SERIALously - 24: Couple Locked Their Adopted Son Inside 8x8 Room For 4 Years
Episode Date: June 22, 2023Today we are revisiting a case I covered last year. It was a little over one year ago on February 8, 2022, that a bizarre case came to light when Jupiter Police arrested a couple for allegedly keeping... one of their children in a box in their garage. Since then, the parents who allegedly kept their boy in a box have been in court several times, while awaiting trial. Your True Crime BFF, Annie Elise xx All Social Media Links: https://www.flowcode.com/page/annieelise_ About Me: https://annieelise.com/ For Business Inquiries: 10toLife@WMEAgency.com
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Hey true crime besties, welcome back to an all new episode of Serialistly.
hey everybody welcome back to an all-new bonus episode of serialously with me your true crime bestie annie and i am breaking down another crazy case for you today before we jump in though please
just take a quick second double check that you are subscribed and following the podcast
check whatever podcast app you're using to listen to this on. It should be in like the
corner. Make sure you're following that way you'll be notified every time I drop a new episode or a
bonus episode off the cuff. And then if you have an extra 30 seconds and you want to leave a rating
or a review, I would greatly appreciate it. So the case we're talking about today, it's really not what it seems, possibly.
Let me just give a little disclaimer there.
It's possibly not what it seems because the initial report about this case and the details
seemed like it was pretty much open and shut.
The writing was on the wall.
Everybody knew.
But then as I started to dig more and more and more,
it looks like maybe it's something else. And again, I want to just use the disclaimer. Possibly.
So, we are going to talk about it. It all started on Friday evening, January 28th. And it was when
detectives responded to follow up on a report of a missing, runawayaway 14-year-old boy. And what they found when they
followed up on this potential teenage runaway would not only haunt the detectives, but it also
would raise tons of questions, even more excuses, and some allegations of truly horrific, horrific
behavior. So let's get right into it. Tracy Ferreter and Timothy Ferreter are both 46
years old, a married couple, and they have four children. They have two daughters, one who is 13
years old, one who is 16 years old. They have a two-year-old son and they have an adopted 14-year-old
teenage son. Now I believe a couple of the other, in addition to the 14-year-old, are adopted as well, but it's unclear who is adopted versus biological. This family was very active on
social media, would post Christmas cards, would post family portraits, and Tracy used to work as
a school aide at the local Catholic school. So that Friday, on January 28th, Tracy had told police
that her 14-year-old adopted son had several
behavioral disorders and that he was in trouble at school just the day before, leading her to think
that he had run away from home. It was at this point in the conversation that another police
officer on the scene told this detective that he had actually also been out to that home just a
month earlier in December of 2021. And he says that the reason that he was at also been out to that home just a month earlier in December of 2021.
And he says that the reason that he was at this home back in December was because of a phone call that he had received.
He received a phone call by somebody who was going by the name of Jack and had said that he was hired to come to this home and to build an office in the garage of their home.
Jack told them that he would absolutely do the job.
an office in the garage of their home. Jack told them that he would absolutely do the job. However,
after getting directions from the couple, he said that he found the job very strange. Jack said that the room was just an eight by eight space. And he says, and I quote, that it had its own door and
its own ceiling. It had a deadbolt lock and a knob, but only on the outside there was no knob inside so if somebody was inside this
office they would not be able to exit unless somebody opened the door for them from the
outside and jack also added that they requested that the space have electricity have a window ac
unit put into it and also installing a camera onto the ceiling and they told him that he only had two days
to complete this job so he had called this in saying it seemed very very odd
so the details of the follow-up here are a little unclear but apparently the
officer had gone nothing was really afoot or strange and so now fast forward
one month the teenage son is suspected to have run away and this information
is beginning to resurface. The police take the statement from Tracy the mother and nothing really
follows up. They assume that this boy who reportedly has behavioral issues has run away
and they're hopeful that he will return home and in the meantime they're going to be looking for him.
So two days later on Sunday Sunday, January 30th,
two police officers come back to the house and they knock on the door because they wanted to
check and see if the boy had returned. And at that point, things began to get very, very weird.
