Knowledge Fight - #662: March 22, 2022
Episode Date: March 25, 2022Today, Dan and Jordan discuss the tumultuous past few days in the world of Alex Jones. They deal with the depositon drama, and then break down the episode Alex did instead of listening to his doctor a...nd staying home. Citations
Transcript
Discussion (0)
I'm sick of them posing as if they're the good guys saying we are the bad guys knowledge
fight.
Dan and George knowledge fight.
I need money.
Andy and Kansas.
Andy and Kansas.
Stop it.
Andy and Kansas.
Andy and Kansas.
Andy and Kansas.
It's time to pray.
Andy and Kansas, you're on the air.
Thanks for holding us.
Hello Alex.
I'm a Christian color.
I'm a huge fan and love your work.
Knowledge Fight.
No, no, no, no, no, no.
Knowledge Fight.com.
I love you.
I love you.
Hey everybody.
Welcome back to Knowledge Fight.
I'm Dan.
I'm Jordan.
We're a couple dudes.
Sit around where you put the altar of Celine and talk a little bit about Alex Jones.
Oh, indeed we are.
Dan.
Jordan.
Dan.
Jordan.
Quick question for you, buddy.
What's up?
What's your bright spot?
My bright spot today.
Jordan is the 2009 Nicholas Cage film knowing and an opportunity to check back in on that
film holds the fuck up.
It really does.
That movie is good.
It is actually good.
I've seen it made fun of too many times.
It is restrained cage, but with a good freak out towards the end.
Yep.
It's, you know, it's a, it's a, it's an accessible Nicholas Cage.
It's not like, you know, you, you get some sort of just run of the mill average everyday
person.
Sure.
And you try to show them like bad Lieutenant Port of Call New Orleans.
Oh, they're not ready for it.
New.
No, no, no.
You got it.
No.
They haven't even seen the original bad Lieutenant.
Some other cage performance is probably too much for the normies.
Let's say, but like national treasure.
You can get them in on that knowing is in that milieu.
Right.
Exciting.
Right.
Anyway, this movie came out 13 years ago.
Man, Googled nine slash one one slash 2001.
You're continuing your track record of spoiling things.
So what's yours?
Sorry.
This spot is a yesterday.
A nice table of women at this restaurant bought me and my partner a bottle of wine.
What?
Yeah.
You tell that you guys were luscious.
Wine.
Oh, here's the worst part.
Right.
I was dressed like this basically.
I had a nicer, a nicer sweater on.
No hood.
Okay.
I purchased it at a secondhand store.
Turtle neck earlier yesterday morning.
Right.
She was wearing hounds jeans.
Nice shirt.
We were both walking.
She had flowers.
Right.
And they immediately came over and they were like, Oh my God, did you guys just get married?
And the problem was we had.
Oh, and that's offensive to me because those people correctly sussed out.
That's as good as this dirt bag is going to look.
Wow.
That's as good as it gets for me.
Yeah.
And I would like to remind the listeners that before we, I went to Austin in December,
we went to the men's warehouse.
Yes, we did.
I tried to buy a suit and it did not happen.
Well, you could have.
You got a hug out of it.
So you're burying the lead there, Jordan.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
We went, we went to the courthouse yesterday at 2pm.
It took us about five minutes to get the marriage license.
That's quick.
Devin, my partner's mom, she married us as a humanist celebrant.
Okay.
Took about 15 minutes.
We were in, out.
We went and had dinner.
It was a good day.
Congratulations to you both.
Oh, it was great.
But really, I want to talk more about knowing.
No, but, but for real, congratulations.
I'm sure everyone out there is very happy and excited for you too.
It was nice.
It was the best way to do a wedding ever.
Well, I mean, pretty low key in terms of the ceremony and such.
Very pretty low key in terms of you announcing it to thousands of people.
Basically.
Yeah.
Yeah.
That's generally how I do it.
Look, there was a witness.
Okay.
Like to a crime.
Yes, exactly.
There was a single witness.
And we'll be shocked if she's alive in two years.
There wasn't an official witness.
It was just someone who happened to be there.
Yes.
Someone saw it go down.
We had our wedding witnessed by an innocent bystander.
That was how it goes.
Well, and that kind of brings us to another point.
And that is that you all are going to take a little bit of a trip.
There's a honeymoon ish.
Yeah.
Yeah.
So you'll be there is a vacation coming up somewhere.
It's a middle of April, something like that.
Yes.
If there's some shady release schedule going on.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Prepare yourselves listeners.
So Jordan today, not to take away, not to not to pivot away from this.
Oh, please let's pivot away.
I got married in a courthouse that needs to stay private.
Fine.
So today we got an episode to go over.
We're talking about the 22nd of March within the year of our Lord 2022.
Okay.
This is chaos.
This episode is going to be a mess.
There is a lot of nonsense.
And the actual episode itself is perfunctory.
Bizarre.
Not really.
No.
It's going over it.
There's some interesting things to discuss, but it's far overshadowed by the
circumstances surrounding this episode.
Well, yeah.
And the larger picture of all that.
So we'll get into this.
But before we do, let's take a little moment to say hello to some new wonks.
Oh, it's a great idea.
So first, Jordan's laugh gets me through the day.
Mike up.
Thank you so much.
You're now a policy wonk.
I'm a policy wonk.
Thank you very much.
Thank you.
Next to Vico from NoCo.
Thank you so much.
You're now a policy wonk.
I'm a policy wonk.
Thank you very much.
Thank you.
Next.
Sorry, pumpkin, but I'm glad we bonded over this.
Thank you so much.
You're now a policy wonk.
I'm a policy wonk.
Thank you very much.
Romantic theme emerging.
If you have your nickname for your partner is pumpkin.
Does not matter.
You claim that one was on you.
Sure.
That's yours.
Yeah.
Next, the green M&M did January 6.
Thank you so much.
You are now a policy wonk.
I'm a policy.
Thank you very much.
That one's new.
Next, Lynn, Lynn Zillard.
Thank you so much.
You are now a policy wonk.
I'm a policy wonk.
Thank you very much.
And not your Amazon Alexa.
Thank you so much.
You are now a policy wonk.
I'm a policy wonk.
Thank you very much.
Thank you.
So I believe that everybody has a vague understanding of the
things that have been going on in Alex's immediate past.
And I feel like we will, we will dig into this whole a bit.
But here is an out of context drop from today's show.
I will not eat your bugs.
Fine.
Fine.
Leave my bugs alone.
My bug specifically.
Yes.
Is this a property issue or a bug issue?
He just does not approve of your bugs.
That's it.
Now it makes more sense.
Yeah.
So I was going to put out an episode on Wednesday this week,
Jordan, you know this because you were.
I was here.
But truth be told, things got a bit overwhelming and I wanted to
see how things ended up playing out.
Monday was an insane day for things that are related to our show.
First, Joe Biden used the words New World Order and in the
process he gave conspiracy theorists decades worth of
justification to believe that their particular flavor of
shadow elite cabal runs the world behind the scenes.
It was a big old boner.
It was a dumb move, but the words do convey what Biden was
trying to say.
It's not like it is a New World Order.
It's an order that is not the same as the old and we are on
the world.
Right.
We've discussed that a bit in the past and we'll do it more
today.
As soon as I heard that Biden had said that I was not pumped to
tune in for Alex's response because I feel like it's super
predictable and I don't really have that much more to say than
we have in response.
Leaders sometimes talk about the international order of the
world, the set of relationships, alliances, trade agreements,
and enemies internationally.
Sometimes when major changes to the status quo of these
relationships happen, one might say that the world order has
become something new.
It's an expression that makes total sense and there shouldn't
be anything wrong with using them to describe exactly the
situation in the world today.
The folks like Alex will hear them and prove that the devil
is puppeteering Biden into taunting the world so we don't
fight back when he tries to eat our children's blood or
something like that.
Yep.
Then Monday evening, everything got thrown into chaos.
Will Summer reported that Alex's lawyers had requested his
deposition in the Connecticut Sandy Hook case be postponed
because of an emergency medical situation.
Apparently that afternoon at 3.30 p.m.
Norm Pattis had received a call that Alex was, quote,
under the care of a physician for medical conditions that
require immediate and possibly emergency testing.
Well, you got to trust Norm.
True.
He doesn't.
He never heard.
Speaks no lies, Pattis.
I've never heard Norm lie.
Right.
The entire thing was super fishy.
Alex had done his show that day and was on air until like 2 p.m.
and there was no sign of any particular problem.
In addition, Norm's filing claimed, quote,
my client has not authorized me to disclose the nature of the
medical conditions or the identity of the physician,
which is sketchy.
This was all in service of trying to delay a deposition that
was scheduled for this Thursday.
Right.
And the supposed doctor had advised Alex shouldn't sit for
the deposition given his medical condition,
which again seems shady.
Yeah.
There was a schedule.
Pardon me.
I sort of oversimplified.
There was a Wednesday and Thursday.
Sure.
There were deposition scheduled for him.
And then Friday, Rob do.
Yeah.
What fun.
Yeah.
He had a case of I don't want to do it.
It is right.
I didn't want to rush into anything and turning around to
get an episode out that discussed this on Wednesday would
have been a challenge.
But at this point, a few more data points have come out.
The first is that Alex was in studio doing his show on
Tuesday.
He wasn't broadcasting from home.
He didn't have Owen or Harrison and covered the show.
So he could keep up the ruse that he was trying to pull with
the court.
It was just business as usual.
And I suspect that the reason for that is that Biden said
New World Order and Alex couldn't let Harrison or Owen swing
at that meatball.
That was right over the plate.
Oh, they would with so hard it would make everyone cry.
Like Alex would have to break into the studio.
He would like in a movie like Mike Myers screaming.
You just see a puff of smoke behind him.
Yeah.
He's gone.
So this leaves an important question that's still hanging.
And that is what's going on with that motion that Norm filed
in the first place.
The most obvious answer is that it could be purely an attempt
to fuck with the plaintiff's case, install the process, as has
been Alex's legal strategy up till this point.
At every turn, he's pulled out any trick he can think of to
slow things down and try and create legal headaches for the
opposing counsel.
This would be totally within his character.
And I wouldn't put it past him at all.
There's nothing he really stands to lose from sitting for the
deposition.
He could just stonewall like he always does, but he does have
something to gain in theory from trying to drag his feet and try
to force the court to reschedule his trial date, which would be
much more fun for him.
Of course.
It wouldn't surprise me if that was part of what he was up to.
Just a fun, just a fun lark.
Yeah.
A second option occurred to me and that is that Alex could have
COVID again.
When he got back from California, Alex was complaining about
feeling sick and we know that he's very reckless and unvaccinated
and he's a guy who consistently hangs out with other unvaccinated
people and takes no precautions about getting sick.
He's in a high risk category and he just took a trip to another
state.
So the opportunities for him to be exposed to something seemed
pretty decent at least.
Yeah.
His behavior as a whole would also fit with the COVID idea because
if he had COVID, he would still show up to his studio to do the
show.
Yeah.
He doesn't give a shit about his staff and he's admitted he
already did that the last time.
So he had COVID.
He went to the work and exposed everyone to it.
Yeah.
I heard that on Twitter.
The first thing I texted you was like, well, of course he's
still in the studio if he has COVID and it would make sense why
he wouldn't go to court or wouldn't want to go to court
because they take things seriously.
Yeah.
Yeah.
They would not like that.
Yeah.
So one of the primary reasons I didn't want to jump a gun on this
is to be able to have some kind of information and not just, you know,
come to this show with assumptions and what ifs.
Thankfully on Wednesday, a sworn affidavit was filed and we learned
a little bit more about this medical emergency.
As it turns out on Monday, Alex had the complete lunatic and guy who
fantasizes about murders, Dr. Marbles on his show to do some fun
COVID denialism content.
Good stuff.
When Marbles showed up at the studio to do the interview, his
quote, personal observations of Mr. Jones so alarmed him that he
insisted on conducting a physical examination of Mr. Jones.
He immediately advised Mr. Jones to go to an emergency room or call 9-1-1.
After Mr. Jones refused, the physician advised him to stay home,
which Mr. Jones did not do.
Ah, okay.
So if I understand this correctly, Dr. Marbles walked into
Info Wars and said, you look like shit.
You got to go to the doctor right now.
Call 9-1-1.
And Alex appropriately understanding that Dr. Marbles is a moron.
Probably.
No, screw you.
I would assume.
Yeah.
But right off the bat, we have a few problems.
The first is that Dr. Marbles is certifiably insane and I wouldn't
take directions to the grocery store from him, let alone medical
advice.
So this is all coming from him seeing Alex, getting freaked out,
and then I guess checking his pulse.
Whatever it was that Marbles saw was enough to advise Alex to
call 9-1-1.
So that does seem serious.
Although again, it's advice coming from a lunatic.
Alex didn't take this advice, although he did pass it along
to Norm Patis to use as an excuse to not go to his scheduled
deposition, which again probably would have come off a little
more convincing if Alex hadn't done his show the next day.
That really punctures any illusion that whatever he's dealing
with would preclude him from sitting for a deposition.
Oh my God.
That's great.
So having snubbed Dr. Marbles advice and not called 9-1-1,
Alex did his show the next day, Tuesday the 22nd, which is what
we're going to cover today.
Marbles was able to convince Alex to go to see a doctor friend
of his, Dr. Amy Offit, who practices in Marble Falls, Texas,
which is about an hour outside Austin.
And at this point, I feel like we're in some kind of a weird
Marbles-based synchronicity.
What is happening?
Yeah, what is going on here?
I don't know.
I mean, is it where Smurfs?
I feel like I'm asleep or something.
