Stuff You Should Know - The Call of the Void: Don’t Pick Up!
Episode Date: August 8, 2024Many of us have experienced the odd sensation that we shouldn’t trust ourselves not to simply jump from a high place for no reason. Some even feel an urge. Philosophers and psychologists have tried ...to make sense of this senseless urge for centuries now. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
There's something different about the conversations we have late at night.
They often spin off in strange and wonderful directions.
So what if those laid back conversations were with some of the biggest musicians in the
world?
Midnight Chats has already welcomed Taemin Parlor, Charlie XCX, Mark Ronson, Vince Staples
and many more.
Join me, Stuart Stubbs.
And me, Greg Cochran.
As we talk to our favourite musicians about the things they don't normally talk about.
Listen to the new series of Midnight Chats on the iHeartRadio app, Apple podcasts or
wherever you get your favourite shows.
Welcome to the CINO Show. I'm your host, CINO McFarlane. I'm an addiction specialist.
I'm a coach, I'm a translator and I'm God's middle man. My job is to crack hearts and
let the light in and help everyone shift the narrative
I want to help you wake up and I want to help you get free most importantly
I don't want you to feel alone
Listen to this you know show every Wednesday on I heart radio app Apple podcast or wherever you get your podcast
Hi, I'm Danny Shapiro host of the hit podcast family secrets
Imagine this your parents sign away your childhood to an academic psychological study.
And what about if your sister is very publicly tried, convicted, and sent to prison,
when really she was just telling her long-buried truce?
These tough questions are just a few that we'll be grappling with on our upcoming
10th season of Family Secrets. Listen to season 10 of
Family Secrets on the iHeartRadio app, Apple podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Welcome to Stuff You Should Know, a production of iHeartRadio.
Hey and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh and there's Chuck and Ben's here too. And that
makes this a good old rousing edition of stuff you should know. Philosophy Now edition.
Yeah. I mean, I apologize to Josh off here. I might as well say it now. I may be a little
rough in this one because my brain breaks a little bit when we have these philosophy subjects.
And even though I made an A in the only philosophy class I took in college, which I've said before,
it's only because I was so frustrated by it, I worked really, really hard to try and understand
it and ended up getting an A. But it breaks my brain a lot of times, like now.
Okay, I gotcha.
Boy, you didn't end that sentence
under normal circumstances.
No, it's tough for me.
But good for you powering through that class
and not just being like,
oh well, I guess I'll take a zero in this one again.
Or drop it in that first week, I did a lot of that.
I did that once in astronomy.
I was like, wait, why are you using like the Greek symbol for epsilon and sigma in this?
Right.
Like I thought we were going to talk about Mars and stuff and no.
Right.
I got rid of that really quick.
Yeah. Good job.
All right. So I kind of I think have a bit of a grasp on the philosophy of it.
What I had trouble with was some of the of a grasp on the philosophy of it.
What I had trouble with was some of the studies, like the actual research on it.
So we'll just muddle through.
It'll be fun.
Sometimes those are our most enjoyable episodes.
Sometimes they're our worst.
Let's find out which way this one goes.
Yeah, what we're talking about is something we've talked about on the show before.
I wish I could remember which episode.
But we've definitely talked about the call of the void,
what the French call
La Peur Du Vide.
Or high place phenomenon.
And that is the idea that,
and it's not just the desire to maybe hurl yourself
off the top of a building if you're standing,
or a bridge if you're standing atop a high structure.
But it can also mean...
Yeah, that's the one we're gonna concentrate on,
but it can also mean, and I know this is what we talked
about before, because I talked about like,
grabbing the cop's gun or driving into oncoming traffic.
That very amazing scene from Christopher Walken
in Annie Hall, where he's talking about,'s talking about swerving into oncoming traffic
is so good, and they smash cut to him driving
Woody and Annie home, it's just one of the great movie jokes.
But that's the idea, is this weird urge,
I know it was on an episode of Louie as well,
and I'm trying to think if I can think of
any more canceled filmmakers. Right, exactly. Roman Polanski did a short on it once.
But you know it was in both of those things and yeah it's this this weird desire to be like
standing atop of a tall structure and be like I could just jump right now and that and see
what's out there. Yeah so that's a I think that's the most common phenomenon of the call of the void,
just it occurring to you that you could do this.
It can get worse though too, because some people not only experienced that notion
occurring to them, they've experienced something akin to an urge so much so that
sometimes people will like push themselves away from the edge.
They'll, they might like go back into whatever stairwell they just came out of
because they don't
want to accidentally or inadvertently don't trust
themselves not to follow that urge.
That's when it gets really scary.
And if you think about it, we humans have a real
tendency towards self-preservation.
Like we fight to live sometimes to degrees that
surprise ourselves afterward, you know?
So that makes the call of the void completely nonsensical.
It makes zero sense whatsoever that you would have an urge
to just end it all for no reason, just because it's there,
just because there's a huge void there,
jumping into it because it occurred to you.
So the fact that this is a fairly common phenomenon,
it bears investigating.
And so psychologists have gotten into it,
philosophers have gotten into it.
Like you said, Woody Allen's gotten into it.
Um, it's a, it's a thing for sure.
