Stuff You Should Know - The Luddites: Misunderstood Working Class Heroes
Episode Date: August 22, 2024Today we think of Luddites as people who don’t know how to use technology or are maybe even afraid of it. That’s pretty far from what the original Luddites were all about. They were the first work...ers to fight for fair treatment. They were not successful.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
The summer of sports is on and I'm feeling the competitive spirit.
Luckily, I have Monopoly Go. Over 150 million have downloaded it to play with other tycoons
to expand their empire and their riches. And my favorite part is playing with my friends.
It's such a rush to win special rewards with a buddy and a partner event.
Or I can go after their fortunes to be a top tycoon. I can smash their landmarks, pull bank
heists, or charge them rent like in classic Monopoly. So make your move and download Monopoly Go, now free on the App Store and Google Play.
For so many people living with an autoimmune condition like myasthenia gravis or chronic
inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, the emotional toll can be as real as the physical
symptoms.
That's why, in an all-new season of Untold Stories, Life with a Severe Autoimmune Condition
from Ruby Studio and Argenics, host Martine Hackett gets to the heart of the emotional
journey for individuals living with these conditions.
To find community and inspiration on your journey, listen now on the iHeartRadio app,
Apple podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Welcome to Stuff You Should Know, a production of iHeartRadio.
Hey and welcome to the podcast.
I'm Josh and there's Chuck and Jerry's here too.
We're about to break our computers just to get in the mood for this episode.
Good job, my friend.
Do you think so?
Because a lot of the times you say like,
oh, that was great, or way to go, or something like that.
And I'm like, that was not that good.
And that's a good example of that.
No, I don't mean that joke.
I mean the article you put together,
just like the old days.
Oh, good.
OK, good.
So it's clear you're not gaslighting me
about my jokes being good. No, this article is great. The joke was mid. Let's do it.
All right, let's do it. So we're talking about Luddites, and I think just about everybody in
the English-speaking world and probably beyond are familiar with the Luddites to some degree or not.
But just as a little background refresher, the Luddites were a group of textile workers living at the
beginning of the 19th century in the Midlands in the north of England which
had recently become industrialized and they didn't like the machines that were
the new technology for using for making textiles so they broke them all and
that's the Luddites. There's nothing more to understand, there's no more nuance to them than that.
Well, yeah, and I think a lot of people
may not even know where the name came from
and may just think Luddite is a word
for someone who is afraid of technology
or hates technology.
It's kind of been co-opted as such.
But as we will learn, you're being coy, and there is a lot of nuance.
And what the Luddites really were, were a people that got together,
some craftsmen and artisans that got together.
And were sort of the first workers' rights people who very reasonably tried
to make workers' rights deals in the face of the Industrial Revolution
and only turned to this after that failed.
Yeah. So, this was the first instance of capitalism kind of steamrolling over labor.
Really steamrolling.
Steamrolling over, yeah.
Literally.
Steamrolling over labor and labor's rights and basically taking care of labor
and being equitable and fair and profit sharing,
the first instance.
And so they were the first people to fight against it.
And sadly, they were the first people to lose that battle.
First of many.
Yeah, they were the Bernie bros of the day.
So let's go back, way back.
Not all the way back.
Let's just go back to 2012, Chuck.
Oh, sure.
Because I like this anecdote.
Yeah, yeah.
That was the Summer Olympics that I believe Danny Boyle curated the opening ceremony and
all that stuff that year, right?
Yeah.
The 2012 London Olympics, Summer Olympics, and the opening ceremony, there was kind of
a super brief synopsis of English history.
Yeah, that's what you do.
Yeah, it was really great.
Just like France did.
Right, exactly.
So there's this moment in the opening ceremonies where the people all move from the countryside
to the city.
And if I remember correctly, I'm doing this from memory, they were hearkened by men in
black suits wearing stove top, stove pipe hats.
And what that represented was the beginning of industrialization.
We tend to think of the industrial revolution here in America as happening here in America.
That was the second one.
The first one had taken place 100 to 50 years before in England, specifically in the north of England
in like towns like Manchester and Liverpool.
And the reason that everybody was being called from the countryside to the city, figuratively
and literally, was because that's where the machines are.
The new machines that have been perfected using steam power that could automate all
sorts of different processes
that used to have to be done by hand.
They were big and they were cumbersome
and they were expensive.
So rather than people doing stuff in their home anymore,
they had to go to where the machines are to do work now.
That was a radical change.
Yeah, a big change.
And that same change, you know,
we've talked about plenty of times
in terms of our American experience here.
But like you said, it happened previously in England same deal people from the country moving into the city
Steam power running the show and the first industry over there to kind of get smashed in the face with that new reality
was the textile industry and
there in the Midlands of of
England am I even saying that right?
Cause we were about to say a lot of Shires.
