The WAN Show - Fortnite vs Apple - WAN Show Aug 14, 2020
Episode Date: August 17, 2020Save 15% today with offer code WAN on Displate at https://lmg.gg/displatewan Reserve Vessi's new Weekend Shoe for $5 at https://www.vessifootwear.com/wanshow Sign up for Private Internet Access VPN ...at https://lmg.gg/piawan Timestamps: (Courtesy of Michael O'Brien) 00:00:00 - Stream Start! 00:00:05 - Ladies and Gentlemen, welcome to the WAN Show! 00:00:47 - Topic #1: The Answer to the Ultim... Fortnite vs Apple & Google (Jump to 00:02:06) 00:00:59 - Topic #2: Starlink SpeedTest[.net] (Jump to 00:37:30) 00:01:05 - Topic #4: Tiger Lake details (not covered) 00:01:12 - Topic #3: Microsoft Surface Duo (Jump to 00:46:35) 00:01:23 - WAN Show INTRO! 00:02:06 - Topic #1: Morpheus vs Neo? (Fortnite vs The World) 00:03:07 - EPIC's plausible strategy 00:03:44 - Community feedback & Luke's 1st hand opinion 00:06:23 - Recap of the current issue & difference of services 00:09:01 - What has been happening as a result 00:10:17 - EPIC Repurposing Apple's "1984" & current role reversal 00:14:07 - Good for EPIC vs Apple/Google, but nothing small creators can do 00:15:27 - EPIC's tactics/propaganda in-game & monopoly and democracy 00:18:23 - EPIC's store vs App[le] Store vs Google Play Store 00:19:49 - Enterprise ecosystems 00:21:55 - What could Apple do to compromise? 00:24:52 - James' take on possible compromises 00:26:37 - Fornite taken off of Play Store, too 00:28:43 - US vs Microsoft legal precedent (referencing last week too) 00:30:27 - How to carve out your share in the market 00:33:02 - Wrapping up the topic 00:33:43 - Sponsors! 00:33:49 - Displate - lmg.gg/displatewan - 15% off w/ code WAN 00:34:45 - PIA - lmg.gg/piawan 00:36:10 - Vessi - vessi.com/linustechtips 00:37:30 - Topic #2: SpaceX beta test bandwidth testing 00:38:35 - Bandwidth vs area spec & archived claims 00:40:26 - Luke's posisited city-density-reduction effect 00:42:44 - Who's the average user/customer for Starlink? 00:44:35 - James' anecdotal TelCom experience, albeit common 00:45:37 - Except for Luke being treated well by the same TelCom 00:46:38 - Topic #3: Microsoft Surface Duo 00:46:42 - James' considered opinion 00:48:24 - Comparison to the Z Fold 00:50:27 - How costs are saved? 00:51:28 - Power vs Productivity vs Average users 00:54:26 - Luke's considered opinion 00:56:24 - The comparative user base & wrapping up 00:58:39 - Superchats? Luke & James have no Dashboard access 00:59:08 - This is the stream that never ends... 00:59:24 - Intro/Outro/Smoutro 00:59:49 - And attempts were made to end the stream 01:01:37 - Unofficial Topic: ASRock blacklists GN & HU 01:02:54 - Meme opportunity 01:04:01 - BYE! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Your mom hates it when you leave six half-full glasses on your nightstand.
It's a good thing mom lives on the other side of the country.
And it's an even better thing that you can get six IKEA 365 Plus glasses for just $9.99.
So go ahead, you can afford to hoard because IKEA is priced for student life.
Shop everything you need for back to school at IKEA today.
I have no clue.
I'm just going to keep repeating ladies and gentlemen welcome to the wan show welcome to the wan show i do actually think we're live everywhere now so that is
fantastic uh is the nah show again myself and james back at it back in action it's been so
long since we had a nah show that i don't even really remember the origin of it i think i guess it's just it's backwards it's just backwards yeah but like i feel like there
was some reason why we did that but it's lost to lost to time and space now but anyways yeah
hopefully you've had a wonderful friday hopefully you had a wonderful week welcome to the wan show
i don't see us on there it is we are live fantastic uh we've got some actually great
topics some things that I'm
actually really excited to talk about this week
I want to talk about
Fortnite versus Apple and Google
this is
crazy I'm so excited
I'm so excited
but yeah okay Fortnite versus Apple and Google
like he just said we've also got the
Starlink beta test and speeds which are
like pretty spicy we've got got the starlink beta test and speeds which are like pretty spicy um we've
got intel details tiger lake architecture and process improvements and james one more there's
also the microsoft surface duo uh i can't decide if i care i kind of care kind of sweet maybe a
little care maybe even a huge care maybe two cares. Anyways, that was a terrible joke. Wham show intro
Dude is that from that that Honda commercial the crab?
Maybe this
display vessi
yeah that's a good word and pia
gi joe
all right yeah so far the stream has not blown up so i'm actually i'm pretty happy with how we're
doing so far and i am also pretty happy about uh morpheus fighting neo or david verse it's not
really david verse glad some giant company that doesn't care about me versus some other giant
company that doesn't care about me which is fortnite versus apple or epic games versus apple and google now the story
has continued they've been kicked off of the uh the play store as well on google stuff that's crazy
um so insane so basically what happened was epic epic games they just they had like the strategy
in their back pocket they're waiting to deploy and i guess the timing is right with all the like um like the senate is it the senate of congress that like the scrutiny that the tech
giants have been under yes whereas last week jeff bezos and satin adala tim cook and and who's the
fourth person was it mark oh microsoft microsoft wasn't there. Zuckerberg was there. Tim Cook was there. Amazon was there.
Yeah.
And I guess they're just,
now that everyone's talking about monopolies and antitrust,
it's time for Epic Games to say,
you know what?
It is a monopoly.
These Play stores and the Apple App Store,
they are a monopoly.
They're the only way that we can get access
to billions of devices
and every time these guys are taking 30 of the money we make yeah it's time for this to end
especially for for us like um us as in floatplane uh it's it's kind of extremely destructive uh so
other other payment so yeah i made a lot of tweets about this and I
heard a lot of feedback. One thing that I heard from some people were like, oh, well, I don't
want to like trust my payment information to every app that's on the App Store. I'd rather use
Apple Payments. And honestly, you preferring to use Apple Payments is not an issue to me,
and I'll talk about that more later on. But we we don't i don't ever want to touch your payment information that is the last thing
i want to do trust me i don't want any of that information ever which is why we use payment
processors which is like what everybody does that's like for us it's stripe and braintree
braintree is effectively just paypal for most people it's stripe and and Braintree. Braintree is effectively just PayPal. For most people, it's Stripe and Braintree or just Braintree or just Stripe or something like that.
