Legal AF by MeidasTouch - WTH! Trump Judge Makes SHOCKING DECISION in Texas
Episode Date: September 20, 2024A Trump Texas federal judge just put labor and employee lives at risk by finding that the National Labor Relations Board has no power to enforce its own regulations or use its own expert regulators an...d judges to enforce its rules. Michael Popok explains why the real culprit is a little-covered decision back in June by the United States Supreme Court penned by Chief Justice Roberts that completely dismantled how the government protects people through federal agencies and their regulatory enforcement actions. Visit https://upliftdesk.com/legalaf and get four free accessories, plus an extra discount off your entire order. Visit https://meidastouch.com for more! Join the Legal AF Patreon: https://Patreon.com/LegalAF Remember to subscribe to ALL the MeidasTouch Network Podcasts: MeidasTouch: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/meidastouch-podcast Legal AF: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/legal-af MissTrial: https://meidasnews.com/tag/miss-trial The PoliticsGirl Podcast: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-politicsgirl-podcast The Influence Continuum: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-influence-continuum-with-dr-steven-hassan Mea Culpa with Michael Cohen: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/mea-culpa-with-michael-cohen The Weekend Show: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-weekend-show Burn the Boats: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/burn-the-boats Majority 54: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/majority-54 Political Beatdown: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/political-beatdown Lights On with Jessica Denson: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/lights-on-with-jessica-denson On Democracy with FP Wellman: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/on-democracy-with-fpwellman Uncovered: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/maga-uncovered Coalition of the Sane: https://meidasnews.com/tag/coalition-of-the-sane Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Looking for a collaborator for your career? A strong ally to support your next level success?
You will find it at York University School of Continuing Studies,
where we offer career programs purpose-built for you.
Visit continue.yorku.ca
What's 2FA security on Kraken?
Let's say I'm captaining my soccer team, and we're up by a goal against, I don't
know, the Burlington Bulldogs. Do we relax? No way. Time to create an extra line of defense
and protect that lead. That's like 2FA on Kraken. A surefire way to keep what you already
have safe and sound. Go to kraken.com and see what crypto can be. Not investment advice.
Crypto trading involves risk of loss. See kraken.com slash legal slash ca dash pru dash disclaimer
for info on Kraken's undertaking to register in Canada.
I'm going back to university for $0 delivery fee,
up to 5% off orders and 5% Uber cash back on rides.
Not whatever you think university is for.
Get Uber One for students.
With deals this good, everyone wants to be a student.
Join for just $4.99 a month.
Savings may vary, eligibility and member terms apply.
The all new FanDuel Sportsbook and Casino
is bringing you more action than ever.
Want more ways to follow your faves?
Check out our new player prop tracking
with real-time notifications.
Or have out more ways to customize your casino page
with our new favorite and recently played games tabs.
And to top it all off, quick and secure withdrawals.
Get more everything with FanDuel Sportsbook and Casino.
Gambling problem?
Call 1-866-531-2600.
Visit connexontario.ca.
What does possible sound like for your business?
It's more cash on hand to grow with up to 55 interest-free days.
Redefine possible with Business Platinum.
That's the powerful backing of American Express.
Terms and conditions apply.
Visit amex.ca slash business platinum.
This is Michael Popak, Legal AF. Well, that didn't take long. The United States Supreme Court's decision in June in a case called Jenksy versus the Securities and Exchange Commission,
in which Chief Justice Roberts effectively dismantled the whole of all regulatory enforcement
power for all agencies in America,
the Securities and Exchange Commission,
the National Labor Relations Board,
the Office of Environmental Protection, all of that.
We said that at the time,
that the Janksees decision will go down as probably the decision
that most impacts in a negative way everybody's day-to-day life.
Well, we now see the result.
We have a Texas judge, Judge Pittman, of all things, in Fort Worth Division in the Northern
District of Texas, who just ruled that the National Labor Relations Board and its use
of an administrative law judge, which is an internal judge which is used for people to deal with NLRB complaints against them, is unconstitutional
because the NLRB's administrative law judge can't be removed and has insulated itself from the powers
of the presidency under Article 2. Let me put that in English. Under the Janksy decision,
the United States Supreme Court ruled in June
that people that are in a regulatory enforcement process
have the right to have an Article III judge,
a judge at the federal court level,
and a jury trial to decide their issues.
