Some More News - SMN: One Year of Joe Biden
Episode Date: January 26, 2022Hi. In today's episode, we ask questions about Joe Biden's first year as president. Questions like, "What's his name?" and "How's it going, Joe?" Support SOME MORE NEWS: http://ww...w.patreon.com/SomeMoreNews We now have a MERCH STORE! Check it out here: https://www.teepublic.com/stores/somemorenews Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/some-more-news/id1364825229 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/6ebqegozpFt9hY2WJ7TDiA?si=5keGjCe5SxejFN1XkQlZ3w&dl_branch=1 Stitcher: https://www.stitcher.com/show/even-more-news Soundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/somemorenews Athletic Greens is going to give you an immune-supporting FREE 1 year supply of Vitamin D AND 5 free travel packs with your first purchase if you visit http://athleticgreens.com/morenews today. Again, simply visit http://athleticgreens.com/morenews to take control of your health and give AG1 a try. Right now, when you purchase a 3-month Babbel subscription, you'll get an additional 3 months for FREE. That's 6 months, for the price of 3! Just go to http://BABBEL.com and use promo code MORENEWS. That's B-A-B-B-E-L dot com, code MORENEWS. Babbel—Language for life. Right now Trade Coffee is offering a total of $20 off your first three bags when you go to http://drinktrade.com/morenews. Executive Producer Katy Stoll (@KatyStoll). Written by Katie Goldin (@KatieGoldin). Directed by Will Gordh (@will_gordh). Edited by Gregg Meller. Graphics by F. Clint DeNisco. Head Writer - David Christopher Bell. Producer - Nick Mundy. Researcher - Marco Siler-Gonzales (@mijo_marco). Associate Producer - Quincy Tucker (@LTP313). Follow us on social media! Twitter: https://twitter.com/SomeMoreNews Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/SomeMoreNews/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/SomeMoreNews/TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@somemorenews Support the show!: http://patreon.com.com/somemorenewsSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Wow, welcome to news.
Hope you are well.
God, so much news all the time.
It's like they say, the news start coming
and they don't stop coming, you know?
Fed to the news and I hit the ground running and so on.
So much news is my point.
Down the news shoot every single day
and I don't even know where it comes from.
The news shoot just showed up one day
and well, my life has never been the same since.
I remember happier times, the taste of strawberries.
I think I had a family, had fun.
Didn't make sense not to live for fun.
Oh, hey now, more news.
Cody like news.
Ah, yum, yum, yum, yum, yum, yum, yum.
We have a new president. Oh, yum, yum, yum, yum, yum, yum, yum. We have a new president.
Oh, that's neat.
And apparently he's been the president for a whole year.
Wow, really that doesn't sound right.
But it's right here written on this paper that's blank.
Okay, well, I guess today we're going to look
into this so-called president
of one of the most powerful countries on earth
and find some stuff out.
For example, what is his name again?
And also, who is he?
What's he done in his first year?
What hasn't he done?
Did he keep his campaign promises?
But mainly, what was his name?
Snow lion?
Toe biting!
There's a B in there. Hold on hold on let me i'm gonna just who is
president america safe search off and uh oh oh wow you may recall i uh you guys have been trying to convince me that I am Bernie Sanders. I'm not. I like him,
but I'm not Bernie Sanders. Look, I didn't overpromise, but I have probably outperformed
what anybody thought would happen. So get this. The president of the United States is Joseph
Robinette Biden Jr. And it turns out he's been doing all kinds of stuff
for an entire year.
And he's actually giving a speech
as we were recording this episode
about how well he thinks he's been presidenting.
A speech that we sure didn't have time to watch
before making this, you know, because of the way time works.
So we absolutely reserve the right to film pickups
or awkwardly add clips later in post-production.
So don't be shocked if we do that, all right?
I warned you, you've been warned.
Anyway, you know, I guess someone has to talk
about his first year,
because people have been generally quiet
about this Biden fellow since he took office.
His accomplishments, his uncomplishments,
his general vibe have all kind of flown under the radar,
unless you're Fox News,
in which case he's an authoritarian commie
trying to force you to go to a doctor or something.
Heck, since he became president,
we really haven't even done an episode just about him.
And partially, this is due to the fact
that we're all just so very tired
of thinking about the president.
Because of that bad one from before, you know the guy.
Trump was like this circus gibbon,
constantly screaming and shitting and throwing his shit
and humping piles of his own shit
to the point that nobody could look away.
So when you suddenly close
the screaming shit fucking gibbon exhibit
and replace it with like a sleepy goat, it may be a relief.
Maybe you don't even want to hang out
at the zoo anymore at all and go do something else.
So everyone just moved along and ignored the fact
that this sleepy goat still very
much holds all of our fates in its cute little hooves. Oh, goat president, look at you, you little
guy. Glad you're out there making the world better. No, bad goat president. Oh, naughty. Oh,
but look at his little bloodstained hooves. Who's a good bloody goat?
It's you, it's you, it's him.
Unfortunately, Biden doesn't quite have the charisma
of blood goat president,
who might've actually just been Satan, I think.
His current polling numbers are super not good.
Yes, he certainly won by the most votes
ever cast for a president,
but like it still really shouldn't have been
as close as it was,
you know, because of all the obviously bad things Trump did.
And so it seems like the people who did vote for Biden
didn't particularly like him.
His best quality was that he wasn't Trump,
which is a precarious starting point.
And so we let him run the country with the hope
that he'd like do something good,
perhaps in a way that would steer us away
from the next election,
just being a return of Trump or a Trump like figure.
And so this is why we really need to steer our attention
back to the president.
Much like he himself is doing in his recent speech.
We too are going to take an unflinching look
at how Biden is doing in his first year.
So let's begin.
No pulling punches.
Who's even gonna care, right?
Statistically speaking, if you're watching this,
you probably don't love Biden.
He doesn't really have that obsessive Trump base.
There are no Biden mega fans
or people going to door to door proselytizing
how great he-
I wonder who that could be.
I didn't order pizza and I'm not in a pornography yet.
Let me slowly get up and answer the door.
Hello, Mr. Cody.
You didn't answer the door, so I threw myself through the window.
What are you doing?
Hi, Wormbo.
Yeah, we were just recording an episode about...
Sounds fun!
One year of Joe Biden.
Oh, yay! A Mr. President Biden episode! Yay!
Yeah! Yay!
Listen, Wormbo, this isn't necessarily going be the most flattering look at your buddy, Joe Biden.
So you might want to...
You're not gonna leave, are you?
Wormbo knows his best friend, Mr. Cody,
will be fair to his best friend, Joe Biden.
Seems ominous, but okay.
We're actually gonna start this off
with a look at some of the positive accomplishments
of the Biden administration.
And then, you know, maybe you'll get sleepy
and head out after that.
Wombo never sleeps.
Just run the next title.
The Good.
Yay, good Biden, good Biden.
Yes, good Biden.
It is important to pay attention
to the things that he's actually accomplished. Not only important to pay attention to the things
that he's actually accomplished.
Not only because it's good to see
where we've made progress and how,
but as proof that you actually can do things
as the president of a country,
which is important when holding presidents of countries
accountable for inaction.
You know, if we ever actually decide to do that someday.
Like if we had more than two political parties
and didn't have to base our vote off of who we think
eats the least amount of shit.
Like if accountability didn't basically amount
to knowing problems and yelling about them
with the hope that Democrats could do something constructive
besides just being the less evil option.
So fine, here's my fucking vote,
you least amount of shit eaters.
Just a thought.
For example, one of the immediate good things Biden has done
is simply reverse a lot of Trump's bad policies.
Biden signed 15 executive orders on his first day in office,
many of which addressed the terrible decisions
of the previous administration,
and has in the past year signed 76 total executive orders,
as well as a number of memos and proclamations.
