The Daily Stoic - Ask Daily Stoic: Ryan and Robert Greene Discuss the Laws of Human Nature
Episode Date: August 22, 2020Today's episode features a 2018 interview in which Ryan talks with author and strategist Robert Greene. They discuss the core message of Robert’s latest book (The Laws of Human Nature)..., the research process that he uses to put together his books, and more.Robert Greene is a bestselling author and strategist. Across his six books he has combined intense research with powerful stories from history and myth to uncover the key motivations behind human behavior and strategy.This episode is brought to you by Future. Future pairs you up with a remote personal trainer that you can get in touch with from your home. Your trainer will give you a full exercise regimen that works for your specific fitness goals, using the equipment you have at home. It works with your Apple Watch, and if you don’t already have one, Future will give you one for free. Sign up at tryfuture.com/stoic and get your first two weeks with your personal trainer for just $1.This episode is also brought to you by LinkedIn Jobs. LinkedIn Jobs is the best platform for finding the right candidate to join your business. And right now, LinkedIn is helping companies like yours find the essential workers that they need in these trying times. Visit http://linkedin.com/stoic to post your healthcare or essential job for free, or to post another job for your business.This episode is also brought to you by Four Sigmatic. Four Sigmatic is a maker of mushroom coffee, lattes, elixirs, and more. Their drinks all taste amazing and they've full of all sorts of all-natural compounds and immunity boosters to help you think clearly and live well. Four Sigmatic has a new exclusive deal for Daily Stoic listeners: get up to 39% off their bestselling Lion’s Mane bundle by visiting foursigmatic.com/stoic.***If you enjoyed this week’s podcast, we’d love for you to leave a review on Apple Podcasts. It helps with our visibility, and the more people listen to the podcast, the more we can invest into it and make it even better.Sign up for the Daily Stoic email: DailyStoic.com/signupFollow @DailyStoic:Twitter: https://twitter.com/ryanholidayInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/ryanholiday/Facebook: http://facebook.com/ryanholidayYouTube: https://www.youtube.com/dailystoicAnd follow Robert Greene:Twitter: https://twitter.com/robertgreeneInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/robertgreeneofficial/Homepage: https://powerseductionandwar.com/Get Robert’s latest book, The Laws of Human Nature: https://geni.us/pmH4See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Hey, prime members, you can listen to the Daily Stoic podcast early and add free on Amazon music. Download the app today.
Welcome to the weekend edition of the Daily Stoic. Each weekday, we bring you a meditation inspired by the ancient Stoic, something that can help you live up to those four stoic virtues of courage, justice, wisdom, and temperance.
And here on the weekend, we take a deeper dive
into those same topics.
We interview stoic philosophers, we reflect, we prepare.
We think deeply about the challenging issues of our time.
And we work through this philosophy
in a way that's more
possible here when we're not rushing to work or to get the kids to school. When we
have the time to think, to go for a walk, to sit with our journals, and to prepare
for what the future will bring. Raising kids can be one of the greatest rewards of a parent's life.
But come on, someday, parenting is unbearable.
I love my kid, but is a new parenting podcast from Wondry that shares a refreshingly honest
and insightful take on parenting.
Hosted by myself, Megan Galey, Chris Garcia, and Kurt Brown-Oller, we will be your resident
not-so- so expert experts.
Each week we'll share a parenting story that'll have you laughing, nodding, and thinking.
Oh yeah, I have absolutely been there.
We'll talk about what went right and wrong.
What would we do differently?
And the next time you step on yet another stray Lego in the middle of the night, you'll feel less alone.
So if you like to laugh with us as we talk about the hardest job in the middle of the night, you'll feel less alone. So if you'd like to laugh with us
as we talk about the hardest job in the world,
listen to, I love my kid, but wherever you get your podcasts.
You can listen ad-free on the Amazon Music or Wondery app.
Hey there listeners, while we take a little break here,
I want to tell you about another podcast
that I think you'll like.
It's called How I Built This,
where host Guy Razz talks to founders behind some of the
world's biggest and most innovative companies, to learn how they built them from the ground
up.
Guy has sat down with hundreds of founders behind well-known companies like Headspace,
Manduke Yoga Mats, Soul Cycle, and Cotopaxi, as well as entrepreneurs working to solve
some of the biggest problems of our time, like developing technology that pulls energy from the ground to heat in cool homes,
or even figuring out how to make drinking water from air and sunlight.
Together, they discuss their entire journey from day one, and all the skills they had to
learn along the way, like confronting big challenges, and how to lead through uncertainty.
So if you want to get inspired and learn how to think like an entrepreneur,
check out how I built this, wherever you get your podcasts.
You can listen early and add free on the Amazon or Wondery.
Hey everyone, welcome to another episode of The Daily Stoke Podcast.
As you know, I recently had one of my heroes, Robert Green on the show.
We talked about the pandemic quarantine.
We talked about a lifetime dead time.
You know, we talked about political sensitivities,
how one learns to tamp down their triggers,
the things that they disagree with,
the things that make them angry.
As Robert talks about in his book, The Laws of Human Nature.
And then we also talked about sort of what great leadership in times of crisis looks like.
Well, I wanted to also share another interview that I did with Robert, this one in the fall
of 2018.
Robert Green was putting out the laws of human nature, and suddenly, as I've talked about
on this podcast before, suddenly had a stroke stroke and it looked like the whole launch was thrown into doubt.
And it wasn't going to be able to do any media appearances,
it wasn't going to be able to travel, it was really touch and go for a long time.
And I actually thought they should pause the whole thing.
I was much too worried about his health to think that any book launch was worth it as amazing as the book was.
I thought we should just wait until the spring.
But anyways, they ended up proceeding
and so what Robert asked me to do
was come out to Los Angeles to interview him on his couch
where he didn't have to travel
where he could trust the person interviewing him
where we could just have a conversation
about the ideas in the book
and put those ideas out in
the world.
