Judge John Hodgman - All Laws Are Off
Episode Date: May 5, 2016Judge John Hodgman rules on overfilling ice cube trays, the best spelling of Elliot for a baby, dog park etiquette, podcast recommendations and more. ...
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Welcome to the Judge John Hodgman podcast.
I'm bailiff Jesse Thorne.
We're clearing the docket this week in chambers.
Hi, Judge Hodgman.
How are you?
Raquel Heiner.
Raquel Heiner.
Thank you very much for supporting the Judge John Hodgman podcast that I'm making right now.
Wait, you can see Jesse through the microphone.
What are you doing, Judge Hodgman?
What's going on?
It's Jesse.
Sorry, I'm thinking Rachel Henner, who is one of the leadership squad
upgraders during the Max Fund Drive.
You know, we had such great response to the Max Fund Drive and especially
my many thanks to those who upgraded or joined at the leadership squad
level or above.
And I'm still thanking them by mispronouncing their names on the internet. I just mispronounced, mispronounce.
And they were so generous. And I'm just, I'm a little behind. So I'm just trying to fit it in
when I can, even on the podcast. Yeah, I mean, I think probably on the air is the best time to do
that, right? I think, I think it probably is. I only have about 15 more to go. So stand by, Jesse.
Oh, no, no, we have to clear the docket.
Judge Hodgman. Okay. All right. All right. Fine. We'll do put it. This is the podcast.
Choose your filter and post the video and let's do this. All right. I am ready to go to make the
podcast. Good podcast to you, Jesse. How are you? Hang on, Jesse. I'm, uh, I know you want to get
going on our podcast, but it's just but I'm just getting a word here.
And you can tell because I'm touching my ear like it's a newscast.
Sure, like you're in the Secret Service.
That Rachel has changed her last name to Roseng.
Oh, that's Rach-tacular.
Well, in fact, now my mispronunciation is doubly mispronounced because I just said the wrong name.
Well, I think that's for the best.
Okay, here's our the best. Okay,
here's our first case. It's from Martine.
Or Martin.
Who knows? I have a dispute with my partner, Andrew.
What's the appropriate way to fill an ice cube tray?
I fill the tray with water
and then gently pour off the excess
so that each cube is within
one half and
three quarters full.
One half?
Andrew prefers to just fill the F out of the entire tray,
paying no heed to whether or not any of the cube wells are overfilled.
Andrew prefers big cubes, but his overfilling leads to cubes that are connected by a solid sheet of ice.
My method avoids this issue, but results in smaller cubes.
Since I've broached this, Andrew has simply stopped filling the ice tray.
I assume in protest.
Judge Hodgman, please order him to continue to fill the tray, but to my specifications.
First of all, Martime, Maritime, or whatever your name is,
First of all, Martime, Maritime, or whatever your name is, I appreciate your coming close to but not actually swearing about ice on the podcast.
I appreciate that you realize that this is a family-friendly podcast, and yet you feel so passionately about ice cubes that you were like, I'm i'm gonna push the envelope on this one i have to i was impressed that she did she didn't even swear about she or he uh didn't even
swear about ice swore about ice to be yeah well it did paint a word picture of how andrew fills
the f out of this ice cube tray yeah because. Because I really see it now just in the,
just hitting the water full on and just smashing it under there and just
waiting until it is totally full.
By the way,
if you fill up the ice cube,
if you have a standardized cube tray,
you've learned by now that you can't fill up the ice cube tray with the
water at full blast.
Cause it'll just hit one of those cube wells and then
just splash right back out of it at full speed into your eyes. You have to do it at low speed
and then you have to fill up that ice cube tray to the top of the ice cube tray and then pour off a little so that you don't get the sheet of ice but in no way
martine do you want to have three quarters or cthulhu forbid one half full cube tray cubes
that's you know when you are using a standard commercial ice cube tray to begin with those cubes are
smaller than they than is acceptable to to start you certainly don't want to make them even smaller
unless you're going to make a mint julep which uses traditionally crushed ice or tiny little
jewels of ice that you fill in a one-third full ice cube tray don't do that big cubes why big cubes jesse
why do big cubes always trump small cubes physics yeah they melt slower they melt slower
they water down your your beverage of choice Took me a little while to figure out the syntax on that one.
And there are certain drinks like them in Julep that call for crushed ice where you want it to get all watery and slushy.
And obviously, frozen drinks required crushed ice.
If your goal is to cool your drink for the longest period of time possible and maintain its integrity, particularly if you're making cocktails or serving something on the rocks.
They don't call it on the pebbles.
They call it on the rocks because the bigger the cube, the longer it keeps your drink cold
without watering it down.
Now, is Andrew reckless?
Sure.
Yeah, it's clear.
I mean, he's filling the F out of that tray.
Yeah.
Sure.
Yeah, it's clear.
I mean, he's filling the F out of that tray.
