The WAN Show - Dell Gaming PCs Got Banned - DON'T PANIC - WAN Show July 30, 2021
Episode Date: August 3, 2021Try FreshBooks free, for 30 days, no credit card required at https://www.freshbooks.com/wan Check out our other Podcasts: Carpool Critics Movie Podcast: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCt-oJR5teQ...IjOAxCmIQvcgA Timestamps (Courtesy of NoKi1119) [0:00] Chapters. [1:31] Intro. [2:12] Topic #1: Dell's Gaming PCs banned in some states.    2:41 Cancellation of Alienware shipments.    3:10 Title 20 "Energy Efficiency Regulations."    3:57 Dell's store shows which model passes Title 20. [7:04] Topic #2: Activision's Blizzard case is getting worse.    7:14 Summarizing the case and new updates.    8:30 Activision hired WilmerHale.    10:36 Blizzard's "Bill Cosby Suite". [17:00] Topic #3: AMD launched RX6600 at ChinaJoy.    17:50 Discussing pricing of materials needed for GPUs.    18:40 AMD and Nvidia reported double the annual revenue.    20:58 Cryptocurrency is a factor on GPU supply.    21:57 Discussing the RX6600 & better DPW.    23:09 Decrease in used GPU prices stalled. [24:23] Topic #4: Intel reveals naming of the new node.    26:03 Qualcomm and Amazon are now Intel's chipmakers.    29:43 Linus defending Intel's rebranding.    33:43 Mentioning AMD's old misleading Athlon rating. [35:42] Sponsors.    35:50 Freshbooks Accounting.    37:19 Graphus Anti Phishing Defense.    41:35 Seasonic Power Supplies. [42:01] Topic #5: Update on Samsung's The Wall    42:29 Neither the SR nor TP know who Linus is.    50:34 Installer does NOT recommend The Wall.    58:57 Linus will buy a MicroLED display later.    1:00:55 Alternatives (TVs and projectors). [1:09:12] New LTTstore merch. [1:10:19] Topic #6: Valve responds to the antitrust lawsuit. [1:17:12] Topic #7: Linus wishing to invest in Framework.    1:18:37 Problems with owning stock.    1:25:40 Alternatives to investing.    1:30:31 Poll #1: Should Linus invest in Framework?    1:32:36 Viewers opinions on the investment.    1:43:36 Anthony shares his thoughts.    1:44:11 Poll #2: After the statements, to invest or not? [1:47:29] Superchats. [1:52:47] Genius superchat suggestion. [1:57:00] Wrapping up. [1:57:58] Outro. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
You know what's great about ambition? You can't see it. Some things look ambitious,
but looks can be deceiving. For example, a runner could be training for a marathon, or
they could be late for the bus. You never know. Ambition is on the inside. So that goal
to beat your personal best? Keep chasing it. Drive your ambition mitsubishi motors and we're live welcome to the
win show we've got a fantastic show for you guys ladies and gentlemen that's right they just can't
catch a break poor activision blizzard a total victim total victim in this situation and i'm
gonna go ahead i've had some problems lately
i've had some problems with people not detecting sarcasm satire verbal irony lately that is not
real that is not real activision blizzard is not the victim but they do keep on digging in this
pretty bad situation they've got going on in other news uh what did i title the
video ah yes dill's gaming pcs got banned in multiple states and it's even worse than you
thought because they're also banned here in british columbia and i had no idea how did i
notice this they've been banned you build custom machines well okay yes that's how i didn't notice
it but they've been banned for a while.
But also, also, so it's worse than you thought,
but it's also not nearly as bad as you thought.
What else we got today, Luke?
Intel renames their manufacturing nodes,
as far as I can tell,
to be as intentionally confusing and misleading as possible.
Talk about that later.
You know what?
I'm going to defend Intel.
So you guys are going to want to stick around for that.
Okay.
All right. Bring it on, Luke. Exc also the wall there's updates yes there are updates on the wall um yeah okay yeah well yeah we'll talk about that why don't we jump into our first topic first. Dell's gaming PCs got banhammered in a number
of US states. So these Title 20 regulations have reached Tier 2 of implementation. What the heck
is Title 20? Well, if you saw the wildly exaggerated headlines about California coming for your gaming PCs. That's what they are talking
about. So this latest tier of restrictions caused Dell to halt or cancel sales of their Aurora R10
and R12 desktops in California, Vermont, Colorado, Hawaii, Oregon, and Washington because
they either don't meet the power efficiency requirements or they haven't been
validated by a third party to meet them. Incidentally, they also cannot be shipped to
British Columbia due to, I believe it's efficiency here, but don't quote me on that, efficiency
concerns. The headlines, however, were blown out of proportion by media outlets as though
gaming was canceled for Californians and Vermontians and...
Hawaiians is right, that one I know.
And that absolutely isn't true.
Title 20 regulations are about reducing the amount of wasted power,
and they actually do exist for a good reason.
The growing power demands of computing are outpacing the growth of power generation,
and currently the estimate is that by 2040,
there will be more computation demands
than there is power to compute,
which is an obvious problem
because if you plug your PC into the wall
and there's no juice, bud,
then you're not going to be gaming at any FPS,
let alone 500 FPS.
Dell has since adjusted their web store to clearly state which models fall into the restrictions,
and a Dell rep confirmed to us that new models and configurations will meet or exceed these regulations,
in line with their long-term focus to address energy and emissions.
Now, that's the, hey, don't panic kind of message. But we have a video coming that
explains in far more detail what's going on because changes like this will come everywhere.
When we did our video on ATX 12 volt only, for example, Japan was one of the countries
that we pointed at as one that is really cranking up the heat in terms of emissions and
power reduction regulations. So California is kind of at the forefront of eco-friendliness
here in North America. So that's why California is kind of at the bleeding edge of this,
at least on this side of the pond. But it's for a pretty good reason because we do need
to reduce our power consumption um but there also could be other ways to go about it so you know
what i'm going to tease the video a little bit luke the idea is that in the video we are going
to try to build a diy pc that would not pass the emissions or excuse me emissions would not pass the efficiency standards
so we're going to try and build like a not super powerful machine but that is so inefficient that
it would not manage to meet these efficiency standards and what we are also going to do
is we are going to show off a balls to the wall gaming rig that would meet the new standards because it's
just a little bit more complicated than fast pc you know like you know you know slow pc what what
is it you got to be like fast pc you know like that kind of thing right like it's not it's really
just not that simple um it's it's not total draw it's efficiency so well no it oh not, it's really just not that simple. It's not total draw, it's efficiency.
So, well, no, it, oh boy,
is it ever more complicated than that?
So there's some part of the regulation
that has to do with like how much bandwidth there is
to the GPU memory.
Like, yeah, yeah, I knew that was gonna,
that bit was gonna blow your mind.
Like there's a whole, there's a whole host of requirements and you know how things are.
It's America.
So every state is kind of,
you know,
plays by their own rules.
Sure.
Yeah.
Often regulations are made by people that have no idea what they're talking
about,
but that's really interesting.
Muppet house says Jane,
Steve have covered this to death this week,
but all right, we will definitely have covered this to death this week, but all right.
We will definitely have a different angle on it.
I will give you my personal Linus tech tips guarantee.
True Scott says, says Linus who wants to buy the wall for his gaming room.
Okay, so we're going to talk about that a little bit more later on in the show because...
That needs its own AC.
Yeah, I might be somewhat convinced somewhat i might be somewhat convinced i might
be somewhat convinced oh all right why don't we jump into our second big topic of the day which
is of course that activision blizzard just keeps on making this problem worse so if you weren't around last week, there has been a slew of accusations
against Activision Blizzard about sexist treatment of employees. I mean, yeah, I guess that's a lot
of it. Harassment. One incident even allegedly went as far as an employee committing suicide on a work trip with a superior who was in a sexual relationship with them.
And something untoward was evidently happening there.
This is all I believe we haven't confirmed 100 percent what, you know, this individual's, you know, reason what the motivation was to to take her own life.
But it's it's clear from the volume
of accusations that there's at least smoke here we just it needs to be looked into and and the
the state of california is is going after them for it and looking into it and that's good because
yeah like you were saying with the whole there's a lot of smoke but yeah there's a ton more that
has happened in the last week so luke why don't you run us through it so this this is this is we we have another topic in a moment that's more like more about what was
revealed last week just some details that we didn't quite have this what we're going to currently
talk about is things that have happened since then um in response to a lawsuit accusing the
firm of subjecting employees to constant sexual harassment, including groping, comments, and advances in the workplace, Activision Blizzard has hired the renowned union busting firm,
WilmerHale, to review the company's policies. Ian Hazacostas, game director at World of Warcraft,
previously worked at the law firm. He was an associate in the litigation department. That
would have been quite a while ago. Other clients that WilmerHale has represented over the years include Swiss banks accused of profiting from the Holocaust
and firms such as Siemens AG and Krupp AG accused of exploiting forced laborers during the Nazi era.
The work with Activision Blizzard will be led by WilmerHale partner Stephanie Avakian,
Hale partner, Stephanie Avakian,
hopefully I'm saying that right,
previously serving as Securities and
Exchange Commission's Enforcement Director
during the Trump administration.
This comes alongside
Activision Blizzard
CEO Bobby Kotick
saying that the company's initial
response was tone-deaf
and his idea
was to bring in a union- busting firm because that's not
tone deaf um fantastic when you lawyer up that's usually because you have absolutely nothing to
hide and when you lawyer up with people who have just a a reputation of defending indefensible things then that's usually i mean i don't know
i must have missed this note too but uh one of their most recent customers was was amazon
uh when amazon was trying to union bust wilmer hale uh so yeah very very cool classy classy yeah yeah uh bobby kodak is definitely on the side of the
employees here definitely making sure that they are taken care of first um and is very concerned
about all the things that are happening there and is not just concerned about union busting
um a little note about sarcasm again moving on more details about the cosby suite i didn't really
go into this last week because i didn't have a lot of details about it and it didn't like
make a ton of sense to me the details that i did have um more details have come out and it's just
super weird i like i think it's worse because immediately when i heard cosby sweet i was like
that sounds terrible and i i think this picture um is worth a thousand words here this is on
kataku.com like okay some notes i i'm gonna i'm gonna throw a lot of stuff out here because
there's been a lot said in defense of this situation um and there's been a lot said against this situation um so one thing
is that that photo and a lot of the details that we have are from 2013 he had been accused many
times by that point but he it had not gotten through it wasn't me too yet yes yeah yes so it was
not a huge thing at that point in time but it was a thing it's it's not that it wasn't today some
people have been like oh he wasn't it wasn't a problem it was a problem it just wasn't as as
blown up as it currently is um during blizzCon specifically, Alex Afrasiabi,
we mentioned him last week, ran something called the Cosby Suite.
