Lex Fridman Podcast - #271 – Ariel Ekblaw: Space Colonization and Self-Assembling Space Megastructures

Episode Date: March 23, 2022

Ariel Ekblaw is the director of the MIT Space Exploration Initiative. Please support this podcast by checking out our sponsors: - BetterHelp: https://betterhelp.com/lex to get 10% off - Coinbase: https://coinbase.com/lex to get $10 in free Bitcoin - Indeed: https://indeed.com/lex to get $75 credit - ExpressVPN: https://expressvpn.com/lexpod and use code LexPod to get 3 months free - Athletic Greens: https://athleticgreens.com/lex and use code LEX to get 1 month of fish oil EPISODE LINKS: Ariel's Twitter: https://twitter.com/ariel_ekblaw MIT Space Exploration Initiative: https://media.mit.edu/groups/space-exploration Books and resources mentioned: Into the Anthropocosmos (book): https://amzn.to/3CUIchM Seveneves (book): https://amzn.to/36ipd4O Endurance (book): https://amzn.to/3CYdKDJ PODCAST INFO: Podcast website: https://lexfridman.com/podcast Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2lwqZIr Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2nEwCF8 RSS: https://lexfridman.com/feed/podcast/ YouTube Full Episodes: https://youtube.com/lexfridman YouTube Clips: https://youtube.com/lexclips SUPPORT & CONNECT: - Check out the sponsors above, it's the best way to support this podcast - Support on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/lexfridman - Twitter: https://twitter.com/lexfridman - Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/lexfridman - LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/lexfridman - Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/lexfridman - Medium: https://medium.com/@lexfridman OUTLINE: Here's the timestamps for the episode. On some podcast players you should be able to click the timestamp to jump to that time. (00:00) - Introduction (06:51) - Space exploration (15:58) - Swarm robotics and self-assembling space habitats (33:39) - Microgravity (37:56) - Deep duration space missions (43:06) - Extraterrestrial life (49:29) - Music and sports in space (56:08) - Colonizing space (1:03:28) - War in space (1:08:02) - Robots in space (1:22:43) - Commercial space exploration (1:26:21) - Future of space exploration (1:34:07) - Beauty of the universe (1:39:03) - Space cities (1:44:44) - Advice for young people (1:48:04) - Consciousness (1:49:50) - Meaning of life

The following is a conversation with Ariel at Blah, director of MIT Space Exploration Initiative. She's especially interested in autonomously self-assembling space architectures, basically giant space structures that can sustain human life, and that assemble themselves out in space, and then orbit Earth, Moon, Mars, and other planets. And now a quick use I can mention of each sponsor. but earth, moon, Mars, and other planets. And now a quick two second mention of each sponsor. Check them out in the description is the best way to support this podcast. We got better help for the mind,

corn base, for the wallet, indeed for hiring, express CPM for privacy, and athletic greens for health. Choose wisely, my friends. And now onto the full lad reads. As always, no ads in the middle. I tried to make this interesting, but if you skipped them, please still check out our sponsors.

I enjoy their stuff. Maybe you will too. This show is brought to you by BetterHelp. It's spelled H-E-L-P-E-HELP. They figure out what you need and match you with a licensed professional therapist in under 48 hours. I am a big believer of obviously talking as a way to figure out stuff about yourself,

to dig deep into your past, deep into your subconscious and figure out what trauma you haven't really dealt with. Obviously, to this podcast partially for that reason, but also my private life, there's nothing more, I don't know, intimate than conversation, just the purity of it, asking the deepest, the honest, the most delving questions of each other, of two people, friends or even strangers, to help you figure out something about yourself. And with better help, it's easy, private, affordable, available worldwide. Check them out at betterhelp.com slash Lex.

That's betterhelp.com slash Lex. This show is brought to you by Coinbase, which is a trusted and easy-to-use platform to buy, sell, and spend cryptocurrency. I use it and I love it. You can buy Bitcoin, Ethereum, Cardano, Deuchcoin, and all the most popular digital currencies. I believe all of the currencies associated with any of the guests I've had on the podcast so far in the cryptocurrency space. I love the excitement that people have for these technologies.

There's an investment component that I think to me is less interesting. The most interesting part is the technology, which I think will revolutionize the way we exchange value, we transact with each other, not just money, just everything. I mean, the blockchain cryptocurrency is going to be one of the things that the 21st century is remembered for, I believe. Anyway, Coinbase is a great place to get started with all of that and to learn about cryptocurrency in general. Go to Coinbase.com slash Lex to get 10 bucks in freebit coin when you sign up. that's Coinbase.com slash Lex. This show was brought to you by Indeed, a hiring website.

I've used them as part of many hiring efforts I've done for the teams I've led in the past. They have tools like Indeed InstaMatch giving you a quality candidates who's resumes on Indeed, fit your job description immediately. There's very few things as important as the folks you surround yourself with. Not only do you spend a large amount of your life with the people you work with, but you're also actually doing some interesting challenging things. You're going through hardship together, and that's where like incredible bonds are formed.

That's where growth happens. So the team you surround yourself with is essential, not just for the productivity and the effectiveness of your business, but for just happiness. So I don't know. I think you definitely, definitely need to use the best tools for the job. Indeed, it's something I've used many times. I love it. Anyway, right now you get a free $75 sponsored job credit to upgrade your job post and indeed.com slash

lex. Get it at indeed.com slash lex terms and conditions apply go to indeed.com slash lex. This show is also brought to you by ExpressVPN. I use them to protect my privacy on the internet in case you didn't know incognito mode on chrome does not protect you. So your ISPs know all about the shady websites you've been visiting. And I'm sure the shadiness and the spectrum is plentiful. I hope you have a house protector from that. You can also help you change the location so that you can access geographically restricted shows on Netflix

and who and so on. That my favorite reason I use ExpressVPN is that it's super fast, both in terms of connectivity and sort of responsiveness of the app itself. It works on any device. My favorite operating system Linux, but also Windows, Android, the whole thing. Big sexy red button. It does one thing, it does it well. Anyway, go to ExpressVPN.com slash LuxPod to get an extra three months free.

It's ExpressVPN.com slash LuxPod. This show is also brought to you by Athletic Greens and it's newly renamed AG1 Drink, which is an all-in-one daily drink to support better health and peak performance. It replaced the multivitamin for me and went far beyond that with 75 vitamins and minerals. I'm just reminding how people are making fun of me for loving Athletic Greens as much as I do. That's okay. That's okay.

It really is one of my favorite sponsors. It's the first thing I drink every day, or rather, the thing I drink before I break the fast, or I guess it counts as the thing you break the fast with. Fasten makes me feel good, eating low carb makes me feel good. And you have to be careful with that stuff to make sure you get the nutrition that you need. And that's what I rely on athletic greens to do. To make sure I have that like

nutritional base for all the wild things I do in terms of work, in terms of food, in terms of exercise, all that kind of stuff. Anyway, they'll give you one month supply of fish oil, another thing I love. When you sign up to atheticreens.com slash Lex, that's atheticreens.com slash Lex. This is the Lux Rebend podcast, and here's my conversation with Ariel at Blah. When did you first fall in love with space exploration and space in general? My parents are both ex-air force. So my dad's an A10 fighter pilot and my mom trained and had qualified to be a fighter pilot, but it was early enough that women were not

letting combat at that time. And so I grew up with these two pilots, and although they themselves did not become astronauts, there's a really rich legacy of Air Force pilots becoming astronauts and this loomed large in my childhood. What does it mean to be courageous, to be an explorer, to be at the vanguard of something hard and challenging? And to be an explorer, to be at the vanguard of something

hard and challenging? And to couple with that, my dad was a huge fan of science fiction. And so I, as a kid, read Heinlein and Isaac Asimov, all these different classics of science fiction that he had introduced me to. And that just started a love affair with space exploration and really thinking about civilization scale, space exploration and really thinking about civilization scale, space exploration. So, did they themselves dream about going to the stars as opposed to flying here in the Earth's atmosphere just looking up? Yeah, my dad always said he was absolutely convinced because he was a

child of the Apollo years that he would get to go in his lifetime. I really thought it was going to happen. So it was a challenge and sad for many people when to their view on the outside space exploration slowed down for a period of time. In reality, we were just catching up. I think we leapt so far ahead with Apollo more than the rest of society was ready for. And now we're coming back to this moment for space exploration where we actually have an economy. And we have the other accoutre mall that society needs to be able to make space exploration more real. And my dad's thrilled because finally, you know, not nearly, I hope not

anywhere near the end of his life, but as he's an older man, he now can see still within his lifetime people really getting a chance to build a sustainable lunar settlement on the moon or maybe even go to Mars. So settlement, civilizations and other planets, that's the cool thing to dream about in the future. What was the favorite sci-fi authors when you were growing up? Probably a Zick Asma Foundation trilogy. This is an amazing story of Harry Selden, this foundation that he forms at different ends of the, well, according to the story, a difference of the universe. And has this interesting focus on society.

So it's not just space exploration for the sake of space exploration or novel technology, which is a lot of what I work on, data data MIT. But how do you structure a society across those vast expanses of distance and time? And so I'd say absolutely a favorite. Now though, my favorite is Neil Stevenson and Seveneves. It's a book that inspired my own PhD research and some ongoing work that we're doing with NASA now for the future of swarm robotics for spacecraft. We were saying offline about Neil Stevenson because I just recently had a conversation with him. And I said that, you know, not until I was doing the research

form that I realized he also had a role to play in Blue Origin. So it's like sci-fi, actually having a role to play in the design, engineering, just the implementation of ideas that come kind of, percolate up from the sci-fi world and actually become reality. It's kind of fascinating to figure in that way. Do you also think about him beyond just his work in science fiction, but his role in coming up with wild, crazy ideas that actually become reality? Yes, I think it's a great example of this cycle between authors and scientists and engineers

that we can be inspired in one generation by what authors dream up. We build it, we make it a reality, and then that inspires another generation of really wild and crazy thought for science fiction. I think Neil Stephenson does a beautiful job of being what we'd call a hard science fiction author. So it's really grounded in a lot of science, which makes it very compelling for me as a scientist and engineer to read and then be challenged to make that vision of reality. The other community, you know, that Neil's involved with and some of my other mentors are involved with, that we are thinking about more and more in the work that we do at MIT is the Long Now Foundation. And this focus on what does society need to take in terms of steps at this juncture, this particular inflection point in human history, to make sure that we're setting ourselves up for a long

and prosperous horizon for humanities horizons. There's a lot of examples of what the Long Now Foundation doesn't think about, but when I think about this in my own work, it's, what does it take to scale humanity's presence in orbit? We are seeing some additional investment in commercial space habitats, so it'll no longer be just NASA running the International Space Station. But to really democratize access to space, to have like Bezos wants to have millions of people living and working in space, you need architecture that's bigger

and grander and can actually scale. That means you need to be thinking about how can you construct things for long-time horizons that are really sustainable in orbit or on a surface of a celestial body that are bigger than the biggest rocket payload fairing that we currently have available. And that what led me to self-assembly and other models of in space construction. Okay, every time you speak, I get like a million tangent ideas, but. You can cut me off. No, no, no, no, no, please keep talking.