And it was obviously an honor to do it.
I agreed in two seconds.
Any chance I have to have the opportunity to spend time with Robert Green who I just love
and adore, obviously going to take.
So I flew out there and we had this conversation and it was a great one.
And it sort of existed out there in limbo.
I put it on my YouTube channel.
I put it on Robert's Facebook.
But so much time has passed.
We've had so many new subscribers.
And I do think the ideas in his books are so timeless.
So I wanted to run that as today's episode for you.
We talk about a bunch of important things in the interview.
We talk about Morphati.
We talk about Memento Mori.
Obviously, Robert's brush with death, which is a sort of a deeply stoic concept. We talk about the importance of
illustrating ideas through stories, which is obviously influenced my writing a great deal.
You know, this is just a touching interview. I look back at that time now, and I'm on the one hand,
so glad that he's come as far as he has. And then it's also incredible for me
to be sitting here in 2020 and think about just all the things
that have happened in the world since then.
I mean, it's incredible.
We talk about Morafati and Momentum Ori in the interview.
And who would have thought that in that intervening
period, just the things that would happen.
I mean, that we would be dealing with a pandemic
that has rippled through the world.
And I guess that's really what stoicism is about, right?
It's like when we look back at the past, we have this sense of how naive we were, how
much we were taking for granted, how all the things we weren't thinking of.
And so revisiting this conversation was a reminder of that for me and something I wanted
to share
with you.
And of course, if you haven't read the laws of human nature, it's an absolute must read.
Robert is a master of his craft.
Certainly the master, I believe, I am apprenticing under.
She haven't read his other books like the 40 laws of power, 33 strategies of war.
One of my favorites, mastery, you absolutely should.
You can follow his email list, which is
great at PowerSiductionWar.com. On Instagram, he's Robert Green official. On Twitter, I believe
is that Robert Green. I think he's one of the great living nonfiction authors of our time.
And again, the theme ultimately of this piece is just how even the great living masters can quite
easily become the not living masters. And we should cherish people while we still can. So enjoy
this interview, be safe out there and we'll be back with another episode for you in
just a few days. So I'm here talking to Robert Green about his new book, The Law
of Human Nature. This book is how many years in the making? I would say between five and six, but it's probably more like
58 years in the making, you know.
Why did you decide to write this book? So you came off mastery,
which is about how we sort of find our life's task and how we
achieve, you know, sort of mastery over it, why did you decide to go from there to human nature?
Well, in mastery, we have chapter four on social intelligence.
And one thing was readers really responded to that chapter.
They really liked it.
But I got the sense that they wanted more.
Like, could you expand this?
I kept people could ask me,
well, how do you
read people by their body language?
Things that I kind of opened up in that chapter.
So I sense there was a hunger for this kind of knowledge
dealing with social intelligence, but sort of from a different
angle.
You know how I don't look at things from the usual self-help
positive polyenish angle. I look at things from the usual self-help, positive, polyanish angle.
I look at from the dark side that people are actually hiding a lot of inner turmoil and
aggressive impulses.
And I felt that there was a hunger for more of that kind of knowledge, but also in the
20 years, over 20 years of writing power and researching it and consulting
with many different powerful people, I had this feeling that people are really difficult.
That's what I write a lot about.
And we spend so much of our time, particularly now in the 21st century, dealing with technology,
dealing with our phones, dealing with algorithms.
It's like, we're immersed in this.
But the source of our misery, the source of our pain,
the source of why we're so fucking messed up right now,
is we don't understand people.
People can't be reduced to an algorithm.
You can't figure them out through your smartphone.
And I've dealt with people who are very powerful,
who are brilliant in their field,
and they come to me with the simplest psychological problem,
a political problem.
I can't handle this partner.
So I had this feeling, you know, when I wrote mastery,
I sensed that we're losing a sense of how to make things.
And I really wanted to address that.
Well, I also felt in this book, we're
losing a sense of psychology of what makes people tick, and it's causing cascading problems
in the world. So I felt an urgency to kind of address something that people don't talk
about. And so mastering this social intelligence, as you'd call it, why is that something that the average person needs to know?
I get why maybe the president needs to master
social intelligence, but if I'm a writer or I'm an athlete
or I go to football team, what walked me through the case
for?
Well, I mean, I've consulted with athletes
very high level NBA basketball player. He came to me, I've dealt consulted with athletes, very high level NBA basketball player.
He came to me, I won't say his name,
because the owner of the team was messing with him.
Like, he was obviously wanting to trade him,
but publicly he was saying also,
it's if he couldn't figure him out.
And it really was hurting him psychologically,
and it was affecting his game, and it was
messing with his relationship with his wife.
So it's ridiculous to think that in some field, you're not having to deal with people.
If you're a parent, you have to deal with your child, and children are extremely difficult.
They're extremely resistant to your will.
They don't want to do what you want them to do.
How do you deal with that? If you're bad at dealing with people, if you don't understand their psychology,
if you push them too much and they resist you, you respond and react and you get kind of defensive and bitter and resentful.
And what happens is your mind is consumed 24 hours a day with,
damn it, this person didn't answer my email, damn it, this person didn't do that, this,
it's wearing away at you, it's eating your mental space, you have no mental space for creative
endeavors for actually doing your work. It drains you, it emotionally drains you,
your imbalance because you're constantly thinking about what people aren't giving you.
I want you to reverse that perspective and think of what you're not giving people, other
people so that you can actually begin to change this dynamic and get out of that sense of
weighting and passivity.
And when you sit down to research a book like this, walk us through your research methodology
because obviously I was your research assistant and so I know
it had changed how I come up with ideas and brainstorm and collect information but how does that
process work for you as you start to hone in on an idea that you're doing? By the way, you were the best
researcher I've ever had. Thank you. I wish I could clone you. I would like you to let me keep
doing it as you want. Oh, you're too powerful.