Oh.
I'm dreaming of Marbles.
Oh, you're just marbling, not the Marbles the way that Marbles
need to marble.
Right.
She prescribed Marble Rye.
Right.
So Alex saw Dr. Offit in the morning of Wednesday, March 23rd.
And as such, he didn't do his show.
Additionally, he didn't show up for the first day of his
scheduled deposition, which was supposed to be, like I said,
on Wednesday and Thursday.
This could end up being a problem down the line and might
result in some sanctions.
Dr. Offit was in agreement with Marbles.
She said that Alex shouldn't be doing this deposition at all
based on issues related to stress.
She said, quote, I had a medical visit with Mr. Alex Jones
for acute medical issues that were time sensitive and
potentially serious.
This is a little tough to parse because the time sensitivity
could be in reference to him having a hard deadline about
the deposition, as opposed to it being something where his
health dictated the time sensitivity.
Right.
It's unclear.
In her note, however, there's a redaction.
Quote, we started a comprehensive medical evaluation and
he has labs that are pending to assess his blank status.
I've asked him to avoid too much stress until we have results
from the blood tests this morning.
Sure.
Assuming that this isn't all an elaborate charade, that's
kind of worrying.
And if I had to guess, this has to do with the medical condition
that's on full display every day.
I guess it has something to do with him having a ridiculously
high risk of heart attack or stroke.
Probably.
Both of these are things that can be exacerbated by increased
stress and markers would be the kind of things you'd find doing
blood tests.
On Wednesday, Alex didn't do his show, but he recorded a long
voice memo while he was driving, probably to Dr.
Offit's office in Marble Falls, that Owen played periodically
on the show to keep the audience from tuning out from the
boring ends.
Right.
Just in case they might think that Alex accidentally showed
up again.
Oh, maybe he'll come back.
Yeah.
We got him.
Yeah.
So a couple of fun pieces of trivia to throw in just for
flavor here.
Dr. Marbles included the dubious claim that he was nominated
for a Nobel Peace Prize in 2021 in his statement of facts in
his affidavit, which is hilarious.
I read that.
I read that and I still don't believe it's true.
And yet it's in an affidavit.
He swore it.
That's wrong.
Also, it's hard to get a sense of who Dr.
Offit is, but I was able to find an August 2021 article from a
local Texas blog about how her and her husband had decided not
to get vaccinated.
Good doctor.
She doesn't run a normal medical office either.
Not a surprise.
She works out of a place called hardened soul integrative
health and yoga.
Oh, she apparently has an MD, but her practice is an
integrative medicine, which is definitely not where you'd go
if you were in need of acute emergency consultation.
Integrative medicine is built on relationships with patients
and her practice seems to actually be one that involves
like a bunch of hormone therapy and yoga.
Also, she doesn't accept insurance, which is strange.
Well, no insurance will accept her.
I think she can say that, but I'm pretty sure it goes the other
way around.
I'm not sure.
Certainly that's not how it's put on the website.
Yeah, I would imagine so.
I don't know what's going up here, but this is 100% not the doctor.
You drive an hour to see if you're needing a consultation about
a condition that could be an emergency.
None of this adds up.
None of it makes sense.
And I think that she has some kind of association with the
America Frontline doctors.
The hydroxychloroquine.
Yeah.
So I think that that might be where the connection is with her.
And why he would go see her as opposed to someone potentially
more qualified.
Well, it sure as fuck isn't because he wants to start doing yoga.
I would think not.
Yeah.
A lot of neck flexibility exercises.
A lot of demons in yoga, I would assume.
So it's hard to tell precisely what's going on here,
but I think it's probably fair to say that this is an intersection
of a shamefully transparent attempt to avoid the deposition
and a real but probably not immediately pressing underlying
condition that Alex is almost certainly struggling with.
He's in terrible shape.
And if he had a heart attack at any point in the last three years,
I can't imagine anyone being surprised.
Unsurprising.
So on Wednesday evening, the judge in the case,
Judge Bellis, gave an order that was basically saying that Alex
didn't listen to Dr. Marbles and still came into work.
So that after David isn't really all that convincing in terms of
the deposition.
Ah, but he does have a Nobel Peace Prize.
Maybe.
Somebody said he should get one.
The court wasn't sure who Dr. Offit was, but taken as a whole,
the two doctors provided indications that Alex had medical issues
that quote, while potentially serious are not currently serious
enough to either require his hospitalization or convince him
to stop engaging in his broadcasts.
Yeah.
Bellis went on to say, quote, Mr. Jones cannot unilaterally decide
to continue to engage in his broadcasts,
but refused to participate in a deposition.
And thus she rejected the motion Alex's lawyers had made to
reschedule and barring a change in circumstances like Alex
actually being hospitalized.
That deposition would go on his planned on Thursday, March 24th.
So the real question became what happens Thursday morning?
Did Alex show up to do his show or does he show up at the deposition
or does he do neither?
Well, let's find out in a very brazen move.
Alex did not show up for the deposition on Thursday.
Bold.
He also didn't do his show, though the show did open with a
prerecorded video of him complaining about how his trial is
a show trial and how it's not a big deal for him to unilaterally
decide that the deposition date should be changed.
No one will ever find me.
The video he put out is legitimately insane.
It's complete nonsense.
Great.
To be perfectly honest, when he didn't show up for Wednesday's
deposition, I was pretty sure he wasn't going to show up on
Thursday either.
And a big part of that was because what he was actually
required to produce for the deposition is stuff he could never,
never bring up.
It seemed likely to me that he knew he was going to be sanctioned
whether he showed up or not.
And if he was able to not show up and make his not showing up
somehow about the court not respecting his health needs,
he had a chance of changing the narrative and distracting his
audience from his clear inability to answer direct questions,
particularly about his finances.
Right.
Since this is a deposition in the penalty phase of the case,
a number of the topics he was going to be required to bring
documents about were issues with finances, including agreements
that he had with Young Jevity, which of course is the
Veterinary and Dr. Wallach Supplement Company,
and any cryptocurrency transactions and documents related
to the connections between his various shell companies,
like PQPR Holdings Limited and JLJR Holdings LLC.
Good stuff.
If you're in Alex's position, it's strongly in your interest
to stonewall this kind of stuff because for the charade of your
show to really work, it's pretty important for the listeners
to just think that they give Alex money and he uses it to fight
the big bad globalists.
Right.
Looking at the actual details of his finances would threaten
that image and probably chip away at the audience's impetus to
blindly throw money at info wars.
And, you know, he's not going to provide this information that is
being required of him in the deposition and that'll get him
sanctioned.
Yeah.
He cannot show up and that'll probably also get him sanctioned.
Sure.
Now, there's been a lot of talk and like headlines about him
like getting arrested.
Sure.
And from my understanding, that was never really a likely
outcome, but that if he were arrested, it would just be a
situation where someone comes and gets him and makes him sit
for the deposition.
It's not like throwing him in jail.
He doesn't go to, he doesn't go to debtor's prison until he can
pay off enough of the settlement in order to sit for the
they send out the marshals.
Yeah.
I don't know if that's true.
You go pick them up.
Right.
But I feel like this video from Thursday morning when he didn't
show up for the deposition, the insane one, it's too important
to ignore.
I'm going to tip into that really quick before we get to the
episode from the 22nd.
All right.
So here's where it starts and he's like, oh man, I talked to
Dr. Marbles.
Ladies and gentlemen, thank you so much for joining us on this
live Thursday edition.
When I say live, I want to show you his live studio.
I am taping this in the morning for my home before I go and get
some more medical tests.
I'm 48.
I'm under a lot of stress.
And Dr. Marbles was in studio as a guest on other issues on
Monday and saw some signs of some concerning things.
Check me out with a stethoscope and blood pressure machine and
said that he thought I should go get checked out by a doctor.
And so as soon as I could get into a clinic versus checking
myself into the emergency room, would have been Wednesday
morning.
There's urgent care centers all over the place.
That's not that's not accurate.
Nope.
The only time I could go to this weirdo America's frontline
hydroxychloroquine yoga doctor.
That's when.
Hey, that's the look I can go to like an urgent care facility or
the emergency room or I don't know backwoods, you know, doula.
I could do all of those things.
But if the yoga ladies available, you go to the yoga lady.
I think this speaks to the fact that it's not urgent and it's
not an emergency.
First of all, right?
And then second of all, if our Alex, I'd feel like I'd feel
pretty insulted.
He's a celebrity and this yoga doctor can't get him in.
Can't fit him in.
If I were Alex, I'd feel pretty insulted by Dr. Marbles looking
at him and saying I need to take your blood pressure.
That's me.
I imagine Alex gets that a lot.
That's fair.
So he gets to the motion to postpone the deposition.
He has some pretty unhinged ideas.
Oh, yeah.
Let's hear them.
And I think it would be a big deal.
I just had my lawyers contact them and said, hey, we probably
need to move this deposition.
They've moved depositions on us dates and times at least five
times that we can document.
And so how could you not document other times?
I've already said three times for depositions in the Sandy
Hood case.
We've given them over 300,000 pages of documents.
They got all our financial records, everything for a
defamation case.
And so when you see my financials on the news, when you see all
the depositions with me on the news and then you see that I've
been defaulted, excuse me, when you see that I've been defaulted
saying I gave them nothing, it's all a lie.
These are show trials.
These are staged events.
But I intend to sit for the deposition, the fourth one.
I intend to fight, even though I'm in a court case in
Connecticut in Texas with three different cases, two in Texas,
one in Connecticut, where I've been found guilty by the
judges.
Now every American, even if they have a low IQ nose, you're
innocent and guilty and the judges don't find you guilty.
Alex doesn't get to decide what is or is not a big deal for the
court.
He seems to think that his individual judgment determines
what rules he is or is not bound to, which is a pretty
disturbing mindset to have on display.
It's essentially of saying I'm above the law.
Well, I mean, he's not above the law.
He gets to take it or leave it.
It's like a tasting plate of the law.
He's like, ooh, this part of the law, I enjoy it.
It very well may be the case that other hearings or
depositions have been rescheduled in the past, but when that has
happened, it was agreed to by both parties.
And I would guess that it didn't happen with almost no lead
time and based on clearly very flimsy rationalizations.
If Alex is trying to suggest that this medical situation is
really actually serious to him, his actions do not reflect
that doing his show on Tuesday is a gigantic red flag that
whatever health concern he had isn't actually pressing, but
just could be a convenient excuse to get him out of having to
do this deposition that he doesn't want to do and probably
would be damaging if he actually cooperated with.
I mean, he does.
I will say that in all fairness, one time the defense lawyers
did or the plaintiff's attorneys did have to reschedule because
the dog ate their homework.
Sure.
And the judge was like, well, I mean, clearly we have to
wait until you can print that out.
It's a valid, valid reason.
Yeah.
Absolutely.
You know.
Yeah.
And larger picture, though, this isn't an isolated case of
Alex trying to postpone this deposition.
Alex's legal team has been trying to get this deposition as
well as that of their new corporate representative, his
lawyer, Brittany Paz, is trying to get those postponed for a
while.
And according to a court filing, quote, they have also
suggested that they may need to extend the trial date in
this case.
Oh, Alex and his lawyers are trying to push this back and
kick the can down the road.
Yeah.
It's one thing to need to reschedule something.
It's another to exhibit a consistent pattern of creating
fake excuses to drag out a process so you might never
face the consequences that are coming to you.
And that's what Alex is doing.
Yeah.
And it's not like he's Chevron.
He can't like afford a judge and buy all that stuff.
You know, he's stuck.
He can afford half a judge.
He can afford a little bit of a judge.
Yeah.
Like a little tasting plate of the judge.
And also, I think in that clip, you kind of get a tell from
Alex that he knows he's full of shit.
He says that he's already sat for a deposition three times in,
quote, the Sandy Hook case, and he uses the singular noun
there.
Later in the clip, he shows that he's keenly aware that
there's multiple different cases, which is part of the reason
that he's required to sit for separate depositions.
And then there's the dynamic that he's completely abused the
discovery and deposition processes in the first phase of
the trial.
And now we're into the damage phase where there's a different
set of facts that the depositions are set to explore.
So obviously there's going to be more times you're required to
sit.
Alex knows all this, but he's counting on his audience
accepting this bullshit, woe is me take where the whole world
is conspired against him in this show trial.
And honestly, it's probably going to work with most of his
listeners, but it's a complete fraud.
Yeah, I mean, it is, it is weird how like everybody knows
that this is malicious.
There's nobody who doesn't know that this is malicious.
And if you don't know that this is malicious, you are
hopelessly naive, right?
And yet at the same time, it's like, well, we've given other
people chances before when it wasn't malicious.
So in the sense of fairness, we need to afford the same chance
even when people are malicious.
And it's like, that's, we could just not do that.
Well, there's a limit.
There's a limit.
I think we're well past that.
I think we're well past, which is the problem.
Right.
Limits should be where it ends.
And to be clear, I mean, I do think Alex has a actual medical
condition that is at the root of this.
I just think it's bullshit the way he's using it.
I don't think it's sincere.
Well, I mean, if you're worried about the deposition being
stressful for you, my friend, I'm afraid that's what a
deposition is going to be for you.
Period.
Sure.
There's no breezy deposition for him.
I actually don't think that he's too stressed out by these
depositions because he knows he can just say, I don't know.
I don't know.
And kill time.
I don't know.
I mean, I said something.
The issue, the issue too, though, is like anything that's
like he, if stress is legitimately the issue, he screams
and freaks the fuck out on his show.
He constantly storms out a studio whenever he's mad at the
crew.
Right.
Like there's no more stressful experience for him than doing
his show.
