Marketplace - Remember tariff exclusions?
Episode Date: March 12, 2025Back in 2018 — the last time President Donald Trump led a trade war — some businesses got tariff exemptions if they imported goods that couldn’t be sourced in the U.S. Was the process to app...ly smooth and transparent? Well … no. Will today’s businesses have the same opportunity? That remains to be seen. Also in this episode: Home improvement stores launch AI helper bots, corporate forecasts aim low, and small businesses hesitate to hire.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
On the program today, making economic sense out of all that uncertainty.
From American public media, this is Market Plans.
In Los Angeles, I'm Kyle Rizdall.
It is Tuesday today, the 11th of March.
Good as always to have you along, everybody.
It is a hard and fast rule of this program that while the economic headlines matter and
should have attention paid to them, what's really important is what people are feeling
in their day to day, people and businesses too.
So I'll give you the headlines,
then Justin Ho is going to come on and tell you what they mean.
We got a couple of data points
about the American labor market this morning,
the January job openings and labor turnover survey,
Jolt's of course from the Labor Department,
and the February small business optimism index
from the National Federation of Independent Business.
The NFIB says a lot of small businesses
are still having trouble filling their open positions.
So there's that.
But the Joltz report showed job openings
have fallen almost 9% since the same period a year ago.
It's a sign that the labor market is slowing a bit, of course,
and then you add the general layer of uncertainty
in this economy right now?
Well, here's Justin.
Throughout last year, sales were strong at Rothman's, a men's clothing store in New
York. Co-President Ken Giddens says he went into this year feeling optimistic, and he
was planning to hire for two new positions.
And then the last week or so has definitely made us think about it a little bit. Giddens says Rothman's imports a lot of the clothing it sells, so he's concerned
that the Trump administration's new tariffs will make that clothing more
expensive. And then there's all the stock market gyrations in recent days, which he
says can put his customers on edge. You know, we sell clothing which is not
something that is necessary, and if you're not feeling good about your
portfolio or worried about what's going on in the big picture, that can sometimes make
you slow down.
As a result, Giddens says he's putting those two new hires on hold.
Sometimes you got to raise that caution flag just to take a little breath and see what's
going on.
Meanwhile, in Ohio, Heather Whaling, who runs a marketing company called Gabin Communication,
is seeing that kind of caution among some of the clients she works with.
In the nonprofit space, there's caution in the education space, certainly in construction
and real estate development.
Whaling says it's affecting her hiring decisions.
She's already brought on three people this year, and she's planning on hiring more.
But that depends on how her clients are feeling.
We even are in a situation right now where we have a person that I am 98% ready to make
a job offer to, but I need to see how a couple more contracts shake out on my end before
making that commitment.
On the plus side, Whaling says she's having an easier time finding new hires.
Same with Randy George, co-owner of Red Hen
Baking Company in Vermont. It's been years really since we've put out ads and fairly quickly
heard from really great applicants. George says the bakery is in the middle of moving to a new
building that's almost twice as big as his current location. He says his business will be affected by
tariffs on Canadian flour, for example, and whatever happens to the economy, he says,
It wouldn't surprise me if we see a downturn in our business in the next four
years. But we also look beyond that.
When the business expands, George hopes to staff up, starting with two or three
new employees. I'm Justin Ho from Marketplace.
Wall Street today?
Well, not as bad as yesterday.
Let's just say that, huh?
We'll have the details when we do the numbers. Coles, the department store chain, reported earnings this morning, including, as most
companies do, its outlook for the year ahead.
Not so great, it turns out.
The company predicts revenue is going to decline between 5 and 7 percent compared to last year,
way worse than what Wall Street was expecting.
And Kohl's joins a growing list of companies making less than rosy guesses about what the
future holds.
In just the past couple of days, Delta Airlines and Dick's Sporting Goods have each issued
gloomy forecasts.
As Marketplace's Matt Levin reports, that kind of corporate guidance is all about setting
expectations.
Zachary Warring takes these corporate guidances with a grain of salt.
He works for the investment research firm CFRA.
Actually, a little more than a grain.
Yeah, I'd say it's probably more like a tablespoon
or maybe even a cup.
Projections are the hardest thing to get right in finance.
As a broad rule of thumb,
if a company's earnings come in lower
than what either the company or Wall Street analysts expected,
the stock price goes down.
If they beat expectations, the price goes up.
So why set high expectations when you can under promise
and over deliver?
You definitely see companies underestimate.
They give a range typically,
and you'll almost never see them miss
the bottom of that range.
Legally, corporations actually don't have to publish
these types of forecasts.
David Vollent is at Indiana University's
Kelly School of Business.
What we've seen is a lot of firms moving away
from issuing these estimates.