I saw that you were like number six
on Amazon business writer list.
How can I hire someone like that
to do my research and be ridiculous?
But anyway, I'll consider that for the next book.
But well, the research process is very laborious,
but there's a method behind the madness,
which is I try and keep an open mind.
Now, I have a bias towards human nature, towards people.
My bias is negative.
I tend to think people are actually worse than they probably are.
As opposed to Stephen Pinker,
who thinks that people are probably better than they actually are.
I admit my bias.
So that helps me.
I know that that's there.
But I want to combat my bias and open my mind up to all the information.
So my process was to start reading books that would kind of open up different vistas on
human nature.
So a lot on neuroscience, Ramachandra Antonio de Maseo,
about how we process information
and things about our emotions
and how the brain processes emotions.
I read a lot of books by psychologists
from the classic period.
Period when people aren't very fashionable now,
like Carl Jung, like Heinz Koh,
like a man named Ronald Fairburn,
Beyond, Wilfred Beyond.
Incredible resource of amazing information about people.
Like for instance, there's a psychologist named Melanie Klein who spent her whole life studying
infants and the psycho-analysing, can you imagine what that's like?
Now, if you're looking from a mastery point of view,
a 10,000 hour point of view,
she spent 20,000 hours studying infants in their psychology.
She understands them on a level that's amazing.
Right.
So these people have an incredible resource,
these psychologists.
So I went into that, I went into anthropology.
My particular bias is that humans have always been aggressive
and have these sort of darker impulses
and have been irrational.
And so there are a lot of anthropologists
that have been discussing that lately
about how primitive people were quite warlike
and had very high murder rates.
But there are other people who argue against that, so I had to read the other side.
All sorts of other fields that I went into, a lot of philosophers are very wise about
human nature, people like Schopenhauer and Nietzsche.
And then novelists, I actually read novels because some of the most perceptive people
are writers who understand, you know,
are great observers.
So speaking of that, one of the things that
I think is interesting in the genre that you write in,
I think you are a pioneer in this,
is that so you did all this academic research,
and most of the time when people do that,
then they're like, this study says X,
or they write about from their own personal experiences,
you've always relied on historical stories,
or in some cases myths, to illustrate your points.
Why do you talk to the reader as through story?
Why have you always done that?
Well, I'm very focused on the reader.
I'm always thinking when I'm writing, how are they going to absorb this information?
And a lot of this, a problem that psychologists have noticed that if you're a teacher,
you assume that your student has the same knowledge that you do and then for your bad teacher.
I know that my readers don't know necessarily what I'm talking about.
They don't know if I'm talking about Carl Jung, if I throw out Jarrigan, they're not
going to get it.
So I have to make it understandable to the average person.
Well, in the art of seduction, I talked about how telling a story lowers people's resistance,
makes the mind open up. When we were like two or three
years old, the sense of being carried by our parents or not or playing peekaboo of not
knowing what comes next is very deeply ingrained in human psychology. So if I tell you a story
about Rockefeller to illustrate aggression, I know as the reader is being pulled into this story,
they don't know what I'm telling,
they don't know who is the aggressor in this story,
they don't know the lesson that I'm trying to derive.
So they're going to want to read,
they want to go further and further and further.
I've tricked them into coming to page eight,
whereas if I immediately hit them with Jung
and this study and sociology, their
mind closes off, they're falling asleep.
That's the mistake 98% of people who write books out their make.
They don't think about their reader.
They assume that the readers as interested in the material as they are, you have to seduce
the reader, so I tell stories.
Is that a form of social intelligence then you're sort of going, what am I, you're not thinking,
oh, I'm right, or this is a fact.
You're thinking, how do I effectively deliver
what's the most effective way to deliver
what I'm trying to do or get the end result
that I want to get?
Yes, it's a very good point.
So a lot of problems that people have in social realm
is they're not practical.
So if you're thinking in terms of what you really want, A lot of problems that people have in social realm is they're not practical.
So if you're thinking in terms of what you really want,
it changes the whole game.
If you want somebody to do your bidding,
to help you to finance your film or whatever it is,
if you come at it from, oh, this is what I deserve,
please give me this, I'm so brilliant, it has no effect.
But if you think in terms of how they think,
the stories they want to hear, what will please them,
what will interest them, the game changes,
you have the power to influence them.
So I have the power to influence the reader
when I start thinking about what the reader wants,
how to draw them in.
The key to my method of writing, I wrote a kind of a secret code
to how I write books.
It was chapter 31, I think, or 30 in the strategy book,
the 33 strategies of war.
Communication, I used Machiavelli as the prime example,
and how you communicate
and what are the ways of styling your work
that will have the greatest effect.
So speaking in an authoritative tone,
saying things that are kind of strong
are ways to get a reaction out of the reader.
You want to get a reaction.
You don't want that kind of mind-numbing feeling
that you get when you read most books.
Right.
Yeah.
Hey, it's run.
So your book is obviously about human nature.
Yeah.
And you said to me, you said the number one law of human nature is that we deny there are
such things as human nature.
Yeah.
And you have a quote from Horace in the book where he says, you can throw nature
out of the pitch for it, but it always comes back. So as we study human nature, what is it that?
What do we discover? What are we trying to understand as we study human nature?
Very simple. You don't know who you are. You walk around in your world and you're kind of sleepwalking.
You assume you have an identity and opinion and image of yourself. There's actually somewhat faults.
You think you're maybe greater than you are, you think you're whatever that image is, but there's
something else going on inside you.
You don't know the source of your emotions.
You don't know what really motivates you,
what makes you tick,
and they say the same thing about other people.
So, look at it this way.
We evolved over hundreds of thousands of years.
Throw away, it's not like we suddenly changed in 1970
and became this incredibly technocratic
sophisticated pinker-like human being. We started out as primitive homo sapiens and before that,
homo erectus, etc. And in that period, we were formed. So many things were formed about us, such as just take one example,
how we are so susceptible to the emotions of other people,
virality, memes, et cetera.
