The Joe Rogan Experience - #2228 - Josh Dubin
Episode Date: November 13, 2024Josh Dubin is the Executive Director of the Perlmutter Center for Legal Justice, a criminal justice reform advocate, and civil rights attorney. https://cardozo.yu.edu/directory/josh-dubin Learn more ...about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Joe Rogan Podcast, checking out the Joe Rogan Experience.
Trained by day, Joe Rogan Podcast by night, all day.
What's up?
What's up, man?
Good to see you.
Good to see you.
So I guess we just get right into it.
The last case that we talked about, we had a very unfortunate incident happen after the
podcast about a month later.
The gentleman beheaded somebody.
Allegedly, yes.
Allegedly.
There's a lot of allegedlys, but there's so many crazy things to that case.
The craziest thing was him trying to fool the security cameras with a wig
Like I guess he didn't know how high-resolution cameras had gotten over the 25 years that he was in jail. I
Mean apparently there's a lot he didn't know the only reason I say allegedly is because
I'd be a bit of a hypocrite if I started calling him guilty before he has a
trial but of course based on the surveillance it doesn't look good what
do they say in Texas it ain't too shiny it's so crazy because you know we went
out with them that evening we brought him to the comedy club he's hanging out
with us in the green room and then the news broke and then the comics were like hey
man what the fuck what the fuck you doing bringing that guy around I'm like
well we didn't know I mean who could have known he was gonna do that other
than him I'm as I'm as I'm as shocked over and now as I was in the moment.
I mean, yeah, I don't, you know, there are no words.
I went through, it's really not funny.
I mean, I'm only laughing out of sort of nervousness,
I guess. Of course.
I mean, yeah, I was in St. Louis of all places,
which is only memorable because that's where I was when someone called me and said, have you looked at the news?
And I said, I was in court and I was on a break.
And I called him a miracle on this show.
And the media shoved that straight up my ass I mean
of course but that's what they're gonna do well he was the only guy that you had
ever brought in that was actually guilty that you felt was in jail for too long
you know he got a 50 year sentence correct 70 70 and it was reduced to 25 it
was just basically time sir he did about 30 years and they re-sentenced him.
Look, I would be, I've had a lot of time to think about this and I know you and I have
discussed it privately and I kind of went into a hole after this.
This didn't happen to me.
A lot of people say say I'm so sorry
Some people have said other things that weren't very nice. Yeah, the people that I you know
Regard their opinion or sorry that it didn't happen to me. My first thought was I had two thoughts was
That poor guy that got killed and it was a gruesome murder you know it wasn't
just beheaded I think he was dismembered completely well he's trying to get rid
of the body right allegedly and my first thought was my second and third thought maybe in tandem was this tore down 50 years of work that a lot of people have fought really hard for and really need.
And I felt like I let you down.
You know you've given us an amazing platform to get stories out for people that really
need help.
I think we've made a ton of progress.
We've got some exonerations as a direct result of this.
Yeah, you didn't let me down at all.
No, I didn't.
I appreciate that you felt like that. It didn't didn't let me down at all. No, I didn't. I appreciate that you
felt like that. It didn't feel like that to me at all. It was just listen, there's a reality
of prison life. There's a reality of being incarcerated. There's a reality of taking
a person who's convicted of a violent crime and putting them in jail with violent people
for 30 years. There's just a reality. And you know, I don't know what history he had with this man that he allegedly killed, but you know, it's like
you can only take so much. Yeah, I mean listen, I don't know, my first emotion,
this is for me and my therapist, my first emotion is usually like guilt. So once I took a little bit of time and thought it through,
I mean of course I come on your show and then you're you know splattered all over the news
for something not positive. Good news is I don't watch the news. I don't pay attention and I don't
listen to anything anybody writes about me so it didn't bother me at all. You're rare. So look for me
listen to anything anybody writes about me so it didn't bother me at all. You're rare. So look, for me, I have to take a hard look at what I'm doing and take the
mirror out and look straight in it and say like what did I do wrong? You did nothing
wrong. Well, well. I don't think you did anything wrong. You just, you just, listen,
the man had great qualities. He, like when you talked to him. He's very intelligent very nice guy
He just thought he could get away with getting payback on somebody. Yeah. Look that's super gracious of you
I'm not whether I did something wrong or not. I typically go to blame
And that's something that I have to that's a kink. I have to work out of my personality, but let me just articulate
Okay, I think what I
to work out of my personality, but let me just articulate it because I think what the platform is so important to me and getting these stories out is so important to me.
And I think that where I've landed is that he didn't let me down.
He didn't let, look, I was the public face of his resentencing.
There was a lot of great people involved and it wasn't just from the defense side. The Center for Appellate Litigation
had some amazing people working on his case. The district attorney of Manhattan agreed
to this. So on paper, even in their personal interactions with him, there was nothing that raised a red flag for anyone. He didn't let
anyone down if he did this, which people will draw their own conclusion, he'll have a trial.
He didn't let anyone down if he did this but himself and the people that still need help.
And I have to swallow the jagged pill that this work comes with some letdowns. The recidivism rate for people that have served
long sentences like that is less than 1%. It just happened to happen on a case where
I was involved. I have no...
Is it really that low?
Yeah.
Wow.
Yeah. If you look at exonerations, resentencings of people that have been incarcerated
for more than 20 years, it's that low. And you know, the harsh reality is that if you
put someone on a public platform and they then do what he supposedly did, it's going
to make headlines. I realize something though that...
This episode is brought to you by ZipRecruiter.
I might not have worked in traditional offices, but I've had many different jobs in my day.
And while there are many different types of offices, one thing is for sure, choosing the
right candidate for any office is a huge responsibility.
So if you're hiring and you want to find the best candidates,
I think you need ZipRecruiter.
Right now, you can try it for free at ziprecruiter.com slash rogan.
ZipRecruiter will save you so much time and money because they have smart technology
that'll show your job to qualified candidates immediately.
And their matching technology works fast to find top talent.
You can even invite top candidates to apply to encourage them to apply sooner.
Remember if you want to find the right candidates for your office, you need ZipRecruiter.
See why four out of five employers who post on ZipRecruiter get a quality candidate within
the first day.
Just go to this exclusive web address right now
to try ZipRecruiter for free.
ZipRecruiter.com slash Rogan.
Again, that's ZipRecruiter.com slash Rogan.
ZipRecruiter, the smartest way to hire.
Need more hot takes?
Head to the FanDuel Sportsbook app.
They got more ways to bet, more ways to win, and more ways to cash out quick.
You can cook up same-game parlays on any MLB or soccer game all in one place, not to mention golf, tennis, and more.
Download FanDuel and get more from North America's number one sportsbook. Please play responsibly.
19-plus and physically located in Ontario. Gambling problem call 1-866-531-2600 or visit connectsonterrio.ca.
Look, no one could have imagined what's in the dark recesses of that man's soul.
Whether it's his group home upbringing and abuse, the prison experience, it's not to make an excuse.
He did it, if he did it.
If he's convicted and he did it, that's on him.
What I'm guilty of is giving a guy a second chance.
And I am, why am I reluctant to say this?
I can't apologize for giving someone a second chance
and then, you you know they squander
it all I can do is say what could I have done better I mean I have a deep
understanding I think of what incarceration means I mean I read this
book I always get his name confused is it Henry Jack Abbott or Jack Henry Abbott
it's called in the belly of the Beast when I was in college.
And it's a series of letters that this inmate wrote to Norman Mailer, a fascinating book,
and about what incarceration does to somebody from the standpoint of
the practical day to day from the deep psychosis inducing confinement and everything else and
Two days before the book was released
And it was reviewed by the New York Times the guy snapped and killed someone in the East Village and
No one will know what it is like to be in there and, I don't want to offer this as an excuse,
but what it has caused me to do is reevaluate and say,
look, maybe I need to take a much closer look
at what sort of mental health counseling
these folks are getting.
Like Sheldon, I arranged for him to be speaking
to a trauma therapist.
Should I have been on him more to be going to those appointments?
Maybe. What was the circumstances with the guy that he allegedly killed? I don't know
if I'm doing it just because I'm distancing myself from it subconsciously, but I don't
know all the circumstances. But apparently this was someone he knew from
childhood and from in prison. I've heard rumors and, you know, stories about the guy threatened
his son to he slashed Sheldon when they were in prison. I don't know if you remember Sheldon had this big gash across his face.
But I don't know. And I frankly don't want to know at this point because someone lost their life. And that, you know, I think unfortunately for my mental health, I just wear that stuff.
You know, if I felt even remotely responsible for that, which I do, and you know, I have
to, I can be at peace with it, but I didn't cause that death.
And I don't, you know, I can take some responsibility for it in the sense that what can I do going
forward where whether it's people that are being exonerated for crimes they didn't commit,
or if it's people that are getting re-sentenced,
you cannot undo decades of confinement, you just can't.
And they all need mental health counseling, all of them.
And I have to put that on my shoulders.
I just do, because, you know, they all have issues
and they come out and need mental health counseling and there's a stigma
attached to it, especially in the African American community. And there shouldn't be. It's no
different than if you have a problem with your liver, you know, and you have to take medication.
I mean, I've always been upfront about the fact that I'm on medication. It's nothing to be ashamed
of. And it's especially warranted when you're in those circumstances.
Again, none of this is to make an excuse but I just think that there's a lot more emphasis
that I can focus on assimilation more.
And I think that making sure that they have job training and that they feel safe when
they get out.
I mean, there hasn't been one person who I've been involved in their case where even when they're innocent they get out and it's a fucking shock. And I
need to be a lot more sensitive to that I think and pay a lot more attention to
what they're doing, how they're doing. Again, I had the foresight to put Sheldon in touch with
and ensure that we were getting him mental health counseling
with a trauma therapist, but I, you know,
I didn't want to meddle too much in that
because it's on him to go.
So, I mean, that's where I land
for better or for worse. Well, I think I really did slash his face if you've been in literal mortal combat with
a person and this person is allegedly threatening your son or whatever.
You know, there's only so much you can do to stop a person from seeking revenge. I guess. Especially if they don't have any hope outside of the system and they've been completely
institutionalized which given the length of his sentence is reasonable to assume.
Yeah, you're a lot more forgiving and understanding than a lot of people were and have been about this. You know, I've had, there's
been two schools of thought in the reaction. I mean, I got pretty nasty hate
mail and I got a lot of words of encouragement. I think the hate mail
outweighed the words of encouragement. Always. But psychologically always. I mean by in
substance number and probably psychologically. Yeah. But that shit
just gives me fuel. You know if you're sending me fuck you, you race baiter, you
this, you that. Race baiter. Oh yeah I got a lot of that. How are you a race baiter? By
telling the truth about the state of race and the criminal justice system in this country.
I see the thing is that one force field I have around myself is when that's incoming,
I'm able to say, okay, thanks for the fuel, thanks for the fuel.
I'll never respond to it.
You know, unless you're doing mental health counseling in a prison, unless you're a corrections
officer or a police officer, know what it's like to be incarcerated, you have no fucking
business giving me your shitty opinion about what you think I am or others that do this
work. Get in the fucking arena and do it yourself. And I, you know, so I take that with a big grain of salt.
I had, you know, I have enough common sense and practical sense to sort of let to disregard
that.