And I love the fact that it's a mystery
because no one's actually successfully explained it.
And, um, I don't know if we ever will and for my money I don't really want to.
What, understand it?
Yes, because I throw, I cast my lot with the philosophers. I think Kierkegaard and Sartre
nailed it, but it's still, I mean, you don't prove things with philosophy, it's
just like, what about this?
Yeah, yeah, I mean, we'll get to statistics and how they align with, you know, legitimate
suicidal ideation later, probably in the last part.
But just among the two of us, I know I said this before with when we talked about it before,
but I have felt the call of the void many, many times. And for me, it's not I could just end it all,
but it's more like it's hard to,
and maybe that's one of the frustrating things.
It's really hard to explain what's going through my head.
It's sort of like no one can stop me from doing this.
And I could know what that feels like to fall.
Part of it is I had a very tragically had a friend
fall off a building to his death.
And so there's a little bit of that like,
I would wanna know what Aaron felt like
and like how scary that was as an empathetic thing.
So there's a lot of things in my head,
none of that explains why I wanna grab the cops' car.
I was about to ask that.
I've never really felt the driving
into the other lane thing, but I just, I don't know,
it's really fascinating to have these thoughts pop
into your head when normally, you know,
you're the kind of person that would never entertain
anything like that.
Yeah, so you just said a mouthful.
Essentially, the call of the void can be, can come from, it can come out of nowhere,
which makes it an intrusive thought in a lot of situations.
Other times it can be triggered by the situation.
Like you're not going to think about driving into
oncoming traffic while you're in your chemistry class.
Like it's while you're driving, right?
So there's some that are triggered by circumstances.
And then you also said that you're like, you're basically, you're horrified by the idea you're
even having this thought. It's just totally out of character for you. So you put all that together,
you have what essentially is the call of the void. And I say we go up to the tee and put the little
baseball or wiffle ball on top of the tee and knock it out of the park with the philosophers first.
All right.
I will say this, that the Kierkegaard stuff really spoke to me.
Me too.
We're talking about Danish philosopher Søren, I guess.
I don't know what the null sign means.
So it's like an umlaut.
Okay. So Søren basically, I guess?
I believe so
He talked about the this idea that the call of the void illustrates
Anxiety and in his case and this is the part that really spoke to me He argued that and I think he's dead right actually is that fear is when outside forces are
Scaring you something that could harm you from the outside.
Anxiety is when that's turned inward
and that's emerging from your,
the threat is coming from within,
they're inside the house basically,
and that house is your brain.
So the freedom to, the freedom of choice in life
to move about the world and to just choose
what you do from moment to moment,
you're constantly making choices
without knowing necessarily what the right thing to do was.
So an anxiety can come from what he called
the dizziness of freedom, of that freedom specifically.
Yeah, exactly.
And it's just the basis of anxiety
is having those choices,
not knowing what's right, like you said.
And that because our lives are filled
from moment to moment with making a choice, not making a choice,
which still is a choice, just ask Eddie Lee.
That of course it's gonna create anxiety,
which means anxiety is the human condition.
It's almost the basis of the human condition
is what he was saying.
So he kind of used that, or used the call of the void
to kind of demonstrate that.
Essentially saying that when you're up there on a precipice,
you're aware that you have the choice
to just throw yourself over.
And just realizing that that is a choice
that you can make right then.
Like you said, no one's gonna stop you.
Having that freedom is too much.
We like to think that we don't have choices, that we have metal, we have a self-preservation drive,
we have all this stuff that would prevent us from even ever considering that.
And yet, whenever we experience the call of the void, it is by definition experiencing that urge,
like the realization that we can choose that.
And that's what Kierkegaard kind of kicked the whole thing off with, I think in the
1850s when he used that to illustrate anxiety in humans. Can we have a
quick side chat? Yeah. What do they call them? Not diversions. Tangents? Yeah, yeah.
One of our tangents. About Rush. Okay. Did you hear me very quickly say Neil Peart?
No, I didn't.
When you said Geddy Lee?
Okay, well, Neil Peart wrote that.
Oh, okay.
So I just quickly pointed that out, but that's not what I was trying to point out.
Okay.
On that record, and I remember this specifically, my brother and I were listening to and looking
over that LP, which you do when-
What is that, Spirit of Radio?
Yeah. On the record is the lyric,
and if you choose not to decide,
well, first of all, if you're not a Rush fan,
the lyric that they recorded was,
if you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice.
I feel like you have to say it like Geddy Lee.
Still have made a choice.
Beautiful.
So they recorded it like that.
Neil Peart was their lyricist,
but on the record, my brother and I noticed it says,
if you choose not to decide,
you cannot have made a choice.
Oh, well, they got that wrong.
They was like on the album and he,
my brother looked at me and laughed and like
mimic to Getty Lee like crossing it out with the pencil.
Like, well, Neil Peart wasn't looking, and that has just always stood out to me.
It's a funny joke.
Anyway.
Did Neil Peart write most of their lyrics, or was it just him?
Yeah, he was their lyricist.
I didn't know that. Okay.
Isn't that crazy?
Drummer.
But yeah, he got that wrong big time.
So, back to it.