Well, that's something deeply ingrained
because in our earliest ancestors,
the ability to be affected by the emotions of other people
was a key to their survival.
Well, that is so deeply a part of us now,
and we don't think of it, we don't understand that.
So when you're interacting with people,
you're being influenced by them in ways
that you're not even consciously aware of,
and because of this susceptibility
to other people's emotions.
I call these primitive forces that are operating in you.
These primitive forces, they're 18 of them,
are what I call human nature.
And so they're actually governing your behavior,
and you're not very aware of it, and they're governing other people's behavior.
I'm trying to open up this world to you and give you like a
a key to decoding some of the things that are so mysterious.
One of the primitive forces you talk a lot about decoding some of the things that are so mysterious.
One of the primitive forces you talk a lot about in the book is envy, how either we're
driven by envy and this is motivating us if we don't understand, or how we need to be
cautious of and aware when other people are driven by envy and that this is something
we want to be both aware of and cautious about.
Yeah, I differentiate passive envy to active envy.
Okay.
So passive envy is something all of us feel.
And I'm trying to, what I really want you to do in this book is
I want you to start being honest with yourself.
Because I think if you're honest with yourself,
you become a better human being and you're happier.
So nobody likes to admit that they're envious,
but everybody feels it.
So you were my disciple or whatever you want to call it,
menti, not disciple, the print is not disciple.
It wasn't that word.
Protoche.
Protoche, thank you.
And then I read that you're higher up on the business list
of readers, of writers than I am.
Okay, I can't.
That was only because my book was for sale for a dollar.
It's very temporary.
Okay, it doesn't matter.
I'm just trying to be on and inject some honesty.
I can't help but feel a pang of envy.
Right.
Okay, everybody feels that.
And I explain why we feel it.
Chimpanzees feel envy.
It's extremely ingrained in our primate nature.
We are always comparing ourselves to other people.
It's how the human brain operates
on a very basic level.
We process information by comparing.
How is this different from that?
We do this socially.
How is that person have more than I do?
Why are they getting this attention and I'm not?
You are feeling envy.
Everybody feels it.
Most of the time, it's not toxic.
It's just part of social life.
Just accept it.
But then there's the toxic, active form of envy.
And I talk in this book a lot about toxic people,
and I have a quote in there from Shope and Hauer,
saying that we think that evil people walk around
with horns on their head,
or that fools have cap and bells.
But people who are toxic are masters of disguising it.
They've learned since they were three years old,
to present a normal saintly front to the world.
Envious people, and there are envious people out there,
don't go announcing themselves that they're envious.
They become your friend in order to wound you.
They ingratiate themselves out of a secret desire
to find a way to punish you.
I'm trying to teach you how to identify these types
before they harm you, and I have many different.
So the idea of toxic people is definitely a theme in the book.
What are some signs that you want to look for for toxic people?
I know you talk about open hour, you should tell someone good news about yourself and then judge
how they react as a sign, which is assigned to see how if they're an
envious person or not. Yeah, in the envy chapter I talk about, and also in the
chapter about body language, micro expressions, which is a sort of a
fashionable word, and Paul Eckman kind of brought that out, where you look at
people, they have a half of a second of a reaction and then they put the mask back on.
And theist people will have that little slight
for half a second.
You will notice if you tell them some bad news about yourself,
a little smile will appear on their face.
Or if you tell them some good news,
a little bit of something unpleasant will cross the face
for just a millisecond.
And Shobhan Howard said,
you can find these people out by deliberately telling them
something good that's happened to you
or something bad and they will reveal themselves.
But, you know, there are certain chapters
that I focus on very toxic qualities like envy,
like the shadow, like the repression,
like aggression, like short-sightedness,
people who can't think past their nose. And I'm trying to give you ways to identify them.
So one of the most important keys is extreme behavior. So when someone reveals to you something, a very what I call emphatic character trait,
they are hyper-confident, hyper-secure, hyper-aggressive, hyper-masculine, hyper-sensitive or temperamental
or very snobby about things, they're concealing something, they're generally concealing...
Compensating for something?
They're compensating, they're concealing with this probably the opposite quality.
Okay.
And they've learned that from very early on.
So if you're an aggressive person, always trying to get what you want from other people,
you know you learn by the age of 11 that that turns people off.
So you learn to present you a different front like a charming front, and lure them in.
So I want you to be aware of appearances are deceptive.
People don't announce their toxicity to you with a trumpet blaring.
They disguise it, and they'll disguise it by presenting often the opposite appearance.
So if somebody is so nice to you, you meet them and they're
immediately wanting to do your favors and they're like, love your work and
they do this that and the other, probably there's something else going on
under the surface. Right. Probably they're feeling they're probably passive
aggressive. So there are other signs in each sort of toxic type, has its own kind of identifying mark,
like I talk about aggressive people, and how you can decode them often from their body
language, their tone of voice.
But the other thing about aggressive people, which is a toxic type, and I don't mean we're
all aggressive, so I try to get that out of the way.
It's not like, oh, some people are aggressive, some others, all humans are aggressive,
but there are toxic aggressive types.
What I want to train you, the reader to look at,
is to not look at people's, what they say,
or their appearance, but to look at their actions,
and the patterns of their behavior.
So, for instance, I talk about Howard Hughes in chapter four as somebody who's got a very weak character
who was a horrific businessman, and people were lured in by his image of this sort of maverick aviator
kind of, you know, great Hollywood person, et cetera. But if you looked at the patterns of his
behavior, you would have seen that he was actually quite toxic.
So stop looking at what people say about themselves
and look at their actions.
And what's the expression now when someone tells you
who they are, you should listen?
Or shows you who they are, you should listen.
Yeah.
Yeah.