Those are the main players in the space.
There are other players, depending on where you are in the world as well, that might be more prevalent than Stripe or Braintree.
But those are really big in North America.
Yeah, other players like Apple.
I mean, Apple, Amazon, Alibaba, like a lot of
massive companies might have their own payment system. But these little companies like Floatplane,
we're not going to have our own payment system. We're just going to... Why would you want to build
that? Why would we want to build that? Why would we want the liability? There's there is no way I
would ever want to touch your credit card number
because I don't want the liability.
Well, this is actually part of Apple's defense.
As they say, we're actually doing developers a favor,
handling all that for them.
So it's good.
So I will touch there.
Because I personally have no issue having an option
to have Apple Pay in the app.
And that's actually kind of interesting to this story because Epic Games
sort of did that. They had the like pay through us directly option and they had the Apple Pay option.
The payment processors will generally take, I believe it's 2.9% plus 30 cents. You may be
surprised that I said I believe. The reason for that is because it changes depending on what like
the origin country is, and
it changes on where the payment is coming from.
There's international charters.
There's a bunch of other things going on.
I think it goes up to 3.7% on the percentage, but generally stays at $0.30.
What that usually is is the percentage is being passed over from the credit card company,
say like MasterCard or Visa or whatever else.
And the flat fee, the $0.30, is usually what the payment processor is taking.
30 cents plus 2.9 to 3.7% is a lot lower generally
for a lot of things than just a flat 30%,
which is what Apple is trying to take.
That is massive.
And it might not be that massive for actually
companies like epic games where what they're delivering you is uh it's it's unlocking a skin
in a game that's already there it's already in your game files it doesn't cost them anything
to deliver it to you zero marginal cost yes it did did cost them designer work to implement it. It might have cost them
marketing dollars to push it out. There are other costs. To duplicate it, there is nothing. For us,
we have to pay creators every single time a payment comes to us. We pay creators. Also,
we have to deliver high quality content video. Like it's expensive to deliver all this high detail video to users.
So there are heavy costs on our side directly related to every purchase.
We can't just give up 30% of the value on every purchase.
We don't have that as an option if we want it to be a reasonable business model.
So if we wanted to use Apple's payment system which i have no problem doing we'd have
to charge more but that's against their terms you're not allowed to charge more for using apple
payments you have to charge the same amount across the board because it can't be worse experience for
apple users which i would like to agree with, but it's more expensive. But does that include things like,
if you go to our website and subscribe and it's $2,
it can't be $3 on the iPhone.
Oh my God, that is crazy.
Right now we're in a situation where
we have tried to remove everything possible.
We have borderline copied some other apps that are
on the app store with with which is not our initial intention but it became kind of our intention
because we were like okay we need to find a way to actually get on the store uh and we have been
denied every time uh it feels almost discriminatory at this point uh at this point they're like you
can't reference uh being able to get subscriptions like, you can't reference being able to
get subscriptions anywhere else. You can't offboard anywhere else. You can't give someone a support
link. You can't give someone an FAQ link. You can't offboard anyone to your main website because
that might encourage them to subscribe there instead of through the app. So we took everything
out to the point where you can't even make an account on the app. And if you try to sign in with an account that doesn't have a subscription, it just says, like, you can't do that.
And that's it.
It doesn't say, like, you have to go to the website.
It doesn't give you any good information.
It's useless.
Nope.
It's a terrible app.
And there's still, like, no, there's too many references to, like, going outside.
There is none, by the way.
There's a blog for everyone's frustration frustration apple trying to get their money and for a company like epic games
like they're talking about hundreds of millions of dollars on like every year right oh yeah so
so what they did was they updated their app they did this on android and ios now it's a less it's
a bit of a less of an issue on android because you can already sideload apks on android and just kind of get whatever app you want anyway
but it still has millions of dollars so they did this on ios and android they made an update to the
app that included like you said uh the option to use apple pay and another option to buy directly
from them and that was cheaper and that is just crazy that they did that, in my opinion,
because what they're saying,
they're basically weaponizing the whole fan base.
They're like, look, everyone around the world,
you are paying more because these guys control access.
This is a monopoly, and it's hurting consumers
because, look, you could be paying less.
So they've just evangelized like legion of fans, turned them all into zealots, got them on their side.
And anyway, the immediate response from Apple and Google, of course, was to take Fortnite off of the store.
Yeah.
You know what Fortnite did to any response?
They had a...
Did you ever see the commercial?
Yes, of course.
That 1984 commercial?
It's an old Apple commercial.
And it was brilliant at the time.
Yeah, it was really transgressive.
And it's supposed to look like, I believe, the movie 1984
from the Orwell novel.
And it's basically a bunch of these drone-type people
sitting in an audience
While Big Brother talks to them from this giant screen and then this one like resistance rebel
Like slow-motion runs in with a big sledgehammer and she throws up the giant blue Big Brother and and Big Brother is supposed to represent
IBM yeah, and it's like break the mold she smashes the screen and everyone's liberated with their Apple devices and it was so
Cool to be an apple user back then well guess what go forward 30 years and guess who big brother is now so epic games produced this video that has fortnite characters in it and it's fully
animated but it looks exactly like and animated in the style of this previous commercial but now
there's like this big
uh big brother is transformed into like a rotten apple looking character with a worm coming out of
his head and uh they smash that screen and they're and they're saying yeah these guys have a monopoly
on the app store and we want we want to smash that for the sake of consumers. Yeah. Yeah. And it's like it's I find things like this interesting because this
truly was like a big part of Apple's identity.
If you if you want to go back, I'm going to tangent here a little bit.
I'm going to tangent here quite a few times, probably.
If you want to go back and watch a really cool movie, honestly, probably everyone
watching this would enjoy this movie.
It's called Pirates of Silicon Valley.
Fantastic movie. It's called Pirates of Silicon Valley. Fantastic
movie. It's it goes over essentially the origins of like Apple and Microsoft. And it's really,
really cool. And the mentality that like Jobs was pushing back then was extremely aggressive
towards IBM, like super, super aggressive towards IBM. IBM is absolutely the enemy and this is a war.