Claims have been made that the name came from the room
resembling Cosby's ugly sweater that he's pictured with in the photo
and is somewhat known for wearing.
They said that there was either a rug in the room
or the room just looked like that
or something um the walls are just like white there's nothing in the room that really resembles
an ugly sweater so none of that really makes a lot of sense there's eyewitness accounts of this
and there's literally photos that the walls are just like white um afrasi abhi would hit on female
employees this these notes are specifically at at blizzcon but
we're pretty sure this happens just like all the time um afrasiabi would hit on female yes
allegedly allegedly would hit on female employees telling them that he wanted to marry them
attempting to kiss them putting his arms around them etc that's employees again so they're at
blizzcon they're not just courting fans they They're courting maybe fans, but also definitely employees, allegedly.
There's screenshots leaked from a group chat centered around the room called BlizzCon Cosby Crew.
I've been showing these.
A rather interesting discussion, which I'm sure you can read on screen.
We do do podcast stuff, but I don't really want to say it all
so yeah that's fine i they i they've seen it all at this point i've been going through as you've
been talking yeah okay um in in one image procured by kotaku a group of women are sitting on a bed
in the room with cosby's portrait so So this is not shown in the article.
I'm not 100% sure why.
Maybe they weren't fully wearing clothes.
I'm not certain.
One woman appears to have a hand on another's breast,
which is cheered on by men in the comments,
according to images.
Yeah.
Two sources with knowledge of Afraf Siabi's
alleged predatory behavior
shared these various photos and the Facebook comments because screenshots of like the group chat saying those things were posted to Facebook.
So it's not like this stuff was tried to be kept private.
This was this was like shared with his friends and potentially family.
It is quoted by a source that it was such a boys club that creating something
like the Cosby suite was seen as like funny.
Yeah, it's, it's interesting. One, one employee there,
Cossack, you can see the names in the, in the screenshot,
is definitely a part of it.
Comments on Facebook with hashtag cause approved
and a bunch of other stuff.
However, this is where like things are kind of going
every direction, which is not surprising in this situation.
However, one source told Kotaku that Cossack,
the same guy engaging in some of this behavior,
was one of the few people who intervened in the past
when another Blizzard developer was sexually harassing them.
So he also came to
the defense of things um okay yeah it doesn't look good now neocortex uh posts in the float
plane chat look even the guilty and downright vile humans need representation in court defense
attorneys don't need to like their clients just defend defend them. And that's a fair point. But if you go straight to the firm that is known for
defending vile human beings and the indefensible, it just says a little something about how good
you think your case is. You can find good representation that doesn't have a track record
for, you know, getting monsters off the hook, for example.
When you go for a certain style of lawyer,
you choose a lawyer or you choose a law firm based on what their specialty is.
And if their specialty is winning unwinnable cases,
there's going to be a premium.
And if you didn't think your case was unwinnable,
you wouldn't want to be paying that premium. Do you guys kind of understand what I mean by that? Another thing, HL made an excellent
point in the floatplane chat. Maybe they're using this firm because no one else wanted to represent
them. And why do you think that might be? So it's this sort of this inference that you can make when someone is represented by a certain type of firm
or a certain type of lawyer.
Birds of a feather, I guess,
is the expression that sort of best sums this up.
Yeah.
Cardinal says Linus has no idea what he is talking about. He has never even come close to
hiring attorneys at this level. There's nothing wrong with WilmerHale. If you want to win a case,
I'm not saying there's anything wrong with it. I'm just saying that the type of firm that you
hire says a lot about you. That's all. All right, let's go ahead and jump into our next topic of the day.
AMD launched the Radeon RX 6600 XT at ChinaJoy.
So, I mean, Luke, at this point, what can we really say about GPU launches?
That they're paper launches, that they're somewhat predictable anything else um
okay yeah i guess that's pretty good good job luke yay i think the biggest
the biggest elephant in the room right now is that gpu pricing it might get better but i don't think it is for the foreseeable future
or maybe ever going back to normal like what we used to have um some of the some of the price
increases that are affecting gpus are ones that the the g GPU industry actually doesn't have any control over. DRAM is up 50%
since 2021 began. Copper's doubled. Aluminum is up 45%. Plastics are up 47%. The actual costs of
building these things are higher. Anthony's got a point in here. He says, some say that this is
hyperinflation from stimulus packages.
Not an economist, says Anthony, but unlikely.
Building materials are being speculated and not all prices are rising.
For example, gold and silver equals confirmation bias.
Now, inflation is currently as high as it was during the 2008 financial crisis.
So it's greater than 5% for two months in a row.
A year ago, it was less than 1%.
Of course, it's worth noting that both AMD and Nvidia
have reported double their revenue
in the gaming segment over the last year.
So make of all of this what you will.
Many of our comments seem to default to this angle
that AMD and Nvidia are plenty profitable.
So everything is fine and now
that you know they've seen that there's demand at this price point it'll stick around but i mean
poor sales for the rtx 20 series cards and the 1060 staying top dog on steam despite two generations
of two companies trying to dislodge it it's probably not all a corporate conspiracy there might actually just have been
some pent-up demand from people not upgrading to 20 series and then now being stuck inside a lot
and being just desperate to game we're also seeing a big crash i mean we're seeing it
everywhere from um views across uh like tech channels it's not just us. It's something that we track industry-wide.
People are just a little less interested,
you know, engagement with tweets.
People are just sentiment.
You know, we see a lot of people
who are just really frustrated
and tired of this passion that they have,
this hobby that they love so much
becoming something that is either they have to spend all day
to try to get their hands on the hardware to enjoy it,
or they just outright cannot afford.
There's a lot of anger.
And that cooling, that cooling is happening.
And it's happening while demand for these products
has not completely fallen off yet.
So what I think
is that the prices remaining high is almost like a false positive sign that the gaming industry is
okay from NVIDIA and AMD's perspective. I think what's going to happen is they are going to
encounter a lull in demand right around the time they catch up with supply,
and it's going to be a bit of a crash.
Now, a crash isn't going to look like $30 GPUs.
Don't kid yourself.
It will just look like NVIDIA reporting a quarter where they have higher inventory than forecasted
and their stock might take a dip or whatever the case may be.
than forecasted and their stock might take a dip or whatever the case may be.
We also have to consider that cryptocurrency prices are a huge unknown factor in all of this.
I mean, Bitcoin's been tracking back up again since about the beginning of, I think about a third of the way through last month.
It's gone from around 30,000 USD to 40,000 USD.
through last month it's gone from around 30 000 usd to 40 000 usd so apparently china's crackdown and rumored upcoming ban are not enough to take down the almighty bitcoin and i i'm kidding i
don't mean that i think a bitcoin is almighty it's just a play on the almighty dollar that's all
yeah um yeah it's down today but it's up over the last five days from around 37,000 and a half to around 41,700.
So to be clear, I am not a financial advisor and I am not recommending in any way that you jump on that train.
I personally own zero Bitcoins, no Bitcoins for me.
bitcoins for me. We're hoping that the RX 6600 XT is going to help to address these problems.
It does have a roughly 50% smaller die area than AMD's previous cards. So that should mean better yields and therefore not just more GPUs per wafer, but also more GPUs per wafer. Because when you've got a smaller die size,
you already get more. And when you have a smaller die size, you also get fewer defects. Because when
you have a defect in the wafer, the chance, like the amount of silicone that it is likely to ruin
will be smaller. Because if it's right smack dab in the middle of a small die, then you just lose
that one small die. If it's right smack dab in the middle of a small die, then you just lose that one small die.
If it's right smack dab in the middle of a big die, you lose that whole big die, if you guys kind of catch what I mean.
It also uses 16 gigabit DRAM chips, which is different than what NVIDIA is using for their lineup.
So that's a kind of separate allocation, separate production stream.
So that might help, but don't hold your breath. I was really hoping that that was the end about a month ago when the when China's crackdown happened and when mining cards were starting to make saturate the demand in China,
and they're going to start leaking out on sites like eBay or AliExpress.
And that clearly hasn't happened.
So that decline that we saw in prices has somewhat stalled.
And going on Newegg right now, a 6700 XT, you can find them in stock. They're still, they're $900 brand new.
And searching for 6600 XT brought up quite literally nothing. So yeah, I mean, at least
not at the top of the, oh, okay. There's three, three references to it on the page oh this is hilarious
i'm going to share my display with you guys here's the three references to 6600 xt on this page
there's my search the search results and the other more different search results all up here in the
top left corner so we found we found a whole lot of we found a whole lot of nothing. A whole lot of nothing here, ladies and gentlemen.
Sorry about that.
In other hilarious news, Intel renames their manufacturing nodes.
Now, Luke, go through this, and then I'm actually going to defend this.
Hit me.
Intel has renamed their upcoming nodes and associated roadmap as part of Pat Gelsinger's plan to bring Intel back to performance leadership by 2025.
Enhanced SuperFin is now Intel 7.
7 nanometer is now Intel 4.
They have also introduced Intel 3 and Intel 20A on their roadmap.
20A refers to 20 angstroms,
which is the equivalent of two nanometer.
Using angstroms makes sense as below two nanometer
improvements to process density
may be measured in increments below one nanometer,
which makes sense.
These names may appear confusing at a glance,
but Intel's numbers have historically been higher
than the rest of the industry in terms of the density naming.
There isn't a standard type of measurement for semiconductor nodes.
So Intel's 10 nanometer, for example, was actually close in density to TSMC's 7 nanometer.
Along with this renaming within the roadmap, each process has attached metrics to it.
renaming within the roadmap each process has attached metrics to it per generation claims are between 10 and 20 performance per watt gains intel 4 will fully utilize utilize euv lithography
for 20a they vaguely claim breakthrough innovations in uh 1a 1 the first half of 2024
okay i've never seen it said that way.
Yeah, that's just how they denote it.
That's odd.
I've seen Q1, Q2, not 1H.
Qualcomm and Amazon have onboarded with Intel
as new Foundry customers,
with Qualcomm committing to the 2024 20A process.
