Knowledge Fight - #486: September 27, 2020
Episode Date: September 28, 2020Today, Dan and Jordan check in to see what Alex Jones' response was to Trump's nomination of Amy Coney Barrett as a Supreme Court Justice. Jordan may compare it to "eating a bowl of poo" more than onc...e.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
No, no, no, no, no, no, no, not in the fight.
Damn it, Jordan, I am sweating.
Knowledge party.com.
It's time to pray.
And I have great respect for knowledge, mate.
Knowledge, mate.
I'm sick of them posing as if they're the good guys, saying, we are the bad guys.
Knowledge, mate.
Knowledge, mate.
Knowledge, mate.
Damn it, Jordan, knowledge.
Fight.
Need, need money.
Andy and Tanzas.
Andy and Tanzas.
Stop it.
Andy and Tanzas.
Andy and Tanzas.
Andy and Tanzas.
Andy and Tanzas.
Andy and Tanzas.
You're on the air.
Thanks for coming.
Hello, Alex.
I'm with Chris.
I'm a huge fan.
I love your work.
Knowledge, mate.
No, no, no, no, no, no, not in the fight.
I love you.
Hey, everybody.
Welcome back to Knowledge Fight.
I'm Dan.
I'm Jordan.
We're good dudes.
It's a roundabout.
We'll talk a little bit about Alex Jones.
Oh, indeed we are, Dan.
Yes.
Yes, Jordan.
Dan.
Jordan.
Quick question for you.
What's up?
What's your bright spot today?
My bright spot today, Jordan, is that, uh, I mean, hey, look, everyone's tired of, uh,
plant stuff, but, uh, my cucumber.
Are they?
Has anybody said they're tired of plant stuff?
No, I'm just projecting.
Oh, okay.
That's fair.
Uh, but my cucumber plant finally gave me a fruit.
I did.
And I've finally been able to eat my first thing that was grown on one of my own plants
and it was exhilarating.
I was overwhelming and I kind of feel a little bit bummed out about it.
Cause if it was something I actually really enjoyed, I might have cried.
Sure.
Sure.
I might have cried if it was like a really nice hot pepper, but instead it was a cucumber,
which I'm wishy washy on it past.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Yeah.
That's true.
That's true.
It was taken from seed to fruit.
Sure.
Um, but then it also be like, even if it was a perfect cucumber, I don't know how excited
I would be.
It's just a cucumber.
They do still really cool.
You know what you should do?
You should take one of the cucumber slices and like freeze dry it and then frame it.
Like some people frame their first dollar that they made in business.
Yeah.
That kind of thing.
I think that's a great idea.
I am.
There's no problem with that idea whatsoever.
I feel like I might do that.
I feel like I could be dangerously close to being talked into doing that.
Yeah.
I mean, if it came off the tree, a pickle, I think I'd be excited.
I'd be more excited, but I think that's probably true of the world too.
Yeah.
Yeah.
So anyway, I mean, it's just, it's, it's weird to be in a position where like, I never thought
any of this stuff would work out.
Any of the plants that I've planted would actually get to a point where you could eat something.
Right.
Right.
And then I expected, and that's really exciting.
And so that's a very big, bright spot.
That is.
I took a bite and it's actually very good.
I forced you to eat a slice of my cucumber.
You did not force me.
You showed it to me and I was like, Oh, I'm excited to eat it.
You are projecting hard.
I would have forced you.
Wow.
That's true.
That's true.
But that may have something to do with why I was like, I'd love to eat it.
You knew you're going to eat a slice of it.
I was going to eat it.
So I might go enjoy it.
Well, it's your right spot.
Was it my slice of cucumber?
Dan, no, I know everybody's getting tired of tennis.
Or whatever it is by everybody.
I just mean you.
True.
But the French open has begun today.
And also my beloved Cubs clinched postseason birth yesterday.
Cubs go against the socks today.
Last game of the season.
What's an abbreviated season?
Oh, always incredibly abbreviated.
It felt like it was.
Okay.
Yeah.
That's a hundred fewer than normal.
Yeah.
Yeah.
I felt like it went real fast.
Isn't that funny how baseball is?
60 games is almost an NBA season, a full season.
Yeah.
And in baseball, you're like, Jesus, it's over already.
I think we learned an important lesson and that is that the season is far too
fucking long.
Way too long.
In baseball and we shouldn't do that.
Well, you're wrong on one count.
What?
We shouldn't do that?
Exactly.
But it is too long.
It is too long.
Yeah.
No reasonable person would say otherwise.
Well, congratulations to your Cubbies.
Yes.
I'm so excited for you to watch more tennis.
Two weeks and then Rafa will have another French open tying Federer for the most
majors ever one.
Neither room can hold a candle to my boy.
Agassi.
How dare you?
How dare you with your glued on wig?
I don't know anything about him except it's a name that I remember from when I was
younger.
I hope he's not a monster.
No, he's great.
Okay.
He's very good.
It's a relief.
No, it's all right.
So Jordan, today speaking of monsters, we're going to be talking about the September
27th, 2020 episode of the Alex Jones show.
I'm Dan.
This is Alex Jones.
God damn it.
Wait, 2020?
I fucked up.
Did you say God damn it's Alex Jones?
Yeah.
Anyway, it's an interesting time.
And what I wanted to do for this episode was talk about anything except Alex Jones.
However, the present day required that we discuss things because.
Why?
Did anything new happen?
Yeah.
At the end of last week, Trump announced his pick for the Supreme Court, which was,
Amy Coney Barrett.
That's great.
And I thought that we needed to find out what Alex's response to this was because immediately
when Ginsburg passed away, Alex said that the inside scoop was that Coney Barrett was
the choice.
Totally.
She was the choice.
And Alex was excited about this.
Of course.
Then he started to talk to Robert Barnes, his former lawyer and noted weirdo.
And Barnes was coming in with some real hot mess talk about Barrett.
Yeah.
Saying that she was going to let the Pope decide the Supreme Court.
Yep.
They decided that she was the worst pick possible.
Of course.
She was basically an authoritarian weirdo.
You got it.
And that Barbara Lagoa was the choice that Trump should make.
Sure.
Barnes pitched Lagoa as somebody who would give him basically a win in Florida, right,
was a perfect choice, very conservative, doesn't have a lot of the baggage that Barrett may
have.
Do you mean like being an occult?
Well, they wouldn't put it that way.
Surprise.
You might as a former cult member, and that's your prerogative.
It's a little bit there.
And so, you know, they were really anti-Barrett in the days prior to Barrett's nomination.
They were really pushing for Lagoa and boy, good work out.
Yeah, they accidentally tapped into the reality of evangelical Christians, which is that they
hate Catholics.
How this is getting lost in all of this rah, rah, how dare you criticize Catholicism?
There's a chance to be analyzed by Alex, and so we will leave it aside for now.
But one thing I thought was really interesting was like, okay, so that announcement came.
And so Saturday, Alex, usually whenever there's big news live a Saturday episode, he didn't
have a Saturday episode.
So we had to wait until Sunday.
So recording this fairly late.
And so we could see what his Sunday reaction would be to the announcement of Trump.
Love Trump nominating somebody that he and his buddy Barnes.
Yeah.
Oh, he respects greatly and is a great constitutional lawyer.
Sure.
The two of them have almost daily been talking about how it would be a huge mistake to nominate
Barrett.
Yeah, she sucks.
She is a choice of the Federalist Society and there are a bunch of monsters on the right.
So I was I was really curious, how is this going to play?
It seems like they now that Barrett is the choice, it seems like it's going to be tough
to justify.
So we're going to see how you're wrong.
Well, I think they might have to stoop to some levels that you might not expect.
Okay, okay.
But I was I was curious to see how it was going to play out.
And that's why we are doing this episode kind of late, sure, a little down to the wire.
But I think I think it may be worth it.
Let's do it.
Before we get to down to business on that, Jordan, let's take a little moment to say
thank you to some folks who have signed up in our Spartan show.
Oh, that's a great idea.
So first, Piscetti Western, thank you so much for an hour policy walk.
I'm a policy walk.
Thanks, Piscetti.
Thank you.
Nick Sawyer, thank you so much.