Was like the type of like direction he was pushing the company in. Apple, if you want to look into
it, I don't think I have great screen capture right now. People saw the Discord minimize.
I'm not playing WoW. I'll move it. That's my desktop background. Calm down.
That's my desktop background.
Calm down.
Jeez.
I just like Thunder Bluff, okay?
But Apple Pirate Flag.
There's like actually official Apple Pirate Flag stuff that they had in the office.
There's pictures of Steve Jobs sitting around with his peeps with this pirate flag in the background that has an apple logo over one of the eyes for their something anniversary i don't remember what they flew pirate flags at all of
their headquarters like this this like we're against the man kind of mentality it's in their
origin oh yeah first product that jobs and was ever made together back when I believe Jobs was still in high school was these little boxes that they used to hack phones so that they could make free long distance phone calls.
Yeah.
They sold them for like 100 bucks.
With Captain Crunch.
Yeah.
Like that was this is where Apple came from.
And now as many problems as I have with it, and we'll go into that in a moment.
As many problems as I have with it, and we'll go into that in a moment, but that Fortnite 1984 commercial positioning Apple on the other side as like kind of more cheesy and less serious.
Sorry for the Slack notification.
As more cheesy and less serious as it is.
Oh, my goodness.
Stop messaging me. It's kind of fair yeah well i mean it's a little
awkward coming from epic for a bunch of different reasons they're big too yeah they're big too and
then the they're kind of they're 40 chinese owned which i guess kind of flavors it a bit but
it's definitely valid it's it is it is very valid criticism of apple regardless of who
it's coming from there are some issues with the short uh as far as i know the short being the the
fortnight's version of the apple 1984 commercial as far as i know it was played in game which at
first i was like oh that's cool i want to go check it out and then later was like uh
check it out and then later was like uh while i am very much happy about this legal battle that's going on because floatplane over here is getting screwed over by apple super hard but we're like
tiny ants on the road and have no ability to impact really anything um compared to a multi-trillion
dollar company that is apple um epic might actually be able to give them a decent fight.
So that's cool.
I feel like there's a Goliath on my side
fighting the other thing, which is cool.
And just because we haven't said it explicitly,
Epic is suing Apple and Google now.
Yeah, they totally weren't prepared.
They just had like a 62-page legal document
ready to go immediately after they were kicked off the app store. But it, yeah, they played it in game and they're directing Fortnite
players specifically to like talk about this and tweet out about this. it is kind of pushing propaganda onto kids directly like playing it
in the game making an event in the game all that kind of stuff i'm gonna message this guy
i kind of like it though because it's weird antitrust and monopoly like law is actually
really tightly entangled with with democracy in a really weird way right but do you
want small children involved with your democracy well i mean because that's they're trying to
they're trying to get kids to like speak up and get angry at apple who probably have no real
understanding of like what's actually going
on and they're just like oh they took my fortnight from the app store yeah but they also know they
know that it costs more right they they know the price difference and i think that the way that
people interface i don't think they're technically allowed to even buy anything well their parents
are and that has an effect on them yeah i just i don't know it's
pushing propaganda to kids is is it's problematic but what i'm saying is like our interface with
power and authority irl is often through economic stuff it's often through our wallet yeah and less
so than like politics yeah and so and economics really like when you can garner a lot of economic power,
that often turns into political power,
whether that's through lobbying or funding research
or staffing government.
And so it is the fact that the US has a history
of breaking up monopolies.
That is a history of supporting democracy, right?
So I think it's really cool
that they're getting all you know they're they're showing everybody they made a point to open up the
app and see how like look this affects you the people yeah and it is kind of propaganda but it's
also you know we are all stopping and this is a monopoly i'm okay with the message it becomes
awkward when it seems to be uh not just targeted
at fortnite fans but but somewhat specifically targeted at children but then i don't know
how you would target fortnite fans without targeting any children so i yeah i guess one
kind of follows the other since yeah their fan base so yeah and like obviously there are people
that aren't children that play fortnite but there is and like obviously there are people that aren't children
that play fortnite but there is a very large amount of people that play fortnite that are
children so it just becomes kind of awkward there um that being said there was no real call to
action that i could find other than just talking about things while including the free fortnite
hashtag which i think probably helps a little bit. But yeah, there's the other side of
it that people have brought up, which is like on Epic's game store, they push really hard for
developer exclusivity, but they do seem to take a lower cut. That gets usually countered by the
fact that Epic's game store is on open platforms that include other game stores.
And that's developers deciding to take that deal instead of it being the only potential option.
So things change there.
You can't sideload apps, at least easily and by standard, onto iPhones.
and bystander onto iPhones, you have to go through that app store
and they have this very anti old school Apple
totalitarian grip on that app store.
Well, it really depends on how you're thinking
of the monopoly and the competition,
because Apple would say, buy an Android phone,
but it's really, the question is,
is that a competing product or am I, I've decided I want an iPhone.
I want the iPhone hardware.
And I want to be able to put whatever app on there or use whatever app stores I want.
But it's an integrated product.
You know, you can't really take apart the hardware from the software.
Yeah.
So it's really kind of sticky.
Yeah.
And there's also, I don't know how this plays legally or if it does at all.
But there are also quite a few different situations, I would say, surprisingly often on
the Apple side where for your work or for some other reason, you are required to have Apple
devices. Things like AirDrop and some other stuff that can simplify things if everyone is using the
same type of device.
Apple's very well known for making it so that once you're in their ecosystem, it's kind of frustrating and difficult to leave their ecosystem because
everything that you have just works with each other and nothing else.
Not only that from the individual level, but as you alluded to,
there's a network effect with other users.
Everyone in my company, we only use iMessage.
Well, it might be a requirement.
I have family members that work in the movie industry in my company, we only use iMessage. Well, it might be a requirement. I have family members that work in the movie industry in British Columbia.
And there are certain...
I'm going to use incorrect terms here.
I am so sorry, Brandon and family members.
But on different sets for different films, for different movies, for different shows, etc.