And I think it would be much easier to take this kind of a
complaint seriously if his actions didn't indicate that he was
still like more than willing to do the thing that's painfully
obviously stressful.
Sure.
I mean, maybe he is doing yoga then.
No.
So Alex gets into the issue of default judgments and I think
he steps in it.
Default judgments are when somebody never shows up one time
or never shows up a quarter, doesn't file papers or gets caught
filing fraudulent documents.
And even then you get sanctioned with lesser sanctions.
We have been fed into the Democratic Party process by
political judges.
Even if that's the standard that Alex is using to determine
when default judgments are justified, his case would merit a
default judgment.
He and Owen Schreuer both didn't appear for scheduled
depositions early in these cases.
He didn't respond to multiple requests or documents.
On multiple occasions, he sent completely unprepared people
to depositions to pretend to be corporate representatives,
which may not be the same thing as filing fraudulent documents,
but man, it's close.
Also, he had a ton of opportunities to stop abusing the
process.
He was given smaller sanctions repeatedly and it was abundantly
clear to anyone paying attention that he was going to
keep that behavior the fuck up.
Oh, yeah.
And that sanctions weren't having any effect on his
non-participation and abuse of the process.
That's why he likes Putin.
He did all this to himself and even by his own metric that
he's laying out here, he deserves that default judgment
against him.
Oh, yeah.
He has just condemned himself, essentially.
Well, I mean, you say that, but it's like, what is the
words that he says?
You know, like, what do they mean?
You know, and I feel like you're just being unfair with
your interpretation of the meaning of words.
Yeah.
Yeah.
That may be.
No.
Okay.
So Alex, Alex is just mad at everybody that's like, they're
the ones trying to cash in on Sandy Hook.
Of course.
Yeah.
They picked a few things I talked about years ago out of
context, made me the Sandy Hook man.
And now when we go to court, literally the judges are
primping with their mirrors and their makeup and they're
miking them up and miking up the lawyers and the BBC and
HBO.
And, you know, all the Chin Netflix are there and then
they got up and say, he's getting rich off Sandy Hook.
He's, he made his whole career off of it.
As the New York Times writer says, buy my book, buy my
book.
It just came out in time for the trial.
Buy my book.
Everything they say about me is who they are.
Elizabeth Williamson's book is available.
Apparently shout out to Liz on this one.
You could buy a Sandy Hook American tragedy.
Alex is giving a nice little plug there.
Yeah.
Yeah.
I think he's, he's distorting the actual conversation.
I don't know if anybody is saying that he made his career
on Sandy Hook.
No.
More just that his actions in the avenue of his career,
he profited by inflicting immense pain right on the
people who experienced that tragedy.
If he does not understand clearly, he does what the
problem is.
After having it been explained to him in so many ways with
so many carrots, so many sticks, sanctions, blood,
everything, he understands it fully, but he totally can't
appear to understand it or else the audience will be like,
wait, you suck man.
Yeah, I know, but isn't that weird that we're on like four
or five years of this and he still has to pretend like he
can't learn.
Yeah, he really, oh, there's only four ways.
No, that's fair.
None of these, none of them are in the law.
Yeah.
So Alex makes a claim that could get him sued if he talks
any more about this.
The groups around Sandy Hook tragedy have brought in hundreds
of millions of dollars of donations.
Some of the people involved rake in up to a million a year
themselves personally.
And when we go to trial, all that's coming out one way or
another.
These judges that aren't judges think they can contain this
and control all this.
It's going to be their waterloo because America knows how
corrupt and how to control the system is.
So look.
Oh boy.
So who cares what charitable groups have raised?
Like who cares?
They make money and use it for charitable causes.
I don't know.
What does that have to do with this case?
Nothing.
You notice that Alex isn't saying that particular plaintiffs
in the case have brought in millions of dollars from Sandy
Hook because if he did, he would get sued.
Well, that's kind of a problem.
That's the impression that he's trying to give the audience,
but he knows damn well that he can't say that because if he
did, he would be defaming them again.
Say a name.
Yeah.
Go ahead and say a name.
We saw this play out in the last deposition that Alex was in
the one in December that I went to in Austin.
Alex has complaints about a group called Sandy Hook promise
and there are some questions that Alex seems to have about
their fundraising and their activism.
Alex believes that all of the Sandy Hook parents are one
monolithic group.
So he's decided that the plaintiffs in the case against
him are interchangeable with Sandy Hook promise, which he
literally knows to not be true based on this exchange from
that deposition.
What is Honor Network?
You know what that is, right?
I think that's a fundraising mechanism that he's involved
and I have heard of that.
A fundraising mechanism.
What do you, how do you, let's start because I know you're
not guessing because you just said you weren't going to guess.
So where did you hear that?
Who told you that?
I can't remember exactly.
It was like, there's been news articles about the tens of
millions, hundreds of millions of dollars raised by the Sandy
Hook families.
Something called Sandy Hook promise, right?
And some controversy about where that money goes.
Yeah.
So I have heard about that.
Yeah.
Does Leonard Posner have anything to do with Sandy Hook promise?
Like I told you, I've heard of him in the Honor Network.
Honor Network.
I've heard that and I've heard the other name he said.
I don't know.
You're just conflicting.
I mean, you heard some random stuff and now you're trying to
smear Mr. Posner with it, right?
He has nothing to do with Sandy Hook promise, does he?
You're asking me questions.
So I don't know.
Yeah.
And I'm asking you, what do you know about Honor Network?
And you just started telling me some stuff, but it's not
anything you actually know, right?
Alex may try to yell and derail the trial with this kind of stuff,
but it's not going to go anywhere or do anything because
his point is meaningless.
He can use this insinuation here on his show to make the audience
think that he's going to walk in like a conquering hero and put
the system on trial.
These judges are judges.
It's all a farce.
And Alex knows that he can say exactly what he's saying, but
if he adds one more detail, he's going to owe a ton more money
and maybe create a whole new suit.
Another summary judgment on the way.
Yes.
Also not for nothing, but Alex's breathing is super heavy in
this clip and it's kind of worrying.
Yeah.
It doesn't sound good here.
Yeah.
I mean, at this point, I'm waiting for him to walk into the
court and just be like, uh, tubal cane.
Oh, Rogan would tell him to.
Yeah, that's fair.
Yeah.
Give me James.
So Alex gets into how, uh, I think, I think maybe he was talking
to Marjorie Taylor Greene and she told him about HIPAA.
Oh God.
No.
Cause Alex has some thoughts.
Thoughts about HIPAA.
Oh boy.
My health issues are my issues and they're private and they're
protected by HIPAA.
And I mean, you saw this judge up in Connecticut yesterday and you
saw the lawyers, these Democrat party lawyers that work for
him.
He's openly saying we want him arrested and put in jail.
If he doesn't show up for some multi-day long way, Connecticut
law works, it's just unlimited long deal.
And so when I talked to these doctors, they said, you're crazy.
You need to go home.
You need to go get these tests.
I got more tests set today, more tomorrow and you need to stay
away from the microphone.
Well, here I am, even though I shouldn't be on here because I have
to respond to the hundreds of news articles, including the
Associated Press that are attacking me and saying I'm a
horrible person.
I don't know if anyone cares to cover whether or not you're a
bad person.
I mean, you are.
Yeah.
I think that's taken his risk.
Yeah.
I think we all assumed it.
Yeah.
So anyway, he's going to protect his health privacy with HIPAA.
Yeah.
But then he goes on to just immediately talk about his
health situation.
Oh, he's violating HIPAA.
I might just release my medical records and make you all look
like fools.
Is that what we're going to do?
I've had EKGs.
I've had scans.
I've had it all.
And I started getting sick after I got COVID last year.
I almost killed my dad and I took care of them.
And it was really bad, Delta variant.
And I got spike protein.
And like everybody else, it attacked my cardiovascular system.
Okay.
And so again, somebody on death row is allowed to go get their
medical treatment and hearings and things are postponed.
But I'm treated worse as somebody on death row.
Wow.
Yeah.
If you can believe anything Alex says, then there's a
decent chance he might be suffering from longterm complications
from one of the times he got COVID.
He may have also gotten it and like again, and then there's
that exacerbates the situation.
Totally.
But just based on what he's saying, this makes total sense.
He's someone who's been super unsafe with his behavior.
He's gotten COVID multiple times.
And as we've learned, there are many poorly understood
phenomena afoot with this virus where lingering effects,
that's not too uncommon.
I wouldn't honestly be too surprised if Alex has heart damage
that was caused by one of the times he got COVID.
Totally.
That being said, he's also a super unhealthy person who's at
high risk of heart disease, even without COVID.
So I don't want to jump to too many conclusions.
Sure.
The part that makes COVID as an idea fit kind of neatly is
Alex's claim that he was getting sicker since he got COVID
that second time, which may be true and thus a symptom,
or it may be the way that his mind does experience things,
but it's not actually an accurate reflection of the
progression of his symptoms.
It'll be interesting to see how this plays out.
And actually, I don't think it's going to be that interesting
for anyone but me, but I'll be keeping an eye on the situation
and see if Alex just stops talking about this.
As soon as it's not a convenient excuse for him.
I mean, the reason that people bring up HIPAA is almost
exclusively when they have COVID and they don't want to tell
you they have COVID because of whatever reason.
Well, yeah, I mean, well, yes, recently, I think there are
plenty of other reasons where HIPAA comes up in appropriate
settings.
Oh, no.
When I was in hearing aids, I worked with HIPAA all the time.
Yeah.
I have all kinds of knowledge about HIPAA.
I had to take a class on it.
The whole thing, none of it was like, Hey, don't tell nobody
you got hearing aids.
Yeah.
Okay.
I recall it being relevant.
I was a temp for a short period of time at a health insurance
company.
I dealt with like underwriting.
Yeah.
Yeah.
So like, I think there was some things that I had to
understand about privacy.
Yeah.
I mean, you know, one of the simplest is if somebody's like,
Hey, can I have my medical records?
You have to be like, who are you?
What's the password?
Can I see you?
So Alex is kind of bummed out actually that he doesn't get to
go to the deposition.
I hate this man so much.
To be talking about here.
And I'm literally quite frankly, I was looking forward to
going to the deposition.
So I was going to chew this Chris Matty guy out.
And hold me back.
You're crazy if you go do your normal 10, 12, 14 hour work
days.
You can't do it.
And so I got some more tests coming up today and tomorrow.
I'm going to get those knocked out and I should be fine.
But I might have to go on some medication or whatever.
And it's just the stress of this world.
I really care.
And I've never really made any bones about that.
But again, they want me arrested.
Wait.
The stress of the world or is it long COVID?
Or do you have a heart condition?
It could be anything.
He's having trouble breathing, Dan.
Why don't you care about a man in struggle?
I like the idea that he's like, I was wanting to get in there
and chew out that Chris Matty.
I was just fucking put on my Sunday best.
Tried to put a million dollar bounty on him.
That didn't work.
That didn't work.
I got to yell at him.
When was the last time a Texan put a million dollar bounty on
somebody and it didn't work?
Crazy.
So look.
Alex is, he's got a message for the leftist stuff.
Sure.
And that is, hey, sorry.
Sorry, leftist.
That's really nice of him to apologize.
And yeah, sorry, leftist.
My health comes before you.
Your plan to become famous off my name and to steal my identity
and to say I'm the Sandy Hook man.
You're the Sandy Hook people.
You eat, drink, sleep and everything.
That's what you do.
I will continue to question any big event because a lot of times
they're staged like the Gulf of Tonkin.
I'm just amazed.
Just smile and give me a decent Iraq.
You just can't stop.
The list goes on and on.
But you guys are the ones that dredge this up.
And misrepresent what I've said over and over again.
And it's disgusting.
So you guys can move your depositions.
You guys can do whatever you want, however you want,
whatever you want.
And then after all these depositions,
all these things I've done, you turn around
and say that I have not.
You say that I have, you know, I'm hiding and all this crap.
Everybody knows Alex Jones doesn't hide.
Everybody knows Alex Jones on the front lines of the situation.
Alex Jones doesn't hide.
I say, as I record this from my bedroom,
I'm really concerned here.
That's that's fucking Hitler in the underground bunker being like,
I've never hidden from a fight in my life.
I'm on the front line.
I will fight to the very last kaboom.
This is this is not sets.
So stupid.
Also, I'm conflicted.
I can't really tell if I think that that cough is real or if it's
like me trying to convince my parents.
I'm sick.
Totally.
I'm right there with you.
That's the problem with like trying to assess the information
that's being put out by a liar is like you really,
really don't know.
Like if taken seriously, I think it's fucked up that he's breathing
so heavily and coughing throughout this,
this little video that you put out.
Yeah.
It's like no more than 10 minutes, probably.
No, I listened to the coughs and then replayed them in my head like a,
like I'm in a seven, you know, like just like, oh,
is this a signal?
Is there a slight frequency variation that'll prove he's lying?
You know, like, I don't know.
Yeah.
So anyway, here's how this ends.
Everybody knows Alex Jones doesn't hide.
Everybody knows Alex Jones on the front lines of this situation.
And I preach the listeners supporting us.
We intend to battle all these kangaroo court operations that takes
money to hire the lawyers to do it.
So please, please support us at infowarstore.com
or by calling toll free, triple eight, two, five, three, three, one,
three, nine, also rather great sponsors of a lot of great products.
And that's basically for everybody that tuned in today.
I want to know where Alex Jones is.
That's it.
And, you know, like I said, wanting your money, they want me arrested.
And again, they tell you, I'm defaulted.
I'm already guilty.
Well, then why am I having to testify if I'm guilty?
And again, I'm happy to go do that.
