Up and Vanished - Case Evidence 10.17.16

Episode Date: October 17, 2016

Take a deeper look at the evidence as experts discuss new developments in the case. A forensic sketch artist for the GBI discusses the possibility of creating a composite nearly 11 years later. To l...earn more about listener data and our privacy practices visit: https://www.audacyinc.com/privacy-policy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Transcript
Discussion (0)
Starting point is 00:00:00 experience basketball like never before with bet mgm an authorized gaming partner of the nba ready to shoot your shot we've made the bet mgm experience more immersive and fun for all types of basketball fans being on the sidelines is one thing this season experience basketball on the foul line exciting state-of-the-art live tracking technology and dozens of sportsbook selections await you at bet mgm sportsbook tap into every game on your mobile devices. Get up off the sideline and drive to the basket yourself. No matter which team starts popping off, you'll find out why there's truly nothing like laying up a W with the king of sportsbooks. Visit BetMGM.com for terms and conditions. Must be 19 years of age or older. Ontario only. Please
Starting point is 00:00:44 play responsibly. If you have any questions or concerns about your gambling or someone else close to you, please contact Connex Ontario at 1-866-531-2600 to speak to an advisor, free of charge. In a cold case, time is your worst enemy. The second you arrive at a crime scene, the clock is ticking.
Starting point is 00:01:07 Most investigators say the first 48 hours is the most crucial time. Unfortunately, in Tara's case, by the time the police got there, she had been missing for almost two days. The last time she was seen was 11 p.m. Saturday night, leaving the barbecue. When the police arrived at her house on Monday morning, they didn't really know what to think. Was she abducted? Or did she leave on her own account? The first to arrive on the scene that morning was Osceola Police Chief Billy Hancock. I spoke to him in person not too long ago. He said the whole time he was there, he thought she would just pull up at any moment. Nobody was really alarmed yet. The first 48 hours of crucial investigation didn't really exist in this
Starting point is 00:01:45 case. Now it's been almost 11 years. With each year that passes, it becomes more and more difficult to sift through all the facts. People's memory, exact times, and how things transpired, it all tends to get a little blurry. But today I want to explore an 11-year-old lead that seemed very promising at first, but has since dwindled away with time. I'm talking about the black truck. This is Case Evidence. I was canvassing the neighborhood talking to people, and I met this kid. He was like 20 years old at the time. He told me, he said, I saw a black truck parked in her yard.
Starting point is 00:02:37 The truck was parked on the left side on the grass, the left side of her driveway. The truck was facing the little ditch beside the road on the left side, on the grass, the left side of her driveway, the truck was facing the little ditch beside the road. On the left of her driveway, he saw an individual in the vehicle. He found several witnesses of this black truck. One kid claimed to have actually seen the man driving the truck. Maurice reported this to the GBI, and they came to talk to him. But it didn't really go as planned. They did send an agent. They went to interview him.
Starting point is 00:03:09 Well, they treated him like a suspect, and so he clammed up. You go talk to somebody, and they get the feeling that you treat them as a suspect through your questioning. They're going to clam up, and they're not going to say anything. The issue about the truck or anything like that was never discussed. When the GBI came to interview this kid, he pretty much just clammed up and didn't say anything. He felt like he was a suspect and just got scared and stopped talking. And because of that, they were never able to get a sketch made of the driver. They had no information to go off of.
Starting point is 00:03:41 So my immediate thought was to find this kid and re-interview him. If he could remember what he looks like, then maybe we could get a forensic sketch artist to make a composite for us. But first I have to actually find this kid. Like I said in the last episode, this kid has been extremely hard to track down, but I'm not going to stop until I find him. But when I do, is he even going to remember this? And if he did remember seeing the man, and could actually describe him, how accurate would it be? My name is Kelly Lawson, and I am the forensic artist for the Georgia Bureau of Investigation. And what a forensic artist is, is basically the person that the police call whenever there's been a crime that was witnessed by an individual or
Starting point is 00:04:26 even the victim. And I would meet with that person. They would give me a description of that person that they saw who perpetrated the event. And I would use basically photos to help them and myself come up with a likeness of what their individual, their perpetrator looked like. It's a likeness of what their individual, their perpetrator looked like. I have a group of photos, and it's usually about 200 photos, and it's divided up by sex and race. They're everything from celebrities to old fun shots. I want you to look through here. See if you see anything that reminds you of the guy that you saw.
