Some More News - Some More News: How (And Why) The Right Stole Christianity
Episode Date: April 24, 2024...
Transcript
Discussion (0)
That's not good.
It's loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening
up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening
up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening
up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening
up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up, loosening up,. Yes. Okay, so we're all set up.
One quick note, since we're doing this religion thing, could you actually try and work in
some lines about how much Jesus loved corn?
Okay.
Is that accurate?
I don't understand the question.
Sorry.
It's just that we really need to offload all these corn cream survival jars, and I'm thinking
maybe we can rope in our religious fanbase that we definitely have.
Oh!
That's what all these new jars are then.
I wasn't sure they were all mixed with my pee jars.
We could sell those too maybe.
Way ahead of you on that one.
Whatever we can do to make some extra money at this point, you know, now that we're on Warmbow's payroll.
You got your envelope full of buttons too, huh?
Little shit is gonna put us in the poor house.
How can someone run away and still never leave?
We need to find him and eat him.
I'm sorry, but it's true.
You know that's what he wants, right?
He made a big stink and ran away
and he's waiting for us to go find him,
but I'm not giving him the satisfaction.
He will come crawling back soon enough.
He has to, I mean, who else does he have but us?
You know, he's probably out there.
He's out there now, he's crying.
He's all cold and alone.
Nobody to talk to or put their hand up inside him
we've been rolling by the way oh hey howdy ho it is the show we'll uh we will we will cut all that other stuff and hey now here's some more news. Cody wants you to know-de about Christianity.
No, no, please, please, please keep watching.
Let me finish.
And the healing magic of Jesus Christ.
And corn, he loved corn.
And corn.
And more specifically, we're talking about
the American version of Christianity
and the healing magic of Jesus Christ.
Or even more specifically,
the right-wing American version of Christianity
and the healing magic of Jesus Christ?
Because here's some news.
The sequel, American Christianity
is almost completely synonymous
with right-wing politics and morals,
despite the fact that those morals,
spoilers for this episode,
don't necessarily line up with the actual religion.
And that's weird, isn't it?
How'd that happen?
Is everyone on the left just a godless Satanist?
Only on the weekends, am I right?
Hold for applause.
Are they applauding?
Go to the title.
Did we go to the title?
General Dr. Reverend Cody's,
How the Rat Stole Christianity.
Hey, it's still me.
And as the title suggests,
today's episode is exploring the long history
of American Christianity and the politics
that have been injected into it.
In case you were worried,
this isn't really gonna be a judgment on religion itself.
I'm not gonna preach about Christianity being good or bad,
or whether or not God exists,
or tell you to subscribe to my zine
about how there's a fleet of invisible spaceships
piloted by the wise Ashtar race over the planet, but that zine is available upon request
and I will pay you to read it.
No, the purpose of this video is to analyze
Christianity's influence on American politics and society
along with how politics also influenced
American Christianity.
Because whether or not you believe
that the Christian God exists,
a whole lot of other people do.
People who vote and make laws and repeal those laws
and do other stuff as well, one assumes.
Somebody made this shirt after all.
Seven out of 10 Americans at least identify as Christian
per a 2020 Public Religion Research Institute poll.
On top of that, this version of Christianity
is uniquely American compared to other countries
in which Christianity is practiced.
Hey, did you watch the Super Bowl this year?
If so, you probably saw this. I
We can
Oh, yeah, he does have us in his name big deal I have Odie in my name, like the dog, and he loves Mondays?
I don't know.
Anyway, that clip was from the He Gets Us campaign,
a movement that promotes, you guessed it,
Jesus and Christianity.
That ad, plus ones that aired during the 2023 Super Bowl,
are part of a billion dollar multi-year
campaign investment to promote Christ
through TV and social media.
It's neat and glad that Jesus guy
is finally getting some mainstream success.
So why spend so much money on promoting a religion
that most Americans already identify with?
Well, you probably noticed how progressively
those ads are framing the church.
And it just so happens that actual church attendance is at an all time low in this country.
Surveys estimate that around six or seven
in 10 Americans identify as Christian,
which is significantly lower
than the whopping 92% recorded in 1972.
And of course, that's people self-reporting themselves
as Christian.
A recent report on cell phone data shows
that actual attendance is even lower.
Also, yeah, apparently we know that from your cell phone data. That's haunting. Obviously,
the COVID-19 pandemic impacted church attendance numbers, but a growing number of Americans are
reporting that they don't associate with any religion at all. The reasons vary more than you
think. Some of them are pretty mundane.
But of course, these surveys also saw a sizable chunk
of people who left the church due to feeling
like they don't fit in or having bad experiences
or because of their gender identity
or being upset at church scandals
or having conflicting politics.
Typically, younger adults don't seem to feel welcome
in a church environment and fear that their life choices wouldn't be accepted.
A 2021 report by the Springtide Research Institute
found that half of the 13 to 25 year olds surveyed
didn't think churches and other Christian houses of worship
cared about the social issues they cared about,
which included income inequality, racial injustice,
gender equity, gun control,
and rights for immigrants among others.
And so from these surveys, what might be the most telling
is that only 14% of evangelicals left their church
because they quote, no longer believe.
And that's actually pretty low.
So in other words, people aren't leaving the church
in droves because they don't leaving the church in droves
because they don't believe in a higher power,
but rather that they don't believe in the church,
probably because of all the things I just mentioned.
I mean, listen, if you live in America,
you already know the problem,
the disconnect between what Christianity teaches
and the terrible things people do and say in the name of it.
You know, like wars or that Dennis Quaid pilot film.
Equally bad things, those.
And so you might look at these He Gets Us ads
and think, yeah, finally.
It was only a matter of time
until somebody decided to modernize the church.