It's just that this isn't the time for me to be doing that.
And they got to move deposition.
So I am as good as these people are.
I have rights.
I have a First Amendment.
What?
And I have my medical life.
And I'm sorry you don't like that.
I know all of the world are taking conservatives and Christians
health care away.
The left is their social credit score.
These people are dangerous authoritarians and they know it
and they're going to be defeated.
All right.
Back to Owen Schreuer and the live broadcast infowarstore.com.
The front lines of human liberty.
I am fascinated by, I mean, first of all, obviously plug.
Obviously that's going to be in there.
But I'm fascinated by this consistent behavior.
And like, is there something about his audience that like really
responds to like petulant baby outbursts?
There must be.
Like I can't imagine hearing somebody act like that and being
like, fuck yeah, that's that's that is a guy who is fighting.
I mean, that's somebody who's really doing the work on the
front line.
Someone who's just wham.
That's a 13 year old.
That is a 13 year old in the fucking eighth grade who's like,
I'm just a little bit too tall.
Like it's, it's fucking awful to listen to this whiny whiny.
Yeah, it's like, it's, it's, it comes off like they didn't let
me on the football team because they don't like me.
Totally.
And I'm too good.
I'm so good.
I'm better than everybody else on the baseball team.
And yeah, that shortstop, even 33, whatever.
I'm better than him.
Yep.
So now we jump to the 22nd and that is Tuesday, the day that
Alex decided to come do his show as opposed to staying home as
under doctor's orders.
Right.
And I think it might be a critical mistake.
I mean, like regardless of what happens on the show, there is
still the, the image of him coming to do the show undercuts his
argument so entirely.
It really breaks it down.
See, I wouldn't have done it if I were him.
I can't do a three hour deposition, but I can do a three
hour show.
Right.
Yeah.
Completely different.
So here's where we start off.
It's Tuesday, March 22nd, 2022, 3222022.
Why to date for the old boys over at Skull and Bones and the
Bohemian Grove and their Satanic death cult.
Why?
Hell bent on establishing their new world order destroying the
Christian era and the Renaissance and establishing in its place
an absolute scientific dictatorship over humanity.
Now, many a politician and leader going back to World War
two has talked of a new world order.
So this is Alex trying to suggest that there's some kind of a
mystical magical spell that Biden was casting by using the words
New World Order on this holiest of days to the globalist 322.
The problem is though that Biden said them the day before on
321 Alex is just whining about it.
That's a different time zone.
Right.
No.
Okay.
322 is on the Skull and Bones logo.
Oh, that makes sense.
Yeah.
There's different theories about exactly what the significance of
that number is, but I don't know.
I don't think it matters.
No.
No.
Wow.
I could not be less interested in him being like, but also many
a politician over the years has said New World Order.
It's true.
That should undercut your argument at no point in time, despite
many politicians having called for the New World Order and you
claiming that every time they do so, they are creating that New
World Order that you so fear and then still having not done so.
Yeah.
It does.
It does seem to keep happening, particularly around times when
situations are changing in the world.
You know, here's what I would like in that too.
If I said many a time the pastor of a church has said that the
end times are upon us, the following part would be and they
still aren't because they're full of shit.
Right.
And so that would be the same response.
Yeah.
I think it would be a fine response.
Let's see how you respond to this.
Something about the lineage of the term New World Order.
All right.
Now I'm listening.
This might be close to racist.
Nazi-ish.
Oh, there we go.
Many a politician and leader going back to World War II has
talked of a New World Order and HD Wells more than 100 years
ago, wrote the bestselling book titled a New World Order.
And it came out in the Nuremberg Trials of the Nazis in World
War II, the end of World War II, that the head of German
propaganda, Joseph Goebbels, wanted to kill HD Wells because
of his book, The New World Order.
Wait, is that good or bad?
It was a different world view of a world government than what
the Nazis wanted.
And they knew that HD Wells, the nonfiction also fiction writer,
was the brain trust of the Anglo-American establishment.
That's the name of the British U.S.
Global Government Combine.
And the Nazis had their own New World Order.
An adult Alois Hitler, you may have heard of him, had an order
about to kill HD Wells.
This is mainline history.
So when you hear about the New World Order, you might pop your
ears up a little bit and open your eyes up and focus.
I think that the extent of Alex's actual knowledge about World
War II is that Hitler's middle name is Alois.
It really does feel like it.
He says it all the time.
He's really aware of it.
He says Adolf Alois Hitler more than he says Barack Hussein
Obama.
Yeah, that's because it's mainline news.
I'm flabbergasted.
I mean, you know when you love a person, you just give them
their full name.
So Alex is making all this up.
There are a couple of important things to point out here.
And the first is that you can't just throw around claims like it
came out in the Nuremberg Trials and expect that to stand as
compelling argumentation.
No, actually, I made that argument at the Nuremberg Trials
where it came out and thus.
And Francis Boyle was the lead prosecutor.
Okay.
And Dr. Marvel's and I have got a peace problem.
So the material involved in the Nuremberg Trials is so dense
and copious that understanding all of it would itself be the
work of a person's entire career.
If you want to cite something in it, you really need to be more
specific because to not do so puts your audience at the
terrible, terrible position of either taking your word for it
or I guess scouring thousands and thousands of pages of
documentation to see if what you're saying shows up anywhere.
Another important thing to keep in mind is that Joseph
Goebbels was not tried at any Nuremberg Trial because he had
already killed himself prior to the end of the war.
The Yale Law School through the Avalon Project hosts transcripts
of the entire proceedings of the Nuremberg Trial and H.G.
Wells isn't mentioned once.
It is recorded that Wells books were included in the books
that were burned beginning in 1933, but it's really unfair to
pretend that Wells was the main target.
Like Magnus Hirschfeld's Institute of Sex Research was
definitely a central target and then tons of authors who the
Nazis didn't feel were German enough or the right kind of
German had their works burned.
It's a long list including people like F. Scott Fitzgerald,
Upton Sinclair, Franz Kafka, and Helen Keller.
Like it's a lot of people.
It wasn't so much the authors as it was just like general
knowledge itself was under attack.
And I think that the awareness that H.G. Wells was included
in that book burning list may be what Alex is exaggerating
or embellishing here.
Just combining that H.G. Wells had a book named New World Order
and Nuremberg Trial is a great place to put it in.
Yeah, so he just makes up whatever he wants to make fake points
when he's trying to sell some sort of a narrative, whatever
that day's narrative is.
Alex's movie Endgame begins with a misquotation from H.G. Wells's
New World Order and I have absolutely zero qualms saying
that he has never read that book.
Zero.
He almost certainly just saw that faulty quotation and a John
Society pamphlet his dad gave him and that's just been his
reality sense.
An important point to bring up here is that in some ways you
could really see what Alex is doing here as being pro Nazi.
I know that he wouldn't accept that characterization, but it
really feels like he's applying his own worldview and motives
to Goebbels here in a way that's really only meant to get the
audience to think that maybe the Nazis weren't doing all that
bad of stuff.
They were fighting Alex's New World Order.
I've been trying to parse exactly what it was he was saying.
And that's where I'm getting stuck because it does sound.
I'm not sure if that's the only reading, but it's a reading.
It sure is.
Alex constantly talks about the globalists and the New World
Order as being working for the literal Christian devil.
So it kind of paints the Nazis as not as bad as they seem if
they too are fighting against the literal Christian devil.
Well, I mean, what he said was the H.G. Wells had a book named
New World Order and Goebbels wanted to kill him because the
Nazis had their own New World Order and we are told pretty
clearly that H.G. Wells' New World Order is the devil one.
Right.
So unless the devil is like farming out like all kinds of
I mean, you know, it's this back in World War II is like the
it was everybody was playing in the minor leagues.
You know, there were a bunch of smaller town devils.
There was barnstorming devils who would come in.
They'd have their own kind of thing going on for a while.
Yeah, I find this absurd, but so I can't say with any certainty
how much of this is intentional, but if Alex isn't trying to be
a Nazi apologist, he needs to be way more careful about how he
talks about issues related to World War II.
The first step would be to stop making stuff up about it.
And then after that, stop saying things that clearly indicate
that you personally identify with a Nazi leadership.
These would be admirable goals to try and bring into the
proceedings.
You know, a lot of politicians and writers have said the
words New World Order over the years.
And the one I agree with is Goebbels.
That's probably not the way you want to go.
Right.
Yeah, probably not.
That's bad.
So yeah, Alex might sympathize with the Nazis.
So anyway, Alex gets into talking about New World Order stuff
as he has been.
Of course, but I think in this clip, he actually kind of
lets slip a little bit too clearly that he knows what people
mean when they use that term.
Right.
The politicians will say, oh, well, a New World Order just
means a reshuffling of the power structure.
And it could certainly mean that.
But we're putting together a compilation.
There's hundreds of these that I'll be airing later in the day
of prime ministers and presidents and world leaders
defining their New World Order as world government,
autocratic, authoritarian world government.
And Klaus Schwab has come out saying, we had the video,
China is the model of world government.
So it's not just a world government.
It's a worldwide authoritarian government with forced abortion,
infanticide, giant death camps.
You will own nothing.
You will have nothing and you will be happy or you'll go to a camp.
So keep in mind this characterization that Alex is making
because he's saying that they have this this compilation
and he's going to play it later.
And we'll see if it holds up to this standard.
It sounds like it's a pretty big compilation.
Yeah.
Yeah.
And spoiler alert, there's no Klaus Schwab in it.
It doesn't play any video of Klaus Schwab saying that China is
the model of the New World Order that he wants to create.
It's like that's important.
Yeah.
But Alex says I have the video in the same way that he says
it's in the white paper or it's not even debated or whatever.
It's just a tick.
He's got the video.
Yeah.
It's just a tick for his audience to be like, oh, he means it this time.
He's definitely telling the truth now.
Yeah.
Never heard that one before.
I also want to touch on the meme that Alex dropped at the end there.
The you will have nothing and you'll be happy thing.
This is something that's really caught on among shithead skeptics
who don't actually want to put any work in but want to present
themselves as competent news and politics critics.
I'm talking about people like Rogan and Russell Brand.
Brand has made multiple videos where this slogan is used
in a nightmarish way to characterize the great reset
conspiracy that he's hard at work making his millions of fans
scared about.
Schwab never said you will own nothing and you'll be happy.
That's not a quote.
It's a paraphrasing of something that was written by Danish MP
Aida Alken in 2016.
Aida was envisioning what life might be like in 2030.
And part of that vision was that things that had historically
been seen as products were now services.
This essay is a little bit far fetched but the essential premise
is that innovation and technological advancement will have
made everything so available and abundant that there's no real
reason to own anything anymore since everything will be free.
From the essay quote, first communication became digitized
and free to everyone.
Then when clean energy became free things started to move quickly.
Transportation dropped dramatically in price.
It made no sense for us to own cars anymore because we could
call a driverless vehicle or flying car for longer journeys
within minutes.
There are also aspects of this vision that are kind of dumb
in as much as they seem incredibly inefficient.
For instance, this part, quote, once in a while I will choose
to cook for myself.
It's easy.
The necessary kitchen equipment is delivered at my door
within minutes.
Since transport became free we've stopped having all those
things stuffed in our home.
Why keep a pasta maker or crepe cooker crammed in our cupboards?
We can just order them when we need them.
That seems like a step backwards in terms of efficiency.
I'm not sure.
Listen, imagination is fun.
Sure.
It is conclusion is that this new technologically advanced city
provides literally everything a person could want but also
affords no actual privacy and quote, all in all, it's a good
life.
There's no specific plan laid out here.
It's more or less a creative writing exercise where someone
came up with some ideas of what life might look like in the
future.
An excerpt from this essay was included in the World Economic
Forum's video and blog post, quote, eight predictions for the
world in 2030.
A paraphrasing of the ideas that Aida wrote out is included
and summarized as, quote, you will own nothing and you will
be happy.
This is not a description of some nefarious plan or the stated
goal that Klaus Schwab is working towards.
It's a clunky brief synopsis of this person's essay.
But that's not how it's reported by people like Alex or
Rogan or Russell Brandt.
For them, it's basically a threat, like a parent saying
you'll eat your peas and you'll be happy.
Do you know what's really funny about it?
What's that?
Is that I remember a specific person saying like, get rid of
all your stuff.
You'll have nothing.
Right.
And you'll be happy about it, right?
Was it the devil?
No.
No, it wasn't the devil.
Wait, wait, let me see if I can.
And it was like, it was way back.
Okay.
And he was talking to some guy and the guy was like, I've got
all this shit.
Ah, what do I do?
And this guy was like, oh, just get rid of it.
You don't need shit because guess what?
It's not making you happy.
Did this involve like a parable about a camel?
No, no, no way.
Absolutely not.
Come on now.
So these people are fucking children.
They're desperate to portray their imagined enemies as parental
figures for them to lash out at because in some way I feel like
that's the only way they can experience the world.
Yeah.
And that kind of goes back to Alex's like his whiny,
petulant nonsense.
Totally.
In response to not getting his way about the legal case.
I mean, it's not the first time that daddy issues will have
an outsized effect on the world's end.
Yeah.
I understand that.
I appreciate it.
But I do feel like there's a certain aspect to it that it's
like, I didn't realize that this kind of psychological
phenomenon or whatever can have an impact.
Right.
I didn't realize it was this profitable in terms of building
an audience.
I always thought that acting like this was a bad move.
Yeah.
I kind of thought it was embarrassing.
Yeah.
Maybe that's because I don't have daddy issues.
Sure.
So that's why I trailed off at the end.
Right.
So in this next clip, we find out that Alex was a little bit
late finding out about Biden's comments.