Yeah, and when you get that sheet of ice at the top,
when you fill it up too much,
then when you twist the cube tray,
and we're talking about a traditional cube tray,
a plastic cube tray,
not an old-timey ice shucker,
which I used to swear by,
which is an aluminum thing with a lever.
But when you twist that cube tray to get those cubes out,
that whole ice shelf at the top,
if you overfill it, shatters.
And then you basically lose
the benefit of the larger cubes because
you are probably going to be adding in a bunch of
shards
of ice from the ice sheet,
which will melt immediately.
And also it's just wasteful of water, which is a precious resource.
So you can tell that I believe, and as someone who used to write about food and non-wine alcohol for a men's magazine,
I care a lot about ice.
It's an incredibly important ingredient in beverages of all kinds, alcoholic or non-alcoholic, because it really will affect the flavor.
And here's the other thing.
Those ice cube trays that you're using, if they are the standard, are not good.
Because, as I already said, they're too small to begin with.
And second of all, they're open at the top.
said they're too small to begin with and second of all they're open at the top now if you go through a lot a lot a lot a lot a lot of ice it's not a big deal but ice will take on off flavors
the longer that it sits in the freezer so you want to get ice cube trays that have bigger
compartments for larger chunks of ice.
And you also want to get them with covers on them,
or you want to cycle them through very quickly every day.
I recommend, but you have a taste of your own, Martine.
You like watered down drinks that don't taste good.
So I have no problem with you making the ice to your taste,
but I would say Andrew has a taste of his own, one that I tend to share.
And I would recommend, if he likes bigger cubes, there are all kinds of big cube makers you can get, including big spherical ice cubes that you can get.
and that's one where you have uh it's a it's a special tray where you can make two globes of ice that are quite large and they go very well into a rocks class and they're wonderful
if you're having something in a rocks class like a whiskey if you're of age and you can only fill
those if you are filling the f out of them because you totally have to overfill them and then shove
the tops of the spheres down to make the perfect thing.
So it suits him perfectly because it'll get his,
his ice Jones out.
And also,
um,
it'll make the nice big ice cubes and also they're covered so you can keep
them in the freezer for a long time,
then get them out and they won't taste terrible.
That's my ruling.
I have a question for you,
judge Hodgman.
Yeah.
I will admit my wife has a large cube silicon ice tray that she got for Christmas from someone
who loves her very much and lives in her house and is me, that she uses for her bourbon.
She likes to drink bourbon at night.
Right.
Yeah.
And it's great.
It's an amazing machine.
I don't drink a cocktail, so I don't need a special giant ice cube.
Sure.
But my ice preference is completely on the other side of the ice spectrum.
I'm an ice chewer.
Oh. um i'm an ice chewer oh and to my mind the single greatest culinary luxury that exists
is not truffles or saffron uh it is pebble ice pebble ice like you would get at a movie theater
in your soda fountain if it was a really amazing movie theater.
Yeah.
So what is pebble ice?
Pebble ice, I mean,
there's a specific machine that makes it. I associate it personally
with a particular restaurant
called Pie and Burger
in Pasadena, California.
All right.
Wonderful restaurant.
I love both of those things.
But it is a type of ice
that can only be made
by a huge industrial machine.
There are now home pebble ice machines, but they are still pretty large and cost a couple thousand dollars, I think.
And it is small and generally round, pebble-ish.
It's also less dense,
but uniformly less dense.
So it can be crunched easily and comfortably.
And is,
yeah,
I mean,
it's sort of like,
it's sort of like the perfect crushed ice.
Well,
I think that that you have made a,
a profound and necessary case for a different kind of ice that you are absolutely right, suits different drinks and different people differently.
So, again, I have to rule on Andrew's side here, which is he's making ice to his taste and Martine's making ice to her taste.
And there are many different tastes of ice.
And I think that that's important.
ice and I think that that's important. You know, when I was growing up, I lived next door to my good friend Peter Rosenmeier, whose father was Danish by birth and brought with him into the
house many European traditions that I ascribed to being European just because they were
very strange. One of them I know was the European tradition
that he carried with him from his family in Denmark.
The candlesticks that have a balance on the bottom
so that, or I should, yeah, candlesticks
with a balance on the bottom
so that you could put them on the bow of a Christmas tree
and light the tree with real candles,
which is an amazing thing to see uh in real life to see
an actual tree inside a house lit with real candles that are balancing because it has a
counterweight at the bottom of the of the candlestick it's just an amazing thing to see um
possible death so near you. Really gave Christmas
an interesting cast to it.
And then they also had a thing,
and maybe this wasn't a European thing,
but it was,
maybe it's just old-fashioned or whatever,
but they had an ice tray that had no,
what would you call them?
They had no cube forms in them.
Do you know what I mean?
It was just a tray
that you would fill up, the size of an ice tray that you would fill up the size of an ice tray.
You would fill it up with water, freeze it.
