Modern Wisdom - #886 - Konstantin Kisin - A Plan To Save The Western World

Episode Date: January 6, 2025

Konstantin Kisin is a podcaster, a speaker and an author. With Trump's historic victory in the books, the implications of his policies and promises could send shockwaves worldwide. So what does this mean for the future of the West and Trump's impact on the global stage? Expect to learn whether Konstantin is actually right wing or not, if the Trump victory will inspire a broader movement across the globe, what happens if Trump is not able to deliver the big changes he promised, Konstantin’s take on the current state of the UK, what the future of legacy media will look like, whether the mass exodus of users from X is a big deal and much more... Sponsors: See discounts for all the products I use and recommend: https://chriswillx.com/deals Get $350 off the Pod 4 Ultra at https://eightsleep.com/modernwisdom (use code MODERNWISDOM) Get the best bloodwork analysis in America and bypass Function’s 400,000-person waitlist at https://functionhealth.com/modernwisdom Get a 20% discount on the best supplements from Momentous at https://livemomentous.com/modernwisdom Get a Free Sample Pack of all LMNT Flavours with any purchase at https://drinklmnt.com/modernwisdom Extra Stuff: Get my free reading list of 100 books to read before you die: https://chriswillx.com/books Try my productivity energy drink Neutonic: https://neutonic.com/modernwisdom Episodes You Might Enjoy: #577 - David Goggins - This Is How To Master Your Life: https://tinyurl.com/43hv6y59 #712 - Dr Jordan Peterson - How To Destroy Your Negative Beliefs: https://tinyurl.com/2rtz7avf #700 - Dr Andrew Huberman - The Secret Tools To Hack Your Brain: https://tinyurl.com/3ccn5vkp - Get In Touch: Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/chriswillx Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/chriswillx YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/modernwisdompodcast Email: https://chriswillx.com/contact - Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

So are you right wing? No, I'm still not right wing. I think you're referring to an article in a video I did saying, the title of which was fine, call me right wing. And it's basically just me saying, I'm tired of like defending myself against this allegation. I'm still not right wing, but if it's really important for people to frame me

in that way, that's fine, they can do it. Why is right wingwing a disparaging marker? Will Barron I think the political realm in which we operate is the framing is, I think deep down, if people are honest, it's like the caricature of the left is that they're wrong, but well-meaning. And of the right is that they're like factually more correct, but evil. Callous.

Callous and evil and cruel and nasty. And so even if you're right, you're still wrong. Kind of, that's kind of the way people seem to. Morally. Morally wrong, exactly. And I think that's what I noticed, right? Because my journey into all of this world, as you know, was like, hey guys, maybe free speech is quite important.

Oh, right wing. I was like, what? And then I just gradually discovered, thinking that you should be allowed to speak freely makes you right wing, which when I was in my early 20s, George Carlin and Bill Hicks, these were my heroes when I was growing up,

these great comedians who were getting arrested like George Carlin for routine, like the seven words you can't say on TV or whatever, whatever it was. So that flipped without me realizing that it had happened. It was a left-wing thing or maybe a universal thing. And then it became a right-wing thing. Then, you know, thinking your country's not all bad

became right-wing and we can go down the list of all of those things. So I just, I think that it's basically what a lot of people call you if what they want to do is discredit the things that you're saying, because they don't actually have a counter argument to what it is that you're saying.

And we can't really be fully aware of somebody's intentions. So castigating, lambasting the moral foundation that it's based on and saying, oh, it's coming from a place of judgments or impoliteness or uncouthness or callousness or whatever is kind of a easy slime to throw at someone maybe. Yeah. And it makes people question people's motives. And a lot of people find people's motives more interesting than the results of the things that they're advocating. So if you go and try to create this beautiful utopian,

which everyone's equal, and you end up killing 50 million people in the process, well, that wasn't real communism. You were well intentioned, but you didn't quite live up to the ideals of this great philosophy. Whereas if you actually do things that work, but you have the wrong intentions or you're a bad person,

then people don't seem as interested in that. And I find that quite an interesting thing because I was in Hungary earlier this year and they have a very actually right-wing government under Viktor Orban. And one of the things that I found out is they were very keen to deal with abortion in some way. They wanted to reduce the number of abortions in Hungary, but they looked around the world

and they realized that abortion as a political issue doesn't work. It's an issue that actually loses votes for the right. Even if people tend to agree with the position, somehow it still ends up being a vote loser and it's a bad thing to do. So what they've been doing, you probably know, is pursuing very pro-family policies more generally. If you have X number of kids, you get this tax break.

If you have this number of kids. If you have three kids, the woman never pays its income tax again for the rest of her life. Exactly. And what they've found is, without actually legislating much about abortion, they've reduced the number of abortions in half, simply by pursuing policies that make families more appealing for people to have.

Isn't that interesting, creating a positive vision for the thing you want, as opposed to a negative vision against the thing you don't want. Exactly. That's like, that seems a very upside down sort of world. We've just come out of the U S presidential election campaign. And in that so many, you know, whatever the most effective political ad of the last few decades was we are not that it was mostly about, we are not that yet. Donald Trump is for you, but the entire thing was Kamala Harris is doing this.

Trans surgeries for immigrants and documented, et cetera, et cetera. We are not that they identified the binding together of an in-group over the mutual othering of an out-group. And, um, I understand that it's effective. It's maybe even more salient to humans to go like, well, that's a threat. That's something that's not right. Something to avoid. Maybe it even does bind us together more effectively, but it doesn't feel like a

particularly hopeful view for the world. And, uh, yeah, I wonder if, I wonder if that can be adjusted a little bit and we can have a little bit more sort of upward vision as opposed to kind of backward defensiveness against other things. Well, I think if you look at the two campaigns that we just saw, I actually thought that, you know, we went to the Nazi rally in Madison Square Garden. We were one of the Nazis. Yeah.

Well, we were kind of there in the just like, let's see what's going on here capacity rather than joining in with the salutes. I would say actually, if you dig down into the core of the Trump campaign, its message is actually very positive, I would argue, which was the make America great again thing. And what we saw at the rally too,

it was really about people who loved their country and wanted to be successful. That's what I saw there. When I looked at the Harris campaign or the way that she conducted interviews or the way she responded to challenging questions, that was all entirely pivoting to how evil and wrong and bad Trump is.

So by the end of the campaign, I didn't think many people knew what she stood for. Whereas with Trump at least, look, the political side of like, these are the bad guys, we're not like them, that's always going to be part of politics. But actually I did think, I came away from the, to my great surprise actually,

very relieved that Trump did win and very hopeful for the world as a result, which is not a position I thought I would be in before the election actually. But I think going to that rally really changed my mind about a lot of this. You introduced me a long time ago, not introduced me to Thomas Sowell,

but certainly kind of repopularized some of those ideas. And one of the ones I wanted to bring up is something I heard you say recently. We have replaced things that work with things that sound good. This sort of optimizing for optics over outcomes. Maybe you could say something like that. Dig into that a little bit more for me.

Why is that a salient quote in the modern world? Well, what he's quoted about that, Thomas Sowell's quoted about that is that's the history of the modern West of the last 30 or 40 years. And I think it's universally true. I mean, we're sitting here in London, for example, where the mantra is, diversity is our strength. And the more it's evident that that has flaws in it, the more we double down on the statement, right?

So a lot of this is sloganeering versus reality. And I think it's really been amplified by social media to a great extent because I think things that are not possible in the real world are possible online. Online, you're an avatar, which can change its sex. It can change its everything about it. You can be effectively whoever you want to be online.

You can make statements that are never stress tested. Correct. They're tested only by whether they get likes or they don't get likes. And you see this on the left and the right. There are things both the far left and the far right will say that are absolutely not in any way related to the truth,

but they are very appealing to people's feelings. And so they'll do that. Look, the reality is the truth is very unpopular and always has been because the truth is messy, unpleasant, complicated. The truth probably doesn't agree with you on a lot of things just necessarily because it's not going to fit exactly

to the worldview that you have. So it's very unpleasant and it's much easier to engage in sloganeering for yourself as well as for society. There's a H.R. Manking quote, something about simple answers to complex problems are often wrong, that it would be nice if we could constrain down a lot of the issues that we're seeing to something that kind of wrangles the chaos into order. But I don't know, the chasing for simplicity, to me, just a lot of the time seems to be retrofitting a new problem to an old solution that you've had for a long time.

Everything is because of dot dot dot. And this again happens on both sides. Yeah. And I think usually the easiest telltale sign of working out that someone's full of shit is if they have a single explanation for all the problems that they identify and they're not willing to recognize the trade-offs

in these situations. So I think in answer to your question, why is this happening, even more so now? I just think we live in a world where we're much more governed by emotion and feeling than we are by the heart. I'm reading Churchill's diaries of World War II right now. And it's funny to the extent to which the stuff

that he clearly takes for granted in describing things is now, would now be completely abhorrent to our sensibilities. Well, for example, one thing I actually didn't know was, the evacuation of the British expeditionary force from Dunkirk, people would have seen the movie. That only was possible because there was a unit at Calais, which is further south of Dunkirk,

which was basically ordered to stand to the death. So we were like, we're gonna sacrifice all these people, they're gonna die so we can save these people. And they did? And they did. Wow, do you know how many people died? I don't know, but they fought almost to the death. Then they pulled out the commanding officer.

They gave him a direct order, you have to get on this boat and leave and leave your men behind because we're gonna need you later. And then they allowed the small remnants of the British unit to surrender, right? If you look at the way we talk about many conflicts that are happening at the moment,

there is no recognition that casualties are part of conflict, for example, right? This has now become completely abnormal to our way of thinking. And so there are lots of things in which we've moved on to this illusory world that exists in our heads in which everything is supposed to be perfect. Therefore, if it's not perfect, it's someone else's fault. That's the, there are no solutions, only trade-offs inside from soul again.

Why I've been thinking, I've been pretty obsessed with that quote over the last couple of months, actually. Why is this need compulsion for perfection or hatred of small flaws? What's the driving force or dynamic behind that? Do you think, is there something that's, is it, so here's my theory. Here's my pet theory before maybe you give yours. Um, if we can predict the weather in Venezuela tomorrow, uh, if we have been able to get planes to fly in the sky and put them out on the moon, why is it.

That I need to encounter traffic. Why is it that civilians need to be caught in a crossfire during war? Why is it that we can't fully control a global pandemic, et cetera, et cetera? It seems like we have mastery in so many areas and yet not in all, which gives us a disproportionate impression of our ability of mastery over everything. That's my like pro-science theory. I totally agree with that. I think that that is really it. And then if you drill down a little bit further into that, one other thing that's worth adding

is that we're living through the era of mass customization. We have been for some time, especially if you live in America. What I mean by that is, if you go to a drinks machine or a vending machine in the US, right, you can have, first of all, you've got eight choices. You can have Fanta, and then you can have each one of them

in like eight different flavors. You can have lemon Fanta, orange Fanta, or raspberry, all of that, right? So you can, not only do we control most of the things around us, we get to choose exactly how we want it. You can, at your fingertips, you have, I don't know, a hundred thousand pairs of different shoes that you could buy.

Same with t-shirts, same. So everything that we now consume, we have a level of choice that's completely unprecedented, which gives us an illusion of really high levels of control over everything. It's not just that, like, we've really kind of got on top of infant mortality and all of these other things.

Not only that, like you can design your baby. You can have your baby exactly the way you want or you will be able to very soon. So in many ways, we are masters of our environment. So why can't we deal with this or with this or with that? And look, it's a noble and worthy thought. It just can't be taken to extremes when the reality is telling you this isn't working. And also I think part of the other reason is, as I say,

I think social media, I don't know if we've talked about this before, I think we haven't. Social media fundamentally changed the way politics is conducted in a profound way that I don't think anyone's aware of, especially if they're on the younger side of things, because I remember a few months ago, maybe a year ago, I was bored in the evening sitting around

and I was on YouTube and this debate popped up between two people most of your audience have never heard of. William Hague, who was the leader of the Conservative Party in the UK at the time, or the deputy leader perhaps, and John Prescott, who was the deputy leader of the Labour Party at the time. And John Prescott was this blue collar, working class guy, couldn't put a proper sentence together

to save his life and whatever. And William Haig, who actually is also working class, but he went to like a, I think he went to a grammar school. So he had this very posh, well-spoken accent. And it was the ultimate clash. But what happened was because there was no social media, they were not pandering to that. They were not trying to pander to their audience.