As forum user Lulz, that would be the LTT forum,
because I recognize that name,
pointed out, these have positive implications for Intel, as it means that they're likely to,
man, if you keep doing that, I can't read. Oh, I'm sorry. I highlight while I read. So I was
reading along with Luke and I'm like highlighting the text. Go ahead. It puts your name there. So
it literally blocks the words.
They're actually on track with their roadmap and third parties are confident in them.
That's it. So I'm going to go ahead and defend Intel, not because Intel is necessarily doing the right thing, but because they have to kind of fight fire with fire here.
fire with fire here the thing about nodes is like luke said there isn't an industry standard for how you measure the size of a node back in the old days when they were measured in
microns or micrometers rather than nanometers it was a little bit more cut and dried but these days now that the approach to fitting more transistors per square
whatever unit let's say millimeter more transistors per square millimeter is different from one
fabricator from one fab to the next and with different approaches you can't just use one measurement.
We actually did an excellent Tech Quickie video about this where we leaned on both.
Did that one get flagged like super hard for fanboyism
by both sides or something?
The comments on that one were super stupid.
Yeah, I remember that.
Sorry, continue.
Yeah, we leaned on both AMD and Intel
to do background research for this one.
We ended up citing Intel most in the episode, and therefore some people concluded that it was a shill piece for Intel or whatever the case may be.
But the truth is that per square millimeter, Intel had better density at the same numbered node than their competitors in the industry,
including TSMC and Samsung.
And in fact, it shouldn't have even been surprising to anybody watching that video to hear this because we went through the same whole thing back when Apple was dual sourcing their A-series
chips from Samsung and TSMC.
Apple dual source, SOC, TSMC. I'm trying to remember what generation
it was. The A9. The A9 was dual sourced at, if I recall correctly, they were both at like the same
process node, but they didn't have quite the same characteristics.
And so that's not, oh no, TSMC was 16 nanometer and Samsung was 14 nanometer. But then TSMC, if I recall correctly, actually performed slightly better.
So what I'm trying to say is that it is not as simple as how many nanometers you have
and how good the manufacturing process is.
But for the lay person
they think it is like i remember watching jim kramer talk about uh you know why amd was a good
stock to buy and this was a number of months ago and he he kind of goes because they have the seven
nanometer chips and everyone wants the seven nanometer chips and And it's like, okay, you're kind of not wrong. Because at that time,
Intel had delayed their 10 nanometer chips many times, and it had become a problem. So his analysis
that AMD had a superior manufacturing process to Intel, and that that was a competitive advantage was not wrong. But the degree to which that was
a competitive advantage was not correct because Intel's most advanced 14 nanometer process was
probably closer to what a 10 nanometer from TSMC would be. So that's why Intel is rebranding their
10 nanometer to be 7 because in terms of actual transistor density,
it's a more apples to apples comparison.
Until everyone else goes and changes their nomenclature
to be like ahead of Intel's
and we end up not having a meaningful number at all
and we're just going to have to, as enthusiasts,
come up with our own number or
something that might just that might actually not be a terrible plan yeah that's what we should do
i'm not a huge fan of it just being a completely separate number which they don't base their stuff
off um i almost wish a number wasn't even necessarily involved i don't
know i just i'm just not a huge fan of the naming but like sitting here listening through you
talking and just even reading it myself i was trying to figure out like what would i call it
i don't know so maybe it's fine because usually i have some form like if i'm going to complain
about a product name there's something i would have preferred it to be called, right?
See, Gremlin Injector says, Linus, how about transistor count per square millimeter of dye?
The problem is that it's not that simple.
Structures like cash can be crammed much more tightly than actual logic, for example.
One of the reasons is that they don't produce as much heat.
So they're not as thermally dense.
They're not as difficult to cool.
So they're not as thermally dense.
They're not as difficult to cool.
So it's just the cold hard truth is that unless you are an actual microprocessor design scientist,
you are not going to understand it well enough to name it. And whoever it is at Intel that's working on the naming has determined that that's an appropriate name as far as at least
protecting themselves against like, you know, class action lawsuits for misleading their investors.
And they're calling that good enough. Is it correct? No, but it's a response to their
competitors also not using correct naming schemes.
And if they're going to have Jim Cramer talking about how AMD has the 7 nanometer chips and
Intel doesn't, and that tanks their stock price or whatever, they're going to have to
respond in some way, especially if they do have a technology that is largely equivalent
in terms of actual real world performance, because
the layperson is going to see the model number, oh, Core i9 is good, or, you know, Radeon 5000.
And they're going to make some assumptions based on those model numbers. And companies are always
going to leverage that while the tech savvy are just going to have to say look we have to let the benchmarks do the talking i mean we could maybe it could be like cinebenches
per millimeter but that doesn't tell us anything about the manufacturing process because now you're
throwing the actual architecture of the chip into the mix so it's just not good enough right
yeah i yeah minimalist came to the same conclusion of just like i can't name it so
minimalist says let's be honest it probably wasn't an engineer deciding these names they
would be 20 digit numbers then that's that's a very good point but also intel finally has
an engineer in charge of the ship so i don't know maybe maybe the engineers are more in charge than
before that's the exact type of point that i would normally try to jump on as well but i don't think it's necessarily relevant anymore yeah uh oskiller
says it's the same thing amd would amd did with their athlon cpus compared to intel's gigahertz
their pr or performance rating yeah it is totally the same thing and amd totally took advantage
of the the goodwill the the brand equity around that naming scheme
that they built with customers,
and it became misleading after a while.
Like, they had multiple chips called 3200+,
that all had dramatically,
very different performance characteristics.
Some that were not even close to an Intel 3.2 gigahertz chip,
and some that actually outperformed it by the time the Athlon 64 3200 plus rolled around.
It just isn't that simple.
AMD also took advantage of consumer goodwill when they changed their mobile naming schemes
to be 1,000 numbers ahead of their desktops compared to what the underlying architecture was.
Intel is no angel
here. I mean, I freaking, I've railed on them so many times for naming their high-end desktop
processors a generation ahead of their mainstream consumer ones. That was so frustrating because
they'd have these high-end HEDT enthusiast overclockable chips that from a single-threaded standpoint, even if they did boost to the same frequency, didn't have the same performance as the mainstream freaking cheaper thing.
So nobody is innocent here.
Everyone is guilty.
At least they're all guilty now.
So that's good.
Or equally guilty. Because I won't say until it wasn't guilty before it's just degrees of guilty i suppose droseph says i love how
linus has to explain that a company isn't your friend almost every episode
yeah i mean it's so true though it's important. Silence, brand.
It's like my favorite meme ever.
The wall?
Yeah, yeah.
Let's talk about sponsors and then I will talk about the wall.
The show today is brought to you by...
Thanks to FreshBooks for sponsoring this podcast.
FreshBooks is an invoicing and accounting solution
that's built for owners and their clients.
They state that average users save 46 hours a month,
get paid 18 days faster,
and increase their ROI by 11 times.
Huge pluses for freelancers and small business owners
who don't have the time to waste on invoicing,
accounting, and payment processing.
Over 3,000 business owners have rated it
an average of four and a half out of five stars on GetApp.
It's super easy to get up and running,
and with award-winning support, you're never alone. Try FreshBooks free for 30 days, no credit card
required. Go to freshbooks.com slash WAN and enter WAN in the, how did you hear about a section?
Now back to the show. There is, here we go. I'm going to pull up the form. I'm sorry,
Grafis. I'm going totally off the script here. Master Disaster posted this on the forum.
You got to check this shiz out.
A warning to YouTube creators.
Scammers have worked out an almost foolproof method of phishing your account.
The mind-blowing thing about this is Jim Browning.
Jim Browning was one of the victims of this scam.
Like, what?
No kidding, right?
Is this the same thing that happened to...
Oh, what's his name?
Sorry, I'll find it. Keep going.
Okay, there's a couple people
that have gotten hit by it already.
But basically, the scammers have worked out a method
of sending people emails
that are originating from a genuine Google domain that makes them indistinguishable from authentic Google emails.
So the scammers, they're bouncing the emails through Google chat.
So when they arrive in your inbox, they look like they are authentic.
So they'll get in a chat with you and they convince you that you have to talk to google support because you have multiple adsense accounts
or something and you have to delete one and jim basically did the right thing can i just say how
cool it is that in spite of the fact that so much of his brand is built around like scams and people
getting scammed online admitting that this happened so that the word gets out and other people will be protected
it's the right thing to do and jim is setting an outstanding example even though you know for some
people out there who don't recognize what a good guy move this is he could have just pretended it
never happened for people who don't recognize what a good guy move this is yeah maybe there's
a hit to his reputation but from my point of view his reputation
just went up by five i think it makes a lot of his content even even more valid than it already was
because it shows like that we all need to be aware of this stuff so back to our message from our
sponsor to be clear jim browning has nothing to do with graphis or anything like that it's just
this was a news topic that didn't make it into the doc that i was like oh wow fishing haha that's a thing um oh uh anthony just messaged me spiffing brit
was also one of the victims uh not a dumb guy at all don't kid yourself so if these guys can fall
for a fishing scam don't sit there and go not me uh we actually did a video like that this week about uh how bad is it if you leave the
plastic on the bottom of your heat sink uh it's it's one of those things that you know it's very
tempting to go not me i could never be that stupid but it could happen to anyone i actually did it
about a year ago all these years building computers i had never done it and then finally i did it i got
like distracted doing something else and i came back and i was mid-build and i was like i don't
know and i put it together i had plastic on the thing yeah jake uh saw the pc had bad thermals
and was like you left the plastic on i was like really anyway we have a video coming on just how
bad it is where we do it on purpose and see how bad it is.
All right.
Sorry, I will do the sponsor talking points now.
All right.
You want an update on the wall, don't you?
I do.
This update is not from Samsung.
Samsung actually does not want me talking about anything
that they've told me about the wall.
I did have a call with them, but it was a little...
How do I say this without sounding like a jerk?
Neither the sales representative nor the technical person had any idea who I was.
I mean that both from a,
hey, you work in the tech industry.
You've never managed to catch one of our videos.
Okay, you know what?
I buy that.
I believe that.
But from a professionalism standpoint,
this is a $350,000 product.
You don't even bother to drop the client's name
in a Google search before you get on a call with them.
I was literally asked, so what do you do?
And I was just kind of, I was kind of stunned.
Oh, yeah.
Because-
That doesn't seem very pro.