He rejoined the Paris Agreement on climate change,
canceled the Keystone XL pipeline,
and signed legislation to regulate the emissions
of greenhouse gas methane from the oil and gas industry.
While these actions are, strictly speaking,
the bare minimum when it comes to reversing
our steady course towards climate disaster,
it's at least a reversal from the Trump administration,
whose approach to climate change
was to do it a lot and hotter.
Because again, all the Democrats have to be
is slightly better than furious malice.
He was a really good wrestling heel
for the left in this regard.
Like how in July of 2020, Trump ended a 17 year pause
on federal executions that resulted
in the deaths of 13 people.
Biden's justice department has since reinstated
that moratorium, which is good,
but also it's not so much progress
as it is just cleaning up after the last guy.
Biden also ended Trump's ban on transgender people
in the military, again, not a step forward
so much as a step not backward
from the previous administration.
Not saying it's not good he did this, obviously,
but it would be neat to lurch out of the stagnation
of simply playing tug of war with civil rights.
And in fact, that is happening to some extent,
as Biden has also directed federal resources
to help prevent violence against transgender women,
specifically having the Office on Violence Against Women
fund grants for transgender serving organizations.
The National Institute of Health
has also prioritized research on gender affirming procedures in order to improve standards for both physical and mental health.
And speaking of human rights, Biden also signed executive orders stopping the Muslim travel ban
and halted construction of the very expensive border cheese grater.
He also directed the DHS to begin uniting migrant families that were separated under Trump,
although not nearly as many as we need.
Not by a long ass shot of a butt.
Other Trump policies that Biden has reversed
is the 15,000 person cap on refugees allowed to enter
the US, which Biden increased to 62,500,
which he intends to raise to 125,000.
But more on this later.
Geez, what else?
Oh, he also freed up billions in disaster aid
that was meant for Puerto Rico
after the hurricane back in 2017.
So that's good.
Maybe we could have done that earlier,
but again, wrestling heel.
I hate to tell you, Puerto Rico,
but you've thrown our budget a little out of whack.
Today with storm preps underway,
he blasted the island as one of the most
corrupt places on Earth, adding, I'm the best thing that's ever happened to Puerto Rico.
Biden has also reversed Trump's attack on national monuments and native lands.
Trump had removed federal protections of New England's Northeast Canyons and Seamount's
Marine National Monument and Utah's Bears Ears National Monument and Grand Staircase-Escalante
National Monument, opening them tocase Escalante National Monument,
opening them to land development and mining.
This was opposed by conservationists
and Native American tribal groups
who pointed out that it was an attack
on their land and culture.
Biden restored the federal protections of these monuments.
So again, good in the sense
that he's not doing the explicitly bad thing.
But it's kind of like praising a babysitter
for not pissing directly on your kids.
But in his defense, Biden has done more
than just reverse some Trump era policies.
In terms of the environment,
he tightened fuel efficiency standards
so that by 2026, fuel efficiency will be nearly
one third higher than it is right now.
That's an actual campaign promise he followed up on.
And speaking of, he's also been addressing
his campaign promise of rebalancing the federal courts
after Trump appointed an astounding 30%
of federal judges during his term.
So I guess that's still a Trump issue,
but Biden has gotten more federal judge confirmations
at this point in his presidency
than any previous president.
His appointees are also far more diverse
by race, gender, and career experience,
including former public defenders, civil rights attorneys
and voting rights experts.
So that's good.
But also it turns out the Democrats are across the board,
just more likely to confirm a racially diverse group
of judges than Republicans.
Imagine that, wowee.
So it's all still kind of par for the course
for any Democrat in office,
which isn't to say that's bad.
There are even some things that Biden is doing
that aren't just business as usual.
And we can certainly talk about those
after we talk about these extremely good advertisements.
As we say in the professional ad biz,
slide these products inside of you.
Hey there, kids and kiddos.
I hope you are enjoying the video so far. I probably am, I think. of you. I bet. What's my secret? Well, aside from eating the cards to gain their power, I often use AG1
by Athletic Greens, the category-leading superfood product that brings comprehensive
and convenient daily nutrition to everybody. It's a drink, you see, a drink that takes all
of your usual daily vitamins and puts them all into one convenient and delicious place.
and puts them all into one convenient and delicious place.
Mmm, it's good.
It's like a super boost energy card for your stomach.
And if you've been eating your super boost energy cards like me,
it's great for digestion.
Did you know you're not supposed to eat them?
Who knew?
And who doesn't like good digestion?
Just one tasty scoop of AG1 contains 75 vitamins, minerals, and whole food sourced ingredients, including a multivitamin, multi-mineral probiotic greens superfood blend,
and more in one convenient daily serving. I really do love it. Instead of dealing with a
bunch of pills or worrying about every single meal, you can simply get her done with AG1.
or worrying about every single meal,
you can simply get her done with AG1.
That's it.
That's the slogan I'm going with.
And right now, Athletic Greens is going to give you an immune-supporting, free, one-year supply of vitamin D
and five free travel packs with your first purchase
if you visit athleticgreens.com slash morenewstoday.
Again, simply visit athleticgreens dot com slash more news
to take control of your health
and give AG1 a try.
Do it for Katie!
Hello there, my tiny
little Codys. As someone who speaks
for a living, language is like
very good thing.
It makes Cody able to say stuff
to you, and we like saying stuff
not just as a Cody,
but for all of the people.
So you could try Babbel, an easy and affordable way
to learn a language online.
That way you also say stuff in other languages
to make your speaking better.
Babbel has many lessons that were created
by more than 100 language experts,
and that's a good thing, Cody think.
They cover 14 different languages,
including Spanish, French, Italian, and German.
So many ways talk.
They have a speech recognition technology
that helps you to improve your pronunciation and accent
so you know our good talk.
You also get access to podcasts, games, videos, stories,
and even live classes.
Cody likes using them to learn good speaking.
And right now,
when you purchase
a three month Babbel subscription,
you get additional three months for free.
Cody think that's great.
That's six months for the price of three.
Just go to babbel.com and use promo code more news.
That's B-A-B-B-E-L.com, code more news.
Make your language good-ish, good now.
Make language, yes.
Okay, we're back and that was our final ad break.
If you don't count the other ad break,
we'll be doing in just a little bit.
So let's talk about some stuff Biden has done
that isn't just undoing the work of the previous guy.
Things that you could, perhaps if you want to,
call progress.
For starters, Biden's administration has actually shown
more backbone when it comes to breaking up mergers,
something that potentially could go against the norm for his party, which is largely split and often stagnant on this issue.
He appointed two major opponents to monopolies to his administration,
antitrust lawyer Jonathan Cantor as the Assistant Attorney General to the Justice Department's Antitrust Division,
as well as Lina Khan as chair of the Federal Trade Commission.
Cantor is a critic of big tech,
has fought on behalf of Google's competitors,
and has advocated for more aggressive monopoly busting
against tech companies like Google, Facebook, and Amazon.
Cantor is also a critic of the consumer welfare standard,
which is basically a measure
of whether a merger is good or bad
based on the effect of the prices
and availability of a product,
not on any other considerations such as the effect on the prices and availability of a product, not on any other considerations,
such as the effect on workers or public safety.
If antitrust regulators just apply
the consumer welfare standard,
they may only be ensuring cheap prices for products,
not good wages or treatment of employees
or quality of life for consumers and so on.
Lina Khan is a legal scholar and antitrust expert
who is also critical of the consumer welfare standard.
She wrote an essay in the Yale Law Journal
called Amazon's Antitrust Paradox,
which was highly critical of the way
that Amazon can skirt antitrust legislation
just by keeping prices down.
And that this is insufficient in measuring the harm
that a de facto monopoly like Amazon can cause.
