The Daily - The Life and Legacy of Jimmy Carter
Episode Date: December 30, 2024In 1976, after the Watergate scandal and the country’s withdrawal from the Vietnam War, American voters elected Jimmy Carter, a Washington outsider who had served one term as governor of Georgia, to... the presidency. Mr. Carter brought a new humility to the Oval Office but, by 1980, many Americans had tired of his modest sensibility and chose not to re-elect him. As it would turn out, the qualities that hurt Mr. Carter in the White House formed the foundation of a post-presidential period that helped redefine, and redeem, his legacy in the final decades of his life.Peter Baker, chief White House correspondent for The New York Times, explains the life, death and legacy of former President Jimmy Carter.Background reading: Read an obituary of Jimmy Carter, whose post-presidency was seen as a model for future commanders in chief.Mr. Carter defied the unwritten rule of former presidents: Don’t criticize the occupant of the Oval Office.In a never-before-seen interview with The Times, in 2006, Mr. Carter reflected on his life and work as a leader during the Cold War, a Middle East peace broker and his post-presidential career as a citizen diplomat.For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Unlock full access to New York Times podcasts and explore everything from politics to pop culture. Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
From New York Times, I'm Michael Bobarro. This is The Daily.
Today, the presidency of Jimmy Carter, who died at the age of 99, has become synonymous
with failure. But as my colleague, Peter Baker,
explains, the very qualities that hurt Carter as president
were the foundation of a post-presidency
that both redeemed and rewrote his legacy.
It's Monday, December 30th.
Peter, you are a White House reporter who has covered the last five presidents.
You're also a historian of the presidency itself.
And in those roles, I'm curious how you've been thinking about the life and now the death
of Jimmy Carter.
Yeah, it's really interesting, Michael,
because I've spent the last few years
writing Jimmy Carter's obituary,
and I know that sounds a little weird,
but that's something we do at the newspaper, right?
To be prepared for these big moments.
And researching and reflecting on his legacy,
I've concluded that it's really hard to imagine anybody
like Jimmy Carter
ever being elected president again.
I mean, he was a very unusual man
and it was a very unusual presidency.
Well, talk about that.
This unusual man and his unusual presidency.
And what in your mind is the first chapter
of that story that we should understand?
Right, well, first of all, we should know that Jimmy Carter, it's the American story in the sense of our mythology,
how we believe in ourselves.
He comes from very humble beginnings in rural Georgia, you know, as a peanut farmer.
He wore blue jeans and had dirty fingernails.
You know, his childhood home had no running water or electricity.
And he was openly religious. He talked about the Bible a lot.
He liked to quote verses from it.
By the time he's running for president of the United States,
he'd basically been a one-term governor
with no connections to Washington.
And that meant that he was running a campaign
as an outsider.
I see an America poised,
not only at the beginning of a new century.
Now, I mean, today that's kind of a cliche, right?
A lot of people run for president these days as an outsider,
but he really was an outsider in every possible sense of that word.
It defined his identity and it defined his campaign
and ultimately would define his presidency.
I see an America that is turned away from scandals and corruption.
I see an American president who governs with vigor
and with vision and affirmative leadership.
And he was the man that was right for that moment,
it felt like, because the country was hungry
for an outsider.
This is my vision of America.
I hope you share it.
You know, in 1976, when he was running for president,
you know, America had been through these multiple traumas.
The war in Vietnam, which killed over 50,000 American troops
and divided the nation, and the angry
and often violent reactions to the civil rights movement,
and you had Watergate, the scandal that forced
a president to resign for the first time.
Things that really sort of tore apart our society
in a lot of ways as we struggle
with who we were and what we wanted to be.
And so Carter shows up at this particular moment
is kind of a theoretically,
at least an antidote to some of that.
And he tells the country,
I'll never tell a lie.
I'll never make a misleading statement.
I will never lie to you at a moment when that really matters and
unlike a lot of politicians people really thought he may have meant it. He
might have actually been telling the truth about telling the truth. He might
have actually been telling the truth. Now it's really hard for politicians to not
lie ever but he was committed to that.