Clip form. Yeah, they were in the room together. And the way that that whole like standoff, that debate was conducted is William Hague would make fun of John Prescott for not being able to talk basically. The late John Prescott, I should say. But John Prescott to his great credit,

he didn't feel like, oh, I'm going to get offended here and then I can get 10,000 retweets and talk about working class people and the snobbery. He was like, well, on this side of the house, we may get the words wrong, but we get the judgment, right? In other words, it was a fight conducted on a kind of gentlemanly understanding that there are certain things that we don't do. Like a boxing match, you don't punch the other guy in the balls. And politics to a larger extent until first the 24 hour news cycle and then the social media environment

was really conducted in a somewhat different way. I'm not saying it was not nasty occasionally or there wasn't that going on, but the incentive structure was different and incentives are everything. The incentive structure now is to do whatever it is that gets you the most attention. That is not necessarily the thing

that gets the most constructive progress being made. Outcomes at all. And that's one of the fascinating things. If you meet a lot of politicians as I now do, you see them in an environment outside of the House of Commons or outside of Congress or whatever, they're not nearly as antagonistic towards each other as they pretend online.

So they're tuning that up in order to garner support, to get attention, to get- Look at how I own the libs or the right or whatever, you know, you can insert your own thing there. Even I suppose from an individual perspective without how it impacts the other side, look at how passionately I fought for our own cause. And look how much of a victim I am,

which is increasingly a thing that's adopted across the political spectrum. Yeah, I read this great article by Gwenda a couple of months ago called The Rise of Neotodlerism. Do you read this? I haven't, no. So, I mean, it's kind of contained in the name that he talks about modern social campaigns

being like adult toddlers. He says if every time that a toddler threw a tantrum, they got front page news and a ton of attention online, they would continue to do it. You know, even if a lot of the time they're being, I don't know many people that supported throwing paint over a Van Gogh painting or whatever, throwing soup over a Van Gogh painting. Uh, but they definitely generated a lot of headlines and attention is kind of akin to, well, there's some things going on, like they're paying attention to me.

Maybe, uh, this could be good. This could, this could end up to people paying more, more care to the problem that I think is very salient. And, uh, I kind of get the sense that our inability to distinguish good attention from bad attention and just be able to like attention at all cost and in attention economy is always positive for the most part, unless it's like unbelievably negative comments that you're getting back for the most part. People are just going to like, yay, my side,

boo, the other side. Uh, so yeah, I think it reinforces, uh, focus on garnering drama, using drama to garner attention pretty much at all costs. Uh, and I think that's why a lot of the time politics to me, especially in the UK, I listened to the debates that are going on. I just think like, what are you talking about? And what, what, what is this discussion? It's nothing, it's nothing. It's it's there's no substance to it.

That doesn't seem to be anything. That's like a hardcore deliverable. It's always surface level issues. It's never actually getting to the root of anything. There's never any sort of definable, um, concrete falsifiable, uh, statements, claims, um, uh, demands that are being made, even if it's not you that's in power or I don't know, it just it's rhetoric. A lot of it is rhetoric.

It is. Sleep isn't just about how long you rest, but also how well your body stays in its optimal temperature zone throughout the night. And this is where 8 Sleep comes in. Just add their brand new Pod4 Ultra to your mattress like a fitted sheet and it automatically cools down or warms up each side of your bed. It's got integrated sensors that track your sleep time, sleep phases, HRV, snoring and your heart rate with 99% accuracy. It even starts cooling or heating your bed an hour before your bedtime and that's why it's been clinically proven to increase total sleep

time by up to one hour every night. I've been using my 8 Sleep mattress for years and I literally can't imagine life without it. I'm on the road at the moment in London and it feels medieval to not have an actively cooled and heated mattress topper. It is a total game changer. Best of all, they have a 30 night sleep trial so you can buy it and sleep on it for 29 days. If you don't like it, they'll give you your money back. Plus, they ship internationally. Right now you can get $350 off the Pod 4 Ultra by going to the link in the description below

or heading to 8sleep.com slash modern wisdom using the code modern wisdom a checkout. That's E I G H T sleep.com slash modern wisdom and modern wisdom a checkout. Trump victory. Do you think that a Trump victory can inspire a broader movement across the world? I think places like the US and Argentina have got their mojo back a little bit, at least it feels like that. They've kind of got confidence back. Is this, is that just the post-coital glow of a election victory or is there something more going on?

Well, what's interesting to me was that, so we were in the US before the election, during the election and after the election. And on the day of the election, we flew from Austin in Texas to LA. And all the people that we know in Austin were like, what are you doing? You're going to LA for the riots for when Trump wins.

You know, there's gonna be, and when we got to LA and we were there on the night of the election and then we were there for a week after, though literally like there was nothing, nobody, there was no reaction of any kind. And I think that was because the scale of the victory was very, very important. It's like nobody can pretend that America didn't vote

in this direction anymore. It wasn't Russia collusion, it wasn't blah, blah, blah. It was like Americans looked at this and went on balance. We prefer this. I thought that was very important. As for whether that has a chance to spread, well, look, America is the place where we all download our memes. Right?

So, I always think of the example of during the summer of BLM, when we had protesters in this country, in London, in front of police officers saying, hands up, don't shoot, in front of cops that don't carry guns. You just go, like, that's not a real thing. You've just downloaded the meme, yeah? And you're misapplying it here about something that really doesn't affect British people in anything

like the same way. And I think that possibility is there. I hope it's there. And by the way, I'm not someone who thinks that the Trump presidency is nailed on to be a positive thing for the world. It's not guaranteed. it's an opportunity. And it really fundamentally depends on whether

he's able to govern and deliver the things that he promised to the American people. One of the fascinating things as well, and this is actually something Francis, my cohost on Trigonometry pointed out, is if you look at the kind of the lineup of the Trump campaign, the people at the very top of that are all Democrats,

former Democrats. Trump, Elon, Vivek, Tulsi, RFK, they're all former Democrats. And so what you're looking at is not a super right-wing coalition actually. It was really a broad movement that won people over on the promise of a number of things. Improving the economy, cutting government waste, closing the border, dealing with illegal immigration and sorting out the geopolitical situation.

But none of those things are particularly right-wing, actually, and he stayed away on the campaign trail from a lot of the more controversial issues, like abortion, for example. He was actually very centrist about that. Now, if he can deliver on those things, if he can close the border and deal with illegal immigration, if America's economy is booming,

and if Elon and Vivek take an ax to the government bureaucracy and it's still standing and able to function in the same way that X is still standing after he fired 80% of the people, I don't see how that doesn't inspire people around the world. I don't see it. Because if you look at all of the Western world,

I would say there are two problems, they're not unrelated entirely, but they're very big problems in their own right. It's the demographic issue and the government debt issue. Right? Almost every country in the Western world, there are some exceptions, is running close to 100% of GDP levels of debt.

All right, we are so indebted. We actually, I don't think there is a way to 100% of GDP levels of debt. All right, we are so indebted. We actually, I don't think there is a way to solve that problem without growing your way out of it. You just can't inflict that much pain on the public and survive electorally. There would be so many restrictions placed that it would be, there would be social unrest

to the point where the country gets destroyed. Well, look at what happened in the UK. The conservatives came in and said, we needed some austerity. They cut the government like expenditure. I don't remember what the number was, but I think it was like 1% or something. And everyone, the Tories are killing people. So how do you cut it? You know, when we just saw this in France, right? Right. Yeah. So the only way to probably to deal with it at this point, if you can deal with it, is to grow your way out of it, right? The UK economy on a per capita basis

is smaller now than it was in 2007. People in this country are poorer per head of population than they were before the financial crisis, we still haven't recovered. The only reason our economy is actually growing, I use inverted commas for people who are listening, is that we import lots of people who they don't increase,

they reduce our income per head because they're low wage people. But the politicians can say, well our economy's grown because look, we've added this person who earns a 12 grand a year or something, right? because look, we've added this person who earns a 12 grand a year or something, right? So if Trump can actually unleash the talents

and ingenuity of the American people and allow them to start businesses, to grow the economy, real growth of the economy, which I suspect he will, because all you really have to do is make energy cheap and then the economy will grow. I mean, this is what people don't understand about net zero and all of this other nonsense that we've got going on here is energy is included in the price of everything.

We put electricity prices are way higher than most other countries. I think they're four times the ones in America. So you tweet that. Yeah. Uh, it's beyond Lomborg's tweet that I tweeted. So basically when you make energy more expensive, you make everything more expensive. That's why all manufacturing is...

Everything needs energy. Everything needs energy. So GDP is energy transformed is the line, right? So if Trump's policy of drill baby drill means that energy in America is cheaper, that alone will make a big difference. Then you add to that cutting of government regulation and waste if that can happen. Then you put those two things together and you've got real economic growth.

Amazing. You close the border. I'm not talking about like mass deportations or any of that because none of that, I don't think is realistic or is going to happen. And you already see people close to the administration rolling all of that back. Actually, you know, I don't think is realistic or is gonna happen. And you already see people close to the administration rolling all of that back. Actually, I had an interview on Winston Marshall's show with the head of the Heritage Foundation saying, well, we're gonna be able to get rid of 100,000 criminal illegal aliens,

but everyone else is gonna be voluntary or something. And you're just going, okay, so we're talking more realistically now. But if you close the border, which is a big problem in all of the Western world, as we know, illegal immigration on a large scale that nobody voted for. If you do that, you destroy DEI and all of this work crap in the institutions. Who wouldn't sign up for that when they're given the option?

So it can inspire that sort of renaissance or revival in the Western world. And I hope that it does if he's able to govern properly. And I hope that he does that. And one of the things that I really hope that Trump administration is able to do is not make the mistakes they had to perhaps make the first time,

which was to actually consider the opinion of the mainstream media as important. Because what this election really showed that we just had, this was the first podcast election. Everyone's talked about this to death, right? But what I think that means is that this could be the first podcast administration. Well, I'm not saying that's universally positive, by the way, but what I'm saying is if the New York Times writes yet another piece about how Trump is Hitler for improving relations between Israel and Saudi Arabia or something, right? He doesn't actually have to give a shit.

He could just govern. He's got the mandate. He's not going to run for another term. He's got the Congress. He's got the Senate. He's got the judiciary. He's got everything Congress, he's got the Senate, he's got the judiciary, he's got everything under his control. If he could just resist the natural inclination

to go after people who go after him. In the same way as you wouldn't necessarily go after an independent student newspaper that said it too, because it's such small fry, low impact that you probably, it's not worthy of a response. We shouldn't overdo, we shouldn't like overpraise ourselves. The New York times has a huge audience. Of course.

But if it's, uh, from reputation perhaps, or, uh, relevance to the people that you care about, I remember, it's funny. Um, I don't use TikTok, but stuff like clips and stuff get repurposed onto that. And, uh, I think I checked it after I hadn't been on the desktop thing for like six weeks. And it turned out that five weeks ago, I'd been involved in some like brouhaha on some video. I remember looking at it and going, huh, how silly.

Like, you know, this platform that I don't use had a bit of drama around something that I said, I still stand by, uh, like, isn't that, isn't that, huh, I don't care about the potential impact and what people said because it's in a domain that I don't really care about. Yes. But then obviously the next step is, well, why do you care about what YouTube says or what Instagram says or what people that reply to your newsletters say, what people on Twitter say? Like, you know, it kind of, I'm aware it's a basic bitch insight, but sort of opened my eyes a little bit like that.

And I wonder whether it's the same. If, uh, legacy media has derogated its credibility so much that now most people just think, I really care about what you say. Yeah. Maybe it gets a lot of circulation. Maybe it even gets a lot of clicks, but it's kind of another, the media equivalent of the boy who cried wolf.

It is. Again, I try to caution people to, against being too convinced of this, because the New York Times, I don't know the exact numbers, but I think it has like 10 million paying subscribers. Paying subscribers, right? So there's clearly a lot of people in America

who read the New York Times and think it's good and believe it. What I, the point I'm making about Trump is, I think it's fair to say, I don't think I'm going out on a limb here to say that the New York Times doesn't like Donald Trump. I think it's fair to say that CNN and MSNBC do not like Donald Trump, right?

So why would he care that they have said the same thing they've said about him 10,000 times already instead of just governing? He's got the mandate, he's got everything he needs to actually govern. Just ignore those people. Just ignore them and govern and do the things. When I say ignore them,

I don't mean do crazy shit just because you've got all the power. I mean, deliver the things you promised to the American people. And that was the thing that irritated me about his first presidency was like, you can dislike Donald Trump, you can dislike the policies that he advocates,

but if he's been elected, it is his duty to implement the policies that he ran for, because that's what people voted on. And you are now criticizing him for doing that. That doesn't make any sense to me. In the same way, like if Keir Starmer in this country is a left-wing leader, implements the policies on which he was elected, I don't know what they are because he didn't articulate any during the campaign, but if that were to happen, then I'd be like, well, I can't complain. I can say I don't like these policies, but I can't criticize him for doing it

because that's what people elected him to do. So my point with Trump, just to finish the answer to your question is, if he can govern well and deliver the things that he promised, which is a strong economy, closer of the border, dealing with the woke shit, et cetera, I don't see how that wouldn't be inspirational. However, there are two factors that I would say

that make me less optimistic about the UK in particular than the US. So we can download the meme, but we have a parliamentary system, which means that Donald Trump really, he had to win primaries as one man, and then he could build his team after that. And none of them had to get elected.