I think it's pronounced the Midlands, it's spelled Midlands,
but it's pronounced Worcestershire.
Right.
But all over that area, Yorkshire, Derbyshire, Leicester, Lancashire, Nottinghamshire?
Mm hmm. Cheshire?
Yeah, the Cheshire cat.
Okay.
Did I get all those?
Why is Lester the only one that's not pronouncing the shur?
It is.
That's Lester-shire.
Oh, did I say it wrong to begin with then?
No, no.
You just left off the shur.
And so just a little note, because I didn't understand this until I finally just went
and looked it up.
Like Leicester is the main town,
the county seat, if you will,
of the larger county of Leicester sure.
So when there's a suffix of S-H-I-R-E
on the end of a town name,
that refers to the county.
And the town is usually the biggest town
or the main town in that county.
Finally cleared that up. So in those areas, this is where the textile artisans, and you know, there were workers, they were
crafts people, trades people, they went through sort of that traditional route where you're an apprentice, you learn the craft.
They had these robust trade unions and guilds that made sure the quality of the worker was up to snuff,
the quality of the product and the materials were all up to snuff.
And they had this good deal going with the merchant class up to that point where these
wealthy merchants basically funded the operations and then split the profits.
They would say, here, we're going to put a loom in your house.
These hand looms aren't too huge. They can fit in your barn. We're going to give you
some good high quality materials to spin, and we'll split the profits in a way that
works for both of us. And they had a good life. They were like working three or four
days a week at home and like, you know, making textiles and earning a good living.
uh, and like, you know, making textiles and earning a good living.
Yeah.
So, and there was a quote from a guy named William Gardner, who was a stocking maker at the time, which was a huge industry right at the beginning,
or up until the beginning of the, um, industrial revolution.
And he said the year was checkered with holidays, wakes, which are festivals
held in honor of patron saints and fairs.
It was not one dull round of labor and like it was just a much more leisurely life than what was
about to come and the thing that's so gripping about the beginning of the
Industrial Revolution and specifically the the initial disruption in the
textile industry is that it happened overnight. I mean, we're talking in the span of like maybe 10, 12, 15 years.
People went from, they just worked at home three or four days a week to having
to work 12 to 13 hour days, seven days a week in a factory just to make less
money than they had been making before at home.
Yeah.
And the other thing too was this wasn't like the the beginning of automation.
There had been automation in textile manufacturing for a little while at this point but and this is
very key Queen Elizabeth I saw the writing on the wall way back in the day and said hey William Lee
you want a patent for this machine? You can't have one, because that's going to put too many people out of work.
So it's very interesting that long before this happened with the Luddites,
Queen Elizabeth I saw what was coming.
Yeah, that was pretty prescient for sure.
And so yes, that's a big misconception.
People are like, these machines just came up out of nowhere and all of a sudden it just disrupted everything.
No, the machines have been there for hundreds of years.
What changed was the way that the machines were used and that they were improved along the way.
Like the machine that William Lee invented in 1580 compared to the machines that were being used in 1780 or 1800 or 1810 were pretty different.
The ones that came later were much, much better. And that there were a bunch of
different machines that were used in the weaving textile creation process that
had all become improved enough that you could put them all together and have and
create a mill. That was part one of why this all kind of happened at
the time that it did. Yeah, I mean, if you have a factory,
it can't just be the machine that makes the thing.
You need all the other machines
to automate that process as well
if you want a really efficient system.
Right.
And so that's what happened.
One of the other things that happened to kind of,
and again, we keep saying steam roll or steam power,
but this thing was full steam ahead.
Stop.
When Adam Smith wrote a book in 1776 called An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the
Wealth of Nations, no colon.
No.
And we've talked a lot about Adam Smith on this show, and he was the guy that basically
said, hey, you know what?
Free market's the way to go.
Laissez-faire economics is the way to go.
Let people stay out of things.
Let the market work it out.
Let the manufacturers and
the business owners work it out with the workers.
And the merchant class,
like why are you splitting all these profits?
Like you should be keeping the lion's share of this stuff.
And the merchant class was like, I love this book.
Yeah.
And to be fair to Adam Smith, like he wasn't advocating for workers to get completely screwed
over.
No.
His arguments and his ideas and his theory of free market competition were interpreted
in a way by the merchant class to mean that they should be self-interested
and maximize profits as much as they could.
He wasn't necessarily expressly saying that.
He almost seems to have been a little naive, or at the very least, he didn't predict the
way that his theory would be used, I think.
Oh, I mean, I think that's exactly the thing, was he thought when he was saying it'll work
itself out,
he wasn't saying to the benefit of few and the detriment of many.
He was saying they'll all just kind of like as we will see, the England did.
They were kind of like, hey, you guys will work this out and we should just stay out
of it and I'm sure you'll come to a fair agreement.
Yeah.