Oh, no.
So I was very tired yesterday.
And I was going to bed early about nine o'clock and my phone
started blowing up by a lot of well-known talk show hosts and
folks calling me and texting me saying, did you see Biden?
Did you see Biden?
Did you see Biden call for a new world order?
And I said, no, I'm going to see it now.
So I got up, got a glass of water, got in front of the big
screen computer.
Great story.
That's better for in the phones.
Extra details.
And I pulled it up and sure as hell there it was.
So this could be a symptom of Alex's COVID, you know, exhaustion.
Terrible stories.
No, well, I like to.
No, but going to bed so early.
Oh, yeah.
And this is me grasping at straws to build up a case because
Alex's petty fascism is boring.
It's honestly bizarre for Alex to say that he heard about this
clip at 9 p.m. because of some texts from a person he's clearly
trying to imply is Tucker, the most important person in the
world.
He is.
That speech Biden gave us a little bit earlier in the day and
it was going around like wildfire and the right wing and
conspiracy information spaces immediately.
I texted you at like seven.
Yeah.
I imagine Alex is like, he's over two hours behind it.
Like we're the tip of the spear.
Alex had no idea.
What an idiot.
Yeah.
This is pathetic.
So, you know, another thing that's pathetic is the way the
media treats Alex.
Oh, I mean, they're just so unfair.
Totally.
They just, it's like, oh, you can't ruin hundreds of
millions of lives without somebody being like, I'll mean to
you.
Put that aside for a second.
Okay.
Because look, here's the deal.
Alex talks about the New World Order and everybody's like boo.
But then Biden says New World Order.
I love the New World Order.
No one's mad.
Nobody's mad.
Now, simultaneously, we have the New York Times, the
Washington Post, CNN.
I have articles here today specifically saying I talk about
a New World Order and that it's hateful and bad and that it
doesn't exist and that I should be taken off the air.
Their latest article was America has a free speech problem in
the New York Times on Friday because they don't want us
discussing the future of the world.
And what I played yesterday, clown Schwab says, leave us
decide the future of the humans.
Terrible Schwab impression.
That was real bad.
That's even not in line with his normal.
That's that's worse than his bad Schwarzenegger.
He has very little range.
More importantly, though, people criticize Alex because he
makes shit up and then he uses the idea of a New World Order
to push incredibly hateful political positions to deny
acts of right wing terrorism in general and then target
marginalized and vulnerable populations.
It's a meaningful distinction, but I don't expect Alex to
ever recognize it publicly.
Also, that New York Times article Alex is talking about
actually says the opposite of what he's claiming it does.
The way he's talking about it reveals that he's literally
just read the headline and assumed that it must be about
how free speech is a problem because it allows Alex to say
the things that he does.
He couldn't have even read the first two paragraphs without
realizing that this article is saying the opposite.
Quote, for all the tolerance and enlightenment that modern
society claims, Americans are losing hold of a fundamental
right as citizens of a free country.
The right to speak their minds and voice their opinions
in public without fear of being shamed or shunned.
This social silencing, the deep pluralization of America,
has been evident for years, but dealing with its stirs
yet even more fear.
It feels like a third rail, dangerous.
For a strong nation and open society, that is dangerous.
The irony of him criticizing that specific editorial
is that everybody at the New York Times, who is Alex Jones,
wrote that editorial.
Yeah.
There's, like, I read that shit.
Yeah.
And it's fucking shameful.
It's wild.
It is disgusting.
Like, if Alex could string two sentences together on a page,
he could have written that off.
He absolutely!
Decrying the scourge of cancel culture.
Oh, my God.
But because he's too lazy to read past a headline,
he's using it as a prop to build up a case
that he's under attack.
It's just pathetic stuff.
Like, this is...
Yeah.
I don't know.
Like, it's at times like this when, like,
there's a lot going on in Alex's world.
Lots of moving parts.
Man.
Lots of things going around that appear to be big stories,
and then you're looking at his show,
and it's like, you didn't even read this article
you're complaining about.
Especially since this one is just such a huge win for Alex.
Alex could be like, even the New York Times understands
that people like Alex Jones should be listened to.
I bet that will be eventually.
Yeah, probably.
What he goes with it.
I mean, yeah, that really, that one really pissed me off.
Yeah.
I'm really, really mad at that one.
Understandably.
I wanted to say mean things.
So, Alex has a guest coming up.
Mm-hmm.
Towards the end of the show.
And I think, like, in terms of the sort of person
you would want to come speak on the sort of topics
that he's covering,
I mean, it's just, this is a slam dunk.
We also have an economist and researcher and stock picker
who's been at the tip of the spear exposing
the depopulation agenda, watching the markets.
The stock picker?
I have Mr. Dow joining us in the third hour
to talk about Daily Mail articles and others
released by the government in the UK.
Hospitals bribed to put patients on path to death
to kill people.
Sure.
Cash incentives for NHS trust that meets targets
on Liverpool care pathway.
That's why they ordered massive amounts
of a euthanasia drug given in lethal injection in the US
to be given to hundreds of thousands of old people
they killed.
If you give somebody a shot of it that has pneumonia,
they always die.
What?
In just a few hours.
What fucking magic is that?
It's for the earth.
Gotta kill your dog.
Gotta kill your cat.
Gotta sterilize your son.
Got to kill the old people.
There's not enough resources.
You will own nothing.
You will have nothing.
Starting to figure out where we're going, folks.
So that headline that Alex is reading
from the Daily Mail, hospitals bribed to put patients
on pathway to death.
That's not an article about COVID or anything current
like he's reporting it.
It's from 2012.
And the article is more complicated than what Alex
is presenting.
This has to do with the NHS having targets of between
one-third and two-thirds of the deaths that occur in a hospital
being on what's known as the Liverpool care pathway.
The LCP is a protocol that is used for patients
who are at end of life and determined to be terminal cases.
And it's essentially a way that doctors attempted
to provide hospice type care in a hospital setting.
Once a patient was deemed to be terminal
and there was no longer any treatment options,
they would receive palliative care to relieve pain and such,
but typically that patient would end up dying.
Right.
This wasn't so much that the hospitals were killing
these patients as much as it was a case where
end-of-life care was being done in a manner
that seemed a bit detached and bureaucratic.
The fact that there was a target range of deaths that should
involve the LCP and the fact that funding was attached
to being in line with these targets,
it really gave the air of impropriety,
even though no wrongdoing was necessarily being done.
Right.
It's just people so divorced from the on-the-ground reality
of it, they're just like looking at numbers.
So they don't feel, yeah.
A review found that when implemented well,
the LCP is a good way to handle end-of-life care
at a hospital setting.
And in fact, it appeared that the existence of the pathway
made it much more clear to families of patients
that their loved one was at the end of their life
and allowed them to act accordingly.
Sure.
That said, when it wasn't implemented well,
it was a sloppy process that could lead to some amount
of negligence, and there were aspects of the pathway
that were too difficult to formalize.
Right.
For instance, diagnosing when someone is at the end of life
is an imprecise thing, so codifying rules of what
qualifies will be difficult to do broadly.
Yeah.
As such, the panel that reviewed the LCP
advised phasing it out, which the NHS did in 2013.
Oh, well, they got them.
Yeah.
We got them, guys.
We did it!
Mission accomplished!
Alex is covering and sensationalizing a decade-old story,
which is just tip-of-the-spear stuff.
It's nonsense.
Oh, boy.
The rest of that stuff is just bullshit ranging
from transphobia to Alex mischaracterizing articles
about how owning a pet is bad for the environment,
mostly because the dynamics involved
in pet food production.
Yeah.
You can see, again, in returning to this drumbeat
of the you'll own nothing and you'll be happy.
He said that a bunch of the past, but not as regularly
as he is now, and I suspect that he's seen the success
that folks like Russell Brand have had with using
that as a mantra, and Alex wants to signal to those audiences
and try and say, hey, I'm doing it too.
Right.
Right, right, right.
See, again, this is also, like, what is it?
Buddhism.
Like, there's a whole organized school of thought
around how having stuff is a bad move.
Wait, wait, isn't Russell Brand a Buddhist?
I think he is.
He's fucking idiot.
Of course.
Anyway, look.
Detach yourself from the idea of not having things.
All right.
Attach yourself to unattachable attachment things
that you can't attach yourself to.
What?
I've been starting to think that maybe Russell Brand
is somebody who deserves a little bit of attention.
Yeah.
Don't be too surprised if we do some episodes about him
in the future.
I just wasn't seeing that the guy from one guy Richie movie
was going to be.
You know what's nuts is that, like, he probably has a larger
audience than Alex at this point.
Totally.
And he's still on mainstream platforms.
Uh-huh.
He's doing some straight-up Alex shit.
Exact same stuff.
Not exactly the same.
There's some nuance to it.
Totally.
That is important.
And I will get into that at a later date.
Yeah.
But, like, I was taking a shower the other day.
I was thinking about it.
It's like, man, he's probably radicalizing a lot of people.
And I wonder, you know, it could lead to trouble and, like,
what if there was another January 6th,
and it's because forgetting Sarah Marshall came out?
Because certainly give me to the Greek or whatever.
Get him to the Greek.
That wouldn't have launched his career.
Well, I mean, when you really think about it,
we are dealing with a triumvirate of Alex Jones,
Joe Broken, and Russell Brand as three purveyors.
Tucker.
Well, of course, Tucker.
Make it a square, baby.
Tucker.
But, I mean, like, this is, this is bush league bullshit.
Like, this is not good.
It's interesting, too.
Like, they appeal to sort of different sectors.
Yeah.
You know, you have, like, dyed-in-the-wool right-wing
types.
Sure.
Love the stuff they get from Tucker.
Right.
Right-wingers, you like to get high, like, to go to Joe Rogan.
Well, Stoned could go either way with Rogan or Brand.
Sure, that's true.
It depends if you're violent or not.
Right.
Yeah, that is the difference, isn't it?
Yeah.
It really is.
Oh, my God.
They're all, like, a fucking choosier.
They're a build-a-character and a fucking RPG where you just
adjust the stats a little bit and you come out with these two.
Mm-hmm.
Fuck me.
Yep.
Goddamn.
Brand X wasn't really, like, enough to merit a cult.
And I mean, he was doing stuff in the UK before.
Yeah.
Like, obviously, he was already a-
No, he was a very, very famous comedian.
But not here.
Nope.
Not here.
Nope.
He got big here.
Oh, boy.
Anyway, I've been thinking about him a bit.
So the New World Order, right?
Sure.
We know that the Nazis were trying to make one.
Right.
So was H.U.
Wells.
Right.
So we know that there are multiple New World Orders.
Right.
New World's Order.
New, New World's, yeah.
So Alex gets into how there's a bunch of New World Orders right
now.
What does, what does that even mean?
You're going to find out.
Oh, God.
What does Biden mean when he announces the New World Order?
Well, you got China saying they lead the New World Order.
Sure.
That's one.
You've got Putin saying he's starting a New World Order.
That's two.
You like that one.
And you've got Biden saying he's got a New World Order.
That's three.
And those are the three power blocks.
What about China?
Sycomps, the Anglo-American establishment, and the Ruskies.
That's it.
You've got Christendom that's all over the world of all groups and peoples.
The real plan through Christ to unify the world and not kill each other, whether you
believe in Christ or not, it's what mainline mass psychologists who study mass psychology
will tell you could actually save the earth.
Really?
Really?
That all the permutation show will, the way it's being carried out, destroy the planet.
Wow.
Then you've got transhumanism that's already decided to kill most of the people and then
have humans become a new species.
And then you have the Chycoms that want their own China-centric, race-based fascism.
They call communism.
Then you've got the Russians that just want to be left alone and have their new order.
Really?
Really?
They want to be left alone?
That's where we are.
Yeah, that's where we are.
I think Alex might still be high from that Caliweed.
Wow.
This is nonsense.
That is fucking insane.
It's meandering childish bigotry that's just, it's shocking and impressive.
And it's crazy how all news world order don't include South America or Africa whatsoever.
Not important.
Not important.
So here are the teams, according to Alex.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
If you pay a tiny bit of attention, you might start to notice that some of these groups are
characterized as good or bad.
So on the bad side, you've got China, who wants to create a racist, fascist new world order.
Right, which is completely different from what he wants.
Right.
Then you have the Anglo-American establishment, which is just code for the globalist.
Yeah.
And we know that they work for the literal devil.
The devil.
There's Islam, which apparently will lead to the destruction of the world.
Why not?
And then there's transhumanism, who they want to create a whole new sort of human.
Sure.
Just right off the top, you can tell that this was an improvised list that Alex was riffing,
because transhumanism is not its own thing.
It's a facet of the globalist's plan.
According to everything Alex has ever said about this topic in globalists, transhumanism
is an essential element of their whole scheme, where they're trying to merge with machines
and become God.
Yeah.
He talks about it all the time.
That's their goal.
It seems strange that he added them in as a distinct group.
But I think he did that because he realized how clearly his Christian identity nationalism
was coming through.
You know, he's like, oh, Christianity, good Islam, bad.
Oh, transhumanism, bad.
How do we do that?
He's trying to throw that out as a distraction from that.
Well, I mean, but even then, where we go right back to Christendom.
Who's left?
We've got China.
No.
We got America.
Globalists.
We got Islam.
No.
So who's our Bastion of Christendom?
Brazil, baby.
No, I doubt it.
So on the good side, you have Russia, who just wants to be left alone and have their own
new world order.
Left alone.
And you have Christendom, which apparently is the true plan to unite humanity according
to unnamed mass psychologists who Alex could definitely name if he wanted to.
This raises some really troubling questions.