But I have to be a big enough person to look at myself and say, well, what can I learn from this and what could I do better? Because, you know, I was
talking to Derek Hamilton, who's been on the show and the deputy director of the
Freedom Clinic at the Perlmutter Center. And, you know, Derek said, look, mental
health counseling when I was incarcerated was something that was like
it flew in the face of the us versus them mentality. I didn't think they could
help me. I didn't want to want to help. I was mad and there was a stigma attached
to it that I was soft if I did it. I didn't want people inside knowing. So, I don't, we're trying to formulate a plan
to normalize mental health counseling in prison. So, Derek and I are doing a town hall at Schuangang,
which is a pretty rough prison in New York on December 6th, to try to get some of the
inmates to understand
that it's okay to ask for this help. I think when they see Derek and hear his
story, it's helpful for them. So... I'm gonna say something that's gonna
sound pretty controversial, but I think, you know, one of the
conversations that I've had repeatedly, I had it with JD Vance, I've
had it with quite a few people, is psychedelic therapy for veterans.
People with severe PTSD because of war, I think, are the most deserving of psychedelic
therapy and the benefits of it.
And the fact that that stuff is schedule one and is illegal in the United States, I think,
is absurd.
It's ridiculous, it's horrible, it's a massive disservice to those people that put their lives on the
line and went over and experienced horrific things that the average person
like myself could only imagine and you're not going to do a good job of
imagining it. I think prisoners could benefit from psychedelic therapy as well.
I think there's a lot of people that could be rehabilitated by changing the way they view things,
literally changing their mind, changing their perspective.
And I think there's a lot of psychedelic therapies that could aid in that, particularly for people who,
you know, they're not violent people. They're just had their victim of circumstance or they made bad decisions in their life or
what have you.
And they're stuck.
And they're stuck both mentally and physically.
And if we want to use prisons as just a deterrent to crime, okay, I think we should probably
put some effort towards rehabilitation, you know, sincere,
significant efforts towards rehabilitation. And one of the best ways to do that is to
try to change the way people view themselves and view the world and view themselves as
a part of the world.
The fact that you would even think that that would be controversial, I think, is just a
byproduct of the fact that anything that somebody articulates that's outside of what's considered
mainstream is rejected. Unquestionably, the research is overwhelming.
Overwhelming. That psychedelics are one of the best, one of
the best, most effective therapies for PTSD. My therapist has, you know, counseled
people with PTSD coming back from war and, you know, has espoused the, not only the efficacy of it, but how remarkably different
it is from conventional therapies in the most positive of ways. And I could not agree with
you more. I think that if you look at some of the European countries that look at their prison systems
as a real rehabilitative model, we have to decide that we talked about the stats and
I'm not going to re-litigate that here, but look, we incarcerate people at a higher rate
than any other civilization on earth.
So we have to decide as a society,
are we just going to throw people away and put them in cages and make them worse,
even if they committed the crime? Or, as you said, are we really going to try to rehabilitate people?
Because some people are getting out no matter what, whether they have people like
me involved and other great people that do this work, But they're going to get out. Do you want them out like they were just an
animal led out of a cage? Or do you want them out where rehabilitation is a cornerstone
of their incarceration? And it just doesn't happen in our criminal justices.
Well, there's a bizarre attitude in this country that we shouldn't do anything to make their
life better while they're in there, you know, and that something like psychedelic therapy
is like that it's a luxury, you know, that it's something they don't deserve, that it's
something that should be reserved for good people. Or that there's some like, it's for people that are like fucking off
and you know, the others that do drugs, that whole mentality.
Sure, yeah there's that too.
So yeah, listen, I mean, you talk about like looking up at the mountain and saying, can I scale it?
I think what you have to do, and I'm talking about this, all it takes is one state, one
municipality, one person who says, that's interesting.
Show us the literature.
We have this amazing policy director at the Perlmutter Center named Sarah Chu and she's in the trenches Having these arguments having these fights trying to get forensic labs
You know ensuring that they have the proper training accreditation so that they're not
Introducing, you know various forms of junk science
All it takes is just the effort going forward to try to start pushing that boulder uphill or else
you know again again this goes to you know the incoming hatred in a situation like we had here
is like what the fuck are you doing to help try to make the situation better
because just calling names and pointing fingers and saying you fucked up or
this person that we threw away is not worth saving. Listen, everybody has made
some mistake that they wish other people didn't know about. You know, and it's not
always homicide obviously, but a lot of people have done something that, but for
the grace of God of Goi, right?
Where if somebody was looking, if law enforcement was looking, it could be you that was there.
And would you want a second chance?
Would you want redemption?
Would you want the help to overcome whatever demons? And I just think why psychedelics aren't, you know, looked at
ketamine, the little bit that I did going through a dark time, it almost
snapped me in a different direction. And. And, I mean, I, you know, you urged me onto it.
I mean, you were the one that said you should really think about this, and my therapist
urged me onto it, and I think, you know, so I know that the literature is there, it's
just we have to get past this whole, it's so weird that you mentioned that. I was talking to a guy
on the plane on the way down who asked me if marijuana legalization passed in Florida
because we were talking about, you know, where are you from, this and that. And he was telling me that,
he was from Colorado. And he told me that, you know, in Colorado, when marijuana was legalized, that there was this whole movement of people that were saying that it would be a gateway drug,
and that it was going to lead people down this slippery slope to doing other hardcore drugs
And he said, you know the gulf between smoking weed and turning into a meth addict
Doesn't exist
He said that the bridge between the two doesn't exist and if you start walking marijuana use and trying to link it to
walking marijuana use and trying to link it to drugs that the US government considers a problem, the link just isn't there. So, I mean, I, you know, he was sort of trying to explain to me how he
didn't understand how marijuana is any different than alcohol. And I said, well, go tell that to
the state legislature. I don't know what to tell you
I did not pass in Florida. It got it 58%
And it needed 60% really. Yeah, I don't get that. I just don't get I
Fucking more than half the people that should be it. Why did it need 60%? That was the same thing with, you know, the amendment on abortion. It needed 60%. Maybe
it was the abortion one that got 58%. I might be wrong about that. But in any event, I don't
understand the resistance to psychedelics as a therapeutic, both in mainstream society,
let alone in the
prison system?
Well, it all goes back to 1970.
It all goes back to the Nixon administration, the sweeping psychedelics act of 1970 that
turned everything schedule one that was designed to, it was designed to cripple the civil rights
movement and the anti-war movement.
That's what it was about.
It was about having new tools to imprison people that were anti-war, that were protesting
the war. The Black Panthers, civil rights organizations, all these people that were
doing drugs, you know, that were using psychedelics to try to achieve a different state of consciousness
and that brought them to these ideas that we're all one and that war is evil and
that the United States government is being controlled by the military
industrial complex and that this is a giant problem in our culture you know
but people were so weirded out by the Timothy Leary's and the whole tune in, turn out, whatever
the fuck his motto was, drop out.
This whole thing of leaving polite society and being a loser and just like traveling
around and doing drugs in a van.
This was like the perspective that people had that was going to take their
kids and turn them into nerd-o-wells and turn them into losers. And that we were going to
have a society filled with people that didn't understand the ethics of hard work and what
made America great and all this bullshit. Look, what's born out of that is this, you know, misunderstanding, I guess is the best
way to put it, ignorance.
Well, it's propaganda.
You're a victim of propaganda.
Well, look, also, if you think about like coin Intel Pro,
all of a sudden you're spying on people that you think are others.
You're legalizing that intelligence gathering
that allows you to start violating people's civil liberties
so that you can gain intelligence on them because the way
they think is unlike you. So, you know, it's again sort of to me all ties back to this very,
I guess, tribal mentality that you're either like us or you're like them. And everything that you mentioned,
the psychedelics act, the resistance to the civil rights movement, it was all based on
the fact that look, we have a potential uprising here of people that are going to challenge
the way we think and the way we do things. So for people that call me a race baiter, right, I, you know, I feel like I'm more of a truth teller and just taking the thread through history.
And, you know, I have at least I'll read and try to educate myself and get perspective. If it wasn't a fact that brown and black men and women get incarcerated at a higher rate,
I wouldn't be talking about it. And I'm just talking about facts. So I think that it's just
this tribal misconception about these are drugs and they're bad versus you sit and speak to someone and take some, you know,
pharmacologic form of therapy
that has probably way worse side effects,
can be addictive and can lead to a whole host
of other issues that you then have to take
something else to address,
versus just having the openness to take a look
at a different way to potentially
help someone. So I don't understand it. And the only thing that I can do is just to keep
on being open minded and, you know, try to figure out if there's other ways that we can
convince the people that are in these penitentiaries
and that run them to allow programs that at least give you
a crack in the door to get in?
Well, I think the doorway to that
is to first show the effectiveness with veterans
and with other people that aren't incarcerated.
And that once that gets established
and once that becomes something,
I think it's much, much more established now
than it was when I first started talking
about this stuff 20 years ago.
You know, like probably when I had my first experiences
was a little more than 20 years ago.
I think people had this very ignorant idea
that was born out of propaganda.
Because you have to think, 20 years ago it was only 30 years removed from the Sweeping
Psychedelics Act.
So you're dealing with a whole society that's been just programmed by propaganda and lies.
And those propaganda and lies were established in order to villainize this one group of the
population that was completely changing the culture. The difference in the United States
culture from 1965 to 1955 to 1965 was so dramatic. It was such an enormous shift. You know, then
you have the Vietnam War, the protests, all these things that were happening
in the 60s, the music, everything was changing so radically and so drastically that the people in
power had a very, like an accurate sense that they were losing control and that change was
inevitable and they threw water on it and they did a great job.
If you look at it from that perspective,
the difference between me, it's terrible what they did,
but it was effective in that from 1970.
A great job of throwing water on it.
Yeah, a great job of changing culture, which
was changing in a potentially beneficial way for everyone,
to get us to recognize that we
truly are all one and that the way to make things better for everyone is to make things better for the most
disadvantaged and This was the civil rights movement, right? And this was the anti-war movement
This was this was recognizing that people are being taken advantage by the military industrial complex and just sent overseas so that they could profit
Amen I
The first guy that I met that really like
changed my perspective on
on the world especially in terms of what what I could potentially do as a lawyer was Jerry Lefkort.
Jerry Lefkort was Abbie Hoffman's lawyer. He was the lead attorney in the Panther 21
trial. I was like a kid. I was in my late 20s and I was met with him to help him pick a jury on a case and I had read about
him before and he saw something in me we hit it off he became like my like my
surrogate uncle and he would regale me with tales of his of the Panther 21
trial and here's a guy that was kind of winging it in his late 20s and
can feel the change that you're talking about happening and he could feel the
weight against him, the pushback coming from the other side where he would get
death threats, he would get bomb threats at his office where he could not
even see his client in jail approaching trial and had to get on a cherry picker
outside the jail to be able to get even with the window so that they
could communicate. So Jerry left court and he by the way got a full acquittal in the Panther
21 trial against all odds, he was the first person that told me about Coinintel Pro and
what the lengths that the government will go to when they feel like their message, their
way of doing things is being challenged. And I think that you hit the
nail right on the head, which is this was like a flu in the face of leave it to
beaver, it flew in the face of you know father knows best, it flew in the face of what white America was trying to instill as a value system
that should be followed by all people without question for all time. And people started
to say, what the fuck is this about? I want to explore the messiness and the gray areas of what it means to exist as a human being.
And that expression, whether it was Richard Nixon or the people around him that got their
backs up, you know, so if you are a student of history and you start to understand sort
of why we're here,
rather than just looking here and forward.
I think these things for me are a little bit easier
to understand when somebody comes at me
and calls me a race baiter for the work that I do,
because I talk about the problem of race.
I understand that that's born out of ignorance. And I don't
mean ignorance like you're a dummy. I mean ignorance like you're...
You don't have access to the information.
Yeah, or you chose not to have access to it.
Yeah, your perspective is incorrect.