As they were knocking on the door, nobody was answering. So they call Tracy and ask her if
they have permission to enter the home to check to see if her son has returned and she refused. She said she wasn't comfortable with them going into her home while
she's not there and that she would let them know if she hears of anything but that she refused to
let them inside the house. So then later that evening around 10 p.m two additional officers
end up going back to the house and at that, Tracy says that her son still had not returned,
but she again denies them entry into the home. Finally, after a very long conversation with
these officers and them persuading her to allow them to come in and make sure that everything's
okay, she allows one of them in. And this officer says that he immediately went to a room that was
inside the home to the right of the front door. Inside that
room was a small crib and on the floor was a small plaid blanket and a pillow. And Tracy told this
officer that her 14-year-old adopted son, who is now missing and suspected to have run away,
shared that room with his two-year-old brother and that he oftentimes slept on the floor while
the two-year-old slept in the crib. And the inside of this room was vibrant and colorful. There were tons of toys everywhere, although all of the toys seemed to
align with the age range of the toddler rather than things that a 14-year-old boy may be playing
with. So when the detective asked Tracy, oh this is great, but where are the belongings that belong
with the 14-year-old boy? If they share a room a room where's all his stuff she says that she'll show him where he keeps his stuff and she leads him through the kitchen
to another room and advises that that's where this other son's belongings are it's at that point that
tracy brings the officer to the garage and to this additional structure and the structure is
described as being very small with a plain white door.
The mother says that they were in the process of converting the structure into an office,
but that they could still go ahead and go on inside and look and take a look around.
So they enter this structure to investigate, but what they find wasn't an office, and it wasn't anything like the mother, Tracy, was trying to describe to them.
The structure had a doorknob
and a deadbolt both locking from the outside as well as a light switch only on the exterior.
This meant that whoever was inside the room or the office wasn't able to control the lighting
or the room being locked or not if they were inside. It was being controlled by somebody
on the outside and this aligns with that concern from that man who was requested to build this structure
and who had called this in back in December. Inside the structure was a plain box spring with
a mattress on top of it and on top of the mattress was a gray sheet with a pillow. Straight back in
the room was a small desk with chairs and school books
on top of that desk. And above that mattress was a ring doorbell camera that was mounted to the
ceiling pointing directly down at the mattress. And as for the aesthetic of the room, like that
other vibrant room that the two-year-old slept in, this one was completely bare. It was just plain concrete and
drywall. The floor was also bare, with just a big part of it covered by an indoor-outdoor rug.
Near the bed was an orange Home Depot bucket that appeared to have human feces in it. While
showing detectives this space, Tracy had tons of excuses and different explanations as to what the
space was used for. She explains that at first it was a structure that was built for that office,
possibly for her husband to use.
But then when she was questioned about this exterior lock,
this lock that you have to do from the outside,
that you can't control at all from the inside,
she stated that the room was used for storage.
And she said it was family storage, so they would lock things up,
and that it was a space
used by all of the children but there wasn't storage in there there were no boxes there was a
bed and a camera mounted to the ceiling which would raise the alarm for anybody so when the
detective asks tracy okay well then why is there a box spring and why is there a mattress she says
that occasionally that space was sometimes used by her 14 year old adopted son
okay so now it's all beginning to come together here the camera the mattress the bucket on the
floor somebody was living in this tiny room that was just eight by eight but at that point all they
had was suspicion they didn't have this 14 yearold boy there to corroborate what they believed may
have been happening. They didn't have any confession to any sort of guilt. They assumed this teenage
boy had still run away, so there wasn't much that they could do, but they definitely did begin to
investigate. Officers eventually found the 14-year-old boy three days later at Independence
Middle School, and they found him by
using a drone over the school to actually pinpoint his exact location after spotting him on security
footage. And that's when this teen unloaded to the police and said that his parents locked him in
that structure every single day. He also says that at one point he was locked inside that for up to 18 hours. When the
officer asked him, why did you run away? He says because he felt like nobody loves him and he says
that he also did not feel safe at home. He said that there was spankings that would take place,
that there was physical abuse that would take place, and then he made a public plea to the
officers for them to arrest him
because he said he would rather be in prison than go back to that home. After getting a search
warrant for that ring camera that was mounted to the ceiling and aimed directly down at the
mattress, they discovered what really went on inside this horrific dungeon of sorts. They uncovered thousands of videos that
showed the teen being locked inside that structure every single day. It was all
caught on camera. And in the affidavit it says, each day the boy was placed in the
room you could hear the door close and the deadbolt lock. In several videos you
could hear and see both Tracy and Timothy yelling at the boy.
