we'll get creative and go other routes as well. Earlier, you mentioned stem cell therapies. Those are not FDA approved in this country. They are actually. You can use.

Oh, sorry, my mistake. So I think that using the term stem cell is a problem. If we use the term autologous cell, which would be PRP, it's basically the same thing. Platelet rich plasma. They take your blood, they spin it down, they take the. Right, and so the ruling is I understand it. As long as you're taking a cell from you

and you give it back within four hours, then that is allowed with under the FDA guidelines. Interesting, there was this clinic in Florida a few years ago was touting stem cell therapies for macular degeneration, injected some stem cells into these patients' eyes and they went blind really quickly and they were not blind prior to the injections. That to my understanding caused a severe setback

to the whole field. I'm old enough to remember when gene therapy was set back by about 10 years because a patient received gene therapy, which is now pretty common for certain diseases, and the patient died. It's unclear exactly why they died, but that delayed the field of gene therapy by at least a decade. I mean, this country is very conservative when it comes to the approval of new therapeutics. Sure, sure. Yeah, no, and I think like anything,

there's gonna be people who get too aggressive. I've heard of doctors injecting stem cells into people's discs, and then they get dyscytis and infection, and that can just spiral very quickly. I think you gotta be reasonable in what you're trying to accomplish. I'm excited about stem cells and exosome therapy and PRP and PRF and using them as biologics

because I think there's a lot to learn. I think we only know very little from what we've seen from working with our patients. It's been tremendous from a rejuvenation standpoint. I mean, as long as, I think, it's taking tremendous from a rejuvenation standpoint. I mean, we're, as long as, you know, I think it's taking from your own, you know, and then giving back your own within how the FDA outlines it,

I think that's a great way to do it. Well, certainly you have the clinical data to back those statements. Thymacin alpha one, what is this peptide? But maybe before we discuss it, did the FDA nuke thymacin alpha one? They sure did. Whoa, okay, they're coming through with a howitzer

and taking out all these peptides. They are. Okay, well then let's keep this relatively brief. What was thymacin alpha one being used for previously? Yeah, I think it was, from my observation, the best peptide for immune modulation. So we would use it if you had an overactive immune system like autoimmune disease by definition,

if someone has an autoimmune disease, their immune system is attacking their own self, right? That's classically lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, things like that, celiac disease, type one diabetes, those are all autoimmune diseases. We could use thymus and alpha one and we tone down the immune response. We'd also use it a lot in post-COVID, where you have an abnormal immune response,

or the immune system hasn't caught back up, and you can kind of dial it up using thymus and alpha 1, and it's very safe. We use it a lot with long COVID, and we were using 5,000 micrograms a day, sometimes intravenously, getting great results, very safe, had no issues with it, but unfortunately it's off the table. I hear a lot of complaints about brain fog with long COVID and brain fog generally. Cerebral Lysan is a very interesting compound. My understanding is that Cerebral Lysan is available in Europe more broadly than it is

in the US. It's available here. Is it still taken out? No, it's still available. Okay, all right. Cerebral lysine made the cut. Yeah, it made the cut. We'll see what happens after this podcast.

That's right. We've used a lot of cerebral lysine. I actually have a clinic that's open in London. We actually did use it. We've used it a lot more over there than over here. So you have a US clinic and a UK clinic. We have one based in London and one actually did use it. We've used it a lot more over there than over here. So you have a US clinic and a UK clinic. We have one based in London and one in Charleston, yeah. And I think cerebral lysine has been used for decades

in the setting of post stroke, post traumatic brain injury. The trouble with it, again, I've observed with people, they get cerebral lysine, we're talking about IV, you can also use it sub-Q, is they will have a day or two where they feel really down and out. Like it's, like their mood shifts to like this dark place. Scary.

Yeah, and they come out of it. But most people don't like that feeling, and so we just, we stopped using it mostly. Yeah. For that reason. My understanding is that cerebral lysine is a kind of a cocktail of brain-derived nootrophic factor, ciliary nootrophic factor,

like some other things. It's not one thing. Yeah, and I think, right, I think collectively it increases BDNF levels, right? Like there was dihexa too, you're not sure if you're familiar with dihexa, that's another one that was removed by the FDA. Supposedly the most potent way to increase,

brain-derived neurotropic factor, kind of the juice the neurons live in, again, oversimplification, that's gone, but I think cerebral lysin did the same thing. Interesting. So as long as we're talking about maintaining or boosting cognitive function, here's one I've never tried,

but you and I have talked a little bit about. And it's still seen as kind of renegade, but it's becoming more commonplace. And that's methylene blue. And I always make the joke that I used to use methylene blue to clean my fish tanks. Cause I was a big fish tank aficionado, at least I was when I was a kid.

Right now I don't have a tank, but it's empty. No pun intended. What is methylene blue and what are people using it for and does it turn your tongue blue? It does for sure. Not permanently. Not permanently. It's actually the first pharmaceutical

ever prescribed in this country in the late 1800s was Methylene Blue. Goodness, here. So it sounds like really renegade, but it's not. It's not. You got it. Yep. But it's gained favor in the last five years.