And the 50 years or more of history
in which all enforcement proceedings
against anybody brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Commodities and
Futures Trade Commission, the EPA, and any other agency that you can think of, all got
done sort of hermetically sealed within the agency itself with the experts of the agency
and an administrative law judge.
That's gone.
That's wrecked. Now, there is no more administrative law judge, effectively.
And so, it does not surprise me that in this new case called, wait for it,
I love when sometimes cases have funny names and you have to keep repeating them, but here we go,
Aunt Bertha versus the National Labor Relations Board, this new case by Judge Pittman, who hold your thought, it is the same judge
that threw out President Biden's loan forgiveness for students issue.
We'll talk about that in a minute.
And some other national injunctions that he's issued, which even the right wing of the United
States Supreme Court don't like national injunctions.
But let's leave it for a minute.
Aunt Bertha is really not Aunt Bertha. Aunt Bertha is really a business called Find Help, and Find Help brought
an emergency application for preliminary injunction arguing to this federal judge
that the entirety of the National Labor Relations Board and its use of an
administrative law judge as part of its enforcement proceedings is illegal and
unconstitutional. And Pittman bought it, mainly referring to the case that came out of the Fifth Circuit,
which covers Texas, all the way to the United States Supreme Court called Janksy versus
the Securities and Exchange Commission.
We said at the time, I had been my Salas and me during our weekend Legal AF, we said at
the time, this case alone, throwing over the apple cart of 50 to 75 years of regulatory enforcement powers and proceedings to
make people's lives better. The Environmental Protection Agency to make clean water and air
now has to go back to the drawing board about how to implement their enforcement power,
have to wind their way through a four, five or 10 year federal trial process instead of, let's say, in less than a year in an administrative law
proceeding. We said that's going to touch more lives in a negative way than mainly anything else
that we're talking about. I mean, we think the immunity decision is terrible for our
Constitutional Republic, but your day-to-day life, clean water, clean air, energy, how much you pay,
how much you pay at the pump, how labor unions are treated, work conditions and things like that. That comes out of the
administrative state, administrative law judges. We have something. Let me do a quick
Patreon legal AF breakout session here. Congress speaks and issues laws and regulations,
but the details of those regulations
and how they are once the law is passed,
that's left to the agencies, the experts in the area,
the scientists, the economists,
the people that are in that industry to create
through the code of federal regulation,
regulations that need to be followed
and administered by that agency.
As part of that, there's something called
the Administrative Procedures Act,
the APA, we're taught it in law school.
And the APA governs how you use administrative law judges
and how issues of dispute resolution
and enforcement proceedings are done
in every agency in America.
That was all completely ripped away. The heart was ripped out of the Administrative Procedures
Act, the APA. All of the ALJs, administrative law judges who work inside of agencies was
called into question, said to be unconstitutional, and then everybody had the right to go run
to your local federal district court and get in line in a four or five year period. You're on a
runway in an airport, that's when your airplane's taken off four or five, ten years from now.
Administrative law judges, yes, were experts in the field and understood this area of the law,
usually from the industry itself. And they were independent, but they were arbiters. And if you
didn't like that ruling, you had very limited effects on appeal.
Now look, when I used to work on Wall Street
and worked inside of a Wall Street firm,
we hated the administrative law judges.
We hated the Securities and Exchange Commissions,
at least I did,
the Securities and Exchange Commission's ability
through regulatory enforcement actions
to use their handpicked judges to make decisions.
So I kind of get it.
But now that I'm on the other side, you know, throwing over and replacing our administrative state, administrative regulatory
environment enforcement proceedings, and then just substituting it for getting lined at the
local courthouse with some judge who doesn't have any time or attention or knowledge or
background in this area, it's terrible. But now we've got in Aunt Bertha,
Judge Pittman, who's made the decision in a seven-page decision that since the administrative law
judge is protected from being removed, therefore the president can't remove them like any Article
3 judge would. We call federal judges Article 3 judges. He can't use his Article 2 power of the Constitution to remove an Article 3 judge. Unconstitutional use of a judge. Get rid of him.