Elon Musk, Vivek, Tulsi, Dharavk, they didn't have to get elected with him, right? In this country, the closest thing we have to Trump is Nigel Farage. Nigel Farage has a party which has five MPs and has a lot of the popular vote in this country. But in order to win, you know, there's 650 seats in the House of Commons, you're probably going to need 300 plus

seats to actually win out, right? That means you have to have 300 people who get elected in the local area as the local MP. So that means you kind of need 300 little Nigel Farage's, if that's the metaphor. That's very difficult. The other thing is for all the talk about, you know, the American election being the podcast election, I don't know that the podcasting breakdown in this country is necessarily favorable to the center right or the center or the...

Well, who do we know in this country? Boris went on Stephen's show. Yeah. But Stephen isn't, he's not a political operator. Correct. He's a dire of a CEO. Correct. Yeah. Who else have we seen?

You had the lady that did that budget and was briefly PM. Liz Truss. Yes, you had Liz Truss, you did. Yeah, we had her on. And we had Suella Bravman on. Yep, I mean, except for you guys, I imagine James O'Brien probably has some people on every so often.

Well, there's a couple that you're missing. So Rory Stewart and Alastair Campbell, we've had Rory on the show. I like Rory as a person. I don't know if you followed their coverage pre-election. I followed it with great interest. Yeah. So they were, and again, this is not an attack on them as individuals, but they were wrong about everything. Not only were they wrong about everything, they massively doubled down

after being wrong about everything. So in the days before the election, Rory Stewart was saying, well, you know, these polls showing that it's neck and neck, they're completely wrong. People are afraid to say the truth, which is the Carmelis is gonna smash this. And on the night of the election,

when he was clearly proving completely wrong, he was like, well, I was wrong on the facts, but I was not wrong to be optimistic or whatever it was. And he was just going, okay, well, just take all that aside. These people have no idea what's going on in reality in America. They were just completely wrong. They are probably the most popular podcast when it comes to

politics in this country. I think it's goal hanger that does, uh, the network that's a part of. I think in, in the top 10 for the Americans listening, the top 10 podcasts on Apple podcasts, which skews a little bit older, um, in the UK, Rory Stewart is in maybe two or three of them regularly. Uh, and goal hanger has maybe four or five, that one network. And again, I like Rory's a person.

He's a lovely man. He's been on the show. I found him, I found him very interesting. And we're happy to have him back and I'd happily have Alistair back. Although I rate him less, but, um, not back. I'd rather have Alistair, I'd happily have Alistair back, although I rate him less, but not back, I'd rather have Alistair, I'd happily have Alistair on. My point though is that quite a lot of people in Britain are living in this imaginary world,

which is reinforced for them by people that they instinctively lean towards. And they're not as aware as you are because you live in the US or as I am because I get a chance to travel there of actually what's going on. And I only realized this, you know, this year because this year is the first,

I've been to America loads of times before, but this year was the year that I actually went to like real America. I've been in Utah and, you know, Oklahoma City. Fuck me, that's real America. And Tulsa and El Paso in Texas and Fort Worth and Sugarland and all these other places, as well as your DCs and your New Yorks

and Nashvilles and all of that. I really had a chance to Colorado, I was in and I traveled around it. So I got a chance to actually meet real American human beings. And I realized that the reason that people in the West, in Western Europe don't understand what's happening in America is because they've never been there.

So if you are a BBC journalist, what is America to you? Well, America is what people like you, i.e. the media elite, tell you that it is, right? And then if you go to America, you go to New York, DC or LA. These are all places that are massively Democrat. They're super dominated. You know, I think Washington DC voted like 92%

for Kamala Harris in this election, something like that. So you end up in these places that are not, whether you think, you you think Democrats are the best or the worst or whatever, it doesn't really matter. My point is they spend a lot of time among people and in places whose views are not representative of the country. And so when you are a British citizen watching the news,

you're really watching people who are deeply embedded into an echo chamber, whose echo chamber also tells them that their opinions are the virtuous ones to have. And so that to me, it's therefore not surprising to me that you even have prominent Tories in this country who were saying they're pro-Kamala. Very difficult to stress test that. You mentioned sort of Trump has the opportunity, very clear set of objectives. Also, I can't even remember what it is. The house, the Senate, the popular vote, the blah, blah, the blah, blah.

The money, the technology, the talent. What happens if Trump fails to deliver change? That's an interesting question. I think all of the things that many of us have been saying about the decline of the West are going to come back a hundred times because what you then see is there's literally no way out. It's unfixable. There's no way out.

There's no way out. So the reason I think a lot of people were relieved as I was, was at least in this election- The Trump one. Yeah. The feeling for me was, well, at least there's choice. In the UK, you don't have choice. On the issues that I care about, which is our country being prosperous, immigration being beneficial to the country.

I'm pro lots and lots of immigration- As an immigrant. If it's beneficial to the country. I'm pro lots and lots of immigration if it's beneficial to the country. I'm against even small levels of immigration that are detrimental to the country. And I'm completely against illegal immigration for that reason. And as you know, the woke shit grinds my gears. So on all of that stuff, we don't have a choice in this country. We haven't had a choice for 14 years. The conservative government that's just left is virtually indistinguishable from the Labour Party that's just come in to the point where the Labour leader is attacking the conservatives for their failure on mass immigration. And everyone's going, well, he's got a point.

I mean, he's going to make it worse, but he's got a point. Do you know what I mean? So in America, at least the feeling was, well, okay, they actually have choice. They can choose. If you don't want this continued slide into managed decline, you can vote for something else. Pivot.

If you vote for that something else and you don't actually end up having that choice, then you're in deep trouble. And as you probably know, you know, in the fringes of right-wing discourse, the Curtis Yarvans of the world. Not super familiar. I've met Curtis, but I'm not super familiar with watches. He's an interesting guy, but it's not even about him specifically. There are a lot of people who up until this point were increasing in profile because they were saying

something that I don't necessarily agree with, but I see the logic of, and that is, what good is democracy if you can't vote for the things that you want? If you can't vote your way out of this, is that democracy or is that a fake democracy? And therefore if it's a fake democracy, then you're not living in a place of choice. You're living in a place where there's a tyrannical authoritarian structure that's telling you,

you must have net zero, you must have woke, you must have DEI. It's just got a much more sophisticated delivery mechanism that makes you feel like you're playing the game. You're living in the matrix, right? You're being given this SOMA, whatever you want to call it. You're being given this drug that makes you feel like you're living in some kind of- On a piece of ballot paper. Yes.

But actually you're living in hell in which you're stuck with the things that you hate. And even if the majority of you get together and vote against this, it will still happen. The same outcome occurs. So their argument is, it will still happen. The same outcome occurs. So their argument is democracy is not working. Why don't we look at alternatives? And alternatives are, you know, that's why that explains the fascination that,

as I say, fringes of the right increasingly have with the Putin's of the world. Because it's like, well, this is like a strong man who actually fixed this country, you know. Um, and if Trump fails, I don't see why those voices wouldn't get louder. That's very interesting. I can't see a logical reason why that wouldn't be the case. Do you?

No, I mean, you can continue to sort of play the game. I'm sure that people that don't like Trump would say, yeah, but that's, he was inefficient. He was unable to do this thing. It's because the policies were pointing in the wrong direction. We can fix it through a different pathway, et cetera, et cetera. But given that there was a majority of people that voted for him, it not being disheartening and disenchanting to the democratic process, especially with all of the power of the smartest guy in the world, the companies and the rockets and the fucking dance moves on stage and stuff.

What else did you want? But yeah, I, I, I'm fascinated by that question. What happens in four years time? If, if change hasn't been delivered, you can't fix it when you've got the Senate, the Congress, the popular vote, the tech bro oligarchs. David Sachs now. David Sachs, you've got a lot of the new media on your side, which is so powerful now in America.

You've got literally everything you could possibly have. You as president are independently wealthy. It's your last term. You don't have to pander to anybody. If a good successor sat in the same organization already, if you can't fix it then, well, how do you fix it? That's, that would be the question. A lot of people ask in that situation.

So Trump must not fail because if he does, you know, that in many ways was the last chance that, that the West had of turning things around. What happens if it goes well? You mentioned about Trump has the opportunity to hard reset sort of the Western world. I think if he does well, if the economy grows rapidly and sustainably,

if he closes the border and deals with illegal immigration and crime. If he ends DEI and all of this neo-racism in the institutions, if he makes energy cheap, if he ends the foreign conflicts that he promised to end, I think that is something that is an undeniable, that's undeniable proof that what that movement offers is better than what we had.

That's why people voted for him the way that they did. And that means that will give massive inspiration to people around the world, especially the Western world. I think that's undeniably the case. Do you think it would give inspiration to the UK? I think it will. That does not mean for the reasons that we already discussed that that will necessarily, that does not mean that that will necessarily result in a political

victory, but that will give inspiration to people around the world for sure. Something that I was, I actually thought about this. I was in Brisbane on the day of the election. So I was moving seamlessly from my workout playlist to the daily wise live stream, like just switching between the two units one in the afternoon or something on Wednesday for me, as I'm watching results come in slowly and, uh, as it became increasingly likely that it seemed like a Republican victory was a foot.

Uh, I actually thought about, uh about you and your position, your particular distaste for right-wing snowflakes. And I wondered being on the outside for the last four years or so allows you to have this sort of anarchistic, rebellious, sort of sexy problem identifying, but not needing to be solution proposing sort of group. I wondered whether you thought there's an opportunity for that right-wing snowflake ism energy to appear more or less now that that side is in power.

I wondered if you considered that. Yeah, I think actually what, what Trump's election will do. And I, I really realized this this particularly when we went to the Trump rally in Madison Square Garden is, I think if he's successful in particular, it has the power to entirely deflate that fringe of the right that has become very much like the woke left in the way that it operates, the cancel culture,

the identity politics, the grievance, mongering. Trump, one of the things that those people are obsessed about is Israel and Jews. And Trump is the most philosemitic president the United States has had for decades. So, and he doesn't need them. And I don't think he's ever really particularly- Well, interesting that on October 7th, he was with Ben. Was he? Yes. I don't think he's ever really particularly... Well, interesting that on October 7th, he was with Ben.

Was he? Yes. I didn't know that. He was, I can't remember where they went, Ben and him, some sort of ceremony type memorial thing. And I remember thinking at the time, fuck, like I see a lot of loud voices on Twitter that have a problem, a big problem on the right, from the right. It was like Fuentes adjacent type people. And I thought, holy fuck, that might have damaged part of the campaign.

Maybe that's lost a significant number of votes. Yeah, I know. That's what happened when I went to the rally in Madison Square Garden, because full of Jews, full of Israel flags. And every time anyone mentioned Israel or like, I mean, one guy was on stage and he just went, we're gonna crush Jihad.

And I was like, and everyone was just loving it. So I think one of the reasons I actually talk less about that fringe of the right now, even though I just find them intellectually very irritating because they're not very bright, is that I don't think they're relevant truthfully. And so I don't really talk about it too much. You know, James Lindsay is trolling them and I enjoy that and I like trolling these idiots.

But generally speaking, what I saw in America was they have no purchase in the Trump movement whatsoever. And if Trump is successful, these people will become utterly irrelevant. And by the way, quite a lot of those people, I don't know if you remember the Lauren Chan situation, but there was the revelation that some of these people were being funded from Russia. And when you see that some of these people, like a week before the election saying, Trump's not my guy or whatever, you go,

are all those likes on Twitter really organic? Are they really? Everyone's had these. Are they really? I don't, because I don't see this reflected in real life. No. You know, I think there's, when it comes to social media, our reality is being distorted in a hundred different ways.

And one of them is undoubtedly foreign operations. Undoubtedly. Yeah, a couple of times I've triggered some of the trip wires, like kicked one of them. I intended sort of stray into those circles. Had a conversation with Rudyard Lynch, what if alt-hissed guy, and a,

when you say, an interesting treatise on why Nick Fuentes is a fed and, uh, that got clipped and put on Twitter. Fed. I saw, I thought you said something else. Uh, maybe that too. And he, uh, I was blown away by not only the replies, the pace of them, like where the f are these people just sat online?