This is amazing. I just, this is like a million of ideas. So one sort of on the dark side, let me ask, do you think about the threats to human civilization that kind of motivate the scaling of the expansion of humans in space and on other planets What are you worried about nuclear war? pandemics

superintelligent artificial intelligence systems you know more not existential crises, but ones that have significant potentially significant detrimental effects on society, like climate change, those kinds of things. And then there's of course the fun estuary coming up from the darkness and hating all earth. There's been a few movies on that.

Anyway, guys, there's something that you think about that threatens us in this century. Mm, I mean, as an ex-military family, we used to talk about all of this. We would say that luck favors the prepared. And so growing up, we had a plan, actually a family plan for what we would do in a pandemic, didn't think we were gonna have to put that plan into place,

and here we are. We do certainly among my own family and my friends and then our work at MIT. We do think about existential threats and risks to humanity and what role does space exploration and getting humans off-world have to play in a resilient future for humanity. But what I actually find more compelling recently

is instead of thinking about a need to ever abandon Earth through a path of space exploration or space foraging, is to see how we can use space technology to keep Earth livable. The obvious direct ways of doing this would be satellite technology that's helping us learn more about climate change or emitters or CO2. But there's also a future for geoengineering that might be space-based. A lot of questions that would have to be answered around that.

But these are examples of pivoting our focus away from maybe the Hollywood vision of, oh, an asteroid's going to come, we're all going to have to escape Earth to use our considerable technology prowess and use space technology to save Earth and be very much focused on how we can have a worthwhile life for Earth citizens. Yeah, because of that. Even if some of us want to go out and further venturing. Right, just to the, yeah, the desire to explore the mysterious, yes. But also it does seem that by placing us in harsh

conditions, the harsh conditions of space, the harsh conditions of planets, on the biology, the chemistry, the engineering, the robotics, the materials, all of that. That's just a nice way to come up with cool new things. Great forcing function. Yeah, it's a force, exactly. It's a forcing function like survival. You don't get this right you die So and that you can bring back to earth and it will improve Like figuring out food in space will make you figure out what how to eat, you know, live healthier lives here on earth So true. I mean some of the technologies that we're directly looking at right now for space habitats,

it's hard to keep humans alive in this really fragile little pocket against the vacuum and all of the dangers that the space environment presents. Some of the technologies we were going to have to figure out is energy efficient, you know, cooling and air conditioning, air filtration, scrubbing CO2 from the air, being able to have habitats that are themselves resilient to extremes of space weather and radiation. Some of these are direct translational opportunities for areas from financial disasters. People in California a decade ago would never have had to think about having an airtight house. But now with wildfires, maybe you do want something close to an airtight house.

How do you manage that? There's a lot of technologies from the space habitation world that we are hoping we can actually bring back down to benefit life on Earth as well in these extreme environment contexts. Okay, so you mentioned to go back to swarm. So that was interesting to you. First of all, in your own work, but also I believe you said something that was inspiring from you, Stevenson as well. So when you say swarm, are you thinking about architectures or are you thinking about artificial intelligence, like robotics or are those kind of intermixed. I think the future that we're seeing is that they're going to be intermixed, which is really exciting.

So the future space habitats are one of intelligent structures, maybe not all the way to how, and the, you know, 2001 space literacy reference that scares people about the habitat having a mind of its own. But certainly we're building systems now where the habitat has sensing technology that allows it to communicate its basic functions, you know, maintaining life support for the astronauts, but could also communicate in symbiosis with these swarm robots that would be on the outside of the spacecraft, whether it's in a microgravity orbiting environment or on the surface, and these little robots, they crawl just a lot,

Neil Stevenson and 70, they crawl along the outside of the spacecraft looking for micrometeorite punctures or gas leaks or other faults and defects. And right now we're just working on the diagnosis. So can the swarm with its collective intelligence act in symbiosis with the spacecraft and detect things. But in the future, we'd also love for these little micro robots to repair in situ and really be like ants

living in a tree altogether connected to the spacecraft. Do you envision the system to be fully distributed and just like an ant colony, one of them is damaged or whatever loses control and all those kinds of things that that doesn't affect the performance of the the complete system or doesn't need to be centralized. This is more like almost a technical question. Do you think of? It's an architecture question. Right. From the ground up, it's so scary to go fully distributed. It's so scary to go fully distributed. Yes.

But it's also exceptionally powerful, right? A robust, resilient to the harsh conditions of space. What do you, if you look into the next 10, 20, a hundred years, starting from scratch, do you think we should be doing architecturalized distributed systems? For space, yes, because it gives you this redundancy and safety profile. It's really critical. So whether it's small swarm robots, where it doesn't matter if you lose a few of them,

to habitats that instead of having a central monolithic habitat, you might actually be able to have a decentralized node of a space station so that you can kind of write out of Star Wars. You can shut a blast door if there's a fire or if there's a conflict in a certain area and you can move the humans in the crew into another decentralized node of the spacecraft. There's another idea out of Neil Stevenson's in 70s actually where these arclets, which were decentralized spacecraft that could form and dock little temporary space stations with each other, and then separate and go off on their way and and have a decentralized approach to living in space. So the self-assembly component of that too, so this is your PhD work and beyond,

you explored autonomously self-assembling space architecture for future space, tourist habitats and space stations and orbit around Earth, Moon, and Mars. There's a few things I personally find sexier than self-assembling, space autonomously self-assembling space architecture. In general, it doesn't even need to be space. The idea of self-assembling architectures is really interesting, like building a bridge or something like that. There's self-assumbing materials. It feels like an incredibly efficient way to do it, because optimization is built in. So you can build like the most optimal structures, given dynamic, uncertain, changing conditions. So maybe can you talk about your PhD work, about this work, about Tesserae? What is it in general?

Any cool stuff, because this is super cool. Yeah, yeah, absolutely. So Tesserae is my PhD research. It's this idea that we could take tiles that construct a large structure, like a bucky ball. Yeah, this is exactly what we're looking at here, which is the tiles that are packed flat in a rocket. They're released to float in microgravity. Magnets, pretty powerful,

electro-permanent magnets on their edges draw them together for autonomous docking. So there's no human in the loop here, and there's no central agent coordinating, saying tile one, go to tile two. It's completely decentralized system. They find each other on their own. What we don't show in this video is what happens if there's an error, right? So what happens if they bond incorrectly? The tiles have sensing, so proximity sensing, magnetometer, other sensors that

allow them to detect a good bond versus a bad bond and pulse off and self correct, which anybody who works in this, you know, the field of self assembly will tell you that error, detection and correction, just like error detection in a DNA sequence or protein folding is really important part of the system for that robustness. And so we've done a lot of work to engineer that ability for the tiles to be self-determining. They know whether they're forming the structure that they're supposed to form or not. They know if they're in a toxic relationship, but they need to get out. Right.

If they need to separate exactly, yeah. All right. This is so amazing. And for people who are just listening to this, yeah, there's a lot. I mean, how large are these tiles? So the size that we use in the lab, they can really be any size because we can scale them down to do testing and microgravity. So we sent tiles that were about three inches wide to the International Space Station a couple years ago to test the code, test the state machine, test the algorithm of self assembly. But now we're actually building our first-over-human scale tiles. They're me human size, so a little smaller than maybe your average human, but

they're 2.5 feet on edge length. The larger scale that we would love to build in the future would actually be tiles that are big enough to form a bucky ball, big open spherical volume, spherical approximation volume, that'd be about 10 meters in diameter, so 30 feet, which is much bigger and grander in terms of open space than any current module on the ISS. And one of the goals with this project was to say, what's the purpose of next generation space architecture?

Should it be something that really inspires and delights people when you float into that space? Can you get goosebumps in the way that you do when you walk into a really stunning piece of architecture on Earth? And so we think that self-assembly, this modular, reconfigurable algorithm for constructing space structures in orbit is going to give us this promise of space architecture that's actually worth living in. Living in, oh, I thought you also meant from like outside artistic perspective, see the

whole thing is just. with the aesthetics of it. Absolutely. You know, when you like go like into Vegas, whenever you go into a city and it like over the hill appears in front of you. And I mean, there's something majestic about seeing like, wow, humans created that. It gives you like hope about like, if these a bunch of ants were able to figure out, build skyscrapers that light up and in general the design of these tiles and the way you envision it are pretty scalable. Yes, and they're inspired by exactly what you mentioned

a moment ago, which is we have these patterns of self-assembly on earth and there's a lot of fantastic MIT research that we're building this concept on. So like Daniela Ruse at C.Sale and Pebbles research that we're building this concept on. So like Daniela Ruse at CSAIL and Pebbles, taking the power of magnets to create units that are themselves interchangeable, this notion of programmable matter. And so we're interested in going really big with it to build big-scale space structures with programmable tiles. But there's also a really fascinating, you know, end of that on the other side of the spectrum, which is how small can you go with matter that's programmable and stacks and builds itself and creates a bridge or something in the future? What do you envision the thing would look like?

When you imagine a thing far into the future where there's, so we're not even thinking about small space, let's not call them small, but our currently sized space stations, but like something gigantic. What are you envision? Is this something with symmetry, or is this something we can't even come up with yet? Is there beautiful structures that you imagine you're in? I've got three candidates that I would love to build.

If we're talking about monumental space architecture, one is, what does a space cathedral look like? It can be a secular cathedral. It doesn't necessarily have to be about religion, but that notion of long sight lines, inspiring, stunning architecture when you go in. And you can imagine floating instead of, you know, being on the ground and only looking up in space,

you could be in a central node. And each direction you look at, all the cardinal directions are spires going off in a really large and long way. So that's concept number one. Number two would be something more organic that's not just geometric. So here, one of the ideas that we're working on in MIT

in my lab is to say, could you, instead of the test array model, right, which is self-assembling a shell, could you, instead of the tesserae model, right, which is self-assembling a shell, could you define a module that's a node, a small node that someone can live in, and you self-assemble a lot of those together. They're called pleziohedrons, like space-filling solids, and you dock a bunch of them together, and you can create a really organic structure out of that. So this is the same way that muscles accrete to appear. You can have these nodes that dock together and one shape that I would love to form out of this is something like a nautilus, a seashell, that beautiful,

you know, fibonacci spiral sequence that you get in that shape, which I think would be a stunning and fabulous aggregated space station. You said so many cool words. Pleasiohedron. Yeah, please do. So that's a space filling solid. The simplest thing to think about is like a cube. It's here, a cube, right?

