Knowledge Fight - #603: October 3-4, 2021
Episode Date: October 8, 2021Today, Dan and Jordan check in on the present day of The Alex Jones Show. In this installment, Alex needs money, multiple power-point presentations get discussed, and Alex really, really needs money r...ight now. Citations
Transcript
Discussion (0)
I'm sick of them posing as if they're the good guys saying we are the bad guys knowledge
fight. Dan and George, knowledge fight. I need money. Andy and Kansas, stop it. Andy
and Kansas, it's time to pray. Andy and Kansas, you're on the earth, thanks for holding it.
Hello Alex, I'm Mr. Tim Cullen, I'm a huge fan, I love your work. Knowledge fight. Knowledge
fight.com. I love you. Hey everybody, welcome back to knowledge fight. I'm Dan. I'm Jordan. We're
couple dudes like to sit around worship at the altar of Celine and talk a little bit about Alex
Jude. Oh, indeed we are Dan Jordan, Jordan. I have a quick question for you. What's up? What's
your bright spot today? My bright spot today. My bright spot today is I mean, look, it's gonna be
couched in sort of a negative right, but it is a bright spot. It is all the positive feedback
from the last episode. Yes. On Monday's episode, there was just a flood of people saying such
positive things about the episode. And like that is really nice, although it is very hard for me
to deal with having the brain that I have. Oh, yeah, it's dastardly. It's it's as if I'm being
given terrible feedback if I were a normal person. Right. My body experiences it. But it's kind of
immersion therapy, you know, to compliments and positive stuff. And I appreciate I appreciate
that because I got I got to get better at. Yeah. Well, I mean, you're a bit like a balloon. You
can handle a certain amount of puffing up, but go too far and that sucker's gonna pop man. You
know, and that was a flood of positive stuff. But but I'm also like a balloon that can only
handle a tiny bit. Yeah, you're a very small balloon. I was trying to be really nice and not
say you were a tiny balloon. I'm a balloon that functions best. Empty. Yes. Yeah, you are. You
are the one remaining luft balloon. Yeah, but I'm I'm I, you know, it's something that I've been
trying to to get better at like accepting positive stuff. And you know, I definitely definitely
appreciate it. I was happy with the episode and yeah, so it was fantastic. So yeah, thank you
for everyone for all the kind words. Yes. Thank you to everyone for that. What about you? I mean,
obviously that was that was very kind. I feel like whatever I say after that is going to be a
real letdown. But it's my partner's birthday coming up soon. Happy birthday. And we have decided at
this point, you know, I used to go out like four or five nights a week for a decade, you know,
yeah, doing comedy. And then in the past two, three years, it's just dwindled down to almost
nothing. Like I just stay in all the time. So we're going to start doing just weird random stuff.
And so for her birthday this year, we have decided to go to a casino. Oh, neither of us gamble,
neither of us like to gamble. You're going to be overwhelmed. It's basically a spin the wheel
and we'll just go. You guys are going to be so overwhelmed. Oh no, we're screwed. We're going
to be so depressing. I don't think you understand the type of the cross section you get when you go
to the casino. People just sitting there at the slots, just endlessly pulling. I've been to Vegas
twice and it was the worst both times. This one, I think is going to be in either Indiana or
Michigan or Wisconsin or whatever way better. So it's going to be a disgusting affair, but I can't
wait. It's just put it on the list, man. Well, spin the wheel. That sounds depressing, but one fun
thing that a friend and his, I guess, I guess his wife did. They would go and they would choose a
random L stop on a line that they don't usually go on and just get off and spend the day around
that L stop. That's a fantastic idea. That's a way to have like some kind of excitement,
randomness, culture, you know, and it won't be as depressing as going to the fucking casino.
And see the city that you fucking love so much. Somehow we just do not see the city, you know.
Stuff that wouldn't be on your normal beaten path. Totally. Yeah. Yep. That's way smarter.
Too bad. We're going to a casino, dad. I should tell you. So in Missouri, there's the riverboat
casino that was a good like half hour drive, maybe 45 minute drive from Columbia. Yeah. And so me
and my buddy Nikki gifts and a burger. I think some other people like to go to, but those are the
two buddies that I remember who like, we would go to the casino, just go to the casino. Yeah.
And we spent some time down there wasted and I don't know how this happened. Okay.
That's a good start. But I think Nick won like a free buffet at the casino. Sure.
And we went on Valentine's Day. Me burger and Nikki gifts. That's the saddest place in the
world. We got a steak at the casino. No. Not not a finest moment, but I do remember it being
pretty fun. That sounds that sounds good. There are worse ways to spend a few hours and a hundred
bucks, right? A couple of good buddies of poorly cooked steak. Yeah. What are you going to do?
Getting mad at Nick because he keeps winning on the three card poker. Five games of $10 black
check and then it's all gone. So Jordan, today we have some episode to get into. We're going to
be talking about October 3rd and 4th, 20. Oh, I was slow. Yeah. So I wanted to check in on Alex's
response to, of course, losing. Yes. These cases by default, being a big loser, being a huge loser,
loosiest loser ever. Quite a big loser. Oh, man. What a big loser. So October 3rd is a Sunday's
episode and Monday is the 4th. And so we're going to dive into this. But before we do,
let's say hello to some new wonks. Oh, that's a great idea. So first, Joy, thank you so much.
You are now a policy wonk. I'm a policy wonk. Thank you. Next, David, thank you so much. You're
now a policy wonk. I'm a policy wonk. Thank you, David. Next, Red, the red kitty. Thank you so
much. You are now a policy wonk. I'm a policy wonk. Thanks, Red. Thank you. Next, Tiny Bullhorn
Operators Union 42021. And then my addition, Blackjack. You are now a policy wonk. I'm a policy
wonk. Thank you very much. Thank you. And we have Technocrat in the mix. So thank you so much. And
hello to Marl Carks. Thank you so much. You're now a policy wonk. Crocky, mate. That's fantastic.
Have yourself a brew. How's your 401k doing, bro? We got to go full tilt bugging on this
Watson. All right, let's just get down to business. We ain't making that money off that heroin.
Why are you pimp so good? My neck is freakishly large. I declare info war on you. Thank you,
Marl Carks. Yes. Thank you very much. Also, Brandy W. Indeed. Sent an email. Wanted to know if we
had wished a happy birthday to Greg, who she had emailed us a long time ago. During the time period
when we were doing birthdays. Yes. Let's let's make this clear. We are not restarting birthdays.
That is not happening. No. But during the time period we're in, we had an obligation to birthday
eyes. Yes. Well, we didn't have an obligation, but we had a reasonable expectation. And I think
yeah, she wanted to know when we had done it. What episode was it on? Right. We might have.
Well, I'm almost positive we did. I can't remember. No clue. So just in case. Yes, 100%
just in case. From Brandy, we'd like to wish you a happy birthday. Great.
Giving someone life is giving someone death.
You could say that
life is death. Happy birthday. Happy birthday. So, Jordan, we jump in here on Sunday, Sunday, Sunday.
Oh, yeah. And Alex has a headspace that he's in. Obviously not good. Oh, yeah. Why is that?
Wow, there's some law things. But he knows that there's a difference between emotional reaction
and thought out calm decision making. Okay, so he's about to tell us that it's fine for all
of humanity to die then. Well, somebody's got to. We really should all just sit back for a moment
and take a deep breath and cogitate or meditate or just think very deeply and very calmly and
very serenely. So stop, meditate, soak in and listen at a cerebral level. And then we have to
make decisions at a cerebral level. And then emotionally, once we've made our decisions
in a very calm way, use the emotions the good Lord gave us to very aggressively power our intellect
against the globalist. You can intellectually decide that you're going to do something
like unscrew a despot's head. But then if you're going to do it physically, it takes the horse
power psychologically mentally and physically to actually break that neck quickly and easily.
I just use that as historical metaphor. Okay. Yes, what a very historical metaphor that is.
Yeah. Historically. Yeah. As we all know, you must calmly decide to do something and then let
your emotions take over as you kill. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. That was that was an adventure. That was
an adventure. I was like, Hey, let's cogitate. Let's think. Let's let's think about that. Let's
cogitate all over this meditate on it. I want to tear a despot's head off. Right. So I need to
emotionally prepare to take the emotion part out of it. Okay. If you just go on emotions,
right, you won't be able to achieve your goal. I won't be able to get there. No, probably somebody
will stop me in advance. Exactly. Because I'll be like, Hey, I'm going to tear your head off.
And the guys are like, No, we're not going to do that. You need to focus like it is Zen state.
Right. And get your resolve ready and know that your goal is to twist off despot head. So I'll
paint myself like the wall of a bank. And then when a despot walks by, I'll just appear and
tear his head off. Brilliant. See, now that's that's how you think things through. You've been
cogitated. This is cogitation. So this is a no man's land of nonsense. And then it gets worse
because a little bit into the show, we get a guest. I'll give you one clue about who he is.
He's a health ranger. Okay, it's Mike Adams. God damn it. Mike Adams joins us. He did a great
job reporting on a story that broke Thursday evening. A lot of different angles to it. He went
with the angle of AI powered DoD data analysis program named project solace shatters official
vaccine narrative shows ADE accelerating in the fully vaccinated with each passing week. And
there's other angles to it. But ADE is the big one. And again, for people that saw this and
didn't follow the links, I have a whole stack of articles here that I'll show TV viewers first.
This is from mainstream news. This is from the Pentagon's own site. Effectiveness of mRNA COVID-19
vaccines against the Delta variant amongst 5.6 million Medicare beneficiaries. 65 years and
older. This is a particular study in about September 28 2021. It got discovered by a
lawyer that's involved in lawsuits against them. And it's now come out. So this is put out by
the Pentagon. So first of all, it's important to note that this is project Salas, not project
solace. Project solace is a 2D platformer you can buy on steam, whereas Salas is an AI initiative
that's run by the Department of Defense. Fair enough. The JAIC or about project C. Alice.
That's something else entirely. Okay. The JAIC or the Joint Artificial Intelligence Center launched
project Salas in March 2020 as quote, a predictive tool to help identify where critical supply chain
shortages were occurring during the pandemic. Essentially, it compiled a ton of data together
and used it to make predictions about where resources should be allocated. Sure. This document
that Alex is talking about that Mike Adams has apparently reported on is a PowerPoint
presentation that was put together by Humetrix, a medical app developer who was seeking to answer
some questions by consulting data from project Salas. The central questions they were concerned
with had to do with vaccine effectiveness and whether or not it waned over time. They were
further interested in reduced effectiveness with the Delta variant and among people in
subpopulations within the data. Right. Information that it would be hard to just compile and analyze
on your own. Yes. Essentially, they found that there may be some concern about waning effectiveness
of the mRNA vaccines, but there's some huge caveats you have to give when discussing this
PowerPoint presentation. The first thing is that the data that they're using only covers
people 65 and older. It's not necessarily something that you can extrapolate out into the entire
population. Right. Also, a very important point is that this is a PowerPoint presentation. If you're
looking at the slides, you can see what are basically the visual aids that someone has put
together to help them in giving a lecture. You're missing the essential context of the person's
actual presentation, which isn't being captured in the PowerPoint. Case in point is slide number
nine. They were looking at vaccine effectiveness in a three to four month post vaccination period
and five to six months post. This slide shows that their age distribution is heavily skewed
with people 85 and older, making up 43% of the folks in the five to six month group, but only
14% in the three to four month group. Okay. Conversely, people aged 65 to 74 made up 51%
of the three to four month group and only 24% of the five to six month group. The fact that the
five to six month group skews much older could introduce confounding variables that make the
analysis more complicated. And as such, the slide includes a discussion question on the sidebar.
Quote, could higher proportion of 85 years and older members in the first vaccinated group
explain reduced vaccine effectiveness? If you only have the PowerPoint to go off of,
you have this discussion question, but you don't have the discussion. Also, none of the stuff that
Alex is saying about this having to do with ADE is real at all. It's just made up explanations
for data that they don't care to try to understand. Right. Right. It's a bunch of bullshit. They're
going off the PowerPoint presentation and creating a fun conspiracy. Yeah. Yeah. Could
having a large number of people who six months after anything might be dead skew our results?
This isn't even about deaths. This is about breakthrough, breakthrough infections. I know,
but yes, I mean, obviously there's no way that that can't have some effect on your data reporting.
But the data that's being presented in this PowerPoint presentation, if everything is above
board and everything is accurate, and it does introduce some interesting questions for people
to look into, but it does not introduce conclusions. They're being unfair.
Now, I don't know. If Mike Adams gets his hand on a PowerPoint presentation, that's all I need
to hear. Sure. That's what I needed to know. Mike, the dramatic ranger is back. It's over.