In one video in particular, the boy was locked in his room after being found to have stolen chocolate and cookies from the kitchen, despite being told that he wasn't allowed to have them.
Uh, hello, he was probably hungry.
This behavior resulted in the boy having the covers removed from his mattress.
Resulted in the boy having the covers removed from his mattress his mattress picked up and tossed against the wall and timothy
Grabbing the boy against the arm and yelling at him each morning when timothy greets the boy
He asks him is it dirty and points to that orange home depot bucket And that's the bucket that this boy uses to relieve himself and it's kept in the corner of this room
And in one of
those videos the boy advises that yes the bucket is dirty and Timothy then
yells at him telling him to clean it. And you can see this young 14 year old
go off camera to clean out what he has you know his bodily fluids that he had
put into this bucket. Investigators quickly determined that this young teenage boy
was forced to live inside this garage, this tiny, tiny structure, since 2017. Meals were brought in
and out to him while he was locked in that room, and he was provided that orange bucket as a
bathroom to use. A Jupiter couple accused of forcing their adopted son to live like a prisoner,
locked in a small room in the garage.
Police say it went on for more than four years.
Once the officer picked this young boy up and started questioning him, he shared a lot more information as to what went on in that home, what went on in that room, and what this pattern of alleged abuse really was.
So this was all included in the original report,
and what I'm going to do is I'm going to pull it up on the screen for you, and I'm going to
read with you guys what was said, because it's the questions and the answers from the detective
and the boy. We start here. The detective wrote, I asked the boy to describe a typical day for him,
and he stated that in the morning he is woken up by someone because
his door is locked. The boy advised that somebody would wake him up in the morning, tell him to go
to the bathroom, and then he would go back to his room. He said that somebody would lock the door
and usually turn the lights off. The boy advised he would be in his room until somebody would return
from dropping off the siblings at school because remember there were three other siblings who lived inside the home. The boy advised
that once his mother was home she would feed him breakfast consisting of a
banana and a piece of bread and peanut butter. The boy stated that after he was
finished eating somebody would come back into the room and he would get dressed
and then he would go to school. After school the boy stated that somebody
would pick him up and his siblings up and return
home and he would go back into that room. I asked the boy to describe his room and he stated it was
eight by eight. The boy further stated that the room had a lockable doorknob and deadbolt that
both locked from the outside and there was a light switch on the outside of the room as well.
The boy stated that someone would always lock him in there stating usually the bottom knob was the one that was locked. The boy stated that he has to
stay in that room when somebody is home or when they want him to be in there. When asked how often
he is in the room he says a lot. I asked him if he was home if he would be playing with his friends
or family and he said no and that he would be reading books in his room and stated he was not allowed to go anywhere else in the house.
I asked the boy if he would like to be in his current room or a different room and he stated
a different room. I asked the boy why he ran away and he said because I feel like no one loves me.
