Muscle for Life with Mike Matthews - The Best of Muscle For Life: Fix Your Knees, Muscle Protein Synthesis, & Large Numbers > Luck
Episode Date: July 14, 2023In this installment of the Best of Muscle For Life, you’ll hear hand-picked clips from three popular MFL episodes: an interview with “Knees-Over-Toes-Guy” Ben Patrick on fixing painful and dysfu...nctional knees, a monologue and practical guide to muscle protein synthesis, and a motivational episode on the Law of Large Numbers and its relation to luck. Some people—my favorite people—listen to most or even all of my podcasts, but my wizbang analytics tell me that while many listeners tune in on a regular basis, they don’t catch every installment of Muscle for Life and thus miss out on insights that could help them do at least a little better inside and outside the gym. That’s why I do “best of” episodes that contain a few of the most practical and compelling ideas, tips, and moments from the more popular episodes I’ve published over the years. This way, you can learn interesting insights that you might have otherwise missed and find new episodes of the show to listen to. So, in this installment of The Best of Muscle for Life, you’ll be hearing hand-picked morsels from three episodes: “Knees-Over-Toes-Guy” Ben Patrick on Fixing Painful and Dysfunctional Knees (Originally published 7/7/2021) The Definitive (And Practical) Guide to Muscle Protein Synthesis (Originally published 8/3/2020) Motivation Monday: Why the Law of Large Numbers > Luck (Originally published 5/28/2018) And we’ll be starting with number one, “Knees-Over-Toes-Guy” Ben Patrick on Fixing Painful and Dysfunctional Knees. Timestamps: (0:00) - Please leave a review of the show wherever you listen to podcasts and make sure to subscribe! (3:24) - “Knees-Over-Toes-Guy” Ben Patrick on Fixing Painful and Dysfunctional Knees (15:49) - Find the Perfect Strength Training Program for You: www.muscleforlife.show/trainingquiz (16:37) - The Definitive (And Practical) Guide to Muscle Protein Synthesis (26:53) - Motivation Monday: Why the Law of Large Numbers > Luck Mentioned on the Show: Find the Perfect Strength Training Program for You in Just 60 Seconds: http://www.muscleforlife.show/trainingquiz
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Hello and welcome to the latest and greatest episode of Muscle for Life. I'm Mike Matthews
and thank you for joining me today. Now, I have recorded hundreds of episodes of Muscle for Life
and I've talked about a huge variety of things related to health, fitness, lifestyle, mindset,
ranging from the basics of diet and exercise like energy and macronutrient balance
and progressive overload and training frequency and volume to fads like the ketogenic and carnivore
diet and collagen protein to more unfamiliar territories like body weight set point and
fasted cardio. And some episodes resonate with my crowd more than others,
but all of them contain at least a few key takeaways that just about anyone can benefit
from. At least that's what I tell myself. That's what helps me sit down in the chair every day and
do this. And as cool as that is, it poses a problem for you, my dear listener, especially if you are new here. And that
is ain't nobody got time for that. We're talking about probably a thousand plus hours of content
at this point. And while some people actually do make the time to listen to most or even all of my
podcasts, my whizbang analytics tell me that while many listeners tune in on a regular
basis, they don't catch every installment of Muscle for Life and thus they miss out on insights
that could help them get even just a little bit better inside and outside the gym. Because if you
just get a little bit better consistently enough, that can add up to big results in the long run. And people
have also been telling me that they would like me to do more shorter multi-topic episodes like my
Q&As and Says You episodes. And so I got an idea. How about a best of series of podcasts that
contains a few of the most practical and compelling ideas, tips, and moments from my most popular episodes,
going all the way back to the beginning.
This way, people who are new in particular
can quickly determine if this is the droid
they're looking for, if this podcast is for them or not.
And then those who are regulars and enjoy what I'm doing,
but just don't have the time or inclination to listen to all of my stuff.
And I do understand that. I don't take it personally.
You can also then benefit from the discussions and the episodes that you are not listening to in full.
You can also find new episodes to listen to without having to give an hour of your time to determine whether it was worth it or not.
So in this installment of the Best of Muscle for Life,
you are going to be hearing hand-picked morsels from three episodes.
The first is an interview I did with knees-over-toes guy Ben Patrick
on fixing painful and dysfunctional knees.