That's certainly when we learned about it, particularly, you know, I learned about it through this doctor who was telling me with COVID patients, he was getting immediate, like within a day of stopping of COVID symptoms from using methylene blue. That's what like piqued my interest, like wow, that's incredible. And then he went on to say that then COVID tests were turning negative within a matter of like two days,

which was unheard of. I've seen that with something else, but I'll get back to that. Yeah, and so that's when I was like, oh, this is, you know, and it started to be talked about and learned about it. So methylene blue, when we talk about the mitochondria used in that mitochondrial membrane,

binds to cytochrome C oxidase. And I think of it, you know, traditionally it's used when people have carbon monoxide poisoning. They'll still use it. You go in the emergency room, you have carbon monoxide poisoning, it'll give you methylene blue, and it helps your red blood cells

displace the carbon monoxide and put oxygen there. And so, it's an oxygenator. That's how I think of it. Is it used as a performance enhancing drug in endurance sports? Because this sounds like the kind of thing that cyclists would really want to use. Check with your local governing body. There's always a question I get people like, are they hear something on a podcast and they go, can I take it or am I going to get disqualified?

And I always say, I have no idea if you'll get disqualified. I don't believe it's on the water list. Okay. I don't believe we- Well, just list. Okay. I don't believe we've. We'll just look for the people with the blue tongues. Yeah. Yeah, easy test. So, methylene blue absorbed very well orally. I think of it like NAD, the molecule NAD,

because it works on the cytochromes. Different than NAD though, because NAD is not, if you're taking NAD by itself, not absorbed orally well at all. That's one of the trouble with it. Methylene blue is, and actually you can take way bigger dosages orally than intravenously. We've given it intravenously a lot,

but we're limited in using it intravenously just because it'll start to cause some spasm of the vein. The arm starts hurting if you're giving too much methylene blue either too much or too quickly. And so we can give it orally. You can get a capsule of it That's how we are from messages. So I think a good dose is no more than 10 milligrams 10 milligrams Yeah, taking when in the morning it is, you know, it's a cognitive stimulant for sure

I mean, I've had more people over the last five years because we make Methylene blue We combine it with some other agents a little bit of some B vitamins, and people say this is the best thing for my brain function, recall memory. And quote unquote, nootropic, a term I don't really like because, there aren't circuits for being smart, there are circuits for task switching. I get it.

So it's 10 milligrams of methylene blue combined, and you've got some other things in the cocktail version that you make. Take it in the morning on an empty stomach. Yeah, you could take it with food though. Again, it's gonna be well absorbed. It will, interesting to people, I need to say it will turn your urine green or blue.

For how long? About 24 hours, depending. And- That can be kind of fun. Yeah, well, and a good caveat is if it doesn't, and I've had patients, then that's interesting to me as a clinician because it means that your mitochondria is not working well.

The way I see this is you should get spillover. You shouldn't use it all. And if you're not, there's something wrong there that you're using all of it and you're getting no spillover back into your bloodstream, which gets filtered into your bladder, your urine, which you urinate out. And that's happened with a couple patients. So it's like, oh, wow, you had no green or blue urine. There's a problem with your mitochondria. So it's putting more oxygen onto the blood cells?

Correct, like your hemoglobin is able to pick up more oxygen. That's exactly right. But then there's the, you know, a mild MAOI inhibitor, which is- Monoamine oxidase inhibitor. Yeah, which can allow things like serotonin to work a little bit longer in that synaptic cleft.

You've expounded way better than I can about serotonin and dopamine and how those work, but there is a cognitive enhancement from it, for sure. It's very real. And we have a lot of people using it and love it. It also seems to be an antiviral. You know, you get this, again, that's probably through the mitochondria, making your mitochondria more efficient.

It's a prescription drug. It's a prescription drug, but there's now, and I don't totally understand it, there's now strictly over-the-counter nutraceutical supplement options that are methylene blue. For sure, anyone can go online and buy it. For sure. Well, trust me now, there are gonna be a few.

And you talked about turning your mouth blue, if you take a liquid form, right, and we'll do that sometimes in the office when we're doing other treatments, we'll give a big dose of methylene blue to kind of help fuel, kind of quickly make a lot of ATP, which we want to do with some different IV treatments we do. So we'll give sometimes up to 50, 50 milligrams at a time. Their gums, teeth, lips are blue for about an hour or two.

And how often can people take methylene blue? Again, you could take it every day. I think it's a little bit longer acting. I don't take it every day. I take it about three times a week. I think that's a little bit longer acting. I don't take it every day. I take it about three times a week. I think that's about right. I do have people who need it more, for whatever they're dealing with. I do think as a nutrient, if we're gonna call it that, it's a lot of it's an insurance policy for your mitochondria.

So earlier you mentioned a patient, or maybe it was patients, plural, that experienced a more rapid transition out of a COVID infection or maybe more recovery from long COVID symptoms, et cetera. It reminded me of the second time I got COVID, far less intense than the first time. But the second time I got COVID, I had an amazing experience where my COVID test was very strong band.