The campaign spokesman, Greg Miller, said, quote,
our goal is to really show that Jesus loved
and cared for anyone and everyone.
The hegetsus.com website also says
that Jesus loves gay people and Jesus loves trans people.
Good for them.
I'm sure there isn't anything bad
we're about to reveal in the next sentence.
See?
This is technically the next sentence
and I'm not saying a bad thing.
This sentence on the other hand is going to tell you
that the He Gets Us campaign has received major funding
from the Signatory, a subsidiary of the Servant Foundation.
The Servant Foundation provides funding
for the Alliance Defending Freedom,
a conservative legal group that's responsible for throttling and overturning LGBTQ rights
and women's rights.
It's also the turd nest that hatched
that scary little freak Mike Johnson
and most notably helped overturn Roe v. Wade.
The good news is that this was back in 2023
and the Servant Foundation no longer oversees
the He Gets Us campaign.
The bad news is that it is now being run and the Servant Foundation no longer oversees the He Gets Us campaign.
The bad news is that it is now being run
by a new charity group named Come Near,
which is financially backed by David Green,
the billionaire owner of Hobby Lobby.
His son, Mark Green, also serves
on Come Near's board of directors.
If you don't recall the deal with Hobby Lobby,
let me jog that memory.
Hobby Lobby Corporation,
owned by the Green family of Oklahoma City,
claims its owners religious beliefs should prevent it
from making some birth control products
available in its employee health plan.
The Department of Justice has ordered
one of the nation's largest craft stores
to hand over illegally acquired artifacts from Iraq.
Hobby Lobby will now have to pay a $3 million fine after
buying more than 5,500 rare tablets and bricks. The company making worldwide headlines with this
letter sent to employees last week. It reads, in part, we serve a God who will guide us through
this storm. Oh right, they're kind of monsters? The company is most famous for forcing employees
to work over a pandemic and restricting their benefits
and stealing artifacts like some kind of Indiana Jones villain.
And they did all of that in the name of their religion,
which seems like a quick and easy way
to make people hate your religion.
So it's a tad ironic that they're now funding
the PR campaign aimed at undoing the thing they helped to cause.
Now, to be fair and balanced and saucy,
but sweet with a smoky finish,
He Gets Us says that their intention
isn't to entice people to start attending church,
but it does invite those who visit their website
to sign up for their newsletter
for people to connect with their community,
get content revolving around Jesus Christ,
get Bible reading plans,
and attend special events in person,
which all just sounds like what a church does.
Like if it's not to get people to attend church,
I'm not sure what it's for.
See, I wanted to start with this campaign
because it's kind of a microcosm of the larger problem.
On the surface, these ads seem very positive.
And all they're doing is pointing out
that Christianity teaches love and compassion
and not being a dickwad about things.
And then the moment you dig into it,
just a little bit more,
you realize that the people pushing these ads
don't actually
believe in them, and probably just want to get church numbers up by pretending to be progressive.
And in spite of what he gets us says, a whole lot of Christians lead the fight against laws
that protect the rights and lives of LGBTQ people. That doesn't seem very loving. The history of
misogyny and throwing hurdles at women's health?
Not loving either. Christianity was a big part of the civil rights movement, but has largely been
the significant backbone for the pasty body of racism in this country. Then there's the whole...
What's it called? Christian nationalism. Christian nationalism is an ideology that is based around the idea that this is a Christian
nation, that this was founded as a Christian nation, and therefore it should be a Christian
nation today and should be so in the future.
What this has led to some decades later is the new apostolic reformation leaders, the
apostles and the prophets that are really at the head of this movement were some of the earliest
to support Donald Trump in 2016.
And they've remained steadfast in that support.
They were at the very avant-garde of trying
to get the 2020 election overturned
in the wake of Joe Biden's victory
and mobilizing folks to be at January 6th.
Boy, that doesn't seem to be loving at all.
Opposite of loving.
We should invent a word for that.
And again, this is all stuff we already kind of know,
but don't stand back and really look at.
Like we just accept that regular evangelicals
are going to vote for Trump.
Again, sure, there's some discord
among the evangelical base
regarding Trump's morality,
but there's still a large amount of evangelists
who are hell bent, heaven bent to get him reelected
to the point that many Trump supporters believe
God sent him to rule over all of us.
And on June 14th, 1946,
God looked down on his planned paradise and said,
I need a caretaker. So God gave us Trump. That's a video that Trump shared
and other people presumably watched
and enjoyed and agreed with.
And like, how did that happen?
Again, I know this isn't new news,
but seriously, how did an obvious con man
who embodies the opposite of Christian teaching
become such a religious icon
to the point that some people think he was sent by God,
or at the very least,
fighting on the side of Jesus.
But I think if you had a real election and Jesus came down and God came down and said,
I'm going to be the scorekeeper here, I think would win there, I think would win in Illinois
and I think would win in New York, which is all places in theory.
Look, politicians using the Bible or religion in general
to gain favor or manipulate people isn't new.
But it's pretty darn wild that this is the guy
that Christians are getting behind.
Because despite this church exodus,
there are certainly a lot of people
who still consider themselves Christians
while siding with progressives on all of these issues,
like the writer of this episode.
And I imagine those people are very frustrated
by this current state of things.
And so after the break, we're going to look into
the history of how Christian values
and right-winged values got intertwined.
But for now, there's only one set of gods
this show has to answer to, our sponsors.
Also the Ashtar, of course, and Xenu, Xenu's there too.
And God willing other deities.
Anyway, ads be with you.
And cut.
What?
Great job Sticky, that was perfect.
But for safety, let's do another take
of everything you already said,
but this time let's work in a little more pattern about corn.
Okay, two things.
Number one, you've never directed the show before.