ABC News presents political spirit of 76. And that does it. ABC now projects Carter is the winner with 272 electoral votes.
And he wins the election.
By our projection, James Earl Carter, the next president of the United States.
He beats an incumbent president, Gerald Ford, who was Nixon's former vice president, and
in many ways the final shadow of the Watergate era.
And pretty much from the get-go, Carter begins redefining the presidency as an institution.
You know, he banned the playing of Hail to the Chief when he walked in the room.
He sold the presidential yacht called the Sequoia. He carried his own bags onto Air Force One when he traveled.
Good evening.
Tomorrow will be two weeks since I became president.
He gave these fireside chats once,
most famously, of course, in a cardigan sweater,
very casual looking from the White House,
something we were not used to in a president.
I'll report to you from time to time about our government, both our problems and our
achievements.
He was really trying to be something different than we had seen in the White House before.
Right, a kind of president who in some ways is unpresidential, like a president who despite
holding the most powerful office in the country, is constantly projecting humility.
Exactly. And in the process demystifying, in a way, the presidency.
But in some ways that doesn't go over well.
You know, he brings this Georgian style to Washington,
but he also brings this small coterie of Georgia advisors to Washington
who didn't know the place very well, didn't know Congress,
didn't know how it worked, didn't know national politics, and didn't seem to want to adjust
to it.
Certainly he didn't.
And so even though Carter has this really powerfully strong Democratic majority in Congress,
he ends up misplaying his relationship with them from the get-go.
How so?
Well, one of the very first things he does
is he attacks a ritual that lawmakers really love,
bipartisan, by the way, local water projects.
These are pork barrel spending things
that allow them to go home to their constituents
and say, I built this and I built that.
And he basically tried to pull the plug on them.
And he just refused to curry favor with lawmakers.
He didn't schmooze or dine with them.
He wasn't like an LBJ or a FDR.
It just didn't, it wasn't his style of governance.
One time the Speaker of the House, Tip O'Neill,
shows up at the White House for a breakfast
with the Congressional leadership with Carter
and all there are are pastries
and he's mad that there's not a hot breakfast.
Small as that is, he feels like he's disrespected.
And that's the kind of thing Carter disdains.
He disdains that sort of what he thinks
is kind of a pomposity of Washington.
Why should I have to serve you a hot breakfast
because you're so full of it?
And instead of adjusting, right,
another politician would simply adjust,
serve him some breakfast, serve him some eggs, whatever.
He stands on principle.
And what we learn about Carter here
is he's actually very stubborn,
really stubborn as a George Amule, if you will.
And he's very certain of his own rectitude.
As the guy who's the outsider,
he has the mandate, he believes, to shake up Washington.
And that's all well and good,
but it means he's not playing the game,
and the game players don't want to help him
Get his agenda through and there's a cost to that stubbornness. Hmm and
The problem began to mount and they were the problems of his own creation and the problems that were not of his own creation
OPEC the organization of oil producing countries, which has thrown the industrial world into grave turmoil.
Inflation starts rising because of an oil crisis
in the Middle East.
The prices in many San Diego stations
have gone up 12 cents a gallon since last summer.
Gas prices skyrocket.
This gas line at one station on the Upper West Side
ran from 96th Street and West End Avenue
all the way up to 102nd Street.
Shortages mean that you can't fill your tank on any given day.
Lines stretch out around the block at gas stations.
Nightmareous scenes on the evening news.
Isn't this disgusting? Why doesn't anybody contact the president?
Why is he letting this happen to us?
And Carter responds by giving out a series of energy speeches.
All of us must learn to waste less energy.
Basically telling people how they can conserve energy.
We simply must balance our demand for energy with our rapidly shrinking resources.
Small sacrifices they can make.
If we learn to live thriftily and remember the importance of helping our neighbors,
then we can find ways to adjust.
Ways that can be more responsible.