I asked the boy if he felt unsafe at home and he stated he did not because somebody gets really
aggressive with him. Now I think that this may have been a typo. I think he was asking him if he felt unsafe
and he stated he did because this doesn't quite make sense. When asked to describe how his dad
gets aggressive, he stated that once somebody slammed him against a wall by his neck and struck
him in the face with an open hand. When asked how often somebody has
been physical with him, he stated that it happened a lot when they lived in Arizona. I asked the boy
to describe the discipline he receives and he stated that somebody, male, gets profane and angry
and that he sometimes spits in my face. The boy further stated his discipline consists of spanking
with a belt. I asked the boy if he ever sleeps in the room with the sibling and he says he does not. Now this is a piece of information because remember
Tracy the mother originally said he shared that room with his two-year-old brother and he's saying
he never sleeps in there. The boy advised the longest he could remember being locked inside
the room was approximately 16 to 18 hours. The boy advised somebody to provide
him with a bucket to go to the bathroom in, stating that he has used the bucket several times in the
past. The boy advised when he uses the bucket, he is made to dump it out in the backyard of the
residence and then clean it out. The boy stated he eats most of his meals in his bedroom, which
consists of leftovers after the family has already eaten. The boy advised if
he is not in his room or at school, he is outside in the yard doing yard work that somebody makes
him do until being locked back inside the room. The boy stated somebody is very physically abusive
to him and he is fearful somebody may knock him out. The boy advised that he had a room in Arizona
similar to the room he is in now,
stating that the room is approximately 8 by 10 feet. Near the end of the interview, the boy advised that he did not want to return to his family and he pled with him stating that he would
rather be in prison than back home. The boy further stated that he had thoughts about taking his own
life. So based on these alarming and heartbreaking statements made by this 14-year-old
boy to the officers, he was placed under a law enforcement baker act and he was transported
to the hospital for evaluation to make sure that he was not only physically okay but mentally okay
as well. But these officers still had to corroborate this kid's story. Even though it seemed like the
evidence was all there and the writing was on the wall,
they had to vet this information
and make sure that he was being truthful.
Because remember, it was alleged
that he had behavioral issues,
that he got in trouble a lot, that he ran away.
So they needed to make sure
that this was in fact the real situation.
The next day, on Tuesday, February 1st,
authorities removed all of the siblings from the family home and removed the two girls from school as they were attending school that day.
They then decided to interview the two girls.
One sister confirmed the allegations that her 14-year-old brother had made, stating that his room is in the garage and he gets put into the room when he is either misbehaving or in trouble, and stated that he gets in trouble a lot.
he is either misbehaving or in trouble and stated that he gets in trouble a lot. She also says that the door has a lock on it from the outside and that if he is in his room, the door is always
locked. When discussing the room, this sister begins getting extremely emotional and she starts
crying and saying that she wanted to play with her brother and that she doesn't know why he's
always locked inside this room. She then says that she wants to do the
right thing for her brother, and she mentions the camera that's in that room as well. She then said
that the punishment this boy receives are very different than the punishments the other siblings
receive, saying that when they get in trouble, they may get their phone taken away and other
light restrictions. However, when he gets in trouble, he gets locked inside this room and he
has to either do yard work or write sentences as a form of punishment. The sister then discloses
that she has seen somebody grab her brother by the neck, but that other than that, she hasn't
seen any other physical abuse take place. However, she has heard it through the walls. She says that
somebody did tell her that her brother had been hit in the past
with a belt and a jump rope. She says that her brother is locked in that room all the time for
several hours, that he uses that bucket to use the bathroom, and sometimes he's even had to use the
bathroom just by going on the floor. Then the other sister has her interview, and according to
the report, she confirms all the statements her brother made and
all of the statements that her sister made but this sister says that she doesn't know exactly
what that room looks like because she hasn't seen it for a while but she says she does know that
that room is in the garage and she knows that there is a lock on the outside because it is
meant to keep her brother locked inside she says that she misses her brother and wishes that he
wasn't in trouble all the time because she missed him and wanted to play with him. Then she states that that weekend
in which he was missing, when they suspected he possibly ran away, she says that somebody took her
and somebody else, I'm assuming a sibling, to a softball tournament in Tampa, clearly not concerned
about the whereabouts of their 14-year-old son. A few days pass from the interviews, and last
Friday, February 4th, this 14-year-old is released from the hospital that he had been at since the
officers approached him and found him at that middle school. He was then taken into the child
protection team for another interview to see, is his story still aligning? Can we get any other
information out of him, you know, assessing the situation? And his answers had not changed. They had not changed at all since his original interview
with that investigator. And during this new interview, he confirmed that he was made to stay
locked in that room for several hours at a time. He confirmed that it was an eight by eight. He
confirmed that there was that ring doorbell mounted to the ceiling to watch his every move. He confirmed that he had to use the bathroom in there and confirmed that there was
that lock on the outside. He was also asked about the discipline during that interview and he says
that he has received several spankings before, both with a leather belt and with a jump rope,
and he stated that the spankings would take place in that room while he would be naked and bent over the bed and this is just heartbreaking but he says in one of those instances when he was
spanked it was so hard and it hurt so bad that he fell off the bed with all of this information
obviously detectives concluded that based on the testimony based on the evidence they had
there was absolutely probable cause to believe that the Ferreters, these two monster parents, willfully tortured, maliciously punished, or willfully and
unlawfully caged this young boy who is a child. So the next day on February 7th, both parents were
arrested for aggravated child abuse and false imprisonment. Now this is where you think this story would end. Case closed. It is not even close to being the end of it, guys. We are just getting
started and you're going to see why here in just one second. Good morning, ma'am. You are charged
with, I guess it's false imprisonment and cruelty, aggravated child abuse and false imprisonment.