This has been on the Humetrix website as of Friday. It was still live on there. I don't know
if it's there now, but this is DoD. This is their JAIC, their artificial intelligence program.
So no one can argue that this is not some secret source somewhere. This is open source
intelligence. What it shows a couple of very important things. One is that the negative
side effects from the vaccine get worse over time with each passing week.
And so the negative outcomes, which includes hospitalizations and ICU outcomes, as well as
deaths, it's very bad at three to four months, but it roughly doubles in about six months.
So this PowerPoint presentation has nothing to do with negative side effects of the vaccine
that he seems to be. I was going to say, is he trying to say that when you get the vaccine,
you have negative side effects that only continue to get worse? Apparently. But I mean,
like this document is entirely about the efficacy over time of the vaccine factoring
an age group as a variable. Right. While that was totally made up, it's fair to say that this
slideshow does seem to indicate that there is an increase in breakthrough cases and thus a decrease
in vaccine efficacy between the three to four month and five to six month groups. Mike is ignoring
all the context and the suggestions of possible explanations for the data presented because
he has his own explanation that he just wants to jam down the audience's throat.
Also on slide six, it literally says that the rate of hospitalization dropped by a third comparing
breakthrough cases to people in the same age group who just got COVID before the vaccines rolled out
in March to December 2020. Not only that, in breakthrough infections, there was a 2.1% death
rate among people aged 65 and up compared to a 12% death rate in that same period between
March and December 2020. Mike is entirely misrepresenting this PowerPoint presentation in
order to make a fraudulent argument against vaccination. I've said it before and I'll say it
again every time he's on. This is surprisingly weak stuff from the health ranger. Oh man. I'm
underwhelmed. You know, I, since I was growing up, I always saw rangers as like the loan like no.
The Texas Aragorn. You know what I'm saying? I'm talking about Strider. I'm talking about somebody
who's just going from place to place, exiled, used to be a king or whatever, solving problems.
And this man is no Aragorn, sir. No. No Aragorn at all. I would love for you to slap Mike Adams
with a glove. How dare you, sir. I know Aragorn and you are. You are no Aragorn, sir. So not only
is Mike misrepresenting and misusing this data, he just decides that he can do whatever he wants
with it. Oh, that's nice. Yeah, it's so fun when there's no rules. I like it. This looks like a
flat line projection. So if we continue to project this out further in time to let's say nine months
or 12 months, which is coming up in our immediate future, it looks like this is going to triple the
three month negative effects or perhaps quadruple the three month negative effects at 12 months.
And it looks like Alex that we're going to see probably, this is my estimation. This is not
in the report, but by my estimation, we're going to see millions of Americans suffering
severe hospitalizations and deaths over the next six months due to the vaccines. So that's where we
are. So Mike's making all that up. What he's saying is that he looked at this graph and he
decided to draw what he wants after the data stops. I was going to say that's that look, I mean,
that's all he's doing one year. I think Schwerber. I want to say it was 2019, maybe 2018, 2019 on the
first at bat. Schwerber was leading off and he had a home run. This would be exactly like if Mike
Adams was like, well, obviously he's going to hit 162 this year. If he hits it one on one game,
that's one every game. Well, and not only that, but every at bat. Exactly. It could be anywhere
from a 500 home runs. You'll never know. Yeah. Just based on the information in this PowerPoint
presentation, there are very strong indications that Mike will be totally wrong with these predictions.
For one thing, he seems to be ignoring that this data is just a group of people 65 and older.
Secondly, because the age distribution in the three to four month group and the five to six
month group is so different, there's not necessarily going to be this straight line
phenomenon Mike is predicting. As time goes on, the average age of people getting vaccinated
tends to go down because the elderly were a top priority initially for vaccination.
Naturally, the proportion of the people aged 85 and older goes way down in the three to four
month group and also the vaccine efficacy numbers go up. It's entirely possible that
there's some relationship between age and MLR and a vaccine efficacy that we are yet to discover.
The point is that there's a lot of possible explanations for the data in this PowerPoint
slide and Mike is just making shit up so you can act like a dramatic little baby talking
about millions dead on Alex because that's how they have fun. Yeah. And make money. Yeah. It's
real sad. It's real sad. Like, I mean, to take something that so obviously shows a massive
improvement over not getting a vaccine and then being like, See, I bet after three months, it's
four times as bad as it was after two days. But you know, but you know what, like if the numbers
do show that there's like a four times higher after nine months, that will just be those people
all that will be is an indication that it's even lower numbers for people in the earlier
cohort or the later cohorts. Yeah, exactly. So I don't know. This is all stupid. Insane.
So there is one piece of information that is in this, this PowerPoint presentation that Mike
lances onto that actually isn't all that surprising. Okay. So the other major finding of this report
is that the the number one most important factor that reduced serious complications over time
was to have a previous COVID-19 infection. So this document actually confirms that
natural immunity is the number one best protective effect against negative outcomes
following vaccination. Let me let me state that in a little bit different way because I know it
sounds odd, but a lot of people are taking the vaccines, even though they've already had
the illness and been sick. And so what we're finding is people that naturally already had it,
even though this injection has compromised them and set them up for death, the body is so smart,
it's able to figure it out if it's already been in contact with it because it's the vaccine itself
creating on the body. Is that right? Is that right? That's part of it. But is that part of it?
If here, here's the weird start over. This is this is really important. This is really important.
So it makes sense that having had COVID previously would give you a leg up in terms of immune
response. A lot of the science hasn't been totally clear on the exact extent to which people
become immune for COVID after they get it, but there is some effect. It's, you know, we'll
know more later. Again, though, I need to stress that this data set is entirely comprised of
individuals age 65 and older, and it's not sensible to think that this can be applied
to the general population. Alex confused himself there because the narrative on inforores up to
this point is that the mRNA vaccines train your body to attack itself. And Alex has been very clear
that he believes that if you get the vaccine after having COVID, you're as good as dead.
Yes. It's going to fucking kill you. You got it. This slideshow that Mike is covering shows
some indications to the contrary. So Alex has to figure out a way to dance around that in a ton
of words, hoping that the audience doesn't realize that this is the exact opposite of what he's been
saying for months. I mean, it's just a fucking word salad he threw out there to avoid saying
the very obvious thing. Yeah. I mean, it's all God because it's directly contradictory to his
shit. God, that's so you're so stupid. Now, here's where things get a little bit dicey.
Just here? A lot of places. But this one might be like this is our fork in the road.
When Mike comes on, there's usually something that's like, oh, boy. Oh, we're taking we're
taking exit 121 B to Diceville. Oh, yes. Okay. If you plan to get vaccinated, according to these
data put out by the DOD, the number one thing that you can do to survive the vaccine is to get
COVID before you take the vaccine. That's in the data. That's what it shows. So for those
those people who have been infected and then they get the vaccine, they are probably likely to have
lower incidents of negative outcomes versus people who never had any infection and then they
got the report says that shows how incredible our body is. It gets it learns how it later gets the
deadly vaccine and then isn't as apt to go into the ADE. Yeah, exactly. I appreciate the restraint,
but I mean, like the implication that he's giving is like, if you're going to get the vaccine, go
get yourself. Go get yourself COVID first. Yes. Yeah. This is like this is getting dangerously
close to him saying like you should infect yourself on purpose. The number one thing you can do
to survive the vaccine to survive a bullet wound is to have it not hit you in the head or the heart.
Okay. So the number one way to survive the vaccine is to not be killed by COVID one way or the other.
Yes. Yeah. I mean, I think that this is dangerous advice for a number of reasons. A lot of reasons.
You put people around you at greater risk. You could have severe complications. You could die.
Yeah. This is, this is a, I mean, he's supposed to be the health ranger. Yeah. I think this is
stupid. Well, I mean, he did try and give everybody a Bola that one time. Well, that was in the name
of curing. Yeah. For somebody who doesn't believe in vaccines, drink a little Bola, but you put some
vodka in there, put a little vodka in your Bola. You'll have a good time. Just you want to make
sure it's disinfected. Yeah. Makes sense. I mean, the thing that I, the thing that weirdly got me
there is, is this the only way that they can get people to justify getting the vaccine? Because
I'm sure most of his audience has already had COVID. They haven't been being safe whatsoever.
So is this like the angle that they're doing of like, listen, they're making you get the vaccine
now. We've got all these vaccine mandates, but guess what? If you've already had COVID,
you're actually going to be fine with this vaccine. I know I've been telling you that the
vaccine is going to murder you and your family and your children and everyone you've ever met.
It might be a way to backdoor like a narrative later for like the vaccine not killing everybody.
Exactly. They could be like, well, you actually had COVID before you got the vaccine and that's
why it didn't kill you. Totally. Yeah. I think that that's probably productive for them. I think
that would be, that would be a way around this, but functionally as it stands, it's also basically
saying you should go get COVID, which is absolutely, absolutely. It's like, hey, go and have a,
you know how kids used to have chicken pox parties? Yeah. Go do one of those. And I mean,
one out of every, what, 10 a year you'll die. No big deal. No big deal. No big deal. So anyway,
Mike misuses some more of this data in order to claim that this is a ethnic bio weapon. Sure.
Yeah, exactly. But also notice the last slide of the slide 17. It also shows the ethnic groups
that are most affected by this slide 17. And it shows that Native Americans have the highest rate
of increase odds of negative outcomes. So if you're Native American, you're getting this vaccine,
you have about a 1.5 times higher risk of death and negative side effects compared to Caucasians.
If you're Hispanic, it's about a roughly 1.3 to 1.4 times greater odds. If you're black,
it's something more like 1.25 roughly in that range. But the point is this vaccine
has ethnic effects that, you know, there have been many people out there warning
about the possibility of this vaccine being a biological weapon. This is not a responsible
reading of this graph at all. There is a higher risk of hospitalization and breakthrough cases
among people of Native American populations. But this slide alone is not enough to demonstrate
that there's a causal relationship. Throughout the pandemic, if you cared to listen, people were
talking a bunch about disproportionately high rates of infection and death among Native communities.
This is part of a long standing conversation. And there are a number of hypotheses given for
the numbers, including a higher rate of shared and intergenerational housing, decreased access to
healthcare and higher prevalence of COVID-19 comorbidities like heart disease, diabetes, and
smoking. Sure. This is something relevant for sure. And it's something that researchers are
keeping an eye on and discussing. But the way that Mike's talking about this stuff is just not,
it's not connected to reality. I mean, it does sound like he's literally saying that once again,
smallpox blankets are roaming across this land, tearing everybody to pieces, which is, I mean,
not terribly wrong. So now in this next clip, what I think is just
spectacular is that everything that Alex says is made up. Okay, everything.
So I want to talk about that here in a few minutes, but just going back to this,
because we could talk 10 hours about this, to have the Pentagon's main AI program that's all over
the news, monitoring deaths, monitoring what's happening. And then they just put out a report,
what it does. And they're honest about it, but no political statements are in it. And it says
that you're way more likely to die if you've had these shots, that it's erasing your regular
immune system. You said the opposite of that. Turn way up, though, if it comes into contact
with a similar virus, not just COVID, but any other coronavirus, I mean,
none of this is a bad, none of that's in that report in the primary sourcing that they're,
they're providing. What is the Pentagon's main AI? You know what I'm saying? Like,
which is the main one? How? How are they still using how? I guess. I don't know. I would hope
we're way past Al. I mean, at least I have 11,000 by now. Halbert. Halbert? Halbert. Holy
shit. Holy shit. Nobody in Halbert is a real human being. Crack the code. It's all artificial
intelligence. Okay. All right. That was great. So Mike believes without any kind of proof that
they're spraying cities with COVID. Yeah, why not? Yeah. And then Alex has an interesting
rejoinder. Oh, okay. Can they do aerosolize releases of these toxic nanoparticles this
coming winter? Could they release this in the United States? Could they target a particular
city? Have they already done so in the past? Personally, this is my opinion, Alex, but I
believe they've already done so. And I think they're planning to do so again. And I think
they are going to continue to commit genocide against the, not just the American people,
but everybody around the world to try to drive people into the vaccines while they're crashing
the economy and causing widespread suffering and death and destitution. And as we said,
as we said 20 months ago here on air, they will then blame the unvaccinated for the vaccinated
dying and others. But to cover it up, they'll then just spray the general public like my dad
and countless others and almost kill them. So apparently Alex's dad got sprayed. Yeah.
Man, it is easier to say that your dad got sprayed than to take responsibility for almost
killing your dad, Alex. You almost killed your dad. You personally almost killed your dad.
Well, maybe not personally, but his behavior was such that it put his dad and there's a chance.