Read Todd Neasy Coates' book, Between the World and Me. It's a fascinating fucking tale. It's a letter written from this, you know, black man to his 15 year old son.
And it is, it's a life-altering book for me because it puts you into his soul of what it
has been like to grow up as a black man in this country. And it stops me in my tracks when I think about it, when I talk about
it, because it's like the only way that we can get to a more common
understanding is to, you know, I think to read books like that and to talk to
people. And if you're so closed off and closed minded, and again I keep on sort
of adding this disclaimer, maybe this is my aversion to like getting attacked.
I am not excusing if Sheldon did this.
I just think that it's not so simple as,
oh, you let some guy, you help some guy get out
and get re-sentenced and look what he did
and fuck all these people and fuck your movement.
Okay, you're entitled to that opinion.
That's where I leave it. Yeah, you can't listen to those people. You just, you're entitled to that opinion. That's where I leave it.
Yeah, you can't listen to those people.
You know what you're doing.
You're smart.
You can't listen.
It's just that you're going to have those people.
They're always going to exist.
There's always going to be people with limited information perspective, and limited information
people sometimes are the loudest and the most vocal about it and and also the ones who are least willing to
Objectively assess how they came to the conclusions that they're so vocal and loud about you know limited information people
That's a it's a big lean. That's why clickbait headlines work. Well look I mean love that shit
That's why you get attacked sometimes by you know
You don't know about it because you don't read it
Why you get attacked sometimes some people try to send it to me? It's funny. Hey, man, fuck off
Yeah, I'm sending me that shit, you know someone someone in my family
a cousin of mine sent me
a
Link to a story about you endorsing Trump and wrote,
what the fuck? And I said, right, what the fuck? Why are you sending this to me?
Like, first of all, what the fuck? What the fuck are you?
Because you all of a sudden support this woman, who by the way probably should have accepted
the invitation to come on the show.
It might have been the difference between people getting to actually know who the fuck
she was.
But putting that aside, it's like I have to do a much better job of filtering that stuff out because the notion that
you know
You
Are gonna be influenced by outside forces other than what you're doing like for you to say, you know what you're doing
I like to think I know what I'm doing and I feel like I'm doing you know
Good things and I just got to keep on working in that direction, not let what happens slow me down, try to
learn from it and go forward. Look, I don't want this to come across as like constantly being like a situation where I'm, every time I get on here I thank you, but I think the
importance of this forum was made clear by having the president on, by having the vice
president on, because it's the only open forum where you don't have to worry about being judged, about someone chopping up
what you say and twisting it or leaving some remarks on the cutting room floor
and it's also important because you don't give a fuck about what other
people say or think and you just do what you feel is the right thing to do.
Because I've told you privately, I'll say it now again, the easy thing for you to do
would have been to say, well, fuck this guy.
I'm turning my back.
I don't need to have him on again.
So that was never going to happen.
Listen, what you've done is amazing.
And the people that you have brought on this show have changed a lot of people's perspectives
about our justice system.
A lot of people.
You brought on some incredible people and you've told some incredible stories.
And as you said, people have been exonerated for crimes that they didn't commit.
If you are a person who's listening to this and you could be fucked by the system, it's
possible.
You could be trapped by a corrupt prosecutor.
It happens.
Thank God it hasn't happened to you.
But if it did happen to you, you would pray that there's a Josh Dubin in the world that
pays attention to your case.
I appreciate it.
And I mean, it's not just me.
There's a village of people.
There is.
But a person like you Yeah, you know and I think highlighting that and highlighting the need for that and understanding of how the system can railroad
You and the system can really fuck you over. I think one of the things that we saw during the the Trump
Campaign was the legal system being used against one of the most powerful people in the world
and how they can get away with turning 34 misdemeanors, essentially one misdemeanor,
but 34 versions of it, 34 writing in a ledger incorrectly that's a misdemeanor and has passed
the statute of limitations, can be converted into a felony and turned against a guy who's
running for president as lawfare. It's just completely using the legal system
to try to attack a guy and try to take him out of the race and also try to
label him a convicted felon. So once you have this label a convicted felon, you
you heard it on all the talk shows, convicted felon, convicted felon. But enough people had a chance to look at the circumstances of the case and understand
what was actually, what he was actually being tried for. Paying someone off to not talk
about how he fucked them. Is that what we're worried about? Are we worried about World
War III? Is that what we're worried about? Are we worried about terrorist cells like
being established in the United States because our borders wide open? Is that what we're worried about? Are we worried about terrorist cells like being established in the United States because our borders wide open? Are we worried about the price of groceries
and people being able to feed themselves? That's what we should be fucking worried about,
not whether or not some guy fucks someone. Like, who cares?
It's so interesting to me because the conversations that people in the legal community in New
York were having at the time, I cannot tell you how many times, didn't matter what side of the spectrum you were on politically.
But in New York, there's a lot of fucking Democrats. And I can't tell you how often
I got this call. What is the crime here? What I mean, with regard to that particular case, first of all, the
DA of Manhattan seemed to realize that it was a futile endeavor to go after this guy
and retreated. And then something happened. And you remember, the special prosecutors
quit because they were furious, apparently, that the DA wouldn't go forward with the case. Then something happens in between.
And Alvin Bragg, the district attorney of Manhattan, proceeds with the case. So many
legal scholars said, what is the crime here? I understand there's a series of misdemeanors
that somehow gets flipped into a felony. Legal scholars that had issues with it,
and if they spoke about it publicly, they were attacked. Alan Dershowitz was one of them. He
was attacked. Anyone that would speak out. And there's this fear for good legal minds to get
behind defending a case like that because it's viewed in democratic strongholds like kryptonite, right?
So, I mean, remarking on that case,
yeah, it was weaponized against him.
And that's why I think it was this morning,
the judge in that case agreed to a joint motion
by the prosecution and the defense
to put everything on hold because they're
deciding whether or not they're going to dismiss that case. And if you remember, the drum that
was constantly beat before this election was he'll never get out of these state cases,
the federal ones we understand because he can pardon himself. But the state cases, oh,
those are going to be a problem. Well, not so fast, right? Because now, if it was that much of a crime
and that people were so up in arms about it,
why are they now considering dismissing it?
And I think that it puts the lie to the notion
that this was really something that we wanted
to make an example out of,
and you can't engage in this type of conduct. What conduct? You know, it was obviously politically
motivated. And you know, it happens all over the country. It happens all over the
country on both sides of the aisle though. We have, I have a case right now that, and for me to be able to say this is probably, you know,
I had to think is this the craziest fucking case I've had?
And it has to be.
It has to be.
Because the DA that is sitting in judgment of whether or not these four men that I'm going to
tell you about in a moment, right before the election for him to become DA gets
indicted. He gets indicted for allegedly like harassing a former employee and
then trying to bribe her not to file a complaint against him,
something like that, right before the election. And all of a sudden, he is now embroiled in this.
He loses the election a couple of weeks ago, and he is now finds himself, according to him, wrongfully accused of a crime he didn't
commit.
Well, my client is a guy by the name of John Edwards.
And there were four guys.
This is in Lorain, Ohio, Lorain County, Ohio.
It's John Edwards, Lenworth Edwards, Benson Davis and a guy named Al Cleveland,
New York guys in the early 90s who were selling drugs in Ohio. They were going back and forth
from Ohio to New York. And one morning, a man by the name of Epps is found dead in the street.
His roommate is found about seven hours later, a woman named Marsha Blakely dumped in an
alley behind a shopping center.
The case is cold for a month.
The police have hit dead ends.
They have nowhere to go with the case.
The prosecutor's office offers a $2,000 reward for anyone with information about the case. Wouldn't you know that the next day, a man by the name of William Avery Sr. walks in
to the Lorraine County Prosecutor's Office.
They sit him down with the police and he says, I have information about the case.
Now, this guy, William Avery Sr. was a known informant.
The police knew him.
He had come and tried to give information
about other cases, didn't pan out.
He was also a drug addict.
And they sit with him for over an hour,
and they say to him, everything you're telling us
has been in the papers.
So you're not giving us anything new here.
He shows up the next day with
his son, William Avery Jr., and he says he witnessed the murder. So William Avery
Jr. talks to the police. At the end of that interview, he goes, what about the
reward money? And the officer says, let's turn the tape recorder off
and let's talk about that.
They tell him, we're not giving you the reward money
because now you're telling us that information
that's been in the papers.
And all you're telling us is that you saw
Marsha Blakely assaulted in an apartment
and you're not telling us anything about the murder. The very next day he
shows up and says that Al Cleveland told him that he murdered Marshall Blakely. So
let's put a bookmark in it because I decided I wanted to do something a little bit different
today.
At the end of the episode, I'm going to give you a Twitter account.
I've submitted today a 40-page submission, all of the exhibits that are mentioned in that submission to the Lorraine County prosecutor.
His name is J.D. Tomlinson. So now I'm going to invite the public. Before you go writing a
letter to him or calling him, you read the submission and look at the exhibits yourself.
Because what often happens is that in these re-investigations,
prosecutors' offices have something called a conviction integrity unit where they say they'll re-investigate the case.
And the very first thing they make you do is sign a no-media agreement that you won't
go to the media because the last thing they want you to do is what I just did, is to talk
about the case publicly.
So we're not in a conviction integrity unit.
We're trying to appeal to a prosecutor, JD Tomlinson, who from what I understand is
told Al Cleveland's wife, because I've spoken to her, her name was Roberta, great woman,
came up to her in the summer at a barbecue and said, when I was a law student, I sat in on your husband's trial and it always bothered me. And I want you to come in and have your
lawyers come in. I'm going to do the right thing. And now that he's been indicted, he
has gone silent. I haven't heard from him. I've texted him. I see he reads my messages
because he has read receipts on and I guess he doesn't know that. And I've texted him, I see he reads my messages because he has read receipts on
and I guess he doesn't know that. And I've asked him for his time, I think in his wildest
dreams he probably never could have imagined that the case was going to now become national
news. He has between now and December 31st to do the right thing and exonerate them.
The incoming DA would
never do it I don't think from what I've heard. So I'm gonna invite the public
and I'll give you the link at the end and I want to tell you the rest of the
story because some of the things I tell you you're gonna say come on that can't
be true. So I have the exhibits sitting in a folder for everybody to read. But you know, the I think that the
justice system has been weaponized against JD Tomlinson because he was
coming up for a re-election. There's all sorts of like personal animosity between
him and the guy that just got elected. There's allegations at least that the guy that just got elected helped, you
know, was somehow involved in, you know, getting him indicted by a special prosecutor. I don't
know if it's true or not, but it doesn't just happen on the big national stage. It happens
all over the place and you just don't always hear about it.
Well, I think the fact that it happened on the big national stage the way it did,
and not just the case of the hush money,
but also the case of Mar-a-Lago being overvalued,
which is preposterous.
That was one of the most ridiculous ones.
They listed it at what, 17, 18 million dollars?
I would buy five of those
if they were available for 18 million dollars. You know how much money you would make for that kind of property?
You ever been to this place?
No.
I've been there. A bunch.
I've seen it.
It's fucking, it's magnificent.
Yeah.
You walk in there and you feel like, you know, Marjorie Post bought it and had it designed.
It's magnificent.
Forbes, I think, had valued it between $700 and $900 million.
Is that true?
Find out what the valuation was.
But independently, before all this shit, it had been valued.
And I think Trump valued it over a billion, which, of course,
he's going to do.
And he's doing it to the bank, trying to get a loan.