It's just not a pro move.
No.
You know what i mean um like i would i would do that
um i would i would google my customer's name like i do that honestly i even do that like when it's
kind of the other way around like if i if i know like if if if some if i have to jump on a call
with some company that we're working with and it's some big wig there, I'll look them up just to see if there's anything interesting I should know before we jump on the call.
It takes less than a minute.
It's not hard.
Yeah, it takes seconds to have some idea who the heck you're talking to.
To be clear.
Relate the name and text.
Right click.
Search on Google.
Oh, hey.
To be clear, you know, I search on google oh hey to be clear
you know i also don't like it when someone gets on the phone with me and they go oh yeah i'm a
huge fan i just watched and it's like the video we released yesterday and clearly you like don't
let on you know don't tell someone that you googled them right before you got on the phone with them.
Although I have done that.
But you've got to be self-aware about it.
You've got to be self-aware.
Like when I get on the phone with another creator, if it's one that I don't follow, what I will do, my general routine is I will Google them.
You know, I'll go creep them on Social Blade.
How many subscribers do they have?
How many views do they have?
I will go watch like their most
popular video i will watch one recent video and then i will admit it i'll be like look the truth
is i you know i don't watch a lot of youtube i i hadn't i haven't seen a ton of your content but
i did really enjoy this and this and i will give specific things that i enjoyed about the video um and i
will i will admit that i you know i did look at it as as preparation because i want to seem prepared
but i don't want to seem like a liar you know don't tell me you're a great big fan if you're
not i i had i had a really awkward moment with a representative for another creator once um this is
oh boy we're getting into
line of story time. I promise I'll give you an update on the wall later. I was working on a
collab where this particular creator had moved into a new office and wanted a trick-to-Wi-Fi
setup. They wanted way better Wi-Fi in their office because they just had whatever crappy
router their ISP sent them over. And I was like, oh, that sounds great. That sounds like a fantastic
collab. Let me see if I can pull in a sponsor who can get us the hardware. Yeah, I'd be willing to
come down and travel and we'll do a video together. But, you know, from my point of view, that should
be a video on the main channel. And they come back to me and they kind of go, well, it can't be on the main channel because
we don't do that kind of content. And I go, well, I'm sure if I can get on the line with the creator
instead of their representative, because I'm on the line, not my representative. So they should
probably be on the line, not their representative. I'm sure if I could get on the line with this person, we could
figure out a way to come up with a creative idea that would work. And they basically dig in and
dig in. And eventually I say, okay, look, I do need to talk to them if we're going to do this collab.
So they schedule a call. It gets pushed. It gets pushed again. And then finally i show up on the call and it's literally that same representative
again the creator does not show up and i get this song and dance about what a big fan they are
uh but they just can't they just can't make that work it just has to be on their secondary like
really small vlog channel and um but they yeah they still totally want to do it i'm like yeah i'm sure you still
totally want a free wi-fi upgrade good for you but the best part was that they assured me like
what a big fan they were okay but the funny part of that is that a few months prior like this is
months not years prior i ran into this person at pax prime like in the hallway and said hello. And they had no idea who I was.
And that's okay. That's totally fine. There's literally hundreds of thousands of creators out
there with a million subscribers. These are people with enormous followings that I wouldn't recognize
on the street. There's nothing wrong with that. But that representative, I don't know if they were acting on instructions from that creator
or if they were going rogue don't lie because you never know you never know man awkward that looked
real bad that was real bad optics we never ended up collabing with that particular creator and
they're on my list of creators whose names i just don't say because I'm just not going to I'm not going to do it.
I'm just not going to be involved in any way because it's just it's a way of doing business that we don't do.
We're just not about that.
Oh, man.
Yeah.
There's another note here.
What's this about?
So Ryan here says, you're talking about business and stuff.
They have thousands of commercial clients who don't make videos.
You really think it's unprofessional they don't Google any random guy's name?
Lol, please.
No, I do actually think that's extremely unprofessional for a purchase of that magnitude.
Whoever this person is, they're probably in a Google search somewhere.
I didn't say they make videos.
In fact, I don't think there's probably a ton of people who make videos buying of the wall.
The vast majority of people buying them are probably business owners.
Your Google search will very likely come up with a LinkedIn, but it'll show you what they do
and that could inform your suggestions and your...
And the thing about business owners
is even more than YouTubers,
from my experience, you do not ask them,
so what do you do if they run like a billion dollar company?
They're going to go, go what are you kidding me you
couldn't even be arsed to find that out before you got on the call don't kid yourself it's just
really really lazy it's really basic really almost no effort and it can make a massive improvement to to the call um jake
foster says sales people for high-end cars etc definitely do research uh yeah they do they
absolutely do that is absolutely basic uh this is yeah vh9 network says maybe if you were applying
to work for them they'd google search yeah exactly for, exactly. For entry level positions at McDonald's, you're going to have your name Googled. So don't kid yourself,
guys. Oh, man. Euler says, so how do you know that they didn't know who you were?
Because they didn't. Why would you ask someone? so what do you do? And they were absolutely surprised when I said.
I think I've got a pretty good BS detector.
No, they had absolutely no idea who I was, which, again, is fine.
It's just the utter lack of research that was pretty surprising to me.
So anyway, I can't really talk about anything that
came of my call with Samsung. Not because I've signed any kind of non-disclosure agreement,
but just because I've been asked not to talk about it. So I'm like, okay, sure, whatever.
But what I do have is an email from an installer who works on the wall system like who is a the wall certified installer
or works for a company that does it and has also installed similar competing products from the
likes of uh actually i don't know if they've specifically worked with sony or lg solutions
because um lgs in particular i don't think is prime time ready uh But they've worked with competing solutions, they say, and they basically did not
recommend a The Wall. I'm just going to read out their letter because it's full of really great
information. I was listening to the recent WAN show where Linus and Luke were discussing
the video wall and ideas for content. We do these types of installs all the time, and as cool as
video walls are, they have a number of
downsides now some of them we talked about before uh heat cost those are definitely downsides this
thing kicks off somewhere in the neighborhood of i think it's uh okay i'm just trying to make sure
i'm well we showed you guys the installation guide last week that required two dedicated 15 amp circuits for
a 4k the wall so somewhere between you know 1500 watts and 3000 watts i should give you some idea
apparently the panels constantly need to be replaced the panels don't always match although
there's another vendor uh sony oh okay yeah sony apparently does
color matching of each panel when they install it and they actually keep yours on record so if you
ever need to get it replaced you will get something that matches they will pre-tune it for you so i
thought that was pretty interesting uh power consumption that goes along with heat output
obviously the need of a level five finished wall man, the apparatus that you mount this thing on,
they sent me a picture.
It looks absolutely insane.
Apparently it takes days to install.
Get this.
The tiles will apparently shift with the building
as it settles and moves.
That's a problem I didn't foresee.
And the depth of the panels.
These things are not thin i had
thought they were like maybe like this but with the mounting on the wall they are crazy thick
the email continues now you could get some additional content on the design process that
goes into the pre-install side of things but the other direction you can go is projection using something like a Christie projector that is capable of 4K 120 hertz.
Now, I'd heard of Christie before, but because they're crazy expensive, I'd never really looked at buying them.
But then all of a sudden, if I was tempted by this, the wall thing.
Yeah, if you're in the market for that.
I guess I might as well look at it.
So they have a 4K 120 hertz projector.
And this is crazy.
They have a few options that have fiber coupled projection heads.
So what these allow you to do is put the projection head in the room
with little power or heat requirements and super quiet.
And then you remote the light sources from a closet that has cooling and power in it.
That's crazy. that's really cool i know right i had never even heard of that before could that just go to your like maintenance room
uh yeah totally well actually i don't know about the distance i don't know how far it can go but
it could almost definitely go out of the theater room. The projector is a little under half the cost of the wall
and would need much less infrastructure.
And they say there are a lot of brands of LED walls
that offer better value compared to the wall
and sent a picture of a Samsung the wall
that they did for a client that...
I was hoping that the borders between the modules would be a lot more seamless.
And it's the kind of thing that's like full array local dimming.
When you're consuming content and you're just chilling on the couch watching a movie,
you probably wouldn't notice it.
Not a big deal.
watching a movie you probably wouldn't notice it not a big deal but at that kind of cost i would want to be able to look at it as closely as humanly possible and not see a freaking seam
so are you are you considering the projector over the sony option
the biggest obstacle to the projector from day one
has been the wife approval factor one of the things for yvonne one of the big things is that
she doesn't want the theater room to feel like a dungeon because she's not going to feel comfortable
there and she won't want to go down there and so for me that's important because a i love my wife
and i value her her you know feelings but more
importantly b i want to use the theater room and i'm not going to sit and watch a movie alone
so i need her to want to go to the theater room so what a projection what a projector means
is a you need to have the room dark when you're consuming content, right?
Because if you want to get those deep blacks,
you're limited to whatever the blackest black
absence of light in your room is.
And B, in order to control the light
that you're going to shine at the screen,
because it's going to be bouncing around the room, right?
You know, ray traced, okay?
In order to control that light,
you need to have the room be as dark as possible.
Hold on.
Yeah, okay.
You want the room to be as dark as possible
so that you don't have like,
let's say, you know,
you've got the pitch blackness of space
and then you've got a bright point, a star.
You don't want that star
to shine light out into the room, have it bounce off the white walls and then light up that pitch
blackness of space. So it turns into more of a gray. So the wall is a way around that. It's a
way to have enough brightness that you can have light in the room or you can have light-colored walls,
like the other walls, not the wall. I hate the name of this product,
without compromising on image quality. So to give you some idea of how important it is to have
complete blackness in the room, this is amazing. So I was chatting with Rob H. So he's
from he does the AV rant podcast. He's buddies with Tom Andrew from AV gadgets.com. He's been
incredibly helpful. And he's told me some stuff that's's been pretty enlightening, actually. So Projection HDR is apparently targeting a mere...
What is this?
Control F HDR.
Come on.
Come on.
Where is it?
Ah, nit.
Give me nit.
There you go.
They call for a peak of just 108 nits.
That's it.