So you can stack cubes together. And if you had an infinite number of cubes, you'd fill all that space. There's no gaps in between the cubes. They stack and fill space. Another pleaserhedrin is a truncated octahedron. And that's actually one of the candidate structures that we think would be great for space stations. What's the truncated part?

So you cut off an octahedron actually has little pointy areas. You truncate certain sections of it and you get surfaces that are on the structure that are cubes and I think hexagons. I'd have to remind myself exactly what the faces are. But overall, a truncated octahedron can be bonded to other truncated octahedrons. And just like a cube, it fills all the gaps as you build it out. So you can imagine two truncated octahedrons, they come together at an airlock, which is what

we space people call doors in space. And you dock them on all sides, and you've basically created this decentralized network of space nodes that make a big space station. And once you have enough of them, and you're growing with enough big units, you can do in any macro shape you want. That's where the Nautilus comes in. It's going to be designed and organically inspired shape for a space station. Can I just say how awesome it is to hear you say, we space people. I know you meant people that are doing research on space exploration, space technology, but it also made me think

of a future. There's earth people. And there's those space people. And then there's the martian night. Those two. Yeah, no, no, for sure. For sure. But like, it's like New Yorkers and like Texans or something like that. Yeah. Of course, you live for time in New York and then you go out to Boston. And but for time, you're the space people. All I know those space people They're kind of wild up there. We'll see how that dynamic of all yeah, there's that culture culture forms and I would love to see What kind of culture once you once you have? Sort of more and more civilians. I mean, there's a human. I mean, I love psychology and sociology and I'll Maybe ask you about that too, which is like the dynamic between humans.

You have to kind of start considering that. You need to start spending more and more time up in space and start sending civilians, start sending bigger and bigger groups of people. And then of course, the beautiful and the ugly emerges from the human nature that we haven't been able to escape up to this point. But when you say the pleasier hydrons, these kinds of shapes, are they multifunctional? Like is the idea you'd be able to, humans cannot be occupies them safely in some of them

and some others have some other purposes? Exactly. One could be sleeping quarters. One could be a greenhouse or an agricultural unit, one could be a storage depot, essentially all of the different rooms or functions that you might need no space station could be subdivided into these nodes and then stacked together. And one of the promises of both test array, my original PhD research was these shells and then this follow-on node concept, is that right now we build space stations, and once they're built, they're done.

You can't really change them profoundly, but the benefit of a modular, self-assembling system is you can disassemble it. You can completely reconfigure it. So if your mission changes, or the number of people in space that you want to host, if you have a space conference happening, like, South by Southwest.

I was thinking space party, but space conference is good too. Then maybe all of a sudden, you want to change out what were window tiles yesterday, Koopala tiles, and make them into a birthing port so that you can welcome five new spaceships to come and join you in space. That's what this promise of reconfigurable space architecture might allow us to explore.

I've been hanging out with Grimes recently, and just feel like she belongs up in space. This is designed for artists, essentially. Like, imagine, I mean, this is what Southby keeps introducing me to you is there's like the weird and the beautiful people and like the artists. Yeah. And it feels like there's a lot of opportunities for art and design. A hundred percent. It's like space is a combination of arts, design, and great engineering.

It's a safety critical with the highest of stakes. First of all, you talk about tiling. So New Stealings is obsessed about tiling. I don't know if it's related to any of this, but he seems to be obsessed with like, how do you tile a space? That's a commandment geometric notion like the translation and it's I mean, it's a beautiful idea for architecture that you can self-assemble these different shapes and You can have probably some

centralized guidance of the kind of thing you want to build you can have probably some centralized guidance of the kind of thing you want to build, but they also kind of figure stuff out themselves in terms of the low level details in terms of the figuring out when the, when everything fits just right for the OCD people like, what's that subreddit? Pleasantly, it's like really fun. Everything, they have like videos of everything is just pleasant when everything just fits perfectly very pleasing All the tolerance is coming out probably so they figure that out on themselves and the local robotics problem But by the way was Daniela was pebbles was the pebbles project. Yeah, the pebbles project are little cubes that have EPMs and them electro permanent magnets and they can self-disassemble so they'll turn off and so you'll have this little structure that all of a sudden can

flip the little pebbles over and essentially just disaggregate. They have to make some pleasing sounds. Okay. You do. And that's gonna, so I'm supposed to talk to Daniel, so I'll probably spend an hour just discussing the sounds on the pebbles.

Okay. What were we talking about? So that's, because you mentioned two, I think. Right, my third one. Yeah, is there we talking about? So that's because you mentioned two, I think. Right, my third one. Yeah, is there a third one? My third one is a ring world, just because every science fiction book ever

that's worth anything has a ring world in it. And this is a donut or a- A donut, yeah. So a really big tourist that could encircle a planet or encircle another celestial body, maybe an asteroid or a small moon. And the promise here is just the beauty of being able to have that geometry in orbit and all that surface area for solar panels and talking and essentially just all of what that enables to have a ring world at that scale in orbit. Which, by the way, for the viewers, we're looking to figure out what paper is this from.

So, hexagonal tiling of a tourist generated in Mathematica, referencing code, and approach from two citations. So we're looking at a tiled donut, and I'm not hungry. So, is this from your thesis or no? This is probably, I mean, this is in my thesis. This looks like it was one of my earlier papers. This was an approach to say great. We've come up with this testellation approach for a buckyball.

And we picked the buckyball because it is the most efficient surface area to volume shape and what's expensive in space, the surface area, shipping up all that material. So we wanted something that would maximize the volume. But if we think about ring worlds and other shapes, we wanted to look at how do you tile a torus, and this is one example with hexagons, to be able to say, could we take this same testeray approach of self-assembling tiles and create other geometries? This is so freaking cool. This is awesome. So you mentioned microgravity, and I saw, I believe that there's a picture of you floating

microgravity. When did you get to experience that? What was that like? Yeah, so I've flown nine times on the affectionately known as the vomit comet. It's the parabolic flight and essentially it does what you want to plane never to do. It pitches really steeply upwards at 45 degrees. That's a picture, yeah. That's a test rate. That's a picture, yeah. Yeah, that's a test rate.

That's super early in my PhD, some of just the passive tiles, before we even put electronics in, we were just testing the magnet polarity and the essentially, is it an energy favorable structure to self-assemble on it so on? So we tweaked a lot of things between. Are we looking at a couple of them? Yeah, you're looking at a bunch of them there.

Almost 32 of them. Yeah, they're clumping a bunch of them there. Almost 32 of them. Yeah, they're clumping. They're clumping. Yeah. Can you comment on what's the difference between microgravity and zero gravity? Yes. So there is, it's important difference.

There is no zero gravity. There's nothing, there's in the universe, there is no such thing as zero gravity. So Newton's law of gravity tells us that there's always gravity attraction between any two objects. So zero G is a shorthand that some of us fall into using. Where's a little easier to communicate to the public? The accurate term is microgravity, where you are essentially floating your weightless, but generally in freefall. So on the parabolic flights, the vomit comet, you're in free fall at the end of the parabola.

And in orbit around earth, when you're floating, you're also in free fall. So that's the light. What was the light? So affectionately called vomit comet. I'm sure there's a reason why it's called affectionately. So what's it like? What's your first time to both philosophically, spiritually and biologically? What's it like?

It's profound. It is unlike anything else you will experience on earth, because it is this true feeling of weightlessness with no drag. So the closest experience you can think of would be floating in a pool, but you move slowly when you float in a pool and your motion is restricted. When you're floating, it's just you and your body flying like in a dream. It takes the little amount of energy, like a finger tap against the wall of the plane to shoot all the way across the fuselage.

And you can move at full speed. Like you can move your arms. Exactly. There's no resistance. It's no resistance. They actually tell you to make a memory when you're on the plane because it's such a fleeting experience for your body that even a few days later you've already forgotten exactly what it felt like it's so foreign to the human experience. They kind of suggested you explicitly try to really form this into a memory and then

you can do the replay. It's a training or for just... Hardly freeze it. Yeah. Say, when we have neural link, we can replay that. There you go. That memory. So in terms of how much stress it has on your body, is it biologically stressful? You do feel a 2G pull out, right?

So the cost of getting those micro-G parabolas is you then have a 2G pull out. And that's hard. You have to train for it. If you move your neck too quickly and that 2G pull out, you can strain muscles. But I wouldn't say that it's actually a profound, tough thing on the body. It's really just an incredibly novel experience. And when you're in orbit and you're not having to go through the ups and downs of the parabolic plane, there's a real grace and elegance, and you see the astronauts learn to operate in this completely new environment. What are some interesting differences between the parabolic plane and when you're actually going up an orbit? Is it that with orbit you can look out and see

that blue little planet of ours? You can see the blue marble, the stunning overview effect, which is something I hope to see one day What's also really different is if you're in orbit for any significant period of time It's gonna be a lot more physiological changes to your body than if you just did an afternoon flight on the vomit comet Everything from your bones your muscles your eyeballs change shape There's a lot of different things that happen for long duration space flight. And we still have to as scientists, we still have to solve a lot of these interesting challenges to be able to keep humans thriving in microgravity or deep duration space missions.

Deep duration space missions. Okay, let's talk about this. I was just going to ask a bunch of dumb questions. So approximately how long does it take to travel to Mars? I'm asking for a friend. As we all do. About three years for a round trip. Okay. And that's not that it actually takes that. Why the round trip?

Well, you're just asking about the one way trip. One way. It's okay. So for just like literally flying two Mars in around. It takes three years. There's an interstitial time there because you really can only go between Earth and Mars at certain points in their orbits, where it's favorable to make that journey. And so part of that three years is you take the journey two Mars a few months, six to nine months. You're there for a period of time until the orbits find a favorable alignment again, and then you come back another 69 months. So one way travel 69 months, they hang out there,

vacation, and come back. Force vacation. Force vacation. You come back. Well, me who loves working all the time, all vacation is force vacation. All right. So, okay, so that gives us a sense of duration and we can maybe also talk about longer, longer, longer duration as well. What are the hardest aspects of living in space for many days? For, let's say, 100 days, 200 days, maybe there's a threshold when it gets really tough. What are some stupid little things or big things that are very difficult for human beings to go through? One big thing and one little thing, there are these two classic problems that we're trying to solve in the space industry. One is radiation. It's not as much of

a problem for us right now on the International Space Station because we're still protected by part of Earth's magnetosphere, but as soon as you get farther out into space and you don't have that protection once you leave the Van Allen belt area of the Earth and the cocoon around the Earth, we have really serious concerns about radiation effect on human health long term. That's the big one.