It was very clear, like I had COVID. There was no question about it. I didn't feel good. I was fatigued. Wasn't super severe. I would put it kind of on a six out of 10 on the kind of malaise level, no fever. Okay, so I stayed in bed and stayed away from people,

this sort of thing. But I did an NAD infusion. I of course told them I had COVID, they came over, they gave me an NAD infusion. And correlation is not causation, but I think it was 750 milligram NAD infusion over the course of about 45 minutes. I had the usual feelings that one gets

when you get an NAD infusion of you feel like an elephant is stepping on your legs. Yep. Your chest kind of cramps, so you feel, and then when that stops, you feel much better than you go into the thing. Yeah. The band was absent the next day.

My symptoms were, I went from, I don't wanna say gone, I went from, you know, like a five, six out of 10, as I mentioned, to like a two out of 10. And within another 48 hours, I was good to go and better. Awesome. Now, this is correlation, not causation. I don't know what was going on. It could have been the saline bag, right?

Could have been any number of things. But the shift from a dark band to no band was so dramatic that I took another test after the no band. And then of course the next day and the next day, you know, this kind of thing. It's interesting. I don't know what it means, the next day and the next day, this kind of thing. It's interesting.

I don't know what it means, but one wonders whether or not it's just a global way of combating inflammation. I just sort of, anytime I think about a systemic effect, and the reason I raise this is that I don't want to give the impression that I think that NAD is specifically in the pathway that was targeted, but that my brain and body were inflamed. Clearly, I had an infection. You could have a flu. You could have a cold.

You're inflamed. What are your thoughts on that anecdote? Again, it's just anecdote, but what are your clinical reflections? We've seen it so many times. For the longest time, and so we've been using NAD longer than most. I'm fortunate that I was given the original NAD infusion protocol,

which came from Mexico. It's kind of a long story, I don't wanna bore you, but that dosage of 750 milligrams is actually what we came up with in my office, and that's what most people adopted, just because we've used it more than probably anyone else on the planet. Huge fan of NAD, very biased,

but that's only because I've seen it work over and over and over in inexplicable scenarios, just like you're describing, where it's not just you go from A to B, but you're going to A to Z very quickly. And I used to use the word transformational talking about it. Not just okay, going from a sick state to a well state,

but in most people going from a well state to a super well state really quickly. And it's super impressive. So there's a lot more to NAD than we understand, right? Because just very empirically giving someone this coenzyme, this vitamin B3 derivative, how is it dramatically changing symptomatically how someone feels?

But it does. And I've seen it with thousands upon thousands of people, certainly in the setting of COVID, certainly in other bio-infections, you name it. I have been more impressed with the work of NAD than probably any other agent we've ever used. Amazing. Yeah, I take sublingual NMN each day.

It makes my hair grow ridiculously fast. I've done the control experiments. I'm a scientist, I know how to do control experiments. It's still just N of one. It's just me. It makes my nails grow really fast, makes my hair grow fast. That's the major consequence.

By the way, I wanna be clear. I don't have any stake in any company that sells NAD or NAD infusion, so I'm just reporting what I'm reporting. I think it's great. Somebody who's quite expert in the NAD pathway, Charles Brenner, who I believe has a relationship to a company that makes NR supplements, encouraged me to try NR.

I took these NR supplements. This is what's correct. Encouraged me to try NR. I took these NR supplements. This is what? It's NAD minus a phosphate group is my understanding. Those I took orally, I couldn't tell if I got the same or different effect because I was taking them together. I didn't continue to take them because compared to NMN, it was very expensive. I just stopped taking them. That's why I used sublingual NMN, it was very expensive. And I just stopped taking it. That's why I use sublingual NMN. But in brief discussions with Charles and how you're forging online, it seems that there

is some literature, human clinical literature, showing that NR can reduce inflammation. Is that right? Yeah, for sure. Okay. Less data that NMN can reduce inflammation, at least lack of human studies. Okay, so we're still kind of in the, it's still murky, foggy territory

with respect to the research and clinical. And the biochemistry. Yeah, and like what does the biochemistry do and the way I think about it, again, because we kind of pioneered the infusions, the NAD drips, which for me, transformational just observing lots of people who I never saw the same thing with NMN and R. You're not having these transformational experiences within a week.

I tell the story a lot is I had a patient, he was diagnosed with chronic Epstein-Barr virus, which is rare, but it does exist. He was depressed and on disability just because he couldn't almost get out of bed. This is mono? But it was reactivation of Epstein-Barr. Yeah, yeah, and so very like fatigued and depressed and literally on disability, couldn't work.

And he, I said, before we do anything, the way I operate is I want to get you feeling better first before we start to tackle some of the bigger things. We did the loading dose of NAD, which we came up with five treatments in 10 days, came back to my office, his wife was there, she was crying, she goes, it's been a week, my husband is back.

Wow. And I've seen that so many times with NAD, and I can't explain it, right? And if I just stick to the biochemistry, it doesn't make sense, oh, you're increasing the NAD-NEH ratio, fueling the mitochondria, which are all over the body, thousands per cell. There's something that we just told, there's got to be outside the mitochondrial effect

of NAD that's not well understood. So in the backdrop of our conversation today, there have been a number of themes, but one of the themes that seems to keep coming up is that there are a lot of things about medicine that we don't understand. Totally. And yet there are tools that seem to work for certain people extremely well. A few years ago, I went to a meeting. This is a foundation meeting, a foundation I was a part of, where you get to see talks

from really the best of the best laboratories, and they only show unpublished data. And at the time, I don't know if this paper's published yet, but at the time they were showing that they took people that were diagnosed with major depression. And they started doing a bunch of metabolomics on them. Now this sounds pretty standard for social media. It's actually pretty, it was like pretty heretical. Not a lot of places have done this right.