From Kierkegaard, along those same lines,
you talked about, is it Sartre?
That's what I've always said. Yeah, he doesn't care. He's dead.
Jean-Paul Sartre, another philosopher, he talked about that as the vertigo of possibility.
Basically the same idea as Kierkegaard with like a literal dizziness of possibilities and he kind of leaned more into the, you know, the
freedom about questions of our human experience and he went down a different road than Kierkegaard
ultimately did, but they both sort of referred to it as a literal dizziness.
Yeah, for sure.
Because a lot of people do experience something akin to Vertigo when they're looking down
from a high place even if they're not afraid of heights, right? Oh, I do.
Oh, I for sure do, yeah.
So, it does make sense that they would both use that,
but Sartre was definitely doing a big yes and
to Kierkegaard, and I think he even calls out Kierkegaard
in the section of being and nothingness, right?
But his whole jam that he kind of took,
the point that he took it to was,
not only are you realizing, like,
you have this freedom of choice, you also realize that your future self has that same freedom of choice.
And you, the one who's making this choice right now, not to leap over this precipice
for no good reason, has zero control over whether you and the future, future you, is
going to make that same choice or not.
And that is a reason to be terrified of being alive,
essentially is what Sartre said.
Right.
Yeah, I mean, not quite multiverse stuff,
but it's sort of along those same lines,
like almost future, future multiverse maybe.
Yeah, but what he was saying also
is a lot like Kierkegaard, like life is made up
of choices moment to moment to moment.
And his whole thing is like there's no solid self. There's no you that exists, you know, when you're born or even after you develop a little bit to the time you die.
You are constantly, you have to constantly keep the self going by making essentially the same decisions over and over again. And if you don't have the same experience, say like, uh, terror, when
you're up on a precipice and decide not to jump, if the next time you're up there
and you're not terrified, you feel like, what's it like to fly?
You might make the same decision, even though it's out of character with how
you were before that the self is that fluid essentially is what he was saying.
with how you were before, that the self is that fluid, essentially, is what he was saying. Yeah, and he sort of related that to gambling or the gambler who,
you know, like an addictive gambler who quits gambling, and, you know, let's say years later,
they walk by a gambling table, and instead of seeing the gambling table and immediately
thinking like, God, that's the worst thing that ever happened to me. The reaction is, well, that was sort of a memory of a feeling that I had.
And in order to get back that true feeling of I shouldn't do this,
I can only do that by doing it again.
It's sort of like a, not quite like rose-colored glasses,
but I think everyone's sort of had that same feeling about an ex before.
Years later, where you're like, well, what was so bad about that? But I think everyone's sort of had that same feeling about an ex before.
Years later, where you're like, yeah, what was so bad about that?
And like, should I, should I give them a call?
When in fact, it was a terrible situation and like to, to give them the call and trying, I mean, John Cusack made a whole movie about it, uh, to go back to and
revisit like the ex-girlfriends and it's just constantly reminded like the gambler
would be of like, no, this was a bad idea 20 years ago.
It's not a good idea now still.
Right.
And the same thing holds true for like smoking or something like that.
Like when you decide to quit smoking, quit gambling, break up, like you're in a
certain experience right then that you don't necessarily feel or experience a
year later.
So you have to remind yourself like
to make that same decision again.
Your future self could make a different decision
than you did right then and you have no control over it.
I know, pretty awesome, right?
Should we break or should we talk about Gary Cox?
Let's finish with Gary Cox real quick
because I like this guy's jib.
The cut of his jib, he's a British philosopher. We can pronounce his name so that's a plus.
And he looks at it more as an existentialist kind of thing where we have these psychological
defenses that we construct against thing but they're basically just all an illusion. It's
things that we make up to fool ourselves
into thinking we have an instinct for self-preservation.
Yeah, and he's saying that what Kierkegaard and Sartre
are both saying is essentially that we,
when we experience the call of the void,
that what's called bad faith,
as far as existentialists are concerned,
anytime we delude ourselves,
it's a bad faith illusion essentially.
That all of those are, are just essentially us diluting ourselves and it's laid bare by the call of the void.
Like the only reason you're not jumping right now is not because you have this
self preservation instinct is not because you don't want to do that to your family
or anything like that, it's because you are choosing right then not to jump.
That's it. That's the only thing It's because you are choosing right then not to jump. That's it.
That's the only thing that's preventing you from jumping right then.
And that scares the bejesus out of anybody who has a brain in their head
when they experience the call of the void,
especially when it's accompanied by the urge to jump,
not just the thought of jumping.
Yeah. So shall we break now?
Yes. Look at that whiff of ball go.
We've knocked it out of the park.
We'll come back and we'll talk about these intrusive thoughts that people are having right after this. Guess what, Mango?
What's that, Will?
So iHeart is giving us a whole minute to promote our podcast, Part-Time Genius.
I know!
That's why I spent my whole week composing a haiku for the occasion.
It's about my emotional journey in podcasting over the last seven years, and it's called
Earthquake House.
Mango, I'm going to cut you off right there.
Why don't we just tell people about our show instead?
Yeah, that's a better idea. So every week on Part-Time Genius,
we feed our curiosity by answering the world's most important questions. Things like, when did America start dialing 911?