The small one, and I say it's small because it seems mundane, but it actually is really big in its own ways, mental health, and how to keep people happy and balanced and you were alluding to some of the psychological challenges of having humans together on missions, and especially as we try to scale the number of humans in orbit or in space. So that's another big challenge. It's how to keep people happy and balanced and cooperating. That's not an issue on Earth at all. Okay, so we'll talk about each of those in a bit more detail, but let me continue on the chain of dumb questions.

What about food? What's a good source for food in space? And what are some sort of standard go-to meals menus? Right now your go-to menu is going to be mostly freeze-dried. Every so often, NASA will arrange for a fun stunt or a fresh food to get up to station. So they did bake double tree cookies with Hilton a couple of years ago, as I recall, I think sometime

before the pandemic. But there's work actually in our lab at MIT, Maggie Koblan, one of my staff researchers, is looking at the future of fermentation. Everybody loves beer, right? Beer and wine and kimchi and miso, these foods that have just been, you know, really important to human cultures for eons because we love the umami and the better flavor in them. But it turns out they also have a good shelf life, if done properly.

And they also have an additional health benefit for the microbiome, for probiotics and prebiotics. So we're trying to work with NASA and convince them to be more open-minded to fermented food for long-duration deep space missions. That we think is one of the future elements in addition to in situ growing your own food. Not okay. This is essential for the space party. Yes. The space beer. Yes. This is the fermented product. Yes. Okay. Cool. In terms of water, what's a good source of drinkable water? Like, where do you get water? Do you have to always bring it on board with you? And is there compressed efficient way of storing it? So to steal a line from Charlie Bolton, who's the former

administrator of NASA, this morning's fresh water is yesterday's coffee. So you think about what that means? You drank the coffee yesterday. Right. As it goes fully through the body. Fully through the body as the recycling system. And then you drink what you peed out as clarified refined fresh water the next day. That is one source of water. Another source of water in the near neighborhood of our solar system would be on the moon. So water ice deposits, there's also water on Mars. This is one of the big things that's bringing people to want to develop infrastructure on the moon,

is once you've gotten out of the gravity well of Earth, if you can find water on the moon and refine it, you can either make it into propellant or drinkable water for humans. And so, that's really valuable as a potential gateway out into the rest of the solar system to be able to get propellant without always having to ship it up from Earth. So how much water is there on Mars? It's a great question. I do not know. I don't know the water, the caps. I suspect NASA from all of the satellite studies that they've done at Mars have a decent idea of what the water deposits look like, but I don't know to what degree they have characterized those.

I really hope there's life or traces of previous life on Mars. This is a special spot in my heart because I got to work on Sherlock, which is the astrobiology experiment that's on Mars right now searching for what they would say in a very cautious way is signs of past habitability. They want to be careful not to get people overly excited and say we're searching for what they would say in a very cautious way is signs of past habitability. They want to be careful not to get people overly excited and say we're searching for signs of life. They're searching to see if there would have been organics on the surface of Mars or water in certain areas that would have allowed for life to flourish.

And I really love this prospect. I do think within our lifetimes we'll get a better answer about finding life in our solar system if it's there. If not on Mars, maybe Europa, one of the icy worlds. So you like the, you like astrobiology. I do. This is part of the, this is not just about human biology,

it's also other extraterrestrial alien biology. Search for life in the universe. Okay. That's scary you, I'll accept you. It excites me profoundly exciting. That there's other alien civilizations, potentially very different than our own. I think there's gotta be some humility there, and certainly from science fiction,

we have plenty of reasons to fear that outcome as well. But I do think as a scientist, it would be profoundly exciting if we were to find life, especially in the near-naprohood of our solar system. Right now, we would expect it to be most likely microbial life, but we have a real serious challenge in astrobiology, which is it may not even be carbon-based life. And all of our detectors, we only know to look for DNA or RNA.

How would you even build a detector to look for silicon-based life, or different molecules than what we know to be the fundamental molecules for life. And then you mentioned offline Sarah Walker. I mean, she heard the question that she's obsessed with is even just defining life. What is life to look outside the carbon-based? I mean, to look outside of basically anything we can even imagine chemically, to look outside of any kind of notions that we think of as biology.

Yeah, it's really weird. So you now get into this land of complexity of a measuring of how many assembly steps it takes to build that thing. Right. And maybe, maybe dynamic movement or some maintenance of some kind of membrane structures. Like we don't even know like which properties life should have, whether it can should be

able to reproduce and all those kinds of things or pass information, genetic type of information. We don't know. And it's like it's that's so humbling. I mean, I tend to believe that there could be I mean, I tend to believe that there could be something like alien life here on Earth, and we're just too human, biology obsessed to even recognize it. The shadow biosphere, I remember you and Sarah were talking about. I mean, that's like speaking of beer. I mean, that's something I wanted to make sure, in all of science, to shake ourselves out of like, remind ourselves constantly how little we know, because it might be right in front of our nose.

I wouldn't be surprised if like, trees are like, orders of magnitude more intelligent than humans. They just stop operating in a much slower scale, and they're like talking shit about us the whole time. Like about silly humans that take everything seriously, and we start all kinds of nuclear wars, and we quarrel and we tweet about it and then but the trees are always there just watching us silly humans as like

the ants in Lord of the Rings. Exactly. So I mean I don't know I mean obviously I'm joking on that one but there could be stuff like that. Well let me ask you the the the the Drake equation the big the question how many like obviously nobody knows But what's your gut? What's your hope as a scientist as a human? How many alien civilizations are out there? As a ex physicist. I'm now much more on the aerospace engineering side first space architecture, but as an ex ex physicist. I hope it is prolific I think the challenges if it's as prolific as we would hope, if there are many, many, many civilizations, then the question is, where are they? Why haven't we

heard from them? And the Fermi paradox is there's some great filter that life only gets to some level of sophistication and then kills itself off through war or through famine or through different challenges that filter that Society out of existence and it would be an interesting question to try to understand if the universe was teaming with life Why haven't we found it or heard from it yet to our knowledge? Yeah, many I personally believe that it's teaming with life and you're right I think that's a really useful product of engineering and scientific question of what kind of great filter can just be destroying all that life or preventing it from just constantly talking to us silly descendants of apes. That's a really nice question. Like, what are the ways civilizations can destroy themselves? And There's too many, sadly.

I don't think we've come up with most of them yet. That's all the probably true. That's the thing. If you look at nuclear war, some of it is physics, but some of it is game theory. It's human nature. It's how societies build themselves, how they interact, how we create and resolve conflict. And it gets back to the human question on when you're doing long-term space travel.

How do you maintain this dynamical system of flawed irrational humans such that it persists throughout time? It's not just maintaining the biological body, but get people from not murdering each other. Like each other sufficiently to where you kind of fit well. I think if songs or poetry or books taught me, if you like each other a little too much, I mean, the problems arise because then there's always a third person who also likes and then there's a drama I said I can't believe you did that in the last night, whatever. So and then there's beer It's complicated. It's complicated quickly. Okay. Anyway, back to the dumb questions because you answered this

There's an interview we answer a bunch of cool little questions from from young students and so on about like space One of them was playing music in space. He mentioned something about what kind of instruments you could use to play music in space. Could you mention about the Spotify work in space and if I wanted to do a live performance, what kind of instruments would I need? Yeah, I mean, you referenced culture before, and I think this is one of the most exciting things that we have at our fingertips, which is to define a new culture for space exploration. We don't just

have to import cultural artifacts from Earth to make life worth living in space, and this musical instrument that you referenced was a design of an object that could only be performed in microgravity. Oh, cool. So it doesn't sound the same way when it's a percussive instrument, when it's rattled or moved in a gravity environment. Is that, can we look it up? It's called the telematron. Yeah, it's created by the...

Of course it's called the telematron. That is so awesome. Created by Sans Fish and Nicole Villierre to amazing graduate students and staff researchers on my team. What does it look like? It looks steam punk, actually. That's awesome. Yeah, it's a pretty cool design.

It looks like it's a geometric solid that has these interesting artifacts on the inside and it has a lot of sensors actually, additionally on the inside, like IMUs, inertial measurement sensors that allow it to detect when it's floating and when it's not floating and provides this really kind of ethereal, they later sonnify it so they use electronic music to turn it into a symphony or turn it into a piece and yeah this is the object that's a limotron. How does the human interact with it? By tossing it so it's an interactive music instrument it actually requires another partner so the idea was that it's something like a dance or just like something like a choreography in space. Got it. And the speaking of which you also talked about sports and like ball sports like playing soccer. So what?

Yeah. So you mentioned that so you're also can move it full speed. And then if you push off the wall lightly, you fly across. Zoom across. How does the physics of that work? Can you still play soccer, for example, in space? You can, but one of the most intuitive things that we all learn as babies, right, is whenever you throw something, if I was going to toss something to you, I toss it up because I know that it has to compensate for the fact that that Keplerian arc is going to draw it down.

The equations of motion are going to draw it down. I would, in space, I would just shoot something directly towards you, so like straight line of sight. And so that would be very different for any type of ball sport is to retrain your human mind to have that as your intuitive arc of motion or lack of arc. From your experience, from understanding how astronauts get adjusted to the stuff, how long does it take to adjust to the physics of this world, this other world? So even after one or two parabolic flights, you can gain a certain facility with moving in that environment.

I think most astronauts would say maybe several days on station or a week on station and their brain flips. It's amazing. The plasticity of the human brain and how quickly they are able to adapt. And so pretty quickly they become creatures of this new environment. Okay, so this is cool. It's creating a little bit of an experience. What about if you go from more than a hundred days for one year, for two years, for three years? What challenges start to emerge in that case? So Scott Kelly wrote this amazing book after he spent a year in space and he's a twin.

It's absolutely fantastic. And that's got to do a twin study. It's perfect. So he wrote a lot about his experience on the health side of what changed, things like bone density, muscle atrophy, eyesight changing because the shape of your eyeball changes, which changes your lens, which changes how you see. If we're then thinking about the challenges between a year and three years, especially if we're doing that three year trip to Mars for your friend who asked earlier, then you have to think about nutrition. And so how are you keeping all of these different needs for your body alive?

How are you protecting astronauts against radiation? Either having some type of a shell on the spacecraft, which is expensive because it's heavy, you know, if it's something like lead, a really effective radiation shell, it's going to be a lot of mass. Or is there a pill that could be taken to try to make you less in danger of some of the radiated radiation effects? A lot of this has not yet been answered, but radiation is really significant challenge less in danger of some of the radiative radiation effects. A lot of this has not yet been answered,

but radiation is a really significant challenge for that three year journey. And what are the negative effects of radiation on the human body out in space? A higher likelihood to develop cancer at a younger age. So you'd probably be able to get there and get back, but you'd find yourself in the same way if you were exposed to significant

radiation on Earth, you'd find significant bad health effects as you age. What do you think about decades? Do you think about decades? Or is this like an entire... I think about centuries. I'm sorry for my space arcs, but yeah, for decades, I think as soon as we get past the three-year mark, we'll absolutely want somewhere between three years and a decade. We'll want artificial gravity. And we know

how to do that, actually. The engineering questions still need to be tweaked for how we'd really implement it, but the science is there to know how we would spin habitats in orbit, generate that force. So even if the entire habitat's not spinning, you at least have a treadmill part of the space station that is spinning, and you can spend some fraction of your day in a near to 1G environment and keep your body healthy. Wait, literally from just spinning? From spinning, yes, in tripletal force. So you generate this force.