So, you know, a couple thousand patients, blood draws, they're trying to figure out, they ask a simple question, are there any specific vitamin deficiencies that are associated with depression? And as I recall, they identified a few different types of vitamin deficiency. So it's not like one vitamin, it's not always methylated B6 or something like that, or excuse me, it's not always B6 or B12. But they found these clusters of patients that had major depression that were deficient in particular B vitamin.

They supplemented back the B vitamin and lo and behold, those patients showed remission of their depression. So one could conveniently conclude, oh, well, all depression is a B vitamin deficiency, but of course that's not true, right? More likely depression like fever is just a broad description of symptoms. Right. But what was so exciting about this talk, to me anyway,

was that people were starting to look at nutritional deficiencies as a potential source of mental illness, which now has a bit more traction, but at the time was like, whoa, what are we really saying here? I thought all of depression was a serotonin deficiency, this kind of thing.

So when you talk about NAD having these transformative effects and the fact that NAD can kind of raise the tide on a number of different biological processes, to me it makes perfect sense. It might have kicked off some mitochondrial pathway or some cellular pathway that then fills in a blank that's desperately needed.

Is that one way that we can conceptualize this? That makes total sense to me. Okay. I like how you've described it. So how often do you encourage your already healthy patients to do NAD infusions? What are the dosages? I should mention the NAD infusions,

for most people are a little bit costly. They are costly. They're like anywhere from 500500 to $1,000. Or more, if you're in Los Angeles. Yeah, or more if you're in Los Angeles. So assuming someone has the means. Yeah, so here's what we found, and again, just found it by treating a lot of people

and learning is we do a loading dose for most people. We found the sweet spot to be 750 milligrams. Intravenous. Intravenous. When they were doing NAD in the 90s and they were doing it for substance abuse, so alcohol, pain medicine, morphine. They used it for that? That's where it came from, actually.

It was in the 90s, people traveling to Mexico for NAD infusions, that protocol was 10 straight days of intravenous NAD, yep. The dose they used was 3,000 milligrams. 3,000 milligrams? Yeah, and that's why it took six to eight to 10 hours per infusion. You could not get through it.

Putting 500 milligrams in over the course of 45 minutes is gonna be very uncomfortable. Many people take an antinagium med. So I'll tell you about that. So that comes from, so there was a gentleman in the States in 2006, lived in Louisiana. He had a pain medicine addiction, went to Mexico, got the N in 2006, lived in Louisiana. He had a pain medicine addiction. Went to Mexico, got the NAD protocol, changed his life.

He then licensed the use of the only injectable NAD product, which was from a South African company at the time, brought it to the United States, opened a clinic in Atlanta. All he did was addiction. And I got to know him because I'm in Charleston, not too far involved in IV work. He was not a physician.

I don't remember the time, but he came to me and said, hey, I need some help because I'm getting a lot of questions about this NAD stuff. And so he handed me the original protocol. I'm super grateful and fortunate. But what I realized is no one has time to spend six to eight to 10 hours in someone's office. They may do that once,

but they're not doing it more than once. So we started trialing different dosages, 250, 500, 750,000 on up. And I just found collectively by watching people and how they did, 750 milligrams was a sweet spot, meaning they'd get the benefits, which we can talk about, but then they could get through it in an hour or two hours. And that was meaningful.

And then we found that we don't need 10 straight days. That's too much. That just is crazy. We found that five treatments in 10 days, again, afforded people, the ability to have great benefits, which were uniform, probably 95% of people who do a loading test will come back and tell you their brain is getting bigger, they feel more creative,

they have an elevated mood, they can sleep less but have more energy, colors look brighter, languaging is easier. I mean this is all very real. So I think it affects the nervous system first, just because of the concentration of the mitochondria for every single neuron in the body. The physical components meaning, you know, recovery and helping with physical exercise,

those come, but I think they come later. And so we settled on 750 milligrams, we settled on the loading dose, and then what I noticed is that people were coming back between three and four weeks saying, hey, I don't feel as good as I did after I did that loading dose. And so we started doing a once a month maintenance dose,

and that is what we still recommend to today. Some people will do less and some people do more. I have some people who do it once a week. But plenty of people do it once a month and then some people do it. Some people will do it once a week. But plenty of people do it once a month and then some people do it quarterly. Some people do it whenever they can. On average, once a month seems to work really well for people.

Then during the pandemic and realizing this is growing, because again, we train practices kind of in the medicine that we practice, we've trained 300, 350 practices and kind of give them the playbook, so to speak. People weren't coming to the office as much with COVID, so we started doing it subcutaneously. And actually that's worked out really well. We'll do 100 milligrams subcutaneously,

again, five days on, take two days off. You get a little bit of that stomach cramping from a hundred milligram injection. Like you said, can't really be absorbed well orally, not gonna really work, so you're gonna have to inject it or infuse it. Agreed, there's a price point here, right? It's going to cost money.

