Muscle for Life with Mike Matthews - Research Review: Dr. Eric Helms on German Volume Training
Episode Date: December 6, 2017As you probably know, I work hard to understand and promote high-quality diet, nutrition, and exercise science. That’s why I’ve spent and continue to spend a lot of time researching and writing, a...nd why I reference quite a bit of scientific literature in my work. What I don’t do, though, is produce a research review where individual studies are broken down and analyzed because my plate is already overflowing with work as it is, and honestly, I don’t think I could do it better than the researchers whose work and research reviews I myself read regularly, like James Krieger, Eric Helms, Greg Nuckols, Mike Zourdos, Alan Aragon, and Bret Contreras. And so I had an idea: why not get those guys to come on my podcast to discuss studies they’ve analyzed in their reviews and share with us what they’ve learned, and how we can use that information to optimize our diets, exercise routines, supplement regimens, and overall lifestyle. In this episode, I have the newly minted Dr. Eric Helms on to discuss a study published in 2016 titled “Effects of a modified German Volume Training program on muscular hypertrophy and strength.” This study looked at the popular “German Volume Training” program, which involves performing 10 sets of a specific exercise in a single workout (usually 10 sets of 10 reps), and gave great insights into the overall effectiveness of this style of training versus more traditional, moderate-volume work. 8:19 - What is volume? 9:24 - What is the study behind German Volume Training? 15:15 - What are the risks of overtraining? 16:40 - If German Volume Training isn’t the correct approach, what is? Want to get my best advice on how to gain muscle and strength and lose fat faster? Sign up for my free newsletter! Click here: https://www.muscleforlife.com/signup/
Transcript
Discussion (0)
any adaptation, it's going to follow a parabolic curve. So what that means is that, you know,
as you're increasing volume, you're going to get this kind of diminishing returns as volume keeps
going up. And eventually you're going to increase volume to the point where you're not making
further gains. You're just doing more volume. Hey, this is Mike from Muscle for Life and
Legion Athletics. And as you probably know,
I work pretty hard to understand and promote high quality diet, nutrition, and exercise science.
And that's why I have spent and continue to spend quite a bit of my time researching and then
writing articles, writing books, recording podcasts, recording videos, and so forth. And that's why
I reference quite a bit of scientific literature in all of my work. Now, something I don't do,
though, is produce a research review where individual studies are broken down and analyzed
because one, my plate is already overflowing with projects as it is. And two, I honestly don't think
that I could do it better than the researchers who are out there creating research reviews and
whose work and research reviews I myself read regularly, like James Krieger, Eric Helms,
Greg Knuckles, Mike Zordos, Alan Aragon, and Brett Contreras. And so I had an idea, why not
get those guys to come on my podcast to discuss various studies that they have analyzed in their
reviews and share with us what they've learned and how we can use these key takeaways, how we
can use the information in those studies to better optimize our diets, exercise routines,
supplement regimens, and our overall lifestyle. Well, I reached out to them and they thought it
was a great idea. And so a monthly series was born. Basically once a month, I'm going to have
one of these guys on the show, and they're going to break down a study that they have analyzed in
their respective research reviews. And they're going to break down a study that they have analyzed in their respective
research reviews, and they're going to explain to us why these studies were conducted, how
they were conducted, what the results were, what their interpretations of the results
were, and how we can use the information to improve our diets, our training, our supplementation,
or in some cases, just the overall quality of our lives.
So in this episode, I have the newly minted doctor, Dr. Eric Helms, on to discuss a study
published in 2016 titled Effects of a Modified German Volume Training Program on Muscular
Hypertrophy and Strength. And this study looked at the very popular German volume training program on muscular hypertrophy and strength. And this study looked at the very
popular German volume training program, which in case you haven't heard of it, involves performing
10 sets of a specific exercise in a single workout. And it's usually 10 sets of 10 reps.
So it's very high volume. It's not 10 sets of one rep or two reps.
And this study gave great insights into the overall effectiveness of this style of training, or as you will see, lack thereof, versus more traditional moderate volume work.
This is where I would normally plug a sponsor to pay the bills, but I'm not big on promoting
stuff that I don't personally use and
believe in. So instead, I'm just going to quickly tell you about something of mine, specifically my
100% natural greens supplement Genesis. Now Genesis is a very unique combination of greens,
superfoods, adaptogens, herbs, and other phytonutrients that have been proven to increase immunity,
heart and circulatory health, energy levels, libido, mood, and more.