Is William Shatner's best acting work in Esperanto? Also, what happened to Esperanto?
Plus we cover questions like, how Chinese is your Chinese food?
How do dollar stores stay in business?
And of course, is there an Illuminati of cheese?
There absolutely is, and we are risking our lives by talking about it.
But if you love mind blowing facts, incredible history, and really bad jokes, make your brains
happy and tune in to Part-Time Genius.
Listen to Part-Time Genius on the iHeart radio app or wherever you get your podcasts.
Hi, I'm Dani Shapiro, host of the hit podcast, Family Secrets.
Imagine this, your parents sign away your childhood to an academic psychological study
that tracks you all the way into your young adult life.
And how about this?
Your middle school kid stumbles onto something he never should have seen or known. Something from your secret life. And what about if your
sister is very publicly tried, convicted, and sent to prison when really she was
just telling her long-buried truths? These tough questions are just a few
that we'll be grappling with on our upcoming 10th season of Family Secrets.
With over 34 million downloads and nearly 100 unique stories in our feed, we continue
to admire and champion our guests whose empowering stories of resilience never fail to amaze,
enlighten and inspire.
Listen to season 10 of Family Secrets on the iHeartRadio app, Apple podcasts, or wherever
you get your podcasts.
Welcome to the CINO Show.
I'm your host, CINO McFarland.
I'm an addiction specialist.
I'm a coach, I'm a translator, and I'm God's middle man.
My job is to crack hearts and let the light in and help everyone shift the narrative.
Whether you get down to sex, drugs, alcohol, love addiction, self-hate,
codependency, or anything else of that matter, I want to help you wake up and I want to help
you get free. I want to help you unleash your potential, overcome obstacles, and achieve your
goals. Most importantly, I don't want you to feel alone. So join me on The CINO Show, where each
week we'll feature a compelling individual
with an even more noteworthy story that will be sure to inspire and educate. Listen to
The CINO Show every Wednesday on iHeart radio app, Apple podcast, or wherever you get your
podcasts. All right, tuck.
I feel like I should start with a confession.
I've been talking a lot of macho talk about T
balls and hitting it out of the park.
I, um, used to strike out at T-ball pretty often.
And they give you a lot more than just three strikes, uh, before they tell you to go sit
down, like maybe seven, eight, sometimes depending on the coach.
And I would still strike out and it happened more than once.
Yeah.
What was happening there?
What was happening there is I was a terrible tee ball player.
I didn't play tee ball, so, you know, I didn't have that experience.
But you know what tee ball is, right?
Yeah, you set a ball on a tee, it's not moving, it's not going anywhere.
And you've got a baseball bat in your hand.
Yeah. I thought I'd feel better after admitting that. I feel much worse, actually.
Well, you've told me that before, so I was pre...
I felt bad for you back then.
Now I just think it's funny.
Have I talked about it on the podcast or was it in private?
No, it was on the show, but that's okay.
That was years ago.
Okay.
Yeah, we've been doing this for 16 years.
It's gonna happen.
What?
Um, we promised talk about intrusive thoughts.
Uh, an intrusive thought isive thought is defined basically as a thought
that is not in character for you, that you're thinking it.
It's pretty bothersome and it's a hard thing
for you to control and if you start really digging in
and worrying about it and looking for meaning behind it,
they can be very, very disruptive to someone's life.
Yeah, they're really a problem for people who have clinical obsessive-compulsive disorder.
The reason why there's such a problem is, I mean, intrusive thoughts can affect anybody.
You don't have to have OCD.
The problem that accompanies OCD is that people will try to find a way of coping with that intrusive thought.
And the classic example is being a germaphobe, feeling like your hands are dirty.
So you go wash your hands. By washing your hands, you're coping with the sensation that your hands are dirty.
You have germs on your hands, and you alleviate that by washing your hands.
Well, if you have an intrusive thought and the idea that your hands are dirty
is essentially constant,
you're gonna spend a lot of your time washing your hands
and it's gonna actually impact your life.
That's a classic example of somebody suffering from OCD.
But if you take away the washing your hands
to alleviate that stress from the intrusive thought, you have what happens to
basically anybody.
This thought that kind of comes out of nowhere, it's often very, very troubling.
There's a whole variety called morbid obsessions, which is, you know, I could pick up that axe
and kill my whole family right now.
And then you're like, wait a minute, why am I thinking that?
And you feel horrible for that even crossing your mind because what loving,
you know, husband, wife, child would ever think of something like that.
Uh, and you start to go down that road and you're too
afraid to even bring it up to anybody.
You'll want to be like, Hey, I just thought of killing all of you guys with an X.
Let's talk that out.
So the more you keep it to yourself and ruminate on it, the more terrifying it
becomes, and that is essentially the cycle of intrusive thoughts
that can only be broken by essentially saying,
that was an intrusive thought,
I accept it was an intrusive thought,
I don't actually wanna kill my family with an axe,
and this kind of thing happens to everybody.
Yeah, and you know, Olivia pointed out,
she did a great job with this one by the way.
Yeah, she did.
She knocked the tea ball out of the park.
She did.