Mr. President, recent polls show that job rating is dropping
and continues to drop.
And people are just not hearing it.
His approval ratings are tanking.
...
So he knows his presidency isn't going smoothly
and he's talking about giving another energy speech
and everybody says, not another energy speech.
Even Rosalind, his wife says,
nobody wants to hear you give another energy speech.
They just wanna know that you're gonna fix the problem.
And it really causes him to think through
what's going on here.
And his advisor, Pat Cadell says,
you need to talk about where the country is.
The country is having a crisis of confidence.
And Carter takes that to heart.
He goes up to Camp David and he basically retreats
from the world for about 10 days.
He won't come back out of Camp David
while he's thinking through what he wants to do,
what he wants to say to the country.
And he brings dozens of people in and out
of this mountain retreat
through the course of more than a week.
Jesse Jackson shows up, Bill Clinton shows up.
He was the governor of Arkansas at the time
to give them their ideas of what they think
is going on in the country.
And there's Jimmy Carter in the lodge at Camp Davis,
sitting on the floor, taking notes
as people are giving him their ideas.
And he's crafting this speech he wants to give
to the country, he's crafting this this speech he wants to give to the country.
He's crafting this address. He wants to connect to the country and address their shared issues.
And so he comes down off the mountain at last and he tells his staff, I'm ready to speak
to the country. I think it's time. And they arranged with the networks to have him get
an address from the Oval Office. He puts on the suit and he sits at the desk,
the Resolute Desk, in the summer of 1979.
Good evening.
This is a special night for me.
And for 30 minutes, he tells the country
what he thinks is going wrong.
It's clear that the true problems of our nation
are much deeper.
Deeper than gasoline lines or energy shortages.
Deeper, even, than inflation or recession.
And he delivers this very risky speech.
The kind of speech you never hear from a president.
It's a president who in a very bracing and blunt way is telling the country to get his act together.
He's diagnosing a larger problem with the American public, not just politics. Human identity is no longer defined by what one does,
but by what one owns.
He talks about the notion that we worship self-indulgence and consumption.
This is a very, much of a preacher's speech in some ways rather than a president's speech.
And these wounds he's talking about are very deep.
And he's also talking about himself
in a way that presidents generally don't do.
I want to share with you what I've heard.
First of all, I got a lot of personal advice.
Let me quote a few of the typical comments
that I wrote down.
Very self-critical.
You're not leading this nation.
You're just managing the government.
He quotes some of the people who come through Camp David telling him how he's getting it
wrong, how he's not doing it right.
You don't see the people enough anymore. He's not doing it right. And it's this remarkable self critique that I think in some ways really
actually resonates at first with the audience that they've never heard a
president open up like this and admit that he isn't leading to his own
satisfaction, that he's willing to accept that his presidency is not going
the way he wants it to be.
Working together with our common faith, we cannot fail.
Thank you and good night.
Imagine a modern president doing that today.
Right, I really can't.
But it very much seems to reflect that campaign promise, Peter, that Jimmy Carter would never
lie to the American people.
In some ways, this is a rather extraordinary dose of truth.
It is exactly right.
He is the truth teller in this instance.
In his view, he is being very honest with the American public about how he sees the problems of the country and it goes over
Well at first because it is so unusual because it is so refreshing in its own way
It was sort of celebrated for its candor and you know at first people think he has actually
broken through but then he does something to undermine the
whole purpose of it.
Which is what?
He fires his whole cabinet.
He fires his whole cabinet?
Yeah, he asked for all of the resignations, all of them.
He ends up keeping most of them, but he ends up using it as a way of cleaning out a few
of them.
And it sends a statement that he may not have intended to the country. It may have been meant as a cleansing idea, a fresh start,
but it actually caused a lot of Americans
to doubt his judgment.
They don't think he knows what he's doing.
And even his own vice president, Walter Mondale,
was so upset about this that he started contemplating
whether he was gonna stay on the ticket
or maybe even resign as vice president.
He thought this was such a hand-handed,
badly handled move.