Yeah. Yeah. But it's better if his dad was sprayed other than saying that as a direct result of
everything Alex believes, Alex's dad almost died. It's way more fun if a globalist came up with
like a little flower on his lapel sprayed him with Coke. No. Maybe it was a seltzer bottle.
The seltzer bottle is good. If you are, if you are putting it in a pie, I think you've gone too far.
Yes. A cream pie is just Jordan. That's no longer aerosolized. That's true. That's
it's important. Yes. Good point. You can transmit covid via pie to the face. Yeah. Well, obviously
it gets in your nose. There is a meringue based distribution that is possible.
Well, I mean, it is October. Obviously there's going to be some pumpkin covid going around.
Pumpkin spice. Yeah. So two years ago or so, a little bit less, Mike Adams appeared on the
show and declared that it was over for humanity. There would only be lone survivors and he was
right. Yes. So now here's his new dramatic prediction. Okay. My prediction is people are
going to see troops on the streets by Christmas and they're going to see bodies piling up in
certain areas. Of course, with a false narrative stating no, it couldn't have been the vaccines,
but this is what we're going to see. This is the winter die off. This is the sort of soft
coup military replacement of the infrastructure of first responders and medical workers. And even
you may have even at some point troops in certain areas at grocery stores checking your
vaccine passports before you're allowed to come in and shop for food. So by Christmas,
like in two months, two and a half months, we're going to have military on the street,
garden grocery stores, bodies piling up everywhere. Yeah. Okay. Yeah. That seems so unlikely. That's
an upgrade still over. It's over for humanity. There will only be lone survivors. He's not
going to compete with that. Okay. No, you can't get more apocalyptic than it's going to be me
and Dave over there against no one. Right. Right. They really, they shot their shot too early. Yeah,
I mean, it's over for humanity. There will only be lone survivors. It was way too early and then
Alex has already done the I'm going to eat my neighbors thing. Totally. And that's like,
that's where you should, you should do that when you've got the light. When someone is giving you
the light, that's when you talk about eating your neighbors because you don't have, you don't have
another place to go after that. Right. They got stirred crazy because they assumed that the lockdown
and the covert thing wouldn't last as long. So they thought it would be fun to say to a scare
monger about it. I think they're, they're like a comic who got overexcited and did their closer
three minutes into their set. Too bad. Too bad. Oh no. Oh shit. Oh boy. I did not have 20. No.
And so the rest of the set is going to just end up being ranting about how you need to get right
with God over and over again. Come on. I want more soldiers that I've been around other big
national talk show hosts and others. Everybody knows it's the end. Everybody understands this.
And I feel so sorry for the public. That's when people ask, Hey, they say you lost your lawsuit.
You don't get a jury trial. People go, that's unconstitutional. Seventh amendment. They don't
care. Seventh amendment. They've all been told the country's going down and they think they're
the winners. But of course they won't. Everybody in the system that served it is going down as well.
In fact, they're most of the people that have taken the shots. It's going to be Democrats
dying in mass from the injections they've taken. I mean, this is biblical. Get right with God.
Get prepared. Get ready because this is going down. It's going down.
Right with God. That's, that's not going to happen though. It's just a lot of buffering.
Like just a lot of filling time with these sort of meaningless platitudes. Yeah. I was really
kind of hoping for, for maybe a Barnes. I was kind of thinking that a Barnes would show up
to let us know that it's actually, he actually won the lawsuit somehow and there's a secret,
double powerful constitutional amendment that we're going to have. I feel like if you're Barnes
or Norm and you're smart, yeah, you stay away. Oh, you're gone. You're out of the country.
You grow a mustache. Exactly. I'm in, I'm in Brazil and I got clones. That's what I'm doing
if I'm Norm. He responds a little bit more to the Sandy Hook stuff on Monday because this is,
this is mostly about Mike Adams is Mike Adams seems to have paid for some time on the program.
He wants a little bit of time. Yeah. So Rand Paul, who Alex loves and he won't debate you,
staunchly refuses to beat me still. He is, he's acting like it's normal times, right? It's normal
now, but it's not. No, it's not. Democrats are going to be dead in mass. Right. What can the
average person do to lessen the blow? What can Congress do? Cause I see great people like Rand
Paul and others. They don't seem to know how much danger we're all in. He's confronting Fauci. He's
talking about illegal spying, you know, but they're still operating from their cocoon.
Like everything's okay, but it's not okay. I mean, everything's falling apart and,
and the hospitals are now full of the vaccinated who are seriously ill.
I'm not sure they realize how close we are to the end of the American empire period,
the end of the dollar. Once you see the only way that they're keeping this going,
and the way that Biden is bribing all of the Democrat groups to carry out more voter fraud
on the ground is through money printing. So the money printing allows them to distribute these
trillions of dollars. They call it, you know, a COVID stimulus. But of course, as you know,
almost none of it goes to anything related to COVID. This just goes, this gets funneled into
other groups to keep the Democrats in power. So at what point have they ever been in power?
It will be, of course, catastrophic for the nation. It would mean the end of America as we
know it at least. Oh, man. Oh, the Democrats in power. That's very funny. I just think that these
villains that these dudes have are, they're spreading themselves too thin. Yeah. They're
like there's too many plans. It just makes no sense. Why do you have to do all these things?
One plan would work. Historically. All right. The most successful plans are simple. They strike
the enemy's weak point, and then they are done. It is a quick, effective, and immediate solution.
All other plans are Rube Goldberg machines that make us look like we're idiots, like say,
I don't know, starting a war in Iraq or something makes us look dumb, short, small, quick.
When you're the devil, you don't want to have different teams working on goals that are completely
antithetical to each other and have nothing to do with the larger objective. And they seem,
that seems to be how the organizational chart works. Here's what I'm thinking for Alex. All right.
If I'm the devil, I have all these people that are working for me, but I'm like,
I'm the fucking devil. I don't care about, does he pay them in devil bucks? Totally. Okay. He's
got his, well, I mean, the only way he can afford it is by money printing, of course. Yeah. That's
what they do. He calls it a stimulus. Yeah. The hell stimulus. None of it goes to hell, Dan. It's
all tied up in the courts of heaven. It's all this pork. I'm just saying, I would want to torture
the people who loved me by having them work against me. See, I'm working at cross purposes
to them. So they're fucking up my plan, but actually my plan is to torture them
by making them fail forever. You see? Aha. No, I'm thinking like the devil, sir.
Yeah. Yeah. I guess that makes sense. Yes. Yes. I guess that makes sense. Yeah. Fine. That's as good
as it's going to get on anything else. That's the point at which I have to give up. Yeah, exactly.
Exactly. Oh, wait. So you're fighting the devil whose plan is to have his followers fight against
himself in order to torture them eternally because their plans will know. Right. I got to go.
Yeah. Nope. Nope. That's what it is. I have other things I have to do. No, it makes for no. You need
to stay and hear this because it makes sense. So there's going to be a lot of planned disasters
according to Mike. Sure. But he won't give a timeframe for it. Although if you've been listening,
he gave a bit of a time for December. It's going to be a engineered famine situation,
a release of another bio weapon, an energy collapse resulting in at least regional
power grid disruptions, and then followed by at the worst possible time, in my opinion,
they're going to cause an economic catastrophe, which may be bank holidays. It may eventually be
the actual collapse of the dollar itself, but we can't know the timing. So I'm not making that
prediction for this winter. It's just we know that's inevitable. It's going to happen. You don't
need all this shit. You don't need all those things. Yeah. Also, I mean, all of those things have
already happened in my lifetime. And we've, we've still not collapsed the dollar. Like we had the
financial collapse in 2008. We've had this fucking pandemic. We've had so many power outages in the
past year that people are shitting in the streets. Right. We're fine. The reason that Mike does stuff
like this and it's scattershot, there's so many different things that just make no sense why someone
would have all of these plans operating is because like, let's say that there is a famine, then he
can be like, I called that totally. And let's say that, you know, all the other stuff doesn't come
to pass, but there is a famine. There you go. Boom. I called this. I know what I'm talking about.
Or there is some kind of a financial downturn. This is what I was talking about. Yeah. If as long
as you make a hundred predictions, people ignore that you got 98 wrong. If two happened to be
close to what ends up happening. And the weirdest part is to me, the weirdest part of all of this
is that those things are all the inevitable end result of all of the people that he's ever supported
getting power. Like all of those things just happened because of the people that you want in
power. That's how it works. There's an irony to that. So, but I mean, wouldn't you be better
predicting it? You know, you're making it happen. Essentially, well, you don't want to be too obvious
about right. That's fair. So, you know, Alex lost these, these Sandy Hook cases and it turns out
there's a reason for that. And I mean, some people would say that the reason is because he
flagrantly abused the discovery process and was being a total baby right in an asshole.
It turns out that's not what Mike thinks. Oh, Mike thinks that there was a more sinister reason
that he lost these cases to devil. Alex, it's going to get so bad. I mean, we're I'm going to
I'm dedicated to staying on air as you are as long as possible. And frankly, the reason they're
coming after info wars with the judgment that, you know, the witch trials, and you don't even get
a jury. The reason they're doing that is because I think they know there's going to be a secession
or a nullification. We're going to have the Republic of Texas and info wars is going to be
the news hub for the new free Texas, which is why you need to survive. That's my take. Well,
I mean, for those who don't know, all we gave them every document, everything they ever asked for
more than anybody ever did. They removed one judge put a new one in and she said, I'm the first
hearing. She's first real hearing. I'm defaulting you. You never gave us one document. And then
they lie over the news. It's stunning. Oh, man, stunning. Also, I have bad news for Mike about
Alex's relationship with the Republic of Texas. Yeah, not not great. Not great. Seems to hate
those people. Those folks are not friends. No, they all declare themselves president and everybody
just dances around. You know what? I say this is actually a great idea. Let's do the number the
biggest experiment of its kind. All right, we give conservatives the Republic of Texas. Alex is
their main news source. Everybody else just watches. Let's see what happens. We'll have definitive
proof on what a good country would be. This is Alex. This is a dangerous experiment that you're
proposing. Oh, it's a dangerous experiment. We'd be New Mexico. Yeah. But you know, left, you know,
alone and just the world continuing as it is. Sure. What do you think is going to happen to
the average leftist? Oh, we're going to I don't know. We're either going to be murdered by the
devil or the vaccine or we're going to kill all the Republicans now is too. This is the average
leftist. The average leftist. Oh, we'll just be murdered. Imagine what the average leftist who's
all about not being ready and being totally dependent. What are all the leftist drug addicts
going to do when everything collapses? Well, they're going to try to kill others to get the drugs
and food that they want, but they have very little discipline and training and most of them will be
killed themselves. And who are you? Most of them are going to die. Most of them are going to die.
Well, as the only people who have gone on air and said, I will murder people in the apocalypse,
immediately murder my neighbors in the apocalypse. Obviously the first thing the average leftist is
going to do is the thing that I have said that I will do. Yes. Yeah. And I'm judging them for it.
They're so immoral. I know that I have some friends who would probably classify themselves as
leftists and I do constantly find myself sitting around with them and they just fucking won't
stop talking about how much they love not being prepared. Oh my God. It's just like a constant
obsession for people on the left. Oh my God. I love that people feed me. I don't go anywhere.
I'm not prepared for it. What if the door is locked? Not prepared. No clue. I even know some
people who like if they accidentally find themselves in a position where they are prepared will
unprepared. I've got to. Yeah. Absolutely. I'm wearing shoes for this race that I'm about to
run. Better light them on fire. They're opposed to cooking because that's a preparation of food.
If you want to eat food, you eat the seeds. And even then you just eat dirt. You just eat dirt.
Yep. So I thought this was a dumb, dumb, dumb, dumb, dumb show. And then we get to about half
hour into the second hour. Oh my God. It's already. And this is where Alex is at.
What an incredible time to be alive, ladies and gentlemen. I have a very important special report
we're going to air at the start of the next segment. And then he's got so much to cover tonight
in Sunday Live 6 8 p.m. I've asked parents and Smith is going to be hosting this weekday morning
is 8 a.m. American Journal here on the M4s network. He's going to come in and finish the last segment
and a half to tell you what's coming up and hit some other news he's got. And then he'll be back
tomorrow morning at 8 a.m. I'll be back at 11 a.m. at Owen shroyer. We'll be back tomorrow.
Alex leaves half an hour early. Yeah. Just like, fuck it. I'm out of here. Yeah. Screw this. I
came in and I talked to Mike Adams. Fucking let the little dork finish the show. Yeah, absolutely.
Let boring white supremacy take take over. Yeah. So before he gets out of the studio,
though, he's got to try to pay them bills. Sure. And so he doesn't my Patriot supply plug
and like I just thought this was hilarious. So this is not how you do it.