The... different sets for for different films for different movies for different shows etc the i don't remember the term but the person who like is a producer i don't know the person who like runs the whole thing will often decide like we are using this device like my mom
showrunner okay sure yeah my mom had to get an iphone because they were using like some stuff that iphones have and
android phones don't and it was just like okay she also i mean as much as i dislike apple right now
it's a better phone for her she naturally picked up iphone a lot faster than she picked up android
phones and she probably got to a level of competency that was higher
with her iphone in like a few weeks compared to when she had her android phone for probably a
couple years that's so weird because i i guess like the curse of knowledge like once you know
something you can't imagine what it's like to not know it but from where i'm standing they seem like
they're almost exactly the same you know swipe down for notifications there's definitely um
they're definitely similar but um
yeah user experience and intuitive design fairly small changes can be pretty impactful
um but yeah what do you think what what do you think apple could do like let's say bearing in
mind that apple is going to want to preserve their profits bearing in mind that they're going to keep the app store existing in some way and they're not
going to allow there to be i don't think they're going to let there be other full-on app stores on
the on the iphone what do you think is the compromise that they're going to make like
genuinely allowed to have your own like epic games Epic Games can make their own, not App Store, but, like, their one individual app can have its own processing.
I'm fairly certain that's what Epic Games wants.
Just so everyone knows as well, Epic Games wanted the app taken off the App Store.
I believe we mentioned this.
That was super obvious.
I do not, I haven't read the 60 whatever pages of legal documentation
i do not suspect at all that they're going after apple for the fact that the app was removed for
the app store they wanted fortnite removed from the app store for like pr and marketing reasons
not for legal reasons or the flame they want it for the flame they want it because we are talking
about it now because of that they want it because of like almost every other news outlet talking about it i austin evans
launched a this is video about it like immediately like people jumped on this right away because the
app was removed it was it was propaganda pr it was that kind of stuff getting the app removed
it was not their legal ground very strategic. Yes
But what Apple will do I have no idea I suspect they're gonna fight this tooth and nail in order to do nothing
if they have to do something what I think would make a lot of sense is
If they want to keep their 30% cut, which is insane
But everyone has to use Apple payments, that's fine completely fine with me as long as we can have custom pricing because i need to make it so that it hurts just as much
to you oh you mean that you have a different iphone price than you have on the web and
that's what i mean or yeah for sure i would even be okay if it was the only payment processor on the App Store, as long as I
was able to make it cost more because it costs more. Or if they let us have them in parallel,
I would still be happy having the Apple one there and no messaging telling people not to use it,
but clearly displaying that it is a higher price. I would be completely okay with that because I can
totally understand the concept of someone being uncomfortable giving their payment information, but being more comfortable using Apple's internal
system.
If you want to do that, that's cool.
I have no issue with that at all.
I just don't want it to very significantly hurt our company's bottom line to the point
where we're directly losing money, which is what's happening.
So it's completely unreasonable but if they
give us some options to actually work with it and actually be able to move forward cool that's all
i'm asking for i have no idea i mean on the far end of the spectrum they could straight up allow
other app stores on the iphone yeah that exists on android already i don't really think that's gonna happen
because and the reason i don't think it's gonna happen is it just seems like way i don't think
anyone's really asking for that and also apple does not want that to happen no because if you
think about like where the money is in terms of internet companies it's basically a graph that's
a parabola and value is on the y-axis and on the first part of the parabola where it's basically a graph that's a parabola and value is on the Y axis.
And on the first part of the parabola,
where it's nice and tall, you've got content creators like LMG.
That's really valuable.
And on the other end of the parabola, you've got aggregators,
people where the content is, people who control discovery of content.
Right. Because there's so many tweets in the world.
You need to go to Twitter to find the best ones.
There's so many web pages.
You need to go to Google to find it.
Discovery is huge.
YouTube is powerful.
Facebook is powerful.
In the middle of the nadir of the parabola, you have your kind of classical distribution.
That's just not worth that much, like cable companies and crap like that.
So they're not going to go,
they're not going to give up their position
on the top of their parabola
to have other competing app stores on the iPhone.
They're going to be the only one.
And instead, they're going to try to have people
land at that bottom where, I mean,
like maybe, I don't know,
maybe like on a one app basis,
you can have different payment strategies but
you can't make a new discovery yeah platform yeah i definitely don't think apple wants that
um i think that would be would be not ideal for them um the interesting part here in addition
to everything else that has been interesting already, is that a few hours later, Fortnite disappeared off the Google Play Store.
This is not just Fortnite versus Apple.
It is mostly Fortnite versus Apple, but it's not just Fortnite versus Apple.
Like Apple, Google requires that games use the Google Play system for in-app purchases.
that games use the Google Play system for in-app purchases.
Developers offering products within a game downloaded on Google Play or providing access to game content
must use Google Play in-app billing as the method of payment.
Google system also takes a 30% cut.
Not as big of a deal because you can at the very least side load.
So like, I don't know if this is how this worked, but you could go to Fortnite's website
and it could be like, install on your phone and you click a button and it just does it.
You could totally do that.
Back in 2018, Epic pulled Fortnite from the Play Store protesting the 30% cut.
Epic pulled Fortnite from the Play Store,
protesting the 30% cut.
18 months later, it was back on the Play Store because of the warnings of the introduction
of Google Play Protect.
Interesting.
Epic has also filed a suit against Google.
This one is kind of surprising
due to the ability to sideload,
but maybe due to Google Play Protect, it's a little bit different.
Well, they have this other fiasco where there was going to be on LG phones and in particular OnePlus devices.
OnePlus phones were going to ship with like Fortnite on the home screen and or at least like a direct download button through like i guess a
progressive web app or something like that but then google squashed it i don't know the details
of what like leverage they threw around or how they intimidated oneplus but it fell through and
they're actually citing that in the in the court documents yeah i mean I don't remember all the details about this, but United States versus Microsoft Corp, which was like around 2000, I believe.
It's like 1998, 2002.
It was somewhere in that range.
US went against Microsoft super hard and for a ton of different reasons.
And that is why, honestly, that is why Windows
is kind of as open as it is now. And you see now that there's like the Microsoft Store and all this
kind of stuff, but there is also lots of other things. And if I remember correctly, it's been
a long time. I should have done more research on this before the show. I didn't actually think I
was going to end up talking about it, but it's relevant i should have looked into it um if i remember correctly they were relatively
aggressive about like browsers and stuff like that yeah there's a big deal with netscape and having
yeah uh internet explorer pre-installed yeah and if i remember correctly it was like the issue was
almost entirely like having internet explorer pre-installed at all.