One of the things you talk about in this book,
and I think it's kind of a theme in all your books,
is sort of the art of persuasion. Yes. He sort of lay out how understanding human nature and our own nature,
I think the phrase used in the book is a master persuader, like how to become. What does a person
need to know to be better at persuasion? Well, the first thing that I try to do, and there's a
chapter in there, what I call is people have a self-opinion.
And what I mean by that is you, Ryan, have an idea of yourself.
And that idea of yourself is I'm very self-reliant, I'm very disciplined, I'm a good person,
I'm conscientious, I don't know what else is. I'm a good father, the mostly positive things,
but there'll be negative things in that opinion of itself.
I could be better at that.
It's how you think of yourself, okay?
And it anchors everything that you do.
If you go buy a car, you're gonna buy a car
that sort of meshes with that self-opinion.
If you think of yourself as being extremely good with money and successful, you'll buy
a Mercedes, but if you think of yourself as very conscientious and saintly, you'll
buy a Prius.
It governs so many of your choices.
Right.
Okay.
When you are trying to persuade somebody or have influence over them, you are generally
not thinking of this opinion that they have of themselves.
You're coming from yourself.
You're thinking of what you want.
You're projecting onto them qualities that they don't necessarily have.
Or see in themselves.
Or see in themselves.
And if you inadvertently say or do something that crosses
that doesn't mesh with their self-opinion,
a door will close, it will never open again.
You've lost them, right?
So if you think of yourself as being really an independent
person who makes up your own mind about things,
and I try and say, oh, no, Ron, I think you've been manipulated.
Well, man, you're gonna get really angry.
That's not how I think of myself.
And you're gonna, and you're not gonna show it,
but you're gonna kind of inwardly turn away,
turn against me.
Well, that's the sin that most people commit.
They don't understand that the other person
has their own psychology, their own belief about who they are.
Instead of violating their self-opinion, you want to validate it.
There's a quote in there from William James, that the single greatest human need is to
be recognized.
People want to feel validated for who they are.
They want attention.
They want to be recognized.
I don't care who you are, that's what you want.
If you can give that to people, if you can feed that self-opinion,
if you can show that they are who they think they are,
or you can kind of say that you can even be better at what you're doing,
then suddenly they're open up to you.
And now you have room to influence them, to change their behavior,
to divert them in the
direction that you want. So, the number one principle is to stop thinking of yourself. When you find
yourself in a moment where you want influence, when you want to persuade something, whether it's your
boss, your child, your spouse, your first reaction is my needs, what I want, who I am.
If you can train yourself, and it takes time,
to stop that and to think of them,
and to put yourself in their position,
and to think of their psychology,
and how they think about themselves,
you've already come an incredibly long way
towards having the ability to persuade them.
It's kind of remarkable to me,
given your book's reputation as being ruthless
and heartless and aggressive. That probably the number one theme in the laws of human nature
is empathy. It appears in almost every law on every page about the importance of empathy.
That's sort of what you're saying there that you if you want to persuade someone you first have
to understand what they want and how they think and not yourself.
Well, one thing I would correct on that is, yeah, people do think of me as being a moral
macchiabalian.
But all of my books are all about getting inside the psychology of the other person.
So I've always talked about that.
I just never used the word empathy before.
That's what people are going to think that I've changed, but I haven't.
But the idea there is,
we have a power, a hidden power. It's almost like a superman-type power that we don't use. And that
power is empathy. It's our ability to think inside other people, to think inside of even other
objects. It's sort of the origins of science itself. And so this empathy is not
something that's intellectual. I like to take a lot of the things in this book, I try to take
away from the intellectual realm. It's a visceral emotional quality that we have. We can feel what
other people are feeling. I can't really know what Ryan is thinking right now. You have a screen there, it's impossible.
But viscerally, I can sense your moods through your body language,
through things that communicate itself non-verbally.
And so this ability to get inside the moods of other people,
their emotions, their quality, their tone,
is to me the essence of empathy.
And if you think about it, our ancestors,
from hundreds of thousands of years,
had to survive in a world with predators,
with sabretooth tigers, with animals
that were going to kill them in an instant
and warring tribes, before the invention of language.
Sure.
Right?
And how did they communicate?
They communicated non-verbally.
They understood each other in a visceral way through nonverbal communication.
We have this power. And I have an icon in the book, Milton Erickson, a great psychologist who's sort of the inventor of hypnotherapy, who is a master at nonverbal communication.
a master at a nonverbal communication. A sort of this is sort of the idea
that we could somehow reach at some point.
One of my favorite parts in the book is related to empathy.
You talk about most people go around
and we have this idea of shot and Freud,
where we're sort of rooting for other people,
the fail, or we take pleasure in the defeats.
And then you talk about, is it Mitten Freud?
Mitten Freud.
Mitten Freud.
Yeah.
What does that mean and why is it important?
Well, it's actually a phrase from Nietzsche.
He says, we feel Shahn Freud,
or really we should feel Mitten Freud.
And Mitten Freud, literally,
Freud means joy.
Shahn Freud means pain in joy,
getting pain in it,
getting joy in other people's pain.
Mid-Fried means joy with, mid-meaning with.
And it means when other people have something good that happens to them,
you feel their joy.
So it's very unnatural.
If somebody comes to you with good news,
your immediate reaction is, most often is, oh, it's a little bit uncomfortable.
Why not me?
Why you?
Oh, maybe you're just lucky, or you don't really deserve that.
You're not, you may not be honest with yourself,
but that often happens.
Yeah.
Can you train yourself to actually feel the joy
that other people feel when something good happens to them?
It kind of opens up your whole mind, your whole spirit.
One of the most important chapters in this book is the chapter on attitude
and how your attitude towards life affects what happens to you.
And I talk about Anton Chekov, a Russian writer who's to me one of the great icons for this book.
And he had a horrifying childhood.
His father beat him every single day,
never even knowing why he beat him.
They grew up in poverty.