But like most things, it's, you know, it's to me, if I had to pick one thing for people, engaging in NAD would be it. Really? Yeah, yeah, I would. Of all the things we've discussed. Of all the things, I've just been so impressed over the years. Now peptides are amazing. Not to knock peptides, peptides, there's so many peptides and I will get there, right?

Because you can take this peptide for the nervous system, this peptide for the immune system. But collectively, one agent, one thing, it's NAD has been the most impactful from where I sit working with patients. Well, that's a significant statement. So 100 milligrams injected subcutaneously, you get a little bit of stomach cramping as compared to the 500 milligrams to 750 or 1000 milligrams that one brings in IV. The fastest I've ever dripped it in was, I think, like 40 minutes.

I can tell you the record. What's the record? Three minutes and 26 seconds. Is that you? No, no, no, no, no, no. For 500 milligrams? 750 milligrams, two separate people did it. 500 cc's of saline.

Three minutes, 26 seconds. It's insane. Yeah, I don't recommend it. No, no, we wouldn't allow it to happen. It's too much. You gotta have a lot of experience with anything. Yeah, I found that because you have to sit there for a while, you could think, okay, well, do you organize the plumbing correctly that you could type or something, but you

feel garbage enough during the infusion that you get irritable. It's actually a very interesting window into empathy for people who have pain. Totally. When you're in this kind of whole body, kind of systemic pain and discomfort and you're getting that saliva, I'm kind of sensing it now, I have a distinct memory of this. Kind of like for people that get seasick,

you think about being on a boat and walking back and forth, get a little nauseous. Someone would walk in the room and you're like, why are they walking like that? And it's your own, it's your sense of pain. I normally don't have that response to people. I'm not a moody person in general.

But then, when you remove the infusion, you feel great. And all of a sudden, people seem delightful. The irritating person. It's a very interesting experiment in social empathy. It is, and this is just what I postulate, is that a lot of people are challenged because a lot of people are numb to the world they live in.

They don't feel things. And when you do NAD, there is nothing like that experience and that feeling. And so you are going to just psychologically say something is changing inside of me. And it's something powerful because when I receive it, it's a lot. And to your point, what we do is we have a kind of an IV room

where you have like eight chairs, and we make it social. Because when you're talking to people and learning about their experiencing it, there's actually a lot of healing that occurs just from that community. That's a bonding experiment. It is, yeah. For people that can't afford the infusions,

the injections would be the next best bet. If they can't afford those, would it be the sublingual NMN or NR? I think so. I think the NMN I would choose over NR. Yeah, so going from most expensive to least expensive most expensive would be in IV then it would be subcutaneous then it would be NR and then it would be sub sublingual NMN. Yeah. Okay, that's about right. I mean, you could do NAD topically, it's a little bit wild card doing it topically,

you could do it under your, yeah, patch. The eye-intraphoretic patches, those give me a really terrible. The problem is the patch. I get this itchy thing. It's the patch, it's adhesive, it's too strong, lots of people get irritated, their skin gets irritated. I think the NAD gets in well,

but the patch itself is a hindrance, obstacle. And for those that are listening to this, and they may recall, I did an episode of this podcast with Dr. Peter Attia, where we talked about NAD and NMN and NR, and that was mainly focused on the research literature. You're not gonna find much. So what we're talking about here is clinical experience. Yeah, full disclosure, I'm a clinician through and through, so my experience is observing

people. You're interested in what works. Well, I'm confident about it because I've done a lot of it. I've seen a lot of how peptides work because we've done a lot of it. This NAD, because we've overseen, again, a lot of NAD here and in London, all over, and the providers we work with. So we get a lot of feedback about what works and what doesn't work. Speaking of clinicians and science and all of this, there are a couple other peptides

that have received FDA approval that are commonly in use, things like PT-141, which is in this melanocytes hormone pathway that's used. One of its FDA approved uses is, I think the brand name is Vilece is for female hypo libido. So it stimulates libido in women. It's also used to stimulate libido in men. Is that right? Can be, and it can be helpful for, it's like a neurogenic mechanism for erectile dysfunction.

So it's not just related to blood flow? It's not, actually. It's not, and PT-141, yeah, like a fragment or derivative of the peptide melanotan, which stimulates alpha melanocyte stimulating hormone, which is becoming more in play, I guess, in the environment I operate in just because of mold toxicity.

And we think of mold toxicity being a biotoxin and hitting MSH being kind of the general in terms of a lot of these hormonal pathways, actually. And melanotan can bolster by putting out more melanocy, stimulating hormone seems to bolster immune response. I think there's an element with energy too. The downside of melanotan is it stimulates melanocytes,

so you're gonna get this tanning, and it's not like a, it's like an orange looking tanning. From the inside out. Yeah, you see it, you recognize it. So PT-141, what they found is in rats, I think it was female rats were copulating more when they got this compound. And they're like, oh cool, and let's try it in humans,

and it's led to that. Our trouble with it is a very small or narrow therapeutic window. And if you give too much, you're gonna get nauseous pretty quickly. And some people don't like, particularly women don't like that tanning look. It's not a very-