Not only just them like not letting you install Netscape or whatever else. Like it's, this is antitrust and anti-monopoly and all this kind of stuff
is a really, really big thing in the US that hasn't really been used very much
since the United States versus Microsoft court.
And maybe this will bring that back.
I would not be surprised at all if this went Supreme court level.
Oh yeah.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Like this is going to go huge because this is talking to the max.
They're going to appeal as far as they can.
What I think is really interesting about it is how it's like a
gray area like you're any successful company it seems to be on the road to monopoly have you ever
read peter teal's uh zero to one no in the first chapter of that book it's a sweet book it's about
how to make a startup he he like taught a stanford class and then they compiled those notes to a book
it's a sweet read and in the opening pages it's basically like your goal as a startup is to try
to become a monopoly because that's where the profits are.
And you're on that course and you might not get there.
And if you do get there, you might not be there for a short time.
I remember listening to a talk from Jeff Bezos where he says, like, even when you are the innovator who makes something completely brand new, you only get about two years of reaping the profits before the competition comes
and you have to put your prices
down and then it's a fully competitive market
and it's a commodity, right?
In the best case scenario, you only get two years
is what he said. Well, these app stores
have had longer than two years. And the thing
that's interesting to me is at first,
these massive profits of 30%
of the labor of all the apps
on your platform.
That's kind of,
that's your reward for making something so awesome as the app store.
And you,
you can't fault these people for designing these platforms and these pay structures that benefit them.
And in some sense they deserve the reward.
However,
when they get so successful at some point,
like now we think of them as like utilities, you know, now that there's so many billions of devices, it's just not fair anymore.
And and they have to like it's a whole paradigm shift where now it's like I don't want to pay for having, I don't know, like the fire department come to my house.
It's just we all get it
apparently chat does not like um that guy that you mentioned i yeah it's oh yeah oh he's like
like the he's famously like the only libertarian in silicon valley or something i'm not saying he's
not a turd but the book is pretty cool. Yeah, I don't know.
It's really interesting.
There's a lot here that I think is going to be above our heads.
I think there's a lot here that's going to be above almost everyone's heads
that is at least watching this,
because this is going to go very far and very deep.
Hey, on that note,
if you want to hear from someone
whose head this is not over,
there is a really awesome podcast slash blog
from a guy named Ben Thompson.
His blog is called Stratechery.
It's like strategy and tech together.
And the podcast is called Exponent.
And they talk about this stuff a lot
and it's a really high level discussion.
Check it out.
Cool.
But yeah, it's going to be really, really exciting to follow where this goes,
especially from Flowplane side, because right now we are screwed. There's like basically nothing we can do. We're being stiff armed out of the App Store unless we have the only payment option on
the App Store be Apple Payments payments we can't make apple payments
charge more when we established our company we tried to have uh very competitive rates try to
be thin margin all that kind of stuff we don't have the ability to just take 30 out of everything
uh therefore we just can't like we are just so what we do have the ability to do is to read our
sponsors we do yes let's jump to that display display is a magnet mounted metal print it's
basically like art that you can easily shunk onto your wall and if you get a new one you just pop
that one off by the magnet and slap your new one on there they're durable and you don't need any
power tools to hang them.
With over 800,000 different arts
spanning a bunch of different styles and influences,
they're pretty awesome and there's something for everyone.
You can browse their store.
I think there's some user-generated content on there.
And a lot of it is like nerd-themed and fantasy-themed stuff.
So very cool.
They have some Cyberpunk 2077 ones too.
They plant one tree for each display purchased and we only have we even have our own line of displays uh one of them has me in it i'm
holding a goddamn duck it's awesome so head to our link below and use code wan w-a-n wan to save 15% on your display today. Yeah.
And then PIA.
I love the PIA spots because we can basically say whatever.
VPNs.
You often want one.
You often need one.
You're often interested in one.
You should check out PIA.
We've been working with them for a while.
They have no bandwidth caps.
They now feature WireGuard, which is cool. Private Internet Access has access to 3,300 servers in 30 different
countries. They have configurable encryption within an internet kill switch. I like the
internet kill switch option. Basically, if your connection to PIA gets interrupted, instead of just bypassing and going back to your ISP, it will just kill everything.
Therefore nothing will flow through your ISP, which is cool.
You can try it risk-free
with their 30 day money back guarantee.
You can connect up to 10 devices at once
with clients for Windows, Mac OS, Android, iOS and Linux.
Check it out. Is that new?
Because the copy used to say five devices.
I thought it was five.
It says 10 in this current copy.
Maybe they doubled it.
I don't know.
But yeah, it used to say five.
It'd be really interesting if you had 10 devices
and you just didn't have them in your hands all the time
and other people had them.
That'd be crazy.
Check it out at lmg.com slash P-i-a-w-a-n or p-i-a-w-a-n we're also brought to you by vessi particularly their new weekend shoe it's a pretty nice model actually model of shoe that is
uh vessi footwear they're known for making comfortable shoes that are light and most
importantly waterproof really good if you live in the pacific northwest like we do you can walk on
almost any train while keeping your feet dry they don't look like weird dad shoes they just look
pretty stylish i have a pair myself actually two pairs um this new weekend shoe you could really
dress it up or dress it down it's pretty sweet And you can reserve a pair right now for five bucks. And once they're ready to ship, you just pay the balance. And that five
bucks actually gets donated to a charity, I believe for mental health awareness. So
like awesome. Yeah, they're an awesome company. The shoes themselves are actually a hundred
percent vegan. So who wants their shoes to harm animals? That's even if you like eating
meat, does your shoe need to? No, it doesn't.
So that's great.
Check them out at Bessie.com slash Linus Tech Tips.
Okay, awesome.
I had some people comment while we were doing that.
Like, why don't you just make like the Safari version better?
Whatever.
Safari is like, I don't remember all the details, super bad at video stuff and has a lot of
like compatibility issues with what we're doing. Blah, blah, blah. It sucks. We all the details. Super bad at video stuff. And has a lot of compatibility issues with what we're doing.
Blah, blah, blah.
It sucks.
We need the app.
We need an app.
Gotta have an app.
Let's talk about Starlink, dude.
Yes, let's do it.
It's fun.
Pissing off astronomers.
You like internet, don't you?
It's fun.