Genesis is also naturally sweetened in flavors and contains no artificial food dyes, fillers,
or other unnecessary junk. And all that is why it has over 200 reviews on Amazon with a four-star average and another 150 plus on my website also with a
four star average. So if you want to be healthier, feel better, train harder, and increase your
immunity and longevity, then you want to head over to www.legionathletics.com and pick up a bottle of
Genesis today. And just to show how much I
appreciate my podcast peeps, use the coupon code podcast at checkout and you will save 10% on your
entire order. And lastly, you should also know that I have a very simple 100% money back guarantee
that works like this. You either love my stuff or you get your money back, period. You
don't have to return the products. You don't have to fill out forms. You don't have to jump through
any other hoops or go through any other shenanigans. So you really can't lose here. Head over to
www.legionathletics.com now, place your order and see for yourself why my supplements have
thousands of rave reviews all
over the internet. And if for whatever reason, they're just not for you, contact us and we will
give you a full refund on the spot. Alrighty, that is enough shameless plugging for now at least.
Let's get to the show. Eric, thanks for coming back on the show welcome back and actually i should uh i should be calling
you dr helms now right out of uh respect and deference well it's always an honor and i'm
happy to be back on but technically it's dr helms phd you kind of have to pre and post load it like
it's protein around training so oh shit i'm sorry. I apologize. But okay. So, Dr. Helms, PhD is back and back to talk
about German volume training and also just high volume training in general, going to be breaking
down a study for us that was reviewed in his research review. I'm excited to put this information
out there because it's something that I actually do ask about fairly frequently, GVT in particular,
and also just high volume. I mean, most people know you can't go balls to the wall all the time,
but they will ask if it's a good idea to do occasionally for short spurts of time.
Eric is going to break it all down. For sure. Yeah. So this study is titled
Effects of a Modified German Volume Training Program on Muscular Hypertrophy and Strength.
And I'm going to try to pronounce the lead author's last name by Amir Thalingam. And that's probably not right. And my apologies to the author. It's
close enough, right? Or not, but I did my best. Let's put it that way. Not bad for a doctor PhD.
So just a really cool study to see come out because, you know, when I was coming up and
first lifting weights, you know, German volume training was something pretty much you'd only
read about on forums or on like T Nation. And if I remember correctly, it was first
posited by Charles Poliquin of all people. And he talked about it. That's funny. Cause it was a
thing when I got into weightlifting, like doing squats 10 by 10, that was something that everybody
in the gym that was cool did. Yeah. Yeah. And, uh, you know, you know, to be fair, like, um,
Charles Poliquin is as much heat as he gets these days for like avocados and other things he said.
He was actually the first person who recommended setting up training in a daily undulating manner.
He's had a few pretty decent training ideas and it's only, things only went downhill after a certain point.
So anyway, a little bit of respect to Charles P there.
So yeah, just the fact that there's a study on something that was more so like an internet lifting culture thing is just really cool to me. And yeah, so this is an
article that Mike Zerdos reviewed. He's, you know, along with me and Greg runs Mass in our first
issue. And it's a really useful study because I think the research community has done a good job
in establishing the link between volume and both strength and hypertrophy
gains. And it's pretty clear. But I think what we haven't done a good job is on kind of tempering
that message to let people know that, hey, like any adaptation, it's going to follow a parabolic
curve. So what that means is that, you know, as you're increasing volume, you're going to get this
kind of diminishing returns as the volume keeps going up. And eventually, you're going to increase
volume to the point where you're not making further gains,
you're just doing more volume. And then you start coming down the other side of that slope,
where you're adding volume, but you're actually progressing slower, or even not progressing,
because you push yourself way past your adaptive capabilities. And, you know, you're starting to
get beat up and you're not recovered. And do you want to quickly just define volume for everybody
listening just to make sure we're on the same page in terms of our terms? Sure. And I think people define volume differently.
You'll hear people define it as sets times reps times load and give you a tonnage value.
I think that's probably only appropriate when you're comparing it within yourself.