The fact that Biden's appointees are critics of this rubric
is a potential huge step forward
in more aggressive antitrust enforcement,
which we desperately need right now.
You could say we're horny for it,
if you were some kind of pervert, which you are.
The reason I'm going into such detail
on these two Biden picks is that they represent
a significant change in combating mergers and monopolies.
In July, 2021, the FTC rescinded a 2015 policy
that limited their ability to enforce antitrust regulations.
This means that the FTC now has more fangs
when it comes to combating corporate monopolies.
So technically still a reversal of something bad,
but not a bad Trump thing.
So different, still good, but not forward good.
I don't know, regardless,
the FTC is already blocking mergers,
including the attempted merger of Penguin Random House
and Simon & Schuster,
and is suing to block the merger between Nvidia and Arm,
which would be the largest semiconductor chip merger
in history.
So again, not necessarily progress
so much as good appointees stopping a couple of bad things
packaged as progress.
Meanwhile, internationally though,
Biden is also making some changes.
And just to be clear, much of the following
is a lot murkier in terms of the good or bad label
we can put on it.
So maybe let's do a new title
card real quick and we'll call it, fuck, I don't know. The Good-ish?
Breaking news this morning out of Afghanistan. Sources say the U.S. is now completely pulling
out all U.S. personnel from the U.S US embassy in Kabul over the next 72 hours.
That is different from what we heard on Thursday
from the president who said some personnel
would be pulled out.
Oh yeah, remember that?
Seems so long ago.
So Biden did stick to his word
and pulled US troops out of Afghanistan,
which, you know, didn't go great,
but on a larger scale was absolutely something
we totally needed to do.
And you could argue that the only way the withdrawal
could have been less of a flustered clock
would have been if we had negotiated surrender
with the Taliban, perhaps admitted that the entire ordeal
had been a lost cause and actually prepared accordingly.
But of course, selling a total surrender to the Taliban
and abandonment of the Afghan government
would have been admitting that we actually lost
this 20 year war, which we did,
but which would also be a pretty hard sell.
We did a whole episode on this
and how the longer we stayed there,
the more the fuck ups just kept building
and the more humiliating withdrawal was gonna get.
So a lot was dumped on Biden's lap.
That said, super not gonna pretend like he nailed it either,
but more on Afghanistan later.
But hey, at least drone strikes are allegedly down,
which maybe you haven't heard about,
because weirdly they're not bragging about it.
The Biden administration has decreased the amount of freedom
the military has to order drone strikes,
requiring White House approval
for any strikes outside of active war zones,
which, wow, kind of wild that wasn't the case before,
but apparently Trump got rid of that rule
to do more murders,
which really sounds like something he would do.
Now, getting the exact numbers is actually quite difficult
because it turns out the military isn't too keen
on telling us how many things they've blown up
or if those things were civilians or not.
And geez, look at this.
Turns out Trump revoked a rule requiring the military
to report drone strike deaths.
Seems bad and like something we should change.
But it's true that from the information we do have,
drone and airstrike numbers were down in 2021
from what they were in 2020.
And that's good.
Except for all the stuff I just said
about how we don't really know the specifics and double Gs.
Maybe it would just be better
if the numbers were a bunch of zeros,
like double whopper with extra Gs.
Maybe I'm being an idealist here,
but perhaps someday we can have a president
who doesn't routinely kill anyone at all via sky robot.
Like maybe when the president claims
that the US is not at war for the first time in 20 years,
but still does like drone strikes
and has tons of military bases
and continues to sell weapons of war.
And again, still uses weapons of war.
Maybe the US is actually always at war
and claiming that we're not
because there's technically no official declaration
is a convenient lie to make us feel better.
But let's say these numbers are accurate and true.
Again, the strange part is that Biden hasn't been bragging
about doing less murder,
because that seems like a good thing to point out
when you're a president or when you're out on a date,
job interview, et cetera.
Unless the job is to murder people, I guess.
Maybe it's because he doesn't want to be seen as weak
for not murdering as many people as his predecessor,
or maybe he's planning to resume doing more drone strikes
after they review their policies
and somehow come to the conclusion
that more killing is good.
So maybe by bragging about doing less drone murder,
he would be admitting that drone murder in general is bad
and something that most other countries don't do nearly
as much as the US and by bragging about it,
people would start realizing this and thinking perhaps
we shouldn't do drone murder at all.
And we can't let that happen.
We already got the drones, but what would we do?
What would we do with all these extra drones lying around?
Aggressive gender reveal parties?
Biden also passed the $1.9 trillion COVID relief package
in the first few months of his term.
So like fucking almost a year ago,
which garnered wide approval.
Even 41% of Republicans
and conservative independents supported it.
Biden's child tax credit may help to cut child poverty
almost by half.
The obvious question is,
why don't we cut child poverty in whole, but then that would cut into our precious Oscar bait industry. But the
COVID relief package is truly a step forward. It breaks with decades of new Democrat orthodoxy
by having given out direct cash payments to most U.S. households instead of the cumbersome tax
rebates under Obama. Though you could also argue that Biden's package was a continuation of a
half-assed payment Trump started.
But anyway, the child tax credit
did not have work requirements.
Again, a break from democratic orthodoxy since Clinton.
And unemployment was not only extended,
but also topped up significantly.
It's actually pretty cool that the stimulus package
moved a couple steps away from the Democratic Party's belief
that people in need should have to jump, fetch,
and roll over for a scrap of welfare,
a philosophy that's held strong
since Clinton's welfare reform that ended cash assistance.
So there we go, the good and goodish stuff.
Yay, episode over.
Yeah, actually, we're now gonna move on to the ads,
just a few more ads, and then we're now gonna move on to the ads. Just a few more ads and then we're done with ads.
Oh, yay, ads.
Wombo loves the economy.
Of course he does.
Hey, are you tired of drinking lime juice
while taking a cold shower in order to shock your system
into waking up every morning?
Well, there's a solution for that.
It's called coffee,
and it's all the kids are talking about these days.
You take a bean, you grind it, pour some hot water on it,
and you got yourself one of these coffees.
I love it, you love it.
And now there's an even better way of getting it
with Trade Coffee.
Trade is a coffee subscription service that offers
both the freshest and ethically sourced beans
from America's best independent roasters.
They use the magic of something called the internet
to provide what the youth is calling a web page,
where you can take a special coffee quiz
that will match you with your ideal cup.
Their subscription service is designed
to be a no hassle experience
in that you can skip deliveries or cancel any time.
They'll even replace your first bag for free
if you don't completely love your experience.
All of this is why Trade has delivered
over five million bags of coffee so far,
and has been featured in Wired, GQ, and the New York Times,
which is what the children call a news paper.
And for our listeners and watchers,
right now Trade Coffee is offering a total of $20
off your first three bags when you go to
drinktrade.com slash more news.
That's drinktrade.com slash more news
for $20 off your first three bags.
So do it, go take the quiz at drinktrade.com slash more news
and start your journey to your perfect cup.
Ah, get on the coffee craze early and try trade.
Ah.
And we're back and there are no more ads left
and Warmbo is here and we just talked about
all the good things President Biden has done
in his first year. So many good things, and Warmbo is here and we just talked about all the good things President Biden has done in his first year.
So many good things, but Warmbo doesn't understand.
If we already talked about the good things
Joe Biden has done, then why is Mr. Cody
still making an episode?
Yeah, so hey Warmbo, can you hold this brick for a second?
Oh neat, Warmbo loves...
Mr. Cody, Warmbo is stuck under the brick.
Oh no, we better call someone to help you. Wombo loves... Mr. Cody, Wombo is stuck under the bridge. Oh, no.
We better call someone to help you.
But while I got you pinned down there and we wait for help...
The Bad.
All right, let's get into it.
Hey, how you doing down there, buddy?
Wombo kind of likes the feeling of being crushed.