That's what you would have in a full-sized commercial Dolby Cinema with
Cinema Dolby Vision. So, you know, when I look at a projector that's rated for a mere 2200 nits
compared to, you know, Sony has this crazy one that'll do 10,000 nits. He's like, no, no, no,
no, no, no, no. That's not actually what's important what's important is
that it handles hdr tone mapping really well and that you have enough brightness for the room that
you're in so he figures that room with an nx9 from jvc which is about 20 grand to be clear that's
still a very expensive display um that room would be perfect for for HDR on a 135-inch screen,
with the only challenge being that if you want to get perceived high brightness out of a 100-init peak brightness screen,
you are going to have to be sitting in complete darkness with nice dark walls in a dungeon.
So no projector.
I think I've made a decision.
I hadn't actually before I started talking through all of this.
I think I've made a decision now.
I am going to buy a micro LED screen, but not now.
I am going to pursue some other option because the reality of it is this is this technology.
And I knew this. I just didn't want to. I just didn't want to face it. I just was like I was
wowed by the cool factor. It's going to come down. This technology is in that stage of its
development where you can expect it'll be like buying one of the first plasma tvs you know
literally 18 to 24 months later you'll be able to get something that is not only half the price
but way better yeah and i don't know it's still it's still one of those things that from a content
standpoint if it was if it was a third of the price you know and i could get like 10 videos out of it
i'd be i'd be sitting there going yeah let's do this i'm gonna make this work i'm gonna find a big
like title sponsor for this series um we'll do some like really strong call to action we'll do
some kind of like brand integration like we've done with dbrand in the past where we like do a
custom skin or something like that and a drop
we do a bunch of promotion and we build like a campaign around it like i could have found a way
to make it work but at that price even if i managed to find a way to write it off as a business expense
it's just not tenable um there's there's way more responsible things that i should do with that money. And I still want a micro LED display because
I think it's the future. I'm super excited about the technology. I've seen it in person at trade
shows and it's drool worthy. It's amazing, but it's not the right move right now. Not the right move. Yeah. All right. I'm committed.
Well, I'm happy, I think, because I think it was not a good plan.
Yeah, it wasn't a good plan.
It was flex first.
So wait, what are you going to do short term?
Are you just going to use your current TV?
There's lots of options.
I mean, the Sony A90J is 83 inches.
That's not exactly small.
It's gorgeous.
Boy, is that an amazing TV.
And in a relatively light controlled environment,
unlike what I have now, it could only look even better.
I could explore the JVC projection option.
We have projection screen companies that i think
would be willing to hook us up so that would make the price a little bit more palatable
or not need to necessarily but even with a with a wouldn't you need to make it somewhat den like
cave like a little bit not to nearly the same degree though i often get the vibe with projectors
that the the space feels empty unless the projector is playing as well not as much for the tv personally that's
fair i mean one of the things you can do is you've got the speakers there right uh you can put a
little kind of stage under it that's where i'm gonna have cable management like there'll be a
little raised section under it um i think that i wouldn't go with a retracting screen i don't
think i'm gonna try and do the whole TV behind a projector.
When we did it in the lounge, what we found was nobody used the TV
because the big screen, even though the latency is worse
and it might not have as many hertz,
the big screen experience is just so much better
when you're in a big group gaming.
And that's what almost everyone used the
tv for otherwise why wouldn't you just sit at a monitor you sit so close to it like this uh 39
inch monitor 38 inch monitor whatever it is in front of me i mean this could easily be a 150
inch tv for how close i'm sitting to it like right uh if you're gaming by yourself use a monitor and
if you're gaming with a group man does that projector ever make something like uh smash bros just totally different it's just
different um you know mario kart that kind of stuff uh farrow wind says i'm not happy linus
just cost me 10 bucks on a bet yeah i'm sorry i'm sorry about that. I'm sorry. It was a scary one, but we pulled through.
It's okay.
Yeah.
I mean, I think you've known me long enough to know that.
I didn't think you were going to buy it.
The odds of me making it that far were, they were pretty slim, but I was, I was tempted.
It was just exciting.
It was cool.
I thought if they came at you with something that wasn't who are you that there was maybe a
chance like if they came at you with like an okay like we're really hoping to see some content but
yeah here's the tv or like we'll sell it to you at a discount or something that maybe there was
a chance but i i thought there'd have to be some type of thing going on if they if
i was thinking about that after the call um and what i came what i concluded was that the discount
would to make it to make it justifiable the discount would have had to be so deep that it
would not have been realistic anyway i don't think there was any way to make that a win-win for both parties.
Because just the amount that we can make making YouTube content
versus the amount that it must cost them to produce that thing,
those numbers weren't going to intersect, was what I concluded.
And full price, I was still considering it
because maybe over the years
I would be able to milk enough content out of it.
But the problem with that theory,
like if I thought that this thing
was going to stay top of the line
for two or three years,
actually, I could consider it
because I could keep milking it.
New graphics card comes out
I game on the wall
new game comes out
I game on the wall
I'd be the only one that has one
I'm serious though
I think it would get old personally
from a viewership standpoint
I think it would get old
maybe you're right
the I game on the wall thing
the first time you see it that's huge
I think that video blows up yeah gaming at whatever that screen size is like oh that's
that's huge and you got a few different angles on it but like playing halo infinite on the wall
it's like okay well we already saw him play four other things on the wall so yeah i don't know this is maybe with like a very key
new game drop like like anything that had cyberpunk in the title right before cyberpunk
came out it was kind of blowing up and then i want to realize it was terrible but i don't think
there's enough of those anyway sorry keep going ambler says uh this is on floatplane chat gotta
wonder if they actually want you to buy it from a PR standpoint, considering all those downsides that you heard about from the installer.
That is a good question. Whenever a company isn't trying to put a product like this in the hands of
influencers, you do have to wonder if they have something to hide um if maybe they know you know it's kind
of it's one of those things like i've i've actually been wondering for a while now why
nvidia even seeds a card like the rtx 3090 why do they even bother sending it to reviewers
because we all already know the conclusion the conclusion is cool technology doesn't make sense at this price. What else are
you supposed to say about it? It's flashy. It's flashy, you know, stuff for people who don't
really care about what the price of their computer is. That's what it is. And so someone like a Steve
from Gamers Nexus or Anthony from our team or other more different Steve from Hardware
Unboxed, their conclusion is always going to be more skewed towards the general consumer.
And we even tried. We actually tried to cover a very high-end card recently from the point of view
of the pay-whatever-it-costs consumer. And we got absolutely crucified for it. So clearly, you guys, you don't even want to see these products covered from the perspective of the actual customer for it, which raises the question, what do these companies stand to gain by having the press cover these things if nobody wants to hear about it? Right?
wants to hear about it. Right. So I, yeah, I guess I get it. Um, so maybe they're trying to cover up downsides. Maybe they just realize that there is no point having the press cover this
because no conclusion could possibly paint them in a favorable light. And the last thing they need,
you know, if they, if they went and they, they dropped, you know, let's, let's say,
let's say their gross margin on it is 35%, okay?
So if they went and dropped 200 grand on a review sample,
so someone would review this thing, and it ended up with a negative review,
if the Mark Zucker books and, you know, Jeff Blue Origins of the world
see that review when they Google it and ultimately don't buy it what a waste right
what a waste so i don't know i don't know maybe i'll uh you know what i should try and do
if i'm gonna go projector i should try and get demo units from a whole bunch of different guys
and then just do a video where i try like a whole bunch of them out the projector gauntlet yeah and i basically just make a
commitment at the beginning of the video that i'll buy one of them but it'll have to be the one that
wows me whether it's from an image quality or price performance standpoint you should do it as
like a tournament and have like have brackets and have like so like have
one and one go against each other and then it like they like yeah video title there can only be one
yeah that's awesome i kind of like that i kind of like that um oh i also like telling you guys
about new products on lttstore.com. That's right,
ladies and gentlemen. I kind of teased them last week, but oh, no, that's not it. Where is it?
Almost teased something else. Yeah, no, no, it's all good. Ah, yes, the GPU shirt designed by the
one and only Sarah Butt has launched. It's in like a retro pixel art style. You can get yours on lttstore.com
So head over there now and get one.
Yay!
Good stuff.
You are no longer funding my purchase of the
wall though. That is officially over.
It's over.
Oh, for those of you who don't feel like
going to lttstore.com, that's too many
characters for you to type,
I will go ahead and I will fire it up for you
and give you guys a look at what the GPU shirt looks like.
Got Nicole, Alex.
Hey, what is he doing?
What is that?
Stop that.
Madison, more Alex.
See, he didn't drop this one because this one works.
He dropped the dummy unit that we have all right
what else we got for topics today oh yes this is a good one valve delivers a scaping response
to antitrust lawsuit luke walk us through it this was bound to happen man this was bound to happen
back in april independent game developer wolfire Games, creators of Humble Bundle, filed an antitrust lawsuit against Valve over the dominance of their Steam storefront.
And Valve responded this week saying that the case should be dismissed because there's no other way that anyone would ever respond to anything because it fails to allege the most basic element of an antitrust case.
You don't say.
Interesting.
One focus for the case surrounds the ability, if you keep doing that, I can't read.
Oh, I'm sorry.
I'm sorry.
One focus for the case surrounds the ability for developers to generate free Steam keys
and sell them elsewhere.
However, Valve prohibits those keys from being sold at a lower price on other storefronts
than on Steam.
Wolfire claims that it is bad as they have to keep their prices high in order to afford
Valve's 30% cut.
Wolfire also alleges that Valve tries to enforce pricing parity for non-Steam versions sold
on other platforms as well.
pricing parity for non-steam versions sold on other platforms as well valve says the lawsuit should be dismissed because again of course they do um and that they have no duty under antitrust
law to allow developers to use free steam keys to undersell prices for the games they sell on steam
or to provide steam keys at all uh they also defend the 30 take claiming that it's not
out of the ordinary not out of the ordinary writing in fact 30 has become the industry
standard while valve has faced competition from some of the largest companies in the industry
including microsoft epic games and amazon now if it was even three weeks ago i might have said that valve is making an
unfair comparison here um because particularly comparing themselves to microsoft a maker of
hardware products that go that they sell at a loss um that they're that they loss that their store sells software to run on.
Like that's an apples to oranges comparison.
But now that Valve has jumped headlong into the console market with the SteamPad.
Okay, interesting.
I actually think that is a very apt comparison.
I actually think that is a very apt comparison.
And if anything, Valve kind of looks like the good guy looking at how things are shaking down for the Steam pad.
Defending a 30% take is...
It's tough.
But hardware development costs do have to come from somewhere.