His father abandoned the family when he was young.
He had nothing in life.
And he lived in this miserable small town,
the most miserable town in Russia, you can imagine.
And one day he decided, in the depths of his misery after he was left alone in this town
to look after himself at the age of 16, he said, I want to not feel this burden by all
of these bad feelings towards other people.
I'm going to start thinking that my father can't help himself, that he was born a surf,
and he's been bred to be this awful person.
And my mother can't help herself, and my siblings, it's just human nature.
I'm going to accept them, and I'm going to love them for who they are.
And he felt this insane wave of freedom.
He was free of all his own negative emotions that were burning him day
and and day out, and it changed the course of his life. So that's sort of the essence of
mitfroida in another way of kind of accepting people for who they are and sort of the freedom that
is ensues from that. That connects to the thing that you and I made together, which is the more faulty coin,
which is the idea that it's also a niche of race
of sort of loving everything that happens to you,
not resenting it, not fighting against it,
not caring around a grudge or a burden,
but sort of embracing it and finding the good in it.
Yeah.
Where does that fit in with our human nature?
Well, it doesn't fit in because it's not natural to us.
Our natural frame, our natural starting position
is when something bad happens, why me, you know,
to feel sort of a grievance, to feel that things aren't fair,
to feel that other people aren't giving you what you want or what you deserve.
We start from a position of feeling kind of sorry for ourselves.
We deserve more than what we're getting.
And so, a lot of what I'm talking about in this book is overcoming some of these natural elements of human nature and turning them around and using them
for another purpose, another way.
And Morphati is very powerful in that you train yourself
to accept everything that happens.
It's sort of a banality to say that things happen for a reason,
but there's some truth to it.
It's like for Nietzsche, it was,
this is life. Life involves pain. Life involves adversity. You're going to die one day and it's not
going to be pleasant. Your friends and family members, they're going to die one day and it's not going
to be pleasant. You're going to have failure in life. People are going to hurt you. But that is life.
That's what it is.
So to resist that, to be angry about that
means to not love life itself.
And he wanted to turn that around
and for you to embrace life
because you only have one go at it
and to embrace even the pain.
He was struck in a very early age, he was this woman that entered his life
named Luandra Esolame.
I talk about her in the art of seduction.
And she wrote a poem about how I embrace the pain
that life has given me.
I love it.
I not only accept it, I love it.
And he was so shaken by that.
And he thought this was such a powerful way
of thinking and being, so shaken by that and he thought this was such a powerful way of thinking and being
so that you're going through and you're accepting life as it is and not wanting things to be otherwise.
It's not natural but it's extremely powerful and I show you I give you ways of how you can
adopt this philosophy in your life.
Obviously you've found through some adversity in your own life.
Yeah.
It's easy to talk about a Morphati.
Yeah.
Especially when you're talking about,
I'm going to love that my plane is delayed or, you know,
that my, there's trouble with the printer and my book or something.
How have you tried to practice a Morphati
recovering from a struggle?
You know, that's like you were writing a book about stoicism
and obstacles the way and then you got robbed
and you had all these things up.
Sure.
And you were being tested.
Well, I had a stroke and it's like the ultimate test for me.
I've never had to go through something like this
because I'm somebody who's very physically active
and independent and suddenly I can't use the left side
of my body and I'm completely dependent.
And the initial reaction is the natural reaction. Oh man, damn why this had to happen.
This is so unfair. Why me? You know, if only I could just keep swimming and doing my life the way it was. I'm so upset.
And I talk in the book, your natural reactions,
you don't have to fight them.
You have to go take the next step,
which is the next day after you've gone through this,
is to analyze your own emotions
and why you're feeling that way.
So I've had to go through that process,
and it's actually been extremely powerful for me.
I've had to learn to accept this as the ultimate kind of training for me for being stronger.
This woman wrote to me, she was trying to give me advice.
She said, look at this as sort of a new experience in your life and you're going to discover new
things.
And I thought that was really a brilliant way of putting it.
So I have to retrain my body.
Every day I have to learn how to use my fingers again,
like a baby.
And I'm learning how the mind works.
I'm learning about patience and frustration
about my own limits.
And I can't necessarily say, I love my stroke.
I think there would be faults of me
to say something like that.
I don't love that this happened, but I've accepted it,
and I've discovered how it can make me a better and stronger person.
And so, you know, you write a book, and it's kind of intellectual,
and then something real happens, and what you write about is something
that you yourself have to overcome.
And it's really been like the most, the most major test in my life so far.
And not not to fast forward because there's some other things I want to go back to,
but I think it's related to what you conclude, what you conclude the book with,
is this sort of extended memento, more this meditation on our mortality.
And you know, perhaps that if the first law of human nature is,
we deny human nature, the second or the last law of human
nature is our denial of death and our mortality.
Why is it so, why did you decide to conclude this book,
which the laws of human nature I serve,
see as the culmination of all your work?
Why did you conclude,
why did you give the most valuable real estate
in your book to death?
Well, it is the end, so why shouldn't it be the last chapter?
It's sort of like if I'm talking about how we have certain
qualities that we have to accept and through accepting them,
try and move past them.
So I'm trying to tell you, you feel envy, accept that, and now find a way to make envy useful.
And I explain how you can start instead of feeling envy, you can start feeling sorry for people who have less than you.
You can start using your envy of powerful people to emulate them, etc.
Well, death is the ultimate
barrier for all of us,
not just physically but psychologically.
I maintain that human beings are messed up, screwed up,
in so many ways because of their awareness of death
and their fear of death.
It is through this fear that we created all kinds of superstitions
that we created the idea of an afterlife.
And so it's like Montenna,
I end the book with a quote from Montenna,
and he says,
the ability to think about death
and overcome the fear of death is the ultimate freedom.
You're enslaved by this fear, you're not aware of it,
it's controlling you, overcoming it is the ultimate freedom. I have to end the book on that.