If you've ever been in those carnival rides, the gravitrons that spin you up around the side, that's the concept. And this is actually one of the reasons why we are spinning out a new company from my MIT lab. Spinning out. That was accidental, but well noted space pun. It can pop up.

It did, you know what I'm saying. All right. But yeah, we're spinning out a new company to look at next generation space architecture and how do we actually scale humanity's access to space and one of the areas that we wanna look at is artificial gravity. Is there a name yet? Yep, there's a name.

We are brand new. We are just exiting stealth modes. So your podcast listeners will literally be among some of the first to hear about it. It's called Aurelia Institute. Aurelia is an old English word for chrysalis. And the idea with this is that we, humanity collectively, are at this next stage of our metamorphosis, like a chrysalis, into a space-faring species.

And so we felt that this was a good time, a necessary time, to think about next generation space architecture, but also starfleet academy, if you know that reference from Star Trek. Yes. So let me ask a silly sounding ridiculous sounding, but probably extremely important question. Sex and space, including intercourse, conception, procreation, birth, like being a parent, like raising the baby. So basically from birth, well from the before birth part, like the birds and the bees and stuff, and then the whole thing, how complicated is that? I remember looking at the, thank you. I remember looking at this exact Wikipedia page actually, and it's, I remember being the Wikipedia page is sex and space

and fascinating how difficult of an engineer and problem the whole thing is. Is that something you think about to how to have generations of humans, self replicating organs? Yes, society is essentially. I mean, I guess with micro, like if you solve the gravity problem,

you solve a lot of these problems. That's the hope, yeah, is like this central challenge like if you saw the gravity problem, you saw a lot of these problems. Yeah. That's the hope, yeah, is like this central challenge of microgravity to human reproduction, but we do host a workshop every year at Beyond the Cradle, which is the space of that we run at MIT, and we always do one on pregnancy in space or motherhood or raising children in space, because there are huge questions. There have been a few mammal studies that have looked at reproduction in space, but there are still really major questions about,

how does it work? How does the fetus evolve in microgravity if you were pregnant in space? And I think the near-term answer is just gonna be, we need to be able to give humans a 1G environment for that phase of our development. Yeah, so there's some studies on mice in microgravity. And it's interesting, like I think the mice, like one's some studies on mice in microgravity.

And it's interesting, like I think the mice, like one of them, the mice weren't able to walk or like they're understanding the physics, I guess, is all for something like that. Yeah, the mental model, when you're really young and you're kind of getting your mental model of physics, we do think that that would change, um, kids' abilities to, if they were born in microgravity, their ability to have that intuition around an Earth-based 1G environment might be missing. Because a lot of that is really crystallized in early development, early childhood development. So that makes sense that they would see that in mice, yeah. So what about life when we, uh, choose to park our vehicles on another planet on the moon, but let's go to Mars.

First of all, is that exciting you? Humans going to Mars, like stepping foot on Mars, and what do you think will happen? It does excite me. I think visionaries like Elon are working to make that happen in terms of building the road to space. We are really excited about building out the human lived experience of space once you get there. So how are you going to grow your food? What does your habitat going to look like? I think it's profoundly exciting, but I do think that there's a little bit of a misunderstanding of Mars anywhere in the near future being anything like a replacement for Earth. So it is good for humanity to have these other pockets of our civilization that can expand out beyond Earth.

But Mars is not in its current state, a good home for humanity. Too many percolates in the soil. You can't use that soil to grow crops. Atmospheres too thin, certainly can't breathe it, but it's also just really thin compared to our atmosphere. A lot of different challenges that would have to be fundamentally changed on that planet to make it a good home for a large human civilization. How does a large civilization of humans get built on Mars? And what do you think, what do you think it gets starts being difficult?

So can you have a small base of like 10 people essentially, kind of like the International Space Station kind of situation. And then can you get it to 100 to 1000 to a million? Are there some interesting challenges there that worry you saying that Mars is just not a good backup at this time for Earth? I think small outpost absolutely, like McMurdo, right? So we have these models of really extreme environments on Earth and Antarctica, for example, where humans have been able to go and make a sustainable settlement.

McMurdo style life on Mars, probably feasible in the 2030s. So we want to send the first human missions to Mars, and maybe as early as the end of this decade, more likely early 2030s, moving anywhere beyond that in terms of a place where like an entire human life would be lived where it's not just you go for a three-month deployment and you come back, that is actually the big challenge line. It's just saying, is there enough technological sophistication that can be brought that far

out into space? If you imagine your electronics break, there's no radio shack. This dates me a little bit that my mind jumps to radio shack. But there's no supply chains on Mars that can supply the level of technological sophistication for all the products that we rely on on day-to-day life. So you'd be going back to actually a very simple existence, more like pie in your life out west in the story of the US, for example. And I think that the future of larger scale gatherings of humans in orbit or so in space is actually

going to be in microgravity, floating space cities, not so much trying to establish settlements on the surface. So you think sort of a significant engineering investment in terms of our efforts and money should be on large Spaceships that's perhaps are doing this kind of self-assembly all these kinds of things and doing it orbit Yeah, maybe building a giant donut around the planet over time Yeah, that is the goal and I think the current political climate is such that you can't get the trillion dollar investment to build to start from scratch and build the sci-fi make a structure. But if you can build it in fits and starts in little different pieces, which is another advantage of self assembly, it's much more like how nature works. So it's bio-memory inspired way for humanity to scale out in space. biomimicry inspired way for humanity to scale out in space.

Whether it's out in space or in Mars, the idea that sort of two people fall in love, if sex, a child is born and then that couple has to teach that child that like we, that they came from Earth. I just love the idea that somebody's born on Mars are out in space and you have to be like, that this is not actually like the original home. Just them looking on our Earth

and being like, this is where we came from. I don't know, that's really inspiring to me. And the child being really confused and then wanting to go back to TikTok or whatever they do. What if they do in that air? I mean, there's great sci-fi right about people being born on Mars.

And because it's a lower gravity environment, they're taller, they're more gangly if they were actually able to develop there. And then they come back to Earth and their second class citizens, because they can't function here in the same way, because the gravity's too strong for them. You see this in series like the expanse with the belters and these different societies that if we were to succeed

in having human societies grow up in different pockets is not necessarily going to be easy for them to always come back to earth as their home. Yeah, different cultures form, which is the positive way of phrasing it, but it's also this human history teaches us that we like to form the other. So there's this kind of conflict that naturally emerges. Let me ask another sort of dark question.

What do you think about coming from a military family? There's still sadly wars in the world. Do you think wars, a military conflict, will follow us into space? Wars between nations. Like, from my perspective currently, it just seems like space is a place for scientists and engineers to explore ideas. But the more and more progress you make, the more you that nation start to step in and form, you know, that go go out and fall out military conflict,

whether it's in cyberspace, in space, or actual hot war. I am really concerned about that. And I do think for decades, the scientific community in space has hung on to this notion from the 1967 outer space treaty, which is space is the province of all humankind, peaceful uses of outer space only,

but I do think the rise in tensions and the geopolitical scene that we're seeing. I do, yeah, I do harbor a lot of concern about hot wars following humanity out into space. And it's worth trying to tie nations together with more collaboration to avoid that happening. The International Space Station is a great example. I think it's something like 18 countries are party to this treaty. It might be less.

It might be more. And then of course, there's a smaller number of countries that actually send astronauts. But even at the fall of the Soviet Union and through some tens times with Russia, the ISS had been a place where the US and Russia were actually able to collaborate between mirror and ISS. I think it'd be really important right now, in particular, to find other platforms where these hegemonic powers in the world and developing world nations can come and collaborate on the future of space and purposefully intertwine our success so that there's a danger

to multiple parties if somebody is a bad actor. So we're not talking as there's a war in Ukraine and I haven't been sleeping much of family, friends, colleagues in both countries and I'm just talking to a lot of people, many of whom are crying refugees. And I, you know, there's a basic human compassion and love for each other that I believe technology can help catalyze and accelerate. But there's also science. There's something about rockets. There's something about, and I mean like space exploration that inspires the world about the positive possibilities of the human species. So in terms of Ukraine and Russia and China and India and the United States and Europe and everywhere else, it seems like collaborating on giant space projects is one way to escape

these wars, to escape these wars To escape the sort of geopolitical conflicts. I mean, there's something there's so much camaraderie to the whole thing and even in this little Period of human history will living through it seems like that's essential even though to this pandemic There's something so inspiring about those like SpaceX rockets going up, for example. It's true. This re-invigoration of the space exploration efforts by the commercial sector, I don't know. That was, I had some, as many of us have, sort of, some dark times during this pandemic, just like loneliness and sometimes emotion and anger and just hopelessness

and politics. And then you look at those rockets going up and it just gives you hope. So I think that's an understated sort of value of space exploration is a thing that unites us and gives us hope. Obviously also inspires young generations of young minds to also contribute in non-asserting space exploration within all of science and literature and poetry. There's something about when you look up to the stars that makes you dream. That's a really good reason to invest in this, whether it's building giant megastructures, which is so freaking cool, but also Well, it's building giant megastructures, which is so freaking cool, but also colonizing Mars. Yeah, it's something to look forward to.

Something that And not make it a domain of war, but a domain of human collaboration and human compassion, I think. Yeah. You're the founder and director of the MIT Space Exploration Initiative. It includes a ton of projects. So I just wanted to focus, I guess, on life and space from astrobiology that we talked about to Habitat. Are there some other interesting projects part of this initiative that you are that pop to mind that you find particularly cool. Absolutely.

One is the future of in-space manufacturing. So if we're going to build large-scale space structures, yes, it's great to ship them up from Earth and self-assemble them. What about extrusion in orbit? It's one of the best technologies to leverage in microgravity because you can extrude a particularly long beam that would sag in a normal gravity environment, but might be able to become the basis of a truss or a large-scale space structure. So we're doing miniature tests of extrusion and are excited to fly this on the International Space Station in a few

months. We are working on swarm robots. We have just announced actually MIT's return to the moon. So my organization is leading this mission for MIT, going back to the surface of the moon as early as the end of this year, 2022, or maybe early 2023. And trying to take data from our research payloads at this historic South Pole site, where NASA's supposed to send the first humans back

on the Artemis III mission. So our hope is to directly support that human mission with our data. How does that connect to the swarm? Uh, aspects. Does it connect? Yes. Yes. We're actually going to fly one of the little astro ants. That's the current plan. Nice.