Highest quality, durable food for the lowest price you're going to find. Can you pay three,
four times more and get more gourmet that tastes better? Yeah. But for food that's good and nutritious
and quality and a lot of it tastes excellent. Most of it tastes, you know, really good. Some
taste okay, but that's just dishes I don't like. You're not going to find anything for this price.
What? Sure. Can you pay more and get better stuff? That's how everything works. Sure.
This stuff is pretty good. It's not great. It's not pretty okay. I don't like some of it. It's
cheap. Honestly, it's pretty much garbage. This is this is shit. Listen, there's going to be armed
guards at my grocery store by this fucking food. Otherwise you're going to show a vaccine passport
if he talked for another three minutes. That's where he would have gotten. Yeah, totally. So
defensive stinks, but it's calories. Listen, you're going to need it. Put it in your body. Wow.
If I if I were my Patriot supply, I might call. I might give him a call after that. What are you
going to survive off candy bars? You're not get them fucking food. So this this info wars thing
right that sells maybe bad food. It's like the rebel base in Star Wars. We need to be on air
when they take everything down. And if that me, I mean, the enemy already knows what we got. But
if that means radio and satellite relays, if that means our own power supplies, if that means
our own microwave relays, I mean, you, you, you name it, we got it. Looks like the rebel base
here, folks, and the Imperial walkers are marching towards us. And that means they're coming at you
too. So people ask, how are you taking all this? Man, I mean, I know what's going down. I'm done.
I'm ready for it. But understanding this. So who knows, it could be your last chance any day
to get ultra 12 or to get down and out sleep support or to get in game or the new film COVID land
or to get an info wars t shirt. I mean, until we turn this around and arrest the globalist,
because they're not going to stop till we arrest them might be your last chance. Yep. Get a t
shirt. Yeah. Also, I don't know if down and out is the best name for your sleep.
That's kind of a depressing name. He's he's really not feeling that great. Give him some down
and out and we'll deal with them later. Can we get a new sleep aid called fucking depressed?
Oh, man. Can we get a can we get a sleep aid called can't get out of bed?
Oh, we've got a new product. It's just called despair.
It doesn't help you sleep, but you can't get out of bed with a mood stabilizer called all we
get. Guaranteed to remove your esprit de corps.
Look, it'll take out the highs take out the lows. It'll take out constantly mildly annoyed. You
will be empty on the inside staring from between glass eyes might have given another pass on that
name. I think that might have sucked. So yeah, he just does these plugs until Harrison comes in,
but he has a couple of news stories that he didn't have time to cover. Oh, come on. I've got
an article right here. I didn't have time to get to I'll play it tomorrow where the head congressional
individual over the spending package says we can quote spend whatever amount of money we want.
We're invincible work. I mean, he actually said we can spend unlimited amounts is the quote.
Yeah, unlimited amounts is the quote. That's how it works. It's imaginary. It devalues everything,
but see, they get the money first. Well, it has value. They buy up real companies and infrastructure
and farms and ranches and weapons and media. And then we all get handed the debt and the inflation
and the hell. And then they say it's white men that are the problem. But it's just globalist
screwing us all. It's totally wild. You're seeing modern war. The collapse has already begun.
It's accelerating. You're in World War Three. You're being hit with bio weapons in the vaccines.
And then they blame those of us that are smart and don't take it as the ones that did it. And I
told you a year and a half ago that would happen. And that would happen. We know what we're talking
about. Please warn everyone there isn't much time left. They've already injected half the public.
They're already dying. That was a very fake bit of dramatics out to break. Yeah, that one.
That one was very clearly like he was like, Oh, no, I've still got three seconds. I better try.
I gotta stretch. I gotta amp it up. I gotta stretch. He is. He is basically the sort of radio
equivalent of somebody who has NOS boosters. Yeah, you know, like he can hit that switch. Yeah.
Yeah. It's that final. It's that final quarter second. But I mean, you know, he is too soon
a lot of the time too early. That'll happen. So what he's talking about there about the
budget thing that was about representative John Yarmouth who gave a speech back in June at a
Rotary Club and he touched on how we don't actually have to pay off the national debt.
Then I guess people are mad about this now, even though it was back in June. He explained
things pretty well, but Alex didn't have time to get into it today before he left work early.
So I guess I'll wait till he covers it to get into the specifics about it. What a dick.
Oh, man. I mean, it's it is. It is funny. Just watching this whole debt ceiling thing,
just being like, this is all made up. This is all imaginary. What are you people doing?
Why am I reading about it? Why are you doing this? This is all pretend.
Please don't make me pretend to care about pretend. This is insane. What are we doing?
So we get to the fourth and this will always be remembered as the day that Facebook went down.
Yes. And we will deal with that in the middle of this episode. Sure. However,
Alex is back from Sunday. I don't know what the fuck is going on on Sunday,
because he just seemed to talk to Mike Adams for about an hour and a half and then leave.
And then leave. I don't know what's going on. I just didn't want to be there.
But there's an actual audience, maybe for his Monday show, the weekday show.
Right. Right. Right. Can't phone those in. Yeah.
So we get to talking about a little bit of the Sandy Hook business. And look,
when Alex is in trouble, so is America. And that's important to remember.
That doesn't sound true. I'm your host Alex Jones.
And Info Wars has always been the canary in the coal mine.
For when you know Info Wars is in trouble, you know the country is on its knees and
willfully sticking its head into the chopping block of the guillotine. Thank you so much for
joining us. Well, we've been the top of Twitter all weekend since last Thursday.
The end of Alex Jones, jury finds Jones guilty of defamation must pay.
Nobody knows Adam Lanz's name, the man that they say killed those children
at Sandy Hook, the young drug addict. It's devil. People don't know his name.
They know my name, though, because the corporate media
constantly attaches me to a shooting that happened almost 10 years ago.
And then I did question as my right as American because so much stuff has been staged.
A couple of kick points. One, people do remember Adam Lanza. Yeah, who he was.
Second, I would say that Alex has more name recognition than Adam Lanza because he has a
fucking talk show and is somebody who constantly is trolling for attention for people. Right.
Right. And then also, if you listen carefully to that clip, it kind of sounds like Alex might
still think Lanza didn't do it. I am pretty sure he is again describing this in a way that suggests
he is still denying Sandy Hook. He says that they say he did it. Yeah.
Are we still doing this? How is this possible? I mean, he can't help himself. Yeah. Yeah.
Why even bother with a default judgment? He's just admitted all of this shit yet again.
Well, he's implied. He's implied that his mind is still there. Yeah. Well,
the issue, dude, is that he's been jammed up. He's been jammed up. I mean,
again, I've watched it and it's all him. It's all him. Democrat judge. No, it's him hoisting
himself upon a patard of his own build. Democrat judge. Oh, okay. But yeah, I've got stacks of news
here from this control corporate press where they don't tell you that a judge says a Democrat judge
that just got elected in Texas, same one trying to block the pro life bill that's that's that's law.
She doesn't have that power as a county judge do it, but she's trying.
And she took the case over from the last judge that just retired
and at the second hearing said, you didn't give him anything. And Mr. Jones,
you said this is a kangaroo trial on your show. She said the ruling a month ago.
The exact quote was you said this is a show trial. Well, I said when she said a month ago,
now five weeks ago at a hearing, the second hearing that I think I'm going to default you
because you haven't given any evidence because the other lawyer said we had didn't matter what the
proof was or the record of the depositions are all of it. Yes, it did. Yeah. And also the day
before you was saying it was the first hearing and now it's the second hearing. Yeah. Story's
a little janky. Don't worry about it. So yeah, I don't I don't buy any of this. This is pretty soft.
So she said, she said that I said this, but no, no, no, no, what I actually said was this thing
and she said something different. And I know you read what she said and she said this,
but what she actually said is what I say. She said this is a very productive way to describe
things. Yeah, definitely. Unbelievable. It's really, as somebody who watched the depositions and
everything, like it's very believable. It's great. Like Alex has a lot of credibility on the subject.
He comported himself with total class. All I'm saying is that when that man
defines reality, you know, reality has been defined when that man defines corporate representative.
So yeah, I mean, really, one of the only things to fall back on is like every attack on me is
an attack on you. Of course, you have to you have to personalize and experience this as an attack
on yourself, right? Because I need you to give me money. But for every attack you see on info
wars, you don't understand that's an attack on you, the infrastructure. I mean, this announcement
that we'll cover next segment that you don't have juries anymore and that, uh, you know, suits
against Rachel Maddow get thrown out, which he says things way more, you know, a defamatory than
I've said, or that's all okay because she has free speech, but I don't. What things does Rachel
Maddow said that was more defamatory than things you've said? Yeah, go ahead, pull one of those out
there. Just go ahead and toss it out. I don't, he doesn't give any specifics. I'm surprising. I don't
love Rachel Maddow, but like, I don't think that she said more defamatory things than Alex. I am.
I'm going to go way out in a limb because I don't know if I can back this up, but I'm going to say
Alex is probably within the top 10 all time defamers of any, anything. I mean, he probably is.
I mean, if you consider that like the reach of his program, right? The like fact that he's been on
air daily for 27 years or so. I mean, yeah. And then you've got, you've got him. You've got William
Randolph Hearst, I assume. How much of that was William Randolph Hearst doing himself? Right? Well,
he wasn't writing it, but he was directing it. He was very clear about directing public opinion
through lives. Sure. But then like, you know, his news core, you're going to consider that
at a good point. You can't consider like entities or bosses. Right. Right. Right. I'm talking about
people who are saying direct, speaking direct. Man, I don't know. It's got to be tough to beat.
Alex is up there, but apparently Rachel Maddow is worse. Sure. Anyway, look, he lost in courts.
That means it's time to buy product. That's all okay to she has free speech, but I don't.
I don't. You see, Tucker Carlson won't have free speech in your life. Others won't have free speech
under this model. And then the judges will simply say it as a matter of how much
a discovery you give us on something that has nothing to do with what this case is.
We're just going to say you didn't default you and say you're guilty and owe money.
That's the violation of the Seventh Amendment on its face. That guy's probably the Seventh Amendment
police. They're all trying to get rid of jury trials for criminal stuff as well.
So that's why you need to understand when I tell you that we need your financial support,
when I tell you that we're working with a lot of folks out there to make sure they're
serious redundancy and a lot of the things that takes money to fight this war. And they realize
they're, they're losing that war instead of bypassing jury altogether, but I need your
financial support. So I'm going to tell you right now, you never know. This will be your last chance
today to get an info or T shirt. This is going to take a lot of money for me to pay my legal.
Yeah, I was going to say ridiculous. I, I, this is so transparent. Just, just the staggering
amount of it's already over. Right. We're all dead. The empire is collapsed. Right. Soldiers
in front of grocery stores, but please buy a T shirt. If you buy a T shirt, so infowars can
protect the Seventh Amendment or something. If you buy a T shirt, we can stay on air and defeat
the globalists that look, we're all going to be dead. Right. I'm going to go, I'm going to go to
a water park. Alex wants to be able to pay his water slide instead of buy your shirt because
you've told me you've failed and it's all over and that everything that you've done up to this
point is meaningless. I have a check back in on Owen's crowdfunding thing, but he fleeced people
for like a quarter million dollars on that bullshit. What an idiot. And Alex is probably
just trying to do the same thing. He wants the audience to pay for his bad behaviors that he's
now facing the consequences for, which I mean, it's an all right business model if you're shithead.
I am asking you, the people, to once again protect me from feeling any negative effects
for all the behavior I've done. Because if things look bad for me, it's over for humanity.
Probably, even though it already is. So anyway, the Seventh Amendment says, quote,
in suits at common law where the value in controversy shall exceed $20, the right of
trial by jury shall be preserved. And no fact tried by a jury shall be otherwise reexamined in
any court of the United States than according to the rules of the common law. This would be
relevant, except this only applies to federal courts and very specifically not to civil cases
being heard in state courts. The Supreme Court has thrice affirmed that state courts have no
obligation to provide jury trials for civil cases, but many do anyway, just sort of as a
formality. Yeah, because why not? Alex's rights have not been violated at all. He does not know
what the Seventh Amendment is. I do love, I do love sometimes you really, you know, like you
know that, you know the stuff is in there. But then you go back and you actually hear it and you
read it again and again, and you're like, wait a second, we're still listening to a constitution
that has a Seventh Amendment that includes a dollar amount in it, like a $17, $76 amount of $20
being like, holy shit, this is worth a million dollars in today's money. I don't know for certain,
but I would bet that that has been updated. I'm sure, I'm sure. But it is like, what are we doing?