Paid the loan off with interest. Everything was fine. There's zero victims
involved in this. And the fact that they want to say that it was actually... So what does
it say here? Okay, 350. Okay. So the club had revenues of 25.1 million for the calendar
year of 2017, 22 in 2018, and in 2019, 2022 Forbes estimate the value of the
state around 350 million dollars. I think Trump jacked it way higher than that and
I think I've read somewhere that someone had said between seven and nine if you
could like what a real estate evaluation would be like what it's actually worth
in the state that it's at. I think there was an issue though that it was a wasn't it like listed as a national
historic landmark or something like that Jamie? Right, so then you really can't do
anything to it which devalues it somewhat but still. I would think listen
18 million is fucking crazy. There's no property like that anywhere. You feel
like you're in Europe when you're there. It is
a magnificent place and has some of the best food in Florida. So I don't, and I don't know
that part of the valuation of something like that seems to me to be a bit subjective. It's
now the home of the sitting two-time president of the United States. So yeah,
but putting all that aside... Just the real estate alone. There was a lot that
was sold next to it, or a home that was sold next to it. There was 50 million
dollars. And it's not just Mar-a-Lago. Across the street they have the beach
club that sits right on the beach. But the point is is that they're meddling
into... Look, the bank could
have said, well, we're going to send an appraiser out there and we're going to determine whether
or not we agree with you that it's worth that. That happens for anyone that's ever sold a
home. So yeah.
You got to the point is there's no victim. The point is like, it's not like he got this
loan and then defrauded the bank and then defaulted on his loan and then
pocketed the money.
No, no, he paid everything back with interest.
It was profitable for the bank.
Everything worked out.
It's like this is a bullshit case.
Everyone knows it's a bullshit case.
So that's another one that was in the news that everybody got a chance to see.
Well, hopefully, hopefully it opens people's eyes. Look, there's a lot of white collar crimes
that I've been a defense lawyer on, where you see the human cost of a prosecution,
what it does to the person accused, but also their family. And to somehow crawl out from under the weight
of the federal government,
these take years and a fortune to defend.
And oftentimes you're thinking,
why did they bring this case?
Who are the victims here?
And they come up with some loss calculation
that's very theoretical.
I'm talking about cases where you can't point to a victim that lost money.
And, you know, you wonder why some prosecutions are brought and others aren't.
And you see again what it does to not only devastate families and the accused,
but is it really deterring anyone? I would never, ever enter an industry where I was working with stocks,
bonds, commodities, anything that was regulated in any way by FINRA, the SEC,
because they'll, oh, it seems like they can make a case sometimes when there
isn't a case to be made. And hopefully, you know, regardless of what side the political
spectrum you're on, what happened to Trump should be eye opening to people because you
don't have to agree with him or his politics or his policies to see what's happening today
as we sit here when everything's being reconsidered and you think about the
massive expense that it takes to prosecute these cases. That guy has, I don't care what
anybody says about him, he's got to be one of the toughest motherfuckers you've ever met
to stare down all of this and most people would be in a puddle to stare down these prosecutions
and the threat of going to jail and everything else that breaks a lot of people.
Yeah and then two assassination attempts. Jesus Christ.
He's built different.
Yeah he has. The guy's 78 years old and I talked to him for three hours and he didn't pee before he didn't pee afterwards
Just sat here talked with didn't lose any energy and then flew off to do a campaign rally
Yeah, listen, I hope I wish him all the success in the world. I hope he does. Well, I got these
You can't vote for Kamala Harris after what you've said about her. You're right
You can't vote for Kamala Harris after what you've said about her. You're right.
I voted for Jill Stein because this two-party system to me is fucked.
You've got to be with us or them.
And then there's all kinds of gaslighting that goes on.
You have to answer to people.
I just feel like there should be more choices, but that's a different...
There certainly should be.
That's a different existential issue. But you, you know, you spoke on the podcast about her history as a prosecutor and what
she had done, and I know they contacted you after that.
Yeah.
I mean, what was happening, well, this was way back when, well, I think it was days before
she was selected to be the vice presidential running
mate for Biden. But I think it was Carpenter, who was set his
name. He's a great congressman. He wears an eyepatch.
I don't know. Oh, Dan Crenshaw, Dan Crenshaw, not Carpenter.
Dan Crenshaw took a clip from the podcast and was circulating it on Twitter.
And it was of me being critical of her. And you know, and again, that's a
situation where she had so many opportunities during this campaign to
just say, listen, I obviously, I watched a little vignette about this family who was prosecuted for their truant child, and it ruined them.
So all of this, I'm a prosecutor and I'm going to prosecute the case against this, that petrified me
because I have sat in rooms with prosecutors that just want to be right and win.
And I would just say, please, just open your mind a little bit.
I was just, I just sat in a room with a conviction integrity unit and there were prosecutors
in the room where, and I can't sign one of those agreements, so I can't name the case or the city or the borough, but where the
prosecutor went to federal prison for bribing witnesses and is accused of the same conduct
in this case where he was giving money to someone who was recanted their testimony.
And the prosecutor sitting in the room, like, it wasn't that they weren't
open-minded. They had their mind made up before we got in there. And you feel like saying, can you
just listen? Just listen. They just want to win. Yeah. And I think that that is my problem with
the two-party system is that it's either on this side or you're on this side, and there's no room for gray area between the issues
Right. I have I have a friend
Who I mean I learned so much during this election. I have a friend who is from Central America and
She was telling me I didn't when Trump won the first time I was furious I couldn't stand the guy
But when I came to this country, I saw my mom fight for citizenship. And I saw what she had to go through the right
way for me to get citizenship. And she said, so I just can't vote for anybody but him.
So everybody has their own reasons for doing it. It doesn't mean it has to be all about a cult of personality and you're voting for your
Endorsing everything about the person and I think that you know
Having that understanding that you know, look a lot of people that I spoke to a friend of mine the other day that
Grandparents, you know, we're in the Holocaust his grandfather survived the Holocaust and he voted for Trump because he's like, I didn't feel protected by the
other side, you know, as the grandson of people that went through that. So yeah, I
just think that watching a system get weaponized against someone in that
way, it's upsetting and hopefully, like you said, it opens people's eyes to the fact that
if they could do it to the president,
it could happen to you.
And it's so transparent.
It was so transparent.
It wasn't like he committed a murder.
And there's a lot of evidence pointing to the fact
that he committed this murder.
No, it was just a crime that didn't make any sense.
You're gonna spend millions and millions of dollars
prosecuting this crime.
You're gonna parade it around for the whole world just so the Democrats can have this
talking point, convicted felon. And you just see it repeated over and over again on MSNBC and CNN.
These pundits want to say, convicted felon. They want to say that. Like, what's the fucking crime?
Tell me what the crime is. But when you want to get smart and spout off facts, why don't you tell me about the case? Because I've looked at it
and it's fucking bananas. And if it happened to you, you'd be terrified because they just
made a crime. They made a felony out of something that's not a felony. the, if you're looking for logic and reasoning in any of these, you're not going to find
it. I mean, listen, I feel terrible, but I feel different about some of the cases. Like,
I feel like the, you know, the election case is had has the most substance to it, you know,
standing up and saying the elections rig the electionsged. I have a problem with that, but you know, obviously
more than half the country didn't have as much of a problem with it.
Well, that was one of the ones that I said was the weirdest where he didn't
have an answer ready. That you should have an answer ready right away. If I
had been accused of something like that and
I strongly believed that the elections were rigged, I'd be able to give you facts right away.
But he can't. Who's his facts? Rudy Giuliani and my pillow?
Well, that's the thing is like, I don't know how much time he has to investigate the cases,
right? So he has probably people telling him things and who are these people and what
is their evidence, what's their information. I would hope that if you have something that's
so controversial, like you ran for president, you believe you should have won and they rigged
it, you should have data that you could spit out at any cocktail party.
But he's doing the same thing that you're talking about CNN and MSNBC do,
which is just repeating the same thing. When people were standing in line voting
a couple of weeks ago, he was saying the election was, this election was rigged
and poof, it must have straightened it out because he won. But I don't...
What he was saying was they were trying to rig the election. And what facts did
he have to back that up? Well there's the one thing of bringing in people to the country illegally and then pushing
for amnesty, which was they were doing.
Well, yeah, I just don't know the numbers on it.
Well, it's millions of people. If you think about the amount of people that came into
the country, right? And you think about how some of these swing states, the cumulative
votes was like 75,000 that switched it one way or another. And just you can imagine if you're bringing in millions and millions of people and you're
moving them to swing states.
Well, if that's, yeah, if that's true.
And the evidence against it was like, well, they're not all moving to swing states.
Well, okay, you can't tell people where they can and can't move once they come to the United
States.
If they have family that's in Texas or if they have family that's in Arkansas or whatever,
they're going to go over the fuck they want to go.
But a significant number of them were in the country. If you're bringing in 10 million people, you have quite
a bit of a buffer. It's not a perfect system. But if you're trying to let people in illegally
and then give them not just protection, but also money, food, food stamps, housing, taking
care of them, and then giving them an incentive to
vote for the party that did that to them when the other party wants to, they want to round
people up and mass deportations.
Yeah, but putting party aside, what evidence did you see, documentary evidence, that people
were registering to vote?
And how many of them?
Well, it's not that they were registering to vote.
The issue is that there's no voter ID, which is fucking insane.
You need an ID for everything.
This ID that poor people-
Where is there no voter ID?
Harris won some states that require voter ID, contrary to online claims, fact check.
So, oh, so there's an online chart that's incorrect that people are passing around?
See that?
This is exactly-
So what states did she win that have voter ID?
Well, she's got, there's certain like deep state, deep blue states.
I hear you.
Colorado and Rhode Island are two.
But look what just happened.
So is that two?
Is that the two?
Vice president also won New Hampshire, which requires voter ID, but allows individuals
without one to either have their identity confirmed by a designated official or fill
out an affidavit.
Harris also won both Delaware and Virginia. So there's a couple states that she won that have voter ID.
But these are these are like these deep blue states. Fair enough. Look, I don't know. The question is the swing states.
I don't know enough about it, and I live I live in a world where I need the evidence,
but backing up to the other election, look, I'm just saying if there was one case where I was like,
come on, man. You know what's weird about the one, the 2020 that we keep going back to is the amount
of people that voted. That's what's really crazy. Way more. Way more. Way more. Way more. And that's-
I don't know what to make of that. Well, it's the first time ever you have mail-in ballots that are used ubiquitously.
You know, that wasn't a thing before. Mail-in ballots were essentially for people that were
overseas. Well, I think COVID had a big part.
Sure, it did. But also never, you know, miss an opportunity. And if you wanted to cheat,
that would be the way to do it. And to try to keep voted mail-in ballots, keep voting by mail-in
ballots when it's not necessary
anymore. It's not a pandemic. Sounds good. Seems crazy. It does, but it's not a to me.
I live in a world that you cannot say shit like that without backing it up. But listen,
whether I don't, I have started to really veer away from having a strong political view and just putting my head down and doing what I
can.
So I don't, I mean, I don't see the evidence on the prior election.
I see the claim repeated a lot.
I just didn't see it.
I don't see the evidence either, but I do see evidence that people are trying to make
it easier for illegals to vote.
That disturbs me.
The pathway to citizenship has always been kind of difficult.
And when you talk to people that have done it the right way,
it's very hard.
They have to go up for review.
They have to hope that this person decides
that they're a person worthy of being in this country.
And you had to be a person of extraordinary skill and talent
where that talent and skill wasn't
available in the United
States?
Listen, I recently moved out of New York to Florida and I got my driver's license and
registered to vote pretty quick after I moved there.
My wife didn't.
When we went to vote, they wouldn't let her vote because it hadn't been 30 days yet. So all I could say is that in Florida they
required an ID and they didn't let my wife... Well California literally passed a
law where you're not allowed to ask for ID which is crazy. Yeah it is crazy.