Those are the charges
you're arrested for obviously your lawyers here with you let me hear from
the state child I'm asking for a hundred thousand count two I'm asking the court
to find probable cause for kidnapping not false imprisonment Florida Statute 787.01 says it is kidnapping if the act is
done to inflict bodily harm or to terrorize the victim. Clearly this is
terrorizing the minor R.F. I'm asking you to hold her no bond under the kidnapping on
count two. Further, I'm asking for no contact with the co-defendant, her husband.
No contact with the victim minor, RF.
No contact with their other three minors, PF, FF, NF.
And no contact with anyone under the age of 18.
I think they're a danger to all minors in the community.
All right, I mean obviously Jupiter Police Department sought an arrest warrant for
aggravated child abuse and false imprisonment.
However, Judge, I find that people do not understand the kidnapping statute at all.
Are you suggesting that Detective Jupiter didn't understand the statute?
I'm suggesting that even attorneys don't understand the kidnapping statute. Okay. Anyway, counsel, good morning. So, by the way,
I'll let you know I read your stuff. Thank you. The flip side to that, though, isn't that sort of
a double-edged sword? Because there could be other reasons why the child is acting out in that manner,
such as the treatment. So, but anyway.
Kelly King on behalf of Tracy Ferretta.
Your Honor, first to quickly respond to the state.
I was in contact with the detectives.
They were working with representatives from the state attorney's office.
So I think the charges were well contemplated before this morning,
as between her office as well as Jupiter Police Department.
Ms. Keene, before you start, by the way, state, is there any history you have?
No, Judge, I did not show one.
No criminal history? Okay.
Your Honor, one of the reasons, to your point, that I provided the materials to the court,
which is unusual, you can imagine, for a first appearance that we have the ability to communicate before the arrest,
that we have the ability to communicate before the arrest is that the police did not contact my office or these folks in order to learn the information that was
offered to them about this young man and so that's and I did it in a private
fashion knowing that he's he's a minor but from the materials you provided this
is not a simple story here and I think because of the presumption of innocence the lack of a prior record the charges even as they stand if the child is over the age of 13
it's a third degree felony on the false imprisonment charges so they the child
is 14 years five months today they have only been in Florida they lived in
Arizona for four years previously.
He's over the age of 13, which makes it a third-degree felony on the false imprisonment charge.
For that reason, I'm asking for the standard bond on both of these counts,
which would be $5,000 on the false imprisonment charge and $15,000 on a first-degree felony, as I understand it.
So $20,000 for both. As to, and this is important, Judge, I have the materials if you need this, there are dependency and shelter proceedings ongoing and I think, in fact there was a hearing this morning according to Mr. Jamison that, and that's why I'm requesting that any issue having to do with contact with these children be dealt with by judge bell in that how long have those proceedings been going since this arrest or since these allegations first came to light or what
since the allegations first came to light i think the 28th of january or 29th of january no later
than february 1st though as far as i know and i have them the order here you know there there
was a hearing yesterday or a meeting yesterday another one this morning there are all sorts of lawyers involved in that end so
I just don't want it to be complicated as far as if there's no contacts or
orders here for example their youngest child is two years old so they're all
all the children are being sheltered currently they are all being with them
actually according to mr. Jamison this morning they're still trying to determine they
they are uh either friends or relatives outside of the um you know outside of tracy and tim the
visits are supervised at this time i also wanted to point out for the court that several of the
ferrators community and neighbors and things like that from schools who know all four of these children and have seen
them including the complainant in this case recently out at a food truck event playing
soccer with their children so I think there's a lot in dispute as far as what this young man is
saying and the court is aware kind of of the the history of reactive attachment disorder
and other sociopathy so as far I'm asking that the
court defer to the dependency shelter proceedings I have the order if you wish
to see it and I gave the court the case number it is you know that that is going
to be going on for months as far as where these children will be and how
visitation is managed.