One of the little swarm robots on the top of a rover. Um, that's part of the... Ants riding a rover? Yes. Exactly. An ant riding a rover. That rover gets packed in a lander. that lander gets packed in a SpaceX rocket So it's a whole nesting doll situation to get to get to the moon mother of robot dragons

Okay, so this one a swarm of one swarm of one exactly we're testing out It's a tech demonstration mission not a true not a true swarm. Yeah, there they are those are the astronauts Wow, and they this was a distributed system and they, in theory, you could have a ton of these. Yes. These could also be centralized. So they have wireless technology that could also talk to a central base station and will be assessing kind of case by case whether it makes sense to operate them in a decentralized swarm or to command them in a centralized swarm. Each robot is equipped with four magnetic wheels which enable the robot to attach to any magnetic surface so you can operate basically any environment.

We tested the mobility of all robots on different materials in a microgravity environment. On the vomit comet, prior to going to the mode. That must look so cool. So they're basically moving along different metallic services. Yeah, exactly. It's interesting when you, you know, just a minute ago talking about the reflection of

how space can be so aspirational and so uniting. There's a great quote from Bill Anders from the Apollo 8 mission to the moon, which is he, it's the Earth-Rise photo that was taken where you see the Earth coming up over the horizon of the moon, and the quote is something along the lines of, we came all the way to discover the moon, and what we really discovered was the Earth, this really powerful image looking back. And so we're also trying to think for our lunar mission, we realize we're a very privileged

group at MIT to get the opportunity to do this. How could we bring humanity along with us? And so one of the things we're still testing out, I don't know if we're gonna be able to swing it, would be to do something like a Twitch plays Pokemon, but with the robot. So let a lot of people on Earth actually control the robot or at least benefit from the data that we're gathering and try to release the data openly.

So we're exploring a couple different ideas for how do we engage more people in this mission? That would be surreal to be able to interact in some way with the thing that's out there. Exactly. On another surface, self-connection. Direct connection. I think about artificial intelligence in that same way, which is like building robots, put some mirror to us humans. It makes us like wonder about like, what is intelligence, what is consciousness, and what is actually valuable about human beings.

When AI system learns to play chess better than humans, you start to let go of this idea that humans are special because of intelligence. It's something else. Maybe the flame of human consciousness, it's the capacity to feel deeply, to sort of to both suffer and to love all those things. And that somehow AI to me, so it puts a mirror to that.

You mentioned how 9,000, you had to bring it up with these warm bots crawling on the surface of your cocoon in space. Right. I mean, let me steal man the, the hell 9000 perspective. Okay. The poor guy just wanted to maintain the mission and the astronauts were, I mean, I don't know if people often talk about that, but you know, like doctors have to make difficult decisions. When there's limited resources, you actually do have to sacrifice human life often because you have to make

decisions. And I think how is probably making that kind of decision about what's more important the lives of individual astronauts or the mission. And I feel like AI's when other humans will need to make these decisions. And it also feels like AI systems will need to help make those decisions. I don't know. I guess my question is about greater and greater collective intelligence by systems. Do you worry about that? What is the right way to sort of solve this problem, keeping a human in the loop? Do you think about this kind of stuff? Or are they sufficiently dumb now, the robots that that's not yet on the horizon to think about? I think it should be on the horizon. It's always good to think about these things early because we make a lot of technical design decisions at this phase working with swarm robots that it would be better to have

thought about some of these questions early in the life cycle of a project. There is a real interest in NASA right now thinking about the future of human robot interaction, HRI, and what is the right synergy in terms of level of control for the human versus level of dependence or control for the robot. And we're beginning to test out more of these scenarios. For example, the gateway space station, which is meant to be in orbit around the moon as a staging base for the surface operations, is meant to be able to function autonomously

with no humans in it for months at a time, because I think it's going to be seasonal. I think we might not be constantly staffing it. So this will be a really great test of, I don't know that anybody's yet worried about how 9,000 evolving, but certainly just the robustness of some of these AI systems that might be asked to autonomously maintain the station while the humans are away. Or detection algorithms that are going to say, you know, if you had a human pilot, they might see debris in orbit and steer around it.

There'll be a lot of autonomous navigation that has to happen. That'll be one of the early test beds where we'll start to get a little bit closer to that future. Well, the HRI component is really interesting to me, especially when the eye includes like almost friendship, because like people don't realize this, I think that we, you know, we humans long for connection and when you have even a basic interaction, that's just like supposed to be just like serving you or something, you still project, it's still a source of meaning and connection. And so you do have to think about that. I mean, how 9,000, you know, the movie maybe doesn't portray it that way, but I'm sure

there's a relationship there between the astronauts and the robot, especially when you have greater and greater level of intelligence. And maybe that addresses the happiness question too. Yeah, I think there's a great book by Kate Darling, who's one of my colleagues at MIT. Yeah, she's amazing. We've been, she's already been on this podcast, but we talk all the time, and we're supposed to talk, and we've been missing each other,

and we're gonna make it happen soon. Yeah. Come down to Texas, Kate. All right. Anyway, yeah, she's amazing. And she has this book. And she has her whole work is about this. Connection with robots, yeah.

This beautiful connection that we have with robots. But I think it's greater and greater and important when it's out in space because it could help alleviate some of the loneliness. Right. One of the projects in the book that I gave you, which is a catalog of the projects that we've worked on over the last five years, is the social robot that was developed at the Media Lab. And we, one of the first years in 2017 that we flew a zero-g-flight, we took the social robot along, and tried to do a little bit of a very scaled-down human study to look at these questions because

you do imagine that we would form a bond, a real bond, with the social robots that might be not just serving us on a mission, but really be our teammates on a future mission. And I do think that that could have a powerful role in the mental health and just the stability of a crewist to have some other robot friends come along. What do you, whether the book you mentioned, is into the anthropocosmos, a whole space catalog from the, a space catalog. Get that reference. Yeah, so call it to earth catalog, a whole space catalog from the MIT Space Exploration Initiative. catalog, a whole space catalog from the MIT Space Exploration Initiative. What about the happiness?

You said that that's one of the problems of when you're out in space. How do you keep humans happy, again asking for a friend? Yes. I mean, one of the big challenges is you can't just open a window or walk out a door and blow off steam, right? You can't just go somewhere to clear your head. And in that sense, you need to build habitats that are homes that really care for the humans inside them and have, whether it's biofilia and a place where you can go and feel like you're in nature or a VR headset,

which for some people is a porous simulchrum, but is maybe better than nothing. You need to be thinking about these technological interventions that are going to have to be part of your home and be part of your, maybe day-to-day ritual to keep you steady and balanced and happy or feeling fulfilled. What about other humans, relationships with other humans? Did those get weird when you get past a certain number of humans? I'm not an expert in this area, but an anecdote that I'll share. My understanding is that NASA has still not decided whether it's better to send married couples or single crew members in terms

of you want some level of stability. You don't want to have the drama of romantic relationships, like you're, you know, alluding to before, but they can't decide because Mary Kupp is also fine. Yeah. And have a really tough dynamic. And so there's a lot of open questions still to answer about what is the ideal psychological makeup of a crew. And we're starting to test some of these things with the civilian crews that are going up

with Inspiration 4, like last fall with SpaceX and X1, that's gonna fly in a few days here in March. As we begin to lengthen the time of those civilian crews, I think we'll start to learn a little bit more about just average everyday human-to-human dynamics and not the astronauts that are themselves selected to be perfect human specimens, very good to work with, easy to get along with. I wish we collected more data about this pandemic because I feel like it's a good rough simulation of what it

built out in space. A lot of people were locked down. Some married couples, I think a lot of marriages broke up, a lot of marriages got closer together. So it's like, and then the single people, some of them went off the cliff and some of them discovered their new happiness and meaning and so on. It's a beautiful little experiment, a painful one. Is there a thorough way to really test that? Because it's such a costly experiment. The sun humans up there, but I guess you can always return back to Earth if it's not working out.

That's what we hope. We hope you don't have a Apollo 13 situation that doesn't quite make it back, but yeah, this is also why Mars is such a challenge. The moon is only three days away. That's a lot quicker to recover from if there's a psychological problem with the crew or any type of maintenance problem, anything. Three years is such a challenge compared to these other domains that we've been getting more used to in terms of human spaceflight.

So this is a question that we will need to have explored more before we start really sending cruise to Mars. So you're a young scientist. Do you think in your lifetime, you will go out into orbit. You will go out beyond and deep space and potentially step you. I don't know if you can call yourself a civilian. I don't know if that's what you can't ask, but you as a curious and from MIT land step on Mars. Yes. So you're a firm, Mr. Firm.

Are you coming back? Yes. I'm coming back. I don't want that one-way mission. I want the two-way mission. But yes, I mean, I think we're already talking about a pretty near-term opportunity where I could send graduate students to the International Space Station. Not a, you know, not a sacrifice, but send graduate students to the ISS to do their research. I do think you and I both would have an opportunity to go to a lunar base of some sort within our lifetime. And there's a good chance if we really wanted to,

we might have to really advocate for it, apply to an astronaut program. There will be some avenues for humans in our lifetime to go to Mars. What's the bar for like health? Do you think that bar will keep getting lower and lower in terms of how healthy, how athletic, like how the psychological profile,

all those kinds of things? Yeah. For one, we're gonna build more robust habitats that don't depend on astronauts being so impeccably well trained. So we're gonna make it better for inclusion and just opening access to space. But there's a fantastic group called AstroAccess that is already helping disabled space flyers

do zero-G flights and potentially get access to the ISS. And some of the things that we think of as disabilities on Earth are hyper abilities in space. You don't need really powerful legs in space. What you'd really benefit from having is a third arm, more ways to kind of move yourself around and grip and interact.

So we are already seeing a much more open-minded approach to who gets to go to space and astro-axis as a wonderful organization doing some of that work. I'm hoping interversion will also be a superpower in space. Okay, well, first I'd love to get your opinion on commercial spaceflight, what SpaceX will blue origin are doing. And also another question on top of that is because you've worked with a lot of different kinds of people, culturally, what's the difference between SpaceX or commercial type of efforts, NASA and MIT.

And academia? Academia. Yeah. So to the first part of your question, I am thrilled by all of the commercial activity in space. It has really empowered our program. So instead of me waiting for five years to get a grant and get the money from the grant

and only then can you send a project to space, I got my fundraise, a lot like a startup founder, and I directly buy access to space on the International Space Station through SpaceX or Nanaracks, same with Blue Origin and their Suborbital Craft, same with Axiom now, Axiom making plans for their own commercial space station.