It was amateurish in his mind.
So this reset that Jimmy Carter has attempted to undertake
with those meetings at Camp David, with this speech,
with this theoretical cleansing of his cabinet,
it is all very much seeming to backfire.
Yes, and after all that drama,
that self-critical speech that he delivered
that so many people originally connected with
suddenly looked different through a different lens.
People will start to see the speech as a sign of weakness.
And it becomes known as the Malay speech,
even though he never even uses the word Malay is in it.
But it's a marker at this point for his presidency. For years to come, people would remember
that speech as an example of somebody who couldn't lead.
Right, and the reason it's called the Malay speech is not just because it was
about American Malays, because it seemed to embody Jimmy Carter's Malays as
president, right?
Right.
He had alienated his own party,
and when it came to the domestic side of his presidency,
he was being seen as a disappointment.
But what was making him unsuccessful at home,
his outsidersness, his stubbornness,
his image of himself as this unvarnished truth teller,
all of that helps him make a success
in one particularly intractable
problem overseas.
We'll be right back.
Peter, after all these domestic stumbles, tell us about this success that Carter has
overseas.
So, amid all these troubles at home, Carter decides he's going to try to do something
that no president had ever done before, which is to resolve one of the biggest conflicts
in the Middle East at that time between these two long-time enemies, Israel and Egypt.
I mean, people may not remember this now,
but Egypt was one of the strongest Arab nations at the time
and like the rest of the region,
hadn't even accepted Israel's right to exist
since it had been established in 1948.
And so they basically been at war for 30 years
at this point off and on
and it was the core instability of the region.
So he wants to dive on in. He
believes through this same stubbornness that he is uniquely qualified to bring them together.
Good evening. The scene is Camp David, the president's mountain retreat 75 miles northwest
of here. The participants... So he invites Menachem Begin, the Prime Minister of Israel,
and Anwar El-Sadat, the president of Egypt,
to Camp David in September 1978.
How long they'll stay in the mountains and what they'll say when they come down, nobody
knows.
For what would become 13 days of pretty remarkable negotiations.
It's an insanely complex negotiation over land and politics and religion and history.
Throughout these 13 days, it's Carter singularly holding the whole thing together, this crazy
enterprise that seems like it's going to break down at any moment.
He's almost literally physically throwing himself in the door to prevent this side or
that side from throwing up their hands and leaving. At one point, you know, the Egyptians packed their bags and singled, they were done
with these talks and it's Carter who has to talk them out of leaving. At another point,
he brings photographs of himself to sign for each of Begin's eight grandchildren, which
reminds the two of them at that moment what they're doing this for, for the next generation.
Carter, he's appealing to anything he can think of
to get these two enemies to come together and make peace.
When we first arrived at Camp David,
the first thing upon which we agreed was
to pray that our negotiations would be successful.
Those prayers have been answered far beyond expectations.
And it works. They actually reach a deal.
One of the most extraordinary moments in the history of diplomacy.
Israel and Egypt have agreed to two documents taking a giant step toward achieving peace in their troubled corner of the world.
And later it's immortalized in this photo. It's one of the most famous photos of his presidency, probably, of him standing between these two leaders,
Begin and Sadat, at a ceremony on the lawn of the White House.
And the three of them are holding hands together,
and they have these big grins on their faces.
And it feels like such an invigorating, inspiring moment.
The Camp David Conference should be renamed. It was the Jimmy Carter conference.
And everybody agrees that had it not been for him, it never would have happened.
And here we see Carter's stubbornness paying off.
He was single-minded in his pursuit.
He was the only one there at Camp David
who thought he could pull it off.
President Carter, for long days and nights,
you devoted your time and energy to the pursuit of peace.
Sadat later called him the unknown soldier
of the peacemaking effort.
And Begin agreed, he says, that Carter would be, quote,
remembered and recorded by generations to come.
As far as my historic experience is concerned, I think that he worked harder than our forefathers
did in Egypt building the pyramids.