Like ever, what's going on?
And two, we wrote the script ahead of time.
There's no corn stuff.
I can't just add corn stuff.
Are we still rolling?
Motherfuck, can we actually cut?
Boy, those Teslas sure seem to be terrifying.
There might be one hiding in your attic right now,
waiting, don't look.
And wouldn't you know it, I just read on ground news
that Tesla is laying off 10% of its workforce.
You see, Grubby, ground news is a news aggregation site and app
that we at the Shoddy specifically sought out as a sponsor.
And we did that because their platform is great
for learning fun things about the news.
And not fun things.
For example, only the left and center leaning headlines
mentioned that those Tesla layoffs
are because of poor car sales, while the right-leaning sites largely omit that part.
Hmm, how strange.
You see, ground news shows you how the media
around the world is covering any single story
and compares and contrasts that coverage
based on things like their political lean
and who owns the publication.
Like if Elon Musk owned an online publication someday,
it would be good to know that.
I wonder if that webpage would also crash a bunch of times.
Oh, you can't get the website wet either?
Gah, terrible products.
So you should check them out, the good product,
ground.news slash smn.
It's a pretty darn important tool to have right now.
For example, they have an elections page
that includes a blind spot section,
showing you which stories aren't being covered
by one particular side.
So once again, go to ground.News slash SMN.
You can subscribe for as little as 40% off
with unlimited access through our link this month only.
What they're doing is more important today than ever.
And I encourage you to check them out.
The link is in the description.
Don't go in that attic.
That's what it wants.
It also wants to like crash and get like caught on fire.
Amen. I mean, amen. get like caught on fire.
Amen. I mean, amen.
Welcome back.
Before we took our moment of reflection
and prayer to capitalism,
our God the coin, Cha-ching be his name,
we were talking about Christianity
and how the right stuck a claim in it.
Just really nailed into it, like something.
I'll think of a simile later.
In any case, let's look at the history
of when Christianity and Republicans
came together like booger glue.
And while abortion is, of course,
going to make a Thanos cameo in there,
the original meet-cute was actually segregation.
You hear of it?
You have, and you think it's bad, yes?
Okay, good.
Well, here is some news for you then.
In 1954, the Brown v. Board of Education decision
desegregated public schools.
Huzzah!
But in turn, that caused a massive shift
in white students dropping out of public school
and moving to private religious schools.
You see, private schools don't have to abide
by pesky things like the Constitution.
And so it's no coincidence that a bunch of new private
schools opened up right around this time.
It was a loophole used by racists who didn't want
to share their space with non-white people.
As this Politico article lays out,
this was quickly challenged in 1969,
when black parents in Holmes County, Mississippi,
took the Treasury Department to court
to prevent tax exempt status from being granted
to three new whites only private schools.
They argued that due to their discriminatory policies,
they shouldn't be considered charitable institutions.
They would eventually win this,
but not before white flight caused a massive dropout
in students attending desegregated schools
to the point that there were no white students attending
Holmes County public schools by 1970.
This was of course happening everywhere.
And the first half of the 1970s saw more than 3,000
segregated private schools enroll 750,000 white students.
As that Holmes County case continued,
the court ordered a preliminary injunction,
which is a fancy way of saying that they made
a temporary decision to stop the actions
the plaintiffs had deemed harmful.
In this case, that meant ordering that any private school
practicing segregation would lose their tax exempt status.
This of course pissed off evangelicals twofold.
The first fold being the obvious racists within their ranks.
The second fold being the very few not actively racist
but still not anti-racist evangelicals
under the impression that their religious liberties
were being attacked.
Eventually the US District Court upheld
and cemented the new IRS policy
to not grant federal tax exemption
to racially discriminatory private schools.
And thus began, at least in this modern political context,
the tradition and tactic of organizations
hijacking the concept of religious freedom
to do selfish and fucked up things.
God demands I bang your spouse.
You see, one of the schools targeted by the IRS
was the fundamentalist Bob Jones University,
which didn't admit black students.
Probably because Bob Jones Jr.'s father is Bob Jones Sr.
just plain thought that racial segregation was good,
even biblical.
Bad job at names, Bob.
But instead of saying any of that,
his fellow Christian conservative friends,
Paul Weyrich and Jerry Falwell,
persuaded him to shift the debate towards religious freedom.
After all, it's a tad bit easier to swallow than,
us honkeys can't learn alongside black people.
You hear?
They formed an argument based on how,
because they didn't accept any federal funding or aid,
aside from, you know, not paying taxes,
they didn't need to answer to the government.
The IRS and Bob Jones University battled back and forth,
with the university initially trying to placate the IRS
by admitting one black student
who they also hired to work part-time
until he quit and left the school a month later.
Without looking it up, I'm going to assume
that the kid did not have a good time there.
No, I'm not gonna look it up.
After that, they were like, okay, fine, we got, okay.
We'll let black students in, but only married ones. Then in 1975, they like, okay, fine. We got, okay. We'll let black students in, but only married ones.
Then in 1975, they said, oh, fine.
Unmarried black students are allowed,
but no interracial dating.
The IRS was still not satisfied
and finally revoked Bob Jones University's
tax exemption status in January of 1976.
It should be noted that Bob Jones University
did eventually lift its interracial dating ban in the year,
guess before I say it, 2000.
Did you guess?
Did you guess the year 2000?
The university also did apologize for its racist policies
in 2008. Oh, and it also became tax racist policies in 2008.
Oh, and it also became tax exempt again in 2017.
Lesson learned.
Anyway, going back to 1976,
the same year as Bob Jones University's tax exempt status
was withdrawn and evangelicals began
to enter the political arena,
something that they had traditionally kept away from.
Why did they do this?