It's not out of the realm of possibility, but in a few years, I will rent lab space in orbit. I will rent a module from the Axiom space station or the Orbital Reef, which is the Blue Origin space station or Nanna Rax is thinking about Star Lab Oasis. There's probably some other companies that I'm not even aware of yet

that are doing commercial space habitats. So I think that's fabulous. And really empowering for our research. Is it affordable? So loosely speaking, does it become affordable for like MIT type of research lab? Is it you know, or does it need to be a multi-university like a gigantic effort thing? One of the reasons we're spinning out or really is we actually realize it's cheap enough It doesn't even have to be MIT and we wanted to start

It doesn't even have to be MIT. And we wanted to start democratizing access to these spaceflight opportunities to a much broader swath of humanity. Could you take a con Academy educational course about, hey, students around the world, this is how you get ready for a zero-g-flight. And by the way, come fly with us next year, which is something we're going to do with our railings.

We're going to bring much more day-to-day folks on zero-g-flights and get them access to engaging in the space industry. So it's become cheap enough, and the prices have dropped enough to consider even that. So that's amazing. It definitely doesn't have to be a consortium of universities anymore. Depends on what you want to fly. If you want to fly James Webb, a huge telescope that's decades in the making. Sure, you need a NASA allocation budget, you need billions. But for a lot of the stuff in the making, sure, you need a NASA allocation budget, you need billions. But for a lot of the stuff in the book and our research portfolio, it's actually becoming far more accessible. So that's commercial. What about NASA and MIT academia? Yeah. I think, you know,

people have been worried about NASA the last few years because in some people's minds they are seeding ground to these commercial efforts, but that's really not what's happening. NASA empowered these commercial efforts because they want to free themselves up to go to Mars and go to Europa and continue being that really aspirational force for humanity of pushing the boundary, always pushing the boundary. And if they were anchored in lower orbitthorough bit, maintaining a space station indefinitely, that's so much a part of their budget that it was keeping them from being able to do more. So it actually is really fantastic for NASA to have grown this commercial ecosystem,

and then that frees NASA up to go further. And in academia, we like to think that we will be able to do the provocative, next-generation research that is going to unlock things at that frontier. And we can partner with NASA. We can go through a program if we want to send a probe out really far, but we can also partner with SpaceX and see what human life in a SpaceX Mars settlement might look like and how we could design for that. Speaking of projects, maybe other other projects that pop to mind from the Space Exploration Initiative or maybe stuff from the book The the convention something super cool. I mean everything I've been talking about is cool

But just something that pops to mind again. Yeah, so we talked about life in space and you might need more arms than legs One of the projects by Valentina Sumini was a air-powered Robotics tale so it's a soft robotics tale that essentially has a little camera on the back end of it. Can do computer vision and nose-writ a grapple? So it's behind you. It grapples onto something and holds you in space and then you can actually free up

both of your hands to work. So we're already starting to think about the design of bionic humans or prosthetics or things that would make you kind of like a cyborg to augment your capabilities when you're in a space environment. of bionic humans or prosthetics or things that would make you kind of like a cyborg to augment your capabilities when you're in a space environment. How would you control something like that? It's just kind of like a, you can't call it a leg, but whatever.

It's a... Additional appendage. A appendage. So, what are ideas for controlling something like that? Yeah, so right now it's super, yeah, there you go. That's cool. Right now it's super manual. It's basically just. That's cool. Right now it's super manual. It's basically just like a kind of a set pattern of inflating as we're testing it.

But in the future, if we had a neural link, I mean, this is something that you could imagine directly controlling, just thinking thoughts and controlling it. That's a ways away. Yeah. So we talked about on the biology side, as the biology, there's probably agriculture stuff. Is there other things that kind of feed the ecosystem of out and space for survival or the robotics architectures the self-assembly stuff?

So kind of combining something we were talking about, you can form these relationships with objects and anthropomorphize. Yes. One of the things that we're thinking about for agriculture created by Manway and Somu, so two students at MIT, was this little, it looks like a planet, but it's inspired by,

I think, a mandala or Nepalese spinning wheel, and you plant plants on the inside, and that astronaut has to spin it every day to help the plant survive. So it's a way to give the astronaut something to care about, something that they are responsible for keeping alive and can really invest themselves in. And it's not necessary.

We have other ways to grow in orbit. Hydroponics, liquid medium, trying to keep the liquid around the plant roots is hard because there's no gravity to pull it down in a particular direction. What I loved about this project was they said, sure, we have ways that the plants could grow on their own, but the astronauts might want to care for it in the same way that we have little plants that come to be important to us, little plant friends. Yeah, so there's agrofuge. That's an early model of this spinning, manually spinning plant habitat.

I guess this is the best of academic research as you can do these kinds of wild ideas. Wild ideas, yeah. Well, you know, I get to spend quite a bit of time with Mr. Elon Musk and he's very stressed but especially about starship and all those kinds of engineering efforts. Yeah. What do you think about how damn hard it is to get out? Like are we humans going to be able to do this? I don't know. I think it feels like it's an engineering problem, it's a scientific problem, but it's also just a motivation problem for the entire human species.

And you also need to have superstar researchers and engineers working on it. So you have to get like the best people in the world to inspire them and starting from a young age and kind of, was inculcating us into why this way it's. I mean, I guess this way, it's exciting. You don't know if we're gonna be able to pull this off. Like, we could like fail miserably. And that I suppose, I mean, that's where the best of engineering is done. It's like success is not guaranteed.

And even if it happens, it might be very painful. I think that's what's so special about what Elon is doing with SpaceX is he takes these risks and he tests iteratively and he'll see the spectacular failures on the path to a successful starship. It's something that people have said, why isn't NASA doing that? Well, that's because NASA is doing that with taxpayer dollars and we would all revolt if we saw NASA failing at all these different stages.

But that level of, you know, spiral engineering theory of development isn't super impressive. And it's a really interesting approach that SpaceX has taken. And I think between people like Elon and Jeff Bezos and Firefly and NASA and ESO, we are going to get there. They're building the road to space. These trailblazers are doing it. And now part of the challenge is to get the rest of the public to understand that it's happening. Right? A lot of people don't know that we're going back to the moon, that we're going to send the first woman to the moon within a few years. A lot of people don't know that there are commercial space stations in orbit, that it's not just NASA that does space stuff. So we have a big challenge to get more of humanity excited and educated and involved again,

kind of like in the Apollo era, where it was a big deal for everybody. Well, a lot of that is also one of the big impressive things that Elon does, I think, extremely well as the social media is getting people excited. And I think that actually, he's helped NASA step their game up in terms of social media. There's something about, yeah, this storytelling, but also not like, you know, like authentic and just real and raw engineering, there's a lot of excitement for that humor and fun also.

All of those things you realize, the thing that make up the virality of the meme is beautiful, you have to kind of embrace that. And to me, to kind of embrace that, and to me, this kind of, I criticize a lot of companies, business, I talked to a bunch of CEOs and so on. And it's just like, there's a caution. Let us do this, press conference thing,

where when the final product is ready, and it's overproduced, as opposed to the raw, the gritty, just showed off. I mean, something that I think MIT is very good at doing is just showing the raw, by nature, the mess of it. And the mess of it is beautiful, and people get really excited, and failure is really exciting. When the thing blows up, and you're like, oh shit, that makes it even more exciting when it doesn't blow up. Right. It even more exciting when it doesn't blow up and doing all of that on social media and showing also the humans behind it The individual young researchers or the Engineers or the leaders

Where everything is at stake. I don't know. I think I'm really excited about that I do want MIT to do that more for students to show off their stuff and not be pressured to do this kind of generic official presentation, but show their, become a YouTuber also, like show off your raw research as you're working on it in the early days. I hope that's the future. Things like I was teasing about TikTok earlier, but you know, these kinds of things, I think inspire young people to show off their stuff, to show their true self, the

rawness of it. Because I think that's where engineering is best. And I think that will inspire people about all the cool stuff we could do out in space. I couldn't agree more. And I actually think that this is why we need a real life. Starfleet Academy right now. It was the place where the space cadets got to go to learn about how to engage in a future of life in space and We can do it in a much better way there a bunch of groups that traditionally haven't thought that they could engage in aerospace Well, there's because you were told you had to be in the math and science now we need space lawyers We need space artists like Grimes, right? We need really creative

profoundly interesting people to want to see themselves in that future. I think it's a big challenge to show us in the space industry to also do some more diversity, equity, and inclusion, and show a broader swath of society that there's a future for them in this space exploration vision. Let me push back on one thing. We don't need space lawyers. I'm just joking.

It's a joke. We do. We do. Okay. We do. The floor is we do. Okay, we do. The floor is a great element. Okay, let me ask a big ridiculous question. What is the most beautiful idea to you about space exploration? Whether it's the engineering, the astrobiology, the science, the inspiration, the human happiness

or aliens, I don't know. What do you like inspires you every day in terms of its beauty? It's all. As an ex-physicist, but I've always found so profound, it's just that at really really small scales, like particle physics, and really really big scales, like particle physics and really, really big scales, like astrophysics, there are similarities in the way that those systems behave and look, and there's a certain beautiful symmetry in the universe that's just kind of waiting for us

to tie together the physics and really understand it. That is something that just really captivates me. And I would love to, even though I'm now much more on the applied space exploration side, I really try to keep up with what's happening in those physics areas, because I think that will be a huge answer for humanity along the lines of, are we alone in the universe?

One of the fascinating things about you is you have a degree in physics, mathematics, and philosophy. And now, I don't know what you want to, what you call aerospace engineering, maybe kind of thing. So you have a foot in all of these worlds, the theoretical, the beauty of that world, and the philosophy somehow is in there. And now the very practical,

pragmatic, implementation of all these wild ideas, plus your incredible communicator, all those things. What did you pick up from those different disciplines? Or maybe I'm just romanticizing all those different disciplines. But what did you pick up from the variety of that physics mathematics philosophy? What I loved about having this chance to do a liberal arts education was trying to understand

the human condition. And I think more designers for space exploration should be thinking about that because there's so much depth of, like we were talking about, issues and opportunities around human connection, human life, meaning in life, how do you find fulfillment or happiness? And I think if you approach these questions just purely from the standpoint of an engineer or a scientist, you'll miss some of what makes it a life worth living. And so I love being able to combine some of this notion of philosophy and the human condition with my work. But I'm also a pragmatist and I didn't want to stay just purely in these big picture questions about the universe.