So kind of, I guess kind of like the pendulum is going to swing this way and then it'll
swing back that way and that way
And they'll finally just settle in the middle
But the pendulum ended up swinging one way toward owners management capital and just got stuck there midair and has been there ever since
Yeah, that's a pin Joe is what do you call a pendulum that doesn't swing anymore?
Stick sounds like a riddle
Okay, so we got a stick now
Sounds like a riddle. Okay.
So, we got a stick now.
So, there was a third factor too, and that was the economic background of England at
the turn of the 19th century.
It was in a really big recession at the time.
Yeah, they had been at war with Napoleon for a long time.
That's going to drain your resources as a nation.
And then they also, because they were at war with France, had blockades against each other,
but shut down a big trade partner.
Those markets that were open to those merchants in England were suddenly closed.
And it hit everyone across the board in England.
Like there was, like families were going hungry for the first time in a long time.
Yeah.
People who had been able to escape, you to escape previous recessions were getting hit hard.
So the reason that this is important is that
first of all now you have desperate workers who are in a situation that
they need help, which puts them in a disadvantage.
And then at the same time you also have a good reason, especially
now that everyone's read The wealth of nations, um, for the,
the owners of these looms, what were the merchant class and are about to
become the first industrialists.
They have a good reason to replace workers with automated machines because
profits are starting to dwindle.
You want to maximize profits.
So that's a really great way to do it.
Replace a bunch of people who you have to pay
like a fair wage to with some machines
that you just pay for upfront and then hire some teenager
to make sure it keeps running and pay him peanuts for doing so.
Boy, this was really the beginning of the downfall of everything
because this is the beginning of,
hey man, this stuff's not gonna be as good,
but who cares?
We can make it for cheap,
and we can sell it for cheaper,
and if they wear out,
people can just buy another cheap version of it
that we'll make.
Uh, it's like, this was the beginning of the drop of,
uh, and craftsmanship and quality and everything.
I think that's why I find this period so fascinating,
because our modern world was
created like here in this like decade,
actually just a few years really.
And it's funny that you say the quality of
goods went down because I've seen more than
once it argued that the thing that really
sparked the Luddite movement was not the
new technology, was not the unfair
treatment, was not the poor wages.
It was the decline in the quality
of what was being produced.
What formerly, like socks essentially, stockings,
what had been produced before with great craftsmanship
and sold at a fair price,
was now being made really cheaply and sold cheaply,
and that that's what really set off the people
who were in the textile industry
to basically riot later on.
Yeah, I mean, what it did was it put them in a position
where they were, you know, if you wanted to stay out
of that and remain, because it's not like every single
small, you know, business textile crafts person
went out of business overnight.
Like they were like, I could keep this open,
like I actually own my own loom, but now I have to,
you know, use cheaper goods and sell them cheaper
if I want to keep up or, you know, just give up and go work for them.
And neither one of those were good prospects.
No, no, because there were zero regulations at the outset of this.
So the mill owners just did whatever they wanted.
And you could either go out on the street and starve or you could come work for me under
my terms.
And so the work in the mills was really difficult.
They kept it really damp in there,
so tuberculosis would run rampant and kill a bunch of people.
The fabric, like little particles of fabric
could give you lung damage.
The machines altogether were really loud,
so they could give you hearing damage.
And the machines were really dangerous too.
Like people would lose their lives, including children,
that again were working 13, 14 hour
days, seven days a week at the mill.
Yeah, and they didn't need those artisans anymore because they could train a 17-year-old
to run these automated, you know, the automated machinery.
And this was like, you know, this was the birth of capitalism when the quality went
down, prices went down,
fewer and fewer workers getting paid less for more work, and the people that own the
joint getting rich.
Right.
But I think for those of us alive today, because capitalism was birthed this way, a lot of
people are like, well, capitalism doesn't work.
It's inherently exploitive.
That's not true.
It was just born that way. It doesn't have to be that way,
but it was born that way and it was allowed to remain that way and grow up that way so that it's
just so commonplace now that people think like that's the only way it can be. And I firmly believe
that there's an equitable way to do capitalism, just not doing it, that that's what the issue is.
And that this is where that started.
Yeah.
That ship has sailed my friend. That stick is not moving.
Disagree.
Oh, you think there's going to be a big change in that?
I think, yeah, I think there can be.
I'm not saying there definitely will be, but I think that there's, there's the
potential for it.
Sure.
I don't think it's completely, it's just going to be that way forever.
Not necessarily.
It could be, but I don't think that is definitely going to be.
That's my take.
All right.
Well, I admire your optimism.
So shall we take a break?
Yeah.
The summer of sports is on and I'm feeling the competitive spirit.
Luckily, I have Monopoly Go.
Over 150 million have downloaded it to play with other tycoons to expand their empire
and their riches.
And my favorite part is playing with my friends.