Well, 1976 marked the beginning of a presidential campaign
for a candidate who would finally represent them
on the national stage.
A candidate that would mark the beginning of the rise
of the ultra religious right wing.
Any guesses who that was?
Evangelicals were not involved in politics,
certainly not in a organized way.
Many were not even registered to vote.
They considered politics dirty and kind of beneath them.
Glory, glory, hallelujah.
Until Jimmy Carter came along.
Not who you imagined, is it?
That's right, the politician that brought
devout evangelical Christianity to the forefront
of American national politics was former peanut farmer,
American dad character, and Guinea worm Hitler, Jimmy Carter.
Part of Carter's pitch and appeal was that he read
the Bible daily, taught Sunday school,
and even preached at churches.
A huge part of his success during the 1976 election
was having this previously unpolitical,
evangelical Christian voting bloc
come together and win him the presidency.
And the right definitely took notice.
Having Bob Jones University fall to the evil of
just needing to pay your fucking taxes
was the biggest rallying cry for evangelicals
and had caused them to wonder if the government
would further interfere with religious institutions.
And guess which political party runs on cutting taxes
and reducing government regulation?
Did you guess?
So you take those worried evangelicals peanut butter
and mix it with the Republicans chocolate need
of a loyal group of voters, and what do you get?
Jesus pieces?
So to self invent Jesus pieces and get a hen.
So this new Christian right was spearheaded
by Republican Paul Weyrich
and conservative Christian televangelist Jerry Falwell.
You know, the two guys that told Bob Jones
he was being too loud about the white supremacy earlier
and who by the mid 1970s had one of the biggest megaphones
any political party could ever want.
Televangelism really erupted in the 1970s
and Jerry Falwell was riding that wave.
Jerry Falwell turned a small Virginia church of 35
into a Christian's communications empire.
A Virginia television preacher
with an audience of millions.
Damn you TV, you sexy enchantress!
This growing national reach is what of course
made a handful of televangelists so politically powerful.
This is also when they immediately began to turn
on the Democrats.
You see, Falwell and Weyrich didn't care
for Carter's diverse cabinet or how he backed civil rights
and even supported gay rights activists.
And despite the fact that Carter had nothing to do
with the IRS taking away their tax exempt status,
they still framed him as the enemy
in the fight for religious freedom.
But this was now the seventies.
Segregation wasn't exactly a winning position.
And so they needed a fresh issue
for their new moral majority to lean on for support.
Luckily for them, Roe v. Wade had just happened.
You see, here's a fun, fun, fun, sure fun,
fun fact about abortion.
Before the late 70s,
Christians actually weren't unanimously bothered by it.
In 1968, the evangelical Christianity Today
gathered 26 theologians to discuss abortion
and contraception,
and then published a collective statement saying, quote,
"'Whether the performance of an induced abortion
is sinful, we are not agreed,
but about the necessity of it and permissibility for it
under certain circumstances, we are in accord.
In short, they couldn't agree on whether abortion was bad,
but they all agreed that it shouldn't be criminalized.
But then came Falwell and Weyrich and the need to find
a new cause for their religious liberty battle.
They had noticed a major uptick
in legal abortions after the Roe v Wade decision, and that this concerned many Americans, but
especially and specifically Catholics. Unlike other sects of Christianity, Catholicism had been
traditionally anti-abortion and anti-contraception even prior to Roe v Wade. As for the uptick, well, yeah, no shit.
There was an increase in legal abortions
after abortion was legalized.
Who would have thought?
Although another fun thing about abortion
is that it actually went way down
since this initial uptick,
probably because of the rise of contraception
and sex education,
and has recently gone back up
now that Roe v Wade was removed.
But anyway, right-wing evangelicals decided to glom
onto abortion as an issue,
which brought many practicing Catholics into their group
and shook up the 1978 midterm elections.
And when I say shook up, I mean they rattled them fuckers.
Senate races in Minnesota and Iowa in 1978 showed that an anti-abortion pro-life movement
could unite the religious right and give them real political power.
In Minnesota, pro-life Republicans won two Senate seats.
In Iowa, the Democratic incumbent, Senator Dick Clark, was expected to win by a landslide.
He did not.
Primarily due to the work of mostly Catholic
pro-like life activists.
The anti-abortion movement has political clout.
That surprised a lot of journalists and political analysts
who believed those people made a lot of noise,
but not much difference.
So basically the anti-abortion crowd
was written off by Democrats,
which in turn bit them on the ass.
It's actually a little ironic
that we're seeing the opposite play out today.
But at the time, relying on the non-issue of abortion
was a political success.
This moral majority movement used the abortion issue
like a Katamari to roll into various evangelical Christians,
conservatives, conservative Catholics,
conservative Protestants, and conservative Jews to form a giant right-wing ball
connected by the abortion web.
They also scooped up some pig figurines and paper clips,
but we'll figure out a use for those.
And so this was a ball big enough
to roll into the 1980 presidential election
and wreck up the place.
We can, and so help us God,
we will make America great again.
He said the line!
It should be noted that Ronald Reagan was also divorced,
an alleged rapist, and was pro-abortion
before aligning himself with the Christian right
to become president.
Also, an actor.
So on top of Donald Trump being all of those things too,
he's apparently a plagiarizing hack.
Also, Reagan plagiarized it from Hitler.
Carter was crushed in the 1980 presidential election
against Reagan, and Reagan crushed again in 1984
against Democrat challenger, Walter Mondale.
This marked the moment in which politicians realized
that they didn't actually have to practice Christianity
to court the religious crowd.
And seeing such dramatic results
forced Republicans, evangelical or not,
to cater to that base in their policies
and incorporate evangelical Christian goals
into their platform.