Everybody likes internet, man.
I think this is going to be kind of amazing.
But yeah, let's talk about this.
Starlink beta tests and speeds.
The first speeds for SpaceX's Starlink satellite broadband service have been revealed.
Using Ookla speed test app, Starlink beta users found speeds ranged from 36 megabits per second to 60 megabits per second on download and 5
megabits per second to 17.7 megabits per second on upload the latency was as low
as 31 milliseconds don't know how high it went to but it went as low as that so
these users by the way are mostly in the northern United States and southern
Canada I mean if they're in Canada at all, they're probably in southern Canada.
If you look at a population map of Canada, we're all along the U.S. border, almost entirely.
Yeah, the 20 gigabyte plus bandwidth of a satellite can support only so much bandwidth
in a given 50 kilometer by 50 kilometer cell.
can support only so much bandwidth in a given 50 kilometer by 50 kilometer cell that bandwidth is roughly 500 megabits per second for each cell maximum uh pricing for the service is not sorry
so that that thing is clutch so there's a tweet here because some of these speeds look a lot
slower than what elon kind of promised so there if you go back and look at the historical record on Twitter,
there is a person named AtTestLatino saying,
you know, if this was like as good as,
or even half as good as Fiverr, that'd be great.
I'm getting 900 megabits per second.
If I got half of that, I'd be happy.
And then Elon says the peak rate of about half of that
for version one of the system
would be about that so that he's saying it would be about 450 megabit per second and now we're
looking at the recorded speeds from the beta that are like 36 megabit per second up to 60 well that's
a long way off of 450 the reason is because each one of these satellites, I guess it services, like you said, a 50K by 50K cell.
And the bandwidth is divided among all the users in that cell.
So theoretically, Elon wasn't yanking your chain when he said you could get that if you're the only person in that 2,500 square kilometer cell.
And he did say it's heavily dependent on users per cell in that tweet.
He also said they're aiming for a latency of under 20 milliseconds.
This is all, we're not fully set up yet.
They're still launching more satellites that should hopefully kind of divide up those users per cell.
Maybe there'll be more than one satellite per cell, not certain.
Or more than one satellite per area thing.
It's interesting do you think people are going to start moving out
oh do i think that more people will live in rural areas and work from home because they
have fast internet out there wow i never thought of that that's pretty awesome because honestly
right now like what's the benefit i mean during covid
right but like that'll that'll pass i guess at some point but right now like a lot of people
are just staying home anyways like you could you could live further out save probably astronomical
amounts you can buy a house like you're a boomer yeah and just live that boomer life live way
further out there have more
land etc maybe you'd be able to go outside because there won't be as many people there
um no restaurants got to make your own avocado toast oh no gotta cook uh we'll have robot cooks
sooner than later they can make you fantastic meals i don't know i think this is like one of the stepping stones to people spreading back out.
We've had a lot of like, for quite a few years, we've had a lot of stuff that has been driving people into cities.
And you're getting these like crazy hyper hubs of people.
And I think this is going to be one of the, there's going to be probably going to need to be quite a few things.
But this is one of the steps if it steps far enough
Like the guy said he needs about half of what his current fiber thing is doing. You should also have better latency, etc, etc
Yeah, that guy though
I don't think I think a lot of people who right now who are in the target market for this the people who have rural
satellite internet right now a lot of them would be happy to
have 10 megabit per second or or 25 would be really 20 to 25 would be really nice you could
stream an hd movie uh while maybe browsing as well so so netflix 4k requires an internet connection
speed of 25 megabits per second or higher i would probably lean on the or higher i think if you got people to even a
hundred the vast majority of users would not really notice a big difference oh most people
don't even have a hundred i mean a lot of gamers are like what because they all have gigabit but
i think i have fiber 150 150 and i only have that to watch 4k blu-ray remixes most people could are totally fine with
if you're watching this show and you are offended by 25 megabit per second internet speed you are
probably not an average user um I am rather offended by that that would bother me I like
my fast internet but I am not exactly a normal user. Well, you're also just not the customer for this right now in this generation.
Exactly. I would love to be.
I would love to move out.
I would rather be further out.
I would rather have a larger place for less money.
Both of those variables at the same time would be fantastic.
I have no personal need to live in a big city.
I would like the entire world to be blanketed in global Internet that, again, becomes so good.
And so I guess it's like the return on investment has been going for so long that it's like paid for and that it's just a utility and all other things just have free Internet everywhere they are.
I think that's howon sold the dream of this
way back at the beginning that got my little nerd boner going someone someone uh who's probably from
british columbia uh said i had 50 down and seven up with shaw just got telus fiber one gig up and
down dot dot dot dot it's the same lol well yeah if you have gigabit you need to use it right you need to
have like your partner watching a 4k movie in the living room while you're gaming in the office or
or have like large data file transfers often kind of in and out or something like that like there's
there's there's other things but it's usually relatively specialized use cases or it's worth it to you to spend like three times
as much to get that steam game downloaded half an hour faster or something i don't know you know
what actually was interesting and i wish telus our telco here had uh you know called me and and been like hey we can do this for you but
they never did was i had a lesser plan it was it was fiber but it was the cheapest one it was like
25 or something and that had a data cap on it like there was a number of gigabytes per month
that if you went over you got an overage fee and we were consistently going over because my wife
was on mat leave and she would just listen to music all day she listened to music on youtube so she's streaming video all day right
so we keep going over and every day it's like 15 extra or every month is about an extra 15 dollar
charge so then i called them and i decided that i want to upgrade to 150 150 the price difference
there when you include the fact that i was getting an overage every month i was paying the same i like 5x my internet speed
and paid the same because at this new tier of being faster there was no limit it's unlimited
it's like they could have just called me like hey you keep going over how about we just bump
you up to this of course why would they do that they actually they did do that for me oh nice tell us tell us has been super nice to me
i like i don't know why i think it's like every two years roughly i get a call and they're like
hey we're gonna upgrade everything you have and you're gonna pay less or the same amount and i'm
like all right thanks thanks. Bye.
A lot I picked up today.
That's pretty much, yeah, that's about how far it goes.
It's not even like an extensive conversation.
It's usually over in like a couple minutes,
and my internet speed is just like faster,
and things are maybe cheaper.
I don't know.
It's like, okay, sweet.
I understand that this does not seem to be a very common occurrence
for most people with ISPs, but my wired internet connection has been fantastic.