You bring it out.
It's this big, long tray full of ice.
And then they had a kitchen implement, which was a heavy weight on the end of a flexible piece of metal.
So you could just whack it.
And you would whack that ice with that heavy metal
and it was an incredibly satisfying thing to do and just smash up the ice in the tray into a
variety of sizes because it was irregular every time so you would get some big chunks of ice
and then you would get little uh slivers and pebbles of ice as well it's not the job of this
podcast to find compromises,
but that might be a compromise because it has ice in it for every member of
the family.
That's amazing.
It's an amazing thing.
And you know what I saw?
I saw one of those implements.
It's like a long,
flexible piece of metal with a big,
heavy sort of semi sphere at the end.
And you literally like do a whipping motion.
And I saw one in an antique store in Vermont
and it was way overpriced and I didn't get it
and I regret it.
Your neighbor's dad who was from Denmark?
Yes. Did he look like a handsome
sea captain like every single person
I saw the entire time I was in Denmark?
He really did. Jesper Rosenmeier,
Peter's dad,
passed away a couple years ago, or a year ago.
Very sad, but I loved him. All the Rosenmeiers are loved by me. Here's dad passed away a couple years ago, or a year ago. Very sad, but I loved him.
All the Rosen Meyers are loved by me. Here's something from Stephen.
My wife and I agree that we want to name our as-yet-unborn son Elliot. He's due this month.
We both love the name, but we can't agree on how best to spell it. I prefer the spelling of Elliot
with two Ts, in the same style as my favorite musician, Elliot Smith. Our
last name is Scott, so our son's first and last names would both end with two Ts. I listened to
Elliot Smith quite a bit in our first year of marriage and appreciate his lyricism. His music
boosts me up, though I realize it does the opposite for many people. My wife, on the other hand, comes
from a bit of a superstitious family and doesn't want our son's name spelled the same way as Elliot Smith. She says he lived a tragic life and thinks it
would be bad luck. She prefers the more common spelling of Elliot with a single T from her native
England. Judge Hodgman, please issue a ruling. Elliot with one T or two.
First of all, for a bit of context, jesse can you explain for our listeners who may not
know who elliot smith is why uh that has some tragic overtones to that name uh yes um i'm
getting dangerously into a territory where other white people know a lot more about the subject
than i do well that's not me so that's why that's why I punted it to you. Okay, good.
I mean, in future,
if you're going to punt those kind of things to me,
could you just focus on Tony, Tony, Tony?
Elliot Smith, he is a singer-songwriter.
Here's what I know.
A beloved singer-songwriter.
We were so in sync just then.
Yes, a beloved singer-songwriter
who wrote beautiful, emotional,
sometimes heart-rending songs.
Did not like to, did not enjoy performing live,
and eventually, I believe, died by his own hand.
That is my understanding as well.
So that is a very tragic life,
and I appreciate that there's a tragic association
with that particular spelling of the name,
but it is a very common spelling of the name. It is not the, well, it's hard to say what the original spelling of the name. But it is a very common spelling of the name.
It is not the, well, it's hard to say what the original spelling of the name is.
The first printed spelling of the name, recognizably, is Elliot,
dates back to the 13th century, and that was E-L-I-O-T.
Single L, single T, which makes sense because extra L's and T's
are the things that get added over the course of history.
For the most part, it is associated with the clan Elliot of Scotland.
It may have derived from the Elliot River, which is E-double-L-I-O-T,
or maybe some version of Elijah we don't really know.
But all variations of spelling of Elliot are equal in the eyes of our dreadlord Cthulhu.
And indeed, the variations are so long-seated
that there's an old rhyme that I discovered
using the internet that dates back to some time,
and I don't know when, but this is how it goes.
And it sort of describes the different Eliots.
The double L and single T descend from Minto and will flee, whoever they are. The double T and single L mark
the old race in Stabbs that dwell. The single L and single T, the Elliotts of St. Germansby,
but double T and double L, who they are, no one can tell. So the double L and double T is the most mysterious of them all.
And for that reason, I kind of like it myself.
So here is the solution that I propose.
Nay, that I rule.
Name Elliot E-double-L-I-O-double-T, but not after Elliot Smith.
Name him after Elliot Kalin,
the famous podcaster,
one of the hosts of my rival podcast flop house,
and one of the sweetest and most decent people that I know his goodness and
intelligence shall erase the tragic history.
And your son can have the name that you want him to have
without the association that makes your wife nervous.
Here's something from Caitlin.
My husband Mark and I are dog owners.
During a recent trip to the dog park,
there was a disagreement between a couple of owners.
One party lost a Frisbee to another dog, who tore it up.
My husband feels that people should not bring
anything of value or anything they want to remain intact to a dog park. I disagree, citing basic
respect of personal ownership in society. I believe that it's a dog owner's responsibility
to maintain a minimum amount of control over their pet. This includes but is not limited to
basic wrangling by calling come or by physically removing your dog from dangerous situations.