Looking at the price of the Steam pad, I don't think they're coming from the steam pad that is my honest that is my honest take on
this i don't think they are i don't think they need 30 percent uh to do i didn't say that yeah
i didn't say that you said yeah i said they have to come in defense of the 30 you said they have to come from somewhere In defense of the 30% you said it has to come from somewhere
Oh no no no wait wait
In defense of Valve's argument
Valve's comparison
Of themselves
To Microsoft
Okay okay
I would have said that Valve shouldn't compare themselves to Microsoft
When they didn't have a
Hardware product
That they were supporting and developing
that was intended for their,
that was what their store supported.
Like if they didn't have that hardware software synergy,
I was going to say it was hard
to make that comparison to Microsoft.
That was all I was trying to say.
And what I was going to say
was that relative to others in the industry, Valve may be taking 30%, which I may not think is reasonable, but they are still coming across as a relatively good guy.
Compared to Microsoft, they allow you to use someone else's store on the Steam pad.
They allow you to install someone else's operating system on the Steam pad. They allow you to take their Steam marketplace and run it on other platforms.
They are, relatively speaking, taking an open approach here.
I also can't think of, like, the fact that they do allow you to sell those Steam keys elsewhere, even if you can't sell them at a lower rate i can't
think of any other platform in any other space at all and i could be totally just ignorant or
misinformed but i can't personally think of any other platform that does that at all for anything
so interesting note um i don't think valve is a saint just to be very clear just in case anyone's
watching yeah um i yeah not not even remotely but yeah this is this is interesting i'm not
surprised at all that wolfire is trying to get at them in any way that they can i mean as soon as
the epic games lawsuit against apple and google happened
that this was going to this was going to be a response yeah now's the time right
the winds are going in this direction i've got some people in the float plane chat pointing out
hey linus doesn't apple make hardware uh yes they do but a key difference is that in the mobile operating system and app space, you could make a much stronger argument that scooped up by large larger entities but you could
still make the argument that there's fairly vibrant competition in the gaming space there's
also quite a few different stores and there's genuinely quite a few different games that don't use that um i guess the riot launcher is no longer just for league
of legends so maybe that doesn't count um but escape from tarkov for instance is definitely
not done through a modern nice store experience it's this super rough uh uh website they have to go buy the game on and then just download its own
launcher um and they are doing more than fine um there's there's lots of games that don't have to
operate through the steam store um so yeah it's a bit different now we've got enough viewers now
that i feel like i have a large enough sample size. I need to talk to you guys about something important.
This actually isn't in the doc, but we did a video this week about a product that I think is really, really important.
It's made by a company called Framework.
So their website is frame.work.
called Framework. Their website is frame.work. It's a laptop that takes a far more open approach than what we've seen from the rest of the industry. All the parts internally have these
very clear labels, QR codes even, that will take you to information about how to upgrade them or
replace them. Things like the battery that have been deemed not worth replacing
and other manufacturers will just glue their devices shut. So you just have to throw the
whole thing away when the battery dies. They've gone out of their way to use standardized
components. So that will not in fact happen to your laptop. Even the screen, the bezel comes
off magnetically and you can replace the screen
with something else in the future. It's just a really, really different approach. Oh, look at
this. They've already got my quote on their site. The team over at Framework has managed to not just
create a laptop that is easily repairable and upgradable, but it's also a thin, gorgeous,
performant laptop. Linus Tech Tips. That's hilarious. They really didn't waste time with that. In the video, I talked about putting my money where my mouth is to support an initiative
that I have been saying is important for as long as I've been making YouTube videos.
Things being easier to repair, things not just being dead end devices that have no upgrade path whatsoever.
They even go as far as to provide the schematics for the main board to repair shops in the event that they need to repair them.
Like these guys are taking a way more open approach.
It's something I respect a lot.
And I said in the video that I wanted to put my money where my mouth is.
And that was in two ways that I'm willing to do that. One is I ordered one. They sent me a review unit. I could
have just kept that. But instead, I ordered one. So I put down my like $1,200 or whatever once I
had configured it with all the options I wanted. So it's got modular ports. So you can have whatever
IO you want on the sides.
And number two was I said I would be willing to invest in the company if they still needed investors. And Framework has reached out and they are interested in taking me up on that offer.
So the reason I need to talk to you guys about this, and obviously, Luke, I'd like you to weigh in as well,
is that this creates a potential conflict of interest for me
that I have never had to deal with before.
I don't own, and I have not throughout my YouTube career
owned any stock of any tech company
unless it was through a mutual fund or something,
like something completely blind
where I had no idea what I owned.
So this would be new. One of the reasons that I that I said it in the video and one of the reasons
that I felt at that time that I would be comfortable investing in this company and owning a share in
this company is that everything that they stand for, and this is not
just words, I can see it in the product. They even provide extra screws. All the internal screws are
color-coded, so you know which ones go where without having to measure which one's the two
and a half millimeter long and which one's the three millimeter long one. Not only are they
color-coded, they include extras in case you lose one while you're performing maintenance on your machine. This is what I've been asking for all this time.
What they stand for seems to be what I stand for to the letter, and I just wanted to find a way
to support it. That's what made me comfortable offering something like that, but what this does is this has the potential to color my coverage, right, of other products.
However, let me make an argument to you guys. Would I be saying if I were a shareholder in
Framework, or I don't even know what the company is called, Framework Computer Inc. That's what
it says at the bottom of the site. If I were to own some shares in Framework Computer Inc.,
would that change my stance on any of this?
When I got a new MacBook and I criticized it
for having everything soldered to the board
and for not providing repair documentation to technicians.
It would bring to question motivations for sure.
Sure.
And like, so if someone knew, like, I don't think it would genuinely change anything that you would say about anything.
But if someone doesn't know you, that doesn't mean anything to them.
And your viewership is going to constantly change.
You're going to constantly be seen by new people.
I believe legally you would have to disclose
every time you talked about any form of laptop, right?
I think.
I think I'd have to mention it.
Yep.
We could probably do a text to disclosure on screen
to keep it from being too disruptive to the content,
but I'd have to acknowledge it in some way.
Yeah, I think so.
Yeah, I don't know.
Yeah, I don't know.
It's tough because for me,
the motivation is that I want to support this.
And I honestly, I don't really care if Framework wins.
If anything, I think it's a long shot.
I think as an upstart laptop maker
going up against the Acer's and MSI's
and gigabytes of the world
by contract manufacturing laptops
through Foxconn or whatever,
I think that's going to be a really tough business.
And if I had thought there was a ton of money
to be made in that business,
it's the kind of thing we could have hired engineers and done. I don't think there's a ton of money to be made in that business, it's the kind of thing we could have hired engineers and done.
I don't think there's a ton of money to be made in that business.
But I would like to be wrong, I guess, is what I'm trying to say.
You know, Floatplane has a lot of thoughts.
You know, Vetito says, if given the choice between Linus invested and the company lived or
Linus did not invest and the company went out of business
I think we can all say it's better the company
stays alive, I don't think I'll be the
difference between staying alive and not staying alive
though, so for me it comes down to
just that I want to vote with my dollars
I want to back
things that I believe in
Happy Rollcake says, I changed my mind
I don't care about the
conflict of interest. Having you as a spokesperson for this is important. That is a thought that I
had had. Like, does me throwing my weight behind this help it in any meaningful way besides the
money? Because, you know, honestly speaking, it's not like I'm going to put millions of dollars
into it. Like it's, you know, the kind of contribution I'd be making would basically be, you know,
prepayment for some laptops that they need to manufacture to ship to, you know, like
it's not, yeah, it's not like I'm going to be single-handedly angel investing, you know,
backing this company, right?
But can I contribute anything by being a voice, sort of beating the drum,
saying, hey, what these guys are doing is important? Another thing is if I'm an investor,
does that give me influence? Does that give me sway? Can I help keep them on the right track
if they start making what I think is a bad decision? Possibly. And this would be an
opportunity that I've never had before. Like it's easy for me to
sit here on the sidelines and yell, Apple shouldn't do this and Dell shouldn't do that.
But I'm not a stakeholder. I have no skin in the game. They don't actually care what I think.
They have to respond to what I think, or at least Dell seems to feel like they have to,
Apple doesn't. But they have to, maybe not I, but the media. They have to respond to what the media thinks because it could color the public's
perception. But at the end of the day, the people running these companies, they're doing math,
right? They're doing math. How many units can we sell? How much margin is there? How will the
shareholders react? How does that affect our credit as a company these are the actual important questions from their standard from their standpoint um boy is there ever a lot
of boy is there ever a lot of uh is there is there other ways to do it outside of investment um
like could you could you do there's some there's been some posts in in flow plane that are talking about like like uh like ltd branded something um like you do like an ltd edition framework laptop um
i don't think it's any different partnering with them in some way or or like cutting them a discount
on advertisement or something like that if anything i see okay cutting them a discount
on advertising that would be one thing.
I don't think doing a partnered product would be really any different than investing in the company, though. If anything, it's kind of worse because how do we review a laptop if we sell a
laptop? Versus if I review a laptop as a shareholder in Framework, I could disclose that I am a Framework shareholder. And the reason that I invested is that I value these fundamental principles that Framework
builds their products with.
And my intention is to hold others to the same standard.
Another question that Jaden brought up is if their business practices changed, would
you sell your stocks?
I would have to divest.
Yeah.
So that's one of those things where that obviously
I'd have no way of putting that in a contract with Framework
because it's too vague.
You can't put things like,
if I disagree with your business principles,
I will sell or something like that.
But that's the kind of thing that I make a verbal contract with you guys.
And I basically say, look, if these guys do not, I lay out, okay, look, these are the
principles, repairability, upgradability, and openness.
If they deviate to a standard that we, the LTT community, are not satisfied with, I will
divest regardless of what the value of those shares are.
I think that's something that is absolutely necessary. Yeah. People in full-plane chat are saying,
oh, that would just be the same as the fans. No, because as far as my knowledge goes,
LTG doesn't make exactly a lot of dedicated videos reviewing fans.
And LTT stopped making dedicated videos about fans when we released the first one. Also, the LTT Edition fan was not an LMG product.
We never sold it.
Noctua sold it.
So, oh wait, no, I think the first round we did.
The heat sinks they sold.
Either way, we stopped making videos about fans.
And we fully disclosed the entire business arrangement there.
We told you guys exactly how it worked.
And we told you guys that the reason we're doing an LTT branded product is because we trust Noctua.