Granted. Injunction granted. Aunt Bertha, you don't have to go through an NLRB, National Labor
Relations Board hearing that's headed by an administrative law judge at all. In fact,
you get to go to court under the Jenksy decision,
which came out of the Fifth Circuit binding precedent
up to the United States Supreme Court.
That's what Judge Pittman said.
I spend most of my day in front of a screen and a microphone.
And this used to mean I spent a lot of my day sitting.
The research on sitting for long periods
has been linked with various conditions,
such as poor heart health, bad posture, diabetes, and the list goes on.
This is why I love uplift desk and their ergonomic desks and chairs.
A standing desk can help lower your risk of disease, improve your mood and focus, boost
productivity and increase your energy.
I use my uplift desk every day.
When I'm standing up thinking with a cup
of Joe about how to prepare for my next hot take or podcast episode, I'm not
staring into space. It's my most productive ruminating and cogitating
me time at my uplift desk. And only when I'm on my feet do my creative juices
really start to flow. The option to move while I work promotes better circulation which can reduce all types of different health risks and
repetitive strains. Uplift Desk helps you build your custom dream desk by
choosing from over a hundred desktop choices and hundreds of accessories.
Their desk configurator lets you build out a complete workstation with storage,
seating, wire management.
Listen, when I used it, I had my perfect dream standing desk that I've wanted for over 30 years
configured in less than 10 minutes. I had loads of fun configuring my uplift desk,
starting with picking my tabletop. I went with a beautiful walnut butcher block,
added white legs and storage drawers, wheels for mobility,
and a number of cool cable management and pop-up and power grommets for my perfect custom uplift
desk. I especially like the different control options and memory settings that puts the desk
at just the perfect height for me and lets my wife join in on the productive fun when she visits at the office too.
We've got a special deal and it's exclusive to our audience. When you visit our link at upliftdesk.com
slash Legal AF you're gonna get four free accessories. Free same-day shipping, free returns
with free shipping, and an industry-leading leading 15 year warranty that covers the entire
desk plus an extra discount off your entire order. That's U-P-L-I-F-T-D-E-S-K.com slash legalaf for
a special offer and it's only available at our link. Work better, live healthier with Uplift Desk.
Now, what I was concerned about when I heard about this Pittman ruling is two things.
One, it was Judge Pittman.
Two, that he may have issued a national injunction,
a universal injunction across the country.
Now he stopped short of a national or universal injunction.
What does that mean?
That means a district court judge
sitting in a small little division in Texas.
And there are a number of them, Abilene, Waco, this one, there's usually one judge or two judges,
and the MAGA run into those courtrooms to try to get these results.
And then they take that result, they get a national injunction, meaning it's imposed
across the entire country. country, right? Like when Judge Casmeric in Amarillo, Texas decided to issue a
nationwide injunction against the use of methamphetrysone as part of a
medicated abortion. One judge sitting by himself as ruler of the universe. Even
the Supreme Court finds abhorrent universal or national injunctions being issued by district
court judges. And where are they generally coming out of? The Fifth Circuit, which is Texas,
Louisiana, a right-wing, alt-right appellate court in the Fifth Circuit. And so I was fearful
that Pittman did that. Oop, here we go. He's's gonna challenge the entire National Labor Relations Board under JNCCC,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
the United for the Supreme Court.
He didn't do that.
He didn't go quite that far.
This decision only on its face applies to Aunt Bertha.
But of course it's gonna be used as binding precedent
because it's the only decision of the district court.
It's consistent with the Fifth Circuit's decision in J Jankse and the United States Supreme Court decision. So it might as well
be a universal injunction until somebody takes an appeal from there, hopefully the National Labor
Relations Board, takes the appeal to the Fifth Circuit where they will lose under Jankse and
then it will get to the United States Supreme Court. Maybe this term that starts the first
Monday in October for the Supreme Court and maybe not. But Pittman, we got to explore here for a minute. Pittman actually worked for
the Securities and Exchange Commission back in the day in Texas as an enforcement attorney. So he
kind of knows his way around agencies, I guess. He was also put on the bench in 2019 by Donald
Trump. And then he's had a series of decisions that have gone against the Biden, the Biden-Harris
administration.