It can look very unnatural. Unnatural is the word. Yeah. The medial pituitary, which at least my understanding is the origin of these peptides that we're talking about now is super interesting. And you mentioned the nausea. These peptides hit multiple pathways. When we had Dr. Zachary Knight from University of California, San Francisco on to talk about

GLP-1 in a lot of detail, he mentioned that some of the nausea associated with Ozempic and Menjaro and things like that relates to the fact that there are receptors for these things not just in one hypothalamic structure, but also in area post-trauma and areas of the brain that are these quote unquote primitive areas that are associated with generating nausea when you need to rid yourself of a poison. The nature conveniently engineered us with neurons that when they detect chemical changes in the blood,

make us vomit. Yeah, and to touch on that is what we found is if we start with, again, a micro dose and go slowly with the GLP ones, the nudge is virtually unheard of. Not saying it doesn't occur, but it's super rare if you just take your time with it. I think when people have most problems,

they're shotgunning the dose essentially, you're overwhelming your system. So I have two more questions. The first one is a bit of a controversial one. Okay. Today we've talked about a lot of peptides that you've observed incredible clinical utility for. Yeah.

We also talked about a lot of peptides that the FDA has banned, basically, to be blunt. We've also talked about peptides that at one point not too long ago were considered part of kind of niche culture like fitness or bodybuilding culture that are now approaching what will probably be trillion dollar industries over the next 10 years, things like GLP-1 agonists. So any listener with their neurons firing will put two and two together and say, okay, what's the deal? Obviously the FDA, I like to believe, has a genuine interest in our safety. They don't want us taking things that are dangerous for us.

At the same time, there seems to be a kind of clawing back of what's out there and then a handing off to pharmaceutical companies to put out compounds for which there are tremendous profit margins. I mean, the profit margins on these are insane. We can't comprehend it. We can't comprehend it. We can't comprehend it. So, you know, MK677, I crossed out, right? FDA grabbed that one.

Thymus and Alpha-1 crossed out. Okay, a bunch of other things that have been... BPC157 clawed back. So how should we frame this in our mind? In other words, do you think that the FDA has genuine good intentions of trying to protect the general public and that's why they're doing this? Or is this a plan to kind of make that appear to be the case so that these can then be sold at a very, very high profit margin?

And perhaps it could be both, right? It's not an either or. And I want to be very high profit margin. And perhaps it could be both, right? It's not an either or. And I want to be very clear, you know, I work at a major medical school, but I'll speak freely anyway, right? As would my colleagues, I like to think that these governing bodies have some people there, at least, with very good intentions. I don't think it's a bunch of bad people writhing their hands together with getting kickbacks on farmers.

I don't believe that. In fact, I know that not to be the case. But like what's really going on here? Because this is kind of weird. There's this huge class of compounds we call peptides that clearly have immensely beneficial uses in the right dosage in the right hands with the right physicians. They're being clawed back. Why?

It's confusing. I think it's probably both I think You know, I would say that unfortunately a lot of times when the government acts they overreach, right? Like I do think they probably have good intentions I think there's a there's probably sound reasons to Want to have oversight of things that seemingly is the wild wild west, right? and there's truth to that, right? Because pet pets came on the scene and people started using them, they're recommended here and there,

people could get them from, still can, research companies, and there's not a lot of corralling of understanding, well, what is going on? So I'm sure there's an element to like, hey, let's understand this better. But on that side, I think they went too far, right? Because I think if you really look at data or if you were really interested in that,

there's ways to understand how things work without removing them from the marketplace. So the other side of me is like, just like we're talking about, Ozempic and Monjourno, semaglutide and terzepatide, are blockbuster drugs. If you're a pharmaceutical company and you see that there's 15 to 20 other peptides, which are really working and really working because, again, we've just seen the clinical response over and over and over, it's not a large leap to think, hey, if we're a pharmaceutical company, what if we turn that peptide,

which was available to the commoner, for lack of a better term, into a drug? Well, like Vilece. That was done for melanocytes simulating hormone pathways. Yeah, and so I'm sure, I think it's both. I think, and that's why I go back to, we have to operate within certain boundaries, right?

Like that's great. We have to understand those boundaries. It would be, and I say this sincerely, I don't, when we're talking about healthcare and we're talking about people's health, we're not even close to talking about the truth for most things, right? We're not talking about why people get chronic disease.

We're not talking about how our food is really over-processed and the availability of high quality nutrients and what that means. We're not talking about all the toxicities. We just look at Roundup glyphosate and its interference with so many pathways in the body. And people say, you know, in Monsanto and whoever runs that now saying it's so safe

and it's just not true. So I think it's in line with, and what I support is unfortunately and fortunately as an individual you have to be your own best advocate. You can't rely on someone to say particularly the government that you have permission or not permission to do this. You think it's best for people to do their own research, you know, seek out reliable information, right? Start here. I mean, you guys vet so much stuff, very safe place for people to be like,

this is where I wanna start. And then life is, you learn by exploring and seeing what works for you. It's like, you start with a recipe to cook, right? But some people like it saltier. Some people like it spicier. You gotta see what works best for you. And that's why I seek out other people,

people like myself, other physicians, other people who have experienced saying, hey, we'll help you, guide you in this. And that's where the magic happens. But to be honest, we're not being truthful on many levels when we talk about health. We're just not. We spend so much money for what? We're not making a dent in chronic disease. We're not making an impact.