You're an hour policy walk.
I'm a policy walk.
Thank you very much, Sawyer.
I hope it's not the character from Lost who I don't like.
I think it must be.
No, it's got to be him.
I told you about how much I don't like Sawyer.
Yes, you have, but I think we were drunk one night and you made me watch the first
episode of Lost.
The whole time you fucking Sawyer.
You shit all over the show you love.
Well, I don't like a number of characters on it.
A lot of the characters suck.
The Sawyer among them.
But this Sawyer donated to the show is not a fictional character.
It is wonderful.
So thank you very much.
Next, Andy Jay.
Thank you so much.
You're an hour policy walk.
I'm a policy walk.
Hi, Andy.
Thank you.
Next, George Soros, Antifa Slush Fund.
Thank you so much.
You're an hour policy walk.
I'm a policy walk.
Thank you very much.
I'm a G.S.A.S.F.
Yep, you got it.
Next, Kmart.
Thank you so much.
You're an hour policy walk.
I assure you, it is not the Kmart.
This is not sponsored by Kmart.
That would be a surprising move for an ad agency.
It's just like, here's our trick.
We've got one show where they will call out your name no matter fucking what.
And that's cut rate for an ad.
Exactly.
That would be genius.
We have discovered a real problem here.
I think this is called arbitrage.
There are so many problems with the way that we do this.
This is the stupidest thing in the world.
We are not good.
No.
We're operating as if we're a podcast where no one's listening because we are still thinking
that's the case because that was the case.
Yeah.
And we updated how we do this.
Why would we?
Oh, God.
I'm Paul kind of old fashioned store.
Causes me.
We've been doing it this way since 1974.
Causes me a lot of headaches.
So thanks Kmart.
Yes, thank you.
Next, Obadiah H. Thank you so much.
You're an hour policy walk.
I'm a policy walk.
Thank you Obadiah.
Thank you.
And finally, thanks to a couple of folks who signed up on Elevated Bub.
We appreciate that very much.
So first, Frank L. Thank you so much.
You are now a technocrat.
Patrick B. Thank you so much.
You are now a technocrat.
And Josh B. Thank you so much.
You are now a technocrat.
I'm a policy walk.
Crikey, mate.
That's fantastic.
Have yourself a brew.
How's your 401K doing, bro?
All right.
We got to go full tilt bugging on this Watson.
All right.
Let's just get down to business.
We ain't making that money off that heroin.
Why are you pimp so cool?
My neck is freakishly large.
I declare info war on you.
Thank you so much, Frank.
Thank you so much, Patrick.
And thank you so much, Josh.
Yes.
Thank you very much to all of you.
If you're out there listening, you're thinking, hey, I enjoy this show.
I'd like to support these gents, too.
You can do that by going to our website, KnowledgeFight.com.
The button says support the show or or what you could do is I see your eyes
looking around my desk for anything.
No, I'm not looking at your desk.
I'm looking in my mind to see if there's anything rolling around in there.
And all I can think is what you can do is be brow beaten by the administration
of your school into doing absolutely nothing.
Wait, is that like late?
No, this is like my partner is dealing with the fucking.
I thought I was the metaphorical administration of your school.
No, no, no, no, no, no, not at all.
Normally, I'm I fucking pull this off perfectly.
Oh, absolutely.
Yeah.
Anyway, with your supportive partner in the scene.
Yeah, yeah, absolutely.
Back and forth.
It's nothing but the best of how you choose to do this.
Yeah, I really like the old no but improv style.
That look in your eye is like a nightmare on an improv stage.
Yeah.
Like that look in your eye was.
Oh, no.
All of a sudden, I was just overwhelmed with all of the tears that just the tears.
I do this every time in every episode now.
I tell you, you know, or oh, do you want me to try and not improv it?
Do you have a plan in advance and make it real disingenuous?
Like I would like it to be.
I mean, I would assume it by this point, it would be less of a surprise for you.
I don't I don't want you to necessarily script something out.
That's not what I'm asking.
But it's coming with a little bit of a plan.
I'm not even saying that.
I'm saying the surprise and terror in your eyes seems.
I don't know.
It seems like an indication that you might not be able to learn things.
I'm worried about you being a Memento guy.
That might be true.
Maybe get a tattoo on your arm.
Come up with a thing to do right there.
Okay.
Now that could happen.
Dad is going to pimp you into a scene.
Just get that tattooed on your arms.
You don't forget.
That's not a terrible idea.
It is.
It is a terrible idea.
I told you.
I told you.
I was off a little bit before we even started recording.
Look, that tattoo on your arm is a terrible idea, but what's not a terrible idea is taking
that generosity and directing it to a charity in your area.
How dare you swoop in like the hero?
How dare you swoop in like you fucking nailed this the whole time?
Like this was your goddamn plan.
That's why they call me the vulture.
I come in for those bits that are dead on the ground and take the meat.
All right.
I like it.
You're a nice little Horatio sands on the improv.
That'll be our next shirt is me as a bit vulture.
All right.
That's great.
That was good stuff.
So Jordan, today, like I said, 27th Sunday episode, Alex comes in and he wants to talk
about like important issues.
Sure.
And actually, I should say, here's an out of context drop from today's show where
he's talking about series.
He talks about series issues on this show.
I've got tons of entertaining anti for clubs.
I've got all sorts of funny videos about all this cutesy stuff.
You know what?
I'm not covering all that.
This is a broadcast for really serious people.
This is a broadcast for serious people.
That's the out of context drop from the middle of the show from the middle of the show.
Right.
So now I should tell you this is how the show starts.
All right.
But I thought I'd start with something that's really at the heart of it.
Remember four years ago, I am four years took over all the live events and said Bill
Clinton's a rapist and pointed out that Bill Clinton and Hillary were globalist and tied
to Jeffrey Epstein's Petafile Island.
We would talk about Jeffrey Epstein on national TV and take over live events.
So much so, they canceled most of their live events the last few weeks.
Did they?
Well, they were out front just yesterday at CNN, the full videos on info wars.com.
CNN was outside the Supreme Court building and thought they'd be able to go live out
there.
And turns out everywhere CNN goes, this now happens.
Justice on the Supreme Court.
Over the next 30 or 40 years.
Right?
Well, absolutely.
I just wanted to say that's why we were here.
They're proud behind us.
So that's cool.
Serious people.
Serious people.
It's like on a good morning, America, whenever they had the window open behind you and all
those people were standing kind of like waving at the camera and shit.
Instead, imagine a bunch of people with rocks just like slamming on the glass during the
broadcast.
Yeah.
Alex didn't go really hard about Epstein back then.
He was doing speed skate stuff though.
That's for damn sure.
But the thing that I think is really interesting is what Alex is describing is that in the
last election cycle, he literally paid people to go yell Bill Clinton's rapist.
Yes, he did.
And if they got on TV, he would give them a bonus.
Right.
And now they're doing it for free.
Yeah.
That's what's going on.
That's the win of a grifter.
That's the real like even now.
Like I put in money up top.
It was an initial investment.
Yeah.
It's always going to pay off.
It's almost as if these people forgot that they were getting paid to do it to begin with.
And now they just delight in the monstrosity.
Right.
The same expectation of some sort of charge or payment will not come.
Uh-uh.
So serious people.
It's real serious.
Real serious.
We're starting the show talking about people yelling at CNN.
Fake news.
Great.
Fake news.
So it turns out the Bidens.
What about them?
They hate everybody.
Sure.
And Alex has this information that he's reporting from a very trustworthy source.
Okay.
He grew up next door to their bar and to their restaurant.
They even I think sold them some property he was saying.
And that's Tyler Nixon up in Delaware.
They're on record being family friends because they live next door to each other.
And there's a lot of correspondence, photos, all that on record.
Good thing we got it on record.
They hate everyone and think they're elitist.
And just have this, this, this, this air, this, this imperious nature.
Yeah.
Great.
Tyler Nixon has told you and they're on record as being friends.
You know, like if we can, let's look that up.
Yeah.
I don't care.
Tyler Nixon is Roger Stone's lawyer friend.
What about it?
I don't care.
Are you saying that he's coming in with, to this with some sort of like agenda or bias?