And I guess the first is, what does Alex mean by saying Russia wants to be left alone,
but they also want a new world order?
Well, the best way to be left alone is to rule everything.
How does this work, man?
It's like so far, Putin is killing tons of civilians in Ukraine.
It doesn't seem like it furthers the goal of being left alone.
No, I mean, it does.
That's the point.
That's the problem with every single person who's ever thought about the idea of an isolated
nation in the current global structure is that if you want to be an isolated nation,
there can be no other nations.
So you either have the entire world or everyone else is dead.
That's not a good plan.
No.
So also what Alex is suggesting with this whole thing about mass psychologists saying
that Christianity is the plan that would unite the world.
What he's saying is that he wants to impose Christian theocracy on the world.
There you go.
The tell there from Alex is that he says that Christendom is the real plan that will unite
the world, whether you believe in Christ or not.
There you go.
He doesn't care if you believe in God or Christ or not.
So long as he's able to assert power over you because he does, so long as you have to submit.
I can't hear things like this and not just think that Alex is losing even more of his grip.
And he's being a bit too overt with his desires.
Like he wants to see a world characterized by Christian theocracy and he sees Putin as
the person who's most likely to usher that in, which probably explains a fair amount
of his more recent content.
I mean, you're just getting it all wrong.
Okay.
That's why we can't have Islam because they want to impose a religious theocracy on us,
even if you don't believe in that particular religion.
That's not how Christendom works and it never has.
Not once, not one time.
I can point to tons of mainline historians who will tell you that nothing good has ever.
Yeah.
No, I feel like this even isn't in line with anything that Alex has said as big picture
stuff and like the major players.
No, not really.
Like, I guess his conception is that China is stopping working with the New World Order
or whatever, or with the globalists.
But Islam is still, there's never been a break in terms of that.
He still thinks that the entirety of Islam right for the New World Order and the globalists.
His conception of the world is so small.
It's true.
There's just so little in his world.
Well, that is true.
But I think it also is just made up.
True.
And that's why I mean it has to be because he doesn't think about like the global south
at all.
Sure.
That's why they're not a part of it.
They're just not a part of it.
Well, I guess he does only in as much as he likes Bolsonaro.
He'll be a lieutenant.
He'll be a Duke.
So under Putin or whatever.
Alex talks a little bit more about this stuff.
And then he gets like so defensive about how smart he is.
But China is competing for the transhumanist system as well.
But they're not following the neoliberal model of feminizing boys, sterilizing boys and girls
and destroying basic human civilization.
The chai comms and the Russians have broken with that arm of the transhumanist system
that seeks to fully end humanity.
And they just believe they're going to merge and augment with the technology.
What?
So that's the real debate going on.
That's the real debate.
You were at a table with billionaires and at the table with Bilderberg group members.
And if you were having an adult discussion, that's what you'd be talking about.
Those are the type of discussions I've had with all sorts of groups.
Intelligence heads, Bilderberg group members.
People were $50 billion, you know, science division heads, heads of harp, heads of major programs.
I'm not trying to brag here, folks.
I've been doing this 28 years and I really study this all day.
So I get to be at the table, even though most of the globalists don't like me.
I get to be at the big boy table.
Wow.
Anyone listening to this show actually believes that Alex is having adult conversations with anyone.
And the conversations are about this bullshit.
I can kind of see how his supplements sell so well.
You're not having an adult conversation with me right now.
Totally.
I'm like, no, I'm allowed to go wherever.
I'm so smart.
I'm the smartest.
Alex isn't talking to anyone who's not insane themselves.
And you can tell by the guests that he has on his show.
They're all lunatics and most of them are lying about their credentials.
Alex had Steve Pachanic on his show for 20 years and never seriously asked himself if this dude was nuts and a liar.
If you were actually like a big serious person, you'd never associate with Alex because you can easily see the company that he keeps and how he behaves.
He's an untrustworthy idiot who's unpredictable and he's surrounded by white supremacists, neo-Nazis and parody level con men.
I do feel a certain amount of pity for anyone who could hear that and take it seriously because this is just Alex's child brain lashing out again.
He knows he doesn't deserve to be taken seriously, so he's creating a comical explanation for how seriously he's taken by imaginary bigwigs that totally exist and they probably hang out with mass psychologists.
Listen, I know you aren't taking me seriously.
But these billionaires that you've never heard of.
Oh boy.
All of them.
The most important people.
The most important.
I am guessing that the person who runs Harp is probably just Nick Begich.
Sure.
We could probably pick out who all of those people are.
Yeah.
What's he basing his bullshit off of?
Yeah.
What's the one person?
It's just, this is just an attempt to be seen by the audience in a certain way because Alex knows that on the merits, he doesn't deserve to be treated like that or seen that way at all.
Right.
At all.
But.
But.
Big news.
What?
It's actually not big news.
How big?
Alex could join the New World Order if he wanted to.
Oh.
Not like you peons, you peasants listening.
I mean, let him go.
Do it.
He can't do it, man.
Come on, do it.
I could join the New World Order.
Do it.
Just like that.
Just fucking do it, man.
Immune from the laws, immune from the system and protect myself for a short period of time from what's coming and lie to myself and say, I could go along with the great culling and this operation.
And then, and then my family will be safe.
You really think you'll be safe joining with this?
The few thousand of you that are actually in it and the millions that serve it that think they're going to get a ticket to Valhalla, to Elysium?
No.
It's a fraud.
It's a lie.
The life extension is a lie.
All of it's a fraud.
We are in a countdown to destroying the planet.
There is a short compilation of just a few world leaders talking about the New World Order and world government and what it means.
Here it is.
You know, we are at an inflection point, I believe, in the world economy.
Not just the world economy in the world.
It occurs every three or four generations.
As one of the top military people said to me in a secure meeting the other day, 60 million people died between 1900 and 1946.
And since then we established a liberal world order and that hadn't happened in a long while.
A lot of people died but nowhere near the chaos.
And now is the time when things are shifting.
We're going to, there's going to be a New World Order out there.
And we've got to lead it.
We've got to unite the rest of the free world in doing it.
I wonder if joining the New World Order would make it so Alex wouldn't have to come up with embarrassing excuses to not have to go to a deposition in the case that he's already lost about defaming the families of murdered children.
If so, maybe he should try that because I don't know what other option he has left.
He's probably run out.
I think I would love it if all of a sudden we came in to work one day and you're like, I have got an episode for you.
Here's your out of context drop.
I've joined the New World Order.
And then we go from there.
That's amazing stuff.
Sure.
I love that.
If Alex just starts wearing black and doing the Too Sweet all the time.
Oh man, hell yeah.
He starts being like a foe like.
He gets the wrong New World Order that he's joined.
Yes.
He hangs out with Hulk Hogan, which you might do anyway.
That is.
Yeah.
Well, you know, people who say the N word got to stick together.
Sure.
So that clip at the end was Biden's recent comment about the New World Order.
And I don't think that it sounds evil or nefarious at all.
This is that compilation that Alex mentioned earlier.
See, I was worried about the compilation part of that.
So it's supposed to point these evil statements, you know, about the horror of the New World Order.
But so far it sounds like someone describing others a change in the status quo that's happening as it relates to international power.
Right.
I'm going to go through each of these clips one by one in this compilation.
And the reason I'm doing this is because I need to drive home the point that the entire notion of this New World Order stuff being some kind of an actual evil conspiracy plot isn't based on anything other than manipulative optics.
That and historical anti-Semitism going back to things like the protocols, but a lot of manipulative optics do.
Yeah.
So here's the next clip, which is Biden again.
And this time it's from a 2013 speech he gave at the annual conference of the Export-Import Bank.
Ooh.
The affirmative task we have now is to actually create a New World Order.
Wow.
Got him.
It's interesting that Alex chose that clip because if you actually listen to Biden's full speech, that's not the only time he says New World Order.
Like, for instance, this is just from a little bit earlier in the speech.
I understand better than almost anyone, you understand almost better than anyone, the sheer potential this global economy affords the United States of America.
And you are well aware of the challenges as well.
This is a familiar story.
In the post-war era, post-World War II era, we faced a slightly different set of challenges.
As the global economy reemerged from the structures of war, we knew that institutions and rules were needed to navigate through this New World Order.
And because our parents and grandparents were wise and because they were committed, we did what we've always done best.
We exercised our global leadership.
Alex didn't use this clip, even though it does involve Biden saying New World Order, because to do so would undercut the point that Alex is trying to make.
To be fully honest, I'm sure Alex has never listened to this speech and has no idea where the clip is even from.
Someone just sent him a fear mongering compilation or these pieces to his employees, put it together, and they played it, but the point is the same.
For whoever decided to include this clip, then it's just ignoring the other one because it doesn't work.
If all you have is an out of context presentation to Biden saying that we need to build a New World Order, that could have come from any period of time
and your brain can imagine that it's related to whatever you want to pretend it's related to, that only works out of context.
Conversely, if you hear the full speech and you see that he uses the words New World Order to refer to the New World Order that appeared in the aftermath of World War II,
it makes it too clear that the New World Order isn't a specific compound noun in this speech.
It's really just referring to the changing set of circumstances on the world stage, in this case in the field of economics and international trade,
since he's speaking to the Export-Import Bank.
The inclusion of this example in the compilation is a strong indication that this isn't making a sincere point.
It's just an attempt to use the image of people saying New World Order and make that into an argument, which it's not.
Yeah. I mean, what exactly are we going to wind up? You know, it's not like we're eventually going to have our politicians all go like,
so I think now that things are changing, we're going to be entering a novel global structure.
Yeah. So the next one is an oldie but a goodie.
And we will be. We have a real chance at this New World Order, an order in which a credible United Nations can use its peacekeeping role to fulfill the promise and vision of the UN's founders.
So we talked about this in depth during the Endgame episodes, but this is George H.W. Bush announcing the beginning of the First Iraq War.
While announcing the war, it has no good. No good! That said, the use of the words New World Order in this speech are not nefarious.
If you read the full speech, it's very clear that this is a reference to the changing state of affairs between the U.S. and the Soviet Union.
In fact, the line that's right before this in that speech, which is weirdly always cut out of these clips, is, quote,
we have in this past year made great progress in sending and ending the long era of conflict and Cold War.
Long story short, this was at the end of the Cold War in 1991, and that's what the term New World Order refers to.
The Old World Order was a state of standoff between the two largest superpowers in the world who would be too occupied with fighting each other
to engage with the UN and their larger peacekeeping mission, and the UN would be too busy worrying about the U.S. and the Soviet Union.
You're free to scoff and disagree with the idea that the UN and the Gulf War were great in terms of peacekeeping, please do,
but that doesn't change the fact that Bush was not talking about a shadowy cabal in world government.
He was talking about a changing status quo between the United States and Russia, which brought about the new order of the world.
Yes.
That's all that's going on there.
It was a novel global structure.
Thing.
You're not going to like this next one.
Oh boy.
There's a need for New World Order, but it has different characteristics in different parts of the world.
This is Kissinger, and I'm not going to spend any time defending him or his legacy, but this is a strange clip to use in this compilation.
This is from an interview he did with Charlie Rose in 2007, and if you just use a nine-second clip, it kind of conveys the message Alex is trying to pretend it says,
but this is misrepresenting the larger context.
If you just hear this clip, it sounds like Kissinger is saying that IT will have different characteristics in different parts of the world
and that IT is implied to be the New World Order, understood to be a one-world government.
Right.
But that's not what he's saying.
Just prior to this clip, Rose is asking him about the Iraq War, and if the way it was carried out should be understood as revealing the limits of American power,
and if given the considerations of so many regions in the world, like states in the Middle East, the rising power of China, was there a need for a New World Order?
Kissinger was saying yes, that there was a change in dynamics that was on the horizon, but that it would play out differently in different parts of the world.
In terms of things Henry Kissinger has said, this is a fairly benign comment.
Yeah.
I mean, you know, I hated Henry Kissinger a lot, and now they're doing that six-part series on behind-the-bestries.
Holy shit.
I didn't even know how much I hated that guy.
I'm guessing that if you were Alex, your doctor would advise you not to listen to that.
Don't know.
I'm not doing good.
The stress.
I listen to it in very short bursts.
Yeah.
Yeah.
And not in public.
Our next clip, we get Bush again.
Well, I mean, he's New World Order classic, you know?
I think I found one person who used the term more than him in this compilation, but he said it a lot.
Oh.
A world in which there is the very real prospect of a New World Order.
This was from another speech in 1991, a couple months after the other one.
This speech is mostly about declaring victory in Operation Desert Storm, and honestly, I don't know why Alex didn't use a longer clip from this speech.
Or possibly, like, there's even more menacing instances of Bush saying New World Order in that speech.
It's hard to listen to an entire speech, Dan.
Listen to this.
Wouldn't it be more impactful if Alex used this clip instead?
Let's hear it.
Even the New World Order cannot guarantee an era of perpetual peace, but enduring peace must be our mission.
Personally, I think that sounds more ominous.
And like the sort of thing Alex could present as a threat.
Like, yeah, even if you let us have our way, there's still going to be violence and war.
Yeah, CIA director becoming president saying that.
Nope, that's bad.
I'm going to guess the reason Alex uses the clips he does is because he's never actually watched or listened to any of the source material.
He's just using clips that other people have posted online and memes and shit.
Yep.
So here's the next one.
All right.
A New World is emerging.
It is a New World Order with significantly different and radically new challenges.
So this is a little sliver of a speech that former UK Prime Minister Gordon Brown gave in front of the Confederation of British Industry Conference, the conference.