Rewrite the fucking thing. We live in the future. $20. Get the fuck out of here. Come on, man.
$20. Oh, man. This is for 1950. What are we talking about? So look, the point is that Alex has been
smeared. Of course. So let me show you some of these news articles here we've got. And again,
this is a lot bigger than Alex Jones. I want to show TV viewers and radio listeners can pull this
up. An article out of the Associated Press who has posed the most respected publication in the world
from almost three years ago in 2019 in June, two and a half years ago. Father of Sandy Hook
victim wins defamation lawsuit against Alex Jones. Alex Jones is the host of the conspiracy-driven
Info Wars website and wrote a book titled Nobody Died at Sandy Hook. That's defamatory. He did
not write that. Nobody died at Sandy Hook. I'm not in the book. When we called the Wall Street
Journal that also published this NAP, they said, go ahead and sue us. We're not going to retract it.
And then about a month later, they took away my perfect corporate credit rating because of this
saying I'm lost to suit and use that to charge us more for credit card transactions and a bunch
of other stuff. That's just an example of true defamation. That's probably not true. But we've
covered this before. And in the case anyone's forgotten, Alex has a good argument here, just
not against the Associated Press. The headline that Alex is reading is from MarketWatch. And
someone who works there definitely fucked up and attributed the writing of that book to Alex.
The MarketWatch page is just an article that's reposted from the Associated Press,
but with a new headline that MarketWatch wrote, which does not appear in the original AP story.
Right. On the AP website, the headline is quote, Newtown parents score a win in growing
fight against hoaxers. And it's never claimed that Alex wrote Fetzer's book. As for the Wall
Street Journal, I can't find that article posted on their site, but this is an important dynamic
to understand. Alex can threaten to sue the AP all he wants. They didn't do anything. His beef
is with MarketWatch. And I've never heard him complain about them. And I think that this is
intentional. I'm sure that Alex knows that if he just contacted MarketWatch and complained about
this very demonstrably not true claim, they would immediately retract it and probably even issue
an apology, which doesn't work for Alex. No, that's no good. That's not good for him. He gets much
more out of it by constantly pointing to the headline and blaming the wrong entity for it and
saying that they won't own up to something they didn't do. Yeah, exactly. And that's just a stupid
game that he's playing, but he's been smeared. Oh boy. So smeared. So anyway, what you do is you
point to this, this headline and you use it to imply that all the headlines about you now are
not true. Hey, if one happened, then the several other thousand are probably, yeah, yeah, that makes
sense. So, so when you see that, remember when you then hear, I just lost a lawsuit to look a little
bit deeper. Let's go through these right now for TV viewers and radio listeners, but TV viewers can
see these. Sandy Hook, Alex Jones loses case over hoax remarks, loses case, BBC.
Yeah. Other Jones, Alex Jones loses two more Sandy Hook cases. Oh yeah, like each lawyer
files like four or five moments of bankruptcy. Other Jones,
Alex Jones loses losses over Sandy Hook hoax conspiracy, ABC News.
Same folks told us there were WMDs in Iraq. Okay. The reason there are multiple cases isn't because
lawyers are filing multiple, it's because there's multiple plaintiffs who have different
complaints about things that you said about their kids. No, whenever you sue somebody,
you get a law firm and all of those lawyers each bring their own individual suits. That
makes perfect sense. That's how law works. Well, I mean, Alex just has to find a way to make this
about a fight between him and lawyers as opposed to humanizing the people behind it who are the
real victims. And Alex can't accept that because he's the real victim. Yeah. According to him.
Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. It's really sad. Yeah. I mean, I'm waiting for, he might as well have a you
can't handle the truth moment where he's like, look, I'm obviously the real victim because
nobody died there. And then everybody's like, see, we fucking told you. Yeah. This is what he was.
Yeah. That's Jesus. Yeah. So anyway, he just reads every headline about himself.
He's got time to fill. Yeah. Yeah. Raw story. Now they start being more honest here.
Alex Jones fumes of her judge rules. He must pay for his Sandy Hook conspiracy theories,
but not after a jury trial and violation of the Seventh Amendment. She lies, which is a clear lie
and says we'd given him nothing. And then she goes and he says, this is a show trial. Well,
I did say that a month ago when she announced I'm probably going to default you. You've given us
nothing. 81,000 pages, two depositions with myself and my whole crew, because we don't have what you
claim we have. The battle plan to say Sandy Hook was a hoax because it makes us so famous when
it was something I barely covered nine years ago. Imagine they say, give me the smoking gun.
I don't have the smoking gun. Okay. You don't get a jury trial then because we have no case.
Okay. Good. Good spin. I guess. Give me the smoking gun. I don't have it. Well,
nothing we can do then. I guess we'll have to ram roll. I guess we have to get a default judgment
against you. Oh boy. Yeah. You didn't give us the smoking gun. This also like really,
really heavily implies an accusation of collaboration between the plaintiffs and the judge.
Yeah. In order for Alex's argument to make any sense, that has to be a united conspiracy
against him. I think it's become like a nice fun joke amongst people that they get their
Soros checks. Sure. You know, these protesters. Everybody loves it. Getting our Soros checks.
I regret to inform you that Soros is actually involved with this plot against Alex. Oh, no.
And this judge is known. She's got elected a year ago as a former CPS lawyer. She is known as a
absolute. I mean, the things that the Democrat lawyers, everybody say about her. I'm not going
to repeat here, but I mean, it's, it's, it's, it's all Soros. I mean, Soros put the DA in here.
He funded her through these PACs. I mean, it's Soros. Folks, Soros is doing this to me. He said,
do it to you too. That is just like, I mean, it's parody. Yeah. Soros is doing this to me and
he's going to do it to you. I mean, this guy is really, you kind of have to think he's playing
with house money right now because he's, he's about to be like, and I think we should put a
million dollars out for anybody who takes care of this judge for me. Like he's so close. Well,
I think he learned his lesson about that. When you do stuff like that, you end up paying a hundred
thousand dollars in sanctions. Right. All right. So Judge Gamble actually ran unopposed for this
seat in the 459th district court back in 2018. Soros probably had to dump a ton of money in
there to make sure she beat the lack of opponent she was up against. Wow. I mean, the lack of
opponent had so much more name recognition right out of the gate. You know, everybody knows no
one. It's true. So all Alex really has to go on is just pointing to this market watch headline
over and over again. And so using it to sort of imply that any stories about him now are not true.
So they had an article saying Alex Jones loses suit for writing a book. Nobody died at Sandyhug.
And we call AP up and have a law firm send him a letter in a big lawyer.
I mean, Norm Pattis is a big famous lawyer. They just said, go ahead and sue.
Okay. So I didn't write that book. I didn't lose that suit, but it created the thing that I'm guilty.
That's why I was up at the Blaze doing shows and I had two different hosts ask me, hey,
so you lost those Sandyhug suits. This is last week before this happened. And I said, no, they
just said that to create that illusion. Fake news. But I said, I will, they're going to default me
very soon. And they did that. I was walking out of the building when I just told somebody that.
And I get the phone call that it happened Thursday. Okay. How did you know? Could it be because you
were told repeatedly given constant warnings that your behavior was going to precipitate this kind
of thing that you don't need psychic dreams to figure this one out? No. And also that
market watch headline had nothing to do with creating the illusion of Alex's guilt. No,
his actions did that. Yeah. So this case, I mean, it's a setback. Obviously, Alex needs money.
But he doesn't want you to think that this is the biggest issue.
The mic down for this. Okay, this clip is fucked up. All right.
But see, behind the scenes, they've done far worse things than for strategic reasons. I'm not
going to say to my family, to my loved ones, to people I know. I mean, folks, folks.
Look, let's just say some people in my family ended up dead just to give me a message and I
didn't back down. Okay. So this stuff is nothing. So apparently, the globalist have killed some of
Alex's family members. Oh my God. Sure. I'd like some specifics on this. I would like names, dates,
as well as method of death, and so on and so forth. And why you're not dead because you didn't
totally totally. Typically, if like some kind of giant mafia cartel syndicate or whatever,
kill somebody as a warning to somebody else when they don't back down at that point,
they get killed, right? Because the warning, the warning is before you kill some. The warning
is a murder. Yes. And then the follow through is more murder. Right. But you're pot committed
once you've already committed the murder. Right. Exactly. You're in. You're not going to back down.
No. Why would you? That's why you committed a murder. That's why you send the message. Exactly.
Boy, they are bad at what they do. Yeah. So anyway, I don't believe any of this, but no,
I do like it. It's folks, folks, folks. Just folks. It made me think of Tommy Mack.
Comedian Tommy Mack. Yes, that is folks. That is
that's fantastic. I'm just waiting for Alex to say like you think I give a fuck.
Anyway, the Seventh Amendment has been violated. Sure. Sure. And that's where we are. Look at
the Seventh Amendment, just in case you're tuning in and oh, well, it's okay to have a judge say
you're guilty. No, not unless you allow a judge to try. You can you can give away your Seventh
Amendment right, but you cannot do it unwillingly. This is from the Seventh Amendment might have
heard of it. In suits of common law, you value in controversy to exceed $20. The right of trial
by jury shall be preserved and no fact tried by a jury shall be otherwise reexamined in any court
of the United States will help the judge up front examined it and said, I decided you're guilty. No
jury. So that's a total violation. Then according to the rules of common law, which goes back to
Martin Magna Carta 1215 total violation of that and it violates the Sixth Amendment as well. Now,
that's your rights being stolen. That's your birthright being stolen. Alex, the Seventh Amendment
rights don't apply to state courts. So this argument sucks, but his claim that his Sixth
Amendment rights have been violated are even sillier. So the first four words in the Sixth
Amendment are quote in all criminal prosecutions already. This just doesn't apply to what happened.
It doesn't apply to a civil suit at all. Okay. Okay. Now I get it. Those two amendments, they
don't apply. No, tell me where the Magna Carta does not protect him because under the Magna
Carta, which is I remember it 1215 maintains its status as forever law. Right. I'm not sure that
Alex really has a really good grasp on this Constitution and Bill of Rights that he loves
so much. Not a big fan. He's taken two bites at this apple and both are are rotten. No, as I've
stated 10 million times, the people who have a pocket Constitution understand it. Not at all.
Right. Yeah. Yeah. That is a prop. Yeah. Yeah. 100%. Anyway, the U.S. is being taken over
and by whom globalists again. Yeah. Haven't they already taken this over?
Is in the process of being looted and absorbed and bankrupted right now.
They're going to use a race for it to try to cover that all up what they've done. And I would just
tell you get ready and dig in because this country is going under judgment. All right,
we'll be right back with the design collapse and where that's going to go next. I said it earlier
and I just I kept having this feeling that the globalist have too many fucking plans.
Why do they need all of these plans? Like no evil organization would do this to themselves
because so much of it just doesn't matter. Yeah. Like what does the U.S. economy collapsing matter
if 90% of the population is killed off by a vaccine bio weapon that will happen on its own.
Yeah. None of this makes sense because Alex is just making it up as he goes along. You don't
need a race war to cover up the collapsing economy or whatever. Furthermore, furthermore,
let's just get this real straight. They do not need to cover up anything because we just saw
the Pandora papers come and go so fast. Right. They we know like we saw it all. We've got it all
written down and we still don't care. I think people were more interested in how much Twitch
streamers made. Yeah. Then you are 100% correct. But yeah. So what what Alex is doing is basically
just bigoted narcissistic paranoid jazz. Like he has the skeleton of these ideas in place and he
just kind of riffs out about whatever he's feeling on these established themes. That's why you'll get
like the globalist having a hundred different plans that seem at odds with each other or
completely contradictory or seem to be working towards different goals. Yeah. It's because
Alex is just making it up based on his feelings. Yeah. I'm really amazed that you can even try
the cover. They're trying to cover up what they're doing. No. No one's covering it up. It's all
very obvious. You look at the okay. This senator received a hundred thousand dollars from this
company and now they vote differently. Yeah. No shit. They're not covering it up at all. It's
obvious. You pay for law. That's fine. We all get it. It's not fine. It's super bad. Yeah.
But it's how we live. So the supply chains are broken down, my friend. Yeah. That's true.