I'm gonna, I'm gonna say that I'll take a different source on character stuff about
the guy who's running against the guy who got Roger Stone out of prison.
Maybe.
He hates everybody says John Wayne Gacy.
Don't care about Tyler Nixon's character assessments.
So for the longest time, Alex has been every single episode.
He's been being like, hey, 46 days till the election, you know, like really counting down.
Here's a show that's actually called Election Countdown.
Yeah, that's true.
On the weeknights.
And now he's, he started to change what his countdown is now that things are getting a
little closer.
On this live Sunday, September 27th, 2020, transmission, 114 days out of the inauguration.
Motherfucker to the election.
Fuck you.
Now, as everyone knows.
Business is promoting human freedom and liberty.
Sure.
Info Wars business is being tomorrow's news or next week's news, next year's news today.
And I don't need to go over your regular list or all the things that we've accurately
tackled over the horizon that has now manifested.
So as soon as he said that my eyes rolled back in my head and just like there was a
download of all the things he's been wrong about.
Yep.
Yep.
Yep.
Cascading before my eyes.
Okay.
Yeah.
I know that you're going to try and relish in being right about the Amy Bicconi Barrett
selection.
Sure.
And you're going to try and maybe pretend that you didn't say that it was the worst
decision possible.
Sure.
But yeah.
I don't know about that.
But so there were a lot of people.
Yeah.
There were a lot of people who were saying that she was on.
I was pretty sure that was like the moment.
I'd know.
Hours after Ginsburg died, it was everybody going like, I think the consensus is Amy Coney
Barrett is going to be.
Yeah.
And Alex, I mean, I'm not taking it away from him that initially that was the direction
he was going.
It's like, hey, it looks like she's the pick.
Sure.
But he was far from the only person who was putting that out in the days after Ginsburg
is passing.
Totally.
So Alex gets into talking about something else that he was, he was totally right about
way before, way ahead of everybody else.
And this is a bit of rewriting history and a bit of just making things up.
I mean, if the Davos group, they put out a report in February saying we're going to
use COVID-19 to lock down the economy, bringing global digital tracking apps on everybody's
phones, shut down all small businesses and start the third world to death lower carbon
emissions.
They call it the great reset.
We were saying in February, this looks like the big reset that Davos has been calling
for to shut down the world economy and consolidate power for them.
So Alex is making up a lot of the specific details there.
We got into this on a past episode, so I'm not going to break down again how all of this
stuff about using COVID-19 to take over shit is that's just completely made up.
However, I'd like to point out how little Alex seems to remember or care about the details
of his own stupid conspiracies.
He says that the Davos group put out this document, the great reset in February.
The reality is that the thing that he's referring to is a huge online presentation
that you can access yourself if you'd like to, which was hosted by the World Economic
Forum, not the Davos group.
It was posted online on July 14th, not in February.
The thing here is that the Davos group isn't really an actual title of something.
The World Economic Forum does hold their meeting every year in Davos in Switzerland,
which is colloquially referred to as Davos, Davos meeting.
If Alex were interested in accurately conveying information or even knew,
he would say that the World Economic Forum put out this report, not Davos,
because it's precise, it's inaccurate.
It would be like if the World Economic Forum held a thing in Austin,
and he called it the Austin Group.
The Bilderberg Group is the name of an actual group,
and it was named after where they had their first meeting.
This is different.
This is the World Economic Forum has a meeting at Davos called Davos.
But to be fair, a lot of people do talk about these people as the Davos folks,
but it's not a real thing.
And people who put out this great reset presentation is a real thing.
It's the World Economic Forum.
He's sloppy with his language on purpose.
This great reset presentation was released by the World Economic Forum in July
based on a publication written by Terry Mallorette and Klaus Schwab.
And it was basically about exploring the ways in which COVID-19 has revealed
fixable problems and how things are structured across a great swath of things,
like ecological issues, economic issues.
It's very wide-ranging.
Alex is saying it's from February,
because that's when he thinks the Davos meeting was this year,
but it was actually January 21st to 24th.
But February is when he would have been mad about it.
Yeah, that makes more sense.
But Alex is just talking shit.
And if you pay close attention,
I think that there's actually a strong indication in there that Alex is intentionally lying.
Listen to this section again and listen closely to where Alex says when the thing came out.
I mean, at the Davos group, they put out a report in February saying...
Alex seems to know that the report came out in July.
He did almost say July.
Wow.
Yeah, he seems to know when it came out,
but he knows also that that information doesn't fit with the narrative
that he's using high-level globalist documents to inform his reporting.
He wants the audience to think that he knew back in February
that COVID-19 was a plot to control society because he read this Davos group document,
but if that document didn't exist in February, that falls apart.
That is an issue.
That's a little hole there.
Yeah.
Alex catches himself when he's about to say July,
because he knows that that would invalidate the whole timeline that he's building.
It really wouldn't work.
So he lies that back to February.
He knows exactly what he's doing.
This is all just complete nonsense.
He said there would only be lone survivors.
Well, that was Mike Adams, who he pretends not to know now.
Oh, well, that's fair.
That's fair.
I just can't...
Isn't that...
You can't start saying July and then say...
Oh, no, no, February.
He's like, that's...
But that's so much worse.
Yeah, it's a bit of a tell.
Yeah.
Also, isn't it weird to think that Mike Adams is not in Four Wars anymore
because he took COVID too seriously?
Yeah, I don't even bother.
Everything is topsy-turvy surreal now.
I just let that all slide.
That one is a matter for historians.
Yeah, you guys figure that one out.
We'll deal with that down the line.
So Alex gets to talking about those two police officers who were shot in Louisville.
And this is actually something that I think is really important,
not the story itself, but the methodology by which Alex tells the story.
So this whole thing is just a charade.
The suspect in the shooting of the police officers in Louisville has been identified as Lorenzo Johnson,
and he's been arrested.
According to an article in WLKY out of Louisville,
quote, he's charged with 14 counts of wanton endangerment on police officer
and two counts of assault on police officers.
He's pled not guilty and a bond of $1 million was set.
Alex is trying to play games with his coverage here.
He's saying that the liberal district attorneys won't even charge this guy,
presumably because they support shooting cops.
But that's absolutely not true.
He is being charged.
Which is why Alex then says he's not being charged with attempted murder.
So if anyone calls him out over his clear misreporting,
he can say that he meant that the liberal district attorneys won't charge him with attempted murder,
not that they weren't charging him at all.
Sure.
Alex is making two separate claims in that sentence,
that they aren't charging the shooter at all,
and that they're not charging him with attempted murder.
The narrative in the story only has weight if you accept the first claim,
because it's outrageous, whereas the second claim makes some sense.
It might be an issue where the punishment for first degree assault on a cop is pretty steep,
and if the evidence they have might not be successful
in leading to a conviction on attempted murder charges,
the prosecutors might decide that this is the best way to prosecute the crime.
Yeah.
The fact that Johnson isn't being charged with attempted murder
is something that's very easy to understand
without having to jump to the conclusion
that the district attorney must love people who shoot cops.
The explanation that assault charges are far more likely to be successfully prosecuted makes total sense,
and rational people can understand why a DA would choose that route.
Conversely, it's much harder to understand how a DA would take someone who is suspected
of shooting police officers and not charge them at all.
This is the sort of thing that Alex can use to drum up fear and anger in his audience,
because it seems like the only explanation for that would be people in the DA's office
want to promote shooting the police.
It does seem like that.
Alex wants his audience to hear and respond as if there are no charges for the shooter,
but he only wants to be held responsible for reporting that there are no attempted murder charges.
Yeah.
That's a nice spot to be in.
He plays this game a lot.
I do like only receiving the consequences for the thing that is true,
but not the lying part.
That's good.
Yeah, and a little bit later in the episode, he even does this again.
The final straw is letting Islamists and communists kill and fire bomb and rape people
and not charge them, and that's now happening across the United States.
It's unbelievable.
I got a stack of news on that coming up.
You hear what I said?
You walk up to a police line, pull a gun, and shoot two cops in the stomach and the leg,
confess to it, and they don't charge you for the attempted murder.
That's Louisville, Kentucky.
See, at the beginning, it's talking about people shooting cops and there's no charges.