But the idea is, most people are gonna say,
oh, that's not me, as they say,
for all of these chapters.
Oh, other people, they're irrational not me.
Yeah, oh, I'm not really afraid of death.
I play video games, and I'm always killing people in it.
I watch movies, and people are always dying,
because I'm not afraid of it.
That's a cartoon version of death. Our culture was permeated with cartoon versions of death.
Your death is something physical. It's going to happen to you. It's a very visceral thing.
You are afraid of it. No matter how many video black ops games you play, you are still
afraid of your own death. And that fear is creates what I call
latent anxiety. It makes you fearful of a lot of things in life and you're not aware of it.
It makes you cautious about failure. It makes you cautious about taking risks. So I'm trying
to show you that your fear of death has infected you on many, many levels. And so I compare
it to this.
I use the metaphor in the book.
I don't use many metaphors, but this is one I use is that death is like this vast ocean
that we stand on the shore of.
Most animals are not aware of their mortality.
We are the only species as far as we know that's aware that's mortality.
And here you are on the shore of this immense vast ocean.
You don't know what death is or what it's going to be.
And you're afraid of it, and you turn your back to it.
And we humans have the ability to explore things
to conquer our fear.
And I want you instead of turning your back
to actually enter that vast ocean and get and explore it.
And I show you ways of
exploring the actual thought of your own mortality and how it can free you and inspire you in many ways.
Do you have any rituals or practices that you use in your own life as far as meditating on
your mortality? Well, I happen to be someone who's kind of obsessed with death. I have been since a child, so it's always in the back of my mind.
And I meditate every morning and not every time,
but often I will try and physically think about my death
and think about, I often imagine it, like,
for some reason occurring in the afternoon.
I've only seen one person die physically, and I talk in the book about how
that's a real problem for us that we no longer see anybody around us actually die. We don't
even see animals die. We eat animals, but we never see them die except you. So I saw only
one person die. That was my father, and it was a very visceral, powerful moment. I literally
was holding his hand when he passed away. I was very close to my father. And so I could sense, you know, in a very physical way,
what that meant to me. And I think about that moment a lot. But also with the stroke,
I came in probably an inch away from dying myself at that time. It wasn't like a brush with
death like 50 had where he was shot nine times in the head.
I'm not trying to dramatize things. But the doctor said I was very close to having permanent
brain damage and actually getting in a car accident because I was driving that could have been fatal.
And so, you know, now that became something a lot more than just writing intellectually about it
and it's something I can think about all the time.
I probably give you a sense of your own fragility how you could be totally healthy and fine and then like that.
And now I look at myself as someone who's been visited by death and I see other people and I say that they're they haven't been visited by them like I'm.
Separated them somehow and I think people have had a brush with death
feel that way. I know 50. Express that to me. That's sort of an amorphous. So you now have an
experience that's additive that other people haven't had. Yeah. So you've written about stoicism.
Obviously, I've written a lot about stoicism. You, and we talked a little bit about this earlier, I think, but to me, the Stoics believed,
you know, we're sort of naturally rational.
They talk a lot about a rational mind, they appeal to reason.
It strikes me that the laws of human nature are sort of about the war between our two
selves, our rational self and our higher rational self.
And I'm just curious how you think about that battle or that process of how do we get from
one to the other.
Or I guess, descending from one to the other.
Well, it's the paradigm for the whole book. It's the opening chapter.
And I told you the paradigm is to understand who you are
in order to change who you are.
So law number one is we are governed by emotions. We are irrational.
We think we're rational beings. We make rational decisions. We are not. We are irrational.
And I pounded into your brain
showing you instant after instant why you are irrational why, after instant why you are irrational, why I'm irrational, why you're irrational.
With that awareness, you can begin to overcome it.
You can say, oh, I have this particular bias.
I'm always looking, the confirmation bias.
I'm always looking for the information of the news that will confirm what I already believe.
When you admit that to yourself, you can do the disconfirming,
you can look at other information.
You're aware that your emotions come first
and then you think later.
I know you're a lifelong student at the Stokes
and obviously I am too.
And the Stokes talked about the importance
and the power of reason of being rational, of not falling prey to destructive or distracting emotions,
and strikes me that in the laws of human nature, which is your new book, your whole book is about the battle between our lower irrational self and our higher rational self.
And how do we get from one to the other?
We get from one to the other by being aware of the lower self.
So the lower self is the animal part of our nature.
It's what makes us react emotionally to things.
It's what makes us take the path of least resistance.
We try and get shortcuts.
We want immediate pleasures. We become addicted get shortcuts. We want immediate pleasures. We
become addicted to things. We eat fast food. Our higher self is less strong. It's like a
voice that's weaker in our brain. That higher self you've experienced when you actually had
an idea and you accomplished it, you executed it, you felt incredible rush of excitement that
you actually did something that you thought you were going to accomplish. You have that
higher self when you are empathetic to other people and you actually care about them and
do a favor for another person, you feel better about yourself. I could go on and on and on
when you overcome your own weaknesses, you feed that higher self.
It's a potential that each one of us has and it's what we want in life.
Now the Stoics talk about logos and rational self and that's sort of what I'm talking
about in this higher part of ourselves.
And the paragon of that I have in the book is Paracles, the great ancient Greek statesman.
And parodies, paracles is the paradigm for how to get out
of that animal lower self.
And his decision was, as a human being, I am naturally emotional.
And I want to worship something.
I want to value something in life.
I want to say, this is something that I love.
For some people it's money.
For other people it's wine and getting drunk.
For other people it's sex.
You cannot escape that that's who I am.
What is going to be the thing that I worship?
It's going to be reason.
It's going to be Athena.
It's going to be thinking, knows, in ancient Greek.
I am going to worship rationality.
I am going to love it as this incredible power.
And I'm going to turn it into an emotional thing.
I'm going to love thinking for itself.