I'm assuming you've been in touch with the detectives and the state attorney.
Yes, well I attempted the state attorney several times. That's why out of frustration I sent
the materials to you in copying the state because they were not kind of responding to
my entreaties. But I will tell you this judge that the the
lawyer for the shelter proceedings is in close contact with my office because
obviously the children are not going back into this home at least under
strict restrictions from from that point all right mr. Gonzaga word criminal case
I'm asking the court for no contact for all these children it's different than All right, Ms. Duggan, final word? We now have a criminal case.
I'm asking the court for no contact for all these children.
It's different than a civil case.
And I think that as a victim of a crime, there should be a criminal no contact
order in place.
There should be no contact with these people under any supervision or
any manner whatsoever.
All right, ma'am you
were unemployed to work your husband work was he do and how long you lived
here in the county
okay you moved here from Arizona how How long had you been in Arizona? Four years.
You own your home here, right?
You own it.
Okay.
Your Honor, they were here, I believe, 16 years.
They were here in Jupiter 16 years, then Arizona for and came back.
Gotcha.
And to their credit, Judge, when I was talking with the detective yesterday,
I was asking just for the time to be able to get through the hearings
and visitation with the youngest child particularly because of his tender age.
So they've been very responsive to everybody as far as showing up.
So I'm assuming Judge Bell has dealt with the children and DCF is involved with the case.
Obviously, rather than just me enter a blind no contact
order I'm just going to defer to Department of Children and Families and
judge Bell and whatever water to say that whatever orders they have in place
regarding the children that's the orders you have to follow okay ma'am all right
you make an exception for the victim of this crime well I assume judge Bell's
doing it and I assume DCF is doing it how many people you know I don't want to step on
anybody's toes they've been working with the kids I trust judge Bell so I assume
she's handling that I just don't want conflicting orders flying all over the
place so there's a guardian I'd like him as well it is everybody has their hand
in this and it's it's ongoing all Alright. Alright, other than that, I am going to set a bond at 25,000
each count and order contact for DCF and for Judge Bell in
the dependency case. Other than that, good luck to you, ma'am.
Alright. I asked for no contact with COVID veterans. Right.
What criminal history does Mr. Ferrer have?
Judge, I didn't show a criminal history.
I'd like for the record to make my same argument that count two should be kidnapping under 787.011A subsection three, where the crime is done to inflict bodily harm or terrorize the victim,
where this victim, the minor, has clearly been terrorized for a number of years.
All right, once again, I'd rather go through it.
Sarah, I don't know if you could hear what happened with your wife?
Okay, so what I've ordered is that any contact with the children,
actually I'm ordering essentially no contact except as authorized by DCF or Judge Bell in the dependency case, okay? Whatever's going on with the kids,
those orders stay in place. Make sure you abide by them, all right? Thank you. Other than that,
I'm going to set bond at $25,000 per count. Good luck to you, sir. Thank you, Your Honor.
All right, take care. Thanks, Judge. All right. Good luck. Thank you.
So this last Wednesday, just a couple of days ago,
both parents ended up bonding out of the jail at approximately 7.30 p.m.,
and their next hearing is set for March 10th.
Those three other children had been removed from the home from the Florida DCF,
and the couple is actually not allowed to contact any of the children at all
unless it's authorized by DCF.