Then they're not charged with attempted murder.
Sure.
These are realities to be in people's heads.
Emotionally respond to the part about them being at no charges for shooting the cops.
Then intellectually, if Alex has to argue it, he can be like,
I was just saying they weren't charged with attempted murder.
Then go fuck yourself.
You know what you're doing.
In this next clip, we get to a little bit of a reveal about Alex's days till the inauguration
now, instead of days till the election.
That is because we have a new narrative.
That is the time between the election and inauguration.
That might be hell.
Okay.
It might be the rapture.
I don't know.
It's not even going to be the mail-in ballot itself that does that.
That bullet's already been fired.
That arrow's already been loosed.
It's the Democrat judges in Michigan and other states like Pennsylvania saying they're going
to keep the election going for months, if not longer, some say weeks, others say months,
to quote, make sure all the ballots are counted to create a civil war crisis in America.
I don't think the last part.
Sir, excuse the last part.
Sir.
What I call 79 days of hell, 79 days in another brazen attempt, just like the Russia hoax,
to claim that the election of Donald John Trump, the 45th president of the United States, the
first time and the second time is illegitimate.
They know they're losing.
Mr. President, you have the Podesta war game that even the New York Times reported on that
night, where they say we're going to contest it because we know we're going to lose.
And then we try to hold it up to inauguration day and hope the military takes out Trump.
Those are quotes.
No, they're not.
No, they're not.
Yeah, that's all nonsense.
I'm real mad.
I'm real mad when you invert reality at 180 degrees, Dan.
That's annoying and boring.
What about 79 degrees of hell?
What about 98 degrees of...
What the fuck?
Nicholas Shea?
Yeah, this is where I was going.
Yeah, 79 days of hell is probably going to be an infowars shirt soon or something.
Yeah.
I mean, it's just you can smell the branding.
Oh, man.
Yeah.
So I guess that's where we're at now.
The election is going to happen and then any kind of time that's needed to count ballots
and to go through the process is going to be the hell that is the hoax that is stopping
Trump from getting elected rightfully, of course.
Right.
Sure.
Sure.
Alex can misrepresent this pedestal thing that he didn't even read.
Great.
I'm not...
You know what I'm not looking forward to?
What's that?
Anything?
We're recording this on Sunday.
Yeah.
And Alex was on air when the news was breaking about the New York Times article about Trump's
taxes.
Sure.
Sure.
Sure.
Sure.
Sure.
I am not looking forward to...
Like, he doesn't know about it on this episode.
Oh, no.
I am not looking forward to what his spin is going to be on that.
Oh, I don't want to deal with it.
No.
Anyway.
No, me neither.
We'll deal with that when it...
Throw a stone.
So, what Alex wants Trump to do, and he's basically begging him to do this.
He spends almost an entire segment...
What he thinks is a direct message to Trump, Mr. President.
Yeah.
You need to do this.
Yeah.
He wants Trump to come out with an ad or a series of ads that essentially argues that
he's already won the election.
You know, basically, that what's going to happen afterwards is I have rightfully won
at any attempt by Democrats to say anything is them trying to interfere with the election.
I want a free and fair election, and as we all know, the outcome of a free and fair election
is already decided.
Which will be I have won.
Exactly.
Yeah.
That's basically...
And I will accept no other explanations.
Yes.
Alex wants Trump to come out with that ad campaign now.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
So, how do you put out these unprecedented ballots and meld them to dead cats, literally,
about 10 years ago, so you could hold things up, and here's where Podesta said it, and here's
where Hillary said it, and put out the ads that go like this.
And we have all the documents, and it's in the news.
We've covered it.
Secretly over a year ago, Democrats began to approach the Pentagon and asked them to remove
President Trump if he really won the 2020 election.
And then it goes on.
The Pentagon said no.
I think Alex is trying to pitch himself as the VO guy, the voiceover guy for those series
of commercials.
Don LaFontaine.
Yeah.
Trump, please, let me be the voice of your commercials.
In a world where only one man can legally win an election, will we survive?
Yeah.
He's really, really trying to push this talking point hard.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
And it's scary because it's pretty authoritarian, dictator-y.
No, no, no.
That's great.
That's great, Dan.
And if you think that that's kind of dictator-y, it's kind of scary.
Sure.
Alex gets into talking about, hey, if there's all of these protests, which are going to
destroy cities, Trump might have to call in the military to put down protesters, and
then they're going to call him a dictator.
Who among us has thought that crossing the Rubicon was a bad idea?
When they activate the BLM and the Antifa and the operatives they've got, the BLM and Antifa
are just decoys for as Patsy's is covered.
They're going to say when the military has to get deployed, when you've got 10 times
the burning you currently see, that that's Trump's martial law, you see, and trick everybody,
and then it's going to get even worse.
And so they believe the crisis will be so big.
Oh, here's the other part.
Drop the stock market 10,000, 15,000 points during the 79 days.
I forgot that part.
And then they're going to say all your pension funds are bad.
Nothing's worth anything.
And all the yuppies, even conservatives, are going to be, I remember during the 2008 deal,
they plunged the markets to get Obama in, and I went to a soccer game with one of my
daughters.
What now?
My middle daughter.
Pee-wee soccer.
Sir.
All the men had their newspapers out.
I'm not even watching the game.
It's freaking out over their money.
I walked over to them and I'd say, hey, just as soon as Obama gets in, Scott Martin will
go back up.
And then they were like, they're all arrogant yuppies.
You know, they're like, oh, you won't drive a BMW.
I'm sure, man.
What do you know?
I bet it never comes back because they're just schmucks, you know, just airheads.
Alex seems so angry in these fake stories that he tells.
Yeah.
All these, all these yuppies with their newspapers and they look down on me, but I was right.
Jesus Christ.
Jesus Christ.
That's such, that's such a fucking.
God damn it.
So W can destroy the economy in eight years.
And then he was only doing that to hold the country hostage so Obama would get elected.
Okay.
Well, now that all makes sense.
Thank you.
Yes.
I apologize.
I never should have said anything.
Right.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Oh God.
Yeah.
There's magical solutions to all the, all of your little counterpoints based in quote
unquote reality.
I just not fair.
Right.
That they get to have the reality that dominates things and it's not real.
That's not fair.
I think that's a part of it.
That's not fair.
Yeah.
I'm starting to think this whole system is not based in fairness.
Nope.
And apparently Alex forgot that during the 79 days of hell they're going to crash the
stock market.
Sure.
Wow.
I forgot this part.
Oh yeah.
Almost as if I'm making it up as I go along and try to come up with things that'll scare
you.
I forgot this part.
Yeah.
You know.
Oh, I forgot this gigantic detail.
I forgot that they're also going to send alligators to eat your feet.
Yeah.
And it won't be crocodiles.
No, absolutely not.
You wouldn't be scared of crocodiles.
Alligators.
What is this?
Egypt.
Yeah.
We've thought for a long time based on the propaganda that people like Alex have been
pushing out that fake ballots are a problem.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Turns out it's not.
Oh, that's nice.
Fake ballots aren't the problem.
Okay.
What?
That's great.
Yeah.
All right.
Let's move on then.
We can just get rid of it.
Different problem.
Oh, no.
It's not steal the election with the fake ballots.
They know the landslides too big.
It's hold it up and create a stock market crash.
But that's the toll.
That's what the plan is.
Or they plan B as they, and Trump's on to plan A.
So they may go plan B and just say, Trump long loses.
Even the numbers don't show it.
And then have all the major media announce it and then say Trump's insane.
So the plan with the ballots, I guess, is to have a reason for the decision to take longer
so they can crash the stock market.
It doesn't make any sense.
No, that doesn't make any sense.
Look, this is all fun and games for Alex, but honestly, I listened to this episode as someone
who's listened to a lot of Alex's work.
And if you believe anything he's been saying, there's no reason to think that this election
matters.
There's no reason that Alex should be worked up about whether or not the globalists are
successful in his imaginary plan to keep Trump from reelection because it's ultimately trivial.
A mere days ago on his show, Alex discussed how the globalists' plan A is to wait until
robots are working the fields and shit, then they'll make us all like cattle with welfare
and vaccines and tracking chips, which will lead to the population being killed off in
a few years.
