Legal AF by MeidasTouch - WOW! Trump OUTMANEUVERED by FED UP Judge in NEW ORDER
Episode Date: August 7, 2024In a new series of 8 orders Judge Chutkan in the Trump DC election interference criminal case, has asserted her muscle and denied attempts by purported “victims” of Trump’s election crimes to fi...le papers and participate in hearings in the case. Michael Popok explains why it is the right thing to lock the door to phony participants, as the judge stays laser focuses on making some of the most important decisions in criminal justice history about Trump and his crimes. Try Mosh today and use LEGALAF to save 20% plus free shipping at https://moshlife.com/LEGALAF Visit https://meidastouch.com for more! Join the Legal AF Patreon: https://Patreon.com/LegalAF Remember to subscribe to ALL the MeidasTouch Network Podcasts: MeidasTouch: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/meidastouch-podcast Legal AF: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/legal-af MissTrial: https://meidasnews.com/tag/miss-trial The PoliticsGirl Podcast: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-politicsgirl-podcast The Influence Continuum: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-influence-continuum-with-dr-steven-hassan Mea Culpa with Michael Cohen: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/mea-culpa-with-michael-cohen The Weekend Show: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-weekend-show Burn the Boats: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/burn-the-boats Majority 54: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/majority-54 Political Beatdown: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/political-beatdown Lights On with Jessica Denson: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/lights-on-with-jessica-denson On Democracy with FP Wellman: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/on-democracy-with-fpwellman Uncovered: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/maga-uncovered Coalition of the Sane: https://meidasnews.com/tag/coalition-of-the-sane Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
This is Michael Popak, Legal AF.
Judge Chutkin already has her hands full with Donald Trump
on one side and the special counsel on the other.
And she doesn't need any other parties involved in the case.
And we know that because she just issued a new order in which
she's denied apparently about eight different motions, which
appear to be coordinated for people who claim to be victims
under the Crime Victims Relief Act of 2004,
claiming that they were victims of
Donald Trump's four crimes.
And therefore, under the Crime Victims Relief Act, the CVRA, they're entitled, if they were
truly victims, they're entitled to various things like to participate in the proceedings,
to be there live, to be able to file papers in the case.
And the judge got these at the last minute back in February,
but we just know about them now because she's denied their participation claiming that they
are not victims. We have a new ruling. Let me break it all down for you. First of all,
we got Judge Chutkin back in her chair, back in the driver's seat, being placed there by the DC
Court of Appeals and by the Supreme Court.
She has regained jurisdiction in the case, as we like to say, and now she's busy kind of cleaning up
the underbrush and getting ready for the August 16th hearing that she's going to be conducting
about how to put the wheels back on this wagon and get this four count case against Donald Trump
moving again in light of the immunity decision that she's now going to have to apply issued by the Supreme Court in July. That's the Crime Victim Relief Act of
2004, which for those that are playing at home can be found at 18 USC 3771 of the federal statutes,
basically gives rights to people who can legitimately claim to be victims directly or
proximately who have been harmed by alleged federal offenses, could be crimes or misdemeanors.
This usually is embodied by physical, emotional, or financial harm. I presume, because we haven't
seen the filings, because the judge wouldn't allow them to be filed, you have to make a request.
That request is off-docket, if you will.
We didn't know about it until now.
It was done in February.
The reporting is there were about eight of them, and they all claimed to be victims.
We're victims.
I presume they're claiming that because Donald Trump tried to interfere with the election, he's charged with defrauding the
United States with obstructing an official proceeding, that they are voters, they are part
of the electorate that almost had their vote denied because of the clinging to power or have
some other argument for a victim status. But the judge is not buying into that. Let me just read you what she has written.
She's written that leave to file denied and there are 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 orders,
but they're all identical, meaning this was sort of a coordinated effort. It says leave to file
an amended application for CVRA relief. That's the Crime Victim Reliefs Act, dated
6-13-2024. There was one on 7-7-2024, 7-10-2024, 7-11-2024, 7-12-2024, and 7-19-2024. These
are all motions to supplement a petition or motion for leaves on a petition. So we got those eight filings the court has said uniformly in response to following.
Although courts have in rare instances exercised their discretion to permit third party submissions
in criminal cases, neither the federal rules or criminal procedure nor the local criminal
rules contemplate that practice. Movement asserts a right to file on this docket under the CVRA, but they do not establish
that they qualify as victim under the CVRA statutory definition.
Back to what I said before, in order to be a victim, you've got to show physical, emotional,
or financial harm directly or proximately caused by the crime, usually after the crime
has been committed,
convicted, and adjudged, not while it's still in progress, but we'll leave that aside for a
minute. The judge goes on to say, consequently, the victim's rights enumerated in the CVRA do
not attach and the court is not persuaded that it is appropriate to depart from the ordinary course
and permit this filing." Then she reminded everybody
that the document is unavailable because the court has denied its filing signed Tanya Chutkin.
What does it all mean? The older I get, the more I find myself wanting to be more intentional about
the way I live, eat, and take care of my body. MOSH, which you may have heard about on Shark Tank,
was founded by Maria Shriver and her son Patrick Schwarzenegger.
And they have a simple mission to create a conversation about brain health through food,
education, and research.
MOSH joined forces with the world's top scientists and functional nutritionists to go beyond
your average protein bar.
With 10 delicious flavors, including three that are plant-based,
each Mosh Bar is made with ingredients
that support brain health, like Ashwagandha,
Lion's Mane, collagen, and Omega-3s.
Mosh is now the first and only food brand
boosted with Cognizant, a premium nootropic
that supplies the brain with a patented form of Cytokoline.
Look, I can truly say mosh bars taste heavenly
and I've been loving their banana bread bars.
The energy boost these bad boys give me in the morning
is unparalleled.
With the fresh kick of energy
and brain health supporting supplements
in their fresh formulas,
you can bet I'll be coming back to them.
If you want to find ways to give back to others and fuel your body and your brain,
Mosh Bars are the perfect choice for you.
Head to moshlife.com slash legal AF to save 20% off plus free shipping on either the bestsellers trial pack or the new plant-based
trial pack.
That's 20% off plus free shipping on either the bestsellers or plant-based trial pack
at moshlife.com slash legal AF.
Thank you, Mosh, for sponsoring this episode.
It means that the judge runs a tight ship as we expected.
She's got her hands full.
She's got enough with the parties to the case,
the people, the United States of America
represented by the special counsel on one side
and Donald Trump on the other.
She already has to take and map onto the indictment
and make major decisions about liberty,
about somebody's liberty, about somebody's liberty,
Donald Trump's liberty, about justice. She has to take the July 1st Trump versus
United States immunity decision which went pro-