In research, a lot of the times the way we will practically control volume is we'll assign a rep
range and a certain number of sets and then the people will train to failure or close to it or at the same percentage one rm
so you'll have a matched relative volume or you'll have a matched number of sets to failure
so yeah it probably looks like number of hard sets kind of yeah that's probably the most practical
way to to kind of think about your volume is uh you know number of hard sets and if you really
want to get analytical about it you could look know, number of hard sets. And if you really want
to get analytical about it, you could look at the number of hard sets in different repetition zones,
because I think you probably wouldn't compare, you know, a hard single to a set of 10. You know,
this is a study on German volume training. And for those who don't know, that's originally,
like you said, that 10 by 10 setup. So it's going to be matched in this setup, at least in terms of
per set basis, the difficulty.
So what these researchers did was they essentially took two groups of trained, and I put quotes around that because they weren't that well trained if you kind of look at their starting
strength numbers, but they'd been in a gym.
They weren't unfamiliar to lifting weights, I think is probably the best way to put them.
Maybe recreationally trained would be a good term.
They took these two groups, had them train three times a week, uh, an upper lower than upper fashion. Uh, so that is actually
quite similar to the real world where you're training, you know, upper body twice as much
as legs and you know, you shouldn't, but you do it anyway. Um, and then they had a one group doing
five sets of 10 on each one of those exercises and the other group doing 10 sets of 10. Uh,
I believe that's on the main lifts and this is for a six-week period.
So, that's a lot of volume when you think about it.
You know, per muscle group, that's like 30 sets per week in the 10 by 10 group.
And then it's even a fair amount of volume in the 5 by 10 group.
That's about 15 sets per week per muscle group.
Now, the reason why I bring that up is because we've had a semi-recent meta-analysis come out by Schoenfeld and colleagues who looked at the dose response relationship
between volume and hypertrophy and found that it starts to kind of plateau and max out. Actually,
it's not true. Somewhere around 10 plus sets is where the highest hypertrophy response to volume
occurs. And we don't have enough data on higher volume than that
to actually see where that trend keeps going. It might plateau. And that's per week? Per week,
exactly right. So that means even the quote unquote low volume group is doing 50% more volume
than has really been effectively analyzed with kind of a pretty solid data set. It's not to say
that 15 sets wouldn't be better than 10 on average in a large population of solid data set. It's not to say that 15 sets wouldn't be better than 10
on average in a large population of trained lifters. It's just that there's not enough
studies where we're taking really high volumes and putting people through training programs to
establish that. So this is a useful study and then it starts to kind of investigate
where are these boundaries and it gives us some instructive value in what happens. So anyway,
these guys are doing their training and it consisted of compound lifts and isolation lifts. They did bench press, lap pull
down, inclined bench, seated row, crunches on day one. They did leg press, lunges, leg extensions,
leg curls, calf raises. It's a kind of typical leg day on day two. And then they came in and
they did shoulder press, upright rows, triceps, biceps, and then more ab work on day three.
These are
on non-consecutive days. So again, one group did basically twice the volume of the other group.
And interestingly enough, it was the group that was doing five sets of 10, not 10 sets of 10,
so 15 sets per week per exercise or per muscle group, I should say, that actually gained more
lean body mass and more strength than the group that did more volume.
So that is a very clear kind of proof of principle that indeed you can do too much volume.
And I think going back to the training age of these individuals, when you are this early in
your career, there's no point and you can actually, there's a detriment to doing way
more than you need to progress because it can just slow down that process.
And make for grueling workouts that you don't like, which is not a good introduction to weightlifting. That's right. You know, I mean, weightlifting and bodybuilding
and the kind of like the CrossFit culture and the fitness culture in general, we tend to really
glorify a little bit of masochism and promote hard work. And don't get me wrong, I think there are
aspects of that that's good. It tells you, you know, you work hard and you get rewarded for it. But at the same time,
like not everyone who comes into fitness has that kind of little sick, twisted person inside like
we bodybuilders have. And just because we're kind of the leaders and look up to because we have good
physiques and we have the training experience and knowledge doesn't mean that everyone getting into
fitness has the same goals or the same mindset. And what we don't want to do is kind of push that philosophy on people who that might actually turn
them off or turn them away when, you know, yeah, having six pack abs is fine and dandy, but the
real benefit is changing your lifestyle and staying active and living a healthier, longer life and
feeling empowered. I think that's the real reason why most people want to get into lifting.