The second is a monologue I recorded called
The Definitive and Practical Guide to Muscle Protein Synthesis.
And finally, we have another monologue I recorded called Why the Law of Large Numbers is Greater Than, little symbol is greater than, luck.
And let's start with number one, which is my interview with Ben Patrick on fixing painful and dysfunctional knees.
I was basically like the worst knee guy.
And one of my knees was like a surgical mess. It has partially artificial kneecap,
meniscus transplant, quad tendon repair. So the stiffness was like unimaginable. And then the
other knee, now that I blew out the other knee had torn ligaments, but I didn't have surgery on
that. So like that was like my starting point of my knees over toes journey. One knee crazy stiff,
the other knee crazy loose from torn ligaments that I never ended up having surgery on. And throughout that entire process,
I had never trained knees over toes. So you could see because of all that shit, I kind of had to
start from ground zero. So the first thing that started changing that for me, because I knew my
knees really well, I had quote unquote, you know, tried everything. And by everything that usually
means massages, foam rollers, stretching, painkillers, those kinds of things is what people are normally thinking of.
Well, the first thing actually started changing it for me was putting my car in neutral and putting
my ass against the bumper and pushing it backwards every fucking day to the point that my quads
actually got like, you know, a little bit of a pump into that lower quad for like the first
time ever. Now, the thing about walking backwards, and if we look at walking backwards, whether
you're towing a sled backwards or just walking backwards, if you stand there, like if anyone
listening to this stands sideways in a mirror and goes to take their first step backwards,
you realize that your knee is over your toes. Walking backwards is just a very rudimentary
test of knees over toes. And when is just a very rudimentary test of
knees over toes. And when tested in elderly, it's actually been proven to be an effective
screening process for falling alone, just by testing old people walking backwards,
better they can walk backwards, less chance they have of falling, which is actually one of the
leading causes of death and hospitalization in elderly. It's not like falling is not a joke,
like it's a big deal. We don't think about that every day, but falling is a huge deal.
So if that same concept is preventing elderly from falling, maybe it could help me land
from a fricking jump or something like that.
And so in my system, that is the first step walk backwards for 10 minutes.
Now, as things go, we want to start towing a sled continuously for five minutes, which
is, I think still, you know still underrated. This is why I work
hard on social media. I should at least work until this stuff's overrated rather than leave some of
this stuff underrated because of the amount of people who have gotten out of pain just from
going backwards. So that's knees over toes. And that's why I'm a knees over toes guy, because
I'm not trying to make it something extreme. I also figured out that on a treadmill,
most basic treadmills,
you can get on it and turn around and stick your butt against the handles and not turn it on and
actually just spin the wheel backwards. That actually supplies some resistance to that motion.
A lot of people swear by that. They go into LA Fitness, first five minutes, they just spin,
we call it reverse deadmill, like treadmills off and you just spin it
backwards. What I really wanted is I could see that like, okay, the opposite of like what I had
been brought up and done is when you see like one of these gold medal Olympic weightlifters,
and you look at them in like the bottom of like a squat or something. And it's just like
unbelievable. You know what I mean? Their knee is like way over their toes, full bend, crazy mobility. Right. And these guys are doing it all the time. So they're
obviously not like in extreme pain doing it, not to mention they're doing it for blood. If they're
okay doing that, those are some pretty bulletproof knees. Those are true 10 RPE all out max effort
lifts that you're seeing. Right. They're not trying to even do it for health. And even them,
if you look at the sport, they actually have one of the lowest knee injury rates compared to like
a sport like I play, like basketball. Right. So, and like no one in basketball can do that.
So it's got, so to me, it was like, if I can't play basketball because I'm so jacked up,
but even all my friends playing basketball have like some degree of knee pain, like the opposite
of us is like the Chinese Olympic weightlifting team who I've spent considerable time studying, for example. That's like the
opposite of us. So my whole mission became like, what if I could do that shit pain-free?
Basketball would probably become easy. And sure enough, that's exactly what's occurred. I've been
able to compete now over a thousand times without knee pain playing basketball. My vertical jump has
continued to skyrocket, which to put it really simply,
if your knees never hurt and you just practice jumping, you're on a good track to jump higher.