Of course.
However, Alex's life work screwed up the plans in the timeline.
Right.
So it looked like the globalists who worked for the literal Christian devil were going
to have to go with plan B, which is the release of super bio weapons, which will just kill
everyone, probably through the deployment of robot trash trucks that release electromagnetic
weapons.
And they'll do it in a very pouty way.
Yes.
How dare you make us kill you bastard.
Because they wanted to have the fun.
You really ruined it for yourselves.
Only a few people will survive this, and when it's all said and done, they'll need to crawl
out of the rubble and enact vengeance for defaulting patriots.
Naturally.
Trump being elected or Biden being elected should not matter at all to anyone who believes
Alex means a word he says.
Sure, you may prefer Trump, but him getting another four years means nothing when the
globalists will just release super bio weapons if he threatens their plans at all.
Mail and ballots mean nothing.
Antifa means nothing.
The stock market crashing means nothing because none of it has any effect on what the actual
outcome is.
If Alex meant a goddamn word that came out of his mouth and his show wasn't just a platform
to push for Christian identity politics while scaring listeners into buying his dumb pills,
this show would not be about politics anymore.
Every single minute of his show should be dedicated towards educating the population about how
to survive in this post super bio weapon release world, so as to increase the chances that
someone who makes it through will be able to recreate society.
He's been clear that the globalist plans are not something they can stop, the extinction
level event is going to happen, so why the fuck is he on air rearranging deck chairs
on the Titanic?
This may seem like a small point, but it's not.
The fact that Alex cares at all about whether or not Trump stays in office reveals that he
doesn't believe his own conspiracies.
He wants Trump to stay in power because that furthers the white Christian identity politics
that he supports, and he's using the conception of all this conspiracy bullshit in order to
trick his audience into thinking something bigger is going on to keep them on board.
That's all that's going on.
He can't even remember that a couple days ago he was fucking yelling about how like all
Plan B were all dead anyways who fucking robot trash trucks from Mike.
He was just having an emotional day.
Of course the globalists are going to kill everybody when he's having an emotional day.
I drank some codeine cost syrup and watched Soylent Green.
I got real freaked out and I decided that we're all going to die by way of trash truck.
And now, hey, we got elect Trump.
It's a life or death thing to elect Trump because Trump will stop the robot trash trucks.
If I did know with 100% certainty that the globalists were just going to kill us all within
the next year, that would almost bring me a sense of calm.
Like I wouldn't be angry on air.
I'd be like, you know, let's appreciate the things that we have in the time we have left.
We're all going to die no matter what.
And since we all die at the same time, it's like nobody died.
Nobody's going to miss us.
Nobody loses their friends.
It's all the same.
Well, I mean the reality with or without imaginary globalist murder is that we all will die.
And we don't have a lot of control over a lot of coincidences in life.
And a lot of fretting about that is wasted time.
Yeah.
And I'm guilty of that in the present and in the past.
Totally.
And yes, certainly.
Now, this has made us all take a lot more of the philosophical long view of like, you know,
these cycles happen.
Sure, my generation will be decimated, obviously.
But you know what?
This is just part of the long game, Dan.
Yeah.
You're bumming me out, man.
Don't worry about it.
It's an endless cycle of violence, Dan.
Come on.
I just think, I mean, leaving what you're bringing to the table aside.
I think, do you want to go back and try that bit again from the beginning?
No, I think you were fine.
I just, I don't have a lot to add to it other than just like, you bummed me out.
I think that if you look at what Alex is saying, though, it's a real, it's a real problem
because all this should be trivial minutia to him.
Yeah.
It should mean nothing.
His ultimate quest is to stop the globalists.
And if you believe the way he's been, you know, his rhetoric has evolved.
Sure.
Then this cycle, it's impossible to defeat the globalists.
The only thing that can happen is after this cataclysm, people find Soros and take him out
or whatever, you know?
And so like, hey, the best way to succeed in your mission is to discuss life after.
Right.
Right.
Right.
How do you clean water?
Like that would be what his show would be.
I don't think that's a terrible show.
I think we should probably find a show like that and see if we can critique it for being racist.
There's a lot of useful information that he could be conveying to his audience.
I don't think it's as profitable as being like Biden's a demon who only cares about
himself.
I would say if Roger Stone's lawyer and then trying to like juice everybody up for this
election that based on his own worldview is meaningless.
All right.
So here's what you can do.
You can boil water.
You can also, and this is a thing not a lot of people know, you can put a little bit of
silver in there and that will also disinfect the water, make it a little bit drinkable.
Now I need to wait after that.
Buy my zinc pills, you idiots.
Post apocalyptic attorney general of New York Township will sue me for trying to sell you
silver.
But don't listen to her.
With mud on her face holding a fucking torch.
Give us the gasoline out, right?
I just get struck by that.
If Alex truly believes that the devil and all this stuff, the plan B is to just kill everybody
with the super body.
Sure.
And nothing that he's saying means anything like all this is so stupid.
Oh yeah.
Oh man.
Anyway, speaking of things that are stupid, Amy Coney Barrett has been announced as Trump's
pick for a nominee for the Supreme Court.
Alex has been saying this is a very bad idea with Robert Barnes for a bit, but hey, you
got to fall in line.
And I don't want to be pushing hope among people.
We've got a problem.
And obviously I'm going to end up supporting the nomination because the Democrats are going
to try to block it.
They would put somebody in probably even worse.
At least she's anti-abortion, but she is.
At least.
What a fucking coward.
No.
Worm.
Look at this.
I mean, I have a worm farm and I'm calling him a war.
Yeah.
Yeah.
This fucking dude.
He's like, okay.
Yeah.
I don't want to support her because the Democrats don't like her.
And hey, they would choose someone worse, great, cool, pointless point.
And then he's like, she's against abortion, but also she's in favor of forced vaccines.
So then you're saying that you want a Supreme Court justice who is in favor of the globalist
plan to vaccinate everyone and kill them.
That is strength of conviction, Dan.
And for some reason, Trump nominated her to be on the Supreme Court odd despite that
belief in her believing and supporting one of the pillars of the globalist plan.
Yeah.
Wow.
Weird.
But hey, Democrats would be worse.
Well, I mean, Democrats would probably put somebody in there who wants to force to vaccinate
everybody, which now that you think about it, that would suggest that there is an elite
class of people who all want to force to vaccinate everybody.
So Alex should really be against all of them, not for some of them.
Well, there's a real struggle that Alex is going through because, like, the Democrats
are clearly against anybody, Trump nominating anybody to the Supreme Court and especially
Barrett.
She has a lot of ideas that Alex doesn't like, but he's got to support her because the Democrats
don't like.
Whenever you create your politics that's basically just oppositional defiance, you end up in
holes like this.
It's an issue.
Yeah.
And again, the Democrats are already saying, kill her, they hate her, blah, blah, blah.
I don't like them.
I'm not trying to join them.
I'm not saying don't confirm her.
I'm just saying, my God, I wish I'd have been on this earlier and we'd have been hammering
this harder to get to the president because I know the president means well.
And now they've got, well, they're going to have five justices.
She's going to join the Democrats in forced inoculation and lockdowns, which she just
ruled on.
I've got the articles right here.
So.
Oh, no, she's pro lockdown and pro vaccines.
Oh, no.
Oh, but the Democrats don't like her.
I can't be opposed to her without joining the Democrat.
Oh, no.
See, this is the difference between someone like Alex and someone like Steve Pachanik.
Like Steve can come on Alex's show and fuck Amy Cohen Barrett.
I think Melania Trump should be on there.
I've not heard Steve's take on this pick, but when Gorsuch was nominated, Steve was
like, this is the worst fucking idea ever.
He's a neocon.
We can't accept this.
Yep.
And he didn't have any qualms about like being against Trump's pick for a Supreme Court
nomination because it violated some piece of his politics.
He didn't think that like, oh, this is me siding with the Dems or something.
Alex is such a baby that he can't justify his politics except in opposition to X.
So like he thinks, oh, I'm against this nomination because she's a bad candidate.
Yeah.
I am now a globalist.
I'm a Democrat.
There's no other explanation for me.
No.
