Muscle for Life with Mike Matthews - Luke Tulloch on Using Auto-Regulation to Optimize Your Workouts
Episode Date: June 2, 2023What if you could train smarter, not harder? That’s the promise of auto-regulation, which you can use to increase autonomy and individualize your program, enhancing gains while staying injury-free. ...In this episode, we have fitness expert Luke Tulloch breaking down the concept of auto-regulation in resistance training. This approach tailors workouts to your physical and mental readiness, ensuring optimal results. Luke Tulloch is an online trainer and fitness educator with an in-depth understanding of exercise science. He uses his knowledge to help fitness professionals become better coaches by breaking down complex topics and teaching them in a simple way, and helping other personal trainers become more confident through education. Of course, he also knows how to help individuals make the most out of their workouts, and in this conversation, Luke and I discuss: - The definition of auto-regulation in resistance training and how it increases autonomy and individualizes workouts. - Practical tips for modifying your training based on auto-regulation for enjoyable and improved results. - The correct implementation of deloading focusing on different body parts. - How to avoid potential mistakes in implementing auto-regulation. - The importance of strategic programming for maximizing progress. - Auto-regulating exercise selection and set intensity. - How to develop the skill of understanding when you're close to failure and how many reps you have left. - Common mistakes people make with auto-regulation. - The role of technology and structure in training programs. - And more . . . If you're looking to optimize your training and make the most of your time in the gym, this podcast will provide practical insights you can start implementing right away. Listen in to delve into the world of auto-regulation with Luke Tulloch! Timestamps: (0:00) - Please leave a review of the show wherever you listen to podcasts and make sure to subscribe! (05:11) - What is auto-regulation? (08:11) - Tips for modifying workouts based on auto-regulation. (11:28) - Implementing deloading for different muscle groups. (14:46) - Common mistakes with auto-regulation and how to avoid them. (24:57) - Importance of strategic workout programming for progress. (27:41) - Legion VIP One-on-One Coaching: https://www.muscleforlife.show/vip (30:06) - Auto-regulating exercise selection and set intensity. (35:14) - Developing skills for recognizing your proximity to failure. (39:52) - Addressing other common mistakes in auto-regulation. (42:58) - The role of technology in auto-regulation. (54:00) - Where can you find Luke Tulloch and his work? Mentioned on the Show: Legion VIP One-on-One Coaching: https://www.muscleforlife.show/vip Luke’s website: https://www.luketulloch.com/ Luke’s Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/_luketulloch/?hl=en
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Hello, hello, and thank you for spending some time with me today. I am Mike Matthews. This
is Muscle for Life. And in this episode, you are going to learn about auto-regulation,
which sounds like something that you probably don't need to learn about, as is the case with
most quote-unquote fancy or sophisticated training methods. Like most things in life,
the Pareto Principle applies bigly to training.
20% of all of the stuff that you could possibly learn about
and do in the gym is going to produce 80% of the results,
and the remaining 20% of the results
is the best you can hope
from the remaining 80% of information and techniques and strategies
and workout splits and programs and so forth.
But auto-regulation is an exception to the rule.
It is something that is not as important as, let's say, progressive overload, but it is
worth your time and attention because no matter where you are in your fitness journey, whether you are
new or experienced, no matter your goals, whether you are looking to just get into good shape or
get jacked, auto-regulation, at least the fundamentals that you are going to learn about
in this episode, can help you get there maybe not faster, but certainly more enjoyably.
One of the biggest benefits of using the information
that you are going to learn about in this podcast
is better compliance, better adherence,
sticking to the plan better because it's more enjoyable.
And in this episode, you are going to be learning
mostly from my guest, Luke Tulloch,
who is a popular online trainer and fitness educator
who I think does a
great job breaking down some of the more complex evidence-based topics and explaining them in a way
that anyone can understand them and more importantly, can use them, can get something
out of them right away. Hey, Luke, thanks for taking time to come and talk to me about auto regulation.
Very much my pleasure, mate. Thanks for having me.
Absolutely. So I was excited to talk about this topic because it's something that I haven't
spoken about or written about in some time. I seem to remember doing an interview with somebody a
couple of years ago on this. So it's always nice to find something that I feel like I haven't
already beaten to death. And I thought, because
I have not talked or written much about this, and it's been some time since I've touched on it at
all, we could have a kind of an auto-regulation 101 discussion. Let's talk about what is
auto-regulation? What is it not? Who is it for? Who is it not for? How does it work? Like,
is it for? Who is it not for? How does it work? Practically, how do you do it in a way that is worth the trouble, so to speak? And how does it not work? And I think those dichotomies,
I bring those things up because if I look at a lot of discussions around auto regulation online,
I see a lot of things that I disagree with, starting with even what is it? And again,
who should be doing it and why and how should you go about it? And so I think if we just give good
information really on those high level points, that'd be a great discussion.
For me, I use a pretty simple definition of it. And in the context of like resistance training,
auto regulation is just something that allows us to adjust things like our training volume, our intensity,
or even like our exercise selection, just based on our physical and our mental readiness.
And the idea behind that is that instead of having like a fixed program, like I have to do
X, Y, Z today for this number of reps on these particular exercises you can adjust based on
some of those factors that are going to vary in your everyday life like your sleep and your
nutrition your stress or like your muscle recovery and so that potentially gives us some
key benefits in terms of like individualizing the program to you a little bit more, you might be able to recover
a little bit better because you're not pushing as hard on days where you don't have the recovery
capacity. And that means that it could mean better long-term progress as well. So when you're able
to push hard, you push hard. When you're not able to push so hard, you can still go in and train
and you're just kind of adjusting based on how you're feeling on that day. And so we have this like potential performance benefit from it, but we also have a sort of
bigger idea, which I'm really big on as a coach, which is having greater autonomy for the client
or like my clients, but you know, if you're the person running the program, because you can kind
of take control of your own training. And this kind of speaks to this like greater psychological need that we have of having some autonomy in our lives. It kind of
feels nice to be able to call the shots if you need to, right? And do the right thing for you
and your situation. There's definitely some benefits to auto-regulating and that's just
kind of the general idea. Like we're just going to either turn up how much training volume or how
difficult the session is if we're feeling really good and we're going to turn it down if we're not feeling so good. And over time, that should
mean that we recover a bit better, we make more gains, we stay injury-free.