It's such a rush to win special rewards with a buddy and a partner event.
Or I can go after their fortunes to be a top tycoon.
I can smash their landmarks, pull bank heists, or charge them rent like in Classic Monopoly. So make your move and download Monopoly Go, now free on the app store
and Google Play. Want to know how to leverage culture to build a successful business? Then
Butternomics is the podcast for you. I'm your host, Brandon Butler, founder and CEO of Butter ATL.
Over my career, I've built and helped run multiple seven-figure businesses that leverage
culture and built successful brands.
Now I want to share what I've learned with you.
And on Butternomics, we go deep with today's most influential entrepreneurs, innovators
and business leaders to peel back the layers on how they use culture as a driving force
in their business.
On every episode, we get the inside scoop on how these leaders tap into culture to
build something amazing.
From exclusive interviews to business breakdowns, we'll explore the journey of
turning passion for culture into business.
Whether you're just getting started or an established business owner, Butternomics
will give you what you need to take your game to the next level.
This is Butternomics.
Listen to Butternomics on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. from the person who experienced it firsthand. I'm excited to share that you can now get access to all new episodes of Haunting, 100% ad-free,
and one week early with an iHeart True Crime Plus
subscription, available exclusively on Apple Podcasts.
So don't wait.
Head to Apple Podcasts, search for iHeart True Crime Plus,
and subscribe today.
All right, one thing that we mentioned in Act 1. You like that?
Fancying this thing up a little bit?
We forgot to introduce the gun that goes off in Act 3.
That's right.
You know what?
I found out who that was.
That was Chekhov that said that.
Yeah. You finally found that out?
Sure. I thought it was you.
No. Are you serious? You thought that was me?
No, I knew it was kind of like a trope,
but I didn't know that Chekhov had come up with it.
I guess I'm not so familiar with 19th century plays as you.
Well, you probably never took drama class I guess I'm not so familiar with 19th century plays as you.
Well, you probably never took drama class or dumb English classes where you read dramas.
Well, what's sad is I was a tried and true drama kid in high school.
Really?
Yeah, we just didn't do any Chekhov. It was all slapstick comedy in my high school.
Well, if the rubber chicken is introduced in Act 1.
It comes back to life and kills everyone in Act 3.
All right, where was I?
Okay, Act 1, when we spoke of the misconception that Luddites are afraid of technology.
And I hinted a little further about what I'm going to say now, which is they tried to
work it out. They weren't like oh my gosh
industrialization is happening we need
to fight it tooth and nail. They were
more like hey it looks like this is
happening so let's you know there's
gonna be a man one day named Josh Clark
who will believe that this can still
happen. We want to make it fair for
everyone so like we'll do, we'll do this work.
Give us a minimum wage, make these working conditions safe, maybe tax these goods some
to create these pensions for people that you're definitely putting out of work.
And let's like just roll this out slowly.
Let's not just go full steam ahead here and give people time to like learn how to do something
else and they went nope
Nope, nope, nope. Nope. Yeah, and that's just so contrary to what people think of as the Luddites today
I mean if you even know about the Luddites beyond, you know
The modern use of the word that there was an actual group you probably still don't think that they were a reasonable group
That's not exactly what they're known for because they broke a bunch of machines. But that was exactly their initial response.
They wanted in, but they wanted in fairly.
And so, like you said, the responses to the requests
were no, no, no, no, no.
And it wasn't just the factory and mill owners
that were saying no.
The government was also saying no.
And essentially, when the workers went to parliament, when some labor-friendly parliamentarians,
MPs tried to get legislation passed that kind of helped workers be treated more fairly,
it just did not pass.
And the idea was, the reasoning was among parliament, that anything we would do would
just screw things up.
Like any regulations we create are just going to hamper business, maybe put business people
out of business, their employees are going to be out on the street.
And so a job where you're exploited is preferable to no job at all.
And since any meddling we might do will possibly cause you to lose your job,
we're just not going to get involved.
Yeah, but they did get involved.
They got involved for the other side.
Yeah, big time.
In 1799, they passed the Combination Acts,
which outlawed the trade guilds
that had kept them protected up until that point.
It stopped them from collective bargaining.
It outlawed strikes.
So they took away basically any tool they would have to get fair treatment and better
wages.
And this is another key point too, was they had had machines before, we talked about that,
Queen Elizabeth not granting the patent, but the machines were still around since the mid-1700s.
And some of those machines had been broken in the past in protest, but they augmented
this law basically on the books that said, hey, if you start up with that stuff again,
you're going to go to the gallows and be hanged in front of the town.
Yeah. So just to kind of put that into perspective today, imagine if hacking carried the death
penalty.
That's kind of akin to what it was like, but even more simplified than that.
It would be more like breaking the computer that your employer gave you when you were
hired, like on purpose.
Or going into an Apple store with a crowbar.