It is, in fact, this singular accomplishment that is probably the one most lasting, enduring,
and triumphal moment of the Carter presidency.
But of course, there's another moment, a final chapter of this presidency that's just as
defining as the Camp David Accords and that is remembered for generations to come.
So tell us about that.
Yeah, just as defining, but not at all triumphant.
In fact, this really is the moment that leads
to the end of Carter's presidency,
and that's the Iran hostage crisis.
Good evening.
A tearful shah of Iran left his country today
on a vacation from which he may never return.
In 1979 in Iran, Muslim clerics lead a revolution that overthrows the leader of the secular
government there.
That's the Shah of Iran, who'd been a close ally of the United States.
And after the Shah was overthrown and left the country, he became sick and needed medical
care.
And as a US ally, wanted to come to the United States for help.
There was a ton of pressure on Carter to let him in.
When you had people like Henry Kissinger and David Rockefeller,
they're all pushing Carter, let him in, let him in.
It's the right thing to do for an ally.
But Carter knew how risky this was,
and maybe in a way almost nobody else did.
He told his aides that he feared it would lead to violence
against American diplomats in Iran.
And why did he fear that? Well, he had seen what had happened
in an earlier stage of the uprising
that had led to a short-lived siege
of the embassy in Tehran.
It didn't last long and there were only a few casualties,
but he saw the potential for violence there
and he realized that if the Shah came,
the United States would be so offensive
to this newly ascendant crowd in Tehran that it would put the embassy in danger.
But given the pressure on him from the Shah's American allies from within and outside the
government, Carter invites him to the U.S. anyway.
And just like he predicted,
Several hundred young people, mainly students at Tehran University, have taken over the
embassy.
We are not occupiers, they said.
We have thrown out the occupiers.
Militants in Tehran storm the U.S. embassy and hold scores of U.S. government workers
there hostage, demanding that the Shah be returned to Iran to stand trial.
This morning, for the first time since the hostages were put under lock and key, one
of the captives blindfolded was brought out into the open.
Yankee go home, they cried,
but they made no attempt to harm him.
Carter refuses to send the Shah back to Iran
and the militants refused to release these hostages.
And it becomes this incredible standoff,
really of a generation,
an enormous story heard around the world.
The special report that we plan to bring you tonight was about domestic politics,
but we think the crisis in Iran is more urgent right now than the campaign here at home.
It's on round-the-clock TV coverage.
Families of the employees are on television pleading for the release.
Americans are tying yellow ribbons around trees in front of their houses.
It's an all-consuming story for much of America. 222nd day of captivity.
The 285th day of captivity.
The 377th day of captivity for American hostages in Iran.
Every night, you had the anchors saying,
day 138 of the hostage crisis,
day 420 of the hostage crisis.
under the hostage crisis.
And it really just consumed the country and it consumed Carter's presidency.
How does it consume Carter's presidency?
Well, you know, he had a choice of putting this to the side
or at least making it one issue of many,
but instead he chose to cancel speeches out of town,
to cancel campaign events. He made this the number one priority of many, but instead he chose to cancel speeches out of town, to cancel
campaign events. He made this the number one priority of his presidency. And these same
qualities we're talking about, the sort of stubborn single-minded determination that
we saw at Camp David that worked well for him there, really kind of works against him
here because he wants to solve this problem and he's going to do nothing but focus on
it, no matter what else is happening basically and that becomes in effect
The sine qua non test of his presidency if he can solve this then he is successful if he can't solve it
It means he's not and he inadvertently creates the the metric by which he's going to be judged
What is your understanding of why President Carter would make this hostage crisis?
Which of course looks terrible for any president.
It's a hostage crisis.
Why does he decide to make it so central
to his presidency in this moment?
Why not basically put it in the background?
He took it very personally.
He felt responsible for these diplomats
who in fact work for him, right?
He's the president of the United States,
and they were there in trouble in some ways
because of a decision he made to let the Shah in.
So he took it very personally.
And it's a little like the Malay speech
in the sense that he can't help himself
but to communicate that to the public, right?