And so the fact that we trusted No going to do uh this is an interesting take
citrus notes says find a company that does something you're passionate about outside of
the tech industry and invest there truthfully i'm not i'm not looking for investment opportunities
that's not that's not what i was after That's not why this conversation got started. It got started because tech is something I'm passionate about. And this aspect of tech is
something that I am passionate about. That's the whole reason that we're even having this
conversation. So that's it. I've laid out what I think are the problems. i've laid out what i think are the problems i've laid out what i think are the
good reasons for it and i'm just going to make it as simple as i'm straw pulling you the audience
you guys are going to make the decision that's it i'm i'm still stuck on like is is there just
something else because like especially if you're saying you don't think it's going to make or break it it's like what's what's the what's the point like if they do well you make money um if
you do well your shares increase in value yes obviously um but then like is that really helping
them so the benefit is that they're at a stage right now where they need a cash infusion to grow
that's the benefit for them and in the the long term, the benefit for the investor,
it's just like any investor-company relationship.
The benefit for the investor is that the shares should grow in value.
Now, I want those shares to grow in value
because I want this business model to be seen as something that's viable.
I want this company to not just succeed in the sense that they sell some laptops.
I want them to succeed in the sense
that they shake up this trend that the industry
has been moving toward for so freaking
long. That's the kind of
success I want.
Okay.
Alright. I'm creating
the poll and I'm going to hit
floatplane with it first here, ladies and gentlemen.
So I want you guys to make the decision for me.
Because this is the kind of thing that without the support of the LTT community,
I cannot do.
It's that simple.
All right.
So someone says invest an equal amount in Dell and Asus,
but I don't want that.
What?
That's not what I'm trying to support.
Come on, guys.
Come on, guys.
All right.
So let's bring up the results.
You guys are going to find out same time as me.
And to be clear, I'm going to use your response to guide my decision.
I'm not necessarily just going to go with a straight majority rules vote here.
It's not that simple.
All right, I'm hitting up Twitch.
Here you go, Twitch.
You guys are up. All right, here we go. And finally,
I'm dropping it in the YouTube chat. People are leaving comments. Guys, there's no point leaving a comment about this in the YouTube chat. In fact, I'm just going to go ahead and pop it into slow mode here.
Or you know what?
I'm going to go even farther than that.
Where's the chat thing?
Customization.
Here we go.
We're going to put it in members only.
There's like hardly any members.
So we just basically turned off the YouTube chat so that everyone can find the link to
the straw poll.
There we go.
All right.
Wow.
We apparently do have a handful of members.
Fascinating.
All right, cool.
There we go.
All right.
You guys are going to see the results same time as me.
Oh, I guess you were watching me do all that.
That's fascinating.
And let's refresh it.
We've got 2,000 votes with 80% of you saying yes
and 20% of you giving it a no.
So I would like to hear,
I actually need to hear some more arguments for and against.
Luke, have you seen anything particularly interesting?
The Dell and Alienware one
definitely wasn't particularly interesting.
Yeah, hit me with something better than that.
I haven't seen...
I don't know.
I've seen a lot of people...
I think there's a decent amount
that are kind of sitting in the same spot
that I am but that might be confirmation bias
or that might just be floatplane echoing what I've been
saying
floatplane does
love you so that can
be a thing
and I've just been reading the floatplane chat so I don't know
but I haven't seen a lot of both ways
there's been a lot of
they're not arguments they're just statements
like invest do it ah don't invest don't do it blah but not a lot of like you know reason behind it
i definitely have a lot to lose i think this comment from snow skeleton puts it pretty well
i believe in this company as well, and I support you supporting them.
But if I stopped supporting them and you were still backing them,
I would stop supporting you.
So here I am hitching my cart to this horse where if Framework screws it up, then I lose.
Yeah.
Right?
It doesn't, I don't know.
I think the investment kind of comes off weird because there's
there's a lot of personal gain based around that um so it's like oh i want to support
this company by making money off this company is is kind of odd um
and then there's also like like you don't really know these guys and it being a public
figure you being a public figure and it being something that is in your space it's going to
come across as a like incredibly informed move yeah um and like i mean it might be
but i i kind of doubt you're that close with these dudes nope i'm not these people
all i know all i've seen so far is the product yeah that's it yeah so yeah that's a that's a big
that's a big uh it's a big big step um all right unfortunately i don't know why this happened but i lost all the viewer
activity on youtube again this is extremely frustrating uh youtube if anyone's watching
you guys gotta fix this like look at this that's it so this hundred dollar super chat from apollo
is just gone when i try to go back and see it.
Fortunately, I was able to get it by scrolling here because I remembered I saw a red one come in.
I wanted to make sure I got to that.
This is a terrible experience for users, guys, when I cannot respond to a super chat
because it just goes away from the viewer activity tab.
So I want to catch Apollo's before it goes away here.
Any thoughts on what tech enthusiasts and gamers
can realistically do to help combat climate change?
I've been real depressed lately due to the state of our planet.
I'd love for you to talk about it a bit.
Thank you.
I mean, really, it's the basics.
Turn off your stuff when you're not using it.
Make sure that you choose,
I mean, not just choose more efficient components, but upgrade less.
Like make sure that you're not just consuming stuff for the sake of consuming. That's
pretty much the biggest difference that you can make. Get involved with an organization like
Freegeek that takes old hardware that would otherwise be destined for the recycler and put it in the hands of people.
Reduce, reuse, recycle in that order is really the biggest key.
All right.
Oops.
Oh, shoot.
No, I don't want to vote.
I want just the results.
There's 4,000 votes, and it has stayed absolutely deadlocked at 80 to 20 i've
seen some i've seen some interesting ideas like uh invest in it and then donate any gains to charity
uh the problem for me is that as a business owner if i lose then what does a charity compensate me
i guess not but then at least i tried to make a difference so i have like kind of the good guy feels from that um from a from a cash flow standpoint that
would be irresponsible kind of like buying a the wall uh if if it was about the investment i should
just make a real investment that i that i think is a good idea instead of something where i'm
committing to say okay no whatever i gain it's about it's about
this is something you taught me though right it's about optics it's not about what it actually
means for you and that's why it's really complicated is because people are going to
see this that don't know you jayden said the whole problem uh jayden had a really good comment and
said if you believe in their vision maybe it's more important for you to stay financially impartial
and just support them vocally.
Yeah.
You know what?
You might be right, Julian.
That's kind of the vibe that I'm currently on as well.
Yep.
I think that's a solid argument.
Bring it up in other reviews of other laptops as a downside
because it is now.
If a competing laptop is not upgradable,
that is now a downside of that laptop, right?
And now you can say that impartially because you're not invested.
Brooks Freeze says, let's remember that the stock market was not supposed to be about making money.
It was supposed to help good companies with good ideas get funding.
So that is the intention here.
But then maybe there would be other ways to tackle it.
I can't read this person's name because it appears to be in chinese characters um there's never been a laptop company that's
backed by strong youtube marketing um they wouldn't survive on their own but if they have
your blessing i think they would have a much stronger business model opinion from an si owner
here in hong kong interesting okay yeah i don't I
I get where your heart's at and I support
it I'm just very concerned about
optics and I think there's a
lot of problems with the optics I
I there's a bunch
of just to address some of this stuff because like
someone in floatplane was like what we've been saying so
one of their things was like why don't you
invest in it personally and they just have other
people at LMG cover laptops.
That's not how any of this works.
He owns the company.
It can be.
You still have to disclose that the owner of the company.
I'm pretty sure you still have to disclose that the owner of the company.
So it depends.
If I have no writing credit on the piece whatsoever or editing credit,
like if I actually properly recuse
myself from the creation of laptop content
entirely then no we wouldn't have to
disclose anything
I'm allowed to have personal investments that
are not disclosed when a writer
voices their own opinion because they
don't have any financial skin in the game
so that's how
those disclosures need
to work.
Ah.
I like that you're switching to it because you and I have disagreed on laptops since I believe literally the first month that we started working together.
And I'm happy you're getting away from ultra thin ultra performance this is ultra thin performance but hopefully this one won't die in a fire as hard as all the other laptops that you seem to like it does hopefully
you can you can upgrade repair it um justin donnarumma says a thought on your investment
to framework it'll be far more than your monetary investment your financial investment will actually likely be a small portion of the full value the gain you may
or may not receive later is irrelevant to the initial risk you take by providing a boost to
their ability to grow also because of the value of your knowledge and experience as well as following
you could negotiate for a board seat which could give you a modicum of control that sounds like it would be helpful in terms of affecting the change that i want to see
but not helpful in terms of uh reducing the conflict of interest um nh4x4 tracker says do
consulting work that is equally a conflict of interest in In that case, they're just paying me directly instead of me standing to gain from their success.
Yeah, there's just, it's a bit of a minefield.
That's the problem.
Madowtex says, why not let your wife invest personally
so you can still review
or would that be the same thing as you doing it?
For all intents and purposes,
my wife and I are one person financially and whatever other measures you might
have.
Yeah,
we are not,
we are not different people at this stage in the game.
Oh,
uh,
infinity puddle says,
I don't think there's any way to have no conflicts and invest.
And that's correct.
I agree 100%.
So I'm going to do one more poll.
Now that we've talked about some of the really solid arguments against and some of the, I'd say, good arguments for.
There's good arguments for.
Supporting the company sounds great.
I have been not interested in laptops at all for a long time.
This thing is very interesting to me.
I wish to support this,
which is why I obviously can't in the same way that Linus is talking about.
But I'm going to try to push this to anyone that's looking for laptops because this is just a fantastic concept yeah everything's great I love it there's
just so many problems oh yeah go ahead but yeah like being able to support them would be fantastic
and and I'm sure Linus being able to have some influence there would be very helpful
and uh using his money to grow would be great and all that kind of stuff.
It's just a mind field.
JR6955 says, spin up a subsidiary and use that to invest.
I mean, I couldn't do that.
If I was just trying to make money, I could have done that and I could have not talked to you guys.
This is not about whether or not I could find a way to invest in the company.
This is about me making you guys part of this process because disclosure is a key part of me being comfortable doing this.
You guys have to know and be on board with what I'm doing.
This is not about whether I could find a loophole.
Absolutely, I could find a loophole.
Anthony has some comments. I think we should do it because this is the behavior we've been asking for and the player is small enough that it's not
a threat to the mainstream market yet. However, I didn't know about investment slash control.