But imagine that that carried the death penalty.
So when you put all of that together, the
government, parliament was essentially saying,
get to work and whatever the mill owners tell you
to do, you're going to do it.
And if you try to resist, you got us to deal with.
That's the way things are.
That's essentially what parliament said.
As the leadites and the textile workers who have become Luddites were trying to approach
this from a reasonable manner.
Yeah, absolutely. And that started, you know, a couple of years of what the Luddites are
known for, for busting these machines up and more, which we'll get to. But they pointed to the previous couple of hundred years earlier when they had already
been breaking machines.
And that stuff happened, but it just kind of came and went.
The Luddites were organized.
There are a lot more of them.
They were super coordinated.
One historian that you found said that, you know, talked about how well-branded they were because they were known as something.
They were known as Luddites, ironically leaderless, even though supposedly this, by all accounts,
is an urban legend named Ned Ludd was their leader.
Yeah.
So just a little on Ned Ludd.
It's pretty clear that Ned Ludd,
especially as leader of the Luddites, never existed.
He was fictitious.
It's possible that there was somebody named Edward Ludlum
who was the real life person that Ned Ludd became based on.
But the story of the whole thing, the story of Ned Ludd,
is that in 1779, a young, I think he was
a weaver named Ned Ludd, was either told by his father or boss, whoever he was working
for at the time, to tighten his needles or square his needles, which means tighten his
weave, or he was told to create cheaper, cheaper product faster. Either way, in a fit of rage, he broke his loom. He broke the machine
that he was working on in protest. So this is 1779. And by the time that 1811 rolls around,
which is when the Luddites really started to rise up, Ned Ludd was kind of like this
catch-all in the textile community. Anytime something happened to a loom, it broke, it was purposely broken,
it was just kind of like, Ned Ludd did it.
You're gonna hate this analogy, so I'm sorry in advance.
But it was kind of like the Family Circus Kids' I Don't Know.
Yeah, I love it.
Oh, wow, that was surprising.
My teeth were clenched waiting for your response.
Yeah. I couldn't remember.
Cause there are other examples of that of like a made up person of like so and so
did it that weren't even real people.
I just can't think of them.
So family circus is the perfect analogy.
Okay.
Great.
Well, thank you.
I was, wow.
I was not expecting this.
I'm going to have to take a break here for a second.
I mean, I hate the family circus still.
You didn't win me over.
Okay.
But I love the ref.
Everything's back to normal.
Good.
But regardless, Ned Ludd was kind of this urban legend.
Went by, you know, King Ludd, Captain Ludd, General Ludd.
But all of this was the idea that he was the leader
of the Luddites when there was no clear leader.
I mean, you know, in different places, depending
where it was taking place, there were, of course, people who might have led the charge
that night or for that operation, but there was no, like, central leader, yet they remained,
like, highly organized.
Yeah.
I mean, like, the Luddites were an actual group that spread across the Midlands and
into Yorkshire from 1811 to 1813.
Some people say 1816, because there was another uprising that year, but really
the Luddite revolution took place from 1811 to 1813.
And there, there, it was a group of people, of textile workers who had sworn a secret oath to this organization, but like you said, it was decentralized.
There was no Ned Ludd, but they were so organized that the British government and the officials
and the mill owners who were trying to break up this organization believed that there very
much was a Ned Ludd.
There had to be a Ned Ludd because who else was leading these people and stirring up unrest
that was spreading across the northern part of the country? So I don't even think we mentioned like the very first thing that happened.
That was in March of 1811 when a group of, you know, these,
what would be known as Luddites a little bit later on,
took to the streets in protest, of course, of their pay, their working conditions.
The British troops came in, broke it up, and they dispersed,
but they came back later that night, and that was the first night of this new, like, hey,
let's break everything. They went to a mill, they trashed everything inside, and that was
sort of the first rubber chicken fired in this new round of busting stuff up. Yeah. That was March. Um, the next big thing that happened was in November.
There was a, um, a group of Luddites who attacked
the home of Edward Hollingsworth, who was, um,
an owner of several automatic looms.
He was, I guess, kind of like a craftsman merchant
all rolled into one.
The reason that he was targeted is because he was
using those looms to make these new cheap stockings that had just completely undermined
the entire stocking trade.
And so they, they broke all of the looms in the
guy's house and left.
Um, and Edward Hollingsworth is like, well,
at least they didn't burn my house down.
And then a week later, the Luddites came back
and burned his house down.
Yeah.
That was, uh, yeah, this seemed like a little much. and burned my house down. And then a week later, the lights came back and burned his house down.
Yeah.
That was, uh, yeah, this seemed like a little much,
but it was a vengeful act that happened because
they were mad.
Yeah.
And so we should say there's a, like a lot of
attacks like this between 1811 and 1813.
And it all started in Nottingham, sure.