I mean, that is such their strength and they're the reason that they get conned by everybody
so much is they're unified in one belief.
Anything the left likes is evil.
So they don't have to think hard about their political positions and they're a unified block.
So they have greater strength.
Another piece of it too.
It also makes you susceptible to anything that they don't like means you have to support
it.
Well, another piece of it too that I think especially in this case for Alex is that
like, obviously he believes that like Soros pays all the protesters and he runs BLM and
Antifa and everything.
And so the real function of that is to invalidate left leaning arguments that you hear or socially
responsible social equity type arguments.
So it's a little pez dispenser in there and you have this like anytime you hear people
talking about Black Lives Mattering, it's there's an element of, hey, this is paid.
Anytime there's protest, it's paid protesters.
These aren't valid opinions that people would have if they weren't coerced into having them.
And he's spent so much time with those narratives that, you know, if you're listening to him,
you could be forgiven if you believe on some level that anybody who believes anything to
the right or I'm sorry, to the left of Rand Paul is being paid to believe those things.
It's all astroturf protests and all this.
It's an illusion.
It's a foreign takeover or whatever.
So for Alex, there's a position that it needs to be called artificial and that is opposing
Amy Coney Barrett as a Supreme Court justice.
All of this has to be another thing that's like it's ludicrous for someone to believe
it.
But it's not and Alex himself should be opposed to it and he can't.
He can't be opposed to it.
Not because that's him joining the left, but because that's having the same opinion as
them and being a free thinker.
It opens up Pandora's box where the audience could start to realize like, oh, you believe
the same thing.
You're not getting paid to believe.
Maybe they aren't getting paid to believe their beliefs.
Oh, yeah, can't really can't really jive with that.
It opens up a box where you could accidentally invite philosophical alliances.
What's he going to say?
I think the Democrats are right on this one.
Like imagine him saying that in 2020.
Imagine that.
Can't do it.
Get the fuck out of here.
So Robert Barnes comes in to rub Alex's belly that he's showing to Trump at all times.
Well, they have to come up with a way to play this because, I mean, obviously, you want
someone like her on the court, but you also don't, right, and you've got to figure out
why the fuck did Trump nominate this person if she's pro lockdown and pro vaccine.
Sure seems difficult to figure that one out.
Yeah.
The 22 judges that the president was considering only one had supported the lockdown and that
was Judge Barrett.
Oh, this is a deep hole.
Okay.
So now you should be against her.
Oh, yeah.
And William Barr, the attorney general, has come out and said that the lockdown is the
gravest violation of civil rights since the since slavery.
And that's why we need her on the Supreme Court.
I don't know how you thread this needle.
I don't think you need to worry about it because reality doesn't worry you.
So why bother?
Well, it turns out that this is all a machination of the Federalist Society.
Sure.
Okay.
So Trump is that she would support him in the election because she was part of the
Bush v. Gore team.
And that's how they got Trump to go along with it.
Trump's not been following the lockdown lawsuits in any detail or the forced vaccination
case.
Brother, I've been busy too.
You're the one that told me about it.
Hey, brother, I love that response.
Hey, Trump didn't know that she was the worst possible choice.
Brother, I've been busy too.
I'm busy too.
What else?
What else you got?
Come on.
Come on.
Next.
Next thing.
That's great.
What else have I ignored?
Also, the undercurrent there of Barnes's comments are that Trump got bamboozled into
electing or nominating a pro lockdown, pro vaccine, mandatory vaccine candidate because
he was told she would hand him the election, right?
Because she was part of the Bush Gore team, which Alex Bush stole the election, which
Alex has called that.
That's what he said that was stealing the election because it was stealing an election.
Yeah.
So this isn't this isn't this doesn't seem like a great argument.
I just the Federalist Society told him that they could steal the election.
And so he said that everybody could get vaccinated.
Think about how truly evil.
You think everyone involved in that story is if you're Barnes, very like, how can you
not understand that your guy who's your God King, you telling me that he got bamboozled
by the Federalist Society?
Those fuck nuts.
Well, and like, that's the guy that you want to be president and think about how pathetic
the argument is to like if Barnes is saying that these people convinced Trump to nominate
this person because of the Bush V Gore stealing of an election, she's going to help you out.
Yeah.
Right.
That that's what he gets.
Yeah.
Now what she brings to the table, if your Barnes and Alex is lockdowns and forced vaccinations,
which they believe is genocide of the entire population.
So essentially Trump would have sold out the entire population in order to stay in power.
Yeah.
And that's the argument that he can come up with.
Yeah.
That's not good.
No, that's perfect.
See, that convinced me.
I really love the idea of nominating a Supreme Court Justice, ignoring everything that you
disagree with her about simply because she is more than willing to help you steal an
election.
I don't get it.
What's wrong with that, Dan?
It's bad.
I mean, it's just a shoddy argument, but I don't know what else they have because they
obviously want there to be a right wing leaning court.
But at the same time, they've been pretty clear they don't like this lady.
And also they can't stop supporting Trump.
It's very weird.
It's a real bummer that Republicans are the dumbest fucking people on the planet.
It's a really interesting box, particularly that Alex and Barnes have created for themselves.
If they just hadn't covered this much and like talked all this shit, then they could
just pretend.
Yeah.
But it's like William Barr.
Like you said that Barr was a terrible choice and then he he was elected and they're like,
and they know why because everybody knew why Barr was appointed there because he had previously
helped people cover up fucking crimes.
And so he was hired to help people cover up crimes.
Alex does later try to ponder whether she could be another William Barr.
Someone who like helps you cover up crimes.
Someone who's like, Hey, this looks like a bad idea, but Trump can get her in line.
She's going to help me cover up crime.
We'll get to that in a little bit.
But before we do, we have to we have to wrestle with a really difficult thing here.
And that is that the Koch brothers, well, the one who's still alive and the Koch foundations
have supported Amy Coney, Barry, and that is something like down for this because it's
going to probably piss you off.
The Koch family put in massive amount of money and effort to make sure Barrett got the pick
and they're already spending more money than the Republican Party is to make sure she gets
on the bench and people you don't may not know the Koch family is big on their pro-immigration
actually.
They're also big on protecting big tech.
Oh, they've given more money to Democrats than to Republicans.
That's a sigh.
Wow.
Wow.
That's one of the first times I've seen you have to get up in your chair.
Obviously, that makes me shiver.
You I'm physically shivering.
You reacted like you just took a shot of something weird for the first time.
Like an alcohol you've never tasted like that was like a surge went through.
That one was that's a big swing.
That's a pochemic level swing.
That is gaslight.
Wow.
Wow.
But the way you get around that is like Alex has now said that being a Libertarian was
the stupidest thing ever and like, so he can say that the Libertarians are actually
lefty.
Secretly Democrat.
Oh my God.
Or whatever.
Kill me.
Yeah.
So the Koch brothers are a Psyop and they mostly give Democrats.
This is going to be a really difficult thing for Alex to unwrite a lot of his career considering
the citizens for a sound economy was Koch funded and Ron Paul was the first president
of it way back and then Koch brothers through Freedom Works funded and asked or turfed a
ton of the Tea Party, which I mean that that alone, it's tough to understand how they're
pro immigration.
Yeah.
I think the people who funded the Tea Party are pro immigration.
You know, I'm not enjoying watching or listening to these two guys eat what is clearly a big
bowl of shit.
Yeah.
Like they are taking big spoonfuls of like they're convincing me that it's a bad idea
while they're trying to convince me it's a good idea.
Well, I'm I'm kind of enjoy it honestly because well, here's the thing.
I agree with you, but that sound you just made is exactly how I feel.
Because I enjoy it on one level, which is it's kind of funny to see Alex and Barnes
be uncomfortable in their own bed.
Yeah.
You know, like you did this to yourself.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Yeah.
It is funny to hear that.
Like they have to like in order to make things make sense, you have to be like, yeah, you
know, Koch brothers are really leftist.
Yeah.
You know, like that kind of thing is pretty funny.
I am going to take a big bite of this poop.
Yeah.
It's uncomfortable because the reality doesn't change like right laughing at this dumb shit
leaves us in the same position that in the real world exactly that is Amy Coney Barrett
has a decent chance of getting on the Supreme Court.