This momentum would carry on into George H.W. Bush,
Reagan's vice president,
to have his own presidential term
thanks to the GOP's continued alignment
with the Christian right.
It was smart for politicians to showcase some version
of Christian faith while on the campaign trail,
regardless of party.
During their candidacies for US president,
both Bill Clinton and Barack Obama
played up their Christian faith
to help secure some votes and appeal
to a few moderate evangelicals.
However, the power of the Christian right
frayed after the disappointing George W. Bush administration
followed by Obama winning the presidency.
The slightly leaner yet louder
and more potent Christian right was very much on tilt
and eager for someone to emerge and be their champion,
a savior.
This guy'll do.
In 2016, Donald Trump courted evangelicals
through invoking God in his speeches,
promising to appoint conservative judges to the Supreme Court
and overturn Roe v. Wade, making America more churchy
and gaining support from Jerry Falwell
like Ronald Reagan did.
Wait, that typo, sorry, not Jerry Falwell,
that's Jerry Falwell Jr.
See, Trump actually did something different there.
He's not a complete hack.
Falwell used funds from his father's Liberty University
to help support the Trump administration's causes,
pushing the limits of Liberty University status
as a 501c3 organization.
I wonder what happened to that guy.
Anyway, along with bumming out evangelicals,
it should be noted that Obama's presidency
also bummed out racists.
And yes, the racist evangelical Venn diagram connects,
but it's worth noting that Trump would once more
connect the religious right with outright racists
who in turn could join forces once more.
Jesus ex-racists, the new empire.
And while you'd think that after the now unpopular
abortion stance and Trump's extremely embarrassing
single term as the pro-crime pandemic president,
the religious right would be seeking to rebrand.
But I guess there's still some steam left.
Despite a low church turnout,
many evangelicals are turning to podcasts,
live stream services, and social media
for their worship fix rather than their local church.
Much like how the television first gave them power,
they are now harnessing the worldwide web.
And so it's not too different
from the televangelism of the 1970s
in which millions of Christians
listened to only a handful of preachers
that were right-wing power brokers.
But this time they're exposed
to the widespread 24 seven internet
instead of just a few hours
of broadcast television each week.
The lack of potential exposure to Christians
who are less Trumpy has created such an echo chamber
that according to one poll,
more Republicans see Trump as a person of faith
over Joe Biden,
Mitt Romney, and Mike Pence,
which is pretty incredible
since Biden goes to Catholic mass regularly.
Mitt Romney is publicly known for being a Latter-day Saint,
and Mike Pence has been a born-again Christian for decades,
and that was after he was a Catholic youth minister.
He also just looks and acts like a communion wafer.
Meanwhile, Trump is, well, you know.
Is that your Bible?
It's a Bible.
Funniest evil guy in the world.
Maybe they just caught him on a bad day though.
Let's give him another shot.
You mentioned the Bible,
you've been talking about how it's your favorite book.
And you said, I think last night in Iowa,
some people are surprised that you say that.
I'm wondering what one or two of your most favorite Bible verses are I wouldn't want to get into it
because to me that's very personal you know when I talk about the Bible it's very personal so I
don't want to get into I don't want to get into there's no verse that means a lot to you that
you think about or cite the Bible means a lot to me but I don't want to get into specifics
I mean come come on.
Even if you're not religious, you can probably assume
that Trump is far from living a Christian lifestyle.
You probably even suspect that a lot
of what the right wing believes is based around them picking
and choosing which parts of the Bible to follow
and which to ignore.
So just for fun, let's actually look into that.
We're gonna go to some juicy non-religious ads,
but when we come back, we're gonna have a Bible study.
You're so excited.
You definitely are.
Look, okay, wait.
If you come back,
I will have some pizza roll stuffed calzones for you.
I promise.
Hey, it's Katie.
You know, sometimes I think about that intangible lapse in human consciousness between our waking
selves and our dream selves.
You know, the timeless void.
And I wonder if that's the oblivion we all face.
But then I have some braised lemongrass tofu nuggets I got from Hungry Rude.
I kind of forget about it.
HungryRude is much like that timeless void in that it saves you time and lets you avoid
the hassle of food prep or unhealthy takeout meals. It is high quality and fresh groceries
delivered straight to your door.
All you have to do is go take their fun and brief online quiz and they'll
actually customize their selection based on stuff like your personal lifestyle
and even the appliances you have. And they have everything.
They got the meats and the sea meats and the pantry meats and the candy meats
and the non-meat
meat.
Anything you can get at a grocery store, they have.
And I'm going to sit here and look you straight in the eye and tell you that I freaking love
it.
I really do.
I love hungry root delivery day.
It's the best day.
And look, we don't have a lot of time.
The hourglass, it only drains.
So why not save some time with a company that's
focused on great tasting food with trusted ingredients? Right now Hungry Root is offering
some more news listeners 40% off your first delivery and free veggies for life of the
subscription. For life of the subscription, just so we're clear. Just go to hungryroot.com slash more news
to get 40% off your first delivery
and get those free veggies, 40% off.
That's a lot, just a little bit less than 50%.
We love it.
That's hungryroot.com slash more news.
Don't forget to use our link so they know we sent ya.
Hello, hi.
I tried to talk to my dog the other day.
She was giving me this really judgmental look.
So I went on Babble and did you know that there are like
a lot of different languages that people speak
that aren't the language I'm speaking now?
It is wild.
So I says to myself, I says, hey, Cody,
why not try and learn a language with Babbel?
That's the sound of learning.
You see friend, Babbel is a language learning app
that's designed by real people for real conversations.
They have 10 minute lessons created by over 200 experts.
They will get you speaking a new language
in as little as three weeks.
They don't have dog though. Turns out that's not a thing.
Look here pretty. Communication is like...
Communi... communication is... ah... it's... communication is important.