All dog owners should have compassion for each other, but my basic rule will allow dog owners to safely have a fun adventure with their pups at the dog park.
Judge Hodgman, what do you say?
Well, I am not a dog owner.
Do you feel comfortable with the term dog owner, Jesse, Or do you prefer something like human companion to a dog?
Judge Hodgman, I'm going to answer your question with a question.
Okay.
And that is this.
No.
What?
Who rescued who?
Muh.
I'm fine with dog owner.
I love my dogs very much, but they're not people.
Who rescued whom?
Ma.
Yeah.
Okay.
So dog owners.
It seems to me, I don't understand where Mark is coming from in this one, because the problem
is that one party lost a Frisbee to another dog, and that dog tore it up, and
the husband feels...
He says that people shouldn't bring anything of value.
I guess you could construe that a Frisbee has a certain monetary value.
But he's basically saying tough luck to the person who owns the Frisbee, who brought the
Frisbee.
Do I read this correctly?
the frisbee who brought the frisbee is that do i read this correctly yeah that it's their own fault for bringing it to a dog park where uh you know sort of uh it's sort of like that uh that movie
what's that movie called where there's all laws are off the purge it's sort of like the purge he
sees dog he sees dog parks i wish it had been called i wish it had been called all laws
are off he sees the dog park as the purge as pure chaos i'm sure he would feel the same way
if uh he dropped his wallet or a book that he was reading and a dog came over and chewed up his
copy of what's the book this guy's reading in the story, Jesse.
The areas of my expertise by John Hodgman. Sure. Yeah.
I think that makes sense.
Let me tell you a little story about where I'm coming from, Mark.
Many years ago, I'd venture to say,
let's say 18 years ago when I was venture to say, let's say 18 years ago, when I was in my 20s and I was writing video game reviews for a magazine and working in book publishing.
And I did not, it may surprise you to learn, I did not have a lot of money from those endeavors.
you to learn I did not have a lot of money from those endeavors. And we, my then-girlfriend and I,
were invited to someone's house in the country for the weekend, a writer that I knew and admired and still do. And I had just purchased a pair of prescription sunglasses, which I had never owned
in my life. I'd never owned prescription sunglasses in my life, and I had never owned in my life. I'd never owned
prescription sunglasses in my life. And I had never spent so much money on a pair of glasses
in my life. I don't know what I was thinking buying these things. I couldn't afford it.
And these sunglasses were not merely sunglasses, but they were polarized super lenses that made the whole world look like a cross between night vision and
game of thrones land i mean everything looked incredible i would just walk around
staring at things through these sunglasses because everything came into such sharp relief
into this weird sepia tone. It was an amazing thing.
And I remember the weekend before I had driven up into the country to go to some writer's conference or something,
and I was driving along the Taconic State Parkway,
very sunny spring day, wearing these sunglasses,
and I didn't have any music in.
I just turned on the AM station.
It was playing some incredibly hypnotic Indian sitar music,
and I just stared out at the countryside of the Hudson River Valley.
And I went into a trance of delight that I've been trying to recapture ever since.
We get to our friend's house in the country.
And guess what she's got?
A new dog.
Cute little rescued dog.
Guess what I do that night? Leave my glasses somewhere where a dog can get them. Guess what I do that night?
Leave my glasses somewhere where a dog can get them.
Guess what happened?
Dog gets them.
Chews them to pieces.
Like there's some kind of gosh darn frisbee or something.
The next morning, my friend who owns this dog says,
my dog chewed up your sunglasses.
And I said, uh-huh. And she said,
I'm really sorry. And I said, that's okay. But do you know what, Jesse? It was not okay.
And it never was okay. Not even 18 years later, okay. If your dog chews up someone's sunglasses you offer to pay for the sunglasses and if they say no that's okay you insist you shove money in their hands because this animal
this animal that is in your charge ruined something of value that belongs to someone else and that is why i say to you
former guest bailiff elizabeth gilbert i need two hundred dollars
judge hodgman i don't mean to put too fine of a point on this yeah but uh former guest host
elizabeth gilbert gave a thoughtful and generous contribution
in the mac fun drive so maybe we can call it even not good enough
it was a big debate between my wife and i for a long time because she didn't
i mean and bear in mind today i have no doubt that Elizabeth Gilbert would have said,
oh my, I'm so sorry, let me get those for you.
Let me pay for them.
Let me replace them.
Let me, what can I do, you know?
But I think we were both younger at that time.
And even though she was in a little bit different place in her career than I was,
I think even then she, we just didn't know.
We just didn't know that that was the right thing to do.
And maybe she was worried that they were going to be really expensive.
Anyway, now we know better.
And take the benefit of my wisdom, Mark.
Pay for that man's Frisbee that your dog chewed up.
I know what happened.
Do it.