We're not helping people lead better lives. You know, medicine is great for life and death things. It really is. You know, I, in August of 2020, I had terrible abdominal pain. I had just come back from visiting our friends in Hawaii. I kind of tried to treat myself unsuccessfully. Eventually it was on Labor Day. I had so much pain the next day.

Called my friend who's a radiologist and said I need to do a CAT scan. I did the CAT scan. He called me on the way back to the office. I had a blood clot in the vein going to my liver that had completely cut off. I almost died. Like it was really serious.

I was gonna be hospitalized. I'm on blood thinners now. I am forever grateful for pharmaceuticals. Saved my life, right? But those same medicines aren't probably gonna help me lead my best life, right? But those same medicines aren't probably gonna help me lead my best life, right? And it's challenging. Having been educated in a very formal,

conventional medical system, which is dominated by the pharmaceutical industry is a problem, right? We go back to the Flexner Report, which is like 1917, 1915 or something, where they studied medical education and basically said, if you're a medical school and you're not promoting pharmaceuticals and inline, and we're gonna kick out alternative remedies

and modalities like chiropractic and acupuncture and nutrition, they don't count anymore. And that's where we are. The only thing that matters, and we see it as a society, we're deemed healthy by the pills we take, right? If we're gonna be really honest, those pills aren't making us healthy. And by and large, they're not even making us well anymore.

You know what I mean? And so I think it's time and it's wonderful to have this forum to be able to talk about. Like, and this is why I support so many other people talking about it. Like we need to make a change in that. We need to start being honest about what we're doing. Our health is not gonna be coming from saying, taking this pill or that potion.

It's not. Not at this stage. And it's more likely that people are going to feel healthy from seeing their trainer in their gym. Right? These, why these things go to the gray market or black market, because people actually get results. You know what I mean?

And it's just sad, but true. And so to answer your question, I think it's both. I think the pharmaceutical companies are greedy. I think they like making money, right? I think they also like helping people right, they want to help people but it comes with a big cost and The government's there to kind of corral that but like most things the government does they go too far, right? And I think we need to be honest about those discussions and it's not threatening and it's not harmful. Just to be saying, hey, how do we make this better?

And how do we even agree to disagree? Let's just start there. I really appreciate your take. I too rely on prescription drugs now and again. I don't know, maybe I'll lose some following for saying this, but like I've had some situations where it made sense to take an antibiotic after a surgery or something.

I'm not anti-antibiotics, right? I also don't eat them like M&Ms. I also believe that, well, everything you said, I generally agree with. I don't have the clinical expertise or the nuance to really understand these governing bodies. That's one of the reasons why I'm asking today and really appreciate you shedding light on this. I think you're clearly a truth teller. You're telling us your truth from the clinical perspective,

but it's clear you also have a broad optics here. And we appreciate that. Sure. This podcast has always been about bringing a diverse outlooks on the same things. It's been wonderful today to be able to explore peptides, NAD, and this issue of FDA approval and FDA removal, as the case may be. You said something earlier a couple of times that I'd like to finish up on.

You talked about positive thoughts. Yeah. You're a physician. Yeah talked about positive thoughts. Yeah. You're a physician. Yeah. Not a psychologist. No. But you're a physician and you're in the business of making people feel better.

And it's clear to me that among your many talents, you have great powers of observation. So what is this thing about positive thoughts? I mean, there are a lot of neuroimmunological data out there showing that stress makes us sick. If we stress too long, repeatedly for too long, stress in the short period is actually good for us, right? There are some data showing that positive thoughts

can enhance immune system function, et cetera. The data are pretty cool. Clinically, however, what's your observation about mindset and health? I think we're just scratching the surface and I think it is the most profound way to affect your life, right? So there's a couple things I'll say about it.

One, no good has ever come from a negative thought. Nothing ever good has come from a negative thought. And because all of us have a choice about every decision we make, to me, it's always best to slant that decision in a positive frame. Now, it doesn't mean you're fake about it, right? People really suffer.

People really go, I mean, it is a very stressful time right now, maybe the most stressful time in human history. And there's no need to gloss over it and saying, I mean, it is a very stressful time right now, maybe the most stressful time in human history. And there's no need to gloss over it and saying life is peaches and cream because it's not for a lot of people. But what I know just personally and professionally is that when you start pivoting towards positivity,

you get more positivity, right? And all of us, every single human has that opportunity to do that. That some people with way harder choices. They are dealt a much more challenging and difficult hand, lots of people. But if we think about it, we didn't get to choose our eye color, we didn't just get to choose our family, we didn't get to choose where we were born or how we were brought up, but we do get to choose how we respond to those things.