That's crazy. Well why would you do that? Andre, Andre... What would be the most
charitable version of why you would do that? Yeah, Andre Ward and I have been discussing California quite a bit recently and seems like
it's a little bananas to live in California right now. It's fucking crazy. Yeah, he's...
It's not going gonna get better either.
A lot more people voted red in California.
Have you seen the map of 2020 versus 2024?
Yeah, I did.
It's a giant significant shift, and if that keeps going, the state's gonna go red.
And I think if the state keeps falling apart, people are gonna come to their senses and
recognize that the policies that they have in place right now are fucking gross.
They're gross.
And you've got a bunch of bureaucrats that are profiting off of the homeless situation.
They're taxing the fucking shit out of people.
The state tax is 14.
If you live in LA, it's another one.
So 15% of all your money just goes to incompetence.
It's the same thing in New York City.
I mean, you're giving to the state, to the city,
you end up paying way more than,
if you make enough money, you end up paying way more.
Here's the rub I don't get about Democrats, all right?
This is the thing that bothers me about Democrats,
and this is why I registered finally as an independent.
We hear about the American dream a lot,
the American dream, the American dream.
The American dream. I was a son of a teacher. Now I sound like a politician. I
was a son of a teacher and a salesman. Did you grow up middle class? What's that? Yeah, I
grew up middle class. I grew up mid middle class, right? And we had to grind it out
and there were financial problems and everything else. So the American dream
is to make it on your own, to be self-made. And then you get to that point and you get demonized for it. Now
you need to give back in a way that how dare you not give more than half your
effective salary, more than half your income if you live in California or New
York. You give it away. 52%, 53%. You end up feeling like, what the
fuck, what did I do wrong I give back in
so many other ways and then
Here's my take on that if they were doing a great job and they were legitimately making
people's lives better I'd be fine with that if there was a system where I had to pay 50%
because I make a lot of money and I had to pay 50% but that 50% was changing people's
lives they could show you all these
success stories. It's like revolutionizing the way poor people are allowed to make it
out of that situation and have a better life. You didn't feel that in California? No? I
wasn't feeling it in New York. Nobody feels it. Going to the state courthouse. You feel
bureaucracy. Yeah. It's a... You feel like corrupt politicians who are profiting off of narratives, and they're a
bunch of dirty people who don't even follow their own fucking rules, particularly Gavin
Newsom.
Doesn't even follow his own rules.
It's the guy that got busted in the middle of the pandemic wearing no mask indoors, eating
at the French Laundry.
It's all bullshit.
It's all bullshit, and the people felt really fucking imprisoned by it.
They felt really captured by their government, and that's why a lot of people move.
He's got great hair.
He does have great hair.
Well, he's a great sort of version of what you would expect of a politician.
Why does great hair get you so far?
Well, people want great hair.
They want good genes.
Tall and great hair means a lot to people.
Yeah, I don't... We're stupid. Yeah, we're stupid. There's a lot of stupidity involved in why we choose things, you know? I read this article once about how
there was a poll done of female voters when Bill Clinton ran the first time,
and they asked the reasons
why and it was multiple choice and one of them was that he was good looking and had
a full head of hair.
Yeah.
They want to fuck him.
Yeah.
And apparently he wanted to fuck them.
Yeah.
He was a great president though.
I mean in terms of policy, in terms of what differed the economy, guy was a great president,
great orator
I agree except for the fact that mass incarceration kind of started with him. Yes the crime bill of 94. Yeah
So I think that our prison industrial complex started with Bill Clinton was kicked off by Joe Biden was
It was just hilarious. This is the guy running against all that. It's all bullshit.
You know, I don't, it was very interesting to me that this is playing out in real time
with the incoming president, and I have this parallel situation going on in Ohio. This
is called a weave. I'm weaving back to Ohio. And I want to tell you the rest of the story about the
Ohio Four. So this guy, JD Tomlinson, is the prosecuting attorney in Lorraine. He's
under indictment right now. He's got two months left. Like I said, he now knows, according
to him, what it's like to be wrongfully accused of a crime.
So watch this.
You have these four guys who,
so again, it's Al Cleveland,
Lenworth Edwards, John Edwards, Benson Davis.
Yeah, you gotta light up for this one.
So I told you, William Avery Senior goes in,
tries to get the reward money they
tell him fuck off brings his son in the next day they say to him no dice then he
comes back and says okay Al Cleveland told me he committed the murder comes
time for their trials to begin and they're going to all be tried separately.
And William Avery Jr. gives this account of how this murder happened.
And he says that he watches this woman, Marshall Blakely, get beat for 15 to 20 minutes inside
of her apartment.
And that, you know, the reason he, this woman gets beat
is because Al Cleveland wanted him to work off a debt
and beat her up, and he said no.
So then these four men bust in the door
and this is how the crime occurs.
It comes time for the first trial of these four men.
And William Avery Jr. shows up
as the prosecution's star witness, and he says,
I want $10,000 to testify. He gave me two, I want 10,000. And the prosecutors say,
we're not giving it to you. And he says, then I'm not testifying. The judge throws him in jail. He's in jail. He is cool in his heels as they say.
And he says, you know, I made this whole thing up and I did it for the money.
And no one believes him. And the judge says, what are you talking about?
You're gonna get on the stand and testify,
he says, no, I'm not.
And now he's facing potential perjury charges.
The judge declares a mistrial.
He then comes back with a new story to the prosecutors
and says he witnessed the beating, he witnessed other details of the crime
He then goes on to testify at all four of their trials after the first mistrial they all get convicted
He then fully recants of his own volition
Says he got off drugs says he wants to straighten out his life.
He's in the process of cooperating with the FBI and the Secret Service. Now these exhibits
are sitting in this folder. You go to Twitter, it's FreeTheOhio4. FreeTheOhio4. There it is. And if you just click on that URL...
What, one person's following? Zero followers?
There was a reason because I didn't put it up until right before the episode today.
I'll be the first person to follow it. I'm gonna get on right now and be the first person to follow it.
If you click on that, it will bring you to a folder with this 40 page submission that I put in today
and references to all of the exhibits.
So here, this is my first page.
At the trials of Al Monday, that was his pseudonym,
Al Cleveland's pseudonym,
at the trials of Al Monday and those charged with him,
I testified under oath that I was an eyewitness
to Alfred Cleveland, who I knew as Monday,
along with other people I knew as J.R. Will and Shaquem,
who was John Edwards, beat Marsha Blakely
at Floyd Epps' apartment,
and then murdered her behind Charlie's Bar in Lorraine.
All of this was a lie. I never witnessed the
murder of Marsha Blakely, was not with her or Al Cleveland the night she was murdered.
I only done it for the money and everything was not true. The entire case was built on
this man. There's no forensic evidence, no eyewitnesses, nothing.
So this is not to be believed.
What was the reason why they thought this woman and that other man were murdered?
They didn't know.
They had no theory.
Police had no theory.
There's no connection to them?
No connection to them.
There was no theory, like drug deal gone wrong, something?
That was what they ended up coming up with, was that she was a drug user, Cleveland was a drug dealer,
it must have been drugs gone wrong.
So, something involving drugs gone wrong.
So William Avery Jr., is after they get convicted,
is working as an informant for the FBI
and the Secret Service.
Now, prior to this case, maybe this is how obtuse I am,
I thought that the Secret Service's purview was the President,
but apparently they have other investigative functions
because he was working on some food stamp scheme as an informant.
The Secret Service tells the FBI,
and the testimony is in that exhibit file, the Secret Service tells the FBI, and the testimony is in that exhibit file,
the Secret Service tells the FBI, this guy, William Avery Jr., he's not to be trusted.
He's lying to us, and he's lying to us for money.
They contact the prosecutor.
The FBI calls the prosecutor in Lorraine County and says,
this guy, William Avery Jr., used him as an informant in that case against these four men. He's a liar.
And he does this for money.
So they end up getting Al Cleveland's lawyers, John Edwards,
lawyers, Lenworth Edwards, Benson Davis.
They ended up getting an evidentiary hearing and William Avery Jr.
comes to testify.
And he's coming to testify that I made the whole thing up. And he's in very exquisite detail. His father, who obviously brought
him there, threatened his life. He was sat him down and smoked crack with him to calm him down.
You can't make this shit up. Wait till you read the affidavit. He sat him down to smoke crack with him to calm him down and told him,
I need that reward money for my drug habit. He was a fucking junkie. So he needs the reward money and he gets his son to go in
there. And it's obvious if you watch the if you read the interrogation and his testimony
that he's being led, they show him pictures of the apartment where this woman was allegedly
beat. He's getting details wrong. They're there. You know, he changed his story. He
was telling conflicting versions of the story. So
at these post-conviction hearings, where these men should have all been exonerated,
he gets on the stand and before he testifies, the judge says to him, have you been advised?
Do you have an attorney? He said, I don't think I need an attorney. And he tells William Avery Jr.
Well, you need an attorney. We're going to appoint you an attorney because you're about to perjure
yourself because you either did one of two things. You either lied and that put four men in prison
or you're about to lie now to set them free. Either way, you've lied under oath.
to set them free.
Either way, you've lied under oath.
Think about the mind fuck of this. So this guy is coming to clear his conscience.
And the judge threatens him with prosecution.
So he gets an appointed attorney.
And they go and ask the prosecutor,
will you give him immunity so he can tell the truth?
They say no. His defense attorney ask the prosecutor, will you give him immunity so he can tell the truth?
They say no.
His defense attorney asks the judge, will you give him immunity so he can tell the truth?
And the judge says no.
And they tell him, we're going to charge you with perjury if you tell the truth.
He walks out of the courthouse, okay, after pleading the fifth and is interviewed by the local paper walking out of the courthouse, okay, after pleading the fifth, and is interviewed by the
local paper walking out of the courthouse. That's in the exhibits. And he says,
they're all innocent. I made the whole thing up. I've been trying to tell the truth here,
but I can't go to jail for whatever time they're going to give me.
time they're going to give me. So here you have a guy that is the son of a known junkie. He has been the prosecutors in this in Lorraine County have told have been told by the FBI
that he's not reliable, that he makes things up just to get money. He's been caught in
lie after lie after lie
and now he comes and wants to tell the truth
and set these men free.
And the crazy, and this judge puts him in this situation
where he can't tell the truth
or else he's gonna get prosecuted.
This is what happens in this country.
This is the kind of thing that, and these four men,
two of them are out, two of them are serving life sentences.
Al Cleveland's wife Roberta Cleveland saw this DA
and he said he was gonna do the right thing.
He knew that the case was problematic,
and now because he's worried about his own indictment,
you know, he's not responding.
So what we're asking
for is your listeners to go through and read this very detailed submission that I've made
along with the Ohio Innocence Project, the Ohio Public Defenders, and a great attorney
by the name of Kim Corral, who you actually had a good laugh over one time,
oddly enough, because she was at the White House when Kanye West was there.
She was apparently standing over him smiling and you were like, look at this fucking girl.
She just thinks that, how the fuck did I get here? She told me about it this morning.
Did she feel that way? How the fuck did I get here? She probably did about it this morning. Did she feel that way? Like how the fuck did I get here?
She probably did. She's super cool. I spoke to her this morning. She's a badass. And she
was like, I've never met him, but he seems awesome. And he did have a good laugh at my
expense when Kanye was in the White House. So yeah, there she is. That's her. Do you
remember this?
Kinda. Kinda.
It's so funny. But she's...
Kanye in the White House. I forgot that.
She's awesome. But so, we're asking your listeners to go and read the exhibits.