It's $7 or whatever.
Be a good person.
I know what happened. Do it. It's $7 or whatever. Be a good person.
Doge Hodgman, was this whole question just an elaborate secret buzz marketing ploy to plug the upcoming second season of Elizabeth Gilbert's new MaxFun podcast, Magic Lessons?
It was not, but I am thrilled to be a part of such a secret agenda.
I did not know.
Look for it this summer.
That will be great.
I love Elizabeth Gilbert and I look forward to my $200.
Here's something from John.
I'd like to have my significant other, Katie,
refrain from using the phrases, these ones and those ones.
Or if not refrain, put a dollar in a jar someplace whenever this is used.
I've searched many grammar webpages.
Oh, geez.
I've searched many grammar webpages, but they all come back with inconclusive results as to whether this is acceptable in English speech.
John, Katie says, look at these ones here.
And it makes my internal copy editor cringe.
Please help us with this issue.
Is the issue that he has an internal copy editor?
I'm afraid you have a copy editor lodged in some part of your body.
Yeah, I'm afraid you have a copy editor lodged in some part of your body.
It sounds like a copy editor endectomy is the only option.
Yeah, and it has a cringing problem.
Much like I have a cramping problem, you have a cringing problem.
I also, curiously, I searched not many grammar webpages, but three a few minutes ago,
to verify that indeed there's a lot of dispute as to whether one usage is more correct than the other.
That is to say, look at these ones or look at these.
Ones is obviously a word.
You say his loved ones all the time.
There's no problem with ones.
So there is really no grammatical error with these ones,
but I think that to some people's ears,
it sounds perhaps less educated or a little bit more redundant
because you could simply say, look at these.
So if you really wanted to strunk and white it,
you'd be white, probably would have said, just look at these. But when I picture Katie saying, look at these ones here, you know
what I think? I think I hear someone with a charming regional inflection and someone that
you are pledged to love. And since, since this court stands
against pedantry,
I'm going to say, Katie, I think you should
break up with this dude.
Yeah, and remember, John and Katie,
this is coming from a man
who earlier in this very podcast
corrected my
quotation of a popular bumper
sticker on grammatical grounds.
Wait, is that a popular bumper sticker?
Who rescued whom?
Who rescued who?
Yes.
But it says who rescued who?
Yeah, I don't think it says who rescued whom.
This isn't some fancy Ivy League bumper sticker.
I live in the constant torment of my beloved bailiff constantly saying me and Jordan did
this and that.
Look, I have other friends, Judge Hodgman.
I have other friends.
How you are, I've missed the point, sir.
You have missed the point.
English is a living language and bumper stickers.
Bumper stickers are also a living language.
And I think that it's important in life to choose your battles.
And this is not one, I think.
These are the ones that don't matter.
Okay, we'll have more Judge John Hodgman when we come back in just a second.
Hello, I'm your Judge John Hodgman. The Judge John Hodgman podcast is brought to you
every week by you, our members, of course. Thank you so much for your support of this podcast
and all of your favorite podcasts at MaximumFun.org,
and they are all your favorites.
If you want to join the many member supporters
of this podcast and this network,
boy, oh boy, that would be fantastic.
Just go to MaximumFun.org slash join.
The Judge John Hodgman podcast is also brought to you this week by the folks over there at Babbel.
Did you know that learning, the experience of learning causes a sound to happen?
Let's hear the sound.
Yep, that's the sound of you learning a new language with Babbel. We're talking about quick 10-minute lessons crafted by over 200
language experts that can help you start speaking a new language in as little as one, two, three
weeks. Let's hear that sound. Babbel's tips and tools are approachable, accessible, rooted in real
life situations, and delivered with conversation-based teaching. So you're ready to practice what you've
learned in the real world, and you get to hear this sound.
It's not just like a game that pretends to teach you a language.
It's also not a rigid, weird, hyper-academic chore.
It is an actually productive app that actually teaches you while you are actually having a nice time.
And you get to hear this sound.
Here's a special limited time deal for
our listeners right now. Get up to 60% off your Babbel subscription, but only for our listeners
at babbel.com slash Hodgman. Get up to 60% off at babbel.com slash Hodgman spelled B-A-B-B-E-L
dot com slash Hodgman. Rules and restrictions apply. The Judge John Hodgman podcast
is also brought to you this week
by our pals over at Made In.
Jesse, you've heard of Tom Colicchio,
the famous chef, right?
Yeah, from the restaurant Kraft.
And did you know that most of the dishes
at that very same restaurant
are made with Made In pots and pans?
Really? What's an example?
The braised short ribs, they're made in, made in. The Rohan duck, made in, made in. Riders of Rohan
duck. What about the Heritage Pork Shop? You got it. Made in, made in. Made in has been supplying
top chefs and restaurants with high-end cookware for years. They make the stuff that chefs need.
Their carbon steel cookware is the best of cast iron, the best of stainless clad.