Jumping high is actually a simpler subject than people realize. You have the relative strength
involved. If your knee hurts, you're not going to be able to even go express your force.
Anyways, so if we look at walking backwards, that is nice, but that sure as hell is not that
perfect, unbelievable, deep knee bend.
Yeah. It's not going to get you to the promised land.
So this is what my career has been devoted to is actually turning that into a step-by-step process.
So the next thing, if we look at backward walking, and if we look at that positioning,
the next thing up from there would basically be doing reverse step-ups. So step-ups are
a well-known strength exercise.
Yeah, a good kind of beginner body weight type of deal.
That's how it's usually used.
And then people load step-ups.
The nature of a normal step-up,
I don't think there's that much good eccentric components.
So it's not like bodybuilders have found
that step-ups are the holy grail of leg mass.
They're still not a common one,
but I mean, most people would be familiar with step up. And so a reverse step up is almost
like if you just imagine like going downstairs only like having to control that motion and go
back up. And so in my system, like I want people just as I want people to be able to walk backwards
pain free, I would like people to be able to do reverse step ups on a six inch box, like that's
not asking for too much. And even some
physiotherapy studies have proven that to help regenerate the patellar tendon. So it's a very
simple exercise, but I had to realize that even that quality scales, like you could take the best
athlete in the world. And if you challenge them with enough weight and make them go fast enough
backwards for five minutes, they probably will have like the burn of a lifetime. Now it's not
much for muscle growth because there's no eccentric component, but the point is just that the same exercise that
a grandma could do could make Usain Bolt want to vomit. You know, that's the idea is it's just a
category of exercise. So going backwards is a category of exercise and then reverse step ups
is a category of exercise. And we do them with the foot flat, which kind of works on that ankle mobility.
We do them with a slant board, which is then actually much tougher on the quads.
Like that one might be, it's sad that slant boards aren't more common, but if you look
at the logistics of it, a slant board is a very affordable thing to make.
That would be a nice one to see in more gyms.
It would be a very simple accessory exercise, kind of in the family of leg extensions, but
you get to work one side of the, you know, each time you get really nice eccentric load. And it's actually
proven for the patellar tendons, particularly if we add that slant board. So we like to work
with a flat foot first, just to like get the balance down. It's not a tough exercise. Now,
when you are on the slant board, it actually becomes a much, you really feel the quads
recruiting. And then the last step of that is actually to remove the slant board.
So that means like you're actually trying to lift your heel and balanced on the ball
of your foot when you do the reverse step up.
So if you progress from backward walking to a flat footed step up to a slant board step
up to then removing the slant board and having to go onto the ball of your foot, you can,
you know, someone who maybe thinks, well, I'm just doomed to weak knees and not being
able to go down steps without pain.
Well, this is why these like rave successes come in.
It's not from something wild.
It's from people actually following strength training over a considerable amount of time
to actually get good at these motions, not working through pain, but, but assessing their
level of range and how much load they can handle.
of range and how much load they can handle. Now, from a muscle perspective, I think only that slant board one would relate. The flat footed one is more ankle mobility. And then the one when you
remove the slant board is definitely more in the athletic kind of department balance foot strength.
Like it's not, you know, I'm at least just trying to put the context because I know a lot of your
listeners want to know like maybe how they would apply this in their routine. You know what I mean? So I'm not trying to make someone think
they have to do like every one of these. So what's the bridge between the reverse step up and the
full bend squat is a full bend squat one side at a time. Now, okay. Does that mean pistol squats
or this or that? And what I've found is that it's an Astrograss style split squat. So that means
you're in a split squat position, but then you're lowering the front hamstring all the way down. Like if you took a screenshot from
the side, it would look identical to that Olympic gold medalist weightlifter in the bottom position.
And most people will have to elevate the front foot because it takes a lot of mobility to do
that. Like it's a little unclear because I was like testing, testing, but I always kept track
of things. And it does seem like it took me about, about two years to have the mobility to do that on
flat ground. Again, someone's seeing that and just trying that, like that's not where the gains come
from. Again, there's range of motion and there's load where I started really making gains was by
elevating the front foot and by using assistance. So again, like negative of my own weight,
but getting that full hamstring over the calf. So I try to have people do this three times a week for 12 weeks. So three times a week for 12 weeks at your level,
getting that full knee bend, letting your heel come up. Then after that, now we start thinking
about whether to add load and try to work that heel towards flat because to get to that ankle
mobility. So for some people, my mom can do it flat ground
without weight. Now, what I find is the stronger someone is, the more likely it is that they would
actually have to add weight to get to that mobility. Like most strong guys would never
get to a flat ground split squat if they think they can just do it with their body weight alone.