Starting point is 00:05:02 There might be someone who has similar eyes, nose, or face shape. Just anything that reminds you of him, pull it aside and we'll talk about it. And the average person looks through the stack of photos and pulls out approximately five or six photos, and they'll have one that maybe it's his eyes and one is his nose. One photo will have the type of facial hair that he had, but usually they'll find at least one photo where the individual will say, you know, he just looks a lot like this guy. If you could just change this or that. How do you think the passing of time affects the accuracy of a sketch? That's a good question. Sometimes if an individual saw someone or was a victim of a crime that's very violent or extremely stressful, you will
Starting point is 00:05:43 hear a victim say, I'll remember his face for as long as I live. His face is burned in my memory. But really, that's more rare. The average person who's the victim or a witness to a crime, their memory is the best anywhere from 48 hours after the event, because you have to give enough time for a person's shock to wear off to about two weeks. Usually at about two weeks, things start to get a little foggy. But that's not to say that you couldn't describe someone that you saw a month and a half, two months ago. You could, and you could still get an accurate likeness. It's just not going to be as easy. What about years? Years, it can happen. Like I was saying, if it's something that really stuck out to someone or if it was something that really kind of affected them, then they're going to remember that face forever.
Starting point is 00:06:32 And people's memories are very unusual in that occasionally we tend to exaggerate things. And the more time goes on, the more we'll exaggerate them or the more emotion was involved, the more we can exaggerate them. we'll exaggerate them or the more emotion was involved, the more we can exaggerate them. So if we were standing side by side in the convenience store and a man came in to rob the convenience store who had a mole on his cheek and we both noticed the mole, if he was violent enough and scared us enough or enough time went by, we can remember in our minds that mole being a good one inch thick when in reality it was just a small bowl. If it's been a long time, do you take that whole exaggeration into account when you're making a sketch? You try to.
Starting point is 00:07:11 You know, obviously if they're wanting you to make the chin extraordinarily long, and a human's chin is not typically that long, you understand that and so you try to reign them in. So you will see some sketches that are strange or alien looking or not human and a lot of that has to do with the personality of the victim. But I personally as an artist and I know the GBI specifically, we really seek to put out sketches that have nothing in them that would draw the attention away from the overall look of the individual. In this case that I'm doing right now, a witness saw a man driving
Starting point is 00:07:54 this black truck going on 11 years ago. They exchanged some words and a lot of people speculate that this truck had something to do with this person's disappearance. So I was just kind of wanting to speculate the probability and likelihood of a sketch being done 11 years later being reliable or accurate in any sort of way. Well, there's also another thing to take into consideration. If we walk up to someone or someone walks up to us and begins talking to us, and our mind is able to make an association like, oh, you know, he really looks a lot like Alan Jackson, or, oh, you know, he really looks like my friend's cousin who came to that party that time, then you can remember that face forever too.
Starting point is 00:08:36 But it's kind of whether or not that person is able to make an association. People are usually pretty good at being able to say, you know, I remember his face pretty able to say, you know, I remember his face pretty good, or, you know, I just really don't think I'll be able to do that. And they're usually pretty dead on. I only have to turn away on average, maybe three or four attempts at making a sketch a year. Yeah. So that's hard. So some random people talk to a guy, and then we're expected to do a sketch 11 years later. That's the challenge. And then you have the challenge of dealing with the fact that, okay, so maybe this doesn't seem like any of our persons of interest.
Starting point is 00:09:15 What would we do with the sketch if we were to distribute it? How do we tell the public this is what he looked like 11 years ago? what he looked like 11 years ago. You know, sometimes if we're talking to someone and we get that gut feeling something's not right here, it can trigger our memories to be better. So I guess the good news is, it's still possible. It might be difficult, but possible. If we want a sketch of this guy,
Starting point is 00:09:44 the whole thing hinges on this kid's memory. Kelly told me that whenever I do get a hold of this kid, she would gladly assist in getting a sketch done. But first, I gotta find him.

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.