He's communicating what he thinks and feels
in a way that most presidents might not.
Most presidents might try to focus on other things
so as not to elevate this particular crisis
among the many he had to deal with,
but that wasn't Carter's way.
He always wants to be transparent with the country
about what he's thinking, what he's feeling.
Right, he wears his worry in a very big public way.
He wears his worry in a very big public way,
it's a good way to put it,
and therefore the country worries with him.
And instead of being able to sort of judge it
among the many different priorities that a president has,
it becomes the singular focus of not just the president,
but the country as a whole.
And in effect, what he tries is what he did at Camp David,
which is that if he simply puts enough determination
into what he feels, he can solve the problem.
So what does Carter do to try to free these hostages
and turn this test into a success?
He engages on this sort of marathon diplomatic negotiation through intermediaries, other countries,
anything he can find to try to, you know, obtain the release of these hostages. That goes nowhere.
The Iranians are not willing to budge. They're not willing to make the deal that he wants them to make and and he finds himself frustrated time after time without any great success to
show for it. And so five months into the crisis he then finally turns to the
military and he says okay it's your turn. And he sends in a mission meant to
rescue the hostages from the embassy in the middle of a big urban city. Big challenge, really hard idea.
Late yesterday I canceled a carefully planned operation to position our rescue
team for a later withdrawal of American hostages.
And that failed.
Equipment failure in the rescue helicopters
made it necessary to end the mission.
Eight of the crewmen of the two aircraft
which collided were killed.
And several other Americans were hurt in the accident.
They miscalculate the number of helicopters they need,
number of American military personnel are killed,
and instead of this dramatic rescue
of Americans from Tehran,
you have this enormous embarrassment
on the international stage, a failed military rescue
operation that leaves Carter in a worse position
than he was even before.
We will seek to continue, along with other nations
and with the officials of Iran, a prompt resolution
of the crisis without any loss of life and through
peaceful and diplomatic means.
Thank you very much.
Right.
And because he is so fixated on this, and as a result, the media is so fixated on this,
that failure becomes a kind of political disaster.
It's a complete political disaster.
His secretary of state resigns, says he never thought that was a good idea in the first
place.
People question his effectiveness as a commander in chief.
He looks weak and people begin to lose faith in him.
And so, you know, the crisis just continued to go on and on for day after
day, week after week, month after month. 1979 drags into 1980. And while at first voters
were kind of supportive of him because they were rallying around their president in a
time of crisis, as the ordeal goes on and drags on and on, they lose faith in him. He
loses support among the public.
And of course, unfortunately for Carter, he is up for reelection that same year.
Right. He's facing a challenge in the primaries from Ted Kennedy. He beats him back, but then
he has to face this charismatic former actor and governor of California, Ronald Reagan.
And Reagan is attacking him for failing to end this crisis, basically saying he will be the one to end it
if he is elected president.
And it just puts Carter on the defensive.
He has a hard time arguing the case of his presidency
when he feels so much under siege
by the day-to-day diplomacy
and this failed military operation.
So he runs what is called a Rose Garden campaign,
which is to say that he doesn't leave the White House
that much to do the traditional stump speeches
and rallies and so forth,
because he feels that would be inappropriate
with these American diplomats
facing life and death in Tehran.
And he ends up losing by a wide margin.
Reagan ends up winning a pretty substantial landslide
and then of course is gonna take office in January of 1981.
And I'll never forget that day,
because on that day, the inauguration,
Carter is trying up until the last minute
to get these hostages out,
and he thinks he finally has a deal.
Around 6.30 in the morning, they tell him,
yes, we've got a deal.
The hostages are gonna be released before noon,
before you leave office, and he's excited.
He calls Reagan to tell him, but Reagan is asleep
and the aides won't wake up the president-elect to tell him.
So he's frustrated by that, and he goes with Reagan later
in the morning to the Capitol, and even then,
the hostages are still on the plane,
but the plane hasn't been released yet.
It hasn't been allowed to take off.