Now, some people would agree. They would say, yeah, in theory, what you just said is fine.
But in reality, when a lot of people try to do that. They inevitably, they consistently train, they don't push themselves
as hard as they should or could. And so what happens is they actually get worse results
over time versus just forcing themselves to stick to the program. What are your thoughts on that?
I do think it's something that works better the
more experienced you get, but I think it's also something that you can practice and get better at
as a skill. So like a big component of it is understanding, okay, well, you know, I've decided
that maybe I'm feeling a little flat today. I'm a bit under recovered or whatever. I'm going to
pull back on my session. There is a skill and some knowledge required to understand like, how do that? How much am I pulling back? What exercises am I changing, if any?
But there's a lot of different ways you can implement auto-regulation. Some of it is
really simple. It could literally just be, okay, I've got one session that is easier than the other
sessions and I'm just going to do that one today and I'm going to push my leg day to Friday or
something. That doesn't require very much skill or expertise and more or less the
sessions can just stay exactly the same as they were. You're just doing them on a different day
versus someone who might go and be like, okay, so I'm going to use RPE and I'm going to use,
like I have a velocity based thing that tells me how fast I'm lifting. And if it goes below this,
then I'm going to cut the set shot. That gets really complicated and you do need some experience
to know how to use that. But there's lots of different levels to this, then I'm going to cut the set short. Like that gets really complicated and you do need some experience to know how to use
that.
But there's lots of different levels to this.
So I think pretty much anybody can use auto-regulation to some extent.
And certainly I think it's valid that, you know, it can be a bit of a cop-out for some
people to just like take it easy.
But I think if you're consistently taking it easy, then there's probably something wrong
either with the program in the first place, it's just too hard for you.
Or on the other end, it could just be that like,
there's something else going on in your life. Like you're not recovering well. If you always feel really tired going to the gym, you're always really sore and you always feel like you need to
take easy days. Okay. Let's look a bit more at your training, your stress. I mean, your nutrition,
stress, sleep, this kind of stuff. So it can also kind of open you up to go, okay, well,
maybe there's some other stuff I need to look at too, if I'm always training pretty soft,
if that makes sense. And that point of moving workouts around is a great one. That's something
that I've done and I've recommended for a long time now. Sometimes it's also based on like,
you know, normally I'll do some heavy deadlifting on Tuesday and I'll do some heavy squatting on Thursday.
But sometimes on Thursday, my lower back is still sore.
It's just not going to be a great squat session just because of that. And then I will take my upper body workout that I normally do on Friday and I'll just
do that on Thursday and give my lower back one more day.
Or sometimes it's my hips.
I'll feel just soreness in my hips, particularly in my SI joint. And I've mildly injured in the past. So I
just, I pay attention to how my joints and particularly my hips and my back are feeling.
So I think that's a great example of a simple auto-regulation tip that everyone can benefit
from that you really can't screw up
because you're still doing your workouts. You're just not forcing yourself to do them in a
prescribed order. What are a couple of other examples of simple modifications based on
auto-regulation that most people could immediately implement to enjoy their training more,
improve compliance and thereby improve results. Yeah. I mean, that's definitely one of my favorite
ones. So that's technically daily undulating periodization. And it sounds really complicated,
but it's actually real simple. It's like do the light workout if you feel like you're still a bit
beat up from your previous session. Another one that I really like. So when we look at
autoregulation, there's stuff that you can do that's a little bit more like bird's eye view, a bit more macro
oriented, like, okay, yeah, let's move the sessions around within a week, things like that.
There's also some stuff you can do on a per session basis. Like you can use things like
reps and reserve or RPE and stuff like that. But just to keep it on the macro for a second,
another thing that I really like is using a reactive deload as opposed to like a pre-planned or a proactive deload.
So a lot of programs will kind of start a little bit too easy and they'll ramp up really quickly.
And then they'll get to like, it's super hard and you basically end up being really beat up for like a week or two.
And you basically have to deload because you're just so beat up.
But there are a lot of programs out there that are just kind of like, they stay in that middle
zone for a really long time. And if you have a pre-planned deload in there, you might not actually
need it. So sometimes it's a wise idea that instead of pre-scheduling your deload weeks,
you can just kind of auto-regulate to determine when to deload. Like if you feel like your
performance is starting to decline, your fatigue is going up, you're feeling a bit more sore, your sleep is getting a little bit
disrupted, then you can go, oh, maybe I need a deload now, so I'm going to take it now. I'm
going to rest and recover, and then I can come back and keep training hard. And the advantage
of that is that it's pretty common for a lot of programs to have three weeks of hard training and
a one-week deload, or five weeks of training and and then a one week deload. And if you do that, you're actually spending one sixth or
one quarter of your time, not really training very hard. And when you add that up over a whole year,
like think about it, you're spending three months doing training that's kind of too easy to really
drive any kind of progress. Whereas if you reactively deload, you might only
need to take those reactive deloads every so often. And it means that you actually spend more
time doing training that's going to push you forward. So that's a really key idea that I like
quite a lot. Now, there are some programs that are designed that's like, if you're picking for
a powerlifting competition or something, and by the 12th week, yeah,
you're going to get really beat up and there's a planned deload in there for that reason.
That's fine. But this is something that the average person can use if they're just going
to the gym and doing a general bodybuilding thing that is just rinse and repeat the same
thing over and over again. You can use these reactive deloads during periods where you are
feeling a little bit under-recovered as opposed to just pre-planning it and then missing out on
all of this
potentially progressing volume and stuff
that you could be doing.
And what do you think about
deloading different muscle groups
on different timelines?