It also just never goes down.
I don't know.
I've been quite lucky in that department, I think.
But moving on to other things.
You want to talk about this Microsoft Surface Duo?
Let's do it.
I have such mixed feelings about this Microsoft Surface Duo? Let's do it I have such mixed feelings
About this device
On the one hand I think it's so
Boring because basically
It's like a Samsung Galaxy Note
It's a big phone that opens
But it's way
Less cool than that because it's not
One bendable OLED screen
It's just it opens like a book
And there's just two separate screens So it feels not one bendable oled screen it's just it opens like a book and there's just two separate
screens so it feels not futuristic at all at the same time it's kind of de facto as good as having
one big bendable screen because when you have that big screen on on the galaxy note a lot of the time
you're just dividing it into two anyway yeah i would always divide it into two personally.
I have,
I can understand why someone would want that if they're like,
yeah,
I want to watch like movies on my phone or something like that.
I'm not going to do that.
The reason why I would want two screens and I'm very excited for dual screen
phones is that I can have like,
uh,
like Slack or,
uh,
Gmail open up on one side and be able to message people
about something that I'm doing on the other side.
That is like always what I'm going to want.
So it doesn't bother me personally.
Also, by the way, this is posted by Goodbytes
on the forum who now has over 22,000 posts.
That's amazing.
Yeah, apparently Microsoft worked with uh with uh they worked with android
they worked with google to collaborate and make sure that all of the apps like the api
was robust enough to make the experience you know not suck um and i think that's going to get
more and more common because all these dual screen devices are getting more and more common.
We're on the second generation of Galaxy Fold coming up here.
I'm trying to figure out what the price of a Galaxy Fold, Galaxy Z Fold 2 was.
It's like $2,400.
Yeah, they're over $2,000.
They're expensive. okay i can't find it let's be
2000 oh no no it says right here no no this device is going to be 1400 us dollars for 128
gigabyte it's 100 more for the 256 and for reference the samsung galaxy fold the first
one was released with a price tag of
1980 so if you if you're thinking it's over two grand
the the microsoft surface duo could be like half the price and you're still getting a dual screen
phone the fold i believe is triple screen because yeah there's an outer screen yeah so like there's
a lot more to it and it has the like the fluid the two screens look like one when you open it like it's
super super fancy super nice you're mostly mostly paying for that bendable
OLED screen and also it had like seven cameras it's got it's there's that phone
is crazy but if you want a dual screen phone and you want the productivity that
comes with it you can get kind of most of it for way
less of the price by going this direction 1400 it's still an insane amount of money just to be
clear but compare that to like the samsung note 20 it's like the same price yeah i don't know i
think this is actually pretty interesting i think personally that people should look at this more seriously.
It's really large.
Each one of the individual screens is huge.
The battery is only 3,577 milliamp hours.
I think that puppy is going to die quick with two screens.
That is a little disappointing. I didn't look into the battery.
Are they OLED screens?
Are they at least like efficient hmm the other thing is they save cost okay they
save cost because they only have one camera so if you want to take a selfie
versus pointing outward you just flip the phone around which I think is
actually so much better I don't like that the galaxy fold has a notch
disrupting its giant screen just to take
selfies when i like it already has an outer screen on the other side yeah yeah just use the other
camera yeah i agree i don't know i'm the battery is a big concern that's not a huge battery
it says dual battery is there two of them well i think um what that means is they've
split the battery so that there is one on either half of the device you know but i don't know if
that's implying that it's it's 3577 times two i don't think so if it was that'd be cool but i think they would say that well the notes don't say it anyway yeah six gigabytes of ram
not a lot no but like again i this doesn't seem like a i think we need another category of users
for phones personally because there's like average whatever you just have a phone and you use it for like texting and maybe some games
and stuff and then there's like power users which is what people use that term
for a long time I think there's like power users and now maybe like
productivity users is maybe a different category because like for me to be
completely honest I would have called myself a power user before.
I did more heavy things on my phone than I think most people did.
Now, probably not.
Spend most of my time on my phone in Slack, Gmail, and Twitter.
Does this really change the game though?
Because I feel like the reason that you don't use your phone, it's not because of screen size.
To me, it's because of interface.
It's like I try to operate a spreadsheet with like tapping
on the phone it's just too annoying you need a keyboard and mouse it changes the game for me when
i don't have the option of something else i love desktops huge fan of desktops i'm like in terms of
pc stuff i don't even screw laptops i love desktops I would massively prefer using a desktop over like anything else
pretty much all the time. But if I'm out somewhere and something happens, I would love to be able to
open something out of my pocket and immediately be more productive than I could have been with
my like Pixel 2 by having two screens and being able to do all this other kind of stuff. And with
six gigs of RAM, I would be able to accomplish all of the things that personally i would do and i think there are
a lot of users in that category um that are gonna power use their phone but not for like games
and if you're not playing like games and stuff six gigs of ram is probably fine you're not going to burn that
battery life as fast i'm still disappointed in the battery life because for me like if something
is going down i might have to have the phone open both screens on for a very extended period of time
and just having the screens on is going to burn that battery really fast even though they are i
feel like you don't you want the ram because you're going to be opening multiple apps and
you're going to have two of them open at
The same time you kind of want to just have this much memory Gmail Twitter
slack
That isn't gonna fill that up way too fast
Like how much give me one second
You know what?
This would be really handy for when you're on a website filling out a form and you don't trust that website
You know that if you navigate away it's just gonna refresh and it's gonna be empty yeah and you get to you
get to a part of that form that you don't have the answer to so you need to switch apps to like
go to your contacts to look up a zip code or something like that then you return to it it's
gone on this phone you can just leave it open leave it open over here and then do all the
research you need to on the other panel and fill out that form over time without losing your session so my current phone which i don't
have memory issues with and i do is that a pixel 2xl pixel 2xl four gigs
all right i'm not saying like oh my goodness this is an amazing phone this is going to change the
game for everyone this is the best thing that's ever happened to phone not at all but i do think
there are definitely users that would benefit from it um i think it hurts a little bit not having the
single screen like if you close the phone yeah um for sure because there are quite a few times where i would probably only be able to like
one hand the phone and being forced to as far as i can tell probably use the phone with two hands
is going to be a big detractor that might be enough to make it so that i wouldn't get this
device it's also or a watch if you combo that with a watch that could be nice true that's
interesting because then you know because linus said when he was daily driving the fold that it made him want to take his phone out of his pocket
less because it was such a commitment to take it out and open it that he used his phone less but
he also uses a watch right so if your watch is going off like oh that's just a casual text clear
that don't need to open my phone for that yeah it's kind of a good energy that's potentially more of
an investment though if you don't already have a watch and we're already looking at a 1400 device
which is to a certain degree a compromise because you're not getting that triple screen more
features one fluid display fold that being said that fold is an astronomical price if you did add the watch to it
i'm certain it's still going to be a cheaper overall price i don't know all i'm saying is i
i'm fairly certain there is a market for this this watch bro last gen i just picked it up on
facebook marketplace 140 canadian dollars i think if you're in the market for a 1500 phone you can
just spend some cash and get a basic watch.