And by kind of taking it in that angle, like we said, like just having this grueling, punishing workouts, that's not always a beneficial thing by any means. And clearly here,
quantitatively, objectively, it wasn't. So yeah, I think the take home message here is that it's
probably better to err on the side of doing a fair amount of volume, but not the most you can handle as
that's not the same as the most you'll benefit from. And that probably has a strong relationship
to one's training age. Yeah. And you know, something else to be said for, for people that
are new again, I think that, um, I'm just speaking from experience, just like emailing with a lot,
a lot of people where I think they'll get too, they try to make it more complicated than it
needs to be in
the beginning. Because if you take your average guy, he starts lifting weights. He's looking at,
let's say 15 to 25 pounds of potential muscle gain, depending on his genetics and compliance
and diet and lifestyle and so forth. You don't need super fancy programming to get there. I mean,
a lot of people get there with something like a starting strength or a five by five. And
it's funny, you mentioned a lot of lower body
training or people training upper body too much and lower body too little. One thing though,
that I've found with people that start with strength training programs is because the lower
body volume tends to be quite a bit higher than the upper body, their legs and butts grow a lot
faster. This is guys in particular, a lot faster than their pecs and
biceps and they don't like that. So, they like a more modified where it's, you know, maybe you
start with like a push-pull legs and then add in some accessory work for the pretty muscles.
And that alone gets you, at least in the beginning for the first year or so,
everything that you can possibly get. Like if that gets you your 20 pounds of muscle and it's
put in the places that you're happy about, then what else do you want? Yeah, that's a hundred percent right. It
doesn't take anything fancy and it doesn't take anything extreme to make really good progress in
the beginning. You know, some people go, well, what's the cost? What if I like training more?
Well, you know, like every time you step in the gym, unfortunately there's, there's a risk of
injury there. And when you're first starting out, you don't want to ingrain bad habits, you know, like every time you step in the gym, unfortunately, there's a risk of injury there. And when you're first starting out, you don't want to ingrain bad habits, you know.
And if you're doing this right and you're using some relatively, you know, high risk, high reward movements like your, you know, squats, your presses, pulls, deadlifts, things like that manner, RDLs, different variations of it.
You know, effective exercises, you want to make sure that when you're in there lifting, you're not only
trying to stimulate the muscles in your body, but also learning the skills of being someone who
lifts weights so that you have a lower likelihood of injury over time. And I had a tough time seeing,
you know, for example, in this study, the starting one RMs for bench press were like 80 kilograms,
so 176 pounds. And in the other group, there were 70.7. So we're talking about people who are
benching like 150 to 185 for a one rep max. They've been lifting probably hard for three to six months
in most cases. And that's really not the person who should be in there punishing themselves with
30 sets per week. I guarantee you the quality of those sets are going to go right down the terrain
and the risk of injury will probably go up as you're going to be training in a fatigued state
with poor form on risky movements. So I think it's difficult to take a long view when you're,
you know, 19 and you're just starting lifting weights, but man, I can tell you as a 34 year
old looking back, there are things that I wish I'd perspective that I wish I could have had
at that age when I first started. Yeah. Same. I totally understand and agree.
So what then would you say to people who are, let's say they are intermediate or advanced
and are looking to, let's say, whatever the programming normally is and make it a lot
harder for a temporary period of time.
So let's say they're going to be in a surplus and they get plenty of sleep and maybe even
they're in their 20s, so they're in their
prime hormonally. If GVT, if this approach isn't the way to go, what would you say to those people?
Excellent question. The cool thing about research is it can, at some level, these single studies
can compare one versus the other and tell you what's better, but they don't tell you a whole
lot about what you should do. To actually figure out what you should do, you kind of have to look at broader yet lower resolution data, like some of
those meta-analyses I talked about. So we're fortunate to be in a time where there's been a
bunch of meta-analyses on things like protein intake, meal frequency, volume, etc. And we've
got a few key metas that have looked at all the studies on a given topic. And they've kind of told
us, hey, you know, if you're somewhere in the bell curve, you're probably going to respond best to this. And that's going to,
you know, apply to about two thirds of people. So what we know is that you probably want to be
training each muscle group around two to three times per week. And you probably want to be doing
probably at least around 10 sets per week per muscle group. And I think that's a great place
to start. You know, if those have decent effort and you are getting 10 sets per week spread out over two to three sessions,
really that's like three sets on two days and four sets on another day or maybe a five by five on one day
and then three by 10 on another and then a couple sets of flies.