Great, you chose the worst possible response.
Thanks for that.
So unfortunately, sometimes presidents don't do good things.
One could even describe these things as bad.
This can be from genocide on US soil,
to war crimes, to sex crimes,
to openly talking about doing a crime
while doing other crimes
on top of the crime you're talking about doing.
This is why maybe they should all go to jail
because historically and currently speaking,
presidents doing monstrous things
is about as American as apple pie.
God damn pie president.
This is why I voted for blood goat.
You see this gag headline is funny
because Biden ordered a pointless drone strike
while we withdrew from Afghanistan and killed 10 civilians,
including an aid worker, his family, and seven children.
Ha ha.
Remember that and how they lied about it and then got caught in the lie and had
to admit they killed those children.
And now the New York times even has footage of the drone strike that shows it
seemingly happening in a densely populated neighborhood that killed children and
civilians that no one got in trouble for doing.
Remember all that war crimes and civilians that no one got in trouble for doing? Remember all that?
War crimes and child murder and jokes.
Everyone's having a great time
except for those people who died.
And even funnier,
we aren't holding anyone accountable for killing them.
You get it?
You get the joke about how everything is bad?
But Mr. Cody, maybe you was just a little mistakey.
Oh no, my foot slipped.
You okay there, bud?
Yeah?
Got it right in your mouth there.
So as I was saying, it turns out
that there are other bad things
that have come out of the Biden administration
besides murdering a whole family in cold blood.
Biden has decided to continue some Trump era policies
that could be described as Trumpian,
except it's Biden doing it.
So I guess they're Bidenian now?
Take our immigration policy.
Please, no, really, please,
someone take away our terrible immigration policy
because Biden's not gonna do it, see?
Title 42 was a policy enacted by the Trump administration,
which uses public health as an excuse
to summarily expel asylum seekers
in violation of US refugee law without any due process.
It's really interesting that we have specifically
deemed asylum seekers as too risky in terms of COVID,
but still allow travel from basically all other countries.
And there are no vaccine or COVID test requirements
for domestic travel in the US,
even though we have the most recorded COVID cases
in the world.
It's like we're hypocrites or something.
Also, even the CDC themselves could find no reason
to have Title 42 in effect.
So hey, maybe it's just a shallow excuse
to kick out refugees trying to avoid being killed
in their home countries, maybe?
While perpetuating a narrative that immigrants are dirty,
unclean, you know, seems fucked up,
like the kind of thing we'd want to change.
And yet Biden's administration has continued this policy
with over a million deportations using Title 42
in the past year.
What this means is that if a refugee is fleeing
almost certain death by murder in their home country,
if they try to seek safety in the US,
they risk being summarily returned home
to probably be murdered.
This defies the Refugee Act of 1980,
which allows a refugee to set foot on US soil
to seek asylum.
And there's no other way to do it.
No way for a refugee to apply online for asylum
or while not on US soil.
So if they're immediately turned away or expelled,
that means they're not being given
their right to seek asylum.
So, you know, criminal, it seems,
both morally and legally.
But, but, but, but Mr. Cody friend,
Mr. President Biden friend said on his internet website,
joebiden.com slash immigration slash,
that he will welcome immigrants in our communities
and reassert America's commitment
to asylum seekers and refugees
and take urgent action to undo Trump's damage
and reclaim America's values.
Sure, man, but he's kept Title 42,
which expels refugees before they can exercise
their legal right to seek refugee status, so.
So maybe he just forgot it to get rid of it?
Actually, the Biden administration
has defended using Title 42.
Biden's Department of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas said,
We have the authority to expel individuals under the laws that Centers for Disease Control have.
It is their public health authority under Title 42,
and that is what we will bring to bear to address the situation in Del Rio, Texas.
Well, maybe it's just hard to get rid of because of laws.
Yeah, except the ACLU filed an injunction
to challenge the expulsion of asylum seekers under Title 42.
And in September, a federal judge granted them the injunction
and the Biden administration is appealing
the federal injunction that would have blocked Title 42.
So, you know.
But Wombo, no, understand, Wumbo feel funny.
Well, you know, maybe just close your eyes for a bit
and stop talking and moving and breathing
and then you'll feel better.
Anyway, there have been some things
the Biden administration has just kind of dropped the ball
on like a bit of an oopsie with forgetting to file
the paperwork for Biden's FDA pick,
which means they couldn't get
that confirmation until just this year,
which they finally did,
except it's all still pending a vote in the Senate
and we don't even have a date for that yet.
There's also the fact that Biden seems to have an obsession
with reaching across the aisle.
He desperately wants to work with Republicans
to get stuff done,
which feels like a humiliation fetish at this point,
like a puppet who gets off
on being crushed, I guess.
Because, you know, have you seen the Gop lately?
And by lately, I mean the last 30 years.
And yet Biden has stated he believes
that Trump was an aberration, although in fairness,
would end up walking that statement back.
Although in extra fairness, he seemed to walk it back
about voters, not the Republican party specifically. And so he still seems unwilling to take any major stance against a party that's
devolved into bizarre anti-vax politics and obsession over wokeness. Mr. Potato Head now
apparently has to go by Potato X. And the whole point of Mr. Potato Head is that you can move the
parts around. He was America's first transgender doll
and even he got canceled.
I think our society is reaching the point
of herd immunity with cancel culture.
And really it's not a culture at all.
It's a cult and it's a cult with no grace.
Right, while the COVID relief bill was being passed
by the Biden administration,
Republicans were busy discussing the finer points
of whether Mr. Potato Head's dick or lack thereof
will lead to the downfall of Western civilization.
These are the guys Biden takes pains to say he can reach.
Why can't we get some of that ornery Biden out here to go,
"'Listen, you horse ass donkey fuckers,
"'have fun arguing about putting little plastic dick
"'and balls on a potato while Papa Joe gives everyone
"'in America money and healthcare and shit.
Now, obviously Biden and the Democrats
can't ram any legislation they want through
because Senators Manchin and Sinema
are basically a Republican
and a hot topic Republican respectively.
But while it's true that reaching across the aisle
can get things done, the things that do get done
using this method are usually exceedingly pro-business.
The bipartisan infrastructure bill, for example,
did get passed, which seems like a victory
for the idea of working with Republicans.
But that kind of depends on how much you believe
in things like preventing climate change
from killing a bunch of people.
The infrastructure bill excluded the Build Back Better plan,
the thing Biden campaigned on.
And importantly, the bill fails
to address climate change significantly.
And by cutting out build back better,
misses out on major ways to cut emissions.
Rapid Energy Policy Analysis Toolkit calculates
a marginal reduction in carbon emissions
through the infrastructure plan
of 58 million metric tons by 2030.
Now this may sound like a lot,
but not when you look at what we should be doing
to keep the temperature from continuing to rise.
According to research by Stanford University,
University of East Anglia, and the Global Carbon Project,
one to two billion tons of carbon
must be reduced per year globally
to prevent an increase of two degrees Celsius.
Given that the US is responsible
for around 15% of global emissions,
let's see, I'm gonna do some math,
a little math, a little fake math,
gonna write some math on this paper, and it's real, don't worry. And the see, I'm gonna do some math, a little math, a little fake math. Gonna write some math on this paper and it's real.
Don't worry.
And the US at the very least needs to reduce emissions
by around 225 million metric tons per year
to prevent us reaching this two degree rise in temperature,
which means that figure of 58 million tons per eight years
is a little low.
But it's better than nothing or is it?
Because another estimate conducted
by the Georgetown Climate Center found a possible increase
in CO2 emissions if you account for the increase
in auto traffic that follows the expansion of roadways.
According to their research,
if we devote our roadway infrastructure dollars
to maintenance and low carbon investments
like electric vehicle charging stations,
then the infrastructure bill would reduce emissions.