And basically what this amounts to is that Alex needs money. The country and the world is in
cardiac arrest. They said they would do it. The damn great reset. And I told you
and then we're sitting here running out of our supply chains, running out of product, even fund
ourselves. That's why we need everybody to go to infowarstore.com. You've never needed your support
now that we needed here to not just stay where we are, but expand. But we either expand or we
explode at this point. Expand. I need to expand. And I'm not going to get into strategic regions for
here you on air. That gives the enemy too much information. But listen, I need financial support
right now. So go to infowarstore.com. Click on the support button at the top. Go to the donation
area. Give a one time donation. Give a long term donation. You can do recurring donations. Give a
hundred bucks. I need the funds to fight the globalist. I need the energy. Oh man, what a coincidence
that he lost a bunch of cases and now he's mysteriously at a point where he desperately needs
the funds to fight the globalists. No, he needs to expand. Oh man, there can't possibly be a one
to one parallel here. Now that I am on the hook for a almost about to be astronomical amount of
money. An unknown amount that could be a disaster. It is time for me to expand my operation and I
need your money and I'm going to need your money. And I also am not going to tell you the things
that I'm going to do right because that would give them too much. Right. It's going to be paying
off my legal fees. I will. It would be doing that. And also did you read the Pandora papers?
It is very easy to offshore your money and they won't get it. Wouldn't the globalists hate it
if I could pay my legal fees? Help me. And it'll come as a shock to them. I'm not even going to
tell them what my plans for this money of yours is. And when I pay off my lawyers, they will be
blown away. The globalists will be like, Oh no. So Alex, he, you know, he's the great reset is
something he's very afraid of. Yes. And he lies about it a little bit here. Well, obviously.
Then I'm looking for the book. Oh, here it is. COVID-19 and the great reset. I don't like
Klaus Schwab. I'm not advertising his book, but this was out a month after the COVID crisis began.
It was already pre-written and it was already pre-planned. I'm going to talk about it here right
now. But so Klaus Schwab's book, The Great Reset was released in July 2020, which is a little bit
more than a month after the COVID crisis started. Alex is lying about the book's release date because
if it came out a month after COVID showed up, that makes it slightly more believable that he
wrote it prior to the pandemic. And if Alex could get you closer to that idea, he's tricked you into
getting closer to accepting the conclusion that the entire pandemic was pre-planned. This is
progress towards using things that seem like trivial facts. Getting you to accept them will
bring you closer to accepting his completely nonsensical conclusion. Totally. It's a manipulation
strategy. Yeah. And also, it's just kind of, it's very fun because he can just be like,
see, there's no way anyone could write a book in a month. That's not possible. I've never heard
of Isaac Asimov. Fuck all of you. I have no idea. Right. You could write a book in a month, first
of all, but second of all, it's not even about that. It's about making the ultimate conclusion
slightly more believable. Sure, sure, sure. Trapping you in acceptable distortions. Right.
So anyway, there's a Polish journalist who is not allowed to go into the United Kingdom. And Alex
is mad about this. Okay. The social credit scores here. Polish journalist denied entry to the UK
over his opinions. Big article and video on infowords.com. Criticizing the EU, criticizing
globalism, criticizing the lockdown. Sorry, you can't come here. So this is about a man named
Rafal Zimkiewicz. If you're wondering, he wasn't barred from entering the UK because of views on
globalism or the lockdowns. As it turns out, he's one of the very fortunate folks to be on the
Home Office's list of people who are such shitheads that they can't enter the country. This illustrious
list includes Americans like Fred Phelps of the Westboro Baptist Church and Alex's buddy Michael
Savage. Typically, these are people who are bigots and they have a history of agitating. And I
guess the UK government is smart enough to just say, we don't want that kind of bullshit over here.
You cannot come. There is there is something nice about being a sovereign nation that can just say
you're a dick. You can't come. Your values are antithetical to what we believe in. And you have
a proven track record of agitating people and causing a public nuisance. Right. But it's the
UK. I mean, they don't, you know, they've got Nigel Farage. They've got all of those people.
They've got enough, but it's like you're a dick and we don't want you. Yeah, we can't kick Nigel
Farage out. Nigel Farage out. We cannot let you in. Exactly. So as for no barts, plural. As for
this guy, Rafal, he's a bigot, mostly of the anti-Semitic, Islamophobic and homophobic variety.
The reality is that he's someone who is called the Holocaust a myth. And Alex is trying to whitewash
away these details and only present them as a Polish journalist. I mean, that's what he does.
Right. Yep. Yeah. So, you know, if you have people telling you that you, you shouldn't
say the N word, it's a slippery slope. I am going to go way past you. You shouldn't even need to.
Right. I agree with you. But I think it's a, I think Alex thinks it's a slippery slope.
That's the real threat is the globalist is the social credit score. And so many folks are saying,
oh, well, we better do what we're told. You know how that works. Do what I say. I'll ban you if you
use the N word. I don't ever use the N word. So, okay, ban them. Oh, now don't say mother or father.
Now. Oh, I'm sorry. Did that happen fast? Forms all over in schools. You name it. Okay.
You know, don't, don't use the word manhole. That's another bad word. See, there's always
something they're always going to move the gold post all the left runs around
the articles on info wars.com and says that white people are inherently bad and our parasites and
our evil mutants that need to be put away. I've got an article from info wars.com with exactly
that headline. That's where we are. So first of all, none of the words Alex is saying our band
are actually banned at all. You can say the N word if you want, there just might be consequences
for doing so. Yeah, that's how it works. You can say mother and father all you want. They were
just conversations about making terms used on official documents gender neutral. So it's not
to stigmatize same sex parents. There you go. Alex is rambling about nothing. And it kind of just
feels like he wants to say the N word. That's just what it feels like tends to be that way.
As for that thing about white people being mutants, this is one of Alex's big headlines for the day.
The left didn't say that. It was just one person named Francis Crest. Well,
Well, sing was an Afro centric activist. And I think it might be fair to describe her beliefs as
being black supremacist. I'm not sure what site people are referring to. But you can find a number
of message board posts by people who are very mad that a quote black history month website quoted
her. I have no idea what's going on. And I can't find a link to the site in question. And even
if you assume it's all true, Alex's presentation of it is still bullshit. Yeah. It's nonsense.
And I didn't even cut this clip out. But at one point in the episode, Alex is like,
yeah, you know what? We are all mutants. Oh, great. Okay. Great. Then you retract your
complaint. I guess you're fine. So look, it's too late for the NWO, the new, new, new, new,
new world order. Okay. Kevin Nash. Right. Scott Hall. Sure. Hulk Hogan. Hollywood Hulk Hogan.
Somebody else who likes to say the N word. True. Yes. And destroy journalism. It's too late for
them. Sure. Because Alex is too credible. Oh, that doesn't you're being conquered. I'm being
conquered by a multinational globalist force. I've been on air 28 years fighting it. And now
it's all out in the open. So you see, I can't be on air. I've got to be destroyed. I've got to be
shut down because our credibility is so high. They don't want us on air now that everybody
believes what we're saying and checks into we're saying and follows up on it. But I got something
for the new order to know. Your whole takeover is not going well. Your whole force vaccine program
stalling. And it's too late. Everybody knows I'm right now. Too late, new world order. Too late.
We know that the 1% globalist elites have hijacked and subverted the US economy, culture,
and government. The battle to take America back begins with Scott McKay, the Patriot Street Fighter
and his advancing the Vorkan Line tour. Now here's Scott. Hi, this is Scott McKay,
better known as Patriot Street Fighter, the high octane full throttle truth hammer.
I don't really care to respond to Alex's claims that he is too credible to be allowed on air.
Just let that sit there. Yeah, that commercial sounded weird, though. That was it. It's too
late, globalist. It's too late. Hi, everybody. We're going to have a good time with a Patriot
Fighter. So Patriot Street Fighter, the truth hammer. What is this local market ass commercial
doing? Alex's big time important show. You think Putin cares about the Street Fighter Patriot
guy? Nonsense. So I decided to learn a little bit more about who this guy is. And I found his
Twitter. This is a guy named Scott McKay. And this is his bio quote former competitive body
builder, wellness industry entrepreneur, former political act consultant, campaign manager, radio
talk show host, Q Patriot Street Fighter. Huh? Patriot Street Fighter conveniently dropped
that part off for the commercial seems like it. Q Patriot Street Fighter. You say it seems like
Alex will just advertise for anything and anyone. He doesn't give a fuck, man. He's called Q a
globalist deep state setup. And here he is taking ad money to promote the Q Patriot Street Fighter
speaking tour. Hey, my the enemy of my enemy is my friend when it comes to me needing money to
fight these fucking lawsuits. I guess so. Yeah. I scrolled down a little bit on his Twitter page
and I saw a picture of him and I immediately realized he's a dude that I've seen as a guest on
Project Camelot. And we might have actually talked about him on the podcast. It's the shit out of
here. I think we talked about the Patriot Street Fighter. We've talked about the truth hammer.
Yeah, I think so. Oh God. Yep. So also Mike Adams was a guest on his show back in August. So I
guess this dude is another direct connection between Info Wars and Project Camelot worlds.
Unreal. Fun. Just everywhere. Here's a couple of bad signs about his tour. Okay. The first is that
tonight when this episode comes out, he's speaking at the Farm Boy Garage, which is a car restoration
shop. Wow. This is being billed as a pre show for the Trump rally, which will be spectacular. You
got to start small. So probably more troubling is that he has dates listed on his website from
October 16th to December 15th with specific cities on specific dates. But the venue for all of them
is TBD. The page says quote site has not been determined. If you know of potential locations,
please go to the contact us page submit your recommendations. This is not how you plan a
tour. This is not going to go well. Just want to let everybody know we'll be doing the Knowledge
Fight theater tour across the United States. We're going to be doing 120 dates next year.
If you know any theaters and can fill them or a jiffy loop, jiffy loop, jiffy loop. That'll
follow up. Yeah. Whoa. Oh boy. I think this is this is maybe putting the car before the horse
a little bit, but it's good that he instead of finding venues in advance to promote, he spent
his time first buying an ad on a house to promote first and then you get the infrastructure.
Right. That's how it's always worked. That's how it always will work. I've been in the
entertainment business for a long time and I love that Alex is willing to promote it. Yeah.
Like a tour that may legit not happen. Oh, I states might not happen or they might happen
in a park. I promoted my first appearance and I remember this. I remember promoting the first
time I was going to be on CYSK and it was about eight months into when I started doing stand-up
and then about six years later, I did it. I promoted the shit out of it and then six years
later it happened. That's the way it works. Yeah, it's like magic. I know that sometimes,
you know, this happens in independent touring, you know, like maybe you have nine out of ten
dates. Sure. You have a venue and you're like, well, we'll be between these two cities. If we
can fit in another date there, we'd like to hit this other city. Yeah. That happens sometimes,
but this is two months of no venues. Hey, if you've got, if you got 10 dates and then all of a sudden
one of your venues drops out, they double booked, they couldn't do something, anything along those,
something else came up. That's not this. TBD. This is, I'm going to your city and I'm going to start
talking somewhere, somewhere, somewhere, bakery. Don't care. Yeah. It's fine. Starbucks. They won't
let me in anymore. I'm banned. The globalists. Truth hammer. So, this is the, Dan gets distracted
by a weird commercial on Alex's show portion. I like it. So now we get back and it turns out
Facebook is down. Oh no. Okay. Obviously, this started happening about an hour ago. Facebook
is down along with Instagram, WhatsApp, Messenger and Oculus VR. And usually that's when they're
doing some back door criminal update. That's all in an arm of the NSA, the globalist controlled
NSA. Well, they're claiming it's outages. They're all just preparing and testing their internet
kill switches where only they'll be online. Everybody else will be offline is what I believe
is going on there. I figured that out real quick. Yep. That was fast. Yeah. Almost like he just
made it up on the spot. Maybe just heard and then made it up. Oh, Facebook's down. Great. I know
what to say about that. Yep. This one I've been waiting for. Yeah. So, Alex completely whiffs
on this one in a spectacular fashion. So, what's going on is Biden had made some comments about
protesters following cinema. Sure. And Alex is trying to sort of defend cinema and also attack
Biden in this. Oh, boy. And this is just incoherent. A little bit, but it's more embarrassing. Okay.
So, here's Biden defending it. And look, you could say, hey, this is just people pissed off.
And that's something that's up to the line, but it's civil disobedience. And it's people being
a little bit noisy and it should be protected. But the Democrats, though, when conservatives do it,
they want us to arrest it. And they defend anti-filling. They shoot people in the back. So,
they want to be aggressive and say, burning down buildings is mostly peaceful,
but then they want to arrest hundreds of people that even go into the U.S. Capitol
like Owen Shroyer and now others. So, here's Joe Biden. And just watching, Mr. President,
you're talking about how you have 48 Democratic votes right now. The other two have been pressured
over the weekend by activists. Joe Manchin had people on kayaks show up to his boat,
PLA. Senator Zimmer last night was chased into a restroom. Do you think that those tactics
are crossing the line? I don't think they're appropriate tactics, but it happens to everybody
from the, the only people that doesn't happen to people who have Secret Service stand around them.