But that doesn't mean they don't have any value,
especially since firms have more up-to-date data
than, say, what the government puts out.
The way that the macro environment
is impacting the internal projections,
that's already happening.
So they can observe internally, you know, contracts, canceled sales, increases in growth.
So what then to make of so many different companies being such Debbie Downers about
the future?
Sean Dunlap at Morningstar says it's partly a hedge against all the uncertainty involving
tariffs and Doge and the world,
but it could also be a sign of a broader downturn
that's already begun.
Well, consumer spending held up really well in 2024.
It's starting to look like there are cracks in the armor,
but a lot of companies are revising
their guidance accordingly.
Here's hoping those corporate guidances are wrong again.
I'm Matt Levin for Marketplace.
Here's a little guidance for you. are wrong again. I'm Matt Levin for Marketplace.
Here's a little guidance for you. If you miss something on the actual radio, and we get it, it happens. Life is busy. We've got a podcast. Marketplace.org is where you can get that. Or,
obviously, just follow us on the platform of your choice. We'll get the February consumer price index tomorrow, inflation at the retail level.
But there is something else burbling around out there that we're going to spend a couple
of minutes on.
Stagflation, high inflation and stagnant economic growth.
To be clear, we are not, repeat, not seeing this right now. The unemployment rate is still historically low and
inflation while elevated is down significantly from its pandemic highs.
But better to know we think what the future might hold, no?
So we got Shabnam Kalimli-Ozkan on the phone. She's an economist teaching at Brown University. Welcome to the program.
Thank you. How are you? Great to Brown University. Welcome to the program. Thank you.
How are you?
Great to be here.
I'm well, thank you.
For those who might not have experienced it back
in the 70s, what does stagflation
feel like in an economy?
It is basically higher prices and higher unemployment,
recession.
So you have a double whammy, the economy is slow,
people are unemployed, at the same time prices are high. To say again we are not
in stagflation right now, that is an important point, but my question is what
has happened to get us to the point where we're having this conversation again?
Why we are having this conversation is what I call extreme uncertainty created by a series
of policies of the new administration.
We all know that tariff is because it's a tax, it's going to lead to higher prices,
but we didn't know there's going to be so much uncertainty about it, like back and forth,
back and forth.
That creates a lot of uncertainty about economic outlook in the future,
which means now consumers are going to cut down their demand,
investors are going to cut down their investment,
and that's the recession part of the stack flesh.
What do we do about it?
I mean, if you're J-PAL listening to this interview,
I don't know if he's going to listen,
but what do you tell the head of the Fed to do?
The Fed's role here is look at what happens to expectations, to inflation expectations,
because the future plans of businesses and consumers is going to be reflected in that
inflation expectations.
And if the Fed, Jay Powell, sees those expectations are elevated, but at the same time, the data,
which is of course always about the past time, the data, which is of course always
about the past, where the data comes also that inflation is not going down, now we are
having a sticky inflation, then obviously they are going to increase the interest rates.
Seems to me though, based on what you've said about uncertainty in the policies of the Trump
administration, that a lot of the solution would be not having so much uncertainty.
That's right.
That would be the solution.
So that solution is better than actually a Fed solution because if the uncertainty really
keeps feeding into these lower demand and lower investment plans and consumption plans,
and that's also what we are seeing in the stock market meltdown yesterday and today, then it is going to be a very difficult job
for Fed because Fed also, you know, they don't want a recession.
So if the recession now wins over inflation, that means they need to cut the rates.
If you have both, your stack inflation scenario, scenario, stagflation is a very,
very hard scenario for a central banker. And the solution here is really not the Fed, but
it is not having these types of uncertain policies coming from the administration.
With the understanding that things in an economy, to paraphrase here, happen very slowly and
then all at once. We're talking about stagflation now, and again, we are not there, but it could be here.
What's a better way to ask this question?
How long do you suppose it'll take?
In terms of when are we going to see the recession
and the higher prices?
That's going to take time because remember,
for higher price, actual higher price,
or actual higher inflation to be observed,
the tariffs has to be observed, the tariffs
has to be in effect.
Tariffs are not in effect yet.
It is just like all this talk creating this uncertainty.
So if tariffs never really happen, but then because now this uncertainty fed into so much
the future plans of consumers and businesses, we might really end up with a recession.
Shibnim Golembli Oghuzkan at Brown University.
Professor, thank you so much.
Thank you very much. Never mind whether artificial intelligence is going to take your job, the good news is
AI can now help you with your next home improvement project, although you will still have to provide
the elbow grease.
Home Depot and Lowe's both launched generative AI assistance this week. Magic Apron at Home Depot for all those shop aprons they wear and My Lowe for Lowe's.