But if these funds go towards building new roads
and adding lanes, it will substantially raise emissions.
So cool, no, opposite of cool, which is hot, very hot.
Two degrees Celsius hotter.
So I guess the question is whether it's worth it
to pass bipartisan bills when they don't address
existential matters of planetary destruction
or possibly maybe even accelerate our path towards them.
And I don't know, I'm just an artfully disheveled news guy
with my foot on a puppet,
but it seems like this strategy of reaching across the aisle
is not so good in the long run.
Maybe I'm being hyperbolic,
but there's this stereotype that the United States
doesn't negotiate with terrorists
because that would set a precedent
and encourage more people to use fear to get their way.
Not to call the GOP terrorists, you know,
even though they did try a coup.
But what I'm getting at is that at some point,
someone needs to put their foot down,
even if it means getting less done in the moment.
And when it comes to something as incredibly
existentially important as the fucking climate,
we kind of need a president who not only refuses to budge,
but is very loud and aggressive
about an extremely real problem
that most of America is becoming increasingly concerned over.
It should be all he talks about,
his build a wall number one big time priority.
That is assuming he actually gives a shit.
Because speaking of worsening the climate disaster,
the Biden administration was responsible
for the biggest sale of oil and gas drilling leases
in the history of the Gulf of Mexico.
While the administration argued
that they were compelled to do so by court order,
it turns out this isn't really true,
or if you prefer, it was a lie.
A memo by the Department of Justice revealed
that the Biden administration was not required
to make this huge sale.
The court order only lifted Biden's pause on new drilling, and it seems that the Biden administration was not required to make this huge sale. The court order only lifted Biden's pause on new drilling.
And it seems that the Biden administration took this
as an excuse to go, ah, heck, we can't stop all drilling.
Well, we might as well do one of the biggest oil
and gas auctions in history.
And so you really have to wonder if this effort
to reach across the aisle is actually just a really good way
for the Democratic Party to look like they're trying
without actually trying.
It's kind of like how they love propping up Manchin
as a single roadblock
when there's actually a handful of Senate Democrats
who quietly agree with his agenda,
but don't have to take the same heat as him.
It's the go ask your mother of political strategies.
The preferred perpetual stance of the Democrats
to act like things are simply out of their hands.
Elect Democrats to protect abortion rights, they scream,
while holding the motherfucking majority.
And while Biden might not be able to do
as much as we'd like,
he could at least call their stupid asses out,
make a stink and actually drum up a base
in a way that frankly, Trump was able to do.
Weird to invoke Trump as a positive model for something,
and I super apologize for that.
But if he was good at one thing,
it was branding his extremely stupid ideas
and actually influencing the ideology of his party,
regardless of whether or not they were able
to accomplish those things.
Publicly calling out and shaming the GOP members
who were blocking his agenda.
Mitch McConnell should have challenged that election
because even back then we had plenty
of material to challenge that election.
He should have challenged the election.
Schumer would have challenged the election.
But Mitch McConnell didn't have the courage to challenge the election.
He's only a leader because he raises a lot of money and he gives it to senators.
That's the only thing he's got.
That's his only form of leadership.
He should have challenged the election.
Albeit a very bad and wrong agenda.
Can't stress that enough.
Not saying Trump is good,
but what's to stop Biden from going on TV
and calling Manchin a coach-faced anus head
who is killing the planet?
Or going to town on the culture war obsessed GOP
for not giving a shit about the American people
during a global pandemic.
But again, that's assuming Biden actually gave a ghost
of a sliver of a turd about the fact
that the planet is dying,
or getting ahead of the pandemic,
or actually looking competent or good before the midterms.
After all, if the Democrats lose their majority,
then they get to comfortably act
like the country is once again out of their hands.
Nancy Pelosi can go back to making fiery clapbacks
instead of sweatily justifying her stock market scams
and responding to an attempted coup
with a performance by the cast of fucking Hamilton.
We're privileged to have a contribution
from one of the great creative talents of our time,
Lin-Manuel Miranda.
May his beautiful words be an inspiration to us.
Thank you to Disney's Hamilton's Lin-Manuel Miranda
for solving our crumbling democracy with a song.
Hey, pretty interesting that Nancy Pelosi
has stock in Disney.
I wonder what that's about.
Anyway, speaking of other embarrassing things,
sanctions in Afghanistan.
Remember how I said more in Afghanistan later, earlier?
I was referring to now earlier.
Might as well talk a bit more about Afghanistan,
the country we bombed a bunch and finally pulled out of
after years of making things worse.
And then never really admitted that we lost the war
and acted all surprised and shocked
when the Taliban took over.
Well, now Biden is punishing the civilians in Afghanistan
who have suffered the most during the war
with sanctions that are going to starve
a bunch of people to death.
The World Health Organization warns
that a million Afghan children may die of starvation.
And according to director of the Center
for Humanitarian Health, Paul Spiegel,
I can clearly state that if the United States
and other Western governments do not change
their Afghanistan sanction policies,
more Afghans will die from sanctions
than at the hands of the Taliban.
Worm, but you getting all this?
A million children may die because of Biden's sanctions?
Eh?
Boy, it feels good to just let all this out
in front of a crying pin down puppet.
What else?
Oh, COVID.
So the COVID relief bill was pretty good,
but heck, COVID's still around.
So we should probably do something about that, eh?
Maybe, eh?
Yeah, that was after all,
Biden's biggest promise of his campaign.
Oh, look at that.
Biden promise tracker, cute.
And it says it's in the works.
So hey, job done, show over.
Let's just for fun though, look into it a little bit.
So take our horrendous COVID testing situation, please.
See, I'm doing the-
The-
Any young men.
Thing, you know, again, where I wait to take my wife,
but I don't have a wife and instead want someone
to take away our terrible pandemic planning instead.
Do you get it?
Do you get the joke?
Warmbo, do you get the joke?
So yes, according to health experts,
at-home testing can help mitigate
the uncontrollable spread of COVID.
And it makes sense.
You might want to get a test
before you go visit your immunocompromised grandma
and kiss her directly on the mouth, tongue optional,
or talk to her even remotely in her vicinity
because Omicron spreads incredibly easily.
See that red line?
That's Omicron spiking straight up,
which is what epidemiologists call a vertical line,
or maybe that's geometry.
Anyway, it's bad.
And so Biden's gonna get us all free COVID tests, yaha!
Well, they promised that you could get a reimbursement
after you pay for at-home tests through your insurance,
who are famously very good at efficient
and reimbursing patients for costs.
Now, some pointed out, hey, maybe that's not a great idea
for A, the millions of people who don't have insurance,
and also the many people who can't afford to wait
for some far away reimbursement.
And we should just distribute them for free,
which led to this very chef's kiss exchange.
Tongue optional.
Why not just make them free and give them out
and have them available everywhere?
Should we just send one to every American?
Maybe.
Then what happens if every American has one test?
How much does that cost and then what happens after that?
All I know is that other countries seem to be making them available in greater quantities
for less money.
Well, I think we share the same objective, which is to make them less expensive and more
accessible, right? Every country is going to do that differently.
Ha ha ha ha ha!
What?
You want us to send out free tests to everyone so people could easily get tested for COVID
for free?
A scoff to you, I say!
Think of the cost!
Where would we get that kind of money?
From our military budget, which has ballooned to $740 billion?
Bah!
Probably, I guess.
And you think this would help stop COVID
and would actually be far less complicated
than a delayed reimbursement scheme?
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.
Yes, actually that does make perfect sense.
But you know, every country does it differently, you see.
What, are we gonna be posers and copy another country?
No, sir, we're gonna do it our way, a less good way.
In fact, the current shortage of tests
is not being seen in Europe,
where according to the New York Times,
rapid testing is widely available and inexpensive
thanks to government subsidies.