So, it's, it's part of the process. Yes, sir. Is it part of the process to have one of your
supporters go shoot a bunch of people or try to kill a bunch of people and shoot Congressmen's
colleagues at the baseball field? The CNN defended that. That's just embarrassing. Yeah, that's sad.
One thing is we covered this a hundred times. CNN did not say that the Scalise shooting was a good
thing or defended it. This is something that Alex has completely fabricated and is just total
bullshit. Yeah. Also, it's really fun how that dude who did the shooting was a Bernie Sanders
supporter literally every time it's come up. But now I guess he was into Biden. Yeah. It's almost
like Alex is just making shit up as he goes along. Doesn't matter. So, what happened here is that
Alex thought he had a point that he was going to be able to score on Biden. He's going to crush it.
The idea was that Biden was endorsing the protesters following cinema into a bathroom,
which I guess proves Alex's theory that there's different treatment for left and right-leaning
protesters, like the right-leaning ones who go into the Capitol get arrested. Oh, no. So, the clip
Alex plays, you know, it doesn't say what Alex said he was saying. It's real unfortunate that it
doesn't say. Biden explicitly says that he didn't think that those are appropriate tactics.
Alex set up this clip completely wrong and it's painfully obvious as it's playing. So, in the
moment, he has to find a way to shift attention as soon as the clip is over. So, magically,
the guy who shot Scalise is now a Biden supporter. This is a rhetorical version of Alex waving a
red flag at a bull. And I suppose in this metaphor, the bull is the consequences of his lack of
preparation. Maybe. I'm not sure. I've lost track of the metaphor, but yeah, that one might have
that one might have skipped your point. Is it the distraction tactic that Alex is engaging in that
has no relation to reality? Yeah. Yeah. And also, what a weird thing. What? What? Leave that one
alone. That's such a weird one to even try and bring up for him. I think. Because shouldn't he
be fine with it? I think that enough people were talking about it and he figured it was a way he
could score a point on Biden. He probably hadn't watched the clip. Yeah. And he just had a sense
of it maybe. Probably should have watched it. He'd heard a few things and he's like, ah, here's how
I'm in a dunk on this in order to weave it into all of my narratives about right wing
agreement. Yeah. Like we're oppressed. Yeah. Like these these liberal protesters can get away
with anything. They chase people into bathrooms. Man. Yeah. And it just doesn't work. It's not.
Yeah. It doesn't play. Yeah. I mean, I would have been just like I would have assumed he would
have gone like that. That's all they're doing. And they're all complaining about it. That's
that's the angle that I would take. And I also think if you're listening to that clip of Biden,
you see a bit of self-effacingness too. He's like the only time they don't do that is via
secret service around you. Yeah. He's talking about himself. Yeah. That's his point. I don't
have to. I am not subjected to this kind of thing, but you know, the implication is, you know, when
I was a senator. I was in government for 50 fucking years. Yeah. Yeah. And not that this is okay.
It's not a good tactic. Yeah. But it is something that people deal with. Yeah. It would have been
more fun if he was like, no, of course I don't support that. What should happen is every time
she wears clean clothes, somebody throws a bucket of fake blood on her. And then the moment she
changes her clothes, boom, another one. I think it might be unpresidential. Another one. So the
globalists, they're spreading new viruses around. And this is big news for Alex, but there might
be something bigger. This is the real globalist attack that they intend to hide claiming a new
virus has been released, which they're already claiming new variants are about to come out that
are going to kill you. Well, yeah, because you're releasing them. But first, let me point this out.
We're having one of the biggest flash sales of our history today. And I can tell you why we need
funds big time right now. I bet what for keep this operation on air, but to stay on air and
continue on into the future. And we need funding now to do this. Okay. Almost like you had some
expenses pop up. Yeah. Some things that you didn't maybe budget for for this quarter.
What a dumbass. We need money completely unrelated to those lawsuits that I lost,
which are totally unconstitutional. I'm sure I'll be able to challenge them in the higher court.
Seventh amendment, baby. No big deal. Seventh amendment. Anyways, I need a lot of money very
quick. So much. We're having a flash sale. I am getting rid of everything because when they
play that judgment down, they're going to liquidate it anyway. Listen, I've worn out anybody giving
a shit about me saying that there's a money bomb. Yeah. Can't do that again. So we got a big
flash sale. Flash sale. Oh boy. So Alex has a guest on. This is a guy named Thomas Renz,
who's a lawyer apparently. Okay. And yeah, this guy is this guy's a weirdo. He has some
information about COVID that's not good. And that information showed and it's incontrovertible.
It's straight from the CMS servers that there are thousands and thousands dying with this vaccine.
48,000 dead within 14 days of getting the vaccination, which is an important number
because if you're within 14 days, they don't count you as a vaccine death. So you're perfectly
healthy. You go get the shot three days later. Your dad, you're not a vaccine death. So 48,000
dead within 14 days. I'm not sure this guy knows what within means. So within 14 days includes
three days after. No. Yes. That's up.
In the set of whole numbers between one and 14, right within. Oh, okay. The three is there. So
this is Thomas Renz first made these claims in a speech. He gave it a Colorado Springs stop on
the reawaken America tour. TBD venue. Well, sorry about his next time. It was just a who's that
of idiots on the panel with the headliner being General Flynn. He also had Stella Emanuel, who
we've talked about on the show. Patrick Byrne, who's also come up on the show, Alex's favorite
grocer, Alfie Oaks gave a speech. And what's this? Oh, the Q Patriots street fighter Scott. Hey,
there we are. Of course he was. Anyway, Renz hasn't produced the data. He's claiming this comes from
and it's all very suspicious. The most likely explanation for what's going on is that he's
just trying to repackage the old conspiracies about vaccine deaths that people took from VAERS data.
Going back to July, Renz was serving as the lawyer for America's frontline doctors, the Waco group
of doctors who love hydroxychloroquine. He filed lawsuit on their behalf against the secretary
of the Department of Health and Human Services. And in that filing, he included a section about
some alleged whistleblower testimony. He had an expert, Jane Doe, who was a computer programmer
who had access to Medicare and Medicaid data. From the lawsuit, quote, in her expert opinion,
VAERS underreported deaths caused by the vaccines by a conservative factor of at least five.
As of July 9, 2021, VAERS reported 9048 deaths associated with the vaccines. Jane Doe queried
all the data from CMS medical claims and has determined that the number of deaths occurred
within three days of injection with the vaccines exceeds those reported by VAERS by a factor of
at least five, indicating that the true number of deaths caused by the vaccines is at least 45,000.
At this point, there was this 45,000 figure, which was based on an anonymous expert witness who
was guessing that you can multiply the VAERS data by five to get the true vaccine death numbers.
This is absolute garbage and it means nothing. She didn't get to this conclusion by way of data
or death records. She was just guessing and multiplying and then Renz put that into his
lawsuit. I'm not impressed by any of this and it's clearly him trying to just sort of redo the
same hustle. This is new intel that he's bringing about is based on whistleblower information
involving Medicare and Medicaid data. This is all just repackaged grift. Renz is a 44-year-old
dude who, quote, passed the Ohio Bar exam in November 2019 on his fifth attempt and has limited
litigation experience according to a Washington Post examination of his career. He just found a
grift and he's going with it. He's running with it full steam and good for him. Good for him.
Yeah. I mean, you can't say that the headliner of that bill is doing anything different than
that. I mean, it's basically the same shit. Nope. Some random person sends him some random
bullshit and they grift off of it until they can't. You passed the bar a couple of months ago and
you're like, hey, holy shit, here's a career. Yeah. I'll make my career by being this guy.
Yep. And it works. There will never be any negative consequences in the future.
So it turns out he's got some other whistleblower documents that show that if you get vaccinated,
you're more likely to get COVID. That doesn't make sense. Holy shit. That's observably fun.
If you look at the last few slides, I'm going to read you this. This is a direct quote from one of
the application for licensure for a booster for the Comnerty. This is an exact quote from that
document. So this is an FDA document from Pfizer, right? Pfizer says, an additional analysis appears
to indicate that the incidence of COVID-19 generally increased in each group of study
participants with increasing time post those two. Well, so does that mean that you've got an
increased likelihood of getting COVID after this shot? Sounds like it. So are you asking me? It's
supposed to be your information. I found this presentation on his website. He has these slides
up and it's really funny. The first slide is so fucking cocky. Quote, fact checkers, please post
all apologies for misleading the American public on Facebook and Twitter. Oh my god. They will be
censored shortly thereafter and you can join the rest of us in social media jail. At no point in time.
Look, if there's anything that we should hammer into first graders, this is the before we get to
arithmetic, the definition of and ways to avoid hubris. That is all we need to start with. That's
a fundamental education. Avoid hubris. The story of Icarus is relevant. Yes. So I scroll down to the
page that Renz is talking about and it's apparently an FDA briefing document from the vaccines and
related biological products advisory committee meeting from September 17th, 2021. This page
on his presentation, it includes the heading of it and then a random paragraph from the document.
This is an easily accessible document. You can find the whole thing. You do not need a whistleblower
to get to it. In fact, I found it. And what's going on is that the line that he read there is
being taken completely out of context. That's not surprising. It does say that quote, an additional
analysis appears to indicate that incidents of COVID-19 generally increased in each group
of study participants with increasing time post dose two at the start of the analysis period.
Right. That is true. Gotcha. Because Renz's PowerPoint presentation just chops this paragraph
out of the text, you wouldn't know what this is referring to or even what's being analyzed.
Seems like that would be important information. Yeah, it is. So this was a study that Pfizer
carried out and it was meant to quote, compare rates of COVID-19 among participants who completed
the two dose primary series early in the study, i.e. those who were originally randomized into
the experimental group versus those who were who completed the two dose primary series later in
the study, i.e. those who were originally randomized to placebo and then crossed over to the experimental
group. There is not an unvaccinated group that these people are being compared to the specific
point of the study was just a test to see if there's a waning efficacy of the vaccine. And if so,
was it something that should be addressed by boosters in the paragraph that Renz uses? They
do say that people who got the shot earlier had 70.3 cases per 1000 person years compared to 51.6
cases for the group that was vaccinated more recently in the same 1000 person years. That
would tend to support Renz's argument or at least imply that vaccine efficacy could drop off a bit.
Sure. However, Renz very clearly intentionally ignored the next paragraph. Quote, in contrast,
during the blinded placebo-controlled follow-up period of the study, with data cut off March 13,
2021, prior to the Delta variant surge, the incidence of COVID-19 among recipients in the
evaluable efficacy population, nearly 60% of whom had four months or more of blinded follow-up
post-dose two, was 12.6 cases per 1000 person years. This observation suggests that while waning
immunity is one potential factor that may have contributed to the higher incidence breakthrough
cases during the Delta variant surge, it's possible that other factors, e.g. dynamics of the Delta
variant transmission and potential differences in vaccine effectiveness against the Delta variant
versus strain circulating during the placebo-controlled portion of the trial, may also
have contributed. This isn't saying that the vaccine will make you more likely to get COVID.
The part that Renz is using is saying that one data set showed some indications that people
who got vaccinated more recently may have better protection than those people who were vaccinated
longer ago. But there's also data that seems to indicate that that conclusion might not be so
certain and other factors could be involved, and he just ignores that paragraph. Anyway,
Thomas Renz is just cherry-picking bullshit and pretending credible whistleblowers are involved
and he's rightly figured out all this stuff. The only thing that he's figured out is that there's
a lot of money to be made in being a lawyer for these right-wing shitheads. And good, just keep
doing it, dude. Yeah, I mean, in this situation, this is one of those like, do you not know how to
read? Do you not know how to read and comprehend? Or are you reading, comprehending and lying to
people? And it's like, if you pass the bar even on your fifth try, you can read and comprehend.
Yeah, you'd think. Or you memorize the answers to the questions. Yeah, it does tend to, I mean,
all the surrounding context would lead somebody to a reasonable conclusion that he's intentionally
ignoring the other part and the context that makes this line make sense. This line that does
sound scary out of context. Much like the Seventh Amendment does sound like Alex got screwed
out of context, but you need to know the context or else you just have the line. It does seem like
their entire job is turning something and going, God, look at this. This is so unreasonable,
a reasonable person would never allow this to happen. And then not going, well, there is a
reason for it. And a bunch of reasonable people came up with it. Yeah. So also the, this guy
apparently was the guy who found the AI document that Mike Adams was reporting on. He's, he's
busy. Yeah. So he's, he's doing a lot of work. Yeah, he's got it all. So anyway, he also seems to
think that there's something going on and the American institutions are under attack. Sure.