It gets super hot.
It's rugged enough for grills or an open flame.
One of the most useful pans you can own.
And like we said, good enough for real professional chefs, the best professional chefs.
Oh, so I have to go all the way down to the restaurant district in restaurant town?
Just buy it online.
This is professional grade cookware that is available online directly to you, the consumer, at a very reasonable price.
Yeah.
If you want to take your cooking to the next level, remember what so many great dishes on menus all around the world have in common.
They're made in Made In.
Save up to 25% this Memorial Day from the 18th until the 27th.
Visit MadeInCookware.com.
That's M-A-D-E-I-N Cookware dot com.
Hello, teachers and faculty.
This is Janet Varney.
I'm here to remind you that listening to my podcast,
The JV Club with Janet Varney,
is part of the curriculum for the school year.
Learning about the teenage years of such guests as Alison Brie,
Vicki Peterson, John Hodgman, and so many more
is a valuable and enriching experience.
One you have no choice but to embrace because yes, listening is mandatory.
The JV Club with Janet Varney is available every Thursday on Maximum Fun
or wherever you get your podcasts.
Thank you.
And remember, no running in the halls.
If you need a laugh and you're on the go, try S-T-O-P-P-O-D-C-A-S-T-I.
Hmm.
Are you trying to put the name of the podcast there?
Yeah, I'm trying to spell it, but it's tricky.
Let me give it a try.
Okay.
If you need a laugh and you're on the go, call S-T-O-P-P-O-D-C-A-S-T-I. Ah, it'll never fit.
No, it will will let me try if you need a laugh and you're
on the go try s-t-o-p-p-p-d-c-o-o oh we are so close stop podcasting yourself a podcast from
maximumfun.org if you need a laugh then you're on the go.
Hey, Judge Hodgman, you won't believe what me and Jordan were doing during the break. Oh!
Okay, here's a case from Brian.
I can't wait.
My fiancé Justin and I have an ongoing argument related to the source of my media choices.
I listen to a number of pop culture related podcasts, which frequently offer TV and movie recommendations.
One, I can only presume that Brian is leaving out the specific names Bullseye with Jesse Thorne and MaximumFun.org's own Pop Rocket because he's worried that he'll be judged for buzz marketing.
But I have no such shame.
Good for you.
I've come to trust these podcasters and find their tastes often align with my own.
You know what?
I'm going to throw in NPR's Pop Culture Happy Hour.
That's a great show, too.
That's true.
And they're friends of this podcast, I'm glad to say.
Justin says I'm acting like a lemming and thinks I need to develop my own tastes.
He's also accused me of dismissing his recommendations until a podcaster seconds them.
I think one of the main purposes of these podcasts is to steer you toward things you will enjoy.
I also see nothing wrong with becoming more interested
after having something recommended by a trusted source besides my partner.
Now, I find myself lying about how I've heard about a piece of culture
or pretending not to know about it at all when he brings it up.
Judge, is a podcast an appropriate place to get recommendations? And should Justin be able to
dismiss my idea when I say I heard it recommended on a podcast? Well, first of all, let me just say
that I'm presuming that Brian and Justin are both men.
I'm very excited and pleased
that not only are they getting married,
but we live in a society which increasingly,
that is not a big deal and is legal.
But when you are referring, Brian,
to your fiance, Justin, who is a man,
you spell fiance F-I-A-N-C-E, full stop.
You put two E's on it, and that's wrong.
And my inner copy editor really cringed,
and I didn't listen to the rest of your question.
Now, I highly recommend, speaking of the pop culture happy hour,
a book that has crossed my desk by Glenn Weldon,
one of the co-hosts, called The Caped
Crusade, Batman and the Rise of Nerd Culture.
It is exactly as it sounds, a, quote, riveting and entertaining history that chronicles the
rises and falls of one of the world's most beloved superheroes.
It's a cultural history of Batman as a character, as a phenomenon, and I've just started it,
and it's a really terrific read. And Brian, I recommend that
you read it. And I recommend that you don't listen to Justin, who is a snob. He's a snob.
The definition, as we have discussed before, of a hipster, more less is someone who uh has enthusiasms like a nerd but uses those
enthusiasms to gain uh to cudgel others with their taste and to gain status because you like the
wrong thing or you don't know what the right thing is uh or you learned about something the wrong way
because you found about it once it became popular or whatever.
Whereas a nerd is someone who also has enthusiasms, but just wants to share the enthusiasms.
And unfortunately, while I look forward to, as I trust you do, your many, many years of happy married bliss,
Justin, in this case, has got to check himself because learning about culture, wherever you can get it, is a gift to you.
And if you find something you really love, it does not matter from...
Oh, I almost said from whence you heard it.
But I think the proper way to say that, I'm not sure, is it doesn't matter whence you heard it.