Yeah, I love that.
I think that's a cool idea.
Like you might find that your lower body
is getting really beat up,
but that doesn't mean that you have to stop
and deload your upper body, for example.
Like sometimes you do just have overall too much stress on the whole system and you need more of
like a full body deload. But typically what I find, it's usually like one lift or a movement
pattern that can start to get a little bit too much. And so it might just be that, okay, your
hips are getting really sore because you do a lot of squatting and sumo deadlifting. So maybe you
just deload those things and you can keep bench pressing and chin upping and training your arms really hard. And that way, again,
you don't lose any potential stimulus to those muscle groups just because your legs are a bit
sore. Yeah. Sometimes I will do, I guess we could call a proper deload for my lower body and I'll
continue training my upper body at the same intensity, but I might just reduce the volume
a little bit. Whereas with my lower body, I might be reducing the intensity and the volume
depending on factors. I mean, now with my training, how it's set up, I'm more just kind
of in a maintenance phase. So I can go longer without deloading and be less rigorous with
basically everything because the goal is just to enjoy my workouts
and maintain muscle and strength. But before that, for about two years, I was pushing for progress
and having to obviously do more volume that I'm doing now and higher intensity and pushing closer
to failure more often. And I found that that I just kind of learned from my body and what I was doing and just my circumstances. I did need to be pretty regular with those lower body deloads and drop the weights on my squat and my deadlift, like whatever I was treating my upper body the same as my lower body and then deloading is boring. So I was like, all right, can I make this a little bit more fun? I'm going to
increase the intensity a little bit of upper body. So at least I can have a little bit of fun during
the week. And that didn't seem to cause any issues for me. And I did work in some proper upper body
deloads, but it was probably every second lower body deload, I actually had to do like a proper upper body.
Yeah, I think that's really common. And so, you know, like as you learn what works best for you,
I think it gets easier and easier to do that. I mean, like I can't even remember the last time
I deloaded because it kind of just happens naturally with my life. Like I have to travel or,
you know, like I need to take care of my kids. So I naturally just get less training in a week.
And so I don't think like personally, I don't have scheduled deloads at all. It just kind of
happens for me. And then I just roll with it. So I think that's a big one. That's a fair point.
Many people listening probably have similar circumstances. Sometimes it's sick sickness,
especially if you have kids like, you know, I have young kids, I have a five-year-old,
she goes to a germ factory of a school just because that's how it is. And unfortunately, you know, every couple months,
she's never very sick, but she is coughing or sneezing or, and it's hard to not get it when
she is coughing and sneezing on me every single day. And so sometimes that's it, that's the deload
is, you know, getting a cold from my
daughter. So coming back to auto-regulation, we can get into some more practical ways of
implementing it. But I thought also we should shift gears and talk about some common mistakes
that people make when trying to auto-regulate. Yeah, for sure. So, auto-regulation is nice because it gives you a bit more freedom and it gives you a little bit more autonomy and flexibility. But that is a double-edged sword, as you mentioned before. It's easy to go too far on the, this is flexible and I can kind of do whatever I want and I'll still get results.
I want and I'll still get results. Like ultimately, if you want to get a strong squat,
like you got to squat really heavy and you got to do that pretty often. If you want big biceps,
you got to train your biceps a lot. You got to do a fair bit of volume on them, that kind of thing.
So there is an element of, there is just a minimum amount of work you need to do on certain muscle groups, on certain exercises. And if you mess around with that too much, you might be derailing
your progress a little bit. So it's kind of treading the line between keeping in the structure, but then working in some elements of flexibility.
classic problem that a lot of people run into as they go from maybe beginner to intermediate it's like wow there's all this different stuff i can do like let me try this oh it's not working let
me try this let me try this this looks cool so you do have to kind of have some continuity and
some consistency to get some results but i think there are maybe the correct way to do it would be
to have some elements of your program that stay the same and some elements where you can introduce this
auto-regulation idea. So like the two key areas that I really think about, you know, from an
exercise like variable standpoint is using something like a reps and reserve model or an
RPE model, which we can talk about in a little bit. But another element is just the exercise
selection piece, because there are lots of ways you can use sort of variable or sort of auto-regulated
exercise selection without messing around with your overall program too much. And so you can
maybe like have one or two little bits and pieces here or there that you tinker with
to get used to some auto-regulation. And that keeps everything a little bit fresher without
compromising the overall structure, which is really going to give you your consistency and
your results. So if I'm hearing you correctly, then let's say you were doing a lower body workout. Now,
assuming that your goal is to continue making progress or maybe even to maximize progress,
because if the goal, like in my case, I'm in a maintenance phase, again, just trying to enjoy
my workouts. And I know what it takes at this point
for me to gain any muscle and strength. And I'm only doing enough for my calves. I'm training my
calves every day. So I'm doing like 20 sets of calves per week. And it's working though, of
course. I mean, how could it not work when you're doing 20 sets a week, like pushing every set right
up to zero to one RAR, doing anywhere from four to six reps per set
to up to 15 reps per set,
like just doing it all, you know what I mean?
Because I came into the world with no calves.
My dad, he has ankles and then he has knees.
And I played a lot of ice hockey and roller hockey as a kid.
So you'd think that would give me some calves.
No, it gave me no calves.
And 12-ish sets per week was not enough
to do much of anything. So I was like, all right, let's just do it right. Let's do
Mac. Yeah, exactly. Let's just brute force it for a year is what I anticipated to. And that's not
going to get me to bodybuilding standards of calves as big as biceps, but it'll get me close
enough to where it won't annoy me anymore. You know what I mean? And it's working. It's working. I'm probably like four months in and I'm not taking measurements because
I'm just looking at pictures and videos, but you know, of course it's working just because of
brute force works. But aside from that, like, I know that that's what it takes. Like if I wanted
to get a bigger, stronger, lower body, that's about what it would take probably 15 to 20 hard
sets. Like I, you know, it's just the way it is after you've been lifting weights for a long time and so in my case where
it does not take very much volume it does not take very much intensity to just maintain what i have
now i do like to train at a certain level of intensity but i can afford right to you could
even say make some mistakes if you were assuming I was trying to make progress.