He's watching his watch, he's waiting for the word,
nothing happens, and there is Reagan taking the oath allowed to take off. He's watching his watch. He's waiting for the word. Nothing happens.
And there is Reagan taking the oath of office and ending the Carter presidency.
Day one of Ronald Reagan's presidency and day one of freedom for 52 Americans.
And only at that point...
The new president had not been in office an hour when the former hostages became free
men and women again.
Did the Iranians finally let the plane take off. One last cruel indignity meant to torture Jimmy Carter
that he could not release them on his watch.
They were released in the first minutes of the Reagan presidency.
The last indignity for a humbled president.
Peter, it's almost as if the Iranians,
having already contributed to Carter's re-election loss,
want to further humiliate him even after that defeat.
Well, it definitely felt that way at the time.
And Carter certainly felt that way,
that they were tormenting him in effect,
that they were adding insult to injury.
Look, it's important to remember,
there were other factors going on in that election as well,
and it's possible Carter would have lost anyway.
I mean, there was kind of an exhaustion with him
at this point, and Americans were struggling
with inflation and unemployment and economic troubles.
Reagan famously said in one of the debates,
are you better off than you were four years ago?
And a lot of Americans thought the answer was no.
And Reagan was this more optimistic figure
at a time when the country was looking for it.
He was the anti-Malays candidate in a way, right?
He talked about America as a shining city on a hill.
And he didn't appear in a cardigan.
He believed in the grandeur of the office.
And so where Carter wanted to make the presidency smaller, more accessible, more approachable,
less pomp and circumstance, Reagan was this Hollywood actor-turned-governor who wanted to bring back kind of black tie
swagger to Washington and convince America that it was this exceptional place in the
world, which is what a lot of Americans wanted to hear then.
It feels complicated though, right, Peter?
Because as you explained a little bit earlier, the idea of Jimmy Carter in 1976, when he's
first running as an outsider after all these excesses, Watergate in 1976, when he's first running as an outsider, after all
these excesses, Watergate in Vietnam, was indisputably alluring, the kind of smaller
version of the office.
But then it seems the reality of Jimmy Carter turned out to be less appealing.
Yeah, I mean, I think these are attributes that really worked for him in 1976 when there
was this Watergate hangover, this Vietnam hangover.
They just didn't work for him in 1980 when there was kind of a Carter-Malays, if you
will, right?
That they didn't serve him as effectively while he was president and running for reelection
as they did the first time he asked voters to put him in office in the first place.
And he didn't adjust, he didn't adapt.
But when he leaves office, it turns out
that it wasn't an act, this was who he was.
Well, just explain that.
What about his post presidency shows us
that this is who Carter was?
Well, what distinguishes it is its utter modesty, right?
Most presidents after leaving office become rich.
They sign multimillion dollar book deals is its utter modesty, right? Most presidents after leaving office become rich.
They sign multimillion dollar book deals
or like with President Obama podcasts and TV deals,
they give paid speeches and they live a life
that resembles the splendor of the office
that they had held.
But Carter didn't do that.
He first literally goes back to Plains, Georgia
to the same house, this little ranch house
that he and Rosalynn had lived in since 1961.
Modest, very unassuming.
At one point, the house, in fact,
is worth less than the large Secret Service vehicles
that are parked outside of it.
And the first thing he does
is start teaching Sunday school.
Wow.
And when he does finally reappear in the public arena, it's when he opens the
Carter Center in 1982, just two years after his defeat in the election. And it's through
this nonprofit group that we witness a post presidency of service and civic mindedness
that's really unlike anything we've seen in the modern political era.
He travels the world, promoting human rights
and monitoring elections in emerging democracies,
countries like Panama and Nicaragua and Venezuela.
Well, we have five minutes to go here on voting.
And at this particular place,
the turnout has been 83%, which is quite good.
He physically shows up during these elections.