Um, in Nottingham specifically and it just kind of
spread. It was a great idea among these pent-up angry textile workers whose entire worlds had
just been upended. So it spread very, very easily. And it was, I think, in a December issue of the
Nottingham Review that the story of Ned Ludd was told and that's
when they became known as the Luddites. And so these textile workers, like
I said, they swore a secret oath to protect this organization with their
lives and in doing so they swore an allegiance to, like you said, King Ludd or
General Ludd. And of course the textile workers knew that Ned Ludd didn't exist and to kind of underscore
that they placed his base of operations in Sherwood Forest in Nottingham, which probably
sounds familiar to anybody who's seen any version of Robin Hood.
Yes, very cheeky thing to do.
For sure.
One of the other misconceptions is that the Luddites were so angry that they just trashed
everything with reckless abandon and went after everyone and tried to wreck all these
factories.
That wasn't the case.
They were very targeted.
Any one that was known to be like a good boss and a good factory owner who treated their
employees more fairly, they did not go and trash their factory. The people who were known to be especially
bad and egregious violators of workers' rights, they were targeted. But they even got letters
beforehand a lot of times that were like, hey, you got a chance here to change things.
Otherwise, next week, we're going to trash your factory or move those things out of there,
make some changes or it's happening.
And they would not do that.
Sometimes they would try and move their machinery
out of there, but because these were kind of
working class heroes, they would get tipped off
on when these caravans were doing that.
And so in the middle of the night,
they would intercept these caravans
and get them out there instead of in the factory.
I just see the mill owners trying to remove their looms in the middle of the night, like Otho trying to escape in Beetlejuice.
Have you seen the new trailer yet for the new one?
No, and I don't want to see it. I just want to go into that movie completely unaware of everything.
Well, you should. I mean, it looks like Beetlejuice.
I hope it didn't spoil it. Yes, you should. I mean it looks like Beetlejuice. I hope it didn't spoil it. Yes you did. You didn't, that's fine. But yeah I'm very excited about seeing that.
No, same here. I wanted to see that Broadway play but it went away.
Did it? Yeah it was supposed to be really good so I don't know if it just had its
run and stopped or what. I'll bet it's playing in New Mexico somewhere.
Well I think there is a traveling version, so maybe it'll come through.
I'll bet it's in New Mexico.
So they were breaking looms at a rate of about $175 a month.
This got very costly for the machinery replacement costs, productivity not happening,
not putting out these stockings and socks and things.
And in 1812, things really, really changed for the scarier. And maybe that's a good time for another break? Sure, I was not expecting that, but yes. All right, we'll keep everyone on the edge stockings. We'll be right back. Brandon Butler, founder and CEO of Butter ATL. Over my career, I've built and helped run multiple seven-figure businesses that leverage culture
and built successful brands.
Now I wanna share what I've learned with you.
And on Butternomics, we go deep with today's
most influential entrepreneurs, innovators,
and business leaders to peel back the layers
on how they use culture as a driving force
in their business.
On every episode, we get the inside scoop
on how these leaders tap in the
culture to build something amazing.
From exclusive interviews to business breakdowns, we'll explore the journey of
turning passion for culture into business.
Whether you're just getting started or an established business owner,
Butternomics will give you what you need to take your game to the next level.
This is Butternomics.
Listen to Butternomics on the iHeart Radio
app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Hey guys, I'm Lauren Lapkus, voice of Tereza and host of Haunting. In this series, we'll
be bringing you different totally true ghost stories each week straight from the person
who experienced it firsthand. I'm Simone Boyce.
I'm Danielle Robay.
And we're the hosts of The Bright Side, the daily podcast from Hello Sunshine that's guaranteed
to light up your day.
Every weekday we bring you conversations with the culture makers who inspire us.
Like a recent episode with author and podcaster, Glennis McNichol, on her new memoir, I'm mostly
here to enjoy myself.
It's all about seeking pleasure in middle age. At some point I stopped feeling shame
around any part of my existence.
There was a point where I thought,
who's benefiting from my feeling of shame?
If there's a general sense of like,
oh goodness, she's doing what she wants,
who benefits from you feeling bad about that?
Because usually not anyone whose opinion
you're interested in, I would argue.
Listen to The Bright Side from Hello Sunshine on the iHeartRadio app, Apple podcasts, or
wherever you get your podcasts. Okay, Chuck, so you said 1812 was kind of like a watershed year and definitely was.
Things got much more violent.
Essentially the Luddites and the Luddite movement as it was spreading across the Midlands and
into Yorkshire became like engaged in all-out war with mill owners. Um, and it could be, you know, a handful of them
wearing masks and carrying swords and muskets
that would attack a, you know, someone's house
and break all their looms.
It could be 2000 of them.