But if I'm not trying to make progress, then I could auto-regulate just about anything
and achieve my goal. So I could just go into the gym and say, all right, I'm feeling pretty good.
I'm going to get in some lower body volume because I need to get in at least a certain
amount of work every week to achieve my goal. And what am I feeling like doing today? Front squat. I don't
really want a front squat. I'm going to do the pen, you know, and just kind of make it up on the
spot. However, if my goal was to make progress, if I'm hearing you correctly, that's where it would
make more sense to put some more thought into how this program is going to work. Certain things would not just
be decided on the fly. Certain things would be pre-planned and the goal is to follow the plan
unless I have a good reason not to. But then there maybe are elements that could be decided.
Like, for example, what are your thoughts on, let's say, okay, I'm going to start with a heavy squat movement.
If it were me programming my workouts, it would be pre-planned.
Like, I like to alternate between back squats, front squats, and safety bar squats.
That's usually my squat.
And then I might do one more quad-focused exercise.
But then there might be, let's say, a hamstring accessory exercise.
And that one maybe just depends on maybe it's going to be a seated, maybe it's going to
be a lying, maybe it's going to be a standing.
What are your thoughts on that approach versus, again, just going in the gym and being like,
okay, I'm going to do a push workout and just making it up as I go?
Yeah, I think you're 100% on the money there.
Maintenance, you can get away with a lot of flexibility.
And it's kind of like if you put some tension on the tissue, it's going to hang around,
right?
So I'm in the same boat, man.
But definitely, there's lots of ways that you can have a quote unquote, like optimized
workout for progress, but still include a little bit of auto-regulation here.
So you could use like a free choice for accessories.
I mean, as an example, if you needed to do like some biceps at the end of like a big
pool day, I don't think it makes that much difference whether you use like, you know,
the rope on the cable curl or whether you use the straight bar, like that's probably
not going to make much difference.
So just choose whatever's, I don't know, the guys using the rope.
So I'll just use the bar that's in front of me.
You can definitely do that.
Or just choose whatever you feel like doing, right?
For whatever reason, you don't have to think about it. Be like, I feel like doing the
rope. All right, do the rope. Yeah, totally. 100%. There was actually a really interesting study that
used a small pool of viable exercises. So they had two or three options per muscle group. And on the
day, the subjects could just choose which one they wanted to do for like quads, like upper pull, upper push or whatever. And so one group had a fixed exercise prescription for every single workout. The other
one had this choice of three different exercises per muscle group. And that auto-regulated group
actually saw a little bit more muscle growth and a slightly bigger increase in their bench press
1RM as well over nine weeks. So it wasn't like a very strong
study design without going too much into it. But what it tells us is that at the very least,
it was just as good as having a fixed exercise prescription. And it might've even been a little
bit better. So that's another option. You could be like, hey, like my main squat movement,
I like front squats, back squats, and safety bar squats. So I can choose one of those. I don't get
to choose a leg press from their main quad, but I can choose from these three. So that's another way of doing
it. So I really like that style. And certainly I think probably some exercises matter less,
if that makes sense, than others. To what you were saying a little bit earlier, there is
a problem if you're going in every time and you're supposed to be doing like some kind of big bang
kind of compound movement for your quads every time and you're kind of wimping out and doing
the leg extension each time or something like that. I think having a small pool is a really
good way of introducing that auto-regulation for sure. And you know, another thing you could do is
you could even rotate some exercises more often than others. Like you could rotate isolated
exercises a bit more than
your main exercises. So you've been in your back squat for eight weeks, but maybe every two or
three weeks you swap around which hamstring exercise you do or something like that. So
there are lots of options depending on what your preference is. Another mistake, at least that I
see that people might not be thinking about it as auto-regulation, but it is, is related to
set intensity. So proximity to failure. And that's something that the only time that I can think of
off at the top of my head, because I actually just had to do it recently because I was out of the
country for two weeks and I only did a couple workouts. Because when I'm on vacation, I'm not
going to make training a priority. If I have some time,
I like to do maybe one workout every three to five days, just do a whole body session,
60 minutes be done. Otherwise, walk, eat food, have fun. And when I got back, though, I wasn't
horribly detrained because I did do a couple of workouts. But I knew that if I jumped right back into my normal workouts,
it was just gonna be a bit much,
especially my lower body.
I was gonna have a number of days
where I couldn't sit down on the toilet properly,
where you kind of just hover over and drop.
And sure, you could do it,
but it's just a little bit annoying, right?
And so to account for that,
I did my normal workouts,
like normal exercises and number of sets per exercise,
but I just didn't push as close to failure. I brought my reps down a little bit. So instead of that set intensity of,
you know, I like it to be anywhere from probably one to three reps shy of failure, depending on
what the exercise is. I mean, I'll go to a zero, actually, if it's like a biceps curl, I would not
do that on a deadlift, at least not anymore. Otherwise, though, that set intensity is something that I like to keep more or less fixed,
where I'm pushing pretty close to failure on all of my exercises and right up to failure on some of
my exercises, at least some of the sets. So a mistake that I see a lot of people making in the
gym is not taking most, if not all of their sets anywhere close to failure, at least from what
I can see where the bar or the machine or the dumbbell has not slowed down at all. They're not
making the weird grimaces, you know, it's just like, okay, it's a little bit uncomfortable now
ending the set. And sometimes they compensate for that by just adding more volume. So staying in the
gym for two hours, doing a bunch of submaximal sets. And what are your thoughts on that point,
particular of auto-regulating the set intensity based on whatever? I mean, it could even be like,
hey, I'm tired. And again, personally, if I'm tired, I was a little bit tired today. I didn't
sleep great last night, had a lower body workout, but oh oh well, went and did it, right? I don't like to auto-regulate set intensity because that
in particular seems to be too much of a slippery slope where you just get into this mindset of
not working. It's okay to just not work that hard. Yeah, yeah. No, I totally hear you. I think that
with something like using reps and reserve or RPE or something like that, you need to have some experience with it to really use it well for auto-regulation. In my opinion, it's a skill that every lifter needs to learn because it has so many different applications. And we all kind of intuitively use some kind of rating of perceived exertion anyway. Like when you do a set, like I always
say to myself, like, no, that felt pretty hard today. Like what I'm doing is I'm rating that as
like a tough set that maybe that's an RPE like eight or nine, you know, but it does take a little
bit of skill to do. And certainly you can slack off a fair bit if you're like, ah, no, just,
you know, I'll push a bit away and I'll take it easy. And like you said, the biggest mistake I
think I see with lifters is exactly what you described where people basically just do like dozens and dozens and
dozens of submaximal sets and they're in the gym for like two hours, but nothing's really
particularly stimulative, right? So I really like using RPE to help me auto-regulate,
or you can use it actually to auto-regulate the volume that you do as well. But I do think you
probably need to develop the skill a little bit so that you can understand like, am I actually
getting close to failure here? What is this in terms of how many reps do I have left?