Read the submission. And then I have a contact page.
Call JD Tomlinson, write him a letter. Look, these four men, thank you, Jamie,
these four men certainly were drug dealers.
Al Cleveland, we've established Al Cleveland's alibi,
John Edwards' alibi, check this shit out.
His alibi witness was Damon John from Shark Tank. He testified in his fucking trial
at post-conviction hearings. Damon John, back then, was a hard-scrabble New Yorker. He was
doing whatever he could to grind it out. This is before FUBU. And he was friends with Al Cleveland, and Al needed to have a TV moved,
and Damon had like a gypsy cab service,
a car service in New York.
You lived in New York, right?
You remember what it was like.
You call a cab service, a car service,
and he was with Al Cleveland the day of these murders.
Al Cleveland saw his probation officer
the day after the murders. People saw him his probation officer the day after the murders.
People saw him all over New York when the murders happened.
John Edwards was with his girlfriend,
his girlfriend's family throughout the night,
from like 10 at night till three in the morning.
His girlfriend was pissed off at him
because he was flirting with some girl in the bar.
So these guys have alibis. There is no question. They had absolutely nothing to do with this
crime. This woman, Marsha Blakely, was murdered, right? Here's one of the strangest facts in
this case. She is seen all over town, all over town. At the time they claim that this guy William Avery originally claimed she was murdered.
She's seen by family members, friends, she's looking for a crack, she's walking down the street.
Way after this guy claims it happened.
How was she murdered?
She was, throat was cut and she was run over by a car.
Alright, so we've talked about tunnel vision before
and when the police think they have the guy, they had a problem on their hands. They couldn't solve
the crime and they have these guys that are drug dealers in the area. So they become easy marks for
this. There is a blade sitting in a diagram found right next to Marsha Blakely's body. They never tested it for DN. They never collected it
They never tested it. It was at a time when DNA is the early 90s
DNA was around
Her roommate Epps Raymond Epps is found a
mile or two down the road
With his throat slit and run over.
Same thing.
Same thing.
No one's been charged.
No one's been charged.
It's an unsolved case as of this day.
Why?
Because they pinned it on these other guys.
Because they pinned it on these guys and this guy, William Avery Jr., only came in with
information about one of the murders. The cases were so clearly
connected that the medical examiner pointed it out. These people were killed in the same
way. Why there isn't an outrage, a fucking outrage about this case is beyond me. When
I got this case, I said, there is no way what you're telling me is true.
That this guy has come and wants the clearest conscience and tells you exactly what happened.
And the FBI told the prosecutors that he's a liar. And these guys are still, two of them
are still serving life sentences. And when you have to live stamped as a murderer, even in the free world,
Hal Cleveland is out and he's suffering.
I mean, I had to listen to his wife heaving.
She couldn't get ahold of herself
because she went down to JD Tomlinson's office
and said, you told me you were gonna help and he said I can't now I'm sorry I've been indicted the
last time I exonerated someone look what they did to me because he exonerated
someone else and his political opponents attacked him you You know, human beings, we sometimes get in our own way because of outside forces,
what we think other people are going to say, think. JD Tomlinson has been voted out. He's
been wrongfully accused of a crime. It's time for him to say, you know what, I'm going to
do the right thing. All I ask is actually a meeting with him. I want to meet with you.
Between now and December 31st, let me lay everything out for you as I have in this submission.
He's now going to have it in his hands. He wouldn't answer my text messages. I'll give him a
break. He was obviously going through some serious personal issues, being under indictment, running
for reelection. This is an easy thing. This is just doing the right thing. There is no
way that you could look at this evidence. And this is why I think it's a good idea for, for rather than give a snapshot of a case
and have to rely on some process
with these conviction integrity units behind closed doors
where they run the reinvestigation.
I like the public being able to get invested
and look at the evidence themselves.
Everyone loves a true crime story.
So why not as part of this, let the public help make the case?
And when they write a letter, they'll do it more forcefully, or they call him and say,
how could you ignore this?
So I would just encourage everyone to go on Twitter and go to Free the Ohio for and look
at the evidence.
And if you ever, I've gotten so many reach outs,
how can I make a difference?
What can I do to make a difference?
This is it.
You can write, you can call.
You know, his cell phone number is online
because he was running for reelection.
You know, let him know that the public is watching
and expect him to do the right thing.
You know, that's the best use I feel like I can make of publicly advocating for change
is to help bring in the public and give them a vested interest in trying to help. Well, this case is, this is just an amazing example, right?
I mean, you said this is the craziest case you think you've ever had.
I don't think I've ever had a case, ever, where the sole alleged eyewitness recants
and then is threatened with jail time.
He's actually put in jail after trying to extort the prosecutors where there's no forensic evidence.
And it was the most incomplete investigation I have ever seen.
What would be the most logical thing to do if this guy says you know what there was a beating
at this house what would be the most logical thing for police to do there was
a beating inside this apartment for 15 to 20 minutes and this woman was brutally
beaten what are the police gonna do first scan for evidence go to the
apartment they go to the apartment right they don't spray it for luminol. They don't see if there's...
Luminol is a chemical agent that brings out hidden blood. You know, they do
nothing. They go and do a scan of the apartment, a visual scan, and see nothing
out of order. They don't test that knife.
And this is living...
Was there evidence that the woman was beaten?
No evidence. Oh, there was evidence that she was beaten, just not in that apartment.
So she was beaten before she was stabbed?
There was an eyewitness that saw her that night with like a black eye, begging for money
for drugs.
Oh, okay.
After he allegedly saw her killed.
So it's she was living a street life.
And she was there was, you know, suspicion that she was trading sex for money
so that she could feed her drug habit.
So I just don't I don't I've never had a case where the FBI calls the
prosecutor and says this guy is a liar and he goes in for reward money and for
financial gain and he can't be trusted. Never had a case where a judge says if
you tell the truth we're gonna put you in jail. If you tell the truth, it's just as bad as putting these guys, you know,
you either told a lie to put them in jail or you're now telling a lie to free them. I mean,
I just don't get it. I just don't get it. I don't understand why, you know, in almost half of the
cases where there has been an exoneration based on a sole eyewitness's testimony,
over half the people recant.
And the courts are very critical of these recantations.
So in other words, if someone makes up a story and then they come back and say,
look, I made that up because my dad was threatening me because the police threatened me.
That's somehow viewed very, very critically.
Whereas the initial allegation, it's really easy to put someone in jail.
Real easy.
Real difficult to get them out.
So do you think that's because the system is set up to not reverse convictions because it's bad for the prosecutor's record, it's bad for the confidence of the judicial system?
Like all of the above.
Yeah.
I mean, why did Kamala Harris block?
Why did she block access to biological evidence from crime scenes?
I think the rationale back
then was, oh well it would lead to a flood of requests. So fucking what? Right.
Flood of requests from innocent people perhaps. Or people that want, you know,
maybe they're guilty and they want to take a shot, who knows, but isn't that
worth the price of, you know, wrongfully incarcerating people? And why is there so much politics
that gets wound up in this? And for the life of me, I don't understand why it doesn't
see the light of day more. I testified before the House Judiciary Committee in Florida in connection with the Perlmutter case when their DNA was stolen.
Their DNA was stolen and they were wrongfully accused of a crime, Ike and Lori Perlmutter.
And I testified before the House Judiciary Committee that stealing someone's DNA as a private citizen should be a felony. All right? It was a misdemeanor.
And you know, it was one of my finer moments of oration, I think, because I got a 16-0
vote. And I had a really interesting discussion. It's recorded, I should find it and send it to you sometime. But there were Republicans that asked me,
hey, what is it that we can do to help you more?
Because this story is crazy.
And I said, well, there is something that you can do
as part of this bill.
We would like to make it not only a felony,
but give defense attorneys that have a good faith basis
to believe that it's an alternative suspect's DNA,
the same right to collect that DNA as law enforcement.
And if they make a showing to the court
that they have a basis to believe that this
is an alternative suspect.
So I had a former police officer who was a member of the Judiciary Committee say,
look, I was a cop and we used to do it all the time.
And his exact quote was, what's good for the goose is good for the gander.
And I think if you can make a good face showing I want to support that. When it came time for the bill to go to the Senate,
the guy that was sponsoring the bill
wasn't responding to me.
I said, we got overwhelming support,
not only to get the bill made from a misdemeanor
into a felony, but also to allow defense attorneys,
criminal defense attorneys with an adequate
showing to collect the DNA of alternative suspects.
And I said, so we'd like to add that amendment.
And he just stopped responding to me.
And finally, I got him on the phone and I said, what's the story?
Why aren't you responding to this?
And he goes, it's not happening, Josh.
Just not going to happen.
And I said, why? He goes, I'm not going to go into that, but it's not happening. So, you know,
obviously there was some political pushback to it. He just wasn't going to have that part of this bill.
So, you know, I don't know what else you can do to push these issues
other than get out there in the public
and bang the drum about it
and try to get people to pay attention.
And this I think is a rare opportunity
because it gives people, it allows them to invest in this.
It allows them to see what the evidence is
and actually write a letter and
say, hey, I saw the testimony of the Secret Service agent, of this FBI agent under oath
in these post-conviction proceedings.
Why can't, how, what more would you need?
You have the power to exonerate these guys and end this 30-year-long nightmare for them.
Why not do it?
Yeah, why not? Well, I'm hoping
that this is one of those cases where the people get activated.
And the way you laid it out is so crazy. I mean,
and with more evidence online
that people have access to, I'm sure there's a bunch of people who are going to react to that.
I'm curious to see what the response is going to be.
Yeah, Free The Ohio 4.
At Free The Ohio 4 on Twitter.
And you know, like I'm not a big Twitter guy.
Or I can't say Twitter anymore.
I'm not a big ex-guy.
I still say Twitter.
Yeah.
So, I mean, I guess I should get more into it.
Yeah, we did.
We threw this up.
Hopefully that the numbers start going oh they will as soon as it gets published I'm sure we'll get a chance to see
It's gonna be interesting to see how many bots lock on to it
Yeah, and then it would be my
it would be my dream to one day have the Ohio force sitting here and have a
Toast yeah force sitting here and have a toast. Yeah. Wow. What a story they have, huh?
Yep.
Jesus Christ.
And you know, the sad part about it is, is like, I hope that people don't say, well,
they were drug dealers at the time. And, you know, again, that's not because you commit
one crime doesn't mean that-
Yeah, doesn't mean you doesn't mean your murder also
like Circumstances are different for every fucking human being and for you to think that there's no way that I would do a crime
Especially a crime like that. Like are you sure are you sure if you were in their shoes if you live their life?
You know, we we all like to think that everybody's life is the same as ours. We only have one life that we can kind of reference. When we
look at other people's lives, we kind of imagine what it would be like to live their life.
We don't know. People do desperate things in desperate times. Depending upon your environment,
depending upon how you grew up, what your influences were, what trauma you experienced, whether you were
incarcerated at a young age. No one has any understanding of that other than the people
that get trapped into the system. They just don't. You know, it's tough on crime. Yes,
I think you should be tough on crime. I think you should arrest criminals and evil people
that do terrible things and make society awful.
Yeah, so do I.
But also you should definitely not arrest innocent people.
You should definitely not imprison them
and then punish someone who's trying to say,
hey, the reason why these people are in jail
is because I told a lie.
Yeah, I mean, I don't get the threat of punishing them.
And you know, I hope you have the type of influence
and following that just listen to that perspective,
folks.
Right?
You know, I have in the last few years developed a way deeper understanding of how relative
trauma can be from individual to individual.