Yep.
And then what do we do?
Yeah.
You know, like it's the same thing with laughing at Alex's stupid ideas about the globalists
plan A and plan B. It's like, yes, this is funny.
And this is the only way that you can keep your grift running.
Right.
Right.
But at the same time, it's really just a facade on the real life issues that you and
I and everybody listening have to deal with.
Yeah.
In the real world.
Yeah.
And so, yeah, it's bittersweet.
You know what you can enjoy watching them eat, but you know that like it still affects
you.
Yeah.
Yeah.
That does suck.
It does.
It's not unadulterated.
Yeah.
That's what fucks me up.
It's not pure Schadenfreude.
I get to Schadenfreude, but then at the end of it, I'm just shivering and angry.
You know, it's a very unsatisfying blue balls feeling of Schadenfreude.
That's one of the problems with the present day stuff is that's the reality of the issues
that they talk about and the real world impact things are going to have tomorrow and the week
after.
That are really, it's really tough to fully enjoy it in the same way that looking back
on the past, you know, that's, we have hindsight, we have to find sight that makes the Schadenfreude
a little bit purer.
The consequences are unclear and that's tough.
I think what's funny to me is I don't think it really matters too much for them to nominate
and sit another Supreme Court justice.
Because if you add Coney Barrett to that, the Supreme Court is so comically corrupted,
there's no point in even having it.
We've talked about this and I don't wholly disagree with you, but still.
But what that means is that even then, you know, whenever, if we elect Biden and that
actually works, ballots are great, that we were going to have to reckon with the Supreme
Court anyways.
Now it's just so blatantly obvious that we have to either pack the court or frankly
remake the entire system, that it's like, it's not too much different to me in terms
of what's going to or what needs to be done to correct it.
Right.
You know what I'm saying?
Well, yes.
And I don't know what the answer to that is, but I do want to offer this slight insight
from looking at these worlds.
I think that this could be a critical misstep on Trump's part.
Yeah.
Amy Coney Barrett is somebody who specifically because of these pro vaccine, pro lockdown
type positions is someone who's highly susceptible to attack from the fringe right.
Yeah.
There is a possibility that this could have such backlash on people who are like Ted
Cruzes, like these types of people that they might end up not being able to support her
nomination for fear of pissing off the QAnon crowd or those people, the anti-vax crowd
who have such loud voices within their coalition now.
So I think that there's a possibility that this nomination could get stalled to the point
where it might not go through and we end up with getting to the election with an opening.
Right.
I'm sorry.
There are other people that could have been nominated that wouldn't have had that difficulty
that I think could have put us in a much more difficult position.
Right.
I think that Barrett is probably not good to be on the Supreme Court, but the nomination
itself might be the best case scenario.
It's going to really piss off a lot of the base, Trump's base and I think that's a positive.
If I were the Democrats and I were at the hearing, I would appeal to far-right bigotry
more than anything else.
So that's what you do?
Yeah.
I mean, what I would say they should do is like a reverse psychology appeal to the far-rights
bigotry.
Like seriously, just compliment her for all the stuff that she believes that the far-right
fringe would absolutely lose their shit about.
Do you mean to tell me, Ms. Barrett, that you believe in science?
Yeah.
Seriously.
Fantastic.
Like I think it's great that you believe vaccines are good.
Who would you prefer a vaccine?
Would you prefer everyone get vaccinated?
You know, like that kind of thing?
It's just over and over and over again until they realize that the far-right is so bigoted
they won't even deal with the far-right.
Yeah.
I think that that strategy could be useful in some way.
I mean, somebody should try it.
I think that everything is on the table.
I think that this is a candidate who is particularly vulnerable to like angering that base.
Totally.
And I think it is a tool that is in the left's disposal and the Democrats, if they should
like to delay this or make this not happen, I think that's the best way to go about it
because there are a lot of people and Alex rightfully recognizes a couple of the attack
points that could be used.
Exactly.
And I think it would be good.
They hate her.
Well, they're clearly saying that they don't like her.
Yes.
They're eating shit.
And they're really setting themselves up for disappointment.
Totally.
So Jacobson was the foundation for the buck decision, which was for sterilizations and
the peak of eugenics in America.
It was the basis for the Korematsu decision, which was the detention camps in America.
So Jacobson is the most dangerous decision ever issued in American constitutional legal
history.
It's nasty.
Citizens United.
We can kill your ass.
And the concentration camp Jacobson was cited as the grounds for the forced draft Jacobson
was decided was cited as the grounds that you could kill Americans overseas for as enemy
combatants.
Jake, you know, any horror, you're not just saying that I looked this up.
Jacobson is seen as one of the most evil rulings in U.S. history, but it's been a lot of evil
ones.
And this lady just endorsed it in 2020.
Man, you talk about shaking that tail feather, shaking that tail feather.
What are we doing?
What are you idiots doing?
They're so fucking stupid.
Yeah.
So I mean, God, this fucking spine.
Yeah.
So this goes to show, like, how potent the potential backlash to this nomination could
be.
Totally.
Like, I don't I don't know because I'm not a legal scholar.
I don't know if Jacobson versus Massachusetts is really as evil as they're saying.
Sure.
I know that the underlying case was about a guy in 1905 was when the decision happened.
There's a guy named Henning Jacobson and he opposed this law in Massachusetts where
vaccines were mandatory.
But if you refused to get one, they'd fine you $5 and you didn't like that because you
didn't want to pay that $5.
So the case went up to the Supreme Court and they ruled against him finding that the Massachusetts
law was not unconstitutional.
Sure.
And it was up for legislators to decide this stuff as opposed to the courts.
Okay.
That kind of makes sense.
You know, like not getting vaccinated, it creates a public health burden and that translates
to public expenses a lot of the time.
So if you it is a kind of dicey hairy territory when it's like forcing people to get vaccines
or any kind of medical thing, you know, bottle the autonomy, sure, kind of decisions.
I don't I don't want to litigate that because I can't, but I think a fine compromise could
be that if you don't get a vaccine, you pay a fine, you help society deal with the potential
consequences.
Right.
And you know, anyway, that's what Jacobson is.
Now, whatever the reality of how it's been used subsequently to that, I don't know.
Yeah.
But I do know that Alex and Barnes are saying that it basically is the justification for
literally all evil and she supports it this year.
This year.
She supported it.
Jesus Christ.
It's not like she's not like she supported it the first year out of college.
She supports it.
Now.
Yeah.
I can't believe how succinctly they are making the case for not supporting her.
Yeah.
And at the same time saying you got a supporter, you got a supporter.
Yeah.
That is so fucking pathetic.
Now, it gets even weirder because this like this was a level of gaslighting that I don't
think I've experienced even on Info Wars.
Oh, no.
Mike down for this because am I going to shiver again?
Yes, you are.
This is a fucking pretzel.
But I think the bigger message is we need Trump elected now more than ever because the
effective bear it being on the bench means that the only thing stopping forced vaccines,
the only thing stopping another national lockdown, the only thing stopping these sort of George
Soros, Coke family, big money, elite agenda, Bill Gates agenda will be Donald Trump getting
reelected.
That's amazing.
So the all that with they want Trump to appoint this lady who is pro forced vaccination in
order to stop forced vaccinations.
Well, no, no.
So Trump did by himself make the decision to nominate this person for the Supreme Court.
And then being on the Supreme Court is going to make forced vaccinations and lockdowns
happen.
And that is why we need to reelect the person who nominated that person for the Supreme
Court because he's the only thing that's stopping forced vaccinations and lockdowns.
Exactly.
Exactly.
That makes perfect sense.
But this would be like legitimately, this would be like trying to argue that we need
to vote for Hillary to save us from Merrick Garland.
Yeah, yeah.
But it would be that would even be weaker because she wouldn't have she wouldn't have
nominated it.
Yeah.
Yeah.
If Obama had a second term in 2016, let's say his first election was in 2012.
Right.
Sure.
Just imagine rewrite history.
He nominates Merrick Garland.
Yep.
Merrick Garland goes through and then I don't know the young Turks is like making the argument
that we got to reelect Obama to save us from Merrick Garland.
So stupid.