Olivia pointed out that this has a great job with us, by the way. She knocked the tea ball out of the park.
She did.
Olivia pointed out that this has led to a lot of bad stuff, especially with people with
OCD in the past with like the court system and like having children taken away or something
because the old idea as far as psychiatry is concerned or psychoanalysis is concerned was if you're
having these ideations, it's really a manifestation of your unconscious desire.
So if you have a thought about, you know, drowning your children and then all of a sudden
you're going down this rabbit hole of like, oh my God, how could I think that and what
is that all about now? And then you're just really drilling down into that because you're horrified by it. You have an out an analyst saying oh
well, that's really your unconscious desire your honor or
ladies and gentlemen of the jury and so you get your children taken away and now they're saying like that's not true at all
Like it's not an unconscious desire. Right? It. It's someone who's horrified by these thoughts
that are obsessing about them because they're horrified about it.
– Exactly. And I think the very fact that you're horrified by it shows you just how far you are
from actually committing that act. So, yeah, the idea that people used to get their children,
it happened at least twice. I could find two cases that happened fairly recently where mothers in both cases confided in either their psychiatrist or their
OBGYN who both just turned around and called Child Protective Services or the cops, you
know? And just the idea that they had it so backwards and that this happens to everybody,
but they lost their kids because they sought help for it.
That's just, that's terrible. So I'm glad we figured out that that's not the case.
And the fact that it can be treated pretty easily, you can even self-treat if you learn
the steps to identifying an intrusive thought, saying to yourself, it's just an intrusive thought.
Like I said, you don't want to do this and that this happens to everybody. If it's really bad and you feel like you can't self treat, there are treatments you can go seek that are also very effective.
One of them is exposure and response prevention.
And one of the examples I've seen is if you think about killing your family with a butcher knife,
your therapist will come to your house and give you the butcher knife and sit you on the couch next to your family with a butcher knife. Your therapist will come to your house and give you the butcher knife and sit you on
the couch next to your family and basically be like, do you really want to kill your family?
Because now is your time to do it if you want.
And I've seen that they actually will have, say like a father, look at their son and be
like, please don't kill me son, as part of this therapy.
And it works because you see firsthand, like you could do it right then and you're just, you don't kill me, son, as part of this therapy. And it works because you see firsthand,
like you could do it right then and you're just,
you don't want to, you're not going,
you're not moved to doing that.
You have control over your behavior
and you see it firsthand right there
and that tends to actually help quite a bit.
And so the fact that that helps and you can self-treat
shows that it is just a weird fluke of human psychology
and then it happens to everybody, including really violent, terrible stuff
that you can think about. Everyone, it happens to everyone.
Yeah, and if we uncomfortably giggled during that part, it's not because
we don't think that that must be the hardest thing in the world would be to sit down
and have a therapy session like that with your family.
I can't even imagine what that's like to sit down
and have to do something like that.
For what it costs.
Yeah.
Oh, I got a snort for that one.
Oh, wow, he sure did.
I don't do that much.
I guess we should talk about the studies.
When I say studies, I mean studies kind of one, two.
There haven't been a ton of them.
Livia dug up a couple.
In 2011, there was a psychologist named Jennifer Hames from Florida State,
along with her colleagues there at Florida State.
They're the people who coined the HPP term high places phenomenon and they asked 431 FSU
students I guess. Yeah go fighting Illini. No come on
Seminoles you know that. Yeah sure. They asked 431 of their students about their
experiences with high place phenomenon.
More than 30% had experience that urged to jump.
And among those who had never experienced suicidal ideation, because you know, when
they study something like this, they're trying to separate those things out of just the call
of the void and someone who actually has thought about taking their own lives.
Yeah, because Freud led everybody down a blind alley
by basically saying, oh, actually,
this is our innate drive to wanna kill ourselves.
Right.
That's really at play, and it turned out,
it's just not true at all.
Yeah, so among those who had never experienced
suicidal ideation, there were still 17%
who had the urge to jump at least one time.
And I believe half of the people who had suicidal feelings
said the same, it was about the same number.
Right, and the researchers were like,
this does not quite track, like, let's reframe the question.
And they asked the same people,
have you ever thought about jumping
from a bridge or a building?
And they're like, oh yeah, I've thought about that for sure.
That's what I'm saying.
There's a difference between just being up
there and thinking like, what would happen
if I did this?
The thought pops in your head.
Right.
Or the urge where you have to push yourself
away from the balcony.
Those are two slightly separate experiences
and the, the, just the thought popping in
people's heads seemed to be the more common one.
So when they reframe the question like that, 74% of people who had, um, uh,
gone through suicidal ideation said, yeah, I've done that.
43% of non-suicidal ideators just say the general population said
that that happened to them.
So almost half of people walking around are like said, like, yeah, it's
occurred to me to throw myself off the top
of a tall building when I've been up there.
And even then, Hames and her colleagues were like,
I still think that's a little small.
And they've come up with little ways to essentially say,
some people are forgetting that this actually happened to them.
Yeah, and mine is always a thought.
It's never a true urge. But they, you know, after this
study, one of the things that they talked about was sort of like what you said with Freud, where
they said like, no, this is not a manifestation of the death drive, of the urge to take your own life.