I did not realize trauma that I had suffered until I started to travel those roads. And then how it
can impact behavior. So I'm trying to make better decisions about how I judge things because I don't
want to say I don't make I'm not judgmental. We're all judgmental. Everyone's judgmental. Yeah. You
have to be. That's how you survive in life. Right. I have to form judgments but
I'm trying to make more educated judgments rather than judging someone
based on you know not having a complete picture of what they might have
been through and also not being able to put myself as best I can behind their eyeballs or in their
brain. It's hard unless you really make an investment and I think the easy
thing to do is to make a quick judgment and keep it moving.
Yes. Right? And I think that words can be an excuse. The deep dive is too much of a
time investment, too difficult. And I've had
to understand behaviors that I never thought I would ever have to consider.
And I can tell you, at least in my experience, it forces you to become a
more compassionate human being, a more understanding human being. You get to
know yourself better. Because if you're not just
Constantly trying to figure out more about yourself and others the fuck are we doing you right? What the fuck are we doing here?
Yeah, yeah, if you're not trying to figure out more about yourself
I mean if you're the most enlightened person alive, tell us how you did it
You know, you don't you don't have any searching to do anymore. Tell us what you did. Because I never met anybody like that.
I can't thank you enough because again it's a rare occurrence these days
that to be unaffected by the outside noise.
And I promise you I'll do better in making sure that I'm a little bit more plugged into
the help people are getting when they get out, whether they have done it or not.
We've had two recent resentencings.
One guy was paralyzed and blinded in prison.
And he's in a wheelchair and he can't see and part of
the reason he was paralyzed was because of poor medical care that he was getting.
It was a difficult decision to make initially because I said shit another
resentencing a guy that was found guilty and then I saw the horrific medical
treatment he was getting and I said you know this just isn't right you don't
just throw out a human being like this and what threat is
he in a wheelchair blind but you know I have to do a good job of making sure that
people are getting the attention and care they need it takes resources and
you know we're thankful to everybody that continues to reach out and support
any of these causes. The Pearl
Mutter Center, you know, the Midwest Innocence Project is a great one, the
Ohio Innocence Project, those are all satellite projects, but the Freedom
Clinic at the Pearl Mutter Center, we've had some terrific folks including the
Pearl Muthers that have given us the resources we need to make a difference. So I just have your, you're in my, I'm in your debt. You're not, you're
not. I appreciate you very much and my thing about the outside noise is you
should never put any effort or time or focus into something that has no net benefit.
There's no benefit in the outside noise. It doesn't do you any good. Especially if you're an introspective person. If you're a person who thinks everything you do is awesome,
maybe it's good to see people shit on you. Maybe it's good to see that some people don't like you.
Maybe it's good. Maybe it's good to hear other people's perspectives. Kind of like
you put your ego in check
But if you're a person that's introspective and I know you are if you're a person that is hard on yourself when you make mistakes
No one's harder on me than me. I'm very hard on me
Oh, I know someone that's that's as hard on themselves as you he's sitting across from you
but it's
you. He's sitting across from you. But it's course correct. You know, if you if you look inward and you don't like what you're doing or what you've said or
who you are, don't do that again. One of the best things I did in the wake of
this whole Sheldon Johnson incident is I turned my comments off on Instagram and
turned my account private. I think I'll make it public again after today because I want to generate support for the Ohio for
and but turning comments off is a nice thing because you can
Believe the good stuff or the bad stuff. Yes stay forward
Especially for people in the public the good stuff you can get what they call audience capture
You know you have enough people leaning you in a certain direction or giving you praise for a certain thing start doing more of that
You know and this is a manipulative tactic that's used online
Both for and against people. Amen. Look when I was on my way over here today
I was walking into the u Uber and a guy at the hotel
goes, I hope you're going to talk that talk over on the JRE.
And I said, yeah I am. And it turns out that he went to high school with Rodney
Reed, who's on death row here in Texas. And I got into an interesting conversation with him.
He's like, man, his older brother could pop and lock.
I said, yeah.
He goes, man, this motherfucker was popping
and locking all the time.
He's telling me about him break dancing.
And he's like, no, for real, you know,
shining a light on this stuff
gives a lot of people out here hope.
And I told him that, you know,
I wrote a letter to the legislator here in Texas that's reconsidering that case. So
it's just real cool, man, to get people behind it that really care about
this stuff. And, you know, the public can really help out. You don't have to be a
lawyer, you don't have to be a lawyer. You don't have to be a psychologist. You don't have to be a therapist. Pressure does break pipes. So reaching out to JD Tomlinson
and making noise between now and December 31. And as you said, talk about things on this podcast
have actually exonerated people. Yeah, I thought this one was probably better off just me.
I thought this one was probably better off just me. Let me think real carefully about the next guy.
Yeah, I know.
Jamie and I were both talking about it.
I was like, you think he's going to bring somebody in?
Fuck.
You certainly can.
I mean, you definitely can.
Hey, listen.
Next time around.
And if it's the Ohio Four, great.
Hey, listen.
The guys that have been on here are all thriving.
Yeah. Bruce Bryan works at the guys that have been on here are all thriving. Yeah.
Bruce Bryan works at the Queen's Defenders office.
He has not been without challenges, trust me.
But he's actually going, I'll leave you with this.
Bruce is going to hope hope that parole lets him because we're still working on his full
exoneration even though he was granted clemency on it on the innocence claim. Bruce is going to
Nairobi and Uganda to speak to prisoners there.
Whoa. And he's a climb advocate for the Queen's defenders. Derek continues to be
a whirlwind of positive activity. He's just amazing. He's getting people out left and right.
Robert Johnson who we had on is continuing to do amazing things down in New Orleans.
And all of them are just thriving. They're doing well. Not enough attention is given to the happy
endings, right? Then we give to the bad stuff.
But of course, I mean, that's just how people are, you know, why is that?
Well, you know, well, the first of all, they're afraid of crime.
Yeah. So they they highlight the the instances where things are bad
and things do go bad and they don't they don't want to look at
the disgusting aspects
of the legal system.
People want to live life through rose-colored glasses
and have this perspective that the bad people go to jail.
But it's not just about crime.
Most of the headlines that get the most clicks
are about someone having a fucking affair, somebody dying.
There's not a lot of triumph in the news.
Well, people like when other people's lives suck.
Why though?
Because it makes them not think about the suck of their own life.
That's why they like it when a celebrity falls, like a P. Diddy gets arrested, because they
see these people living these lives they could never imagine, like yachts and Rolls Royces
and all that shit.
And then they see them get taken down like, yeah,
because they were, you know, envious. And it's also like, it's a part of our culture is to
celebrate wealth in the most disgusting and extravagant ways, you know, like, I mean, how many
social media personalities have emerged just complete just all about look at all the stuff I
have look at all the things I have look at all the famous people hang out with
look at all the girls look at the yacht look at the car look at the jet look at
the this look at that look at all the things you can't get and when those
people get got people love it you know who you know who folks are probably
clamoring gets got who if that's the basis and I don't agree who's that fucking guys always got his shirt off
He's taking pictures on yachts and shooting machine guns. Oh damn bills are oh man. Yeah
I'd like to I like to peek into his brain one day. Mm-hmm
Yeah, it's probably a lot going on in there.
It's interesting how people do become famous for that, though.
It's like showing your stuff makes you famous.
Showing a life that other people can't really imagine ever living.
But think of the hypocrisy and the inner conflict and turmoil that that exposes.
So in other words, we want people to fail.
That's somehow innate in many of us.
It makes us feel better about ourselves.
Yet, you will have three million followers,
or 10 or 15 following someone that,
and I'm not talking about that guy,
whoever, who
is clearly just selling their looks or their lifestyle or whatever it is, so yet we're
drawn to it and we want to watch it, and then when the person fails we want to fucking devour
them to the point where they're a carcass laying in the street.
Sure. Celebrity marriages and divorces, that's another big
one. Love it when celebrities get divorced. Ha ha. Ha ha. You're miserable too. Do you
love it? No. People love it. I find it fascinating when people keep getting married and keep
getting divorced. It's god damn, how many times can JLo get married before the next
guy's like, hey, I don't know if this is going to work out. Yeah. Is it really Ben Affleck
that's the problem?
Who's the problem?
Well, he's certainly a problem as well.
That guy Mark Anthony seems like a nice fucking guy.
Seems like a sweetheart.
When she married a bunch of dudes.
But, you know, whatever.
She's obviously a lot of work.
That's it. You want a diva?
Good luck.
That requires a lot of work.
I just want to understand it all.
I just want to like, me and my brother, who sometimes go, what's it all about?
It's definitely not all about caring whether or not JLo gets divorced again.
You know what I find difficult?
I've been playing with this idea in something that I'm writing right now, and it couldn't be more oppression than right now, is this notion
of what the truth is.
I don't know what, like we had it happen to us right here.
Are some of the swing states requiring ID, or all of them?
It's hard to keep a grasp on reality and the truth these days because there's information
that is intravenously injected into your veins, it seems like. So I have a hard time knowing
what's true anymore.
Well, the news itself outright lies. It's not like a conversation like we have where
Jamie checks it in real time and I saw a thing that said the swing state or the the states that required no voter ID or the ones that she won, she won other ones as well. But
when you have the news saying things, so they have researched it, they do know that it's a lie. This
is not like a live conversation like we're having where I didn't know we were going to talk about
that at all, nor did you. It just spontaneously came up.
These people are putting narratives out there that are just flat out lies and they're doing
it all the time.
I mean Obama did it during the campaign where he repeated that lie about Donald Trump talking
about white supremacists saying they're very fine people on both sides.
So just a flat out lie.
Well that was the the Unite the Right.
What was all about the statue, the statues of Civil War people being taken down and he's
saying, I'm not talking, literally said, I'm not talking about white supremacists and the
KKK.
They should be condemned.
He said, I'm talking about people that came out.
Did he say that in the same? Oh, yeah. Oh, you can see it. Go to the JRE companion Instagram,
because on that page, there is what Obama said. And then on the same video, there is what Trump
actually said. And it's disgusting.
It's a disgusting lie.
And it's a guy who's as,
and he's talking about George Washington.
He said, George Washington had slaves.
So Thomas Jefferson, we take down Thomas, let's play it.
So you could see it here.
Said that there were very fine people
on both sides of a white supremacist rally.
And you had some very bad people in that group.
But you also had people that were very fine people
on both sides.
You had people in that group.
Excuse me.
Excuse me.
I saw the same pictures as you did.
You had people in that group that
were there to protest the taking down of, to them, a
very, very important statue and the renaming of a park from Robert E. Lee to another name.
George Washington was a slave owner.
Was George Washington a slave owner?
So will George Washington now lose his status?
Are we going to take down, excuse me, are we going to take down, are we going
to take down statues to George Washington? How about Thomas Jefferson? What do you think
of Thomas Jefferson? You like him? Okay, good. Are we going to take down the statue? Because
he was a major slave owner. Now, are we going to take down his statue? So you know what?
It's fine. You're changing history. You're changing culture. And you had people, and
I'm not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists, because they should be condemned totally.
But you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists, okay?
And the press has treated them absolutely unfairly.
Now-
See, see, see, that's crazy.
I have never-
Isn't that crazy?
I have never seen that last part of it
Yeah, so here so here is my struggle with the truth unfold this way
I've never seen that part because I news has said that lie over and over and over and over and over again
That the news the mainstream corporate controlled news that wanted this narrative that Donald Trump was a Nazi
Said that over
and over and over again. They repeated it. They compared him up until the election.
Joy Reid was literally comparing him to Stalin, Hitler, and Mussolini and spent a
whole piece describing right-wing dictators that he is going to be a
right-wing dictator just like Hitler, just like Stalin.