Like if that was bench, bench and fly, you know, there's many ways to set that up.
And none of them are going to be better than the other unless they work better for your schedule or your personal preference. So I think first thing you do is set up, let me get in the ballpark
of what we think is probably going to be in the ballpark of optimal. And then from there you go,
I'm not the mean of 15 studies on trained individuals. I am me. So you have to then
look at your progress. So if you're making measurable progress in terms of strength
over say two to
three month periods, which I think is a reasonable amount of time to track progress for an intermediate
or advanced lifter. I don't mean a lot of progress. I mean measurable. So yeah, I added,
you know, five, 10 pounds on a lift. That's awesome. Then you're doing something right.
And if you are stalled, but you're feeling well recovered and you think maybe you want to
experiment with pushing up the volume, my advice would be, like you said, do it while you're in a calorie surplus. Maybe do it
off of a deload or do an introduction block coming into it so that you can acclimate to the volume
and then make a reasonable increase in volume, not a crazy increase. If you think about what
they did in this GVT study, I guarantee you the people in this study were not doing 30 sets prior.
So if you are currently doing, let's say, 10 to 12 sets per muscle group per week and you want to increase it, I would go to like maybe 15 to 16, not to 30.
So don't triple your volume.
Think about maybe increasing it by a quarter.
I think that's a very reasonable increase.
And you'll feel that and you'll notice it.
And if it was a successful increase in volume that actually produced gains, then you've, you've learned something. Uh, if it made you really, really
beat up and not progress anymore, then maybe you just need to evaluate other, other aspects of
your training or other aspects of your life. You know, are you getting enough sleep? Uh,
are you actually managing stress in your life? Is your schedule make sense with, with the,
how much volume you're trying to do? Are you trying to pack too much into too few days? You
know, that that's all of those are possible possible things and many more that is beyond what we can cover
in this podcast. But I think the take-home message is that if you do want to increase volume,
do it in a manner that is respecting where you're at and you're increasing volume for a purpose.
And the purpose being to make more progress, not just increasing volume because you want to do
more volume.
Well said. I like it. And for how long would you, so let's say that that person is listening and they're going, cool.
So I'm going to bump my volume up by about 50%, my number of hard sets.
How long would you recommend that? Would you say go as long as you're progressing and feeling good?
Or would you put a more hard limit on it before they go back to normal?
This is a tough one. This is where you kind of have to go back to the classic saying of know
thyself. If you're someone who has a history, because now we're talking about intermediates
and advanced here. If you have a history of grinding yourself into the dust and taking it
too far, and you're notoriously bad at coaching yourself, you probably want to institute a regular
deload so that you can kind of get out of your own
way and i would suggest doing that you know every four to six weeks or you just take a down week
if you're doing hard sets make those moderately hard sets so if you're training normally to eight
to ten rpe drop that down to six to eight and then just drop your sets down by a third it should be
a week that obviously not going to lose anything you're just going to kind of hit pause and allow
the fatigue to dissipate while you then get back into it. And I think in terms of how much time will it take for
you to see progress, you know, if you're smart about it and you kind of do a little bit of a
taper at the end, similar to that deload I described, and then you decide to test your
strength, I think for an intermediate or advanced, somewhere between eight to 12 weeks, you should be
able to see some level of progress on at least the majority of your lifts. And if you've done
that, then that's good. You know, let's say you're, you got quote unquote, big six, cause you're
focused on hypertrophy. You're doing, you know, front squat, RDL overhead press a row, uh, you
know, a chin up and another pressing movement, another hip hinge movement. And you test them all
over the course of a week and, you know, more than half progress and the other holds still.
That's great. I think that's good progress. I think a lot of intermediate lifters, especially, they think that progress is defined
by the progress they saw as a beginner. And unfortunately, that's just not going to happen
again unless you decide to, you know, jump on gear. You know, you're not going to have those
kind of newbie gains again. That's not an endorsement of gear, by the way. It's just
saying that... What are you saying, Matt?
Fake daddy.
That's the solution to being an intermediate.
Yeah.
No.
That's what Instagram says.
That's right.
But they don't tell you that explicitly.