And they looked at actual, you know, real cases of suicide. They looked at previous research and all the data.
And their argument was, you know,
when someone takes their own life,
it's rarely a truly, truly impulsive act.
Right.
It's usually something that has happened over time
and it's a big sort of accumulation of these ideations.
And while the exact moment may have some impulsivity to it,
it's rarely just a completely impulsive act.
Right, and usually it's characterized by resolution
more than impulsiveness too.
You know, like the person is-
Right, like this is something I'm gonna do.
Yes, exactly.
So they basically said, okay, Freud was totally wrong,
but still we think that some people
don't really remember that this happened.
We think that more people than say 43% of the population
have experienced this.
And one of the explanations they had was that,
oh, one thing we left out,
they found a huge correlation
between people who experience anxiety and people
who have experienced the high place phenomenon or the call of the void.
Right?
And so what Haymes and her colleagues said was, all right, what we think happened
is when you're anxious, when you're an anxious person, you're more attuned to like internal signals.
Yeah.
And so you're, you are experiencing those like more acutely, um, like all the symptoms associated with it, like just being nervous and, um, just having like your stomach kind of topsy turvy, like those symptoms stand out to you more.
And so those people remember having experienced the call of the void more.
So they're more likely to report it. And that everybody, most people probably experience this.
It's just some people, it's just so fleeting
or whatever to them that they don't remember it later on.
I find that questionable,
but that's kinda how they explained it.
Yeah, and they also sort of wrapped their heads
around the idea that the call of the void
is a survival instinct.
It's kind of the opposite of what people, especially
Freud, had previously thought about it, is that it reflects a survival instinct
that we have to, you know, sort of think about that in terms of framing it, of how
they're appreciating being alive and not doing that.
Yeah, so the scientific explanation,
Oh, current, which means current,
um, is that you, uh, when you're up there on a
tall building and you're looking over the edge or
something like that, your innate instinct, like say
your lizard brain is like, jump back, Jack.
And so you, um, it sends a fear signal and your
rational brain, which is a little bit slower,
um, catches up and is like, hey, why
am I feeling fear?
There's no danger here whatsoever.
There's like a sturdy railing and I've got like a solid floor beneath my feet.
I guess I'm afraid or I guess I got a fear signal because I had the urge to jump and
that that's the call of the void, that it's a miscommunication or misunderstanding of of your physiology and your rational mind, essentially.
And that that's what the call of the void is.
I guess, I mean, that's certainly, certainly
jibes to a certain extent, but I don't,
it still doesn't quite stand out to me
like Kierkegaard's and Sartre's explanations.
Like, I think they just completely nailed it.
Like five, five years ago, I think they just completely nailed it.
I like, like five, five wiffle balls at once out of the park.
Yeah.
I mean, they, they did the study and they had data and stuff, but then there's a
lot of just philosophical extrapolation that you may not fully be on board with.
Yeah.
There was another study, I think maybe only the only other study,
I couldn't find any other ones.
No, huh?
Tobias Teismann and his other coworkers there
at Ruhr-Junevstädt-Bocham, this is in Germany.
That's the fighting Ruhr-Jurrs.
In 2020.
And they looked at a couple of different samples of patients, 276 people who did an online survey.
About half of them had experienced suicidal ideation at some point.
And then 94 patients who were being treated for flight phobia,
like, you know, fear of flying in a plane, which you used to have pretty solidly but seem to have gotten over pretty well. Yeah I did. You know you
don't cover your head with a blanket anymore when you fly, which is great. No
it is, it's very nice because that was torturous. Of course and along the lines
of the HAME study 80% of the people who had experienced suicidal ideation had
experienced HPP, 45% of those experience HPP
who hadn't gone through suicidal ideation.
Yeah, it's almost like exactly the same numbers,
which is crazy, and then it's crazy.
Who was that?
It was supposed to be walking, but that was just so bad.
I'm gonna say Colonel Sanders.
No, no, no, no, no, no. I got walking after you said it. So.
Just like every great impression.
Right.
Right after I explained it.
So Tobias Teismann,
is that how you pronounced his name earlier?
I think it's Teismann.
I think it's the second letter for Germany.
Okay.
Tobias Teismann et al.
This same study also used a different group,
looked at a different group,
people who suffer from clinical fear of heights, acrophobia.
And they found that only 45% of them had ever experienced high place phenomenon, which is
basically tracking exactly with the general population.
So that shows that it really is not, it doesn't stem from a fear of heights, even though there's other people that say that's exactly what it stems from.
And so then they, the people that they were reporting to and getting their funding from said,
so what'd you learn about the fear of flying? And they said, nothing.
Right.
Sorry.
Exactly. And Delta was like, man, we've got to stop funding these terrible studies.
Have you heard of this Call of the Void thing?
And they're like, oh, jeez.
We're only the second study.
So right.
We'll get it someday.
I say we take our second break and then come back and do more speculating.
All right. Hi, I'm Dani Shapiro, host of the hit podcast, Family Secrets.
Imagine this, your parents sign away your childhood to an academic psychological study
that tracks you all the way into your young adult life.