Because I think whence means the from
is implied hence brian's right jesson's wrong go buy a book hey you should listen to glenn weldon
on the hit public radio program bullseye with jesse thorne that's my recommendation that's
your recommendation yeah glenn weldon he's the best that book is great
i've read the i read that whole batman book and despite not necessarily being uh you know world
champion batman guy as glenn is i really enjoyed it i was thrilled when he when he got the world
champion batman guy trophy yeah he did i know award shows tend to be meaningless popularity
contests but sometimes they get it right and world championship batman guy finally got it right this Yeah, he did. The Gathering. This was in episode 249. So in that dispute, if you don't remember,
there was a man who played Magic the Gathering with a good friend of his,
and the defendant insisted on buying singles. The plaintiff was playing using a more random
selection of cards. And basically, the beef there was that the gameplay was imbalanced
because one of the players had chosen to bring his focused money to bear upon the singles.
One guy was going out there and spending his money on all the good, powerful cards, and the other guy was playing the game, you know, old school.
Just you get what you get and you don't get upset.
Yeah.
You get what you get and you don't get upset.
Yeah.
The judge ruled that the plaintiff should start a Patreon and attempt to blow his friend out of the water by constructing the very best deck available with other people's money,
which he did do.
He did start that Patreon.
Oh, I didn't see that.
Did it get funded?
Is it too late?
Can I?
Yeah, I think you can contribute something.
All right.
As soon as Liz Gilbert gives me 200 bucks, I'm going to just pass it along and pay it forward.
We actually had some suggestions from other Magic the Gathering players and their loved ones.
So I'm going to run through a few of those.
By the way.
Yeah.
We got a lot of letters on this one.
And I didn't understand a lot of them, but I was grateful that people came in and added their own wisdom.
I didn't understand a lot of them, but I was grateful that people came in and added their own wisdom.
Regular listeners to Maximum Fun Podcasts will know that I played Magic the Gathering in middle school, but have not done so since.
And the only thing I remember really is that there was a really important card called Sarah Angel. So I always refer to Sarah Angel to demonstrate that I'm on the Magic the Gathering people's team, but I don't have any other references to go to. So it's always Sarah Angel to demonstrate that I'm on the Magic the Gathering people's team, but I don't have any
other references to go to. So it's always Sarah Angel. A listener of this show and Jordan Jesse
Goh, who had noticed it on both shows, was kind enough during the Max Fun Drive time to send me a
bunch of Sarah Angel cards to collect my autograph on, which he then used to raise money for Max Fun.
Let's be clear.
No one wants that.
So I don't think it was a successful effort, but it was appreciated, certainly.
You know what?
It was very smart thinking.
Okay.
So here's something from Hannah.
Hannah's fiance is a magic enthusiast who has played competitively. And she said that she would rather watch the Gilmore Girls for the 50th time than play magic. But she did have a good suggestion. She said that the friends, by the way, there's no need to watch the Gilmore Girls for the 50th time. You can watch Crazy Ex-Girlfriend. That's new. It's great.
Is that your pop culture recommendation?
That's my pop culture recommendation. If you're looking for the same satisfactions that you get
from that show, go to Crazy Ex-Girlfriend. It's-
Now I can't watch it because I heard about it from a podcast.
Charming, medium stakes, and very funny.
I will check it out.
Okay. So she says this.
She says that the friends should mutually agree on a gameplay format, and she named two.
One is constructed, in which players make their decks ahead of time with whatever cards they can get their hand on,
which is the problem that the plaintiff is complaining about. The other is drafting, where they each open a pack of cards and take turns picking cards
from those packs until each has built a suitable deck for play, at which point the two play
with these new decks that did not exist prior to the game at hand.
I like that second one because it reminds me of fantasy sports.
And it's fantasy.
Yeah, exactly. It's literally fantasy. that second one because it reminds me of fantasy sports and it's fantasy yeah exactly it's lit
it's literally fantasy is that sort of literally yeah maybe what if fantasy sports just meant like
your fantasy football team was mostly regular players but then a couple minotaurs
i would suddenly become the biggest sports fan. Well, Hannah, thank you for those suggestions.
Those are both great, and we didn't get any more, correct?
No, it did not stop there, according to this piece of paper in front of me.
We also heard from Mark.
Mark suggested a different method.
He says, I've used this one in friendly non-tournament play.
It helps even the playing field.
Everyone brings their favorite decks,
and each player randomly selects one of the decks that was brought. Essentially,
each player has an equal chance of using an overpowered deck during a given match.
Sure. And that's all there is.
No, no, no. Gabe suggested three different methods, including the peasant and backdraft formats.
Please don't describe them.
I shan't.
You can find them all on our website at MaximumFun.org.
Is that all the different ways to play Magic the Gathering with your friend?
That's all the different ways to play Magic the Gathering with your friends.
There are no more ways.
If you disagree, please tweet at Hodgman on Twitter.
Twitter.com slash Hodgman.