And if you can do that, then it unlocks a whole nother level of auto-regulation that you can use.
So it's pretty important to at least go in with the intention of like, I'm going to work
hard today and get in some hard sets. And then I think like if you're getting those hard sets,
and at least you know you're getting some stimulus, and if you need to cut the sets
short or something, then okay, cool. That's a little bit of a better situation than still
spending two hours in the gym, but not really getting too much done. How would you like to know
a little secret
that will help you get into the best shape of your life? Here it is. The business model for
my VIP coaching service sucks. Boom, mic drop. And what in the fiddly frack am I talking about?
Well, while most coaching businesses try to keep their clients around for as long as possible,
I take a different approach.
You see, my team and I, we don't just help you build your best body ever.
I mean, we do that.
We figure out your calories and macros, and we create custom diet and training plans based
on your goals and your circumstances, and we make adjustments depending on how your body
responds, and we help you ingrain the right eating and exercise habits so you can develop a healthy
and a sustainable relationship with food and training and more. But then there's the kicker,
because once you are thrilled with your results, we ask you to fire us.
Seriously, you've heard the phrase, give a man a fish and you feed him for a day,
teach him to fish and you feed him for a lifetime. Well, that summarizes how my one-on-one coaching
service works. And that's why it doesn't make nearly as much coin as it could, but I'm okay with that because my mission is not to just help you gain muscle and lose fat.
It's to give you the tools and to give you the know-how that you need to forge ahead in your fitness without me.
So dig this. When you sign up for my coaching, we don't just take you by the hand and walk you through the entire process of
building a body you can be proud of. We also teach you the all-important whys behind the hows,
the key principles, and the key techniques you need to understand to become your own coach.
And the best part? It only takes 90 days. So instead of going it alone this year,
why not try something different? Head over to muscleforlife.show slash VIP. That is muscle
F-O-R life.show slash VIP and schedule your free consultation call now. And let's see if my
one-on-one coaching service is right for you.
Practically speaking, how would that work?
How would you go about auto-regulating a workout, particularly with the RPE or reps and reserve?
Do you prefer RPE over reps and reserve?
I often speak RPE because that's what they use in research and stuff. But I think reps and reserve is a little bit more intuitive for people to use, right? So it's probably better to use that language.
That's what I like personally. It feels easy. And so long as you kind of keep it calibrated by
really pushing up to that point of failure now and then, so you don't trick yourself into thinking
that you're working harder than you are. Yeah, totally. So the way you can
use it practically to auto-regulate volume is by using what's called, it's called the RPE stop
method, or you could change it to the RIR stop method. And essentially what you're doing is
you're giving yourself a target RIR that you're not going to go over, so to speak.
And sorry to interject, I just realized some people listening might not
know what RAR is. So it's just good reps left. So if you're doing a set, I just want people to
understand what we're talking about. It just occurred to me. So we all tend to do this,
whether we know we're doing it or not. As the set starts getting harder, we're asking ourselves,
like, all right, how many more reps do I think I have before my form falls apart? And that we
could say
that that's where that's usually that technical failure is also usually where muscular failure
is reached. So our instinctive answer to that question is, and I know you know this, Luke,
but for people listening, that's your reps in reserve. So it's getting hard on that squat.
And you're like, wow, I'm not sure how many more I can do. I think I can get two more.
And then maybe you go for those two and you get them and you're like, all right, I think I could actually do one more, but I'm going
to end the set there because I don't want to fail. Then that would be a one RAR. So you ended that
set thinking you could get one more good rep, but almost certainly not two. So anyway, just want to
make sure people understand that. Yeah, exactly right. It's good to actually know what it is because
people also get really confused with all of the nomenclature in this whole thing, for sure. So
what you can do is like, let's say you select a load, let's say it's like 100 pounds and you say,
right, I'm not going to go any closer to failure than two reps in reserve. So when I feel like I
have two reps left, that's when I terminate and I stop. You select a rep range. So let's say I'm doing 100 pounds for 10 reps and you basically just do sets at 100 pounds and you just stop whenever you stop doing sets whenever you get closer than RIR 2.
feeling really good, you might be able to get like five or six sets before getting really close to failure and having to stop doing your sets. On a day where you feel really tired, maybe you hit
RIR 200 kilos for 10 reps after like two or three sets. So it sort of auto-regulates how much volume
you're doing on that day, depending on how good you feel. And you can do the exact same thing for
the number of reps that you do. Let's say you go, okay, on my training plan, I have a hundred
pounds for this exercise. I don't want to exceed reps and reserve of two, and I'm going to do four
sets. You just keep doing your reps at a hundred kilos and you stop each set at a reps and reserve
of two. You don't exceed that. And again, that helps you auto-regulate the number of reps. Sometimes you might get 10 reps at a hundred pounds or a hundred kilos or
whatever I said before. And sometimes you might get 15, but either way, you're getting close to
failure depending on your readiness for that day, how mentally prepared you are, how physically
recovered you are. And so that way you're actually controlling how much volume you're doing.