Maybe you want to travel or just better yourself.
With Babbel's tips and tools, their lessons are rooted in conversation-based teaching,
ordering food, asking for the bathroom,
creating an alibi, begging.
This is why they have over 16 million subscriptions sold
and all their courses come
with a 20-day money-back guarantee.
And here's a special limited time deal
for our listeners and watchers.
Right now, get up to 60% off your Babbel subscription, but only for our listeners and watchers. Right now, get up to 60% off your Babbel subscription,
but only for our listeners and watchers, at babbel.com slash more news.
Get up to 60% off at babbel.com slash more news, spelled B-A-B-B-E-L.com slash more news.
Rules and restrictions may apply, but since when did that stop us huh
there's a rule about is there a rule for tearing up paper there's no rule about
so i can just do this but we need the paper
Okay, people, we are coming back from ads, doing great so far. Maybe lose the beard though.
I feel like I need to reiterate that you do not direct the episodes.
No idea what you're saying right now.
It's just a blubbering noise, kind of like a dead squirrel stuck in a tailpipe.
But sorry, circling back,
did you say earlier that religions are tax exempt?
Is that true?
I don't like where this is heading.
Okay, are we supposed to be rolling?
Because we are.
Son of a...
Hey, hi, we're apparently back.
I guess we can't edit this even though it's not live.
We can't, even though it's not live. We can't even know it's not live.
All right, anyway, I lied about the pizza roll stuffed calzones.
They aren't coming.
And trust me, from my experience, you are better off.
I will not explain why.
Anyway, before the break, we were threatening to do a Bible study.
So let's see if we can dig into this so-called Bible
and see what it says about right wing talking points,
starting with abortion.
As you may suspect, the word abortion doesn't appear
in any English translation of the Bible.
And there are a lot of different translations, mind you.
We're about to use a bunch of different ones.
And the closest thing to it is an excerpt in Exodus
in the Old Testament that is referring to a miscarriage
with the focus being the harm done to the pregnant woman.
And the fetus is discussed as property, not a person.
Some pro-choice Christians refer to a verse
that teaches rabbis how to induce a miscarriage to
unfaithful wives.
Not exactly a cool reason, but you know,
it's there in English,
unlike the words no abortions ever for any reason.
Aside from that, the Bible is neutral
when it comes to intentionally induced abortions,
with nothing regarding them
written in the New Testament either.
As we've previously mentioned,
there is a significant debate
among the Christian faithful regarding abortion.
But per a 2022 Pew Research Survey,
the majority of American non-evangelical Protestants
and Catholics surveyed didn't think abortion
should be outright illegal.
Jesus doesn't mention abortion one way or another
in biblical texts, but apparently did heal a woman
who had been menstruating for 12 years
back when being in contact with women on their period
was considered unclean.
So he seems to be cool with women's health.
WWOBGYN, dude.
Regarding gay people, things are a little more muddled.
Jesus himself, Jesus Christ himself,
doesn't appear to comment on it one way or another,
like abortion.
Man, you'd think you'd have a hot take about this stuff,
but, uh.
Of course, the famous anti-gay quotes
come from the Old Testament,
before this Jesus guy dropped. Specifically, there, uh. Of course, the famous anti-gay quotes come from the Old Testament,
before this Jesus guy dropped.
Specifically, there's Leviticus 20,
where a man lying with another man
is called an abomination,
and they should, quote,
surely be put to death.
There's some debate about the use of abomination,
and some have said the original text was more vague
and could have been about rape.
But if we take it as what many on the Christian right do,
that being gay is bad,
well, it also says that they should be put to death.
And so I guess to all of our Christian brothers
and sisters out there, I ask,
do you wanna do that?
If you wanna do that,
you should say you wanna do that.
Because it's perhaps even more noteworthy
to point out the other things that Leviticus says
you should be put to death for,
including but not limited to generally adulterers,
boning your daughter-in-law,
boning a woman and her mother, high five.
Also the woman and mother have to be killed,
high five or sinned,
or cursing your mother or father, all death.
Other punishments laid out include exile
for anyone who has sex on their period,
or anyone who sees their relative naked.
Also kill the palm readers.
If you work seven days in a row, death.
Also being defiant to your parents is death.
Which is all to say that the Old Testament
has some very stern rules about a lot of stuff
that we don't make laws about or even take seriously.
We just honed in on that one part
and ignored all the other stuff.
That's odd, isn't it?
It's like saying Jurassic Park is a movie about hacking.
Meanwhile, there are verses that are against the hatred
and discrimination of gay and queer people,
or rather all people in general.
Just do unto others as you would have them do unto you.
Some guy said it allegedly.
Specifically, sew in everything.
Do to others what you would have them do to you.
He who is without sin cast the first stone, et cetera.
And of course, technically speaking,
homosexual and heterosexual weren't really terms
or even the social constructions they are today
until the 1860s.
And even then, they weren't exactly those words
since they were originally coined in German, not English.
Again, the Bible has been translated hundreds of times.
And there's a case to be made that the use of the word
was a mistranslation merging of the Greek terms
malakoi and arsenicatoi.
Malakoi literally means soft in Greek,
which could be associated with being cowardly,
lazy and effeminate, which is villainized
because of the deep pockets of big chore,
but more importantly, because of the patriarchy of the time
and of now too come to think of it.
The other mistranslated word arsenicatoi in English means,
well, that's up for debate.
Some believe it's a compound word meaning male bed,
and several American churches and theologians
haven't come to a consensus of what that means.
Some have said that it's definitely
a condemnation of homosexuality.
Others say male prostitution.
Others say male on male sexual assault.
Others say pederasty.
It's debatable.
Someone made a whole movie about it.