People can visit testing sites
like tents outside pharmacies in France
or abandoned nightclubs in Germany
and get tested at no charge.
Many people also keep tests in their homes
and self administer them.
So why can't we have that here?
Well, the fact is we can,
and Biden could make that happen
if Biden signs an executive order reclassifying COVID tests
as a public health tool.
European suppliers could sell their surplus of tests
to the US.
Even Boris Johnson's UK was able to send out free tests
to their citizens.
There's no reason that the US couldn't.
Oh, right, that.
Our healthcare system, a woven patchwork of scabs, spiders,
and dead leaves is really bad.
And COVID makes it really obvious how bad it is.
That and all the people dying of preventable diseases
before COVID, but you get it.
If only we had a president willing to embrace change
in our healthcare system.
Do we have one of those?
No?
Okay, good to know.
It's just too darn expensive,
says the president of a country
that spends 5 billion a year on tanks
that the army has repeatedly said it doesn't need.
So yeah, here we are, squarely in hell,
and that episode where White House Press Secretary
Jen Psaki scoffed at sending out free COVID tests sure touched a nerve with a lot of people.
And the outrage over that press conference may have put pressure on the Biden administration
to actually commit to giving out free COVID tests starting the end of last year.
So I'm announcing today the federal government will purchase one half billion, that's not million, billion with a B,
additional at-home rapid tests with delivery starting in January. We'll be getting these
tests to Americans for free, and we'll have websites where you can get them delivered to
your home. We've arranged for it to be easier for you to find a free COVID testing site near you on Google.
Just enter COVID test near me on the Google search bar,
and you can find a number of different locations nearby where you can get tested.
We're going to continue to use the Defense Production Act, as we did earlier this month,
to make sure we're producing as many tests
and as quickly as possible.
The bottom line is it's a lot better than it was,
but we're taking even more steps to make it easier
to get tested and get tested for free.
So that's cool, but also kind of late,
given that we've already endured the huge spike
in Omicron cases, and by the time the tests are distributed,
we may well be over the spike, but hey,
they started giving the tests out this week.
So that's good.
I mean, good unless you live in an apartment
or there's more than four people in your household
or if the pandemic started a couple of years ago.
So basically the White House was able to look
like cruel idiots and then half admit they were wrong
and then kind of help.
But hey, Poe buddies Nerf it.
And listen, Mac, you can just Google it, you know?
An official White House statement explains,
"'We have arranged for it to be easier for you
"'to find a free COVID testing site near you on Google.
"'Just enter COVID test near me in the Google search bar
"'and you can find a number of different locations nearby
"'where you can get tested.'
"'I'm sorry, you arranged for the search term
"'COVID test near me to give results "'reflecting the search term COVID test near me to give results reflecting the search term?
You needed a special deal for that?
Anyway, thanks for explaining how Google works.
We all definitely didn't know that
before you posted that statement.
But sure, honestly, better late than never.
Well, some of it is still never,
like a rapid COVID test developed just weeks
into the start of the pandemic
that never received FDA approval
because of excessive red tape.
And again, this could be solved by an executive order
reclassifying the test as public health tools
and heck, maybe some better leadership at the FDA.
Oh, right, that thing.
Also, quite frankly,
some things are simply not better late than never.
Like how we're now finally investing
in vaccine plants overseas long after so many people
have already died.
Boy, it sure appears that there are things
that this Biden fellow could really be doing better
and sooner.
And geez, gee, gee, weasel, in fact.
Maybe we should talk about that a little bit more.
What could he be doing, but isn't doing,
and what can a president do anyways?
Sometimes what a president doesn't do
can have just as many dire consequences
as what a president does do.
Right now, Roe v. Wade is under attack in the courts
and in a perilous position
given Trump's conservative judicial appointments.
While you could blame Hillary losing for this
or Susan Sarandon for existing, I guess,
or Ruth Bader Ginsburg not retiring under Obama,
Obama himself backtracked on a promise to secure Roe v. Wade.
During his campaign, he said he would sign
the Freedom of Choice Act, a bill that would have prohibited
federal, state, and local governments from interfering
with a woman's right to choose whether or not
to have an abortion.
Obama promptly broke his promise and said the bill
wasn't his highest legislative priority.
And now here we are with bounties on people's heads
if they help a woman seek an abortion.
In 2008, Obama was elected
and he had a filibuster proof majority
in the Senate and the House.
So it doesn't seem like there was much stopping him
from trying to pass the bill.
Maybe Obama was afraid of the backlash from conservatives he'd receive if he'd signed the bill.
But on the other hand, he received backlash for what kind of mustard he'd put on his suits or whatever.
So I'm not entirely sure the Democratic presidents should always operate based on avoiding backlash from conservative pundits.
And you see the resounding effects of lack of action,
where now it may be too late to save Roe v. Wade
from being torn apart during a later presidency.
So the things Biden fails to act on now
may not be noticed until years from now,
but still profoundly matter.
It is true, however, that a president's powers are limited.
It's kind of a funny little paradox.
The executive branch could unilaterally
order a nuclear strike,
something maybe we should, you know, look into, perhaps, maybe that's a little bad,
but they can't unilaterally pass legislation,
which is good because you don't want a dictator.
Checks on presidential power by a representative body
are good.
What's bad is that our electoral system
isn't very democratic.
Hello, Wyoming, which has 70 times
the proportional senatorial power as California, et cetera.
So when you have a Senate and House
that heavily leans conservative out of sync
with the political alignment of the population,
a minority of the population can overrule
the policy desires of the majority,
even with a president who wins both the popular vote
and the electoral vote, which doesn't even always happen.
Hello again, people in Wyoming,
whose votes in a presidential election
are worth four whole Californians, huzzah!
But this isn't about America's most squarest state.
It's about Joe Biden, America's squarest president.
So what can a president actually do on their own?
Over time, this has actually changed.
Article two of the constitution sets and limits
what a president can do,
and yet is surprisingly brief
at only a little over a thousand words.
And it's just vague enough that it's open
to different interpretation over time.
Presidents can expand their powers during times
of emergency, real or imagined.
Boy, seems like you could define something like
climate change as one of those emergencies,
or you know, the pandemic.
During World War II, FDR was able to greatly expand his power
through War Powers Acts.
FDR in general often tested the bounds
of presidential power.
Presidential power researchers believe
that FDR's fireside chats were integral
to keeping FDR popular and helping justify his expansion
of presidential powers.
These addresses during which the president would speak
to Americans through a radio program,
peaked in listenership after Pearl Harbor with nearly 80% of Americans tuning in to listen.
While FDR's expansions of his powers is often viewed as justified,
except for the whole concentration camps for Japanese Americans thing,
you can also see how a president who is similarly charismatic with high viewership ratings
can test these presidential norms in a frightening way, like Trump, who used Twitter as his direct line
to his followers and called a national emergency
in order to push through construction of his border wall
without congressional approval.
And of course, in the time between FDR and Trump,
there have been plenty of presidents
who have expanded executive power.
Remember 9-11, or did you forget 9-11?
Holy shit, you forgot 9-11 for a second, didn't you?
You make me sick.
Well, the panicked aftermath of 9-11
granted Bush the opportunity to greatly expand his powers,
which has remained true for Obama, Trump, and now Biden.
This expanded the president's military powers,
established the Department of Homeland Security,
which consolidated the powers of 22 separate agencies,
allowed the president to create
the Guantanamo Bay Detention Center
and the endless detention, torture,
and lack of fair trials that followed.
But at least Guantanamo Bay is closed now.
It's not.
But Mr. President Biden said he would, Mr. Cody.
Well, he didn't.
And in fact, the Pentagon just invested $4 million
toward keeping it open.
Did you hear about that, Warmbo?
Hey, Warmbo, did you hear?
Did you hear what I just said?