And you can even do the exact same thing for a total number of reps, which works really well
for some exercises like chin-ups, for example. So you could say, okay, I want to do 30 total reps.
I'm going to spread that across however many sets it takes, but every set, I'm going to make sure
that I don't get any closer than two reps away from failure. So sometimes it might take you four
sets to get your 30 reps. Sometimes it might take you five, sometimes six or seven. So I use that
quite a lot when I'm trying to build up training volume for things
like bodyweight exercises, like dips or chin-ups or something like that. So these are all ways of
like auto-regulating the amount of volume that you're doing in a session. And another really
clever one that I actually like a lot is setting a time limit for something. So I do this with my
clients sometimes where they have a normal session kind of programmed and then
they have an extra 10 or 15 minutes where I basically go right you've done all of your main
work for your push day to day and now you've got 10 minutes to do whatever you want on arms
so just pick however many exercises you want I don't care how many sets you do I don't care how
many reps you do I don't care how long you rest, just go for it, 10 minutes. And the nice thing about it
is that it's really fun, but I can also control their volume because there's only so much work
you can do in 10 minutes. Now, if you're feeling really good in 10 minutes, you might be able to
get four or five sets, but if you're not feeling so good, you might only get two or three sets.
Either way, I know that it's within a certain band that probably not going to be able to get like
six or seven sets, good quality sets in that time.
So it still controls the amount of volume you're doing, but it enables you to be like
really, really open and free with how you set that up.
And some people might be wondering when you would want to use some of the techniques that you just outlined versus just programming progression
in, let's say, a linear fashion or just using double progression? Not that you necessarily
couldn't combine those things, but that might get a little bit tricky.
Yeah, totally. I think that it kind of depends on the program. It kind of depends on the mentality.
Some people just like knowing like, hey, if I keep doing what I'm doing, then in three weeks time, like this is the
goal. I'm going to be doing three sets of five at 200 pounds or whatever. So it does depend a little
bit on personality, but it also comes down to like, if you focus on reps and reserve or something
like that, some kind of auto-regulated method that I just mentioned, if you're always going to an RIR of one or two, you're getting close
to failure every time and you're pushing really hard every time, then essentially the progressive
overload piece takes care of itself because every set is going to be really stimulative.
It's going to be hard.
And that means that over time, you automatically get double progression.
You automatically get either more reps or you lift more weight and you're getting close to
failure every time, which means you're going to grow some muscle. And eventually you're probably
going to cash those more reps in for more weight because there's a point where, especially with
certain exercises, it just becomes masochistic to do more than 10 reps in a set or
something. Exactly. Exactly. So I think if you're using that, this is one of the reasons why I like
using RPE or RIR, and I think people should learn it, is because once you get good at using it,
then you know how to take yourself to that place where each set is really, really effective.
And then you don't need to really worry about how many sets and reps and stuff you're doing. All you need to do is like
look back over the last like three or four weeks of your program and be like, okay, yeah, my reps
increased. Okay. My load increased. That means I'm doing something that's working. I can keep going,
but you don't necessarily have to try and figure out, okay, how much should I be increasing each
week? Like this is the plan, but I didn't hit the plan. And oh my God, I didn't sleep last night.
And now I'm really like, I'm feeling weak today and I can't lift as much.
What do I do?
It just kind of takes care of itself.
Yeah.
Yeah.
I found it very useful in that regard, especially with isolation or with accessory exercises.
I think it can work fine with compound exercises.
For a period, I was using a linear model on my big compound lifts, but it wasn't
one that prescribed weight increases. It was just working in rep ranges given my strength at the
time and then with a kind of RIR target. And so it was doing that for a period of time and then
using double progression and RAR on the accessory
exercises and accumulating volume and then culminating with an AMRAP to see if I've gained
strength. But now, especially now that also I'm in a maintenance phase and I'm happy if I make a
little bit of progress here and there on certain muscle groups, my approach is very much in line
with what you just mentioned. Yeah. I don't think like one approach is better than the other, to be perfectly honest. I think
it just kind of suits different people differently sometimes and different program setups. I mean,
I still have clients where almost have like no real rep targets. It's like all just this way
at this RIR or no weight target. It's just like hit this rep target at this RIR.
And I have other clients where I'm specifically programming, okay, you know, increase the load
week by week, lower the rep range. It's essentially artificial progression, right?
Because it gives them a sense of momentum and it gives them a sense of stability. And that's great.
And then you can mix and match and you can pull in and out these accessory exercises or these
isolation exercises and use some auto-regulation for that. So it probably just depends on like
where you're at with your journey right now and how much you feel like you want to put it in.
You know, like certainly for me, I found that having these skills was invaluable when like
I have a one-year-old and when she was born, it was literally like, okay, I have 30 minutes
three times a week to train. And so I use that method I mentioned before. You have 10 minutes to do a squat. You have 10 minutes
to do a pull. You have 10 minutes to do a push. That's your workout. And sometimes I got a lot
more done than other days, but that's how I had to split it up. So I don't train like that right
now, but it's a really good tool to have had in my toolbox to help me get through that period of my
life. Yeah. That's a great tip for time efficient training,
especially if the person just has a bit of experience and knows what is and isn't possible in 10 minutes. Are there any other common mistakes that you see people making with
auto-regulation or people listening who are thinking about incorporating it? I want to
make sure we don't miss any big potential blockers that people can run into.
I think just overcomplicating it, to be honest, like there's a lot of different techniques and
methods that I've mentioned here and you don't have to use them all.
And more complex is usually not better. So it gets a lot of attention on social media
and you can find a lot of big, strong people who supposedly follow very complex programs, but
maybe they do, maybe they don't.
And you probably shouldn't and don't need to, I think.