It's unclear what year this is from because conspiracy sites online claim that it's from 2007, but I found a transcript of the speech that he gave that year at the CBI and it doesn't match this one.
So I have some doubts about that.
I'm actually really frustrating because the backdrop behind Brown is definitely from CBI, but it's also not the backdrop that matches what the conference used in 2007, nor any other years that I can find videos from.
It's all I've been able to find Brown speeches from other years that he was there and none of them match this other and it's a real pickle.
Did you fucking find Brigadoon or something?
What is happening?
I looked through all of the videos.
Don't tell me that you know what the backdrop looks like for each of the years.
Maybe not every year, but relevant years.
No, that's the problem.
I did also look through all of the videos that are posted on C-SPAN, including Gordon Brown in the description.
Right.
It's a mess.
Oh boy.
So this does exist.
There's a two minute clip that this comes from that does exist as a YouTube snippet that was posted in 2007.
So I can be fairly certain that it wasn't said after that.
Right.
But beyond that, I don't know what to say.
A fairly certain barring space-time manipulation, which apparently might be occurring here.
You never know.
It's true.
That said, Gordon Brown talked about the New World Order all the fucking time.
He's the guy who was more than Bush.
He loved.
If you read any of his speeches, he throws that shit around like it's going out of style.
Here's an excerpt from another one of his speeches from 2007.
So you can see how nefarious and scary this stuff is.
Quote, our task as government leaders, and this is why the theme of the conference is so timely,
is to engage the citizens of our countries in discussing and then implementing with their active imagination,
the new policy program that ensures that the benefits of this emerging New World Order can be shared,
not just by some, but by all.
Terrifying.
Yeah, that's, that's, man.
It chills.
Yeah, man.
That HW one, that's real scary compared to all the rest of these.
Why?
So here's Kissinger again.
Well, we got a new contender.
His task will be to develop an overall strategy for America in this period when really a
New World Order can be created.
It's a great opportunity.
It isn't just a crisis.
So this one is him on a show called Squawks on Stocks, where he's being interviewed on
the stock market floor.
It's like the anniversary of him like going to China, I think.
Oh, okay.
So when, yeah.
So there's a reason for him to be there, but it's very weird.
Yeah.
One thing I want to point out is that if you watch this full interview, it's fucking insane.
The interviewer is discussing the ongoing hostilities between Israel and Palestine, and she asks
if it's all going to stop after Obama gets inaugurated for his first term.
She is straight up asking if the fighting in Gaza is something that's being orchestrated
by Obama for political gain.
And this is on CNBC.
Wow.
Obviously fuck Kissinger, but this interviewer is not looking crazy.
That is crazy.
Yeah.
He's like, what?
I had the people around because there's other people standing around looking at her.
Oh, okay.
Good.
Somebody reacted.
It wasn't just like, this is a totally normal question that we could have.
They do let her ask another question, but there is a definite look on a couple of faces
that's subtly like, what the hell?
Excuse me.
Mr. Kissinger, real quick, amazing record, by the way.
Are the Jews orchestrating this to elect Barack Obama president?
Just real quick off the top of your head.
It's uncomfortable.
So this clip comes after Kissinger has asked a strange question about what country's
relationship with the United States will define Obama's presidency.
It's such a weird question that I'm just going to play it and Kissinger's response
so you can sort of get the full context.
What do you think the most important thing is for Barack Obama?
Obviously you're here to talk about the anniversary for U.S.-China diplomatic relations,
but if you had to say this is going to be the country or the conflict or the place
that will define the Obama administration, what would it be?
The president-elect is coming into office at the moment when there are upheavals
in many parts of the world simultaneously.
You have India, Pakistan, you have the key-hearted movement.
So he can't really say that it's one problem, that it's the most important one,
but he can give new impetus to American foreign policy,
partly because the reception of him is so extraordinary around the world.
I think his task will be to develop an overall strategy for America in this period
when really a new world order can be created.
It's a great opportunity. It isn't just a crisis.
When you hear the question he's responding to in the full answer,
the context of this comment makes way more sense.
Depriving it of that context is really the only way this works,
as making it seem some kind of ominous, spooky, scary comment in this compilation.
Yeah, it's not like he said.
If I had that, I could have committed a lot more generously.
You know what? You are Alex Jones-ian in your impression work.
I'm not doing good work today. This has been a bad one for me.
I've never done a Kissinger before. I gave it a shot. Listen. Try things.
No one's accusing you of being the man of a million voices.
I am not accused of that by anyone.
So this next clip is, I feel like it's warmer.
It's not good, eventually, once we discuss why,
but at the surface level, it appears a lot warmer.
2009 is also the first year of global governance
with the establishment of the G20 in the middle of the financial crisis.
The Climate Conference in Copenhagen is another step towards
the global management of our planet.
So this is a clip from a speech that Herman von Rumpi gave
after he was elected as the first president of the European Council.
Prior to this point, there was a six-month rotation of presidents
where whichever country was president of the EU for that six-month chunk,
they also held the ceremonial position of president of the council.
They decided to go a different way with that in 2009.
So von Rumpi got elected.
Good for von.
Von Rumpi isn't talking about global government per se,
and he didn't even say New World Order in that clip.
He's talking about international cooperation
that was prompted by the worldwide economic crash of 2007-2008.
When he says that the G20 was formed in 2009, that's not accurate.
It was formed in 1999, but in 2008, in response to the global financial crisis,
they decided that they should have annual meetings
and that they would be the body where the primary economic cooperation conversations happened.
Prior to this, that was mostly the role of the G8, but in the wake of the financial crisis,
people recognized that there were other countries.
Are you done fucked up bigger time?
Yeah, the interconnectedness of world economies had more important actors in it than just those A8.
The reason that Rumpi says that this is the first year of global governance
is because the EU isn't a member of the G8.
Individual EU states are members, but the body itself is not.
Conversely, the EU is a member of the G20.
What Rumpi is saying is not that this is the first year of global governance,
it's that the forum where international economic cooperation conversations happen
is now the body that the EU, which he was just elected president of, is included in.
This one, it sounds the closest to making Alex's point,
but if you know a little bit about the situation and the context of what Rumpi is saying,
this clip doesn't say what Alex is presenting it to saying at all.
It's not talking about a new global government.
You know what? I'm going to say this right now, and I've got strong opinions about it.
I think that maybe short compilation videos aren't how you should learn about history.
No, but good for slam dunks.
Yes, that's true. Amazing for slam dunks.
Yes.
Rex Chapman.
Don't bring him up.
Oh, I know.
I feel like he's a better dunker than a tweeter.
He was. I would say, I don't know how his dunks are now.
So disappointing.
Yes, so we have one last clip that's within this compilation,
and then Alex comes in with sort of a coda.
Are you optimistic a global system can happen from what we've heard so far?
It could happen, and in fact, it's in the work.
And they use that plan to create crises, to consolidate control, to bankrupt you,
to make you poor in steps until you can be starved to death and killed.
Sure.
You will own nothing. You will have nothing. You will like it because you will be dead.
So we have Soros on some interview show saying that a global system is in the works
with absolutely no context about what's being discussed.
I think at this point you can see the game that's being played here
and how all of these clips are meant to come at you fast and without any surrounding context.
If you're overwhelmed by what appears to be a ton of powerful people saying that there's a new world order afoot
and then Alex comes back in the studio and says that this is their plan to kill you,
you might just accept him at his word.
However, if you like conspiracy theorists' love to say, do your research
and take a little bit of time to ask the question of where these clips came from
and what's the context, you'll easily see that the conclusion Alex taxed on there at the end
about this being a plan to kill you is laughable.
This compilation doesn't establish or build to this conclusion at all.
It's just smoke and mirrors because that's all this shit is.
And where was Klaus Schwab? He wasn't in there at all.
No.
And again, you can see the drumbeat of you will own nothing and you'll be happy.
That mantra, you can see it. It's just simple anchoring.
So annoying.
Repeating this phrase like he does is meant to lodge it in the audience's mind
and connect it to other ideas like they want to kill you.
Yep.
It's a subconscious manipulation that he's doing.
Yep.
Real, real bad.
It is.
It is.
Yeah.
I really, really despise those types of slogans because you know that they're just like,
they're what you hear before the boot stomps on your face.
Like that kind of shit.
Like they're taking everything away from us as right before they shoot you is like,
you before I die, I have to say, wait one second, you realize the,
and then I'm dead.
The problem with it too is that like obviously it did come from a world
economic forum video that they put out like it is a caption that's on there.
Sure.
So it's their fault that they did.
Well, of course, but the actual context of it is being abused and misrepresented.
And I just hate.
I mean, obviously you can't always be playing defense like against what
conspiracy theorists are going to use your content for right, but something
like that.
I feel like maybe saying New World Order is an own goal.
Okay, you don't always have to be playing defense, but don't kick the ball
into your own fucking goal.
I kind of disagree because like as evidenced by you trying to come up
with words that would replace it novel global structure.
I think that works.
I'm going to use that one from now on.
That's not as bad as it could be.
It could be worse.
New World Order does sound better.
It does.
It's got a ring to it, but that's only because we've seen it in so many conspiracy videos
and movies and all that shit before because of Scott Hall.
It's repeated.
It's repeated in our, it's just like where we wear the take all your stuff and you
will have nothing in the like it.
That's the, that's the phrase they're talking about the devil.
Yeah.
So here's just some random rambling.
Let me tell you, when I go to a liberal area of Austin or LA or San Francisco
or Seattle or New York, I don't drive by and look at the ghostly looking
people, the ghoulish eyes, how unalive they are, how stupid they are, how weak
they are, how scared they are and feel powerful myself.
It makes me feel weak to see my fellow humans in that condition.
But for the globalists, when they see the homeless shelters and the needles and the
trendies offering their children up to pedophile story time, they feel powerful.
They've broken your life force and broken your will.
But by just opening up to God and saying, save me, help me, take me to the infinite.
I want to be good and strong.
I believe in goodness.
You will begin to elevate your spirit.
Literally electrochemically, it will manifest into a higher vibration.
That's right.
New age.
That's not that science folks.
What that science.
So this is, this is something that can be replicated in repeated studies.
If I understand correctly, science says that if you drop down on your knees
and accept Jesus Christ into your heart, then you will, of course, magnetically
begin to accelerate to a higher plane on a different vibration.
Science says that.
Science.
It's science, Dan.
Vibration.
It's not new age.
These are the conversations that they're having at the big boy table.
Billionaires everywhere.
This is an adult conversation.
Cool.
So we get to the bug eating.
I do so love when we bookend something to the point where I've completely forgotten
about it by the end of the show.
Half the goal.
Half the fun.
No, you fucking love it.
These aren't the good guys.
But they know that they, that we manifest what we believe in.
So they tell us you own nothing.
You have nothing.
You're a failure.
You're ugly.
You're going to eat bugs and you get used to that.
Your mind starts becoming comfortable with it.
Instead of, I will not eat your bugs and I will have children and we will colonize
space and we will transcend your new world order.
What?
God is real and you are not God and we are not under your control.
We are under God's control and we choose liberty and justice and freedom.
Incredible.
We're going to go to break.
I want to encourage listeners to understand that the heat of the battle for
Info Wars is here.
Plus we have great products.
If you were ever going to buy a book, a film, a t-shirts now at the time, we're
selling out of t-shirts even at below cost, some of them, at 75% off.
We've got to get all the funds in.
We can right now with some undridges we have.
It's a 25 to 75% off on things like Vaso beats that are back at stock.
You know who else said that you'll have nothing and you'll be happy about it?
Uh-huh.
Marie Kondo.
Oh, is that right?
I would say that if this is accurate at all, what Alex is talking about,
things are looking real bad.
Things are real bad.
If he's selling out things at prices that are under cost because he can't make
operating expenses, the goose is basically cooked.
I guess he could sell out all his shit and then maybe it puts a bandaid on
things for a bit, but this problem isn't going to go away because ultimately
this propaganda platform is a model that's doomed to fail.
Actually, Alex's propaganda platform is a great example of how sometimes
growth can be bad.
If he'd stayed humble and kept things in the mid range like where he was in
2008 or 2012 yelling about how Ron Paul should have won the primary and showing
up at places with bullhorn every once in a while, he could have been comfortable
to rich probably for the rest of his life and he would have been able to
continue to pretend to fight an info war against imaginary enemies.
The growth is what's killing Alex.
It's the overhead and the expenses and the worthless employees on his payroll.
A propagandist doesn't need that kind of hassles.
A propagandist is born to run free, bullhorn in hand, making up shit about
books he's never read.
This, a man selling his wares at a loss just so he can afford to pay a dork
like Harrison Smith to host a pointless show to pad out the content he's putting out,
that's a debasement.
That is no good.
This is not how God intended a propagandist to live.
Nope.
Also, something in that clip stuck out to me where Alex said,
we're not under your control.
We're under God's control and we choose liberty and justice and freedom.
That thought is completely nonsensical.
How does one choose freedom if they're under a deity's control?
If you're under someone's control, that means you don't have free will and thus
can't choose anything, let alone choosing to be free, which is a confounding idea.
But of course, Alex believes that God is a free will kind of God,
so maybe being under his control is to have free will.
But in that case, what does it even mean to have free will?
Pretty much nothing.
That would tend to imply that people who aren't under God's control don't have free will,
but then how can they possibly be condemned for the fact that they're not under God's control?
They can't choose to be under God's control.
They have no free will.
I don't think you understand, okay, Dan?
When God created the universe, he also created the end of the universe simultaneously.
He knows everything that begins and ends.
He knows everything that will happen.
And that means that you have the ability to choose what's going to happen, right?
Can I actually tell you, I read this really great book about free will and determinism recently.