Like it's probably not enough load to even like signal to their body to pull into that kind of a
depth. So again,
it's not like there's any pressure on it, but we're trying to use the deepest range of motion
that we can without pain. And we're trying to use the weight that gives us the best range of
motion. If you go too heavy, you'll shorten up. Like you won't go all the way down. If you go
too light, it won't pull you that far down. So there's my system in a nutshell. And people start
to find as they get better and better into that ass to grass split squat position, which not surprisingly comes from Olympic weightlifting in the 60s. There was lifters who would actually catch their Olympic lifts in that ass to grass split squat, which is just remarkable. And well, you know, you gradually put those legs together and it's like, oh, shit, squatting felt like crap for the last 10 years of my life. Now it actually feels great. So the final stage of my system is where I do let people, you know, squat and dead
lift with a bar. And we use that as a finisher one to three sets. We still use that dumbbell,
dumbbell squat as a finisher one to three sets of 20 reps. So there's probably some research out
there of another that would show that maybe a back off like higher rep finisher set. And in this case, it would allow you to kind of, I think it could provide a little
fun for someone rather than saying, okay, now do a set of 20 barbell back squats. You know,
it could maybe give them a little bit of a different stimulus, elevate the heels a little
bit more and, you know, hold the dumbbell and pump out 20 reps. I made sure to say like how to
regress every quality we've talked about so far. Right. And so it's the same with this heels elevated squat, like someone with knee pain, the idea
of elevating their heels and going all the way down would probably hurt them to think
about.
But we do this in five levels.
And the lowest level is when you have a high amount of, of assistance.
Meaning like, if you imagine that if you had two basic chairs and you actually held the
backs of those chairs, one on each side, you'd be able to assist yourself like almost through
the whole range.
Now imagine turning the chairs around so that you only get to use the seat of the chair. Does that make sense? It's a push off. Now you have to handle your weight most of
the way down. And then you just get a boost in the bottom position, which then level three would be
not touching the chairs with your hands. Level four would then actually be holding the dumbbell
in front. And again, since I'm just trying to stay in my lane, like I'm not trying to teach someone how to build the most, I'm not trying to teach
someone how to drive up a squat or if I only live this shit, that's going to force me to be really
good at this shit. So level five is actually holding with straight arms, which holds some
strictness, holding the weight behind your back. Walk backwards is the foundation. Reverse step
ups is the second point, which is harder than walking backwards.
The ATG split squat is harder than the step up.
But again, it still regresses because you can use assistance, elevate your front foot,
and then it heals up all the way down.
Squat is like our king exercise.
But for my intents and purposes, I'm still just talking about like about the posture
and how pain free you can do it and not actually speaking of that.
Everything I do would still be considered accessory work for an actual, you know, Olympic weightlifter or power
lifter. All right. Well, I hope you liked a few of the highlights from my interview with Ben
Patrick. And if you want to listen to that full interview, you can find it back in July of 2021.
And so now let's move on to the highlight reel from the Definitive and Practical Guide to
Muscle Protein Synthesis. But first, have you ever wondered what strength training split you
should follow? What rep ranges you should work in? How many sets you should do per workout or per
week? Well, I created a free 60-second training quiz that will answer those questions for you and others,
including how frequently you should train each major muscle group,
which exercises you should do, what supplements you should consider,
which ones are at least worth taking, and more.
To take this quiz and to get your free personalized training plan,
go to muscleforlife.show, muscleforlife.show
slash training quiz, answer the questions and learn exactly what to do in the gym to gain more
muscle and strength. What is muscle protein synthesis? The simple explanation is this is the process your body uses to repair, grow, and
strengthen muscle fibers. And it occurs when your body takes amino acids that it gets from the food
you eat, or at least it gets some of them. It gets the essential amino acids from the food that you
eat and it combines them with others that it produces, and then it creates new proteins. And these new
proteins are used to repair and to build new muscle tissue. The body has an opposite mechanism
as well called muscle protein breakdown, whereby it breaks muscle tissue down into amino acids
that it can then use for its various needs. And when you look at muscle growth through this lens, it's actually
very simple. What it is is it is muscle protein synthesis rates outpacing muscle protein breakdown
rates for extended periods of time. So you could look at that in terms of weeks or months or years.