Why are your tears green?
Nevermind that.
So presidents can also use executive orders
with varying degrees of success.
Bush opened Guantanamo Bay with an executive order.
Obama started DACA with an executive order.
And Trump did the travel ban of people from majority Muslim countries using an executive order. Obama started DACA with an executive order. And Trump did the travel ban of
people from majority Muslim countries using an executive order. But executive orders can be
challenged in courts if they overstep the judicial branch's interpretation of the Constitution.
And they can be reversed by the next president, like what Biden is doing with many of Trump's
executive orders. A president can also sign an executive action, which sounds similar to an
order, but it's a lot weaker.
Executive orders are legally binding
until overturned by the courts.
Executive actions are not legally binding
and more like a stern warning by the president
to do this thing, Jack,
but the federal agencies directed to do it
don't legally have to follow through.
Another question is what presidents should and shouldn't do
in terms of exerting executive power.
Ruling by a formal decree and breaking previous norms
doesn't always make for an effective presidency.
Trump was great at marketing himself to his base,
but terrible at actually getting legislation passed.
His lasting impact comes instead through other actions,
such as how thoroughly he filled the federal courts
with his choice of shitty judges,
his massive tax cut to the wealthy
that redistributes wealth to the wealthiest, and the way he led the political philosophy of the
right completely off the rails. More completely off the rails, I mean. So what can and can't Biden
do? And what should he be doing that he isn't doing? One thing he could do, but isn't doing,
is, you knew this was coming, cancel student debt. This is a situation in which an executive order
would be powerful as Biden could forgive the debt owned
by the federal government.
This accounts for 92% of total student debt
and would make a huge difference
for people drowning in student debt,
specifically people in low income households,
depending on the specifics.
But would this get struck down in the courts?
Not necessarily.
A report by the Great Democracy Initiative
looked into laws surrounding eliminating student debt
and found the Higher Education Act
grants the education department
the authority to compromise, waive, or release
any claims it has against student debtors,
and that administrative student debt cancellation
of any ambition would be most efficiently accomplished
with a president fully committed to the project.
Importantly, courts may not be able to strike it down
given that there would need to be an actual plaintiff
that could claim they were harmed by the executive order.
Currently, Biden has frozen debt repayment until May,
after previously saying he'd end the freeze in February.
But he so far hasn't kept his promise
to forgive $10,000 per borrower in student debt.
Mostly, he's been trying to enforce
previous debt forgiveness programs
that were already enacted,
such as the debt relief program
for borrowers with disabilities
who have not been receiving the loan forgiveness
they were entitled to.
But he hasn't started any new debt forgiveness initiatives,
which may be due to his own lackluster feelings
on the matter.
During his campaign,
he undercut Warren
and Sanders' debt relief promise of $50,000 and over per borrower, promising only $10,000, which,
as I just mentioned, hasn't happened yet. Student loans are crushing my family,
friends, and fellow Americans. Me too. The American dream is to succeed, but how can we
fulfill that dream when debt is many people's only option for a degree?
We need student loan forgiveness beyond the potential $10,000 your administration has proposed.
We need at least a $50,000 minimum.
What will you do to make that happen?
I will not make that happen.
Or, here's an idea.
Instead of a complicated program of working off debt with volunteering or means testing it
until everyone's so confused,
nobody even knows how to apply for forgiveness,
just like that debt relief program
for people with disabilities we talked about,
what if you just forgive the debt with an executive order
and tax the wealthy more,
if you're worried they'll benefit from forgiveness too much
or you know, that whole complicated thing you mentioned
with working in a battered women's shelter or so on.
I do think that in this moment of economic pain and strain that we should be eliminating
interest on the debts that are accumulated, number one. And number two, I'm prepared to
write off the $10,000 debt, but not 50. Mr. President, let me ask you.
Because I don't think I have the authority
to do a place on the pen. And the thing I do in terms of student debt that's accumulated
is provide for changing the existing system now for debt forgiveness if you engage in volunteer
activity. For example, if you were, if you're teaching school, after five years, you'd lose you have $50,000 of your
debt forgiven if you worked in a battered women's shelter, if you worked and so on.
So you'll be able to forgive debt.
Thirdly, I am going to change the position that we have now to allow for debt forgiveness, this is so hard to calculate, whereby you can now,
depending on how much you make and what program you saw, you can work off that debt by the
activity you have. And you cannot be charged more than X percent of your take home pay so that it
doesn't affect your ability to buy a car, own a home, et cetera.
Why would you have the authority to sign off $10,000 in debt
but not 50,000?
Is there some law that puts the cap
on all debt forgiveness at 10,000?
No?
So you just don't want to because you say so?
This doesn't even make sense
if you think he's trying to avoid bad politics.
Some form of student loan forgiveness is wildly popular
with over 66% of Americans supporting it.
And with 77% of Democrats and 50% of independents
supporting student debt forgiveness up to $50,000
for people making up to $125,000.
So the only reason for Biden to not do it
is because he doesn't really want to.
Maybe it goes along with his tweeted theory
that I know Americans aren't looking for a handout.
They just want a fair chance to get ahead.
And I'll work every day to make sure folks get that chance.
What do you mean Americans don't want handouts?
Because we put money into the government.
So any money we get back from the government
is just getting our investment back.
And if these polls are to be trusted,
we want our investment put towards saving people
from drowning in interest accruing debt
for the rest of their lives.
But maybe Mr. President Biden secretly wants to,
but he can't because-
Nope.
Because the Republicans-
Nope, this is something he could do on his own.
But maybe, maybe our evil witch
cursed Mr. President Biden
that if he forgives student loan debts,
he would explode.
Sure, bud.
Yeah, no, that's probably it.
What Biden can't do is something like end the filibuster,
which allows the minority party to stop bills
from being passed unless there's a 60 vote majority.
Biden doesn't have the power to get rid of it himself,
as this is an act that Congress would have to pass,
and is currently being held up by Manchin and Sinema
and the aforementioned secret cowardly senators
hiding behind them.
Even with the combined force of people
like former presidents, Bill Clinton, Obama, and Oprah,
even Tim Kaine is trying to convince these clowns.
And that guy is hardcore.
Tim Kaine, ah, Tim Kaine in the membrane.
Tim Kaine in the brain. Tim Kaine in the brain.
Boy, do they love that guy.
So what could Biden do?
Well, he could try to use his bully pulpit
to call out Manchin and try to convince him,
but this runs the risk of Manchin getting pissed off
and switching parties.
And Manchin is openly being courted
by Mitch McConnell to do so,
as that would make old Jally McFacemelt leader of the Senate.
And while the filibuster remains in place,
more ambitious changes like adding seats
to the Supreme Court wouldn't get past the Senate.
And while a president can pressure justices to retire,
they can't make them.
And while Biden could try to convince Justice Stephen Breyer
to retire during his presidency,
Breyer has no obligation to do so
and may resent being asked to.
But again, do we really want to be held hostage like this?
And is it better for Biden to actually call this bullshit
out despite that possibly getting less stuff
immediately done or hurting someone's feelings?
Or does Biden even really care?
Because even with these kinds of roadblocks,
there may still be ways he could use his influence
to shift the stance of the Democratic Party from always
being in retreat to actually helping promote a left-wing philosophy. Passing legislation is an
important part of a presidency, but almost equally important is shaping the tenor of the party,
being a communicator, a leader. Despite passing legislation, including popular bills like the
COVID relief package, Biden's popularity has fallen. Six in 10 people cite their discontent
as believing Biden accomplished little or nothing.
Clearly Biden's marketing of himself is not working
and he can't rely on the media to prop him up.
He's neither flashy nor outrageous enough like Trump was
to merit constant free attention.
He's simply old and tired,
nor is he a media darling with vague analysis such as,
if you'd passed your bill 16 days ago, it would be more effective.