This is the lie of the media.
So this is one of the reasons why it's so hard to tell the truth.
It should be illegal to do that.
It should be illegal to say that, because it's not true.
And you're changing the perspective of millions of people, especially low information voters that look
at Obama like a thing from the past when time was sane, when the world was normal. A brilliant
guy who was the president. If this brilliant guy is willing to lie in front of everybody.
Yeah, but here's the thing. There's no question. They all lie. Trump included. We talked about that earlier. He lies also.
This is like the problem. Right, but did he lie about Biden? About what Biden did?
Did he lie about any of that? No. He's lied plenty. I'm sure. For sure. But in the
context of a campaign where you're completely distorting the perspective
of the person you're running against,
not just who they are, but what they've done
and what they've said and what they stand for.
He does the same thing though.
But did he do that with Biden?
I believe he did.
How did he do it?
I think that there were many times where he would accuse
him of having created the problem
at the border, that it was all his creation.
People don't seem to remember that when Trump was president,
his border policies of separating families at the border
was not great.
It was not great, but do you understand
that Obama had those exact same policies?
I'm not disagreeing with that.
I'm just saying you can distort it.
But you know that this is just what they do with children when children are, when a parent's
arrested, they separate the families.
This is-
It was a, that happened under Obama, but under Trump, it wasn't just separating the children.
It was separating them for indefinite periods.
Is there a difference in the way Obama handled it in the separation?
I'm not going to speak to something. Right. So that's a problem, right? So it's a problem
if you're accusing him of that. Here's the here's the thing. I think they all lie. I
don't have I don't I didn't follow it closely enough to say they all lie too. But there's
not a thing like that here I can point to where he was saying something about Biden
that was factually incorrect.
Here's the thing that turned me off completely about the election this time and why I said
fucking, I'm voting for Jill Stein, a physician that probably is the least qualified of anyone
only as like my form of saying, I'll protest it.
You know, Kamala Harris during the debate said that there is not a single, it was some
remark, there's not a single, it was some remark,
there's not a single American soldier deployed
and then I saw videos of American soldiers in a war zone
watching it like in parallel reality,
I said what the fuck is she talking about?
Well did you see Dan Crenshaw post about that?
Where are we right now?
They were in a fucking foxhole or in a tent.
Dan Crenshaw posted all of the soldiers all the the numbers
that we have that see if you can find that post it's on his Instagram in
response to that you know Dan Crenshaw who lost his eye in war yeah he was Navy
SEAL he was the one that was circulating the clip about of me being critical of
her it's a good clip yeah sound clip I stand by it yeah and you were correct I
mean and then the crazy thing is you had a conversation with her about that.
Yeah, I was on Zoom and she couldn't answer a question then and she can't answer a question
now.
She still refused to answer a fucking question.
That was the most frustrating thing.
I mean, how about saying, look, obviously what happened at the border is a crisis.
It was not handled well.
Here is what I plan to do different.
It's outside of at least her capacity or willingness to do something like that.
But it was also the complicit nature of that the media was in on it because they were fact-checking
Trump constantly.
They didn't fact-check her on that, something that should be immediately fact-checked.
Especially during a debate.
I agree with that.
First of all, how did you not know?
How do you not know that?
You're either lying or you don't know that we have troops deployed on the war zone.
Maybe you're right.
Maybe it is that Trump repeats things that he heard
that are moronic and nonsensical sometimes,
and that takes away from the great he can do.
He definitely does that.
Like talking about people eating dogs and cats
and the election being rigged,
all sort of baseless shit takes away from the fact that,
you know, the things that stick out to him,
and it's like, get out of your own way, bro.
He pardoned Jack Johnson. He pardoned one of my clients. I think that he has done
more and cared more about criminal justice reform than certainly than any other president
in my lifetime.
No one ever wants to highlight the good things that that guy's done.
That's why I just did it. And it's frustrating to me because it's like, just don't listen to the last thing
everyone told you because you can be great. You can, I mean, the fact that he does what
he wants and says what he wants and gets elected. Look at this. This is what Dan Crenshaw responded
with. No US troops, active combat zones? How did ABC let Kamala get away with that during the debate US sailors and Marines are fighting off?
Houthi attacks in Yemen over three thousand four hundred troops are engaged in Iraq and Syria
We have forces in Western Africa battling terrorists just this year three US soldiers were killed and 40 injured in Jordan by an
Iranian-made drone nearly one thousand troops are still deployed in Syria,
and 2,500 remain in Iraq under Operation Inherent Resolve." So that's crazy.
Yeah, it is crazy.
It's a crazy thing to say. But it also just shows you how corrupt the relationship is between the
media and what we get to see. It's corrupt. There's a bunch of people that had decided that they were going to fact check Trump
continually and not fact check her. And they were doing this because they wanted
her
to look better than him because they wanted her to win. Yeah, I mean listen,
the most...I have...and this is why I mentioned, you know,
it's hard to know what the truth is.
Right.
The reason why I posted all the exhibits, the reason why I put the letter up, and the reason why
I put the contact information up is that when, when you have a transcript, um, and you have,
uh, you know, actual documentary evidence, that's hard to argue with.
Right.
It's not a sound bite. It's not a clip. So I feel like maybe part of what appeals to me about this work is trying
to get closer to the truth. A truth that is a bit more provable. You know I would
probably been very happy as a mathematician if I was any good at math.
I stink at it. But I think that there is, it's very difficult to understand,
you know, I feel like I'm sitting here and I feel manipulated by the fact that I never,
and it's really on me that I didn't go and watch the entirety of that comment,
because I literally don't think I've ever Listened to the part where he says obviously the neo-nazis and you know
The people that were there for the wrong reasons need to be condemned
You know when I was watching recently I was talking to the great Dubini about this
He's he pointed out to me that comment about
Liz Cheney. And then he's like, go watch the full clip.
Right, it's another one.
And I watched the full clip and I was like,
It's enraging.
This is so out of fucking context.
So then you start to wonder,
well how much is my opinion of him
been formed by my concern about other people
lashing out at me? Yes. mean, you should hear the shit I got when I spoke ill of Kamala Harris by, I guess,
called them the left.
And it was inf, politics to me is too, it's too much of, you know,
you have to serve so many different interests
that you sort of forget who you are.
Yes.
And what you stand for.
Yes.
So that's what turns me off about it.
And you know, I don't think that that'll change.
That's why I sort of shifted to,
this is the most I've talked about politics
in probably five years. But that's why I've shifted to let me just
put my head down and get to work on what I can work on. Yes. Well I think that's
very practical. I think what you said is very important for people to understand
that a lot of what people say they say it because they don't want people to
attack them. They say it because they think that if they say it, it will clear them.
They'll be okay.
If you say you support X, you might not even support X, but if you say you support X, you're
not going to get attacked and the right people will leave you alone or agree with you and
appreciate you or praise you.
Thank you for saying that.
There's a lot of that out there.
There's a lot of people that don't speak their mind. Do you know how many artists that have reached out to me that are like fucking hippies, man?
Like artists, like musicians, comedians that thanked me for endorsing Trump because they
can't do it.
They said they want to, but they don't want to be attacked.
They can't say it.
They think the country is going in the wrong direction
They think that this control of social media by the government which we would have had pretty much fully
If it wasn't for Elon buying Twitter
But this is a dangerous precedent to set
Whether it's a right-wing government or a left-wing government and that what you see that's happening in the UK where people are being in
Prison for tweets and Facebook posts. Yeah, and the you in the UK is the part that's mind- the UK where people are being in prison for tweets and Facebook posts.
Yeah, in the UK is the part that's mind bending about it to me.
Mind bending.
The whole thing is nuts and it's a dangerous path that we were on.
We were on that path.
Trump has vowed to have free speech become a very important part of what he's standing for and that this censoring of information
needs to stop and that we need to stop all government influence in what people have to
say.
Yeah, look, that alone.
That shouldn't be as revolutionary as it is.
I know.
It should be a core tenet of what, I mean, it's essentially the First Amendment. You know, and I think it's so transferable to what I do in this context because a lot
of the reluctance of prosecutors not to do the right thing or what their conscience tells
them is the fear of the backlash.
Yes.
How will it hurt my chances in a re-election?
Of course.
What will, and so that's what I hate about politics, is you serve so many masters.
Yeah. It's a dirty business, man.
It's a dirty business, and you gotta have nuts of steel.
Or you have to be a fucking sociopath. It's either or.
You have to be a blindly ambitious sociopath who can weave your way through these sort of social and
political relationships and to get to the top. For what? Imagine if one of those persons
does wind up becoming president that has no real thought or no real care about the country,
no real ambition other than the blind serving of their own success. Well, I think that that's what, for people that are so like...
It's hard to explain if you didn't live in New York.
For people that are just like, oh my God,
what's the next four years gonna be like?
And you know, like it's a funeral.
Like, get up and do something all four years
that you think is going to help make society better you do that whether it's getting out and
knocking on doors and making your for whatever you're passionate about not just when an election
is coming up but get out and knock on, get out and get involved in some organization that you believe in, do something that you think will help lend
itself to bettering society in some way. What happens is every four years there's this polarization
and people get on one side or the other and they complain and bitch and then they wallow
in it too often for too long a time. I think that the people that actually make
the most change happen are the ones that can sit
and talk with people that might have different beliefs
than them and don't make them other than.
Absolutely.
Right?
I mean, anytime I've made an emotional decision
in business personally, it's never gone well
for me. So people are gonna have different points of view than you. I was
talking to my cousin about it and I was trying to help her explain that just
because you voted for Trump, that doesn't make you bad. I said, you know, her
whole thing was, well, if you have daughters, there's no way you can vote for him.
I said, here's the fundamental flaw
how you're looking at this.
There are some people that are pro-life, okay?
That doesn't make them wrong.
That makes you have a different opinion than them.
You have a disagreement.
And if the basis of your vote is that
you're pro Choice and they're pro life
Okay, have a disagreement
you know, I
Just don't understand how a singular issue like that and I understand that listen
I understand from a woman's perspective. Yeah, I'm a father of two daughters. Yeah, I
Talked to my wife about it often,
especially going to Florida where the laws on abortion ain't the same as they are in New York.
And I understand it from a woman's perspective completely, and I actually disagree with
overturning Roe versus Wade, but you cannot be that myopic You just can't because if you're that myopic you're gonna then find yourself in a corner on one issue and
Life is a little bit more
Robust than that isn't it? It's more nuanced. Yeah. Yeah, that was the better word
Yeah, it is more nuanced. Well,, my brother, I love you to death.
I appreciate what you do.
I think the world's a better place because of what you do.
I really do.
And I think you've changed a lot of people's perspective on the legal system.
And I'm glad that we didn't let what happened with Sheldon change that.
And I think there's just so much more great work to be done. Well, my continued profound gratitude
to continuing to let me tell these stories,
I promise the next time I bring a guest on,
they will be well, they will be vetted.
The guests will be vetted a lot more thoroughly.
You know, it was-
There's no way you could have known.
There's no way I could have known,
and you know, it was interesting
because for 48 hours, I felt what it was like. I felt what it was like to be a headline
And then I was like this sucks
For the wrong reasons it was like I know you were in a dark place, but I'm glad you got out of it
Yeah, and it's not about me. It takes time. Yeah, and I just,
I'm really, really, really appreciative of this. And, you know, if that can't shake the
foundation of this forum, I think we're going to just keep on making great change happen
and hopefully we free the Ohio for and keep on moving.
Yeah, and I hope we do do a podcast one day with them.
Deep love.
Deep love to you too.
Goodbye everybody.