Um, like what happened in one attack, uh, in
March, I believe, or it could be a couple of
hundreds, um, one of the most famous, uh, was
called the battle of Rawfold's mill in Huddersfield in West Yorkshire.
And there were between 100 and 200, depending on who you ask,
former workers of that mill who stormed it one night.
And it just got super violent.
Yeah, because these owners had had enough.
They start hiring armed guards, like mercenaries basically, to stand by and watch with their
rifles.
And there was a gun battle.
Two, I believe two of the Luddites were shot.
They later died.
They retaliated.
They assassinated William Horsefall, which was a really sort of ardent anti-Luddite.
He had talked about riding up to a Saddle Gerson, ludite blood.
And so they went after him, assassinated him in a bar.
I think he ended up dying a couple of days later, but they shot him in the thighs, the
hip, and the testicles.
Not that that's funny.
I don't know why I laughed, but it just seemed like a particularly egregious thing to do.
And they took him back to the bar where he was,
had been spouting off and drinking,
and he died there a couple of days later.
Something ironic about that is that Horsfall,
when he left that bar initially before he got shot,
he had just bought a round of drinks
for some of his workers.
Talk about irony.
One other thing to know about the Luddites is that their secret was not only kept by them,
but by the communities that they came from. You might think like, okay, these guys are burning
down mills and breaking machines. They're putting people out of work. And that's absolutely true.
They also would go into people's homes and requisition weapons to use for raids. And yet,
almost universally, they were beloved and kept secret by the local communities. And yet, almost universally, they were beloved
and kept secret by the local communities.
And that's evidenced by the army of spies
that the British government sent in to try to break up
this movement who could get nowhere.
They got nothing.
And as a matter of fact, the spies started reporting back
that there was such a person as Ned Ludd.
They got so, their efforts were just that frustrated.
Yeah.
So they've sent in spies.
They're getting nowhere.
There's actual bloodshed happening now at a quicker rate.
And so they're like, we got to do something.
We have to get involved militarily.
And they sent in troops, initially just to sort of quiet things down.
They had 14,000 troops stationed in the Midlands and Yorkshire.
They had more people stationed there than they had fighting the war with Napoleon at
the time.
That's crazy.
They, you know, they had some sort of effect, but they didn't completely like break the
movement up.
And so they finally said, all right, remember that death penalty
stipulation we put in there about going into the Apple Store with a crowbar, we're going
to start enforcing that. And they started hanging dozens of Luddites in public after
hasty trials, sometimes even teenagers. And that was what really got everyone's attention,
that they could be put to death for this.
Yeah, there was one particularly grim day in Lancashire where I think they hanged 14 Luddites,
including, like you said, a teenager, a 16-year-old who'd only acted as a lookout for one of the raids.
And they were clearly making an example out of these people.
These were very public trials, very public hangings.
They built special gallows so they could hang multiple people at the same time.
Like they were, the British government was saying like,
we're just going to keep doing this.
We're going to kill you if we catch you, so you better stop.
And that's what finally worked.
Other people, by the way, were transported to Australia, sometimes for life.
They would just take them there and be like, you transported to Australia, sometimes for life.
They would just take them there and be like,
you're Australian now.
Good for them.
Right.
All of that put together, the fact that now,
the one remaining tool they had in their toolbox
to try to fight for equal treatment
or at least better treatment at work,
was now like they would get the death penalty for that.
That finally broke up the Luddite movement around 1813. Yeah and they had about another dozen years
of you know pretty bad treatment until finally the there was a bit of a wake-up
call for the British government and in 1824 Parliament said you know what maybe
unions are a decent idea after all they repeal that ban on unions but you know what, maybe unions are a decent idea after all. They repealed that ban on unions.
But, you know, like I said, that ship had sailed. There was no putting the
genie back into the bottle at this point. And, you know, like we mentioned a few times, the popular
sort of view of Luddites these days is not entirely right. They didn't hate the technology.
They tried to work things out in a the technology. They tried to work things
out in a fair way. They tried to stand up for workers' rights very early on. And it
seems like a lot of sort of the rewriting of that came from a novelist and scientist
named C.P. Snow who looks like it was the first person to kind of cast them as, you
know, anti-technology, which was reinforced again in the 70s in New Scientist and other publications.
Yeah.
So at least by the 70s, if not earlier, Luddites were now synonymous with being afraid, usually
irrationally afraid of technology or the future, or in some cases you were anti-capitalist
is another way that some people use it, right?
And that's lasted that way for a while until Thomas
Pinchon, the famous author of Gravity's Rainbow,
among others, in 1984, he wrote an essay essentially
saying like, I'm not so sure we should scoff at Luddites.
He wrote an essay called, Is It Okay to Be a Luddite?
And basically said, if you stop and look around at
the way that technology is going,
maybe we should be a little bit afraid. Maybe we should start questioning some of this stuff.
And in 1984, he made a warning about, like, you really want to keep your eye on artificial intelligence.