Nub and Clature aside, they can give you product recommendations, summarize reviews, and maybe
offer some how-to advice.
They're just the latest retailers those two are, looking to soup up their consumer experience
with an AI bot.
Marketplace's Megan McCarty-Corino drills down on that one.
I'm actually not in the market for a drill at the moment, but I do need a lot of help
with weeds after our winter rains.
You might be looking at Weed Killer, sounds like.
Home Depot's president of online, Jordan Brogi, says their AI assistant is meant to simulate
the in-store experience.
You might have a set of basic questions. How much do I need? Is this gonna kill the weeds that I
have in my lawn and is it gonna harm my grass? How do I apply it? Whatever it may be. This is
intended to help answer those questions in real time. Lowe's Milo AI suggested I might need mulch
to suppress new weeds once I've sprayed. And after some coaxing,
it calculated how many bags I'd need to buy. I think they're really promising because they
have a step by step. Greg Zakowicz, a strategist at e-commerce marketing platform Omnisend,
says AI assistants are on almost every website now, though many don't seem to have a clear function. I think we're just at an early stage where the companies put them on, figure out what
works, what doesn't, and then refine them.
For retailers, these tools provide a valuable new stream of consumer data to analyze, says
Anastasia Ghosh, a marketing professor at the University of Arizona.
What is the first question a person asks when they buy in a washing machine?
But the more personalized and creative these chatbots get, the bigger the risk.
Generative AI is still prone to hallucination and other errors.
So if I buy something, let's say a piece of furniture and I assemble it myself.
Or I go on a DIY weed killing mission.
But if I followed your instructions and I don't like it, now that's your fault.
Home Depot's Jordan Brogi says the advice is clearly labeled as AI generated.
I think customers are in the process of getting more familiar with using tools like this
and knowing that they can be extremely helpful even if they're not 100% accurate.
Sort of like weed killer.
I'm Megan McCarty-Corino for Marketplace. Coming up.
They can't tell us if they'll have the chocolate we'll need in six months.
Yeah, now that's a crisis.
First though, let's do the numbers.
Dow industrials off 478 points today, 1.1%, 41,433.
The Nasdaq subtracted 32 points, two tenths percent.
Closed at 17,436.
The S&P 500 down 42 points, about three quarters percent, 55 and 72.
They bounced off the lows lows is the phrase you're
looking for. That bad outlook from Kohl's that Matt Levin was telling us about that drove shares in
the retailer down more than 24 percent. Some of the other gloomy gusses he mentioned. Dick's
sporting goods deducted 5.7 percent. Delta Airlines dipped seven and a quarter percent.
American Airlines projected a bigger than expected first quarter loss descended eight and a quarter percent. American Airlines projected a bigger than expected first quarter loss, descended 8.3% as a result.
United Airlines got caught in the downdraft too.
It dropped 2%.
There was the array of light in the airline sector.
Southwest Airlines announced that bags fly free
is no longer an operative slogan.
Some customers will now have to pay to check luggage.
Southwest flew 8.3% higher today.
Bond prices fell.
The yield on the 10-year T-note rose to 4.28 percent.
And you are listening to Marketplace.
This is Marketplace.
I'm Kai Rizdal.
At the risk of repeating myself,
tariff and trade policy in this economy right now
is unclear at best.
On again, off again, back and forth, you've heard all the descriptions.
So too have business owners who, as they wait for clarity, are exploring their options.
We heard yesterday from Sam DeSye.
He's the VP of a metals distributor in New Jersey who, back in 2018, had filed for exemptions
from the steel and aluminum tariffs in President Trump's first term.
Among the many things we don't know about the tariff process this time around is whether
there is going to be a formal exemption process.
But if there is and if it looks anything like it did back then, it might be a little bit
messy.
Marketplace's Kristen Schwab looks back at the tariff exclusion process in the trade
war last time.
When Austin Ramirez learned there was a way to potentially get out of being taxed on imports
during the Trump administration's first trade war with China, he knew he had to apply.
There are a subset of our products that we just don't have North American alternatives
for.
Ramirez's company is called Husco and is headquartered in Waukesha, Wisconsin.
It makes hydraulic and electromechanical components
for cars and construction and agricultural equipment. About half the parts he needs to
manufacture these goods are imported from abroad, parts like iron castings.
So these are molten metal that's poured into a mold. You know, it solidifies and ultimately
it's machined into a final product. It's a fairly labor-intensive,
not hugely environmentally friendly process. So a lot of those foundries have moved overseas.
This was the main argument Ramirez's lawyers used in tariff exclusion applications back
in 2018, that there was no way to source these castings in the US. They had to outline reasoning
in pages of applications for dozens of items, a process that took months.