He stands at the polls and watches people vote
election after election to assure that the process is free and fair. The worm comes out and
joins say in your knee. It swells up and destroys a tissue. He starts a
program to eradicate Guinea worm, the very painful and debilitating disease in
the developing world that in the 1980s affected millions of people. And of
course these kids can't go to school.
The pain is too great and they need medical care.
And he persuades volunteers in tens of thousands of villages
to treat the water where the worms grow.
And the Carter Center hands out millions
of specialized drinking straws that filter out these worms.
And basically Guinea worm is almost gone now
as a result of some of the things that he did.
And. And...
And now I call upon the Peace Prize laureate of 2002, Jimmy Carter.
All this finally, I think, leads to the Nobel Peace Prize that he didn't win while he was
in office.
Members of a Nobel committee from Norway.
It is with a deep sense of gratitude
that I accept this prize.
And during his acceptance speech,
Carter demonstrates his humility,
a genuine humility.
The scope and character of our sinners' activities
are perhaps unique,
but in many other ways they are typical
of the work being done
by hundreds of non-governmental organizations
that strive for human rights and peace. He praises the tireless efforts of other
humanitarian workers. God gives us a capacity for choice. We can choose to alleviate suffering.
We can choose to work together for peace. And he urges others to devote themselves to the small humble work that had defined the last several decades of his life.
We can make these changes. And we must. Thank you.
And you know, it's this service and modesty that he demonstrated that finally, I think in some ways allows him to redeem himself for the failures of the time when he was in
office.
In fact, a lot of people say Carter was a better former president than he was president.
At one point, one of his biographers, Kai Bird,
said Carter's the only president ever to use the White House
as a stepping stone to doing bigger things.
And it earned Carter a lot of respect,
even among Republicans who otherwise
didn't particularly like him,
and Democrats who were kind of disappointed in him.
But certainly I think the way most Americans
remember Carter today is the man from Plains, Georgia,
who's trying to use his platform of a former president
to achieve things that, in fact,
he couldn't do while in office.
The modern presidency in some ways requires compromises
he wasn't really willing to make
and kind of performances that he wasn't maybe capable of.
And every successor, everybody who's come after him,
has thought about how not to be the kind of president
Jimmy Carter was, even as they respect the kind of man
that Jimmy Carter was.
And that's why, for good or bad,
it feels like we're never going to see someone
like Jimmy Carter in the presidency again
Peter thank you very much. Thank you. Appreciate it. I
Prayed more when I was in the Oval Office at any other time in my life and
I prayed more when I was in the Oval Office than any other time in my life.
And I never did pray that I would be popular
or that I would be reelected.
I prayed that I could keep my country at peace,
that I could find peace for others,
that I could have patience
and an adequate element of wisdom, judgment.
Paul said these are the only things that are important,
justice, truth, humility, service, compassion, love,
those are the things that make a great life.
Over the next week, the body of former President Carter is expected to be taken by motorcade
from his home in Plains, Georgia to Atlanta, where he will lie and
repose at the Carter Center.
After that, he will be flown to Washington, where he will lie in state at the U.S. Capitol,
before a formal funeral at the National Cathedral.
Per Carter's wishes, he will be interred back in Georgia at a simple family plot.
We'll be right back. Here's what else you need to know today.
Investigators are trying to determine what caused a South Korean passenger plane to skid
across a runway on Sunday morning and crash into a barrier, killing nearly all 181 people
on board.
It was one of the deadliest aviation disasters in years.
Shortly before the crash, the control tower at the airport warned of a possible bird strike, and soon after, the plane's pilots issued a Mayday.
Today's episode was produced by Carlos Prieto and Sydney Harper, with help from Alexandra
Lee Young and Will Reed.
It was edited by Lisa Chow and Devin Taylor, fact-checked by Susan Lee, contains original music by Marian
Lozano, Dan Powell, Rowan Yamisto, and Sophia Landman, and was engineered by Alyssa Moxley.
Our theme music is by Jim Brunberg and Ben Landsferk of Wonderly.
That's it for the Daily.
I'm Michael Bobarro. See you tomorrow.