Do you think that the customer for this phone is the same customer as the Galaxy Fold?
No.
That's what I'm trying to establish.
The Fold customer is actually, it's more about status and having the coolest thing.
I think the Fold is style.
I think it's status.
It looks nicer.
Sorry, Microsoft, but it just does.
It looks nicer. It Microsoft, but it just does It it looks nicer it kind of does more the the
Microsoft duo you can see more of the
Like mechanical nature of the phone. It's the the bezels are bigger. It looks a little chunkier
It looks like it might
potentially be a little bit more durable. Uh, but this is a little nerdier. Yeah. This isn't,
it's not as flashy. It's not as like sexy. If I want to use that term, it's,
I see it as like a small business owners. Yes, exactly.
It's more like a successful real estate or car sales.
Yeah, exactly.
I think there is a different market for it.
I think you're going for a different style.
I think you're going into it for a different reason.
I think you're both probably power users to a certain degree.
You might be different kinds.
You might be the same kind. But if you're the same kind of power user, it's probably going to be leaning on the other one for style or the convenience of the single screen.
And you can afford the like $800 more probably US.
So that's astronomical for that like essentially single screen.
Instead of just buying a second phone.
Or a watch.
Just buy a completely second phone.
Probably be better off. There's my third screen, boom
Yeah, I don't know
I think they're both very interesting devices
I hope the Surface Duo does not get ignored
Because I think there's definitely a market for it
But Microsoft devices
Seem to
Kind of be forgotten
In a lot of conversations
Not in the laptop category
True, true They're awesome, Surface devices have been pretty cool to kind of be forgotten in a lot of conversations. Not in the laptop category. True.
They're awesome. Surface devices
have been pretty cool. This is not a Windows
phone. It's a Microsoft phone.
Yes.
Well, we're definitely going to cover it
as soon as we can on LTT and
Short Circuit probably, so hopefully it fares
pretty well. I hope it does too.
Yes, but I
can't see them.
Oh. Well, neither
can I.
Is
Jake still watching? Can he
copy paste some or something?
No.
I have no access
to the YouTube dashboard.
Is he not here?
Because I think he would have to end the stream.
It's 3.30.
Yeah.
I can't end the YouTube stream.
This is the stream that never ends.
Because I can...
So I can...
We can effectively say the show's over.
Here, I'll roll the intro.
I can walk over to my desktop.
Oh. Bye, everyone. the intro I can walk over to my desktop oh bye everyone
I want to I want to establish that like
the main show
I want to do the
just in case it's like
P.I.A.
Bessie.
Display.
Okay, now we're back.
Now we are attempting to end the show,
which is going to be the ending of the show.
Felt short.
It, I think, was maybe slightly short.
Yeah, it was a little bit short.
But James has got to go.
He's got to go.
No super chats?
Yeah, I'm sorry.
I can't see them.
Next time if this happens again,
I don't know how long Linus has gone for,
we might have to find a way to get me logged in
to some of the LTT stuff.
But, yeah.
After party?
I'm gonna be streaming tonight.
I'm gonna be streaming some Horizon Zero Dawn
if you wanna come hang out.
Did Linus retire again?
No, he's just taking a probably well-needed vacation.
I can post a ghiasso of a $100 super chat if you want. While James tries to do that, maybe I'll do another topic.
AS Rock blacklists Gamers Nexus and Hardware Unboxed. ASRock has blacklisted due to the controversy surrounding Z490 content produced by Gamers Nexus and Hardware Unboxed.
There's a Gamers Nexus post that I believe was under a Hardware Unboxed video where I believe they talk about it.
Gamers Nexus said,
Fortunately, most of the companies realize it's a bad idea to sue media over objectively backed statements.
ASRock Black listed us as well, it seems, also because of our Z490 content.
Same boat.
We even told them we had good things to say about B550, but they stonewalled us.
Some companies are too stuck in the past to realize it's best for everyone to work together.
They'll forget about years of good things that have been said after one critical review drops. It's absolutely insane.
I strongly agree. There have been, there's a note here that says LTT is pretty critical of
manufacturers when appropriate thoughts. Yeah. Even myself specifically, I have been very critical
about certain things. There was a Logitech video that I went pretty all in the paint on.
There was a...
I think it was Gigabyte.
I think it was Gigabyte.
There was a video that I went pretty hard on.
And the Logitech guys are still super chill.
Gigabyte guys weren't necessarily immediately,
but became super chill.
You got to understand that like,
it's not, I don't like hate your company.
Hardware Unboxed doesn't hate your company.
Gamers Access doesn't hate your company
because you release like one potentially bad product.
You have to be able to take that criticism
and roll forward with it.
Hello?
Hello.
Are you still streaming?
Maybe
Jake says just end the OBS stream
Okay, cool
I just did another topic while you were gone
YouTube is dead, okay, sweet
Alright, that's it for the show guys
Goodbye
Well, I turned it to private
I'll turn it back to public now
No, no, no, that's fine
Because we're ending the stream now, that's good It's good Well, I turned it to private. I'll turn it back to public now. No, no, no. That's fine. No, no, no.
Because we're ending the stream now.
That's good.
It's good.
Yeah, but I should put it back.
Wait.
I don't know what happens with YouTube or with the WAN VOD.
I think it has to become a VOD and then you set it to public.
It won't become a VOD because I haven't stopped streaming yet.
All right.
Well, I will put it to public now and just let it do its own thing.
Okay.
Sounds good.
All right.
Have a good weekend.
Bye.
Have a good weekend.
Bye.