It's absurd. So yeah, I, there's some fuckery. I'm being trolled by a bot farm. Oh God, I feel terrible. There's an amount, there's an amount of fuckery. In other news, this episode is brought to you by Function. Did you know that your annual physical only screens for around 20 biomarkers. That leaves a lot of gaps when it comes to understanding your health, which is why I partnered with Function.

They run lab tests twice a year that monitor over a hundred biomarkers. They even screen for 50 types of cancer at stage one. They've got a team of expert physicians that takes that data, puts it into a simple dashboard and gives you actionable recommendations to improve your health and lifespan. They track everything from your heart health to your hormone levels, thyroid function. Plus Dr. Andrew Cuban is their scientific advisor and Dr. Mark Hyman is their chief medical officer. So you can trust that the data and insights you receive

are scientifically sound and practical. Getting your blood work analyzed like this would usually cost thousands, but with Function it's only $500. And right now you can get the exact same panels I get plus bypass their 400,000 person wait list by going to the link in the description below or heading to functionhealth.com slash modern wisdom. That's functionhealth.com slash modern wisdom.

So, okay. The, the opposite side of this, like it's almost kind of done to death, but I wonder if there's something novel to talk about here around Trump's victory being a death blow for overreaching progressivism and stuff like that. We've been saying in one form or another peak woke. There was, it was, it was summer of 2020 or whatever it might be. Uh, I, again, bro science theory, I have this idea that, uh, you have this sort of conceptual inertia that maybe even if things on the internet have moved on, if these ideas have caught

hold in the real world, there's this momentum, this big juggernaut, this lumbering behemoth, which is like boomers and my parents had this idea that, uh, uh, a new story hasn't reached full mainstream significance when it's on the front page of the New York Times or when it trends on Twitter, but when your dad messages you about it on Facebook messenger, like that's when, you know, it's happened two or three times, I think, over the last few years, one being, uh, Rogan CNN debacle during COVID, where he messaged me and said, I see your friend, Mr. Rogan is in the news again.

I'm like, wow, like that's hit a, you know,aged me and said, I see your friend, Mr. Rogan is in the news again. I'm like, wow. Like that's hit a, you know, sixties year olds, Northeast of the UK father. And then, uh, mid 22, where he messaged and said that Andrew Tate's a nasty piece of work, isn't it? T-A-I-T. I was like, Tate, you have reached full mainstream significance because my dad is talking about you. Um, but all of that together,

to say there are many worlds that you inhabit and if you're an agile online DGN X user power user type thing, I think you have a skewed perspective of how sort of nimbly things are moving along. So how have you come to sort of conceptualize this and the trajectory of the sort of progressive overreach? Well, I think the geography is very important here. So I've done it in the UK or Australia or in Canada, we've remotely reached peak work because DEI and all of this other stuff is so deeply embedded in the institutions. And in politics, you look, I mean, look at London.

London is run by a guy who's painted the crossings rainbow colors and the police rainbow, and all of this stuff, right? And I know there's those trivial things, but they're symbolic of very strong underlying things where people are being hired or fired based on their demographic characteristics and so on. In the US, yes, Trump and people like Chris Ruffo and Elon and Vivek, they have an opportunity to

absolutely dismantle from the ground up all of these ideological introductions that have occurred over the last 10, 20 years. Even if structurally they can't get into Yale or into Harvard or into Netflix or whatever, they can go a little bit more upstream from that. But most of this stuff is in government. So if you can strip affirmative action hiring from the government institutions, then everything else will naturally follow. The corporations never wanted to be woke. They just felt they had to. Yeah, that's interesting. In, incentives as opposed to like ideology. Yeah, and you know, the jaguars of this world,

they're not gonna benefit from that, from what's coming. So I think that there's a big opportunity for a reset in America, but even so, it's like you've got the virus and it's infected you and you are still sick, but you have the potential to start recovering. That's kind of how I see it. In the rest of the Western world,

I don't think we're, I think woke is gonna run and run for a long time. Given that you're downstream, hopefully from the US though, if that is. But I really don't, until the political leadership changes, I don't see how it changes. Because if, even if, you know, you could tell me,

well, look, Gen Z men are not working, great. What are they ruling? What are they deciding? Who gives a shit what they think? You know what I mean? Other than me and you. So the political power to change the things that are embedded in institutions.

That's what this is about. That's why Trump has a chance to reset it in the US. Then hopefully it's inspirational to the rest of us. What's your assessment on the state of the UK at the moment? At the moment, I think it's fucked. I really do. You know, I love this country, I really do. But at the moment, I feel like,

have you ever heard that Mickey Flanagan joke about going to Brighton? So Mickey Flanagan is a very famous, very successful British comedian. And I remember he did a show in Brighton and he talked about, you know, the contrast between London, the big city, and Brighton, the seaside town that he comes in.

He went, you know, you get on the train in London, you're really stressed and you just get on the train, it's full, it's packed, it's uncomfortable. And then you just get off at the station in Brighton, you smell the sea air and you can feel the ambition just draining out of you. It's kind of how I feel about the UK. And I know that, and the reason I'd say that is that all the bright and talented people that I know are leaving. Anyone who can is. All the rich people are leaving.

This country has lost more millionaires than any other country except China. Now, if you compare the populations, that tells you- 3%. Right. So we're losing the people who have created the jobs, who are creating the jobs and who are going to create the jobs.

And one of the reasons is they look at the environment that we're operating in. We've talked about high energy prices, but this government has decided that the people who it needs to tax are the businesses basically, particularly the smaller side businesses, which is where so much creativity really happens. And then there's all sorts of other things

about infrastructure, housing, demographics that are going on that I don't, you know, we talk about net immigration figures and what no one really talks about is the fact that what we're actually doing is we're chasing out all the people who create wealth and have wealth, who pay the taxes, and we're replacing them with people coming in towards the bottom

of the jobs market at best, if they're actually working at all. And so your net immigration figure of 900,000, that includes you having lost some of your best people and replaced them with people who are not contributing. That's very interesting. Yeah, net doesn't account for the cohorts that have gone and the cohorts that have come in,

and it's probably not like for like. Yeah, and so everyone I know who actually had a successful business that's portable, they're moving to Dubai, They're moving to America. They're moving to all sorts of other places. And what they say is very simple. Well, look, I want my kids to go to a school where they're not taught that they're trans. I want to pay reasonable taxes, which in some places is like 0%. I want want clean safe streets, which you do not have. I don't go on the tube very much these days, just from a, and I'm not in London that often actually. And I went on the tube

the other day, during daytime, it was like five, six o'clock and there was kids running absolutely rampant all over it, jumping over barriers, not paying, pushing each other on the escalators, smashing the stop button, like really causing genuine nuisance. And I watched the staff watch them jump over barriers and do nothing. I got some data. Recent data reveals a 56% increase in tube crime with thefts up by 83% and robberies doubling in 23, 24. And this extends more broadly. I saw the Labour government's talking about, you know,

they're gonna reduce crime. Well, street crime is up very significantly. And one of the reasons it's up is that it's not really being dealt with by the police. I mean, anyone who I had my car broken into a few years ago, window smashed, there was a CCTV camera right above it. I called the police, you can't call, I had to email the police,

because they don't answer the phone, unless it's like, you know, someone's, someone's been misgendered or something, you know. And they emailed me back saying, we've investigated, we can't find anything right under CCTV camera, here's your crime reference number. There was a viral video that you probably

would have been seen of a guy who deliberately left a bike on the street with a geolocator. Directly outside of Scotland Yard? Yeah, he got nicked. They tracked it down to the house where it was being stored. They gave the police the information, the police said,

we've looked into it, here's your crime reference number, we can't do anything. And then once the video caught sufficient fire, they got an email back from the police saying, we've reopened your case, great news. Exactly. Now, by the way, I don't want this to come across as if I'm criticizing police officers, because I know police officers and I know that a lot of them really are working very, very hard.

But the priorities and the resources they have for SEP from above don't seem to manifest themselves in this kind of low-level crime being addressed. Now, you might say, well, you know, there's some kids not paying for the tube, who cares? Well, actually, the broken window series is entirely correct. If you are observing people engage in low level criminal behavior,

it makes people feel much less safe about the overall experience because they know that, well, if they're not gonna enforce this, well, what reason do I have to think that if my phone gets stolen? The subtext is that most serious things also won't be locked out with care.

And they aren't, and they aren't. I know people who've left because of single incidents. I know a really wealthy guy who left the UK because she was walking out of a restaurant on Mayfair with a nice watch on his wrist and his pregnant wife. Three guys jumped out of a van with balaclavas on, smashed him to the floor, punched him a few times, pushed his pregnant wife aside, got the watch off him, got back in their van. Police don't give a shit. No real investigation, nothing. Why?

Why are these crimes in the UK, why is this sort of social fabric disintegrating like that? I think it's partly because the economy isn't growing and so there's not a lot of money to be put into policing. And when you think that net zero is the way to prosperity, Partly because the economy isn't growing, and so there's not a lot of money to be put into policing. And when you think that net zero is the way to prosperity, i.e. driving up energy prices because you wanna feel green or whatever,

you wanna reduce Britain's contribution to global climate change from 2% to 1%. That's the great ambition. Well, then you're not gonna have money. And when you don't have money, you can't pay police officers. And when you don't have police officers, people engage in crime. Um, I mean, this is just to add additional context for the northerner in the room.

Uh, this is in London. Yeah. I think the UK has the sixth biggest economy in the world. I heard this really phenomenal explanation, which is the UK is not the sixth biggest economy in the world. UK is a very poor country attached to a very rich city. London has the sixth biggest economy in the world. No one gives a fuck about Newcastle.

No one cares about Carlisle or Wrexham, except for Ryan Reynolds, Manchester, Manchester, like a little bit, like a tiny, teeny, tiny little bit, Birmingham, a teeny tiny little bit. Everyone else can go and get fucked. Like anything basically north of Birmingham can just fall off a map. And, you know, I wrote this thing after the riots that occurred a few months ago. I read it.

Yeah. If you can remember that I basically, my thesis was, I saw some videos of my old hometown, Middlesbrough, and there were street marches. These people hadn't joined. It looked like they were maybe walking to the place where the main march was going to go on, but it's kind of classic sort of British Larry, louty behavior. Um, these people weren't carrying slogans.

They weren't chanting anything. It didn't seem like they were there for a particular purpose. And there were houses that looked like they'd been recently built a classic working class British street, you know, terrace, terrace, terrace, terrace, terrace all the way along. This was a house that had those pieces of, um, stickers still on the windows that looked like they were, they were sort of freshly created. And you see one of the people pick up a big brick, just throw it through

the window of this house. It doesn't have anybody in. It's not like it's the house of an immigrant or the house of an enemy or the house of somebody from the other political party. And it's very difficult to describe this to somebody that didn't spend half of their life 18 years in a Northern working class town at a state primary, state secondary, state sixth form college. That was me.

I spent 11 years, no, 13 years in full-time education, right? Around these people. I know these people. I know the way that they feel. And it's this ambient malevolence, they're disgruntled, they're unhappy, they feel stuck and they don't know why. And they're mean, they're mean about it. And the synopsis that I came up with was that, uh, immigration wasn't the reason it was the excuse for this kind of antisocial behavior.

And we don't even remember ASBOs, I fucking heard ASBOs in ages, antisocial behavior order for the Americans. And it was the youths on street corners that would sort of, you know, push and jumble granny as she tries to go to the corner shop to get milk and stuff like that. They'd be issued with an antisocial behavior order, which meant they sort of couldn't leave the house and they shouldn't go to certain areas. It kind of like a weird sort of curfew type thing. And, um, that culture in the UK, and I'm sure it's everywhere. I'm sure that working class towns and all the rest of it, people don't

necessarily have much way of upward mobility. They don't have much to distract them. Maybe they're a little bit despondent. Maybe they haven't had the right role models, fatherless homes, all of these things. I understand. But that culture in the UK is so fucking self-defeating because it is a gravitational well that keeps people stuck to the floor as much as possible, that this is as good as things are going to be.

And the best use of your agency and self authorship is to break things, not to build things. And I know that intimately, well, this ambient malevolence, it's like the air before a thunderstorm starts. And that was what I saw in that video. It really got to me. It's the first time that I've seen something

on the internet that really got to me and that really fucking got to me. So, yeah. Well, I know what you mean. And I think the answer to that, and I know I keep banging on about net zero in this conversation, but the answer to that is to scrap net zero because, zero because what those people need

is meaning and purpose and for the vast majority of working class men, the primary source of meaning and purpose is gonna be a job. And when you have a job that is a meaningful job, that you're making something, you're building something, that you're making good money, that you're providing for your family, that you feel like you have upward mobility.