I just I just can't I can't believe this is the flimsiest shit.
I just can't believe this.
You know, you you want people to find some backbone in times of crisis, just a little
bit.
But we see it from no one.
We know one.
We Democrats don't have a backbone, Republicans don't have a backbone, fucking local governments
don't have a backbone.
We need Trump to save us from the consequences of Trump's direct appointment.
That makes perfect sense.
No one could stop it.
Because if we had a Democrat in there, they'd nominate somebody who was for forced vaccinations
and lockdowns and lockdowns.
That would be even worse.
I guess.
What?
Wow.
I when I hear things like that, I really wonder if they like someone like Barnes even knows
what he's saying.
Like he must.
He's a smart guy.
He's a lawyer.
You would hope.
You know, like he's not an idiot.
I've seen him in various interview scenarios.
And like he knows like he has a pretty good sense about himself.
But he's saying legitimately, we need Trump to get reelected to fight against his Supreme
Court nomination that he chose to make himself.
I mean, it is it's not even making a lesser of two evils arguments.
It's making an evil of two evils argument.
You know, like we have to elect this guy.
He's evil.
Wow.
He put someone evil on the Supreme Court.
Yeah.
Just the other guy is so evil and this guy is evil in the same exact way and we got to
get him.
And what if like, you know, in the next four years, there's another opening of the Supreme
Court.
We might need Trump to have a third term to fight whoever he nominates.
I think I think whenever Trump nominates a fucking Bernie Sanders to the bench, we're
going to have to elect Trump for a third term in order to keep him from becoming a socialist.
I don't know what's going on anymore.
No, this doesn't mean anything.
No, they just want to kill leftists.
It's all you want.
Yeah.
And all this shit is such a pretzel like you're bending over backwards to blame like, oh,
the Federalist Society was actually the leftist Koch brothers are the ones Federalist Society
has anything other than fucking right wing dingbats.
Yeah.
And if Trump is as strong of a leader and as brave and smart as you all say he is, then
the Federalist Society doesn't get to take credit for like a nomination that is only
Trump's to make.
This is terrible.
Yeah.
Very stupid.
It's really, I must, you know, it's one of those things where I think the right has to
be a little disappointed in their dictator.
You know, like Mussolini wasn't really good at being a dictator, but he was competent.
You know, they were they were evil dictators who kind of knew how to dictate right.
And Trump doesn't even know how to do that right.
Yeah.
They're in a unique position of like an embarrassing dictator.
Yeah.
That's a mess.
That's terrible.
So you were asking earlier about the William Barr sort of thing where it's like, you
know, hey, he's bad, but Trump made him good.
Sure.
That argument that they made.
Yeah.
And I told you that that comes up and Alex is trying to talk to Barnes about like, hey,
you know, hey, Barr, we didn't like him.
He was he was sketchy, but it turns out he's pretty good.
We like him.
He's doing the stuff we want.
What about what about Barrett?
Maybe she'll be like that.
And this is so weak.
This is just the weakest thing ever.
Trump makes mistakes.
He gets educated.
I think we educate him and warn him on this lady so that we he gets concessions and behind
the scenes up front.
She gets hit with some real questions by Republicans instead of fawning at her so that we can get
her position to not be a total traitor because I think I think she's a follower of Barrett
is.
And I think overall she has some good ideas, really bad ideas.
I think just her MO now that I've had a chance to look at her, maybe I'm wrong, is that there's
enough pressure put on her at the hearings and by the culture that she won't be the creature
of the Koch brothers and the Trump can cut her out.
Or is that just no hope?
Oh, no, there's hope of that because she's a memorizer personality.
She's not like a Bork level intellect.
So she's one of the people that memorized everything in school and was kind of the teacher's
pet kind of personality.
Was Bork also another kind of authoritarian?
Oh, yes, Bork had a lot of crazy ideas.
He was for forced sterilization as a condition of employment.
So I was never a Bork fan, but he was extremely intelligent.
So that meant he was prepared to move.
She's not very intelligent actually at all.
And so she is someone that can, through pressure, be pushed to change positions.
So Trump has nominated someone for this green part who you think is stupid and malleable.
What is wrong with these people?
How can you eat this much shit?
This is so much shit.
They don't get tired of eating this much shit.
I'm tired of watching them eat this much shit.
Yeah.
All that shotting for it is fun for a little bit and now it's just watching two people
eat shit.
Yeah.
Eventually, the novelty wears off and now you're just grossed out by what's happening.
You're not wrong and you want to think like, well, the alternative must be worse, but what's
the alternative?
I mean, like for them.
Yeah, exactly.
I can't imagine that Barnes or Alex is worried about going to jail or something like, I don't
know what it could be other than like, well, we've made too much of our identity and our
position in the market surrounding Trump and to go back on that would be to go broke.
It's like a dance with the one what Brunga, you know, but if the one what Brunga is making
you in the balls over and over and over again, don't dance with them.
You can find another dance bar.
That's probably true.
Go back to Ron Paul.
You just had a stroke.
You got to support Ron Paul, but put him on the Supreme Court.
Fuck it.
You can go back to like rallying around him in his time of need.
Totally.
You can make that a big deal, the light of liberty and you know, you could do all sorts
of shit about that.
Yeah.
Just like, and God damn it.
Why not?
Why not let this be?
I'm done with Trump.
Why not?
Like based on his narratives, the election doesn't matter.
The globalists are going to release super bio weapons.
Yep.
Who gives a shit?
Politics is meaningless.
Yep.
Who cares?
Supreme Court doesn't matter.
Trump has fucked us because he nominated somebody who's into forced vaccines.
I am a man who has a breaking point and this is it.
I listen, ladies and gentlemen, I believed in him.
I was given assurances that all this stuff was Machiavellian games, but I can say at
this point, the law of the land is determined by the Supreme Court and you cannot take lightly
who someone nominates to be on the Supreme Court.
And if he's going to put somebody in who's in favor of vaccines and forced lockdowns,
I say no.
Or you could get down on your knees, rub, first rub your nose in the shit that you've
already eaten, leave a little leftovers there and then lick Trump's boots over and over
and over again until maybe he smiles at you.
Yep.
I guess that's the choice.
That sounds right.
Yeah.
Anyway, this is a bummer.
I expected better, but I don't know why.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Just a bunch of disgraceful dicks.
It is almost like I expect this and yet at the same time, it still surprises me.
I expect them to pull out bowls of Trump flavored shit and eat it in front of us because there's
no bottom.
But at the same time, how can anyone pull out a bowl of Trump flavored shit and not have
a problem with it?
It's becoming farcical.
It is.
This is a parody.
Yeah.
Continuing to make an argument for why somebody should not be nominated as though you're saying
that it's a great choice is a parody.
Well, but the only way to thread that needle and what they're trying to do, which is just
transparent and sad, is yeah, this is a bad nomination from Trump, but it's not Trump's
fault.
I know.
It's just come on, guys.
Just curl up.
And it's entirely Trump's decision because he's so smart and so great, but also it's
not his fault because he got bamboozled because he's an idiot.
Yeah.
No, because they told him that she would give him another term because she would steal
an election.
I mean, here's, okay.
Here's why it's not even parody or why it is parody is because it's unperdiable.
What he's literally saying is you should vote for this guy because he's an appointing a Supreme
Court justice who is in favor of killing all of us.
Who is a how do you escalate that who will allow killing all of us?
If it means Trump having another term exactly like how do you escalate that sounds like a
good guy?
I don't know.
But well, certainly probably find out when we come back for another episode.
But boy, until then we have a website.
We do have a website.
It's knowledgefight.com.
Yep.
We are also on Twitter.
We are on Twitter.
It's that knowledge underscore fight and I go to bed Jordan.
Yep.
We're on Facebook.
We are on Facebook.
Download, right.
Leave a review.
And if you would like, please donate to a charity or bail fund in your area or a bear
fund or a bear fund.
Absolutely.
We'll be back.
But until then, I'm Leo.
I'm Leo.
I'm DZX.
Clark.
I am the juiciest ice cube.
Andy and Francis, you're on the air.
Thanks for holding.
Well, Alex, I'm a first-time caller.
I'm a huge fan.
I love your work.