And how about this? Your middle school kid stumbles onto something he never
should have seen or known. Something from your secret life. And what about if your
sister is very publicly tried, convicted, and sent to prison when really she was
just telling her long-buried truths? These tough questions are just a few that we'll be grappling with on our upcoming tenth
season of Family Secrets.
With over 34 million downloads and nearly 100 unique stories in our feed, we continue
to admire and champion our guests whose empowering stories of resilience never fail to amaze,
enlighten, and inspire.
Listen to season 10 of Family Secrets
on the iHeartRadio app, Apple podcasts,
or wherever you get your podcasts.
Guess what, Mango?
What's that, Will?
So iHeart is giving us a whole minute
to promote our podcast, Part-Time Genius.
I know, that's why I spent my whole week
composing a haiku for the occasion.
It's about my emotional journey in podcasting
over the last seven years, and it's called
Earthquake House.
Mango, Mango, I'm going to cut you off right there.
Why don't we just tell people about our show instead?
Yeah, that's a better idea.
So every week on Part-Time Genius, we feed our curiosity by answering the world's most
important questions.
Things like, when did America start dialing 911?
Is William Shatner's best acting work in Esperanto?
Also, what happened to Esperanto?
Plus we cover questions like how Chinese is your Chinese food? How do dollar stores stay in
business? And of course, is there an Illuminati of cheese? There absolutely is, and we are risking
our lives by talking about it. But if you love mind-blowing facts, incredible history, and really
bad jokes, make your brains happy
and tune into Part-Time Genius.
Listen to Part-Time Genius on the iHeart Radio app
or wherever you get your podcasts.
Welcome to the CINO Show.
I'm your host, CINO McFarlane.
I'm an addiction specialist.
I'm a coach, I'm a translator, and I'm God's middle man.
My job is to crack hearts and let the light in
and help everyone shift the narrative.
Whether you get down to sex, drugs, alcohol,
love addiction, self-hate, codependency,
or anything else of that matter,
I wanna help you wake up and I wanna help you get free.
I wanna help you unleash your potential,
overcome obstacles, and achieve your goals.
Most importantly, I don't want you to feel alone.
So join me on The CINO Show,
where each week we'll feature a compelling individual
with an even more noteworthy story
that will be sure to inspire and educate.
Listen to The CINO Show every Wednesday
on iHeart radio app, Apple Podcast,
or wherever you get your podcasts.
So Olivia dug up some more, some more
Yep.
Is it gonna be this one?
I think this might be, this might be it. Yeah, that's a good one.
I think so too.
And I added an it, it's don't pick up.
Don't pick up.
Yeah, which is even funnier actually.
For sure.
There's a psychology professor from Britain,
or a researcher rather named Paul Salkowski,
who basically said the thoughts of doing these
inappropriate things or dangerous things
like the call of the void are a result
of our problem solving process within the brain.
So our subconscious is throwing something out there and then our rational brain getting
an opportunity to say like, no, of course I'm not going to jump off a bridge.
Right.
This is a terrible idea.
And then your unconscious is like, but you could.
Yeah.
I'm down with that one.
I'm not down with that one, rather.
Okay, I got one.
So, and I guess when we're going back and forth like this,
everybody should just imagine us like we're in a break off
and now like you've backed off,
like you did a little dance to back out
and now I did a little dance to back in or jump in.
Okay, so I-
Cardboards on the pavement.
There's a really great article in Nautilus about this too.
And there was a researcher named Adam Anderson, who is a cognitive
neuroscientist at Cornell.
I like this guy's idea.
He basically says that when we're on a tall building, we're so just not
designed to experience heights.
That's not exactly new.
I mean, cliffs have been around for a long time, but our experience of being high up is far more
frequent than it ever was in the past, just even a few
hundred years ago, right?
So when we're up there, that lizard brain again is
like, oh, we're in danger, we're in danger.
And that same lizard brain says, let's get to
safety as soon as possible.
Hey, there's the ground.
It's safe to be on the ground.
Let's just jump and be on the ground.
And luckily, our rational brain catches up in time and is like, no,
I get what you're saying.
Like, yes, this is kind of dangerous.
But jumping to the ground is a really terrible idea and
we're not gonna do that.
But that is the call of the void.
That's what gives us that urge to jump.
It's our dumb unconscious
minds seeking safety.
Yeah, that's interesting, I think.
Okay, you jumping in?
Well, I'll jump in.
Okay.
I'll pop and lock. Even though we said that it's not related to acrophobia, there are
people who think it is. There's an Oxford psychologist named Daniel Freeman who said,
no, it actually is part of the trifecta of what you might experience if you have a fear of heights,
fear of falling, fear that whatever you're on, the bridge or whatever, will collapse beneath you.
And then the third one, which is a fear of jumping.
So he lumps it in there as part of the trio of things
that what he thinks make up acrophobia.
Or the fear of jumping part of it,
he's saying like is the call of the void,
or triggered by it, I think.
Yeah, yeah, that's the call of the void,
but he thinks it is a form of acrophobia.
Right, exactly.
I don't know, I didn't see much support for his, but...
Nah.