Now, usually with
these cases, we've seen it with the Turpin case, we've seen it with several cases, right? But
usually with these cases when the parents or whoever is holding this person or these children
in a dungeon or locking them in a room, generally we never hear from them as far as what their
reasoning was, as far as any motive behind it, because there
really is no reason. There's no excuse that anybody can give to make it okay. And very rarely do we
ever hear one. Usually it is, you know, they get arrested, case closed, they're locked up, they
don't talk, and that's that. Maybe they'll strike a deal, maybe they won't. But that's not what's
happening here. Because the defense attorney for these parents is speaking out.
And she is speaking out a ton.
She is sharing all of the details as to the why in this case.
Why he was isolated in that 8x8.
Why he was locked inside.
And she's saying that the root of this entire thing and why the parents did that.
And justifying why the parents did that and justifying why the parents
did that was to protect their other children from their 14 year old brother and not just to protect
their children but to protect the world the outside world from this 14 year old boy the parents
defense attorney nelly king writes an extensive and detailed letter outlining the details that she now requested be added into the file
and taken into consideration by the prosecution and the state
while they gather everything and look at all the evidence.
And a lot of this letter has been redacted because it can get vulgar,
because there are minors included,
but I'm going to read you a lot of the pieces of this letter,
and we're going to go through some of the key paragraphs that she outlines. So part of this letter includes her saying that there
are a number of issues you don't know about involving this boy particularly since the family
moved back to Jupiter after living in Arizona for four years. She goes on to describe an unruly and
out of control and a very destructive and cruel child and she says that he
has been that way since he was just two years old. She says there are numerous school records,
photos, psychological and medical files, and police reports which all serve to frame his account
in an entirely different light and apparently this documentation comes from multiple agencies
across two different states.
She says that there are longstanding dangerous and disturbing behavior that the boy has exhibited
in multiple schools, neighborhoods, and homes towards other children and adults over the course
of a number of years. There is documentation from teachers, school administration, law enforcement,
doctors, neighbors, and unknowing citizens who just
happened to cross paths with this 14-year-old boy. She says his behaviors and manipulation
will not end by just being taken away and that placement decisions of the other children should
be thoroughly considered before any of these minor children are housed with this 14-year-old boy.
She goes on to say that other people's safety,
including the siblings, has been jeopardized by his attacks, a number of which have resulted in
a serious injury. And in one instance, when he was quite a bit younger, he allegedly pushed somebody
so hard that she fractured her shoulder. And this is suspected to be one of his sisters.
and this is suspected to be one of his sisters. Then saying he got more violent and even more vulgar, stating that just a few years later after fracturing her shoulder, he attacked again another
female, punching her in the face into a marble window seal, saying that she had to go to the
hospital for her injuries. She goes on to say that as the years went by, this 14-year-old boy, much younger
at the time, tortured animals, yelled in class that the Holocaust was a good thing, and that all
immigrants are drug dealers, saying that the boy searched disturbing ways for girls to die using
school electronics, saying that he stole anything he could get his hands on, including numerous
school tablets,
money from other students' houses he entered after using a fake name,
and even money from the collection plate at church.
She then wrote that as he got older, his schemes progressively got more disturbing, more violent.
He dropped a heavy wooden door on somebody,
an early indication that his aggression would next turn towards somebody else. Then she
says by the time that the sibling was two years old, he was thrown off a bike by this 14-year-old
brother, causing facial injuries and more fear that this boy would continue to hurt schoolmates
and strangers. She says that there have been referrals from school teachers, and there's too
many to count, from multiple school districts that he
has been sanctioned by school administrators for punching cursing stealing destroying school
property putting a classmate against a wall while jabbing his finger and thumb into the boy's wind
pipe breaking and entering into school buildings and lying constantly when he was caught by teachers
for his misconduct.
Most recently, at the Independence Middle School, where police found,
the boy started as a new school by impersonating being a school evaluator,
secretly recording the other students, stealing phones, credit cards, and cash.
She says that the boy brings knives and weapons to school,
draws pictures of guns and artillery fire, roams the house terrorizing others at night, and fantasizes about killing people.
School authorities apparently recognized this at a very young age and it has been
thoroughly documented, saying that his targets have been many. This defense attorney Nellie
then ends this letter by offering to share material with law
enforcement and prosecutors to substantiate the patterns that she's outlining in this letter.