1946 is the first time in any language,
in any translation,
the word homosexual ends up in the Bible, right?
I found that incredibly hard to believe.
Who made this decision?
Why did they make this decision?
How did they make this decision?
It's also important to note
that in the Martin Luther translation of the German Bible
from 1534, over 300 years before a German coined the term homosexuality, the words malakoi and arsinekoitai
were translated to nabenschander, which when translated to English means boy molester.
That's really quite different from an act of love between two consenting adults,
isn't it? At the end of the day, there are two sliding scales to think about here.
You are either somebody who thinks the Bible
is referring to child molesters,
or was really trying to point at gay people specifically,
and in fact, only gay men specifically.
Though it does include separate passages
for both men and women who fuck animals
and who will all, you guessed it, be put to death,
including the animals that were fucked. The second sliding scale is how important do you find the Bible to be? Either it's a book
of lies or a moral tale or something absolute that we should make laws around. And this is all to say
that you have to land on a very narrow and specific place on those scales to think that we should make laws punishing gay people
because the Bible says so.
And if you were such a person,
then I assume you'd also want laws punishing adulterers
and the greedy and drunkards and people who screw
on their periods and curse their parents
since they are also on that shit list, the death list.
You get death.
Although if you're such a purist,
you'd probably also follow the original translations
the same way Star Wars nerds would ignore
the many, many remasters.
Jehoah shot first.
Word from the Bible.
Again, it's weird that this thing mentioned in passing
gets so much attention
while all the other parts around it get ignored.
It's one of the most overt cases of cherry picking.
And people want to base like political policies
around these few sentences.
It's just weird.
Especially when that policy goes against
so many other parts of the Bible.
Racism and discrimination,
the Bible has versus against that.
Xenophobia, there are verses against that.
Hate against the existence and rights
of trans and queer people.
The Bible has verses which contradict that.
And in fact, there are church leaders
that use scripture to fight against it.
Good old fashioned misogyny.
Yep, there are verses that conflict with that too.
Some people even argue that Jesus says
you should pay your taxes,
although I suspect he was being a little cheeky
and clever there.
And while being against Trumpism isn't found in the Bible,
obviously not, idiot.
I mean, obviously not.
But idolatry is.
Even conservative Christians from Turning Point USA,
the Christian Post, and the Daily Fucking Liar
acknowledged this and denounced the God Made Trump video.
How could they not?
Not having other gods and not committing idolatry
are the first two rules of the Big Ten.
They and every person in the GOP should know this.
Not just idolizing Trump before their God,
but idolizing America before their God too.
Pretty weird that the same people
trying to keep monuments of the Ten Commandments
in front of government buildings
and schools don't actually follow those rules.
Number 11, thou shalt not read.
These odd contradictions between what the Christian
right claims and what some biblical scripture says
would explain why religious leaders
from different Christian denominations
could lean either Democrat or Republican
while being influenced by that very same Bible.
There are many Christian leaders who use their faith
as the crux of progressive movement,
aside from Jimmy Carter.
Christian theologian Dietrich Bonhoeffer
was a vocal protester of Nazism and antisemitism
during World War II while living in Germany,
and was hanged for his connection to an attempt
to assassinate Adolf Hitler.
Alice got him.
Chung Hyun-kyung is a Presbyterian Christian theologian
that preaches to wide audiences about ecofeminism.
Kittredge Cherry is a lesbian journalist turned priest
who has promoted activism for feminist and LGBTQ causes
since the 1980s.
Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.'s Christian faith
was such a large part of the civil rights movement
that even the Christian right dares to co-opt him.
Well, a whitewashed version of him for their own cause.
Although lately, at least one evangelist
has tried a new tactic
of just claiming he wasn't Christian at all.
And the strange irony was a year later,
they did the same thing for Martin Luther King,
who was not a Christian at all,
whose life was immoral. I'm not saying he didn't do some social good, and I've always
been glad that he was a pacifist or he could have started a real revolution. But you don't honor a non-believer
who misrepresented everything about Christ and the gospel. Seems like a worrying precedent
to just start changing what it means to be Christian
based on your personal racism and politics.
But that's also kind of what they have to do
at this point, right?
After all, per the Bible,
one can interpret that Jesus commanded his followers
to heal the sick without compensation,
to comfort and help the poor, hungry, naked, unsheltered,
and imprisoned, redistribute wealth,
and one can argue, stop modern capitalism.
He even flipped tables over at that last one.
Of course, your average ex-user these days
will say that that was an act of anti-wokeness
about trans people or something.
My, how we have fallen.
And you may also notice that these are things
we can do without the help of the Bible.
They're just good things to do.
For example, many European nations
are getting more secular than Americans
and yet are doing better than America
at attempting and achieving those Christ-like goals.
And while Asian countries like South Korea and Japan
still have issues with wealth inequality,
they're certainly doing a better job than the US
at taking care of their citizens.
And that's all without Jesus being a major motivator
and player within their culture's history,
especially since both Japan and South Korea
have national pension systems,
universal healthcare, and universal eldercare
for their citizens.
This isn't a big reveal or anything,
but it seems like you don't have to be a Christian
to vote for and advocate policies
that Jesus would be okay with, or dare I say,
be vocally supportive of.
It seems like good ideas are good ideas,
regardless of who says them.
Of course, I'm sure that right-wing Christians,
especially evangelicals, can cherry pick
and cite additional scripture
that could be argued to back up their views.
I mean, that's what we just did.
But that's also the point we're getting to.
The Bible is pretty vague.
It's been translated a bunch of different ways
and can be used to support pretty much any political belief.
It's this joke.
I've done everything the Bible says,
even the stuff that contradicts the other stuff.
Going back to that sliding scale,
whatever you believe about the Bible,
it's probably bad to base national policies around it.