And upward mobility doesn't have to look like I grew up in Newcastle and then I started a YouTube channel and now I live in Austin, Texas. Upward mobility might be, you know, I made 30 grand a year for 10 years and now I'm making 35. And now I've got a promotion at work. And now I own a home. I own a home, right?

Most people really don't need very much to be happy, to be honest. And it's a tragedy that in most of the Western world and especially in the UK, the thing that we used to consider like them, what is the American dream? The American dream is you arrive with nothing but the shirt on your back and your kids go to university, you have a house, maybe a small business, you pass it on to them and their children are- Better off.

Really better off. Well, if those people that you're talking about, where I agree with you, there's underlying malevolence and it's not malevolence, it's anger really. It's frustration. It's frustration and anger. And what is that anger about? Well, the anger is about the feeling that you're not going to be able to do the things

that you thought you would. And what are they? Well, you get a job, you get a house, you have some kids, they're gonna be slightly better off than you. You're gonna have dignity, you're gonna have community, you're gonna be respected. Meaning mastery. Right, now, if you have a society

which has effectively said, we're going to do a green accounting trick. We're going to take your jobs, we're gonna put them in India, we're gonna put them in China where they're gonna make the same steel or the same cars or the same whatever they used to make. They're gonna do it dirtier,

which of course they are because it's a much less developed country, and then we're gonna import that steel and we're gonna import those cars back into the UK so we can pretend that we're green. Well, you combine that with this person no longer having a job and our economy, as I said, we're poorer now than we were in 2007.

What did you expect? Just gruntled. There's this feeling, there was always this feeling, but I can never put my finger on it. It's kind of being forgotten in the Northeast of the UK. It was like, on the outside a little bit, even within a community on the outside of culture. Yeah. Even little things like the way that you were represented in media, like a story about New Castle that hit the national press was like a whimsical fucking cottage industry piece or something like that.

I said I was going to show you this video. Can we do one more thing on just that? Absolutely. So one of the things that we've talked about in the UK is like, well, we need to build infrastructure, we need to build transport links. And it's like, why do you need a better train line to nowhere? And so what you really have to do is you have to, and that's why, you know, I was talking to Mary Harrington, who I know you're a fan of too.

She's great. At our Christmas party, actually. And she was saying something I really have been thinking about as well, which is I think if we're in the offering solutions space, the solution for the UK is to accept the reality, that's always the first bit of the solution, is to accept the reality that, you know, the slogan of make Britain great again isn't gonna work because we're not gonna recolonize India.

Do you know what I mean? We're not gonna rebuild the British Empire. What I think we could do if we really wanted to, but this would require both a political and a cultural shift on a level that would be extremely significant, would be to recognize that over the 20th century, Britain went from being the center of Western civilization to being the provincial part of it.

We're on the periphery now. The center of Western civilization after being the provincial part of it. We're on the periphery now. The center of Western civilization after World War II, during World War II, I would say, shifted from Britain to America. We are now effectively the European outpost of American civilization. That's a great point. That's what we are.

Now, what does that mean? Well, what that means is we have to lean in to that. That means we have to download the right memes from America. Instead of downloading the hands up, don't shoot meme, what we should be downloading is, okay, we want economic growth memes. How do you do that? Well, you're gonna have to make energy cheap,

slash regulation, et cetera. You're gonna have to do the right trade deals with that world, right? to make energy cheap, slash regulation, et cetera. You're gonna have to do the right trade deals with that world, right? That means all sorts of other things that we borrow from them and apply to ourselves as opposed to thinking that we know best. We clearly don't, otherwise our society

wouldn't be as screwed up as it is. And part of that is you're gonna have to give people in deprived parts of the country work. And you're gonna have to find ways of employing them and actually creating things that are of value. And that means, yes, we in the UK may end up paying more for some of the things that they make, but that money is going to go to your neighbor

instead of a perfectly nice guy in India doing the same job. But if we want our society to hold cohesively together, some of the extremes of the globalization process that is the reason why those people in Newcastle are angry and malevolent, mean and nasty, we're gonna have to find ways to actually give them jobs and employment. And that means not chasing out the people who are job creators,

and that means not pricing them out of the country by making business impossible. I think those of us in podcastistan maybe overindex on what nice words and inspirational memes can do that I'm not convinced you can self-development mantra your way out of structural problems. You can't. Um, you know, it's all well and good trying to give people some upward aiming sense of

hope and all the rest of it. But when there's really sort of structural problems, the physics of the system that this, these people are sort of involved in, uh, is very difficult. I don't, I'm not convinced that that reframe, you just need to sort of think more positively or do whatever, like that's, Well, they're both true in the sense that convinced that that reframing, you just need to sort of think more positively or do whatever, like that's, fuck off. Well, they're both true in the sense that if you are a teenager in Newcastle

listening to this conversation, the world is your oyster. Correct. Look at Chris, right? Look at Chris, look at other people who inspire you. You have the opportunity, you have access to the global economy with the internet and everything.

You can make it, you can do that. But at a structural level, at the level of society, not everyone who went to your school had the ability to become Chris Williamson. A lot of them just needed to have a great job in the local factory. That would have been the right solution. Trust really is everything when it comes to supplements.

A lot of brands may say they're top quality, but few can actually prove it, which is why I'm such a massive fan of Momentus. They make the highest quality supplements on the planet. Three of the products that I use every day to support my brain, body and sleep are Omega 3's creatine and magnesium L3 and 8. Dr Rhonda Patrick and Andrew Hubeman have all extolled the virtues and honestly I try to limit the number of supplements I rely on, but when I have these consistently, they make a massive impact on my cognitive performance

and my strength and my health. Momentus are literally unparalleled when it comes to rigorous third-party testing. So you can be sure that what you read on the label is what's in the product and absolutely nothing else. If you're going to spend time and money on supplements, you need to make sure that they have what they say they have in them. Best of all, Momentus offers a 30-day money back guarantee so you can buy anything that you like, try it for 29 days. If you do not love it, they will give you your money back and they ship internationally. Right now you can get 20% off all of the products and that 30-day money back guarantee by going

to the link in the description below or heading to livemomentus.com slash modern wisdom and using the code modern wisdom at checkout. That's L I V E M O M E N T O U S dot com slash modern wisdom and modern wisdom at checkout. I had this idea. So my, my housemate said for the first time in his life, his sister had a baby recently and he held this kid. And for the first time he realized why men went to war for their family, because it was the first like new blood relative maybe that he'd ever held, something like that. And we came up with this idea. And I think that it's true that kind of relates to declining birth rates, that there's a

mimetic sense to motherhood, like a mimetic desire for motherhood. If there's fewer mothers, it begets less people being mothers around you, which makes you less likely to see the beauty of motherhood, which makes you less likely to want to be a mother. And the same thing goes for sort of this, this situation that he had. And I wonder whether there's something similar with this talent exit. Uh, you know, the most agentic people, the most self-authoring people, uh, the ones who would break the mold that would push back against the tall

poppy syndrome, you are losing ever more of, there is a dearth of precisely the countervailing force that you want to the worst parts of some of British culture, the bottom up stuff, not the top down stuff. And, um, it seems like a recursive cycle. And I appreciate that. I have perhaps contributed to that after 15 years of coaching, maybe a thousand 18 to 25 year olds in a desperate attempt to try and move culture. I'm like, pull the ripcord.

Like I'm going to go somewhere else. Anyway, I was going to show you this video. So this is a, a Tik Tok of an American guy who spent six months in the UK in London. And he's describing his experience cut a little bit into this, but he's basically said his grandparents were British. He sees himself a little bit as British, but he's basically said his grandparents were British. He sees himself a little bit as British and this isn't meant to be as a dig at British

people. So we'll have a, we'll have a watch of this. The people there don't seem like they're having fun. They seem like they're constantly trying to escape misery. They seem like their work is just so depressing and that the joke is that everything is depressing and bad. And like, that's the entire sense of humor. It's like, this all sucks. Let's just make jokes about it.

The class system is so obvious and weird. Like, they're just upper class people, lower class people, and you're just born into it. And the accents, you can tell based on people's accents. And that's weird. In America, it's pretty much like you have to give it to us or to America that you just earn your way. And I know there's lots of people,

you get born into things, you're lucky, but if you get rich, if you move up in your class, you're just able to. In England, it's like, you're never going to really be upper class if you're born lower class. They'll always know that you're not, because it's about culture. It's not just about money. It's about the way you act.

And there's a lot of inter like anger and like weird feelings. And also, I just want to say there's a lot of anger in the culture. I was at a lot of games, soccer games, Premier League games, things like that. And the fans are so angry. Like it's not like America where people get mad or whatever, you know, but it's like normal. It's like they where people get mad or whatever, you know, but it's like normal It's like a little mad in England. They're like so pissed the whole time. They're just looking for For like reasons to let their anger out and there's so much anger. There's so much swearing. There'll be a six-year-old just

Yelling the c-word What the hell what's going on here? It's like borderline. I'm looking around thinking like this is uncivilized. Six year old yelling the C word. That's what makes Britain great. Make Britain great again. No, he's bang on man. He's bang on.

Um, I look, I do think part of it is the weather, to be honest. Dude, it's huge. It's a huge, massive influence. You know what it's like. You come out to Austin, Texas. When was the first time you came out this year? February, something like that? February, March, maybe?

March time? I actually don't like the weather in Austin, to be honest. March is fine. March is fine. But the rest, yeah. Well, you only came in March and then you fucking came back in October. Yeah, between November and March,

the weather in Austin is fine. Beautiful. But if you spend a week in LA and you just look around, oh, I can see why these people are happy because the weather is really nice. So I think that's part of it. But that is the country, okay. Unless we're gonna get to the stage

where we can terraform the ozone layer above the UK, this isn't gonna change. So what do you need to do? Compensate. Yes, exactly. You have to compensate for it. And the compensation for it is if you go to central London, the nice parts of it, it's a beautiful place. It's a beautiful place. And on those three days a year when Britain is sunny, it's the most beautiful country in the world.

But what you have to do is make the other things in this country so good that it trumps that. And that means people have to have a better quality of life than they otherwise do. And that means they have to be able to afford a home. That means they have to be able to raise their kids and all the rest of it. You know, I was very persuaded by a book

by a guy called Desmond Morris called The Human Zoo, in which he talked about the fact that essentially all the problems that we see in modern human society are exactly the problems you get if you put animals into those exact conditions. So in a zoo, the animals that are there, they have much less space than they need. They may be surrounded by other animals

that they don't necessarily want to be surrounded by and all sorts of other things. And they have the exact same outcomes in terms of interpersonal violence, mental health, failure to reproduce and on and on and on. So partly this is just a problem of the fact that we have a very, very broken housing market

which prices people out of it. And the houses here are very small. So most people end up flat sharing in central London or wherever, living four to a flat. Well, are you going to expect those people to be happy? Are you going to expect them to have kids? That's personal space. That's personal space. And then all of the other things that build on top of it. So you have to have a fundamental shift in the way that this country operates.

And in order for that to happen, maybe we need to hit that, you know, alcoholics rock bottom. What do you make? You mentioned it earlier on. What do you make of Stammer's recent comments on immigration? Well, he is saying the Tories failed, which we all know is true, but I don't think he's gonna make things any better.

So I think this situation is gonna continue the way it's been going, because as I say, we know this from having people like Sweller Bravman on our show, who basically said, the reason I as Home Secretary, the person in charge could not reduce immigration was not actually the thing that most other people are saying, which is, you know, the civil service doesn't lay you,

although I'm sure parts of that are true. It's that our own government didn't want to happen. And the reason is they know that if we reduce mass immigration, we are gonna have a problem with the economy. Because the headline figure will be, well, we're no longer growing by the amazing figure of 0.7% we're actually not growing we're gonna have to be honest with the British people about that. So yeah I think that until people are prepared to be very

honest that's not gonna happen this why I use the metaphor of you know hitting rock bottom that's as you well know that's not gonna happen. This is why I use the metaphor of hitting rock bottom. That's, as you well know, that's when you actually confront the reality of where you are. Have you reached out to Dominic Cummings? Yeah, he's coming on the show soon. Unreal.

I mean, the most recent episode that I saw him, I can't remember who the podcast was, but he was talking about how, would you say, curated and fabricated a lot of the press governmental sort of press opportunities are people sort of walk down and they get the photo outside of 10 Downing Street and they're going this is very, very important. And there's a script that's followed fake meetings, everything that is

very much a house of cards style optics management thing, who's talking about how basically most of the MPs consider that all they're doing is looking for their feature within the newspaper for that particular week, that's considered a win, not impact on the country, not doing good things for the electorate. And, um, it's even more scary in the UK because in America, you kind of think about the sort of vanity pro I'm aware that that's just a stereotype in the UK. You would think, well, no one even fucking cares.