She also was offering to share efforts to help the boy and to protect his family. Now this just
kind of flips this entire case right on its head, right? Because first of all, regardless if he is truly a sociopath or psychopath,
who knows? Who knows if all of this is documented and true? But even so, what they put him through
is absolutely not the answer. You need to find a solution for the problem rather than trying to
contain the problem. And it's said that they have tried to get him psychological help,
medical help, and that it just doesn't work,
that he refuses, that it goes right back to square one.
So while I can appreciate and understand a parent's concern
for their other children's safety and the safety of others,
if this is in fact true, and if he is a violent person,
locking him in a room isn't going to solve
that. I would imagine that's just going to make this problem even bigger. That by locking him up,
he is going to become unruly, become angry, and become, I would imagine, pretty vengeful.
I'd imagine there would have been options for inpatient treatment or medication. Again, so many
of these details are just beginning to surface
that I'm sure that in the coming days we'll get a much clearer indication
of all of the avenues that were truly explored.
However, even again, going back to it,
even if he were the violent one and if all of these allegations are true,
not only does it not justify the treatment from the parents here,
but it also doesn't align with his outcry of the abuse.
Being thrown against the wall by his father, being spanked so hard that he fell off the bed, being forced to do housework if he wasn't locked inside the room, being forced to use the bucket.
That is much more in line with systematic abuse.
And clearly we see that the other siblings weren't dealing with any of that. So it wasn't the parents who are just these evil
masterminds and executing all of this on all of their children, like we saw in the Turpin case,
which if you aren't familiar with that, it's a few videos down. It's called the House of Horrors,
and it truly is the House of Horrors. But that's not what this was like it was their efforts
were targeted at a singular person now again we don't know about the other siblings and who was
a biological and who was adopted so could this have been a target because he was the adopted
son and not a biological son or could this have been the target because he was a troublemaker
and they thought that they needed to punish him or give him tough love again never
excusable not at all but I'm just trying to understand here a little bit what the reasoning
is here and why he was the one locked away so again typically we don't hear many things like
this in these cases because usually again it's indefensible and so for somebody to come back with any sort of defense they just don't because there's no reasoning but here they are coming back
with a mountain of reasoning and excuses and ultimately the defense attorney's job is to of
course get this in front of the jury either get the charges dismissed or get them acquitted and
protect her clients so you don't know what's exactly true or not.
Until we get concrete evidence of these reports in black and white that they say were filed with
the schools, with the doctors, and all of these people, then we'll know what's true or not. But
again, that still does not justify or excuse what they did to this 14-year-old boy. They took the
responsibility when they adopted him to be his guardians, to be his parents,
to teach him right from wrong, to help him, to love him, to nurture him. There were a million
different options that they could have done besides what they chose to do. And so regardless
of his behavior, they should be held accountable. Now, what do you guys think about this case?
What have you heard? Because again, it took me some digging to get this whole piece from the defense attorney
because everywhere else on all of the media outlets,
although everybody's talking about it,
it's just painting one side of the story.
And so I'm interested to know,
now hearing both of those sides, what do you think?
And again, I know nobody's gonna say,
oh yeah, he deserved it
or they were trying to just protect their kids.
How do you think they could have handled it?
How do you think they should have handled it how do you think they should have handled it do you think those allegations are true to me it just
seems again more like systematic abuse um when just you know targeted at this one child of theirs
and i'm unsure why well i think we're gonna again start learning more and more as we peel this back
all right guys thanks for tuning in to another episode of Serialistly with me. Thanks for letting me break down another crazy true crime case with you. I just feel like
we're talking through it like besties. I really do. Before you head out, please don't forget to
just double check. Make sure that you are following along with the podcast so that you don't miss any
extra bonus episodes that I drop that are outside of the normal release schedule. And again, if you have an extra 30 seconds to spare, I would greatly appreciate it if you would just quickly rate and
write a review for the podcast. It helps support the podcast. It's a free way to do so and helps
push it out there so that more people get notified about it and know about this podcast and can be
besties with us and talk true crime with us. All right, guys, so until the next episode,
take care and I will be talking with you very soon. Bye guys. Thank you.