Not just because religion and government should be separate,
but because the Bible itself
is a tricky document to interpret.
Christianity and the Bible are apolitical
in that there is no outright consensus.
The Bible and the faith contain arguments and viewpoints
that can fit in either a right-wing or left-wing lens.
It's an omnibus of different documents
written by several different authors
from different eras with different agendas,
whether you believe in its divinity or not.
It's a now that's what I call God compilation of old laws, poetry, letters, parables, stories,
and oral history written down, rather than a consistent through-line vision written by
one author that then handed the reins over to another author and so on.
If it were a compilation book about vampires, it would contain the script for
Nosferatu, the first book of the Twilight series, and the Castlevania strategy guide. And hundreds
of years later, Dracula fans would be debating about whether vampires burned to dust in the
daylight or just sparkled with exposed abs. Also, we'd wonder if we should include wall
chickens in our floor plans. Maybe we should. Heck, the story of Jesus is told four times in the Bible,
written in different time periods
and with some differences in each version,
much like a star is born.
Which means Bradley Cooper is Jesus?
Yes, exactly.
The point is that this is precisely why
we have that pesky First Amendment
with the separation of church and state and whatnot.
Because even if you take stock in the Bible by faith,
the ambiguity in certain interpretations and its ability to be manipulated
by those interpretations make it far too loose to be a cornerstone for laws.
Even if you were a fundamentalist and believed the Bible literally.
What parts do you believe literally? And which parts do you dismiss?
Do you think we should kill children
who tell their parents to go to hell?
You fucking freak.
Even if you believe that everything written
in the Bible is true,
there are still issues in how to interpret that truth.
Of course, there are other factors involved
in how the Christian right rose to power,
including how Jesus and the Christian faith
are marketed like a product to Americans.
But that's another video.
Foreshadowing.
The point is that it's not necessarily
Christian faith itself as a problem,
but how it has been and continues to be
used as a vehicle for the hard right
to the point at which we're genuinely voting
later this year for whether or not
we're going to elect fascist nationalism and a one-day dictator. And it's important to call it out now,
more than ever, because I think we're nearing another moment where hard right Christian
nationalist values are being pushed forward. They have a House Speaker in place and yet another
Trump candidacy, and they're going to use trans rights as their new religious freedom talking point
and once more attempt to gain power.
The good news is that it's exactly these same GOP freaks
who are driving people away from organized religion.
As we said at the start, more and more people
are falling out of favor with American Christianity
because of its MAGA association or its adherence
to MAGA-ish ideas and doctrines.
The bad news is that we just don't know
what kind of difference this makes.
And if Trump does win this year,
it'll very likely revitalize this movement.
And folks, folks.
Republican front runner and former president Donald Trump
increasing his lead in a new national NBC News poll,
now up five points in a hypothetical
general election matchup.
It's not great.
That is of course from about two months ago,
but even looking at newer polls, not great.
And here's the thing,
while a MAGA victory is a win
for the Christian nationalist crowd,
I'd argue it will not be good for Christianity itself.
One thing we haven't really talked about
is how frustrating this all must be
for actually religious people trying to follow
the positive moral messages in the Bible.
Liberal or conservative, it's probably horrifying
to watch your religion be hijacked by this guy
and used to push unpopular, dare I say fascist, policies.
Because besides the obvious problems
with a fascist in charge,
it'll probably continue to drive people away from the church
while also integrating the church more heavily
into its movement.
Along with it being dishonest and gross,
Christian nationalism and the hijacking of Christian faith
for political gain is a far bigger threat to Christianity
than anything else.
Yes, even wokeness, heck, even super shredder
and that guy was a hardcore Satanist.
It's like, I don't know,
if a social media site was hijacked
by a weird right-wing freak,
and over time, everyone who was cool
and reasonable left that site,
eventually all that would be left is a social media site
filled with Nazis and some stragglers
complaining about the Nazis.
Similarly, if a religion is hijacked
by a bunch of racists and fascists and everyone else flees,
then eventually those are the only people who will be left.
And that's a pretty good motivator for religious people
to want to get rid of all the Nazis.
That and the fact that they're the Nazis,
so get rid of them.
Because religion and spirituality are about faith.
And faith involves being vulnerable
and putting yourself out there,
often in an embarrassing way.
And that can clearly give people great joy
and satisfaction and comfort.
But unfortunately, that same quality
also makes people easy marks for grifters
looking to benefit off of the faith of others.
Ha ha! K-Money is fucking back!
All rise for the first session of the Church of the Low-Priced Corn Cream.
I am your God-Priest, Katie the Cornstole, presiding over the corn room.
Be seated. We will now hear opening arguments.
Wait. So are you a religious figure or a judge?
I am all and none of those things.
But mostly of all, I am registered with the federal government.
Now bow to your corn goddess.
Bow to your corn goddess, I said.
Boop.
I forgot I can just hang up.
I really should do that more.
It's so easy to just hang up.
That is the corn cream going.
Oh my gosh.
That, wait a second.
I think it's the corn cream.
Honestly, it's bad either way.
So what did we just learn?
I completely forgot all of it.
I totally forgot what we were talking about.
All right.
Bye.
["The Star-Spangled Banner"]
Something about cheeses sliced?
Cheese and rice?
It'll come back to me.
Just like a certain somebody came back to us.
Am I talking about Jesus or warmbo, you ask?
And to that I answer, what's the difference?
Thank you all so much for watching. Be sure to like and subscribe. Be sure to like and
subscribe and make sure you check out our merch store which we have and we've got a
patreon.com slash some more news. We've got a podcast called even more news where all
the podcasts are. You can listen to this show as a podcast called Some More News. I think I said all the things.
I think I said all the things.
Praise our merch store!