It was called Knowing, starring Nicholas Hage.
Which I have some continuity.
So Alex gets a little bit worked up because he thinks that the globalist want you to kill your pets.
Oh, no. That's the first time that I believe the globalist.
Or maybe I've just been wrong.
Maybe I should submit and maybe we should all go out today with hatchets
and kill our dogs in the backyards and our cats.
Because it's to save the earth, right?
We're supposed to give up everything we've got because we're bad.
We're guilty because we have dogs and cats.
We're guilty because we have children. We're evil.
But none of that's even true.
It's all a greedy group of monsters that want you to learn to hate yourself
so you roll over into the ditch of history so they can steal the future.
They're projecting their globalist hatred of themselves onto you and I.
All the beautiful nice things they have and the science they have came from the commoners,
came from the people. We built all this.
And now they've got their robots coming online and they say they don't need us anymore
and we're supposed to just hate ourselves and go commit collective suicide.
Well, guess what? It's not going to happen.
Okay.
Or maybe it should happen. Maybe.
Maybe I'm wrong. Maybe I am the bad guy, like the media says.
Maybe because I don't want to kill my new puppy. I'm the bad guy.
Maybe I should kill the puppy.
I want to apologize to the United Nations.
What the fuck just happened?
The World Economic Forum. I want to apologize to Bloomberg,
the owner, the billionaire owner of Bloomberg and the publication and the BBC
and all the other groups that came out yesterday and said we should kill our dogs and cats
to save the earth and to cut our carbon footprint and to stop Vladimir Putin.
They actually said that and I came out against that and was wrong.
I have never seen this level of preparation on Alex's show.
The idea that he's in the middle of what appears to be a rant about something
and then it throws to a video about the same subject that he did in advance.
Like he prepared this. That's, I mean, it's really a low bar,
but it's impressive for him.
I thought, I, here's, here's what I thought.
You almost, you almost fell out of your chair.
100% thought it was a complete accident.
Somebody had accidentally like overlaid the broadcast with an old video or something,
or maybe they had like hit the, they'd run out of the five second delay after he was
talking about killing pets and then it got real weird, you know, and they just cut away.
No, this was on purpose. Yeah. Wow. Impressive. That 28 years into his career.
He's figured this out. Not once did that thought occur to me independently.
Well, I'm not positive about this because we've listened to so much of his show.
Yeah, but I don't think I've ever seen anything that coherent.
Yeah, like in terms of a pre-recorded piece, right?
Maybe once. I would, I'd afford possibly once.
You know, it is good to show some real growth at that.
You know, at the end of your career, it's, it's a good time to really still show that you can learn new tricks.
You know, this would be like, if you saw this on a local access thing, you'd be like, well, see, but that was what he was doing 28 years ago.
Right. Well, so that's a bizarre clip there beyond just these reasons.
There's two features that look really bad when there's further context than you understand, Alex.
Just off the top, though, Bloomberg and all these papers didn't say that you should kill your pets.
There was an op-ed in Bloomberg that was a bit tone deaf, perhaps, but it was just about ways that people could deal with inflation.
It wasn't even about like, it's bad for the earth or anything.
Although that is a topic that has been written about in the past, like going back a ways, the carbon footprint of pet ownership.
So one of the main problems about this Bloomberg thing, though, is that it was addressed to people who make less than $300,000 a year.
So just from that premise, it's going to piss some people off and they did get dunked on.
I am shocked that people would hear from Bloomberg.com, you know, things that maybe are tone deaf towards the poor.
So in the tweet, it said that you should replace meat with lentils.
But the article actually just said it suggested meat substitutes like vegetables, lentils or beans.
So you can see that there's just like essential detail that's missing from the tweet, which is natural.
So another suggestion that's in the article is to quote, rethink those costly pet medical needs.
This wasn't saying that you should kill your pet or that you shouldn't take your pet to the vet,
but that some expenses related to pets might not be good expenses.
The next line in the article is quote, it may sound harsh, but researchers actually don't recommend pet chemotherapy,
which can cost up to $10,000 for ethical reasons.
Even though this article sucks and it was rightly conned on by Twitter, it's really obvious that Alex is creating a fake version of it to get mad at,
saying that they're telling you to kill your pets.
Now, the two things that are problematic about this clip are one, Alex is supposed to be in the grips of some really serious emergency situation with his health
and he has to avoid any stress, but here he is on air getting himself worked up,
whether genuinely or as a performance, which would be pretty bad for his blood pressure.
He should probably calm down.
Yeah. And two, Alex has a rich history about talking about killing dogs on way more than one occasion in the past.
He's gone on and on about how he's killed dogs.
So I don't know if he's actually the best messenger for this right wing fake outrage about this article.
I think it kind of makes his supposed comedy piece.
He cuts there at the end a little bit less impactful.
Yeah.
The satire of that piece is supposed to be that it's outlandish to imagine Alex killing his pet, but it's not.
Nope.
He's talked about doing that very thing a bunch in the past.
Yep.
I don't know.
It doesn't.
It hits differently, as the kids say.
I mean, it is kind of like him being like, what kind of psychopath would talk about killing their dog?
Cut to.
Yeah, exactly.
It's like, what are we doing?
I had to stomp on this dog's head.
I've never thought about things for more than a second.
Yeah.
It's a total mess.
Insane.
So look, the second hour, there's a lot of time spent with Alex interviewing his former employee, Savannah Hernandez.
Here's what happened.
She got kicked off Twitter after posting some videos of her interviewing people about how unfair it is that Lea Thomas is allowed to compete in women's swimming.
Oh, she was doing some transphobia.
Yes.
Gotcha.
But as it turns out, she wasn't actually kicked off for the video.
She was kicked off for creating a new account to evade a previous ban.
And the way that her new video went viral in the right wing media, it brought her ban evasion to Twitter's attention.
So her new account got banned.
Okay.
She was originally kicked off in 2020 for election related misinformation.
Sure.
Anyway, she's gone on to become a personality and a producer at the Blaze, which is probably really smart for her career.
It's still a dead end, but at very least Glenn Beck isn't selling products at below cost in order to squeeze out a couple more months on air.
Yeah.
I'm not going to cover her interview because honestly, I don't care.
I'm just going to play this one clip because I think it really illustrates how little Alex does like he doesn't even know what he's talking about.
So he's got multiple aspects of this story wrong.
The first is that the interview Savannah did was not with someone who filed the complaint.
It was just a person who had some slightly critical comments about Thomas and her complaint seemed to be about how her friend didn't make finals.
And I guess that she would have if Thomas hadn't been swimming.
Right.
I don't recommend pursuing this line of thinking to its logical conclusion because it doesn't go anywhere good.
The second thing that Alex has wrong here is that the person Savannah was interviewing didn't get kicked off Twitter.
Savannah did.
This is the entire reason this is a story and why Alex would be having Savannah on.
She's doing a right wing media blitz to strike while the iron's hot and her victim hood argument is fresh in people's minds.
It's honestly bizarre that Alex doesn't even seem to understand the premise of the interview he's agreed to do on his show.
He is literally no preparation for this at all.
Anyway, like I said, and you said this interview is just transphobia.
That's pure.
Yeah, that's all that's going on here.
It's basically concern trolling to where these folks attempt to mask their underlying intense bigotry behind a pretend sincere concern about women swimming.
Yeah.
Look at the fuck out of here.
I mean, it is.
It's so fucking bullshit.
How how dare you how fuck.
I mean, not just that, but simply because like Bill Burr made the transphobic joke that everybody's been dining out on on the far right like 10 years ago in one of his specials.
And it was done in a completely different context to make it look like he's the idiot for having this kind of thought process whatsoever.
But fuck it.
They're just going to do the same fucking bullshit because it doesn't matter.
It doesn't matter what it is.
If it's not sports, it's there.
They shouldn't be in the bathrooms.
If it's not the bathrooms, it's they shouldn't be in the same restaurants.
It doesn't fucking matter.
Right.
It's just that they exist.
I agree.
It's infuriating.
Yep.
It sucks.
So if you're somebody who's had his lawyer contact court and say that you have a serious emergency medical condition.
I would say you probably wouldn't want to then go to work and do a ridiculous pageant of a show the next day, right?
Maybe.
And definitely if you did do that, you probably wouldn't want to say on air that you're going to come back and do another show that evening.
Yes, that would be bad.
This is definitely real.
This is all out in the open.
The New World Waters out in the open.
We're going to have a special live info wars broadcast tonight from at least seven to nine commercial free to take phone calls on the great reset on the New World Order.
I don't know what you think we should do as callers to stop this.
It'll be info wars.com streams.
I don't know if he actually ended up following through with that, but I would just not have done that.
Yeah.
I mean, if the next clip is him saying like never felt better in my life.
This is as good as it gets for me.
I feel like I've lost like five pounds in the past couple of days.
Like what?
What are we talking about?
I was kind of hoping that there would be some clip of him trying to sell his supplements a bit like I feel like.
Look at how great I feel because I took this one supplement.
Yeah, of course.
That would be ironic.
That would be great.
So we have one last clip and it's because Alex for the third hour does interview that economist stock picker guy.
Sure.
I just I he sucks.
I don't even care.
Here's just a clip of Alex getting into the interview.
They're publicly announcing the NIH what we already knew, but now admitted.
Paid to have them give people these assisted suicide drugs that they bought a bunch of right before the pandemic record levels.
And we know the same thing here.
Give them morphine.
Don't give them treatment.
Watch them die.
But to read this, here's the headline.
Hospitals bribe to put patients on pathway to death.
Cash incentives by the National Health Service Trust that meet targets on Liverpool care pathway.
The third hour is him doing this interview with the stock trader, Edward Dowd, who seems in completely insane.
He's on to talk about how the government's killing everyone with code vaccines and what have you.
Sure.
Alex's central piece of evidence in covering this story seems to be this article about the Liverpool care pathway,
which Alex is pretending as a current story and has to do with the pandemic.
He obviously forgot to check the date on the article he's reading.
He didn't look into this at all, so he has no idea it's a decade old story and that the LCP was phased out in 2013.
I don't know how else to put this.
This shit's embarrassing.
If Alex cared at all about the quality of the work he's doing,
realizing that he fucked this up, that badge should be a huge issue for him.
He should do a big segment on the next episode about how important it is to check dates on stories
and how he had it wrong and that they weren't giving people assisted suicide drugs.
But Alex doesn't have to do any of that.
His audience accepts whatever trash he gives them.
There's no incentive to do better than trash and that's what this is.
It's trash.
Absolute trash.
This show is, at the present day, more or less a combination of extreme bigotry
and incompetently delivered false news stories.
I think I say this a bit, but it bears repeating.
There's no value in the existence of Info Wars as a piece of the information landscape.
It's full on completely negative in terms of what it brings to society.
You think about the position that I came from early on doing this show.
I think that I had a position that was far more like,
there's a place for something like Alex in the world.
I still kind of believe that that's true.
There's a place for skeptical voice, but that's not what this is.
There's a world where in Alex Jones' performance is appreciated
because it is not having any effect on people's actual lives.
Well, we're in the unfortunate world where the performance is very much hurtful.
I would take issue with how you phrase that.
I disagree slightly because I don't think that even in a different organized world,
this has value.
Oh, no, no, absolutely not this.
I think that there is a model of somebody who can be generally wrong,
but asking pointed questions that does have a societal value.
Right.
And that's the position that I kind of felt like this is the idea of Alex.
Right.
And it's not.
Well, what he should be is the buffoon.
The buffoon, the architect, the jester.
No, no, no.
Just that, that fucking idiot who sometimes says something and you're like,
Oh, instead of being the idiot who says nonstop bigot stuff.
Well, yeah.
What if the, what if the buffoon is a hateful bigot and then also says that
they're right all the time and tries to sell you shit?
There's no place in the world for that.
Not even in the media landscape.
I mean, just in the world, I just, I think what I'm trying to get at when I'm
starting to stress is that that like there may have been a time now when
listening to Alex Jones could give you like maybe point.
Oh, one value point.
Oh, one info units compared to reading a new story,
which might be like one info you right.
Right.
Yeah, you get like I like the system we're developing trace amounts of info
units.
We've developed the metric system for media.
So it might be in the negatives.
It is negative 10 info units.
You lose information.
You die slower or faster.
Yeah.
It's, oh man.
Anyway, I, I'm interested to see where his health situation goes.
Yeah.
I'm interested to see some of these other court cases,
what, what develops with them and whether he's back in studio on Friday.
We'll see.
Yeah.
Any, any outcome is possible.
Funny if he shows up in studio on Friday.
Of course he is on a treadmill.
He's got a show.
I think it'd be better if he shows up at a stretcher wheel him in have him have
him late do it.
The whole show laying down.
Oh, that's the way you do it.
One way or another.
I demand pageant.
Absolutely.
And we will not get it, but we'll be back on Monday.
Yes, we will.
And until then, Jordan, we have a website.
We do.
It's knowledge fight.com.
Yep.
We're also on Twitter.
We are on Twitter.
It's at knowledge underscore fight and I go to bed Jordan.
Yep.
I feel like I can't say Dr. Marbles anymore since Dr. Marbles.
Oh, yeah.
I thought he was going to be someone who showed up and then disappeared.
Yeah.
Funny name.
Nope.
Now he's a international man of peace.
Oh, well, back to the oldie, but a goodie.
We'll be back.
But until then, I'm Leo and Leo.
I'm DZX Clark.
I'm Darryl Rundis.
And now here comes the sex robot, Andy and Kansas.
You're on the air.
Thanks for holding.
Hello, Alex.
I'm a first time caller.
I'm a huge fan.
I love your work.
I love your work.