The outcome?
I'd say probably a third to half of our exclusions were approved.
That's higher than the average 13% approval rate through early 2020 for tariff exclusions
on Chinese imports, according to the Congressional Research Service.
But Ramirez says the whole process was frustrating because it was opaque.
We couldn't find any kind of rhyme or reason to why certain component categories were approved
and why others were rejected.
Dinesh Hasijia at Augusta University researched exclusions data from the 2018 tariffs on steel
and aluminum imports.
There was a lot of randomness.
Randomness, Hasijia says, because it was hard to find consistent reasons why applications
were denied
or approved. But there were some patterns. For instance, if your supplier was in a country
that had a favorable relationship with the U.S., you were more likely to be granted an
exclusion.
So the country of affiliation matter.
So did, perhaps, a company's political affiliations. A study in the Journal of Financial and Quantitative
Analysis found businesses that made campaign contributions to the Republican Party were
more likely to be granted exclusions. Now, the Trump administration has not announced
an exclusion process for tariffs this time around. Robert Friedman, who co-leads the
international trade practice at law firm Holland and Knight, has been getting calls from clients
for months to explore all their options.
This time around, we were seeing companies preparing far in advance of Trump's election.
He's a bit skeptical there will be an exclusion process because of how wide-reaching these
tariffs are and the kind of government staffing reviewing applications would require. But
however messy the tariff exclusion process was or may be, it would at least give
smaller business owners a way to be heard. Friedman says no exclusion process would give
more voice to bigger firms.
The companies with greater political power have an easier time conveying their messages,
but that unfortunately is not available to many businesses.
Austin Ramirez at Husco, the hydraulics manufacturer, isn't so worried about Chinese
tariffs this time around. The company has reduced its imports from China by about 80%,
though none of those supply chains shifted to the U.S.
We now source in Thailand and Malaysia and some to India and some to Europe.
That won't save Ramirez if Trump puts global tariffs into place, something he's floated
before. It is so volatile that, you know, I don't know that anybody knows what to do.
He says he can't create a plan until the administration solidifies its own.
I'm Kristin Schwab for Marketplace. Those who follow the corporate fortunes of Swiss chocolatiers closely, of which, to be
clear, I am not usually one, might have seen this item the other day that Lint, that's
L-I-N-D-T, announced better than expected profits the other day in the face of historically
high cocoa prices.
Point number one, that's about the pricing power that Lindt has. But
point number two and related is that not everybody can maintain their margins when input costs
go up and sometimes go up a lot. So we called the chocolate retailer we know to ask about
her chocolate plants for 2025. Kristin Tallheimer Bingham is the co-owner of Dean's Sweets.
It's in Portland, Maine. So cocoa prices as a lot of people know have been going up in
2024 the price of chocolate we use went up four separate times and
This year chocolate prices have already gone up again with an increase of 20% just in January
of 20% just in January.
And then there's maybe an even harder aspect, which is the uncertainty about the supply chain.
What we're hearing from our suppliers is that they aren't even sure when
their inventory will be available.
They can't tell us if they'll have the chocolate we'll need in six months.
And they certainly can't tell us what the prices will be half a year from now.
We plan ahead as best we can.
So we purchased a lot of chocolate in late 2024 and early 2025, and that means at least
we can predict that we'll have enough chocolate on hand through the summer and
Then there are the tariffs on China and we aren't sure yet
But it looks very much like some of the packaging we need will be affected by that
But somehow
Even with all the uncertainty we're still working
Happily as ever We were relieved and pleased
to get through and have good Valentine's Day sales. Right now we're doing more and more
corporate sales and custom chocolate for hotels. And now because Easter and Passover are a
little later this year, we have some extra time. So we're still working away happily
and getting ready with lots of little bunnies for Easter.
Chris and Talheimer Bingham,
their co-owner of Dean's Suites.
If you're in Portland, Maine, check them out. This final note on the way out today, which takes us to a place this program doesn't usually
go, the White House briefing room, where given the state of the markets and of the president's
economic policies, press secretary Caroline Levitt was fielding a lot of questions
about the state of the markets and the president's economic policies.
Most of what she said was misleading at best, dissembling at worst,
and then this lie.
Tariffs are a tax cut for the American people.
We started with one hard and fast rule of this program.
We end with another. Facts matter.
Tariffs are a tax on the American people.
Our digital and on-demand team includes Carrie Barber, Jordan Mangy, Dylan Mietinen, Janet
Winn, Olga Oxman, Ellen Rolfus, Virginia K. Smith, and Tony Wagner.
Francesca Levy is the executive director of Digital and On Demand.
And I'm Kyle Rizdal.
We will see you tomorrow, everybody.