Regardless, if you're going to gain muscle, your muscle protein synthesis rates are going
to have to exceeded your muscle protein breakdown rates over that period of time.
So to build muscle, then what you want to do is you want to increase your muscle protein
synthesis rates as much as you can, as often as you can, and for as long as
you can in each individual instance of increasing them, right? And you also want to reduce muscle
protein breakdown rates as much as you can, you know, in terms of frequency and intensity and
duration. Now, when you lift weights, when you train, you are damaging cells
in your muscle fibers, and this tells the body that it's time to increase muscle protein synthesis
rates because it needs to repair the damage, right? So in that way, training is anabolic.
It leads to the creation of more complex tissues from simpler substances, right? It takes the simpler amino
acids and it turns them into the more complex proteins. And after you do a workout, there is a
rapid and a prolonged increase in muscle protein synthesis that lasts anywhere from a couple of
days, three days or so to less than 24 hours, depending on what you did in the workout. If you did a couple of sets,
that's not going to be as anabolic as let's say nine sets, right? And also how trained you are,
how close you are to your genetic potential for muscle and strength, because as you get more
jacked, your body becomes more resistant to the training stimulus. And it takes a lot more to get a lot less muscle protein
synthesis. Now, as far as the relationship between the amount of training you are doing in an
individual workout and the amount of muscle protein synthesis that occurs because of it,
a good rule of thumb is something between probably three and nine, maybe as many as 12 hard sets, which would be sets taken close to technical
failure with heavy weights for an individual muscle group in a session is the effective range.
So if you want to get the maximum training stimulus for an individual muscle group in an
individual session, somewhere between nine and 12 sets for
that muscle group is the most that I would recommend. Okay, let's flip this coin over now
and talk about something related to nutrition, to how you eat, and that is simply calories.
Because we'll get to protein, of course, and eating protein is important. And anybody into
building muscle has heard that and probably at
least tried a high protein diet, but many people don't understand how important calories alone are
because a calorie deficit is great and needed to lose fat, but it also impairs your body's ability
to create new muscle proteins. It impairs muscle protein synthesis, and that then slows down
or can even halt muscle growth. Now, again, in newbies, the effect is not great enough to stop
muscle gain, and that's why newbies can recomp. That's why newbies can gain muscle and lose fat
at the same time. But as you become more experienced and as your body becomes more resistant to the training stimulus and as muscle protein synthesis
rates do not rise as high as they once did after you work out for as long as they once did,
the hindrance of the calorie deficit becomes great enough to more or less eliminate the
possibility of gaining muscle. Another related downside to restricting calories is when you are
in a calorie deficit, and especially as time goes on, anabolic hormone levels like testosterone go
down and catabolic hormone levels like cortisol go up. And that, of course, is not conducive to
muscle gain. And so really the key takeaway here then is when you want to maximize muscle and strength
gain, you have to make sure you are not in a calorie deficit. Okay, now let's talk about
protein. Why is eating protein so important to muscle protein synthesis? Well, it directly
stimulates it. There is an amino acid in protein called leucine that is most responsible. That is
the amino acid that is most responsible for this mechanism. So you eat protein, muscle protein synthesis rates go up and muscle protein
breakdown rates go down. And then of course, protein gives your body the raw materials,
the building blocks it needs, the amino acids to then build the new muscle tissue, to create the
new muscle tissue. Now you should also know that eating enough protein every day
is far more important than when you eat it. So if for whatever reason you can't or don't want to
have protein before or after your workouts, that's totally fine. Just make sure that you eat enough
protein every day, something around one gram per pound of body weight per day. Now, as far as optimizing your protein intake goes, the timing
is one tool you can use. And research shows that eating more frequently, eating protein more
frequently is probably superior for muscle gain over time than eating protein infrequently. So,
for example, having one or two large meals with a lot of protein is
probably inferior for muscle gain, and especially for talking experienced like intermediate or
advanced weightlifters, than eating four to six servings of protein per day, which of course would
be smaller. Another component of the muscle protein response to eating protein is duration. How long do muscle
protein synthesis rates rise when we eat protein? Well, we do have some insight here. Research shows
that muscle protein synthesis rates remain elevated for no longer than three hours. And
here's the interesting part, regardless of how long amino acids remain in your bloodstream.