I totally agree.
And I think if you were to go in like Google auto-regulation right now, you're going to
see a lot of stuff come up with like velocity-based training and this kind of thing as well, which is where you put a device on the bar or the dumbbell
and you measure how quickly you're lifting. And then you adjust when you terminate the set or
when you move on to a different exercise or how much load you use based on the changes in velocity
from rep to rep. Now that obviously starts to get like a lot more complicated than it needs to be.
So it's interesting and it helps quite a lot when we're looking at research, but is it something
that your average person needs to use? Like, I don't think so. If you've never really come across
the concept of like RPE or RIR before, I would just start by like looking up a chart of that
and just like familiarize yourself with the concept a bit more and just like give it a go. You know, when you're training just, okay, could I
have done more there? Like how hard was that? Did I have two reps left? Did I have three reps left?
And for me, if you can get a handle on that, it just opens up the door to start auto-regulating
a whole lot better. But I mean, like we said at the start, probably the simplest thing is literally
just if you have an easier workout and you've had a crappy night's sleep the night before, just switch
it around.
And that's probably like going to make a really big difference to your training without it
getting overly complicated.
Speaking of technology, probably a more common device that I've seen used, I see the velocity
devices usually on competitive weightlifters. And I understand
if you are competing at a high level and you know how to use that properly, I understand why they're
doing it. But among maybe the more gen fit crowd, it's common to pay attention to recovery scores that according to one app and device or another,
sometimes it's the Oura Ring or another similar device. And I've spoken, I've written about that.
Long story short there, my opinion is don't put too much stock in that because on some days you're
going to feel great. And the app is going to say that you are completely
under-recovered. You're going to go have a great workout. You're not really going to understand it.
Other days, the app is going to say that you should be willing to lift everything in the gym
today and you really don't feel good and you have a bad workout. But are there any other tech,
other tech, interesting pieces of tech that are out or maybe coming that might help people auto-regulate your training? If not, then the answer is no. But I'm just curious if there's
anything that you know about that I don't know about that sounds interesting that actually might
be useful and evidence-based. Look, I think they're constantly revising those algorithms.
So the tech will improve. But I mean, the thing is,
is that just like you said, it can't really triangulate all of these different variables.
And I think that's why being able to auto-regulate when you're actually in the gym is so helpful,
because ultimately we can't, if you pre-plan six or eight weeks of training, you don't know exactly how you're
going to be feeling and all the different variables going on in your life six weeks
from now.
On Monday, like in July, you just don't know what's going to happen.
And because the human body is this convergence of like a lot of dynamic variables, you know,
it's really, really difficult to pinpoint that stuff.
So I do think that maybe
some value to tracking some of these metrics, but at the same time, I think exactly what you said,
it's very easy to nocebo yourself into having, you know, a not so good workout when ultimately,
if you get in the gym and you just like, okay, cool, well, let me see how I feel after my warm
up. And then, oh, actually it doesn't feel so bad bar's moving okay that is maybe as about as much tech as you really need i think that the
algorithms will get better so like there's tech now that can start to monitor like the oxygen
saturation of your blood it can monitor heart rate variability it can combine scores like that
and it can give a much better outcome but beyond that I still think that it starts to get a little complicated.
And probably the easiest way is literally just to go in and start lifting and being
like, oh, okay, it feels really hard today.
I'm going to have to switch up some things or something like that.
Yeah.
Anybody who's been training long enough has had many days where you thought you were going
to have a terrible workout and you ended up having a great
workout. There are many times where you go in feeling great, but for whatever reason, maybe
it's not a terrible workout, but I can remember this happening many times where everything just
feels heavy and hard. Even though I felt great, good energy levels, good sleep, whatever, I thought
it was going to be a great workout and the performance just wasn't quite there for whatever reason. Yeah, totally. Happens to everybody. So,
you know, ultimately I think it's just about kind of getting in there and getting it done.
And look, the thing is, is that you'll start to recognize patterns for yourself quite often,
you know? So like I've had some female clients, for example, will notice like two or three days
before their menstrual cycle starts, like everything just feels really hard or something like that. You know, it's just one of these things where, you know,
other people won't feel that. So it just kind of depends on exactly what's going on with you.
And sometimes you can identify patterns. But again, I think that for me, I've gone from earlier
in my career trying to be really prescriptive and trying to structure things out and okay,
this phase will feed into that phase and feed into this to actually being much more reactive. And I used to think that
being reactive was lazy, but I actually think it's probably the way to go just given the factors that
I mentioned before. There's definitely a psychological component to all of this,
just certain types of personalities. I also am maybe not OCD, but I'm a very detail-oriented person.
I like to plan things out. I like to put thought into what I'm doing and why. I like to look at
each component of a plan or of a workflow and think about how can I make it more efficient
or effective? How can I do one unit of work and have it serve three or four different
goals or outcomes, for example? So I understand that. And that's that also is generally how I've
approached my training. And so probably similarly, for me, it felt a bit odd, it felt almost like I
was like doing something wrong by not training in that fashion.
But I will also say, and for people listening who maybe also have a similar personality
or who have just followed a more rigid structured program for some time,
the novelty is also just inherently stimulating and it is also fun.
And I think that that's a good takeaway for people listening is simply making your training more interesting
and more fun. I think a valid objective that even if that means maybe that you are going to be doing
something that maybe it isn't even perfectly scientifically optimal, but it sounds interesting
to you. It's something different than you've been doing. You are going to look forward to your
workouts where you're going to enjoy it more.
And so for me, training, maybe you could say more reactively or following a more auto-regulated
approach has done that.