And so what I've learned is there's never enough positivity I can exude. There's never enough positivity I can be around ever in my life. It is just the most amazing thing and it can never be taken from you. Right? And so when we talk about success and longevity and health span, to me, positivity has to be a part of that because the mindset of positivity will override almost everything, literally. And I can't tell you how that happens on a biochemical or physiologic basis, but I know it to be a truth. I know it in the core of my being that the more positive I am, the more I can influence

other people's and plant seeds and help people be more positive. And that is something that I cherish and just love. And it's not talked about enough. Specifically as a physician, we're talking about the science and, oh, this study and putting people on this medicine. But really the value, and I made this decision back in 2010

because I had my own practice and I decided to stop taking insurance. And it wasn't a money thing. It wasn't like, oh, it was because I was no longer valuable taking five to seven minutes with each person and seeing 40 patients a day. And for me, I felt like I'm not fulfilling my purpose here when I'm just writing prescriptions, that my purpose will be fulfilled if I can really have conversations where I get to know people.

And peptides and NAD tie into that because they are gateways to build trust with me so that I can actually help you, an individual, learn how to be more positive. And to slant yourself and have that posture. Because ultimately all of us need the energy and want the energy to find our purpose, right? And once you find that purpose, Oh my goodness, life gets magical. Right.

Cause we're all unique. We all have a different DNA structure. God gave us that to be unique, to shine our light, to contribute, to help others. Most people don't know about that because they're in pain or they're tired or whatever they're suffering. And if we can help walk people through that and help them heal that, that's gonna get really good. And that's just what I enjoy doing.

Beautifully said. And so grateful to you for doing that within your clinical practice, for making that decision a few years back to shift over to being aligned with your purpose and the way that you've now expanded your practice to public education will provide links to your practice and to your public education efforts.

And for coming here to do this significant public education effort about peptides and other compounds and regulatory bodies, and also just the field of medicine. And also just, you know, I think so often we hear from scientists or from physicians and we forget the human component. And what's so beautiful about what you do and the way you do it is that your humanity

really comes through. Oh, I appreciate that. So it really does. I can tell you really care. And I know our listeners and viewers can tell as well. So- really does. I can tell you really care and I know our listeners and viewers can tell as well So thank you as this field evolves and advances Please come back and talk to us again. I'd love to meanwhile again We'll provide links so that people can find you and some of the resources that

Back up what we've discussed today and Craig. Dr. Conover. thank you ever so much. Well, thank you, Andrew. No, it's really, I'm so honored to be here. I respect and love the work you're doing and the light you're shining and you're helping so many. You have such a wide audience that, you know, trust you. And it's amazing. Like I said, I see it every day with people coming to me and bouncing what you do and saying, hey,

is this good for me? And that is amazing. I love that. That's how we get better, right? We help support each other. And I just appreciate what you're doing. And being here is truly an honor, really a big deal for me. So thank you.

Thank you. I'll take that in and write back at you. Okay. Come back again. I appreciate it. I appreciate you. Thank you. Thank you for joining me for today's discussion with Dr. Craig Conover.

To learn more about his work and his clinic, as well as to find links to some of the things discussed in today's episode, please see the show note captions. And if you'd like to learn more about peptides, including some of the ones that we discussed today, but also some additional ones, please see the link to the solo episode that I did about peptide therapies in the captions.

If you're learning from and are enjoying this podcast, please subscribe to our YouTube channel. That's a terrific zero cost way to support us. In addition, please subscribe to the podcast on both Spotify and Apple. And on both Spotify and Apple, you can leave us up to a five-star review. Please check out the sponsors mentioned at the beginning

and throughout today's episode. That's the best way to support this podcast. If you have questions for me or comments about the podcast or guests or topics that you'd like me to consider for the Huberman Lab podcast, please put those in the comment section on YouTube. I do read all the comments. For those of you that haven't heard, I have a new book coming out. It's my very first book. It's entitled Protocols, an Operating Manual for the Human Body. This is a book that I've been working on for more than five years, and that's based on more than 30 years of research and experience.

And it covers protocols for everything from sleep, to exercise, to stress control, protocols related to focus and motivation. And of course, I provide the scientific substantiation for the protocols that are included. The book is now available by presale at protocolsbook.com. There you can find links to various vendors. You can pick the one that you like best.

Again, the book is called Protocols, an operating manual for the human body. If you're not already following me on social media, I am Huberman Lab on all social media platforms. So that's Instagram, X, formerly known as Twitter, threads, Facebook, and LinkedIn. And on all those platforms, I discuss formerly known as Twitter, threads, Facebook, and LinkedIn. And on all those platforms,

I discuss science and science related tools, some of which overlaps with the content of the Huberman Lab podcast, but much of which is distinct from the content on the Huberman Lab podcast. Again, that's Huberman Lab on all social media channels. If you haven't already subscribed to our Neural Network Newsletter,

our Neural Network Newsletter is a zero cost monthly newsletter that includes podcast summaries, as well as protocols in the form of brief one to three page PDFs. Those protocol PDFs are on things like neuroplasticity and learning, optimizing dopamine, improving your sleep, deliberate cold exposure, deliberate heat exposure.

We have a foundational fitness protocol that describes a template routine that includes cardiovascular training and resistance training with sets and reps all backed by science. And all of which again is completely zero cost. To subscribe, simply go to hubermanlab.com, go to the menu tab up in the upper right corner,

scroll down a newsletter and provide your email. And I should emphasize that we do not share your email with anybody. Thank you once again for joining me for today's discussion with Dr. Craig Conover. And last but certainly not least, thank you for your interest in science.