I wanted to have an impact on society and I also felt like I had such a wonderful childhood and a really fantastic setup that I owe society some work to really make a positive impact for a broader swath of citizens. And so that kind of led me from the physics domain to thinking about engineering and practical questions for life and space. In physics, was there a dream? Are you also captivated by this search for the theory of everything that kind of unlocks

the deeper and deeper in the simple elegant way, the function of our universe? Do you think they'll be useful for us for the actual practical engineering things that you're working on now? It could be. I mean, I worked at CERN for two summers in undergrad and we were looking for super symmetry,

which was one of these alternatives to the standard model. And it was sad because my professors were getting sadder and sadder because they weren't finding it. They were excluding what we would call this parameter space of finding these super symmetricsymmetric particles, but the search for what that theory of everything could be or a grand unified theory that kind of answers some of the holes within the standard model of physics would presumably kind of unlock a better understanding of certain fundamental physical laws that we should be able to build a better

understanding of engineering and day-to-day services from that might not be an immediately obvious thing. When we discovered the Higgs boson, I was there at CERN that day. It was July 4th, 2012, that it was announced. We all waited like nerds overnight in line to get into the announcement chamber. I had never waited for even like a Harry Potter premiere in my life, but we waited for this announcement of the Higgs boson to get into the chamber. That's awesome. But did that immediately translate to technology for engineering? No.

But it's still a really important part of our understanding of these fundamental laws of physics. And so I don't know that it's always immediate, but I think it is really critical knowledge for humanity to seek. It might just shake up on the world. Yeah. What scares me is it might help us create more dangerous weapons. So, um, and then we'll figure out

that great filter situation. And I still believe that human compassion and love, uh, is actually the way to defend against all these greater and greater and more impressive weapons. Yeah. Let me ask a weird question in terms of you disagreeing with others. What important idea do you believe is true that many others don't agree with you on?

Maybe it's a tough question. Think about that one, but it's very specific, like, which material to use or something about a particular project, or it could be grand priorities on missions. I think one you actually mentioned is interesting is like, the thing we should be looking for is like colonization of space versus colonization of planets, meaning like... Yes, it's probably my best hot take that people would disagree with me on is life in floating cities as opposed to life on the surface.

How do you envision that like spread of humans? Because you said at the beginning of the conversation something about like scale, increasing the scale, basically humans and space, are they just like like in they're in orbit and then they get a little farther and farther out like do you see this kind of floating cities just getting farther and farther from Earth they can always kind of return. But like if you look a few centuries from not you just see us all these like floating cities. And it's just kind of envelops the space around us in these second neighborhoods. Yeah, yeah, these are great. The spectral and there's like giant structures and there's small pirate structures and

that kind of stuff. I think low earth orbit might come to look like that and it's a really interesting regulatory challenge to make sure that there's some cross purposes. So the more cool space cities we have in orbit, the more shiny objects in the night sky, the worst it is for astronomers in a really, kind of overly simplified case. So there's some pushback to this like,

amoebaing where we just grow kind of inconsistently or indiscriminately as an amoeba in lower Earth orbit. Beyond that though, I think we'll grow in pockets where there are resources. So we want just to expand around the gravity well of Earth, we'll do some development around the moon, some development around asteroids,

some development around Mars, because there'll always be purposes for which we want to go down to a physical object and study it or extract something or learn from it. But I think we'll grow in fits and starts in pockets. Some of the coolest pockets are the gravity-balanced pockets, like the Lagrange points, which is where we just sent, we not me personally, but NASA just sent James Webb, the big telescope. I think it's at L2.

What's the nice feature about those pockets? So it's a stable orbit. There are several different Lagrange points. And so it just requires less energy to stay where you're trying to stay. Yeah, that's fascinating. What's also fascinating is the interaction between nations. On that regard, like who owns that? Would you say in those floating cities, do you envision independent governments? That was going to be my next answer to you, which pushed me harder for a more provocative question, where I might disagree with other people. I don't yet have my own opinions fully formed on this, but we are trying to figure out right now what happens to the moon with all of these first-come, first-served actors just arriving and setting precedents

that might really affect future access. And one example is property rights. We do want companies that have the expertise to go to the moon and mine stuff that will help us develop a human settlement there or a gateway, but companies need to know generally that they have rights to a certain area or that they have But companies need to know generally that they have rights to a certain area or that they have some legal right

to sell things that they're getting. Does that mean we're gonna grant property rights on the moon to companies who has the right to give that right away? So there's a bunch of really kind of gnarly questions that we have to think about, which is why I think we need space lawyers. Maybe that's the true provocative answers.

I think we need space. True. I mean, yeah, yeah. I mean, but those questions again, as you said, eloquently, will help us answer questions about here. We have. So, yeah, it is a little strange. I mean, it's obvious, but it's also strange if you look at the big picture of it all, that we draw these like borders around geographical areas and we say, this is mine. Right. And then we fight wars over what's mine and not.

It seems like there's possible alternatives, but also it seems like there needs to be a public ownership of some parts, like, you know, what is it, Central Park in New York. Is there something like preserving? The commons. Yeah, the commons. That's why we titled the book into the anthropocosmos. We know it's a long kind of a mouthful, but this notion of the Anthropocene. We have a lot of commons problems in humanity. How are we treating the earth global climate change? How are we going to treat in behaving space? How can we be responsible stewards of the space commons? And I would love to see

an approach to the moon that is commons based, but it's hard to know who would be the protector or the enforcer of that. And if it's, which it will be probably in the early days, a lot of companies sort of working on the moon, working on Mars, working out in space, it feels like there still needs to be a civilian representation of like the greater effort or something like that, like where there should be a president, there should be a democracy of some kind where people can vote. Some representative government. Those are all again the same, the same human questions. What advice would you give to a young person today, thinking about what they want to do with

their life, career, so somebody in high school, somebody in college, maybe somebody that looks up to the stars and dreams to one day, take it one way, take it to Mars, or to contribute something to the effort. I'd say you should feel empowered because it's really the first time in human history that we're at this cusp of interplanetary civilization and I don't think we're gonna lapse back from it. So the future is incredibly bright for young people that even younger than you and I will actually really get a chance to go to Mars for certain. The other thing I would say is be open-minded about what your own interests are. I don't think you anymore have to be shoehorned into a particular career to be welcomed into

the future of space exploration. If you are an artist and that is your passion, but you would love to do space art or, if not space art, use your artistry to communicate a feeling or a message about space. That's a role that we desperately need, just as much as we need space scientists and space engineers. So, well, when you look at your own life, you're an incredibly accomplished scientist, young scientists, but, you know, and you hopped around from, you know, physics to aerospace. So going from the biggest theoretical ideas to the biggest practical ideas, is there something from your

own journey you can give advice to like how to end up doing incredible research at MIT, maybe the role of the university in college and education and learning all that kind of stuff. the role of the university in college and education and learning all that kind of stuff? I'd say one piece of advice is find really good teammates because I get to be the one that's talking to you, but there are 50 graduate student staff and faculty that are part of my organization back at MIT, and I'm actually you guys can't see it on camera, but I'm sitting here with my co-founder and COO Danielle Delod, and that is really what makes these large scale challenges for humanity possible, is really fantastic teams working together to scale more than what I could do alone. So I think that that's an important model that we

don't talk about enough in academia. There's a big push for this like lone wolf genius figure in academia, but that's certainly not been the case in my life. I've had wonderful collaborators and people that I work with along the team also cross-disciplinary So absolutely yeah cross-disciplinary interdisciplinary whatever you want to call it Artists where do artists come in do you work with artists? We do we have an arts curator on the space exploration initiative side She helps make sure partly around that communication challenge that we talked about that We're not just doing zero-g flights and space missions, but that we take our artifacts of this sci-fi space feature to museums and galleries and exhibits.

She pushed me to make sure her name is Shinglu. She pushed me for our first ISS mission. I was just gathering all the engineering payloads that I wanted to support for the students to fly, including my own work. And she said, you know what, we should do an open call internationally for artists to send something to the ISS. And we found out it was the first time we were the first ever international open call for art to go to the ISS. And that was thanks to Scheng and artists bringing a perspective that I might not have thought about prioritizing. So. Yeah, that's awesome. So when you look out there,

it's the flame of human consciousness. There does seem to be something quite special about us humans. Well, first of all, what do you think it is? What's consciousness? What are we trying to preserve here? What is it about humans that should be preserved or life here on earth? They would give you hope to try to expand it out farther and farther. Like, what

makes you sad if it was all gone? I think we're a remarkable species that we are aware of our own thoughts. We are meta aware of our own thoughts and of ourselves. And we're able to speak on a podcast about a meta awareness about our own thoughts. Yeah, I think that that is a really special gift that we have been given as a species and that there's a worth to expanding our circles of awareness. So we're very aware of as an Earth-based species, we've become a little bit more aware of the fragility of Earth and how special a place it is when we go to the moon and we look back.

What would it mean for us to have a presence in our purpose in life as a inter-solar system? Species are eventually an intergalactic species. I think it's a really profound opportunity for exploration, for the sake of exploration, or real gift for the human mind. Yeah, for anything we're curious creatures, you see, do believe we might one day become intergalactic solution. Long, long time from now. We have a lot of propulsion challenges to answer to get that far. So you have a hope for this. Yeah. Another big ridiculous question building on top of that. What do you think is the meaning of life, this individual life of ours, your life, that unfortunately has to come to an end as far as we know for now. And our life here together, is there a why?

Or do we just kind of, like, let our curiosity carry us away? Oh, interesting. Is there a single kind of driving purpose why or can it just be curiosity based? I certainly feel, and this is not the scientist in me talking, but just more of like a human soul talking. I certainly feel some sense of purpose and meaning in my life, and there's a version of that that's a very local level within my family, which is funny because this whole conversation has been big, grand space exploration themes, but you asked me this question in my first

thought, is what really matters to me, my family, my biological reproducing units. But then there's also another purpose, like another version of the meaning in my life that is trying to do good things for humanity. So that sense that we can be individual humans and have our local meaning, and we can also be global humans.

Maybe someday, like the Star Trek Utopia will all be global citizens. I don't want to sound too naive. But there is I think that beauty to a meaning and a purpose of your life that's bigger than yourself working on something that's bigger and grander than just yourself. The deepest meaning is from the local biological reproduction unit, and then it goes to the engineering scientific, what is it, corporate, like company unit, that can actually produce and compete and interact with the world, and then there's the giant human unit

that's struggling with pandemics. And commons. And together struggling against the forces of nature that you're trying to kill us. Yeah, there'd be nothing like an alien invasion to unite the planet, we think. I can't wait, bring it on aliens. Listen, your work, your incredible, communicative, incredible young scientist, Aaron, it's you, John, or the you would spend your time with me. I can't wait what you do in the future. And thank you for representing MIT so beautifully,

so masterfully, your incredible person. Thank you for talking to me. Thank you so much for having me. It's been an absolute pleasure. It's a great conversation. Thanks for listening to this conversation with Ariel Eckblow. To support this podcast, please check out our sponsors in the description. And now let me leave you with some words from from Seneca, the Roman Stoke philosopher. There is no easy way from earth to the stars. Thank you.