I saw one comment saying that a loan would be a no strings attached sort of deal. High risk,
but could be an ROI for you in exchange for the cash infusion could give them generous terms um maybe we could buy frameworks
with modules as workstation notebooks for everyone in the office they're modular easy to repair
logistically simple with interchangeable parts show a real world reason for why it makes sense
um and he reminds me that youtube chat is still members only uh yeah that's fine because i'm gonna post a final answer now here um here we go ladies and gentlemen i like the idea of of like workstation
laptops i think that's really cool um even showing like oh if there's a part that tends to fail like
having it on hand so you don't have to ship out your your workers laptops all the times like that's a really cool benefit um people are saying give them a loan yeah the loan honestly has the same kind
of conflict of interest as investing in it it's not really any different and even if by law you
don't technically have to disclose that arrangement it's still there's there's lawful and then there's ethical
right lawful maybe i don't have to disclose it but ethically i have to disclose it i have to
i have to disclose that relationship whatever it happens to be even if they're the ones that owe me
something rather than me owing them something and being a public person and a reviewer and all those other kind of things, trust and ethics is extremely important.
Absolutely.
So it looks like the community is far from unanimous,
but with 1,600 votes in,
this is split enough that it doesn't seem like
it's the kind of thing that I could safely do.
So I'll give you guys a little bit more time to vote.
Please, guys, do make your voice heard
because what you guys are doing
is going to affect the decision.
Yeah.
Yeah, Jaden's comment here is good.
Here's the thing.
I personally am confident it wouldn't color his coverage,
but others won't, and that would undermine the whole thing.
And that's a really good point.
But then here's my argument, Jaden to to kind of to push back against that is i don't want
it to not color my coverage that's not actually my intention here it should color my coverage
i should be i should be happy to disclose this at every possible opportunity so that I can
say, hey, this is what it looks like when a company does something that I actually am on board with,
that I actually think is pro-consumer and is okay. If you want to fight that battle,
I think that makes it significantly more okay. It's also a big risk for framework,
battle i think that makes it significantly more okay it's also a big risk for framework because if they up i can assure you i promise you and i'm saying this publicly before entering
into any kind of arrangement with them i promise it'll be a super public breakup yeah it'll be
i mean you have an extremely long track record of not, but if you screw up, it's also bad for them.
That's true.
Because this is more than just a financial investment, right? This is a partnering of public image.
This is definitely a huge step, someone says in the float plan chat.
Yeah.
If you want to fight that fight, I think that makes it significantly okay.
You just have to be ready to fight it all the time.
Right.
And people are going to try to take advantage of that
at every single moment they possibly can.
And that's...
Yeah.
I don't know.
That sounds really annoying.
This is a really good comment from Muppet House.
Not a great username to make thoughtful comments like this, but whatever.
Ask your team at LMG first, IMO.
Maybe that's what this comes down to then.
It's like, hey guys,
should we do this?
Happy Roll Cake says, LMG makes a lot of money
from laptop sponsors, right? Is this okay
for LMG? That's a really good point.
That's somewhere where good point. That's
somewhere where we are probably going to end up eating it because I would have to disclose my
framework state that I own in any sponsored laptop review, which it would almost definitely cost us
laptop sponsors. Yeah. So while I would stand to make money, this absolutely could cost the company money.
Yeah.
Yep.
Yeah, 100%.
Man, why are all these good comments crawling out of the woodwork now that I've asked people to give their final answers?
It keeps coming back to this, though.
Infinity Puddle says, I think you can support them without investing.
And I think that is super true i think you avoid a massive amount of problems and i think you can make
a monumental impact without investing in that way you could do the office thing if you wanted
you don't have to but you can keep bringing it up in reviews there is now a competitor
that is diy configurable to the end all from the from the beginning to the end you can
do everything right and that is now a criticism of every single other thing that competes with
this laptop and that can be brought up every single time and your reach is astronomical so
like that will create a huge impact probably more than any form of investment could. And they can probably find that money to grow from somewhere else, especially with your vocal support, not being an investor.
So that's my current stance on it. But I think you can make this win in both ways. I think you
can make it a win if you invest. I think you can make it a win if you don't invest. So yeah.
All right. Let's have a look at the final results,
shall we, ladies and gentlemen?
Refresh.
61% yes and 39% say no.
That's it.
So I'm going to hold on to that.
You could call that a win,
but that to me looks pretty split.
I think I'll take this to the LMG team.
And it looks to me like enough people would be upset by it
that it is just not worth it.
And we're going to have to find another way to support them, though.
It did lean again, right?
Our initial commentary was quite positive.
And the poll was quite positive.
And then we went quite negative right before the final answer. Yep.
And then it became much more negative.
And then we got a lot more positive during the final answer.
And then the final answer shifted more positive. So I, yeah.
Yeah. Okay. All right.
Let's have a look and see if there's any other topics that we want to cover
uh that looks kind of boring that looks boring all right neat i guess not so that wraps it up
for the wan show today oh yeah we should at least do the super chats that we can um
uh isaac truckin broad says lewis rossman has mentioned them in several videos about right
to repair maybe collaborations with other tech youtubers would go a long way to support them,
more so than investments.
Yep, that's fair.
Michael says, talk to Daktronics about the LED wall.
May not happen, but they do a lot of different stuff.
I don't know if they do anything as dense as the micro LEDs that Samsung does.
You know what?
I'm not going to respond to ones that are about the uh the framework topic that
have kind of already been covered um abdullah says have you considered going in with other
creators like lewis rossman i don't think it would be necessary like it's if they want to
do their own thing then they should just do their own thing would be uh would be sort of what I have to say about that.
Michael Taylor just advises against investing,
just separate from the ethics,
just says, don't invest with your feelings.
There's a reason the modular companies never took off.
But that's why I'm trying to support it. I could, yeah, okay.
Yeah, Elizabeth says,
potentially create an investment fund that could be done blindly that supports the things you want, including the framework laptop. Now, that is a possibility. So you give a financial advisor or whatever that role would be, you give them these guidelines and you say, look, this company is an example of what I'm talking about. But these are my principles.
Invest based on these.
And then you actually don't know whether they did or didn't.
That's a really interesting way of doing it.
That is pretty interesting, for sure.
But what that does...
That removes, yeah.
Yeah, that removes a lot of the benefit, I think,
of having me as a backer.
Where if they could say,
Linus Sebastian is a backer and if they could say Linus Sebastian was a,
is a backer and it was more of like a partnership.
That's a whole,
that's a whole other,
that's a whole other thing.
Jonathan Linford just sent the most genius super chat that we have ever
received in the history of this show.
Instead of reading super chats at the
end you should allow a wan show message box on ltc store purchases while the show is live and read
those so instead of people sending money i thought about this today actually they should send money
to ltc store and we read comments from there that is so much smarter and a much better use of your funds.
We could totally do it.
I'm rather certain we could do it.
Let's get that on the roadmap.
Thank you, Jonathan Lindford.
So wait, do you want it to be,
let's have a product meeting
in the middle of Wancho.
Do you want it to be,
or maybe this ends up being both.
Both would be possible as well, I believe.
Would you want it to be
where they purchase a product
and there's a note section while the Wancho is well i believe would you want it to be where they purchase a product and there's a note section while the wansha is running or you want to be a
note they purchase on the store uh oh oh they should buy a product they should get something
i believe people should get something for their money yeah no i don't i don't believe in digital
uh notice me senpai attentions for money okay i mean, it worked for Linford here, but I don't know. Whatever.
And also, I'm really
glad, Jonathan, I'm glad you sent that
because that is a brilliant idea.
I should send you a
super chat.
Seriously, though, I will refund your super chat
and then some if you get in touch with the business team
through the public-facing email.
That is my personal tech tips guarantee.
It's a great idea.
All right.
Brock says, buying them for the office or giveaways,
outfitting a local school, that would be huge advertisements.
It would, but that's a weird relationship.
If I have no skin in the game,
I don't think I can justify that from a business standpoint.
Like, I have made Linus Media Group what it is
by doing the responsible thing at every stage.
So the only reason that I would be able to invest in this
is if it's responsible from multiple angles.
Responsible promoting this for the good of consumers and the earth
and responsible from a business standpoint as well.
I do need something out of it if we're going to dump a bunch of money into this company.
Now, man on the internet seems to misunderstand what bias is. Man on the internet says you're
already heavily biased toward repairable laptops. Investing wouldn't really change your bias much.
pairable laptops. Investing wouldn't really change your bias much. That's not what a bias is.
You can have an opinion about something that is well-reasoned and fact-based. That is not bias. Bias is an unconscious leaning one way or the other. And it's not fact-based. It's not driven by data.
Data is the opposite of bias.
So what I like about framework
or what I like about repairable laptops
is that they are better for consumers
and better for the environment.
I was going to say, and the world.
Those are just facts.
That's not bias.
Those are facts.
So what people are talking about when they talk
about bias is that i would have a financial incentive that has the potential to introduce
bias that is a conflict of interest and needs to be disclosed the fact that i can tell that up is
up and down is down and i know a fact from a fabrication.
And I believe in repairable devices.
That is not bias.
That's just having two functioning eyes and a brainstem.
That's it.
Brock says, you could sell like accessories for it on LTT store
and offer to do it for other oems if they have swappable
parts yeah that's interesting accessories for a product like this are not a high enough volume
game though typically that you can actually get your return on the tooling costs of creating them
so it would be pretty tough um robert mail says shut up and take my LTTstore.com. Yeah, yeah. Hopefully that'll be a thing soon.
All right.
I think that's pretty much it for the show today.
Luke, was there anything else that you wanted to add on that topic?
Any other interesting comments you've seen in the meantime?
No, not majorly.
Okay.
I think that's pretty much it.
All right.
Well, I've heard from the community the last group i need to hear from is lmg employees and after that i will take that
feedback and i will make a final decision this is not a democracy if it was then uh yes would
have won already but there's more to consider than just majority rules in this case.
And you'd probably still make motherboard videos.
I'm sorry?
Motherboard videos?
Yeah, I was saying, if it was a democracy,
you'd probably still make motherboard videos. Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
That would probably be a thing.
All right.
Thanks for watching, guys.
We'll see you again next week.
Same bad time, same bad channel.
And yes, Flipplane staff, you guys will be weighing in too,
although you've kind of already gotten a chance now
did they ask
about that? uh no but
just they were providing their opinions I just
I want to make sure they know they have a voice too
yeah creator warehouse
too Outro Music