Oh, true.
But yeah.
So, like, for example, like, I mean, my bench press in the first year of training went from
a plate to two plates.
Like, that's a 90 90 pound increase in my bench.
For the next 90 pounds, from when I went from 225 to 315, that took me another two years. So like,
you know, and then from there, it really slowed down. For me to get from 315 to now just under
365 as I train in kilos here in Down Underland, that's taken me another nine years. The point is,
is like I gained 90 pounds in six months to a year and then another 90 in two years after that.
And then the last 40, 40 to 50 has taken me nearly a decade after that. So I think that's just kind
of the reality of the situation. And if you aren't comfortable with that, you're going to be thinking
you're not making gains when in fact you are. And at a certain stage, you know, progress is progress. Even if that's, you know, two and a half kilos or five pounds on a squat or a deadlift, you know, every two training blocks, that's still quite good. And it adds up. And I think you have to kind of have the perspective of look, this is a lifestyle for me. Now, this is something I do. Am I going to be not lifting when I'm 45?
I do. Am I going to be not lifting when I'm 45? And if you ask yourself, honestly,
you probably haven't thought about that, but you'd go, well, no, of course not. I want to keep lifting. And you go, all right, well, if I've got 25 more years to progress,
then actually I'm doing fine. You kind of have to take that view at a certain point
where you'll be kind of doomed to frustration. I totally agree. Perspective matters.
Okay, great. So there it is. German volume training, high volume versus moderate volume.
I think that's a wrap. All right. Well, I hope you enjoyed this first installment of the
research review series. Again, this will be a monthly series and I actually already have the
second episode recorded, which is with Eric again. That'll be coming out next month. And then I will
be reaching out to other people, as I mentioned in the intro, to get their
takes on various other studies.
And in this case, again, if you really liked what Eric has to say and you want to check
out his research review, it is called Mass, M-A-S-S.
And you can learn about it at strongerbyscience.com forward slash mass, M-A-S-S. And I will say,
I highly recommend it. I read it every month. I learn a lot from it. It has articles from Eric,
from Greg Knuckles, from Mike Zordos. And again, they do a great job. So I highly recommend you
check it out. I hope you enjoyed this episode and found it interesting and helpful. And if you did and don't mind doing me a favor and want to help me make this the most popular
health and fitness podcast on the internet, then please leave a quick review of it on
iTunes or wherever you're listening from.
This not only convinces people that they should check the show out, it also increases its
search visibility and thus helps more people find their way to me and learn how
to build their best bodies ever too. And of course, if you want to be notified when the next episode
goes live, then just subscribe to the podcast and you won't miss out on any of the new goodies.
Lastly, if you didn't like something about the show, then definitely shoot me an email
at mike at muscleforlife.com and share your thoughts
on how you think it could be better. I read everything myself and I'm always looking for
constructive feedback, so please do reach out. All right, that's it. Thanks again for listening
to this episode and I hope to hear from you soon. And lastly, this episode is brought to you by
me. Seriously though, I'm not big on promoting stuff that I don't personally
use and believe in. So instead I'm going to just quickly tell you about something of mine,
specifically my 100% natural greens supplement Genesis. Now Genesis is a very unique combination
of greens, superfoods, adaptogens, herbs, and other phytonutrients that have been proven to increase immunity,
heart and circulatory health, energy levels, libido, mood, and more. Genesis is also naturally
sweetened in flavors and contains no artificial food dyes, fillers, or other unnecessary junk.
And all that is why it has over 200 reviews on Amazon with a four-star average and another 150 plus on my
website also with a four-star average. So if you want to be healthier, feel better, train harder,
and increase your immunity and longevity, then you want to head over to www.legionathletics.com
and pick up a bottle of Genesis today. And just to show how much I
appreciate my podcast peeps, use the coupon code podcast at checkout and you will save 10% on your
entire order. And lastly, you should also know that I have a very simple 100% money back guarantee
that works like this. You either love my stuff or you get your money back,
period. You don't have to return the products. You don't have to fill out forms. You don't have to
jump through any other hoops or go through any other shenanigans. So you really can't lose here.
Head over to www.lesionathletics.com now, place your order and see for yourself why my supplements have
thousands of rave reviews all over the internet. And if for whatever reason,
they're just not for you, contact us and we will give you a full refund on the spot.