So let's put these parts together. We have the body that can only process about seven grams
of protein per hour for muscle protein synthesis. And we have something around 30 grams,
maximally stimulating muscle protein synthesis rates, and we have that
stimulation occurring, that elevation occurring for no more than three hours, then we can see
why eating 30-ish grams of protein every three, four hours or so makes a lot of sense and why
that can result in more muscle gain over time than eating fewer,
larger servings. Now, one final component I should actually talk about in terms of muscle
protein synthesis, it has occurred to me, is sleep. We'll end on this one. And this is
extremely important because if you want to immediately make every aspect of your physiology
better, just get better sleep. If you are not getting
enough high quality sleep, start doing that and everything gets better. Now, as far as muscle
building goes, not getting enough sleep is associated with a decrease in anabolic hormones
like testosterone, growth hormone, and IGF-1. And these are hormones that play a key role in
stimulating muscle protein synthesis and reducing muscle protein1. And these are hormones that play a key role in stimulating muscle protein
synthesis and reducing muscle protein breakdown. So by not getting enough sleep, you are basically
producing an environment in the body that is much less conducive to muscle gain. It is a systemic
effect. And the only way to prevent that or to fix that if you are experiencing it and to create the opposite,
to create a hormonal environment that is maximally conducive to muscle gain, the only way to do it
is to get enough sleep. Let's quickly summarize here. Let's quickly wrap up. Elevating muscle
protein synthesis rates, enough to gain muscle effectively, mostly comes down to providing the
proper stimulus in the gym.
So you got to do effective strength training, really, and you got to do enough of it in each
session and each week in each major muscle group that you want to develop to get the response that
you want. And then you have to eat enough calories. You have to make sure you are not consistently in
a calorie deficit. And the easiest way to do that is to consistently be in a calorie surplus.
And then of course,
you wanna make sure you're eating enough protein every day
and protein timing is worth considering.
It's worth paying attention to, I think.
And the best way to go about that
is to eat around 30 grams of protein several times per day,
separate those meals by several hours and make
sure you get enough sleep. And that's really most of the recipe for maximum muscle growth.
It really is that simple. Okay, that's it for the featured snippets from the definitive and
practical guide to muscle protein synthesis. And if you want to listen to that full episode,
it was published in August of 2020. So you can go back into the feed and find it.
And last, we have a few moments from why the law of large numbers is greater than luck.
The law of large numbers is a theorem that states that the average of a large number
of trials should be close to the expected value.
And in case you're not familiar with the term
expected value, it means more or less what you would guess. It is the return that you can expect
for some kind of action. For example, if you were to take a 20 question multiple choice test
with four options, A, B, C, D as the answers. And if you were to guess A on all of them, you could expect to get
25% right. You could expect to get five out of 20 of those questions right. Now, this is why,
for example, if a casino loses money on a single spin of a roulette wheel, they're not concerned.
They can rest easy knowing that the law of large numbers guarantees them a profit over
time because of course the game is rigged in such a way that they make a slight mathematical profit
every spin regardless of the actual outcome. All they need then is enough money to float enough
spins to realize that mathematical edge. This fundamental mathematical truth isn't just for
casinos and insurance companies. It actually has a very profound relevance to all of our lives
because success in any field or endeavor is, in my opinion, little more than a function of the law
of large numbers. In other words, in the game of life, you're the house,
and all you have to do is keep spinning the ball. However you spin it doesn't matter whether you
spin it fast, slow, clockwise, counterclockwise, it's all the same. The advantage is yours,
and every spin racks up a small profit in your favor, regardless of whether it pays out immediately or not. And in my experience,
one of the things that really sets successful people apart from unsuccessful people isn't luck
or the brilliance of their ideas, the people they know, or anything other than the will to keep the
wheel spinning. You see, these people treat their businesses and their work
like a numbers game and they focus on what they can control, which is of course their actions.