Because if you just say, oh, I'm just going to be rational,
it's kind of worthless because you're always going
to be fighting your emotions.
But if in each situation you say, what gives me pleasure is not reacting in the animal
way, but thinking my way through it, analyzing who I am, analyzing what I'm doing, and getting
actual pleasure from that process, then you can conquer the lower self.
And he is an amazing example, not studied enough in this world,
because he practiced this as the leader of a great democracy
under incredible amounts of pressure,
making very important decisions all the time.
And he was able to step away from all the heated arguing
and irrationality that was plaguing Greek
politics and find out a way of a middle course, a way of overcoming that in himself and in
other people. So he's sort of the paragon for that.
And why do you think, if you look at where we are right now politically, culturally,
in every way, if you pull up someone
plus a political comment on Facebook or you're watching television, it appears that irrational
thinking is the norm and that the lower self has taken over for almost everyone.
It's getting worse and worse and worse out there.
I don't know what it is if it's social media, if it's, we're going through a period like
if you read a biography of Montenna and where his moment when he was living in France, it
was a moment of incredible turmoil and people were becoming insane and irrational.
Maybe we're living through a moment like that.
I talk in the book about, I have a book about generations
and how things happen through history.
And moments of great rationality and history
are often followed by moments of extreme irrationality.
It's what I call the animal spirits in us.
We actually get pleasure from our emotions,
from feeling anger, from feeling outrage.
If you're outrage and anger and hate can become addictive,
it's the only way you feel alive.
It gives you a rush of adrenaline.
God, I hate that person.
I hate Donald Trump.
I want to kill Donald Trump.
It's actually something I won't go to.
But it kind of becomes literally a physical addiction.
And people are addicted to these emotions.
It's the only way that they can feel alive.
And to actually sit back and have to think about what they are saying on Facebook or how
they're responding is painful.
It's unpleasant.
It means, except that they could be wrong, that maybe their
convictions and their outrageous misplaced, that their anger is foolish. Nobody wants to
admit that. It's better to think, I'm righteous, I know what's right, fuck everybody else.
And you know, one of the main things in the book is we humans have aggressive impulses.
I don't care who you are, the sweetest, most lovable person has aggressive impulses.
And we have to find a way to channel them that are socially acceptable.
Well, venting our outrage and social media and getting angry and saying, I hate these
people, screw them, I'm going to beat people up, is a way to invent your aggressive impulses,
but disguise it to yourself.
I'm not fighting because I'm violent, I'm fighting because I believe in a cause.
Actually you're fighting because you are violent, that is the primary motivation.
Sure.
So, we can wrap up here. You have this book.
It's now out everywhere.
You've worked on it for all these years.
What do you feel like you learned about yourself writing
this book or going through what you've done
through it now, putting it out into the world
that's either made you better or changed how you live
or behave?
What's the main thing that you feel like you said that sometimes you go through things
after you've written a book and then you have to go back through and learn them and actually
practice them?
What do you think the main thing that you've taken away from this book that maybe you
hope readers will also take away?
Well, it's altered how I look at other people.
It's having lived with it for so long.
I've always been someone that's kind of not accepting people's for their appearance, trying
to figure out what's going on behind the mask.
But now I'm armed with much more knowledge and awareness and thinking.
But the other thing that's happened is it made me in a weird way kind of humbler in
that you write a book,
particularly the books that I write,
thinking I've figured out the solution,
I've answered this puzzle,
I'm someone great, I'm God, I am.
And in writing this book, I realize God,
it's really, really difficult to understand people.
The more I know, the actually the less I know in a way.
That people are really, really complicated. An example that always crosses my mind is in sports,
where we so much now in sports is dominated by data and algorithms. But when I watch like a
baseball, like the World Series or something, there's a spirit to a team
A way that they're cohere as humans
A way of relating to each other
That no algorithm in the world could possibly solve. It's that element of the spirit
Right? Yeah of the ispried the core that it'll actually determine whether they win or not
And I don't care how what nerd runs a team
that you can't figure that out.
Right. Right?
So when you're interacting with people, it's complicated.
It's like three-dimensional, four-dimensional chess.
Sure.
And so it's made me kind of humble and sense of,
I don't really know people as well as I think.
And it's kind of what's Socrates.
Self probably. And it's kind of what's Socrates...
Self probably.
And even myself.
So Socrates talks about
wants you to begin from a position of ignorance.
That's the source of knowledge.
The source of knowledge is that you don't know anything.
And therefore you're open to learning.
So this has made me realize that I really,
in some ways, don't know people as well as I thought I did.
And I have to constantly learn and train myself and be open.
And so the book then sort of like rather than being the end of your study of it, it's
the beginning of it.
It's like, I feel like the book poses a lot of big questions rather than gives you definitive
answers on everything.
Because you're giving data and stories and then I'm the reader is supposed
to take that home and try to make sense of it. Yeah. Not just once, but over the course of their life.
Yeah, I want the book, you know, this is kind of the longest book I've ever written. I apologize
for that. It's the longest book I've written and I'm trying to immerse you in a whole way of thinking. I want to alter how you think about people
from the inside out.
So it's not like I've come to you with all the answers
that now you just read my book, and you have to apply
what I say, ABC, and you will somehow magically
succeed in life.
You have to take this information and apply it to yourself.
You have to look at yourself and realize
think why you are irrational, when you feel envy,
what your shadow is like, what your attitude is towards life.
I'm posing a challenge to you,
and the book is sort of, will you meet this challenge?
So in that sense, it is kind of open-ended
and it depends on the reader.
If you're liking this podcast, we would love for you to subscribe. Please leave a review on iTunes or any of your favorite podcast listening apps. It really helps and tell a friend.
Hey, Prime Members, you can listen to the Daily Stoic early and ad-free on Amazon Music, download the Amazon
Music app today, or you can listen early and ad-free with Wondery Plus in Apple podcasts.