Nah. There's a neuroscientist who apparently is a real pet ant
because psychologists have been seeking to basically
discredit Freud's idea that the call of the void
is actually a manifestation of our urge to destroy ourselves.
You know, large or writ large, right?
And they found like, no, that's not true.
And Emil Gabriel Bruno, uh, who again is a neuroscientist was like, uh, actually
there's a, there's a condition where you can actually have some sort of, um, pre
funnel cortex damage and you'll violate social norms left and right.
They, that person may actually follow the urge
of the call of the void.
It could actually result in somebody jumping.
And everybody stopped inviting Emile Gabriel Bruneau
to their conferences.
Yeah.
I'm with everybody there.
Yeah.
I don't need somebody pointing that out.
All kinds of terrible things can happen
when you have a damage to your brain.
Exactly.
You want to end with Judith Dankoff?
Yeah.
I'm gonna sit down and let you take it home.
Judith Dankoff is a novelist
who described the urge to jump in Washington state
from Deception Pass Bridge.
I mean, just that name alone
makes you wanna do
something weird, I think.
As not a frightening thing, but like an urge to fly.
And that's sort of along the lines of what I was
talking about, not necessarily urge to fly,
but just sort of like to see what it's like.
Right.
You know?
Yeah, and hers was serious enough or significant enough
that she just sat down in the middle
of the bridge to make sure she didn't actually follow through on the urge that it was that
strong.
Yeah, and she quit knitting her macrame wings.
Right.
You got anything else?
No sir.
That's the call of the void everybody.
Don't feel weird if number one, you experience it, and number two, you feel like no one's actually
fully explained what it is, because they haven't.
And since I said that, it's time for listener mail.
This is just sort of a quick one that came in today
because I think a lot of people don't know that this is the case,
and we say it from time to time, but this is about our bumper music
that we play between case and we say it from time to time, but this is about our bumper music that we play
between commercial and content.
Yes.
Hey guys, I've been listening to this show
for several years now, my hobby is woodworking,
so I always listen with earmuffs and Bluetooth,
built in Bluetooth to protect my ears
and still hear the show.
Wow.
I enjoy the very jingles that you play
at the beginning and the end of the breaks.
Even if I skip the ads, I always make sure to listen to the jingles and I usually
even sing along. Can you provide a collection of these? I'm not the only one who loves them.
Keep up with the great info and the entertaining tunes. That's from Rob. And Rob, we read this
because like I said, I don't think a lot of people realize
that those are all, 100% of them are made by listeners.
People send them in.
We don't use every single one of them.
Sometimes it's just, you know, some are better than others.
But we use most of them.
And we're always willing to listen to them.
Keep it around 12 seconds long.
And that's kind of been one of the very fun things of the show, is hearing everyone's
take on the Stuff You Should Know jingle theme.
Yeah, everybody has a favorite, too.
That's the coolest part, is you talk to Stuff You Should Know listeners and everybody has
their own favorite jingles.
Yeah, and sometimes Jerry is invested enough in editing a particular episode to try and be a little
cheeky with some particular style as it relates to topic.
And sometimes that happens purely by happenstance and has even happened to our disadvantage
at times when people are like, hey, why'd you play that kind of music in this one?
That's really not too cool.
And it's just like, oh oh shoot, that was an accident.
Right.
Yeah, I remember the one you're talking about too.
And I'm not going to name it either.
Yeah.
Who was that from?
That's from Rob.
That was awesome, Rob.
Thank you for asking that, setting us up
like a T-ball coach for that one.
If you want to be like Rob and get in touch with us
and ask us a question that we can answer, we love to answer questions. And if you're a listener who has a little bit of musical talent
and you want to share a jingle with us, we would love that too. Either way, you can wrap it up,
spank it on the bottom, and send it off to stuffpodcast at iHeartRadio.com.
Stuff You Should Know is a production of iHeartRadio. For more podcasts, Welcome to The CINO Show.
I'm your host, Cino McFarlane.
I'm an addiction specialist. I'm a coach
I'm a translator and I'm God's middleman. My job is to crack hearts and let the light in and help everyone shift the narrative
I want to help you wake up and I want to help you get free. Most importantly
I don't want you to feel alone. Listen to the CINO show every Wednesday on iHeart, radio app,
Apple podcast or wherever
you get your podcasts.
Want to know how to leverage culture to build a successful business?
Then Butternomics is the podcast for you.
I'm your host, Brandon Butler, founder and CEO of Butternomics.
On Butternomics, we go deep with today's most influential entrepreneurs, innovators, and
business leaders to peel back
the layers on how they use culture as a driving force in their business.
Butternomics will give you what you need to take your game to the next level.
Listen to Butternomics on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts or wherever you get your
podcasts.
There's something different about the conversations we have late at night.
They often spin off in strange and wonderful directions.
So what if those laid back conversations were with some of the biggest musicians in the world?
Midnight Chats has already welcomed Taemin Parlor,
Charli XCX, Mark Ronson, Vince Staples and many more.
Join me, Stuart Stubbs.
And me, Greg Cochran.
As we talk to our favourite musicians about the things they don't normally talk about.
Listen to the new series of Midnight Chats on the iHeartRadio app,
Apple Podcasts or wherever you get your favourite shows.