So the secret to making a bunch of sales, engage a lot of prospects, right? That's one of those
sales management cliches is work out exactly how many calls you have to make to get into
conversation with how many prospects and how many prospects you have to make to get into conversation with how many prospects
and how many prospects you have to engage in conversation to make a sale. And then you go,
cool. On average, I know that I will get one sale per X number of calls. And if I look at my time,
I think I can make Y number of calls per day and therefore expect Z sales per day from my
current system. I think this also applies to more creative type of
endeavors like building an app or writing a book. Create a lot of versions. Start with a minimum
viable product, which is a very important concept. If you don't know what that is,
read the book Lean Startup right now and iterate. Add one feature at a time, fix one bug at a time,
iterate. Add one feature at a time, fix one bug at a time, write one word at a time, one page at a time every day. And the quality of this work almost doesn't matter. If you are relentless enough,
the total spins is ultimately what counts. Quality is of secondary importance. Yes,
you would rather have high quality spins, but you can make up for
a lack of quality in quantity. And you can also rest easy knowing that your technique will
inevitably improve with repetition, whether you like it or not. Now, I like this framework because
it also teaches us to focus on the process, not the goals or dreams which are necessary,
Focus on the process, not the goals or dreams which are necessary, but in the scheme of things,
not nearly as important as the system for achieving those goals and dreams. I also like this metaphor because it helps me discount luck and windfalls. I sit down every
day and do the work that I know I need to do to keep the ball moving. And I do that confident in the knowledge that over time,
I'm going to win. How big I'm going to win? Not sure. And that's where luck, I think,
comes into play truly. So anyway, my point here is that I reject the idea that you can chalk
most of an entrepreneur's success up to luck. In some cases, that's true for sure. Some people that produce, let's say,
an app that just goes absolutely apeshit and they're just like, well, fuck, I win, I guess.
Yeah, that's pretty lucky. But in most cases, that's just not how it goes. And I know you can
argue that there are two forms of luck, right? So you can have positive things happen to you, which I would say in my own personal story, I've had a lot of small positive things happen. I wouldn't necessarily
say that those were due to luck though. I mean, there was a lot of work that was being, that has
been done to generate a lot of these positive small things to happen, but I can't think of any
major defining like, oh yeah, Tom Brady started tweeting about my stuff and that
was the beginning. Nothing like that. But there's also the type of luck which manifests in not
having bad things happen. Here's what I want to leave you with. Don't put too much stock in
immediate, tangible success or failure. Because often these things feel kind of random and out
of our control, even if they are
directly caused by things that we have done in the past, whether good or bad. When it lands on your
plate, it can often be quite mysterious and leave you wondering how the hell that possibly happened.
And that's why I like to look more into the future than worry about the present. I like to play the long game
and place my faith in what I can control and know that the law of large numbers says that if I
continue to do the right things every day, it will pay out eventually. There are going to be good
days or going to be bad days. Sometimes it feels like you're making progress. Sometimes it doesn't
feel like you're making progress. Sometimes it doesn't feel like you're
making progress. And all of that stuff is fine, but don't get lost in the subjective. Try to
remain focused on the objective. Are you doing the right things every day? Do you have a system
that is likely to produce the outcomes that you want? If you do, then you just work the system
and pay attention to the trends over time more than the day-to-day fluctuations.
Alrighty, well that's it for the featured moments from Why the Law of Large Numbers is Greater Than Luck.
And if you want to listen to that, you can find it in May of 2018.
Well, I hope you liked this episode. I hope you found it helpful. And if you did,
subscribe to the show because it makes sure that you don't miss new episodes. And it also helps me
because it increases the rankings of the show a little bit, which of course then makes it
a little bit more easily found by other people who may like it just as much as you. And if you
didn't like something about this episode or about the
show in general, or if you have ideas or suggestions or just feedback to share, shoot me an email,
mike at muscleforlife.com, muscleforlife.com, and let me know what I could do better or just
what your thoughts are about maybe what you'd like to see me do in the future.
I read everything myself. I'm always looking for new ideas and constructive feedback. So thanks again
for listening to this episode, and I hope to hear from you soon.