Evidently you do within the small bubble of white hall or Westminster or wherever it is that you are, but yeah, um, this over concern, and maybe this is fed into by the British predisposition pre sort of the obsession with class with what is my place within society? How can I ensure that I maintain? How's my optics management thing going on in image image control? It we are not attracting the best talent. Any talent that does get there is being perverted by bizarre incentives. And any change that does need to be made is curtailed by a combination of those two things by the fact that there's nobody competent around you to fucking deploy it.

And anybody that is competent is distracted by other things in the same way as Americans rail against the fact that whatever percentage, some absurd percentage of time is spent doing fundraising, like more than 50% of the time is spent doing fundraising. I would guess something not too dissimilar happens in the UK, but around this image management, the going to the right meetings. And Rory Stewart said this, Rory Stewart's book said this too. He describes in exquisite detail, said this, Rory Stewart's book said this too, he describes in exquisite detail the smell of these people. So it's sort of like stale beer and cheap cologne, covered over with cheap cologne. And I don't know, these are the people that are fucking running the country that mean you have spent most of our lives in. This is the thing that a lot of people will say in

response to this, which is, you know, those that do remember, remember the 70s. I don't remember the 70s, I wasn't born, neither were you. But what they will tell you is the reason Thatcher ended up being so popular, is she came in at a time when literally the dead weren't being buried and rubbish was piling up in the streets, or shortly after that. And she created a country full of aspiration and drive and a willingness to do business and cut regulation and all of this other stuff. And this is why we talk about, you know, the Trump victory has the potential, but as we've been discussing, there's a long, long way to go and a lot of things need to get turned

around. My view on it is that it's my duty as someone who's an immigrant to this country, to whom this country has given a lot, has given the opportunity to be who I am, to give it my best shot in terms, with a tiny amount of influence that I have to do everything that I can. But I'm not wedded to the idea of going down with the ship.

And this is the point I would make about, there's a lot of sneering about this idea of the talented and the wealthy and the successful leaving. Oh, these are mercenary people, we didn't want them anyway. A lot of them really aren't mercenary at all. A lot of them would have much rather stayed in the UK. A lot of would have much rather

had their business in the UK. A lot of them would have much rather created jobs in the UK than in Dubai or in Texas or somewhere else. A lot of them would love to be here. But the problem is the only people who do end up staying are people who are either too rich to care. In other words, they don't mind paying 50% tax because they've got so much money, they've got their children in

a nice school or whatever, they're protected from most of the crap that the rest of us have to deal with. And so they just, you know, enjoy going from the club in Mayfair to the house and in wherever and they have a great life and there's no reason for them to leave. And then everyone else who can't physically leave because they just don't have the opportunity to do that. But the slice of people in the middle, a lot of them really don't wanna leave. I don't wanna leave the UK.

I really like it here. What do you think you're going to do? I'm gonna wait and see. But the point I'm making to you is people who are by the fortune of the opportunities they have, not wedded to this country, but not rich enough or successful enough to be able to cope with what's happening. Yeah, this liminal space of- That space of people are not mercenary at all. They are just being forced out. And if I am one of them, I will hate and regret that,

but I'm not going to stay forever in a country that I think is declining and going into degradation. Why would I? And particularly as a father. My wife and I, I'm 40 something years old. By the end of my, I will live out my life in this country comfortably. Even if the crime and the whatever continues to go, I'll be able to afford to live in a part of the country

or move further and out from the big cities or whatever, that I can live the next 40 or 50 years without really things being terrible. But why would I condemn my children to that when I have the opportunity to offer them a better life? And that's really the question that people will be asking and the people who run our country and the people who make these decisions have to ask themselves, what are they offering to the next generation that's going to make them want to be here,

as opposed to seeing this country like many other countries have been seen in the past as a sinking ship from which you want to escape. What are you doing to prevent that? That's the question. We'll get back to talking to Constantin in one minute. But first, I need to tell you about element for the last three years, every single day I've started my morning with element. It's a tasty electrolyte drink mix with everything that you need and nothing that you don't. You might not be tired. You might not need more caffeine. You might just be dehydrated. Proper hydration is not just

about drinking sufficient water. It's having the right amount of electrolytes in your body to let yourself use those fluids. Element contains a science-backed electrolyte ratio of sodium, potassium and magnesium with no sugar, no coloring, no artificial ingredients or any other junk. It's a game changer. This orange salt, first thing in the morning, tastes phenomenal. And they have a no questions asked unlimited duration refund policy so you can buy it, try the entire box And if you don't like it for any reason they'll give you our money back and you don't even need to return it That's how confident they are that you'll love it right now

You can get a free sample pack of all eight flavors with any box by going to link in the description below or heading to drinklmnt.com Modern wisdom that's drinklmnt.com Modern wisdom we have touched on it a couple of times already give me your That's drinklmnt.com slash modern wisdom. We have touched on it a couple of times already. Give me your assessment of the state of legacy media at the moment, that maybe the post-mortem post-election, uh, the level of credibility, I think, uh, MSNBC ratings recently, uh, collapsed to its lowest since July 19th, 2004. 38,000 total viewers in the 24 to 54 age group,

30 year age bracket. Look, there's a lot of, I have an article in my sub stack, which is also a video called the real reason the mainstream media is dying. And I think there's actually a lot of economic and other drivers of this. It's, you know, people in our space like to go, oh, they've been discredited. Well, actually, if you apply the same standards to new media, most of the new media is equally

discreditable. Correct. It's not exactly showering itself in glory. No. And it's the amount of fact checking that happens. Which just held to way less rigorous standards. Right. That's basically all the difference is.

It's like people on a podcast who will have some crazy guy on who's talking complete nonsense. But what did you expect? It's just, you know, it's me, we're just shooting the shit. Right. Have a bigger audience than MSNBC or CNN who then go, look how they got this tiny fact wrong. So there's a lot of this bullshit going on, I think. Agreed.

But the real reason is that, I think the real shift is less about that actually. And I think a lot of it is to do with the economics of how media works. If you think about what a news channel is or a newspaper is, it's basically they are buying individual creators, packaging them together

and offering it to people as a package. You no longer need to do that because algorithms exist and you are able to curate your own stuff. And it also doesn't really make financial sense for the content creators. Nobody could put you on TV now, and it's not because you think TV is discredited, it's because they don't have the audience to offer you

or the money to offer you or whatever, because it makes more sense for you to cut out the middleman and go straight to your audience. The same for me with my sub stack, it's the same for me with trigonometry on YouTube. So what's happening is the mainstream institutions are simply losing the ability to maintain the top talent and over time you will see that must customization that we talked about with drinks applied to content as well. And probably, you know, the next big thing is going to be some sort of thing on your phone, which curates on an algorithm basis,

all the content that you like from different platforms. As opposed to being like, hey, I'm going on YouTube and I'm seeing this. If you had a thing on an app on your phone that went, well, here's the newspaper article you really want to read, the sub stack from whoever, the video from whoever, et cetera. A couple of tweets that are... Yeah. Exactly. So the economics of the whole thing are changing and there's just a lot more competition now. So people have way more choice. And so you can go to wherever your particular preferences are being panned to in the best possible way.

And you can get exactly the thing. Or outrage. Or outrage or whatever. And as I say, for better or worse, you're gonna get exactly what you want. What's your thoughts on this, I guess, bifurcating, trifurcating of social media networks, a lot of liberal type people leaving X over the last month or so, some going to blue skies,

some just swearing off of this altogether. The Guardian made a hefty exit note. I wonder whether they'll be back at some point. What are the implications of not only people being within their own echo chambers on the same platform, but being within their own echo chambers now that our entire universe is a part? Yeah, I don't think that's really happened in the sense that people think it's happened.

I think what's happened is a lot of people have made loud exits. I don't think that the vast majority of those left-wing people have left to X. Some have, some have, they post more on Instagram now or whatever. But broadly speaking, nobody wants to be on the third best social media platform. The network effect is very real. And so I don't think we're actually going to split off into our own political commentary websites because the interaction is quite valuable with different sites. But we will see how that evolves. I mean, one of the things I am hopeful with X is that I was incredibly with X is that I was incredibly grateful to Elon for buying it and for the changes that he's made.

But I do think there's more work to do, things that he himself identified when he took over, like dealing with the bot issue. And it has become a bit of a cesspit. It really has. The shitposting is real. Yeah. And so- Do you think Trump would have got in if Elon hadn't bought X?

Nobody knows. I suspect not, but maybe he would have done. I don't think anybody really knows. I think Elon's support and X was a big factor. Cool thought experiment. But I just, I really hope that over time what happens is Elon continues to improve X and there are improvements that could be made. And certainly finding a way, like I don't need to see the N word in every reply. Do you know what I mean? Do you see what I'm saying? Like that would be quite nice.

And I'm sure there's ways of dealing with that. Eric Weinstein, when we had him on, we had him kind of back and forth and I sort of accused him of not having solutions. And I don't have solutions exactly, but I think the problem Jordan Peterson put his finger on a long time ago is that online anonymity causes a lot of issues.

Online anonymity is also extremely valuable, but there's got to be some way of finding some kind of golden middle. There are no solutions, only trade-offs. Right. Yeah, what was it that he once said? Anonymity online has driven the proximate price of being a prick down to zero.

And so my point is, I'm not a snowflake who's triggered by some unpleasant word in the thing. I just recognize that if we're gonna have a public square, the most retarded person ever shouting the most offensive word that he can think of, the loudest, is probably not conducive to a healthy discussion. And also, is it an enjoyable environment to be in?

That's right. When you go onto social media, everybody's seen this, where it was Tristan Harris or the litany of limbic hijack techniques that we've seen from intermittent schedule rewards to designs being taken from gambling and casinos and stuff, all of that stuff. Even if that is all happening, at least trying to restrict down to make it an enjoyable experience. If you're going to hack my fundamental psychology to get me addicted to this app, at least have the thing that I'm addicted to the content that I'm addicted to be

something that once I finish up, I go, so I went to this Spotify event in LA a couple of weeks ago, they announced this new, uh, create a partner program thing. And I went there and I got to sit down with Alex Nordstrom, who's president. And he told me, uh, Roman Watson Muller as well, who's like the head of podcasting, told me the same thing. He said, we want the hour that people spend on Spotify every day, no matter what it is, but they're specifically talking about podcasting, we want that to be the best hour of their day that they spend on their screens, that they

look back at it and they have no regrets. And I think that made my life better when we leave. And I don't know how many other apps, membership services and sites and stuff like that can say the same thing. How much did they pay you to say that? Nothing yet. But I think it's, I think it's genuinely true when I, when I reflect on my own experience, when I reflect on my own use of these sorts of platforms, uh, I can't always say the same

thing for YouTube. I need to be more disciplined on YouTube. It's like a, a, a tool that can be used for good or evil on YouTube. And then as we get more toward Instagram, it sort of skews a little bit darker. The five times a year that I go on to tick tock, I'm like, Oh my God, uh, potent fucking fuel, um, sub stack. I would say for me is even more reliably, uh, better. Oh, sub stacks. Amazing.

Hours spent than, uh, on Spotify, but more effortful. Yes. You have to read exactly. Even if I listen, you know, your voiceovers and stuff like that. Um, but yeah, I'm just, I w I really, really hope that that can, that energy can kind of be a little bit more in infused. And I'm aware that that is going to damage time on site that that's going to reduce interaction.

That's going to reduce engagement. That's going to make companies less profitable in some ways or whatever. But I wonder whether, uh, the post content clarity that people have after they've spent a bit of time on something can end up winning over outrage, triggering porn at all costs. And um, yeah, I, I, that makes sense to me around like, does every other reply, it is, there is a lot of shit posting on X now because it's like the shiny new toy where people can say whatever, pretty much whatever they want.

And, uh, not that it's just not a superbly enjoyable experience as much of the time as I would like it to be, like should be able to be easily fixed. Should it? I would hope so. I think that if you can curate your algorithm in a manner where you can say, should be able to be easily fixed. Should it? I would hope so. I think that if you can curate your algorithm in a manner where you can say, Hey, I want to step in. I'm not limiting free speech at all.

Like that's, that's not the sort of stuff I want to see. I don't see music from very many jazz bands on Spotify. Uh, you know, the YouTube algorithm tends to show me stuff for the most part that I actually agree with. YouTube doesn't outrage porn you all that much with opposing points of view. Now maybe that's echo chambery and obviously lots of content creators that you like may find something not that you agree with, but something they disagree with, which you will also disagree with.