On sort of the reality check inside the White House. Look, yesterday, that event,
I'll be honest, it felt like, it just felt like an event out of time. That event might've been impactful in August or September or October.
It feels more like an epilogue to the ending
of what's going to, might not be a good story
for Democrats in 2022.
Thanks, Chuck.
Great stuff.
One thing Biden could do is learn from past presidents
like FDR or, you know, Trump.
While FDR and Trump are about as far away from each other
on the political spectrum as you could get,
other than the concentration camps they both did,
what they do share, other than the concentration camps,
was their ability to personally appeal
to the American public.
The fireside chats that FDR did were unprecedented.
They weren't like a typical formal presidential address,
but a comforting presence of someone talking to you
like a friend.
Similarly, Trump's Twitter feed didn't read like a president's so much as it did WeedGoku69's,
the dude you'd get teabagged on Call of Duty with,
which while stupid was still an effective way
to reach his base.
Or if done well, this is a way to reach
even outside your base.
Trump's strategy obviously didn't work as well as FDR's
as FDR was a four-term president
and Trump was a one-term loser president.
But Biden could learn his lesson from both of them
and try to do a modern version of the fireside chat.
Unfortunately, this requires, aside from not being tired,
a savviness for how to go viral
and pick up the attention of the public,
while also being relatable and charming,
which Biden doesn't excel at.
In an election where people were simply desperate
to get rid of Trump,
it sure would have been neat to have a candidate
with some kind of passion
that would lead us into the midterms
and ensure we could keep all the Trumpism from returning,
possibly in the form of literally Trump,
since we never did bar him from running again
despite the multiple impeachments.
It's almost like this dispassionate moderate Biden fellow
shouldn't have been the person that the party got behind
in the primaries in the first place,
but geez, who could have seen that coming?
Look, I know it's sort of too late now
and I'm not trying to blow my own extremely robust horn,
but seriously, how wild is it that after the most partisan
and toxic Republican president,
the Democrats thought it would be good to counter them
with a man pathologically plagued with this rhetoric
about getting stuff done with the GOP.
And despite Mitch McConnell's statements
that he's going to stop all of Biden's agenda,
Biden somehow remains optimistic saying,
"'Look, he said that in our last administration
"'with former President Barack Obama,
that he was going to stop everything
and I was able to get a lot done with him.
And yet today, here he is saying the complete opposite
as if he was blindsided by this.
I did not anticipate that there'd be such a stalwart effort
to make sure that the most important thing was
that President Biden didn't get anything done.
Holy mother of shit.
The vice president of a guy who was perpetually stonewalled
by the GOP is saying he didn't expect this extent
of Republican obstruction.
The Republicans who have continuously told him
they would specifically block everything he tried to do.
Are we really hearing that correctly?
He's like the manager of every new Jurassic Park, swearing that this time they won't get their staff eaten
by ancient lizards.
Charlie Brown taking a kick at that football again
and again, even after Lucy says to his face
that she's gonna swipe it away.
An obvious clown shit fantasy
that everyone else can see except for him.
It makes my eyes well up with rage blood
just thinking about it.
I can feel it.
I can feel the blood right now.
Is he constantly hallucinating?
Or perhaps does Biden actually just like not give a shit?
Or rather, is this actually what he wants?
Is the entire Democratic Party secretly in favor
of perpetually being the party of protest?
The oppressed always on the ropes,
crushed, if you will, by the rock that is the Gap.
And I say to my Republican friends,
take back your party.
The country needs a big, strong Republican party.
Here I say that as a leader in the Democratic Party,
but we need a big, strong Republican party.
You've done so much for our country.
Does it?
Really?
We need a strong Republican party
to stop everything the Democrats say
they want to accomplish?
I tell you, if I was in some sort of drawn out battle
to do things I think are good,
and there was another group of people trying to stop me
from doing those good things,
and in fact, doing bad things instead,
I would actually want them to be pretty weak.
But sure, yeah, no, let's have a strong Republican party
to represent some kind of very valid political philosophy. Controversy once again surrounding North Carolina Congressman
Madison Cawthorn tonight as he doubles down on his comments about the 2020 election being rigged
and stolen. And all this while investigators right now are looking into the calls that he's made
during the January 6th riot at the U.S. Capitol. Fox 46's Ryan Krueger joins us live tonight with
the story. Ryan, do we know right now what investigators are looking for specifically?
Yeah, so Cawthorn is one of nearly a dozen Republicans who had their phone and social
media records subpoenaed. That is according to reports out there. Now, the House Select
Committee that's investigating the January 6th riots is looking to see if any of those Republicans, including Cawthorn,
played any kind of a role leading up to the violence of that day.
Ladies and gentlemen, please welcome Congressman Madison Cawthorn.
In his short time in office, Asheville Republican Madison Cawthorn has made a name for himself as a conservative firebrand.
I sent you a text shortly thereafter and said, listen, I'd like to go on because the way
I phrased things yesterday, it was sloppy and it was frankly dumb.
I don't buy that.
Yeah, 100% of my focus is on stopping this new administration.
Huh.
Maybe she just means she wants Republicans to go back to being the party of Reagan.
Last night I tell you to watch that thing on television
that I did.
Yeah.
To see those, those people in those African countries.
Damn them, they're still uncomfortable wearing shoes.
So yeah, return to a strong, normal Republican party,
I guess.
The thing is, Pelosi is right
in that the Republican party is changing.
While Trump certainly wasn't an aberration
and more like the inevitable result
of where the Republican party had been going,
he did signal a paradigm shift
towards breaking norms, cues, anti-vax, et cetera.
But it seems like Republicans and Democrats
are responding to this shift in vastly different ways.
Republicans are trying to keep up
with the increasing velocity of the far right treadmill
towards authoritarianism,
while Democrats continue to cling to the romantic notion
of returning to normal.
But normalcy is a mirage.
There was no good normal before President Trump
because the conditions before Trump led to Trump.
Recreating the conditions right before a disaster
will just lead to another disaster.
So when Biden soothes his donors saying
nothing would fundamentally change,
we're just committing ourselves to a time loop
where Democrats cling to moderate ideals,
get nothing done and lead to yet another
and more extreme Republican party in charge
before pleading we return to normal every time.
And then every time the Dems do get control,
it's back to fixing the disaster of the last guy
while never really pushing any progressive ideas forward.
So at best we stagnate while the other side inches us
towards authoritarianism and fascism
until the heat death of the universe,
otherwise known as the extremely disastrous future midterms.
Hey, Wormbo, did any of this get through to you?
Oh God, he's yeah. He's gone.
He's fucking gone. I got free, you silly goat. Good God. Don't you worry. While Mr. Cody was
talking about how good friends he is with Warmbo and how worried he is about those scary Republicans,
his pal Warmbo found out how the Democrats can win the midterms after all. Democrats get elected and they eventually serve two terms, as both Bill and Barack did,
to fix things. I mean, people want these leaders, and both of them obviously were charismatic and
very bigger than life, you know, kinds of leaders, but they want them to fix things.
So I understand why people want to argue for their priorities.
That's what they believe they were elected to do.
But at the end of the day, nothing is going to get done if you don't have a
Democratic majority in the House and the Senate. And our majority comes from people who win in much more difficult districts.
And our majority in the Senate comes from people who can win in not just
blue states and hold those wins, as we saw didn't happen in Virginia, but can win in more purplish
states. It turns out that Mrs. Clinton had the answer this whole time. Why would she be wrong?
Yep, there it is. I think my eye is starting to bleed.
Yay! Happy eye bleed!
Happy eye bleed.
Hey everybody, thanks for watching! I've... this hurts, but leave a like and subscribe bleed. merch with Wormo on it and not this shirt. So
there are other ones though.
And taking this off.
Thanks for watching.