Yeah. Meanwhile, you look across our nation at all the other institutions that are bedrock
institutions of our nation were under attack. Sir, I had a court, it's due default judgments on me
when I gave them everything and they assigned a new judge at the second hearing. They just said
default and all of the news it says I've lost and then I don't get the Seventh Amendment. I mean,
I'm just telling you, it's not just me. It's on every front the bedrock is being removed.
Yeah. Yeah, it really is. And I'm going to tell you, Alex, we want to be peaceful. We want to do
this the right way. But if we don't stand now, we're not going to be able to stand later. You
know, once you've lost freedom, you've lost it. It's not coming back. Oh boy. Just say you want
to kill people. Jesus Christ. Hey, we want to do this peacefully. But if we don't stand now,
then we won't be able to stand later. So the obvious distinction that I'm making is
we should be violent now. Yeah. So anyway, I listened to this. I checked in on some of these
documents. I found some suspicious presentation issues. And that's why this next clip is really
funny. I also have a bunch more information that I'm going to be breaking here coming up as soon
as I can get it all analyzed. We always double check our work before we say anything because,
you know, we can't afford to lose our credibility. Oh, that's going to be tough. Wow.
Just wow. Yeah. Just wow. I can't afford to lose my credibility. So I'm going to go talk to Alex
Jones. See, this is the thing. This is the thing. This is why I can never be in charge because
this type of shit, this is cartoonish and it requires cartoon based solutions. Like this is
when if somebody does that in my government, we drop an anvil on your head or a piano that's
wasted. Exactly. Exactly. This is a cartoon. There's no reason to treat you like you're a real
person. This is yes. This is ridiculous. How dare you? Yeah, you're a clown. So anyway, these
documents and I'm a clown. That's coming from a cloud. So these documents that Renz has. Yes.
Now there are just some of the documents that Alex has and these are the reasons that he is
under attack and that's why you need to give him some fucking money. Of course, they're trying
to take us off the air. And for what you see on the news with them saying, oh, Jones will be shut
down. Jones will have all these judgments. Jones will have all that on and on and on.
That's not going to be the case, ladies and gentlemen, if you support us and spread the word
about the articles, the videos, and pray for us. And if other talk show hosts rally behind us and
other folks on Twitter is Facebook and all that's down right now and support us and say, hey, see
what you're not supposed to see. Here what you're supposed to hear. Hear the verboten person that's
under constant demonization, constant attack. A lot of the globalists fear him so much because
I'm covering their own documents. Okay. So yeah, I gotta say, like I know it's probably
obvious, but his like financial stuff is acute in in this episode. Yeah. It's it's it's excessive.
He's he's very, very worried very much. So yeah. So he has for the third hour on Monday,
he has Wayne Allen root on the show who's a Trumpy talk show host guy. Sure. Also made a name
for himself originally in like sports gambling. Cool. Yeah. He sucks. Yeah. But he is on because
he has apparently written an article and maybe even a full book about the necessity of civil
disobedience. I think he wants to brand himself something of a Gandhi for the Trump era. Jesus
Christ. I mean, look, nonviolent resistance is not going to get you to the top in today's
conservative climate. No, but at the same time, a lot of this is just him kind of discovering
elementary ideas about organization. Oh, like grassroots activism, all the stuff that conservatives
have kind of hid from him all these years. He's suddenly discovering.
Well, first of all, in the book, I list the whole book is about one way of attacking,
which is the way Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton have done it for the last four decades.
They intimidate corporate America. I'm a believer, Alex, that nothing happens from the politicians.
They're a bunch of nobodies, right? The money is what allows them to be important and to make policy
and to ruin our country. And by the way, all the politicians, in my opinion,
the most important ones are owned by China. They're either owned or blackmailed by China.
So they don't care what we say, even if we are the majority and we've been the silent majority.
My book, The Great Patriot Protest, a boycott book is all about making us the loud majority.
We got to be loud. We got to tell corporate America that writes all the checks and backs
all these politicians and backs all the packs, not with $10 like you and I give,
or $100 or $1,000. They write a million dollar and 10 million dollar checks.
So the politicians listen to them and we got to bring them to their knees and starve them.
Yeah. I mean, on an elementary level, putting financial pressure on businesses is an effective
organizing strategy. But unfortunately, one of the things that he's going to quickly learn
is that a lot of these same people that he would like to pressure, right? Also fund all of the
information space and the politicians that he supports. There is that problem. Yeah,
it's kind of going to end up being shooting yourself in the foot. See, now what he doesn't
understand, because he can't take it that next step further, is that this is endemic to the entire
system. And any idea of him being on the right side is quite laughable and silly. Yeah, but it
it's like discovering something that everyone is already aware of for a long time, but it's cute.
These, you know what? The management is really taking advantage of the workers. And I just don't
think we're being paid well. And there's just no way to negotiate them with by myself because they
can just fire me at any time. I don't have any protections. The law doesn't protect me. This
is a free market system. The only way, the only way is if we all come together and do something
like withhold something from these corporate power brokers, it's, oh, how could we do that?
Probably there's probably not a way. There's just no way. There's just no way. Well, actually,
Wayne found a way. Okay. And this is so sad. So I went out and I hired a team of telemarketers
to dial the 116 most liberal woke companies in America that survive on our sales. We
conservatives, Christians and patriots are the ones buying their products,
but they're spitting in our face. They're insulting us. They're offending us. They're
ignoring us. So I identified what I think are the top 116 Coca Cola, AT&T that own CNN, Ben
and Jerry's. The list is long. Victoria's secret. And we can bring them to their knees. So I had
the telemarketers find out with hundreds of phone calls, pushing, pushing, pushing. What's the phone
number of the CEO? What's the email for the CEO? What's the social media accounts? What's the
websites? What is the physical mailing address? And I've got, and I got the board of directors
names and the CEO's names. So now you just open the book and you dial. This implies that it's
not as grassroots as you, as he wants to sort of imagine. He had to hire a team of telemarketers
to harass people quite literally. They are paid protesters. Yeah. Yeah. This is, this isn't fun.
This is kind of stupid. Also, it wasn't just the recent like story about how AT&T provides 90%
of one American news is funding. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Real woke company as shit AT&T. You know,
that company that is essentially built a trust and is unwilling to budge on coverage or anything
like that because they completely control them. So he's, he got these telemarketers so woke
and he paid them to find the contact information for CEOs and stuff and he's putting in his book
so you can harass them too. You know what? Hey, I'm fine with that because one, one, I think it's
hilarious. If fine, if that's how you get to corporations by picking the most woke ones,
fine. You, you win. You got the most woke corporations. You're not going to like the
outcome of it. Exactly. Yes. Your political interests are not served by these corporations
losing whatever power they have. You don't know why you think they're woke or liberal,
but whatever it is you need to hate those corporations, I'm fine with it. God bless you.
Yeah. I think, I think that if some kind of quote unquote Antifa group were finding CEOs of
right-leaning companies like Hobby Lobby or whatever, posting their contact information,
I think Alex would not enjoy that. No, no. Also, I think if an Antifa group picked the most
right-leaning corporations, it would be the identical fucking list that this asshole has.
I bet there would be overlap. There's significant overlap. So look, Wayne, good, good on you,
I guess. I mean, like if you're posting like ways to get in contact with decision makers
for corporations, I don't know if that's bad, but if you're putting like home addresses or
phone numbers or doxing people, I think that that still may be like, I don't know if I,
that's cool. I'm not sure what he did. Yeah. It might just be a corporate email address
that's in this book. But anyway, there's a tale of victory that Wayne has that is the
saddest fucking thing I've ever heard. And just one person that bought my book, one,
on the first day it came out, sent me an email and said, Wayne, I sent an email to the head of
Nordstroms, the head of Costco and the head of AT&T, and all three answered back and said,
why are you boycotting? Don't do this to us. What can I do to make you happy? That was one.
Can you imagine if we got a hundred thousand or a million patriots to do this every day,
five minutes a day, send three out tomorrow, a new three, the next. I totally agree. Wayne,
Wayne, stay there. We're going to come back and talk about this all and see this guy got like
customer service emails. I've just discovered something. It's called spam email. And it's
how we're going to take this country back. There's no way they'll figure out how to organize
their inbox. Here I am, the CEO of Costco. I got a hundred thousand emails saying that people
were going to boycott us, but our numbers are unaffected. I'll ignore these emails. Oh no.
Our sales are up 2% in this quarter. Or maybe whenever these emails come in,
hit them with a form response. Oh no, I'm so sorry. Oh my God, not an email campaign.
Oh boy. If you know, I was just thinking about that women's march, you know, the two will,
two million just walking through the streets and how effective that was. But man,
that did everything. I can't believe what would have happened if they had run an email campaign.
I can't count the number of times where like, you know, I've had something that didn't get
delivered or something. You know, like I ordered a frame from Wayfair and it didn't come and,
you know, like all you got with that was that little kid. Yeah. I sent an email about how like,
you know, this sucks. I got a response and they were like, I'm so sorry. They're going to change
their corporate policies. The whole thing. Yeah. Everything. They are going to pay their workers
more. Yeah. Stop sending kids in there. That one, that one they did a little while ago, quietly.
So we have one last clip here of Wayne and this is not good. And I'm telling you, I'm not the most
religious person in the entire world, but I do believe this is the devil. Rules for radicals is
their Bible, the left. And it's dedicated to Lucifer. And it's not a coincidence that Joe
Biden the other day said, well, we haven't passed my agenda yet by $3.5 trillion bill. If it takes
six days, six weeks or six months, we'll pass it. Six, six, six. Why did he say it that way?
Pure chance. Pure coincidence. No, they're sending out codes. Yeah, man. They're sending out devil
codes. There's nothing I can do for you, sir. Nope, sir. I'm going to have to ask you to leave.
Why did he say six days, six weeks, six months? Well, it's the devil. It's the devil. It's
obviously the devil. Can't be anything other than the devil. Oh boy. Oh my God. So, uh, you know,
we see this, uh, this, uh, this period of response and, you know, obviously Alex is in,
in not good mood. No, about the, uh, the, the cases. He could use some money. He's desperately
trying to fundraise. Yeah. And I mean, it's, it's, it's hilariously transparent. Yeah, this is bad,
but he hasn't, you know, on these episodes, he hasn't reached a point yet where it would be like
losing his shit. Right. You know, right. And I still think that may be on the horizon. Yeah.
Yeah. I mean, if, if I'm listening to this, even for an info wars listener, I am absorbing some
of this news and I'm just going, this ship is sinking. And every time he says he needs money
to fight the globalists, all I hear is another bucket of water going on that ship. If you're a
fan, even like, how do you not hear this and be like, Oh, he's saying he really, really needs
money. He just ended up being on the hook for a lot of money in those lawsuits. Do you think
that's connected? I don't know if he's trying to expand. Frankly. And I'm going to, let me,
I'm going to search my memory real quick. His last expansion, uh, was Corsi and DC.
Well, no, cause he also did that like firepower show that got canceled. Right. Right. Right.
Right. Yeah. Not good. Not a good track record. Ooh. Ooh. Ooh. Ooh. Ooh. What about that show
that was all callers that he's going to start with old man house phone? Yeah. Co-hosting. Yeah.
What about that show that's been on the back burner for five years? Anytime now. Anytime now.
Oh my God. Harrison Smith. He's going to do all calls. I remember that. Yep.
That went well. Fired David Knight. Yep. Where's Steve? Oh, I know. I was kind of hoping for a
Steve conspiracy about the lawsuits. Well, maybe it'll come in the future, but we'll, we'll, uh,
track, uh, some other days after this on Monday's episode. Uh, but, uh, you know,
just be too much to bite off all at once. Oh yeah. Um, but we'll be back for that until then.
We have a website. We do. It's knowledge fight.com. Yep. Uh, we also are on Twitter. We are. It's
at knowledge underscore fight and that go to bed Jordan. And, and you just launched an Instagram
for the show. Oh, I did launch an Instagram. We're knowledge underscore fight on Instagram.
Yeah. We decided, we decided we got to promote a little bit. Uh, well, I think we just decided
that we should put our cat pictures somewhere. Yeah. Promote is a very generous. We got to get
with it in terms of somebody. Everybody wants to see the Celine pic. Eight years from now,
we're going to get on TikTok. I don't know if that's ever going to happen for us. Probably not.
Yeah. Anyway, we'll be back. But until then, I'm Neo. I'm Leo. I'm DZX Clark. I'm Daryl Rundis.
And now here comes the sex robots, Andy and Kansas. You're on the air. Thanks for holding.
Hello, Alex. I'm a first time caller. I'm a huge fan. I love your work. I love you.