Or write me, I guess.
I've asked for it.
Hodgman at MaximumFun.org.
We did get other letters this week, did we not?
We did.
But I want to suggest an alternative activity for these guys that I think they might enjoy.
Oh, Minotaur football?
Yeah, Minotaur football.
for these guys that I think they might enjoy?
Oh, Minotaur football?
Yeah, Minotaur football.
There's a band called Mount Erie,
which is in fact a man named Phil Elverum.
And Phil Elverum is a lovely guy,
sort of indie rock luminary,
who lives up in,
he lives in some weird,
one of those weird islands off the coast of Oregon or Washington State.
Very nice dude.
And he came on Jordan Jesse Go once a couple of years ago,
and he described this game that he and his bandmates
and crewmates play when they are on tour together.
And he's very much, he's a very deeply DIY guy,
so his tours are very DIY.
They play this game called Wadlord.
And here's how you play Wadlord.
One player is designated the Wadlord.
And the Wadlord puts some of his own money into a handful of money.
Then each of the other players put their money into the handful of money. The Wadlord turns and he shows everybody the outside of the Wad of money.
And then everyone has to guess how much money is inside the Wad.
Whoever guesses how much money is inside the Wad wins the full amount of money in the Wad.
But is it like Price is Right rules, closest without going over? Or you have to guess the full amount of money in the wad. But is it like Price is Right rules, closest without going over,
or you have to guess the exact amount?
I don't know. Ask Phil Elverum.
Well, I'm sure there are many different ways to play.
Right now, I don't remember why the Wadlord doesn't have himself an unfair advantage.
But the key strategy in the game, the key strategy here is that the more money you put in this is what i like about it relative
to this magic situation the more money you put in the more control you have over the amount of
money that's in the wad so like if you put in three hundred dollars you're the only one who
knows that there's more than three hundred in there because that $300 is probably buried in this wad.
Right.
But, but, but you're also risking $300 if you put in $300.
This is a insidious game.
Somebody on Reddit is going to clarify the rules of Wild Lord, by the way.
Maximumfun.reddit.com.
So you can remind me how somebody is going to go listen back
to the episode of Jordan Jesse Go
called Wadlord
with Phil Elverum
from four years ago
or whatever it was
and remind me
because it is the most
it's the most magical
that's interesting
it's the most magical
waste of time and money
that anyone has ever created
other than Magic the Gathering
is there a way to capitalize
on Wadlord?
I'm not saying we take this idea from your friend, but this is insidious. Is there a way to
make this game into a game that you can then sell to other people? Oh, I assumed that what you meant
by capitalize on it was like, take it to the streets, three card Monty style. Oh yeah, no,
no, no. I'm, I'm, I'm purely a three card Monty guy.
I'm not going to mix up my games out there on the streets.
Well,
you know what I think we need to do?
No,
we,
we make a boxed version.
We started out in Scandinavia and then we can see if we can license it to the
American market.
Jesse,
that's why they call you the wad Lord.
I love it.
Yeah.
Stick that in your pipe and put some
divorced rabbit royalty in there and we got
ourselves a game. We have one last
email from Tim. He wrote us to
say, while I do regularly
enjoy your program, I got an unexpected
belly laugh from this week's case
when I accidentally hit the half speed
button on my preferred podcast application.
At half speed, all
the participants sound extremely intoxicated, which puts a whole
different spin on fake internet court litigation.
Highly recommended.
Thanks, Tim, for writing!
I'm glad that someone finally discovered our alternate podcast, Judge John Hodgman,
Chopped and Screwed.
Drunk justice.
Judge John Hodgman chopped and screwed?
Drunk justice.
If you have a case for Judge John Hodgman,
go to MaximumFun.org slash JJHO.
If you want to follow us on Twitter,
Judge Hodgman is at Hodgman.
I am at Jesse Thorne.
You can also find us on Reddit at MaximumFun.reddit.com where someone is posting the full remembered rules of Wadlord
right this very moment.
You can find our show online at MaximumFun.org
and please send in
a review of Judge John Hodgman. It makes a
big difference in our iTunes rankings.
And if you like Judge John Hodgman,
why not tell someone you know about how much you like
it? How about that? And before you
go, stay tuned. Just don't do it on a
podcast. Before you go stay tuned don't do it on a podcast but before you go set
your listening speed to half speed to hear this important secret message for you hi it's me john
hodgman i'm gonna be performing at largo and corn at los angeles on june 9th my one-man show
vacation land tickets are available online go to johnodry.com slash store our producer is
julia smith our editor is mark mcconville and ho hey by the way let's go max fun max fun con east
tickets are on sale right now on maxfuncon.com so if you live on the east coast and you want to come
out hang out with me and lots of other max fun talent and brilliant and amazing people and really
nice people go to maxfuncon.com to buy tickets for max fun con east okay bye
maximum fun.org comedy and culture artist owned listener supported