Um, but I get the sense that there could be more work to be done. That being said, I follow 101 people on Twitter, which is a very good way to just constrain down reality to the point where most of what you see is fine. But I'm aware that that's a- And you can mute people who are rude or whatever or block them. Even that, the muting and the blocking thing, Elon, like, announced an update to that relatively recently, I think. Yeah, the blocking thing, people you've blocked still see your stuff. Hmm.

Yeah. Odd. I don't know. I think it would be good. You tweeted about something actually that I missed. I've been largely offline for the last month. So I check in briefly, see what's going on and then fuck the fuck off again. You tweeted about people removing pronouns from their ex bio. What have I missed here? Is that a thing? Is that a trend that's going on?

Yeah. A lot after the election, a lot of people, AOC did it among other people. And, you know, what I said about that is they were sheep when they put them in their propios and they're sheep now when they're removing them. And I think that's true. And the point I was trying to make is, is not that I don't welcome people doing that.

The point I was trying to make is that a lot of people make decisions not on the basis of what they think is right or true or moral or whatever, but on the basis of what other people are doing. And it's an important thing to keep in mind when we talk about a lot of these social movements, because they're really driven by a very small number of people who seem to have currency or power in that environment. And that's a kind of reassuring thing in many ways about the possibility of change. We talked about the UK and how stuck it feels at the moment.

Well, all it takes is a significant number of high status people to have a different perspective. And that perspective then becomes the dominant one as we saw in America with the Trump election. So, but yeah, there is a readjustment happening in response to the landslide that Trump managed to secure. Yeah, I mean, we saw this, I think my favorite examples of this are how quickly the word politically correct

became sort of impossible to use unironically. And then the word woke, the feedback mechanism on woke was what felt like to me within six months, that it was a word, nobody used a word that certain people used in an unironic way. Almost immediately alchemized into a word that could not be used unironically. And now there needs to be something else socially aware or whatever. I'm not sure what it is.

And, um, that's one of the situations I always question a be used unironically and now there needs to be something else socially aware or whatever. I'm not sure what it is. And, um, that's one of the situations. I always question a little bit the power of ridicule for creating social change. I think part of that is just that the UK has tried to sort of piss take its way out of many problems without much profit or success. take its way out of many problems without much profit or success. But that is one of those examples where you think it was a word that people didn't like and very quickly had pushback against it and it was here and gone before you even knew it. You know what I mean?

Yeah. Yeah. Well, that can happen, especially when the underlying concepts are as ridiculous as they are, people will then use. And you're right, it was very funny because you literally had people writing articles in The Guardian about why they're woke. And then like six months later saying, oh, well, these right-wing people are calling us woke.

Yeah. You had this interesting perspective about a lesson that societies don't last forever, the societies and cultures and empires providing additional perspective when thinking about cultural issues. Obviously something pretty salient to you given where you were born. What is that additional perspective or insight? What's the lesson that should be taken away from that? I can't remember who said this, but there's this very famous line that things that can't last forever won't. If something can't go on forever, it won't. And so when we look at the direction of Western society over the last 10, 15 years, we've talked about it in

the UK, we've talked about it in Europe and to some extent in the United 10, 15 years. We talked about it in the UK, we've talked about it in Europe, and to some extent in the United States, unless Trump really is able to turn it around. If you run very high levels of debt, if you have high levels of crime, if you have high levels of illegal and legal immigration that fundamentally change the values and culture of a country, if you refuse to prioritize as citizens of your own country

and say, we want to take care of our people. If you refuse to pursue economic growth at the cost of other things, which that's what you have to do because everything is trade off. So if you want more economic growth, you might have less climate obsession or whatever. things trade off. So if you want more economic growth, you might have less climate obsession or whatever. If you have a situation where young people

can't advance as we've talked about, if we have a situation where large communities of people don't have access to meaningful work, on and on and on. If that goes on for a period of time, I know from my Soviet experience that societies don't always last forever. And then if you actually look at history, you know that no society lasted forever, ever. So when things are bad and continually so and keep getting worse and this is maintained over a period of time and on top of that you're told actually this is the right way to go. It's not unreasonable in that situation to say, well, if we carry on going in this direction,

this is gonna end badly. Now, at the same time, people like me who make this point often get accused of like scaremongering and whatever, you know, and it's true. Like I remember in the nineties, when I was talking to my dad about my job prospects, he was like, look, definitely don't be a lawyer because on current trends by the year 2000,

everyone in the world is gonna be a lawyer. Now, surprise, surprise, not everyone in the world is a lawyer and so societies do change track over time and people change track over time. But it's the job I feel of people like me who've had that experience of knowing their society doesn't last forever, to remind people that, like, it's, all our civilization is,

is like a big Jenga block. Like, you can pull some out and it will stay standing, but if you pull all of the cause bits out, it is actually capable of collapse. This isn't guaranteed to last forever. It's one of those people that takes their relationship, their significant other for granted over and over again. And they don't do the things that need to keep the relationship on track.

And then one day the relationship breaks down and that person leaves them. And I get it. You know, the vast majority of of Western citizens are, historically speaking, very passive, very, very unwilling to revolt, very unwilling to engage in violence, very unwilling to overthrow the government, very comfortable by comparative standards

to previous, centuries ago where it's literally like, well, I could like die tomorrow of disease and hunger, starvation, cause you're not looking after me, or I could try and overthrow you. Like, what do I really have to lose? Most people in the West are not like that. And so the people in charge are very insulated and protected.

There's a level of comfort that sedates the populace from doing that. Yes, I get it. But you've got to recognize that that can change over time. And I would really like us not to push as far as we possibly can to find out where that line is, where you piss people off enough. Do you see what I mean?

Why don't we just like- Is that a risk, do you think? Not right now, but it was in the summer in this country. We had riots in this country from people who as you rightly say you know the media and other people tried to call them far right. I thought the vast majority of them were not remotely political at all. Correct. So what does that tell you? It tells you that there's a significant body of the population who are very very very frustrated. There's some kindling there. Yeah, the kindling is undoubtedly there.

And by the way, not just among those people, you saw from the Muslim community, the feeling that like, well, we've got to go and tool up and be in the streets to defend ourselves. Now you have those two forces rising at once. It's not a good outcome. And so, no, I'm not saying, again, like when I had this, I don't know if you saw my conversation with this journalist about Elon Musk, it's a recorded conversation with him

trying to interrogate me about why I agree with Elon, the civil war. It's a video on our channel, it's done in crazy numbers, because he's trying to, it shows you all the sleazy, old school approaches that- Was it for your channel or for somebody else? For our channel. Who was it? It's like NBC journalists versus Constantine Kissing about Elon Musk or something like that. And he tries to catch me out

and it really doesn't end well for him. But the broader point is, Elon said, looking at the riots in the UK, the logical conclusion of this or something like that is civil war. And I think he's right. That doesn't mean that I think we're there now. It doesn't mean that I think we're guaranteed to get there. And that we can't intervene. And it certainly doesn't mean that we can't intervene. I think the reason that Elon and

I are both saying this is a possibility is we'd like it not to happen. But for it not to happen, things have to be improved. And my invitation to the people who have the ability to change things to the extent that they do is to recognize that, yes, we're not there right now, but you carry this shit on for another 20 years, you have no idea what the situation is gonna be like. Strange that that sort of rhetoric

is sometimes interpreted as a threat. It's like, I'm not, this isn't me saying that this is an outcome that I'm looking for, but just like head in sand, this isn't an option, this isn't going to happen. You're being overblown. I don't know man, you're right. But it happens in everything, you know this. Like I actually know personally somebody whose mother went to the hospital because she had diabetes and the doctor said, if you keep up the diet that you have,

you will die and have very serious complications as a result of your diabetes, because you are obese. And that person, who's my friend's relative, reported the doctor for being offensive or whatever. And this is what people often do. It's like if you say, if you only eat ice cream, you're actually gonna get fat and be unhealthy.

People sort of like, they blame you for telling them that truth. And this is the same thing. It's like nobody who's predicting that we're heading in the wrong direction wants us to be heading in the wrong direction. On the contrary, but you get blamed for warning about the things that end up happening. It doesn't make any sense

to me. So just to be clear, I want the West to be prosperous, successful. I want it absolutely, unashamedly to be the dominant civilization in the world. I don't want any of this multipolibolics. Our civilization is the best civilization on the planet. Its values, such as they were classically, not a lot of all this other rainbow bullshit, are the right values. They're the best values human beings have ever come up with.

Freedom in every form, liberty, the capitalist model which has areas that need managing carefully, but broadly speaking is about unleashing the talents of human beings and rewarding them for cooperation. And all of these other things that we've developed over time, they are the best values. I'm not saying we have to go

and impose them on anybody else. In fact, that's not how freedom works. People have to buy into it. And so, you know, I'm not into going and bombing Iraq into democracy, bombing Afghanistan into freedom, because clearly it doesn't work. But our civilization is the best. Our civilization needs to be strong, confident, prosperous, and united. And that is very far from where we are. And that's the goal I'd like us to be working with. So when I say we're heading in the wrong direction, what I mean is let's

head in this direction instead. Yes. Yes, yes, yes. I'm interested in how your worldviews changed since becoming a dad. You know, somebody that spends a good bit of time sort of thinking about this stuff. How am I positioned within society, within culture with, you know, broad perspective on different cultures, different backgrounds, the directions that things can go in, the time that you spend professionally doing this stuff.

But then you have a very visceral experience, which is mini me in the world. What have you, what have you learned? What has, has much changed? Were you surprised, have you been surprised by anything? First of all, it changes you in a way that isn't conscious, first and foremost. So I remember literally like a week after finding out that my wife was pregnant, I was driving into the studio,

someone cut in front of me, and I later realized I hadn't reacted in the way that I used to react. So in the past I would have been like, what are you doing? And I was just like, you know what? I've got somewhere to be. I haven't got time for this bullshit.

So it changes you in that way. It's a very humbling experience for a number of reasons. One of them is, my firm belief is that you can never be happy until you've forgiven your parents. I don't think it's possible. I don't think a human being can be happy until they've forgiven their parents. Forgiven isn't the same as condone, accept

that what they did was right in every way. You just can't be happy and fulfilled until you've let go of the resentments that everyone has towards their parents one way or another. Everybody has them. Even the people who had the best childhood, there was still, you know, when they put the egg on your silver plate,

you know, there was something imperfect about it or whatever. So one of the things that really helps with that, I found, is that you've got the mini me, as you say, and you suddenly recognize, oh wait, I am doing the best with the resources that I have and I'm not perfect. And then I look back at my parents and my parents had me when my mother had been 18

for four days, my dad was 20, I was an accident, there were two deeply impoverished students in Moscow in the Soviet Union in the 1980s. There were no books about raising kids. There was no internet. There was no can I Google this, can I Google that. My mum tells the story to this day of how one day when I was a toddler she came home and discovered me as a toddler.

Maybe not even came home, maybe she was in another room or something. And I had this triangular pack of milk that I was glugging, this carton of milk that we had in the Soviet Union, drinking it. And she was horrified because she was using that milk to make the porridge or whatever. And that was the only milk that we could afford that day. and that was the only milk that we could afford that day. So when I look at that versus the opportunity I have with my son and compare, it gives me a lot more compassion for them and the way that they were versus the way that I am now.

So- You found in some ways reflection, healing of your own childhood in fatherhood. Yeah, now to be honest with you, I don't think that like having a child isn't going to solve all those problems, but it's certainly a helpful factor and understanding the context of that. And it's just very humbling in understanding your own imperfections, you know, recognizing that you don't always behave in the best way and then actually taking action to remedy that and realizing this, I've gone to the next level.

Now I have to be at the next level. I have to be better. I have to be, you know, I have to deal with the shit that I still haven't dealt with that I didn't realize I had and all of that stuff. So on a personal development perspective, amazing. Then it connects you fundamentally, I believe, with the past and the future in a way that nothing else does.