In 84. And what's really interesting is around 2023, I think there was an author named Brian Merchant who wrote a book called Blood in the Machine.
And he essentially said he didn't cite Pinchon. I don't think I haven't read the books possibly did.
But essentially what he was saying is that what Pinchon predicted has now come to roost.
The AI is starting to creep closer and closer to this creating a world that's even more upended, even more quickly,
putting even more people out of work
than what happened to the textile workers, the Luddites,
at the beginning of the 19th century.
Yeah, and he said,
and then there shall be a Justine Bateman
who is the new Thomas Pinchon.
What?
You know, we've talked about it before.
She's the actor Justine Bateman from Family Ties.
Of course.
She's sort of the leading voice in Hollywood fighting against, you know, AI destroying
Hollywood.
Gotcha.
Yeah.
So yeah, that's one thing that people are questioning.
I mean, just that when ChatGPT came out, it was like, we know companies that actually fired people.
They're like, oh good, we can fire you now.
First chance they got, right?
So it is worth questioning.
And that's what Merchant
and some of these Neo-Luddites are saying.
They're like, we should stop and say like,
okay, where's this technology going?
Who exactly is making this technology
that's going to totally change our world?
How can we protect people who are about to lose their jobs?
All the same questions the Luddites asked at the beginning of the 19th century
and then faced the death penalty for trying to do something about.
And the most ironic thing, Chuck, the most ironic thing of all
is the people who are questioning where artificial intelligence are going
are being branded as Luddites.
Yeah. And that's our show.
Uh, we're gonna do a Q&A.
I know.
That is how we end live shows, but not episodes,
but it was just too perfect, man.
Yeah, no. That was a very live showy ending.
We just, uh, don't have our traditional handshake afterwards.
We even held for applause for a second.
We did. I heard none.
Uh, so I'm taking it you got nothing else, right?
I got nothing else.
All right.
Well, if you want to know more about Luddites,
go read about them.
Read about neo-Luddites.
Read about everything you can.
And since I said that, it's time for Listener Mail.
This is from Cash, and this is about Dr. Bronner.
And this is going to include, we'll do a little business
plug for Cash, too. OK. Hey, guys. Just listened to the Dr. Bronner. And this is gonna include, we'll do a little business plug for cash too.
Okay.
Hey guys, just listened to the Dr. Bronner's episode
and thought of a use that you guys didn't mention
and maybe we'd get a kick out of.
It is a fantastic insecticidal soap.
I run a small gardening business in Portland, Maine,
one of our favorite towns,
that focuses on designing and creating gardens
that don't require much human input
and no chemical input. Generally I don't treat pests and that's even in quotes and let nature
run its course but for the particularly tough ones like scale and viburnum leaf beetle I treat
with Dr. Bronner's diluted with 1-6 water with a spray bottle Works wonders and has no negative ecological impacts love the show
You guys are great company on my long days working alone
And hey if you are in Portland, Maine or nearby check out cash at founder opus fine gardens
Well, thanks a lot cash
And we are happy to plug your business and if you want to be like Cash and send us an interesting email and plug your business
at the same time, we are happy to do that.
Email us at stuffpodcastsatihartradio.com.
Stuff You Should Know is a production of iHeartRadio.
For more podcasts, my heart radio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple podcasts, or wherever
you listen to your favorite shows.
Meet the real woman behind the tabloid headlines in a personal podcast that delves into the
life of the notorious Tori Spelling, as she takes us through the ups and downs of her
sometimes glamorous, sometimes chaotic life and marriage. I just filed for divorce.
Whoa.
I said the words that I've said, like, in my head
for, like, 16 years.
Wild.
Listen to Miss Spelling on the iHeartRadio app,
Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Guess what, Will?
What's that, Mango?
I've been trying to write a promo for our podcast,
Part-Time Genius, but even though
we've done over 250 episodes, we don't really talk about murders or cults.
We did just cover the Illuminati of cheese, so I feel like that makes us pretty edgy.
We also solve mysteries like how Chinese is your Chinese food, and how do dollar stores
make money, and then of course, can you game a dog show?
So what you're saying is everyone should be listening.
Listen to Part-Time Genius on the iHeart Radio app
or wherever you get your podcasts.
Hi, I am Lacey Lamar.
And I'm also Lacey Lamar.
Just kidding, I'm Amber Revin.
What?
Okay everybody, we have exciting news to share.
We're back with season two of the Amber and Lacey,
Lacey and Amber show on Will Ferrell's
Big Money Players Network.
This season, we make new friends, deep dive into my steamy DMs, answer your listener questions
and more.
The more is punch each other.
Listen to the Amber and Lacey, Lacey and Amber show on Will Ferrell's Big Money Players Network
on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts.
Just listen, okay?
Or Lacey gets it.
Do it.