In November 2022, he found, and not once, but twice, that the Biden-Harris administration
did not have the authority to forgive student loans, which is why Joe Biden has constantly
tried to help the American people, going back to the drawing board time and time again,
to try to find a way to forgive student loans.
But that's because of Pittman.
He also found that it was unconstitutional given the United States Supreme Court ruling
about guns in the Bruin versus New York Rifle Association case in which gave broad Second
Amendment powers, Second Amendment rights to people to carry their own guns,
including concealed weapons.
He found that bans on teenagers carrying concealed weapons
in Texas was unconstitutional.
So he was in favor of teenagers in Texas
carrying concealed weapons.
Even Texas and Governor Abbott there
thought that went too far.
You know, that's saying something.
When the governor of Texas thinks
maybe 18 to 20 year olds mental states
and what's going up up here in the old cranium
is not properly developed enough or mature enough
to be carrying a concealed weapon
into the public space and marketplace,
Pittman goes, no, no unconstitutional
United States Supreme Court.
He's very good at taking the messaging
out of the United States Supreme Court and applying it very good at taking the messaging out of the United States
Supreme Court and applying it immediately to cases in front of him. So what does this mean,
Popak, to ask my own question, to my daily life? It means that all of the agencies that were put
in place, the Consumer Protection Agency, the Environmental Protection Agency, the Securities
and Exchange Commission, the CFTC,
the Department of Justice, if you will, the National Labor Relations Board, things that
matter that address our logistics, our supply chain, our work conditions for laborers,
for union members and workers, the rights of people not to violate the law
and what their rights will be if they violate the law.
The Environmental Protection Agency on water
and clean energy and nuclear power and all of that,
it's all been destroyed by the United States Supreme Court
and the district court judges like Judge Pittman
are applying it in this way.
Meaning the new administration,
the new Harris administration is gonna have to go back
to the drawing board and design an enforcement mechanism
for each of these agencies that gets past
this right wing alt-right Supreme Court.
And fix it because we can't have no enforcement power
for these agencies, all bark and no bite.
We can't live in a Hobbesian society
where anybody just does whatever they want
to make whatever money they want,
no matter how many bones are broken.
Can't allow that.
So it's gonna be something that's gonna have to be
the top of the mind, top of the head for Kamala Harris
in executive orders in the first 180 days
when she gets back in.
It looks like under the Supreme Court,
she's gonna have to allow federal district judges to be the final arbiter, to be the judges of the cases and destroy all the administrative
law judges. Fire them all. There's not going to be able to be a design that I can see that's
going to allow an administrative law judge to continue to operate under the rulings
of the United States Supreme Court. But that's all right. Stop pinning your head against
the brick wall. Let's design something new. Enforcement is what's necessary. And we're running up against it with test cases like this one with Judge Pittman in
Texas. We'll continue to follow it all on the Midas Touch Network. We sit at the crossroads
of law and politics so you don't have to as practicing lawyers in these courtrooms telling
you our best analysis of what we think is going to happen. In fact, there's nowhere in YouTube
that has the level of commentary and analysis
on law and politics than on Legal AF.
Find out what 40 million people a month already know,
that Legal AF is the home of law and politics,
commentary and legal analysis, bar none.
Follow me, Michael Popak here
on the Midas Touch Network exclusively here
on Wednesdays and Saturdays.
We live record the podcast.
We get 20,000 people watching us on live record
on YouTube live.
We'll be in the top three in the entire world on that day.
Join us live chat with the anchors.
Wednesdays, I do it with Karen Freeman at Knitfollow.
Saturdays with Ben Mycelis.
And then on Hot Tixit like this,
about every hour to keep you updated.
And if you'd like to pick up your podcast
the old fashioned way like I do, OG, like to pick it up in audio format, just look for Legal AF.
There's our album cover. Plug it in wherever you get your audio podcasts from. So until my next hot
tick, until my next Legal AF, this is Michael Popak reporting. Hear ye, hear ye. Legal AF law
breakdown is now in session. Go beyond the headlines and get a deep dive into the important legal concepts you need to know
and we discuss every day on Legal AF.
Exclusive content you won't find anywhere else,
all for the price of a couple of cups of coffee.
Join us at patreon.com slash Legal AF.
That's patreon.com slash Legal AF.