It connects you with the past in the sense that you recognize that you are just passing on some things that happened for centuries before you got here. And also that you're the custodian of the future and that your child is going to be the custodian of the future too. So to that extent, it makes me think much more inclusively about the country that I live in. It makes me want to contribute more,

to be a more positive influence in the world, to improve the society that I live in, or as we talked about earlier, to find one that matches my values and creates the opportunities I want for my children going forward. the society that I live in, or as we talked about earlier, to find one that matches my values and creates the opportunities I want for my children going forward. So it makes me really, really care

about the place that I live in, because I know that I will be living here even after I'm dead. You see what I mean? So that's another one. It also, it puts a lot of strain on the relationship you have with your wife, because you've suddenly got less time,

less time together, more things are difficult, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. And so that means you have to go to the next level as a couple. You really have to up your game together. And that's been really- Did your background, I'm interested, people might not know this,

but you've done quite a bit of sort of emotional work, things, courses, so on and so forth that we've spoken about, um, two elements that I'm interested in, whether or not your inner work, emotional, personal development side stuff. Uh, you think that that contributed to maybe, maybe being a bit more robust, uh, as a parent for these and also your time in the business the business, building up the business, like operationally effective as a person, managing spinning plates, like having to deploy orders, you know, oh, there's none of the nappies that we need from this store. Like, you know, like just

that kind of logistical competence. Yeah. And the management of human beings too, right? I heard this great thing, just as an aside, I wanted to share with you Warren Buffett's three things that you need in people that you employ. It was integrity, intelligence and energy. And people think that the worst you could possibly have is someone who's low integrity, low energy and low intelligence. And he's like, that is not true.

The worst thing you can have is someone who's low integrity, low energy, and low intelligence. And he's like, that is not true. The worst thing you can have is someone who's high energy, high intelligence, and low integrity. Yeah. Yeah. Working incredibly hard at making things worse. Yeah. Or stealing company money or whatever it is. But anyway, yeah, of course.

Jordan said this to me, actually. I remember talking about this and he asked me about, what difference running trigonometry had made. And I talked about managing people and he was like, oh yeah, running a business is like a fatherhood by proxy, which I think to some extent it is. Hopefully your employees are not bawling their eyes out and shitting their pants every two hours, but nonetheless.

Depends how many episodes we try to do in a day. Yeah. But yeah, of course you're more prepared. I mean, the more, the one thing I say to everybody who asked me this is like, whatever it is that you know is lacking in your skillset, get it sorted before you become a parent. Like if you don't know how to ride a bike, learn to ride a bike before you become a parent.

If you don't have to drive a car, learn how to drive. If you don't have to manage your emotions, learn to do that before you. What was the thing, or was there anything that in retrospect, like potential father, Constantine, you'd have been like, hey man, you've got nine months. Like fucking, that's a good area that you could focus on so you don't need to do it once he's arrived.

The most important thing is, I think it's a mistake most people made, my wife and I definitely made it, which is once the child is born, you totally forget about your relationship and you're just like, how do we like actually, like keep this baby alive? And you don't go out on dates

and you don't spend time together with each other. The romance can suffer. It's not just romance, it's the connection. It's fundamentally the connection. And so there's a danger that you become business partners who are dealing with a difficult problem, as opposed to a couple who's like a couple and then the baby is kind of there, you know what I mean?

And so there was definitely a period where we didn't do enough of that. So now we're like having a day every week, making sure that we spending time together, having lots of conversations, lots of flowers, lots of all of that. Just really making sure that the relationship is first, the parenting is second in the sense

that you can't really be a good parent if your relationship is not working optimally. So that's definitely, definitely very important. And then, I believe that all performance in every area ultimately comes down to how psychologically aligned you are with who you wanna be. So if you, whatever psychological issues you have, they are going to be the thing that affects

whether you're a good boss or not, whether you're a good dad or not, whether you're a good husband or not, whether you're a good dad or not, whether you're a good husband or not, all of those things. So that feeling of continually working on yourself, I'm reading a book now that somebody in LA gave me about how to be a good husband. The next one is how to raise boys. The next one is, you know, so that's where my focus is now

is how do you improve in those areas? And one of the reasons I'm so obsessed with that is it's like the impact is the greatest. A two-year-old really takes on the lessons of whatever it is that you're teaching them. A very permeable sponge. Yeah, but perhaps irreversibly so. So you really wanna make sure that you're like,

you can't squeeze the crap out of the sponge again. So you want to make sure that you're at your best. Is that a motivating force for you? Already somebody who, you know, like maybe lots of the people that are listening who don't yet have kids, open aiming, self authoring, agency, intentionality, all of those things.

And then you think, oh, you know, I'm, the RPM limiter is already bouncing off the top. And then you realize that there's five more gears that you could step into from a, uh, obsession, intensity, intentionality standpoint. Now that you're doing something for somebody else. Yeah. It's interesting. I don't mean to be picky with the metaphor, but it's not like there's

five more gears vertically. It's not like there's a six and the seventh and the eighth gear. It's more like when you are one of the driven people like us and you're obsessed with your work and you love what you do and blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. It can be tempting to just go, well, there's this other area of life which is personal relationships where it's like,

well, as long as I'm making enough money and being successful out here. I don't need to worry about that. I don't really need to worry too much about that. I fundamentally don't believe that, which is why, in some ways I really admire people who don't have an to worry too much about that. I fundamentally don't believe that, which is why, you know, in some ways, I really admire people who don't have an amazing woman by their side as I've been lucky to have,

who are still able to be successful. Cause I know that for me, like, there's no fucking way that would have happened, you know? So I really needed to be pulled back into like, as the success of our channel has happened and everything else, I've really had to be dragged back into, okay, this is a time to go back to the thing you did 10, 15 years ago,

where you go, okay, the relationship isn't exactly how I want it. Let's focus on this. Let's work on this. And so it's, I find life is like those five bars that you're trying to balance at the same time. And as this one goes up, this one is slipping and whatever. So I'm just trying to raise all of balance at the same time. And as this one goes up, this one is slipping and whatever. So I'm just trying to raise all of them at the same time as much as I can.

And that means, you know, I look at you travel around the world way more than I could possibly do and doing things that I might not be able to do. And like I'm spending that time with my son, to me that's a worthwhile trade off. And then you'll get to that stage at some point where you'll be like- I can't wait, I can't wait.

And you know, my friend a few years ago in Austin said to me, successful guy, big business, besotted, smitten with his new partner, and then starting to talk about engagements and kids and all the rest of this stuff. And he said, I realized I spent most of my 20s and half of my thirties making myself into the person I wanted to be as a father.

And, uh, I saw how, like a beautiful way to alchemize all of the stuff you do. Cause there is a kind of sterile isolation to doing things just for yourself, uh, even if they're grand, even if they are you enacting your logos forward, you know, actualizing your purpose and stuff, and they can still give you meaning, but I, there is, especially if you've got to some degree of success, which is maybe why people that reach success, uh, struggle even more so, because they realized that success wasn't filling the hole that they thought it would do, um, and there is a little bit of me that thinks, well, how great if you kind of

get to, you get to benefit twice from this thing, you did all of this work because you wanted to fix yourself. And maybe the reason you want to fix yourself was to become successful. So it can be validated and have social recognition and stuff like that. Maybe that's not like the most superbly virtuous alignment, but it sort of put you in the right direction. And then later on, you realize that all of that work has this additional second benefit that somebody who wasn't obsessed to do that, regardless of what the motivation was, you now have this beautiful foundation that you can then pay forward.

And I know, I think like that's a really, a really lovely type of alchemy I think. Well it's you know that quote I'll butcher it but what does it profit a man to to gain the world and lose his soul or something like that and the way I look at success is what does it profit you to have millions in the bank if the people around you are miserable or don't exist what what what have you you know that the fulfillment you get from family is incomparable. Now, if you're living in the bed set and struggling to pay the bills, it puts so much strain on your life

that it's very difficult to enjoy. And some people are saints and are able to actually enjoy that in difficult circumstances. People always go, well, money can't buy you happiness. It can make it a lot easier to be happy. That's for sure. Now- Poverty can make you miserable.

Yes. And all money is is a tool. So if you use that tool to solve problems that get in the way of your happiness, it can make you happy. My friend George talks about people that say money doesn't buy you happiness, never met P. Diddy's neighbors. The difference, you buy this expensive house,

fuck you realize it's next to P. Diddy. You spend a tiny bit more money, now you have earplugs. That it's very much how you deploy it. Yes. And so I think success for especially for a man is a great thing to pursue. And one of the reasons is that if you want to be more successful,

you're gonna have to be better. You have to work on yourself. You have to get better as a human being. Hopefully, hopefully, not everybody does. But once you've got that success and you are making good money and you're, you know, whatever. Something Jordan said to me when we were on tour together.

He said, the best place to store excess resources is in your reputation. That's interesting. What's that mean to you? What it means is once you're doing well, the best thing that you can possibly do with the extra resources that you have is to help other people, is to make opportunities for other people,

is to be somebody that other people benefit from knowing, is to be good to your family too, in some respect. So the resources that you have, whether it's money or connections or whatever, are really best deployed into other people around you because that's how you're gonna have the best possible life. And I think that's fundamentally true. It gives me way more joy to buy my wife something

than to spend that money on myself. Correct. And the same for, you know, seeing my son's eyes light up when something happens that we now can afford that we couldn't before. Think about this, you know, I imagine as the recovering workaholic or maybe still recovering workaholic, you may be, and I almost certainly will have to be, that.

I'm not recovering. No, I love work. I will always love work. But think about, think about it this way. There's this lovely insight from James Clear, where he says that if you're already at a level of material comfort, trading quality of life for more money is a bad deal and the level of success, the level of material comfort, trading quality of life for more money is a bad deal. And the level of success, the level of material comfort, so on and so forth.

One of the best gifts that you can give, which is totally non-obvious is to say, I'm going to leave additional revenue on the table or I'm going to leave additional life experiences, travel the world less, do fewer live events, which all of this stuff you could do more in order to do that. And how much does Sun's eyes light up from new toy truck versus from daddy being at home for an additional five hours a week? And that's one of those sort of hidden metrics. It's never going to appear on a balance sheet somewhere, not objectively, but very much

is something that you need to dedicate a good bit of time to. Yes. And I remember I had a very interesting conversation with Bill Ackman. It was a private one, but I don't imagine he would mind. He probably has talked about this elsewhere in public. Him and I were just having lunch. And his wife is amazing in her own right, Neri Aksmer.

Oh yeah, she's like a super genius, like ex-model, PhD fucking like interstellar person, right? She's incredible, lovely human being, just wonderful. They both are great people actually. But Bill was saying to me, Bill is one of the most successful investors in the history of capitalism and he showed me a graph where there was like a massive dip in the company valuation and then it just goes massively back up. And he went right at the bottom and he said, this is when we got together. And he said, this is not an accident. He said, when your personal life is good,

you inevitably succeed in everything else because it's the foundation from which you operate. And so that happiness and joy that he has from being married to a woman he is clearly just passionate and passionately in love with, who's great for him. He says that that is a big part of his business success. And I have no doubt that that's true. You know, when the foundation of everything

that you're doing is strong, it's so much easier to do everything else. It's probably, I mean, I'm hardly an expert on bodybuilding, but I imagine if you've got a weak core and you do lots of really heavy lifting, it's probably not that good for you, right? And so to me, family and the relationships you have with the people around you are really that core

that you build everything else on. That's very interesting. Constantine Kisson, ladies and gentlemen, dudes, I appreciate the heck out of you. I always love having a chat. Where should people go? I'm gonna keep up to date with everything you're doing. My sub stack, ConstantineKisson.com and Tr, dudes, I appreciate the heck out of you. I always love having a chat. Where should people go? I'm going to keep up to date with everything you're doing. My sub stack, constantinkishen.com and Trigonometry, the YouTube channel and podcast.

Highly recommended. Also, I think that you have done a great job of writing a book and selling it by the sentence, we do the article, then you get early access on that, that's monetized. Then that gets put into a spoken script that people can watch on the YouTube. Then that'll get... Everyone's copying that people can watch on the YouTube, then that'll get clipped. Everyone's copying that now, have you noticed? I have somewhat. It is a price that you're going to pay

for finding anything that's effective. Oh, I love it, I love it. This is one of the things that people get very upset in our space about like stealing ideas. And I'm like, they're not stealing, they take the proof of concepting what I've done. Precisely correct. That's great.

I want more great people to be doing exactly the thing that... And this is... I was not always like this. This is one of the things I've learned. And actually the person I've learned that from... Your positive, some equanimity. The person I've learned that from is Rogan, undoubtedly. Because he's like, you should have a podcast.

You should have a podcast. Everyone gets a podcast. Whereas most people mentality when they're ahead of everybody else is like, yeah, tighten, shut it down. And Joe's like, there's enough in this world. There's more for everybody. And that let's grow the pie instead of obsess about how we divide the pie thing.

It's a much nicer way to operate as well. It's the best. It's the best. It's awesome, man. I really think that the stuff that you're putting out, this sort of position that you guys have carved for yourselves is super interesting and long may it continue. Well, I appreciate you as well, man. And you've had amazing success this year, so congratulations. You're going to cut this out like last time. Last time I said, well done, congratulations,

and you cut it out of the episode. Don't do it again. Okay. Dean, did you listen to that? Stop it. All right. Appreciate you, man. Until next time. Thanks, brother. Appreciate it.