It has made my workouts a little bit more fun, even if it is just tricking myself with
that autonomy point where I feel like I have a little bit more flexibility and I'm not
necessarily only doing what's in my spreadsheet
regardless of anything else. Yeah. I couldn't agree with you more. And I'm sure you're the
same. It really sounds like it. But earlier on, when I first got into this as a job, it was like
training was the thing that I cared about. And I thought I would never, ever, ever fall out of love
of training. And unfortunately, like 15 years into lifting,
I had that where I was just like, man, I don't feel like going to the gym anymore. I just don't
like training. And it happened, it went on for like a couple of years, man. So someone might
be listening to this and going like, yeah, whatever. I'm never going to get sick of like
my spreadsheet or doing my rigid plan and stuff. And the thing that got me back into the gym and
enjoying lifting again was being able to be a little bit spontaneous and to try different
things and be like, oh, this is kind of a fun exercise that I feel like doing today.
So there is that. It's probably inevitable for most people where at some point you're
going to want to kind of break out a little bit just to keep yourself focused and interested in
your training. Yeah. Yeah. I can totally relate to that. Probably similar to you in that I'm too
stubborn to stop, but following the spreadsheet was much
more enjoyable many years ago than it was just two years ago. And there are a number of reasons
for that. One of them being at this point, I have to work so hard to make any progress whatsoever.
And I'm not opposed to hard work, but there was a point again, after a couple of years where I was
like, okay, I did it.
And I don't have that much to show for it.
Like my 1RMs went up a little bit here and there.
And sure, I've gained a little bit of muscle.
But it's pretty inconsequential in the scheme of things. And so then why am I doing that?
That did entail doing a lot of workouts I didn't really want to do.
And that I maybe wasn't fully physically prepared to do just doing it anyway. And it's a good thing to be able
to do that. But there should be I mean, I'm not like literally getting paid to go work out. Yes,
it's related to my work. But it'd be one thing if that's what was required to feed my family.
But it's not.
So it's okay to have some fun with it.
And if following the spreadsheet is no longer fun and training at more or less maximum recoverable capacity for long periods of time is no longer fun.
I had to myself acknowledge that, you know, dude, you don't have to keep doing that. You can do some other things that are a little bit more fun. I had to myself like acknowledge that, you know, dude, you don't have to keep doing that.
You can do some other things that are a little bit more fun. You can reduce your volume. You
don't have to be in the gym like 90 minutes a day on average. You can bring that back down to 60
minutes. And for me, it sounds like similar to you. I made that change maybe about a year ago
and I've enjoyed my training a lot more. Yeah, exactly right. That's what happened to me. So it does happen. I mean, I totally relate to
what you're saying. Just like the diminishing returns as well. It's like, okay, this extra
like five hours a week in the gym is going to get me an amount of muscle that literally nobody is
going to even notice. So it's hard for me to even notice like you know in looking at pictures over a long enough period
and really scrutinizing okay yeah actually i think i see a little bit there like i gained a little
that's cool that's that's about it though i better see something there otherwise all those hours have
gone to waste yeah yeah that's basically everything i had on my list is is there anything that we
haven't covered yet that you want to you want to mention before we wrap up here? I don't think so, man. I think there's a lot that
people can potentially use in there. So that's pretty much auto-regulation. Now it's being
investigated more and more as we go along in the literature. So it is interesting to see
if more of it comes out, but it's definitely looking pretty good in terms of results. It
seems like at least you can get the same results as a stricter set training plan. And honestly, it might even be a
little bit better in terms of results. So worth giving a shot. Yeah. Yeah. It'll be interesting
to see some more practical programs that have some of these techniques and some of these principles
integrated in ways that people can easily understand and apply. I think that's where at least the chasm I've seen between
evidence-based people who are really into this stuff and then the larger market of just everyday
people out there who will buy a book, who drive the economics of everything that we do.
book will drive the economics of everything that we do. And currently, a lot of what I've seen is too complex. It requires too much time, too much thinking. It requires too much fiddling with
spreadsheets. It just requires too much for mass adoption. It is much easier for somebody new,
for example, getting into this to just get a simple prescriptive program that's designed well
and just follow it. And I understand the appeal of that, not have to think about anything else.
I'm just going to go in the gym. I'm going to do my squats. I'm going to do my few sets of whatever
reps and I understand reps and reserves. So I have at least I'm going to train at an appropriate
intensity. I'm going to do the next exercise, the next exercise, and I'm going to get out of the gym. So I think that the bridge needs to be built there because currently it's probably only,
you have to be pretty motivated to tinker with your training and to progress in your training.
Yeah, a hundred percent. Just get in and do it as kind of like the foundation right and then from there as you
get experience you can go like okay like i have learned over this initial period that i prefer
doing these exercises and not these ones or you know i'm too sore to do this day today i'm not
going to perform well because i've learned by doing these set programs so yeah it probably is
a bit more of like an evolution that needs to
happen, but I agree. It kind of feels like it's either like the set programs or it's like, okay,
now you're like a power lifter with like five years of experience using RPE. Here's your
auto-regulated program. And it's like, where's the transition? Totally. Yep. Well, again, that's
everything that I had. Why don't we wrap up with where people can find you and find your work and your coaching
service and anything else you want them to know about?
Yeah, for sure.
If you go to luketalik.com or look at my Instagram, those are the two main places that you can
find me.
On my website, I've actually got a free little mini course that teaches you how to use RPE
and RIR for auto-regulation.
So feel free to jump on that if you like,
and you'll get some practical examples of how I implement it in my clients' programs.
Great. And links will be in the show information, but for people who
are not going to see the links, how do you spell your last name just so people know?
Sure. It's T-U-L-L-O-C-H.
Cool. Well, thanks again, Luke. This was a great discussion. Really appreciate it.
Thanks a ton, man. Appreciate you having me on.
the rankings of the show a little bit, which of course then makes it a little bit more easily found by other people who may like it just as much as you. And if you didn't like something
about this episode or about the show in general, or if you have ideas or suggestions or just
feedback to share, shoot me an email, mike at muscleforlife.com, muscleforlife.com,
and let me know what I could do better or just what your thoughts
are about maybe what you'd like to see me do in the future. I read everything myself. I'm always
looking for new ideas and constructive feedback. So thanks again for listening to this episode and
I hope to hear from you soon.